1
|
Miles A, Paschalidi A, Sharma N. The effect of numeric information about the likelihood of receiving a false negative or false positive result on people's attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening using faecal immunochemical testing (FIT). PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 114:107857. [PMID: 37348310 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of numeric risk information about false negative (FN) and false positive (FP) rates in fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) on attitudes towards screening. METHODS 102 people aged 45-55, living in the UK, read 6 hypothetical vignettes presented online about the use of FIT kits to detect colorectal cancer, in which information about FN and FP rates was systematically varied. RESULTS Numeric FN risk information reduced people's interest in screening, perception of screening effectiveness and lowered trust in screening compared to verbal FN information. Verbal FN information reduced perceptions of screening effectiveness and trust compared to no FN information. People with high subjective numeracy reported lower trust in screening following the provision of numeric FN information but numeracy did not moderate any other associations. FP information did not affect attitudes towards FIT testing. CONCLUSION Numeric FN risk information decreased people's perceptions of screening effectiveness and trust in the results of screening. While it influenced people's interest in screening, the effect was small. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Numeric FN information has a small effect on interest in screening and could promote informed decision making without affecting screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Miles
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
| | - Alexandra Paschalidi
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
| | - Navya Sharma
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nonikashvili M, Kereselidze M, Toidze O, Beruchashvili T. The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Georgia continues to increase: A population-based registry study. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2023; 35:100693. [PMID: 36827758 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION CRC is one of the most common and serious public health problem. In Georgia, it ranks among the top five most fatal cancers for both men and women. This study aimed to utilize cancer registry data to evaluate the incidence and stage distribution of CRC in Georgia. METHODS The study included all new cases of CRC registered in Georgia during the period 2018-2021 (classified under ICD-10 codes C18-C21). The annual gender- and age-group-specific population figures were obtained from the National Statistics Office of Georgia (GEOSTAT). RESULTS Among the cases analyzed, the majority of patients were men (53.23%). Only about one third of the cases were diagnosed at the localized stage. The study found that the number of patients diagnosed with CRC in Georgia gradually increased from 2018 to 2021. The age-standardized incidence rates of CRC in men and women in 2021 were 17.09 and 12.04 per 100,000 individuals, respectively, with men having a slightly higher rate. The crude and direct age-standardized incidence rates increased over the 4-year period, but slightly changed in 2020. The directly adjusted incidence rate over the 4-year period was 55.44 per 100,000 population. The share of distant stage has reduced in both men and women from 2018 to 2021, but detection at localized stage remains low. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of colorectal cancer in Georgia increased with advancing stage, emphasizing the need to enhance the country's cancer control program to improve screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda Nonikashvili
- Department of Public Health and Healthcare Management, School of Health Sciences, The University of Georgia, 77a Kostava Street, 1st Building Tbilisi, 0175, Georgia.
| | - Maia Kereselidze
- Department of Public Health and Healthcare Management, School of Health Sciences, The University of Georgia, 77a Kostava Street, 1st Building Tbilisi, 0175, Georgia; Department of Medical Statistics, National Center for Disease Control and Public Health (NCDC & PH), Georgia
| | - Otar Toidze
- Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, The University of Georgia, Georgia
| | - Tina Beruchashvili
- Department of Public Health and Healthcare Management, School of Health Sciences, The University of Georgia, 77a Kostava Street, 1st Building Tbilisi, 0175, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kotzur M, Macdonald S, O'Carroll RE, O'Connor RC, Irvine A, Steele RJC, Robb KA. What are common barriers and helpful solutions to colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional survey to develop intervention content for a planning support tool. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062738. [PMID: 36691140 PMCID: PMC9445780 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal screening using faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) can save lives if the people invited participate. In Scotland, most people intend to complete a FIT but this is not reflected in uptake rates. Planning interventions can bridge this intention-behaviour gap. To develop a tool supporting people willing to do colorectal screening with planning to complete a FIT, this study aimed to identify frequently experienced barriers and solutions to these barriers. DESIGN This is a cross-sectional study. SETTING Participants were recruited through the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme to complete a mailed questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS The study included 2387 participants who had completed a FIT (mean age 65 years, 40% female) and 359 participants who had not completed a FIT but were inclined to do so (mean age 63 years, 39% female). OUTCOME MEASURES The questionnaire assessed frequency of endorsement of colorectal screening barriers and solutions. RESULTS Participants who had not completed a FIT endorsed significantly more barriers than those who had completed a FIT, when demographic, health and behavioural covariates were held constant (F(1,2053)=13.40, p<0.001, partial η2=0.01). Participants who completed a FIT endorsed significantly more solutions than those who did not (U=301 585.50, z=-3.21, p<0.001, r=0.06). This difference became insignificant when covariates were controlled. Participants agreed on the most common barriers and solutions regardless of screening history. Barriers included procrastination, forgetting, fear of the test result, screening anxiety, disgust and low self-efficacy. Solutions included hand-washing, doing the FIT in private, reading the FIT instructions, benefit of early detection, feelings of responsibility, high self-efficacy and seeing oneself as a person who looks after one's health. CONCLUSION This survey identified six barriers and seven solutions as key content to include in the development of a planning tool for colorectal screening using the FIT. Participatory research is required to codesign an engaging and accessible planning tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Kotzur
- School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sara Macdonald
- School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Rory C O'Connor
- School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Kathryn A Robb
- School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clark GR, Steele RJ, Fraser CG. Strategies to minimise the current disadvantages experienced by women in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022; 60:1496-1505. [DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Currently, women are disadvantaged compared to men in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, particularly in programmes that use faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin (FIT) followed by colonoscopy. Although there is no single cause for all the known disadvantages, many can be attributed to the ubiquitous finding that women have lower faecal haemoglobin concentrations (f-Hb) than men; there are many plausible reasons for this. Generally, a single f-Hb threshold is used in CRC screening programmes, leading to lower positivity for women than men, which causes poorer outcomes for women, including lower CRC detection rate, higher interval cancer (IC) proportion, and higher CRC mortality. Many of the now widely advocated risk scoring strategies do include factors taking account of sex, but these have not been extensively piloted or introduced. Using different f-Hb thresholds for the sexes seems advantageous, but there are difficulties, including deciding which characteristic should be selected to achieve equivalency, for example, positivity, IC proportions, or specificity. Moreover, additional colonoscopy resources, often constrained, would be required. Governments and their agencies should be encouraged to prioritise the allocation of resources to put simple strategies into practice, such as different f-Hb thresholds to create equal positivity in both sexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin R.C. Clark
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening , University of Dundee , Dundee , Scotland , UK
| | - Robert J.C. Steele
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening , University of Dundee , Dundee , Scotland , UK
| | - Callum G. Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening , University of Dundee , Dundee , Scotland , UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fraser CG, Benton SC. Faecal haemoglobin examinations have come of age, but further maturation seems desirable. Ann Clin Biochem 2022; 59:97-100. [PMID: 35060392 DOI: 10.1177/00045632211063459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, Population Health and Genomics, School of Medicine, 85326University of Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Sally C Benton
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and NHS Bowel Cancer Screening South of England Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Flander L, Dekker E, Andersen B, Larsen MB, Steele RJ, Malila N, Sarkeala T, van der Vlugt M, de Klerk C, Knottnerus B, Bertels L, Woudstra A, Spaander MCW, Fransen M, Heinavaara S, Dillon M, Ait Ouakrim D, Jenkins M. What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia? Cancer Control 2022; 29:10732748221121383. [PMID: 35969473 PMCID: PMC9381723 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221121383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most diagnosed cancer in men and women and second most common cause of cancer death in Australia; Australia’s CRC incidence and mortality are among the world’s highest. The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program began in 2006; however, only 33% of those approached for the first time by the Program between 2018 and 2019 returned the kit. Of the 5.7 million kits sent during this period, only 44% were returned. Our aim was to identify practices and features of national bowel cancer screening programs in countries with similar programs but higher screening participation, to identify potential interventions for optimising Australian CRC screening participation. Methods We searched published and grey literature for CRC screening programs reporting at least 50% screening participation using postal invitation and free return of iFOBT home kits. Interviews were conducted with cancer registry staff and academic researchers, focused on participant and practitioner engagement in screening. Results National programs in Netherlands, Scotland, Denmark, and Finland reported over 50% screening participation rates for all invitation rounds. Shared characteristics include small populations within small geographic areas relative to Australia; relatively high literacy; a one-sample iFOBT kit; national registration systems for population cancer screening research; and screening program research including randomised trials of program features. Conclusions Apart from the one-sample kit, we identified no single solution to persistent Australian low uptake of screening. Research including randomised trials within the program promises to increase participation. Impact This screening program comparison suggests that within-program intervention trials will lead to increased Australian screening participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Flander
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, 85084The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 26066Amsterdam UMC, AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Berit Andersen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, 53198Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, 53198Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Robert J Steele
- Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, 3042University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Nea Malila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Manon van der Vlugt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 26066Amsterdam UMC, AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Clasine de Klerk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 26066Amsterdam UMC, AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bart Knottnerus
- 8123Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Lucinda Bertels
- 113896Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anke Woudstra
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Fransen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute 1105AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Mary Dillon
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, 85084The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Information and Service Management, 4321Aalto University, Finland
| | - Driss Ait Ouakrim
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, 85084The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, 85084The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pelitari S, Gautham A, Mistry P, Mohan S, Brookes M, McKaig B, Shah A, Jewes S, Fieldhouse G, Veitch A, Murugananthan A. Impact on healthcare resources of switch from fecal occult blood test to fecal immunochemical test within the English Bowel Cancer Screening Program: a single-center study. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:598-606. [PMID: 33727015 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In July 2019, the fecal immunochemistry test (FIT) replaced the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in England as the Bowel Cancer Screening Program (BCSP) screening tool. We aimed to assess the impact of this on healthcare resources at our BCSP center. METHODS Two 6-month periods were initially analyzed for stool sample return and positivity rates. A subsequent comparative analysis of patient screening episodes assessed utilization of specialist screening practitioner (SSP) time, endoscopy, histology, radiology, surgical, and oncology service usage. RESULTS A total of 42,234 patients received FOBT and 42,545 patients received FIT stool kits, with FIT showing higher return (61.8% vs 58.58%, FIT vs FOBT, P < .001) and sample positivity rates (2.41% vs 1.45%, FIT vs FOBT, P < .001). Four hundred patients commenced FOBT and 616 FIT screening episodes, a 54% increase. The FIT group had of a lower mean age (67.5 vs 69.5 years, FIT vs FOBT, P = .0001) with a lower nonattendance rate (.16% vs 1.5%, FIT vs FOBT, P = .01). With higher patient numbers, the FIT group required 69% more endoscopic procedures, 58% increased SSP time, 40% more radiologic tests, and 68% higher surgical procedures. FIT also led to a 109% increase in endoscopy-derived histology samples from an increase in the proportion of patients with polyps with FIT (54.8% vs 47.2%, P = .020) and a greater number of polyps per patient in whom polyps were found (3.00 vs 2.50 polyps, P = .017). This additional service burden equated to additional financial costs of approximately $558,000 per annum. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of FIT led to notable increases in SSP time, endoscopy procedures, radiology tests, surgical procedures, and histopathology services, resulting in considerable ongoing financial implications on the organization. Findings can be used to aid workforce and service planning in National Health Service sites delivering BCSP and countries that have already adopted or are considering FIT within their national screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavroula Pelitari
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Abhirami Gautham
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Pritesh Mistry
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Siddhartha Mohan
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Matthew Brookes
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK; Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Brian McKaig
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Ashit Shah
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Sarah Jewes
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Gemma Fieldhouse
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Andrew Veitch
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Aravinth Murugananthan
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Medical Division, Wolverhampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clarke N, Kearney PM, Gallagher P, McNamara D, O'Morain CA, Sharp L. Negative emotions and cancer fatalism are independently associated with uptake of Faecal Immunochemical Test-based colorectal cancer screening: Results from a population-based study. Prev Med 2021; 145:106430. [PMID: 33482227 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Although systematic colorectal cancer screening is efficacious, many programmes suffer from low uptake. Few behavioural or attitudinal factors have been identified as being associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening. We explored knowledge, beliefs about cancer, subjective health literacy, emotional attitudes to screening, and social influences among individuals invited to a population-based screening programme. Regression modelling of a cross-sectional survey of 2299 individuals (users and non-users) of a population-based Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) screening programme in Dublin was conducted. Questions were derived from previous theoretically-informed qualitative work and assessed using previously used and validated measures. The primary outcome variable was uptake status (User/Participation or Non-User/Non-participation); multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) for screening participation. Stronger fatalistic beliefs independently predicted lower uptake (OR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-0.98; P = 0.003). Those aged <65 who disagreed that "cancer can often be cured" also had lower uptake (OR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.22-0.82: P = 0.017). Agreement that the test was disgusting and tempting fate predicted lower uptake (OR = 0.16: 95% CI 0.10-0.27: p < 0.001), while the influence of a partner on decision to be screened was associated with higher uptake (OR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.15-1.50: P < 0.001). Negative cancer-related and screening-related beliefs and emotions are associated with non-participation in FIT (-based screening). Research is warranted to explore if these negative beliefs and emotions are modifiable and, if so, whether this would improve screening uptake. The association between the influence of a partner and screening participation present a challenge around improving uptake among those not in co-habiting relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Colm A O'Morain
- Faculty of Health Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Linda Sharp
- Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang A, Lee B, Patel S, Whitaker E, Issaka RB, Somsouk M. Selection of patients for large mailed fecal immunochemical test colorectal cancer screening outreach programs: A systematic review. J Med Screen 2021; 28:379-388. [PMID: 33683155 DOI: 10.1177/0969141321997482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Digital health care offers an opportunity to scale and personalize cancer screening programs, such as mailed outreach for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, studies that describe the patient selection strategy and process for CRC screening are limited. Our objective was to evaluate implementation strategies for selecting patients for CRC screening programs in large health care systems. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of 30 studies along with key informant surveys and interviews to describe programmatic implementation strategies for selecting patients for CRC screening. PubMed and Embase were searched since inception through December 2018, and hand searches were performed of the retrieved reference lists but none were incorporated (n = 0). No language exclusions were applied. RESULTS Common criteria for outreach exclusion included: being up-to-date with routine CRC screening (n = 22), comorbidities (n = 20), and personal history (n = 22) or family history of cancer (n = 9). Key informant surveys and interviews were performed (n = 28) to understand data sources and practices for patient outreach selection, and found that 13 studies leveraged electronic medical care records, 10 studies leveraged a population registry (national, municipal, community, health), 4 studies required patient opt-in, and 1 study required primary care provider referral. Broad ranges in fecal immunochemical test completion were observed in community clinic (n = 8, 31.0-59.6%), integrated health system (n = 5, 21.2-82.7%), and national regional CRC screening programs (n = 17, 23.0-64.7%). Six studies used technical codes, and four studies required patient self-reporting from a questionnaire to participate. CONCLUSION This systematic review provides health systems with the diverse outreach practices and technical tools to support efforts to automate patient selection for CRC screening outreach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Wang
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,College of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Briton Lee
- Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shreya Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Evans Whitaker
- University of California San Francisco Medical Library, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rachel B Issaka
- Clinical Research and Public Health Science Divisions, Fred Hutchinson, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ma Somsouk
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Clark G, Strachan JA, Carey FA, Godfrey T, Irvine A, McPherson A, Brand J, Anderson AS, Fraser CG, Steele RJ. Transition to quantitative faecal immunochemical testing from guaiac faecal occult blood testing in a fully rolled-out population-based national bowel screening programme. Gut 2021; 70:106-113. [PMID: 32234803 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are replacing guaiac faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Data from the first year of FIT screening were compared with those from FOBT screening and assumptions based on a pilot evaluation of FIT. DESIGN Data on uptake, positivity, positive predictive value (PPV) for CRC and higher-risk adenoma from participants in the first year of the FIT-based Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (n=919 665), with a threshold of 80 µg Hb/g faeces, were compared with those from the penultimate year of the FOBT-based programme (n=862 165) and those from the FIT evaluation (n=66 225). RESULTS Overall, uptake of FIT was 63.9% compared with 56.4% for FOBT. Positivity was 3.1% and 2.2% with FIT and FOBT; increases were seen in both sexes, and across age range and deprivation. More CRC and adenomas were detected by FIT, but the PPV for CRC was less (5.2% with FIT and 6.4% with FOBT). However, for higher-risk adenoma, PPV was greater with FIT (24.3% with FIT and 19.3% with FOBT). In the previous FIT evaluation, uptake was 58.5% with FIT compared with 54.0% with FOBT; positivity was 2.5% with FIT and 2.0% with FOBT. CONCLUSION Transition to FIT from FOBT produced higher uptake and positivity with lower PPV for CRC and higher PPV for adenoma. The FIT pilot evaluation underestimated uptake and positivity. Introducing FIT at the same threshold as the evaluation caused a 67.2% increase in colonoscopy demand instead of a predicted 10%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Clark
- Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Judith A Strachan
- Blood Sciences and Scottish Bowel Screening Laboratory, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Frank A Carey
- Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Thomas Godfrey
- Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Audrey Irvine
- Scottish Bowel Screening Centre, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Alisson McPherson
- Blood Sciences and Scottish Bowel Screening Laboratory, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Jess Brand
- National Specialist and Screening Services Directorate, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Annie S Anderson
- Centre for Public Health Nutrition, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Robert Jc Steele
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hoeck S, van de Veerdonk W, De Brabander I, Kellen E. Does the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme reach equity in FIT uptake? Eur J Public Health 2020; 29:1108-1114. [PMID: 30887054 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates by the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) according to sociodemographic characteristics and nationality. METHODS Men and women, aged 56-74, invited to participate in the Flemish CRC screening programme in 2013 and 2014 were included in this study. We analysed the association between CRC screening uptake and sex, age, (first and current) nationality and several proxies for socio-economic status (SES). The statistical analysis was based on descriptive analyses and logistic regression models. RESULTS A total of 1 184 426 persons were included in our analysis. The overall screening uptake was 52.3%, uptake varied by sex, age, nationality and SES. Lower participation rates were associated with the youngest and oldest age categories (56-60 and 70-74) and being male. All nationalities other than Belgian or Dutch were significantly less screened. Lower uptake of screening was also associated with several proxy's for low SES, such as having an allowance for being disabled, not being able to work, being an extended minor and having a social allowance/minimum wage. The descriptive analysis showed a 27% difference in CRC screening uptake between the (early) retired and the people entitled to a minimum wage. CONCLUSIONS There is a significant difference between screening uptake and demographic and socio-economic variables in the first 2 years of the population-based screening programme in Flanders. Based on the study results, implementing strategies to improve participation in those subgroups is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hoeck
- Centre for Cancer Detection, Bruges, Belgium.,Department of Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - W van de Veerdonk
- Department of Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - E Kellen
- Centre for Cancer Detection, Bruges, Belgium.,University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Libby G, Barnett KN, Fraser CG, Steele RJC. Association between faecal occult bleeding and medicines prescribed for chronic disease: a data linkage study. J Clin Pathol 2020; 74:664-667. [PMID: 33051288 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The presence of detectable faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) has been shown to be associated with all-cause mortality and with death from a number of chronic diseases not known to cause gastrointestinal blood loss. This effect is independent of taking medicines that increase the risk of bleeding. To further investigate the association of f-Hb with chronic disease, the relationship between f-Hb and prescription of medicines for a variety of conditions was studied. METHODS All subjects (134 192) who participated in guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) screening in Tayside, Scotland, between March 2000 and March 2016, were studied in a cross-sectional manner by linking their gFOBT result (abnormal or normal) with prescribing data at the time of the test. RESULTS The screening participants with an abnormal gFOBT result were more likely to have been being prescribed medicines for heart disease, hypertension, diabetes and depression than those with a normal test result. This association persisted after adjustment for sex, age and deprivation (OR 1.35 (95%CI 1.23 to 1.48), 1.39 (1.27 to 1.52), 1.35 (1.15 to 1.58), 1.36 (1.16 to 1.59), all p<0.0001, for the four medicine categories, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study confer further substantial weight to the concept that detectable f-Hb is associated with a range of common chronic conditions that have a systemic inflammatory component; we speculate that f-Hb might have potential in identifying individuals who are high risk of developing chronic conditions or are at an early stage of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Libby
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Karen N Barnett
- Division of Public Health and Genomics, University of Dundee School of Medicine, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention & Screening, University of Dundee School of Medicine, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Robert J C Steele
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention & Screening, University of Dundee School of Medicine, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Myers L, Goodwin B, Ralph N, Castro O, March S. Implementation Strategies for Interventions Aiming to Increase Participation in Mail-Out Bowel Cancer Screening Programs: A Realist Review. Front Oncol 2020; 10:543732. [PMID: 33117681 PMCID: PMC7550731 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.543732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Bowel cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death, with 1,849,518 new cases of bowel diagnosed and 880,792 deaths reported globally in 2018 alone. Survival can be improved through early detection via national mail-out bowel cancer screening programs; however, participation remains low in many countries. Behavior change is therefore required to increase participation. This realist review aims to (a) identify the behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in each intervention, (b) understand the mechanisms of action (MoAs) responsible for the BCT effectiveness, and (c) apply a behavior change model to inform how MoAs can be combined to increase screening participation. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature for interventions aiming to increase participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening. We used a four-stage realist synthesis approach whereby (1) interventions were extracted from each study; (2) BCTs applied in each intervention were identified and coded using the BCT Taxonomy-v1; (3) the Theory and Techniques Tool was used to link BCTs to their MoA; and (4) BCTs and MoAs were categorized according to their effectiveness and what Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) stage of change they would affect. Results: We identified 68 intervention trials using 26 unique BCTs and 13 MoAs to increase participation. Sixteen BCTs and 10 MoAs were identified within the interventions that successfully increased participation rates. Interventions targeting both stages of the HAPA model had a higher success rate (80%) than those targeting one stage of change (51%). When targeting only one stage, interventions targeting the volitional stage had a higher success rate (71%) than interventions targeting only the motivational stage of change (26%). Conclusion: Importantly, this review identified a suite of BCTs and MoAs effective for increasing participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening programs. With increased participation in bowel cancer screening leading to improved survival, our findings are key to informing the improvement of policy and interventions that aim to increase screening using specific strategies at key stages of health decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larry Myers
- Centre for Health, Informatics, and Economic Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia.,School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia
| | - Belinda Goodwin
- School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia.,Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicholas Ralph
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.,Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Oscar Castro
- Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group, Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia
| | - Sonja March
- Centre for Health, Informatics, and Economic Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia.,School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kotzur M, McCowan C, Macdonald S, Wyke S, Gatting L, Campbell C, Weller D, Crighton E, Steele RJC, Robb KA. Why colorectal screening fails to achieve the uptake rates of breast and cervical cancer screening: a comparative qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf 2020; 29:482-490. [PMID: 31879320 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Scotland, the uptake of clinic-based breast (72%) and cervical (77%) screening is higher than home-based colorectal screening (~60%). To inform new approaches to increase uptake of colorectal screening, we compared the perceptions of colorectal screening among women with different screening histories. METHODS We purposively sampled women with different screening histories to invite to semistructured interviews: (1) participated in all; (2) participated in breast and cervical but not colorectal ('colorectal-specific non-participants'); (3) participated in none. To identify the sample we linked the data for all women eligible for all three screening programmes in Glasgow, Scotland (aged 51-64 years; n=68 324). Interviews covered perceptions of cancer, screening and screening decisions. Framework method was used for analysis. RESULTS Of the 2924 women invited, 86 expressed an interest, and 59 were interviewed. The three groups' perceptions differed, with the colorectal-specific non-participants expressing that: (1) treatment for colorectal cancer is more severe than for breast or cervical cancer; (2) colorectal symptoms are easier to self-detect than breast or cervical symptoms; (3) they worried about completing the test incorrectly; and (4) the colorectal test could be more easily delayed or forgotten than breast or cervical screening. CONCLUSION Our comparative approach suggested targets for future interventions to increase colorectal screening uptake including: (1) reducing fear of colorectal cancer treatments; (2) increasing awareness that screening is for the asymptomatic; (3) increasing confidence to self-complete the test; and (4) providing a suggested deadline and/or additional reminders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Kotzur
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Colin McCowan
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK
| | - Sara Macdonald
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sally Wyke
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lauren Gatting
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - David Weller
- General Practice, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Emilia Crighton
- Public Health Directorate, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Kathryn A Robb
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Steele RJC, Carey FA, Stanners G, Lang J, Brand J, Brownlee LA, Crichton EM, Winter JW, Phull PS, Mowat C, Strachan JA, Digan AM, Fraser CG. Randomized controlled trial: Flexible sigmoidoscopy as an adjunct to faecal occult blood testing in population screening. J Med Screen 2019; 27:59-67. [DOI: 10.1177/0969141319879955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening at around age 60 can reduce colorectal cancer incidence. Insufficient evidence exists on flexible sigmoidoscopy at age 60 in a population being offered biennial faecal occult blood test screening from age 50. This randomized controlled trial assessed if flexible sigmoidoscopy would be an effective adjunct to faecal occult blood test. Methods In the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme between June 2014 and December 2015, 51,769 individuals were randomized to be offered flexible sigmoidoscopy instead of faecal occult blood test at age 60 or to continue faecal occult blood test. Those not accepting flexible sigmoidoscopy and those with normal flexible sigmoidoscopy were offered faecal occult blood test. All with flexible sigmoidoscopy-detected neoplasia or a positive faecal occult blood test result were offered colonoscopy. Results Overall flexible sigmoidoscopy uptake was 17.8%, higher in men than women, and decreased with increasing deprivation (25.7% in the least to 9.2% in the most deprived quintile). In those who underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy, detection rate for colorectal cancer was 0.13%, for adenoma 7.27%, and for total neoplasia 7.40%. In those who underwent colonoscopy after a positive flexible sigmoidoscopy, detection rate for colorectal cancer was 0.28%, adenoma 8.66%, and total neoplasia 8.83%. On an intention to screen basis, there was no difference in colorectal cancer detection rate between the study and control groups. Adenoma and total neoplasia detection rate were significantly higher in the study group, with odds ratios of 5.95 (95%CI: 4.69–7.56) and 5.10 (95%CI: 4.09–6.35), respectively. Conclusions In a single screening round at age 60, there was low uptake and neoplasia detection rate. Flexible sigmoidoscopy detected significantly more neoplasia than faecal occult blood test alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert JC Steele
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
- Scottish Bowel Screening Centre, NHS Tayside, Kings Cross Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | - Francis A Carey
- Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Greig Stanners
- Quality Indicators, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jaroslaw Lang
- Quality Indicators, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jess Brand
- National Specialist and Screening Services Directorate, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Linda A Brownlee
- Scottish Bowel Screening Centre, NHS Tayside, Kings Cross Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | - Emilia M Crichton
- Public Health Directorate, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jack W Winter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Perminder S Phull
- Department of Digestive Disorders, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Craig Mowat
- Department of Gastroenterology, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Judith A Strachan
- Department of Blood Sciences and Scottish Bowel Screening Laboratory, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Ann-Marie Digan
- Scottish Bowel Screening Centre, NHS Tayside, Kings Cross Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Myers L, Goodwin B, March S, Dunn J. Ways to use interventions to increase participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Behav Med 2019; 10:384-393. [DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
The impact of colorectal cancer can be reduced through nationwide fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening. Unfortunately, participation in screening programs are low with interventions only increasing participation modestly.
This meta-analysis explores if intervention effectiveness can be increased by targeting specific subpopulations with specific interventions or by combining interventions. Six databases were searched for studies aiming to increase participation in mail-out FOBT screening. To investigate if interventions are more effective for certain subpopulations, the difference in (log) Risk Ratios (RRs) between alternate subpopulations (male vs. female; low vs. high Socioeconomic Status (SES); <65 vs. ≥65 years) was assessed. To investigate if interventions should be combined, uptake rates for single interventions were compared to uptake rates for combined interventions. Cochrane Collaboration tools were used to assess the risk of bias.
Searches found 3,436 articles, with 32 meeting the inclusion criteria. These contained 30 trials that reported uptake rates within subpopulations and 17 trials that combined interventions. Most differences in intervention effects between subpopulations were nonsignificant. Combining interventions led to greater participation, RR = 1.06, confidence interval [1.03; 1.10]. As interventions rarely affect subpopulations differently, targeting them at specific subpopulations may be an ineffective strategy. While individual interventions show modest effects, these results indicate that future programs might overcome this by combining interventions together. Care is needed when selecting interventions to combine as adding some interventions (e.g., additional print materials) can reduce the effectiveness of a combined strategy. Future research should examine methods for effectively combining interventions in nationwide programs to maximize participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larry Myers
- School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia
| | - Belinda Goodwin
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia
| | - Sonja March
- School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
- School of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wieten E, de Klerk CM, van der Steen A, Ramakers CR, Kuipers EJ, Hansen BE, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Bossuyt PM, Dekker E, Spaander MCW. Equivalent Accuracy of 2 Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Detecting Advanced Neoplasia in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:1392-1399.e5. [PMID: 30055170 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Revised: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Although different brands of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, few studies have compared their accuracy in detecting advanced neoplasia. METHODS We performed a large prospective cohort study within the Dutch national CRC screening program to evaluate 2 quantitative FITs: FOB-Gold (Sentinel, Milan, Italy) and OC-Sensor (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo Japan), from May 2016 through March 2017. We randomly selected 42,179 screening-naïve individuals (55-75 years old), who were asked to perform both FITs themselves using the same bowel movement. Participants with positive results from 1 or both FITs (≥15 μg hemoglobin/gram feces) were invited for colonoscopy examination (reference standard). Equivalence in detection of advanced neoplasia was evaluated with a predefined margin of 0.15%. RESULTS Of 42,179 invitees, 22,064 (52%) participated and FITs were completed for 21,078 participants. Of 2112 participants (9.6%) with 1 or 2 positive results from FITs, 1778 (84%) underwent a colonoscopy. Of all invitees, the FOB-Gold test detected advanced neoplasia (confirmed by colonoscopy) in 610 participants (1.45%) and the OC-Sensor detected advanced neoplasia (confirmed by colonoscopy) in 606 participants (1.44%)-an absolute difference of 0.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.06% to 0.08%). Of the 21,078 participants who completed both FITs, 1582 (7.5%) had a positive result from the FOB-Gold test and 1627 (7.7%) a positive result from the OC-Sensor test (P = .140). The relative true-positive rate of FOB-Gold vs OC-Sensor in detecting advanced neoplasia was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-1.01) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87-1.03) for CRC. The relative false-positive rate of the FOB-Gold test vs the OC-Sensor test in detecting advanced neoplasia was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.05). CONCLUSIONS In a large prospective study of individuals invited for CRC screening in The Netherlands, we found equivalent accuracy of the FOB-Gold FIT vs the OC-Sensor FIT in detecting advanced neoplasia. These results are relevant for selecting FITs for CRC screening programs worldwide. Dutch National Trial Registry: NTR5874.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Els Wieten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clasine M de Klerk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke van der Steen
- Regional Organization for Population Screening South-West Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian R Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bettina E Hansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick M Bossuyt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Blom J, Löwbeer C, Elfström KM, Sventelius M, Öhman D, Saraste D, Törnberg S. Gender-specific cut-offs in colorectal cancer screening with FIT: Increased compliance and equal positivity rate. J Med Screen 2018; 26:92-97. [PMID: 30336730 DOI: 10.1177/0969141318804843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) in colorectal cancer screening enables adjustment of the cut-off for a positive test. As men have higher stool blood levels and higher prevalence of colorectal neoplasia, different cut-off levels can be chosen for men and women. We evaluated participation and positivity rates switching from guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) (Hemoccult®) to FIT (OC-Sensor), using gender-specific cut-offs. METHODS The colorectal cancer screening programme of Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden, started in 2008 and invited individuals aged 60-69 to biennial testing using gFOBT. From 1 October 2015 the test was switched to FIT, with positivity cut-offs of 40 (200) and 80 (400) µg Hb/g (ng/mL) faeces for women and men, respectively. The first year was evaluated for compliance and positivity, number of reminders and incorrect/inadequate tests, compared with gFOBT in the preceding 12-month period. RESULTS There were 127,030 and 87,269 individuals invited to screening with gFOBT and FIT, respectively. The change of test increased overall participation by 11.9% (95% confidence interval 11.5%-12.3%) from 56.5% to 68.4% ( p < 0.001). The increase was larger in men (14.3%) than women (9.7%), and in those aged 60-64 (14.2%) than those aged 65-69 (8.7%). The positivity rate was 2.6% in women and 2.5% in men. There was a lower rate of reminders and incorrect/inadequate tests with FIT. CONCLUSIONS Within a well-organised colorectal cancer screening programme, changing the test from gFOBT to FIT markedly increased participation, especially among men, and in the younger age group. With a lower cut-off in women than men, the positivity rate was similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Blom
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,2 Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden
| | - Christian Löwbeer
- 3 Division of Clinical Chemistry, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,4 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Aleris Medilab, Täby, Sweden
| | - K Miriam Elfström
- 2 Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden.,5 Division of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Daniel Öhman
- 2 Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden
| | - Deborah Saraste
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sven Törnberg
- 2 Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden.,6 Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
White A, Ironmonger L, Steele RJC, Ormiston-Smith N, Crawford C, Seims A. A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:906. [PMID: 30236083 PMCID: PMC6149054 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an illness strongly influenced by sex and gender, with mortality rates in males significantly higher than females. There is still a dearth of understanding on where sex differences exist along the pathway from presentation to survival. The aim of this review is to identify where actions are needed to improve outcomes for both sexes, and to narrow the gap for CRC. Methods A cross-sectional review of national data was undertaken to identify sex differences in incidence, screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer stage at diagnosis and survival, and their influence in the sex differences in mortality. Results Overall incidence is higher in men, with an earlier age distribution, however, important sex differences exist in anatomical site. There were relatively small differences in screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer staging at diagnosis and survival. Screening uptake is higher in women under 69 years. Women are more likely to present as emergency cases, with more men diagnosed through screening and two-week-wait. No sex differences are seen in diagnosis for more advanced disease. Overall, age-standardised 5-year survival is similar between the sexes. Conclusions As there are minimal sex differences in the data from routes to diagnosis to survival, the higher mortality of colorectal cancer in men appears to be a result of exogenous and/or endogenous factors pre-diagnosis that lead to higher incidence rates. There are however, sex and gender differences that suggest more targeted interventions may facilitate prevention and earlier diagnosis in both men and women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan White
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, Leeds Beckett University, Civic Quarter, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
| | - Lucy Ironmonger
- Cancer Research UK, Angel Building, 407 St John Street, London, EC1V 4A, UK
| | - Robert J C Steele
- Division of Cancer Research, Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening (CRiPS), University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Nick Ormiston-Smith
- Department of Health, 15 Butterfield Street, Herston, Brisbane, 4006, QLD, Australia
| | - Carina Crawford
- Cancer Research UK, Angel Building, 407 St John Street, London, EC1V 4A, UK
| | - Amanda Seims
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, Leeds Beckett University, Civic Quarter, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Quyn AJ, Fraser CG, Rodger J, Digan A, Anderson AS, Steele RJC. Participation in bowel screening among men attending abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. Br J Surg 2018; 105:529-534. [PMID: 29465743 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uptake of population-based screening for colorectal cancer in Scotland is around 55 per cent. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening has recently been introduced for men aged 65 years and the reported uptake is 78 per cent. The aim was to determine the impact of a brief intervention on bowel screening in men who attended AAA screening, but previously failed to complete bowel screening. METHODS Men invited for AAA screening between September 2015 and March 2016 within NHS Tayside were included. Attendees who had not responded to their latest bowel screening invitation were seen by a colorectal cancer clinical nurse specialist. Reasons for not completing the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) were recorded; brief information on colorectal cancer screening was communicated, and participants were offered a further invitation to complete a FOBT. Those who responded positively were sent a further FOBT from the Scottish Bowel Screening Centre. Subsequent return of a completed FOBT within 6 months was recorded. RESULTS A total of 556 men were invited for AAA screening, of whom 38·1 per cent had not completed a recent FOBT. The primary reason stated for not participating was the time taken to complete the test or forgetting it (35·1 per cent). Other reasons included: lack of motivation (23·4 per cent), confusion regarding the aim of screening (16·2 per cent), disgust (19·8 per cent), fear (6·3 per cent) and other health problems (9·9 per cent). Following discussion, 81·1 per cent agreed to complete the FOBT and 49 per cent subsequently returned the test. CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of previous bowel screening non-responders subsequently returned a completed FOBT following a brief intervention with a nurse specialist. Attendance at non-bowel screening appointments may provide a valuable opportunity to improve bowel screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Quyn
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - C G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - J Rodger
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - A Digan
- Scottish Bowel Screening Centre, Dundee, UK
| | - A S Anderson
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - R J C Steele
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Larsen MB, Mikkelsen EM, Rasmussen M, Friis-Hansen L, Ovesen AU, Rahr HB, Andersen B. Sociodemographic characteristics of nonparticipants in the Danish colorectal cancer screening program: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Clin Epidemiol 2017; 9:345-354. [PMID: 28721099 PMCID: PMC5500541 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s139168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fecal occult blood tests are recommended for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Europe. Recently, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has come into use. Sociodemographic differences between participants and nonparticipants may be less pronounced when using FIT as there are no preceding dietary restrictions and only one specimen is required. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and nonparticipation for both genders, with special emphasis on those who actively unsubscribe from the program. METHODS The study was a national, register-based, cross-sectional study among men and women randomized to be invited to participate in the prevalence round of the Danish CRC screening program between March 1 and December 31, 2014. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were used to quantify the association between sociodemographic characteristics and nonparticipation (including active nonparticipation). PRs were assessed using Poisson regression with robust error variance. RESULTS The likelihood of being a nonparticipant was highest in the younger part of the population; however, for women, the association across age groups was U-shaped. Female immigrants were more likely to be nonparticipants. Living alone, being on social welfare, and having lower income were factors that were associated with nonparticipation among both men and women. For both men and women, there was a U-shaped association between education and nonparticipation. For both men and women, the likelihood of active nonparticipation rose with age; it was lowest among non-western immigrants and highest among social welfare recipients. CONCLUSION Social inequality in screening uptake was evident among both men and women in the Danish CRC screening program, even though the program is free of charge and the screening kit is based on FIT and mailed directly to the individuals. Interventions are needed to bridge this gap if CRC screening is to avoid aggravating existing inequalities in CRC-related morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers NO
| | - Ellen M Mikkelsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus N
| | - Morten Rasmussen
- Digestive Disease Center K, Bispebjerg Hospital, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen NV
| | - Lennart Friis-Hansen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Nordsjællands Hospital, The Capital Region of Denmark, Hillerød
| | - Anders U Ovesen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, North Denmark Region, Aalborg
| | - Hans Bjarke Rahr
- Department of Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers NO
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wilhelmsen M, Christensen IJ, Rasmussen L, Jørgensen LN, Madsen MR, Vilandt J, Hillig T, Klaerke M, Nielsen KT, Laurberg S, Brünner N, Gawel S, Yang X, Davis G, Heijboer A, Martens F, Nielsen HJ. Detection of colorectal neoplasia: Combination of eight blood-based, cancer-associated protein biomarkers. Int J Cancer 2017; 140:1436-1446. [PMID: 27935033 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Serological biomarkers may be an option for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study assessed eight cancer-associated protein biomarkers in plasma from subjects undergoing first time ever colonoscopy due to symptoms attributable to colorectal neoplasia. Plasma AFP, CA19-9, CEA, hs-CRP, CyFra21-1, Ferritin, Galectin-3 and TIMP-1 were determined in EDTA-plasma using the Abbott ARCHITECT® automated immunoassay platform. Primary endpoints were detection of (i) CRC and high-risk adenoma and (ii) CRC. Logistic regression was performed. Final reduced models were constructed selecting the four biomarkers with the highest likelihood scores. Subjects (N = 4,698) were consecutively included during 2010-2012. Colonoscopy detected 512 CRC patients, 319 colonic cancer and 193 rectal cancer. Extra colonic malignancies were detected in 177 patients, 689 had adenomas of which 399 were high-risk, 1,342 had nonneoplastic bowell disease and 1,978 subjects had 'clean' colorectum. Univariable analysis demonstrated that all biomarkers were statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the blood-based biomarkers in combination significantly predicted the endpoints. The reduced model resulted in the selection of CEA, hs-CRP, CyFra21-1 and Ferritin for the two endpoints; AUCs were 0.76 and 0.84, respectively. The postive predictive value at 90% sensitivity was 25% for endpoint 1 and the negative predictive value was 93%. For endpoint 2, the postive predictive value was 18% and the negative predictive value was 97%. Combinations of serological protein biomarkers provided a significant identification of subjects with high risk of the presence of colorectal neoplasia. The present set of biomarkers could become important adjunct in early detection of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Wilhelmsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Ib J Christensen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Louise Rasmussen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Lars N Jørgensen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark
| | - Mogens R Madsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Herning Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herning, Denmark
| | - Jesper Vilandt
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hillerød Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Thore Hillig
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hillerød Hospital, Denmark
| | - Michael Klaerke
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Horsens Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Knud T Nielsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Randers Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Randers, Denmark
| | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aarhus Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nils Brünner
- Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susan Gawel
- Cancer Core R&D, Abbott Diagnostics Division, Abbott Park, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Xiaoqing Yang
- Cancer Core R&D, Abbott Diagnostics Division, Abbott Park, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gerard Davis
- Cancer Core R&D, Abbott Diagnostics Division, Abbott Park, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Annemieke Heijboer
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Martens
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans J Nielsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Raine R, Atkin W, von Wagner C, Duffy S, Kralj-Hans I, Hackshaw A, Counsell N, Moss S, McGregor L, Palmer C, Smith SG, Thomas M, Howe R, Vart G, Band R, Halloran SP, Snowball J, Stubbs N, Handley G, Logan R, Rainbow S, Obichere A, Smith S, Morris S, Solmi F, Wardle J. Testing innovative strategies to reduce the social gradient in the uptake of bowel cancer screening: a programme of four qualitatively enhanced randomised controlled trials. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2017. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar05080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundBowel cancer screening reduces cancer-specific mortality. There is a socioeconomic gradient in the uptake of the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP), which may lead to inequalities in cancer outcomes.ObjectiveTo reduce socioeconomic inequalities in uptake of the NHS BCSP’s guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBt) without compromising uptake in any socioeconomic group.DesignWorkstream 1 explored psychosocial determinants of non-uptake of gFOBt in focus groups and interviews. Workstream 2 developed and tested four theoretically based interventions: (1) ‘gist’ information, (2) a ‘narrative’ leaflet, (3) ‘general practice endorsement’ (GPE) and (4) an ‘enhanced reminder’ (ER). Workstream 3 comprised four national cluster randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the cost-effectiveness of each intervention.MethodsInterventions were co-designed with user panels, user tested using interviews and focus groups, and piloted with postal questionnaires. RCTs compared ‘usual care’ (existing NHS BCSP invitations) with usual care plus each intervention. The four trials tested: (1) ‘gist’ leaflet (n = 163,525), (2) ‘narrative’ leaflet (n = 150,417), (3) GPE on the invitation letter (n = 265,434) and (4) ER (n = 168,480). Randomisation was based on day of mailing of the screening invitation. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score associated with each individual’s home address was used as the marker of socioeconomic circumstances (SECs). Change in the socioeconomic gradient in uptake (interaction between treatment group and IMD quintile) was the primary outcome. Screening uptake was defined as the return of a gFOBt kit within 18 weeks of the invitation that led to a ‘definitive’ test result of either ‘normal’ (i.e. no further investigation required) or ‘abnormal’ (i.e. requiring referral for further testing). Difference in overall uptake was the secondary outcome.ResultsThe gist and narrative trials showed no effect on the SECs gradient or overall uptake (57.6% and 56.7%, respectively, compared with 57.3% and 58.5%, respectively, for usual care; allp-values > 0.05). GPE showed no effect on the gradient (p = 0.5) but increased overall uptake [58.2% vs. 57.5% in usual care, odds ratio (OR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.10;p < 0.0001]. ER showed a significant interaction with SECs (p = 0.005), with a stronger effect in the most deprived IMD quintile (14.1% vs. 13.3% in usual care, OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.20;p = 0.003) than the least deprived (34.7% vs. 34.9% in usual care OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06;p = 0.98), and higher overall uptake (25.8% vs. 25.1% in usual care, OR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11;p = 0.001). All interventions were inexpensive to provide.LimitationsIn line with NHS policy, the gist and narrative leaflets supplemented rather than replaced existing NHS BCSP information. This may have undermined their effect.ConclusionsEnhanced reminder reduced the gradient and modestly increased overall uptake, whereas GPE increased overall uptake but did not reduce the gradient. Therefore, given their effectiveness and very low cost, the findings suggest that implementation of both by the NHS BCSP would be beneficial. The gist and narrative results highlight the challenge of achieving equitable delivery of the screening offer when all communication is written; the format is universal and informed decision-making mandates extensive medical information.Future workSocioculturally tailored research to promote communication about screening with family and friends should be developed and evaluated.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN74121020.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 5, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind Raine
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Wendy Atkin
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Duffy
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ines Kralj-Hans
- Department of Biostatistics, King’s Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Sue Moss
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Lesley McGregor
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Cecily Palmer
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel G Smith
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary Thomas
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary Howe
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma Vart
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Roger Band
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Evesham, UK
| | - Stephen P Halloran
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Julia Snowball
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Neil Stubbs
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Graham Handley
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme North East Hub, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK
| | - Richard Logan
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Eastern Hub, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sandra Rainbow
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme London Hub, Northwick Park and St Marks Hospitals NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - Austin Obichere
- North Central London Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen Smith
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Midlands and North West Hub, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Hospital of St Cross, Rugby, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Francesca Solmi
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jane Wardle
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Clarke N, McNamara D, Kearney PM, O'Morain CA, Shearer N, Sharp L. The role of area-level deprivation and gender in participation in population-based faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 2016; 93:198-203. [PMID: 27765660 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2016] [Revised: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of sex and deprivation on participation in a population-based faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening programme. The study population included 9785 individuals invited to participate in two rounds of a population-based biennial FIT-based screening programme, in a relatively deprived area of Dublin, Ireland. Explanatory variables included in the analysis were sex, deprivation category of area of residence and age (at end of screening). The primary outcome variable modelled was participation status in both rounds combined (with "participation" defined as having taken part in either or both rounds of screening). Poisson regression with a log link and robust error variance was used to estimate relative risks (RR) for participation. As a sensitivity analysis, data were stratified by screening round. In both the univariable and multivariable models deprivation was strongly associated with participation. Increasing affluence was associated with higher participation; participation was 26% higher in people resident in the most affluent compared to the most deprived areas (multivariable RR=1.26: 95% CI 1.21-1.30). Participation was significantly lower in males (multivariable RR=0.96: 95%CI 0.95-0.97) and generally increased with increasing age (trend per age group, multivariable RR=1.02: 95%CI, 1.01-1.02). No significant interactions between the explanatory variables were found. The effects of deprivation and sex were similar by screening round. Deprivation and male gender are independently associated with lower uptake of population-based FIT colorectal cancer screening, even in a relatively deprived setting. Development of evidence-based interventions to increase uptake in these disadvantaged groups is urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Clarke
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Patricia M Kearney
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - Colm A O'Morain
- Faculty of Health Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Nikki Shearer
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Linda Sharp
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, England.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Comas M, Mendivil J, Andreu M, Hernández C, Castells X. Long-Term Prediction of the Demand of Colonoscopies Generated by a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0164666. [PMID: 27732635 PMCID: PMC5061389 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the long-term need for colonoscopies after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and post-polypectomy surveillance in the context of a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program. METHODS A discrete-event simulation model was built to reproduce the process of CRC screening and post-polypectomy surveillance following European guidelines in a population of 100,000 men and women aged 50-69 years over a 20-year period. Screening consisted of biennial FIT and colonoscopy in participants with positive results. The model was mainly fed using data from the first and second rounds of a Spanish program (2010-2013). Data on post-polypectomy surveillance results were obtained from the literature. A probabilistic multivariate sensitivity analysis was performed on the effect of participation, FIT positivity, and adherence to surveillance colonoscopies. The main outcome variables were the number of colonoscopies after a positive FIT, surveillance colonoscopies, and the overall number of colonoscopies. RESULTS An average yearly number of 1,200 colonoscopies after a positive FIT were predicted per 100,000 inhabitants with a slight increase to 1,400 at the end of the 20-year period. Surveillance colonoscopies increased to an average of 1,000 per 100,000 inhabitants in the long-term, showing certain stabilization in the last years of the 20-year simulation horizon. The results were highly sensitive to FIT positivity. CONCLUSIONS Implementing a population-based CRC screening program will increase the demand for colonoscopies, which is expected to double in 20 years, mainly due to an increase in surveillance colonoscopies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercè Comas
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Joan Mendivil
- CPS Market Access, Roche Diagnostics International Ltd., Rotkreuz, Switzerland
| | - Montserrat Andreu
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Hernández
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Blume JE, Wilhelmsen M, Benz RW, Brünner N, Christensen IJ, Croner LJ, Dillon R, Hillig T, Jones JJ, Jørgensen LN, Kao A, Klaerke M, Laurberg S, Madsen MR, Nielsen KT, Vilandt J, Wilcox BE, You J, Nielsen HJ. Discovery and Validation of Plasma-Protein Biomarker Panels for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma in a Danish Collection of Samples from Patients Referred for Diagnostic Colonoscopy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 1:181-193. [DOI: 10.1373/jalm.2016.020271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
28
|
Wardle J, von Wagner C, Kralj-Hans I, Halloran SP, Smith SG, McGregor LM, Vart G, Howe R, Snowball J, Handley G, Logan RF, Rainbow S, Smith S, Thomas MC, Counsell N, Morris S, Duffy SW, Hackshaw A, Moss S, Atkin W, Raine R. Effects of evidence-based strategies to reduce the socioeconomic gradient of uptake in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (ASCEND): four cluster-randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2016; 387:751-9. [PMID: 26680217 PMCID: PMC4761689 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01154-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uptake in the national colorectal cancer screening programme in England varies by socioeconomic status. We assessed four interventions aimed at reducing this gradient, with the intention of improving the health benefits of screening. METHODS All people eligible for screening (men and women aged 60-74 years) across England were included in four cluster-randomised trials. Randomisation was based on day of invitation. Each trial compared the standard information with the standard information plus the following supplementary interventions: trial 1 (November, 2012), a supplementary leaflet summarising the gist of the key information; trial 2 (March, 2012), a supplementary narrative leaflet describing people's stories; trial 3 (June, 2013), general practice endorsement of the programme on the invitation letter; and trial 4 (July-August, 2013) an enhanced reminder letter with a banner that reiterated the screening offer. Socioeconomic status was defined by the Index of Multiple Deprivation score for each home address. The primary outcome was the socioeconomic status gradient in uptake across deprivation quintiles. This study is registered, number ISRCTN74121020. FINDINGS As all four trials were embedded in the screening programme, loss to follow-up was minimal (less than 0·5%). Trials 1 (n=163,525) and 2 (n=150,417) showed no effects on the socioeconomic gradient of uptake or overall uptake. Trial 3 (n=265 434) showed no effect on the socioeconomic gradient but was associated with increased overall uptake (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1·07, 95% CI 1·04-1·10, p<0·0001). In trial 4 (n=168 480) a significant interaction was seen with socioeconomic status gradient (p=0·005), with a stronger effect in the most deprived quintile (adjusted OR 1·11, 95% CI 1·04-1·20, p=0·003) than in the least deprived (1·00, 0·94-1·06, p=0·98). Overall uptake was also increased (1·07, 1·03-1·11, p=0·001). INTERPRETATION Of four evidence-based interventions, the enhanced reminder letter reduced the socioeconomic gradient in screening uptake, but further reducing inequalities in screening uptake through written materials alone will be challenging. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Wardle
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Ines Kralj-Hans
- Department of Biostatistics, King's Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen P Halloran
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK; Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, and University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Samuel G Smith
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Lesley M McGregor
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma Vart
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary Howe
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Julia Snowball
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Graham Handley
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme North East Hub, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK
| | - Richard F Logan
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Eastern Hub, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sandra Rainbow
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Hub, London Hub, Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK
| | - Steve Smith
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Midlands and North West Hub, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Hospital of St Cross, Rugby, UK
| | - Mary C Thomas
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Counsell
- Cancer Research Centre UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Steve Morris
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen W Duffy
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research Centre UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sue Moss
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Wendy Atkin
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rosalind Raine
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bradley DT, Treanor C, McMullan C, Owen T, Graham A, Anderson D. Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e008266. [PMID: 26353870 PMCID: PMC4567666 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the reasons why some people do not participate in bowel cancer screening so that steps can be taken to improve informed decision-making. DESIGN Qualitative study, using focus groups with thematic analysis of data to identify, analyse and report patterns. Transcripts were repeatedly read and inductively coded using a phenomenological perspective, and organised into key themes. SETTING Belfast and Armagh, two areas of Northern Ireland with relatively low uptake of bowel cancer screening. PARTICIPANTS Ten women and 18 men in three single-gender focus groups (two male and one female), each with 9-10 participants. Study participants were recruited by convenience sampling from the general public and were eligible for, but had not taken part in, the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. RESULTS Key themes identified were fear of cancer; the test procedure; social norms; past experience of cancer and screening; lack of knowledge or understanding about bowel cancer screening; and resulting behaviour towards the test. Fear about receiving bad news and reluctance to conduct the test themselves were reactions that participants seemed willing to overcome after taking part in open discussion about the test. CONCLUSIONS We identified barriers to participation in bowel cancer screening and used these insights to develop new materials to support delivery of the programme. Some of the issues raised have been identified in other UK settings, suggesting that knowledge about barriers, and strategies to improve uptake, may be generalisable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Declan T Bradley
- Public Health Agency, Belfast, UK
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Charlene Treanor
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tinmouth J, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Allison JE. Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know. Gut 2015; 64:1327-37. [PMID: 26041750 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2014] [Accepted: 03/21/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cause of cancer-related death, it is fortunately amenable to screening with faecal tests for occult blood and endoscopic tests. Despite the evidence for the efficacy of guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests (gFOBT), they have not been popular with primary care providers in many jurisdictions, in part because of poor sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasms (advanced adenomas and CRC). In order to address this issue, high sensitivity gFOBT have been recommended, however, these tests are limited by a reduction in specificity compared with the traditional gFOBT. Where colonoscopy is available, some providers have opted to recommend screening colonoscopy to their patients instead of faecal testing, as they believe it to be a better test. Newer methods for detecting occult human blood in faeces have been developed. These tests, called faecal immunochemical tests (FIT), are immunoassays specific for human haemoglobin. FIT hold considerable promise over the traditional guaiac methods including improved analytical and clinical sensitivity for CRC, better detection of advanced adenomas, and greater screenee participation. In addition, the quantitative FIT are more flexible than gFOBT as a numerical result is reported, allowing customisation of the positivity threshold. When compared with endoscopy, FIT are less sensitive for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasms when only one time testing is applied to a screening population; however, this is offset by improved participation in a programme of annual or biennial screens and a better safety profile. This review will describe how gFOBT and FIT work and will present the evidence that supports the use of FIT over gFOBT, including the cost-effectiveness of FIT relative to gFOBT. Finally, specific issues related to FIT implementation will be discussed, particularly with respect to organised CRC screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Tinmouth
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - James E Allison
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Senore C, Inadomi J, Segnan N, Bellisario C, Hassan C. Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review. Gut 2015; 64:1158-77. [PMID: 26059765 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2014] [Accepted: 03/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The study aims to review available evidence concerning effective interventions to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening acceptance. We performed a literature search of randomised trials designed to increase individuals' use of CRC screening on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. Small (≤ 100 subjects per arm) studies and those reporting results of interventions implemented before publication of the large faecal occult blood test trials were excluded. Interventions were categorised following the Continuum of Cancer Care and the PRECEDE-PROCEED models and studies were grouped by screening model (opportunistic vs organised). Multifactor interventions targeting multiple levels of care and considering factors outside the individual clinician control, represent the most effective strategy to enhance CRC screening acceptance. Removing financial barriers, implementing methods allowing a systematic contact of the whole target population, using personal invitation letters, preferably signed by the reference care provider, and reminders mailed to all non-attendees are highly effective in enhancing CRC screening acceptance. Physician reminders may support the diffusion of screening, but they can be effective only for individuals who have access to and make use of healthcare services. Educational interventions for patients and providers are effective, but the implementation of organisational measures may be necessary to favour their impact. Available evidence indicates that organised programmes allow to achieve an extensive coverage and to enhance equity of access, while maximising the health impact of screening. They provide at the same time an infrastructure allowing to achieve a more favourable cost-effectiveness profile of potentially effective strategies, which would not be sustainable in opportunistic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Senore
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO Piemonte), AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - John Inadomi
- Digestive Disease Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nereo Segnan
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO Piemonte), AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristina Bellisario
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO Piemonte), AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Participant uptake of the fecal immunochemical test decreases with the two-sample regimen compared with one-sample FIT. Eur J Cancer Prev 2015; 23:516-23. [PMID: 25203483 PMCID: PMC4186737 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are recommended to screen average-risk adults for colorectal cancer (CRC). Little research has examined whether a two-sample FIT affects participant uptake, compared with a one-sample FIT. Examining participant uptake is important, as evidence suggests that a two-sample FIT may increase the sensitivity to detect CRC. OBJECTIVE This study had two objectives: (i) to evaluate FIT completion in a population that received either a one-sample FIT kit (1-FIT) or a two-sample FIT kit (2-FIT) and (ii) to understand whether uptake varies by age, sex, or receipt of prior CRC screening. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which 3081 participants who were aged between 50 and 75 years and were at an average risk for CRC, and who had requested FITs, randomly received 1-FIT (n=1540) or 2-FIT (n=1541) kits. FIT completion was defined as the completion and return of a one-sample test by the patients in the 1-FIT group or of both sample tests by those in the 2-FIT group. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine the independent effect of group type (2-FIT vs. 1-FIT) on the completion of the FIT, adjusting for age, sex, and receipt of prior CRC screening. RESULTS The 2-FIT group had lower test completion rates (hazard ratio=0.87; 95% confidence interval=0.78-0.97; P=0.01) after adjusting for age, sex, and receipt of prior CRC screening. Participant uptake did not vary by age, sex, or receipt of prior CRC screening. CONCLUSION This unique, rigorous randomized controlled trial found that the 2-FIT regimen decreases completion of FIT. Further research is needed to understand whether decreases in participant uptake are offset by increased gains in test sensitivity.
Collapse
|
33
|
Improving uptake of screening for colorectal cancer: a study on invitation strategies and different test kit use. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 27:536-43. [PMID: 25806603 PMCID: PMC4423577 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the uptake of mail-delivered tests for colorectal cancer screening. We assessed the effect of an advance notification letter and a reminder letter, and analysed the proportion of inappropriately handled tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen thousand randomly selected residents of Latvia aged 50-74 years were allocated to receive one of three different test systems: either a guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or one of two laboratory-based immunochemical tests (FIT) - FOB Gold or OC-Sensor. Half of the target population received an advance notification letter; all nonresponders were sent a reminder letter. RESULTS The uptake of screening was 31.2% for the gFOBT, 44.7% for FOB Gold and 47.4% for the OC-Sensor (odds ratio 0.55; 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.60 for gFOBT vs. FOB Gold; odds ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.83-0.98 for FOB Gold vs. OC-Sensor). The uptake in the gFOBT group was improved by the advance notification letter (7.7%, P<0.0001). 30.9% returned tests were received after the reminder letter. The proportion of tests that could not be analysed because of inadequate handling was 0.9% for gFOBT, 4.4% for FOB Gold and 0.2% for the OC-Sensor (P=0.002 for gFOBT vs. OC-Sensor; P<0.001 for all comparisons vs. FOB Gold). CONCLUSION The use of FIT resulted in higher uptake. Receipt of a reminder letter was critical to participation, but the use of an advance notification letter was important mainly for gFOBT. The proportion of inappropriately handled tests was markedly higher for FOB Gold.
Collapse
|
34
|
Zorzi M, Fedeli U, Schievano E, Bovo E, Guzzinati S, Baracco S, Fedato C, Saugo M, Dei Tos AP. Impact on colorectal cancer mortality of screening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test. Gut 2015; 64:784-90. [PMID: 25179811 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Accepted: 08/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes based on the guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) reduce CRC-specific mortality. Several studies have shown higher sensitivity with the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) compared with gFOBT. We carried out an ecological study to evaluate the impact of FIT-based screening programmes on CRC mortality. DESIGN In the Veneto Region (Italy), biennial FIT-based screening programmes that invited 50-69-year-old residents were introduced in different areas between 2002 and 2009. We compared CRC mortality rates from 1995 to 2011 between the areas where screening started in 2002-2004 (early screening areas (ESA)) and areas that introduced the screening in 2008-2009 (late screening areas (LSA)) using Poisson regression models. We also compared available data on CRC incidence rates (1995-2007) and surgical resection rates (2001-2012). RESULTS Before the introduction of screening, CRC mortality and incidence rates in the two areas were similar. Compared with 1995-2000, 2006-2011 mortality rates were 22% lower in the ESA than in the LSA (rate ratio (RR)=0.78; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89). The reduction was larger in women (RR=0.64; CI 0.51 to 0.80) than in men (RR=0.87; CI 0.73 to 1.04). In the ESA, incidence and surgery rates peaked during the introduction of the screening programme and then returned to the baseline (2006-2007 incidence) or dropped below initial values (surgery after 2007). CONCLUSIONS FIT-based screening programmes were associated with a significant reduction in CRC mortality. This effect took place much earlier than reported by gFOBT-based trials and observational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Zorzi
- Veneto Tumour Registry, Veneto Region, Padua, Italy
| | - Ugo Fedeli
- SER-Epidemiological Department, Veneto Region, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mario Saugo
- SER-Epidemiological Department, Veneto Region, Padua, Italy
| | - Angelo Paolo Dei Tos
- Veneto Tumour Registry, Veneto Region, Padua, Italy Department of Pathology, Santa Maria di Ca' Foncello Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Senore C, Ederle A, DePretis G, Magnani C, Canuti D, Deandrea S, Zorzi M, Barca A, Bestagini P, Faitini K, Bisanti L, Casale C, Ferro A, GiorgiRossi P, Quadrino F, Fiorina G, Capuano A, Segnan N, Fantin A. Invitation strategies for colorectal cancer screening programmes: The impact of an advance notification letter. Prev Med 2015; 73:106-11. [PMID: 25602908 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2014] [Revised: 01/09/2015] [Accepted: 01/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM To estimate the impact of an advance notification letter on participation in sigmoidoscopy (FS) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening. METHODS Eligible subjects, invited in 3 Italian population based programmes using FS and in 5 using FIT, were randomised (1:1:1), within GP, to: A) standard invitation letter; B) advance notification followed after 1month by the standard invitation; and C) B+indication to contact the general practitioner (GP) to get advice about the decision to be screened. We calculated the 9-month attendance and the incremental cost of each strategy. We conducted a phone survey to assess GP's utilization and predictors of participation. RESULTS The advance notification was associated with a 20% increase in the attendance among 15,655 people invited for FS (B vs A - RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.10-1.25; C vs A - RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.12-1.27); the incremental cost ranged between 10 and 9 Euros. Participation in FIT screening (N=23,543) was increased only with simple pre-notification (B vs A - RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10); the incremental cost was 22.5 Euros. GP consultation rate was not increased in group C. CONCLUSIONS An advance notification represents a cost-effective strategy to increase participation in FS screening; its impact on the response to FIT screening was limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Senore
- AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, CPO Piemonte, Via San Francesco da Paola 31, Torino, Italy.
| | - Andrea Ederle
- Ospedale Fracastoro, UO Gastroenterologia, Via Circonvallazione 1, S Bonifacio, VE, Italy
| | - Giovanni DePretis
- UO Gastroenterologia, Ospedale S Chiara, Largo Medaglie d'Oro 9, Trento, Italy
| | - Corrado Magnani
- Unversità del Piemonte Orientale, CPO Piemonte, Via Solaroli 1, Novara, Italy
| | - Debora Canuti
- SS Programma di Screening Oncologici AUSL Rimini, Via Coriano 38, Rimini, Italy
| | - Silvia Deandrea
- ASL Città di Milano, Servizio di Epidemiologia, Corso Italia 19, Milano, Italy
| | - Manuel Zorzi
- Registro Tumori del Veneto, Passaggio Gaudenzio 1, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Barca
- Regione Lazio, Direzione Regionale Salute e Integrazione Sociosanitaria, Via Rosa Raimondi Garibaldi 7, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Katia Faitini
- UO Gastroenterologia, Ospedale S Chiara, Largo Medaglie d'Oro 9, Trento, Italy
| | - Luigi Bisanti
- ASL Città di Milano, Servizio di Epidemiologia, Corso Italia 19, Milano, Italy
| | - Coralba Casale
- SS Programma di Screening Oncologici AUSL Rimini, Via Coriano 38, Rimini, Italy
| | - Antonio Ferro
- Dipartimento di Prevenzione, ASL 17 di Este Monselice, Via Francesconi 2, Este, PD, Italy
| | - Paolo GiorgiRossi
- Servizio Interaziendale Epidemiologia, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Quadrino
- Regione Lazio, Direzione Regionale Salute e Integrazione Sociosanitaria, Via Rosa Raimondi Garibaldi 7, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Fiorina
- AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, CPO Piemonte, Via San Francesco da Paola 31, Torino, Italy
| | - Arianna Capuano
- AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, CPO Piemonte, Via San Francesco da Paola 31, Torino, Italy
| | - Nereo Segnan
- AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, CPO Piemonte, Via San Francesco da Paola 31, Torino, Italy
| | - Alberto Fantin
- Ospedale Fracastoro, UO Gastroenterologia, Via Circonvallazione 1, S Bonifacio, VE, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
UNLABELLED There is a wide choice of fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) for colorectal cancer screening. GOAL To highlight the issues applicable when choosing a FOBT, in particular which FOBT is best suited to the range of screening scenarios. Four scenarios characterize the constraints and expectations of screening programs: (1) limited colonoscopy resource with a need to constrain test positivity rate; (2) a priority for maximum colorectal neoplasia detection with little need to constrain colonoscopy workload; (3) an "adequate" endoscopy resource that allows balancing the benefits of detection with the burden of service provision; and (4) a need to maximize participation in screening. Guaiac-based FOBTs (gFOBTs) have significant deficiencies, and fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin have emerged as better tests. gFOBTs are not sensitive to small bleeds, specificity can be affected by diet or drugs, participant acceptance can be low, laboratory quality control opportunities are limited, and they have a fixed hemoglobin concentration cutoff determining positivity. FITs are analytically more specific, capable of quantitation and hence provide flexibility to adjust cutoff concentration for positivity and the balance between sensitivity and specificity. FITs are clinically more sensitive for cancers and advanced adenomas, and because they are easier to use, acceptance rates are high. CONCLUSIONS FOBT must be chosen carefully to meet the needs of the applicable screening scenario. Quantitative FIT can be adjusted to suit Scenarios 1, 2 and 3, and for each, they are the test of choice. FITs are superior to gFOBT for Scenario 4 and gFOBT is only suitable for Scenario 1.
Collapse
|
37
|
Sustained participation, colonoscopy uptake and adenoma detection rates over two rounds of the Tallaght-Trinity College colorectal cancer screening programme with the faecal immunological test. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26:1415-21. [PMID: 25244415 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies to date support the use of the faecal immunological test (FIT) in colorectal cancer screening programmes, and it has been widely adopted across Europe, Canada, Australia, and the USA. Successive screening rounds are necessary to detect and prevent colorectal cancer. The overall success of FIT screening will depend on several factors, the most important probably being the acceptability of repeated screening rounds. Being a newer form of occult blood testing, there is little data available on its overall efficacy over time. AIMS The aim of this study was to assess key performance indices during a second round of FIT screening in an Irish cohort and to compare results between successive rounds. METHODS A biennial, two tests, two-step design with postal invites and colonoscopy offered to anyone with a single FIT greater than 100 ngHb/ml was used. Recommended key performance measures were assessed and compared, including participation, positivity, colonoscopy uptake and adenoma and cancer detection rates. RESULTS In round two, 9863 individuals (98.6%) of the round one cohort were contacted. The round two participation rate was 47.5% (n=4685), only slightly lower than the 51% registered in round one. Male sex and younger age were associated with lower uptake. Overall positivity decreased from 10 to 8% over time (P<0.0001). Although the number of cancers detected during round two decreased significantly, overall neoplasia detection rates remained stable; positive predictive values for cancer and adenoma were 4 versus 1% and 37 versus 35%, respectively. CONCLUSION Repeated rounds of FIT screening in the Tallaght-Trinity College cohort achieved stable participation and neoplasia detection rates, suggesting that this mode of screening is both effective and acceptable to patients in the long term.
Collapse
|
38
|
Libby G, Brewster DH, Steele RJC. Impact of faecal occult blood test screening on emergency admissions and short-term outcomes for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2014; 101:1607-15. [PMID: 25219923 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2014] [Revised: 04/04/2014] [Accepted: 06/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small studies have examined the effect of faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening on the proportion of hospital admissions for colorectal cancer (CRC) classed as an emergency. This study aimed to examine this and short-term outcomes in persons invited for screening compared with a control group not invited. METHODS The invited group comprised all individuals invited between 1 April 2000 and 31 July 2007 in the Scottish arm of the UK demonstration pilot of FOBT, and subsequently diagnosed with CRC aged 50-72 years between 1 May 2000 and 31 July 2009. The controls comprised all remaining individuals in Scotland not invited for FOBT but diagnosed with CRC aged 50-72 years in the same period. RESULTS There were 2981 people diagnosed with CRC in the group invited for screening (58·3 per cent participated) and 9842 in the control group. Multivariable regression adjusted for sex, age, deprivation, co-morbidities, tumour site and Dukes' stage showed no difference between the groups for emergency admissions (odds ratio (OR) 0·89, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·77 to 1·02; P = 0·084) or length of hospital stay (LOS) (β coefficient -1·02 (95 per cent c.i. -1·05 to 1·01) days; P = 0·226). Comparing participants with controls, there were fewer emergency admissions (OR 0·59, 0·49 to 0·71; P < 0·001) and shorter LOS (β coefficient -1·06 (-1·10 to -1·02) days; P = 0·001). Short-term mortality was lower in the screened than the non-screened population (1·1 versus 2·8 per cent; P = 0·001). CONCLUSION People who participated in FOBT screening had fewer emergency admissions and a shorter LOS. Deprivation was associated negatively with participation, but the impact of FOBT participation on emergency admissions was independent of deprivation level. The reduction in LOS has potential to reduce financial costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Libby
- Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Digby J, McDonald PJ, Strachan JA, Libby G, Steele RJC, Fraser CG. Deprivation and faecal haemoglobin: implications for bowel cancer screening. J Med Screen 2014; 21:95-7. [PMID: 24803480 DOI: 10.1177/0969141314535388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between deprivation and faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb). SETTING Scottish Bowel Screening Programme. METHODS A total of 66725 men and women, aged 50 to 74, were invited to provide a single sample for a faecal immunochemical test. Deprivation was estimated using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation quintiles: f-Hb was measured (OC-Sensor, Eiken, Japan) on 38439 participants. The relationship between deprivation quintiles and f-Hb was examined. RESULTS Median age was 60 years, 53.6% women, with 14.1%, 19.7%, 17.7%, 25.9% and 22.6% in the lowest to the highest deprivation quintiles respectively. No detectable f-Hb was found in 51.9%, ranging from 45.5% in the most deprived up to 56.5% in the least deprived. As deprivation increased, f-Hb increased (p < 0.0001). This trend remained controlling for sex and age (p < 0.001). Participants in the most deprived quintile were more likely to have a f-Hb above a cut-off of 80 µg Hb/g faeces compared with the least deprived, independent of sex and age (adjusted odds ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.37 to 2.11). CONCLUSIONS Deprivation and f-Hb are related. This has important implications for selection of cut-off f-Hb for screening programmes, and supports the inclusion of deprivation in risk-scoring systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayne Digby
- Scottish Bowel Screening Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland
| | - Paula J McDonald
- Scottish Bowel Screening Centre Laboratory, Kings Cross, Dundee, Scotland
| | - Judith A Strachan
- Scottish Bowel Screening Centre Laboratory, Kings Cross, Dundee, Scotland
| | - Gillian Libby
- Scottish Bowel Screening Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland
| | | | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention & Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Carroll MRR, Seaman HE, Halloran SP. Tests and investigations for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Biochem 2014; 47:921-39. [PMID: 24769265 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2014] [Revised: 04/11/2014] [Accepted: 04/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Worldwide, colorectal (CRC) is the third most common form of cancer, after lung and breast cancer, and the fourth most common cause of cancer death, although in developed countries CRC incidence is higher and it accounts for an even higher proportion of cancer deaths. Successful treatment of early-stage CRC confers substantial survival advantage, and there is now overwhelming evidence that screening average-risk individuals for CRC reduces the incidence and disease-specific mortality. In spite of considerable research for new biomarkers for CRC, the detection of blood in faeces remains the most effective screening tool. The best evidence to date for population-based CRC screening comes from randomised-controlled trials that used a guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBt) as the first-line screening modality, whereby test-positive individuals are referred for follow-up investigations, usually colonoscopy. A major innovation in the last ten years or so has been the development of other more analytically sensitive and specific screening techniques for blood in faeces. The faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT) confers substantial benefits over gFOBt in terms of analytical sensitivity, specificity and practicality and FIT are now recommended for CRC screening by the European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. The challenge internationally is to develop high quality CRC screening programmes for which uptake is high. This is especially important for developing countries witnessing an increase in the incidence of CRC as populations adopt more westernised lifestyles. This review describes the tests available for CRC screening and how they are being used worldwide. The reader will gain an understanding of developments in CRC screening and issues that arise in choosing the most appropriate screening test (or tests) for organised population-based screening internationally and optimising the performance of the chosen test (or tests). Whilst a wide range of literature has been cited, this is not a systematic review. The authors provide FOBT CRC screening for a population of 14.6 million in the south of England and the senior author (SPH) was the lead author of the European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis and leads the World Endoscopy Organization Colorectal Cancer Committee's Expert Working Group on 'FIT for Screening'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalen R R Carroll
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, 20 Priestley Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7YS, UK; Royal Surrey County Hospital Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XX, UK.
| | - Helen E Seaman
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, 20 Priestley Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7YS, UK; Royal Surrey County Hospital Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XX, UK; University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
| | - Stephen P Halloran
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, 20 Priestley Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7YS, UK; Royal Surrey County Hospital Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XX, UK; University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Allison JE, Fraser CG, Halloran SP, Young GP. Population screening for colorectal cancer means getting FIT: the past, present, and future of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT). Gut Liver 2014; 8:117-30. [PMID: 24672652 PMCID: PMC3964261 DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.2.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2013] [Accepted: 02/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin (FIT) are changing the manner in which colorectal cancer (CRC) is screened. Although these tests are being performed worldwide, why is this test different from its predecessors? What evidence supports its adoption? How can this evidence best be used? This review addresses these questions and provides an understanding of FIT theory and practices to expedite international efforts to implement the use of FIT in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Allison
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. ; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee School of Medicine, Dundee, Scotland
| | - Stephen P Halloran
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Southern Programme Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital and University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Graeme P Young
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Bedford Park SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|