Psychosocial Assessments and Outcomes in Organ Transplantation

Using a natural language processing toolkit to classify electronic health records by psychiatric diagnosis

Objective: We analyzed a natural language processing (NLP) toolkit's ability to classify unstructured EHR data by psychiatric diagnosis. Expertise can be a barrier to using NLP. We employed an NLP toolkit (CLARK) created to support studies led by investigators with a range of informatics knowledge. Methods: The EHR of 652 patients were manually reviewed to establish Depression and Substance Use Disorder (SUD) labeled datasets, which were split into training and evaluation datasets. We used CLARK to train depression and SUD classification models using training datasets; model performance was analyzed against evaluation datasets. Results: The depression model accurately classified 69% of records (sensitivity = 0.68, specificity = 0.70, F1 = 0.68). The SUD model accurately classified 84% of records (sensitivity = 0.56, specificity = 0.92, F1 = 0.57). Conclusion: The depression model performed a more balanced job, while the SUD model's high specificity was paired with a low sensitivity. NLP applications may be especially helpful when combined with a confidence threshold for manual review.

Obesity, organ failure, and transplantation: A review of the role of metabolic and bariatric surgery in transplant candidates and recipients

Obesity is a risk factor for kidney, liver, heart, and pulmonary diseases, as well as failure. Solid organ transplantation remains the definitive treatment for the end-stage presentation of these diseases. Among many criteria for organ transplant, efficient management of obesity is required for patients to acquire transplant eligibility. End-stage organ failure and obesity are 2 complex pathologies that are often entwined. Metabolic and bariatric surgery before, during, or after organ transplant has been studied to determine the long-term effect of bariatric surgery on transplant outcomes. In this review, a multidisciplinary group of surgeons from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and the American Society for Transplant Surgery presents the current published literature on metabolic and bariatric surgery as a therapeutic option for patients with obesity awaiting solid organ transplantation. This manuscript details the most recent recommendations, pharmacologic considerations, and psychological considerations for this specific cohort of patients. Since level one evidence is not available on many of the topics covered by this review, expert opinion was implemented in several instances. Additional high-quality research in this area will allow for better recommendations and, therefore, treatment strategies for these complex patients.

Obesity, organ failure, and transplantation: a review of the role of metabolic and bariatric surgery in transplant candidates and recipients

Obesity is a risk factor for kidney, liver, heart, and pulmonary diseases, as well as failure. Solid organ transplantation remains the definitive treatment for the end-stage presentation of these diseases. Among many criteria for organ transplant, efficient management of obesity is required for patients to acquire transplant eligibility. End-stage organ failure and obesity are 2 complex pathologies that are often entwined. Metabolic and bariatric surgery before, during, or after organ transplant has been studied to determine the long-term effect of bariatric surgery on transplant outcomes. In this review, a multidisciplinary group of surgeons from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and the American Society for Transplant Surgery presents the current published literature on metabolic and bariatric surgery as a therapeutic option for patients with obesity awaiting solid organ transplantation. This manuscript details the most recent recommendations, pharmacologic considerations, and psychological considerations for this specific cohort of patients. Since level one evidence is not available on many of the topics covered by this review, expert opinion was implemented in several instances. Additional high-quality research in this area will allow for better recommendations and, therefore, treatment strategies for these complex patients.

Interitem Psychometric Validation of the Stanford Integrated Assessment for Transplant Scale Among Thoracic Transplant Candidates

BACKGROUND

Psychosocial evaluations are mandatory for transplant listing, however the methodology for creating psychosocial risk stratifications is unclear. The Standford Psychosocial Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant Scale is the most commonly used instrument, however its interitem validity has never been examined.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the interitem validity of a psychosocial assessment tool for transplant candidates among a sample of thoracic transplant candidates.

METHODS

Clinic data consisting of Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant administrations from 173 heart and lung transplant candidates were fit to a partial credit model. Data were subsequently fit to 4 separate partial credit models based on subscale categories, demonstrating the discrimination parameter estimate of each item. Differential item functioning analyses were conducted on the data within each subscale by sex to investigate potential bias produced by each item.

RESULTS

The initial partial credit model using the full scale did not converge, indicating the subscales possibly did not measure the same underlying construct. Subscale discrimination parameter estimates demonstrated that most items were adequately or highly discriminative. The item measuring history of substance use demonstrated poor fit and differential item functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

While the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant has demonstrated strong potential as a standardized framework for psychosocial assessments in transplant, this study identified some areas for improvement in the scoring system. The subscale scores appeared to show greater construct validity when utilized individually than when aggregated to form a total score. The substance use/abuse/dependence item did not fit well into its respective subscale. Future studies should aim to optimize the scoring system and re-asses its construct validity to improve its accuracy in discriminating between high-risk candidates and those needing psychosocial assistance.

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms after Liver Transplantation in a 65-Year-Old Male Patient

The development of immunosuppressants has been key for the advancement of solid organ transplant surgery. Specifically, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, or everolimus have significantly increased the survival rate of patients by reducing the risk of a rejection of the transplanted organ and limiting graft-versus-host disease. We report the case of a 65-year-old man who, after undergoing a liver transplantation and receiving an immunosuppressive treatment with cyclosporine and everolimus, presented severe obsessive, psychotic, and behavioral symptoms over the past three years, and describe the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions implemented against these symptoms. In this case, the immunosuppressants used have been cyclosporine and, preferably, everolimus. On the other hand, potential adverse reactions to the treatment have been observed, including neuropsychiatric symptoms such as tremor, anxiety, dysthymia, psychosis, and behavioral disorders, which make it necessary to use corrective psychoactive drugs such as benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and antipsychotics, combined with non-pharmacological interventions. A transversal approach, from the medical and psychosocial disciplines, facilitates success in managing neuropsychiatric symptoms after soft organ transplants.

Experience of ethical dilemmas among professionals working in pediatric transplantation: An international survey

BACKGROUND

Professionals working in pediatric transplantation commonly encounter complex ethical dilemmas. Most ethical research in transplantation is related to adult practice. We aimed to gain insight into ethical issues faced by transplant professionals when dealing with pediatric transplant recipients.

METHODS

A two-stage study was designed; the first part was a questionnaire completed by 190 (80%) members of the International Pediatric Transplant Association (IPTA) from over 30 different countries. This was followed by a multidisciplinary focus group that explored the preliminary data of the survey.

RESULTS

A total of 38% (56 of 149) respondents of the questionnaire had experienced an ethical issue between 2016 and 2018. Surgeons were more likely to have encountered an ethical issue as compared with physicians (60% vs. 35.7%, p = .035). Clinicians from Europe were more likely to have experienced an ethical issue in living organ donation compared with those from North America (78.9% vs. 52.5%, p = .005), with common ethical concerns being psychosocial evaluation and follow-up care of donors. The focus group highlighted the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to ethical issues.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study can direct future research into pediatric transplantation ethics with the aim of producing educational resources, policies, and ethical guidelines.

Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A National Survey of Centers' Practices

OBJECTIVE

This study characterizes pre-hematopoietic cell transplant psychosocial assessment practices with adult patients at centers in the U.S. An online, cross-sectional survey was conducted to describe the content and process of assessment including the high risk factors that influence transplant eligibility and how eligibility decisions are made.

METHODS

Psychosocial professionals (one per center) were invited to participate by sharing their center's practice. The questionnaire was developed by the researchers and pre-tested with a group of HCT social workers. Univariate statistics were used to describe the sample as well as the content and process of psychosocial assessment. Content analysis was conducted on textual data.

RESULTS

A total of 90 centers had one psychosocial professional that responded. There was general consistency among centers about the major psychosocial components that are assessed, but variation occurred regarding what, if any, standardized measures were used. Approximately half of centers that used standardized measures used the PACT, TERS, or SIPAT to rate overall psychosocial risk. Most respondents (86%) reported that their center has declined an otherwise medically eligible patient due to psychosocial risk factors. Risk factors most frequently reported as potentially influencing eligibility included no caregiver/poor support system, illicit drug use, and serious, untreated mental illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings provide a fuller understanding of psychosocial assessment practices, including the challenging ethical issue of psychosocial eligibility, and will help inform best practices. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Nurse-led self-management support after organ transplantation-protocol of a multicentre, stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Recipients of an organ transplantation face a number of challenges and often need to change their health behaviour. Good self-management skills are essential for optimal clinical outcomes. However, few interventions are available to support post-transplant self-management. To fill this gap, we developed a self-management support intervention offered by nurse practitioners. The primary aim of the study is to implement and test the effectiveness of the ZENN intervention in promoting self-management skills among heart, kidney liver and lung transplant recipients in comparison to standard care. The secondary aim is to assess the self-management support skills of nurse practitioners who will deliver the intervention.

METHODS

This multi-centre stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial will take place from September 2020 until May 2023. All departments will commence with inclusion of patients in the control period. Each department will be randomly assigned to a start date (step in the wedge) to commence the experimental period. Patients in the control period will receive standard care and will be asked to complete questionnaires at baseline (T0), 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2), to assess self-management, self-regulation, quality of life and adherence. During the experimental period, patients will receive standard care plus the ZENN intervention and receive the same set of questionnaires as participants in the control period. Nurse practitioners will complete a baseline and follow-up questionnaire to assess differences in self-management support skills. Video recordings of outpatient clinic consultations during the control and experimental periods will determine the differences in nurses' needs-thwarting and needs-supporting skills between the control and experimental period.

DISCUSSION

The ZENN intervention could be a useful approach to support patients' self-management skills after organ transplantation and thus promote clinical outcomes as well as avoid adverse events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trial Register NL8469 . Registered on March 19, 2020.

Variation in opioid prescribing patterns after abdominal transplant surgery

BACKGROUND

Opioids are associated with negative transplant outcomes. We sought to identify patient and center effects on over-prescribing of opioids (> 200 OME (oral morphine equivalents)).

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical and opioid prescription data (2014-2017) were collected from three academic transplant centers for kidney (KT), liver (LT), and simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLK) patients. Multivariable models were used to identify predictors of opioid over-prescribing at discharge and the occurrence of refill prescriptions at 90 days.

RESULTS

Three-thousand seven-hundred and two patients underwent transplant in the cohort (KT: n = 2358, LT: n = 1221, SLK: n = 123). More than 80% of recipients were over-prescribed opioids at discharge (Median OME (mOME) = 300 (IQR 225-375). LT and SLK had the largest prescription size (LT mOME 338 (IQR 300-450); SLK mOME 338 (IQR 225-450) and refill rate (LT: 64%, SLK 59%) (all, P < .001). Multivariable analysis indicated that transplant center was a significant predictor of opioid over-prescription after KT and LT (all, P < .001); older age (in KT) and length of stay (LOS) (in LT) were protective factors (both, P < .05). Refill occurrence was associated with initial prescription size and was reduced by older age and initial LOS (all, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The wide variation in opioid prescribing patterns has implications for transplant practice innovation, guideline development, and further study.

Characterization of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT) in Lung Transplant Candidates

The SIPAT is a standardized measure for pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation. Previous SIPAT studies utilized a relatively small lung transplant sample and only included listed patients. This study characterized the SIPAT in 147 lung transplant candidates to better elucidate its utility. The average score corresponded to a minimally acceptable rating and nearly half of the patients had relative or absolute contraindications. Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) patients scored more favorably than non-ILD patients (U = 7.69, p < .05). The Total (β = - .05, SE = .018, p < .01), Social Support Subscale (β = - .133, SE = .058, p < .05), and Psychosocial Stability and Psychopathology Subscale (β = - .103, SE = .040, p < .05) significantly predicted listing status. The SIPAT has a unique profile in lung transplant candidates and demonstrated utility for guiding transplant decisions. Future research should examine which lung transplant outcomes are significantly associated with SIPAT scores.

The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant Is Associated With Outcomes Before and After Liver Transplantation

The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT) is a standardized psychosocial evaluation tool used in liver transplantation (LT) evaluation. We assessed the impact of the SIPAT score and subdomains on transplant waitlisting decisions and post-LT outcomes including immunosuppression (IS) nonadherence, biopsy-proven rejection, andmortality/graft failure. We conducted a single-center observational cohort study of 1430 patients evaluated for LT. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on a SIPAT cutoff score of <21 or ≥21 (higher SIPAT scores indicate higher psychosocial risk). Regression models assessed relationships between total SIPAT score and domain scores and waitlisting decisions, IS nonadherence, allograft rejection, and death/graft failure. Elevated total SIPAT and SIPAT domain scores were associated not being added to the waitlist (total SIPAT core ≥21 adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.78 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.36-2.33]; readiness score ≥5 aOR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.36-2.76]; social support score ≥4aOR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.15-1.94]; psychopathology score ≥7 aOR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.07-1.94]; lifestyle/substance abuse score ≥12 aOR, 1.72 [95%CI, 1.23-2.39]) and were more likely to experience IS nonadherence as measured by the tacrolimus coefficient of variation (CoV) (total SIPAT score ≥21 aOR, 2.92 [95% CI, 1.69-5.03]; readiness score ≥5 aOR, 3.26 [95% CI, 1.63-6.52]; psychopathology score ≥7 aOR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.00-3.50]; lifestyle substance abuse score ≥12 aOR, 3.03 [95% CI, 1.56-5.86]). SIPAT readinessscore ≥5 was associated with biopsy-proven allograft rejection (aOR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.20-5.91). The SIPAT score was independently associated with LT listing decisions and IS nonadherence, and the readiness domain was associated with the risk of allograft rejection. These findings offer insights into higher risk recipients who require additional support before and aftertransplantation.

Pediatric Living Lung Donor Transplant Candidates: Psychiatric Status of Utilized and Non-Utilized Donors

Living donor lung (lobar) transplantation has greatly decreased in the past decade due to the success of the lung allocation score (LAS) system, instituted in 2005 by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Between 1993 and 2006, 460 living lung donor transplants were performed in the United States with 369 donations occurring at the University of Southern California and Washington University in St. Louis. These two centers accounted for over 80% of all living donor lung transplants between 1994 and 2006. All potential donors received a psychological/psychiatric evaluation as part of the donor selection process, which is standard practice in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Utilized and non-utilized lung donors were compared in terms of their psychiatric history and present status. Results indicated that 31% (N = 54) of the total sample had a lifetime prevalence of a psychiatric disorder, which is less than that the 46% lifetime rate for the general population (Kessler in Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:593-602, 2005). This study did find that psychiatric history or status was not exclusion factor for transplant surgery in either group. This observation about psychiatric issues in potential living lung donors should be useful to transplant centers who utilize adult live donors of any solid organ type for pediatric recipients and in Japan where live donor lung transplants still represent a significant proportion of lung transplants (Date in J Thorac Dis 8: S631-S636, 2016).

Psychosocial evaluation for liver transplantation: A brief guide for gastroenterologists

Liver transplantation is a lifesaving treatment that improves survival and quality of life. The procedure requires adequate transplant candidate selection carried out by a multidisciplinary team. Psychosocial evaluation is a necessary part of recipient selection and its primary aims are to identify problems and psychosocial needs of the patient and his/her family, to improve transplantation outcomes. Different psychosocial conditions are considered risk factors for morbidity and mortality after transplantation. The presence of those factors per se is not an absolute contraindication, thus adequate evaluation promotes equal access to healthcare, improves results, and optimizes resources. The present review provides an overview of and guidelines for the most important psychosocial issues during the pretransplantation phase.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

Opioids and Kidney Transplantation

The United States has faced an unprecedented opioid crisis in recent years, which has led to an increase in opioid overdose-related deaths and, consequently, an increase in the number of potential deceased donors available for transplantation. This new pool of potential organ donors is composed of younger donors with higher infectious disease transmission risk. The use of organs from these donors requires appropriate patient education, informed consent, and post-transplant monitoring practices. Prescription opioid use is also an important component of the evaluation of transplant and living donor candidates because it may impact outcomes and eligibility for the procedures. In kidney transplant recipients, prescription opioid use predicts a higher risk of mortality, graft loss, and post-transplant complications. These effects seem to be proportional to the levels of opioid use, and to parallel patterns in other transplant populations such as liver, heart and lung recipients. Among living kidney donors, predonation prescription opioid use is associated with an increased risk of re-admission after nephrectomy. Overall, the opioid epidemic creates educational needs for patients awaiting deceased donor transplant, and also impacts the evaluation and care of transplant candidates. Among transplant candidates and recipients, the identification of patients with chronic opioid use should prompt multidisciplinary evaluation and management strategies to minimize risks.

The Utility of a Pre-Transplant Psychosocial Evaluation in Predicting Post-Liver Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient evidence about the ability of pretransplant psychosocial evaluations to predict posttransplant outcomes. While standardized assessments were developed to increase predictive validity, it is unclear whether the risk scores they yield predict outcomes. We investigated if the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT), a scaling approach to those assessments, would have been a superior predictor than the standard psychosocial evaluation.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, medical records of 182 adult liver transplant recipients who were at least 1 year posttransplant and prescribed tacrolimus for immunosuppression were analyzed. Regression analyses predicted outcomes of interest, including immunosuppressant nonadherence and biopsy-proven rejection, obtained 1-year posttransplant to time of data collection. Nonadherence was determined using the medication level variability index (MLVI).

RESULTS

Approximately 49% of patients had MLVI > 2.5, suggestive of nonadherence, and 15% experienced rejection. SIPAT total score did not predict adherence either using the continuous (P = .70), or dichotimized score, above or below > 2.5 (P = .14), or rejection (P = 0.87). Using a SIPAT threshold (total score > 69) did not predict adherence (p = .16) nor was a superior predictor of the continuous adherence score (P = .45), MLVI > 2.5 (P = .42), or rejection (P = 0.49), than the standard evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the SIPAT is unable to predict 2 of the most important outcomes in this population, immunosuppressant adherence and rejection. Research efforts should attempt to evaluate the best manner to use psychosocial evaluations.

The Need for Psychological Rehabilitation in Lung Transplant Recipients

Transplant recipients have significant psychosocial stressors due to unique posttransplant sequela that results in an increased incidence of psychopathology. Posttransplant psychological interventions, especially in lung transplant recipients, are understudied, as the focus of prior research has emphasized pretransplant interventions. However, posttransplant psychological stability affects medical outcomes. The importance of posttransplant psychological intervention is highlighted. Recommendations exist which call for attention to specific psychological domains in the posttransplant recovery period and highlight the impact of psychological rehabilitation on overall wellness and success in recovery. A novel psychological rehabilitation intervention is outlined as a response to posttransplant intervention recommendations to demonstrate implementation.

Psychotropic medication use trends in a large pediatric and young adult solid organ transplant population

INTRODUCTION

This study describes psychotropic medication use in a pediatric and young adult solid organ transplant population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the lifetime incidence of psychotropic medication use and associated characteristics in patients seen over a 6-year period at a large pediatric transplant center utilizing univariate and multivariate statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The lifetime incidence of psychotropic medication use was 36.5% in 393 patients. Transplant psychiatry provided psychopharmacological consultation to 21.9% of patients. Controlling for age and sex, there were significant associations between psychotropic use and thoracic organ disease (heart/lung) (AOR = 2.14; 95% CI: 1.2-3.8; P = 0.01), White race (P = 0.0002), histories of depressive/mood disorders (AOR = 3.68; 95% CI: 1.8-7.7; P = 0.0005), attention/learning disorders (AOR = 3.30; 95% CI: 1.6-6.9; P = 0.001), acute and post-traumatic stress disorders (AOR = 10.54; 95% CI: 2.6-42.8; P = 0.001), and experiencing bullying (AOR = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.03-4.55; P = 0.04). In unadjusted tests, significant associations were found between lifetime psychotropic usage and patient anxiety history (OR = 2.26; 95% CI: 1.5-3.5; P = 0.0002), end-of-life disease progression (OR = 3.04; 95% CI: 1.7-5.4; P = 0.0002), family psychiatric history (OR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.4-3.4; P = 0.0007), and adherence concerns (OR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.7-4.1; P < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

The lifetime incidence of psychotropic medication use among pediatric and young adult transplant patients is substantial. Patients with thoracic organ disease, end-of-life illness, individual/family psychiatric histories, trauma, and bullying histories have particularly high rates. Integrating child psychiatry as part of pediatric transplant teams should be an important consideration for the care of these patients.

Psychological profile and disease-coping strategies of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation

AIM

To determine the psychological characteristics of patients on the liver transplant waiting list; to analye the implications of the patient's psychological profile on coping with the disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study population: patients on the liver transplant waiting list. Psychological-profile: Socio-personal history; Mini Mental State Examination; Brief-Symptom Inventory of psychopathological problems; International Neuropsychiatric Interview; Family APGAR questionnaire; Social Support Questionnaire. Coping with the disease: A questionnaire about mental adaptation to the disease. Patients were recruited for the study at the time when they were included on the waiting list.

RESULTS

The patients (n=112) had the following characteristics: 68% of the patients had symptoms of emotional psychopathology, with 48% being of a depressive, anxious and obsessive-compulsive type, respectively. In terms of social and family support, 27% had the perception of being in a dysfunctional family (slight-23%; serious-4%). What is more, according to the Global Support Index, 21% had non-functional social and family support. Coping with the disease: 8% were well-adapted to the disease, the remaining 92% were poorly adapted; of which, 79% had a weaker fighting spirit, 51% expressed anxiety and concern about coping with the disease, 34% found they resorted to fatalism, 29% were in denial and 27% felt helpless.

CONCLUSIONS

Once liver patients are included on the transplant waiting list, they poorly adapt to the disease, with important emotional implications that result in psychological alterations.

Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation (PACT) Score Identifies High Risk Patients in Pediatric Renal Transplantation

Background: Currently, there is no standardized approach for determining psychosocial readiness in pediatric transplantation. We examined the utility of the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation (PACT) to identify pediatric kidney transplant recipients at risk for adverse clinical outcomes. Methods: Kidney transplant patients <21-years-old transplanted at Duke University Medical Center between 2005 and 2015 underwent psychosocial assessment by a social worker with either PACT or unstructured interview, which were used to determine transplant candidacy. PACT assessed candidates on a scale of 0 (poor candidate) to 4 (excellent candidate) in areas of social support, psychological health, lifestyle factors, and understanding. Demographics and clinical outcomes were analyzed by presence or absence of PACT and further characterized by high (≥3) and low (≤2) scores. Results: Of 54 pediatric patients, 25 (46.3%) patients underwent pre-transplant evaluation utilizing PACT, while 29 (53.7%) were not evaluated with PACT. Patients assessed with PACT had a significantly lower percentage of acute rejection (16.0 vs. 55.2%, p = 0.007). After adjusting for HLA mismatch, a pre-transplant PACT score was persistently associated with lower odds of acute rejection (Odds Ratio 0.119, 95% Confidence Interval 0.027-0.52, p = 0.005). In PACT subsection analysis, the lack of family availability (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.97, p = 0.047) and risk for psychopathology (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.87, p = 0.025) were associated with a low PACT score and post-transplant non-adherence. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of standardized psychosocial assessments and the potential use of PACT in risk stratifying pre-transplant candidates.

Prescription opioid use before and after kidney transplant: Implications for posttransplant outcomes

Evolving literature suggests that the epidemic of prescription opioid use affects the transplant population. We examined a novel database wherein national U.S. transplant registry records were linked to a large pharmaceutical claims warehouse (2007-2015) to characterize prescription opioid use before and after kidney transplant, and associations (adjusted hazard ratio, _95%LCL aHR_95%UCL ) with death and graft loss. Among 75 430 eligible patients, 43.1% filled opioids in the year before transplant. Use was more common among recipients who were women, white, unemployed, publicly insured, and with longer pretransplant dialysis. Of those with the highest level of pretransplant opioid use, 60% continued high-level use posttransplant. Pretransplant opioid use had graded associations with one-year posttransplant outcomes; the highest-level use predicted 46% increased risk of death (aHR _1.28 1.46_1.66 ) and 28% increased risk of all-cause graft failure (aHR _1.17 1.28_1.41 ). Effects of high-level opioid use in the first year after transplant were stronger, predicting twice the risk of death (aHR _1.93 2.24_2.60 ) and 68% higher all-cause graft failure risk (aHR _1.50 1.68_1.89 ) over the subsequent year; increased risk persisted over five years. While associations may, in part, reflect underlying conditions or behaviors, opioid use history is relevant in assessing and providing care to transplant candidates and recipients.

Quality of life and care burden in primary caregivers of liver transplantation recipients in China

So far, liver transplantation (LT) has become the most effective way to treat end-stage liver-related diseases. As we all know, a stable caregiver is crucial to LT recovery. However, compared with LT patients, few studies were focused on LT caregivers.This study aimed to describe the quality of life (QoL), care burden, and their related factors in caregivers of LT patients in Shanghai, China.We collected 225 liver transplanted patients and their corresponding caregivers' social demographic and medical information; meanwhile, we assessed 225 LT recipients' caregivers' life quality; by using Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Liver Transplantation in Chinese version (CQOLC-LT), Zarit caregiver burden inventory in Chinese version (ZBI) was used to access the care burden. Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Center for Epidemiological Survey-Depression Scale (CES-D) were used to assess caregivers' anxiety and depression status. For physical assessment, we used Fatigue Scale-14 (FS-14). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify clinical factors influencing QOL of LT primary caregivers.The QoL of LT caregiver was not optimistic; the care burden on caregiver was still heavy. In particular, most caregivers experienced mild to moderate mental health disorders.In general, our findings emphasized the importance of assessment of physical and mental health in primary caregivers during overall process.

Depressive Symptoms, Exercise Capacity, and Clinical Outcomes After Lung Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Depressive symptoms are common among lung transplant recipients and have been associated with worse clinical outcomes. However, few studies have examined the association between depressive symptoms assessed at multiple time points or behavioral mechanisms by which posttransplant depressive symptoms may confer greater clinical risk. We therefore examined the associations between depressive symptoms, exercise capacity, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and mortality prospectively in a large sample of lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

Between July 2009 and February 2016, 251 lung transplant recipients were assessed before transplantation and again approximately 3 weeks and 3 months after transplant. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression scale. Functional exercise capacity was assessed using the 6-minute walk test. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations between depressive symptoms, exercise capacity, CLAD, and mortality.

RESULTS

During a median (range) follow-up of 4.5 (0.1 to 6.3) years, 53 participants (21%) died. Greater depressive symptoms (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.39 [95% CI = 1.05 to 1.84], p = .021) and poorer exercise capacity (HR = 0.58 [95% CI = 0.38 to 0.90], p = .021) assessed 3 months after transplant were both independently associated with mortality. Although greater depressive symptoms were associated with lower exercise capacity (β = -0.14, p = .039), exercise capacity did not mediate the association between depressive symptoms and mortality. In secondary analyses, depressive symptoms were independently predictive of CLAD (HR = 1.29 [95% CI = 1.01 to 1.65], p = .045) and the composite outcome of CLAD and mortality in a clustered event model (HR = 1.30 [1.09 to 1.56], p = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Depressive symptoms are associated with mortality and CLAD after lung transplantation, independent of exercise capacity.

The 2018 ISHLT/APM/AST/ICCAC/STSW recommendations for the psychosocial evaluation of adult cardiothoracic transplant candidates and candidates for long-term mechanical circulatory support

The psychosocial evaluation is well-recognized as an important component of the multifaceted assessment process to determine candidacy for heart transplantation, lung transplantation, and long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS). However, there is no consensus-based set of recommendations for either the full range of psychosocial domains to be assessed during the evaluation, or the set of processes and procedures to be used to conduct the evaluation, report its findings, and monitor patients' receipt of and response to interventions for any problems identified. This document provides recommendations on both evaluation content and process. It represents a collaborative effort of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) and the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine, American Society of Transplantation, International Consortium of Circulatory Assist Clinicians, and Society for Transplant Social Workers. The Nursing, Health Science and Allied Health Council of the ISHLT organized a Writing Committee composed of international experts representing the ISHLT and the collaborating societies. This Committee synthesized expert opinion and conducted a comprehensive literature review to support the psychosocial evaluation content and process recommendations that were developed. The recommendations are intended to dovetail with current ISHLT guidelines and consensus statements for the selection of candidates for cardiothoracic transplantation and MCS implantation. Moreover, the recommendations are designed to promote consistency across programs in the performance of the psychosocial evaluation by proposing a core set of content domains and processes that can be expanded as needed to meet programs' unique needs and goals.

Antidepressant medication use before and after kidney transplant: implications for outcomes - a retrospective study

We examined a novel database wherein national US transplant registry identifiers were linked to records from a large pharmaceutical claims warehouse (2008-2015) to characterize antidepressant use before and after kidney transplantation, and associations [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 95% CI] with death and graft failure. Among 72 054 recipients, 12.6% filled antidepressant medications in the year before transplant, and use was more common among women and patients who were white, unemployed, and had limited functional status. Pre-transplant antidepressant use was associated with 39% higher 1-year mortality (aHR 1.39, 95% CI 1.18-1.64) and 15% higher all-cause graft loss risk (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.30). More than 50% of patients who filled antidepressants pre-transplant continued fill post-transplant. Antidepressant use in the first year after transplant was associated with twofold higher risk of death (aHR 1.94, 95% CI 1.60-2.35), 38% higher risk of death-censored graft failure, and 61% higher risk of all-cause graft failure in the subsequent year. Pre-listing antidepressant use was also associated with increased mortality, but transplantation conferred a survival benefit regardless of prelisting antidepressant use status. While associations may in part reflect underlying behaviors or comorbidities, kidney transplant candidates and recipients treated with antidepressant medications should be monitored and supported to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes.

Is social support associated with post-transplant medication adherence and outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Although social support is used to determine transplant eligibility, the relationship between social support, medication adherence, and survival among transplant recipients remains unclear. We estimated the relationship between social support and post-transplant medication adherence and outcomes using 10 electronic databases from inception to January 2016. Study quality was assessed and all review stages were conducted independently by 2 reviewers. Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Thirty-two studies (9102 participants) met inclusion criteria: 21 assessed medication adherence (5197 participants), and 13 assessed clinical outcomes (3905 participants). Among high quality studies, neither social support nor marital status was predictive of medication adherence or post-transplant outcomes. Social support was not associated with medication adherence. It was associated with superior post-transplant outcomes, but the relationship was not significant among high quality studies. Compared to unmarried recipients, married recipients were more likely to adhere to medication post-transplant, but this relationship was not significant among high quality studies. Marital status was not significantly associated with transplant success. Social support is weakly and inconsistently associated with post-transplant adherence and outcomes. Larger prospective studies using consistent and validated measures are needed to justify the use of inadequate social support as a contraindication to transplantation.

Electronic Psychosocial Evaluation Tool: Use in a Living Donor Organ Transplant Program

Psychosocial evaluation of potential organ donors ensures that these patients are prepared for donation and that their psychosocial issues have been addressed. The determination that the decision to donate an organ has been made voluntarily by a competent individual is a primary concern for living donor transplant programs, which must work to the highest ethical standard in this unique area of medicine. Identification of potential vulnerabilities on the part of the donor permits monitoring and/or intercession both before and after donation. Ensuring the confidentiality of patient information is important and represents a cornerstone of social work practice. At our institution, social workers have developed an electronic recording tool for use in evaluating organ donors; this tool is designed to maximize quality and ease of information gathering, ensure standardization of practice across programs, simplify record keeping, and enhance communication while minimizing time investment and ensuring patient confidentiality.

Avoidant Coping with Health Problems is Related to Poorer Quality of Life among Lung Transplant Candidates

Context

Lung transplant candidates face numerous health-related stressors. Although previous work has described the range of coping strategies candidates may use, whether those strategies are related to quality of life in physical functioning, emotional, and social domains has rarely been examined.

Methods

Adult lung transplant candidates (N=128) participated in semistructured interviews that included questions regarding global and domain-specific quality of life and a multidimensional assessment of coping with health-related problems. Demographic characteristics, health status, and other psychosocial variables were also assessed, and their effects were examined and controlled in multivariate analyses of the coping–quality-of-life relationship.

Results

Respondents were most likely to use active, acceptance, and support-seeking strategies to cope with health problems. Self-blame or avoidance were rarely used. Although used least often, avoidant coping was the most strongly and consistently related to quality of life. With demographic and psychosocial variables controlled, higher avoidant coping remained associated with significantly poorer global quality of life, bodily pain, difficulty with daily work or activities as a function of emotional problems, and depressive symptomatology. Avoidant coping accentuated the association of poor health status and lower quality of life. Among respondents with lower health status, using more avoidant coping was associated with greater difficulty functioning in daily activities as a result of emotional problems. Those with higher health status had less difficulty functioning in daily activities as a result of emotional problems.

Conclusions

Transplant team members are encouraged to be aware of and help patients refrain from using avoidant coping strategies.

The Swiss Transplant Cohort Study's Framework for Assessing Lifelong Psychosocial Factors in Solid-Organ Transplants

Background

Understanding outcomes after transplant requires a biopsychosocial model that includes biomedical and psychosocial factors. The latter, to date, are assessed only in a limited way as part of transplant registries or cohort studies. The Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS) is a nationwide open cohort study (starting May 2008) to systematically and prospectively assess psychosocial factors. This article describes the framework underpinning STCS's psychosocial assessment.

Methods

The STCS framework was adapted from the multidimensional conceptual perspective of Dew et al to describe transplant psychosocial domains and specific outcomes by adding a time perspective, a system perspective, and interaction among domains.

Results

We propose a multidimensional, multilevel biopsychosocial framework representing mutually influencing domains from before to after transplant, and exemplify each domain by factors included in STCS and their measurement. The transplant patient, centrally positioned, is described by clinical and sociodemographic characteristics (eg, socioeconomic status, educational, professional, and relationship status). The following psychosocial domains further describe the patient: (1) physical/functional (eg, perceived health status, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness), (2) psychological (eg, depression, stress), (3) behavioral (eg, medication adherence, smoking, drug use, physical activity, sun protection), (4) social (eg, work capacity/return to work), and (5) global quality of life. Factors associated with health care system level (eg, trust in transplant team) are also included in the model.

Conclusion

The STCS's psychosocial framework provides a basis for studying the interplay of biomedical, sociodemographic, psychosocial, behavioral, and health care system factors in view of transplant outcomes and therefore has the potential to guide biopsychosocial transplant research.

Ethical Aspects of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation and Recipient Adherence to Treatment

Living donor kidney transplantation comprises approximately 30% of kidney transplantations in the United States and is an effective form of renal replacement therapy, with low risk to the donor. Twenty percent of living donors do not have a genetic relationship with their recipients. In the selection of living donors, guiding ethical principles include altruism, the absence of coercion or monetary reward, patient autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. In order for the benefit of living donor kidney transplantation to outweigh the risk, evidence that the proposed recipient will care for the transplanted organ must exist. Nonadherence to treatment has been identified as a major risk factor for graft rejection. When nonadherence to treatment regimens leads to loss of the graft, the consequences are felt by the recipient, donor, and the treatment team. The decision to transplant an organ to a noncompliant patient from a cadaveric or a living donor raises issues of patient autonomy, justice, paternalism, and benevolence versus nonmaleficence.

Liver Transplant Recipients' First Year of Posttransplant Recovery: A Longitudinal Study

A longitudinal study of 20 liver transplant recipients was conducted to investigate their posttransplant recovery experience. Data were collected using semistructured interviews at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after transplantation. Qualitative analysis of data revealed physical, psychological, social, economic, and spiritual dimensions of recovery. Findings reflect ongoing improvement of physical health and functionality for most recipients. Those with continuing health problems often suffered from preexisting health conditions. Psychological adjustment was uneven, with intermittent periods of fear, anxiety, and depression. Some recipients reported short-lived split identities and personality changes. Social support of family was critical in the hospital and at home. Economic issues became primary by the 1-year interview, with all recipients questioning whether they could afford ongoing healthcare and medicines. Spiritual needs were met in secular and nonsecular activities. Findings suggest that healthcare personnel should attend to the lived experience of liver transplant recipients.

Neurocognitive status is associated with all-cause mortality among psychiatric, high-risk liver transplant candidates and recipients

OBJECTIVE

Judicious selection of potential liver transplant candidates and close monitoring of progress are essential to successful outcomes. Pretransplant psychosocial evaluations are the norm, but the relationship between psychosocial (and neurocognitive status) and longer term medical outcomes is understudied. This exploratory study sought to examine the relationship between objective measures of pretransplant psychosocial and neurocognitive status and service utilization, transplant status, and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review examined outcomes among 108 psychiatric, high-risk liver transplant candidates up to four years following initial evaluation. Predictor variables of outcomes included demographic, medical, neurocognitive, psychological, and mental health treatment variables.

RESULTS

Transplant status and neurocognitive functioning were independently associated with all-cause mortality. None of the other variables were associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Better neurocognitive functioning in high-risk liver transplant candidates may allow for greater involvement in medical care and/or compliance with treatment recommendations. More aggressive assessment and management of neurocognitive dysfunction may improve outcomes. Objective measures identified significant psychopathology typical of liver transplant candidates but were not associated with outcomes; engagement in specialized mental health care may have attenuated this relationship. Further study is needed to better understand the relationship between psychosocial functioning and outcomes.

Pancreas and islet transplantation: psychological themes pre- and posttransplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To date, islet and whole pancreas transplantation have been largely researched and reported separately. Therefore, for the first time, this review seeks to examine together the recently reported psychological issues as they relate to the two different types of transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

In relation to pancreas transplantation, recent findings indicate potential issues relating to energy levels, including sleep problems; mood problems (anxiety, depression, traumatic stress); social interactions; and identity issues. Similarly, the research on islet allotransplantation (ITA) indicates mood disruptions associated with Type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM), which seem to improve as a result of treatment with ITA.

SUMMARY

The review indicates a need for more research to guide effective intervention to optimize psychological recovery post islet and/or pancreas transplantation for patients with T1DM. Effective psychological intervention for this group relies on researchers eliciting more detailed knowledge of pretransplant psychosocial issues, not only in relation to how these might vary by transplant group, but also in relation to patient health status vis-à-vis microvascular complications and glycaemic control, and how these issues change across the whole transplant journey.

Depression and psychosocial correlates of liver transplant candidates: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplant candidates are vulnerable to develop depression. This paper aims to ascertain the prevalence of depression in liver transplant candidates and its psychosocial factors in a systematic review.

METHODS

An extensive review via electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) and hand search were carried out to retrieve published articles up to December 15, 2013, using (Incidence OR Prevalence) AND Depress* AND liver transplant as the keywords. Information on the study design, patient characteristics, prevalence of depression, and its associated risk factors were extracted from included studies.

RESULTS

There were 22 studies included in this review with a total of 3055 patients. The prevalence of depression in the liver transplant candidates ranges between 2% and 80%. Studies that used diagnostic tools found a narrower range of prevalence (4.5-43%) as compared to the self-administered questionnaires (2-80%). Studies that used Beck Depression Inventory reported a higher prevalence than those studies which used Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (median = 28%, range = 2-80% versus median 17%, range 6.1-25.8%). A number of socio-demographic factors, illness-related and psychosocial factors were found to be associated with depression.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of depression in liver transplant candidates is high, and early detection will improve survival and quality of life.

Psychological Differences of Patients and Relatives according to Post-Transplantation Anxiety

The aim of this investigation is to analyze the psychological differences of patients and their relatives according to the formers' post-transplantation anxiety. We used two groups of participants: transplant patients (n = 166) and close relatives (n = 166). Four questionnaires were applied: a Psychological Survey (to both groups), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Quality of Life Questionnaire (to the transplant patients), and the Leeds Scales for the Self-Assessment of Anxiety and Depression (to the relatives). Participants were assessed twice: post-Intensive Care Unit (ICU; when patients were moved from the ICU to the Transplantation Unit) and post-hospital (one year after transplant). Results showed that high anxiety in patients just after organ transplant was related to an increase of anxiety and depression symptoms both in patients and relatives one year after transplant; it was also related to a decrease in the quality of life of these patients.

Psychiatric consultation after kidney transplantation: a 10-year single-center study including outpatients in Japan

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical characteristics and frequency of psychiatric consultation in a routine clinical setting after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Subjects were 1,139 consecutive recipients who received kidney transplantation at our hospital between January 1997 and September 2006. The hospital patient database was searched to determine whether these recipients received psychiatric consultation after their transplantation during this period.

RESULTS

Among 1,139 recipients, 118 (10%) received psychiatric consultation after their transplantation. There were significantly more women among these recipients (p = 0.036). Many of the recipients had received psychiatric consultation before transplantation (p < 0.0001) and had received dialysis for a long time (p = 0.018). There were three main psychiatric diagnoses according to ICD-10 diagnostic criteria in these 118 recipients: 42 (36%) had neurotic, stress-related, and somatoform disorders (F4); 35 (30%) had organic, including symptomatic, mental disorders (F0); and 27 (23%) had mood (affective) disorders (F3). The median length of time between kidney transplantation and initial psychiatric consultation was 57 days (interquartile range: 10-650 days). The lengths were 7 days (6-17 days) for F0, 75 days (18-650 days) for F4, 243 days (35-1,004 days) for F3, and 253 days (10-1,393 days) for other diagnostic groups. Significant differences were observed among these four groups (Jonckheere-Terpstra test, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that appropriate psychiatric intervention is necessary not only in early stages after kidney transplantation but also over the long term.

Assessing historical compliance with medical recommendations among transplant candidates: preliminary findings

CONTEXT

Noncompliance with medical recommendations by transplant candidates and recipients carries serious consequences for morbidity and mortality. Few patient-specific, objective measures for assessing historical compliance exist.

OBJECTIVE

To address this gap, a psychometric and exploratory analysis of an interview-based, global measure of clinician-rated judgment of historical compliance was undertaken.

METHODS

All findings are based on a retrospective chart review of the medical and psychosocial evaluations of 96 consecutive potential heart transplant candidates seen at a large Southeastern academic medical center.

RESULTS

Preliminary results demonstrated adequate interrater reliability and discriminant validity for the measure. Additionally, results from hierarchical multivariable regression analysis revealed years of education to be positively associated with clinician-rated judgment of historical compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary psychometric support for the use of a measure of historical compliance among heart transplant candidates. Findings from this study also are consistent with the literature to date and may be reflective of a psychobiological process that mediates the relationship between socioeconomic status and health outcomes.

Assessing Historical Compliance with Medical Recommendations among Transplant Candidates: Preliminary Findings

Context

Noncompliance with medical recommendations by transplant candidates and recipients carries serious consequences for morbidity and mortality. Few patient-specific, objective measures for assessing historical compliance exist.

Objective

To address this gap, a psychometric and exploratory analysis of an interview-based, global measure of clinician-rated judgment of historical compliance was undertaken.

Methods

All findings are based on a retrospective chart review of the medical and psychosocial evaluations of 96 consecutive potential heart transplant candidates seen at a large Southeastern academic medical center.

Results

Preliminary results demonstrated adequate interrater reliability and discriminant validity for the measure. Additionally, results from hierarchical multivariable regression analysis revealed years of education to be positively associated with clinician-rated judgment of historical compliance.

Conclusions

This study provides preliminary psychometric support for the use of a measure of historical compliance among heart transplant candidates. Findings from this study also are consistent with the literature to date and may be reflective of a psychobiological process that mediates the relationship between socioeconomic status and health outcomes.

Adherence to the medical regimen during the first two years after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite the importance of adherence to the medical regimen for maximizing health after lung transplantation, no prospective studies report on rates or risk factors for nonadherence in this patient population. Whether adherence levels differ in lung versus other types of transplant recipients is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 178 lung recipients and a comparison group of 126 heart recipients were enrolled. Adherence in nine areas was assessed in separate patient and family caregiver interviews 2, 7, 12, 18, and 24 months posttransplant. Potential risk factors for nonadherence were obtained at the initial assessment.

RESULTS

Cumulative incidence rates of persistent nonadherence (i.e., nonadherence at > or =2 consecutive assessments) were significantly lower (P<0.05) in lung recipients than heart recipients for taking immunosuppressants (13% nonadherent vs. 21%, respectively), diet (34% vs. 56%), and smoking (1% vs. 8%). Lung recipients had significantly higher persistent nonadherence to completing blood work (28% vs. 17%) and monitoring blood pressure (70% vs. 59%). They had a high rate of spirometry nonadherence (62%; not measured in heart recipients). The groups did not differ in nonadherence to attending clinic appointments (27%), exercise (44%), or alcohol limitations (7%). In both groups, poor caregiver support and having only public insurance (e.g., Medicaid) increased nonadherence risk in all areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung recipients were neither uniformly better nor worse than heart recipients in adhering to their regimen. Lung recipients have particular difficulty with some home monitoring activities. Strategies to maximize adherence in both groups should build on caregiver support and on strengthening financial resources for patient healthcare requirements.

Childhood abuse, nonadherence, and medical outcome in pediatric liver transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

The study assessed the relationship between a history of child abuse, nonadherence to medications, and medical outcome in children who had a liver transplant.

METHOD

Abuse history for children and adolescents ages 8 to 21 who underwent a liver transplantation at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York was obtained in interviews in 2002. Adherence to tacrolimus was assessed from January 1 to December 31, 2003 by computing the SD of a series of medication blood levels for each patient. Biopsy-proven rejection episodes, degree of fluctuation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and maximal ALT levels were recorded as indicators of medical outcome.

RESULTS

Of 72 eligible patients, 56 were evaluated. Five had documented abuse. Abused children were less adherent to their medication regimen (p = .02; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.66 to -0.24), had poor disease control (higher maximal ALT, p <.01; 95% CI -613.72 to -249.55), had greater fluctuation in ALT levels (p <.01; 95% CI -151.19 to -65.91), and suffered more biopsy-proven rejection episodes (two episodes in the abused cohort versus none in the rest) in 2003.

CONCLUSIONS

A history of child abuse is a significant risk factor for poor outcome posttransplantation and should be evaluated routinely. Adherence to medications can be a target for intervention in patients with a history of abuse.