1
|
Ofori-Ansah S, Evans M, Baillie L, Moorley C. Young adults with kidney failure lived experiences of kidney replacement therapy decision-making. J Ren Care 2024. [PMID: 39106089 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adults living with kidney failure make decisions to select a kidney replacement therapy choice in partnership with healthcare professionals. However, little is known about how they experience kidney replacement therapy treatment decision-making and the impact this has on their well-being. OBJECTIVES To explore young adults living with kidney failure experiences of treatment decision-making. The treatment decision-making investigated is about the choice of dialysis and/or kidney transplant options. DESIGN A qualitative interpretive hermeneutic phenomenology study. PARTICIPANTS Purposeful sampling was used to recruit young adults with kidney failure from social media, electronic media such as local kidney group websites and word of mouth. Semistructured interviews were conducted with (n = 18) participants aged 18-30 years. APPROACH Inductive analysis of the data were performed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework. FINDINGS The five themes generated were (1) awareness and anticipation of future kidney replacement therapy decision; (2) health information and education; (3) engaging in decision-making, support and choices; (4) implementation of kidney replacement therapy and transitioning into the new normal life and (5) the impact of decision-making and choice on well-being. CONCLUSIONS Decision-making significantly affected young adults' psychosocial and mental well-being. Young adults had unmet informational and decisional needs and struggled to cope due to lack of support. A four-talk model, with an implement talk phase added to the existing three-talk (team talk, option talk, decision talk) shared decision-making model, would promote a focus on the implementation of choice and support the transitioning from previous life to long-term dependence on treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Ofori-Ansah
- Institute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Michelle Evans
- Institute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Lesley Baillie
- Institute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Calvin Moorley
- Institute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brathwaite S, Alabi O, Simpson L, Massarweh N. Exploring Health Literacy and Vascular Access Decision Making: A Scoping Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3734. [PMID: 38999300 PMCID: PMC11242509 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
One in seven adults in the United States has chronic kidney disease (CKD) and individuals with the most severe form, end stage kidney disease (ESKD), may require renal replacement therapy with hemodialysis. Despite well-established guidelines indicating that arteriovenous access is the preferred type of vascular access for hemodialysis, in 2021, 85.4% of patients initiated dialysis with a CVC. While the reasons for this evidence-practice gap are unclear, health literacy and patient disease-specific knowledge may play an important role. Importantly, 25% of patients with CKD have limited health literacy. While there is an abundance of research regarding the presence of poor health literacy, poor kidney disease-specific knowledge, and their association with health outcomes in patients with CKD, there is currently a paucity of data about the relationship between health literacy, vascular access-specific knowledge, and vascular access outcomes. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the relationship between health literacy, disease-specific knowledge, and vascular access in patients with CKD. A better understanding of health literacy in this population will help inform the development of strategies to assess patient vascular access-specific knowledge and aid in vascular access decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayna Brathwaite
- Surgical and Perioperative Care, Atlanta VA Healthcare System, Decatur, GA 30033, USA; (O.A.); (N.M.)
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA
| | - Olamide Alabi
- Surgical and Perioperative Care, Atlanta VA Healthcare System, Decatur, GA 30033, USA; (O.A.); (N.M.)
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA
| | - Lynne Simpson
- Information Services, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA;
| | - Nader Massarweh
- Surgical and Perioperative Care, Atlanta VA Healthcare System, Decatur, GA 30033, USA; (O.A.); (N.M.)
- Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cazzolli R, Sluiter A, Bateman S, Candler H, Cho Y, Cooper T, Craig JC, Dominello A, Duncanson E, Guha C, Hawley CM, Hewawasam E, Hickey L, Hill K, Howard K, Howell M, Huuskes BM, Irish GL, Jesudason S, Johnson DW, Kelly A, Leary D, Manera K, Mazis J, McDonald S, McLennan H, Muthuramalingam S, Pummeroy M, Scholes-Robertson N, Teixeira-Pinto A, Tunnicliffe DJ, van Zwieten A, Viecelli AK, Wong G, Jaure A. Improving Diverse and Equitable Involvement of Patients and Caregivers in Research in CKD: Report of a Better Evidence and Translation-Chronic Kidney Disease (BEAT-CKD) Workshop. Am J Kidney Dis 2024:S0272-6386(24)00784-4. [PMID: 38810688 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Patient and caregiver involvement can enhance the uptake and impact of research, but the involvement of patients and caregivers who are underserved and marginalized is often limited. A better understanding of how to make involvement in research more broadly accessible, supportive, and inclusive for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and caregivers is needed. We conducted a national workshop involving patients, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers from across Australia to identify strategies to increase the diversity of patients and caregivers involved in CKD research. Six themes were identified. Building trust and a sense of safety was considered pivotal to establishing meaningful relationships to support knowledge exchange. Establishing community and connectedness was expected to generate a sense of belonging to motivate involvement. Balancing stakeholder goals, expectations, and responsibilities involved demonstrating commitment and transparency by researchers. Providing adequate resources and support included strategies to minimize the burden of involvement for patients and caregivers. Making research accessible and relatable was about nurturing patient and caregiver interest by appealing to intrinsic motivators. Adapting to patient and caregiver needs and preferences required tailoring the approach for individuals and the target community. Strategies and actions to support these themes may support more diverse and equitable involvement of patients and caregivers in research in CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna Cazzolli
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney.
| | - Amanda Sluiter
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Samantha Bateman
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide; Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide
| | | | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane; Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane; University of Queensland, and Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
| | - Tess Cooper
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide
| | - Amanda Dominello
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Emily Duncanson
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide
| | - Chandana Guha
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Carmel M Hawley
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane; Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane; University of Queensland, and Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
| | - Erandi Hewawasam
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide
| | | | - Kathy Hill
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney
| | | | - Martin Howell
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Brooke M Huuskes
- Department of Microbiology, Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Agriculture. Biomedicine and Environment, La Trobe University, Melbourne
| | - Georgina L Irish
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide
| | - Shilpanjali Jesudason
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide
| | - David W Johnson
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane; Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane; University of Queensland, and Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
| | - Ayano Kelly
- University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Diana Leary
- University of Queensland, and Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
| | - Karine Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Jasmin Mazis
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide
| | - Stephen McDonald
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide; Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide
| | - Helen McLennan
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Shyamsundar Muthuramalingam
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide; Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide
| | | | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - David J Tunnicliffe
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Anita van Zwieten
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane; Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane; University of Queensland, and Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| | - Allison Jaure
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney; University of Sydney, and Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dahm MR, Raine SE, Slade D, Chien LJ, Kennard A, Walters G, Spinks T, Talaulikar G. Older patients and dialysis shared decision-making. Insights from an ethnographic discourse analysis of interviews and clinical interactions. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 122:108124. [PMID: 38232671 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe and analyse the perspectives and communication practices of kidney clinicians and older patients (aged 60 +) during collaborative education and decision-making about dialysis. METHODS This qualitative study drew on pluralistic data sources and analytical approaches investigating elicited semi-structured interviews (n = 31) with doctors (n = 8), nurses (n = 8) and patients (n = 15), combined with ethnographic observations, written artefacts and audio-recorded naturally-occurring interactions (n = 23, education sessions n = 4; consultations n = 19) in a tertiary Australian kidney outpatient clinic. Data were analysed for themes and linguistic discourse features. RESULTS Five themes were identified across all data sources: 1) lost opportunity in education; 2) persistent disease knowledge gaps; 3) putting up with dialysis; 4) perceived and real involvement in decision-making and 5) complex role of family as decision-making brokers. CONCLUSION As the first study to complement interviews with evidence from naturally-occurring kidney interactions, this study balances the perspectives of how older patients and their clinicians view chronic kidney disease education, with how decision-making about dialysis is reflected in practice. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The study provides suggestions for contextualized, multi-perspectives formal and informal training for improving decision-making about dialysis, spanning from indications to boost communication efficiency, to reducing unexplained jargon, incorporating patient navigators and exploring different dialysis modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria R Dahm
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
| | - Suzanne Eggins Raine
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Diana Slade
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Laura J Chien
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Alice Kennard
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Giles Walters
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Tony Spinks
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
| | - Girish Talaulikar
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Osmanodja B, Sassi Z, Eickmann S, Hansen CM, Roller R, Burchardt A, Samhammer D, Dabrock P, Möller S, Budde K, Herrmann A. Investigating the Impact of AI on Shared Decision-Making in Post-Kidney Transplant Care (PRIMA-AI): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e54857. [PMID: 38557315 PMCID: PMC11019425 DOI: 10.2196/54857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients after kidney transplantation eventually face the risk of graft loss with the concomitant need for dialysis or retransplantation. Choosing the right kidney replacement therapy after graft loss is an important preference-sensitive decision for kidney transplant recipients. However, the rate of conversations about treatment options after kidney graft loss has been shown to be as low as 13% in previous studies. It is unknown whether the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI)-based risk prediction models can increase the number of conversations about treatment options after graft loss and how this might influence the associated shared decision-making (SDM). OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the impact of AI-based risk prediction for the risk of graft loss on the frequency of conversations about the treatment options after graft loss, as well as the associated SDM process. METHODS This is a 2-year, prospective, randomized, 2-armed, parallel-group, single-center trial in a German kidney transplant center. All patients will receive the same routine post-kidney transplant care that usually includes follow-up visits every 3 months at the kidney transplant center. For patients in the intervention arm, physicians will be assisted by a validated and previously published AI-based risk prediction system that estimates the risk for graft loss in the next year, starting from 3 months after randomization until 24 months after randomization. The study population will consist of 122 kidney transplant recipients >12 months after transplantation, who are at least 18 years of age, are able to communicate in German, and have an estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients with multi-organ transplantation, or who are not able to communicate in German, as well as underage patients, cannot participate. For the primary end point, the proportion of patients who have had a conversation about their treatment options after graft loss is compared at 12 months after randomization. Additionally, 2 different assessment tools for SDM, the CollaboRATE mean score and the Control Preference Scale, are compared between the 2 groups at 12 months and 24 months after randomization. Furthermore, recordings of patient-physician conversations, as well as semistructured interviews with patients, support persons, and physicians, are performed to support the quantitative results. RESULTS The enrollment for the study is ongoing. The first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2025. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to examine the influence of AI-based risk prediction on physician-patient interaction in the context of kidney transplantation. We use a mixed methods approach by combining a randomized design with a simple quantitative end point (frequency of conversations), different quantitative measurements for SDM, and several qualitative research methods (eg, records of physician-patient conversations and semistructured interviews) to examine the implementation of AI-based risk prediction in the clinic. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06056518; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06056518. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/54857.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilgin Osmanodja
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Zeineb Sassi
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sascha Eickmann
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Carla Maria Hansen
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roland Roller
- German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - David Samhammer
- Institute for Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter Dabrock
- Institute for Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Möller
- German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, Germany
- Quality and Usability Lab, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Herrmann
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dahm MR, Raine SE, Slade D, Chien LJ, Kennard A, Walters G, Spinks T, Talaulikar G. Shared decision making in chronic kidney disease: a qualitative study of the impact of communication practices on treatment decisions for older patients. BMC Nephrol 2023; 24:383. [PMID: 38129771 PMCID: PMC10734071 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03406-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective interpersonal communication is critical for shared decision-making (SDM). Previous SDM communication training in nephrology has lacked context-specific evidence from ethnographic analysis of SDM interactions with older patients considering treatment options of end stage kidney disease (ESKD). This study explores communication strategies in SDM discussions in nephrology, specifically focusing on older patients considering dialysis as kidney replacement therapy (KRT). METHODS We conducted a qualitative study analysing naturally-occurring audio-recorded clinical interactions (n = 12) between Australian kidney doctors, patients aged 60+, and carers. Linguistic ethnography and qualitative socially-oriented functional approaches were used for analysis. RESULTS Two types of communication strategies emerged: (1) Managing and advancing treatment decisions: involving active checking of knowledge, clear explanations of options, and local issue resolution. (2) Pulling back: Deferring or delaying decisions through mixed messaging. Specifically for non-English speaking patients, pulling back was further characterised by communication challenges deferring decision-making including ineffective issue management, and reliance on family as interpreters. Age was not an explicit topic of discussion among participants when it came to making decisions about KRT but was highly relevant to treatment decision-making. Doctors appeared reluctant to broach non-dialysis conservative management, even when it appears clinically appropriate. Conservative care, an alternative to KRT suitable for older patients with co-morbidities, was only explicitly discussed when prompted by patients or carers. CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight the impact of different communication strategies on SDM discussions in nephrology. This study calls for linguistic-informed contextualised communication training and provides foundational evidence for nephrology-specific communication skills training in SDM for KRT among older patients. There is urgent need for doctors to become confident and competent in discussing non-dialysis conservative management. Further international research should explore naturally-occurring SDM interactions in nephrology with other vulnerable groups to enhance evidence and training integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria R Dahm
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Baldessin Precinct Building, 110 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
| | - Suzanne Eggins Raine
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Baldessin Precinct Building, 110 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Diana Slade
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Baldessin Precinct Building, 110 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Laura J Chien
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Baldessin Precinct Building, 110 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Alice Kennard
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Giles Walters
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Tony Spinks
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
| | - Girish Talaulikar
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu J, Zhou Y, Tang Y, Chen J, Li J. Patient engagement during the transition from nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease to dialysis: A meta-ethnography. Health Expect 2023; 26:2191-2204. [PMID: 37641530 PMCID: PMC10632643 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient engagement, encompassing both patient experience and opportunities for involvement in care, has been associated with increased patient satisfaction and the overall quality of care. Despite its importance, there is limited knowledge regarding patient engagement in the transition from nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) to dialysis-dependent treatment. This systematic review employs meta-ethnography to synthesize findings from qualitative studies examining patients' experiences of engagement during this transition, with the aim of developing a comprehensive theoretical understanding of patient engagement in the transition from nondialysis-dependent CKD to dialysis. METHODS A systematic search of six databases, namely the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science was conducted to identify eligible articles published between 1990 and 2022. Meta-ethnography was utilized to translate and synthesize the findings and develop a novel theoretical interpretation of 'patient engagement' during the transition to dialysis. RESULTS A total of 24 articles were deemed eligible for review, representing 21 studies. Patient engagement during a transition to dialysis was found to encompass three major domains: psychosocial adjustment, decision-making and engagement in self-care. These three domains could be experienced as an iterative and mutually reinforcing process, guiding patients toward achieving control and proficiency in their lives as they adapt to dialysis. Additionally, patient engagement could be facilitated by factors including patients' basic capability to engage, the provision of appropriate education, the establishment of supportive relationships and the alignment with values and resources. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review underscore the necessity of involving patients in transitional dialysis care, emphasizing the need to foster their engagement across multiple domains. Recommendations for future interventions include the provision of comprehensive support to enhance patient engagement during this critical transition phase. Additional research is warranted to explore the effects of various facilitators at different levels. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The studies included in our review involved 633 participants (547 patients, 14 family members, 63 healthcare providers and 9 managers). Based on their experiences, views and beliefs, we developed a deeper understanding of patient engagement and how to foster it in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinjie Liu
- School of NursingSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Yujun Zhou
- The First Affiliated HospitalSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Yanyao Tang
- School of NursingSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Jieling Chen
- School of NursingSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Jianying Li
- The First Affiliated HospitalSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bekker HL, Winterbottom AE, Gavaruzzi T, Finderup J, Mooney A. Decision aids to assist patients and professionals in choosing the right treatment for kidney failure. Clin Kidney J 2023; 16:i20-i38. [PMID: 37711634 PMCID: PMC10497379 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney services vary in the way they involve people with kidney failure (PwKF) in treatment decisions as management needs change. We discuss how decision-science applications support proactively PwKF to make informed decisions between treatment options with kidney professionals. Methods A conceptual review of findings about decision making and use of decision aids in kidney services, synthesized with reference to: the Making Informed Decisions-Individually and Together (MIND-IT) multiple stakeholder decision makers framework; and the Medical Research Council-Complex Intervention Development and Evaluation research framework. Results This schema represents the different types of decision aids that support PwKF and professional reasoning as they manage kidney disease individually and together; adjustments at micro, meso and macro levels supports integration in practice. Conclusion Innovating services to meet clinical guidelines on enhancing shared decision making processes means enabling all stakeholders to use decision aids to meet their goals within kidney pathways at individual, service and organizational levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary L Bekker
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
- ResCenPI – Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Aarhus and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
| | - Anna E Winterbottom
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Renal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Teresa Gavaruzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- ResCenPI – Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Aarhus and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Andrew Mooney
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Renal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mcpeake ML, Cook N, Mcilfatrick S, Hasson F. The experience of shared decision-making for patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis and their families-A scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:6243-6253. [PMID: 37243448 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
AIM To identify the experiences of shared decision-making (SDM) for adults with end-stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis (HD) and their family members. DESIGN A scoping literature review. METHOD A scoping literature review, using Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. DATA SOURCES Medline (OVID), EMBASE, CINAHL, Psych Info, ProQuest, Web of Science, Open grey and grey literature were searched covering years from January 2015 to July 2022. Empirical studies, unpublished thesis and studies in English were included. The scoping review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta analysis-scoping review extension (PRISMA-Scr). RESULTS Thirteen studies were included in the final review. While SDM is welcomed by people undergoing HD, their experience is often limited to treatment decisions, with little opportunity to revisit decisions previously made. The role of the family/caregivers as active participants in SDM requires recognition. CONCLUSION People with end-stage kidney disease undergoing HD do and want to participate in the process of SDM, on a wide range of topics, in addition to treatment. A strategy is needed to ensure that SDM interventions are successful in achieving patient-driven outcomes and enhancing their quality of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE This review highlights the experiences of people undergoing HD and their family/caregivers. There is a wide variety of clinical decisions requiring consideration for people undergoing HD, including considering the importance who should be involved in the decision-making processes and when decisions should occur. Further study to ensure nurses understand the importance, and influence of including family members in conversations on both SDM processes and outcomes is needed. There is a need for research from both patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives to ensure that people feel supported and have their needs met in the SDM process. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No patient or public contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari-Louise Mcpeake
- School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK
| | - Neal Cook
- School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK
| | | | - Felicity Hasson
- School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hsiao SM, Kuo MC, Hsiao PN, Moi SH, Chiu YW, Wang SL, Chen TH, Kung LF, Hwang SJ, Lee CL. Shared decision-making for renal replacement treatment and illness perception in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:159. [PMID: 37580719 PMCID: PMC10426182 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02261-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current healthcare trends emphasize the use of shared decision-making (SDM) for renal replacement treatment (RRT) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This is crucial to understand the relationship between SDM and illness perception of CKD patients. Few studies have focused on SDM and illness perception status of CKD patients and the impact of illness perception on RRT after SDM. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, we used a questionnaire with purposive sampling from March 2019 to February 2020 at the nephrology outpatient department of a medical center in southern Taiwan. The nephrology medical team in this study used the SHARE five-step model of SDM to communicate with the patients about RRT and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) was applied to evaluate illness perception of these patients at the beginning of SDM. According to the SDM decision time, the study participants were classified general and delayed SDM groups. The distribution between SDM groups was estimated using independent two sample t-test, chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. The correlation between illness perception and SDM decision time were illustrated and evaluated using Spearman's correlation test. A p-value less than 0.05 is statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 75 patients were enrolled in this study. The average time to make a dialysis decision after initiating SDM was 166.2 ± 178.1 days. 51 patients were classified as general group, and 24 patients were classified as delayed group. The median SDM decision time of delayed group were significantly longer than general group (56 vs. 361 days, P < 0.001). Our findings revealed that delayed group was significantly characterized with not created early surgical assess (delayed vs. general: 66.7% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.001) compared to general group. The average BIPQ score was 54.0 ± 8.1 in our study. We classified the patients into high and low illness perception group according to the median score of BIPQ. The total score of BIPQ in overall participants might increase by the SDM decision time (rho = 0.83, p = 0.830) and the linear regression line also showed consistent trends between BIPQ and SDM decision time in correspond cohorts. However, no statistically significant findings were found. CONCLUSIONS The patients with advanced chronic kidney disease took an average of five and a half months to make a RRT decision after undergoing SDM. Although there is no statistical significance, the trend of illness perception seems correlated with decision-making time. The stronger the illness perception, the longer the decision-making time. Furthermore, shorter decision times may be associated with earlier establishment of surgical access. We need more research exploring the relationship between illness perception and SDM for RRT in CKD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih-Ming Hsiao
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Chuan Kuo
- Department of Nephrology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Ni Hsiao
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Sin-Hua Moi
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Wen Chiu
- Department of Nephrology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Li Wang
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Hui Chen
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Lan-Fang Kung
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Shang-Jyh Hwang
- Department of Nephrology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Lun Lee
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jones EL, Shakespeare K, McLaughlin L, Noyes J. Understanding people's decisions when choosing or declining a kidney transplant: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071348. [PMID: 37562929 PMCID: PMC10423837 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To synthesise qualitative research exploring patients' perspectives, experiences and factors influencing their decision-making preferences when choosing or declining kidney transplantation. DESIGN A qualitative evidence synthesis. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases were searched from 2000 to June 2021: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest Core Databases for Dissertations and Theses, and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Qualitative studies exploring and reporting decision-making preferences of people with kidney disease, which reported influencing factors when choosing or declining kidney transplantation, published in English from high-income and middle-income countries. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Titles were screened against the inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis was done with the use of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist to assess study quality, and assessment of confidence in the qualitative findings was done using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research. FINDINGS 37 studies from 11 countries reported the perspectives of 1366 patients with kidney disease. Six descriptive themes were developed: decisional preferences influenced patients' readiness to pursue kidney transplantation, gathering sufficient information to support decision-making, navigating the kidney transplant assessment pathway, desire for kidney transplantation, opposed to kidney transplantation and uncertainties while waiting for the kidney transplant. A new enhanced theoretical model was developed to aid understanding of the complexities of decision-making in people with kidney disease, by integrating the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Adaptive Decision Maker Framework to incorporate the novel findings. CONCLUSION The synthesis provides a better understanding of the extremely complex decision-making processes of people with kidney disease, which are aligned to their kidney transplantation preferences. Further research is needed to better understand the reasons for declining kidney transplantation, and to underpin development of personalised information, interventions and support for patients to make informed decisions when presented with kidney replacement options. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021272588.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Louise Jones
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Kate Shakespeare
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Clinical Psychology Dept, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Rhyl, UK
| | - Leah McLaughlin
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Jane Noyes
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sakurada T, Koitabashi K, Murasawa M, Kohatsu K, Kojima S, Shibagaki Y. Effects of one-hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality at the outpatient clinic: A retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching. Ther Apher Dial 2023; 27:442-451. [PMID: 36226753 DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.13941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of present study was to evaluate the effects of one-hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality at the outpatient clinic. METHODS Charts of consecutive patients who had started maintenance dialysis from May 2013 to April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Characteristics at the start of dialysis were compared between patients participated and not participated in the discussion. RESULTS Of the 620 incident dialysis patients, 128 patients had participated in the discussion. After propensity score matching (1:1), 127 patients who participated in the discussion tended to have fewer urgent hospitalizations (13.4% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.068). In addition, more patients who initiated peritoneal dialysis (PD) (30.7% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, participation in the discussion (OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.807-8.24; p < 0.001) was related to PD initiation. CONCLUSION One-hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality may increase PD initiations and decrease the number of urgent hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Sakurada
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Masaru Murasawa
- Division of Nephrology, Gyotoku General Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kaori Kohatsu
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shigeki Kojima
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yugo Shibagaki
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kalantar-Zadeh K, Bellizzi V, Piccoli GB, Shi Y, Lim SK, Riaz S, Arronte RU, Lau WP, Fouque D. Caring for Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Dietary Options and Conservative Care Instead of Maintenance Dialysis. J Ren Nutr 2023:S1051-2276(23)00022-5. [PMID: 36796502 DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
An expert advisory board discussed the prevention and treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a focus on dietary options. This is timely, given the uptake of value based models for kidney care in the United States. Timing of dialysis start is influenced by patients' clinical status and complex patient-clinician interactions. Patients value personal freedom and quality of life and may want to delay dialysis, whilst physicians are sometimes more concerned with clinical outcomes. Kidney-preserving therapy can prolong the dialysis-free period and preserve residual kidney function, thus patients are asked to adjust their lifestyle and diet, to follow a low- or very low-protein diet, with or without ketoacid analogues. Multi-modal approaches include pharmacotherapies, management of symptoms, and a gradual, individualized dialysis transition. Patient empowerment is vital, including CKD education and involvement in decision making. These ideas may help patients, their families, and clinical teams to improve the management of CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Kidney Transplantation, University of California, Orange County, California
| | - Vincenzo Bellizzi
- Nephrology and Dialysis Division, Department of Medical Sciences, Hospital Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Italy
| | - Giorgina B Piccoli
- Service de Néphrologie, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Le Mans, Le Mans, France
| | - Yunying Shi
- Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Soo Kun Lim
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sumira Riaz
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Wai Pooi Lau
- Department of Dietetics, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Denis Fouque
- Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (CarMeN), Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fraga Dias B, Rodrigues A. Managing Transition between dialysis modalities: a call for Integrated care In Dialysis Units. BULLETIN DE LA DIALYSE À DOMICILE 2022. [DOI: 10.25796/bdd.v4i4.69113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Summary
Patients with chronic kidney disease have three main possible groups of dialysis techniques: in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and home hemodialysis. Home dialysis techniques have been associated with clinical outcomes that are equivalent and sometimes superior to those of in-center hemodialysisTransitions between treatment modalities are crucial moments. Transition periods are known as periods of disruption in the patient’s life associated with major complications, greater vulnerability, greater mortality, and direct implications for quality of life. Currently, it is imperative to offer a personalized treatment adapted to the patient and adjusted over time.An integrated treatment unit with all dialysis treatments and a multidisciplinary team can improve results by establishing a life plan, promoting health education, medical and psychosocial stabilization, and the reinforcement of health self-care. These units will result in gains for the patient’s journey and will encourage home treatments and better transitions.Peritoneal dialysis as the initial treatment modality seems appropriate for many reasons and the limitations of the technique are largely overcome by the advantages (namely autonomy, preservation of veins, and preservation of residual renal function).The transition after peritoneal dialysis can (and should) be carried out with the primacy of home treatments. Assisted dialysis must be considered and countries must organize themselves to provide an assisted dialysis program with paid caregivers.The anticipation of the transition is essential to improve outcomes, although there are no predictive models that have high accuracy; this is particularly important in the transition to hemodialysis (at home or in-center) in order to plan autologous access that allows a smooth transition.
Collapse
|
15
|
Frazier R, Levine S, Porteny T, Tighiouart H, Wong JB, Isakova T, Koch-Weser S, Gordon EJ, Weiner DE, Ladin K. Shared Decision Making Among Older Adults With Advanced CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2022; 80:599-609. [PMID: 35351579 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) face difficult decisions about dialysis initiation. Although shared decision making (SDM) can help align patient preferences and values with treatment options, the extent to which older patients with CKD experience SDM remains unknown. STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional analysis of patient surveys examining decisional readiness, treatment options education, care partner support, and SDM. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 70 years or older from Boston, Chicago, San Diego, or Portland (Maine) with nondialysis advanced CKD. PREDICTORS Decisional readiness factors, treatment options education, and care partner support. OUTCOMES Primary: SDM measured by the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) instrument, with higher scores reflecting greater SDM. Exploratory: Factors associated with SDM. ANALYTICAL APPROACH We used multivariable linear regression models to examine the associations between SDM and predictors, controlling for demographic and health factors. RESULTS Among 350 participants, mean age was 78 ± 6 years, 58% were male, 13% identified as Black, and 48% had diabetes. Mean SDM-Q-9 score was 52 ± 28. SDM item agreement ranged from 41% of participants agreeing that "my doctor and I selected a treatment option together" to 73% agreeing that "my doctor told me that there are different options for treating my medical condition." In multivariable analysis adjusted for demographic characteristics, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and diabetes, being "well informed" and "very well informed" about kidney treatment options, having higher decisional certainty, and attendance at a kidney treatment options class were independently associated with higher SDM-Q-9 scores. LIMITATIONS The cross-sectional study design limits the ability to make temporal associations between SDM and the predictors. CONCLUSIONS Many older patients with CKD do not experience SDM when making dialysis decisions, emphasizing the need for greater access to and delivery of education for individuals with advanced CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Frazier
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Center for Translational Metabolism and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Jesse Brown Veterans Administration Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Sarah Levine
- William B. Schwartz MD Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thalia Porteny
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab) and Departments of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| | - Hocine Tighiouart
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John B Wong
- Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tamara Isakova
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Center for Translational Metabolism and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Susan Koch-Weser
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Department of Surgery-Division of Transplantation, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniel E Weiner
- William B. Schwartz MD Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Keren Ladin
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab) and Departments of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abdullah B, Snidvongs K, Poerbonegoro NL, Sutikno B. Reshaping the Management of Allergic Rhinitis in Primary Care: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph192013632. [PMID: 36294211 PMCID: PMC9603682 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic presented unique challenges to the delivery of healthcare for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) following its disruption and impact on the healthcare system with profound implications. Reliance on self-care for AR symptom management was substantial during the pandemic with many patients encouraged to only seek in-person medical care when necessary. The advantage of digital technology becomes apparent when patients and healthcare providers had to change and adapt their method of interaction from the regular physical face-to-face consultation to telehealth and mobile health in the provision of care. Despite the pandemic and the ever-evolving post pandemic situation, optimal management of AR remains paramount for both patients and healthcare professionals. A reshaping of the delivery of care is essential to accomplish this goal. In this paper, we present what we have learned about AR management during the COVID-19 pandemic, the role of digital technology in revolutionizing AR healthcare, screening assessment in the identification and differentiation of common upper respiratory conditions, and a framework to facilitate the management of AR in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baharudin Abdullah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Correspondence: or
| | - Kornkiat Snidvongs
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | | | - Budi Sutikno
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Jl. Mayjen. Prof. Dr. Moestopo No. 6-8, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
McKeaveney C, Noble H, Courtney AE, Griffin S, Gill P, Johnston W, Maxwell AP, Teasdale F, Reid J. Dialysis, Distress, and Difficult Conversations: Living with a Kidney Transplant. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10071177. [PMID: 35885704 PMCID: PMC9321787 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Providing holistic care to kidney patients is important; however, without full consideration of the perspectives of people living with a kidney transplant, the provision of truly ‘holistic healthcare’ cannot be possible. It is imperative to understand patient experiences by including kidney patients in key strategies and future renal service planning. Ignoring these important patient views means that there is a significant risk of inappropriate renal service provision and lack of adequate support, impacting overall health. The aim of this study was to develop an in-depth understanding of the lived experiences of kidney transplant recipients. Methods: A total of 23 participants were recruited between two regional nephrology units within the United Kingdom via clinical gatekeepers. In-depth interviews were undertaken. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results: Two themes emerged: “managing ongoing fears of dialysis, distress, and COVID-19” and “dealing with difficult conversations”. Conclusions: Renal healthcare professionals need to understand more than the biological impact of receiving a kidney transplant. Understanding the holistic and multidomain experiences that these participants experience will help healthcare professionals to recognize the needs of this group and ensure more responsive psychosocial care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare McKeaveney
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK; (C.M.); (H.N.)
| | - Helen Noble
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK; (C.M.); (H.N.)
| | | | - Sian Griffin
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK;
| | - Paul Gill
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 0AB, UK;
| | - William Johnston
- Northern Ireland Kidney Patients Association, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK;
| | | | | | - Joanne Reid
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK; (C.M.); (H.N.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van der Gaag M, Heijmans M, Spoiala C, Rademakers J. The importance of health literacy for self-management: A scoping review of reviews. Chronic Illn 2022; 18:234-254. [PMID: 34402309 DOI: 10.1177/17423953211035472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Self-management of chronic diseases is rather complex, especially for patients with limited health literacy. In this review, we aim to disentangle the specific difficulties patients with limited health literacy face in relation to self-management and their associated needs with respect to self-management support. METHODS We performed a literature search in five databases. We used a broad definition of health literacy and self-management was categorized into four types of activities: medical management, changing lifestyle, communicating and navigating through the health care system and coping. Included reviews described the relationship between health literacy and different domains of self-management and were published after 2010. RESULTS A total of 28 reviews were included. Some clear difficulties of patients with limited health literacy emerged, predominantly in the area of medical management (especially adherence), communication and knowledge. Other associations between health literacy and self-management were inconclusive. Barriers from the patients' perspective described mainly medical management and the communication and navigation of the health care system. DISCUSSION Patients with limited health literacy experience difficulties with specific domains of self-management. For a better understanding of the relationship between health literacy and self-management, a broader conceptualization of health literacy is warranted, including both cognitive and behavioural aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Monique Heijmans
- 8123Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, the Netherlands
| | - Cristina Spoiala
- 8123Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, the Netherlands
| | - Jany Rademakers
- 8123Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, the Netherlands.,Department of Family Medicine, 168092Maastricht University, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Al-Adra D, Al-Qaoud T, Fowler K, Wong G. De Novo Malignancies after Kidney Transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:434-443. [PMID: 33782034 PMCID: PMC8975024 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.14570920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is an important outcome after kidney transplantation because it is the second leading cause of death in most Western countries. The excess risk of cancer after transplantation is approximately two to three times higher than the age- and sex-matched general population, driven largely by viral- and immune-related cancers. Once cancer develops, outcomes are generally poor, particularly for those with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. More importantly, effective screening and treatment strategies are limited in this high-risk population. In this review, we begin with a patient's journey that maps the experience of living with a kidney transplant and understand the patient's knowledge, education, and experience of cancer in the context of transplantation. The epidemiology and burden of cancer in recipients of kidney transplants, along with the up-to-date screening and treatment strategies, are discussed. We also focus on the current understanding of optimal care for recipients of kidney transplants who are living with cancer from the patients' perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Al-Adra
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Talal Al-Qaoud
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kevin Fowler
- The Voice of the Patient, Inc., Columbia, Missouri
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, Kids Research Institute, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yu X, Nakayama M, Wu MS, Kim YL, Mushahar L, Szeto CC, Schatell D, Finkelstein FO, Quinn RR, Duddington M. Shared Decision-Making for a Dialysis Modality. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:15-27. [PMID: 35005310 PMCID: PMC8720663 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of kidney failure continues to rise globally. Dialysis is a treatment option for individuals with kidney failure; after the decision to initiate dialysis has been made, it is critical to involve individuals in the decision on which dialysis modality to choose. This review, based on evidence arising from the literature, examines the role of shared decision-making (SDM) in helping those with kidney failure to select a dialysis modality. SDM was found to lead to more people with kidney failure feeling satisfied with their choice of dialysis modality. Individuals with kidney failure must be cognizant that SDM is an active and iterative process, and their participation is essential for success in empowering them to make decisions on dialysis modality. The educational components of SDM must be easy to understand, high quality, unbiased, up to date, and targeted to the linguistic, educational, and cultural needs of the individual. All individuals with kidney failure should be encouraged to participate in SDM and should be involved in the design and implementation of SDM approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueqing Yu
- Division of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Xueqing Yu, Division of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, 106th, Zhongshan Road II, Guangzhou 510080, People’s Republic of China.
| | | | - Mai-Szu Wu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yong-Lim Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Lily Mushahar
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Tuanku Ja'afar, Seremban, Malaysia
| | - Cheuk Chun Szeto
- Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Dori Schatell
- Medical Education Institute, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Robert R. Quinn
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Apel C, Hornig C, Maddux FW, Ketchersid T, Yeung J, Guinsburg A. Informed decision-making in delivery of dialysis: combining clinical outcomes with sustainability. Clin Kidney J 2021; 14:i98-i113. [PMID: 34987789 PMCID: PMC8711764 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfab193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
As the prevalence of chronic kidney disease is expected to rise worldwide over the next decades, provision of renal replacement therapy (RRT), will further challenge budgets of all healthcare systems. Most patients today requiring RRT are treated with haemodialysis (HD) therapy and are elderly. This article demonstrates the interdependence of clinical and sustainability criteria that need to be considered to prepare for the future challenges of delivering dialysis to all patients in need. Newer, more sustainable models of high-value care need to be devised, whereby delivery of dialysis is based on value-based healthcare (VBHC) principles, i.e. improving patient outcomes while restricting costs. Essentially, this entails maximizing patient outcomes per amount of money spent or available. To bring such a meaningful change, revised strategies having the involvement of multiple stakeholders (i.e. patients, providers, payers and policymakers) need to be adopted. Although each stakeholder has a vested interest in the value agenda often with conflicting expectations and motivations (or motives) between each other, progress is only achieved if the multiple blocs of the delivery system are advanced as mutually reinforcing entities. Clinical considerations of delivery of dialysis need to be based on the entire patient disease pathway and evidence-based medicine, while the non-clinical sustainability criteria entail, in addition to economics, the societal and ecological implications of HD therapy. We discuss how selection of appropriate modes and features of delivery of HD (e.g. treatment modalities and schedules, selection of consumables, product life cycle assessment) could positively impact decision-making towards value-based renal care. Although the delivery of HD therapy is multifactorial and complex, applying cost-effectiveness analyses for the different HD modalities (conventional in-centre and home HD) can support in guiding payability (balance between clinical value and costs) for health systems. For a resource intensive therapy like HD, concerted and fully integrated care strategies need to be urgently implemented to cope with the global demand and burden of HD therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Apel
- Health Economics and Market Access EMEA, Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Hornig
- Health Economics and Market Access EMEA, Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany
| | - Frank W Maddux
- Global Medical Office, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | | - Julianna Yeung
- Health Economics & Market Access Asia-Pacific, Fresenius Medical Care, Hong Kong
| | - Adrian Guinsburg
- Global Medical Office, Fresenius Medical Care, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
House TR, Wightman A, Rosenberg AR, Sayre G, Abdel-Kader K, Wong SPY. Challenges to Shared Decision Making About Treatment of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study of Patients and Clinicians. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 79:657-666.e1. [PMID: 34673161 PMCID: PMC9016096 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE Greater understanding of the challenges to shared decision-making about treatment of advanced CKD is needed to support implementation of shared decision-making in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Patients aged ≥65 years with advanced CKD and their clinicians recruited from 3 medical centers participated in semi-structured interviews. In-depth review of patients' electronic medical records was also performed. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Interview transcripts and medical record notes were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients (age 73±6 years, 66% male, 59% Caucasian) and 10 of their clinicians (age 52±12 years, 30% male, 70% Caucasian) participated in interviews. Four themes emerged from qualitative analysis: 1) Competing priorities - patients and their clinicians tended to differ on when to prioritize CKD and dialysis planning above other personal or medical problems; 2) Focusing on present or future -patients were more focused on living well now while clinicians were more focused on preparing for dialysis and future adverse events; 3) Standardized versus individualized approach to CKD - although clinicians tried to personalize care recommendations to their patients, patients perceived their clinicians as taking a monolithic approach to CKD that was predicated on clinical practice guidelines and medical literature rather than patients' lived experiences with CKD and personal values and goals; and 4) Power dynamics - while patients described cautiously navigating a power differential in their therapeutic relationship with their clinicians, clinicians seemed less attuned to these power dynamics. LIMITATIONS Thematic saturation was based on patient interviews. Themes presented might incompletely reflect clinicians' perspectives. CONCLUSIONS Efforts to improve shared decision-making for treatment of advanced CKD will likely need to explicitly address differences in approaches to decision-making about treatment of advanced CKD between patients and their clinicians and perceived power imbalances in the therapeutic relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor R House
- Pediatric Nephrology Fellow, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sandpoint Way NE, O.C. 9.820, Seattle, WA 98105.
| | - Aaron Wightman
- Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital
| | - Abby R Rosenberg
- Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington
| | - George Sayre
- Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, HSR&D Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System
| | | | - Susan P Y Wong
- Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Washington, VA Puget Sound Health Care System
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lawless MT, Drioli-Phillips P, Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Kitson AL. Communicating with older adults with long-term conditions about self-management goals: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2439-2452. [PMID: 33658141 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesise a body of fine-grained observational research on communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs), older adults, and carers regarding self-management goals and actions. METHODS We conducted a systematic review, searching nine electronic databases and the grey literature. Two reviewers independently selected for inclusion following a two-stage process and studies and discrepancies were resolved through consultation with the review team. RESULTS 898 records were retrieved, and eight studies were included in the review. Aggregative thematic analysis resulted in 13 categories of communication practices across three decision-making domains: (1) initiating: actions occurring prior to the commitment point; (2) proposing: putting forward a course of action; and (3) committing and closing: committing (or not) to the course of action. CONCLUSIONS Despite an increasing emphasis on the importance of personalised care planning and shared decision-making (SDM) to support older people's health and wellbeing, HCPs did not consistently practice this approach and, in some cases, worked in opposition to it. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS We encourage HCPs to prepare older adults to engage actively with SDM and the goal setting process by employing patient-centred communication resources. These could assist with identifying different types of goals that are realistic and relevant to patients in daily life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | | | - Mandy M Archibald
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia; College of Nursing Helen Glass Centre for Nursing, 99 Curry Place University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
| | - Rachel C Ambagtsheer
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Torrens University Australia, 88 Wakefield Street, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| | - Alison L Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Murea M, Grey CR, Lok CE. Shared decision-making in hemodialysis vascular access practice. Kidney Int 2021; 100:799-808. [PMID: 34246655 PMCID: PMC8463450 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process of collaborative deliberation in the dyadic patient-physician interaction whereby physicians inform the patients about the pros and cons of all available treatment options and reach an agreement with the patients on their preferred treatment plan. In hemodialysis vascular access practice, SDM advocates a deliberative approach based on the existence of reasonable alternatives-that is, arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, and central venous catheter-so that patients are able to form and share preferences about access options. In spite of its ethical imperative, SDM is not broadly applied in hemodialysis vascular access planning. Physicians and surgeons commonly deliver prescriptive fistula-centered recommendations concerning the approach to vascular access care. This paternalistic approach has been shaped by directions from long-held clinical practice guidelines and is reinforced by financial payment models linked with the prevalence of arteriovenous fistula in patients on hemodialysis. Awareness is growing that what may have initially seemed a medically and surgically appropriate approach might not always be focused on each individual's goals of care. Clinician's recommendations for vascular access often do not sufficiently consider the uncertainty surrounding the potential benefits of the decision or the cumulative impact of the decision on patient's quality of life. In the evolving health care landscape, it is time for the practice of hemodialysis vascular access to shift from a hierarchical doctor-patient approach to patient-centered care. In this article we review the current state of vascular access practice, present arguments why SDM is necessary in vascular access planning, review barriers and potential solutions to SDM implementation, and discuss future research contingent on an effective system of physician-patient participative decision-making in hemodialysis vascular access practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Murea
- Section on Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Carl R Grey
- Section of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charmaine E Lok
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Multidisciplinary education and lifestyle camps for CKD patients and their closest family members: effects on disease progression, self-management and psychosocial condition-a retrospective cohort study. Int Urol Nephrol 2021; 54:851-860. [PMID: 34268674 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-02948-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary education including psychosocial care (MDE) may alleviate high burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Family support also has utmost importance, yet, MDE has rarely been provided jointly for patients and their relatives. METHODS We organized intensive, 1-week-long boarding MDE and lifestyle camps for CKD stage III-V patients and their relatives and assessed the rate of CKD progression, proportion of participants' home-based dialysis choice, transplant activity, and improvement of their coping and attitude evaluated by written narratives. Outcome was compared to 40 controls with similarly advanced CKD, under standard of care on our outpatient clinic. RESULTS In 60 predialysis patients, serum creatinine 12 months before participation was 281 [IQR 122] µmol/l, right before MDE 356 [IQR 141] µmol/l, 12 months after MDE 388 [IQR 284] µmol/l, eGFR decreased from 18.5 [IQR 10] ml/min to 14.0 [IQR 7] ml/min and 13.0 [IQR 8] ml/min, respectively. Twelve months' changes before and after MDE differed significantly (p = 0.005 for creatinine; p = 0.003 for eGFR). Decreased progression was found in comparison to controls (p = 0.004; 0.016, respectively) as well. During follow-up, MDE patients compared to controls chose PD as dialysis modality more often (p = 0.004), and were more active in renal transplantation (p = 0.026). Based on narratives, MDE enhanced participants' disease-specific knowledge and ability for coping. It also improved sympathy, helpfulness, and the mutual responsibilities of family members. CONCLUSIONS Our unique MDE programme with participation of the closest relatives enhanced the effectiveness of education and strengthened family support, which contributed to favorable CKD outcome, increased activity in home-based dialysis selection and transplant activity.
Collapse
|
26
|
van Hoorn BT, van Rossenberg LX, Jacobs X, Sulkers GSI, van Heijl M, Ring D. Clinician Factors Rather Than Patient Factors Affect Discussion of Treatment Options. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:1506-1516. [PMID: 33626027 PMCID: PMC8208442 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making aims to combine what matters most to a patient with clinician expertise to develop a personalized health strategy. It is a dialogue between patient and clinician in which preferences are expressed, misconceptions reoriented, and available options are considered. To improve patient involvement, it would help to know more about specific barriers and facilitators of patient-clinician communication. Health literacy, the ability to obtain, process, and understand health information, may affect patient participation in decision-making. If the patient is quiet, deferential, and asks few questions, the clinician may assume a more paternalistic style. A patient with greater agency and engagement could be the catalyst for shared decisions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We assessed (1) whether effective clinician communication and effort is related to patient health literacy, and (2) if there are other factors associated with effective clinician communication and effort. METHODS We combined a prospective, cross-sectional cohort of 86 audio-recorded visits of adult patients seeking specialist hand care for a new problem at an urban community hospital in the Netherlands with a cohort of 72 audio-recorded hand surgery visits from a tertiary hospital in the United States collected for a prior study. The American cohort represents a secondary use of data from a set of patients from a separate study using audio-recorded visits and administering similar questionnaires that assessed different endpoints. In both cohorts, adult patients seeking specialist hand care for a new problem were screened. In total, 165 patients were initially screened, of which 96% (158) participated. Eight percent (13) of visits were excluded since the final diagnosis remained unclear, 8% (12) since it was not the first consultation for the current problem, 5% (8) in which only one treatment option was available, and < 1% (1) since there was a language barrier. A total of 123 patients were analyzed, 68 from the Netherlands and 55 from the United States. The Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy test, validated in both English and Dutch, measures the ability to use health information and is based on a nutrition label from an ice cream container. It was used to assess patient health literacy on a scale ranging from 0 (low) to 6 (high). The 5-item Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION5) instrument is commonly used to assess the quality of patient-clinician discussion of options. Scores may be influenced by clinician effort to involve patients in decision-making as well as patient engagement and agency. Each item is scored from 0 (no effort) to 4 (maximum effort), with a total maximum score of 20. Two independent raters reached agreement (kappa value 0.8; strong agreement), after which all recordings were scored by one investigator. Visit duration and patient questions were assessed using the audio recordings. Patients had a median (interquartile range) age of 54 (38 to 66) years, 50% were men, 89% were white, 66% had a nontraumatic diagnosis, median (IRQ) years of education was 16 (12 to 18) years, and median (IQR) health literacy score was 5 (2 to 6). Median (IQR) visit duration was 9 (7 to 12) minutes. Cohorts did not differ in important ways. The number of visits per clinician ranged from 14 to 29, and the mean overall communication effectiveness and effort score for the visits was low (8.5 ± 4.2 points of 20 points). A multivariate linear regression model was used to assess factors associated with communication effectiveness and effort. RESULTS There was no correlation between health literacy and clinician communication effectiveness and effort (r = 0.087 [95% CI -0.09 to 0.26]; p = 0.34), nor was there a difference in means (SD) when categorizing health literacy as inadequate (7.8 ± 3.8 points) and adequate (8.9 ± 4.5 points; mean difference 1.0 [95% CI -2.6 to 0.54]; p = 0.20). After controlling for potential confounding variables such as gender, patient questions, and health literacy, we found that longer visit duration (per 1 minute increase: r2 = 0.31 [95% CI -0.14 to 0.48]; p < 0.001), clinician 3 (compared with clinician 1: OR 33 [95% CI 4.8 to 229]; p < 0.001) and clinician 5 (compared with clinician 1: OR 11 [95% CI 1.5 to 80]; p = < 0.02) were independently associated with more effective communication and effort, whereas clinician 6 was associated with less effective communication and effort (compared with clinician 1: OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.75]; p = 0.03). Clinicians' communication strategies (the clinician variable on its own) accounted for 29% of the variation in communication effectiveness and effort, longer visit duration accounted for 11%, and the full model accounted for 47% of the variation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The finding that the overall low mean communication effectiveness and effort differed between clinicians and was not influenced by patient factors including health literacy suggests clinicians may benefit from training that moves them away from a teaching or lecturing style where patients receive rote directives regarding their health. Clinicians can learn to adapt their communication to specific patient values and needs using a guiding rather than directing communication style (motivational interviewing).Level of Evidence Level II, prognostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bastiaan T. van Hoorn
- Department of Surgery, Hand Service, Diakonessenhuis, Medical University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Luke X. van Rossenberg
- Department of Surgery, Hand Service, Diakonessenhuis, Medical University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Xander Jacobs
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Service, Diakonessenhuis, Medical University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - George S. I. Sulkers
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Service, Diakonessenhuis, Medical University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, Hand Service, Diakonessenhuis, Medical University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - David Ring
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shi Y, Li W, Duan F, Pu S, Peng H, Ha M, Luo Y. Factors promoting shared decision-making in renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Int Urol Nephrol 2021; 54:553-574. [PMID: 34159522 PMCID: PMC8831292 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-02913-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Shared decision-making (SDM) about the type of renal replacement therapy to use is a matter of great importance involving patients, their families, and health treatment teams. This review aims to synthesize the volume of qualitative work explaining the factors influencing SDM regarding renal replacement therapy. METHODS A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis approach recommended by JBI was used, six databases were searched. Studies were qualitative or mixed research published since 2000, with a primary focus on patient experiences, perceptions and practices regarding which method to choose for renal replacement therapy in End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) patients. All themes were analyzed and compared to the established connectedness. RESULTS A total of 1313 patients were enrolled in 32 studies focusing on factors associated with SDM regarding renal replacement therapy were included. All quality evaluations of the literature were medium to high. Four common themes were identified in our synthesis: (1) patient personal reasons, (2) family-related factors, (3) health care professional-related factors, and (4) social factors influence. CONCLUSION The model proposes pathways that could be explored further in future qualitative and quantitative studies and suggests that patients' beliefs, emotions, and awareness should be targeted alongside patients' decision-making practices to increase the efficacy of interventions. The majority of studies included in this review focus on older patients, and all report patients' perspectives. Further research is required to understand the family member perspectives on SMD of renal replacement therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Shi
- School of Nursing, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.,Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Wang Li
- Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Fangjian Duan
- School of Nursing, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China
| | - Shi Pu
- Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongmei Peng
- Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Mei Ha
- School of Nursing, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Luo
- School of Nursing, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Impacts of Interaction of Mental Condition and Quality of Life between Donors and Recipients at Decision-Making of Preemptive and Post-Dialysis Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11050414. [PMID: 34069298 PMCID: PMC8157173 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pre-emptive kidney transplantation (PEKT) is considered one of the most effective types of kidney replacement therapies to improve the quality of life (QOL) and physical prognosis of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In Japan, living-donor kidney transplantation is a common therapeutic option for patients undergoing dialyses (PDKT). Moreover, during shared decision-making in kidney replacement therapy, the medical staff of the multidisciplinary kidney team often provide educational consultation programmes according to the QOL and sociopsychological status of the ESRD patient. In Japan, the majority of kidney donations are provided by living family members. However, neither the psychosocial status of donors associated with the decision-making of kidney donations nor the interactions of the psychosocial status between donors and recipients have been clarified in the literature. In response to this gap, the present study determined the QOL, mood and anxiety status of donors and recipients at kidney transplantation decision-making between PEKT and PDKT. Deterioration of the recipient's QOL associated with "role physical" shifted the decision-making to PEKT, whereas deterioration of QOL associated with "role emotional" and "social functioning" of the recipients shifted the decision-making to PDKT. Furthermore, increased tension/anxiety and depressive mood contributed to choosing PDKT, but increased confusion was dominantly observed in PEKT recipients. These direct impact factors for decision-making were secondarily regulated by the trait anxiety of the recipients. Unlike the recipients, the donors' QOL associated with vitality contributed to choosing PDKT, whereas the physical and mental health of the donors shifted the decision-making to PEKT. Interestingly, we also detected the typical features of PEKT donors, who showed higher tolerability against the trait anxiety of reactive tension/anxiety than PDKT donors. These results suggest that choosing between either PEKT or PDKT is likely achieved through the proactive support of family members as candidate donors, rather than the recipients. Furthermore, PDKT is possibly facilitated by an enrichment of the life-work-family balance of the donors. Therefore, multidisciplinary kidney teams should be aware of the familial psychodynamics between patients with ESRD and their family members during the shared decision-making process by continuing the educational consultation programmes for the kidney-replacement-therapy decision-making process.
Collapse
|
29
|
Schellartz I, Ohnhaeuser T, Mettang T, Scholten N. The role of personal attitudes of control and responsibility for the uptake of peritoneal dialysis- a national survey among dialysis patients. BMC Nephrol 2021; 22:107. [PMID: 33761891 PMCID: PMC7989083 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02303-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although most patients are suitable for both hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD), there seem to be differences in the outlook of patients who choose one modality over the other. There is currently limited literature about the impact of patients' personal attitudes on the decision for PD or HD. In this study, we tried to find out whether there were differences between patients who were on HD and PD in their desire for control and responsibility for their treatment. METHODS The data were drawn from a nationwide postal survey of 630 HD and PD patients. Patients' desire for control was measured by scores on the internal locus of control (ILOC) scale. Patients were also asked how important taking responsibility for their dialysis had been for their treatment decision (ITR). Two multivariate logistic regression models, both adjusted for age, were applied to investigate whether there were differences between HD and PD patients in ILOC and ITR. Having one generic measure (ILOC) and one tailored to the dialysis context (ITR) gave the opportunity to investigate if it is a generic personality trait or rather a specific attitude that affects choice of dialysis modality. RESULTS PD patients were younger and showed higher ILOC and ITR values. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for age confirmed the significant influence of ILOC and ITR on the uptake of PD. The odds ratios for being in the PD group were 1.53 for ILOC (p = 0.030; 95% CI 1.04-2.25), 1.49 for ITR (p = 0.019; 95% CI 1.07-2.07), and 0.95 (p = 0.000; 95% CI 0.94-0.97) for age in both models. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis shows the impact of personal attitudes on the uptake of PD. Participants who generally want to keep control of their lives and take responsibility for their dialysis treatment tended to choose PD. As PD is a home dialysis treatment that requires patients to participate and contribute, it is beneficial if patients' personalities support the treatment procedure. Having two completely different treatment options that suit to different personalities gives us the opportunity to consider the relationship between personal attitudes and choice of dialysis modality. TRIAL REGISTRATION The MAU-PD study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register. DRKS-ID DRKS00012555 . Date of Registration in DRKS: 2018/01/04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabell Schellartz
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Eupener Str. 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Tim Ohnhaeuser
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Eupener Str. 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Nadine Scholten
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Eupener Str. 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vasilica C, Oates T, Clausner C, Ormandy P, Barratt J, Graham-Brown M. Identifying Information Needs of Patients With IgA Nephropathy Using an Innovative Social Media-stepped Analytical Approach. Kidney Int Rep 2021; 6:1317-1325. [PMID: 34013110 PMCID: PMC8116902 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The number of people with kidney disease using social media to search for medical information and peer support is increasing. IgA nephropathy (IgAN) predominantly affects young adults, demographically the biggest users of social media. This article presents an innovative analysis of social media interactions to identify unmet education and information needs of patients with IgAN. Methods Following ethical approval for the study, the IgAN Support UK Facebook group (https://www.facebook.com/groups/915274415226674) granted us permission to anonymously collect and analyze 1959 posts and comments from 498 group users. An initial patient focus group and quantitative word-frequency analysis created an initial categorization matrix that was iteratively refined after serial analyses of the social media database to generate a final categorization matrix of needs. We evaluated narrative data relating to each identified category to define patient narratives relating to each area. Results A large number of information gaps and unanswered questions were identified relating to the following: diet, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and patient comorbidities. Patient–clinician communication and the presentation of information were also drawn out as cross-cutting issues. These themes differed significantly from those identified from the traditional patient focus group, highlighting the value of this novel method for interrogating social media data to understand unmet patient needs. Conclusion Social media data are untapped and valuable resources that can be used to better understand patient information gaps, leading to the generation of targeted materials to address unmet educational needs. This innovative approach could be replicated across other health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tom Oates
- Department of Nephrology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of General Medicine, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Paula Ormandy
- School of Health and Society University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Jonathan Barratt
- John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.,Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Matthew Graham-Brown
- John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.,Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ghodsian S, Ghafourifard M, Ghahramanian A. Comparison of shared decision making in patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis for choosing a dialysis modality. BMC Nephrol 2021; 22:67. [PMID: 33622265 PMCID: PMC7903714 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02269-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is recognized as the gold standard for patient-centered care. This study aimed to assess and compare the SDM among patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis for choosing a dialysis modality. Methods This is a cross-sectional study that was performed on 300 dialysis patients (218 HD and 82 PD) referred to two Dialysis Centers. Data were collected using demographic information and a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The data were analyzed using ANOVA and independent t-test by SPSS software. Results The mean SDM-Q-9 score in all samples (PD and HD) was 21.94 ± 15.08 (in a possible range of 0 to 45). Results of the independent t-test showed that the mean SDM-Q-9 score in PD patients (33.11 ± 10.08) was higher than HD patients (17.14 ± 74.24) (p < 0.001). The results showed a statistically significant difference in mean SDM-Q-9 score based on patients’ age, educational level, and income (p < 0.05). Conclusion Implementing shared decision making and providing information on RRT should be started in the early stage of CKD. The health care providers should involve patients with CKD and their families in dialysis-related decisions and it should be started in the early stage of CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepide Ghodsian
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mansour Ghafourifard
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. .,Medical Education Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Akram Ghahramanian
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Eneanya ND. Equitable hemodialysis for undocumented immigrant patients: prioritizing patient voices in care implementation. Kidney Int 2021; 99:26-28. [PMID: 33390231 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Undocumented immigrant patients with kidney disease in the United States are rightfully gaining increased access to scheduled hemodialysis treatments. For health care systems that have transitioned from emergency to more consistent treatments, the impact of this care on patients' livelihood remains unknown. Cervantes and colleagues provide evidence to better understand patients' experiences following transitions to scheduled hemodialysis treatments. These data are invaluable to formulate future implementation strategies that prioritize patients' values and health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nwamaka D Eneanya
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
van Klaveren CW, de Jong PGM, Hendriks RA, Luk F, de Vries APJ, van der Boog PJM, Reinders MEJ. Topics, Delivery Modes, and Social-Epistemological Dimensions of Web-Based Information for Patients Undergoing Renal Transplant and Living Donors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e22068. [PMID: 32946412 PMCID: PMC7546867 DOI: 10.2196/22068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has markedly affected renal transplant care. During this time of social distancing, limited in-person visits, and uncertainty, patients and donors are relying more than ever on telemedicine and web-based information. Several factors can influence patients’ understanding of web-based information, such as delivery modes (instruction, interaction, and assessment) and social-epistemological dimensions (choices in interactive knowledge building). Objective The aim of this study was to systemically evaluate the content, delivery modes, and social-epistemological dimensions of web-based information on COVID-19 and renal transplantation at time of the pandemic. Methods Multiple keyword combinations were used to retrieve websites on COVID-19 and renal transplantation using the search engines Google.com and Google.nl. From 14 different websites, 30 webpages were examined to determine their organizational sources, topics, delivery modes, and social-epistemological dimensions. Results The variety of topics and delivery modes was limited. A total of 13 different delivery modes were encountered, of which 8 (62%) were instructional and 5 (38%) were interactional; no assessment delivery modes were observed. No website offered all available delivery modes. The majority of delivery modes (8/13, 62%) focused on individual and passive learning, whereas group learning and active construction of knowledge were rarely encountered. Conclusions By taking interactive knowledge transfer into account, the educational quality of eHealth for transplant care could increase, especially in times of crisis when rapid knowledge transfer is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte W van Klaveren
- Division of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Peter G M de Jong
- Center for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Renée A Hendriks
- Center for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Franka Luk
- Division of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Aiko P J de Vries
- Division of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Paul J M van der Boog
- Division of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marlies E J Reinders
- Division of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
People with advanced chronic kidney disease and evidence of progression have a high risk of renal replacement therapy. Specialized transition clinics could offer a better option for preparing these patients for dialysis, transplantation or conservative care. This review focuses on the different aspects of such transition clinics. We discuss which patients should be referred to these units and when referral should take place. Patient involvement in the decision-making process is important and requires unbiased patient education. There are many themes, both patient-centred and within the healthcare structure, that will influence the process of shared decision-making and the modality choice. Aspects of placing an access for haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are reviewed. Finally, we discuss the importance of pre-emptive transplantation and a planned dialysis start, all with a focus on multidisciplinary collaboration at the transition clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Evans
- Renal Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kai Lopau
- Department of Internal Medicine , University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Engels N, de Graav G, van der Nat P, van den Dorpel M, Bos WJ, Stiggelbout AM. Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034142. [PMID: 32111615 PMCID: PMC7050317 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with advanced kidney disease (AKD) have to make difficult treatment modality decisions as their disease progresses towards end-stage kidney disease. International guidelines in nephrology suggest shared decision-making (SDM) to help patients make timely treatment modality decisions that align with their values and preferences. However, systematic reviews or scoping reviews on these SDM interventions and on their reported use or outcomes are lacking. This limits the adoption of SDM in clinical practice and hampers further research and development on the subject. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of these SDM interventions by means of a scoping review of the literature. Scoping reviews can provide a broad overview of a topic, identify gaps in the research knowledge base and report on the types of evidence that address and inform practices. This paper presents our study protocol. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The proposed scoping review will be performed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. It will cover both qualitative and quantitative scientific literature, as well as the grey literature on SDM interventions for treatment modality decisions in AKD. Only literature written in English will be considered for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will participate in an iterative process of screening the literature, paper selection and data extraction. Disagreements between the reviewers will be resolved by discussion until consensus is reached or after consultation with the research team when needed. Results will be reported with descriptive statistics and diagrammatic or tabular displayed information, accompanied by narrative summaries as explained in the JBI guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for the conduct of this study is not required. We will analyse previously collected data for the proposed scoping review. Our results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through conferences and/or seminars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noel Engels
- Shared decision making, Santeon, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gretchen de Graav
- Internal Medicine, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Willem Jan Bos
- Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Molnar AO, Akbari A, Brimble KS. Perceived and Objective Kidney Disease Knowledge in Patients With Advanced CKD Followed in a Multidisciplinary CKD Clinic. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2020; 7:2054358120903156. [PMID: 32110417 PMCID: PMC7016305 DOI: 10.1177/2054358120903156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: One of the key components of multidisciplinary CKD clinics is education;
however, kidney disease knowledge among patients followed in these clinics
is not routinely measured. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine objective and perceived kidney disease
knowledge and patient characteristics associated with knowledge among
patients followed in a multi-care kidney clinic. Design: This is a cross-sectional survey study. Setting: This study was conducted in a multi-care kidney clinic in Ontario,
Canada. Patients: Patients who did not speak English, who were unable to read due to
significant vision impairment, or who had a known history of dementia or
significant cognitive impairment were excluded. Measurements: Perceived kidney disease knowledge was evaluated using a previously validated
9-item survey (PiKS). Each question on the perceived knowledge survey had 4
possible responses, ranging from “I don’t know anything” (1) to “I know a
lot” (4). Objective kidney disease knowledge was evaluated using a
previously validated survey (KiKS). Methods: The association between patient characteristics and perceived and objective
kidney disease knowledge was determined using linear regression. Results: A total of 125 patients were included, 57% were male, the mean (SD) age and
eGFR were 66 (13) years and 16 (5.9) mL/min/1.73 m2,
respectively. The median (IQR) objective and perceived knowledge survey
scores were 19 out of 27 (16, 21) and 2.9 out of 4 (2.4, 3.2), respectively.
Only 25% of patients answered correctly that CKD can be associated with no
symptoms, and 64% of patients identified correctly that the kidneys make
urine. More than 60% of patients perceived themselves to know nothing or
only a little about medications that help or hurt the kidney. Older age was
independently associated with lower perceived and objective knowledge, but
sex, income, and educational attainment were not. Limitations: This is a single-center study. Cognitive impairment was based on the treating
team’s informal assessment or prior documentation in the chart; formal
cognitive testing was not performed as part of this study. Conclusions: Despite resource-intensive care, CKD knowledge of patients followed in a
multidisciplinary clinic was found to be modest. Whether enhanced
educational strategies can improve knowledge and whether increasing
knowledge improves patient outcomes warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber O Molnar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ayub Akbari
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - K Scott Brimble
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
McCarron TL, Moffat K, Wilkinson G, Zelinsky S, Boyd JM, White D, Hassay D, Lorenzetti DL, Marlett NJ, Noseworthy T. Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review. Syst Rev 2019; 8:97. [PMID: 30999950 PMCID: PMC6474065 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-0994-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With healthcare striving to shift to a more person-centered delivery model, patient and family involvement must have a bigger role in shaping this. While many initiatives involving patients and family members focus on self-care, a broader understanding of patient participation is necessary. Ensuring a viable and sustainable critical number of qualified patients and family members to support this shift will be of utmost importance. The purpose of this study was to understand how health systems are intentionally investing in the training and skill development of patients and family members. METHODS Patient co-investigators and researchers conducted a scoping review of the existing literature on methods adopted by healthcare systems to build the skills and capacity of patients to participate in healthcare decision-making using a recognized methodological framework. Six electronic databases were searched to identify studies. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and full-text papers for inclusion. The research team independently extracted data. Any disagreements were resolved by achieving consensus through discussion. Quantitative and qualitative content synthesis, as well as a quality assessment, was conducted. RESULTS After eliminating duplicates, the search resulted in 9428 abstracts. Four hundred fifty-eight articles were reviewed and 15 articles were included. Four themes emerged: forums (33%), patient instructors (20%), workshops (33%), and co-design (13%). Four of the identified studies measured the impact and overall effectiveness of the respective programs. Examples of how patient and family members were supported (invested in) included advocacy training to support future involvement in engagement activities, a training program to conduct patient-led research, involvement in an immersive experience-based co-design initiative, and involvement in training pharmacy students. Overall, these studies found positive outcomes when patients and family members were recipients of these opportunities. CONCLUSIONS The results of this scoping review demonstrate that an evidence base around programs to advance patient engagement is largely absent. An opportunity exists for further research to identify strategies and measures to support patient engagement in healthcare decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara L McCarron
- The Department Community Health Sciences, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada. .,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
| | - Karen Moffat
- Patient Co-investigators, Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gloria Wilkinson
- Patient Co-investigators, Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sandra Zelinsky
- Patient Co-investigators, Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jamie M Boyd
- The Department Community Health Sciences, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Deborah White
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary in Qatar, PO Box 23133, Doha, Al Rayayan Al Forousiya, Qatar
| | - Derek Hassay
- Haskayne School of Business, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Diane L Lorenzetti
- The Department Community Health Sciences, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.,Health Sciences Library, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N, Canada
| | - Nancy J Marlett
- The Department Community Health Sciences, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Thomas Noseworthy
- The Department Community Health Sciences, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|