Reduced incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with severe factor XI deficiency

Milvexian vs apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: The LIBREXIA atrial fibrillation trial rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants are the standard of care for stroke prevention in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter; however, bleeding remains a significant concern, limiting their use. Milvexian is an oral Factor XIa inhibitor that may offer similar anticoagulant efficacy with less bleeding risk.

METHODS

LIBREXIA AF (NCT05757869) is a global phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, event-driven trial to compare milvexian with apixaban in participants with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Participants are randomly assigned to milvexian 100 mg or apixaban (5 mg or 2.5 mg per label indication) twice daily. The primary efficacy objective is to evaluate if milvexian is noninferior to apixaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. The principal safety objective is to evaluate if milvexian is superior to apixaban in reducing the endpoint of International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding events and the composite endpoint of ISTH major and clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding events. In total, 15,500 participants from approximately 1,000 sites in over 30 countries are planned to be enrolled. They will be followed until both 430 primary efficacy outcome events and 530 principal safety events are observed, which is estimated to take approximately 4 years.

CONCLUSION

The LIBREXIA AF study will determine the efficacy and safety of the oral Factor XIa inhibitor milvexian compared with apixaban in participants with either atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05757869.

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of asundexian: a novel factor XIa inhibitor for stroke prevention

INTRODUCTION

Antithrombotic therapy is the mainstay of ischemic stroke prevention. Current drugs (antiplatelets and oral anticoagulants) lead to increased bleeding risks, and the rates of stroke recurrence, despite antithrombotic therapy, are still elevated. There is a need for novel antithrombotic therapies with superior effectiveness but without increased bleeding risk. Factor XIa inhibitors might cover this gap.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript examines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of asundexian and the current clinical evidence regarding its application in preventing ischemic stroke.

EXPERT OPINION

Asundexian shows a very favoring pharmacokinetic profile. Despite asundexian being inferior to apixaban for cardioembolic ischemic stroke, it could be useful in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke. Although antiplatelet therapy is the recommended treatment to prevent non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, adding an anticoagulant might have beneficial effects through the dual-pathway inhibition strategy. Due to the potential risk of hemorrhagic transformation, there is hesitation to administer anticoagulants early to patients who have recently had an ischemic stroke, especially if they are also on antiplatelet therapy. However, clinical trials on asundexian confirmed its safety for bleeding, even when used with antiplatelets. A phase 3 trial is currently investigating the efficacy of asundexian in preventing non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke.

Factor XI Inhibitors: perspectives in primary and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke

Stroke is one of the most common causes of mortality and disability worldwide. Antithrombotic therapy represents the mainstay in primary and secondary prevention, both in cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic stroke. Particularly, direct oral anticoagulants play a crucial role in atrial fibrillation, the most common cause of cardioembolic stroke, whereas single or dual antiplatelet therapy is preferred in non-cardioembolic stroke. However, the limitations related to the residual risk of cardioembolic or cerebrovascular events, and the risk of major bleeding, still represent unmet medical needs. To overcome them, new drugs inhibiting Factor XI (FXI) and Factor XII have been proposed, with a selective inhibition of contact pathway of coagulation, delineating a new anticoagulant approach. This review provides a summary of the currently available evidence and future perspectives on FXI inhibitors, that can represent an additional therapeutic option in the primary and secondary prevention of cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, also in challenging therapeutic contexts.

Novel horizons in anticoagulation: the emerging role of factor XI inhibitors across different settings

Anticoagulants have long been fundamental in preventing and treating thromboembolic disorders, with a recent shift of focus towards direct oral anticoagulants, thanks to their ease of use, efficacy, and safety. Despite these advancements, bleeding complications remain a major concern with any anticoagulant, highlighting the need for safer drugs. Factor XI (FXI) inhibitors have emerged as promising agents in this regard, offering a novel approach by targeting upstream factors in the coagulation system. Phase II trials have shown encouraging outcomes, indicating a reduced bleeding risk compared to that associated with traditional anticoagulants, particularly in the context of cardiovascular disease management when combined with antiplatelet therapy. However, the variability in findings and limited efficacy data call for a cautious interpretation pending insights from phase III trials. These trials are essential for validating the potential of FXI inhibitors to balance bleeding risk reduction and maintain anticoagulant efficacy. This review explores the pharmacology, potential indications, clinical data, and future directions of FXI inhibitors, providing a perspective on their evolving role in anticoagulant therapy. It also provides a detailed analysis of data from published clinical trials on FXI inhibitors in various indications. Preliminary data from ongoing trials are also outlined. As the field moves forward, a cautiously optimistic outlook can be expected, focusing on comprehensive data from phase III trials to define the role of FXI inhibitors in various clinical scenarios.

Inhibitors of Polyphosphate and Neutrophil Extracellular Traps

The contact pathway of blood clotting has received intense interest in recent years as studies have linked it to thrombosis, inflammation, and innate immunity. Because the contact pathway plays little to no role in normal hemostasis, it has emerged as a potential target for safer thromboprotection, relative to currently approved antithrombotic drugs which all target the final common pathway of blood clotting. Research since the mid-2000s has identified polyphosphate, DNA, and RNA as important triggers of the contact pathway with roles in thrombosis, although these molecules also modulate blood clotting and inflammation via mechanisms other than the contact pathway of the clotting cascade. The most significant source of extracellular DNA in many disease settings is in the form of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which have been shown to contribute to incidence and severity of thrombosis. This review summarizes known roles of extracellular polyphosphate and nucleic acids in thrombosis, with an emphasis on novel agents under current development that target the prothrombotic activities of polyphosphate and NETs.

Milvexian: An Oral, Bioavailable Factor XIa Inhibitor

Direct oral anticoagulants have a dose-dependent increased bleeding risk which limits use in certain populations. Studies in both animals and humans with inherited variations in factor XI levels provide a theoretical basis for a drug target capable of addressing current unmet needs. Milvexian is an oral factor XIa inhibitor that has the potential to provide robust anticoagulant effect without increased bleeding compared with current standard of care. Several key studies in the preclinical, phase I, and phase II stages have reported promising safety data in venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention without compromising hemostasis. The planned phase III trials will examine the efficacy of milvexian for prevention of thrombotic events in patients with acute stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and atrial fibrillation.

Elevated factor XI is associated with recurrent left ventricular thrombus of unknown origin

BACKGROUND

Elevated factor XI (FXI) has been shown to predispose to thromboembolism. We investigated whether it is associated with left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation, its recurrence and subsequent thromboembolic events.

METHODS

In 54 patients with prior LVT of unknown origin, who stopped anticoagulation and 54 controls, we determined FXI, along with plasma clot permeability (Ks), fibrinolysis time (CLT), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), von Willebrand factor (vWF) and fibrinolysis proteins. During follow-up, the primary endpoint involving the recurrence of LVT a symptomatic ischemic stroke or systemic embolism was recorded.

RESULTS

Elevated (>120%) FXI levels were more often observed in LVT patients when compared to the control group (14 [25.9%] vs. 6 [11.1%], p = .048) in association with the presence of active FXI. FXI correlated with age (r = .406, p = .002), Ks (r = -.542, p < .001) and CLT (r = .406, p = .002), also after adjustment for age, but not with ETP, vWF or fibrinolysis proteins. During follow-up of 77.6 ± 18.5 months the primary endpoint occurred in 17 (31.5%) LVT patients, including 11 (20.4%) recurrent LVT, and in 4 (7.4%) controls (annual incidence rate 4.9% vs. 1.1%, respectively; p = .002). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, elevated FXI was independently associated with the primary endpoint (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.09-1.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated FXI in association with a prothrombotic state characterizes patients with prior LVT of unknown origin and predisposes to its recurrence and/or ischemic stroke during follow-up. It might be speculated that the measurement of FXI helps identify patients who could benefit from prolonged anticoagulation and FXI inhibitors in the future.

Factor XIa inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for atherothrombosis

When selecting an anticoagulant, clinicians consider individual patient characteristic, the treatment indication, drug pharmacology, and safety and efficacy as demonstrated in randomized trials. An ideal anticoagulant prevents thrombosis with little or no increase in bleeding. Direct oral anticoagulants represent a major advance over traditional anticoagulants (e.g., unfractionated heparin, warfarin) but still cause bleeding, particularly from the gastrointestinal tract which can limit their use. Epidemiological studies indicate that patients with congenital factor XI (FXI) deficiency have a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and ischemic stroke (IS) than non-deficient individuals, and do not have an increased risk of spontaneous bleeding, even with severe deficiency. These observations provide the rationale for targeting FXI as a new class of anticoagulant. Multiple FXI inhibitors have been introduced and several are being evaluated in Phase III trials. In this review, we explain why drugs that target FXI may be associated with a lower risk of bleeding than currently available anticoagulants and summarize the completed and ongoing trials.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of milvexian with aspirin and/or clopidogrel in healthy participants

Milvexian, an oral activated Factor XI (FXIa) inhibitor, is in clinical studies where it may be combined with antiplatelet agents, including aspirin and/or clopidogrel, to prevent thromboembolic diseases. This phase I trial assessed safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of milvexian coadministration with aspirin and/or clopidogrel in healthy participants through 3 drug-drug interaction studies using a 3-period, 3-treatment, crossover design. A total of 113 participants were randomized to receive milvexian (200 mg; twice daily for 5 days) or matched placebo coadministered with once-daily aspirin (325 mg for 5 days) and/or clopidogrel (Day 1: 300 mg; Days 2-5: 75 mg). Milvexian was safe and well tolerated, with and without aspirin and/or clopidogrel. Eight mild bleeding adverse events (AEs) were reported in 5 of 113 participants across various treatment arms. Peak and total exposures of milvexian were similar with or without clopidogrel and/or aspirin. Exposure-dependent prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time and reduction of FXI clotting activity by milvexian were similar with coadministration of aspirin and/or clopidogrel. Milvexian, with or without coadministration of aspirin and/or clopidogrel, did not affect bleeding time or platelet aggregation. Administration of milvexian alone or with aspirin and/or clopidogrel was safe and well tolerated without increased incidence of AEs, including bleeding. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of milvexian, including bleeding time, were similar with or without aspirin and/or clopidogrel.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03698513.

Milvexian: evaluating the factor XIa inhibitor for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Balancing the prevention of thrombosis with bleeding risk when combining anticoagulants and platelet antagonists remains a concern among clinicians, particularly in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are treated with potent antiplatelet therapy. This may be because the available antiplatelet and anticoagulants are unable to uncouple physiological hemostasis and pathological thrombosis. Therefore, their use is associated with an unavoidable elevated risk of bleeding.

AREAS COVERED

Evidence available from studies evaluating FXIa inhibitors and milvexian was collected from a selective literature search. In this review, the authors describe the potential role of FXI/XIa in experimental thrombosis, evidence for FXIa inhibition in the treatment of clinical thrombotic events, and highlight the current evidence supporting the role of milvexian, a novel FXIa inhibitor, in patients with ACS.

EXPERT OPINION

The ongoing LIBREXIA-ACS trial is a large-scale study currently investigating milvexian in patients with ACS. This study may support the proof of concept of differentiating physiological hemostasis and pathological thrombosis and achieving maximum antithrombotic efficacy with minimum bleeding risk when used on top of dual antiplatelet therapy with potent P2Y12 receptor blockers.

Real world management of individuals with severe FXI deficiency and its impact on clinical outcomes: Experience from a haemophilia treatment centre

INTRODUCTION

The management of Factor XI deficiency is challenged by a variable association between FXI level and bleeding phenotype. Additionally, there is scarce data describing management strategies and their outcomes, specifically bleeding, thrombosis, and other complications.

AIMS

To evaluate bleeding, thrombosis, and other complications in individuals with severe FXI deficiency seen in our comprehensive haemophilia treatment centre (HTC). Peri-procedural management strategies and the resulting impact on bleeding and other clinically relevant outcomes were reported.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the electronic medical record of adult patients with severe FXI deficiency (< 20% activity) seen at a New York City comprehensive HTC between 2017 and 2022. Procedures, haemostatic management, and outcomes were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

We identified 38 individuals (64%) females with severe FXI deficiency. The mean age was 56 ± 21 years (SD). The median FXI activity level was 3% (IQR: 1-8%). The mean BAT score was 3.1 ± 2.4; (52%) individuals did not have a history of bleeding. A total of 256 surgeries and procedures were performed. There was reduced bleeding with preventative or reactive treatment during procedures. Arterial but not venous thrombotic complications were observed. Plasma was mostly used for procedures associated with higher risk of bleeding and antifibrinolytics for procedures at sites of high fibrinolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Current management strategies pose a burden of care for these patients and manifested as nonbleeding adverse events and changes in clinical management. These findings highlight the need for novel investigation in predicting and managing bleeding for individuals with severe FXI deficiency.

Factor XI and coagulation. Factor XI inhibitors - antithrombotic perspectives

Factor XI is a zymogen with an important role in the coagulation cascade. It is activated by FXII, thrombin and or it can be autoactivated. It has a prothrombotic effect after being activated by thrombin, but also through its antifibrinolytic action, stabilizing the formed clot. Hereditary deficiency of FXI causes haemophilia C - a disease manifested by an usually provoked, small to moderate mucosal bleeding. People with severe FXI deficiency have a low risk of thrombotic events. Conversely, increased FXI values have been found to be associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism and ischemic stroke. Lowering serum FXI levels has become a treatment target for the prevention of thrombotic events. New pharmacological agents - FXI inhibitors - have been investigated in phase II clinical trials, with promising results in terms of efficacy and safety in the prevention of thrombotic events. FXI inhibitors are emerging as new anticoagulant agents with broad indication prospects beyond direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists.

Factor XI as a new target for prevention of thromboembolism in cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Anticoagulant therapy is a mainstay in the management of patients with cardiovascular disease. The use of conventional anticoagulants carries potential side effects, mainly bleeding. Drugs targeting Factor XI (FXI) have been investigated in randomized controlled trials as a new option with more favorable outcomes. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing FXI inhibitors to placebo or standard therapy. The primary outcomes were incidence of all bleeding events, major bleeding, and thromboembolism. Secondary outcomes included incidence of all adverse events (AE), serious AE, and all-cause mortality. A total of 11 studies involving 10,536 patients were included. FXI inhibitors were associated with a trend toward reduction of bleeding events and incidence of thromboembolism compared to the control group (placebo/standard therapy). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of adverse events and all-cause mortality. When compared to enoxaparin, FXI inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of bleeding events (RR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23-0.76, P = 0.004) and thromboembolism (RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.44-0.77, P = 0.001). On the other hand, when compared to DOACs, FXI inhibitors were associated with a significant reduction in bleeding events but not thromboembolism. Whereas, compared to placebo, FXI inhibitors did not increase the risk of bleeding events, adverse events, or all-cause mortality (P > 0.05). FXI inhibitors could be a safer and more potent option for prevention of thromboembolism than conventional therapy.

Genetic assessment of efficacy and safety profiles of coagulation cascade proteins identifies Factors II and XI as actionable anticoagulant targets

Aims

Anticoagulants are routinely used by millions of patients worldwide to prevent blood clots. Yet, problems with anticoagulant therapy remain, including a persistent and cumulative bleeding risk in patients undergoing prolonged anticoagulation. New safer anticoagulant targets are needed.

Methods and results

To prioritize anticoagulant targets with the strongest efficacy [venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention] and safety (low bleeding risk) profiles, we performed two-sample Mendelian randomization and genetic colocalization. We leveraged three large-scale plasma protein data sets (deCODE as discovery data set and Fenland and Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities as replication data sets] and one liver gene expression data set (Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec bariatric biobank) to evaluate evidence for a causal effect of 26 coagulation cascade proteins on VTE from a new genome-wide association meta-analysis of 44 232 VTE cases and 847 152 controls, stroke subtypes, bleeding outcomes, and parental lifespan as an overall measure of efficacy/safety ratio. A 1 SD genetically predicted reduction in F2 blood levels was associated with lower risk of VTE [odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.38-0.51, P = 2.6e-28] and cardioembolic stroke risk (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.39-0.76, P = 4.2e-04) but not with bleeding (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.93-1.36, P = 2.2e-01). Genetically predicted F11 reduction was associated with lower risk of VTE (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.58-0.64, P = 4.1e-85) and cardioembolic stroke (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.69-0.86, P = 4.1e-06) but not with bleeding (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.95-1.08, P = 7.5e-01). These Mendelian randomization associations were concordant across the three blood protein data sets and the hepatic gene expression data set as well as colocalization analyses.

Conclusion

These results provide strong genetic evidence that F2 and F11 may represent safe and efficacious therapeutic targets to prevent VTE and cardioembolic strokes without substantially increasing bleeding risk.

The foundation for investigating factor XI as a target for inhibition in human cardiovascular disease

Anticoagulant therapy is a mainstay in the management of patients with cardiovascular disease and related conditions characterized by a heightened risk for thrombosis. Acute coronary syndrome, chronic coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, and atrial fibrillation are the most common. In addition to their proclivity for thrombosis, each of these four conditions is also characterized by local and systemic inflammation, endothelial/endocardial injury and dysfunction, oxidative stress, impaired tissue-level reparative capabilities, and immune dysregulation that plays a critical role in linking molecular events, environmental triggers, and phenotypic expressions. Knowing that cardiovascular disease and thrombosis are complex and dynamic, can the scientific community identify a common pathway or specific point of interface susceptible to pharmacological inhibition or alteration that is likely to be safe and effective? The contact factors of coagulation may represent the proverbial "sweet spot" and are worthy of investigation. The following review provides a summary of the fundamental biochemistry of factor XI, its biological activity in thrombosis, inflammation, and angiogenesis, new targeting drugs, and a pragmatic approach to managing hemostatic requirements in clinical trials and possibly day-to-day patient care in the future.

Targeting factor XI and factor XIa to prevent thrombosis

ABSTRACT

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that inhibit the coagulation proteases thrombin or factor Xa (FXa) have replaced warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for most indications requiring long-term anticoagulation. In many clinical situations, DOACs are as effective as VKAs, cause less bleeding, and do not require laboratory monitoring. However, because DOACs target proteases that are required for hemostasis, their use increases the risk of serious bleeding. Concerns over therapy-related bleeding undoubtedly contribute to undertreatment of many patients who would benefit from anticoagulation therapy. There is considerable interest in the plasma zymogen factor XI (FXI) and its protease form factor XIa (FXIa) as drug targets for treating and preventing thrombosis. Laboratory and epidemiologic studies support the conclusion that FXI contributes to venous and arterial thrombosis. Based on 70 years of clinical observations of patients lacking FXI, it is anticipated that drugs targeting this protein will cause less severe bleeding than warfarin or DOACs. In phase 2 studies, drugs that inhibit FXI or FXIa prevent venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty as well as, or better than, low molecular weight heparin. Patients with heart disease on FXI or FXIa inhibitors experienced less bleeding than patients taking DOACs. Based on these early results, phase 3 trials have been initiated that compare drugs targeting FXI and FXIa to standard treatments or placebo. Here, we review the contributions of FXI to normal and abnormal coagulation and discuss results from preclinical, nonclinical, and clinical studies of FXI and FXIa inhibitors.

Current and potentially novel antithrombotic treatment in acute ischemic stroke

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the most common type of stroke and requires immediate reperfusion. Current acute reperfusion therapies comprise the administration of intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular thrombectomy. Although these acute reperfusion therapies are increasingly successful, optimized secondary antithrombotic treatment remains warranted, specifically to reduce the risk of major bleeding complications. In the development of AIS, coagulation and platelet activation play crucial roles by driving occlusive clot formation. Recent studies implicated that the intrinsic route of coagulation plays a more prominent role in this development, however, this is not fully understood yet. Next to the acute treatments, antithrombotic therapy, consisting of anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet therapy, is successfully used for primary and secondary prevention of AIS but at the cost of increased bleeding complications. Therefore, better understanding the interplay between the different pathways involved in the pathophysiology of AIS might provide new insights that could lead to novel treatment strategies. This narrative review focuses on the processes of platelet activation and coagulation in AIS, and the most common antithrombotic agents in primary and secondary prevention of AIS. Furthermore, we provide an overview of promising novel antithrombotic agents that could be used to improve in both acute treatment and stroke prevention.

Factor XI Inhibitors: A New Horizon in Anticoagulation Therapy

Anticoagulation therapy has undergone significant evolution, marked by the emergence of direct oral anticoagulants with distinct advantages. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in managing residual thrombotic and bleeding risks, particularly among vulnerable populations. The pursuit of alternative drugs has honed in on factor XI/XIa inhibitors. This comprehensive review delves into several key aspects regarding this new target: (i) the role of factor XI in the coagulation cascade; (ii) the genetic evidence and pathophysiologic rationale supporting factor XI inhibition as a therapeutic target; (iii) an exploration of the various types of factor XI/XIa inhibitors currently under investigation; (iv) potential applications of these medications, spanning thromboprophylaxis after orthopedic surgery, stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome, non-cardioembolic stroke, thromboprophylaxis after foreign material implantation, end-stage renal disease, and patients with cancer; and (v) an overview of ongoing studies, recent findings, and the future trajectory of research into these drugs.

Milvexian: A Focus on a New Oral Anticoagulant that Targets Factor XIa for Thromboembolism Prophylaxis

Drugs that target factor XI and/or XIa have been evaluated as alternatives to existing anticoagulants, in light of studies that indicate that a decrease in Factor XI/XIa levels or activity may result in a lower risk of thrombosis without a significant increase in bleeding risk. Milvexian is an investigational small-molecule factor XIa inhibitor that has recently completed phase 2 clinical trials. Preclinical studies were suggestive of its potential to prevent arterial and venous thrombosis. It was well-tolerated in healthy participants, as well as in participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment and moderate or severe renal impairment. Notably, patients who received milvexian after knee arthroplasty had a dose-proportional lower incidence of venous thromboembolism compared to patients who received postoperative enoxaparin, and they had a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding. A separate phase 2 trial was conducted that assessed the use of milvexian for secondary stroke prevention in patients who had ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. It failed its primary objective of establishing a dose-response relationship between milvexian and a composite endpoint of symptomatic ischemic stroke or covert brain infarction. The trial did, however, show a reduction in the relative risk of symptomatic ischemic stroke across most of the treatment groups receiving various dosages of milvexian compared to placebo. The efficacy of milvexian in secondary stroke prevention will be further assessed in an upcoming phase 3 trial. Additional upcoming phase 3 trials will also assess its efficacy in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation as well as in event reduction in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Haemodialysis (HD) requires safe and effective anticoagulation to prevent clot formation within the extracorporeal circuit during dialysis treatments to enable adequate dialysis and minimise adverse events, including major bleeding. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may provide a more predictable dose, reliable anticoagulant effects and be simpler to administer than unfractionated heparin (UFH) for HD anticoagulation, but may accumulate in the kidneys and lead to bleeding.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation strategies (including both heparin and non-heparin drugs) for long-term HD in people with kidney failure. Any intervention preventing clotting within the extracorporeal circuit without establishing anticoagulation within the patient, such as regional citrate, citrate enriched dialysate, heparin-coated dialysers, pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF), and saline flushes were also included.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to November 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled studies (quasi-RCTs) evaluating anticoagulant agents administered during HD treatment in adults and children with kidney failure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool and extracted data. Treatment effects were estimated using random effects meta-analysis and expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 113 studies randomising 4535 participants. The risk of bias in each study was adjudicated as high or unclear for most risk domains. Compared to UFH, LMWH had uncertain effects on extracorporeal circuit thrombosis (3 studies, 91 participants: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.42; I2 = 8%; low certainty evidence), while major bleeding and minor bleeding were not adequately reported. Regional citrate anticoagulation may lower the risk of minor bleeding compared to UFH (2 studies, 82 participants: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.85; I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence). No studies reported data comparing regional citrate to UFH on risks of extracorporeal circuit thrombosis and major bleeding. The effects of very LMWH, danaparoid, prostacyclin, direct thrombin inhibitors, factor XI inhibitors or heparin-grafted membranes were uncertain due to insufficient data. The effects of different LMWH, different doses of LMWH, and the administration of LMWH anticoagulants using inlet versus outlet bloodline or bolus versus infusion were uncertain. Evidence to compare citrate to another citrate or control was scant. The effects of UFH compared to no anticoagulant therapy or different doses of UFH were uncertain. Death, dialysis vascular access outcomes, blood transfusions, measures of anticoagulation effect, and costs of interventions were rarely reported. No studies evaluated the effects of treatment on non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospital admissions. Adverse events were inconsistently and rarely reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulant strategies, including UFH and LMWH, have uncertain comparative risks on extracorporeal circuit thrombosis, while major bleeding and minor bleeding were not adequately reported. Regional citrate may decrease minor bleeding, but the effects on major bleeding and extracorporeal circuit thrombosis were not reported. Evidence supporting clinical decision-making for different forms of anticoagulant strategies for HD is of low and very low certainty, as available studies have not been designed to measure treatment effects on important clinical outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of factor XIa inhibition with milvexian for secondary stroke prevention (AXIOMATIC-SSP): a phase 2, international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial

BACKGROUND

People with factor XI deficiency have lower rates of ischaemic stroke than the general population and infrequent spontaneous bleeding, suggesting that factor XI has a more important role in thrombosis than in haemostasis. Milvexian, an oral small-molecule inhibitor of activated factor XI, added to standard antiplatelet therapy, might reduce the risk of non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke without increasing the risk of bleeding. We aimed to estimate the dose-response of milvexian for recurrent ischaemic cerebral events and major bleeding in patients with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA).

METHODS

AXIOMATIC-SSP was a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial done at 367 hospitals in 27 countries. Eligible participants aged 40 years or older, with acute (<48 h) ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA, were randomly assigned by a web-based interactive response system in a 1:1:1:1:1:2 ratio to receive one of five doses of milvexian (25 mg once daily, 25 mg twice daily, 50 mg twice daily, 100 mg twice daily, or 200 mg twice daily) or matching placebo twice daily for 90 days. All participants received clopidogrel 75 mg daily for the first 21 days and aspirin 100 mg daily for the first 90 days. Investigators, site staff, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of ischaemic stroke or incident covert brain infarct on MRI at 90 days, assessed in all participants allocated to treatment who completed a follow-up MRI brain scan, and the primary analysis assessed the dose-response relationship with Multiple Comparison Procedure-Modelling (MCP-MOD). The main safety outcome was major bleeding at 90 days, assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03766581) and the EU Clinical Trials Register (2017-005029-19).

FINDINGS

Between Jan 27, 2019, and Dec 24, 2021, 2366 participants were randomly allocated to placebo (n=691); milvexian 25 mg once daily (n=328); or twice-daily doses of milvexian 25 mg (n=318), 50 mg (n=328), 100 mg (n=310), or 200 mg (n=351). The median age of participants was 71 (IQR 62-77) years and 859 (36%) were female. At 90 days, the estimates of the percentage of participants with either symptomatic ischaemic stroke or covert brain infarcts were 16·8 (90·2% CI 14·5-19·1) for placebo, 16·7 (14·8-18·6) for 25 mg milvexian once daily, 16·6 (14·8-18·3) for 25 mg twice daily, 15·6 (13·9-17·5) for 50 mg twice daily, 15·4 (13·4-17·6) for 100 mg twice daily, and 15·3 (12·8-19·7) for 200 mg twice daily. No significant dose-response was observed among the five milvexian doses for the primary composite efficacy outcome. Model-based estimates of the relative risk with milvexian compared with placebo were 0·99 (90·2% CI 0·91-1·05) for 25 mg once daily, 0·99 (0·87-1·11) for 25 mg twice daily, 0·93 (0·78-1·11) for 50 mg twice daily, 0·92 (0·75-1·13) for 100 mg twice daily, and 0·91 (0·72-1·26) for 200 mg twice daily. No apparent dose-response was observed for major bleeding (four [1%] of 682 participants with placebo, two [1%] of 325 with milvexian 25 mg once daily, two [1%] of 313 with 25 mg twice daily, five [2%] of 325 with 50 mg twice daily, five [2%] of 306 with 100 mg twice daily, and five [1%] of 344 with 200 mg twice daily). Five treatment-emergent deaths occurred, four of which were considered unrelated to the study drug by the investigator.

INTERPRETATION

Factor XIa inhibition with milvexian, added to dual antiplatelet therapy, did not substantially reduce the composite outcome of symptomatic ischaemic stroke or covert brain infarction and did not meaningfully increase the risk of major bleeding. Findings from our study have informed the design of a phase 3 trial of milvexian for the prevention of ischaemic stroke in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or TIA.

FUNDING

Bristol Myers Squibb and Janssen Research & Development.

Design, expression and biological evaluation of DX-88mut as a novel selective factor XIa inhibitor for antithrombosis

Thrombotic diseases, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and deep vein thrombosis, severely threaten human health, and anticoagulation is an effective way to prevent such illnesses. However, most anticoagulant drugs in the clinic have different bleeding risks. Previous studies have shown that coagulation factor XI is an ideal target for safe anticoagulant drug development. Here, we designed the FXIa inhibitory peptide DX-88mut by replacing Loop1 (DGPCRAAHPR) and Loop2 (IYGGC) in DX-88, which is a clinical drug targeting PKa for the treatment of hereditary angioedema, using Loop1 (TGPCRAMISR) and Loop2 (FYGGC) in the FXIa inhibitory peptide PN2KPI, respectively. DX-88mut selectively inhibited FXIa against a panel of serine proteases with an IC50 value of 14.840 ± 0.453 nM, dose-dependently prolonged APTT in mouse, rat and human plasma, and potently inhibited FeCl3-induced carotid artery thrombosis in mice at a dose of 1 µmol/kg. Additionally, DX-88mut did not show a significant bleeding risk at a dose of 5 µmol/kg. Taken together, these results show that DX-88mut is a potential candidate for the development of a novel antithrombotic agent.

Clotting of the Extracorporeal Circuit in Hemodialysis: Beyond Contact-Activated Coagulation

Thrombotic complications in patients with end-stage kidney disease are frequent. While being a lifesaving treatment for these patients, hemodialysis introduces a thromboinflammatory environment. Additionally, the extracorporeal hemodialysis circuit itself is prone to clotting because of an interaction between different activation mechanisms of the coagulation system, platelets, and the immune system. Anticoagulation of the patient and the machine is frequently complicated by bleeding. We discuss the factors important in this balancing act and touch on potential strategies that are on the horizon to target thromboinflammation.

A new strategy for anticoagulation: The factor XI inhibitors

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are currently the first-choice therapy for the prevention of cardioembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to their more favorable efficacy to safety profile in comparison to vitamin K antagonists (VKA). DOACs did not show a clinical benefit when used for in stroke prevention in patients with mechanic or rheumatic valves or in those who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), in the treatment of VTE in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and in prevention of VTE in medically ill patients. There are some concerns for bleeding excess at the gastrointestinal site for some, but not all, DOACs. In recent years, in order to overcome the limitations of the available DOACs and to explore the advantages of anticoagulation in additional clinical settings, the development of factor XI and factor XII inhibitors as anticoagulant agents has been proposed. Emerging data show that factor XI has a minor role in the physiological process of hemostasis and an important role in the development of thrombosis. Bleeding has been viewed for several years as an unavoidable side effect of anticoagulant therapy. The aim of factor XI inhibitors is to challenge this dogma by favoring the uncoupling between hemostasis and thrombosis. This paper provides an update on the rationale for the use of factor XI inhibitors, their pharmacological properties and the preliminary clinical findings.

Design and Preclinical Characterization Program toward Asundexian (BAY 2433334), an Oral Factor XIa Inhibitor for the Prevention and Treatment of Thromboembolic Disorders

Activated coagulation factor XI (FXIa) is a highly attractive antithrombotic target as it contributes to the development and progression of thrombosis but is thought to play only a minor role in hemostasis so that its inhibition may allow for decoupling of antithrombotic efficacy and bleeding time prolongation. Herein, we report our major efforts to identify an orally bioavailable, reversible FXIa inhibitor. Using a protein structure-based de novo design approach, we identified a novel micromolar hit with attractive physicochemical properties. During lead modification, a critical problem was balancing potency and absorption by focusing on the most important interactions of the lead series with FXIa while simultaneously seeking to improve metabolic stability and the cytochrome P450 interaction profile. In clinical trials, the resulting compound from our extensive research program, asundexian (BAY 2433334), proved to possess the desired DMPK properties for once-daily oral dosing, and even more importantly, the initial pharmacological hypothesis was confirmed.

Determination of the Potential Clinical Benefits of Small Molecule Factor XIa Inhibitors in Arterial Thrombosis

Anticoagulants are the mainstay for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. However, bleeding complications remain a primary concern. Recent advances in understanding the contribution of activated factor XI (FXIa) in arterial thrombosis with a limited impact on hemostasis have led to the development of several FXIa-targeting modalities. Injectable agents including monoclonal antibodies and antisense oligonucleotides against FXIa have been primarily studied in venous thrombosis. The orally active small molecules that specifically inhibit the active site of FXIa are currently being investigated for their antithrombotic activity in both arteries and veins. This review focuses on a discussion of the potential clinical benefits of small molecule FXIa inhibitors, mainly asundexian and milvexian, in arterial thrombosis based on their pharmacological profiles and the compelling results of phase 2 clinical studies. The preclinical and epidemiological basis for the impact of FXIa in hemostasis and arterial thrombosis is also addressed. In recent clinical study results, asundexian appears to reduce ischemic events in patients with myocardial infarction and minor-to-moderate stroke, whereas milvexian possibly provides benefits in patients with minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). In addition, asundexian and milvexian had a minor impact on hemostasis even in combination with dual-antiplatelet therapy. Other orally active FXIa inhibitors also produce antithrombotic activity in vivo with low bleeding risk. Therefore, FXIa inhibitors might represent a new class of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of thrombosis, although the explicit clinical positions of asundexian and milvexian in patients with ischemic stroke, high-risk TIA, and coronary artery disease require confirmation from the outcomes of ongoing phase 3 trials.

Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Recent Advances, Unmet Needs, and Future Direction

Cancer-associated thrombosis, with the incidence rising over the years, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Recent advances in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) include the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which provide a more convenient and effective option than low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Nonetheless, important unmet needs remain including an increased risk of bleeding in certain patient subgroups such as those with gastroesophageal cancer, concerns about drug-drug interactions, and management of patients with severe renal impairment. Although DOACs are more convenient than LMWH, persistence can decline over time. Factor XI inhibitors have potential safety advantages over DOACs because factor XI appears to be essential for thrombosis but not hemostasis. In phase II trials, some factor XI inhibitors were superior to enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE after knee replacement surgery without increasing the risk of bleeding. Ongoing trials are assessing the efficacy and safety of factor XI inhibitors for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE.

News at XI: moving beyond factor Xa inhibitors

Oral anticoagulants are a mainstay for the prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have replaced vitamin K antagonists for many indications. Currently available DOACs include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, which inhibit factor (F) Xa. A new class of DOACs is under development. These new DOACs, which include asundexian and milvexian, inhibit FXIa, which is positioned in the intrinsic pathway of coagulation. Anticoagulants that target FXIa have the potential to be safer than the current DOACs because there is emerging evidence that FXI is essential for thrombosis but mostly dispensable for hemostasis. In addition to the oral inhibitors of FXIa, parenteral inhibitors are also under development. These include fesomersen, an antisense oligonucleotide that reduces the hepatic synthesis of FXI; abelacimab, an antibody that binds to FXI and blocks its activation; and osocimab, an FXIa inhibitory antibody. Focusing on these new agents, this article describes the unmet needs in oral anticoagulation therapy, explains why FXI is a promising target for new oral anticoagulants, reviews phase 2 clinical data on new agents, describes ongoing phase 3 trials, and provides a perspective on the opportunities and challenges for FXI inhibitors.

New pharmacotherapeutic options for oral anticoagulant treatment in atrial fibrillation patients aged 65 and older: factor XIa inhibitors and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Although much progress has been made using anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, bleeding is still a major concern.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews current pharmacotherapeutic options in this setting. Particular emphasis is placed on the ability of the new molecules to minimize the bleeding risk in elderly patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2023 was carried out.

EXPERT OPINION

Contact phase of coagulation is a possible new target for anticoagulant therapy. Indeed, congenital or acquired deficiency of contact phase factors is associated with reduced thrombotic burden and limited risk of spontaneous bleeding. These new drugs seem particularly suitable for stroke prevention in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in whom the hemorrhagic risk is high. Most of anti Factor XI (FXI) drugs are for parenteral use only. A group of small molecules are for oral use and therefore are candidates to substitute direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Doubts remain on the possibility of impaired hemostasis. Indeed, a fine calibration of inhibition of contact phase factors is crucial for an effective and safe treatment.

Titanium is a potent inducer of contact activation: implications for intravascular devices

BACKGROUND

Titanium (Ti) and its alloys are widely used in manufacturing medical devices because of their strength and resistance to corrosion. Although Ti compounds are considered compatible with blood, they appear to support plasma contact activation and may be thrombogenic.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare Ti and titanium nitride (TiN) with known activators of contact activation (kaolin and silica) in plasma-clotting assays and to assess binding and activation of factor XII, (FXII), factor XI (FXI), prekallikrein, and high-molecular-weight kininogen (HK) with Ti/TiN.

METHODS

Ti-based nanospheres and foils were compared with kaolin, silica, and aluminum in plasma-clotting assays. Binding and activation of FXII, prekallikrein, HK, and FXI to surfaces was assessed with western blots and chromogenic assays.

RESULTS

Using equivalent surface amounts, Ti and TiN were comparable with kaolin and superior to silica, for inducing coagulation and FXII autoactivation. Similar to many inducers of contact activation, Ti and TiN are negatively charged; however, their effects on FXII are not neutralized by the polycation polybrene. Antibodies to FXII, prekallikrein, or FXI or coating Ti with poly-L-arginine blocked Ti-induced coagulation. An antibody to FXII reduced FXII and PK binding to Ti, kallikrein generation, and HK cleavage.

CONCLUSION

Titanium compounds induce contact activation with a potency comparable with that of kaolin. Binding of FXII with Ti shares some features with FXII binding to soluble polyanions but may have unique features. Inhibitors targeting FXII or FXI may be useful in mitigating Ti-induced contact activation in patients with titanium-based implants that are exposed to blood.

Development of new anticoagulant in 2023: Prime time for anti-factor XI and XIa inhibitors

Thrombosis remains one of the leading causes of death in the world. The history of anticoagulation has evolved considerably from non-specific drugs (i.e., heparins and vitamin K antagonists, VKA) to agents that directly target specific coagulation factors (i.e., argatroban, fondaparinux and direct oral anticoagulants, DOAC). Since the last decade, DOAC are widely used in clinical practice because of their ease to use with favorable pharmacological profile and not requiring monitoring, particularly for venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. However, despite having a better safety profile than VKA, their bleeding risk is not negligible. Therefore, research is underway to develop new anticoagulant therapies with a better safety profile. One of these news approaches to reduce the risk of bleeding is to target the coagulation in the intrinsic pathway, in particular the contact activation, with the ultimate goal of preventing thrombosis without impairing hemostasis. Based on epidemiological data with patients with inherited factor XI (FXI) deficiency and preclinical studies, FXI emerged as the most promising candidate target separating hemostasis from thrombosis. This review summaries the role of FXI and FXIa in hemostasis, provides evidence of initial success with FXI pathway inhibitors in clinical trials (such as IONIS-FXI_Rx, fesomersen, osocimab, abelacimab, milvexian, asundexian or xisomab 3G3) and highlights the opportunities and challenges for this next generation of anticoagulants.

Effect of high-dose statin therapy on coagulation factors: Lowering of factor XI as a modifier of fibrin clot properties in coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Multiple pleiotropic effects of statins include antithrombotic properties with formation of looser fibrin networks more susceptible to lysis. Recently, rosuvastatin 20 mg/d has been reported to decrease coagulation factors (F) VII, FVIII and FXI in venous thrombosis patients.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated how high-dose statin therapy recommended in coronary artery disease (CAD) alters plasma levels of coagulation factors and if such changes might affect fibrin clot properties.

METHODS

We studied 130 advanced CAD patients, who initially did not achieve the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Before high-dose statin therapy (rosuvastatin 40 mg/d or atorvastatin 80 mg/d) and 6-12 months after its initiation, FII, FV, FVII, FVIII, FIX, FX, FXI and fibrinogen were assessed. We evaluated the impact of statin-induced alterations to the factors on plasma fibrin clot permeability (Ks) reflecting a fibrin pore size, and clot lysis time (CLT) reflecting fibrinolytic potential.

RESULTS

At baseline LDL-C (median 3.2, interquartile range 2.7-3.7 mmol/L) was independently associated solely with FXI (β = 0.58, P < 0.001). Median LDL-C reduction by 25% (P < 0.001) on high-dose statin treatment was accompanied by lowering of FVII, FVIII, and FXI (for all P < 0.001). On high-dose statin treatment, Ks (R = 0.65, P < 0.001) inversely associated with CRP (β = -0.41, P < 0.001), LDL-C (β = -0.26, P = 0.001), and FXI (β = -0.18, P = 0.016). In turn, CLT (R = 0.45, P < 0.001) was positively associated with LDL-C (β = 0.19, P = 0.043) and FXI (β = 0.17, P = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose statin therapy in CAD patients decreases FVII, FVIII, and FXI. The statin-induced reduction in FXI may contribute to less prothrombotic fibrin clot phenotype, indicating additional antithrombotic effect of high-dose statins.

Pharmacology and Clinical Development of Factor XI Inhibitors

Therapeutic anticoagulation is indicated for a variety of circumstances and conditions in several fields of medicine to prevent or treat venous and arterial thromboembolism. According to the different mechanisms of action, the available parenteral and oral anticoagulant drugs share the common principle of hampering or blocking key steps of the coagulation cascade, which unavoidably comes at the price of an increased propensity to bleed. Hemorrhagic complications affect patient prognosis both directly and indirectly (ie, by preventing the adoption of an effective antithrombotic strategy). Inhibition of factor XI (FXI) has emerged as a strategy with the potential to uncouple the pharmacological effect and the adverse events of anticoagulant therapy. This observation is based on the differential contribution of FXI to thrombus amplification, in which it plays a major role, and hemostasis, in which it plays an ancillary role in final clot consolidation. Several agents were developed to inhibit FXI at different stages (ie, suppressing biosynthesis, preventing zymogen activation, or impeding the biological action of the active form), including antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, small synthetic molecules, natural peptides, and aptamers. Phase 2 studies of different classes of FXI inhibitors in orthopedic surgery suggested that dose-dependent reductions in thrombotic complications are not paralleled by dose-dependent increases in bleeding compared with low-molecular-weight heparin. Likewise, the FXI inhibitor asundexian was associated with lower rates of bleeding compared with the activated factor X inhibitor apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation, although no evidence of a therapeutic effect on stroke prevention is available so far. FXI inhibition could also be appealing for patients with other conditions, including end-stage renal disease, noncardioembolic stroke, or acute myocardial infarction, for which other phase 2 studies have been conducted. The balance between thromboprophylaxis and bleeding achieved by FXI inhibitors needs confirmation in large-scale phase 3 clinical trials powered for clinical end points. Several of such trials are ongoing or planned to define the role of FXI inhibitors in clinical practice and to clarify which FXI inhibitor may be most suited for each clinical indication. This article reviews the rationale, pharmacology, results of medium or small phase 2 studies, and future perspectives of drugs inhibiting FXI.

BJTJ-1837, a novel FXI activation-blocking antibody

Background

Factor (F)XI contributes to thrombosis development while it plays a limited role in normal hemostasis. FXI targeting has the potential for preventing and treating thrombosis with little bleeding risk.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to develop novel antibody therapeutics against FXI for the treatment of thrombosis-related diseases.

Methods

Mouse hybridoma technology was applied to screen for anti-FXI antibodies. Surface plasma resonance, enzyme inhibition, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time assays were conducted to characterize the binding affinity and activity of antibodies. A cynomolgus monkey arterial venous shunt model was applied to validate the antithrombotic activities.

Results

A humanized antibody, BJTJ-1837, reported here bound to the protease domain of FXI and activated FXI with high affinity. BJTJ-1837 fully inhibited the activation of FXI by activated FXII and thrombin. BJTJ-1837 also demonstrated strong anticoagulant activity in human and cynomolgus monkey plasma as measured by activated partial thromboplastin time. Moreover, BJTJ-1837 showed favorable antithrombotic activity with a dose-dependent protection in an arterial venous shunt thrombosis model in cynomolgus monkeys without the bleeding adverse effect. Furthermore, BJTJ-1837 displayed favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and good developability.

Conclusion

As a potential antithrombotic therapeutic agent with a safe profile, BJTJ-1837 is a very promising FXI activation-blocking antibody candidate.

Factor XI/XIa Inhibition: The Arsenal in Development for a New Therapeutic Target in Cardio- and Cerebrovascular Disease

Despite major advancements in the development of safer and more effective anticoagulant agents, bleeding complications remain a significant concern in the treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Improvements in our understanding of the coagulation pathways highlights the notion that the contact pathway-specifically factor XI (FXI)-has a greater role in the etiopathogenesis of thrombosis than in physiological hemostasis. As a result, a number of drugs targeting FXI are currently in different stages of testing and development. This article aims to review the different strategies directed towards FXI-inhibition with a brief summation of the agents in clinical development, and to comment on the therapeutic areas that could be explored for potential indications. Therapeutics targeting FXI/FXIa inhibition have the potential to usher in a new era of anticoagulation therapy.

Novel Antithrombotic Agents in Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease: Progress in the Search for the Optimal Treatment

Ischemic cardiovascular diseases have a high incidence and high mortality worldwide. Therapeutic advances in the last decades have reduced cardiovascular mortality, with antithrombotic therapy being the cornerstone of medical treatment. Yet, currently used antithrombotic agents carry an inherent risk of bleeding associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of thrombus formation have led to the discovery of new targets and the development of new anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents aimed at preventing thrombus stabilization and growth while preserving hemostasis. In the following review, we will comment on the key limitation of the currently used antithrombotic regimes in ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke and provide an in-depth and state-of-the-art overview of the emerging anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents in the pipeline with the potential to improve clinical outcomes.

Nanobodies against factor XI apple 3 domain inhibit binding of factor IX and reveal a novel binding site for high molecular weight kininogen

BACKGROUND

Factor XI (FXI) is a promising target for novel anticoagulants because it shows a strong relation to thromboembolic diseases, while fulfilling a mostly supportive role in hemostasis. Anticoagulants targeting FXI could therefore reduce the risk for thrombosis, without increasing the chance of bleeding side effects.

OBJECTIVES

To generate nanobodies that can interfere with FXIa mediated activation of factor IX (FIX).

METHODS

Nanobodies were selected for binding to the apple 3 domain of FXI and their effects on FXI and coagulation were measured in purified protein systems as well as in plasma-based coagulation assays. Additionally, the binding epitope of selected nanobodies was assessed by hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

We have identified five nanobodies that inhibit FIX activation by FXI by competing with the FIX binding site on FXI. Interestingly, a sixth nanobody was found to target a different binding epitope in the apple 3 domain, resulting in competition with the FXI-high molecular weight kininogen (HK) interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

We have characterized a nanobody targeting the FXI apple 3 domain that elucidates the binding orientation of HK on FXI. Moreover, we have produced five nanobodies that can inhibit the FXI-FIX interaction.

SHR2285, the first selectively oral FXIa inhibitor in China: Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics combined with aspirin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SHR2285, the first oral coagulation factor XIa (FXIa) inhibitor developed in China in combination with aspirin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor in healthy subjects. Methods: This study was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (only SHR2285) design (NCT04945616). A total of 52 healthy subjects, 29 male and 23 female, were completed in this study. The subjects were divided into three groups: A, B and C, 16 subjects in group A [aspirin + clopidogrel + placebo or SHR2285 200 mg bid (1:3, 4 received placebo and 12 received SHR2285)] 16 subjects in group B [aspirin + clopidogrel + placebo or SHR2285 300 mg bid (1:3, 3 received placebo and 13 received SHR2285)] and 20 subjects in group C (aspirin + ticagrelor + placebo or SHR2285 300 mg bid (2:3, 8 received placebo and 12 received SHR2285)), respectively. All groups were administered orally for six consecutive days. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics parameters were assessed. Results: 1) SHR2285 was well tolerated, and all adverse events were mild. There was no evidence of an increased risk of bleeding. 2) After 6 days of twice-daily administration, SHR2285 could reach a steady state. The mean half-life of SHR2285 in group A, group B and group C was 13.9 h, 14.5 h and 13.8 h, respectively. 3) SHR2285 markedly inhibited FXI activity and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). In group A, group B and group C, the mean maximum inhibition rate of FXI activity was 84.8%, 89.3% and 92.2% and the mean maximum prolongation of APTT was 2.08-fold, 2.36-fold and 2.26-fold, respectively. Conclusion: These data suggest that SHR2285, a potential oral FXIa inhibitor, is expected to become a novel, safe and effective anticoagulant when combined with aspirin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Milvexian in Participants with Normal Renal Function and Participants with Moderate or Severe Renal Impairment

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of moderate or severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of milvexian.

METHODS

This open-label, parallel-group study assessed the PK, safety, and tolerability of a single oral 60 mg dose of milvexian in participants with normal renal function (n = 8; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2) and participants with moderate (n = 8; eGFR ≥ 30 to ≤ 59 mL/min/1.73 m2) or severe (n = 8; eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) renal impairment. Regression analysis was performed using linear regression of log-transformed PK parameters versus eGFR.

RESULTS

Milvexian was well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events, or serious bleeding reported. The maximum milvexian concentration (Cmax) was similar for all groups. Based on a regression analysis of milvexian concentration versus eGFR, participants with eGFR values of 30 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, had area under the curve (AUC) values that were 41% and 54% greater than in participants with normal renal function. Median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was similar for the three groups (4.5-5.0 h). The half-life increased for participants with moderate (18.0 h) or severe (17.7 h) renal impairment compared with those with normal renal function (13.8 h).

CONCLUSION

A single dose of milvexian 60 mg was safe and well tolerated in participants with normal renal function and moderate or severe renal impairment. There was a similar increase in milvexian exposure between the moderate and severe renal groups.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03196206, first posted 22 June 2017).

Factor XIa inhibition with asundexian after acute non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke (PACIFIC-Stroke): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial

BACKGROUND

Asundexian (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany), an oral small molecule factor XIa (FXIa) inhibitor, might prevent thrombosis without increasing bleeding. Asundexian's effect for secondary prevention of recurrent stroke is unknown.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b dose-finding trial (PACIFIC-Stroke), patients with acute (within 48 h) non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke were recruited from 196 hospitals in 23 countries. Patients were eligible if they were aged 45 years or older, to be treated with antiplatelet therapy, and able to have a baseline MRI (either before or within 72 h of randomisation). Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), using an interactive web-based response system and stratified according to anticipated antiplatelet therapy (single vs dual), to once daily oral asundexian (BAY 2433334) 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, or placebo in addition to usual antiplatelet therapy, and were followed up during treatment for 26-52 weeks. Brain MRIs were obtained at study entry and at 26 weeks or as soon as possible after treatment discontinuation. The primary efficacy outcome was the dose-response effect on the composite of incident MRI-detected covert brain infarcts and recurrent symptomatic ischaemic stroke at or before 26 weeks after randomisation. The primary safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. The efficacy outcome was assessed in all participants assigned to treatment, and the safety outcome was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04304508, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between June 15, 2020, and July 22, 2021, 1880 patients were screened and 1808 participants were randomly assigned to asundexian 10 mg (n=455), 20 mg (n=450), or 50 mg (n=447), or placebo (n=456). Mean age was 67 years (SD 10) and 615 (34%) participants were women, 1193 (66%) were men, 1505 (83%) were White, and 268 (15%) were Asian. The mean time from index stroke to randomisation was 36 h (SD 10) and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 2·0 (IQR 1·0-4·0). 783 (43%) participants received dual antiplatelet treatment for a mean duration of 70·1 days (SD 113·4) after randomisation. At 26 weeks, the primary efficacy outcome was observed in 87 (19%) of 456 participants in the placebo group versus 86 (19%) of 455 in the asundexian 10 mg group (crude incidence ratio 0·99 [90% CI 0·79-1·24]), 99 (22%) of 450 in the asundexian 20 mg group (1·15 [0·93-1·43]), and 90 (20%) of 447 in the asundexian 50 mg group (1·06 [0·85-1·32]; t statistic -0·68; p=0·80). The primary safety outcome was observed in 11 (2%) of 452 participants in the placebo group versus 19 (4%) of 445 in the asundexian 10 mg group, 14 (3%) of 446 in the asundexian 20 mg group, and 19 (4%) of 443 in the asundexian 50 mg group (all asundexian doses pooled vs placebo hazard ratio 1·57 [90% CI 0·91-2·71]).

INTERPRETATION

In this phase 2b trial, FXIa inhibition with asundexian did not reduce the composite of covert brain infarction or ischaemic stroke and did not increase the composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared with placebo in patients with acute, non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke.

FUNDING

Bayer AG.

Current and Future Insights for Optimizing Antithrombotic Therapy to Reduce the Burden of Cardiovascular Ischemic Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

The pharmacological treatment strategies for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in recent years are constantly evolving to develop more potent antithrombotic agents, as reflected by the introduction of more novel P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors and anticoagulants to reduce the ischemic risk among ACS patients. Despite the substantial improvements in the current antithrombotic regimen, a noticeable number of ACS patients continue to experience ischemic events. Providing effective ischemic risk reduction while balancing bleeding risk remains a clinical challenge. This updated review discusses the currently approved and widely used antithrombotic agents and explores newer antithrombotic treatment strategies under development for the initial phase of ACS.

Rationale and design of the AXIOMATIC-SSP phase II trial: Antithrombotic treatment with factor XIa inhibition to Optimize Management of Acute Thromboembolic events for Secondary Stroke Prevention

BACKGROUND

Individuals with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) have a high early risk of ischemic stroke despite dual antiplatelet therapy. The risk of ischemic stroke, and associated disability, represents a significant unmet clinical need. Genetic variants resulting in reduced factor XI levels are associated with reduced risk for ischemic stroke but are not associated with increased intracranial bleeding. Milvexian is an oral small-molecule inhibitor of FXIa that binds activated factor XI with high affinity and selectivity and may reduce the risk of stroke when added to antiplatelet drugs without significant bleeding. We aimed to evaluate the dose-response relationship of milvexian in participants treated with dual antiplatelets.

METHODS

We began a phase II, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at 367 sites in 2019. Participants (N = 2366) with ischemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤7) or high-risk TIA (ABCD² score ≥6) were randomized to 1 of 5 doses of milvexian or placebo for 90 days. Participants also received clopidogrel 75 mg daily for the first 21 days and aspirin 100 mg for 90 days. The efficacy endpoint was the composite of ischemic stroke or incident infarct on magnetic resonance imaging. Major bleeding, defined as type 3 or 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium, was the safety endpoint. Participant follow-up will end in 2022.

CONCLUSION

The AXIOMATIC-SSP trial will evaluate the dose-response of milvexian for ischemic stroke occurrence in participants with ischemic stroke or TIA.

A Factor XIa Inhibitor Engineered from Banded Krait Venom Toxin: Efficacy and Safety in Rodent Models of Arterial and Venous Thrombosis

Activated factor XI (FXIa) is an important antithrombotic drug target. Clinical and pre-clinical data have demonstrated that its inhibition attenuates thrombosis with minimal risk of excessive bleeding. We isolated Fasxiator from the venom of banded krait Bungarus fasciatus and subsequently engineered FasxiatorN17R,L19E, with improved affinity (Ki = 0.9 nM) and selectivity towards FXIa. Here, we assess the in vivo efficacy and bleeding risk of rFasxiatorN17R, L19E in pre-clinical animal models. Rats injected intravenously (i.v.) with bolus rFasxiatorN17R, L19E showed the specific in vivo attenuation of the intrinsic coagulation pathway, lasting for at least 60 min. We performed the in vivo dose-ranging experiments for rFasxiatorN17R, L19E as follows: FeCl3-induced carotid artery occlusion in rats (arterial thrombosis); inferior vena cava ligation in mice (venous thrombosis); tail bleeding time in both rats and mice (bleeding risk). Head-to-head comparisons were made using therapeutic dosages of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for arterial and venous thrombosis, respectively. In the arterial thrombosis model, 2 mg/kg i.v. rFasxiatorN17R,L19E achieved a similar antithrombotic efficacy to that of UFH, with >3-fold lower bleeding time. In the venous thrombosis model, the 10 mg/kg subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of rFasxiatorN17R,L19E achieved similar efficacy and bleeding levels to those of LMWH enoxaparin. Overall, rFasxiatorN17R,L19E represents a promising molecule for the development of FXIa-targeting anticoagulants.

Pharmacological profile of asundexian, a novel, orally bioavailable inhibitor of factor XIa

BACKGROUND

Activated coagulation factor XI (FXIa) contributes to the development and propagation of thrombosis but plays only a minor role in hemostasis; therefore, it is an attractive antithrombotic target.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacology of asundexian (BAY 2433334), a small molecule inhibitor targeting FXIa, in vitro and in various rabbit models.

METHODS

The effects of asundexian on FXIa activity, selectivity versus other proteases, plasma thrombin generation, and clotting assays were evaluated. Antithrombotic effects were determined in FeCl2 - and arterio-venous (AV) shunt models. Asundexian was administered intravenously or orally, before or during thrombus formation, and with or without antiplatelet drugs (aspirin and ticagrelor). Potential effects of asundexian on bleeding were evaluated in ear-, gum-, and liver injury models.

RESULTS

Asundexian inhibited human FXIa with high potency and selectivity. It reduced FXIa activity, thrombin generation triggered by contact activation or low concentrations of tissue factor, and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time in human, rabbit, and various other species, but not in rodents. In the FeCl2 -injury models, asundexian reduced thrombus weight versus control, and in the arterial model when added to aspirin and ticagrelor. In the AV shunt model, asundexian reduced thrombus weight when administered before or during thrombus formation. Asundexian alone or in combination with antiplatelet drugs did not increase bleeding times or blood loss in any of the models studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Asundexian is a potent oral FXIa inhibitor with antithrombotic efficacy in arterial and venous thrombosis models in prevention and intervention settings, without increasing bleeding.

Factor XI Inhibitors for Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: A Review on the Rationale and Update on Current Evidence

Although anticoagulation therapy has evolved from non-specific drugs (i.e., heparins and vitamin K antagonists) to agents that directly target specific coagulation factors (i.e., direct oral anticoagulants, argatroban, fondaparinux), thrombosis remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Direct oral anticoagulants (i.e., factor IIa- and factor Xa-inhibitors) now dominate clinical practice because of their favorable pharmacological profile and ease of use, particularly in venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. However, despite having a better safety profile than vitamin K antagonists, their bleeding risk is not insignificant. This is true for all currently available anticoagulants, and a high bleeding risk is considered a contraindication to anticoagulation. As a result, ongoing research focuses on developing future anticoagulants with an improved safety profile. Several promising approaches to reduce the bleeding risk involve targeting the intrinsic (or contact activation) pathway of coagulation, with the ultimate goal of preventing thrombosis without impairing hemostasis. Based on epidemiological data on hereditary factor deficiencies and preclinical studies factor XI (FXI) emerged as the most promising candidate target. In this review, we highlight unmet clinical needs of anticoagulation therapy, outlay the rationale and evidence for inhibiting FXI, discuss FXI inhibitors in current clinical trials, conduct an exploratory meta-analysis on their efficacy and safety, and provide an outlook on the potential clinical application of these novel anticoagulants.