The polygenic nature of inhibitors in hemophilia A: results from the Hemophilia Inhibitor Genetics Study (HIGS) Combined Cohort

Mutation detection and inhibitor analysis of 43 children with severe hemophilia A in a single center: three novel mutations

To investigate the risk factors of FVIII inhibitors development in severe hemophilia A (HA) patients who were received on-demand therapy and were infused with plasma cryoprecipitate and multiple FVIII concentrates alternately. We collected clinical information from 43 severe HA children who were treated with plasma cryoprecipitate and multiple FVIII concentrates. The F8 mutation was detected by long-distance PCR for inversion and detected by all exons and their flanking sequencing for other mutations. The inhibitor detection was performed by Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay. The impact of novel amino substitutions on FVIII protein was predicted by SIFT and PolyPhen-2. The 3D analysis of missense mutations was performed using Swiss-PdbViewer. FVIII inhibitors were detected in nine cases (20.9%). All of the inhibitor positive cases had high risk F8 gene mutations. In most of the positive cases (7/9), inhibitors were developed during the first 10 EDs, which was significantly higher than that in the 10-50 EDs group and 50 EDs group (p = 0.009). Three novel mutations were reported, including c.214G > T (E72X), c.218 T > C (F73S), and c.2690C > G (S840X). For severe HA patients who are treated with multiple products of replacement therapy, it is important to supervise inhibitor during the first 10EDs, especially for those with high risk F8 gene mutations. F8 gene mutation is one of the most important genetic factors for inhibitor development. It is essential to detect F8 gene for all severe HA patients. Three novel mutations were reported to expand the mutation spectrum of the F8 gene.

A review of the rationale for gene therapy for hemophilia A with inhibitors: one-shot tolerance and treatment?

The therapeutic landscape for people living with hemophilia A (PwHA) has changed dramatically in recent years, but many clinical challenges remain, including the development of inhibitory antibodies directed against factor VIII (FVIII) that occur in approximately 30% of people with severe hemophilia A. Emicizumab, an FVIII mimetic bispecific monoclonal antibody, provides safe and effective bleeding prophylaxis for many PwHA, but clinicians still explore therapeutic strategies that result in immunologic tolerance to FVIII to enable effective treatment with FVIII for problematic bleeding events. This immune tolerance induction (ITI) to FVIII is typically accomplished through repeated long-term exposure to FVIII using a variety of protocols. Meanwhile, gene therapy has recently emerged as a novel ITI option that provides an intrinsic, consistent source of FVIII. As gene therapy and other therapies now expand therapeutic options for PwHA, we review the persistent unmet medical needs with respect to FVIII inhibitors and effective ITI in PwHA, the immunology of FVIII tolerization, the latest research on tolerization strategies, and the role of liver-directed gene therapy to mediate FVIII ITI.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

Association between interleukin-2 (rs2069762) gene polymorphism and FVIII inhibitor development in Indonesian patients with severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in hemophilia A (HA) patients render FVIII replacement therapy ineffective. Although its development cause is unclear, it has been classified into therapeutic and genetic-related etiologies. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in several cytokine genes, including interleukin (IL)-2, could increase the risk of FVIII inhibitor development. This study aimed to evaluate the association between IL-2 (rs2069762) gene SNP and FVIII inhibitor development in Indonesian patients with severe HA. METHODS The IL-2 (rs2069762) gene SNP was examined in 119 HA patients. The presence of FVIII inhibitors was quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, with a titer of <0.28 ng/ml considered negative. Patients were divided into two groups: 59 with FVIII inhibitors (positive group) and 60 without inhibitors (negative group). The genotype of the subjects was determined using peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS There was no association between IL-2 (rs2069762) gene polymorphism and FVIII inhibitor development on genotypes (p = 0.138) and allele frequencies (p = 0.780). CONCLUSIONS IL-2 (rs2069762) gene polymorphism is not a risk factor in the development of FVIII inhibitors in Indonesian patients with severe HA. Thus, further polymorphism studies in other cytokine genes are required to gain a comprehensive understanding of the FVIII inhibitor development.

Spectrum of Causative Mutations in Patients with Hemophilia A in Russia

Hemophilia A (HA) is one of the most widespread, X-linked, inherited bleeding disorders, which results from defects in the F8 gene. Nowadays, more than 3500 different pathogenic variants leading to HA have been described. Mutation analysis in HA is essential for accurate genetic counseling of patients and their relatives. We analyzed patients from 273 unrelated families with different forms of HA. The analysis consisted of testing for intron inversion (inv22 and inv1), and then sequencing all functionally important F8 gene fragments. We identified 101 different pathogenic variants in 267 patients, among which 35 variants had never been previously reported in international databases. We found inv22 in 136 cases and inv1 in 12 patients. Large deletions (1-8 exons) were found in 5 patients, and we identified a large insertion in 1 patient. The remaining 113 patients carried point variants involving either single nucleotide or several consecutive nucleotides. We report herein the largest genetic analysis of HA patients issued in Russia.

Immunogenicity of Current and New Therapies for Hemophilia A

Anti-drug antibody (ADA) development is a significant complication in the treatment of several conditions. For decades, the mainstay of hemophilia A treatment was the replacement of deficient coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) to restore hemostasis, control, and prevent bleeding events. Recently, new products have emerged for hemophilia A replacement therapy, including bioengineered FVIII molecules with enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles: the extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII products. However, the main complication resulting from replacement treatment in hemophilia A is the development of anti-FVIII neutralizing alloantibodies, known as inhibitors, affecting approximately 25–30% of severe hemophilia A patients. Therefore, the immunogenicity of each FVIII product and the mechanisms that could help increase the tolerance to these products have become important research topics in hemophilia A. Furthermore, patients with inhibitors continue to require effective treatment for breakthrough bleedings and procedures, despite the availability of non-replacement therapy, such as emicizumab. Herein, we discuss the currently licensed treatments available for hemophilia A and the immunogenicity of new therapies, such as EHL-rFVIII products, compared to other products available.

Genome-Wide Association Study and Gene-Based Analysis of Participants With Hemophilia A and Inhibitors in the My Life, Our Future Research Repository

Introduction

Up to 30% of individuals with hemophilia A develop inhibitors to replacement factor VIII (FVIII), rendering the treatment ineffective. The underlying mechanism of inhibitor development remains poorly understood. The My Life, Our Future Research Repository (MLOF RR) has gathered F8 and F9 mutational information, phenotypic data, and biological material from over 11,000 participants with hemophilia A (HA) and B as well as carriers enrolled across US hemophilia treatment centers, including over 5,000 whole-genome sequences. Identifying genes associated with inhibitors may contribute to our understanding of why certain patients develop those neutralizing antibodies.

Aim and Methods

Here, we performed a genome-wide association study and gene-based analyses to identify genes associated with inhibitors in participants with HA from the MLOF RR.

Results

We identify a genome-wide significant association within the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus in participants with HA with F8 intronic inversions. HLA typing revealed independent associations with the HLA alleles major histocompatibility complex, class II, DR beta 1 (HLA DRB1*15:01) and major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ beta 1 (DQB1*03:03). Variant aggregation tests further identified low-frequency variants within GRID2IP (glutamate receptor, ionotropic, delta 2 [GRID2] interacting protein 1) significantly associated with inhibitors.

Conclusion

Overall, our study confirms the association of DRB1*15:01 with FVIII inhibitors and identifies a novel association of DQB1*03:03 in individuals with HA carrying intronic inversions of F8. In addition, our results implicate GRID2IP, encoding GRID2-interacting protein, with the development of inhibitors, and suggest an unrecognized role of this gene in autoimmunity.

Neutralizing Antibodies Against Factor VIII Can Occur Through a Non-Germinal Center Pathway

Humoral immunity to factor VIII (FVIII) represents a significant challenge for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A. Current paradigms indicate that neutralizing antibodies against FVIII (inhibitors) occur through a classical CD4 T cell, germinal center (GC) dependent process. However, clinical observations suggest that the nature of the immune response to FVIII may differ between patients. While some patients produce persistent low or high inhibitor titers, others generate a transient response. Moreover, FVIII reactive memory B cells are only detectable in some patients with sustained inhibitor titers. The determinants regulating the type of immune response a patient develops, let alone how the immune response differs in these patients remains incompletely understood. One hypothesis is that polymorphisms within immunoregulatory genes alter the underlying immune response to FVIII, and thereby the inhibitor response. Consistent with this, studies report that inhibitor titers to FVIII differ in animals with the same F8 pathogenic variant but completely distinct backgrounds; though, how these genetic disparities affect the immune response to FVIII remains to be investigated. Given this, we sought to mechanistically dissect how genetics impact the underlying immune response to FVIII. In particular, as the risk of producing inhibitors is weakly associated with differences in HLA, we hypothesized that genetic factors other than HLA influence the immune response to FVIII and downstream inhibitor formation. Our data demonstrate that FVIII deficient mice encoding the same MHC and F8 variant produce disparate inhibitor titers, and that the type of inhibitor response formed associates with the ability to generate GCs. Interestingly, the formation of antibodies through a GC or non-GC pathway does not appear to be due to differences in CD4 T cell immunity, as the CD4 T cell response to an immunodominant epitope in FVIII was similar in these mice. These results indicate that genetics can impact the process by which inhibitors develop and may in part explain the apparent propensity of patients to form distinct inhibitor responses. Moreover, these data highlight an underappreciated immunological pathway of humoral immunity to FVIII and lay the groundwork for identification of biomarkers for the development of approaches to tolerize against FVIII.

Haemophilia

Haemophilia A and B are rare congenital, recessive X-linked disorders caused by lack or deficiency of clotting factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX), respectively. The severity of the disease depends on the reduction of levels of FVIII or FIX, which are determined by the type of the causative mutation in the genes encoding the factors (F8 and F9, respectively). The hallmark clinical characteristic, especially in untreated severe forms, is bleeding (spontaneous or after trauma) into major joints such as ankles, knees and elbows, which can result in the development of arthropathy. Intracranial bleeds and bleeds into internal organs may be life-threatening. The median life expectancy was ~30 years until the 1960s, but improved understanding of the disorder and development of efficacious therapy based on prophylactic replacement of the missing factor has caused a paradigm shift, and today individuals with haemophilia can look forward to a virtually normal life expectancy and quality of life. Nevertheless, the potential development of inhibitory antibodies to infused factor is still a major hurdle to overcome in a substantial proportion of patients. Finally, gene therapy for both types of haemophilia has progressed remarkably and could soon become a reality.

Non-Human Glycans Can Regulate Anti-FVIII Antibody Formation in Mice

Recombinant Factor VIII (FVIII) products represent a life-saving intervention for patients with hemophilia A. However, patients can develop antibodies against FVIII that prevent FVIII function and directly increase morbidity and mortality. The development of anti-FVIII antibodies varies depending on the type of recombinant product employed, with previous studies suggesting that 2nd generation baby hamster kidney (BHK)-derived FVIII products display greater immunogenicity than 3rd generation Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-derived FVIII. However, the underlying mechanisms responsible for these differences remain incompletely understood. Our results demonstrate that BHK cells express higher levels of the non-human carbohydrate a1-3 galactose (aGal) than CHO cells, suggesting that aGal incorporation onto FVIII may result in anti-aGal antibody recognition that could positively influence the development of anti-FVIII antibodies. Consistent with this, BHK-derived FVIII exhibits increased levels of aGal, which corresponds to increased reactivity with anti-aGal antibodies. Infusion of BHK-derived, but not CHO-derived, FVIII into aGal knock out mice, which spontaneously generate anti-aGal antibodies, results in significantly higher anti-FVIII antibody formation, suggesting that the increased levels of aGal on BHK-derived FVIII can influence immunogenicity. These results suggest that post-translational modifications of recombinant FVIII products with non-human carbohydrates may influence the development of anti-FVIII antibodies.

FVIII Immunogenicity-Bioinformatic Approaches to Evaluate Inhibitor Risk in Non-severe Hemophilia A

The life-long inhibitor risk in non-severe hemophilia A has been an important clinical and research focus in recent years. Non-severe hemophilia A is most commonly caused by point mutation, missense F8 genotypes, of which over 500 variants are described. The immunogenic potential of just a single amino acid change within a complex 2,332 amino acid protein is an important reminder of the challenges of protein replacement therapies in diverse, global populations. Although some F8 genotypes have been identified as "high risk" mutations in non-severe hemophilia A (e.g., R593C), this is likely, in part at least, a reporting bias and oversimplification of the underlying immunological mechanism. Bioinformatic approaches offer a strategy to dissect the contribution of F8 genotype in the context of the wider HLA diversity through which antigenic peptides will necessarily be presented. Extensive modeling of all permutations of FVIII-derived fifteen-mer peptides straddling all reported F8 genotype positions demonstrate the likely heterogeneity of peptide binding affinity to different HLA II grooves. For the majority of F8 genotypes it is evident that inhibitor risk prediction is dependent on the combination of F8 genotype and available HLA II. Only a minority of FVIII-derived peptides are predicted to bind to all candidate HLA molecules. In silico predictions still over call the risk of inhibitor occurrence, suggestive of mechanisms of "protection" against clinically meaningful inhibitor events. The structural homology between FVIII and FV provides an attractive mechanism by which some F8 genotypes may be afforded co-incidental tolerance through homology of FV and FVIII primary amino sequence. In silico strategies enable the extension of this hypothesis to analyse the extent to which co-incidental cross-matching exists between FVIII-derived primary peptide sequences and any other protein in the entire human proteome and thus potential central tolerance. This review of complimentary in vitro, in silico, and clinical epidemiology data documents incremental insights into immunological mechanism of inhibitor occurrence in non-severe hemophilia A over the last decade. However, complex questions remain about antigenic processing and presentation to truly understand and predict an individual person with hemophilia risk of inhibitor occurrence.

Detection of F8 int22h inversions using digital droplet PCR and mile-post assays

BACKGROUND

Inversions involving intron 22 (Inv22) of F8 are detected in approximately 45% of all severe hemophilia A patients. Diagnosis is complicated by the large size of the ~9.5 kb int22h repeated sequence, which generates the inversions. Methods such as long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and inverse-shifting PCR are currently used diagnostically, but suffer from low PCR efficiencies and are difficult to standardize.

OBJECTIVES

To design and validate a sensitive and robust assay for the detection of F8 int22h inversions.

METHODS

Digital droplet PCR using mile-post assays was used to investigate archival DNA samples.

RESULTS

The detection of linkage as a function of physical distance between loci was investigated using an anchor locus and mile-post loci at 1, 6, 12 and 15 kb distances from the anchor locus. The proportion of linked molecules decreased with increasing distance between loci and showed 30% to 40% linked molecules for loci 12 to15 kb apart. Mile-post assays specific for wild type and Inv22 type 1 and 2 chromosomes were then designed and optimized. All three assays showed high specificities and sensitivities, with coefficients of variation <5% for all assays. Analysis of 106 patients and 20 carrier mothers showed complete concordance with previously known mutation status. The analysis demonstrated the robustness of the assays versus input DNA concentration (6 ng and higher) and level of fragmentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital droplet PCR and mile-post assays can be used to detect F8 int22h inversions. The assay systems are technically simple to perform, highly efficient, and robust.

Removal of Mannose-Ending Glycan at Asn2118 Abrogates FVIII Presentation by Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells

The development of an immune response against therapeutic factor VIII is the major complication in hemophilia A patients. Oligomannose carbohydrates at N239 and/or N2118 on factor VIII allow its binding to the macrophage mannose receptor expressed on human dendritic cells, thereby leading to factor VIII endocytosis and presentation to CD4+ T lymphocytes. Here, we investigated whether altering the interaction of factor VIII with mannose-sensitive receptors on antigen-presenting cells may be a strategy to reduce factor VIII immunogenicity. Gene transfer experiments in factor VIII-deficient mice indicated that N239Q and/or N2118Q factor VIII mutants have similar specific activities as compared to non-mutated factor VIII; N239Q/N2118Q mutant corrected blood loss upon tail clip. Production of the corresponding recombinant FVIII mutants or light chains indicated that removal of the N-linked glycosylation site at N2118 is sufficient to abrogate in vitro the activation of FVIII-specific CD4+ T cells by human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. However, removal of mannose-ending glycans at N2118 did not alter factor VIII endocytosis and presentation to CD4+ T cells by mouse antigen-presenting cells. In agreement with this, the N2118Q mutation did not reduce factor VIII immunogenicity in factor VIII-deficient mice. Our results highlight differences in the endocytic pathways between human and mouse dendritic cell subsets, and dissimilarities in tissue distribution and function of endocytic receptors such as CD206 in both species. Further investigations in preclinical models of hemophilia A closer to humans are needed to decipher the exact role of mannose-ending glycans in factor VIII immunogenicity.

An evaluation of the safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa for hemophilia A

Introduction: Hemophilia A is an inherited disorder that is characterized by decreased or absent factor (F)VIII and an increased risk of bleeding. Clinical presentation of the severe form of the disease includes spontaneous bleeding into the joints and muscles, while patients with milder forms usually exhibit trauma-associated bleeding. The treatment of hemophilia aims to prevent bleeding. A number of clotting FVIII concentrates are available for managing hemophilia A, which have different safety and efficacy characteristics. Advancements in biotechnology have enabled development of recombinant factor concentrates, which thus minimize the risk of transmitting infectious diseases. Turoctocog alfa (NovoEight®, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) was the first third-generation B-domain truncated recombinant FVIII.Areas covered: The manuscript describes the characteristics of turoctocog alfa, as well as its efficacy and safety for prophylaxis and on-demand treatment for patients with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors.Expert opinion: In clinical trials, turoctocog alfa has demonstrated very good efficacy and safety for the prophylaxis and on-demand treatment of hemophilia A patients, as well as high hemostatic activity during surgery and in managing bleeding episodes. Post-marketing studies and real-life data are anticipated to further reinforce the value of long-term prophylaxis, and estimate the incidence of inhibitors to FVIII.

Prevalence of inhibitors and clinical characteristics in patients with haemophilia in a middle-income Latin American country

INTRODUCTION

Development of inhibitors is the most serious complication in patients with haemophilia (PWH). The prevalence of inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A (HA) is approximately 25%-30%. Inhibitor prevalence differs among populations. Some studies report a prevalence of almost twice in Hispanic as compared to Caucasian patients. Most data available, on the prevalence of inhibitors and their predisposing factors, originate from centres in developed countries.

AIM

Establish the prevalence of inhibitors of FVIII and FIX in Mexico.

METHODS

This was an observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study. The records of all patients diagnosed with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB), with and without inhibitors, were included. Clinical and demographical characteristics of patients with inhibitors were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 22. The Ethics Committees of the various participating institutions approved this study.

RESULTS

A total of 1455 patients from the 20 participating centres were recruited, from which 1208 (83.02%) had HA and 247 (16.97%) were diagnosed with HB. The presence of inhibitors in severe HA was reported in 93/777(11.96%), and 10/162 (6.17%) in severe HB. Of them, 91.7% exhibited high titres in HA and 100% in HB.

CONCLUSION

In Mexico, the general prevalence of inhibitors varies considerably among centres. This study established a basis of comparison for future development and advances in the treatment and follow-up of patients. These findings also augment our understanding of risk factors related to inhibitor development.

Factor VIII: Perspectives on Immunogenicity and Tolerogenic Strategies

Therapeutic treatment of bleeds with FVIII can lead to an antibody response that effectively inhibits its function. Herein, we review the factors that contribute to this immunogenicity and possible ways to overcome it.

Investigating the influence of LCT rs3754689 polymorphism on inhibitor development in Iranian and Afghan patients with severe hemophilia A

: Development of alloantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) in patients with severe hemophilia A is the main complication of FVIII replacement therapy. There are many studies indicating several genetic factors associated with inhibitor development. A recent study showed that there is a correlation between the risk of inhibitor development and LCT rs3754689 polymorphism among Italian hemophilia A patients. The aim of this study was to speculate whether LCT rs3754689 polymorphism is correlated to inhibitor development in Afghan and Iranian patients. In addition, we assessed the association of F8 gene mutations and inhibitor development in Iranian patients. This case-control study was conducted on 33 severe hemophilia A patients with inhibitor and 119 samples without inhibitor. Genotyping was performed by Sanger sequencing, inverse and multiplex PCR. According to the obtained data, we found a significant correlation between LCT rs3754689 polymorphism and the risk of inhibitor development in Afghan patients (observed risk, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.88; P = 0.012). Among Iranian patients, rs3754689 polymorphism showed no significant association with inhibitor development against FVIII (P > 0.05). However, we found a significant correlation between the risk of inhibitor formation and large deletions and nonsense mutations in F8 gene among Iranian patients (observed risk, 7.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.93-27.18; P = 0.003). Lack of association of rs3754689 polymorphism in Iranian population shows the various effects of genetic markers in different populations. More studies in different ethnicities or larger sample sizes are recommended.

Polymorphisms in the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 immune regulatory gene and their impact on inhibitor development in patients with hemophilia A

Objective

The development of inhibitors against infused factor VIII represents the most severe complication of substitution therapy in hemophilia A (HA) patients. Data on risk factors for inhibitor formation in Iraqi Kurdish patients with HA are unavailable. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in an immune regulatory gene in the emergence of inhibitors.

Methods

We focused on 126 patients with either severe or mild/moderate HA presenting with and without inhibitors. We analyzed the frequency of two polymorphisms in the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 gene (CTLA-4; CTLA-4-318C > T and CTLA-4 + 49A > G). Genotyping was performed using restriction fragment length polymorphism–PCR and direct sequencing.

Results

We found no significant correlation between the CTLA-4-318 C > T T allele and inhibitor development among patients with severe or mild/moderate HA. However, a significantly high inhibitor risk was detected for the CTLA-4 + 49 A > G G allele (odds ratio [OR] = 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.383–7.024) and (OR = 4, 95% CI = 1.719–9.437) among patients with severe and mild/moderate HA, respectively.

Conclusion

We conclude that the CTLA-4 +49 A > G SNP plays a substantial role as a potential risk determinant for inhibitor formation in Iraqi Kurdish patients with HA.

Risk stratification integrating genetic data for factor VIII inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A

Replacement therapy in severe hemophilia A leads to factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in 30% of patients. Factor VIII gene (F8) mutation type, a family history of inhibitors, ethnicity and intensity of treatment are established risk factors, and were included in two published prediction tools based on regression models. Recently investigated immune regulatory genes could also play a part in immunogenicity. Our objective is to identify bio-clinical and genetic markers for FVIII inhibitor development, taking into account potential genetic high order interactions. The study population consisted of 593 and 79 patients with hemophilia A from centers in Bonn and Frankfurt respectively. Data was collected in the European ABIRISK tranSMART database. A subset of 125 severely affected patients from Bonn with reliable information on first treatment was selected as eligible for risk stratification using a hybrid tree-based regression model (GPLTR). In the eligible subset, 58 (46%) patients developed FVIII inhibitors. Among them, 49 (84%) were “high risk” F8 mutation type. 19 (33%) had a family history of inhibitors. The GPLTR model, taking into account F8 mutation risk, family history of inhibitors and product type, distinguishes two groups of patients: a high-risk group for immunogenicity, including patients with positive HLA-DRB1*15 and genotype G/A and A/A for IL-10 rs1800896, and a low-risk group of patients with negative HLA-DRB1*15 / HLA-DQB1*02 and T/T or G/T for CD86 rs2681401. We show associations between genetic factors and the occurrence of FVIII inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A patients taking into account for high-order interactions using a generalized partially linear tree-based approach.

Polymorphisms in MAPK9 (rs4147385) and CSF1R (rs17725712) are associated with the development of inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A in North China

INTRODUCTION

The formation of neutralizing antibodies (FVIII inhibitors) in haemophilia A patients is an immune response to the deficient factor. This process is multifactorial and includes environmental and genetic factors. Some genetic markers that play a decisive role in the immune response have been identified as risk factors for inhibitor development.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to investigate the association between polymorphisms in several genes involved in the regulation of the immune response and inhibitor development in patients with haemophilia A in North China.

METHODS

We analysed eight SNPs (MAPK9 rs4147385, CSF1R rs17725712, CD44 rs927335, STAT4 rs7574865, IKZF1 rs4917014, ETS1 rs6590330, BANK1 rs17266594 and rs10516487) by Snapshot SNP genotyping assays in 100 haemophilia A patients, including 29 with inhibitors and 71 without inhibitors.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrated that the rs17725712 A allele and the AA homozygous genotype of CSF1R were more frequent in patients with inhibitors. The rs4147385 G allele in MAPK9 was also more frequent in the inhibitor cohort.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed an association of CSF1R rs17725712 and MAPK9 rs4147385 with inhibitor development in haemophilia A patients in North China.

Inflammatory and immune response genes: A genetic analysis of inhibitor development in Iranian hemophilia A patients

A major problem of hemophilia A (HA) treatment is the development of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor, which usually occurs shortly after initiating replacement therapy. Several studies showed the correlation between inhibitor development and polymorphisms in inflammatory and immune response genes of HA patients; however, literature data are not available to prove this association in Iranian population. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible association between FVIII inhibitor formation and the polymorphisms of 16 inflammatory and immune response genes in Iranian severe HA patients (FVIII activity < 1%). This case-control study was performed on 55 patients with severe HA inhibitors and 45 samples without inhibitors from Iranian Comprehensive Hemophilia Care center. After extraction of whole genomic DNA from blood samples and design of primers for 16 genes, the genotyping was performed by Tetra primer ARMS PCR, and the validation of single nucleotide polymorphisms was determined by DNA sequencing. The data indicated that there was a significant association between inhibitor development, and F13A1 (TT), DOCK2 (CC& CT), and MAPK9 (TT) genotypes. Moreover, a considerably increased inhibitor risk carrying T, C, and T allele for F13A1, DOCK2, and MAPK9 genes was observed in patients with inhibitors, respectively. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference between the genotypic and allelic frequencies for other genes in patients with inhibitors compared to patients without inhibitors. These results demonstrate that only polymorphisms in F13A1, DOCK2, and MAPK9 genes are associated with the risk of developing FVIII inhibitors in Iranian HA patients.

Systematic molecular analysis of hemophilia A patients from Colombia

Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive disorder and the second most common coagulation disorder with an incidence of 1 in 5,000 live born males. Worldwide, there are 178,500 affected individuals, 60% with the severe form of the disease. Intron 22 and 1 inversions (Inv22 and Inv1) are the most frequent molecular alterations found in severe HA patients with a frequency of 45-50% and 0.5-5%, respectively. We have implemented a systematic cost-effective strategy for the identification of the molecular alteration in HA patients using Inverse shifting-PCR for Inv22 and Inv1, followed by the analysis of the F8 gene coding region by means of high resolution melting (HRM) PCR and Sanger sequencing in Inv22 and Inv1 negative patients. A total of 33 male HA patients and 6 women were analyzed. Inversion 22 was detected in 14/33 male patients (42.4%), 3/33 (9.1%) had Inv1, 3/33 (9.1%) had large structural variants, and 11/33 (33.3%) single nucleotide/ small frameshift variants. No genetic variant was found in 2/33 patients (6%). With this systematic approach we detected pathogenic variants in 31 out of 33 male affected individuals (94%) tested for the first time.in a cohort of patients from Colombia.

Polymorphisms in the TGF-β1 (rs1982037) and IL-2 (rs2069762, rs4833248) genes are not associated with inhibitor development in Iranian patients with hemophilia A

Objectives Development of neutralizing antibodies against factor VIII is the major complication in hemophilia care which makes replacement therapies ineffective. The reports showed that inflammatory cytokines play an important role in inhibitor production. In the present study, the relationship between inhibitor development and the polymorphisms of two cytokine genes was studied in severe hemophiliac patients from Iran. Methods In this case-control study, three polymorphisms of immune regulatory genes [TGF-β (rs1982037) and IL-2 (rs2069762, rs4833248)] were analyzed in 100 Iranian hemophilia A patients divided into 55 inhibitor positive and 45 inhibitor negative patients using Tetra primer ARMS PCR, and DNA sequencing. Results The analysis of polymorphisms in the TGF-β and IL-2 genes showed no association between the genotypes and the production of inhibitors (p > 0.05). Also, comparison of allele frequencies for TGF-β and IL-2 genes between two groups indicated no significant differences associated with the development of FVIII inhibitors (p > 0.05). Discussion In contrast with some reports involving the correlation between polymorphisms of the TGF-β1 and IL-2 genes and inhibitor development in the world, no statistically significant differences in analysis of the alleles and genotypes for TGF-β and IL-2 genes were found between the inhibitor and non-inhibitor Iranian patients. Thus, other genetic markers influencing the immune response to replacement therapy in patients with hemophilia should be identified. Conclusions Regarding our results in molecular predisposition for inhibitor development, further studies of effective genetic markers are required as a prerequisite for the development of novel immunogenic therapeutic approaches in the future.

F8 inversions of introns 22 and 1 confer a moderate risk of inhibitors in Mexican patients with severe hemophilia A. Concordance analysis and literature review

Intron-22 (Inv22) and intron-1 (Inv1) inversions account for approximately one half of all severe cases of hemophilia A (SHA) worldwide. Inhibitor development against exogenous factor VIII (FVIII) represents a major complication in HA. The causative F8 mutation is considered the most decisive factor conditioning inhibitor development. We aimed to investigate prevalence of Inv22 and Inv1 mutations, and its association as risk factors for developing inhibitors to FVIII. We investigated Inv22 and Inv1 in 255 SHA Mexican patients from 193 unrelated families using the inverse shifting-polymerase chain reaction (IS-PCR). We analyzed the association between inversions and inhibitor development via logistic regression introducing as covariates the populations, the inversions, F8-haplotypes and the age of patients at enrollment. Inv22 was found in 91/193 (47.2%: 38.9% exhibited Inv22-1 and 8.3% Inv22-2), and Inv1 in 2/193 (1.0%) independent families. Absolute inhibitor prevalence (IP) for Inv22 in unrelated patients was 15% (10-19). The cohorts and age of patients were independent predictors of inhibitor risk, but not inversions or haplotypes. Inversions presence in our population was associated to a moderate risk of developing inhibitors. Inv1 was found for the first time in two Mexican families. A relevant genetic component was observed by the strong concordance among brother-pairs.

Coagulation factor VII variants resistant to inhibitory antibodies

Replacement therapy is currently used to prevent and treat bleeding episodes in coagulation factor deficiencies. However, structural differences between the endogenous and therapeutic proteins might increase the risk for immune complications. This study was aimed at identifying factor (F)VII variants resistant to inhibitory antibodies developed after treatment with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in a FVII-deficient patient homozygous for the p.A354V-p.P464Hfs mutation, which predicts trace levels of an elongated FVII variant in plasma. We performed fluorescent bead-based binding, ELISA-based competition as well as fluorogenic functional (activated FX and thrombin generation) assays in plasma and with recombinant proteins. We found that antibodies displayed higher affinity for the active than for the zymogen FVII (half-maximal binding at 0.54 ± 0.04 and 0.78 ± 0.07 BU/ml, respectively), and inhibited the coagulation initiation phase with a second-order kinetics. Isotypic analysis showed a polyclonal response with a large predominance of IgG1. We hypothesised that structural differences in the carboxyl-terminus between the inherited FVII and the therapeutic molecules contributed to the immune response. Intriguingly, a naturally-occurring, poorly secreted and 5-residue truncated FVII (FVII-462X) escaped inhibition. Among a series of truncated rFVII molecules, we identified a well-secreted and catalytically competent variant (rFVII-464X) with reduced binding to antibodies (half-maximal binding at 0.198 ± 0.003 BU/ml) as compared to the rFVII-wt (0.032 ± 0.002 BU/ml), which led to a 40-time reduced inhibition in activated FX generation assays. Taken together our results provide a paradigmatic example of mutation-related inhibitory antibodies, strongly support the FVII carboxyl-terminus as their main target and identify inhibitor-resistant FVII variants.

Analyses of the FranceCoag cohort support differences in immunogenicity among one plasma-derived and two recombinant factor VIII brands in boys with severe hemophilia A

Around one third of boys with severe hemophilia A develop inhibitors (neutralizing antibodies) against their therapeutic factor VIII product. This adverse effect may result in more life-threatening bleeding, disability, impaired quality of life, and costly care. We compared the incidence of inhibitors in boys treated with the three factor VIII products most used in France: one plasma-derived (Factane) and two recombinant products (Advate and Kogenate Bayer). A previously untreated cohort of patients was created in 1994 to investigate risk factors for inhibitor development. We selected boys with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII <1 IU/dL) first treated with one of the three factor VIII products studied. Details of product infusions, inhibitor assays and main fixed and time-varying inhibitor risk factors were recorded for the first 75 exposure days. Three outcomes (all inhibitors, high-titer inhibitors and subsequently treated inhibitors) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox models. We studied 395 boys first treated between 2001 and 2016 (131, 137, and 127 with Factane, Advate, and Kogenate Bayer, respectively). Clinically significant inhibitors were diagnosed in 121 patients (70 high-titer). The incidence of high-titer inhibitors was significantly associated with the factor VIII product received (P=0.005): the cumulative incidence at 75 exposure days was 12.7% (95% CI: 7.7-20.6) with Factane, 20.4% (95% CI: 14.0-29.1) with Advate, and 31.6% (95% CI: 23.5-41.7) with Kogenate Bayer. The low inhibitor incidence observed with Factane is concordant with recent findings from the SIPPET randomized trial. These consistent results from observational and experimental studies should lead to improved care for previously untreated patients and cost savings for healthcare systems worldwide.

Marginal zone B cells are critical to factor VIII inhibitor formation in mice with hemophilia A

Although factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy can be lifesaving for patients with hemophilia A, neutralizing alloantibodies to FVIII, known as inhibitors, develop in a significant number of patients and actively block FVIII activity, making bleeding difficult to control and prevent. Although a variety of downstream immune factors likely regulate inhibitor formation, the identification and subsequent targeting of key initiators in inhibitor development may provide an attractive approach to prevent inhibitor formation before amplification of the FVIII immune response occurs. As the initial steps in FVIII inhibitor development remain incompletely understood, we sought to define early regulators of FVIII inhibitor formation. Our results demonstrate that FVIII localizes in the marginal sinus of the spleen of FVIII-deficient mice shortly after injection, with significant colocalization with marginal zone (MZ) B cells. FVIII not only colocalizes with MZ B cells, but specific removal of MZ B cells also completely prevented inhibitor development following FVIII infusion. Subsequent rechallenge with FVIII following MZ B-cell reconstitution resulted in a primary antibody response, demonstrating that MZ B-cell depletion did not result in FVIII tolerance. Although recipient exposure to the viral-like adjuvant polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid enhanced anti-FVIII antibody formation, MZ B-cell depletion continued to display similar effectiveness in preventing inhibitor formation following FVIII infusion in this inflammatory setting. These data strongly suggest that MZ B cells play a critical role in initiating FVIII inhibitor formation and suggest a potential strategy to prevent anti-FVIII alloantibody formation in patients with hemophilia A.

To serve and protect: The modulatory role of von Willebrand factor on factor VIII immunogenicity

Hemophilia A is a bleeding disorder characterized by the absence or dysfunction of blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Patients are treated with regular infusions of FVIII concentrate. In response to treatment, approximately 30% of patients with severe hemophilia A develop inhibitory antibodies targeting FVIII. Both patient and treatment related risk factors for inhibitor development have been described. Multiple studies comparing the immunogenicity of recombinant and plasma-derived FVIII have yielded conflicting results. The randomized controlled SIPPET (Survey of Inhibitors in Plasma-Product Exposed Toddlers) trial demonstrated an increased risk of inhibitor development of recombinant FVIII when compared to von Willebrand factor (VWF)-containing plasma-derived FVIII. Presently, it is unclear which mechanism underlies the reduced immunogenicity of plasma-derived FVIII. In this review we address the potential role of VWF on FVIII immunogenicity and we discuss how VWF affects the immune recognition, processing and presentation of FVIII. We also briefly discuss the potential impact of glycan-composition on FVIII immunogenicity. It is well established that VWF shields the uptake of FVIII by antigen presenting cells. We have recently shown that VWF binds to the surface of dendritic cells. Here, we present a novel model in which surface bound FVIII-VWF complexes regulate the internalization of FVIII. Binding of FVIII to VWF is critically dependent on sulfation of Tyr1699 (HVGS numbering) in the light chain of FVIII. Incomplete sulfation of Tyr1699 has been suggested to occur in several recombinant FVIII products resulting in a loss of VWF binding. We hypothesize that this results in alternative pathways of FVIII internalization by antigen presenting cells which are not regulated by VWF. This hypothetical mechanism may explain the reduced immunogenicity of VWF containing plasma-derived FVIII concentrates as found in the SIPPET study.

Haemophilia treatment in 2030

INTRODUCTION

Looking into the future is difficult and sometimes hazardous. A reliable look into haemophilia treatment in 2030 should be based on history and contemporary progress as well as dilemmas. Today, the issue of inhibitors overshadows the entire haemophilia community together with lack of treatment for large parts of the world's persons with haemophilia.

AIMS

The aim of this paper was to provide a perspective on haemophilia treatment in 2030 and its provenance.

METHODS

Literature review on history, treatment of haemophilia today as well as of emerging therapies give a base for the author's opinion on haemophilia treatment in 2030.

RESULTS

Development of haemophilia treatment has virtually exploded during the last decade and a number of new clotting factor concentrates and alternative approaches are in the pipeline.

CONCLUSION

The collection of treatment resources that we can see on the horizon gives hope that each person with haemophilia will get the care needed in 2030. The products used will be directed by individual needs and tailored to regional and local situations.

Treatment burden, haemostatic strategies and real world inhibitor screening practice in non-severe haemophilia A

Inhibitor formation in non-severe haemophilia A is a life-long risk and associated with morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of data to understand real-world inhibitor screening practice. We evaluated the treatment burden, haemostatic strategies, F8 genotyping and inhibitor screening practices in non-severe haemophilia A in seven London haemophilia centres. In the 2-year study period, 44% (377/853) patients received at least one haemostatic treatment. Seventy-nine percent of those treated (296/377) received factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate. F8 genotype was known in 88% (331/377) of individuals. Eighteen per cent (58/331) had 'high-risk' F8 genotypes. In patients with 'standard-risk' F8 genotypes treated on-demand with FVIII concentrate, 51·3% episodes (243/474) were screened within 1 year. However, poor screening compliance was observed after 'high-risk' treatment episodes. In patients with 'standard-risk' F8 genotypes, 12·3% (28/227) of treatment episodes were screened in the subsequent 6 weeks after surgery or a bleed requiring ≥5 exposure days. Similarly, in the context of 'high-risk' F8 genotypes after any FVIII exposure, only 13·6% (12/88) of episodes were screened within 6 weeks. Further study is required to assess optimal practice of inhibitor screening in non-severe haemophilia A to inform subsequent clinical decisions and provide more robust prevalence data to further understand the underlying immunological mechanism.

Partnering to change the world for people with haemophilia: 6(th) Haemophilia Global Summit, Prague, Czech Republic, 24-26(th) September 2015

The 6(th) Haemophilia Global Summit was held in Prague, Czech Republic, in September 2015. The programme was designed by an independent Scientific Steering Committee of haemophilia experts and aimed to share optimal management strategies for haemophilia at all life stages, explore recent potential advances in the management of haemophilia A and B and discuss challenges in haemophilia care. In this supplement from the meeting, Dan Hart reviews the lessons that can be learnt from cost-constrained environments with regard to improving care for people with haemophilia globally. Sébastien Lobet discusses the importance of physical activity for optimising care and Roseline d'Oiron and Jan Blatný consider the role of real-world data in understanding the effect of treatment in a clinical setting over the long term and the true impact of treatment on the day-to-day life of the patient. Gili Kenet addresses the current challenges relating to the optimal management of prophylaxis, and Gerry Dolan and Cedric Hermans discuss the value of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in informing treatment decisions. Cedric Hermans and Valérie Libotte explore the importance of considering social and occupational development factors as an integral part of haemophilia care, and Jan Astermark reviews key strategies to predict and prevent inhibitor development.

Enhanced uptake of blood coagulation factor VIII containing immune complexes by antigen presenting cells

Essentials Anti-factor (F) VIII antibody formation is a major complication in the treatment of hemophilia A. We investigated uptake of FVIII and FVIII immune complex by bone marrow derived dendritic cells. Immune complex formation increased uptake of FVIII 3-4 fold in a Fcγ receptor dependent manner. FVIII immune complex binding to Fcγ receptors may modulate immune tolerance induction.

SUMMARY

Background A major complication in the treatment of hemophilia A is the development of inhibitory antibodies targeting coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Eradication of these inhibitors can be established by immune tolerance induction (ITI), which consists of daily administration of high dosages of FVIII. FVIII immune complexes (FVIII-IC) could be formed following FVIII infusion in patients with pre-existing anti-FVIII antibodies. Objectives Here we studied endocytosis of FVIII-IC by bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs). Methods BMDCs were pulsed with FVIII/FVIII-IC and uptake was assessed by flow cytometry and confocal imaging. Results BMDCs were able to efficiently internalize FVIII-IC in a dose-dependent manner, 3-4-fold more efficiently when compared with equimolar concentrations of non-complexed FVIII. Uptake of FVIII-IC, but not FVIII alone, could be inhibited with anti-Fcγ receptor (FcγR) antibody 2.4G2, indicating functional involvement of FcγR. No internalization of FVIII-IC was observed in BMDCs lacking FcγRI, FcγRIIb, FcγRIII and FcγRIV. Genetic ablation of FcγRIIb, FcγRIII or FcγRIV individually did not affect the ability of anti-FVIII IgG to promote the uptake of FVIII. BMDCs lacking FcγRI showed lower FVIII-IC uptake levels when compared with other single FcγR null BMDCs. Expression of the inhibitory FcγRIIb alone was sufficient to internalize FVIII-IC more efficiently than FVIII. Conclusions FcγR are critical in the internalization of FVIII-IC by BMDCs and multiple FcγR can contribute independently to this process. Our findings provide a basis for future studies to address whether the outcome of ITI is dependent on the interplay between FVIII-IC and inhibitory and activating FcγR.

The importance of genetic factors for the development of arthropathy: a longitudinal study of children and adolescents with haemophilia A

Haemophilia A is a congenital bleeding disorder characterised by recurrent haemorrhages into the major joints. Haemophilic arthropathy is a well-established outcome of recurrent joint bleeding; however, it is clear that multiple factors determine the extent and severity of its occurrence. We sought to identify genetic factors related to abnormalities in range of motion (ROM) in the knees, ankles and elbows in a cohort of children and adolescents with haemophilia A not treated primarily with regular prophylaxis. Using data from the Haemophilia Growth and Development Study, we examined associations between 13,342 genetic markers and ROM scores measured at six-month intervals for up to seven years. As a first step, ordered logistic regression models were fit for each joint separately. A subset of SNP markers showing significant effects (p<0.01) on the right and left sides for at least two joints were included in a full model fit using a multivariate generalised linear mixed model assuming an ordinal response. The models contained all ROM scores obtained at all visits. Twenty-five markers analysed in the full model showed either increased or decreased risk of ROM abnormalities at the p<0.001 level. Several genes identified at either the first or second stage of the analysis have been associated with arthritis in a variety of large studies. Our results support the likelihood that risk for haemophilic arthropathy is associated with genetic factors, the identification of which holds promise for further advancing the individualisation of treatment.

Plasma-derived versus recombinant factor concentrates in PUPs: a never ending debate?

Inhibitor development in haemophilia is a serious complication to treatment with factor concentrates. Since the advent of more pure products, especially developed using recombinant DNA technology, some studies have shown an increased incidence of inhibitors in previously untreated patients (PUPs) receiving recombinant products whereas plasma-derived concentrates sometimes have been claimed to have a protective role, probably due to the content of von Willebrand factor (VWF). In fact, experiments indicate that the VWF may block uptake of factor VIII into macrophages for further processing to the immune system. Also, a competition between VWF and inhibitor binding to the C2 domain of factor VIII has been suggested. Recently, large cohort and surveillance studies have created a vigorous debate about the role of product class for inhibitor development as results have been conflicting. The only randomised prospective study, the SIPPET study, was published in 2016, and substantiated previous reports claiming that plasma derived concentrates give less inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A, previously not exposed to factor VIII. The debate will continue.

Achievements, challenges and unmet needs for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: Report from a symposium in Paris, France on 20 November 2014

Over the past 20 years, there have been many advances in haemophilia treatment that have allowed patients to take greater control of their disease. However, the development of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is the greatest complication of the disease and a challenge in the treatment of haemophilia making management of bleeding episodes difficult and surgical procedures very challenging. A meeting to discuss the unmet needs of haemophilia patients with inhibitors was held in Paris on 20 November 2014. Topics discussed were genetic and non-genetic risk factors for the development of inhibitors, immunological aspects of inhibitor development, FVIII products and inhibitor development, generation and functional properties of engineered antigen-specific T regulatory cells, suppression of immune responses to FVIII, prophylaxis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, epitope mapping of FVIII inhibitors, current controversies in immune tolerance induction therapy, surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitors and future perspectives for the treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors. A summary of the key points discussed is presented in this paper.

Key insights to understand the immunogenicity of FVIII products

The treatment of haemophilia has made significant progress in recent decades, and patients are now being treated safely with great clotting products. However, inhibitor development remains the largest problem, particularly in children. Consequently, the haemostasis that was obtained with traditional clotting factors is not being achieved. Moreover, inhibitor complications translate into adult life and there are an increasing number of situations where adult patients with an inhibitor require major surgery but the clinician is faced with the knowledge that required haemostasis levels are difficult to achieve. Therefore, it is of upmost importance to consider factors relating to inhibitor development, and to determine how inhibitors can be prevented and/or eliminated. Of the various factors at play with regard to inhibitor development, it is important to consider the immunogenicity of factor VIII (FVIII) products, and this topic is the focus of the current paper.

The evolution of comprehensive haemophilia care in the United States: perspectives from the frontline

The establishment of dedicated comprehensive treatment centres more than a half century ago transformed the management of haemophilia in the United States. Formerly, a disease associated with crippling disability and premature death, today, persons with haemophilia who are treated appropriately from infancy and do not develop inhibitors can expect a normal life expectancy and relatively few bleeding episodes. The evolution of the comprehensive haemophilia care, while chastened by the viral epidemics of the 1980s, has been marked by ongoing advances, including prophylaxis, immune tolerance induction, new drugs and gene therapy research. Current challenges include sustaining the comprehensive care model despite decreased funding and expanding the delivery and affordability of comprehensive haemophilia care.

Whole-exome sequencing to identify genetic risk variants underlying inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A patients

The development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is the most problematic and costly complication of FVIII replacement therapy that affects up to 30% of previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. The development of inhibitors is a multifactorial complication involving environmental and genetic factors. Among the latter, F8 gene mutations, ethnicity, family history of inhibitors, and polymorphisms affecting genes involved in the immune response have been previously investigated. To identify novel genetic elements underling the risk of inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A, we applied whole-exome sequencing (WES) and data analysis in a selected group of 26 Italian patients with (n = 17) and without (n = 9) inhibitors. WES revealed several rare, damaging variants in immunoregulatory genes as novel candidate mutations. A case-control association analysis using Cochran-Armitage and Fisher's exact statistical tests identified 1364 statistically significant variants. Hierarchical clustering of these genetic variants showed 2 distinct patterns of homozygous variants with a protective or harmful role in inhibitor development. When looking solely at coding variants, a total of 28 nonsynonymous variants were identified and replicated in 53 inhibitor-positive and 174 inhibitor-negative Italian severe hemophilia A patients using a TaqMan genotyping assay. The genotyping results revealed 10 variants showing estimated odds ratios in the same direction as in the discovery phase and confirmed the association of the rs3754689 missense variant (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.36-0.94; P = .028) in a highly conserved haplotype region surrounding the LCT locus on chromosome 2q21 with inhibitor development.

Game, set, match for factor VIII mismatch?

In this issue of Blood, Gunasekera et al provide evidence that the high rate of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors seen in black hemophilia A (HA) patients is not due to a mismatch between the structure of treatment products and FVIII genotypes common in blacks.

Engineering less immunogenic and antigenic FVIII proteins

The development of neutralizing antibodies against blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), referred to clinically as "inhibitors", is the most challenging and deleterious adverse event to occur following intravenous infusions of FVIII to treat hemophilia A. Inhibitors occlude FVIII surfaces that must bind to activated phospholipid membranes, the serine proteinase factor IXa, and other components of the 'intrinsic tenase complex' in order to carry out its important role in accelerating blood coagulation. Inhibitors develop in up to one of every three patients, yet remarkably, a substantial majority of severe hemophilia A patients, who circulate no detectable FVIII antigen or activity, acquire immune tolerance to FVIII during initial infusions or else after intensive FVIII therapy to overcome their inhibitor. The design of less immunogenic FVIII proteins through identification and modification ("de-immunization") of immunodominant T-cell epitopes is an important goal. For patients who develop persistent inhibitors, modification of B-cell epitopes through substitution of surface-exposed amino acid side chains and/or attachment of bulky moieties to interfere with FVIII attachment to antibodies and memory B cells is a promising approach. Both experimental and computational methods are being employed to achieve these goals. Future therapies for hemophilia A, as well as other monogenic deficiency diseases, are likely to involve administration of less immunogenic proteins in conjunction with other novel immunotherapies to promote a regulatory cellular environment promoting durable immune tolerance.