Frontline rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone with bortezomib (VR-CAP) or vincristine (R-CHOP) for non-GCB DLBCL. Blood. 2015;126:1893-1901. [PMID: 26232170 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-632430]

How to improve RCHOP as frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials

RCHOP is the standard of care for patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) but failures occur in approximately 40% of them. We performed a meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing experimental regimens with RCHOP. We searched the database of PubMed with proper criteria, and data of efficacy (Progression Free Survival-PFS) in the ITT population were extracted and analyzed. Cross comparisons of RCTs were performed by using the CINEMA software. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%, CI) are reported. The literature search yielded 21 RCTs including 5785 patients in the RCHOP arm and 5648 patients in the experimental arm. Odds ratio (OR) for PFS in the total cohort was OR (95%, CI): 0.87 (0.76-0.99), p=0.02. Among different strategies to improve RCHOP, addition of a novel agent on RCHOP improved PFS. In total 1740 patients in the RCHOP arm were compared with 1755 in the RCHOP plus a novel agent arm, and the OR (95% CI) for PFS was 0.84 (0.71-0.97), p=0.02. Indirect comparisons of nine studies adding a novel agent on RCHOP does not give prominence to any agent. Subgroup analysis according to cell of origin was performed for non-GC DLBCL patients. In this subgroup, 1546 patients treated with RCHOP were compared with 1538 patients treated with experimental regimens. The OR (95% CI) for PFS was 0.86 (0.73-1.02), p=0.34. Overall survival data extracted from 18 studies showed no superiority of experimental regimens over RCHOP. Efficacy of RCHOP backbone is marginally improved when adding a novel anti-lymphoma agent.

Challenges identifying DLBCL patients with poor outcomes to upfront chemoimmunotherapy and its impact on frontline clinical trials

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has a variable course of disease among patients as it consists of subgroups that are clinically, biologically and molecularly heterogeneous. In this review, we will discuss how this heterogeneity has likely hindered the ability of traditional prognostic models to identify DLBCL patients at high risk of having poor outcomes with conventional upfront chemoimmunotherapy. We will highlight the challenges and downsides of using these models for risk stratification in clinical trials. Also, we present some of the novel prognosticators that have shown a prognostic value independently or when incorporated into existing prognostic models. Additionally, since the failure of frontline clinical trials to improve outcomes beyond R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy may be at least partially explained by the restrictive eligibility criteria, risk stratification methods and the selection bias encountered due to the complexed logistics of clinical trials; we will discuss strategies to refine and modernize clinical trial design.

POLE2 knockdown suppresses lymphoma progression via downregulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

Lymphoma is the most common malignant tumor arising from immune system. Recently, DNA polymerase epsilon subunit 2 (POLE2) was identified to be a tumor promotor in a variety of malignant tumors. However, the biological role of POLE2 in lymphoma is still largely unclear. In our present study, the expression patterns of POLE2 in lymphoma tissues were identified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of human tissue microarray. Cell viability was determined by CCK-8 assay. Cell apoptosis and cycle distribution were evaluated by Annexin V and PI staining, respectively. Cell migration was analyzed by transwell assay. Tumor growth in vivo was observed by a xenograft model of mice. The potential signaling was explored by human phospho-kinase array and immunoblotting. POLE2 was significantly upregulated in human lymphoma tissues and cells. POLE2 knockdown attenuated the proliferation, migration capabilities of lymphoma cells, as well as induced cell apoptosis and cycle arrest. Moreover, POLE2 depletion impaired the tumor growth in mice. Furthermore, POLE2 knockdown apparently inhibited the activation of β-Catenin and downregulated the expression of Wnt/β-Catenin signaling-related proteins. POLE2 knockdown suppressed the proliferation and migration of lymphoma cells by inhibiting Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway. POLE2 may serve as a novel therapeutic target for lymphoma.

Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis: A roadmap to do better than Pola-RCHP in DLBCL

In treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), oncologists have traditionally relied on the chemotherapy backbone of R-CHOP as standard of care. The two dangers that the hematologist must navigate between are the aggressive disease (Charybdis that in the absence of therapy systematically destroys all the ships) and the toxicity of the therapies (Scylla with its six monstrous heads that devours six crew members at a time), and hematologists have to navigate very carefully between both. Therefore, three different strategies were employed with the goal of improving cure rates: de-escalating regimens, escalating regimens, and replacement strategies. With a replacement strategy, a breakthrough in treatment was identified with polatuzumab vedotin (anti-CD79B antibody/drug conjugate) plus R-CHP. However, this regimen still did not achieve the elusive universal cure rate. Fortunately, advances in genomic and molecular technologies have allowed for an improved understanding of the heterogenous molecular nature of the disease to help develop and guide more targeted, precise, and individualized therapies. Additionally, new pharmaceutical technologies have led to the development of novel cellular therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, that could be more effective, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Thus, we aim to highlight the challenges of DLBCL therapy as well as the need to address therapeutic regimens eventually no longer tethered to a chemotherapy backbone. In the intersection of artificial intelligence and multi-omics (genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics), we propose the need to analyze multidimensional biologic datato launch a decisive attack against DLBCL in a targeted and individualized fashion.

Pembrolizumab With R-CHOP in Previously Untreated DLBCL: Sustained, High Efficacy, and Safety With Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

While generally ineffective in relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may hold greater promise in untreated, immunocompetent patients. We previously reported safety and early efficacy of pembrolizumab plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (PR-CHOP) in a phase I trial of untreated DLBCL, noting responses in 90% of patients (complete response 77%) and a 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 83%. We herein report long-term safety and efficacy at 5-year follow up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients with untreated DLBCL or grade 3b follicular lymphoma, intended to receive 6 cycles of R-CHOP were eligible. Patients (N = 30) were treated with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV and R-CHOP in 21-day cycles for 6 cycles.

RESULTS

At median follow up of 4.8 years, 5-year PFS was 71% (CI, 54%-94%) and 5-year overall survival was 83% (CI, 71%-98%). Immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) occurred in 7 (23%) patients (10% grade 3/4). Three IRAEs (rash, thyroiditis, rheumatoid arthritis) occurred beyond 3 months of treatment completion. PD-L1 tumor expression was documented in 19 of 23 (83%) tested patients. None of the 19 patients who had any PD-L1 expression have relapsed, whereas 2 out of the 4 patients with no PD-L1 expression have relapsed.

CONCLUSION

PR-CHOP has led to durable responses in most patients, with the best outcomes in PD-L1-expressing disease. Furthermore, the safety profile was manageable, with no consistent pattern of late events. These data support ongoing strategies incorporating ICIs in frontline DLBCL therapy and confirmation of predictive biomarkers including tumor PD-L1 expression.

The biology and treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-positive diffuse large B cell lymphoma, NOS

EBV positive Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (EBV+DLBCL-NOS) referred to DLBCL with expression of EBV encoded RNA in tumor nucleus. EBV+DLBCL-NOS patients present with more advanced clinical stages and frequent extranodal involvement. Although rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy regimens can significantly improve outcomes in patients with EBV+DLBCL, the best first-line treatment needs to be further explored. Due to the relatively low incidence and regional variation of EBV+DLBCL-NOS, knowledge about this particular subtype of lymphoma remains limited. Some signaling pathways was abnormally activated in EBV+DLBCL-NOS, including NF-κB and JAK/STAT pathways) and other signal transduction pathways. In addition, immune processes such as interferon response, antigen-presenting system and immune checkpoint molecule abnormalities were also observed. Currently, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy and novel targeted therapeutic drugs are expected to improve the prognosis of EBV+DLBCL-NOS patients, but more studies are needed to confirm this.

Mature B-cell lymphomas in adolescents and young adults

Pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma includes over 30 histologies (many with subtypes), with approximately 800 cases per year in the US, compared to >60,000 cases of adult NHL annually. Improvements in survival in pediatric and adolescent mature B cell NHL over the past 5 decades align with the overall success of the cooperative trial model with dramatic improvements in outcomes through dose escalation of chemotherapy and, more recently, targeted therapy with rituximab. Pediatric dose-intense strategies carry risks of long-term consequences, but treatment failure is nearly universally fatal. By comparison, adult mature B cell lymphoma is typically less aggressive and treated with less intense chemotherapy. Optimizing therapy for adolescents and young adults remains a major challenge that requires creative solutions, including engineering study groups to combine biologically comparable adult and pediatric populations and developing effective salvage strategies that will ultimately be required for investigations of front-line dose reduction. In this review, we discuss challenges and opportunities for improving outcomes for adolescents and young adults with high-grade mature B cell lymphomas, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma.

Differential Efficacy From the Addition of Bortezomib to R-CHOP in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma According to the Molecular Subgroup in the REMoDL-B Study With a 5-Year Follow-Up

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The REMoDL-B phase III adaptive trial compared rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) versus R-CHOP + bortezomib (RB-CHOP) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), stratified by molecular subtype. Primary analysis at a median follow-up of 30 months found no effect of bortezomib on progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Retrospective analysis using a gene expression-based classifier identified a molecular high-grade (MHG) group with worse outcomes. We present an updated analysis for patients successfully classified by the gene expression profile (GEP). Eligible patients were age older than 18 years with untreated DLBCL, fit enough for full-dose chemotherapy, and with adequate biopsies for GEP. Of 1,077 patients registered, 801 were identified with Activated B-Cell (ABC), Germinal Center B-cell, or MHG lymphoma. At a median follow-up of 64 months, there was no overall benefit of bortezomib on PFS or OS (5-year PFS hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; P = .085; OS HR, 0.86; P = .32). However, improved PFS and OS were seen in ABC lymphomas after RB-CHOP: 5-year OS 67% with R-CHOP versus 80% with RB-CHOP (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.95; P = .032). Five-year PFS was higher in MHG lymphomas: 29% versus 55% (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.84). Patients with ABC and MHG DLBCL may benefit from the addition of bortezomib to R-CHOP in initial therapy.

Superiority of polatuzumab vedotin over other novel agents in previously untreated ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a network meta-analysis of 20 RCTs

Because of lacking of head-to-head comparison among polatuzumab (Pola) vedotin and other novel agents for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the optimal option remains undefined. We searched twelve relevant published reports, covering 8376 subjects. Interestingly, the PFS benefit with Pola-R-CHP over other regimens was found prominently in those B-cell-like type (ABC-type) patients. For those ABC-type patients, the PFS advantage with Pola-R-CHP was statistically significant, when compared to R-CHOP+Bort (HR: 0.52, P=0.02), R-CHOP+Ibru (HR: 0.43, P=0.001), R-CHOP+Lena (HR: 0.51, P=0.009), G-CHOP (HR: 0.46, P=0.008), and R-CHOP (HR: 0.40, P<0.001). Meanwhile, for those germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) type patients, no PFS advantage with Pola-R-CHP was found when compared to R-CHOP+Bort (HR: 1.18, P=0.46), R-CHOP+Lena (HR: 1.21, P=0.45), G-CHOP (HR: 1.39, P=0.14), R-CHOP-14 (HR: 0.94, P=0.82), and R-CHOP (HR: 1.00, P=1). The PFS advantage with Pola-R-CHP over other regimens might be confined to those patients of ABC-type DLBCL.

Efficacy, safety, and molecular response predictors of oral ixazomib and short-course rituximab in untreated iNHL

Patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) generally require treatment but experience normal survival, emphasizing the need for simpler, safer therapies. Proteasome inhibitors target aberrant signaling pathways within iNHL and have manageable toxicities. We evaluated the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib as initial monotherapy, and combined with rituximab, for first-line treatment of iNHL. Treatment-naïve patients with iNHL needing therapy received oral ixazomib 4 mg weekly until progressive disease or unacceptable adverse events. A 4-week course of rituximab was added during month 7. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) during the ixazomib monotherapy window. Correlations included gene expression profiling and response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Thirty-three patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) (n = 20), marginal zone lymphoma (n = 7), and other iNHL were treated with a median follow-up of 30.3 months. During the 6-month ixazomib window, the ORR was 24%, including 35% in FL. The best ORR over the entire study period was 52% overall and 65% in FL; complete response was achieved in 33% and 45%, respectively. The median duration of response was 25.8 months (range, 0-49.7), and the 24-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32-67) and 91% (95% CI, 74-97), respectively. Ixazomib was well tolerated. Baseline downregulation of proteasome genes, PSMB9 (P = .03) and PSMB8 (P = .007), were associated with response. All evaluated patients generated anti-S antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with a median of 254.9 binding arbitrary unit per mL. Ixazomib demonstrated efficacy alone and with short-course rituximab in untreated iNHL while exhibiting favorable toxicity, convenience, and retention of the B-cell immune response. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02339922.

Molecular classification and therapeutics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) encompasses a wide variety of disease states that have to date been subgrouped and characterized based on immunohistochemical methods, which provide limited prognostic value to clinicians and no alteration in treatment regimen. The addition of rituximab to CHOP therapy was the last leap forward in terms of treatment, but regimens currently follow a standardized course when disease becomes refractory with no individualization based on genotype. Research groups are tentatively proposing new strategies for categorizing DLBCL based on genetic abnormalities that are frequently found together to better predict disease course following dysregulation of specific pathways and to deliver targeted treatment. Novel algorithms in combination with next-generation sequencing techniques have identified between 4 and 7 subgroups of DLBCL, depending on the research team, with potentially significant and actionable genetic alterations. Various drugs aimed at pathways including BCR signaling, NF-κB dysfunction, and epigenetic regulation have shown promise in their respective groups and may show initial utility as second or third line therapies to patients with recurrent DLBCL. Implementation of subgroups will allow collection of necessary data to determine which groups are significant, which treatments may be indicated, and will provide better insight to clinicians and patients on specific disease course.

Cost-effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin combined with chemoimmunotherapy in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

In patients with treatment-naive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the POLARIX study (A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Polatuzumab Vedotin With Rituximab-Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone [R-CHP] Versus Rituximab-Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone [R-CHOP] in Participants With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma) reported a 6.5% improvement in the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), with no difference in overall survival (OS) or safety using polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (pola-R-CHP) compared with standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pola-R-CHP for DLBCL. We modeled a hypothetical cohort of US adults (mean age, 65 years) with treatment-naive DLBCL by developing a Markov model (lifetime horizon) to model the cost-effectiveness of pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP using a range of plausible long-term outcomes. Progression rates and OS were estimated from POLARIX. Outcome measures were reported in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Assuming a 5-year PFS of 69.6% with pola-R-CHP and 62.7% with R-CHOP, pola-R-CHP was cost-effective at a WTP of $150 000 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $84 308/QALY). pola-R-CHP was no longer cost-effective if its 5-year PFS was 66.1% or lower. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that pola-R-CHP is cost-effective up to a cost of $276 312 at a WTP of $150 000. pola-R-CHP was the cost-effective strategy in 56.6% of the 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations at a WTP of $150 000. If the absolute benefit in PFS is maintained over time, pola-R-CHP is cost-effective compared with R-CHOP at a WTP of $150 000/QALY. However, its cost-effectiveness is highly dependent on its long-term outcomes and costs of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Routine usage of pola-R-CHP would add significantly to health care expenditures. Price reductions or identification of subgroups that have maximal benefit would improve cost-effectiveness.

RAB39B as a Chemosensitivity-Related Biomarker for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma with an increased tendency to relapse or refractoriness. RAB39B, a member of the Ras-oncogene superfamily, is associated with a variety of tumors. Nevertheless, the role of RAB39B in DLBCL is still unknown. This study aimed to identify the role of RAB39B in DLBCL using integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Methods: RAB39B expression data were examined using TIMER, UCSC, and GEO databases. The LinkedOmics database was used to study the genes and signaling pathways related to RAB39B expression. A Protein–protein interaction network was performed in STRING. TIMER was used to analyze the correlation between RAB39B and infiltrating immune cells. The correlation between RAB39B and m6A-related genes in DLBCL was analyzed using TCGA data. The RAB39B ceRNA network was constructed based on starBase and miRNet2.0 databases. Drug sensitivity information was obtained from the GSCA database.

Results: RAB39B was highly expressed in multiple tumors including DLBCL. The protein–protein interaction network showed enrichment of autophagy and RAS family proteins. Functional enrichment analysis of RAB39B co-expression genes revealed that RAB39B was closely related to DNA replication, protein synthesis, cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction, JAK-STAT signaling pathway, NF-kappa B signaling pathway, and autophagy. Immune infiltrate analysis showed that the amount of RAB39B was negatively correlated with iDC, Tem, and CD8 T-cell infiltration. CD4⁺ T cell and DC were negatively correlated with CNV of RAB39B. DLBCL cohort analysis found that RAB39B expression was related to 14 m6A modifier genes, including YTHDC1, YTHDC2, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDF3, RBMX, ZC3H13, METTL14, METTL3, RBM15, RBM15B, VIRMA, FTO, and ALKBH5. We constructed 14 possible ceRNA networks of RAB39B in DLBCL. The RAB39B expression was associated with decreased sensitivity of chemotherapy drugs such as dexamethasone, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine, and cytarabine and poor overall survival in DLBCL. In vitro experiments showed that RAB39B was associated with proliferation, apoptosis, and drug sensitivity of DLBCL cells.

Conclusion: RAB39B is abnormally elevated and related to drug resistance and poor OS in DLBCL, which may be due to its involvement in immune infiltration, m6A modification, and regulation by multiple non-coding RNAs. RAB39B may be used as an effective biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of DLBCL.

Identification of CXCR4 Upregulation in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Associated with Prognostic Significance and Clinicopathological Characteristics

Background

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous malignant lymphoma with distinct characteristics. Patients with treatment failure after the standard immunochemotherapy have worse prognosis, which implies the necessity to uncover novel targets. The C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) overexpression has been identified in several hematopoietic malignancies. However, the expression signatures and prognostic significance of CXCR4 in DLBCL associated with clinicopathological features remain unclear.

Methods

Gene expression profiles of DLBCL were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Then, a meta-analysis with an integrated bioinformatic analysis was performed to assess the relationship between CXCR4 expression and clinicopathological features of DLBCL. Finally, experimental verification including immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was carried out using patient samples. In vitro cell line viability tests were conducted using CXCR4 inhibitor WZ811.

Results

DLBCL patients with activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype have higher expression level of CXCR4 with worse survival. Differential expressed genes in the CXCR4-upregulation group were enriched in canonical pathways associated with oncogenesis. DLBCL with CXCR4 upregulation had lower degree of CD8⁺ T cell infiltration. TIMER analysis demonstrated that the CXCR4 expression was positively correlated with the expression of CD5, MYC, NOTCH1, PDCD1, CD274, mTOR, FOXO1, and hnRNPA2B1 in DLBCL. IHC study in patient samples showed the positive correlation between CXCR4 and nongerminal center B-cell (non-GCB) subtype and mTOR expression. Meanwhile, quantitative polymerase chain reaction results revealed that high CXCR4 mRNA level was correlated to double-hit DLBCL. Finally, cell viability test showed that WZ811 exerted antiproliferation effect in DLBCL cell lines in a dose-dependent manner.

Conclusion

CXCR4 was upregulated in ABC-DLBCL associated with worse prognosis. Our analysis predicted CXCR4 as a potential target for DLBCL treatment, which may serve as an inhibitor both on BCR signaling and nuclear export warranting further investigation in clinical trials.

Improving eligibility criteria for first-line trials for patients with DLBCL using a US-based Delphi-method survey

Recent first-line randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have shown negative results, which may be due in part to onerous eligibility criteria limiting enrollment of poor-risk patients who require immediate treatment. We conducted a Delphi-method survey with lymphoma experts in the United States to define recommendations for essential and potentially unnecessary enrollment criteria for modern first-line DLBCL RCTs aimed at increasing clinical diversity of ensuing study groups. We first tabulated enrollment criteria from 19 DLBCL RCTs spanning the rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) era to identify common eligibility criteria from prior DLBCL RCTs for inclusion in the Delphi-method survey. We tabulated 451 total eligibility criteria comprising 51 criterion categories across 19 first-line DLBCL RCTs in the R-CHOP era. We then surveyed lymphoma clinical trial experts representing 8 academic medical centers in the United States regarding essential and unnecessary eligibility criteria for modern DLBCL RCTs. Seventeen of 29 invited clinical investigators completed the round-1 questionnaire (response rate, of 58.6%), 15 of 17 round-1 participants (88.2%) completed the round-2 survey, and all round-1 participants reviewed finalized recommendations for eligibility criteria for modern first-line DLBCL RCTs. We defined consensus recommendations for 31 modernized eligibility criteria including threshold values for 10 quantitative eligibility criteria aimed at facilitating enrollment of a clinically diverse study population in first-line DLBCL RCTs designed to improve standard-of-care therapy.

Ideal dose intensity of R-CHOP in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). However, its ideal dose intensity varies among cases.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides the latest insights on the dose intensity of R-CHOP for DLBCL patients. Specifically, we discussed the optimal dose intensity for elderly patients, the optimal number of treatment cycles for limited or advanced-stage diseases, and the role of dose-intensified therapies or adding targeted inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

Performing a comprehensive or simplified geriatric assessment can distinguish elderly DLBCL patients who will likely benefit from curative R-CHOP. Very elderly or medically unfit patients may need dose reduction in R-CHOP; the Age, Comorbidities, and Albumin index may aid decision-making. Four cycles of R-CHOP followed by two rituximab cycles comprise a new standard for low-risk, limited-stage DLBCL patients. Compared to eight cycles, six cycles of R-CHOP have similar efficacy and fewer toxicities for advanced-stage DLBCL. Dose-intensified therapy is not recommended in most DLBCL cases but may be considered for patients with double (or triple)-hit lymphoma. Applying targeted inhibitors and not merely escalating R-CHOP dose intensity through molecular subtyping will improve the treatment outcome for DLBCL.

How CAR T Cells Breathe

The manufacture of efficacious CAR T cells represents a major challenge in cellular therapy. An important aspect of their quality concerns energy production and consumption, known as metabolism. T cells tend to adopt diverse metabolic profiles depending on their differentiation state and their stimulation level. It is therefore expected that the introduction of a synthetic molecule such as CAR, activating endogenous signaling pathways, will affect metabolism. In addition, upon patient treatment, the tumor microenvironment might influence the CAR T cell metabolism by compromising the energy resources. The access to novel technology with higher throughput and reduced cost has led to an increased interest in studying metabolism. Indeed, methods to quantify glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration have been available for decades but were rarely applied in the context of CAR T cell therapy before the release of the Seahorse XF apparatus. The present review will focus on the use of this instrument in the context of studies describing the impact of CAR on T cell metabolism and the strategies to render of CAR T cells more metabolically fit.

lncRNA GAS5, as a ceRNA, inhibits the proliferation of diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma cells by regulating the miR‑18a‑5p/RUNX1 axis

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common and fatal malignant tumor caused by B-lymphocytes. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) GAS5 (growth arrest specific 5) has been reported to function as a tumor suppressor gene, and is differentially expressed in DLBCL. The present study aimed to explore the potential mechanisms of action of lncRNA GAS5 in the proliferation of DLBCL cells. The expression levels of GAS5, miR-18a-5p and Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) in DLBCL cell lines were detected using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and their effects on cell proliferation, the cell cycle and apoptosis were determined using 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine assay and flow cytometry. Dual-luciferase reporter and RNA pull-down assays were used to evaluate the interaction between GAS5 and miR-18a-5p, or between miR-18a-5p and RUNX1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay was used to identify the interaction between RUNX1 and BAX. The expression levels of GAS5 and RUNX1 were downregulated; however, miR-18a-5p expression was upregulated in the DLBCL cell lines compared with the normal controls. GAS5 directly interacted with miR-18a-5p by acting as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) and reversed the low expression of RUNX1 induced by miR-18a-5p. Additionally, the knockdown of RUNX1 reversed the inhibitory effects of GAS5 on the proliferation and cell cycle G1 arrest, and its promoting effects on the apoptosis of OCI-Ly3 and TMD8 cells. Moreover, RUNX1 enhanced BAX expression by directly binding to the BAX promoter. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that GAS5 functions as a ceRNA, inhibiting DLBCL cell proliferation by sponging miR-18a-5p to upregulate RUNX1 expression. These findings may provide a potential therapeutic strategy for DLBCL.

LncRNA LINC01857 promotes cell growth and diminishes apoptosis via PI3K/mTOR pathway and EMT process by regulating miR-141-3p/MAP4K4 axis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

LINC01857 has been proven to be involved in glioma and breast cancer. However, the biological function of LINC01857 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poorly investigated. By accessing to the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTE_X), LINC01857 expression was found upregulated in both DLBCL tissues and cells. Cell proliferation and flow cytometry assays showed that LINC01857 promoted proliferation and cell cycle, but suppressed apoptosis in DLBCL cells. Bioinformatics analysis and luciferase reporter assay confirmed that LINC01857 may serve as a sponge for miR-141-3p and miR-141-3p may target MAP4K4. Mechanically, the regulatory action of miR-141-3p/MAP4K4 on DLBCL cellular behaviors was regulated by LINC01857. In addition, LINC01857 could increase the activity of PI3K/mTOR pathway and facilitate the EMT process in a miR-141-3p-mediated manner in DLBCL. Our data illustrated that the LINC01857/miR-141-3p/MAP4K4 might function as a promising therapeutic avenue for DLBCL treatment.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma originating from the maxillary sinus with skin metastases: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of malignant lymphoma (ML), accounting for 30%-40% of cases of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in adults. Primary paranasal sinus lymphoma is a rare presentation of extranodal NHL that accounts for only 0.17% of all lymphomas. ML from the maxillary sinus (MS) is a particularly rare presentation, and is thus often difficult to diagnose. We have reported the first known case of DLBCL originating from the MS with rapidly occurrent multiple skin metastasis.

CASE SUMMARY

An 81-year-old Japanese man visited our hospital due to continuous pain for 12 d in the left maxillary nerve area. His medical history included splenectomy due to a traffic injury, an old right cerebral infarction from when he was 74-years-old, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A plain head computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a 3 cm × 3.1 cm × 3 cm sized left MS. On day 25, left diplopia and ptosis occurred, and a follow-up CT on day 31 revealed the growth of the left MS mass. Based on an MS biopsy on day 50, we established a definitive diagnosis of DLBCL, non-germinal center B-cell-like originating from the left MS. The patient was admitted on day 62 due to rapid deterioration of his condition, and a plain CT scan revealed the further growth of the left MS mass, as well as multiple systemic metastasis, including of the skin. A skin biopsy on day 70 was found to be the same as that of the left MS mass. We notified the patient and his family of the disease, and they opted for palliative care, considering on his condition and age. The patient died on day 80.

CONCLUSION

This case suggests the need for careful, detailed examination, and for careful follow-up, when encountering patients presenting with a mass.

Combination of novel molecular targeted agent plus R-CHOP-based regimen versus R-CHOP alone in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The addition of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) to R-CHOP has been one of the main focuses of research in patients with DLBCL. Despite encouraging preliminary results, recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) have not shown a definitive benefit over standard R-CHOP. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of this strategy. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify RCT that evaluated the addition of MTA to R-CHOP-based regimen versus R-CHOP alone in previously untreated DLBCL patients. Fixed and random effects models were used to estimate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and adverse events (AE) were analyzed. A total of seven RCT including 3,255 patients with DLBCL met the eligibility criteria. Three different types of MTAs (bortezomib, ibrutinib, and lenalidomide) were investigated in combination with R-CHOP. Overall, R-CHOP plus MTA showed a slightly better PFS (HR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.98). No differences were observed according to the cell of origin subtype of DLBCL. Interestingly, patients younger than 60 years had a significantly better PFS with R-CHOP plus MTAs (HR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.56-0.93), while no benefit was observed in patients older than 60 years (HR=0.96). The combination strategy showed higher odds to develop serious AEs (OR= 1.46, 95% CI 1.11-1.91). R-CHOP plus MTA seems only to slightly improve PFS in patients with DLBCL, particularly in younger patients. An increase in toxicity was observed in comparison to R-CHOP.

Apoptotic and Non-Apoptotic Modalities of Thymoquinone-Induced Lymphoma Cell Death: Highlight of the Role of Cytosolic Calcium and Necroptosis

Simple Summary

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with a high curability rate. However, 40% of patients will relapse or exhibit refractory disease, and compromised apoptotic pathways is among the prognosis-worsening factors. Therefore, drugging non-apoptotic modalities might be therapeutically promising. Thymoquinone (TQ) has been reported to promote apoptosis in cancer cells. Herein, we show that TQ selectively kills DLBCL cells, either cell lines or primary lymphoma cells bearing resistance features to standard treatment. Investigations show that, although TQ induced apoptotic markers, non-apoptotic death was the major mechanism responsible for TQ-induced cellular demise. We demonstrate critical and selective roles of cytosolic calcium and necroptosis in TQ-induced non-apoptotic cell death. Finally, TQ exhibits an improved selectivity profile over conventional chemotherapy. Collectively, this work provides new insights into the mode of action of TQ and points to the therapeutic relevance of non-apoptotic modalities as a fail-safe mechanism for pro-apoptotic DLBCL therapies.

Abstract

Targeting non-apoptotic modalities might be therapeutically promising in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with compromised apoptotic pathways. Thymoquinone (TQ) has been reported to promote apoptosis in cancer cells, but little is known about its effect on non-apoptotic pathways. This work investigates TQ selectivity against DLBCL cell lines and the cell death mechanisms. TQ reduces cell viability and kills cell lines with minimal toxicity on normal hematological cells. Mechanistically, TQ promotes the mitochondrial caspase pathway and increases genotoxicity. However, insensitivity of most cell lines to caspase inhibition by z-VAD-fmk (benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethyl ketone) pointed to a critical role of non-apoptotic signaling. In cells dying through non-apoptotic death, TQ increases endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress markers and substantially increases cytosolic calcium ([Ca²⁺]_c) through ER calcium depletion and activation of store-operated calcium entry (SOCE). Chelation of [Ca²⁺]_c, but not SOCE inhibitors, reduces TQ-induced non-apoptotic cell death, highlighting the critical role of calcium in a non-apoptotic effect of TQ. Investigations showed that TQ-induced [Ca²⁺]_c signaling is primarily initiated by necroptosis upstream to SOCE, and inhibition necroptosis by necrostatin-1 alone or with z-VAD-fmk blocks the cell death. Finally, TQ exhibits an improved selectivity profile over standard chemotherapy agents, suggesting a therapeutic relevance of the pro-necroptotic effect of TQ as a fail-safe mechanism for DLBCL therapies targeting apoptosis.

R-CHOP compared to R-CHOP + X for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is standard of care first line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), though outcomes remain suboptimal.

METHODS

We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of R-CHOP vs. R-CHOP + X (addition of another drug to R-CHOP) as first line treatment for DLBCL. We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed and conference proceedings up to September 2020.

RESULTS

Our search yielded ten trials including 4206 patients. The added drug was bortezomib or lenalidomide in three trials each, and gemcitabine, bevacizumab and ibrutinib, each drug in one trial. R-CHOP + X was associated with statistically significant improved disease control (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99). The point estimate was in favor of improved overall survival with R-CHOP + X (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.00), although this was not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis revealed improved disease control with the addition of lenalidomide and in patients younger than 60 years. R-CHOP + X was associated with an increase in serious adverse events and grade III/IV hematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The addition of another drug to frontline R-CHOP treatment for DLBCL did not result in a significant improvement in OS, although we did observe improved disease control compared to R-CHOP, perhaps most evident with the addition of lenalidomide. Yet, RCHOP + X was associated with an increased risk for serious and hematological adverse events. Further studies could reveal subgroups that would benefit most from augmentation of standard R-CHOP.

Why R-CHOP + X is not enough: lessons learned and next steps in the mission to improve frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Two-thirds of newly diagnosed cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are cured with R-CHOP, an immunochemotherapy regimen that has been the standard of care for almost two decades. Ongoing molecular characterization of DLBCL has revealed a heterogeneous disease comprised of multiple subtypes based on putative cell of origin or somatic mutations with unique oncogenic signaling pathways. The door has been opened to the use of novel agents that target the specific molecular vulnerabilities of DLBCL, but despite this, multiple randomized studies have not identified a suitable drug 'X' to combine with R-CHOP. This report will review recent attempts to add individual novel agents to R-CHOP in the mission to improve frontline treatment for DLBCL and discuss promising ongoing studies. It will offer potential strategies to explore when designing future clinical trials, including exploiting synergy between multiple novel agents.

Genetic Events Inhibiting Apoptosis in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Simple Summary

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Despite the genetic heterogeneity of the disease, most patients are initially treated with a combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), but relapse occurs in ~50% of patients. One of the hallmarks of DLBCL is the occurrence of genetic events that inhibit apoptosis, which contributes to disease development and resistance to therapy. These events can affect the intrinsic or extrinsic apoptotic pathways, or their modulators. Understanding the factors that contribute to inhibition of apoptosis in DLBCL is crucial in order to be able to develop targeted therapies and improve outcomes, particularly in relapsed and refractory DLBCL (rrDLBCL). This review provides a description of the genetic events inhibiting apoptosis in DLBCL, their contribution to lymphomagenesis and chemoresistance, and their implication for the future of DLBCL therapy.

Abstract

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is curable with chemoimmunotherapy in ~65% of patients. One of the hallmarks of the pathogenesis and resistance to therapy in DLBCL is inhibition of apoptosis, which allows malignant cells to survive and acquire further alterations. Inhibition of apoptosis can be the result of genetic events inhibiting the intrinsic or extrinsic apoptotic pathways, as well as their modulators, such as the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, P53, and components of the NF-kB pathway. Mechanisms of dysregulation include upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins and downregulation of pro-apoptotic proteins via point mutations, amplifications, deletions, translocations, and influences of other proteins. Understanding the factors contributing to resistance to apoptosis in DLBCL is crucial in order to be able to develop targeted therapies that could improve outcomes by restoring apoptosis in malignant cells. This review describes the genetic events inhibiting apoptosis in DLBCL, provides a perspective of their interactions in lymphomagenesis, and discusses their implication for the future of DLBCL therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of the Biosimilar IBI301 Plus Standard CHOP (I-CHOP) in Comparison With Rituximab Plus CHOP (R-CHOP) in Patients with Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Trial

INTRODUCTION

Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have limited access to rituximab. IBI301 is a recombinant chimeric murine/human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and is a candidate biosimilar to rituximab. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic equivalence of IBI301 and rituximab in previously untreated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial compared IBI301 and rituximab, both plus the chemotherapy of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, and prednisone (CHOP), was conducted in 68 centers across China. Eligible patients with untreated CD20 positive (CD20⁺) DLBCL randomly received IBI301 (375 mg/m²) plus the standard CHOP or rituximab (375 mg/m²) plus the standard CHOP for six cycles of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was the overall remission rate (ORR). Efficacy equivalence was defined if 95% CIs for the ORR difference between the two groups were within a ± 12.0% margin.

RESULTS

Between August 22, 2016, and September 5, 2018, 419 patients were randomly allocated into the IBI301 group (N = 209) and rituximab group (N = 210). In the full analysis set, the ORR was 89.9% and 93.8% in the IBI301 and rituximab groups, respectively, and the ORR difference was -3.9% (95% CI - 9.1%-1.3%), falling within a ± 12.0% margin. The occurrences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (100% vs. 99.0%) and AEs of grade ≥ 3 (87.1% vs. 83.3%) were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

IBI301 had a non-inferiority efficacy and a comparable safety compared with rituximab. IBI301 plus CHOP could be suggested as a candidate treatment regimen for untreated patients with CD20⁺ DLBCL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02867566).

LINC00857 contributes to proliferation and lymphomagenesis by regulating miR-370-3p/CBX3 axis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains to be a high aggressive and invasive malignancy with enigmatic etiology. Ectopic expression of long non-coding RNAs is widely involved in the progression of human cancers. We discovered that LINC00857 level was remarkably elevated in DLBCL tissues compared with non-tumor controls. High LINC00857 level predicts lower survival rate, more advanced tumor node metastasis and larger tumor size. LINC00857 overexpression promoted DLBCL cell proliferation and facilitated cell cycle as evidenced by elevated Cyclin D1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) accompanying with reduced p21 level. LINC00857 overexpression also suppressed DLBCL cell apoptosis as evidenced by elevated Bcl-2 protein level, reduced Bax and cleaved caspase-3 protein levels. On the contrary, LINC00857 knockdown using short hairpin RNAs inhibited DLBCL cell proliferation yet induced cell apoptosis. LINC00857 knockdown also repressed tumor growth in vivo, concomitant with decreased Ki67 level. Besides, microRNA miR-370 was down-regulated in DLBCL tissues and served as a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) target of LINC00857. We further validated that chromobox homolog 3 (CBX3) served as a downstream target gene of miR-370-3p. LINC00857 level was reversely correlated with miR-370-3p level yet positively correlated with CBX3 level. In addition, CBX3 overexpression alleviated the impact of LINC00857 knockdown on DLBCL cell survival. In conclusion, our findings indicated that LINC00857 contributes to DLBCL proliferation and lymphomagenesis through regulating miR-370-3p/CBX3 axis.

Treatment of Aggressive B Cell Lymphomas: Updates in 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent years have seen the development of gene expression profiling and next-generation sequencing in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), leading to a more defined characterization of this disease into distinct subentities. The genomic era has ushered in the possibility of using precision guided therapy, in part based on targeting genes with somatic mutations. Such precision-targeted therapies will ultimately reduce the need for chemotherapy, induce fewer adverse events, and likely enhance the cure rate for these patients. Here, we discuss emerging therapeutic strategies that have been recently developed for the upfront and relapse setting of DLBCL.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical trials exploring precision medicine have showed promising results; however, attempts to enhance frontline immunochemotherapy by adding targeted agents to the R-CHOP backbone did not confirm the expected benefit. The last decade has also seen a revolutionary development of immunotherapy in B cell lymphomas. While cellular immunotherapy demonstrated a striking success of CAR T cells in DLBCL, checkpoint inhibitors have lacked success in B cell lymphomas. A parallel therapeutic expansion has involved bispecific monoclonal antibodies as a powerful tool for redirected T cell therapy independently from costimulatory molecules and major-histocompatibility complex. The landscape of drugs for the treatment of DLBCL has become overwhelmed by the increasing number of targeted and immunological therapies; however, none have enhanced efficacy of frontline therapy. Future direction should focus to redefine therapeutic paradigm and develop mechanism-based combinatorial regimens specifically tailored for DLBCL genetic subgroups.

New agents and regimens for diffuse large B cell lymphoma

As a widely recognized standard regimen, R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) is able to cure two-thirds patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and the remaining patients suffer from refractory or relapsed disease due to resistance to R-CHOP and fare poorly. Unsatisfied outcomes for those relapsed/refractory patients prompted efforts to discover new treatment approaches for DLBCL, including chimeric antigen receptor T cells, bispecific T cell engagers, immunomodulatory drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, molecular pathway inhibitors, and epigenetic-modifying drugs. Herein, up-to-date data about the most promising treatment approaches for DLBCL are recapitulated, and novel genetic classification systems are introduced to guide individualized treatment for DLBCL.

Network meta-analysis of targeted therapies for diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Background

The purpose of this network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to compare rank targeted therapies for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Methods

The PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane library electronic databases were systematically searched throughout December 2019. Direct and indirect evidence from relevant RCTs was identified for network meta-analysis. The pooled results for grade 3 or greater adverse events between targeted therapies and chemotherapy were calculated using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 18 RCTs enrolling 8207 DLBCL patients were selected for the final meta-analysis. The results of the network analysis indicated that the addition of dacetuzumab (74.8%) to rituximab-based regimens or lenalidomide (77.1%) was associated with better therapeutic effects on overall survival, whereas dacetuzumab (80.4%) or bortezomib (70.8%) added to rituximab was most likely to improve events-free survival. Moreover, lenalidomide (93.8%) and I-tositumomab (77.2%) were associated with higher overall response rates. Finally, patients receiving targeted therapies were associated with an increased risk of diarrhea (RR: 2.63; 95%CI: 1.18–5.86; P = 0.019), and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.41; 95%CI: 1.05–1.90; P = 0.023).

Conclusions

This study provides the best treatment strategy for DLBCL patients in terms of overall survival, events-free survival, and overall response rate. The findings of this study require validation with further large-scale RCTs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07715-2.

Biomarkers and novel therapeutic approaches for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the era of precision medicine

Despite the great efforts for better treatment options for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (most common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, NHL) to treat and prevent relapse, it continues to be a challenge. Here, we present an overview of DLBCL and address the diagnostic assays and molecular techniques used in its diagnosis, role of biomarkers in detection, treatment of early and advanced stage DLBCL, and novel drug regimens. We discuss the significant biomarkers that have emerged as essential tools for stratifying patients according to risk factors and for providing insights into the use of more targeted and individualized therapeutics. We discuss techniques such as gene expression studies, including next-generation sequencing, which have enabled a more understanding of the complex pathogenesis of DLBCL and have helped determine molecular targets for novel therapeutic agents. We examine current treatment approaches, outline the findings of completed clinical trials, and provide updates for ongoing clinical trials. We highlight clinical trials relevant to the significant fraction of DLBCL patients who present with complex cases marked by high relapse rates. Supported by an increased understanding of targetable pathways in DLBCL, clinical trials involving specialized combination therapies are bringing us within reach the promise of an effective cure to DLBCL using precision medicine. Optimization of therapy remains a crucial objective, with the end goal being a balance between high survival rates through targeted and personalized treatment while reducing adverse effects in DLBCL patients of all subsets.

Long-term follow-up of abbreviated R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy for completely resected limited-stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma (CISL 12-09)

The standard of treatment for completely resected limited-stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients without residual lesions has not yet been established. Previously, we designed a phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP in patients with completely resected limited-stage DLBCL and reported favorable survival outcomes. We present the long-term follow-up results to taking into account the importance of delayed relapse in patients with limited-stage DLBCL. With a median follow-up duration of 62.7 months (range, 60.2-75.5 months), the 5-year OS and DFS rates were both 95.0% (95% confidence interval, 85.59-104.11%). Only one patient experienced disease progression which was confirmed at 12.3 months, and one patient with primary intestinal DLBCL developed non-small cell lung cancer 6 years after treatment. The long-term results of our data support the use of three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP for patients with completely resected limited-stage DLBCL. The study was reviewed and approved by the review boards of the participating institutes and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01279902, in August 3, 2010.

Saudi Lymphoma Group's Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Management and Follow-up of Patients with Various Types of Lymphoma during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

The Saudi Lymphoma Group had previously published recommendations on the management of the major subtypes of lymphoma. However, the effect the currently ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has on the management of patients with lymphoma has been paramount. Therefore, the Saudi Lymphoma Group has decided to provide clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, management and follow-up of patients with various types of lymphoma during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in malignant lymphoma: Advances and perspectives

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has been identified with universal genetic alterations of chromosome 9p24.1, which contains PD-L1/PD-L2 genes. The amplification of 9p24.1 is associated with the increased expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 on RS cells, which promotes their immune evasion, and subsequently makes cHL sensitive to PD-1 blockade. Several PD-1 inhibitors have shown significant efficacies with overall response rate (ORR) of 70%-90% in relapse/refractory (r/r) cHL and have acquired the approvals for this indication. Recently, more and more studies are conducted to investigate PD-1 blockade in earlier disease course and in combination with neo-agents or chemotherapy. Unlike cHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) consists of numerous subtypes harboring highly biological heterogeneity. Only a few subtypes have been shown to have genetic alteration of9p24.1 including primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBL), gray zone lymphoma (GZL) with features intermediate between diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and cHL, primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and primary testicular lymphoma (PTL). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated lymphomas have a virally mediated overexpression of PD-L1, also making them sensitive to PD-1 blockade. Therefore, PD-1 inhibitors are less effective in most r/r NHL than in r/r cHL. Further understanding of the biological features of NHL and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) combined therapy is the research focus in the future. In this review, we outlined the recent progress of ICPi in lymphoma originating from clinical studies.

EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Epstein Barr virus-positive (EBV+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified (NOS) is an entity included in the 2016 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms. EBV+ DLBCL, NOS, is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma associated with chronic EBV infection, and a poor prognosis with standard chemotherapeutic approaches.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis is made through a careful pathological evaluation. Detection of EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) is considered standard for diagnosis; however, a clear cutoff for positivity has not been defined. The differential diagnosis includes plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL), DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation and primary effusion lymphoma (PEL), among others.

RISK-STRATIFICATION

The International Prognostic Index (IPI) and the Oyama score can be used for risk-stratification. The Oyama score includes age >70 years and presence of B symptoms. The expression of CD30 and PD-1/PD-L1 are emerging as potential adverse but targetable biomarkers.

MANAGEMENT

Patients with EBV+ DLBCL, NOS, should be staged and managed following similar guidelines than patients with EBV-negative DLBCL. EBV+ DLBCL, NOS, however, might have a worse prognosis than EBV-negative DLBCL in the era of chemoimmunotherapy. There is an opportunity to study and develop targeted therapy in the management of patients with EBV+ DLBCL, NOS.

Integrating transcriptome-wide association study and copy number variation study identifies candidate genes and pathways for diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The genetic basis of diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (DNHL) is largely unknown now. We conducted a large-scale transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) of DNHL to identify novel candidates for DNHL.

METHODS

The GWAS summary data of DNHL was obtained from the UKBiobank, involving 685 cases and 451,579 controls. TWAS of DNHL was performed using tissue-specific gene expression weights generated from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) data. The DNHLTWAS results were further validated by a previous published copy number alterations (CNA) study of DNHL. Gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis of identified candidate genes were conducted by the DAVID 6.8.

RESULTS

We identified 214 genes with TWAS P value < 0.05 for DNHL, such as MRPL19 (P_TWAS = 0.0010), CRCP (P_TWAS = 0.0010) and SEMA3C (P_TWAS = 0.0010). After further comparing the 214 genes with copy number variations of DNHL patients, we found 1 overlapped gene, BCL10 (P_TWAS = 0.0100). We also detected 6 common GO terms shared between gene set enrichment analysis results of TWAS and CNAs, such as cytosol (P_TWAS = 0.0003, PCNAs = 4.99 × 10^-7) and membrane (P_TWAS = 0.0048, P_CNAs = 0.0046). The pathway enrichment analysis of TWAS and CNAs detected 3 common pathways, including HIF-1 signaling pathway (P_TWAS = 0.0195, P_CNAs = 1.96 × 10^-5), mTOR signaling pathway (P_TWAS = 0.0242, P_CNAs = 6.75 × 10^-5) and adipocytokine signaling pathway (P_TWAS = 0.0392, P_CNAs = 0.0103).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified multiple DNHL associated genes and pathways, providing novel useful information for the pathogenetic studies of DNHL.

Trial watch: chemotherapy-induced immunogenic cell death in immuno-oncology

The term ‘immunogenic cell death’ (ICD) denotes an immunologically unique type of regulated cell death that enables, rather than suppresses, T cell-driven immune responses that are specific for antigens derived from the dying cells. The ability of ICD to elicit adaptive immunity heavily relies on the immunogenicity of dying cells, implying that such cells must encode and present antigens not covered by central tolerance (antigenicity), and deliver immunostimulatory molecules such as damage-associated molecular patterns and cytokines (adjuvanticity). Moreover, the host immune system must be equipped to detect the antigenicity and adjuvanticity of dying cells. As cancer (but not normal) cells express several antigens not covered by central tolerance, they can be driven into ICD by some therapeutic agents, including (but not limited to) chemotherapeutics of the anthracycline family, oxaliplatin and bortezomib, as well as radiation therapy. In this Trial Watch, we describe current trends in the preclinical and clinical development of ICD-eliciting chemotherapy as partner for immunotherapy, with a focus on trials assessing efficacy in the context of immunomonitoring.

Challenges and Opportunities for High-grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 Rearrangement (Double-hit Lymphoma)

The most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, is cured in approximately two thirds of patients after initial therapy. The remaining one-third of patients who suffer relapse or become refractory have very poor survival outcomes despite salvage chemotherapy with or without stem cell transplantation. A considerable proportion of relapsed or refractory large B cells belong to the WHO subtype known as high-grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangement of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6, also known as double-hit lymphoma (DHL). Most DHL patients present with Ann Arbor's stage III/IV, a comparatively higher rate of extranodal involvement including bone marrow and central nervous system infiltration, high levels of lactate dehydrogenase, and an elevated Ki67 expression in the tumor cells. Newer therapeutic approaches, including targeted therapy against BCL2, MYC, or other associated pathways, are needed. In addition, recent therapies that harness the immune system, such as checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, are changing the paradigm of treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and could impact the outcome of DHL.

Bortezomib for the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies: 15 Years Later

Bortezomib is a dipeptidyl boronic acid that selectively inhibits the ubiquitin proteasome pathway, which plays a role in the degradation of many intracellular proteins. It is the first-in-class selective and reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome, with antiproliferative and antitumor activity. It exerts its anti-neoplastic action mainly via the inhibition of the nuclear factor-κB pathway components associated with cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. The drug has revolutionized the treatment of multiple myeloma and, more recently, mantle cell lymphoma. In 2003, bortezomib received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and in 2008 for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. In 2006, bortezomib was approved for the treatment of refractory/relapsed mantle cell lymphoma and, in 2014, for previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma. Bortezomib has also demonstrated clinical efficacy both as a single drug and in combination with other agents in light chain amyloidosis, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, and peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Furthermore, continued clinical studies are required to confirm its value for patients with indolent and aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and acute leukemias.

Genetic alterations and their clinical implications in DLBCL

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a highly heterogeneous lymphoid neoplasm with variations in gene expression profiles and genetic alterations, which lead to substantial variations in clinical course and response to therapy. The advent of high-throughput genome sequencing platforms, and especially whole-exome sequencing, has helped to define the genetic landscape of DLBCL. In the past 10 years, these studies have identified many genetic alterations in DLBCL, some of which are specific to B cell lymphomas, whereas others can also be observed in other types of cancer. These aberrations result in altered activation of a wide range of signalling pathways and other cellular processes, including those involved in B cell differentiation, B cell receptor signalling, activation of the NF-κB pathway, apoptosis and epigenetic regulation. Further elaboration of the genetics of DLBCL will not only improve our understanding of disease pathogenesis but also provide further insight into disease classification, prognostication and therapeutic targets. In this Review, we describe the current understanding of the prevalence and causes of specific genetic alterations in DLBCL and their role in disease development and progression. We also summarize the available clinical data on therapies designed to target the aberrant pathways driven by these alterations.

Methodology of clinical trials evaluating the incorporation of new drugs in the first-line treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): a critical review

Background

The first-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the combination of rituximab with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy, curing approximately 60% of patients. Many clinical trials have been carried out over the last 10 years trying to improve the results of this treatment, but the appropriateness of their planning strategies could be rediscussed.

Patients and methods

Reports of phase III trials evaluating the addition of molecularly targeted agents or new monoclonal antibodies to the classic R-CHOP backbone in first-line induction or maintenance treatment were reviewed. The trial design, primary end point, number of patients enrolled, patient selection criteria, treatment schedule and results were registered for each one. In addition, the phases I and II trials which preceded these phase III trials were also reviewed.

Results

Among six phase III trials with results, only one trial evaluating lenalidomide maintenance after response to R-CHOP induction was positive and reached its primary end point. The other five trials did not show an improved outcome with the addition of the new agent. The preceding phases I and II trials were very heterogeneous in their end points and design. Even though most of these trials were considered positive, thus encouraging further investigation, so far they failed to predict the results of the subsequent phase III trials.

Conclusion

The standard of care for DLBCL is still R-CHOP. Phase I/II trials failed to predict the results of subsequent phase III trials evaluating non-chemotherapeutic agents added to R-CHOP. The methodology of phase II trials evaluating new agents in DLBCL needs to be better defined in the future.

Refining diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subgroups using integrated analysis of molecular profiles

Background

Gene expression profiling (GEP), next-generation sequencing (NGS) and copy number variation (CNV) analysis have led to an increasingly detailed characterization of the genomic profiles of DLBCL. The aim of this study was to perform a fully integrated analysis of mutational, genomic, and expression profiles to refine DLBCL subtypes. A comparison of our model with two recently published integrative DLBCL classifiers was carried out, in order to best reflect the current state of genomic subtypes.

Methods

223 patients with de novo DLBCL from the prospective, multicenter and randomized LNH-03B LYSA clinical trials were included. GEP data was obtained using Affymetrix GeneChip arrays, mutational profiles were established by Lymphopanel NGS targeting 34 key genes, CNV analysis was obtained by array CGH, and FISH and IHC were performed. Unsupervised independent component analysis (ICA) was applied to GEP data and integrated analysis of multi-level molecular data associated with each component (gene signature) was performed.

Findings

ICA identified 38 components reflecting transcriptomic variability across our DLBCL cohort. Many of the components were closely related to well-known DLBCL features such as cell-of-origin, stromal and MYC signatures. A component linked to gain of 19q13 locus, among other genomic alterations, was significantly correlated with poor OS and PFS. Through this integrated analysis, a high degree of heterogeneity was highlighted among previously described DLBCL subtypes.

Interpretation

The results of this integrated analysis enable a global and multi-level view of DLBCL, as well as improve our understanding of DLBCL subgroups.

Primary Intra-Axial Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Immunocompetent Patients: Clinical Impact of Molecular Analysis and Histogenetic Evaluation

Primary central nervous system (CNS) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents less than 1% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas and 2%-3% of brain tumors. Primary CNS DLBCL occurs sporadically in healthy patients. Tumor development and progression have been associated with reduced/absent expression of human leukocyte antigen class I and II proteins; increased expression of CXCR4, CXCL12, CXCR5, and CCR7; mutations of VH4/34, BCL6, MYC, and PAX5 genes; and rearrangement of immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes. Generally, DLBCL is a single supratentorial lesion (60%-70%), and stereotactic biopsy and intraoperative examination are the main diagnostic methods. Distinctive histologic features are a diffuse growth pattern and angioinvasiveness. Most neoplastic cells resemble centroblasts and exhibit positive CD20, CD22, PAX5, CD79a, and MUM1 expression. The prognosis of primary CNS DLBCL is less favorable than that of nodal DLBCL, and DLBCL subtype, strong FOXP1 immunoreactivity, MYC and BCL2 overexpression, and BCL6 translocations are associated with poor prognosis.

The IL-6 signaling complex is a critical driver, negative prognostic factor, and therapeutic target in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a growth factor for normal B cells and plasma cell-derived malignancies. Here, we show that the IL-6 signaling pathway is also active in a subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with particularly poor prognosis. Primary DLBCL cells and DLBCL cell lines expressing IL-6R engraft and form orthotopic lymphomas in humanized mice that ectopically produce human IL-6, and in mice reconstituted with a human immune system. We show that a subset of DLBCL cases have evolved mechanisms that ensure constitutive activation of the IL-6 signaling pathway, i.e., the expression of both chains of the IL-6R, the expression of the cytokine itself, and the mutational inactivation of a negative regulator of IL-6 signaling, SOCS1. IL-6 signaling promotes MYC-driven lymphomagenesis in a genetically engineered model, and treatment with the IL-6R-specific antibody tocilizumab reduces growth of primary DLBCL cells and of DLBCL cell lines in various therapeutic settings. The combined results uncover the IL-6 signaling pathway as a driver and negative prognosticator in aggressive DLBCL that can be targeted with a safe and well-tolerated biologic.

Treatment approaches for older and oldest patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma - Use of non-R-CHOP alternative therapies and impact of comorbidities on treatment choices and outcome: A Humedica database retrospective cohort analysis, 2007-2015

INTRODUCTION

We characterized real-world treatment patterns in older (65-74 years) and oldest (75-85 years) patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving initial therapy (R-CHOP, non-R-CHOP regimens). Impact of comorbidities on treatment choice, and overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) were assessed by age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the Humedica database, we identified 1436 newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL who received frontline therapy from 1/07-9/15. The 885 patients ≥65 years of age were further evaluated for baseline demographics, comorbidities, initial therapy, and PFS/OS.

RESULTS

Of 885 patients, 406 (45.9%) were age 65-74, and 479 (54.1%) age 75-85, years. First line therapy was R-CHOP (61.8%) or non-R-CHOP (38.2%). Although Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were similar at baseline, congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction were more common in those receiving non-R-CHOP regimens. Survival outcomes were superior for those receiving initial R-CHOP, versus non-R-CHOP, therapy (median PFS 53.9 versus 27.8 months; two-year PFS 71.2% versus 51.6%, p < .0001; median OS not reached versus 45 months; two-year OS 81.3% versus 62.9%, p < .0001, respectively). Only 10.4% (R-CHOP) and 12.1% (non-R-CHOP) of patients received second line therapies. Two-year OS by age (65-74, 75-85 years) was 66.4% and 39.1%, respectively with R-CHOP (p = .0045), and 74.3% and 54.5%, respectively with non-R-CHOP (p = .004), therapy. Age ≥ 75 years and CCI of 2+ were associated with shorter OS and PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified real-world first line treatment patterns for older patients with DLBCL. Our findings support the feasibility of administering standard R-CHOP therapy, even to oldest patients with DLBCL.

Discriminant analysis and machine learning approach for evaluating and improving the performance of immunohistochemical algorithms for COO classification of DLBCL

Background

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is classified into germinal center-like (GCB) and non-germinal center-like (non-GCB) cell-of-origin groups, entities driven by different oncogenic pathways with different clinical outcomes. DLBCL classification by immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based decision tree algorithms is a simpler reported technique than gene expression profiling (GEP). There is a significant discrepancy between IHC-decision tree algorithms when they are compared to GEP.

Methods

To address these inconsistencies, we applied the machine learning approach considering the same combinations of antibodies as in IHC-decision tree algorithms. Immunohistochemistry data from a public DLBCL database was used to perform comparisons among IHC-decision tree algorithms, and the machine learning structures based on Bayesian, Bayesian simple, Naïve Bayesian, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine to show the best diagnostic model. We implemented the linear discriminant analysis over the complete database, detecting a higher influence of BCL6 antibody for GCB classification and MUM1 for non-GCB classification.

Results

The classifier with the highest metrics was the four antibody-based Perfecto–Villela (PV) algorithm with 0.94 accuracy, 0.93 specificity, and 0.95 sensitivity, with a perfect agreement with GEP (κ = 0.88, P < 0.001). After training, a sample of 49 Mexican-mestizo DLBCL patient data was classified by COO for the first time in a testing trial.

Conclusions

Harnessing all the available immunohistochemical data without reliance on the order of examination or cut-off value, we conclude that our PV machine learning algorithm outperforms Hans and other IHC-decision tree algorithms currently in use and represents an affordable and time-saving alternative for DLBCL cell-of-origin identification.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12967-019-1951-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Gene-expression profiling of bortezomib added to standard chemoimmunotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (REMoDL-B): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Biologically distinct subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma can be identified using gene-expression analysis to determine their cell of origin, corresponding to germinal centre or activated B cell. We aimed to investigate whether adding bortezomib to standard therapy could improve outcomes in patients with these subtypes.

METHODS

In a randomised evaluation of molecular guided therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with bortezomib (REMoDL-B), an open-label, adaptive, randomised controlled, phase 3 superiority trial, participants were recruited from 107 cancer centres in the UK (n=94) and Switzerland (n=13). Eligible patients had previously untreated, histologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with sufficient diagnostic material from initial biopsies for gene-expression profiling and pathology review; were aged 18 years or older; had ECOG performance status of 2 or less; had bulky stage I or stage II-IV disease requiring full-course chemotherapy; had measurable disease; and had cardiac, lung, renal, and liver function sufficient to tolerate chemotherapy. Patients initially received one 21-day cycle of standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP; rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 [to a maximum of 2 mg total dose] intravenously on day 1 of the cycle, and prednisolone 100 mg orally once daily on days 1-5). During this time, we did gene-expression profiling using whole genome cDNA-mediated annealing, selection, extension, and ligation assay of tissue from routine diagnostic biopsy samples to determine the cell-of-origin subtype of each participant (germinal centre B cell, activated B cell, or unclassified). Patients were then centrally randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based system, with block randomisation stratified by international prognostic index score and cell-of-origin subtype, to continue R-CHOP alone (R-CHOP group; control), or with bortezomib (RB-CHOP group; experimental; 1·3 mg/m2 intravenously or 1·6 mg/m2 subcutaneously) on days 1 and 8 for cycles two to six. If RNA extracted from the diagnostic tissues was of insufficient quality or quantity, participants were given R-CHOP as per the control group. The primary endpoint was 30-month progression-free survival, for the germinal centre and activated B-cell population. The primary analysis was on the modified intention-to-treat population of activated and germinal centre B-cell population. Safety was assessed in all participants who were given at least one dose of study drug. We report the progression-free survival and safety outcomes for patients in the follow-up phase after the required number of events occurred. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01324596, and recruitment and treatment has completed for all participants, with long-term follow-up ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between June 2, 2011, and June 10, 2015, 1128 eligible patients were registered, of whom 918 (81%) were randomly assigned to receive treatment (n=459 to R-CHOP, n=459 to RB-CHOP), comprising 244 (26·6%) with activated B-cell disease, 475 (51·7%) with germinal centre B cell disease, and 199 (21·7%) with unclassified disease. At a median follow-up of 29·7 months (95% CI 29·0-32·0), we saw no evidence for a difference in progression-free survival in the combined germinal centre and activated B-cell population between R-CHOP and RB-CHOP (30-month progression-free survival 70·1%, 95% CI 65·0-74·7 vs 74·3%, 69·3-78·7; hazard ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·65-1·13; p=0·28). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse event was haematological toxicity, reported in 178 (39·8%) of 447 patients given R-CHOP and 187 (42·1%) of 444 given RB-CHOP. However, RB-CHOP was not associated with increased haematological toxicity and 398 [87·1%] of 459 participants assigned to receive RB-CHOP completed six cycles of treatment. Grade 3 or worse neuropathy occurred in 17 (3·8%) patients given RB-CHOP versus eight (1·8%) given R-CHOP. Serious adverse events occurred in 190 (42·5%) patients given R-CHOP, including five treatment-related deaths, and 223 (50·2%) given RB-CHOP, including four treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

This is the first large-scale study in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma to use real-time molecular characterisation for prospective stratification, randomisation, and subsequent analysis of biologically distinct subgroups of patients. The addition of bortezomib did not improve progression-free survival.

FUNDING

Janssen-Cilag, Bloodwise, and Cancer Research UK.