Antifactor VIII Antibody Inhibiting Allogeneic but not Autologous Factor VIII in Patients With Mild Hemophilia A

Structural basis for inhibition of coagulation factor VIII reveals a shared antigenic hotspot on the C1 domain

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A arises from dysfunctional or deficient coagulation factor (F)VIII and leads to inefficient fibrin clot formation and uncontrolled bleeding events. The development of antibody inhibitors is a clinical complication in hemophilia A patients receiving FVIII replacement therapy. LE2E9 is an anti-C1 domain inhibitor previously isolated from a mild/moderate hemophilia A patient and disrupts FVIII interactions with von Willebrand factor and FIXa, though the intermolecular contacts that underpin LE2E9-mediated FVIII neutralization are undefined.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the structure of the complex between FVIII and LE2E9 and characterize its mechanism of inhibition.

METHODS

FVIII was bound to the antigen binding fragment (Fab) of NB2E9, a recombinant construct of LE2E9, and its structure was determined by cryogenic electron microscopy.

RESULTS

This report communicates the 3.46 Å structure of FVIII bound to NB2E9, with its epitope comprising FVIII residues S2040 to Y2043, K2065 to W2070, and R2150 to H2155. Structural analysis reveals that the LE2E9 epitope overlaps with portions of the epitope for 2A9, a murine-derived inhibitor, suggesting that these residues represent a shared antigenic region on the C1 domain between FVIII-/- mice and hemophilia A patients. Furthermore, the FVIII:NB2E9 structure elucidates the orientation of the LE2E9 glycan, illustrating how the glycan sterically blocks interactions between the FVIII C1 domain and the von Willebrand factor D' domain. A putative model of the FVIIIa:FIXa complex suggests potential clashing between the NB2E9 glycan and FIXa light chain.

CONCLUSION

These results describe an antigenic "hotspot" on the FVIII C1 domain and provide a structural basis for engineering FVIII replacement therapeutics with reduced antigenicity.

Characterisation and application of recombinant FVIII-neutralising antibodies from haemophilia A inhibitor patients

The development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is a serious outcome of treatment strategies involving biological medicines. Coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is used to treat haemophilia A patients, but its immunogenicity precludes a third of severe haemophiliac patients from receiving this treatment. The availability of patient-derived anti-drug antibodies can help us better understand drug immunogenicity and identify ways to overcome it. Thus, there were two aims to this work: (i) to develop and characterise a panel of recombinant, patient-derived, monoclonal antibodies covering a range of FVIII epitopes with varying potencies, kinetics and mechanism of action, and (ii) to demonstrate their applicability to assay development, evaluation of FVIII molecules and basic research. For the first objective we used recombinant antibodies to develop a rapid, sensitive, flexible and reproducible ex vivo assay that recapitulates inhibitor patient blood using blood from healthy volunteers. We also demonstrate how the panel can provide important information about the efficacy of FVIII products and reagents without the need for patient or animal material. These materials can be used as experimental exemplars or controls, as well as tools for rational, hypothesis-driven research and assay development in relation to FVIII immunogenicity and FVIII-related products.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Emicizumab in Persons with Hemophilia A with Factor VIII Inhibitors: HAVEN 1 Study

Emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody, bridges activated factor IX (FIXa) and FX, replacing the function of missing FVIIIa to restore effective hemostasis in persons with hemophilia A (PwHA). Here we assess pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers in PwHA with FVIII inhibitors in the Phase III HAVEN 1 study (NCT02622321). Blood samples from 112 PwHA receiving 1.5 mg/kg once-weekly subcutaneous emicizumab were analyzed at central laboratories. Emicizumab concentrations for PK analysis were measured via validated immunoassay. PD effects were assessed using FVIII chromogenic activity assay containing human factors (Hyphen Biophen FVIII:C), and by FXIa-triggered thrombin generation (TG). Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), antigen levels of FIX and FX, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and prothrombin fragment 1.2 (PF1.2) levels were determined. Emicizumab trough concentrations ≥ 50 µg/mL were maintained throughout the study. FVIII-like activity and TG (peak height) correlated with emicizumab concentrations and remained above 20 U/dL and 100 nM, respectively, with a weekly maintenance dose, theoretically converting persons with severe hemophilia A to a mild disease phenotype. aPTT was normalized at subtherapeutic concentrations of emicizumab. Plasma concentrations of target antigens FIX and FX were not significantly affected by emicizumab treatment; nor were fibrinogen, PT (international normalized ratio), D-dimer, or PF1.2. The PK profile of once-weekly emicizumab in HAVEN 1 provides sustained therapeutic plasma levels, consistent with population PK models. Both the PK profile and the PD and safety biomarkers are consistent with the established efficacy of emicizumab prophylaxis in PwHA with FVIII inhibitors.

Frequency and epitope specificity of anti-factor VIII C1 domain antibodies in acquired and congenital hemophilia A

Several studies showed that neutralizing anti-factor VIII (anti-fVIII) antibodies (inhibitors) in patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA) and congenital hemophilia A (HA) are primarily directed to the A2 and C2 domains. In this study, the frequency and epitope specificity of anti-C1 antibodies were analyzed in acquired and congenital hemophilia inhibitor patients (n = 178). The domain specificity of antibodies was studied by homolog-scanning mutagenesis (HSM) with single human domain human/porcine fVIII proteins and antibody binding to human A2, C1, and C2 domains presented as human serum albumin (HSA) fusion proteins. The analysis with HSA-fVIII domain proteins confirmed the results of the HSM approach but resulted in higher detection levels. The higher detection levels with HSA-fVIII domain proteins are a result of antibody cross-reactivity with human and porcine fVIII leading to false-negative HSM results. Overall, A2-, C1-, and C2-specific antibodies were detected in 23%, 78%, and 68% of patients with AHA (n = 115) and in 52%, 57%, and 81% of HA inhibitor patients (n = 63). Competitive binding of the human monoclonal antibody (mAb) LE2E9 revealed overlapping epitopes with murine C1-specific group A mAbs including 2A9. Mutational analyses identified distinct crucial binding residues for LE2E9 (E2066) and 2A9 (F2068) that are also recognized by anti-C1 antibodies present in patients with hemophilia. A strong contribution of LE2E9- and 2A9-like antibodies was particularly observed in patients with AHA. Overall, our study demonstrates that the C1 domain, in addition to the A2 and C2 domains, contributes significantly to the humoral anti-fVIII immune response in acquired and congenital hemophilia inhibitor patients.

The past and future of haemophilia: diagnosis, treatments, and its complications

Haemophilia A and B are hereditary haemorrhagic disorders characterised by deficiency or dysfunction of coagulation protein factors VIII and IX, respectively. Recurrent joint and muscle bleeds lead to severe and progressive musculoskeletal damage. Existing treatment relies on replacement therapy with clotting factors, either at the time of bleeding (ie, on demand) or as part of a prophylactic schedule. The major complication of such therapy is the development of neutralising antibodies (ie, inhibitors), which is most frequent in haemophilia A. Treatment might improve considerably with the availability of new modified drugs, which might overcome existing prophylaxis limitations by reducing dosing frequency and thereby rendering therapy less distressing for the patient. Subcutaneous administration of some new therapies would also simplify prophylaxis in children with poor venous access. Gene therapy has the potential for a definitive cure, and important results have been obtained in haemophilia B. Despite improvements in haemophilia care, the availability of clotting factor concentrates for all affected individuals worldwide remains the biggest challenge.

High-affinity, noninhibitory pathogenic C1 domain antibodies are present in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors

Inhibitor formation in hemophilia A is the most feared treatment-related complication of factor VIII (fVIII) therapy. Most inhibitor patients with hemophilia A develop antibodies against the fVIII A2 and C2 domains. Recent evidence demonstrates that the C1 domain contributes to the inhibitor response. Inhibitory anti-C1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been identified that bind to putative phospholipid and von Willebrand factor (VWF) binding epitopes and block endocytosis of fVIII by antigen presenting cells. We now demonstrate by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry that 7 of 9 anti-human C1 mAbs tested recognize an epitope distinct from the C1 phospholipid binding site. These mAbs, designated group A, display high binding affinities for fVIII, weakly inhibit fVIII procoagulant activity, poorly inhibit fVIII binding to phospholipid, and exhibit heterogeneity with respect to blocking fVIII binding to VWF. Another mAb, designated group B, inhibits fVIII procoagulant activity, fVIII binding to VWF and phospholipid, fVIIIa incorporation into the intrinsic Xase complex, thrombin generation in plasma, and fVIII uptake by dendritic cells. Group A and B epitopes are distinct from the epitope recognized by the canonical, human-derived inhibitory anti-C1 mAb, KM33, whose epitope overlaps both groups A and B. Antibodies recognizing group A and B epitopes are present in inhibitor plasmas from patients with hemophilia A. Additionally, group A and B mAbs increase fVIII clearance and are pathogenic in a hemophilia A mouse tail snip bleeding model. Group A anti-C1 mAbs represent the first identification of pathogenic, weakly inhibitory antibodies that increase fVIII clearance.

T cell response to FVIII

Several lines of evidence indicate that the immune response to Factor VIII (FVIII) in patients with hemophilia A is T cell-dependent. This review highlights the link between the epitope specificity of FVIII-specific T cells and their potential roles in different categories of patients. FVIII-specific T cells able to recognize wild-type (i.e. therapeutic) FVIII but not the mutated self FVIII of hemophilia patients have been identified in patients with mild/moderate hemophilia carrying some point mutations. Such T cells likely contribute to the higher frequency of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (inhibitors) development in these patients. In contrast, as yet no T cells have been identified that can differentiate between FVIII molecules with non-hemophilia-causing single amino acid variants encoded by non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the F8 gene. Other mechanisms are therefore still to be identified that will explain the clinically noted differences in the incidence of inhibitor development between patients of different races who are known to have differences at these sites. Beside information about the mechanism of inhibitor development, the analysis of FVIII-specific T cells has provided tools to develop novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, such as the generation of FVIII-specific regulatory T cells that may be useful in preventing or suppressing the immune response to FVIII.

Personalized approaches to the treatment of hemophilia A and B

The recognition that individuals respond differently to the same medication is not new and dates almost to the founding of western medicine. In the last century it came to be recognized that genetic factors influence the heterogeneity of individual responses to medications with respect to both toxicity and effectiveness. Nonetheless, it has been challenging to integrate pharmacogenetic approaches in the routine practice of medicine as the identification of biomarkers is difficult due to the inherent complexity of biological systems. Here, we present potential applications of pharmacogenetics in managing hemophilia A and B. We discuss how predicting and circumventing immunogenicity, an important impediment to treating hemophilia patients, particularly lends itself to a pharmacogenetic approach. In addition, we discuss new trends toward personalizing the management of hemophilia in clinical settings.

Risk factors associated with inhibitor development in Chinese patients with haemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Inhibitor development is a severe complication of factor IX substitution treatment for haemophilia B (HB). Current research examined the association between inhibitor development and F9 genotypes and polymorphisms in immune response genes in Chinese HB patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

11 inhibitor-positive HB patients and 41 inhibitor-negative HB patients were enrolled. Direct sequencing, copy number variation (CNV) detection and fragment length analysis were applied to identify F9 genotypes and 15 polymorphisms in immune response genes.

RESULTS

7 patients developed high titer inhibitors, with 5 of them having histories of consecutive exposure to FIX products on demand for at least 5 days. Allergic reactions/anaphylaxis to prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) occurred in 3 patients before inhibitors were detected. Five nonsense mutations (E54X, R75X, Q185X, R298X and R379X), two large deletions (E1~6del and E1~8del) and one missense mutation (S411G) were identified in patients with inhibitors. Missense mutations had a low odds ratio for FIX inhibitors development (IOR) of 0.078 (P = 0.02), while nonsense mutation presented a high IOR of 8.500 (P = 0.0044). The frequency of allele T in CD44(95102) (A/T) was significantly higher in inhibitor-negative patients, with OR of 0.324 (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsense mutations conferred a higher risk for while allele T in CD44(95102) (A/T) might play a protective role against inhibitor development in Chinese HB patients.

Factor VIII gene variants and inhibitor risk in African American hemophilia A patients

African American hemophilia A (HA) patients experience a higher incidence of neutralizing anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies ("inhibitors") vis-à-vis white patients. Nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (ns-SNPs) in the F8 gene encoding FVIII-H484, FVIII-E1241, and FVIII-V2238 are more prevalent in African Americans. This study tested the hypothesis that immune responses to these sites provoke inhibitors. Blood samples were obtained from 174 African American and 198 white HA subjects and their F8 gene sequences determined. Major histocompatibility complex class II binding and T-cell recognition of polymorphic sequences were evaluated using quantitative binding assays and HLA-DRB1 tetramers. Peptides corresponding to 4 common ns-SNPs showed limited binding to 11 HLA-DRB1 proteins. CD4 T cells from 22 subjects treated with FVIII products having sequences at residues FVIII-484, 1241, and 2238 differing from those of putative proteins encoded by their F8 genes did not show high-avidity tetramer binding, whereas positive-control staining of tetanus-specific CD4 T cells was routinely successful. African Americans with an intron-22 inversion mutation showed a 2-3 times-higher inhibitor incidence than whites with the same mutation (odds ratio = 2.3 [1.1-5.0, P = .04]), but this did not correlate with any of the ns-SNPs. We conclude that immune responses to "sequence-mismatched" FVIII products are unlikely to contribute appreciably to the inhibitor incidence in African Americans.

The intron-22-inverted F8 locus permits factor VIII synthesis: explanation for low inhibitor risk and a role for pharmacogenomics

Intron-22-inversion patients express the entire Factor VIII (FVIII)-amino-acid sequence intracellularly as 2 non-secreted polypeptides and have a positive "intracellular (I)-FVIII-CRM" status. Mutations conferring a positive I-FVIII-CRM status are associated with low inhibitor risk and are pharmacogenetically relevant because inhibitor risk may be affected by the nature of the therapeutic FVIII-protein (tFVIII), the affinity of any tFVIII-derived foreign peptide (tFVIII-fp) for any HLA class-II isomer (HLA-II) comprising individual major histocompatibility complex (MHC) repertoires, and the stability of any tFVIII-fp/HLA-II complex. We hypothesize that mutations conferring a completely or substantially negative I-FVIII-CRM status are pharmacogenetically irrelevant because inhibitor risk is high with any tFVIII and individual MHC repertoire.

Inhibitor development and management in three non-severe haemophilia A patients with T295A variant

Missense mutations are the most common F8 gene defects among the patients with non-severe haemophilia A. This type of mutation is typically associated with low (5%) inhibitor risk. In the present retrospective study we analysed the clinical data of 16 haemophiliacs with the T295A missense mutation treated at Bonn Haemophilia Centre. In total, three patients developed inhibitors: two patients experienced low-titer and one high-titer inhibitors. Both patients with low titer inhibitors underwent successful ITI. The third patient, at the age of 81, developed initially low-titer inhibitors (3 BU/ml) after rFVIII therapy because of knee surgery. He experienced spontaneous multiple large skin haematomas and haemarthrosis. Immunosuppressive therapy was not applicable because of the infectious origin of discitis (Th3-Th4). Immunoadsorption was performed, but the inhibitor titer increased up to 42 BU/ml nine weeks after termination. A successful treatment of discitis with antibiotics finally allowed a weekly therapy (four times) with rituximab (375 mg/m(2)). This resulted in a decrease of inhibitor titre to 0.7 BU/ml eight weeks after the fourth rituximab application. Patient had endogenous FVIII levels of 3-5%. Twelve months after rituximab therapy (after B cells recovery) he relapsed with low-titer inhibitors and therefore was treated with single rituximab dose (375 mg/m(2)) again. This resulted in his depletion of B cells, measurable endogenous FVIII levels and non measurable inhibitors. This study demonstrated T295A variant to be associated with significantly increased (3/16 patients, 17%) inhibitor development.

Molecular and clinical predictors of inhibitor risk and its prevention and treatment in mild hemophilia A

The risk for inhibitor development in mild hemophilia A (factor VIII levels between 5 and 40 U/dL) is larger than previously anticipated, continues throughout life, and is particularly associated with certain mutations in F8. Desmopressin may reduce inhibitor risk by avoiding exposure to FVIII concentrates, but the heterogenous biological response to desmopressin, showing large interindividual variation, may limit its clinical use. However, predictors of desmopressin response have been recently identified, allowing the selection of the best candidates to this treatment.

Rhesus monkeys and baboons develop clotting factor VIII inhibitors in response to porcine endothelial cells or islets

BACKGROUND

Xenotransplantation of porcine organs holds promise of solving the human organ donor shortage. The use of α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GTKO) pig donors mitigates hyperacute rejection, while delayed rejection is currently precipitated by potent immune and hemostatic complications. Previous analysis by our laboratory suggests that clotting factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors might be elicited by the structurally restricted xenoantibody response which occurs after transplantation of either pig GTKO/hCD55/hCD59/hHT transgenic neonatal islet cell clusters or GTKO endothelial cells.

METHODS

A recombinant xenoantibody was generated using sequences from baboons demonstrating an active xenoantibody response at day 28 after GTKO/hCD55/hCD59/hHT transgenic pig neonatal islet cell cluster transplantation. Rhesus monkeys were immunized with GTKO pig endothelial cells to stimulate an anti-non-Gal xenoantibody response. Serum was collected at days 0 and 7 after immunization. A two-stage chromogenic assay was used to measure FVIII cofactor activity and identify antibodies which inhibit FVIII function. Molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations were used to predict antibody structure and the residues which contribute to antibody-FVIII interactions. Competition ELISA was used to verify predictions at the domain structural level.

RESULTS

Antibodies that inhibit recombinant human FVIII function are elicited after non-human primates are transplanted with either GTKO pig neonatal islet cell clusters or endothelial cells. There is an apparent increase in inhibitor titer by 15 Bethesda units (Bu) after transplant, where an increase greater than 5 Bu can indicate pathology in humans. Furthermore, competition ELISA verifies the computer modeled prediction that the recombinant xenoantibody, H66K12, binds the C1 domain of FVIII.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of FVIII inhibitors is a novel illustration of the potential impact the humoral immune response can have on coagulative dysfunction in xenotransplantation. However, the contribution of these antibodies to rejection pathology requires further evaluation because "normal" coagulation parameters after successful xenotransplantation are not fully understood.

Polymorphisms in the F8 gene and MHC-II variants as risk factors for the development of inhibitory anti-factor VIII antibodies during the treatment of hemophilia a: a computational assessment

The development of neutralizing anti-drug-antibodies to the Factor VIII protein-therapeutic is currently the most significant impediment to the effective management of hemophilia A. Common non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (ns-SNPs) in the F8 gene occur as six haplotypes in the human population (denoted H1 to H6) of which H3 and H4 have been associated with an increased risk of developing anti-drug antibodies. There is evidence that CD4+ T-cell response is essential for the development of anti-drug antibodies and such a response requires the presentation of the peptides by the MHC-class-II (MHC-II) molecules of the patient. We measured the binding and half-life of peptide-MHC-II complexes using synthetic peptides from regions of the Factor VIII protein where ns-SNPs occur and showed that these wild type peptides form stable complexes with six common MHC-II alleles, representing 46.5% of the North American population. Next, we compared the affinities computed by NetMHCIIpan, a neural network-based algorithm for MHC-II peptide binding prediction, to the experimentally measured values and concluded that these are in good agreement (area under the ROC-curve of 0.778 to 0.972 for the six MHC-II variants). Using a computational binding predictor, we were able to expand our analysis to (a) include all wild type peptides spanning each polymorphic position; and (b) consider more MHC-II variants, thus allowing for a better estimation of the risk for clinical manifestation of anti-drug antibodies in the entire population (or a specific sub-population). Analysis of these computational data confirmed that peptides which have the wild type sequence at positions where the polymorphisms associated with haplotypes H3, H4 and H5 occur bind MHC-II proteins significantly more than a negative control. Taken together, the experimental and computational results suggest that wild type peptides from polymorphic regions of FVIII constitute potential T-cell epitopes and thus could explain the increased incidence of anti-drug antibodies in hemophilia A patients with haplotypes H3 and H4.

The development of anti-drug antibodies to therapeutic proteins is a significant impediment to development and licensure of therapeutic proteins and limits their clinical utility. The development of such antibodies requires CD4+ T-cell activation, which is mediated by the recognition of epitopes presented by MHC class-II (MHC-II) molecules. Here, we use experimental measurements and computational predictions of peptide-MHC-II affinities to study the clinical observation that African-American hemophilia A patients have a higher incidence of anti-drug antibodies to Factor VIII than Caucasian patients. Specifically, we used the experimental data to select and validate a computational prediction method which, in turn, allowed us to expand our analysis to a larger repertoire of peptide-MHC-II complexes. We showed that wild type peptides spanning haplotype polymorphisms common in the African American population bind MHC-II proteins significantly more than a negative control, thus providing a mechanistic explanation of the phenomenon in this population.

Do proteolytic antibodies complete the panoply of the autoimmune response in acquired haemophilia A?

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder characterized by the sudden generation of autoantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) in individuals with no previous history of abnormal haemostasis. Understanding the pathogenesis of this disease has been hampered by the rarity of the patients and the difficulty in obtaining biological material from untreated patients. Still, progress has been made recently in understanding the pathogenesis of AHA. In particular, the importance of CD4(+) T cells in AHA development has been documented and the epitopes targeted by T cells on FVIII have been delineated. Accordingly, a polymorphism in the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 gene (CTLA4), known to participate in the regulation of CD4(+) T-cell responses, and a preferential usage of certain human leukocyte antigen class II haplotypes, have been associated with the disease. Recent findings have documented the presence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) with proteolytic activity against FVIII and factor IX (FIX) in patients with AHA. While FVIII-hydrolysing IgG has been shown to inactivate FVIII, FIX-hydrolysing IgG from AHA patients activate FIX in vitro. Here, we describe the latest findings on the immuno-pathogenesis of AHA, with a special focus on the potential role played by antibodies endowed with proteolytic properties.

Haemophilia management: time to get personal?

The possibility of alloimmunization in patients receiving protein replacement therapy depends on (at least) three risk factors, which are necessary concomitantly but insufficient alone. The first is the degree of structural difference between the therapeutic protein and the patient's own endogenous protein, if expressed. Such differences depend on the nature of the disease mutation and the pre-mutation endogenous protein structure as well as on post-translational changes and sequence-engineered alterations in the therapeutic protein. Genetic variations in the recipients' immune systems comprise the second set of risk determinants for deleterious immune responses. For example, the limited repertoire of MHC class II isomers encoded by a given person's collection of HLA genes may or may not be able to present a 'foreign' peptide(s) produced from the therapeutic protein - following its internalization and proteolytic processing - on the surface of their antigen-presenting cells (APCs). The third (and least characterized) variable is the presence or absence of immunologic 'danger signals' during the display of foreign-peptide/MHC-complexes on APCs. A choice between existing therapeutic products or the manufacture of new proteins, which may be less immunogenic in some patients or patient populations, may require prior definition of the first two of these variables. This leads then to the possibility of developing personalized therapies for disorders due to genetic deficiencies in endogenous proteins, such as haemophilia A and B. [Correction made after online publication 11 July 2011: several critical corrections have been made to the abstract].

Successful immune tolerance induction by FVIII in hemophilia A patients with inhibitor may occur without deletion of FVIII-specific T cells

BACKGROUND

 The development of an inhibitor is the major complication facing patients with hemophilia A treated by administration of factor (F) VIII concentrates. Restoration of tolerance to FVIII can be achieved by prolonged administration of FVIII (immune tolerance induction, ITI). Although ITI has been used for more than 30years in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitor, its mechanism of action is still poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

 As administration of high doses of antigen can induce the apoptosis of the T cells recognizing the antigen, a potential mechanism of action of ITI may be the deletion of FVIII-specific T cells.

PATIENTS/METHODS

 We studied the CD4+ T-cell response to FVIII in five (one mild, one moderate and three severe) patients successfully desensitized by administration of FVIII and in control subjects.

RESULTS

 Following repeated stimulation with autologous dendritic cells loaded with FVIII, FVIII-specific T oligoclonal cell lines were expanded from the blood of one of the successfully desensitized patients. The FVIII-specific T cells produced IL-5, IL-13 and IL-2. By contrast, FVIII-specific T-cell lines could not be derived from three patients with mild hemophilia A without inhibitor or from four normal control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

 These data represent the first analysis of the cellular mechanisms regulating the induction of tolerance to FVIII. They demonstrate that successful tolerance induction may occur without deletion of FVIII-specific T cells.

T-cell responses in two unrelated hemophilia A inhibitor subjects include an epitope at the factor VIII R593C missense site

BACKGROUND

Development of neutralizing anti-factor (F)VIII antibodies ('inhibitors') is a serious clinical problem in hemophilia A. Increased inhibitor risk has been associated with certain FVIII missense substitutions, including R593C in the A2 domain.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to identify T-cell epitopes in FVIII and characterize T-cell responses in two unrelated hemophilia A subjects sharing F8-R593C and HLA-DRB1*1101 genotypes. We hypothesized that the hemophilic substitution site coincides with an important T-cell epitope.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The binding affinities of peptides for recombinant HLA-DR proteins were measured and compared with epitope prediction results. CD4+ T cells were stimulated using peptides and stained with fluorescent, peptide-loaded tetramers.

RESULTS

The inhibitor subjects, but not HLA-matched controls, had high-avidity HLA-DRB1*1101-restricted T-cell responses against FVIII(589-608), which contains the hemophilic missense site. Antigen-specific T cells secreted Th1 and Th2 cytokines and proliferated in response to FVIII and FVIII(592-603). FVIII(589-608) bound with physiologically relevant (micromolar) IC(50) values to recombinant DR0101, DR1101 and DR1501 proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemophilia A patients with R593C missense substitutions and these HLA haplotypes had an increased incidence of inhibitors in our cohorts, supporting a paradigm in which presentation of FVIII epitopes containing the wild-type R593 influences inhibitor risk in this hemophilia A sub-population.

Mild haemophilia: a disease with many faces and many unexpected pitfalls

SUMMARY

Despite major advances in diagnosis and treatment, the management of patients with mild haemophilia (MH) remains a major challenge. Mild haemophilia is defined by factor levels between 0.05 and 0.40 IU mL(-1). The bleeding associated with mild haemophilia is most frequently episodic, occurring during surgery or following trauma. Spontaneous bleeding is rare. Diagnosis is sometimes delayed because of insensitivity of screening clotting assays or discrepancies in factor VIII activity as measured by different assays. The treatment of choice in mild haemophilia A is desmopressin, which typically induces a 2-6-fold increase of factor VIII over baseline. However, desmopressin has its limitations in this setting such as the occurrence of tachyphylaxis and failure to respond in an undetermined proportion of patients. Factors underlying poor biological response or magnitude of response to desmopressin are incompletely understood. Inhibitor development in mild haemophilia is particularly distressing. This complication arises at an older age in this patient group because of infrequent need for factor VIII replacement. Inhibitors in mild haemophilia patients often cross-react with endogenous factor VIII resulting in severe spontaneous bleeding frequently in a postoperative setting. Intensive perioperative use of factor VIII and some specific mutations induce a particularly high risk for inhibitor development, but risk factors are incompletely understood. For reasons of the older age of the patients, treatment of bleeding with bypassing agents may cause major thrombotic complications. Data on therapeutic options for inhibitor eradication in patients with mild haemophilia are particularly scarce. With increased life-expectancy for all haemophilia patients, the group of elderly patients with mild haemophilia requiring major surgery will further increase. Prevention of inhibitors, particularly in this patient group, should be a major topic of interest in both clinic and research.

In non-severe hemophilia A the risk of inhibitor after intensive factor treatment is greater in older patients: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

 Twenty-five percent of new anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies (inhibitors) that complicate hemophilia A occur in those with mild and moderate disease. Although intensive FVIII treatment has long been considered a risk factor for inhibitor development in those with non-severe disease, its strength of association and the influence of other factors have remained undefined.

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate risk factors for inhibitor development in patients with non-severe hemophilia A.

METHODS

 Information on clinical and demographic variables and FVIII genotype was collected on 36 subjects with mild or moderate hemophilia A and an inhibitor and 62 controls also with mild or moderate hemophilia A but without an inhibitor.

RESULTS

 Treatment with FVIII for six or more consecutive days during the prior year was more strongly associated with inhibitor development in those ≥30years of age compared with those <30years of age [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 12.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.76-57.81 vs. OR 2.54; 95% CI, 0.61-10.68]. Having previously received <50days of FVIII was also not statistically associated with inhibitor development on univariate or multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

 These findings suggest that inhibitor development in mild and moderate hemophilia A varies with age, but does not vary significantly with lifetime FVIII exposure days: two features distinct from severe hemophilia A.

Mild hemophilia A

Mild hemophilia A (HA), defined by clinical features and factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) between 0.05 and 0.40 IU mL(-1), is characteristically distinct from severe HA. Indeed, although the molecular characterization of mild HA has permitted the identification of specific underlying mutations, its clinical phenotype is strikingly different from that of patients with a severe FVIII defect, where spontaneous hemorrhages or recurrent joint bleeding are usual manifestations. With aging, mild HA patients may develop complications (i.e. cancers and cardiovascular disorders), the management of which may prove challenging due to the concomitant bleeding tendency. Furthermore, the development of inhibitors provides an additional major complication in these patients, because it increases the severity of the bleeding phenotype and complicates their management. Standard management of mild HA includes the use of desmopressin and antifibrinolytic agents for minor bleeding episodes or surgical procedures, whilst major bleeding or surgery requires replacement therapy with FVIII concentrates. As regards treatment of patients with inhibitors, bypassing agents (i.e. activated prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant activated FVII) have proven effective in the treatment of bleeding episodes, but as there are insufficient data to determine the optimal approach to immune tolerance induction in this group of patients, their optimal management remains controversial. Rituximab is a newer, promising therapeutic option for inhibitor eradication in such patients. Many aspects concerning mild HA remain to be clarified, including the molecular basis, the natural history and the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Only large prospective studies will shed light on this condition.

Characteristics, mechanisms of action, and epitope mapping of anti-factor VIII antibodies

The development of anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies (Abs), also called inhibitors, is currently one of the most serious complications arising during the treatment of hemophilia A patients. Improved prevention and eradication of these Abs remain a challenge both for clinicians and scientists. Numerous studies in the literature have reported on their epitope specificity, on their mechanism of FVIII inactivation, as well as on the methods used for their detection. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the nature (isotypes, kinetic properties), epitope properties, and mechanisms of action of anti-FVIII Abs. Furthermore, we present methods for detection and epitope characterization of anti-FVIII Abs with emphasis on the Luminex technique susceptible to facilitate the monitoring of changes in the epitope specificity of these Abs.

Molecular and phenotypic determinants of the response to desmopressin in adult patients with mild hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

The relationship of the biologic response to desmopressin with the F8 mutation and physiological characteristics has been poorly investigated in patients with mild hemophilia A.

OBJECTIVES

We prospectively assessed the molecular and phenotypic determinants of the biologic response to desmopressin in a cohort of 50 patients with mild hemophilia A.

METHODS

Up to 24 h after desmopressin, blood samples were serially obtained and factor (F)VIII and von Willebrand factor (VWF) measured. The promoter region, all exons and exon-intron boundaries of the F8 gene were screened using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC). Direct sequencing was done when DHPLC screening was normal. Genomic DNA was also sequenced for exons 18-21, 24 and 27 of VWF.

RESULTS

Mean basal FVIII:C was 19 +/- 9 IU dL(-1) (range 6-37) and the median postdesmopressin peak increase was 2.5-fold (range 1.1-7.1). Eleven patients with a cross-reacting material positive (CRM(+)) phenotype had similar basal levels and relative increases of FVIII:C to the remaining patients with low FVIII:Ag. Using multivariate regression, FVIII:C half-life was positively related to basal and peak VWF:Ag levels (P = 0.008) and patient age (P = 0.004). Eleven patients had evidence of reduced FVIII survival. While 27 different gene mutations were identified in 41 patients, nine patients had no detectable mutation. These patients had significantly smaller peaks and smaller relative increase of postdesmopressin FVIII:C (median FVIII:C 26 IU dL(-1) vs. 54 IU dL(-1); P < 0.001; fold 1.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.8; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with mild hemophilia A, a poor biologic response to desmopressin was frequently associated with the absence of detectable F8 mutations.

F8 gene mutation profile and ITT response in a cohort of Italian haemophilia A patients with inhibitors

Anti factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies represent the main complication of replacement therapy in severe cases of haemophilia and most patients with inhibitor have gross gene rearrangements or point mutations that hamper the production of normal circulating FVIII. In this study we have investigated 82 haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Seventy six were severe, three were moderate and three were mild. We screened the patients for the causative mutations using long range PCR for the recurrent intron 22 inversion (invint22), multiplex PCR for intron 1 inversion (invint1) and conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis followed by DNA sequencing for all other mutation types in the F8 gene. Diverse genetic defects were detected in the severe cases (with a predominance of severe molecular defects): F8 gene inversions, large deletions and non-sense mutations account for 71% of the mutations. Only missense and splicing mutations were identified in the non-severe patients and we confirmed that the presence of inhibitors correlates well with the presence of severe mutations, but a proportion of severe patients develops inhibitors despite the presence of diverse less severe mutations. When we have analysed the subgroup of patients who underwent immunetolerance, we have found that F8 gene large deletions are likely to be a high risk factor also for immunetolerance therapy unresponsiveness, while no clear evidence has been demonstrated for other mutation types.

T-cell responses over time in a mild hemophilia A inhibitor subject: epitope identification and transient immunogenicity of the corresponding self-peptide

BACKGROUND

Antibodies that neutralize factor (F) VIII activity, clinically referred to as 'inhibitors', complicate the treatment of hemophilia A patients; current tolerance and bypass strategies are extremely costly and sometimes ineffective. The development of inhibitors requires T-cell help.

OBJECTIVES

We characterized T-cell responses of a subject with mild hemophilia A with missense genotype A2201P for one year following his initial inhibitor response, with the goals of defining the primary epitope(s) and its (their) MHC Class II restriction. We investigated the possible involvement of regulatory T cells in modulating immune responses.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The subject developed high-titer FVIII-neutralizing antibodies (250 BU mL(-1)) that declined over time to 8 BU ml(-1). His clotting activity was initially impaired (3%) but returned to baseline (8-10%) within four weeks. MHC Class II tetramers were used to analyze his CD4 T cells, which were stimulated with peptides spanning the C2 domain. Responses of total and CD25-depleted CD4 cells to sequences containing A2201 (native), P2201 (hemophilic), and other predicted T-cell epitopes were evaluated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

An HLA-DRA-DRB1*0101 restricted T-cell epitope containing the wild-type A2201 sequence was identified. Interestingly, peptides containing A2201 were recognized by CD4 T cells at all time points, whereas a P2201 peptide was recognized only near the initial peak response. The responsiveness of CD25-depleted CD4 cells to an A2201 peptide was enhanced 11 and 19 weeks following inhibitor detection, suggesting the possible involvement of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in modulating immune responses. Patient-derived T-cell clones proliferated in response to C2 protein and to peptides containing A2201 but not P2201.

The factor VIII C1 domain contributes to platelet binding

Activated factor VIII (FVIIIa) forms a procoagulant complex with factor IXa on negatively charged membranes, including activated platelet surfaces. Membrane attachment involves the FVIII C2 domain; involvement of the adjacent C1 domain has not been established. Binding of recombinant FVIII C1C2 and C2 proteins to platelets was detected by flow cytometry using (1) anti-C2 monoclonal antibody ESH8 followed by a phycoerythrin-labeled secondary antibody; (2) biotinylated C1C2 detected by phycoerythrin-labeled streptavidin, and (3) C1C2 and C2 site-specifically labeled with fluorescein. Highest binding and lowest background were obtained using fluorescein-conjugated proteins. More than 90% of activated platelets bound C1C2, compared with approximately 50% for equimolar C2. Estimates using fluorescent microbeads indicated approximately 7,000 C1C2-binding sites per platelet, approximately 1,400 for C2, and approximately 3,000 for fluorescein-labeled FVIIIa. Unlike C2 or FVIII(a), C1C2 bound to approximately 700 sites/platelet before activation. C1C2 binding to activated platelets appeared independent of von Willebrand factor and was competed effectively by FVIII(a), but only partially by excess C2. Fluorescein-labeled FVIIIa was competed much more effectively by C1C2 than C2 for binding to activated platelets. Two monoclonal antibodies that inhibit C2 binding to membranes competed platelet binding of C2 more effectively than C1C2. Thus, the C1 domain of FVIII contributes to platelet-binding affinity.

Basic aspects of inhibitors to factors VIII and IX and the influence of non-genetic risk factors

The appearance of polyclonal antibodies inhibiting the function of exogenous factors VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX) continues to be a major challenge in the treatment of patients with congenital haemophilia. Why these inhibitors develop in 10-20% of patients with haemophilia A, and in 1-5% of patients with haemophilia B, remains largely unexplained. The antibodies, however, are characterized by several features that may have implications for the immune process by which they occur. The FVIII antibodies are mainly directed towards the A2, A3 and C2 domains, thereby interfering with the function of the factor Xase complex, the binding of FVIII to von Willebrand factor, and the binding of FVIII to phospholipid membranes. The FIX epitopes are localized to the NH(2)-terminal gamma-carboxyglutamic acid region and the serine protease domain. Genetic risk factors are known to be of importance in the development of inhibitors, whereas the impact of non-genetic factors is less clear. However, based on studies of related subjects, it is obvious that non-genetic factors are of importance as well. Putative factors currently debated include age at the start of treatment, treatment in association with immune challenges, the type of product, and the mode of administration. Most of the findings reported to date, however, derive from small cohorts that have not been sufficiently well characterized with respect to genetic risk profile. Therefore, additional studies are required to quantify the impact of non-genetic factors on the pathophysiologic process of inhibitor development.

Peptides derived from a secretory yeast library restore factor VIII activity in the presence of an inhibitory antibody

The development of autoantibodies against factor VIII represents one of the major complications in the treatment of hemophilia A patients. We have employed a novel library system to obtain peptides that specifically neutralize the interaction between factor VIII and these inhibitors. The random peptides are presented as carboxy-terminal extensions of the eukaryotic initiation factor 5a, an intracellular protein with a molecular mass of 18 kDa. These random peptides formed an unique binding site, as demonstrated by molecular simulations using the computer programs InsightII and GROMACS. The library was screened to identify peptides binding to the murine monoclonal anti-factor VIII antibody ESH8 and to inhibitors derived from patients with factor VIII antibodies. Ten peptides binding to ESH8 were identified. Their specificity was confirmed by displacement assays. Two peptides with the sequences STKTLGRPLHGPAGPVEGGALAGVAEDADLVTAVSGR and YHCKREDLTDRDATCALRQPPQAVRGLGPRVTAVSGR showed the ability to restore the factor VIII activity from 33% up to approximately 90% in functional tests performed in vitro. Three candidates for binding to factor VIII antibodies derived from four different patient's sera were achieved. Three fusion proteins with the peptide sequences PQLGSRRSTTPSLTFQNASWFPAGGPCARSNRG, SGSRQVCKLARSLQPF and WERGRRVGAQVRHARHLVARVLDGAGHQARLTAVNGP bound to inhibitors derived from different patients. Furthermore, two of the obtained fusion proteins with the peptide sequences RHWTALGPAPTHTCADLNYPLLS and WERGRRVGAQVRHARHLVARVLDGAGHQARLTAVNGP did also bind to the monoclonal antibody ESH8. This study demonstrates the potential of this system to identify peptides that inhibit the activity of potent inhibitory antibodies and also shows potential as a method for screening of bioactive peptides.

Characteristics of inhibitors in mild/moderate haemophilia A

Patients with mild or moderate haemophilia A usually have a mild bleeding disorder requiring only occasional treatment with factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates. The frequency of inhibitor development in such patients has been the subject of several recent surveys, which significantly modified our appreciation of this complication. Studies of the anti-FVIII antibodies provided an explanation for the different bleeding phenotypes observed in mild/moderate haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Antibodies distinguishing between the patient's mutant FVIII and the normal wild-type FVIII were characterized, in addition to antibodies inhibiting completely or only partially FVIII activity. T lymphocytes recognizing FVIII and likely involved in the development of the immune response to FVIII were successfully identified. The FVIII peptides recognized by those FVIII-specific cells bind to many major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules, which may provide an explanation for the lack of strong association between MHC haplotypes and inhibitor development. Although these studies have advanced our understanding of the conditions leading to inhibitor development, further work is required to determine whether the mode of FVIII administration significantly influences inhibitor development. Further studies of the genetic factors are also required to fully understand the mechanisms leading to inhibitor development in patients with mild/moderate haemophilia A.

Genetic risk factors for inhibitors to factors VIII and IX

The formation of alloantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) is the most severe complication of replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia. In the last decade, genetic factors have been shown to constitute a decisive risk determinant for the development of inhibitors. In severe haemophilia A and B, mutations that result in an absent or truncated FVIII/FIX protein are associated with a 20-80% risk of inhibitor formation. In mild to moderate haemophilia, missense mutations represent the main mutation type, with an inhibitor prevalence of 5%. These patients synthesize some endogenous, although non-functional protein that is sufficient to induce immune tolerance. However, in patients with missense mutations clustered in the A2 and C2 domains (C1/C2 junction), the risk of inhibitor formation is fourfold greater than in patients with mutations outside this region, indicating that inhibitor prevalence in missense mutations is also dependent on localization of the mutation. Recently, a significant association between inhibitor formation and polymorphisms in genes coding for cytokines (IL-10) and other immunoregulatory factors (TNF-alpha) has been shown. These genetic factors constitute the individual genetic risk profile of a haemophilic patient. This risk is imprinted and fixed; however, environmental factors such as treatment schedule may increase or decrease the inhibitor risk in an individual patient. Improved understanding of these complex interactions may lead to the development of preventive measures to minimize inhibitor formation.

Tyr2105Cys mutation in exon 22 of FVIII gene is a risk factor for the development of inhibitors in patients with mild/moderate haemophilia A

We report the case of a patient with mild haemophilia A, due to a Tyr2105Cys mutation in exon 22 of the C1 domain, who developed a high-titre factor VIII inhibitor (maximum titre 1600 BU) with recurrent severe haemorrhages and fatal intracranial bleeding. Based on published data, it appears that although this mutation occurs rarely in patients with mild or moderate haemophilia A, it is frequently associated with the development of high-titre inhibitors.

Impact of Choice of Treatment for Bleeding Episodes on Inhibitor Outcome in Patients With Mild/Moderate Hemophilia A and Inhibitors

Patients with mild/moderate hemophilia A (MHA) may develop inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII). In this condition, FVIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) baseline levels may remain stable for some patients, but may be reduced to less than 0.01 U/mL for others. Several risk factors for the development of inhibitors in MHA have been proposed. Genetic factors, such as mutations in the FVIII gene, may play a central role; however, other influences, such as intensive treatment with FVIII products, may also be important. Optimal treatment regimens have yet to be determined, not only for the eradication of inhibitors, but also for the management or surgical prophylaxis of hemorrhages associated with this condition. Several treatment options for the control of bleeding in patients with MHA and inhibitors (MHAI) are currently available, and the choice of therapeutic strategy should be given careful consideration; some treatments may produce an anamnestic response, thus delaying the return to FVIII:C baseline levels and adversely affecting the duration of the severe bleeding phenotype. To increase our knowledge of MHAI, a retrospective collection of data is currently being performed among hemophilia centers in France and Belgium. Based on five examples of patients with MHAI collated from preliminary study data, we illustrate the impact on inhibitor outcome of the therapeutic choices used to treat bleeding episodes in these patients.

Molecular models of the procoagulant factor VIIIa-factor IXa complex

BACKGROUND

Formation of the intrinsic tenase complex is an essential event in the procoagulant reactions that lead to clot formation. The tenase complex is formed when the activated serine protease, Factor IXa (FIXa), and its cofactor Factor VIIIa (FVIIIa) assemble on a phospholipid surface to proteolytically convert the zymogen Factor X (FX) into its active form FXa. The physiological relevance of the tenase complex is evident in hemophilia A or B patients who present with bleeding disorders.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to establish three-dimensional (3D) models of the FVIIIa-FIXa complex.

METHODS

First, we built two new theoretical models of FVIIIa via homology modeling, inter-domain docking and loop simulation algorithms as well as a model for FIXa. This was followed by pseudo-Brownian protein-protein docking in internal coordinates with the ICM (Internal Coordinates Mechanics) program between the two FVIIIa and the FIXa structures.

RESULTS

Ten representative models of this complex are presented based on agreements with known experimental data and according to structural criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

These novel 3D models will help guide future site directed mutagenesis aimed at improving the functionality of FVIIIa and/or FIXa and will contribute to a better understanding of the role of this macromolecular complex in the blood coagulation cascade.

Identification and removal of a promiscuous CD4+ T cell epitope from the C1 domain of factor VIII

BACKGROUND

The development of inhibitors in hemophiliacs is a severe complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy and is a process driven by FVIII specific T helper cells.

OBJECTIVES

To finely map T cell epitopes within the whole FVIII protein in order to investigate the possibility of engineering FVIII variants with reduced propensity for inhibitor development.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

T cell lines were generated from five patients with severe hemophilia who had developed inhibitors, and were screened for T cell proliferation against pools of overlapping peptides spanning the entire B domain deleted (BDD) FVIII sequence. Positive peptide pools were decoded by screening individual peptides against the T cell lines. Positive peptides, and mutants thereof, were tested for their ability to bind major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class II and stimulate T cell proliferation in a panel of healthy donors. The activities of the corresponding mutant proteins were assessed via chromogenic assay.

RESULTS

One peptide, spanning FVIII amino acids 2098-2112, elicited a vigorous response from one hemophiliac donor, induced strong T cell responses in the panel of healthy donors and bound to a number of HLA-DR alleles. Mutations were made in this peptide that removed its ability to stimulate T cells of healthy donors and to bind to MHC Class II while retaining full activity when incorporated into a mutant BDD-FVIII protein.

CONCLUSIONS

Fine T cell epitope mapping of the entire FVIII protein is feasible, although challenging, and this knowledge may be used to create FVIII variants which potentially have reduced immunogenicity.

Inhibitors in congenital coagulation disorders

The development of inhibitory 'allo' antibodies to a deficient coagulation factor is arguably now the most severe and important complication of clotting factor concentrate exposure in haemophilia and other congenital coagulation disorders. Furthermore, development of an inhibitor to the factor VIII or factor IX transgene product remains a significant concern in gene therapy protocols for haemophilia. Although the development of an inhibitor does not usually change the rate, initial severity or pattern of bleeding, it does compromise the ability to manage haemorrhage in affected individuals, resulting in a greater rate of complications, cost and disability. The purpose of this review is to summarize current understanding of the epidemiology, immunobiology, laboratory evaluation and management of inhibitors arising in patients with congenital coagulation disorders. An attempt has been made to focus on recent advances in the immunology of inhibitors, and to speculate on their potential clinical application.

Environmental and genetic factors influencing inhibitor development

Inhibitor formation occurs at a frequency of 20% to 30% in severe hemophilia A, and 3% in hemophilia B. Today, it represents the major complication in patient care and renders classical substitution therapy ineffective. Genetic factors, such as factor VIII (FVIII) gene mutations and immune response genes, particularly the major histocompatibility complex, have been shown to constitute decisive risk factors for the development of inhibitors. In severe hemophilia A and B, those mutations that result in the absence or severe truncation of the FVIII/factor IX (FIX) proteins are associated with the highest risk for inhibitor formation, indicating that a major driving force in inhibitor development is the presentation of a novel antigen to the patient's immune system. An alternative pathomechanism may underlie inhibitor development in patients with mild hemophilia A. Missense mutations, especially those in the C1/C2 domains, may alter the immunogenicity of the FVIII protein, eliciting an inhibitor response against the mutated epitope. In some patients with hemophilia B, especially those with large deletions to the FIX gene, a severe allergic reaction occurs simultaneously with inhibitor onset. Despite the obviously strong genetic predisposition, discordant inhibitor status in monozygotic hemophilia A twins demonstrates that environmental factors also play a role in the development of inhibitors.