1
|
Kisielewski D, Naegele M. Advanced Practice Nursing and CAR-T Cell Therapy: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions. Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151628. [PMID: 38594105 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a new treatment for patients with myeloma and other B cell malignancies where advanced practice nurses (APN) can make a great contribution. The aim of this review is to identify key aspects of current literature relevant to APNs working with this population. METHODS Discussion of selected peer-reviewed literature and best practice guidelines found through electronic database searches (CINAHL, MEDLINE). RESULTS Although few APN roles in CAR-T cell therapy have been published to date, recent research suggests that the APN is central to the care of these patients. They are essential for continuity of care and navigation through the treatment process, providing an important and consistent point of contact for patients' and carers' anxieties and uncertainties. APNs play a central role in symptom management, as they constantly incorporate new experience and scientific findings into the refinement of existing protocols. The continuum of care extends far beyond the inpatient stay and addresses symptoms that may persist long after cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity have resolved. The APN may therefore make a relevant contribution to patients' health-related quality of life, given its likely correlation with the dynamics and intensity of treatment-related symptoms. The APN also takes on a leadership role in the treatment team. CONCLUSIONS APNs use all core competencies to sustainably support and empower patients and caregivers. This is achieved through counseling and education, in addition to identifying, developing, and implementing evidence-based symptom management. They play pivotal roles in introducing new CAR-T cell products, educating teams, and advancing their role through APN networks. Finally, APNs are integral members of multiprofessional teams, supporting colleagues in ethically challenging patient situations. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE APNs in the field of CAR-T cell therapy make an important contribution to the continuous care of patients, caregivers, and treatment teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kisielewski
- Department for Haematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation, and Palliative Care, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Matthias Naegele
- Department of Development and Quality Management in Nursing, Network Oncology, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perthus A, Colin F, Charton E, Anota A, Lhomme F, Manson G, De Guibert S, Daufresne P, Bellec A, Le Bars L, De Barros S, Ysebaert L, Merceur M, Cogné M, Lamy De La Chapelle T, Houot R, Moignet A. Remission after CAR T-cell therapy: Do lymphoma patients recover a normal life? Hemasphere 2024; 8:e72. [PMID: 38803454 PMCID: PMC11129324 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.72] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells) can induce prolonged remission in a substantial subset of patients with relapse/refractory lymphoma. However, little is known about patients' life after CAR T-cell therapy. We prospectively assessed the multidimensional recovery of lymphoma patients in remission, before leukapheresis, before CAR T-cell infusion, and 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. Validated tools were used to measure lymphoma-related and global health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma [FACT-Lym] and EQ-5D-5L), cognitive complaint (FACT-Cognition), fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue subscale), psychological status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Post-Traumatic Check List Scale), and sexuality (Relationship and Sexuality Scale). Beyond 12 months of remission, we also surveyed physical, professional, sexual, and general life status. At 3, 6, and 12 months, 53, 35, and 23 patients were evaluable, respectively. Improvement in lymphoma-related HRQoL was clinically relevant at 3, 6, and 12 months with a mean change from baseline of 10.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8; 16.1), 12.2 (95% CI: 4.2; 20.1), and 11.72 (95% CI: 2.06; 21.38), respectively. Improvement in global HRQoL, fatigue, and anxiety was clinically relevant, but 20%-40% of patients experienced persistent fatigue, psychological distress, and cognitive complaints over time. Beyond 12 months after CAR T cells, 81.8% of 22 evaluable patients were satisfied with their daily life. Physical activity, professional, sexual, and global well-being had returned to prediagnosis levels in nearly half of the patients. We found an improvement in HRQoL after CAR T-cell therapy including anxiety, depression, sexual satisfaction, and general well-being. However, not all patients recover a "normal life." Further research is needed to determine which patients are at risk of quality-of-life impairment to improve recovery after CAR T-cell infusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alya Perthus
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Fanny Colin
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Emilie Charton
- Human and Social Sciences DepartmentLeon Berard CenterLyonFrance
| | - Amélie Anota
- Human and Social Sciences DepartmentLeon Berard CenterLyonFrance
- Department of Clinical Research and InnovationLeon Berard CenterLyonFrance
| | - Faustine Lhomme
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Guillaume Manson
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Sophie De Guibert
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Pierre Daufresne
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Adeline Bellec
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Laetitia Le Bars
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Sandra De Barros
- Department of HematologyCancer University Institute of Toulouse OncopoleToulouseFrance
| | - Loïc Ysebaert
- Department of HematologyCancer University Institute of Toulouse OncopoleToulouseFrance
| | - Marianne Merceur
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Mélanie Cogné
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Thierry Lamy De La Chapelle
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
- UMR U1236, INSERMUniversity of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Roch Houot
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
- UMR U1236, INSERMUniversity of RennesRennesFrance
| | - Aline Moignet
- Service d'Hématologie—CHU Pontchaillou, Department of HematologyUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hadiloo K, Taremi S, Safa SH, Amidifar S, Esmaeilzadeh A. The new era of immunological treatment, last updated and future consideration of CAR T cell-based drugs. Pharmacol Res 2024; 203:107158. [PMID: 38599467 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Cancer treatment is one of the fundamental challenges in clinical setting, especially in relapsed/refractory malignancies. The novel immunotherapy-based treatments bring new hope in cancer therapy and achieve various treatment successes. One of the distinguished ways of cancer immunotherapy is adoptive cell therapy, which utilizes genetically modified immune cells against cancer cells. Between different methods in ACT, the chimeric antigen receptor T cells have more investigation and introduced a promising way to treat cancer patients. This technology progressed until it introduced six US Food and Drug Administration-approved CAR T cell-based drugs. These drugs act against hematological malignancies appropriately and achieve exciting results, so they have been utilized widely in cell therapy clinics. In this review, we introduce all CAR T cells-approved drugs based on their last data and investigate them from all aspects of pharmacology, side effects, and compressional. Also, the efficacy of drugs, pre- and post-treatment steps, and expected side effects are introduced, and the challenges and new solutions in CAR T cell therapy are in the last speech.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveh Hadiloo
- Department of immunology, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, the Islamic Republic of Iran; School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, the Islamic Republic of Iran
| | - Siavash Taremi
- Department of immunology, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, the Islamic Republic of Iran; School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, the Islamic Republic of Iran
| | - Salar Hozhabri Safa
- School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, the Islamic Republic of Iran
| | - Sima Amidifar
- School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, the Islamic Republic of Iran
| | - Abdolreza Esmaeilzadeh
- Department of Immunology, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, the Islamic Republic of Iran; Cancer Gene Therapy Research Center (CGRC), Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, the Islamic Republic of Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clarke NA, Braverman J, Worthy G, Shaw JW, Bennett B, Dhanda D, Cocks K. A Review of Meaningful Change Thresholds for EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G Within Oncology. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:458-468. [PMID: 38191023 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This literature review provides an overview of meaningful change thresholds for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) used across hematological cancers and solid tumors (melanoma, lung, bladder, and prostate). METHODS Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched to identify relevant oncology publications from 2016 to 2021. Label claims from the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for 7 recently approved drugs (pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, glasdegib, gilteritinib, tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, and daratumumab plus hyaluronidase-fihj) were reviewed. RESULTS Publications providing guidance on meaningful change thresholds for the QLQ-C30 displayed a growing trend away from broad "legacy" thresholds of 10 points for all QLQ-C30 scales), toward deriving "contemporary" thresholds (eg, subscale specific, population specific). Contemporary publications generally provide guidance on selecting thresholds for specific scales that account for improved or worsening thresholds (eg, QLQ-C30 subscales). This trend was not clear for FACT-G, with less new guidance available. Most clinical trials used in regulatory label submissions have used thresholds of 10 points for the QLQ-C30 subscales and 3 to 7 points for the FACT-G total score. Despite the availability of more recent guidelines, contemporary meaningful change thresholds seem slow to emerge in the published literature and regulatory labels. CONCLUSIONS Trialists should consider using contemporary thresholds, rather than legacy thresholds, for QLQ-C30 endpoints. Thresholds derived for a similar patient-population should be used where available. Further work is required to provide these across a broader range of cancer sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan A Clarke
- Statistics and Programming, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, England, UK.
| | - Julia Braverman
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Gill Worthy
- Statistics and Programming, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, England, UK
| | - James W Shaw
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Bryan Bennett
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Uxbridge, England, UK
| | - Devender Dhanda
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Kim Cocks
- Statistics and Programming, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gordon LI, Liu FF, Braverman J, Hoda D, Ghosh N, Hamadani M, Hildebrandt GC, Peng L, Guo S, Shi L, Sehgal A. Lisocabtagene maraleucel for second-line relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: patient-reported outcomes from the PILOT study. Haematologica 2024; 109:857-866. [PMID: 37646670 PMCID: PMC10905070 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In the single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II PILOT study, second-line treatment with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) for whom hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was not intended resulted in high response rates, durable responses, and a safety profile consistent with previous reports. Here, we analyzed changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients who received liso-cel in PILOT. Patients received liso-cel, an autologous, CD19-directed, 4-1BB CAR T-cell product administered at equal target doses of CD8+ and CD4+ CAR+ T cells, for a total target dose of 100×10⁶ CAR+ T cells. HRQOL, a secondary endpoint of PILOT, was assessed as prespecified using three patient-reported outcome instruments (EORTC QLQ-C30; FACT-LymS; EQ-5D-5L). Evaluable datasets for the EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-LymS, and EQ-5D-5L health utility index, and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) included 56 (92%), 49 (80%), 55 (90%), and 54 (89%) patients, respectively. Clinically meaningful improvement was achieved across most post-treatment visits for EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue and FACT-LymS. Overall mean changes from baseline through day 545 showed significant improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue, pain, and appetite loss, FACT-LymS, and EQ VAS. In within-patient analyses, clinically meaningful improvements or maintenance in scores were observed in most patients at days 90, 180, 270, and 365. HRQOL was maintained or improved in patients who received liso-cel as second-line therapy in PILOT. These findings support liso-cel as a preferred second-line treatment in patients with R/R LBCL not intended for HSCT (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03483103).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leo I Gordon
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL.
| | | | | | - Daanish Hoda
- Intermountain Healthcare, Loveland Clinic for Blood Cancer Therapy, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Mehdi Hamadani
- BMT and Cellular Therapy Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | | | | | | | - Alison Sehgal
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Phillips T, Lugtenburg P, Kalsekar A, Mutebi A, Wang A, Blaedel J, Kosa K, Martin S, Sacchi M, Kilavuz N, Thieblemont C. Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients Treated With Epcoritamab. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2024; 24:e78-e87.e2. [PMID: 38151388 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated in EPCORE NHL-1 in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with epcoritamab monotherapy (NCT03625037). MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults with R/R CD20+ LBCL and ≥2 prior systemic antilymphoma therapies, including anti-CD20, completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) and EQ-5D-3L. A subgroup of patients provided additional feedback in one-on-one qualitative interviews. FACT-Lym and EQ-5D-3L score changes from baseline (CFB) to cycle 9 or end of treatment were interpreted using published minimally important differences (MID). RESULTS In total, 157 patients (88.5% with diffuse LBCL) were treated (median age, 64 years). In total, 70.7% had ≥3 prior treatments, 61.1% had primary refractory disease, and 82.8% were refractory to last systemic therapy. FACT-Lym scores exceeded MID thresholds: mean (SD) CFB were 4.4 (15.2), MID 3.0 to 7.0 (FACT-General); 5.9 (7.6), MID 2.9 to 5.4 (FACT-Lymphoma subscale); 8.4 (15.2), MID 5.5 to 11.0 (FACT-Trial Outcome Index); 10.3 (20.2), MID 6.5 to 11.2 (FACT-Lym total score). EQ-5D-3L index scores, 0.09 (0.20), MID 0.08, and EQ-VAS scores, 16.6 (22.8), MID 7.0, improved. In 20 qualitative interviews, 88.2% reported symptom improvements; 80.0% were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with epcoritamab. CONCLUSIONS R/R LBCL patients reported consistent, clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms and HRQoL and satisfaction with epcoritamab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tycel Phillips
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Pieternella Lugtenburg
- On behalf of the Lunenburg Lymphoma Phase I/II Consortium-HOVON/LLPC, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Catherine Thieblemont
- Assistance Publique & Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Hémato-Oncologie, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu FF, Bartlett M, Craigie S. A Systematic Literature Review of Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes and Associated Utility Values in Relapsed and/or Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2024; 8:171-190. [PMID: 38198111 PMCID: PMC10883903 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00464-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this ever-expanding treatment landscape, there is a lack of consolidated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes and utility reports in relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) to inform health care policy and decision-maker assessments for both old and new products. These assessments can have a direct effect on what treatment options are available to patients and physicians. OBJECTIVE A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to understand the HRQOL evidence for treatments in R/R LBCL and identify associated health utility values. METHODS The SLR searched and screened literature published from 1 January 2003 to 2 May 2022. Studies were screened based on Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study design criteria established a priori and were assessed by two independent reviewers; quality assessments of the evidence were performed in accordance with health technology assessment recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Several types of therapies were included, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell products (lisocabtagene maraleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel), novel therapies (selinexor, nivolumab, polatuzumab vedotin, and bendamustine), salvage therapies, and rituximab. RESULTS The review identified 33 unique studies reporting HRQOL, including 15 economic studies that reported health state utility values, 9 clinical trials, 7 health technology assessment reports, and 1 each of a vignette-based study and a point-in-time survey. Improvements in general and/or lymphoma-specific HRQOL measures were observed with CAR T cell therapy in both the second-line and third-line or later settings. On-treatment utility values for CAR T cell therapies ranged from 0.50 to 0.74. Values for remission/progression-free survival (0.70-0.90) and for disease progression (0.39-0.59) were similar across studies. For novel therapies, utility values were 0.83 for progression-free survival and ranged from 0.39 to 0.71 for disease progression. On-treatment utility values for salvage chemotherapy ranged from 0.63 to 0.67. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the evidence synthesized in this SLR provides a comprehensive understanding of the HRQOL evidence in R/R LBCL. This article identified several sources for utility values in the published literature showing variation in the HRQOL outcomes for patients across a variety of therapeutics. Treatment of R/R LBCL with CAR T cell therapies was associated with improvement in health utility values. Mixed results were found for novel therapies and salvage therapies. More data are needed as new therapies are used in this patient population to inform treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Fei Liu
- Bristol Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrence Township, Princeton, NJ, 08648, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Puckrin R, Jamani K, Jimenez-Zepeda VH. Long-term survivorship care after CAR-T cell therapy. Eur J Haematol 2024; 112:41-50. [PMID: 37767547 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
While cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome are well-recognized acute toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, these complications have become increasingly manageable by protocolized treatment algorithms incorporating the early administration of tocilizumab and corticosteroids. As CAR-T cell therapy expands to new disease indications and the number of long-term survivors steadily increases, there is growing recognition of the need to appropriately evaluate and manage the late effects of CAR-T cell therapy, including late-onset or persistent neurotoxicity, prolonged cytopenias, delayed immune reconstitution and infections, subsequent malignancies, organ dysfunction, psychological distress, and fertility implications. In this review, we provide a practical approach to the long-term survivorship care of the CAR-T cell recipient, with a focus on the optimal strategies to address the common and challenging late complications affecting this unique population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Puckrin
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kareem Jamani
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Taylor S, Law K, Coomber-Moore J, Davies M, Thistlethwaite F, Calvert M, Aiyegbusi O, Yorke J. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used in patients undergoing adoptive cell therapy (ACT) for the treatment of cancer: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2023; 12:183. [PMID: 37777816 PMCID: PMC10541698 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02337-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) is a rapidly evolving field. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) allow patients to report the impact of treatment on their quality of life during and after treatment. The systematic review aims to characterise the breadth of PROs utilised in ACT cancer care and provide guidance for the use of PROs in this patient population in the future. METHODS A systematic search was conducted (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL) in August 2021 by two reviewers. Search terms covered the following: "adoptive cell therapy", "patient-reported outcomes" and "cancer". Studies were included if they used a PRO measure to report the impact of ACT. The methodological quality of PROs was assessed. Forward and backward reference searching was conducted of any relevant papers. A quality grading scale was applied based on Cochrane and Revenson criteria for classification of high-quality studies. Key data from the studies and the included PROs was extracted by two researchers and tabulated. RESULTS One-hundred nine papers were identified; 11 papers were included. The majority of studies were single-arm trials or observational studies. Twenty-two different PROs were identified; none was ACT specific. The PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D were most commonly used. Few studies collected PRO data in the first 1-2 weeks. Four studies followed patients up for over a year, and a further four studies followed patients for approximately 3 months. DISCUSSION None of the PROs identified have been designed specifically for ACT. Appropriateness of existing instruments should be considered. It should be considered whether it is appropriate to collect data more frequently in the acute stage and then less frequently during follow-up. It should be considered if one tool is suitable at all time points or if the tool should be adapted depending on time since treatment. More research is needed to identify the exact timings of PRO assessments, and qualitative work with patients is needed to determine the most important issues for them throughout the treatment and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Taylor
- Christie Patient Centred Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M204BX, UK.
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Kate Law
- Christie Patient Centred Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M204BX, UK
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jake Coomber-Moore
- Christie Patient Centred Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M204BX, UK
| | - Michelle Davies
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M204BX, UK
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Fiona Thistlethwaite
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M204BX, UK
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Mel Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre (ARC) West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
- Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Midlands Health Data Research UK, Birmingham, UK
- DEMAND Hub, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Olalekan Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre (ARC) West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - Janelle Yorke
- Christie Patient Centred Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M204BX, UK
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wu W, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Keramat SA, Balasooriya NN, Zhao Z, Yang Y, Comans T, Dong H. Value for Money of CAR-T Cell Therapy for Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in China: Evidence from a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:773-783. [PMID: 37356080 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00817-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This research assesses the cost effectiveness of Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel), Tisagenlecleucel (Tis-cel), Relmacabtagene autoleucel (Rel-cel) and Lisocabtagene maraleucel (Lis-cel) against standard of care (SOC) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the first-line setting (1L), second-line setting (2L) and third-line or later setting (3L+). METHODS Markov modelling based on a flexible survival model was adopted to evaluate four chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies compared with SOC for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The clinical inputs and utility values of the model were derived from the most recent clinical trials and the health care costs from a Chinese provincial clinical center. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to derive incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from the Chinese health care system perspective. RESULTS The ICER of Axi-cel (1L) versus SOC was approximately Chinese Yuan (CNY) 2,125,311 per QALY. The ICER for Axi-cel (2L), Tis-cel (2L) and Liso-cel (2L)) versus SOC in transplant-eligible patients were approximately CNY363,977, CNY32,066,781 and CNY347,746 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), respectively. The ICER for Liso-cel (2L) versus SOC in transplant-ineligible patients was approximately CNY1,233,972 per QALY. The ICERs for Axi-cel (3L+), Tis-cel (3L+), Rel-cel (3L+) and Liso-cel (3L+) versus SOC were approximately CNY346,009, CNY654,344, CNY280,964 and CNY436,858 per QALY, respectively. In the scenario analysis using mixture cure models, the long-term survival benefit for CAR-T and SOC groups was found higher, and only Rel-cel (3L+) was found to be cost effective. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrated that CAR-T treatments are not cost effective in any-line settings for DLBCL patients at the WHO-recommended willingness-to-pay threshold (CNY257,241 per QALY) in the base-case analysis. Price reduction of CAR-T therapies is the main approach for lowering ICERs and ensuring that the drug costs are proportional to patient health benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijia Wu
- Department of Science and Education of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Center for Health Policy Studies, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, Queensland of University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Yuping Zhou
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yannan Wang
- Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Cancer Center, Clinical Research Institute, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China
| | - Syed Afroz Keramat
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, Queensland of University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Namal N Balasooriya
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, Queensland of University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Zixuan Zhao
- Department of Science and Education of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Center for Health Policy Studies, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Science and Education of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Center for Health Policy Studies, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tracy Comans
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, Queensland of University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Hengjin Dong
- Department of Science and Education of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Center for Health Policy Studies, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang XS, Srour SA, Mendoza T, Whisenant M, Subbiah I, Gonzalez E, Kamal M, Shen SE, Cleeland C, Kebriaei P, Rezvani K, Neelapu S, Ahmed S, Shpall E. Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess symptom burden after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Br J Haematol 2023; 201:738-746. [PMID: 36733986 PMCID: PMC10159926 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
This cross-sectional study aimed to develop and validate a patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessment tool to assess symptom burden and daily functioning in patients after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-CAR). The items were generated based on literature review, content elicitation interviews with patients, and clinician's review. The patients completed the MDASI core and module, single-item quality-of-life (QoL) measure and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29). The psychometric validation analysis was based on the acceptability after item reduction process. The final 10 MDASI-CAR module items included tremors, fever/chills, headache, balance, dizziness, attention, difficulty speaking, coughing, sexual dysfunction, and diarrhoea with high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: MDASI Core, 0.865; MDASI Interference, 0.915; CAR-T module, 0.746). The MDASI-CAR has excellent known-group validity that was demonstrated by differentiate patients based on patient's performance status (Cohen's d for MDASI core = -1.008, interference = -0.771, module = -0.835). Criterion validity was demonstrated by the significant correlations between the MDASI-CAR composite score, the single QoL item and the relevant domains on PROMIS-29 (all p < 0.05). This study established the MDASI-CAR module as a reliable and valid PRO tool for monitoring symptom burden after CAR T-cell therapy in patients with haematological malignancies. The findings need to be validated with a longitudinal design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Shelley Wang
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Samer A. Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Tito Mendoza
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Meagan Whisenant
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Ishwaria Subbiah
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth Gonzalez
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mona Kamal
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shu-En Shen
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Charles Cleeland
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Katayoun Rezvani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sattva Neelapu
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cusatis R, Balza J, Uttke Z, Kode V, Suelzer E, Shaw BE, Flynn KE. Patient-reported cognitive function among hematopoietic stem cell transplant and cellular therapy patients: a scoping review. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:939-964. [PMID: 36203005 PMCID: PMC10259487 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03258-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cognitive dysfunction is a known complication following cellular therapies (CT), which can be assessed through performance based and patient-reported measures. We performed a systematic scoping review to assess self-reported cognitive function measures used among adult CT patients and describe long-term results, including associations with clinical outcomes. METHODS Library databases were searched from inception to February 2020 according to PRISMA guidelines. Additional studies were identified through reference lists and trial protocols. Two members of the research team screened titles and abstracts and resolved discrepancies. Articles that met eligibility criteria continued to full-text review, with 25% double screening. Articles were removed if they (1) were not original research, peer-reviewed articles; (2) were the wrong disease, age, or treatment-specific patient population; (3) did not use patient-reported outcomes; (4) did not separately report cognitive function outcomes. RESULTS Of the1952 articles, 56 were included. Twenty-one patient-reported measures of cognitive function were used; most frequently the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30), which includes a two-item cognitive function subscale (57%; n = 32). Thirteen studies collected performance-based and self-reported measures and of those (n = 6) who assessed associations found moderate correlations (range r = .13-.58). Longitudinal patterns showed declines in cognitive function soon after treatment (< 1 month) returning to baseline at 1 year. Cognitive function was often associated with other quality of life measures, chiefly depression (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS EORTC-QLQ-C30 is the most commonly used to measure, though there remain numerous measures used, including several measures with little previous validation and investigator developed items.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Cusatis
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| | - Joanna Balza
- Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Zachary Uttke
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vishwajit Kode
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Bronwen E Shaw
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kathryn E Flynn
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carey N, Leahy J, Trela-Larsen L, Mc Cullagh L, Barry M. Cost-utility and value of information analysis of tisagenlecleucel for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the Irish healthcare setting. JOURNAL OF MARKET ACCESS & HEALTH POLICY 2023; 11:2166375. [PMID: 36684853 PMCID: PMC9858398 DOI: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2166375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence base of tisagenlecleucel is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel. To conduct expected value of perfect information (EVPI) and partial EVPI (EVPPI) analyses. STUDY DESIGN A three-state partitioned survival model. A short-term decision tree partitioned patients in the tisagenlecleucel arm according to infusion status. Survival was extrapolated to 5 years; general population mortality with a standardised mortality ratio was then applied. EVPI and EVPPI were scaled up to population according to the incidence of the decision. SETTING Irish healthcare payer. PARTICIPANTS Patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). INTERVENTIONS Tisagenlecleucel versus Salvage Chemotherapy (with or without haematopoietic stem cell transplant). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Population EVPI and EVPPI. RESULTS At list prices, the ICER was €119,509 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) (incremental costs €218,092; incremental QALYs 1.82). Probability of cost-effectiveness, at a €45,000 per QALY threshold, was 0%. Population EVPI was €0.00. Population EVPI, at the price of tisagenlecleucel that reduced the ICER to €45,000 per QALY, was €3,989,438. Here, survival analysis had the highest population EVPPI (€1,128,053). CONCLUSION Tisagenlecleucel is not cost-effective, versus salvage chemotherapy (with or without haematopoietic stem cell transplant), for R/R DLBCL in Ireland. At list prices, further research to decrease decision uncertainty may not be of value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh Carey
- National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Old Stone Building, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joy Leahy
- National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Old Stone Building, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Lea Trela-Larsen
- National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Old Stone Building, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Laura Mc Cullagh
- National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Old Stone Building, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Barry
- National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Old Stone Building, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Taylor MR, Steineck A, Lahijani S, Hall AG, Jim HSL, Phelan R, Knight JM. Biobehavioral Implications of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy: Current State and Future Directions. Transplant Cell Ther 2023; 29:19-26. [PMID: 36208728 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable clinical responses in hematologic malignancies. Recent advances in CAR T-cell therapy have expanded its application into other populations including older patients and those with central nervous system and solid tumors. Although its clinical efficacy has been excellent for some malignancies, CAR T-cell therapy is associated with severe and even life-threatening immune-mediated toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. There is a strong body of scientific evidence highlighting the connection between immune activation and neurocognitive and psychological phenomena. To date, there has been limited investigation into this relationship in the context of immunotherapy. In this review, we present a biobehavioral framework to inform current and future cellular therapy research and contribute to improving the multidimensional outcomes of patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallory R Taylor
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Palliative Care and Resilience Program, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Angela Steineck
- Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin and Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Sheila Lahijani
- Division of Medical Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Anurekha G Hall
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Rachel Phelan
- Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin and Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Jennifer M Knight
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medicine, and Microbiology & Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies and Patient-reported Outcomes: A Scoping Review. Hemasphere 2022; 6:e802. [PMID: 36504547 PMCID: PMC9722582 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The inclusion of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy research is critical for understanding the impact of this novel approach from a unique patient standpoint. We performed a scoping review to map the available literature on the use of PRO measures in CAR T-cell therapy studies of patients with hematologic malignancies published between January 2015 and July 2022. Fourteen studies were identified, of which 7 (50%) were investigational early-phase trials, 6 (42.9%) were observational studies, and 1 (7.1%) was a pilot study. The EQ-5D and the PROMIS-29 were the 2 most frequently used PRO measures, being included in 6 (42.9%) and 5 (35.7%) studies, respectively. Despite differences in study designs, there seems to be evidence of improvements over time since CAR T-cell infusion in important domains such as physical functioning and fatigue, at least in patients who respond to therapy. Overall, the studies identified in our review have shown the added value of PRO assessment in CAR T-cell therapy research by providing novel information that complements the knowledge on safety and efficacy. However, there are several questions which remain to be answered in future research. For example, limited evidence exists regarding patient experience during important phases of the disease trajectory as only 4 (28.6%) and 5 (35.7%) studies provided information on PROs during the first 2 weeks from CAR T-cell infusion and after the first year, respectively. Time is ripe for a more systematic implementation of high-quality PRO assessment in future clinical trials and in real-life settings of patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Elsawy M, Chavez JC, Avivi I, Larouche JF, Wannesson L, Cwynarski K, Osman K, Davison K, Rudzki JD, Dahiya S, Dorritie K, Jaglowski S, Radford J, Morschhauser F, Cunningham D, Martin Garcia-Sancho A, Tzachanis D, Ulrickson ML, Karmali R, Kekre N, Thieblemont C, Enblad G, Dreger P, Malladi R, Joshi N, Wang WJ, Solem CT, Snider JT, Cheng P, To C, Kersten MJ. Patient-reported outcomes in ZUMA-7, a phase 3 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2022; 140:2248-2260. [PMID: 35839452 PMCID: PMC10653042 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022015478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Here, we report the first comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy vs standard-of-care (SOC) therapy in second-line relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) from the pivotal randomized phase 3 ZUMA-7 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) vs SOC. PRO instruments were administered at baseline, day 50, day 100, day 150, month 9, and every 3 months from randomization until 24 months or an event-free survival event. The quality of life (QoL) analysis set comprised patients with a baseline and ≥1 follow-up PRO completion. Prespecified hypotheses for Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) physical functioning, global health status/QoL, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) were tested using mixed-effects models with repeated measures. Clinically meaningful changes were defined as 10 points for QLQ-C30 and 7 for EQ-5D-5L VAS. Among 359 patients, 296 (165 axi-cel, 131 SOC) met inclusion criteria for QoL analysis. At day 100, statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in mean change of scores from baseline were observed favoring axi-cel over SOC for QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL (estimated difference 18.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 12.3-23.9]), physical functioning (13.1 [95% CI, 8.0-18.2]), and EQ-5D-5L VAS (13.7 [95% CI, 8.5-18.8]; P < .0001 for all). At day 150, scores significantly favored axi-cel vs SOC for global health status/QoL (9.8 [95% CI, 2.6-17.0]; P = .0124) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (11.3 [95% CI, 5.4-17.1]; P = .0004). Axi-cel showed clinically meaningful improvements in QoL over SOC. Superior clinical outcomes and favorable patient experience with axi-cel should help inform treatment choices in second-line R/R LBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03391466.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Elsawy
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Irit Avivi
- Hematology Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jean-François Larouche
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec, Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Luciano Wannesson
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Kate Cwynarski
- Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals National Health Services (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Keren Osman
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Kelly Davison
- Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jakob D. Rudzki
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, The Medical University of Innsbruck, University Clinic for Internal Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Saurabh Dahiya
- Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kathleen Dorritie
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Samantha Jaglowski
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - John Radford
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Franck Morschhauser
- Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, University of Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho
- Hematology Department, Salamanca University Hospital, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Salamanca, Spain
| | | | | | - Reem Karmali
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Gunilla Enblad
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter Dreger
- Department of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ram Malladi
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul Cheng
- Kite, a Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA
| | | | - Marie José Kersten
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC on behalf of Stichting Hemato-Oncologie voor Volwassenen Nederland (HOVON)/ Lunenburg Lymphoma Phase 1 / II Consortium (LLPC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu CJ, Chen YC, Bai LY, Chiou TJ, Lin KC, Wang YJ. Trajectories of symptom severity predicts quality of life change in newly diagnosis lymphoma survivors: An initial study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13741. [PMID: 36254839 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the subgroups of symptom severity and impact of their trajectories on quality of life in lymphoma survivors. METHODS Secondary data were analysed from a prospective study with four-time measures: before treatment (T1), during treatment (T2), treatment completion (T3) and 10 weeks after treatment (T4). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, group-based trajectory model and generalised estimation equation. RESULTS Fifty nine of 61 participants completed three-time measure (mean age = 60.43 years, male-predominant). The changes in symptom severity over time were divided into two subgroups: slight-stable group (n = 54, 89%) and mild-fickle group (n = 7, 11%). Pain, tiredness and sleeping trouble were the predominant symptoms. The quality of life change in the slight-stable group was significantly better than that of the mild-fickle group (B = 13.35, SE = 3.53, p < 0.001). The overall quality of life at T2, T3 and T4 was better than it was at T1. CONCLUSION The different trajectories of symptom severity significantly influenced quality of life changes in lymphoma survivors. Healthcare providers must be aware that there is a group of lymphoma survivors with relatively severe symptoms when newly diagnosed, compared to the opposite. More attention must be paid to this group, in addition to providing in-time symptom management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Jung Wu
- School of Nursing, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chi Chen
- Department of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Yuan Bai
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Tzeon-Jye Chiou
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuan-Chia Lin
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Jung Wang
- Department of Nursing, DaYeh University, Changhua, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gordon MJ, Sureda A, Westin JR. Novel strategies for relapsed/refractory DLBCL; navigating the immunotherapy era in aggressive lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2022; 63:2041-2051. [PMID: 35549635 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2068007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Combination chemotherapy with immunotherapy can be curative, however, nearly one-third of patients will have a disease that is refractory or will relapse (R/R) after standard first-line therapy. In second-line, the standard treatment strategy for fit patients has been high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant for a quarter-century, however more than half of patients have chemotherapy-refractory disease with this approach. The patients not cured with current chemotherapy-based approaches may benefit from immunotherapy. Several classes of immunotherapy have been developed including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells. In the following review, we discuss the currently available immunotherapeutic options for patients with R/R DLBCL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max J Gordon
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anna Sureda
- Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jason R Westin
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sidana S, Dueck AC, Thanarajasingam G, Griffin JM, Thompson C, Durani U, Burtis M, Warsame R, Paludo J, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, Ansell SM, Vincent Rajkumar S, Yost K, Bennani N, Lin Y, Kumar S. Longitudinal Patient Reported Outcomes with CAR-T Cell Therapy Versus Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:473-482. [PMID: 35550440 PMCID: PMC9357185 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
There are limited data on patient experience after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, especially in comparison to autologous and allogeneic transplantation, which are more established forms of cellular therapy. We prospectively evaluated longitudinal patient-reported quality of life (QoL), symptom burden and cognition after CAR-T cell therapy and compared it with prospective cohorts of patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) and allogeneic SCT (alloSCT). This was a single center study. The primary endpoint was change in QoL. Secondary endpoints were patient-reported adverse events (PRO-AEs) measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) and cognitive function (NeuroQOLv2 questionnaire). Time profile of PRO-AEs was evaluated using longitudinal analysis, Toxicity over Time (ToxT). Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, week 2 and monthly for 6 months. One hundred four patients were evaluable (CAR-T: 34, autoSCT: 33, alloSCT: 37). Baseline QoL was similar across groups. We observed a short-term decline in QoL in all groups that gradually returned to baseline. The nadir in QoL was at week 2 and coincided with peak in symptom burden. The decline in overall QoL, physical and functional well-being was significantly less with CAR-T versus SCT groups and returned to baseline faster. Patients in the alloSCT group experienced the greatest symptom burden, greater decrease in performance status, largest short-term decline in QoL and slowest recovery. This study provides comprehensive data comparing QoL, PRO-AEs and cognition following CAR-T cell therapy versus autoSCT and alloSCT, and the first application of ToxT to PRO-CTCAE data. Short-term QOL, including physical and functional domains was better in the CAR-T group versus SCT groups, although all groups experienced an initial decline coinciding with peak symptoms. These data can serve as a guide for patient education, symptom management, and future studies in CAR-T cell therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surbhi Sidana
- Division of BMT and Cellular Therapy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA,Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amylou C. Dueck
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale Arizona
| | | | - Joan M. Griffin
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research and Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | - Jonas Paludo
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | - Kathleen Yost
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Nora Bennani
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Yi Lin
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schroeder BA, Jess J, Sankaran H, Shah NN. Clinical trials for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: lessons learned and future directions. Curr Opin Hematol 2022; 29:225-232. [PMID: 35787551 PMCID: PMC9354650 DOI: 10.1097/moh.0000000000000723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to summarize the status and utilization of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy based on the most recent clinical trials in patients with leukemia and lymphoma. Additionally, this review will highlight limitations in current strategies, discuss efforts in toxicity mitigation, and outline future directions for investigation. RECENT FINDINGS CD19 targeted CAR-T-cell therapy (CD19-CAR) is highly effective in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell hematologic malignancies. However, multiple challenges have arisen, particularly life-threatening adverse events, such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Despite these challenges, recent CD19-CAR trials, including two randomized studies, have demonstrated both impressive initial results along with durable responses. Combined with results emerging from 'real-world' experience, the efficacy of CAR-T-cells is high, propelling CAR-T-cells studies targeting alternate B-cell antigens [e.g. CD20, CD22 and CD269 (BCMA)] and other targets for hematologic malignancies, along with solid and CNS tumors. SUMMARY Given the benefit for CD19-CAR, determining the appropriate place in utilization for both an individual patient's treatment course and more broadly in the generalized treatment paradigm is critically needed. We discuss the most recent trials exploring this topic and future directions in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett A. Schroeder
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD
| | - Jennifer Jess
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Hari Sankaran
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Nirali N. Shah
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Knight JM, Szabo A, Arapi I, Wu R, Emmrich A, Hackett E, Sauber G, Yim S, Johnson B, Hari P, Schneider D, Dropulic B, Cusatis RN, Cole SW, Hillard CJ, Shah NN. Patient-reported outcomes and neurotoxicity markers in patients treated with bispecific LV20.19 CAR T cell therapy. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2022; 2:49. [PMID: 35603278 PMCID: PMC9098435 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-022-00116-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background With the rising number of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell treated patients, it is increasingly important to understand the treatment's impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and, ideally, identify biomarkers of central nervous system (CNS) adverse effects. Methods The purpose of this exploratory study was to assess short-term PROs and serum kynurenine metabolites for associated neurotoxicity among patients treated in an anti-CD20, anti-CD19 (LV20.19) CAR T cell phase I clinical trial (NCT03019055). Fifteen CAR T treated patients from the parent trial provided serum samples and self-report surveys 15 days before and 14, 28, and 90 days after treatment. Results Blood kynurenine concentrations increased over time in patients with evidence of neurotoxicity (p = 0.004) and were increased in self-reported depression (r = 0.52, p = 0.002). Depression improved after CAR T infusion (p = 0.035). Elevated 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid (3HAA) concentrations prior to cell infusion were also predictive of neurotoxicity onset (p = 0.031), suggesting it is a biomarker of neurotoxicity following CAR T cell therapy. Conclusions Elevated levels of kynurenine pathway metabolites among CAR T cell recipients are associated with depressed mood and neurotoxicity. Findings from this exploratory study are preliminary and warrant validation in a larger cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M. Knight
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA ,grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Departments of Medicine and Microbiology & Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Aniko Szabo
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Igli Arapi
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Ruizhe Wu
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Amanda Emmrich
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Edward Hackett
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Garrett Sauber
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Neuroscience Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Sharon Yim
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460BMT & Cellular Therapy Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Bryon Johnson
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460BMT & Cellular Therapy Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Parameswaran Hari
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460BMT & Cellular Therapy Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Dina Schneider
- Lentigen, a Miltenyi Biotec company, Gaithersburg, MD USA
| | - Boro Dropulic
- Lentigen, a Miltenyi Biotec company, Gaithersburg, MD USA
| | - Rachel N. Cusatis
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Steve W. Cole
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Departments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Cecilia J. Hillard
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Neuroscience Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | - Nirav N. Shah
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460BMT & Cellular Therapy Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sawalha Y, Maddocks K. Novel treatments in B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. BMJ 2022; 377:e063439. [PMID: 35443983 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2020-063439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
The improved understanding of lymphoma biology and recent advances in the field of cancer immunology have paved the way for the development of many effective small molecule inhibitors and immunotherapies in B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. This article reviews novel treatments that have been approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration and are now routinely used in clinical practice. It discusses their mechanisms of action, efficacy and safety, current therapeutic roles, and future directions in the treatment paradigm of different types of B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It also reviews other exciting novel treatments that are not yet approved but have unique mechanisms of action and have shown encouraging early results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazeed Sawalha
- Internal Medicine - Division of Hematology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kami Maddocks
- Internal Medicine - Division of Hematology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With an increasing number of long-term lymphoma survivors, there has been emphasis on optimizing quality of life and identifying survivorship challenges. This review summarizes the latest advancements pertaining to health-related quality of life and survivorship in lymphoma. RECENT FINDINGS Quality of life can vary from diagnosis through survivorship though some physical, social, and emotional effects may be persistent. Incorporation of patient reported outcomes enables recognition of factors that significantly impact quality of life. A greater understanding of quality of life and survivorship issues has generated momentum for practice change, improving education, and designing behavior related interventions. Patients with lymphoma face many challenges as they navigate their cancer experience. There is a tremendous opportunity to build upon this work through well-designed prospective longitudinal studies aimed at identifying vulnerable patient groups and impactful points of intervention during survivorship.
Collapse
|
24
|
Crawford R, Gries KS, Valluri S, Fastenau J, Morrison R, Yeh T, Olyslager Y, Goldberg JD, Schecter JM, Jackson CC, Deraedt W, Doward L. The patient experience of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma and perspectives on emerging therapies. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2022; 5:e1603. [PMID: 35168299 PMCID: PMC9675381 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is a disease that is nonresponsive or progressive on therapy, and although patients can achieve remission, relapse is common. As more treatment options become available for multiple myeloma (MM), it is important to understand patients' experiences of current and emerging therapies. AIMS This study aimed to better understand patient experiences with treatment and therapies for MM using qualitative interviews and patient-reported information (PRI) shared on social media. METHODS Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with adults with RRMM who resided in the United States. In addition to the interviews, PRI was collected from YouTube and a patient advocacy website. Key themes from the interviews and PRI were summarized, and illustrative quotes were extracted. RESULTS Twenty participants were interviewed; 11 were female, and mean (standard deviation) age was 60 (7.0) years. The PRI included 14 posts and 19 unique contributors (10 were female). Similar treatment-related symptoms were reported in the interviews and PRI. Fatigue and pain were the most frequently reported symptoms while receiving treatment in both the interviews and PRI. These symptoms had a meaningful impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL); being off treatment and returning to normal living was described as an ideal treatment outcome. Nearly all interview participants (n = 18) preferred a treatment that would allow for a treatment-free interval, if it had the same efficacy and safety profile as a continuous treatment. CONCLUSION The symptom experience reported in this study is consistent with known RRMM symptoms and HRQOL impacts. Additionally, this study highlighted that patients' treatment expectations are changing relative to their past treatment experience. Individuals living with RRMM strongly desire therapies with a treatment-free interval and minimal impact on their HRQOL.
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19 has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas. Based on unprecedented response rates and durability of response in high risk B-cell lymphoma patients, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy was rapidly approved by the FDA for a variety of lymphoma subtypes. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is now considered standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) after 2 or more lines of therapy. Three second-generation anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products have been FDA approved for R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma and FDA approval has been obtained for Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Follicular lymphoma as well. This has ensured broad access to CAR T-cell therapy for patients with NHL and new real-world trials have helped confirm feasibility of CAR T-cell therapy for a broad patient population. The emergence of CAR T-cell therapy will likely provide a new patient population who is status post anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Investigation of mechanisms of failure of CAR T-cell therapy and clinical trials to study strategies to address this are thus required. Here we provide a thorough review on the use of the FDA approved anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with indolent or aggressive B-cell lymphoma, and touch on mechanisms of failure of CAR T-cell therapy and potential approaches which are currently under investigation to address this.
Collapse
|
26
|
Schneider BJ, Naidoo J, Santomasso BD, Lacchetti C, Adkins S, Anadkat M, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, Chau I, Davies MJ, Ernstoff MS, Fecher L, Ghosh M, Jaiyesimi I, Mammen JS, Naing A, Nastoupil LJ, Phillips T, Porter LD, Reichner CA, Seigel C, Song JM, Spira A, Suarez-Almazor M, Swami U, Thompson JA, Vikas P, Wang Y, Weber JS, Funchain P, Bollin K. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:4073-4126. [PMID: 34724392 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 567] [Impact Index Per Article: 189.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialists, and advocacy experts was convened to update the guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic literature review and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on evidence published from 2017 through 2021. RESULTS A total of 175 studies met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review and were pertinent to the development of the recommendations. Because of the paucity of high-quality evidence, recommendations are based on expert consensus. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations for specific organ system-based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented. While management varies according to the organ system affected, in general, ICPi therapy should be continued with close monitoring for grade 1 toxicities, except for some neurologic, hematologic, and cardiac toxicities. ICPi therapy may be suspended for most grade 2 toxicities, with consideration of resuming when symptoms revert ≤ grade 1. Corticosteroids may be administered. Grade 3 toxicities generally warrant suspension of ICPis and the initiation of high-dose corticosteroids. Corticosteroids should be tapered over the course of at least 4-6 weeks. Some refractory cases may require other immunosuppressive therapy. In general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, except for endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jarushka Naidoo
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ian Chau
- Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London & Surrey, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Umang Swami
- Huntsman Cancer Institute-University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - John A Thompson
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Spira A, Zhou X, Chen L, Gnanasakthy A, Wang L, Ungar D, Curiel R, Liao L, Radford J, Kahl B. Health-Related Quality of Life, Symptoms, and Tolerability of Loncastuximab Tesirine in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2021; 22:158-168. [PMID: 34690090 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Loncastuximab tesirine has shown antitumor activity with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who were relapsed or refractory after ≥2 prior therapies, including activity in patients with high-risk disease characteristics. This analysis examined health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms, and tolerability in patients receiving loncastuximab tesirine for relapsed or refractory DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS The single-arm, open-label phase II LOTIS-2 study (ADCT-402-201; NCT03589469) enrolled 145 patients aged ≥18 years. Patients received loncastuximab tesirine as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using EQ-5D and FACT-Lym at baseline, day 1 of each cycle, and the end-of-treatment visit. RESULTS During the course of treatment, EQ VAS overall health score was improved over time. The adjusted improvement was 0.65 per cycle (95% CI, 0.26-1.04; P = .001), and the adjusted mean change from baseline score was 5.00 (95% CI, 1.75-8.25; P = .003) at cycle 9, day 1. FACT-Lym total scores remained stable during treatment. More patients reported improvement compared to baseline in pain, lumps/swelling, and losing weight for a majority of visits. More than 60% of patients reported being "not at all" or "a little bit" bothered by treatment side effects for all treatment visits. Findings in elderly patients were similar to the population as whole. CONCLUSION The findings on HRQoL, symptoms, and tolerability further support the clinical use of loncastuximab tesirine for the treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL. FUNDING This work was funded by ADC Therapeutics SA. Authors affiliated with ADC Therapeutics SA participated in designing the study; in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting the data; in writing the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Spira
- Virginia Cancer Specialists, US Oncology Research, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Fairfax, VA
| | - Xiaolei Zhou
- RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Lei Chen
- ADC Therapeutics America Inc., Murray Hill, NJ.
| | | | | | - David Ungar
- ADC Therapeutics America Inc., Murray Hill, NJ
| | | | - Laura Liao
- ADC Therapeutics America Inc., Murray Hill, NJ
| | - John Radford
- NIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility, Christie NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester UK
| | - Brad Kahl
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Schuster SJ, Tam CS, Borchmann P, Worel N, McGuirk JP, Holte H, Waller EK, Jaglowski S, Bishop MR, Damon LE, Foley SR, Westin JR, Fleury I, Ho PJ, Mielke S, Teshima T, Janakiram M, Hsu JM, Izutsu K, Kersten MJ, Ghosh M, Wagner-Johnston N, Kato K, Corradini P, Martinez-Prieto M, Han X, Tiwari R, Salles G, Maziarz RT. Long-term clinical outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas (JULIET): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:1403-1415. [PMID: 34516954 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00375-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the primary analysis of the pivotal JULIET trial of tisagenlecleucel, an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, the best overall response rate was 52% and the complete response rate was 40% in 93 evaluable adult patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas. We aimed to do a long-term follow-up analysis of the clinical outcomes and correlative analyses of activity and safety in the full adult cohort. METHODS In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (JULIET) done at 27 treatment sites in ten countries (Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, and the USA), adult patients (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas who were ineligible for, did not consent to, or had disease progression after autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 at screening, were enrolled. Patients received a single intravenous infusion of tisagenlecleucel (target dose 5 × 108 viable transduced CAR T cells). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ie, the proportion of patients with a best overall disease response of a complete response or partial response using the Lugano classification, as assessed by an independent review committee) at any time post-infusion and was analysed in all patients who received tisagenlecleucel (the full analysis set). Safety was analysed in all patients who received tisagenlecleucel. JULIET is registered with ClinialTrials.gov, NCT02445248, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between July 29, 2015, and Nov 2, 2017, 167 patients were enrolled. As of Feb 20, 2020, 115 patients had received tisagenlecleucel infusion and were included in the full analysis set. At a median follow-up of 40·3 months (IQR 37·8-43·8), the overall response rate was 53·0% (95% CI 43·5-62·4; 61 of 115 patients), with 45 (39%) patients having a complete response as their best overall response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anaemia (45 [39%]), decreased neutrophil count (39 [34%]), decreased white blood cell count (37 [32%]), decreased platelet count (32 [28%]), cytokine release syndrome (26 [23%]), neutropenia (23 [20%]), febrile neutropenia (19 [17%]), hypophosphataemia (15 [13%]), and thrombocytopenia (14 [12%]). The most common treatment-related serious adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (31 [27%]), febrile neutropenia (seven [6%]), pyrexia (six [5%]), pancytopenia (three [3%]), and pneumonia (three [3%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION Tisagenlecleucel shows durable activity and manageable safety profiles in adult patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas. For patients with large B-cell lymphomas that are refractory to chemoimmunotherapy or relapsing after second-line therapies, tisagenlecleucel compares favourably with respect to risk-benefit relative to conventional therapeutic approaches (eg, salvage chemotherapy). FUNDING Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Schuster
- Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Constantine S Tam
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Clinic I for Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nina Worel
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joseph P McGuirk
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Harald Holte
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Edmund K Waller
- Bone Marrow and Stem Cell Transplant Center, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Samantha Jaglowski
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Michael R Bishop
- Hematopoietic Cellular Therapy Program, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lloyd E Damon
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephen Ronan Foley
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jason R Westin
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabelle Fleury
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Maisonneuve-Rosement Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - P Joy Ho
- Institute of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephan Mielke
- Department of Medicine II, University of Würzburg Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Takanori Teshima
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Murali Janakiram
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jing-Mei Hsu
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Koji Izutsu
- Department of Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marie José Kersten
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monalisa Ghosh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nina Wagner-Johnston
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Koji Kato
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Paolo Corradini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Xia Han
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | | | - Gilles Salles
- Department of Hematology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Richard T Maziarz
- Center for Hematologic Malignancies, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ernst M, Oeser A, Besiroglu B, Caro-Valenzuela J, Abd El Aziz M, Monsef I, Borchmann P, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N, Goldkuhle M. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for people with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 9:CD013365. [PMID: 34515338 PMCID: PMC8436585 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013365.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive cancer of the lymphatic system. About 30% to 40% of people with DLBCL experience relapse and 10% are refractory to first-line treatment usually consisting of R-CHOP chemotherapy. Of those eligible for second-line treatment, commonly consisting of salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), around 50% experience relapse. With a median overall survival of less than six to 12 months, the prognosis of individuals who relapse or are refractory (r/r) to advanced lines of treatment or of those who are ineligible for ASCT, is very poor. With the introduction of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, a novel treatment option for these people is available. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for people with relapsed or refractory (r/r) DLBCL. SEARCH METHODS An experienced information specialist performed a systematic database search for relevant articles on CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase until September 11th, 2020. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of identified studies up to this date. All search results were screened by two authors independently and a third author was involved in case of discrepancies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included prospectively planned trials evaluating CAR T-cell therapy for people with r/r DLBCL. We had planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and we flexibly adapted eligibility criteria to the most reliable study designs available. We excluded studies involving fewer than 10 participants with r/r DLBCL and studies with a proportion of participants with r/r DLBCL below 70%, unless data were reported separately for this subgroup. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors extracted data and performed risk of bias ratings independently. A third author was involved in case of disagreements. As our search did not yield any completed RCTs, prospective controlled non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs) or prospective observational studies with a control group, we did not meta-analyse data and reported all results narratively. We adopted the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence for prioritised outcomes. MAIN RESULTS We identified 13 eligible uncontrolled studies evaluating a single or multiple arms of CAR T-cell therapies. We also identified 38 ongoing studies, including three RCTs. Ten studies are awaiting classification due to completion with no retrievable results data or insufficient data to justify inclusion. The mean number of participants enrolled, treated with CAR T-cell therapy and evaluated in the included studies were 79 (range 12 to 344; data unavailable for two studies), 61 (range 12 to 294; data unavailable for one study) and 52 (range 11 to 256), respectively. Most studies included people with r/r DLBCL among people with other haematological B-cell malignancies. Participants had received at least a median of three prior treatment lines (data unavailable for four studies), 5% to 50% had undergone ASCT (data unavailable for five studies) and, except for two studies, 3% to 18% had undergone allogenic stem-cell transplantation (data unavailable for eight studies). The overall risk of bias was high for all studies, in particular, due to incomplete follow-up and the absence of blinding. None of the included studies had a control group so that no adequate comparative effect measures could be calculated. The duration of follow-up varied substantially between studies, in particular, for harms. Our certainty in the evidence is very low for all outcomes. Overall survival was reported by eight studies (567 participants). Four studies reported survival rates at 12 months which ranged between 48% and 59%, and one study reported an overall survival rate of 50.5% at 24 months. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of CAR T-cell therapy on overall survival. Two studies including 294 participants at baseline and 59 participants at the longest follow-up (12 months or 18 months) described improvements of quality of life measured with the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level visual analogue scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) or Function Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of CAR T-cell therapy on quality of life. None of the studies reported treatment-related mortality. Five studies (550 participants) reported the occurrence of adverse events among participants, ranging between 99% and 100% for any grade adverse events and 68% to 98% for adverse events grade ≥ 3. In three studies (253 participants), 56% to 68% of participants experienced serious adverse events, while in one study (28 participants), no serious adverse events occurred. CAR T-cell therapy may increase the risk of adverse events and serious adverse events but the evidence is very uncertain about the exact risk. The occurrence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was reported in 11 studies (675 participants) under use of various grading criteria. Five studies reported between 42% and 100% of participants experiencing CRS according to criteria described in Lee 2014. CAR T-cell therapy may increase the risk of CRS but the evidence is very uncertain about the exact risk. Nine studies (575 participants) reported results on progression-free survival, disease-free survival or relapse-free survival. Twelve-month progression-free survival rates were reported by four studies and ranged between 44% and 75%. In one study, relapse-free survival remained at a rate of 64% at both 12 and 18 months. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of CAR T-cell therapy on progression-free survival. Thirteen studies (620 participants) provided data on complete response rates. At six months, three studies reported complete response rates between 40% and 45%. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of CAR T-cell therapy on complete response rates. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The available evidence on the benefits and harms of CAR T-cell therapy for people with r/r DLBCL is limited, mainly because of the absence of comparative clinical trials. The results we present should be regarded in light of this limitation and conclusions should be drawn very carefully. Due to the uncertainty in the current evidence, a large number of ongoing investigations and a risk of substantial and potentially life-threatening complications requiring supplementary treatment, it is critical to continue evaluating the evidence on this new therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Ernst
- Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annika Oeser
- Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Burcu Besiroglu
- Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Caro-Valenzuela
- Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Ina Monsef
- Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lise J Estcourt
- Haematology/Transfusion Medicine, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- Cochrane Cancer, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marius Goldkuhle
- Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lentiviral Vectors for T Cell Engineering: Clinical Applications, Bioprocessing and Future Perspectives. Viruses 2021; 13:v13081528. [PMID: 34452392 PMCID: PMC8402758 DOI: 10.3390/v13081528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Lentiviral vectors have played a critical role in the emergence of gene-modified cell therapies, specifically T cell therapies. Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah), axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) and most recently brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus) are examples of T cell therapies which are now commercially available for distribution after successfully obtaining EMA and FDA approval for the treatment of blood cancers. All three therapies rely on retroviral vectors to transduce the therapeutic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) into T lymphocytes. Although these innovations represent promising new therapeutic avenues, major obstacles remain in making them readily available tools for medical care. This article reviews the biological principles as well as the bioprocessing of lentiviral (LV) vectors and adoptive T cell therapy. Clinical and engineering successes, shortcomings and future opportunities are also discussed. The development of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-compliant instruments, technologies and protocols will play an essential role in the development of LV-engineered T cell therapies.
Collapse
|
31
|
Geethakumari PR, Ramasamy DP, Dholaria B, Berdeja J, Kansagra A. Balancing Quality, Cost, and Access During Delivery of Newer Cellular and Immunotherapy Treatments. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2021; 16:345-356. [PMID: 34089485 PMCID: PMC8179081 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-021-00635-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is currently changing the landscape of hematologic malignancies with multiple FDA-approved cell therapy products in the USA. The current administration process of the CAR T-cell therapy is complicated, labor-intensive, and expensive. RECENT FINDINGS The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is currently changing the landscape of hematologic malignancies with multiple FDA-approved cell therapy products in the USA. The current administration process of the CAR T-cell therapy is complicated, labor-intensive, and expensive. This review article addresses the present-day challenges and discusses opportunities to optimize the access and affordability of the CAR T-cell therapy. The field of cellular immunotherapy is going to change the future of solid tumors and non-oncological diseases. However, this promising therapy poses challenges in the administration and management of quality in the current field of healthcare. We describe various novel approaches to manage challenges in improving access and improving widescale implementation of cellular therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dheepthi Perumal Ramasamy
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2201 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX, 76034, USA
| | | | - Jesús Berdeja
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ankit Kansagra
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2201 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX, 76034, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
The evolving need for patient reported outcome data in determining choice of immune therapy treatment. MED 2021; 2:907-911. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
33
|
Patient-Reported Symptom and Functioning Status during the First 12 Months after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:930.e1-930.e10. [PMID: 34265479 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is being increasingly used to treat patients with advanced hematologic malignancies; however, the symptoms related to standard of care CAR T cell therapy during the first year after treatment have not been assessed using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements. This study aimed to quantify patients' perspectives of symptom burden and functional status using PROs during the first year after CAR T cell therapy for hematologic malignancies, especially in patients who experienced grade 2-4 toxicities. Sixty patients were enrolled in this observational cross-sectional study at any time during their first 12 months post-treatment. All 60 had received CAR T cell therapy as standard of care at MD Anderson Cancer Center in 2019. PROs were measured using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), the PROs Measurement Information System 29 (PROMIS-29), the global health tool EQ5D-5L, and the single-item health-related quality of life scale (HRQoL). Twenty-two additional symptoms related to CAR T cell therapy, as identified by an expert panel, were also evaluated. CAR T cell therapy-related toxicities were rated according to the ASTCT consensus grading criteria. The majority of patients (52 of 60; 87%) received axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta). One-third of the patients developed grade 2-4 cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity. The first 90 days after infusion represented the most symptomatic period, in which >10% of patients rated 18 symptoms as severe (ie, MDASI symptom score of 7 to 10 on scale of 0 to 10), strongly indicating the need for effective symptom management. Physical functioning, measured by interference on the "general activity" item on the MDASI and this domain on the PROMIS-29, were significantly worse in patients who underwent therapy during the first 30 days compared with those who underwent therapy over 90 days (all P < .05 with the Hochberg step-up procedure), whereas the EQ5D-5L and single-item HRQoL did not detect such differences. Compared with patients who had mild cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity (grade 0-1), patients who developed grade 2-4 toxicities persistently reported multiple severe symptoms after 30 days following therapy (all P < .05). Furthermore, although using a different recall period, patient-reported scores on several PROMIS-29 domains were significantly correlated with the scores of corresponding MDASI symptom items. This real-world quantitative PRO symptoms study provides evidence of unique profiles of the physical, psychological, and cognitive symptom burden in patients undergoing CAR T cell therapy that varies within the first year after infusion and demonstrates differences among PRO measurement scales. These results support the need for validation of fit-for-purpose PRO measurements for routinely monitoring symptom and toxicity burdens in CAR T cell therapy care settings.
Collapse
|
34
|
Banerjee R, Shah N, Dicker AP. Next-Generation Implementation of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Using Digital Health. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 5:668-678. [PMID: 34110929 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a paradigm-shifting immunotherapy modality in oncology; however, unique toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome limit its ability to be implemented more widely in the outpatient setting or at smaller-volume centers. Three operational challenges with CAR-T therapy include the following: (1) the logistics of toxicity monitoring, ie, with frequent vital sign checks and neurologic assessments; (2) the specialized knowledge required for toxicity management, particularly with regard to CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; and (3) the need for high-quality symptomatic and supportive care during this intensive period. In this review, we explore potential niches for digital innovations that can improve the implementation of CAR-T therapy in each of these domains. These tools include patient-facing technologies and provider-facing platforms: for example, wearable devices and mobile health apps to screen for fevers and encephalopathy, electronic patient-reported outcome assessments-based workflows to assist with symptom management, machine learning algorithms to predict emerging CRS in real time, clinical decision support systems to assist with toxicity management, and digital coaching to help maintain wellness. Televisits, which have grown in prominence since the novel coronavirus pandemic, will continue to play a key role in the monitoring and management of CAR-T-related toxicities as well. Limitations of these strategies include the need to ensure care equity and stakeholder buy-in, both operationally and financially. Nevertheless, once developed and validated, the next-generation implementation of CAR-T therapy using these digital tools may improve both its safety and accessibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Banerjee
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nina Shah
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.,Jefferson Center for Digital Health, Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Shalabi H, Gust J, Taraseviciute A, Wolters PL, Leahy AB, Sandi C, Laetsch TW, Wiener L, Gardner RA, Nussenblatt V, Hill JA, Curran KJ, Olson TS, Annesley C, Wang HW, Khan J, Pasquini MC, Duncan CN, Grupp SA, Pulsipher MA, Shah NN. Beyond the storm - subacute toxicities and late effects in children receiving CAR T cells. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18:363-378. [PMID: 33495553 PMCID: PMC8335746 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-00456-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
As clinical advances with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are increasingly described and the potential for extending their therapeutic benefit grows, optimizing the implementation of this therapeutic modality is imperative. The recognition and management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) marked a milestone in this field; however, beyond the understanding gained in treating CRS, a host of additional toxicities and/or potential late effects of CAR T cell therapy warrant further investigation. A multicentre initiative involving experts in paediatric cell therapy, supportive care and/or study of late effects from cancer and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation was convened to facilitate the comprehensive study of extended CAR T cell-mediated toxicities and establish a framework for new systematic investigations of CAR T cell-related adverse events. Together, this group identified six key focus areas: extended monitoring of neurotoxicity and neurocognitive function, psychosocial considerations, infection and immune reconstitution, other end organ toxicities, evaluation of subsequent neoplasms, and strategies to optimize remission durability. Herein, we present the current understanding, gaps in knowledge and future directions of research addressing these CAR T cell-related outcomes. This systematic framework to study extended toxicities and optimization strategies will facilitate the translation of acquired experience and knowledge for optimal application of CAR T cell therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haneen Shalabi
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Juliane Gust
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Agne Taraseviciute
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Pamela L Wolters
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Allison B Leahy
- Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Carlos Sandi
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
- St. Baldrick's Foundation, Monrovia, CA, USA
| | - Theodore W Laetsch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics and Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Lori Wiener
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca A Gardner
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Veronique Nussenblatt
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Joshua A Hill
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kevin J Curran
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy S Olson
- Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Colleen Annesley
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hao-Wei Wang
- Laboratory of Pathology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Javed Khan
- Oncogenomics Section, Genetics Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Marcelo C Pasquini
- Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Christine N Duncan
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephan A Grupp
- Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael A Pulsipher
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nirali N Shah
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Effect of lisocabtagene maraleucel on HRQoL and symptom severity in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Blood Adv 2021; 5:2245-2255. [PMID: 33904895 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown efficacy as a third-line or later treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, we evaluated the impact of CAR T-cell treatment with lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms in patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL in the ongoing, open-label, nonrandomized TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial. Clinically meaningful improvement was observed in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores for global health status/QoL, based on a minimally important difference of 10 points at 2 to 18 months after liso-cel infusion. There were no clinically meaningful changes in physical functioning and pain, whereas clinically meaningful improvements were observed in fatigue at 2, 12, and 18 months. The proportion of patients with clinically meaningful improvement in global health status/QoL was generally higher for treatment responders than for nonresponders. A trend toward decreased mean EQ-5D-5L index scores was observed at 1 month after liso-cel infusion, followed by subsequent increases through 18 months. Mean EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale scores increased from 2 through 18 months. In summary, patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL treated with liso-cel had early, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL and symptoms that correlated with antitumor activity. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02631044.
Collapse
|
37
|
DLBCL patients treated with CD19 CAR T cells experience a high burden of organ toxicities but low nonrelapse mortality. Blood Adv 2021; 4:3024-3033. [PMID: 32614964 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome are the most notable toxicities of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. In addition, CAR T-cell-mediated toxicities can involve any organ system, with varied impacts on outcomes, depending on patient factors and involved organs. We performed detailed analysis of organ-specific toxicities and their association with outcomes in 60 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with CD19 CAR T cells by assessing all toxicities in organ-based groups during the first year posttreatment. We observed 539 grade ≥2 and 289 grade ≥3 toxicities. Common grade ≥3 toxicities included hematological, metabolic, infectious, and neurological complications, with corresponding 1-year cumulative incidence of 57.7%, 54.8%, 35.4%, and 18.3%, respectively. Patients with impaired performance status had a higher risk of grade ≥3 metabolic complications, whereas elevated lactate dehydrogenase was associated with higher risks of grade ≥3 neurological and pulmonary toxicities. CRS was associated with higher incidence of grade ≥3 metabolic, pulmonary, and neurologic complications. The 1-year nonrelapse mortality and overall survival were 1.7% and 69%, respectively. Only grade ≥3 pulmonary toxicities were associated with an increased mortality risk. In summary, toxicity burdens after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy were high and varied by organ systems. Most toxicities were manageable and were rarely associated with mortality. Our study emphasizes the importance of toxicity assessment, which could serve as a benchmark for further research to reduce symptom burdens and improve tolerability in patients treated with CAR T cells.
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
ABSTRACT Anti-CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy yields durable remissions in up to 40% of patients with chemoresistant aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), a group of patients expected only to survive on average 6 months. Although longer follow-up is needed to define durability, CD19 CAR T cells are demonstrating similar promise in other B-NHL subtypes such as mantle cell lymphoma and the indolent B-cell NHLs. This transformative therapy, however, remains hamstrung by its associated toxicities of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, as well as by mechanisms of resistance and relapse and accessibility. To address these limitations, studies are underway to investigate toxicity prevention and mitigation strategies and the development of safer CARs, combination strategies to overcome T-cell exhaustion and dual antigen targeting to combat antigen loss, and alternative cell sources to address cost and manufacturing inefficiencies and resolve issues surrounding T-cell fitness.
Collapse
|
39
|
Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Tisagenlecleucel for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma in Japan. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:506.e1-506.e10. [PMID: 33823168 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
There are limited treatment options and substantial unmet needs for adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) in Japan. In 2019, tisagenlecleucel, a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, was approved for r/r DLBCL in Japan. The efficacy and safety of tisagenlecleucel were demonstrated in the pivotal phase II single-arm JULIET trial. The objective of the current study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel treatment strategy versus current standard of care (salvage chemotherapy treatment strategy) for the treatment of patients with r/r DLBCL in Japan. A three-state partitioned survival model was constructed from a Japanese public healthcare payer's perspective, with the following three health states: progression-free survival, progressive/relapsed disease, and death. Because the tisagenlecleucel arm included patients who did or did not receive the infusion, a decision-tree structure was used to partition patients based on their infusion status. Treatment efficacy and costs were based on tisagenlecleucel-infused patients for those who received the infusion; for non-infused patients, they were based on standard salvage chemotherapy. The efficacy inputs for tisagenlecleucel-infused patients and salvage chemotherapy were based on observed data in the JULIET trial and the international SCHOLAR-1 meta-analysis, respectively, before year 3. Afterward, all patients were assumed to have no further progression and to incur the mortality risk of long-term DLBCL survivors. The base case analysis explored a lifetime horizon (44 years), with costs and effectiveness discounted 2.0% annually, and it used a monthly model cycle. Direct costs were considered in the base case, composed of pretreatment costs, treatment costs, adverse events management costs, follow-up costs before progression, subsequent SCT costs, post-progression costs, and terminal care costs. Total incremental costs, life years (LYs), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared for tisagenlecleucel versus salvage chemotherapy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated as the costs per QALY gained, and a threshold of ¥7.5 million was used to assess whether tisagenlecleucel is cost effective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. The total LYs (discounted) for tisagenlecleucel and salvage chemotherapy were 7.24 and 4.35 years, respectively; the corresponding QALYs were 5.42 and 2.57 years, respectively. The discounted incremental LYs and QALYs comparing tisagenlecleucel to salvage chemotherapy were estimated as 2.89 and 2.85 years, respectively. Over a lifetime horizon, the model estimated that tisagenlecleucel had a total incremental cost of ¥15,590,335 (discounted) versus salvage chemotherapy. Tisagenlecleucel was associated with an ICER of ¥5,476,496 per QALY gained compared to salvage chemotherapy. Extensive sensitivity analyses supported the base-case findings. Tisagenlecleucel is a cost-effective treatment strategy for r/r DLBCL compared to salvage chemotherapy treatment strategy from a Japanese public healthcare payer's perspective.
Collapse
|
40
|
Chakraborty R, Hill BT, Majeed A, Majhail NS. Late Effects after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell Therapy for Lymphoid Malignancies. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:222-229. [PMID: 33928266 PMCID: PMC8078596 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell [CAR T] therapy has changed the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory lymphoid malignancies. With an expanding pool of post CAR T-cell therapy survivors, prevention and management of late toxicities is emerging as an important component of survivorship care. This review summarizes the current state of evidence on late toxicities after CAR T-cell therapy in lymphoid malignancies. Late effects that are well described in clinical trials and observational studies include hypogammaglobulinemia, prolonged cytopenias, late infections, neurologic and neuropsychiatric effects, immune-related late effects, and subsequent malignancies. Hypogammaglobulinemia is the most common late effect in the setting of CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, which necessitates immunoglobulin replacement. Common determinants of late toxicities are age, underlying tumor type, prior therapy, CAR construct, and acute toxicities. Among currently approved indications, the incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia and prolonged cytopenia is higher in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia compared to aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patient-reported physical and mental quality of life in long-term survivors is comparable to general population, albeit, with limited data thus far. This review provides an overview of the incidence, known risk-factors, and strategies for prevention and management of late toxicities in this population. Further research is needed to characterize the trajectory of late effects from population-based registries and long-term follow-up of ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian T. Hill
- Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Aneela Majeed
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hoogland AI, Jayani RV, Collier A, Irizarry-Arroyo N, Rodriguez Y, Jain MD, Booth-Jones M, Hyland KA, James BW, Barata A, Bachmeier CA, Chavez JC, Khimani F, Krivenko GS, Lazaryan A, Liu HD, Nishihori T, Pinilla-Ibarz J, Shah BD, Abidi M, Locke FL, Jim HSL. Acute patient-reported outcomes in B-cell malignancies treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel. Cancer Med 2021; 10:1936-1943. [PMID: 33641257 PMCID: PMC7957158 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi‐cel) has considerably improved survival in adults with relapsed/refractory large B‐cell lymphoma. This study reports patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) such as quality of life (QOL) and toxicity in the first 90 days after treatment. Hematologic cancer patients treated with axi‐cel (N = 103, mean age = 61, 39% female) completed SF‐36 or PROMIS‐29 QOL questionnaires prior to treatment and 90 days after. PRO‐Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicity items were completed by patients at baseline and 14, 30, 60, and 90 days after treatment. Mixed models examined change in PROs over time. From preinfusion to 90 days later, patients reported improvements in physical functioning, pain, and fatigue (ps < 0.01), but worsening of anxiety (p = 0.02). Patient‐reported toxicities worsened by day 14 with improvement thereafter. The five most severe symptoms at day 14 included fatigue, decreased appetite, dry mouth, diarrhea frequency, and problems with concentration. Results indicate improvement in some domains of QOL over time with transient patient‐reported toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aasha I Hoogland
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Reena V Jayani
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Aaron Collier
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Yvelise Rodriguez
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michael D Jain
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Kelly A Hyland
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brian W James
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anna Barata
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Christina A Bachmeier
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Julio C Chavez
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Malignant Hematology, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Farhad Khimani
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gabriel S Krivenko
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Aleksandr Lazaryan
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hien D Liu
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Taiga Nishihori
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Bijal D Shah
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Malignant Hematology, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Muneer Abidi
- Spectrum Health Cancer Center, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Frederick L Locke
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shah NN, Hamadani M. Is There Still a Role for Allogeneic Transplantation in the Management of Lymphoma? J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:487-498. [PMID: 33434076 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nirav N Shah
- Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Mehdi Hamadani
- Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.,Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shah J, Shacham S, Kauffman M, Daniele P, Tomaras D, Tremblay G, Casasnovas RO, Maerevoet M, Zijlstra J, Follows G, P Vermaat JS, Kalakonda N, Goy AH, Choquet S, Den Neste EV, Hill BT, Thieblemont C, Cavallo F, la Cruz FD, Kuruvilla J, Hamad N, Bouabdallah R, Jäger U, Caimi P, Gurion R, Warzocha K, Bakhshi S, Sancho JM, Schuster M, Egyed M, Offner F, Vasilakopoulos TP, Samal P, Nagy A, Ku M, Canales Albendea MÁ. Health-related quality of life and utility outcomes with selinexor in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Future Oncol 2021; 17:1295-1310. [PMID: 33528286 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health utility impact of single-agent selinexor in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients & methods: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Lymphoma and EuroQoL five-dimensions five-levels data collected in the single-arm Phase IIb trial SADAL (NCT02227251) were analyzed with mixed-effects models. Results: Treatment responders maintained higher FACT - Lymphoma (p ≤ 0.05), FACT - General (p < 0.05) and EuroQoL five-dimensions five-levels index scores (p < 0.001) beginning in cycle 3. The estimated difference in health state utilities for treatment response and progressive disease was both statistically significant and clinically meaningful (mean difference: 0.07; p = 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, objective response to selinexor was associated with HRQoL maintenance, reduction in disease-related HRQoL decrements and higher health utilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jatin Shah
- Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc., Newton, MA 02459, USA
| | | | | | - Patrick Daniele
- Health Economics, Purple Squirrel Economics, Montreal, QC H3J 1M1, Canada
| | - Dimitrios Tomaras
- Health Economics, Purple Squirrel Economics, Montreal, QC H3J 1M1, Canada
| | - Gabriel Tremblay
- Health Economics, Purple Squirrel Economics, Montreal, QC H3J 1M1, Canada
| | | | | | - Josee Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - George Follows
- Haematology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Joost S P Vermaat
- Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Nagesh Kalakonda
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Andre Henri Goy
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA
| | - Sylvain Choquet
- Service d'Hématologie clinique, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, 75013, France
| | - Eric Van Den Neste
- Faculté de médecine et médecine dentaire, Université catholique de Louvain, Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium
| | - Brian T Hill
- Hematology & Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | | | - Federica Cavallo
- Divisione di Ematologia, University of Turin, Turin, 10138, Italy
| | - Fátima de la Cruz
- Facultativo Especialista de Área de Hematología, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, 41013, Spain
| | - John Kuruvilla
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, University Health Network Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nada Hamad
- Haematology Clinical Trials Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, 3065, Australia
| | | | - Ulrich Jäger
- Department of Clinical Hematology & Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Paolo Caimi
- Department of Medicine, UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Ronit Gurion
- Hematology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
| | | | - Sameer Bakhshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, New Delhi, 110029, India
| | - Juan Manuel Sancho
- Department of Clinical Hematology, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, Barcelona, 08916, Spain
| | | | - Miklós Egyed
- Department of Haematology, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Hospital, Kaposvár, 7400, Hungary
| | - Fritz Offner
- Department of Clinical Hematology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | | | | | - Agnes Nagy
- Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary
| | - Matthew Ku
- Department of Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3065, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kamal M, Joseph J, Greenbaum U, Hicklen R, Kebriaei P, Srour SA, Wang XS. Patient-Reported Outcomes for Cancer Patients with Hematological Malignancies Undergoing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: A Systematic Review. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:390.e1-390.e7. [PMID: 33965176 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Databases were searched to identify studies published over the past 10 years that addressed the utility of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in patients with hematological malignancies. Among 280 records, three articles covering 206 patients were eligible. The data were prospectively collected at multiple time points. The compliance rates were 70% to 94%. There was an inverse relationship between fatigue and social function among adults. The quality of life (QoL) improvement and ability to complete PROs were linked to disease status. About 40% of adults reported at least some cognitive difficulties, with a detrimental impact on mental and physical health status. In adults, the most commonly reported cognitive impairment was memory difficulties. Depression was associated with cognitive difficulties. Younger adults were at higher risk of long-term poor mental health, anxiety, and depression. For pediatric and adolescent patients, emotional dysfunction improves over time. QoL status improved over time; yet, severe cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity caused delayed improvement. Information regarding whether the PROs were integrated into medical records and clinical guidelines is lacking. Utilizing PROs in patients on CAR T cell therapy seems feasible and informative. Studies utilizing larger sample sizes and using validated PRO tools at different time points remain unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Kamal
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Jacinth Joseph
- Department of Stem Cell and Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uri Greenbaum
- Department of Stem Cell and Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rachel Hicklen
- Department of Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell and Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samer A Srour
- Department of Stem Cell and Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xin Shelly Wang
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Real world experience of approved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies outside of clinical trials. Curr Res Transl Med 2020; 68:159-170. [DOI: 10.1016/j.retram.2020.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
46
|
Cher BP, Gan KY, Aziz MIA, Lin L, Hwang WYK, Poon LM, Ng K. Cost utility analysis of tisagenlecleucel vs salvage chemotherapy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from Singapore's healthcare system perspective. J Med Econ 2020; 23:1321-1329. [PMID: 32780608 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1808981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) have limited treatment options and poor prognoses. Tisagenlecleucel, a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown early promise in improving survival outcomes, but at a high upfront cost. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel versus salvage chemotherapy for treating patients with r/r DLBCL who have failed at least 2 lines of systemic therapies. METHODS A hybrid decision tree and three-state partitioned survival model (progression-free (PF), progressive disease and death) was developed from the Singapore healthcare payer perspective. Survival curves from JULIET trial and CORAL-1 extension study were extrapolated beyond trial period over a 15-year time horizon to estimate the underlying progression-free survival and overall survival parametric distributions for both arms. Health state utilities were retrieved from the literature, and direct costs were sourced from public healthcare institutions in Singapore. One-way probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties and assumptions on cost-effectiveness results. RESULTS Compared with salvage chemotherapy, tisagenlecleucel was associated with a base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) US$508,530 (S$686,516) per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained and US$320,200 (S$432,269) per life year (LY) gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the ICER was most sensitive to time horizon, PF utility and cost of tisagenlecleucel. Scenario analyses confirmed that the ICERs remained high under favorable assumptions and substantial price reduction was required to reduce the ICER. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis showed tisagenlecleucel use in r/r DLBCL patients who failed at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapies was associated with exceedingly high ICER, which is unlikely to represent good use of healthcare resources. Comparative clinical evidence from the ongoing trials might provide more insight into future evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boon Piang Cher
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kar Yee Gan
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Liang Lin
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - William Ying Khee Hwang
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li Mei Poon
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kwong Ng
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|