The effect of immunosuppressants on the prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Diosmetin-7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside from Pogostemonis Herba alleviated SARS-CoV-2-induced pneumonia by reshaping macrophage polarization and limiting viral replication

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Viral pneumonia is the leading cause of death after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite effective at early stage, long-term treatment with glucocorticoids can lead to a variety of adverse effects and limited benefits. The Chinese traditional herb Pogostemonis Herba is the aerial part of Pogostemon Cablin (Blanco) Benth., which has potent antiviral, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects. It was used widely for treating various throat and respiratory diseases, including COVID-19, viral infection, cough, allergic asthma, acute lung injury and lung cancer.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate the antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects of chemical compounds from Pogostemonis Herba in SARS-CoV-2-infected hACE2-overexpressing mouse macrophage RAW264.7 cells and hACE2 transgenic mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The hACE2-overexpressing RAW264.7 cells were exposed with SARS-CoV-2. The cell viability was detected by CCK8 assay and cell apoptotic rate was by flow cytometric assay. The expressions of macrophage M1 phenotype markers (TNF-α and IL-6) and M2 markers (IL-10 and Arg-1) as well as the viral loads were detected by qPCR. The mice were inoculated intranasally with SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant to induce viral pneumonia. The levels of macrophages, neutrophils, and T cells in the lung tissues of infected mice were analyzed by full spectrum flow cytometry. The expressions of key proteins were detected by Western blot assay.

RESULTS

Diosmetin-7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (DG) presented the strongest anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. Intervention with DG at the concentrations of 0.625-2.5 μM not only reduced the viral replication, cell apoptosis, and the productions of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) in SARS-CoV-2-infected RAW264.7 cells, but also reversed macrophage polarity from M1 to M2 phenotype. Furthermore, treatment with DG (25-100 mg/kg) alleviated acute lung injury, and reduced macrophage infiltration in SARS-COV-2-infected mice. Mechanistically, DG inhibited SARS-COV-2 gene expression and HK3 translation via targeting YTHDF1, resulting in the inactivation of glycolysis-mediated NF-κB pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

DG exerted the potent antiviral and anti-inflammatory activities. It reduced pneumonia in SARS-COV-2-infected mice via inhibiting the viral replication and accelerating M2 macrophage polarization via targeting YTHDF1, indicating its potential for COVID-19 treatment.

Obinutuzumab treatment for membranous nephropathy: effectiveness and safety concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Obinutuzumab is a humanized and glycoengineered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has been shown to induce more profound B-cell depletion than rituximab. The effectiveness and safety of obinutuzumab in the treatment of membranous nephropathy remain unclear.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted in Huashan Hospital, Fudan University between 1 December 2021 and 30 November 2023. Patients with membranous nephropathy were included to assess the effectiveness and safety of obinutuzumab and prevalence of severe pneumonia during the outbreak of COVID-19 in China.

Results

Eighteen patients were included in the study assessing the effectiveness of obinutuzumab. After a 12-month follow-up, 14 patients (78%) achieved remission, with six (33%) achieving complete remission and eight (44%) achieving partial remission. Among the 18 obinutuzumab-treated patients contracting COVID-19 for the first time, six (33%) developed severe pneumonia, and one died. By contrast, two of the 37 patients receiving glucocorticoids combined with cyclophosphamide, and none of the 44 patients on calcineurin inhibitors or the 46 patients on rituximab developed severe pneumonia. However, compared to patients receiving rituximab or glucocorticoids plus cyclophosphamide, the obinutuzumab-treated patients had a longer duration of membranous nephropathy and immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, cardinal matching was employed to balance these baseline characteristics. Owing to small sample size for each regimen, patients receiving all the three non-obinutuzumab immunosuppressive regimens were grouped as a control cohort. After matching for age, gender, remission status, duration of membranous nephropathy, duration of immunosuppressive therapy, and ongoing immunosuppression, the obinutuzumab-treated patients still had a significantly higher incidence of severe pneumonia compared to those on other regimens (P = .019).

Conclusion

Obinutuzumab was an effective treatment option for patients with membranous nephropathy. On the other hand, it was associated with a higher incidence of severe pneumonia following COVID-19 infection compared to other immunosuppressive regimens.

Outpatient glucocorticoid use and COVID-19 outcomes: a population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Owing to controversy information surrounds effect of glucocorticoids on the evolution of COVID-19, we evaluate the effects of outpatient glucocorticoid use on the severity and progression of COVID-19 and risk of infection and analyse the effect of window of exposure and dose.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based case - control study, involving 4 substudies: (i) Hospitalisation; (ii) Mortality, using subjects hospitalised with a PCR + as cases and subjects without a PCR + as controls; (iii) Progression, including subjects with a PCR + (hospitalised versus non-hospitalised); and (iv) Susceptibility, with all subjects with a PCR + and subjects without a PCR + . Adjusted odds ratios (ORa) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

The outpatient glucocorticoid use was associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation (aOR 1.79; 95% CI 1.56-2.05), mortality (aOR 2.30; 95% CI 1.68-3.15), progression (aOR 1.69; 95% CI 1.43-2.00) and susceptibility (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19-1.41). Furthermore, the effects was observed to be greater at higher doses and the closer that drug use approached the outcome date, with an almost fourfold increase in mortality among users in the previous month (aOR 3.85; 95% CI 2.63-5.62).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of this real-world data study, outpatient glucocorticoid use should be considered in making decisions about intrahospital treatment.

Coronavirus Disease 2019: Past, Present, and Future

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is one of the most impactful diseases experienced in the past century. While the official national health emergency concluded in May of 2023, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to mutate. As the summer of 2023, all countries were experiencing a new surge of cases from the EG.5 Omicron variant. Additionally, a new genetically distinct Omicron descendant BA2.86 had been detected in multiple countries including the United States. This article seeks to offer lessons learned from the pandemic, summarize best evidence for current management of patients with COVID-19, and give insights into future directions with this disease.

Symptoms and Severity of COVID-19 in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Experience of a University Medical Center

Background

The pandemic situation of the novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)) and its associated disease (coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)) represents a challenging condition with a plethora of aspects. The course of COVID-19 in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rheumatic diseases (RD) is not well known. Our study is one step toward closing this gap by collecting data on vaccination rates, infection-free survival, and individual symptom severity.

Methods

We conducted a prospective questionnaire-based study between April 2022 and October 2022 at our university hospital. Outward patients over the age of 18 years were screened for participation and reported about their infection/infection-free survival since the start of the pandemic.

Results

Finally, 156 patients were included in the study, 117 (75.0%) of which had inflammatory bowel disease and 39 (25.0%) patients with rheumatic disease. Altogether, 143 (91.7%) persons had received at least one vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. A total of 153 patients provided information regarding their COVID-19 history: 81 patients (52.0%) self-reported about their SARS-CoV-2 infection. In general, courses of infection were mild: only two patients (2.5% of patients with reported COVID-19) were hospitalized due to COVID-19 with one (1.2%) of the two needing intensive care. Asymptomatic COVID-19 had been described by 7 persons (8.6% of patients with reported COVID-19). Acute COVID-19 was accompanied by fatigue/tiredness in 58 persons (71.6% of patients with history of COVID-19) as the most frequent symptom. Other complaints were common cold (55 patients = 67.9%), cough (51 patients = 63.0%), headache (44 patients = 54.3%), and fever (35 patients = 43.2%). Stratified by vaccination status (unvaccinated vs. at least once vaccinated), the time to infection differed significantly (logrank test: p = 0.04, Chi2 4.1). At least once vaccinated people had a median COVID-19-free survival of 28.5 months (confidence interval (CI): 23.6 months-not reached). Without any vaccination, the estimated time to infection was 25.1 months (CI: 23.6 months-not reached).

Conclusion

Our IMID patients have a high rate of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Data show a significantly longer infection-free survival in vaccinated IMID patients as compared to unvaccinated patients. Discrimination between symptoms of COVID-19 and a concomitant inflammatory disease is difficult as complaints might be overlapping. This trial is registered with DRKS00028880.

Impact of immunosuppressive therapy on SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine effectiveness in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a Danish nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Patients receiving immunosuppressives have been excluded from trials for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine efficacy. Investigation of immunosuppressants' impact on effectiveness of vaccines, particularly in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), is therefore required.

DESIGN

We performed a nationwide cohort study to assess the risk of COVID-19 infection in vaccinated patients with IMID exposed to immunosuppressives compared with IMID unexposed to immunosuppressives. Exposure to immunosuppressives in the 120 days before receiving the second SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination was assessed. Patients were followed from date of second vaccination and weighted Cox models were used to estimate the risk of infection associated with immunosuppressives. Secondary outcomes included hospitalisation and death associated with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Risk of infection by immunosuppressant drug class was also analysed.

SETTING

This study used population-representative data from Danish national health registries in the period from 1 January to 30 November 2021.

RESULTS

Overall, 152 440 patients were followed over 19 341 person years. Immunosuppressants were associated with a significantly increased risk of infection across IMID (HR: 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.5), in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (HR: 1.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.9) and arthropathy (HR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.4) but not psoriasis (HR: 1.1, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.4). Immunosuppressants were also associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation across IMID (HR: 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.0), particularly in IBD (HR: 2.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 4.1). No significantly increased risk of death in immunosuppressant exposed patients was identified. Analyses by immunosuppressant drug class showed increased COVID-19 infection and hospitalisation with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF), systemic corticosteroid, and rituximab and other immunosuppressants in vaccinated patients with IMID.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppressive therapies reduced effectiveness of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination against infection and hospitalisation in patients with IMID. Anti-TNF, systemic corticosteroids, and rituximab and other immunosuppressants were particularly associated with these risks.

SARS-CoV-2 infection status in corneal preservation solution and COVID-19 prevalence after corneal transplantation

The potential risks associated with organs from COVID-19-infected donors were unclear. To determine the SARS-CoV-2 infection status of corneas transplanted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we performed a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the corneal preservation solution that was used for corneal transplantation. We also examined the postoperative health status of the recipients. This study included 144 transplants in 143 eyes. Ninety-nine eyes of imported corneas and 10 of the 14 corneas donated in the prefecture were PCR tested at our hospital, and all were SARS-CoV-2 negative. All corneal transplants were performed after confirming their SARS-CoV-2 negativity by a PCR using a corneal preservation solution at our hospital or a nasopharyngeal swab at a previous facility. Despite postoperative steroid administration, no patient developed COVID-19 infection until discharge. Hence, if the donor's nasopharyngeal swab test is SARS-CoV-2 negative, COVID-19 infection in the recipient due to corneal transplantation may be prevented. Since corneal transplant recipients are susceptible to infection due to prolonged steroid administration and are at high risk for severe diseases if infection occurs, SARS-CoV-2 detection testing using nasopharyngeal swabs in donors should be performed.

CoronaVac and BBIBP-CorV vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 during predominant circulation of Omicron BA.5.2 and BF.7 in China, a retrospective cohort study

Pandemic of COVID-19 hit China at the end of 2022. According to China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Omicron BA.5.2 and BF.7 were the main circulating variants. Chinese people had a high COVID-19 vaccination rate, and the most widely used vaccines were CoronaVac (Sinovac) and BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm). An online questionnaire was distributed to survey the vaccination history and infection information of China mainland residents during this pandemic. A total of 4250 subjects were included for propensity score matching, 566 unvaccinated subjects and 1072 vaccinated subjects were finally included to analyze the effects of the two vaccines on BA.5.2 and BF.7. The SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was 84.5% in the vaccinated group and 82.3% in the unvaccinated group (p = 0.255). Vaccinated subjects had significantly higher rates of COVID-19-related symptoms, including fever, cough, nasal obstruction, runny nose, and sore throat. However, vaccinated people had lower risk of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR]: 0.467, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.286-0.762) and hospitalization (OR: 0.290, 95% CI: 0.097-0.870) due to COVID-19. In general, the current study did not observe the protective effect of CoronaVac and BBIBP CorV against BA.5.2 and BF.7 infection. However, these vaccines can still reduce the risk of adverse outcomes such as pneumonia and hospitalization.

Clinical Characteristics of Myasthenia Gravis Patients with COVID-19 in Guangxi, China: A Case-Control Study

Purpose

With the adjustment of prevention strategies in December 2022, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) became widely prevalent in China. This study is aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with COVID-19 and identify risk factors of exacerbation in MG patients with COVID-19 in Guangxi.

Patients and Methods

A total of 489 MG patients and 587 control subjects in Guangxi during the COVID-19 pandemic were enrolled in this case-control study. After contacting the participants, the clinical data of MG patients and the control group were analyzed. The clinical characteristics of MG patients with COVID-19 were described. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used for discovering independent risk factors of MG exacerbation in the patients with MG and COVID-19.

Results

A total of 311 (75.30%) MG patients and 428 (72.91%) control subjects were infected with COVID-19, and 64.31% of MG patients with COVID-19 were women. The median age at the time of interview was 41 (IQR: 28, 54) years old, and median onset age was 36 (IQR: 24, 51), both of which were lower than those in MG patients without COVID-19. MG duration was 24 (IQR: 9, 72) months. About 44.69% of patients were generalized MG (GMG). About 11.90% of MG patients with COVID-19 showed severe COVID-19 symptoms and the duration of symptomatic COVID-19 was 9.57 ± 6.79 days, higher than those in the control group. About 35.69% MG patients with immunosuppressive drugs were infected with COVID-19, which is higher than those in the non-infected MG patients (21.57%). A total of 120 (38.59%) MG patients with COVID-19 had comorbidities. About 21 (20.19%) of the 104 MG patients without vaccination showed severe COVID-19 symptoms. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that baseline MG activities of daily living profile (MG-ADL, OR 1.280, 95% CI: 1.010-1.621, p = 0.041), duration of COVID-19 (OR 1.158, 95% CI: 1.100-1.220, p < 0.001), GMG (OR 2.331, 95% CI: 1.228, 4.426, p = 0.010), and lack of COVID vaccination (OR 2.075, 95% CI: 1.152, 3.738, p = 0.015) were independent factors of exacerbation in MG patients with COVID-19.

Conclusion

MG patients with immunosuppressive drugs, younger onset, longer MG duration, or comorbidities are more susceptible to COVID-19. The baseline MG-ADL, duration of symptomatic COVID-19, GMG, and lack of COVID-19 vaccination are independent risk factors of exacerbation in MG patients with COVID-19.

Pituitary Diseases and COVID-19 Outcomes in South Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study

The pituitary gland is either directly or indirectly impacted by SARS-CoV-2 infection. As a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction or pituitary apoplexy can occur. This study aimed to investigate severe COVID-19 outcomes and COVID-19-related mortality in patients with underlying pituitary disease in Korea using a nationwide cohort database. The data required for this study were obtained from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection between January 2020 and December 2021 were divided into the following three groups and analyzed: Group A, those who were hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection without underlying pituitary disease (n = 725,170); Group B, those who were hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection with underlying pituitary disease without exposure to systemic steroids (n = 1509); and Group C, patients with underlying pituitary disease and exposure to systemic steroids (n = 365). Differences in severe COVID-19, requirement for oxygen therapy, intensive care unit admission, application of invasive ventilation or use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and COVID-19-related deaths between groups were then analyzed. Group C had the highest rates of hospitalization after COVID-19 infection (82.2%) and mortality within 30 days of infection (6.8%). Group B had a 1.3-fold increase in severe COVID-19 outcomes compared to Group A. Group C had 1.8-fold and 1.3-fold increases in severe COVID-19 outcomes compared to Group A and Group B, respectively. Group C also had 2.34 and 3.24 times higher mortality rates within 30 days of COVID-19 infection than Group A and Group B, respectively. In conclusion, patients with pituitary disease who are receiving systemic steroids have poorer outcomes and higher mortality associated with COVID-19. Therefore, thorough COVID-19 infection control is required in these patients.

Meta-Analysis of Glucocorticoids for Covid-19 Patients Not Receiving Oxygen

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids reduce mortality in hospitalized patients with severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), although a possible harm was documented in patients with Covid-19 not requiring oxygen. METHODS: We searched Embase, BioMed Central, medRxiv, bioRxiv, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for any randomized trial or matched study ever performed on adult patients with Covid-19 not receiving oxygen therapy treated with intravenous or oral glucocorticoids versus any comparator (standard therapy or placebo); there were no restrictions on dose or time of administration. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at the longest available follow-up. RESULTS: Five randomized trials and one propensity-matched study involving 6634 hospitalized patients not on oxygen were finally included (3704 received glucocorticoids and 2930 received standard treatment). The overall mortality of patients treated with glucocorticoids was significantly higher than the mortality of patients in the control group (509 of 3704 [14%] in the glucocorticoid group vs. 294 of 2930 [10%] in the control group; odds ratio, 1.56 [95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 1.92], with three articles reporting mortality events and contributing to the combined odds ratio; P<0.001; number needed to harm=27). CONCLUSIONS: Glucocorticoid use likely increases mortality in hospitalized patients with Covid-19 not receiving oxygen, with a number needed to harm of 27. (PROSPERO number CRD42022342996.)

Total escape of SARS-CoV-2 from dual monoclonal antibody therapy in an immunocompromised patient

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against the spike of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are effective therapeutic options to combat infections in high-risk patients. Here, we report the adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 to the mAb cocktail REGN-COV in a kidney transplant patient with hypogammaglobulinemia. Following mAb treatment, the patient did not clear the infection. During viral persistence, SARS-CoV-2 acquired three novel spike mutations. Neutralization and mouse protection analyses demonstrate a complete viral escape from REGN-COV at the expense of ACE-2 binding. Final clearance of the virus occurred upon reduction of the immunosuppressive regimen and total IgG substitution. Serology suggests that the development of highly neutralizing IgM rather than IgG substitution aids clearance. Our findings emphasise that selection pressure by mAbs on SARS-CoV-2 can lead to development of escape variants in immunocompromised patients. Thus, modification of immunosuppressive therapy, if possible, might be preferable to control and clearance of the viral infection.

Immunocompromised Host Pneumonia: Definitions and Diagnostic Criteria: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report

Pneumonia imposes a significant clinical burden on people with immunocompromising conditions. Millions of individuals live with compromised immunity because of cytotoxic cancer treatments, biological therapies, organ transplants, inherited and acquired immunodeficiencies, and other immune disorders. Despite broad awareness among clinicians that these patients are at increased risk for developing infectious pneumonia, immunocompromised people are often excluded from pneumonia clinical guidelines and treatment trials. The absence of a widely accepted definition for immunocompromised host pneumonia is a significant knowledge gap that hampers consistent clinical care and research for infectious pneumonia in these vulnerable populations. To address this gap, the American Thoracic Society convened a workshop whose participants had expertise in pulmonary disease, infectious diseases, immunology, genetics, and laboratory medicine, with the goal of defining the entity of immunocompromised host pneumonia and its diagnostic criteria.

The association between immunosuppressant and the outcome of COVID-19

We read with great interest the study investigating the association between immunosuppressant and the outcome of patients withs SARS-CoV-2 infection [1]. They found that the prior use of immunosuppressant would be associated with a significantly increased risk of death (adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.10–2.22) which was mainly driven by exposure to systemic glucocorticoids (aRR, 2.38; 95% CI 1.72–3.30). Overall, it is a well-designed study; however, we have three concerns about the findings of this study.

Melatonin: highlighting its use as a potential treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection

Numerous pharmaceutical drugs have been repurposed for use as treatments for COVID-19 disease. These drugs have not consistently demonstrated high efficacy in preventing or treating this serious condition and all have side effects to differing degrees. We encourage the continued consideration of the use of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent, melatonin, as a countermeasure to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. More than 140 scientific publications have identified melatonin as a likely useful agent to treat this disease. Moreover, the publications cited provide the rationale for the use of melatonin as a prophylactic agent against this condition. Melatonin has pan-antiviral effects and it diminishes the severity of viral infections and reduces the death of animals infected with numerous different viruses, including three different coronaviruses. Network analyses, which compared drugs used to treat SARS-CoV-2 in humans, also predicted that melatonin would be the most effective agent for preventing/treating COVID-19. Finally, when seriously infected COVID-19 patients were treated with melatonin, either alone or in combination with other medications, these treatments reduced the severity of infection, lowered the death rate, and shortened the duration of hospitalization. Melatonin’s ability to arrest SARS-CoV-2 infections may reduce health care exhaustion by limiting the need for hospitalization. Importantly, melatonin has a high safety profile over a wide range of doses and lacks significant toxicity. Some molecular processes by which melatonin resists a SARS-CoV-2 infection are summarized. The authors believe that all available, potentially beneficial drugs, including melatonin, that lack toxicity should be used in pandemics such as that caused by SARS-CoV-2.

The paradox of immunosuppressants and COVID-19

For millions of people, taking immunosuppressive medication to control or prevent disease is a daily reality [1]. Rheumatological disease, inflammatory lung disease, organ transplantation and graft-versus-host disease are but a few of the immune dysregulation syndromes that may require short- or long-term immunosuppressive therapy (IST). Patients taking ISTs are frequently regarded as immunocompromised, sharing risks of increased infection susceptibility with cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, those with profound neutropenia from haematological malignancies, and individuals living with HIV. In the context of the immune-mediated respiratory failure associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an apparent paradox arises: can ISTs both promote and protect against severe COVID-19?

Lessons learned from a large registry analysis show worse COVID-19 outcomes for patients previously exposed to glucocorticoidshttps://bit.ly/306rNrk