Developments in lung transplantation over the past decade

Bilateral orthotopic lung transplantation for the patient with lung-limited invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma: a case-based literature review

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) of lung is a unique subset of adenocarcinomas characterized by an intrapulmonary aerogenous spread resulting in multicentric, multilobar, and bilateral lesions with a low frequency of distant metastasis. The treatment options for IMA are limited, and advanced IMA has a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than a year. Lung transplantation performed in a handful of selected patients showed improved survival outcomes and clinical improvement. However, high postoperative recurrence rates have been observed and recurrence appeared to originate from the primary tumor in many cases. Techniques, such as non-sequential double lung transplantation utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass, have been performed to reduce recurrence. Here, we present the first case of bilateral lung transplantation employing cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient with stage ⅣA lung-limited IMA without lymph node or distant metastasis. At 15 months post-transplantation, the patient remains stable with no evidence of disease recurrence or organ rejection. Additionally, we describe the classification, clinical outcomes, protein expression, and genetic characteristics of IMA. IMA was previously classified as a subset of bronchioalveolar carcinoma (BAC), which is invasive and mucinous with goblet or columnar cells secreting mucin. We reviewed and summarized the lung transplantation cases reported to date for BAC. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival have been reported approximately 50% (range, 39-100) and 50% (range, 35-100), respectively. The literature shows these outcomes are comparable to bilateral lung transplantation performed for non-cancerous pulmonary disease.

Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Early After Lung Transplantation: A Prospective Study on Incidence, Pathogen Origin, and Outcome

BACKGROUND

Hospital-acquired (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are important complications early (<30 days) after lung transplantation (LT). However, current incidence, associated factors, and outcomes are not well reported.

METHODS

LT recipients transplanted at our institution (July 2019-January 2020 and October 2021-November 2022) were prospectively included. We assessed incidence and presentation of pneumonia and evaluated the impact of associated factors using regression models. We also evaluated molecular relatedness of respiratory pathogens collected peri-transplant and at pneumonia occurrence using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

RESULTS

In the first 30 days post-LT, 25/270 (9.3%) recipients were diagnosed with pneumonia (68% [17/25] VAP; 32% [8/25] HAP). Median time to pneumonia was 11 days (IQR, 7-13); 49% (132/270) of donor and 16% (44/270) of recipient respiratory peri-transplant cultures were positive. However, pathogens associated with pneumonia were not genetically related to either donor or recipient cultures at transplant, as determined by PFGE. Diagnosed pulmonary hypertension (HR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.62-12.08) and immunosuppression use (HR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.30-6.56) were pre-transplant factors associated with pneumonia. Pneumonia occurrence was associated with longer hospital stay (HR, 5.44; 95% CI, 2.22-13.37) and VAP with longer ICU stay (HR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.73-10.75) within the first 30 days post-transplantation; 30- and 90-day mortality were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospectively assessed early pneumonia incidence occurred in ∼10% of LT. Populations at increased risk for pneumonia occurrence include LT with pre-transplant pulmonary hypertension and pre-transplant immunosuppression. Pneumonia was associated with increased healthcare use, highlighting the need for further improvements by preferentially targeting higher-risk patients.

Management of superior vena cava syndrome during lung transplantation for a patient with cystic fibrosis

Central venous catheters including totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) have revolutionised the management of pulmonary infections and exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). While being better tolerated by the patient, these have allowed aggressive intravenous antibiotic therapies during recurrent hospitalisations. Given improvement in procedural strategies and operator experience, many patients with CF undergo lung transplants in the course of their disease nowadays. TIVADs can be associated with thrombosis leading to superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction and SVC syndrome which can pose a challenge, especially during the transplant surgery. We describe a case of successful management of SVC syndrome in a patient with CF undergoing a lung transplant, highlighting the strategies used to minimise risks associated with such a procedure.

ISHLT consensus statement on the perioperative use of ECLS in lung transplantation: Part II: Intraoperative considerations

The use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) throughout the perioperative phase of lung transplantation requires nuanced planning and execution by an integrated team of multidisciplinary experts. To date, no multidisciplinary consensus document has examined the perioperative considerations of how to best manage these patients. To address this challenge, this perioperative utilization of ECLS in lung transplantation consensus statement was approved for development by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Standards and Guidelines Committee. International experts across multiple disciplines, including cardiothoracic surgery, anesthesiology, critical care, pediatric pulmonology, adult pulmonology, pharmacy, psychology, physical therapy, nursing, and perfusion, were selected based on expertise and divided into subgroups examining the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. Following a comprehensive literature review, each subgroup developed recommendations to examine via a structured Delphi methodology. Following 2 rounds of Delphi consensus, a total of 39 recommendations regarding intraoperative considerations for ECLS in lung transplantation met consensus criteria. These recommendations focus on the planning, implementation, management, and monitoring of ECLS throughout the entire intraoperative period.

The combination of postmortem sevoflurane ventilation and in situ topical cooling provides improved 6 hours lung preservation in an uncontrolled DCD porcine model

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical series on donation after uncontrolled cardiovascular death (uDCD) reported successful transplantation of lungs preserved by pulmonary inflation up to 3 hours postmortem. This study aims to investigate the additive effects of in situ lowering of intrathoracic temperature and sevoflurane preconditioning on lung grafts in a porcine uDCD model.

METHODS

After uDCD induction, donor pigs were allocated to one of the following groups: control-static lung inflation only (SLI); TC - SLI + continuous intrapleural topical cooling (TC); or TC+Sevo - SLI + TC + sevoflurane. Lungs were retrieved 6 hours postasystole and evaluated via ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) for 6 hours. A left single lung transplant was performed using lungs from the best performing group, followed by 4 hours of graft evaluation.

RESULTS

Animals that received TC achieved intrathoracic temperature <15°C within 1 hour after chest filling of coolant. Only lungs from donors that received TC and TC+Sevo completed the planned postpreservation 6 hours EVLP assessment. Despite similar early performance of the 2 groups on EVLP, the TC+Sevo group was superior-associated with overall lower airway pressures, higher pulmonary compliances, less edema development, and less inflammation. Transplantation was performed using lungs from the TC+Sevo group, and excellent graft function was observed postreperfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of uDCD lungs with a combination of static lung inflation, TC and sevoflurane treatment maintains good pulmonary function up to 6 hours postmortem with excellent early post lung transplant function. These interventions may significantly expand the clinical utilization of uDCD donor lungs.

Concomitant Heart and Lung Surgery During Lung Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

There is limited data concerning concomitant cardiac and lung surgery outcomes during lung transplantation (LTx). While some evidence suggests that cardiac surgery during LTx has no significant impact on surgical outcomes, scarce data examines the role of concomitant lung surgery (CLS). This study compares the survival outcomes of concomitant cardiac and lung surgeries during LTx.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all single and double LTx patients from March 2012 to June 2023 at a single center was performed (n = 1099). Patients were stratified into three concomitant surgical groups: concomitant cardiac surgery (CCS), CLS, and no concomitant surgeries. Groups were compared on recipient demographics, diagnosis, and surgical intervention using analysis of variance and chi-square tests. Survival (5 y) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and univariable Cox proportional hazard model where P value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In total, 1099 patients were analyzed in this study; 965 had no concomitant surgery, 100 had CCS (mode: coronary artery bypass grafting, n = 75), and 34 had CLS (mode: lung volume reduction surgery, n = 14). Between the three surgical groups, there was no significant difference in body mass index (P = 0.091), total ischemic time (P = 0.194), induction (P = 0.140), or cause of death (P = 0.240). Lung allocation score and length of stay were significantly higher in the concomitant surgical groups, especially the CLS group when compared to the no concomitant surgery group (P = 0.002, P = 004). Patients with no concomitant surgery had a higher incidence of single LTx and off-pump utilization than concomitant surgical groups (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests found no significant difference in survival between groups (P = 0.849). This result is supported by Cox proportional hazard model with no significant difference in mortality risk between the CCS group (P = 0.522) and CLS group (P = 0.936) compared to no concomitant surgery during LTx.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides promising data indicating that individuals undergoing concomitant heart or lung surgery during LTx have similar survival outcomes to those exclusively undergoing LTx. These results highlight the potential advantages of utilizing LTx to address concurrent thoracic surgical needs, such as coronary revascularization. This holds implications for optimizing patient care and decision-making when complex thoracic interventions are necessary.

The Lymphatic Highway: How Lymphatics Drive Lung Health and Disease

The pulmonary lymphatic system has emerged as a critical regulator of lung homeostasis and a key contributor to the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases. As the primary conduit responsible for maintaining fluid balance and facilitating immune cell trafficking, the integrity of lymphatic vessels is essential for preserving normal pulmonary structure and function. Lymphatic abnormalities manifest across a broad spectrum of pulmonary disorders, underscoring their significance in respiratory health and disease. This review provides an overview of pulmonary lymphatic biology and delves into the involvement of lymphatics in four major lung diseases: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), asthma, and lung transplant rejection. We examine how lymphatic abnormalities manifest in each of these conditions and investigate the mechanisms through which lymphatic remodeling and dysfunction contribute to disease progression. Furthermore, we explore the therapeutic potential of targeting the lymphatic system to ameliorate these debilitating respiratory conditions. Despite the current knowledge, several crucial questions remain unanswered, such as the spatial and temporal dynamics of lymphatic changes, the molecular crosstalk between lymphatics and the lung microenvironment, and the distinction between protective versus detrimental lymphatic phenotypes. Unraveling these mysteries holds the promise of identifying novel molecular regulators, characterizing lymphatic endothelial phenotypes, and uncovering bioactive mediators. By harnessing this knowledge, we can pave the way for the development of innovative disease-modifying therapies targeting the lymphatic highway in lung disorders.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of lung transplantation in patients with severe COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize the clinical experience of patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or pulmonary fibrosis (PF) receiving lung transplantation (LTx) and compare the characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 LTx patients.

METHODS

A literature search of online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wan Fang databases) was performed regarding LTx for COVID-19-associated ARDS or PF. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD2024507647).

RESULTS

Eight eligible studies were included with 478 COVID-19 LTx patients and 163 non-COVID-19 LTx patients. In COVID-19 LTx patients, the pooled hospital mortality and follow-up survival rate was 0.00% (95% CI 0.00-0.03) and 87.40% (95% CI 0.76-0.96). Compared to non-COVID-19 LTx patients, COVID-19 LTx patients were associated with significantly higher rate of primary graft dysfunction (odds ratio [OR] 8.72, 95% CI 3.54-21.47, P < 0.001) but significantly higher follow-up survival rate (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.02-6.01, P = 0.04), within an overall similar follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS or PF, LTx offers acceptable short-term outcomes and is suggested as a viable lifesaving treatment.

Pushing the Survival Bar Higher: Two Decades of Innovation in Lung Transplantation

Survival after lung transplantation has significantly improved during the last two decades. The refinement of the already existing extracorporeal life support (ECLS) systems, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and the introduction of new techniques for donor lung optimization, such as ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), have allowed the extension of transplant indication to patients with end-stage lung failure after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the expansion of the donor organ pool, due to the better evaluation and optimization of extended-criteria donor (ECD) lungs and of donors after circulatory death (DCD). The close monitoring of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) has allowed the early recognition of pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which requires a completely different treatment and has a worse prognosis than acute cellular rejection (ACR). As such, the standardization of patient selection and post-transplant management has significantly contributed to this positive trend, especially at high-volume centers. This review focuses on lung transplantation after ARDS, on the role of EVLP in lung donor expansion, on ECMO as a principal cardiopulmonary support system in lung transplantation, and on the diagnosis and therapy of pulmonary AMR.

The application of ERAS in the perioperative period management of patients for lung transplantation

Objective

To explore the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of lung transplantation.

Methods

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 27 lung transplant patients who underwent ERAS during the perioperative period, while 12 lung transplant patients receiving routine treatment served as controls. General information was collected, including the specific implementation plan of ERAS, the incidence of complications and survival rate during the perioperative period (<30 d), postoperative hospitalization indicators, the postoperative length of stay, and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores.

Results

Comparison of postoperative hospitalization indicators, the ERAS group compared with the control group, there were significant differences in postoperative ICU stay time (2.0(2.0,4.0) vs 4.5(3.0,6.0), p = 0.005), postoperative hospital stay time (18(15,26) vs 24(19.5,32.75), p = 0.016), duration of nasogastric tube (3(2,3) vs 4(2.25,4.75), p = 0.023), and first ambulation time (4(3,5) vs 5.8(4.5,7.5), p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in postoperative invasive mechanical ventilation time, time to eat after surgery, duration of urinary catheter and duration of chest tube between the ERAS group and the control group (p>0.05). The perioperative survival of the ERAS group was 81.5%, which was higher than the control group (66.7%), but there is no statistically significant difference. Comparison of post-extubation NRS scores, the ERAS group had lower NRS scores at 12 h (5.30 ± 0.14 vs 6.25 ± 0.75), 24 h (3.44 ± 0.64 vs 5.58 ± 0.9), 48 h (2.74 ± 0.66 vs 4.08 ± 0.79) and 72 h (1.11 ± 0.80 vs 2.33 ± 0.49) than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). Intra-group comparison, post-extubation 12 h comparison post-extubation 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, the NRS scores showed a gradual downward trend, the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). In the comparison of perioperative complications, the ERAS group had a lower postoperative infection incidence than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (44.4% vs 83.3%, p = 0.037). The ERAS group had lower postoperative delirium incidence than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (11.1% vs 50%, p = 0.014). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute rejection, primary graft loss (PGD), gastrointestinal (GI) complications and airway complications between two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion

The ERAS can be applied to lung transplant patients to relieve postoperative pain, shorten postoperative tube time, and shorten postoperative stay. Perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation exercises are beneficial to reducing the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications.

A modular simulation framework for organ allocation

BACKGROUND

We describe and validate a new simulation framework addressing important limitations of the Simulated Allocation Models (SAMs) long used to project population effects of transplant policy changes.

METHODS

We developed the Computational Open-source Model for Evaluating Transplantation (COMET), an agent-based model simulating interactions of individual donors and candidates over time to project population outcomes. COMET functionality is organized into interacting modules. Donors and candidates are synthetically generated using data-driven probability models which are adaptable to account for ongoing or hypothetical donor/candidate population trends and evolving disease management. To validate the first implementation of COMET, COMET-Lung, we attempted to reproduce lung transplant outcomes for U.S. adults from 2018-2019 and in the 6 months following adoption of the Composite Allocation Score (CAS) for lung transplant.

RESULTS

Simulated (median [Interquartile Range, IQR]) vs observed outcomes for 2018-2019 were: 0.162 [0.157, 0.167] vs 0.170 waitlist deaths per waitlist year; 1.25 [1.23, 1.28] vs 1.26 transplants per waitlist year; 0.115 [0.112, 0.118] vs 0.113 post-transplant deaths per patient year; 202 [102, 377] vs 165 nautical miles travel distance. The model accurately predicted the observed precipitous decrease in transplants received by type O lung candidates in the six months following CAS implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

COMET-Lung closely reproduced most observed outcomes. The use of synthetic populations in the COMET framework paves the way for examining possible transplant policy and clinical practice changes in populations reflecting realistic future states. Its flexible, modular nature can accelerate development of features to address specific research or policy questions across multiple organs.

Evaluation of the Current Urgency-Based Lung Allocation System in Korea with Simulation of the Eurotransplant Lung Allocation Score

PURPOSE

Due to the shortage of lung donors relative to the number of patients waiting for lung transplantation (LTx), more than one-third of patients on the waitlist have died without receiving LTx in Korea. Therefore, the importance of fair and effective allocation policies has been emphasized. This study investigated the characteristics of the current urgency-based allocation system in Korea by simulating the Eurotransplant lung allocation score (ET-LAS) using a nationwide multi-institutional registry for LTx in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY), along with additional retrospective data for ET-LAS calculation. A total of 194 patients were included in this study between January 2015 and December 2019. The Korean urgency definition classifies an LTx candidate as having statuses 0-3 according to urgency. The ET-LAS was analyzed according to the Korean urgency status.

RESULTS

In total, 92 patients received lung transplants at status 0, 85 at status 1, and 17 at status 2/3. The ET-LAS showed a bimodal distribution with distinct peaks corresponding to status 0 and non-status 0. There was no significant difference in the ET-LAS among non-status 0 patients. In logistic and decision tree analyses, oxygen supplementation methods, particularly oxygen masks and high-flow nasal cannulas, were significantly associated with a high ET-LAS (≥50) among non-status 0 patients.

CONCLUSION

Simulation of the ET-LAS with KOTRY data showed that the Korean urgency definition may not allocate lungs by urgency, especially for patients in non-status 0; therefore, it needs to be revised.

A single-centre analysis of lung transplantation outcomes in recipients aged 70 or older

OBJECTIVES

As life expectancies continue to increase, a greater proportion of older patients will require lung transplants (LTs). However, there are no well-defined age cutoffs for which LT can be performed safely. At our high-volume LT centre, we explored outcomes for LT recipients ≥70 vs <70 years old.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-centre study of survival after LT among older recipients. Data were stratified by recipient age (≥70 vs <70 years old) and procedure type (single versus double LT). Demographics and clinical variables were compared using Chi-square test and 2 sample t-test. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test with propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 988 LTs were performed at our centre over 10 years, including 289 LTs in patients ≥70 years old and 699 LTs in patients <70 years old. The recipient groups differed significantly by race (P < 0.0001), sex (P = 0.003) and disease aetiology (P < 0.0001). Older patients were less likely to receive a double LT compared to younger patients (P < 0.0001) and had lower rates of intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (P = 0.019) and shorter length of stay (P = 0.001). Both groups had overall high 1-year survival (85.8% vs 89.1%, respectively). Survival did not differ between groups after propensity matching (P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed high survival for older and younger LT recipients. There were no statistically significant differences observed in survival between the groups after propensity matching, however, a trend in favour of younger patients was observed.

Creating synthetic populations in transplantation: A Bayesian approach enabling simulation without registry re-sampling

Computer simulation has played a pivotal role in analyzing alternative organ allocation strategies in transplantation. The current approach to producing cohorts of organ donors and candidates for individual-level simulation requires directly re-sampling retrospective data from a transplant registry. This historical data may reflect outmoded policies and practices as well as systemic inequities in candidate listing, limiting contemporary applicability of simulation results. We describe the development of an alternative approach for generating synthetic donors and candidates using hierarchical Bayesian network probability models. We developed two Bayesian networks to model dependencies among 10 donor and 36 candidate characteristics relevant to waitlist survival, donor-candidate matching, and post-transplant survival. We estimated parameters for each model using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data. For 100 donor and 100 candidate synthetic populations generated, proportions for each categorical donor or candidate attribute, respectively, fell within one percentage point of observed values; the interquartile ranges (IQRs) of each continuous variable contained the corresponding SRTR observed median. Comparisons of synthetic to observed stratified distributions demonstrated the ability of the method to capture complex joint variability among multiple characteristics. We also demonstrated how changing two upstream population parameters can exert cascading effects on multiple relevant clinical variables in a synthetic population. Generating synthetic donor and candidate populations in transplant simulation may help overcome critical limitations related to the re-sampling of historical data, allowing developers and decision makers to customize the parameters of these populations to reflect realistic or hypothetical future states.

Pulmonary Diseases in Older Patients: Understanding and Addressing the Challenges

As the global population ages, pulmonary diseases among older people have emerged as a significant and growing public health concern. The increasing incidence of these conditions has led to higher rates of morbidity and mortality among older adults. This perspective study offers a thorough overview of the prevalent pulmonary diseases affecting the elderly demographic. It delves into the challenges encountered during the diagnosis and management of these conditions in older individuals, considering factors such as comorbidities, functional limitations, and medication complexities. Furthermore, innovative strategies and personalized interventions such as precision medicine, advanced therapies, telemedicine solutions, and patient-centered support systems aimed at enhancing the care provided to older individuals grappling with pulmonary disorders are thoroughly explored. By addressing the unique needs and complexities of this vulnerable population, healthcare systems can strive towards improving outcomes and enhancing the quality of life for elderly individuals affected by pulmonary diseases.

Survival and Long-Term Functional Status of COVID-19 Patients Requiring Prolonged Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

Rationale: Severe cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may require prolonged (>28 d) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In nonresolving disease, recovery is uncertain, and lung transplant may be proposed. Objectives: This study aims to identify the variables influencing survival and to describe the functional status of these patients at 6 months. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study including patients requiring ECMO support for coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related ARDS for >28 days. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression in preselected variables and in least absolute shrinkage and selection operator selected variables. In a post hoc analysis to account for confounders and differences in awake strategy use by centers, treatment effects of the awake strategy were estimated using an augmented inverse probability weighting estimator with robust standard errors clustered by center. Results: Between March 15, 2020 and March 15, 2021, 120 patients required ECMO for >28 days. Sixty-four patients (53.3%) survived decannulation, 62 (51.7%) were alive at hospital discharge, and 61 (50.8%) were alive at 6-month follow-up. In the multivariate analysis, age (1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.15; P = 0.002) and an awake ECMO strategy (defined as the patient being awake, cooperative, and performing rehabilitation and physiotherapy with or without invasive mechanical ventilation at any time during the extracorporeal support) (0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.47; P = 0.003) were found to be predictors of hospital survival. At 6 months, 51 (42.5%) patients were at home, 42 (84.3%) of them without oxygen therapy. A cutoff point of 47 ECMO days had a 100% (95% CI, 76.8-100%) sensitivity and 60% (95% CI, 44.3-73.6%) specificity for oxygen therapy at 6 months, with 100% specificity being found in 97 days. Conclusions: Patients with COVID-19 who require ECMO for >28 days can survive with nonlimiting lung impairment. Age and an awake ECMO strategy may be associated with survival. Longer duration of support correlates with need for oxygen therapy at 6 months.

The Immunopathology of Pulmonary Rejection after Murine Lung Transplantation

To improve outcomes following lung transplantation, it is essential to understand the immunological mechanisms that result in chronic graft failure. The associated clinical syndrome is termed chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which is known to be induced by alloimmune-dependent (i.e., rejection) and alloimmune-independent factors (e.g., infections, reflux and environmental factors). We aimed to explore the alloimmune-related mechanism, i.e., pulmonary rejection. In this study, we use a murine orthotopic left lung transplant model using isografts and allografts (C57BL/6 or BALB/c as donors to C57BL/6 recipients), with daily immunosuppression (10 mg/kg cyclosporin A and 1.6 mg/kg methylprednisolone). Serial sacrifice was performed at days 1, 7 and 35 post-transplantation (n = 6 at each time point for each group). Left transplanted lungs were harvested, a single-cell suspension was made and absolute numbers of immune cells were quantified using multicolor flow cytometry. The rejection process followed the principles of a classic immune response, including innate but mainly adaptive immune cells. At day 7 following transplantation, the numbers of interstitial macrophages, monocytes, dendritic cells, NK cells, NKT cells, CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T and B cells were increased in allografts compared with isografts. Only dendritic cells and CD4+ T cells remained elevated at day 35 in allografts. Our study provides insights into the immunological mechanisms of true pulmonary rejection after murine lung transplantation. These results might be important in further research on diagnostic evaluation and treatment for CLAD.

Molecular monitoring of lung allograft health: is it ready for routine clinical use?

Maintenance of long-term lung allograft health in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) requires a fine balancing act between providing sufficient immunosuppression to reduce the risk of rejection whilst at the same time not over-immunosuppressing individuals and exposing them to the myriad of immunosuppressant drug side-effects that can cause morbidity and mortality. At present, lung transplant physicians only have limited and rather blunt tools available to assist them with this task. Although therapeutic drug monitoring provides clinically useful information about single time point and longitudinal exposure of LTRs to immunosuppressants, it lacks precision in determining the functional level of immunosuppression that an individual is experiencing. There is a significant gap in our ability to monitor lung allograft health and therefore tailor optimal personalised immunosuppression regimens. Molecular diagnostics performed on blood, bronchoalveolar lavage or lung tissue that can detect early signs of subclinical allograft injury, differentiate rejection from infection or distinguish cellular from humoral rejection could offer clinicians powerful tools in protecting lung allograft health. In this review, we look at the current evidence behind molecular monitoring in lung transplantation and ask if it is ready for routine clinical use. Although donor-derived cell-free DNA and tissue transcriptomics appear to be the techniques with the most immediate clinical potential, more robust data are required on their performance and additional clinical value beyond standard of care.

Inhibition of Prostaglandin-Degrading Enzyme 15-PGDH Mitigates Acute Murine Lung Allograft Rejection

PURPOSE

Acute rejection is a frequent complication among lung transplant recipients and poses substantial therapeutic challenges. 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH), an enzyme responsible for the inactivation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), has recently been implicated in inflammatory lung diseases. However, the role of 15-PGDH in lung transplantation rejection remains elusive. The present study was undertaken to examine the expression of 15-PGDH in rejected lung allografts and whether inhibition of 15-PGDH ameliorates acute lung allograft rejection.

METHODS

Orthotopic mouse lung transplantations were performed between donor and recipient mice of the same strain or allogeneic mismatched pairs. The expression of 15-PGDH in mouse lung grafts was measured. The efficacy of a selective 15-PGDH inhibitor (SW033291) in ameliorating acute rejection was assessed through histopathological examination, micro-CT imaging, and pulmonary function tests. Additionally, the mechanism underlying the effects of SW033291 treatment was explored using CD8+ T cells isolated from mouse lung allografts.

RESULTS

Increased 15-PGDH expression was observed in rejected allografts and allogeneic CD8+ T cells. Treatment with SW033291 led to an accumulation of PGE2, modulation of CD8+ T-cell responses and mitochondrial activity, and improved allograft function and survival.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides new insights into the role of 15-PGDH in acute lung rejection and highlights the therapeutic potential of inhibiting 15-PGDH for enhancing graft survival. The accumulation of PGE2 and modulation of CD8+ T-cell responses represent potential mechanisms underlying the benefits of 15-PGDH inhibition in this model. Our findings provide impetus for further exploring 15-PGDH as a target for improving lung transplantation outcomes.

Defining a natural killer cell-enriched molecular rejection-like state in lung transplant transbronchial biopsies

In lung transplantation, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosed using the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria is uncommon compared with other organs, and previous studies failed to find molecular AMR (ABMR) in lung biopsies. However, understanding of ABMR has changed with the recognition that ABMR in kidney transplants is often donor-specific antibody (DSA)-negative and associated with natural killer (NK) cell transcripts. We therefore searched for a similar molecular ABMR-like state in transbronchial biopsies using gene expression microarray results from the INTERLUNG study (#NCT02812290). After optimizing rejection-selective transcript sets in a training set (N = 488), the resulting algorithms separated an NK cell-enriched molecular rejection-like state (NKRL) from T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR)/Mixed in a test set (N = 488). Applying this approach to all 896 transbronchial biopsies distinguished 3 groups: no rejection, TCMR/Mixed, and NKRL. Like TCMR/Mixed, NKRL had increased expression of all-rejection transcripts, but NKRL had increased expression of NK cell transcripts, whereas TCMR/Mixed had increased effector T cell and activated macrophage transcripts. NKRL was usually DSA-negative and not recognized as AMR clinically. TCMR/Mixed was associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction, reduced one-second forced expiratory volume at the time of biopsy, and short-term graft failure, but NKRL was not. Thus, some lung transplants manifest a molecular state similar to DSA-negative ABMR in kidney and heart transplants, but its clinical significance must be established.

[Ventilatory management of SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory failure]

COVID-19 pneumonia presents several particularities in its clinical presentation (cytokine storm, silent hypoxemia, thrombo-embolic risk) and may lead to a number of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) phenotypes. While the optimal oxygenation strategy in cases of hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) is still under debate, ventilatory management of COVID-19-related ARF has confirmed the efficacy of high-flow oxygen therapy and restored interest in other ventilatory approaches such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and noninvasive ventilation involving a helmet, which due to patient overflow are sometimes implemented outside of critical care units. However, further studies are still needed to determine which patients should be given which oxygenation technique, and under which conditions they require invasive mechanical ventilation, given that delayed initiation potentially burdens prognosis. During invasive mechanical ventilation, ventral decubitus and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have become increasingly prevalent. While innovative therapies such as awake prone position or lung transplantation have likewise been developed, their indications, modalities and efficacy remain to be determined.

Update in lung transplantation: anesthetic considerations

The field of lung transplantation (LTx) has expanded rapidly since its inception in the early 1960s with the work of James Hardy and colleagues at the University of Mississippi from the work of local single specialty physicians into an international multidisciplinary specialty. Advancements throughout the next several decades have led to the completion of over 70,000 lung transplants worldwide. The unique challenges presented by patients with end-stage lung disease have both evolved and remained consistent since then, yet these challenges are being answered with major improvements and advancements in perioperative care in the 21st century. The current practice of LTx medicine is fundamentally multidisciplinary, and members of the LTx team includes surgeons, physicians, and allied health staff. The integration of anesthesiologists into the LTx team as well as the multidisciplinary nature of LTx necessitates anesthetic considerations to be closely incorporated into emerging surgical, medical, and systems techniques for patient care. This review discusses a host of emerging strategies across the spectrum of LTx, including efforts to expand the donor pool, utilization of perioperative extracorporeal life support, perioperative echocardiography, and anesthetic techniques to mitigate primary graft dysfunction that have all contributed to improved long term outcomes in LTx patients.

Lung transplant survival with past and concomitant cardiac revascularization

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease is common among lung transplant (LTx) candidates and has historically been viewed as a contraindication to the procedure. Survival outcomes of lung transplant recipients with concomitant coronary artery disease who had prior or perioperative revascularization remain a topic of conversation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all single and double lung transplant patients from Feb, 2012 to Aug, 2021 at a single center was performed (n = 880). Patients were split into 4 groups: (1) those who received a preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention, (2) those who received preoperative coronary artery bypass grafting, (3) those who received coronary artery bypass grafting during transplantation, and (4) those who had lung transplantation without revascularization. Groups were compared for demographics, surgical procedure, and survival outcomes using STATA Inc. A p value< 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Most patients receiving LTx were male and white. Pump type (p = 0.810), total ischemic time (p = 0.994), warm ischemic time (p = 0.479), length of stay (p = 0.751), and lung allocation score (p = 0.332) were not significantly different between the four groups. The no revascularization group was younger than the other groups (p<0.01). The diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis was predominant in all groups except the no revascularization group. The pre-coronary artery bypass grafting group had a higher portion of single LTx procedures (p = 0.014). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significantly different survival rates after post-LTx between the groups (p = 0.471). Cox Regression analysis showed diagnosis significantly impacted survival rates (p 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative or intraoperative revascularization did not affect survival outcomes in lung transplant patients. Selected patients with coronary artery disease may benefit when intervened during lung transplant procedures.

Contribution of skin cancer to overall healthcare costs of lung transplantation in Queensland, Australia

BACKGROUND

Skin cancers are a major source of morbidity in lung transplant recipients, but the relative costs associated with their treatment are unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 90 lung transplant recipients from enrollment in the Skin Tumors in Allograft Recipients study in 2013-2015, until mid-2016. We undertook a cost analysis to quantify the health system costs relating to the index transplant episode and ongoing costs for 4 years. Linked data from surveys, Australian Medicare claims, and hospital accounting systems were used, and generalized linear models were employed.

RESULTS

Median initial hospitalization costs of lung transplantation were AU$115,831 (interquartile range (IQR) $87,428-$177,395). In total, 57 of 90 (63%) participants were treated for skin cancers during follow-up at a total cost of AU$44,038. Among these 57, total government costs per person (mostly of pharmaceuticals) over 4 years were median AU$68,489 (IQR $44,682-$113,055) vs AU$59,088 (IQR $38,190-$94,906) among those without skin cancer, with the difference predominantly driven by more doctors' visits, and higher pathology and procedural costs. Healthcare costs overall were also significantly higher in those treated for skin cancers (cost ratio 1.50, 95%CI: 1.09, 2.06) after adjusting for underlying lung disease, age on enrollment, years of immunosuppression, and the number of treated comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin cancer care is a small component of overall costs. While all lung transplant recipients with comorbidities have substantial healthcare costs, those affected by skin cancer incur even greater healthcare costs than those without, highlighting the importance of skin cancer control.

Innovative three-dimensional models for understanding mechanisms underlying lung diseases: powerful tools for translational research

Chronic lung diseases result from alteration and/or destruction of lung tissue, inevitably causing decreased breathing capacity and quality of life for patients. While animal models have paved the way for our understanding of pathobiology and the development of therapeutic strategies for disease management, their translational capacity is limited. There is, therefore, a well-recognised need for innovative in vitro models to reflect chronic lung diseases, which will facilitate mechanism investigation and the advancement of new treatment strategies. In the last decades, lungs have been modelled in healthy and diseased conditions using precision-cut lung slices, organoids, extracellular matrix-derived hydrogels and lung-on-chip systems. These three-dimensional models together provide a wide spectrum of applicability and mimicry of the lung microenvironment. While each system has its own limitations, their advantages over traditional two-dimensional culture systems, or even over animal models, increases the value of in vitro models. Generating new and advanced models with increased translational capacity will not only benefit our understanding of the pathobiology of lung diseases but should also shorten the timelines required for discovery and generation of new therapeutics. This article summarises and provides an outline of the European Respiratory Society research seminar "Innovative 3D models for understanding mechanisms underlying lung diseases: powerful tools for translational research", held in Lisbon, Portugal, in April 2022. Current in vitro models developed for recapitulating healthy and diseased lungs are outlined and discussed with respect to the challenges associated with them, efforts to develop best practices for model generation, characterisation and utilisation of models and state-of-the-art translational potential.

Diagnostic accuracy of eNose 'breathprints' for therapeutic drug monitoring of Tacrolimus trough levels in lung transplantation

In order to prevent long-term immunity-related complications after lung transplantation, close monitoring of immunosuppressant levels using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is paramount. Novel electronic nose (eNose) technology may be a non-invasive alternative to the current invasive procedures for TDM. We investigated the diagnostic and categorization capacity of eNose breathprints for Tacrolimus trough blood plasma levels (TACtrough) in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). We performed eNose measurements in stable LTR attending the outpatient clinic. We evaluated (1) the correlation between eNose measurements and TACtrough, (2) the diagnostic capacity of eNose technology for TACtrough, and (3) the accuracy of eNose technology for categorization of TACtroughinto three clinically relevant categories (low: <7µg ml-1, medium: 7-10µg ml-1, and high: >10µg ml-1). A total of 186 measurements from 86 LTR were included. There was a weak but statistically significant correlation (r= 0.21,p= 0.004) between the eNose measurements and TACtrough. The root mean squared error of prediction for the diagnostic capacity was 3.186 in the training and 3.131 in the validation set. The accuracy of categorization ranged between 45%-63% for the training set and 52%-69% in the validation set. There is a weak correlation between eNose breathprints and TACtroughin LTR. However, the diagnostic as well as categorization capacity for TACtroughusing eNose breathprints is too inaccurate to be applicable in TDM.

Extracellular vesicles: a potential new player in antibody-mediated rejection in lung allograft recipients

Identification of recipients with pre-existing antibodies and cross-matching of recipient sera with donor lymphocytes have reduced the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after human lung transplantation. However, AMR is still common and requires not only immediate intervention but also has long-term consequences including an increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). The mechanisms resulting in AMR remain largely unknown due to the variation in clinical and histopathological features among lung transplant recipients; however, several reports have demonstrated a strong association between the development of antibodies against mismatched donor human leucocyte antigens [donor-specific antibodies (DSAs)] and AMR. In addition, the development of antibodies against lung self-antigens (K alpha1 tubulin and collagen V) also plays a vital role in AMR pathogenesis, either alone or in combination with DSAs. In the current article, we will review the existing literature regarding the association of DSAs with AMR, along with clinical diagnostic features and current treatment options for AMR. We will also discuss the role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in the immune-related pathogenesis of AMR, which can lead to CLAD.

Lung Cancer in Lung Transplant Recipients: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Characteristics and Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate clinical and radiologic characteristics of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients and evaluate the treatment course and prognosis.

METHODS

The study included 448 patients who underwent lung transplant between 2005 and 2021. All patients had pretransplant chest computed tomography (CT), 429 patients had posttransplant CT, whereas 19 had no posttransplant CT (median number of posttransplant CT, 6; range, 0-24). Medical records of these patients were reviewed to identify patients who developed lung cancer after lung transplant. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography/CT at the time of lung cancer diagnoses were reviewed to obtain imaging features. Demographics, tumor histology, stages, and survival were compared using Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Among 448 lung transplant recipients with a median follow-up of 71.3 months after lung transplant, 15 patients (3.3%) developed posttransplant lung cancer (13 unilateral, 2 bilateral; 10 men, 5 women; median age, 63.1 years; median time from transplantation to cancer diagnosis, 3.1 years). Twelve cancers were in native lung, and 3 were in transplanted lung. The incidence of lung cancer was higher in single lung transplant recipients than in bilateral lung transplant recipients (10.3% vs 0.6%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Imaging manifestations varied according to tumor stages. Among 12 patients treated for lung cancer, 2 patients developed posttreatment acute respiratory distress syndrome. The median survival from cancer diagnosis of cancer was 6.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant lung cancer was noted in 3% of lung transplant recipients and was more common in unilateral transplant recipients. The prognosis upon diagnosis was poor with rapid clinical deterioration and serious posttreatment complications.

Timing of Lung Transplant Referral in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Lung Injury Supported by ECMO

Severe respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 often requires mechanical ventilation, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In rare cases, lung transplantation (LTx) may be considered as a last resort. However, uncertainties remain about patient selection and optimal timing for referral and listing. This retrospective study analyzed patients with severe COVID-19 who were supported by veno-venous ECMO and listed for LTx between July 2020 and June 2022. Out of the 20 patients in the study population, four who underwent LTx were excluded. The clinical characteristics of the remaining 16 patients were compared, including nine who recovered and seven who died while awaiting LTx. The median duration from hospitalization to listing was 85.5 days, and the median duration on the waitlist was 25.5 days. Younger age was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of recovery without LTx after a median of 59 days on ECMO, compared to those who died at a median of 99 days. In patients with severe COVID-19-induced lung damage supported by ECMO, referral to LTx should be delayed for 8-10 weeks after ECMO initiation, particularly for younger patients who have a higher probability of spontaneous recovery and may not require LTx.

Lung transplantation for coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome/fibrosis: silver lining of a global pandemic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The COVID-19 pandemic revolutionized the field of lung transplantation, as lung transplant is now an acceptable life-saving therapy for select patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), while prior to the pandemic, few transplants were performed for ARDS. This review article details the establishment of lung transplantation as a viable therapy for COVID-19-related respiratory failure, how to evaluate COVID-19 patients for lung transplant, and specific technical considerations for the operation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lung transplantation is a life-altering treatment for two distinct cohorts of COVID-19 patients: those with irrecoverable COVID-19-associated ARDS and those who recover from the initial COVID-19 insult but are left with chronic, debilitating post-COVID fibrosis. Both cohorts require stringent selection criteria and extensive evaluation to be listed for lung transplantation. As the first COVID-19 lung transplantation was recently performed, long-term outcomes are lacking; however, short-term outcome data of COVID-19-related lung transplants are promising.

SUMMARY

Given the challenges and complexities associated with COVID-19-related lung transplantation, strict patient selection and evaluation are required with an experienced multidisciplinary team at a high-volume/resource center. With promising short-term outcome data, ongoing studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes of COVID-19-related lung transplants.

Specific HLA-DQ risk epitope mismatches are associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation

A high-risk epitope mismatch (REM) (found in DQA1*05 + DQB1*02/DQB1*03:01) is associated with de novo donor-specific antibodies (dn-DSA) after lung transplant (LTx). Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a barrier to LTx survival. The aims of this study were to measure the association between DQ REM and risk of CLAD and death after LTx. A retrospective analysis of LTx recipients at a single centre was conducted between Jan-2014 and Apr-2019. Molecular typing at HLA-DQA/DBQ identified DQ REM. Multivariable competing risk and Cox regression models were used to measure the association between DQ REM and time-to-CLAD and time-to-death. DQ REM was detected in 96/268(35.8%) and DQ REM dn-DSA detected in 34/96(35.4%). CLAD occurred in 78(29.1%) and 98(36.6%) recipients died during follow-up. When analysed as a baseline predictor, DQ REM status was associated with CLAD (SHR 2.19 95%CI 1.40-3.43; p=0.001). After adjustment for time dependent variables, dn-DQ-REM DSA (SHR 2.43 95%CI 1.10-5.38; p=0.029) and A-grade rejection score (SHR 1.22 95%CI 1.11-1.35; p=<0.001), but not DQ REM status was associated with CLAD. DQ REM was not associated with death (HR 1.18 95%CI 0.72-1.93; p=0.51). Classification of DQ REM may identify patients at risk of poor outcomes and should be incorporated into clinical decision-making.

Utility and safety of airway stenting in airway stenosis after lung transplant: A systematic review

Background

Airway complications seriously affect the clinical outcomes and long-term prognosis of lung-transplantation patients. Airway stenting provides effective palliation for patients with airway stenosis. However, a lack of consensus regarding the efficacy and safety of airway stents in airway stenosis after lung transplantation. This study critically evaluated all available evidence regarding this concern.

Methods

We retrieved studies from EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they reported baseline characteristics of airway complications after lung transplantation, stenting for airway stenosis, or prognosis.

Results

In total, 279 papers were screened and 17 papers were included in final analysis. The short-term efficacy of airway stenting was assessed in almost all studies, with immediate palliation in symptom and improved pulmonary function reported. Eleven of the included studies evaluated the long-term efficacy of stent therapy, with no distinct lung function. The median overall survival time was 1,124 (95% confidence interval 415–1,833) days in stented patients only. Stent-related complications are common regardless of the material; However, serious complications are rare and can be improved with routine management.

Conclusion

We demonstrated that airway stenting is a safe and effective method to treat airway stenosis after lung transplantation. The short-term effect was significant, while the long-term efficacy on survival rate needed further investigations.

Systematic review registration

www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022364427.

Impact of Culture-Positive Preservation Fluid on Early Morbidity and Mortality After Lung Transplantation

The prevalence, risk factors and outcomes associated with culture-positive preservation fluid (PF) after lung transplantation (LT) are unknown. From January 2015 to December 2020, the microbiologic analyses of PF used to store the cold ischaemia-placed lung graft(s) of 271 lung transplant patients were retrospectively studied. Culture-positive PF was defined as the growth of any microorganism. Eighty-three (30.6%) patients were transplanted with lung grafts stored in a culture-positive PF. One-third of culture-positive PF were polymicrobial. Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were the most frequently isolated microorganisms. No risk factors for culture-positive PF based on donor characteristics were identified. Forty (40/83; 48.2%) patients had postoperative pneumonia on Day 0 and 2 (2/83; 2.4%) patients had pleural empyema with at least one identical bacteria isolated in culture-positive PF. The 30-day survival rate was lower for patients with culture-positive PF compared with patients with culture-negative PF (85.5% vs. 94.7%, p = 0.01). Culture-positive PF has a high prevalence and may decrease lung transplant recipient survival. Further studies are required to confirm these results and improve understanding of the pathogenesis of culture-positive PF and their management.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease: evolution over three decades

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has emerged as the most common indication for lung transplantation globally. However, post-transplant survival varies depending on the underlying disease phenotype and comorbidities. This study aimed to describe the demographics, disease classification, outcomes and factors associated with post-transplant survival in a large single-centre cohort.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively assessed for 284 recipients who underwent lung transplantation for ILD in our centre between 1987 and 2020. Patient characteristics and outcomes were stratified by three eras: 1987-2000, 2001-2010 and 2011-2020.

RESULTS

Median patients' age at time of transplantation was significantly higher in the most recent decade (56 (51-61) years, p<0.0001). Recipients aged over 50 years had worse overall survival compared with younger patients (adjusted HR, aHR 2.36, 95% CI 1.55 to 3.72, p=0.0001). Better survival was seen with bilateral versus single lung transplantation in patients younger than 50 years (log-rank p=0.0195). However, this survival benefit was no longer present in patients aged over 50 years. Reduced survival was observed in fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, which remained the most common indication throughout (aHR 2.61, 95% CI 1.40 to 4.60, p=0.0015).

CONCLUSION

In patients transplanted for end-stage ILD, older age and fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia were associated with poorer post-transplant survival. The benefit of bilateral over single lung transplantation diminished with increasing age, suggesting that single lung transplantation might still be a feasible option in older candidates.

Diagnostic performance of electronic nose technology in chronic lung allograft dysfunction

BACKGROUND

There is a need for reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). In this light, we investigated the diagnostic value of exhaled breath analysis using an electronic nose (eNose) for CLAD, CLAD phenotype, and CLAD stage in lung transplant recipients (LTR).

METHODS

We performed eNose measurements in LTR with and without CLAD, visiting the outpatient clinic. Through supervised machine learning, the diagnostic value of eNose for CLAD was assessed in a random training and validation set. Next, we investigated the diagnostic value of the eNose measurements combined with known risk factors for CLAD. Model performance was evaluated using ROC-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 152 LTR (median age 60 years, 49% females), of whom 38 with CLAD. eNose-based classification of patients with and without CLAD provided an AUC of 0.86 in the training set, and 0.82 in the validation set. After adding established risk factors for CLAD (age, gender, type of transplantation, time after transplantation and prior occurrence of acute cellular rejection) to a model with the eNose data, the discriminative ability of the model improved to an AUC of 0.94 (p = 0.02) in the training set and 0.94 (p = 0.04) in the validation set. Discrimination between BOS and RAS was good (AUC 0.95). Discriminative ability for other phenotypes (AUCs ranging 0.50-0.92) or CLAD stages (AUC 0.56) was limited.

CONCLUSION

Exhaled breath analysis using eNose is a promising novel biomarker for enabling diagnosis and phenotyping CLAD. eNose technology could be a valuable addition to the diagnostic armamentarium for suspected graft failure in LTR.

The Year in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2022

This special article is the 15th in an annual series for the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. The authors thank the editor-in-chief Dr. Kaplan and the editorial board for the opportunity to continue this series, namely the research highlights of the past year in the specialties of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesiology. The major themes selected for 2022 are outlined in this introduction, and each highlight is reviewed in detail in the main body of the article. The literature highlights, in the specialties for 2022, begin with an update on COVID-19 therapies, with a focus on the temporal updates in a wide range of therapies, progressing from medical to the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and, ultimately, with lung transplantation in this high-risk group. The second major theme is focused on medical cardiology, with the authors discussing new insights into the life cycle of coronary disease, heart failure treatments, and outcomes related to novel statin therapy. The third theme is focused on mechanical circulatory support, with discussions focusing on both right-sided and left-sided temporary support outcomes and the optimal timing of deployment. The fourth and final theme is an update on cardiac surgery, with a discussion of the diverse aspects of concomitant valvular surgery and the optimal approach to procedural treatment for coronary artery disease. The themes selected for this 15th special article are only a few of the diverse advances in the specialties during 2022. These highlights will inform the reader of key updates on a variety of topics, leading to the improvement of perioperative outcomes for patients with cardiothoracic and vascular disease.

Lung transplantation for coronavirus disease 2019 associated severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to analyze the most recent and relevant literature involving lung transplantation for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the pathological mechanisms of lung injury, selection criteria and outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pathological analysis of lungs after COVID-19 ARDS has shown architectural distortion similar to that observed in explanted lungs from patients undergoing lung transplantation for end-stage lung diseases such as emphysema. Short-term outcomes after lung transplantation for COVID-19 associated respiratory failure are comparable to those performed for other indications.

SUMMARY

Lung transplantation after COVID-19 ARDS is a potentially life-saving procedure for appropriately selected patients with no evidence of lung function recovery despite maximal treatment. Lung transplantation should be ideally performed in high-volume centers with expertise.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in Lung Transplantation: Potential Benefits and Inherent Limitations

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), a technique in which isolated lungs are continually ventilated and perfused at normothermic temperature, is emerging as a promising platform to optimize donor lung quality and increase the lung graft pool. Over the past few decades, the EVLP technique has become recognized as a significant achievement and gained much attention in the field of lung transplantation. EVLP has been demonstrated to be an effective platform for various targeted therapies to optimize donor lung function before transplantation. Additionally, some physical parameters during EVLP and biological markers in the EVLP perfusate can be used to evaluate graft function before transplantation and predict posttransplant outcomes. However, despite its advantages, the clinical practice of EVLP continuously encounters multiple challenges associated with both intrinsic and extrinsic limitations. It is of utmost importance to address the advantages and disadvantages of EVLP for its broader clinical usage. Here, the pros and cons of EVLP are comprehensively discussed, with a focus on its benefits and potential approaches for overcoming the remaining limitations. Directions for future research to fully explore the clinical potential of EVLP in lung transplantation are also discussed.

A Randomized, Multicenter, Blinded Pilot Study Assessing the Effects of Gaseous Nitric Oxide in an Ex Vivo System of Human Lungs

INTRODUCTION

Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is used to evaluate and condition donor lungs for transplantation. The objective of this study was to determine whether administration of exogenous nitric oxide during EVLP contributes to improvement of lung health.

METHODS

A multicenter, blinded, two-arm, randomized pilot study evaluated the effect of gaseous nitric oxide (gNO) administered during EVLP on donor lungs rejected for transplantation. gNO introduced into the perfusate at 80 parts per million (ppm) was compared with perfusate alone (P). An open-label substudy assessed inhaled nitric oxide gas (iNO) delivered into the lungs at 20 ppm via a ventilator. Primary endpoints were an aggregate score of lung physiology indicators and total duration of stable EVLP time. Secondary endpoints included assessments of lung weight and left atrium partial pressure of oxygen (LAPO₂).

RESULTS

Twenty bilateral donor lungs (blinded study, n = 16; open-label substudy, n = 4) from three centers were enrolled. Median (min, max) total EVLP times for the gNO, P, and iNO groups were 12.4 (8.6, 12.6), 10.6 (6.0, 12.4), and 12.4 (8.7, 13.0) hours, respectively. In the blinded study, median aggregate scores were higher in the gNO group compared to the P group at most time points, suggesting better lung health with gNO (median score range [min, max], 0-3.5 [0, 7]) vs. P (0-2.0 [0, 5] at end of study). In the substudy, median aggregate scores did not improve for lungs in the iNO group. However, both the gNO and iNO groups showed improvements in lung weight and LAPO₂ compared to the P group.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that inclusion of gNO during EVLP may potentially prolong duration of organ stability and improve donor lung health, which warrants further investigation.

Functional comorbidities and brain tissue changes before and after lung transplant in adults

Background

Adults undergoing lung transplant, as a lifesaving treatment for end stage lung disease, exhibit high levels of peri-operative neurocognitive dysfunction in multiple domains, including delirium, cognition, and autonomic deficits. These complications impact healthcare costs, quality of life, and patient outcomes. Post-operative symptoms likely result from loss of brain tissue integrity in sites mediating such regulatory functions. Our aim in this study was to examine peri-operative neurocognitive dysfunction and brain tissue changes after lung transplant in adults.

Methods

We retrospectively examined the UCLA lung transplant database to identify 114 lung transplant patients with pre-operative clinical and neurocognitive data. Of 114 patients, 9 lung transplant patients had pre- and post-transplant brain magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical and neurocognitive data were summarized for all subjects, and brain tissue volume changes, using T1-weighted images, before and after transplant were examined. T1-weighted images were partitioned into gray matter (GM)-tissue type, normalized to a common space, smoothed, and the smoothed GM-volume maps were compared between pre- and post-transplant (paired t-tests; covariate, age; SPM12, p &lt; 0.005).

Results

Increased comorbidities, including the diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, kidney disease, and sleep disordered breathing, as well as higher rates of neurocognitive dysfunction were observed in the lung transplant patients, with 41% experiencing post-operative delirium, 49% diagnosed with a mood disorder, and 25% of patients diagnosed with cognitive deficits, despite incomplete documentation. Similarly, high levels of delirium, cognitive dysfunction, and mood disorder were noted in a subset of patients used for brain MRI evaluation. Significantly decreased GM volumes emerged in multiple brain regions, including the frontal and prefrontal, parietal, temporal, bilateral anterior cingulate and insula, putamen, and cerebellar cortices.

Conclusion

Adults undergoing lung transplant often show significant pre-operative comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease, as well as neurocognitive dysfunction. In addition, patients with lung transplant show significant brain tissue changes in regions that mediate cognition, autonomic, and mood functions. The findings indicate a brain structural basis for many enhanced post-operative symptoms and suggest a need for brain tissue protection in adults undergoing lung transplant to improve health outcomes.

Decreasing blood wastage during ex vivo lung perfusion recovery through utilization of thermal control technology

BACKGROUND

The Organ Care System (OCS) is a revolutionary ex vivo organ perfusion technology that can potentially expand the organ retrieval range. The OCS Lung device uses packed red blood cells (pRBC) with a proprietary solution. We report the ability to reduce blood waste during this procedure by using a thermal packaging solution in conjunction with the OCS platform.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all OCS Lung recoveries performed by our recovery team, using pRBCfrom May 2019 to January 2021. Initially, units were stored using passive refrigeration with the Performance cooler at a temperature range of 1-6°C for 4 h. Subsequently, thermal control technology with the ProMed cooler was utilized to maintain the same temperature range for 72 h.

RESULTS

Twenty-three recoveries were initiated with 63 pRBC. The Performance cooler was used for 8, while the ProMed cooler for 13. 37.5% of pRBC transported with the Performance cooler was used within the validated time range, while 25.0% were used beyond the validated time range based on clinical judgment. In addition, 37.5% of pRBC transported with the Performance cooler were returned to the institution after canceled recoveries with an estimated loss of $1800; the ProMed cooler had no wastage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that using an advanced thermal packaging solution facilitates proper storage of pRBC and represents an advancement for extended donor lung preservation. The elimination of blood wastage in this initial study portends ongoing benefits for the limited blood supply and reduced cost.

A comparison of outcomes after lung transplantation between European and North American centers

BACKGROUND

With advancements in basic science and clinical medicine, lung transplantation (LT) has evolved rapidly over the last three decades. However, it is unclear if significant regional variations exist in long-term outcomes after LT.

METHODS

To investigate potential differences, we performed a retrospective, comparative cohort analysis of adult patients undergoing deceased donor single or double LT in North America (NA) or Europe between January 2006 and December 2016. Data up to April 2019 were abstracted from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Thoracic Organ Registry. We compared overall survival (OS) between North American and European LT centers in a propensity score matched analysis.

RESULTS

In 3,115 well-matched pairs, though 30-day survival was similar between groups (NA 96.2% vs Europe 95.4%, p = 0.116), 5-year survival was significantly higher in European patients (NA 60.1% vs Europe 70.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This survival difference persisted in a sensitivity analysis excluding Canadian patients. Prior observations suggest that these disparities are at least partly related to better access to care via universal healthcare models prevalent in Europe. Future studies are warranted to confirm our findings and explore other causal mechanisms. It is likely that potential solutions will require concerted efforts from healthcare providers and policymakers.

Assessment of Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-Antibody-Dependent Humoral Response in Patients before and after Lung Transplantation

Background and Objectives: Testing for anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies both before and after transplantation is of fundamental significance for the success of lung transplantation. The aim of this study was the evaluation of anti-HLA immunization of patients before and after lung transplant who were subjected to qualification and transplantation. Materials and Methods: Prior to the transplantation, patients were examined for the presence of IgG class anti-HLA antibodies (anti-human leukocyte antigen), the so-called panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), using the flow cytometry method. After the transplantation, the class and specificity of anti-HLA antibodies (also IgG) were determined using Luminex. Results: In the group examined, the PRA results ranged from 0.1% to 66.4%. Low (30%) and average (30-80%) immunization was found in only 9.7% of the group examined. Presence of class I anti-HLA antibodies with MFI (mean fluorescence intensity) greater than 1000 was found in 42.7% of the patients examined, while class II anti-HLA antibodies were found in 38.4%. Immunization levels before and after the transplantation were compared. In 10.87% of patients, DSA antibodies (donor-specific antibodies) with MFI of over 1000 were found. Conclusions: It seems that it is possible to confirm the correlation between pre- and post-transplantation immunization with the use of the two presented methods of determining IgG class anti-HLA antibodies by increasing the size of the group studied and conducting a long-term observation thereof.

Exploring predisposing factors and pathogenesis contributing to injuries of donor lungs

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation (LTx) remains the only therapeutic strategy for patients with incurable lung diseases. However, its use has been severely limited by the narrow donor pool and potential concerns of inferior quality of donor lungs, which are more susceptible to external influence than other transplant organs. Multiple insults, including various causes of death and a series of perimortem events, may act together on donor lungs and eventually culminate in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after transplantation as well as other poor short-term outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the predisposing factors contributing to injuries to the donor lungs, specifically focusing on the pathogenesis of these injuries and their impact on post-transplant outcomes. Additionally, various maneuvers to mitigate donor lung injuries have been proposed.

EXPERT OPINION

The selection criteria for eligible donors vary and may be poor discriminators of lung injury. Not all transplanted lungs are in ideal condition. With the rapidly increasing waiting list for LTx, the trend of using marginal donors has become more apparent, underscoring the need to gain a deeper understanding of donor lung injuries and discover more donor resources.