1
|
Sathiyamoorthy A, Guay M, Chen R. Estimates and determinants of HPV non-vaccination in 14-year-old Canadians: Results from the childhood national immunization coverage survey, 2019. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2379090. [PMID: 39051527 PMCID: PMC11275521 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2379090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections, the most common sexually transmitted infections, are associated with various health outcomes including anogenital warts and cancers. Despite significant investments in HPV vaccination programs, ensuring adequate vaccination coverage for adolescents remains a challenge in Canada. This analysis used data collected through the 2019 Childhood National Immunization Coverage Survey (CNICS) to determine national estimates of HPV non-vaccination and investigate determinants of HPV non-vaccination for adolescents aged 14-years old in Canada, both overall and stratified by gender. The primary outcome of interest was HPV vaccination status, categorized as vaccinated with at least one dose or unvaccinated. Simple and multiple logistic regression models were used to investigate determinants of HPV non-vaccination. In 2019, an estimated 19.8% of the 14-year-olds in Canada were unvaccinated for the HPV vaccine, with males having higher non-vaccination rates than females (27.0% compared to 12.9%). In the unstratified analysis, factors associated with HPV non-vaccination for 14-year-olds were gender and region of residence. These factors differed by gender - for males, region of residence and respondent's age were significant factors, whereas for females, total household income was a significant factor. These results could help public health officials and policymakers develop and implement tailored interventions to enhance the delivery of HPV vaccination programs for male and female adolescents. By targeting populations that are under-vaccinated, vaccine uptake could be better facilitated to help reduce inequalities in access to the HPV vaccine, which could also potentially reduce disparities in HPV-related health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aranee Sathiyamoorthy
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Immunization Surveillance, Infectious Diseases and Vaccination Programs Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mireille Guay
- Centre for Immunization Surveillance, Infectious Diseases and Vaccination Programs Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ruoke Chen
- Centre for Immunization Surveillance, Infectious Diseases and Vaccination Programs Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bogka E, Naoum P, Pavi E, Athanasakis K. What Influences Parents on Their Decision to Vaccinate Their Daughters Against HPV? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2024; 37:396-401. [PMID: 38367952 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To investigate and compare the attitudes of parents who initiated their daughters' HPV vaccination with parents who did not. METHODS Data were collected through telephone interviews with a close-end questionnaire on parents' knowledge, attitudes towards the vaccine, and the reasons for vaccinating or not their daughters against HPV. The sample was random, stratified by geographic region and urbanization level, national, and representative of the general population of parents of girls aged 11-18 in Greece. Statistical analysis consisted of descriptives, an inferential analysis with hypothesis testing, and a logistic regression model. RESULTS Overall, 996 parents were included in the analysis, 99.0% of which were women. Forty-seven percent of them initiated their daughters' HPV vaccination, with physician recommendation stated as the most important reason for this decision (50.2%). For those who had not initiated their daughters' HPV vaccination (53%), lack of information was the most important reason (25.6%). In the hypothesis testing, parents with unvaccinated daughters agreed more with the statements "I do not have enough information for the HPV vaccine to decide," and "My child is very young to be vaccinated for an STD" (P < .05), but no significant difference found for the statement "It's more possible for a vaccinated girl to begin sexual activities" (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS Lack of information, young age of the daughter, and perceived effectiveness of the vaccine are the most important hesitation factors. Physician recommendation is the most important reason to initiate vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elissavet Bogka
- Department of Public Health Policy, Laboratory for Health Technology Assessment, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
| | - Panagiota Naoum
- Department of Public Health Policy, Laboratory for Health Technology Assessment, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
| | - Elpida Pavi
- Department of Public Health Policy, Laboratory for Health Technology Assessment, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
| | - Kostas Athanasakis
- Department of Public Health Policy, Laboratory for Health Technology Assessment, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Malkin J, Jessiman-Perreault G, Alberga Machado A, Teare G, Snider J, Tirmizi SF, Youngson E, Wang T, Law J, Bandara T, Rathwell M, Neudorf C, Allen Scott L. Individual and Geospatial Determinants of Health Associated With School-Based Human Papillomavirus Immunization in Alberta: Population-Based Cohort Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024; 10:e45508. [PMID: 38536211 PMCID: PMC11007603 DOI: 10.2196/45508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection causes nearly all cervical cancer cases and is a cause of anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. The incidence of HPV-associated cancers is inequitable, with an increased burden on marginalized groups in high-income countries. Understanding how immunization status varies by material and social deprivation, health system, and geospatial factors is valuable for prioritizing and planning HPV immunization interventions. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe school-based HPV immunization rates by individual and geospatial determinants of health in Alberta, Canada. METHODS Health administrative data for male and female individuals born in 2004 in Alberta were used to determine HPV immunization status based on age and the number of doses administered in schools during the 2014/2015-2018/2019 school years. Immunization status and its relationship with material and social deprivation and health system factors were assessed by a logistic regression model. Geospatial clustering was assessed using Getis-Ord Gi* hot spot analysis. Mean scores of material and social deprivation and health system factors were compared between hot and cold spots without full HPV immunization using independent samples t tests. A multidisciplinary team comprising researchers and knowledge users formed a co-design team to design the study protocol and review the study results. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 45,207 youths. In the adjusted model, the odds of those who did not see their general practitioner (GP) within 3 years before turning 10 years old and not being fully immunized were 1.965 times higher (95% CI 1.855-2.080) than those who did see their GP. The odds of health system users with health conditions and health system nonusers not being fully immunized were 1.092 (95% CI 1.006-1.185) and 1.831 (95% CI 1.678-1.998) times higher, respectively, than health system users without health conditions. The odds of those who lived in areas with the most material and social deprivation not being fully immunized were 1.287 (95% CI 1.200-1.381) and 1.099 (95% CI 1.029-1.174) times higher, respectively, than those who lived in areas with the least deprivation. The odds of those who lived in rural areas not being fully immunized were 1.428 times higher (95% CI 1.359-1.501) than those who lived in urban areas. Significant hot spot clusters of individuals without full HPV immunization exist in rural locations on the northern and eastern regions of Alberta. Hot spots had significantly worse mean material deprivation scores (P=.008) and fewer GP visits (P=.001) than cold spots. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that material and social deprivation, health system access, and rural residency impact HPV immunization. Such factors should be considered by public health professionals in other jurisdictions and will be used by the Alberta co-design team when tailoring programs to increase HPV vaccine uptake in priority populations and regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Malkin
- Cancer Prevention and Screening Innovation, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Geneviève Jessiman-Perreault
- Cancer Prevention and Screening Innovation, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Amanda Alberga Machado
- Cancer Prevention and Screening Innovation, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Gary Teare
- Cancer Prevention and Screening Innovation, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Joanne Snider
- Communicable Disease Control, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Syed Farhan Tirmizi
- Communicable Disease Control, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Erik Youngson
- Provincial Research Data Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Ting Wang
- Provincial Research Data Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jessica Law
- Cancer Prevention and Screening Innovation, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Thilina Bandara
- School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | | | - Lisa Allen Scott
- Cancer Prevention and Screening Innovation, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abebe D, Mengistu T, Demssie EA, Mesfin S. Corona virus vaccine hesitancy among higher education students in Adama City, Oromia, Ethiopia. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1364225. [PMID: 38590806 PMCID: PMC10999607 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1364225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccination stands as the most efficient approach for managing the continued transmission of infections and preventing the emergence of novel variants. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy poses a significant burden in the fight to achieve herd immunity. Methods A cross-sectional study, based on institutional parameters, was conducted among a cohort of 530 higher education students, selected via a simple random sampling method. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique from February to March 2022. Structured questionnaire data were gathered and subsequently analyzed using SPSS version 21. The strength of the association between various factors and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was assessed using the odds ratio along with its 95% confidence interval. Statistical significance was deemed to be present at a p-value of < 0.05. Result The prevalence of coronavirus vaccine hesitancy was 47.5%. The factors that were found to be significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were residential address (AOR = 2.398, 95% CI: 1.476-3.896); agreeing with leaders and groups that do not support COVID-19 vaccination (AOR = 2.292, 95% CI: 1.418-3.704); coming from a community whose leaders support COVID-19 vaccination for young adults (AOR = 0.598, 95% CI: 0.381-0.940), and believing that COVID-19 vaccines are safe (AOR = 0.343,95% CI: 0.168-0.701). Conclusion Approximately five out of 10 students who participated in this study were hesitant to get vaccinated against coronavirus. Incorporating messages and initiatives into local plans to specifically target the factors identified in this study is imperative for substantially increasing the COVID-19 vaccine uptake among students in higher education institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawit Abebe
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Jigjiga University, Jigjiga, Ethiopia
| | - Tewodros Mengistu
- Department of Public Health, Adama General Hospital and Medical College, Adama, Ethiopia
| | - Enku Afework Demssie
- Department of Public Health, Adama General Hospital and Medical College, Adama, Ethiopia
| | - Sinetibeb Mesfin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khan A, Abonyi S, Neudorf C. Barriers and facilitators in uptake of human papillomavirus vaccine across English Canada: A review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2176640. [PMID: 36803510 PMCID: PMC10026928 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2176640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a highly contagious sexually transmitted infection that leads to preventable cancers of the mouth, throat, cervix, and genitalia. Despite the wide availability of HPV Vaccine (HPVV) in Canada, its uptake remains suboptimal. This review aims to identify factors (barriers and facilitators) in HPV vaccine uptake across English Canada at three levels (provider, system, and patient). We explored academic and gray literature to examine factors involved in HPVV uptake and synthesized results based on interpretive content analysis. The review identified the following factors of prime significance in the uptake of the HPV vaccine (a) at the provider level, 'acceptability' of the HPV vaccine, and 'appropriateness' of an intervention (b) at the patient level, the 'ability to perceive' and 'knowledge sufficiency' (c) at the system level, 'attitudes' of different players in vaccine programming, planning and delivery. Further research is needed to conduct population health intervention research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amal Khan
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Sylvia Abonyi
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Cory Neudorf
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Malkin J, Allen Scott L, Alberga Machado A, Teare G, Snider J, Ali Tirmizi SF, Bandara T, Rathwell M, Neudorf C. Factors influencing human papillomavirus school-based immunization in Alberta: A mixed-methods study protocol. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278472. [PMID: 36454791 PMCID: PMC9714709 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
More than 1,300 Canadians are diagnosed with cervical cancer annually, which is nearly preventable through human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization. Across Canada, coverage rates remain below the 90% target set out by the Action Plan for the Elimination of Cervical Cancer in Canada (2020-2030). To support this Plan, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer has commissioned the Urban Public Health Network (UPHN) to coordinate a quality improvement project with Canada's school-based HPV immunization programs. In Alberta, the UPHN partnered with Alberta Health Services (AHS) for this work. This study has one overarching research question: what are parent/guardian and program stakeholder perceived barriers, enablers and opportunities to immunization for youth as part of the school-based HPV immunization program in Alberta? This study uses a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. A survey will be emailed to a sample of Albertans with children aged 11-17 years. Questions will be based on a Conceptual Framework of Access to Health Care. Subsequent qualitative work will explore the survey's findings. Parents/guardians identifying as vaccine hesitant in the survey will be invited to participate in virtual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Stakeholders of the school-based immunization program will be purposively sampled from AHS' five health zones for virtual focus groups. Quantitative data will be analyzed using SAS Studio 3.6 to carry out descriptive statistics and, using logistic regression, investigate if Framework constructs are associated with parents'/guardians' decision to immunize their children. Qualitative data will be analyzed using NVivo 12 to conduct template thematic analysis guided by the Framework. Study results will provide insights for Alberta's public health practitioners to make evidence-informed decisions when tailoring the school-based HPV immunization program to increase uptake in vaccine hesitant populations. Findings will contribute to the national study, which will culminate in recommendations to increase HPV immunization uptake nationally and progress towards the 90% coverage target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Malkin
- Public Health Evidence and Innovation Division, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Lisa Allen Scott
- Public Health Evidence and Innovation Division, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amanda Alberga Machado
- Public Health Evidence and Innovation Division, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gary Teare
- Public Health Evidence and Innovation Division, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joanne Snider
- Communicable Disease Control Division, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Syed Farhan Ali Tirmizi
- Communicable Disease Control Division, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Thilina Bandara
- Urban Public Health Network, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
- School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Mika Rathwell
- Urban Public Health Network, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Cordell Neudorf
- Urban Public Health Network, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
- Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tandy CB, Odoi A. Geographic disparities and socio-demographic predictors of pertussis risk in Florida. PeerJ 2021; 9:e11902. [PMID: 34540361 PMCID: PMC8415280 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis is a toxin-mediated respiratory illness caused by Bordetella pertussis that can result in severe complications and death, particularly in infants. Between 2008 and 2011, children less than 3 months old accounted for 83% of the pertussis deaths in the United States. Understanding the geographic disparities in the distribution of pertussis risk and identifying high risk geographic areas is necessary for guiding resource allocation and public health control strategies. Therefore, this study investigated geographic disparities and temporal changes in pertussis risk in Florida from 2010 to 2018. It also investigated socioeconomic and demographic predictors of the identified disparities. METHODS Pertussis data covering the time period 2010-2018 were obtained from Florida HealthCHARTS web interface. Spatial patterns and temporal changes in geographic distribution of pertussis risk were assessed using county-level choropleth maps for the time periods 2010-2012, 2013-2015, 2016-2018 and 2010-2018. Tango's flexible spatial scan statistics were used to identify high-risk spatial clusters which were displayed in maps. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was used to identify significant predictors of county-level risk. Residuals of the OLS model were assessed for model assumptions including spatial autocorrelation. RESULTS County-level pertussis risk varied from 0 to 116.31 cases per 100,000 people during the study period. A total of 11 significant (p < 0.05) spatial clusters were identified with risk ratios ranging from 1.5 to 5.8. Geographic distribution remained relatively consistent over time with areas of high risk persisting in the western panhandle, northeastern coast, and along the western coast. Although county level pertussis risks generally increased from 2010-2012 to 2013-2015, risk tended to be lower during the 2016-2018 time period. Significant predictors of county-level pertussis risk were rurality, percentage of females, and median income. Counties with high pertussis risk tended to be rural (p = 0.021), those with high median incomes (p = 0.039), and those with high percentages of females (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION There is evidence that geographic disparities exist and have persisted over time in Florida. This study highlights the application and importance of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology and spatial statistical/epidemiological tools in identifying areas of highest disease risk so as to guide resource allocation to reduce health disparities and improve health for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinne B. Tandy
- Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Agricola Odoi
- Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Older adolescents and young adults willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine: Implications for informing public health strategies. Vaccine 2021; 39:3473-3479. [PMID: 34023134 PMCID: PMC8114588 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Importance The success in ending the COVID-19 pandemic rests partly on the mass uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine. Little work has been done to understand vaccine willingness among older adolescents and young adults. This is important since this age group may be less likely to adhere to public health guidelines. Objective To understand willingness of getting a vaccine and reasons for vaccine hesitancy among a sample of older adolescents and young adults. Design Data were from the Well-Being and Experiences study (The WE Study), a longitudinal community-based sample of older adolescents and young adults collected from Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada from 2017 to 2020 (n = 664). Setting The study setting was a community-based observational longitudinal study. Participants Participants for the study were aged 14 to 17 years old at baseline in 2016–17 (n = 1000). Data were also collected on one parent/caregiver. Waves 2 (n = 747) and 3 (n = 664) were collected in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Exposures The main exposures were sociodemographic factors, health conditions, COVID-19 knowledge, and adversity history. Main Outcomes The main outcomes were COVID-19 vaccine willingness, hesitancy, and reasons for hesitancy. Results Willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine was 65.4%. Willingness did not differ by age, sex, or mental health conditions, but did differ for other sociodemographic characteristics, physical health conditions, COVID-19 knowledge, practicing social/physical distancing, and adversity history. The most common reasons for not wanting a vaccine were related to safety, knowledge, and effectiveness. Sex differences were noted. Conclusions and Relevance Increasing uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among older adolescents and young adults may rely on targeting individuals from households with lower income, financial burden, and adversity history, and generating public health messaging specifically aimed at vaccine safety, how it works to protect against illness, and why it is important to protect oneself against a COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lismidiati W, Emilia O, Widyawati W. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Health Savings as an Alternative Solution: HPV Vaccination Behavior in Adolescents. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2021; 22:471-476. [PMID: 33639662 PMCID: PMC8190369 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2021.22.2.471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to measure the effects of reproductive health savings (tabungan kesehatan reproduksi, Takespro) on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine initiation program and the quality of the decision making to get vaccinated, as measured by knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and self-efficacy toward HPV vaccination. METHODS This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 128 students randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. This research was conducted in junior high schools. The intervention group received the health education "Takespro HPV" intervention through videos and booklets for 6 months at school. Participants in the control group received usual care from the school. Data were collected using a questionnaire of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and self-efficacy about HPV vaccination modified by researchers based on previous research and tested for validity and reliability. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney test and independent t-test. RESULTS A total of 40 participants were actively enrolled in the intervention group, and 88 were passively enrolled in the control group. The health education that was part of the Takespro HPV intervention improved the knowledge (p < 0.05) and self-efficacy (p < 0.05) of the intervention group compared with the control group. The attitude and belief variables showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). Forty students exhibited the health reproduction savings behavior at schools. However, the savings amount was insufficient to get HPV vaccination at the initiation phase. CONCLUSION "Takespro" HPV intervention can be considered an alternative to increasing the coverage of HPV vaccination in adolescents in Yogyakarta. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiwin Lismidiati
- Department of Pediatric and Maternity Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
| | - Ova Emilia
- Department of Medical Education and Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
| | - Widyawati Widyawati
- Department of Pediatric and Maternity Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huon JF, Grégoire A, Meireles A, Lefebvre M, Péré M, Coutherut J, Biron C, Raffi F, Briend-Godet V. Evaluation of the acceptability in France of the vaccine against papillomavirus (HPV) among middle and high school students and their parents. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234693. [PMID: 33091021 PMCID: PMC7580947 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pathogenic and oncogenic roles of papillomavirus (HPV) infections have been documented and shown to occur in women as well as in men. While other countries have already extended their vaccination guidelines to include boys, in 2019 the French National Authority for Health validated implementation of HPV vaccination in the 2020 vaccination schedule. There is, however, a climate of distrust in regard to vaccination in France, and there have been few studies to date regarding the acceptability of HPV vaccination in boys in France. The aim of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the acceptability of extending the recommendations for HPV vaccination in men, among middle and high school students and their parents. METHODS Our study (HPVac) was a prospective, multicenter, departmental, and descriptive survey applied to a sample of male middle and high school students attending schools in the Loire-Atlantique department and their parents. It took place from January 2017 to January 2018. RESULTS We analyzed the information obtained from 127 parent questionnaires and 145 children questionnaires. In terms of acceptability, 36.6% (n = 53) of the children and 37.8% (n = 48) of the parents were in favour of being vaccinated or of having their children vaccinated against HPV (51.7% (n = 75) and 50.4% (n = 64), respectively, were undecided). The perception of a risk stemming from HPV infection was positively associated with acceptability of the HPV vaccine. Being against vaccines in general, being discouraged by their parents, parents thinking that their child is not at risk, and the belief that the vaccine is not mandatory were arguments cited and significantly associated with a willingness to be vaccinated. CONCLUSION This study revealed a lack of information among boys and their parents about HPV and its vaccination. It also clearly showed that taking time to discuss the consequences of an infection and the merits of being vaccinated can help parents overcome their reluctance. The children then generally go along with their parent's choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-François Huon
- Clinical Pharmacy of the UHC of Nantes, and UMR INSERM 1246 SPHERE Universities of Nantes and Tours, Nantes, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Antoine Grégoire
- Center for the Prevention of Infectious and Transmitted Diseases of the UHC of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Anita Meireles
- Center for the Prevention of Infectious and Transmitted Diseases of the UHC of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Maëva Lefebvre
- Center for the Prevention of Infectious and Transmitted Diseases of the UHC of Nantes, Nantes, France
- Department of Infectious Diseases, and CIC 1413, INSERM, University Hospital Center of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Morgane Péré
- Plateforme de Méthodologie et Biostatistique, Direction de la Recherche, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Julie Coutherut
- Center for the Prevention of Infectious and Transmitted Diseases of the UHC of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Charlotte Biron
- Center for the Prevention of Infectious and Transmitted Diseases of the UHC of Nantes, Nantes, France
- Department of Infectious Diseases, and CIC 1413, INSERM, University Hospital Center of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - François Raffi
- Department of Infectious Diseases, and CIC 1413, INSERM, University Hospital Center of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Valérie Briend-Godet
- Center for the Prevention of Infectious and Transmitted Diseases of the UHC of Nantes, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
O’Neill J, Newall F, Antolovich G, Lima S, Danchin M. Vaccination in people with disability: a review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 16:7-15. [PMID: 31287773 PMCID: PMC7012164 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1640556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2019] [Revised: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
People with disabilities are vulnerable to complications from vaccine-preventable diseases, and every effort should be made to ensure equitable access to immunization for this population. This paper aims to summarize the research on immunizations in people with disabilities, in order to ensure a comprehensive understanding of knowledge in this area and direct further research. The literature is weighted towards coverage data that is difficult to synthesize because of the different definitions of disability, and the variety of settings, vaccinations and age groups across the studies. In-depth qualitative data and data from a variety of health-care providers and people with disability is notably lacking. This is vital to redress in order to develop effective immunization interventions in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny O’Neill
- Department of Neurodevelopment and Disability, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- The Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Developmental Disability and Rehabilitation Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fiona Newall
- The Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Nursing Research, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Clinical Haematology Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Australia
- The Department of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Giuliana Antolovich
- Department of Neurodevelopment and Disability, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Developmental Disability and Rehabilitation Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sally Lima
- Nursing Research, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- The Department of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Clinical Learning and Development Unit, Bendigo Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margie Danchin
- The Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- The School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bryden GM, Browne M, Rockloff M, Unsworth C. The privilege paradox: Geographic areas with highest socio-economic advantage have the lowest rates of vaccination. Vaccine 2019; 37:4525-4532. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
13
|
Guay M, Gosselin V, Petit G, Baron G, Gagneur A. Determinants of vaccine hesitancy in Quebec: a large population-based survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 15:2527-2533. [PMID: 31050594 PMCID: PMC6930046 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1603563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Vaccine hesitancy is a global phenomenon that needs to be measured and addressed. This study aimed to identify the determinants of vaccine hesitancy among a large regional population.Methods: A structured telephone survey was administered to a random digit sample in Quebec's Eastern Townships region. In addition to socioeconomic information, respondents were asked questions on several health topics such as knowledge and beliefs about immunization, medical consultations, health status, and life habits. Data were weighted according to age, sex, and territories. Statistically significant variables in the univariate analysis were introduced into a multivariate logistic regression model to determine independent factors for vaccine hesitancy (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] and 95% confidence intervals).Results: A total of 8,737 interviews were conducted (participation rate 48.3%). Among all respondents, 32.2% were vaccine-hesitant. Several beliefs were significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy: belief that children receive too many vaccines (aOR = 2.72; 2.32-3.18), belief that a healthy lifestyle can eliminate the need for vaccination (aOR = 2.48; 2.09-2.93), and belief that the use of alternative medicine practices can eliminate the need for vaccination (aOR = 1.39; 1.16-1.68). Other determinants associated with vaccine hesitancy were having consulted a massage therapist (aOR = 2.34; 1.46-3.75), not being vaccinated against influenza (aOR = 1.80; 1.49-2.16), having a low (<$30,000) (aOR = 1.58; 1.24-2.02) or moderate ($30,000-$79,000) (aOR = 1.37; 1.12-1.67) household income, distrust in public health authorities (aOR = 1.40; 1.21-1.63), perceived insufficient knowledge about immunization (aOR = 1.26; 1.04-1.51), and smoking (aOR = 1.22; 1.01-1.47).Conclusions: Many determinants are related to vaccine hesitancy. These determinants should be taken into account when health professionals engage with vaccine-hesitant individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryse Guay
- Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Centre de recherche, Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Geneviève Petit
- Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- Direction de santé publique du CIUSSS de l’Estrie – CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Geneviève Baron
- Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- Direction de santé publique du CIUSSS de l’Estrie – CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- Institut universitaire en première ligne en santé et services sociaux, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Arnaud Gagneur
- Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- Département de pédiatrie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The uptake of adolescent vaccinations through the School Immunisation Program in specialist schools in Victoria, Australia. Vaccine 2018; 37:272-279. [PMID: 30522907 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2018] [Revised: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As part of the National Immunisation Program (NIP) students in Australia receive adolescent immunisations through the School Immunisation Program at 12 to 13 years. For children with disabilities attending specialist schools, no vaccine uptake data is collected at this time point. We aimed to determine uptake of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (dTpa) and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) immunisations amongst young people with disabilities in specialist schools in Victoria. METHODS A prospective cohort study was conducted in Victoria, Australia. Data was collected on immunisation days in the 2017 school year from specialist schools in Victoria. The school immunisation coordinator entered data online for eligible students for receipt of dTpa and HPV on each school immunisation day. Demographic data, motor and intellectual function of students and reasons for non-receipt of dTpa and HPV vaccine were recorded. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of 73 eligible specialist schools in Victoria, 28 (38%) participated. dTpa was received by 63% (237/374) of participating students and HPV dose 1 (HPV1) was received by 66% (76/114) females and 67% (174/260) male students respectively. Three doses of HPV were received by only 41% (100/241) of students. The main reasons for missed immunisation were absence from school, lack of consent and inability to immunise due to the student's behaviour and/or anxiety. CONCLUSION This is the first study in Australia to report that uptake of adolescent immunisations in specialist schools for young people with a disability is significantly lower than in mainstream settings. Comparative data during the same time period for students in mainstream schools demonstrated higher uptake, at 89% for dTpa and 75% for three doses of HPV. These data highlight the inequity of receipt of school-based immunisations for this group of adolescents, the barriers to which could be more thoroughly explored through qualitative inquiry from a socio-ecological perspective.
Collapse
|
15
|
Cervantes JL, Doan AH. Discrepancies in the evaluation of the safety of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2018; 113:e180063. [PMID: 29846395 PMCID: PMC5967601 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760180063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite being more than ten years since its introduction, global acceptance to the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is still low. The immunogenetic background of the host, and HPV antigen recognition, are important in natural HPV infection, and should be taken into account in the understanding of adverse autoimmune reactions by the HPV vaccine in certain groups. There is no doubt of the benefit of vaccines in the reduction of the incidence of infectious diseases, and in the case of HPV, the prevention of persistent infection that would lead to cervical cancer. Side-effects, however, should be closely monitored and reported without any bias, to ensure that the benefits of vaccines outweigh the risks of adverse reactions. In this article we bring the attention on certain adverse effects of the vaccine against HPV that have not been well studied as they are not well defined. We also compare the different approaches on HPV vaccine policies regarding its adverse reactions in countries like Japan and Colombia, vs. the recommendations issued by the WHO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge L Cervantes
- Paul L Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Amy Hoanganh Doan
- Paul L Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu EY, Smith LM, Ellis AK, Whitaker H, Law B, Kwong JC, Farrington P, Lévesque LE. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination in girls and the risk of autoimmune disorders: the Ontario Grade 8 HPV Vaccine Cohort Study. CMAJ 2018; 190:E648-E655. [PMID: 29807937 PMCID: PMC5973886 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite demonstrated effectiveness in real-world settings, concerns persist regarding the safety of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV4) vaccine. We sought to assess the risk of autoimmune disorders following HPV4 vaccination among grade 8 girls eligible for Ontario's school-based HPV vaccination program. METHODS We undertook a population-based retrospective cohort study using Ontario's administrative health and vaccination databases from 2007 to 2013. The self-controlled case series method was used to compare the rate of a composite end point of autoimmune disorders diagnosed during days 7-60 post-vaccination ("exposed" follow-up) to that at any other time ("unexposed"). The analysis was repeated to assess the effect of a history of immune-mediated diseases and time since vaccination. We also conducted an exploratory analysis of individual autoimmune disorders. Rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using conditional Poisson regression, adjusted for age, seasonality, concomitant vaccinations and infections. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 290 939 girls aged 12-17 years who were eligible for vaccination between 2007 and 2013. There was no significant risk for developing an autoimmune disorder following HPV4 vaccination (n = 681; rate ratio 1.12, 95% CI 0.85-1.47), and the association was unchanged by a history of immune-mediated disorders and time since vaccination. Exploratory analyses of individual autoimmune disorders found no significant risks, including for Bell palsy (n = 65; rate ratio 1.73, 95% CI 0.77-3.89), optic neuritis (n = 67; rate ratio 1.57, 95% CI 0.74-3.33) and Graves disease (n = 47; rate ratio 1.55, 95% CI 0.92-2.63). INTERPRETATION We did not observe an increased risk of autoimmune disorders following HPV4 vaccination among teenaged girls. These findings should reassure parents and health care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Y Liu
- Department of Public Health Sciences (Liu, Lévesque), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Smith), McGill University, Montréal, Que. Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine (Ellis), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Allergy Research Unit (Ellis), Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ont.; School of Mathematics and Statistics (Whitaker, Farrington), The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; Vaccine Safety Section, Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases (Law [retired from the Public Health Agency of Canada June 2015]), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Kwong, Lévesque), Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Ontario (Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Kwong), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Lévesque), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Leah M Smith
- Department of Public Health Sciences (Liu, Lévesque), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Smith), McGill University, Montréal, Que. Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine (Ellis), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Allergy Research Unit (Ellis), Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ont.; School of Mathematics and Statistics (Whitaker, Farrington), The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; Vaccine Safety Section, Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases (Law [retired from the Public Health Agency of Canada June 2015]), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Kwong, Lévesque), Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Ontario (Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Kwong), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Lévesque), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Anne K Ellis
- Department of Public Health Sciences (Liu, Lévesque), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Smith), McGill University, Montréal, Que. Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine (Ellis), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Allergy Research Unit (Ellis), Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ont.; School of Mathematics and Statistics (Whitaker, Farrington), The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; Vaccine Safety Section, Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases (Law [retired from the Public Health Agency of Canada June 2015]), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Kwong, Lévesque), Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Ontario (Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Kwong), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Lévesque), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Heather Whitaker
- Department of Public Health Sciences (Liu, Lévesque), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Smith), McGill University, Montréal, Que. Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine (Ellis), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Allergy Research Unit (Ellis), Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ont.; School of Mathematics and Statistics (Whitaker, Farrington), The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; Vaccine Safety Section, Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases (Law [retired from the Public Health Agency of Canada June 2015]), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Kwong, Lévesque), Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Ontario (Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Kwong), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Lévesque), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Barbara Law
- Department of Public Health Sciences (Liu, Lévesque), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Smith), McGill University, Montréal, Que. Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine (Ellis), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Allergy Research Unit (Ellis), Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ont.; School of Mathematics and Statistics (Whitaker, Farrington), The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; Vaccine Safety Section, Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases (Law [retired from the Public Health Agency of Canada June 2015]), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Kwong, Lévesque), Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Ontario (Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Kwong), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Lévesque), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jeffrey C Kwong
- Department of Public Health Sciences (Liu, Lévesque), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Smith), McGill University, Montréal, Que. Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine (Ellis), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Allergy Research Unit (Ellis), Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ont.; School of Mathematics and Statistics (Whitaker, Farrington), The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; Vaccine Safety Section, Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases (Law [retired from the Public Health Agency of Canada June 2015]), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Kwong, Lévesque), Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Ontario (Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Kwong), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Lévesque), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Paddy Farrington
- Department of Public Health Sciences (Liu, Lévesque), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Smith), McGill University, Montréal, Que. Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine (Ellis), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Allergy Research Unit (Ellis), Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ont.; School of Mathematics and Statistics (Whitaker, Farrington), The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; Vaccine Safety Section, Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases (Law [retired from the Public Health Agency of Canada June 2015]), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Kwong, Lévesque), Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Ontario (Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Kwong), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Lévesque), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Linda E Lévesque
- Department of Public Health Sciences (Liu, Lévesque), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Smith), McGill University, Montréal, Que. Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine (Ellis), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Allergy Research Unit (Ellis), Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ont.; School of Mathematics and Statistics (Whitaker, Farrington), The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; Vaccine Safety Section, Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases (Law [retired from the Public Health Agency of Canada June 2015]), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Kwong, Lévesque), Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Ontario (Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Kwong), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Lévesque), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shapiro GK, Guichon J, Kelaher M. Canadian school-based HPV vaccine programs and policy considerations. Vaccine 2017; 35:5700-5707. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Revised: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
18
|
Feiring B, Laake I, Bakken IJ, Greve-Isdahl M, Wyller VB, Håberg SE, Magnus P, Trogstad L. HPV vaccination and risk of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: A nationwide register-based study from Norway. Vaccine 2017. [PMID: 28648542 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination has been suggested to be involved in the aetiology of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). HPV vaccine was introduced in the Norwegian Childhood Immunisation Programme and offered 12year old girls from 2009. We studied the association between HPV vaccination and risk of CFS/ME and also assessed medical history in relation to both risk of CFS/ME and HPV vaccine uptake. METHODS Individual data from national registries, including the Norwegian Population Registry, the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Immunisation Registry were linked using the unique personal identification number. Yearly incidence rates of CFS/ME for 2009-2014 were calculated among the 824,133 boys and girls, aged 10-17 living in Norway during these 6years. A total of 176,453 girls born 1997-2002 were eligible for HPV vaccination and included in further analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs) of CFS/ME were estimated using Cox regression. Risk differences (RDs) of vaccine uptake were estimated with binomial regression. RESULTS A similar yearly increase in incidence rate of CFS/ME was observed among girls and boys, IRR=1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.19) and 1.15 (95% CI 1.09-1.22), respectively. HPV vaccination was not associated with CFS/ME, HR=0.86 (95% CI 0.69-1.08) for the entire follow-up period and 0.96 (95% CI 0.64-1.43) for the first two years after vaccination. The risk of CFS/ME increased with increasing number of previous hospital contacts, HR=5.23 (95% CI 3.66-7.49) for 7 or more contacts as compared to no contacts. Girls with 7 or more hospital contacts were less likely to be vaccinated than girls with no previous hospital contacts, RD=-5.5% (95% CI -6.7% to -4.2%). CONCLUSIONS No indication of increased risk of CFS/ME following HPV vaccination was observed among girls in the first 6 birth cohorts offered HPV vaccine through the national immunisation programme in Norway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berit Feiring
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Modelling, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Ida Laake
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Modelling, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Inger Johanne Bakken
- Department of Child Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Margrethe Greve-Isdahl
- Department of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Vegard Bruun Wyller
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Health, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway.
| | - Siri E Håberg
- Division of Physical and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Per Magnus
- Division of Health Data and Digitalisation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Lill Trogstad
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Modelling, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hefti E, Blanco JG. Pharmacotherapeutic Considerations for Individuals with Down Syndrome. Pharmacotherapy 2017; 37:214-220. [PMID: 27931082 DOI: 10.1002/phar.1880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Down syndrome (DS; trisomy 21) is the most common survivable disorder due to aneuploidy. Individuals with DS may experience multiple comorbid health problems including congenital heart defects, endocrine abnormalities, skin and dental problems, seizure disorders, leukemia, dementia, and obesity. These associated conditions may necessitate pharmacotherapeutic management with various drugs. The complex pathobiology of DS may alter drug disposition and drug response in some individuals. For example, reports have documented increased rates of adverse drug reactions in patients with DS treated for leukemia and dementia. Intellectual disability resulting from DS may impact adherence to medication regimens. In this review, we highlight literature focused on pharmacotherapy for individuals with DS. We discuss reports of altered drug disposition or response in patients with DS and explore social factors that may impact medication adherence in the DS setting. Enhanced monitoring during drug therapy in individuals with DS is justified based on reports of altered drug disposition, drug response, and other characteristics present in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Hefti
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| | - Javier G Blanco
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dubé E, Bettinger JA, Fisher WA, Naus M, Mahmud SM, Hilderman T. Vaccine acceptance, hesitancy and refusal in Canada: Challenges and potential approaches. CANADA COMMUNICABLE DISEASE REPORT = RELEVE DES MALADIES TRANSMISSIBLES AU CANADA 2016; 42:246-251. [PMID: 29769995 PMCID: PMC5757714 DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v42i12a02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
"Vaccine hesitancy" is a concept used frequently in vaccination discourse and is challenging previously held perspective that individual vaccination attitudes and behaviours are a simple dichotomy of accept or reject. Given the importance of achieving high vaccine coverage in Canada to avoid vaccine preventable diseases and their consequences, vaccine hesitancy is an important issue that needs to be addressed. This article describes the scope and causes of vaccine hesitancy in Canada and proposes potential approaches to address it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Dubé
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, QC
| | - JA Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - WA Fisher
- University of Western Ontario, London, ON
| | - M Naus
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC
| | - SM Mahmud
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
DiAnna Kinder F. Parental Refusal of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine. J Pediatr Health Care 2016; 30:551-557. [PMID: 26776841 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Revised: 11/21/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to explore reasons why parents may defer administration of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to their children. The literature suggests that parents choose to defer administration of this vaccine for several reasons. Data from this pilot study will contribute to our understanding of why parents defer administration of the vaccine. METHOD This mixed-methods study took place in a pediatric practice. After a health care visit in which the vaccine was deferred, a survey was provided to the parent in a private room. The survey was confidential and anonymous. RESULTS A total of 23 surveys were completed. Demographic data were reported. Data were analyzed for descriptive statistics and themes from open-ended questions. The majority of parents (75%) deferred administration of the HPV vaccine because they believed it was too new or required further research. DISCUSSION Nurse practitioners are in an excellent position to dispel myths and clarify information about HPV vaccination. The data are useful in communicating with parents and promoting best practices to facilitate good health in children.
Collapse
|
22
|
Dubé E, Gagnon D, Ouakki M, Bettinger JA, Guay M, Halperin S, Wilson K, Graham J, Witteman HO, MacDonald S, Fisher W, Monnais L, Tran D, Gagneur A, Guichon J, Saini V, Heffernan JM, Meyer S, Driedger SM, Greenberg J, MacDougall H. Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy in Canada: Results of a Consultation Study by the Canadian Immunization Research Network. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0156118. [PMID: 27257809 PMCID: PMC4892544 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 05/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
"Vaccine hesitancy" is a concept now frequently used in vaccination discourse. The increased popularity of this concept in both academic and public health circles is challenging previously held perspectives that individual vaccination attitudes and behaviours are a simple dichotomy of accept or reject. A consultation study was designed to assess the opinions of experts and health professionals concerning the definition, scope, and causes of vaccine hesitancy in Canada. We sent online surveys to two panels (1- vaccination experts and 2- front-line vaccine providers). Two questionnaires were completed by each panel, with data from the first questionnaire informing the development of questions for the second. Our participants defined vaccine hesitancy as an attitude (doubts, concerns) as well as a behaviour (refusing some / many vaccines, delaying vaccination). Our findings also indicate that both vaccine experts and front-line vaccine providers have the perception that vaccine rates have been declining and consider vaccine hesitancy an important issue to address in Canada. Diffusion of negative information online and lack of knowledge about vaccines were identified as the key causes of vaccine hesitancy by the participants. A common understanding of vaccine hesitancy among researchers, public health experts, policymakers and health care providers will better guide interventions that can more effectively address vaccine hesitancy within Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Dubé
- Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Maladies infectieuses, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Maladies infectieuses et immunitaires, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec–Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Dominique Gagnon
- Maladies infectieuses, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Manale Ouakki
- Maladies infectieuses, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Julie A. Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children’s Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Maryse Guay
- Maladies infectieuses, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Scott Halperin
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Kumanan Wilson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janice Graham
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Holly O. Witteman
- Département de médecine familiale et de médecine d’urgence, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec–Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Nursing Faculty, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - William Fisher
- Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laurence Monnais
- Département d'Histoire, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Dat Tran
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arnaud Gagneur
- Département de pédiatrie, Service de néonatologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Juliet Guichon
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vineet Saini
- Department of Production Animal Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jane M. Heffernan
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samantha Meyer
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Michelle Driedger
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Joshua Greenberg
- School of Journalism and Communication, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather MacDougall
- Department of History, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gilbert NL, Gilmour H, Dubé È, Wilson SE, Laroche J. Estimates and determinants of HPV non-vaccination and vaccine refusal in girls 12 to 14 y of age in Canada: Results from the Childhood National Immunization Coverage Survey, 2013. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2016; 12:1484-90. [PMID: 26942572 PMCID: PMC4964714 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1153207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Revised: 01/23/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the introduction of HPV vaccination programs in Canada in 2007, coverage has been below public health goals in many provinces and territories. This analysis investigated the determinants of HPV non-vaccination and vaccine refusal. Data from the Childhood National Immunization Coverage Survey (CNICS) 2013 were used to estimate the prevalence of HPV non-vaccination and parental vaccine refusal in girls aged 12-14 years, for Canada and the provinces and territories. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with non-vaccination and vaccine refusal, after adjusting for potential confounders. An estimated 27.7% of 12-14 y old girls had not been vaccinated against HPV, and 14.4% of parents reported refusing the vaccine. The magnitude of non-vaccination and vaccine refusal varied by province or territory and also by responding parent's country of birth. In addition, higher education was associated with a higher risk of refusal of the HPV vaccine. Rates of HPV non-vaccination and of refusal of the HPV vaccine differ and are influenced by different variables. These findings warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas L. Gilbert
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases; Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Département de médecine sociale et préventive; Université de Montréal; Montréal; Québec; Canada
| | - Heather Gilmour
- Health Analysis Division; Statistics Canada; Ottawa; Ontario; Canada
| | - Ève Dubé
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec; Québec; Québec; Canada
| | - Sarah E. Wilson
- Public Health Ontario; Toronto; Ontario; Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health; University of Toronto; Toronto; Ontario; Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Toronto; Ontario; Canada
| | - Julie Laroche
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases; Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Moore L, Cisse B, Batomen Kuimi BL, Stelfox HT, Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Clément J, Bourgeois G. Impact of socio-economic status on hospital length of stay following injury: a multicenter cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:285. [PMID: 26204932 PMCID: PMC4513757 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0949-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 07/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Injury is second only to cardiovascular disease in terms of acute care costs in North America. One key to improving injury care efficiency is to generate knowledge on the determinants of resource use. Socio-economic status (SES) is a documented risk factor for injury severity and mortality but its impact on length of stay (LOS) for injury admissions is unknown. This study aimed to examine the relationship between SES and LOS following injury. This multicenter retrospective cohort study was based on adults discharged alive from any trauma center (2007-2012; 57 hospitals; 65,486 patients) in a Canadian integrated provincial trauma system. SES was determined using ecological indices of material and social deprivation. Mean differences in LOS adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities, and injury severity were generated using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS Mean LOS was 13.5 days. Patients in the highest quintile of material/social deprivation had a mean LOS 0.5 days (95 % CI 0.1-0.9)/1.4 days (1.1-1.8) longer than those in the lowest quintile. Patients in the highest quintiles of both social and material deprivation had a mean LOS 2.6 days (1.8-3.5) longer than those in the lowest quintiles. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that patients admitted for traumatic injury who suffer from high social and/or material deprivation have longer acute care LOS in a universal-access health care system. The reasons behind observed differences need to be further explored but may indicate that discharge planning should take patient SES into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne Moore
- Department of social and preventive medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHU de Québec - Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
| | - Brahim Cisse
- Department of social and preventive medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHU de Québec - Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
| | - Brice Lionel Batomen Kuimi
- Department of social and preventive medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHU de Québec - Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
| | - Henry T Stelfox
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Alexis F Turgeon
- Department of social and preventive medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHU de Québec - Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
| | - François Lauzier
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHU de Québec - Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
| | - Julien Clément
- Department of Surgery, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
| | - Gilles Bourgeois
- Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services Sociaux, Montréal, Qc, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|