1
|
Feng Y, Kristensen SR, Lorgelly P, Meacock R, Núñez-Elvira A, Rodés-Sánchez M, Siciliani L, Sutton M. Pay-for-Performance incentives for specialised services in England: a mixed methods evaluation. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:857-876. [PMID: 37831298 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01630-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A Pay-for-Performance (P4P) programme, known as Prescribed Specialised Services Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (PSS CQUIN), was introduced for specialised services in the English NHS in 2013/2014. These services treat patients with rare and complex conditions. We evaluate the implementation of PSS CQUIN contracts between 2016/2017 and 2018/2019. METHODS We used a mixed methods evaluative approach. In the quantitative analysis, we used a difference-in-differences design to evaluate the effectiveness of ten PSS CQUIN schemes across a range of targeted outcomes. Potential selection bias was addressed using propensity score matching. We also estimated impacts on costs by scheme and financial year. In the qualitative analysis, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions to gain insights into the complexities of contract design and programme implementation. Qualitative data analysis was based on the constant comparative method, inductively generating themes. RESULTS The ten PSS CQUIN schemes had limited impact on the targeted outcomes. A statistically significant improvement was found for only one scheme: in the clinical area of trauma, the incentive scheme increased the probability of being discharged from Adult Critical Care within four hours of being clinically ready by 7%. The limited impact may be due to the size of the incentive payments, the complexity of the schemes' design, and issues around ownership, contracting and flexibility. CONCLUSION The PSS CQUIN schemes had little or no impact on quality improvements in specialised services. Future P4P programmes in healthcare could benefit from lessons learnt from this study on incentive design and programme implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Feng
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AB, UK.
| | - Søren Rud Kristensen
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Danish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Paula Lorgelly
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences and School of Business, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Meacock
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Luigi Siciliani
- Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Russo LX, Powell-Jackson T, Borghi J, Sampaio J, Gurgel Junior GD, Shimizu HE, Bezerra AFB, E Silva KSDB, Barreto JOM, de Carvalho ALB, Kovacs RJ, Gomes LB, Fardousi N, da Silva EN. Does pay-for-performance design matter? Evidence from Brazil. Health Policy Plan 2024; 39:593-602. [PMID: 38661300 PMCID: PMC11145906 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czae025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Pay-for-performance (P4P) schemes have been shown to have mixed effects on health care outcomes. A challenge in interpreting this evidence is that P4P is often considered a homogenous intervention, when in practice schemes vary widely in their design. Our study contributes to this literature by providing a detailed depiction of incentive design across municipalities within a national P4P scheme in Brazil [Primary Care Access and Quality (PMAQ)] and exploring the association of alternative design typologies with the performance of primary health care providers. We carried out a nation-wide survey of municipal health managers to characterize the scheme design, based on the size of the bonus, the providers incentivized and the frequency of payment. Using OLS regressions and controlling for municipality characteristics, we examined whether each design feature was associated with better family health team (FHT) performance. To capture potential interactions between design features, we used cluster analysis to group municipalities into five design typologies and then examined associations with quality of care. A majority of the municipalities included in our study used some of the PMAQ funds to provide bonuses to FHT workers, while the remaining municipalities spent the funds in the traditional way using input-based budgets. Frequent bonus payments (monthly) and higher size bonus allocations (share of 20-80%) were strongly associated with better team performance, while who within a team was eligible to receive bonuses did not in isolation appear to influence performance. The cluster analysis showed what combinations of design features were associated with better performance. The PMAQ score in the 'large bonus/many workers/high-frequency' cluster was 8.44 points higher than the 'no bonus' cluster, equivalent to a difference of 21.7% in the mean PMAQ score. Evidence from our study shows how design features can potentially influence health provider performance, informing the design of more effective P4P schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letícia Xander Russo
- Faculty of Business, Accounting and Economics, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Rodovia Dourados—Itahum, Km 12, Dourados, MS 79804-970, Brazil
| | - Timothy Powell-Jackson
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
| | - Josephine Borghi
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
| | - Juliana Sampaio
- Department of Health Promotion, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil
| | | | - Helena Eri Shimizu
- Department of Collective Health, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil
| | | | - Keila Silene de Brito E Silva
- Collective Health Nucleous, Academic Center of Vitória, Federal University of Pernambuco, Vitória de Santo Antão 55608-680, Brazil
| | | | | | - Roxanne J Kovacs
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
| | - Luciano Bezerra Gomes
- Department of Health Promotion, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil
| | - Nasser Fardousi
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jadidfard MP, Tahani B. Painless cost control as a central strategy for universal oral health coverage: A critical review with policy guide. Int J Dent Hyg 2024. [PMID: 38764157 DOI: 10.1111/idh.12818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to critically review the methods used to control the significantly increasing costs of dental care. METHODS Through a comprehensive search of the available literature, the cost control (CC) mechanisms for health services were identified from a healthcare system perspective. The probable applicability of each CC method was evaluated mainly based on its potential contribution to oral health promotion. Each mechanism was then classified and discussed under any of the two headings of financing and service provision. An operational guide was finally presented for policy-making in each of the three main models of healthcare systems, including National Health Services, social/public health insurance and private insurance. RESULTS From a total of 142 articles/reports retrieved in PubMed, 73 in Scopus and 791 in Google Scholar, 35 were included in the final review after eliminating the duplicates and screening process. Totally ten mechanisms were identified for CC of dental care. Seven were discussed under the financing function, including cost sharing, preauthorization, mixed payment method and an evidence-based approach to benefit package definition, among others. Three further methods were classified under the service provision function, including workforce skill mix with emphasis on primary oral healthcare providers, development of primary healthcare (PHC) network and an appropriate use of tele-dentistry. CONCLUSION Painless control of dental expenditures requires a smart integration of prevention into the CC plans. The suggested policy guide emphasizes organizational factors; particularly including the development of PHC-based networks with midlevel providers (desirably extended-duty dental hygienists) as the frontline oral healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad-Pooyan Jadidfard
- Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bahareh Tahani
- Department of Oral Public Health, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Slawomirski L, Hensher M, Campbell J, deGraaff B. Pay-for-performance and patient safety in acute care: A systematic review. Health Policy 2024; 143:105051. [PMID: 38547664 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Pay-for-performance (p4p) has been tried in all healthcare settings to address ongoing deficiencies in the quality and outcomes of care. The evidence for the effect of these policies has been inconclusive, especially in acute care. This systematic review focused on patient safety p4p in the hospital setting. Using the PRISMA guidelines, we searched five biomedical databases for quantitative studies using at least one outcome metric from database inception to March 2023, supplemented by reference tracking and internet searches. We identified 6,122 potential titles of which 53 were included: 39 original investigations, eight literature reviews and six grey literature reports. Only five system-wide p4p policies have been implemented, and the quality of evidence was low overall. Just over half of the studies (52 %) included failed to observe improvement in outcomes, with positive findings heavily skewed towards poor quality evaluations. The exception was the Fragility Hip Fracture Best Practice Tariff (BPT) in England, where sustained improvement was observed across various evaluations. All policies had a miniscule impact on total hospital revenue. Our findings underscore the importance of simple and transparent design, involvement of the clinical community, explicit links to other quality improvement initiatives, and gradual implementation of p4p initatives. We also propose a research agenda to lift the quality of evidence in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Slawomirski
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St., Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia.
| | - Martin Hensher
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St., Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Julie Campbell
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St., Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Barbara deGraaff
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St., Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ishida R, Koga K, Ohbe H, Izumi G, Matsui H, Yasunaga H, Osuga Y. Impact of government-issued financial incentive to medical facilities on management of secondary dysmenorrhea. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2024. [PMID: 38597093 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
AIM In April 2020, the Japanese government introduced a Specific Medical Fee for managing secondary dysmenorrhea (SD). This initiative provided financial incentives to medical facilities that provide appropriate management of SD with hormonal therapies. We aimed to assess how this policy affects the management processes and outcomes of patients with SD. METHODS Using a large Japanese administrative claims database, we identified outpatient visits of patients diagnosed with SD from April 2018 to March 2022. We used an interrupted time-series analysis and defined before April 2020 as the pre-introduction period and after April 2020 as the post-introduction period. Outcomes were the monthly proportions of outpatient visits due to SD and hormonal therapy among women in the database and the proportions of outpatient visits for hormonal therapy and continuous outpatient visits among patients with SD. RESULTS We identified 815 477 outpatient visits of patients diagnosed with SD during the pre-introduction period and 920 183 outpatient visits during the post-introduction period. There were significant upward slope changes after the introduction of financial incentives in the outpatient visits due to SD (+0.29% yearly; 95% confidence interval, +0.20% to +0.38%) and hormonal therapies (+0.038% yearly; 95% confidence interval, +0.030% to +0.045%) among the women in the database. Similarly, a significant level change was observed after the introduction of continuous outpatient visits among patients with SD (+2.68% monthly; 95% confidence interval, +0.87% to +4.49%). CONCLUSIONS Government-issued financial incentives were associated with an increase in the number of patients diagnosed with SD, hormonal therapies, and continuous outpatient visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Risa Ishida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kaori Koga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ohbe
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Gentaro Izumi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Osuga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Blonigen DM, Humphreys K. A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Pay-for-Performance Initiative to Reduce Costs of Care for High-Need Psychiatric Patients. Psychiatr Serv 2024:appips20230481. [PMID: 38566562 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pay-for-performance (P4P) initiatives hold promise for improving health care delivery but are rarely applied to behavioral health or tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This RCT examined the effectiveness of a P4P initiative to reduce total cost of 24-hour care among patients with high needs for psychiatric care in a large county in California. METHODS From August 2016 to March 2022, a total of 652 adult residents of Santa Clara County, California, were enrolled in a P4P initiative (mean±SD age=46.7±13.3 years, 61% male, 51% White, and 60% diagnosed as having a bipolar or psychotic disorder). Participants were randomly assigned to usual full-service partnerships from the county (N=327) or a comparable level of care from a contractor who agreed to a schedule of financial penalties and rewards based on whether enrollees (N=325) used more or less care than a historical cohort of similar county patients. The primary outcome was total cost of 24-hour psychiatric services. Secondary outcomes were costs of each of the 24-hour care services. RESULTS The proportion of the total sample that used 24-hour psychiatric services decreased over the 36-month study period. Intent-to-treat analyses revealed no differences between the two study conditions in total care costs during the follow-up period. No significant care utilization differences were observed between the two conditions in most of the individual 24-hour services. CONCLUSIONS A P4P initiative for high-need patients was no more effective than usual care for reducing costs of 24-hour psychiatric care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Blonigen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, and Center for Innovation to Implementation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, and Center for Innovation to Implementation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anders A. Reconsidering performance management to support innovative changes in health care services. J Health Organ Manag 2024; 38:125-142. [PMID: 38546186 PMCID: PMC10988776 DOI: 10.1108/jhom-12-2022-0379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE A large number of studies indicate that coercive forms of organizational control and performance management in health care services often backfire and initiate dysfunctional consequences. The purpose of this article is to discuss new approaches to performance management in health care services when the purpose is to support innovative changes in the delivery of services. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH The article represents cross-boundary work as the theoretical and empirical material used to discuss and reconsider performance management comes from several relevant research disciplines, including systematic reviews of audit and feedback interventions in health care and extant theories of human motivation and organizational control. FINDINGS An enabling approach to performance management in health care services can potentially contribute to innovative changes. Key design elements to operationalize such an approach are a formative and learning-oriented use of performance measures, an appeal to self- and social-approval mechanisms when providing feedback and support for local goals and action plans that fit specific conditions and challenges. ORIGINALITY/VALUE The article suggests how to operationalize an enabling approach to performance management in health care services. The framework is consistent with new governance and managerial approaches emerging in public sector organizations more generally, supporting a higher degree of professional autonomy and the use of nonfinancial incentives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anell Anders
- Department of Business Administration, Lund University
School of Economics and Management, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yordanov D, Oxholm AS, Prætorius T, Kristensen SR. Financial incentives for integrated care: A scoping review and lessons for evidence-based design. Health Policy 2024; 141:104995. [PMID: 38290390 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to the increasing prevalence of people with chronic conditions, healthcare systems restructure to integrate care across providers. However, many systems fail to achieve the desired outcomes. One likely explanation is lack of financial incentives for integrating care. OBJECTIVES We aim to identify financial incentives used to promote integrated care across different types of providers for patients with common chronic conditions and assess the evidence on (cost-)effectiveness and the facilitators/barriers to their implementation. METHODS This scoping review identifies studies published before December 2021, and includes 33 studies from the United States and the Netherlands. RESULTS We identify four types of financial incentives: shared savings, bundled payments, pay for performance, and pay for coordination. Substantial heterogeneity in the (cost-)effectiveness of these incentives exists. Key implementation barriers are a lack of infrastructure (e.g., electronic medical records, communication channels, and clinical guidelines). To facilitate integration, financial incentives should be easy to communicate and implement, and require additional financial support, IT support, training, and guidelines. CONCLUSIONS All four types of financial incentives may promote integrated care but not in all contexts. Shared savings appears to be the most promising incentive type for promoting (cost-)effective care integration with the largest number of favourable studies allowing causal interpretations. The limited evidence pool makes it hard to draw firm conclusions that are transferable across contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitar Yordanov
- Danish Centre for Health Economics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Anne Sophie Oxholm
- Danish Centre for Health Economics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Thim Prætorius
- Research Unit for Integrated Care and Prevention, Steno Diabetes Centre Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 11, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Søren Rud Kristensen
- Danish Centre for Health Economics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brosig-Koch J, Hennig-Schmidt H, Kairies-Schwarz N, Kokot J, Wiesen D. A new look at physicians' responses to financial incentives: Quality of care, practice characteristics, and motivations. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS 2024; 94:102862. [PMID: 38401249 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
There is considerable controversy about what causes (in)effectiveness of physician performance pay in improving the quality of care. Using a behavioral experiment with German primary-care physicians, we study the incentive effect of performance pay on service provision and quality of care. To explore whether variations in quality are based on the incentive scheme and the interplay with physicians' real-world profit orientation and patient-regarding motivations, we link administrative data on practice characteristics and survey data on physicians' attitudes with experimental data. We find that, under performance pay, quality increases by about 7pp compared to baseline capitation. While the effect increases with the severity of illness, the bonus level does not significantly affect the quality of care. Data linkage indicates that primary-care physicians in high-profit practices provide a lower quality of care. Physicians' other-regarding motivations and attitudes are significant drivers of high treatment quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannette Brosig-Koch
- Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg and Health Economics Research Center (CINCH) Essen, Germany.
| | | | - Nadja Kairies-Schwarz
- Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Centre for Health and Society (chs) and German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Germany.
| | - Johanna Kokot
- University of Hamburg and Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Germany.
| | - Daniel Wiesen
- University of Cologne, Department of Healthcare Management and Center for Social and Economic Behavior (C-SEB), Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Campbell KM, Schlag KE, Oni K, Amaechi O, Foster KE, Walcher C, Porterfield L. Overcoming Mission Competition in Departments of Family Medicine. Fam Med 2024; 56:5-8. [PMID: 38055852 PMCID: PMC10836619 DOI: 10.22454/fammed.2023.564792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Departments of family medicine are centered around the tripartite mission of education, research, and clinical care. Historically, these three missions have been balanced and interdependent; however, changes in the funding and structures of health systems have resulted in shrinking education and research missions and an increased emphasis on clinical care. In the wake of waning state and federal contributions to primary care research, many departments of family medicine have adopted a private practice approach. This approach is centered on generating revenue for the institution, incentivizing physicians to remain clinically focused through productivity and intense attention to volume targets. As a department's focus shifts to the clinical care mission, education and research are increasingly neglected and underresourced. Meanwhile, the administrative burden of electronic health records (EHRs) has further encroached on time previously allocated to research, with the EHR burden disproportionately affecting the primary care workforce. To counteract mission competition in departments of family medicine and to recover the vital missions of education and scholarship, devising a clear plan for reclaiming and sustaining a tripartite mission is important. Advocating for increased primary care research funding, enhancing EHRs, balancing clinical and education metrics, and supporting primary care research, especially for groups underrepresented in medicine, are interventions to help fully support education and research missions and to recover and sustain mission balance in departments of family medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendall M Campbell
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Karen E Schlag
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Keyona Oni
- Department of Family Medicine, Atrium Health-Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC
| | - Octavia Amaechi
- Spartanburg Regional Family Medicine Residency Program, Medical University of South Carolina Area Health Education Consortium, Spartanburg, SC
| | - Krys E Foster
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christen Walcher
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Laura Porterfield
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Scheefhals ZTM, de Vries EF, Struijs JN, Numans ME, van Exel J. Stakeholder perspectives on payment reform in maternity care in the Netherlands: A Q-methodology study. Soc Sci Med 2024; 340:116413. [PMID: 38000174 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Based on theoretical notions, there is consensus that alternative payment models to the common fee-for-service model have the potential to improve healthcare quality through increased collaboration and reduced under- and overuse. This is particularly relevant for maternity care in the Netherlands because perinatal mortality rates are relatively high in comparison to other Western countries. Therefore, an experiment with bundled payments for maternity care was initiated in 2017. However, the uptake of this alternative payment model remains low, as also seen in other countries, and fee-for-service models prevail. A deeper understanding of stakeholders' perspectives on payment reform in maternity care is necessary to inform policy makers about the obstacles to implementing alternative payment models and potential ways forward. We conducted a Q-methodology study to explore perspectives of stakeholders (postpartum care managers, midwives, gynecologists, managers, health insurers) in maternity care in the Netherlands on payment reform. Participants were asked to rank a set of statements relevant to payment reform in maternity care and explain their ranking during an interview. Factor analysis was used to identify patterns in the rankings of statements. We identified three distinct perspectives on payment reform in maternity care. One general perspective, broadly supported within the sector, focusing mainly on outcomes, and two complementary perspectives, one focusing more on equality and one focusing more on collaboration. This study shows there is consensus among stakeholders in maternity care in the Netherlands that payment reform is required. However, stakeholders have different views on the purpose and desired design of the payment reform and set different conditions. Working towards payment reform in co-creation with all involved parties may improve the general attitude towards payment reform, may enhance the level of trust among stakeholders, and may contribute to a higher uptake in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoë T M Scheefhals
- Department of National Health and Healthcare, Center for Public Health, Healthcare and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
| | - Eline F de Vries
- Department of Health Economics and Healthcare, Center for Public Health, Healthcare and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Jeroen N Struijs
- Department of National Health and Healthcare, Center for Public Health, Healthcare and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
| | - Mattijs E Numans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsai YS, Tsai WC, Chiu LT, Kung PT. Diabetes Pay-for-Performance Program Participation and Dialysis Risk in Relation to Educational Attainment: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2913. [PMID: 37998405 PMCID: PMC10671833 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11222913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs for diabetes care enable the provision of comprehensive and continuous health care to diabetic patients. However, patient outcomes may be affected by the patient's educational attainment. The present retrospective cohort study aimed to examine the effects of the educational attainment of diabetic patients on participation in a P4P program in Taiwan and the risk of dialysis. The data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. Patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) aged 45 years from 2002 to 2015 were enrolled and observed until the end of 2017. The effects of their educational attainment on their participation in a P4P program were examined using the Cox proportional hazards model, while the impact on their risk for dialysis was investigated using the Cox proportional hazards model. The probability of participation in the P4P program was significantly higher in subjects with a junior high school education or above than in those who were illiterate or had only attained an elementary school education. Subjects with higher educational attainment exhibited a lower risk for dialysis. Different educational levels had similar effects on reducing dialysis risk among diabetic participants in the P4P program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Shiun Tsai
- Department of Orthopedics, Feng Yuan Hospital, Taichung 420210, Taiwan;
- Department of Health Services Administration, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 406040, Taiwan; (W.-C.T.); (L.-T.C.)
| | - Wen-Chen Tsai
- Department of Health Services Administration, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 406040, Taiwan; (W.-C.T.); (L.-T.C.)
| | - Li-Ting Chiu
- Department of Health Services Administration, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 406040, Taiwan; (W.-C.T.); (L.-T.C.)
| | - Pei-Tseng Kung
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia University, Taichung 413305, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen CC, Chien KL, Cheng SH. Examining the Long-term Spillover Effects of a Pay-for-Performance Program in a Healthcare System That Lacks Referral Arrangements. Int J Health Policy Manag 2023; 12:7571. [PMID: 38618790 PMCID: PMC10699817 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have examined the intended effects of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs, yet little is known about the unintended spillover effects of such programs on intermediate clinical outcomes. This study examines the long-term spillover effects of a P4P program for diabetes care. METHODS This study uses a nationwide population-based natural experimental design with a 3-year follow-up period under Taiwan's universal coverage healthcare system. The intervention group consisted of 7688 patients who enrolled in the P4P program for diabetes care in 2017 and continuously participated in the program for three years. The comparison group was selected by propensity score matching (PSM) from patients seen by the same group of physicians. Each patient had four records: one pertaining to one year before the index date of the P4P program and the other three pertaining to follow-ups spanning over the next three years. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) with difference-in-differences (DID) estimations were used to consider the correlation between repeated observations for the same patients and patients within the same matched pairs. RESULTS Patients enrolled in the P4P program showed improvements in incentivized intermediate clinical outcomes that persisted over three years, including proper control of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We found a slight positive spillover effect of the P4P program on the control of non-incentivized triglyceride [TG]). However, we found no such effects on the non-incentivized high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) control. CONCLUSION The P4P program has achieved its primary goal of improving the incentivized intermediate clinical outcomes. The commonality in production among a set of activities is crucial for generating the spillover effects of an incentive program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Chen Chen
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Liong Chien
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Population Health Research Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shou-Hsia Cheng
- Population Health Research Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jamili S, Yousefi M, Pour HE, Houshmand E, Taghipour A, Tabatabaee SS, Adel A. Comparison of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs in primary care of selected countries: a comparative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:865. [PMID: 37580717 PMCID: PMC10426118 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09841-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pay for performance (P4P) schemes provide financial incentives or facilities to health workers based on the achievement of predetermined performance goals. Various P4P programs have been implemented around the world. There is a question of which model is suitable for p4p implementation to achieve better results. The purpose of this study is to compare pay for performance models in different countries. METHODS This is a descriptive-comparative study comparing the P4P model in selected countries in 2022. Data for each country are collected from reliable databases and are tabulated to compare their payment models. the standard framework of the P4P model is used for data analysis. RESULTS we used the standard P4P model framework to compare pay for performance programs in the primary care sector of selected countries because this framework can demonstrate all the necessary features of payment programs, including performance domains and measures, basis for reward or penalty, nature of the reward or penalty, and data reporting. The results of this study show that although the principles of P4P are almost similar in the selected countries, the biggest difference is in the definition of performance domains and measures. CONCLUSIONS Designing an effective P4P program is very complex, and its success depends on a variety of factors, from the socioeconomic and cultural context and the healthcare goals of governments to the personal characteristics of the healthcare provider. considering these factors and the general framework of the features of P4P programs are critical to the success of the p4p design and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Jamili
- Student Research Committee, Department of Health Economics and Management Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mehdi Yousefi
- Department of Health Economics and Management, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| | - Hossein Ebrahimi Pour
- Department of Health Economics and Management, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Elahe Houshmand
- Department of Health Economics and Management, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Ali Taghipour
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Seyed Saeed Tabatabaee
- Department of Health Economics and Management, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Amin Adel
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tummalapalli SL, Struthers SA, White DL, Beckrich A, Brahmbhatt Y, Erickson KF, Garimella PS, Gould ER, Gupta N, Lentine KL, Lew SQ, Liu F, Mohan S, Somers M, Weiner DE, Bieber SD, Mendu ML. Optimal Care for Kidney Health: Development of a Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Value Pathway. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:1315-1328. [PMID: 37400103 PMCID: PMC10400097 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) is a mandatory pay-for-performance program through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that aims to incentivize high-quality care, promote continuous improvement, facilitate electronic exchange of information, and lower health care costs. Previous research has highlighted several limitations of the MIPS program in assessing nephrology care delivery, including administrative complexity, limited relevance to nephrology care, and inability to compare performance across nephrology practices, emphasizing the need for a more valid and meaningful quality assessment program. This article details the iterative consensus-building process used by the American Society of Nephrology Quality Committee from May 2020 to July 2022 to develop the Optimal Care for Kidney Health MIPS Value Pathway (MVP). Two rounds of ranked-choice voting among Quality Committee members were used to select among nine quality metrics, 43 improvement activities, and three cost measures considered for inclusion in the MVP. Measure selection was iteratively refined in collaboration with the CMS MVP Development Team, and new MIPS measures were submitted through CMS's Measures Under Consideration process. The Optimal Care for Kidney Health MVP was published in the 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule and includes measures related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker use, hypertension control, readmissions, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, and advance care planning. The nephrology MVP aims to streamline measure selection in MIPS and serves as a case study of collaborative policymaking between a subspecialty professional organization and national regulatory agencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sri Lekha Tummalapalli
- Division of Healthcare Delivery Science & Innovation and Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- The Rogosin Institute, New York, New York
| | - Sarah A. Struthers
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Amy Beckrich
- Renal Physicians Association, Rockville, Maryland
| | | | - Kevin F. Erickson
- Selzman Institute for Kidney Health, Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Pranav S. Garimella
- Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Edward R. Gould
- Division of Nephrology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Nupur Gupta
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Krista L. Lentine
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM-Saint Louis University Hopstial, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Susie Q. Lew
- Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Frank Liu
- The Rogosin Institute, New York, New York
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Michael Somers
- Division of Nephrology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel E. Weiner
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Mallika L. Mendu
- Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pirritano M, Miller Parrish K, Kim Y, Solomon H, Keene J. It takes quality improvement to cross the chasm. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:e001906. [PMID: 37487653 PMCID: PMC10373703 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Healthcare organisations in the USA rank significantly lower in quality of care compared with other developed nations. Research shows US performance emphasises expensive treatment over effective prevention programmes. This study demonstrates how a comprehensive quality improvement programme can improve health outcomes in a large county-based Medicaid health plan. The health plan serves a diverse community of members spanning racial and ethnic groups with varying levels of clinical risk and social determinants of health burdens. We used a regression discontinuity design to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive quality improvement programme vs using mainly pay-for-performance on Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) metrics over the course of 10 years. We found significant improvements in several HEDIS metrics that occurred after the quality improvement programme was implemented. These results demonstrate the importance of using a comprehensive quality improvement strategy along with pay-for-performance to improve health outcomes. It was determined that this research was exempt from institutional review board approval, as it used administrative healthcare data, and did not involve direct interventions with human subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Pirritano
- Quality Improvement, Local Initiative Health Authority, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Yonsu Kim
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Policy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| | - Henock Solomon
- Local Initiative Health Authority, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jordan Keene
- Local Initiative Health Authority, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lu JFR, Chen YI, Eggleston K, Chen CH, Chen B. Assessing Taiwan's pay-for-performance program for diabetes care: a cost-benefit net value approach. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:717-733. [PMID: 35995886 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01504-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Pay-for-Performance (P4P) to better manage chronic conditions has yielded mixed results. A better understanding of the cost and benefit of P4P is needed to improve program assessment. To this end, we assessed the effect of a P4P program using a quasi-experimental intervention and control design. Two different intervention groups were used, one consisting of newly enrolled P4P patients, and another using P4P patients who have been enrolled since the beginning of the study. Patient-level data on clinical indicators, utilization and expenditures, linked with national death registry, were collected for diabetic patients at a large regional hospital in Taiwan between 2007 and 2013. Net value, defined as the value of life years gained minus the cost of care, is calculated and compared for the intervention group of P4P patients with propensity score-matched non-P4P samples. We found that Taiwan's implementation of the P4P program for diabetic care yielded positive net values, ranging from $40,084 USD to $348,717 USD, with higher net values in the continuous enrollment model. Our results suggest that the health benefits from P4P enrollment may require a sufficient time frame to manifest, so a net value approach incorporating future predicted mortality risks may be especially important for studying chronic disease management. Future research on the mechanisms by which the Taiwan P4P program helped improve outcomes could help translate our findings to other clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jui-Fen Rachel Lu
- Graduate Institute of Business and Management and Department of Health Care Management, College of Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Ying Isabel Chen
- Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Karen Eggleston
- Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, and NBER, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chih-Hung Chen
- Division of Metabolism, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Brian Chen
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gaunt DM, Papastavrou Brooks C, Pedder H, Crawley E, Horwood J, Metcalfe C. Participant retention in paediatric randomised controlled trials published in six major journals 2015-2019: systematic review and meta-analysis. Trials 2023; 24:403. [PMID: 37316945 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07333-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The factors which influence participant retention in paediatric randomised controlled trials are under-researched. Retention may be more challenging due to child developmental stages, involving additional participants, and proxy-reporting of outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis explores the factors which may influence retention in paediatric trials. METHODS Using the MEDLINE database, paediatric randomised controlled trials published between 2015 and 2019 were identified from six general and specialist high-impact factor medical journals. The review outcome was participant retention for each reviewed trial's primary outcome. Context (e.g. population, disease) and design (e.g. length of trial) factors were extracted. Retention was examined for each context and design factor in turn, with evidence for an association being determined by a univariate random-effects meta-regression analysis. RESULTS Ninety-four trials were included, and the median total retention was 0.92 (inter-quartile range 0.83 to 0.98). Higher estimates of retention were seen for trials with five or more follow-up assessments before the primary outcome, those less than 6 months between randomisation and primary outcome, and those that used an inactive data collection method. Trials involving children aged 11 and over had the higher estimated retention compared with those involving younger children. Those trials which did not involve other participants also had higher retention, than those where they were involved. There was also evidence that a trial which used an active or placebo control treatment had higher estimated retention, than treatment-as-usual. Retention increased if at least one engagement method was used. Unlike reviews of trials including all ages of participants, we did not find any association between retention and the number of treatment groups, size of trial, or type of treatment. CONCLUSIONS Published paediatric RCTs rarely report the use of specific modifiable factors that improve retention. Including multiple, regular follow-ups with participants before the primary outcome may reduce attrition. Retention may be highest when the primary outcome is collected up to 6 months after a participant is recruited. Our findings suggest that qualitative research into improving retention when trials involve multiple participants such as young people, and their caregivers or teachers would be worthwhile. Those designing paediatric trials also need to consider the use of appropriate engagement methods. RESEARCH ON RESEARCH (ROR) REGISTRY: https://ror-hub.org/study/2561.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisy M Gaunt
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Cat Papastavrou Brooks
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Hugo Pedder
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Esther Crawley
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Jeremy Horwood
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Foo CD, Yan JY, Chan ASL, Yap JCH. Identifying Key Themes of Care Coordination for Patients with Chronic Conditions in Singapore: A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11111546. [PMID: 37297686 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11111546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
A projected rise in patients with complex health needs and a rapidly ageing population will place an increased burden on the healthcare system. Care coordination can bridge potential gaps during care transitions and across the care continuum to facilitate care integration and the delivery of personalised care. Despite having a national strategic vision of improving care integration across different levels of care and community partners, there is no consolidation of evidence specifically on the salient dimensions of care coordination in the Singapore healthcare context. Hence, this scoping review aims to uncover the key themes that facilitate care coordination for patients with chronic conditions in Singapore to be managed in the community while illuminating under-researched areas in care coordination requiring further exploration. The databases searched were PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Results from Google Scholar were also included. Two independent reviewers screened articles in a two-stage screening process based on the Cochrane scoping review guidelines. Recommendation for inclusion was indicated on a three-point scale and rating conflicts were resolved through discussion. Of the 5792 articles identified, 28 were included in the final review. Key cross-cutting themes such as having standards and guidelines for care programmes, forging stronger partnerships across providers, an interoperable information system across care interfaces, strong programme leadership, financial and technical resource availabilities and patient and provider-specific factors emerged. This review also recommends leveraging these themes to align with Singapore's national healthcare vision to contain rising healthcare costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan De Foo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore
| | - Jia Yin Yan
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore
| | - Audrey Swee Ling Chan
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore
| | - Jason C H Yap
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Feng X, Qu Y, Sun K, Luo T, Meng K. Identifying strategic human resource management ability in the clinical departments of public hospitals in China: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066599. [PMID: 36921938 PMCID: PMC10030578 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Chinese public hospitals are managed like a bureaucracy, which is divided into two levels of hospital and departmental management. Improving strategic human resource management ability (SHRMA) within clinical departments can improve department performance and service quality, which is an important way for public hospitals to obtain an advantage in a diversified competitive medical market. However, there is a lack of specialised evaluation tools for SHRMA in clinical departments to support this effort. Therefore, this study aims to develop an index for evaluating the SHRMA of clinical departments in public hospitals. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING The Delphi technique was carried out with 22 experts, and an evaluation index of the SHRMA in the clinical departments of public hospitals was constructed. The weight of each indicator was calculated by the intuitive fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. RESULTS The SHRMA index constructed in this study for the clinical departments in public hospitals includes 5 first-level indicators, 13 second-level indicators and 36 third-level indicators. The first-level indicators are distributed in weight among human resource maintenance (0.204), human resource planning (0.201), human resource development (0.200), human resource stimulation (0.198) and human resource absorption (0.198). The top three weighted indicators on the second level are job analysis and position evaluation (0.105), career management (0.103) and salary incentivisation (0.100). CONCLUSIONS The index constructed in this study is scientific and feasible and is expected to provide an effective tool for the quantitative evaluation of SHRMA in the clinical departments of public hospitals in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingmiao Feng
- School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Qu
- Human Resources Department, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kaijie Sun
- Human Resources Department, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Luo
- Human Resources Department, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Meng
- School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dantas Gurgel G, Kristensen SR, da Silva EN, Gomes LB, Barreto JOM, Kovacs RJ, Sampaio J, Bezerra AFB, de Brito E Silva KS, Shimizu HE, de Sousa ANA, Fardousi N, Borghi J, Powell-Jackson T. Pay-for-performance for primary health care in Brazil: A comparison with England's Quality Outcomes Framework and lessons for the future. Health Policy 2023; 128:62-68. [PMID: 36481068 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Pay-for-performance (P4P) has been widely applied in OECD countries to improve the quality of both primary and secondary care, and is increasingly being implemented in low- and middle-income countries. In 2011, Brazil introduced one of the largest P4P schemes in the world, the National Programme for Improving Primary Care Access and Quality (PMAQ). We critically assess the design of PMAQ, drawing on a comparison with England's quality and outcome framework which, like PMAQ, was implemented at scale relatively rapidly within a nationalised health system. A key feature of PMAQ was that payment was based on the performance of primary care teams but rewards were given to municipalities, who had autonomy in how the funds could be used. This meant the incentives felt by family health teams were contingent on municipality decisions on whether to pass the funds on as bonuses and the basis upon which they allocated the funds between and within teams. Compared with England's P4P scheme, performance measurement under PMAQ focused more on structural rather than process quality of care, relied on many more indicators, and was less regular. While PMAQ represented an important new funding stream for primary health care, our review suggests that theoretical incentives generated were unclear and could have been better structured to direct health providers towards improvements in quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Søren Rud Kristensen
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK; Danish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | - Roxanne J Kovacs
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Juliana Sampaio
- Department of Health Promotion, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
| | | | | | - Helena Eri Shimizu
- Department of Collective Health, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
| | | | - Nasser Fardousi
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Josephine Borghi
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Timothy Powell-Jackson
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pay-for-Performance in the Massachusetts Medicaid Delivery System Transformation Initiative. J Healthc Qual 2023; 45:38-50. [PMID: 36006396 DOI: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pay-for-performance (P4P) is among the alternative payment models (APMs) that are designed to incentivize enhancements to healthcare efficiency and quality. Massachusetts' Office of Medicaid implemented a delivery system transformation initiative (DSTI) through an 1115(a) Demonstration Waiver to support and incentivize seven safety net hospitals to implement clinical care changes and transition to risk-based APMs. Comparative case study design was used to describe achievement of hospital-specific clinical and operational measures. Qualifying hospitals implemented 47 projects across three categories: (1) development of a fully integrated delivery system, (2) health outcomes and quality, and (3) ability to respond to statewide transformation to value-based purchasing and to accept alternatives to fee-for-service payments that promote system sustainability. Projects commonly focused on care transitions improvements, physical and behavioral healthcare integration, and chronic disease care management interventions. Collectively, the hospitals met all or most of 60 population-focused improvement measures and 10 common measures' targets, indicative of the progress. Some hospitals achieved substantial positive gains; however, missed targets suggest substantial organizational and workflow changes over a longer timeframe as well as consistent patient engagement may be necessary. Overall, the P4P structure of DSTI was effective in encouraging organizational change and supporting the transition of these hospitals towards APMs.
Collapse
|
23
|
The role of pay-for-performance in reducing healthcare disparities: A narrative literature review. Prev Med 2022; 164:107274. [PMID: 36156282 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
As American healthcare shifts to value-based payment, Pay-for-Performance (P4P) has become an important and controversial topic. One of the main controversies pertains to its potential to narrow or widen existing healthcare disparities depending on how the program is designed and implemented. It is thus imperative to understand which design features are most likely to reduce disparities. We conducted a systematic literature review from 2004 to 2021 of P4P's impact on disparities. Given the interdisciplinary nature of P4P research, multiple search strategies were combined, and many study designs were eligible for analysis. The literature was then qualitatively analyzed, with themes and major findings developed using Grounded Theory. Six major design features emerged as most promising in leveraging P4P to reduce disparities: 1) Risk/Case-Mix Adjustment; 2) Stratified Performance Measures/Stratification; 3) Disparity Reduction Metrics; 4) Exception Reporting; 5) Pay-for-Improvement; and 6) Population-Specific Metrics. Each design feature has its own mechanism, strengths, and weaknesses. We identify and define these features' direct and indirect effects on healthcare disparities. The interaction of each design feature with one another, with P4P as a whole, and within the larger reimbursement system can have considerable effects on disparities. Promising strategies exist to leverage P4P to narrow disparities for clinically and socially complex patients. The six design features discussed in this review help P4P programs address structural disadvantages faced by such patients and their providers. In regard to health equity, these design features can transform P4P from being part of the problem to being part of the solution.
Collapse
|
24
|
Jin JL, Bolton J, Nocon RS, Huang ES, Hoang H, Sripipatana A, Chin MH. Early experience of the quality improvement award program in federally funded health centers. Health Serv Res 2022; 57:1070-1076. [PMID: 35396732 PMCID: PMC9441276 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the Health Resources and Services Administration's Quality Improvement Award (QIA) program, award patterns, and early lessons learned. STUDY SETTING 1413 health centers were eligible for QIA from 2014 to 2018. STUDY DESIGN We assessed cumulative QIA funding earned and modified funding excluding payments for per-patient bonuses, electronic health record (EHR) use, patient-centered medical home (PCMH) accreditation, and health information technology. We compared health centers on rural/urban location, PCMH accreditation, EHR reporting, and size. DATA COLLECTION Organizational and quality measures are reported in the Uniform Data System, QIA program data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Average cumulative funding was higher for health centers that were not rural (USD 380,387 [± USD 233,467] vs. USD 303,526 [± USD 164,272]), had PCMH accreditation (USD 401,675 [± USD 218,246] vs. USD 250,784 [± USD 144,404]), used their EHR for quality reporting (USD 374,214 (± USD 222,866) vs. USD 331,150 (± USD 198,689)), and were large (USD 435,473 (± USD 238,193) vs. USD 270,681 (± USD 114,484) an USD 231,917 (± USD 97,847) for small and medium centers, respectively). There were similar patterns, with smaller differences, for average modified payments. CONCLUSIONS QIA is an important feasible initiative to introduce value-based payment principles to health centers. Early lessons for program design include announcing award criteria in advance and focusing on a smaller number of priority targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janel L. Jin
- Section of General Internal MedicineThe University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Joshua Bolton
- U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesHealth Resources and Services AdministrationRockvilleMarylandUSA
| | - Robert S. Nocon
- Department of Health Systems ScienceKaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of MedicinePasadenaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Elbert S. Huang
- Section of General Internal MedicineThe University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Hank Hoang
- U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesHealth Resources and Services AdministrationRockvilleMarylandUSA
| | - Alek Sripipatana
- U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesHealth Resources and Services AdministrationRockvilleMarylandUSA
| | - Marshall H. Chin
- Section of General Internal MedicineThe University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
de Walque D, Kandpal E. Reviewing the evidence on health financing for effective coverage: do financial incentives work? BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:bmjgh-2022-009932. [PMID: 36130774 PMCID: PMC9490608 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The widening gap between improving healthcare coverage rates and stagnating health outcomes across low-income and middle-income countries highlights the need for investments in quality of care, in addition to access. New research, presented in a World Bank report, examines one type of relevant policy reform: performance-based financing (PBF), which is a package reform that always includes performance pay to front-line health workers and often also provides facility autonomy, transparency and community engagement. A large body of rigorous studies and new analysis show that in under-resourced, centralised health systems, PBF can result in gains to service utilisation, but only has limited impacts on quality. Even the relative benefits of PBF on service utilisation are less clear when compared with (1) direct facility financing which provides front-line facilities with operating budgets and provider autonomy, but not performance pay and (2) demand-side financial support for health services (ie, conditional cash transfers and vouchers). Thus, the central component of PBF—the performance pay—appears to add little value over flexible payment systems and provider autonomy. The analysis shows that this lack of impact is unsurprising because most of the constraints to improving quality do not lie with the health worker in these settings. While PBF was conceived as a complex package ‘blueprint’, we review the evidence to conclude that only some elements seem to make sense. To improve quality of care, health financing should pivot from performance pay while retaining the elements of direct facility financing, autonomy, transparency and community engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien de Walque
- Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Eeshani Kandpal
- Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Birkner B, Blankart KE. The Effect of Biosimilar Prescription Targets for Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents on the Prescribing Behavior of Physicians in Germany. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1528-1538. [PMID: 35525830 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to aid decision makers by analyzing the impact of introducing biosimilar prescription targets on physician prescribing behavior in the prescription of biologic erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in Germany. METHODS We combined secondary data of regional level biosimilar prescription targets and secondary data of routinely collected claims data of dispensed prescriptions by physicians operating within the statutory health insurance system in ambulatory care across 7 German regions from 2009 to 2015. Two-way fixed-effects regression analysis was used to identify the average treatment effect of introducing biosimilar prescription targets at the physician level. The main outcome of interest was the share of biosimilar prescriptions on all prescriptions within the substance group. We compared 6 regions that introduced biosimilar prescription targets with 1 region without any prescription target policy. RESULTS Introducing biosimilar prescription targets increased the average share of biosimilars between 6 percentage points (P < .05) in Hamburg and up to 20 percentage points (P < .001) in Saxony-Anhalt. Stratification of specialists by prescription volume and adoption status indicated heterogeneous effects. We identified similar but higher effects for high-volume prescribers. Disentangling of effects with regard to the composition of biosimilar share suggested that the increase in biosimilar share was driven by increased biosimilar use accompanied by a nonsignificant decrease in original biologics prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS Prescription targets to alter physician prescribing behavior meet their intended goals by increasing biosimilar share. Physicians partly responded to the policy by decreasing overall prescriptions of the target substance. Prescription targets might be a useful tool, but decision makers need to consider all aspects of potential responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Birkner
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Katharina E Blankart
- Faculty of Business Administration and Economics/CINCH Health Economics Research Center, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Henkel M, Horn T, Leboutte F, Trotsenko P, Dugas SG, Sutter SU, Ficht G, Engesser C, Matthias M, Stalder A, Ebbing J, Cornford P, Seifert H, Stieltjes B, Wetterauer C. Initial experience with AI Pathway Companion: Evaluation of dashboard-enhanced clinical decision making in prostate cancer screening. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0271183. [PMID: 35857753 PMCID: PMC9299327 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Rising complexity of patients and the consideration of heterogeneous information from various IT systems challenge the decision-making process of urological oncologists. Siemens AI Pathway Companion is a decision support tool that provides physicians with comprehensive patient information from various systems. In the present study, we examined the impact of providing organized patient information in comprehensive dashboards on information quality, effectiveness, and satisfaction of physicians in the clinical decision-making process. Methods Ten urologists in our department performed the entire diagnostic workup to treatment decision for 10 patients in the prostate cancer screening setting. Expenditure of time, information quality, and user satisfaction during the decision-making process with AI Pathway Companion were recorded and compared to the current workflow. Results A significant reduction in the physician’s expenditure of time for the decision-making process by -59.9% (p < 0,001) was found using the software. System usage showed a high positive effect on evaluated information quality parameters completeness (Cohen’s d of 2.36), format (6.15), understandability (2.64), as well as user satisfaction (4.94). Conclusion The software demonstrated that comprehensive organization of information improves physician’s effectiveness and satisfaction in the clinical decision-making process. Further development is needed to map more complex patient pathways, such as the follow-up treatment of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurice Henkel
- Research & Analytic Services University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| | - Tobias Horn
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Francois Leboutte
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Trotsenko
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Gina Dugas
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Ursula Sutter
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Georg Ficht
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Engesser
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marc Matthias
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Jan Ebbing
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Helge Seifert
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bram Stieltjes
- Research & Analytic Services University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Wetterauer
- University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jin Y, Tian W, Yu Y, Pan W, Yuan B. Incentives Promoting Contracted Family Doctor Service Policy to Improve Continuity and Coordination in Diabetes Patient Management Care in China. Front Public Health 2022; 10:843217. [PMID: 35910878 PMCID: PMC9334846 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundAs the first step toward building a gatekeeping system in China, the governments have introduced a contracted family doctor service (CFDS) policy in primary healthcare (PHC) facilities. This study was to examine the association between apply of incentive to improve the implementation of CFDS and the performance on diabetes management care.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study in 72 PHC facilities in 6 cities that piloted the CFDS. Multivariate regression models were applied, based on a sample of 827 PHC providers and 420 diabetic patients.ResultsPHC providers who reported the performance being linked with increased income were 168.1 and 78.0% more likely to have good continuity and coordination of diabetes patient management care, respectively. Additional one-point percentage of PHC providers whose performance on CFDS was assessed was associated with 7.192 times higher probability of patients with control of blood glucose.DiscussionInclusion of incentives rewarding better performance on CFDS were associated with better delivery process and outcome performance on diabetes management care.ConclusionDesign and implementation of the incentive should be accompanied with the policy of CFDS, in order to increase the proportion of performance-related income of PHC providers, thereby improving the quality of diabetes management care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinzi Jin
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenya Tian
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yahang Yu
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Wen Pan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Beibei Yuan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- *Correspondence: Beibei Yuan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fardousi N, Nunes da Silva E, Kovacs R, Borghi J, Barreto JOM, Kristensen SR, Sampaio J, Shimizu HE, Gomes LB, Russo LX, Gurgel GD, Powell-Jackson T. Performance bonuses and the quality of primary health care delivered by family health teams in Brazil: A difference-in-differences analysis. PLoS Med 2022; 19:e1004033. [PMID: 35797409 PMCID: PMC9262241 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pay-for-performance (P4P) programmes to incentivise health providers to improve quality of care have been widely implemented globally. Despite intuitive appeal, evidence on the effectiveness of P4P is mixed, potentially due to differences in how schemes are designed. We exploited municipality variation in the design features of Brazil's National Programme for Improving Primary Care Access and Quality (PMAQ) to examine whether performance bonuses given to family health team workers were associated with changes in the quality of care and whether the size of bonus mattered. METHODS AND FINDINGS For this quasi-experimental study, we used a difference-in-differences approach combined with matching. We compared changes over time in the quality of care delivered by family health teams between (bonus) municipalities that chose to use some or all of the PMAQ money to provide performance-related bonuses to team workers with (nonbonus) municipalities that invested the funds using traditional input-based budgets. The primary outcome was the PMAQ score, a quality of care index on a scale of 0 to 100, based on several hundred indicators (ranging from 598 to 660) of health care delivery. We did one-to-one matching of bonus municipalities to nonbonus municipalities based on baseline demographic and economic characteristics. On the matched sample, we used ordinary least squares regression to estimate the association of any bonus and size of bonus with the prepost change over time (between November 2011 and October 2015) in the PMAQ score. We performed subgroup analyses with respect to the local area income of the family health team. The matched analytical sample comprised 2,346 municipalities (1,173 nonbonus municipalities; 1,173 bonus municipalities), containing 10,275 family health teams that participated in PMAQ from the outset. Bonus municipalities were associated with a 4.6 (95% CI: 2.7 to 6.4; p < 0.001) percentage point increase in the PMAQ score compared with nonbonus municipalities. The association with quality of care increased with the size of bonus: the largest bonus group saw an improvement of 8.2 percentage points (95% CI: 6.2 to 10.2; p < 0.001) compared with the control. The subgroup analysis showed that the observed improvement in performance was most pronounced in the poorest two-fifths of localities. The limitations of the study include the potential for bias from unmeasured time-varying confounding and the fact that the PMAQ score has not been validated as a measure of quality of care. CONCLUSIONS Performance bonuses to family health team workers compared with traditional input-based budgets were associated with an improvement in the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasser Fardousi
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Roxanne Kovacs
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Josephine Borghi
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Juliana Sampaio
- Department of Health Promotion, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil
| | | | - Luciano B. Gomes
- Department of Health Promotion, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil
| | | | | | - Timothy Powell-Jackson
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Diaconu K, Witter S, Binyaruka P, Borghi J, Brown GW, Singh N, Herrera CA. Appraising pay-for-performance in healthcare in low- and middle-income countries through systematic reviews: reflections from two teams. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 5:ED000157. [PMID: 35593101 PMCID: PMC9121198 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.ed000157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Neha Singh
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Cristian A Herrera
- Department of Public HealthSchool of MedicinePontificia Universidad Católica de ChileChile
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dissemination of Contingency Management for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. Perspect Behav Sci 2022; 46:35-49. [PMID: 37006603 PMCID: PMC10050478 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-022-00328-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Contingency management is an intervention for substance use disorders based on operant principles. The evidence base in support of contingency management is massive. It is effective in treating substance use disorder in general and opioid use disorder in particular. Dissemination has remained slow despite the urgency created by the opioid epidemic. Key barriers include a lack of expertise, time, and money. Implementing contingency management with smartphones eliminates the need for special training. It also solves logistical issues and requires little time on the part of clinicians. Thus, remaining barriers relate to cost. Federal anti-kickback regulations complicate solutions to the cost barrier. Other important regulatory challenges related to cost include the lack of billing codes and the difficulty of obtaining FDA approval for digital therapeutics. Even after the cost barrier is overcome, provider adoption is not guaranteed. Incentivizing providers for collaborative care may increase adoption and generate referrals. Recently proposed legislation and governmental policy statements provide optimism regarding the near-term large-scale adoption of contingency management in the treatment of opioid use disorder.
Collapse
|
32
|
Meier R, Chmiel C, Valeri F, Muheim L, Senn O, Rosemann T. The Effect of Financial Incentives on Quality Measures in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:556-564. [PMID: 33904045 PMCID: PMC8858366 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06714-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial incentives are often used to improve quality of care in chronic care patients. However, the evidence concerning the effect of financial incentives is still inconclusive. OBJECTIVE To test the effect of financial incentives on quality measures (QMs) in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus in primary care. We incentivized a clinical QM and a process QM to test the effect of financial incentives on different types of QMs and to investigate the spill-over effect on non-incentivized QMs. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS Parallel cluster randomized controlled trial based on electronic medical records database involving Swiss general practitioners (GPs). Practices were randomly allocated. INTERVENTION All participants received a bimonthly feedback report. The intervention group additionally received potential financial incentives on GP level depending on their performance. MAIN MEASURES Between-group differences in proportions of patients fulfilling incentivized QM (process QM of annual HbA1c measurement and clinical QM of blood pressure level below 140/95 mmHg) after 12 months. KEY RESULTS Seventy-one GPs (median age 52 years, 72% male) from 43 different practices and subsequently 3838 patients with diabetes mellitus (median age 70 years, 57% male) were included. Proportions of patients with annual HbA1c measurements remained unchanged (intervention group decreased from 79.0 to 78.3%, control group from 81.5 to 81.0%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90-1.32, p = 0.39). Proportions of patients with blood pressure below 140/95 improved from 49.9 to 52.5% in the intervention group and decreased from 51.2 to 49.0% in the control group (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99-1.36, p = 0.06). Proportions of non-incentivized process QMs increased significantly in the intervention group. CONCLUSION GP level financial incentives did not result in more frequent HbA1c measurements or in improved blood pressure control. Interestingly, we could confirm a spill-over effect on non-incentivized process QMs. Yet, the mechanism of spill-over effects of financial incentives is largely unclear. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN13305645.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahel Meier
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. .,University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Corinne Chmiel
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Valeri
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Leander Muheim
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Senn
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Rosemann
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Giancotti M, Mauro M, Rania F. Exploring the effectiveness of a P4P scheme from the perspective of Italian general practitioners: A replication study. Int J Health Plann Manage 2022; 37:1526-1544. [DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Giancotti
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro Catanzaro Italy
| | - Marianna Mauro
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro Catanzaro Italy
| | - Francesco Rania
- Department of Law, Economics and Sociology Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro Catanzaro Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
CLARKE LORCAN, ANDERSON MICHAEL, ANDERSON ROB, KLAUSEN MORTENBONDE, FORMAN REBECCA, KERNS JENNA, RABE ADRIAN, KRISTENSEN SØRENRUD, THEODORAKIS PAVLOS, VALDERAS JOSE, KLUGE HANS, MOSSIALOS ELIAS. Economic Aspects of Delivering Primary Care Services: An Evidence Synthesis to Inform Policy and Research Priorities. Milbank Q 2021; 99:974-1023. [PMID: 34472653 PMCID: PMC8718591 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy Points The 2018 Declaration of Astana reemphasized the importance of primary health care and its role in achieving universal health coverage. While there is a large amount of literature on the economic aspects of delivering primary care services, there is a need for more comprehensive overviews of this evidence. In this article, we offer such an overview. Evidence suggests that there are several strategies involving coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance arrangements which can, if implemented, have positive economic impacts on the delivery of primary care services. These include arrangements such as worker task-shifting and telemedicine. The implementation of any such arrangements, based on positive economic evidence, should carefully account for potential impacts on overall health care access and quality. There are many opportunities for further research, with notable gaps in evidence on the impacts of increasing primary care funding or the overall supply of primary care services. CONTEXT The 2018 Declaration of Astana reemphasized the importance of primary health care and its role in achieving universal health coverage. To strengthen primary health care, policymakers need guidance on how to allocate resources in a manner that maximizes its economic benefits. METHODS We collated and synthesized published systematic reviews of evidence on the economic aspects of different models of delivering primary care services. Building on previous efforts, we adapted existing taxonomies of primary care components to classify our results according to four categories: coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance. FINDINGS We identified and classified 109 reviews that met our inclusion criteria according to our taxonomy of primary care components: coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance arrangements. A significant body of evidence suggests that several specific primary care arrangements, such as health workers' task shifting and telemedicine, can have positive economic impacts (such as lower overall health care costs). Notably absent were reviews on the impact of increasing primary care funding or the overall supply of primary care services. CONCLUSIONS There is a great opportunity for further research to systematically examine the broader economic impacts of investing in primary care services. Despite progress over the last decade, significant evidence gaps on the economic implications of different models of primary care services remain, which could help inform the basis of future research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LORCAN CLARKE
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- Trinity College Dublin
| | | | | | | | | | - JENNA KERNS
- London School of Economics and Political Science
| | | | | | | | | | - HANS KLUGE
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO/Europe)
| | - ELIAS MOSSIALOS
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- Imperial College London
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Trogdon JG, Amin K, Gupta P, Urick BY, Reeder-Hayes KE, Farley JF, Wheeler SB, Spees L, Lund JL. Providers' mediating role for medication adherence among cancer survivors. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0260358. [PMID: 34843550 PMCID: PMC8629272 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We conducted a mediation analysis of the provider team’s role in changes to chronic condition medication adherence among cancer survivors. Methods We used a retrospective, longitudinal cohort design following Medicare beneficiaries from 18-months before through 24-months following cancer diagnosis. We included beneficiaries aged ≥66 years newly diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung or prostate cancer and using medication for non-insulin anti-diabetics, statins, and/or anti-hypertensives and similar individuals without cancer from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, 2008–2014. Chronic condition medication adherence was defined as a proportion of days covered ≥ 80%. Provider team structure was measured using two factors capturing the number of providers seen and the historical amount of patient sharing among providers. Linear regressions relying on within-survivor variation were run separately for each cancer site, chronic condition, and follow-up period. Results The number of providers and patient sharing among providers increased after cancer diagnosis relative to the non-cancer control group. Changes in provider team complexity explained only small changes in medication adherence. Provider team effects were statistically insignificant in 13 of 17 analytic samples with significant changes in adherence. Statistically significant provider team effects were small in magnitude (<0.5 percentage points). Conclusions Increased complexity in the provider team associated with cancer diagnosis did not lead to meaningful reductions in medication adherence. Interventions aimed at improving chronic condition medication adherence should be targeted based on the type of cancer and chronic condition and focus on other provider, systemic, or patient factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin G. Trogdon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Krutika Amin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Parul Gupta
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Benjamin Y. Urick
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Joel F. Farley
- Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Lisa Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jennifer L. Lund
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Changing Invisible Landscapes - Financial Reform of Health and Care Systems: Ten Issues to Consider. Int J Integr Care 2021; 21:21. [PMID: 34824570 PMCID: PMC8603852 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
37
|
Meier R, Chmiel C, Valeri F, Muheim L, Senn O, Rosemann T. Long-Term Effects of Financial Incentives for General Practitioners on Quality Indicators in the Treatment of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care-A Follow-Up Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Parallel Controlled Trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:664510. [PMID: 34765612 PMCID: PMC8576070 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.664510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The effect of financial incentives on the quality of primary care is of high interest, and so is its sustainability after financial incentives are withdrawn. Objective: To assess both long-term effects and sustainability of financial incentives for general practitioners (GPs) in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus based on quality indicators (QIs) calculated from routine data from electronic medical records. Design/Participants: Randomized controlled trial using routine data from electronic medical records of patients with diabetes mellitus of Swiss GPs. Intervention: During the study period of 24 months, all GPs received bimonthly feedback reports with information on their actual treatment as reflected in QIs. In the intervention group, the reports were combined with financial incentives for quality improvement. The incentive was stopped after 12 months. Measurements: Proportion of patients meeting the process QI of annual HbA1c measurements and the clinical QI of blood pressure levels below 140/85 mmHg. Results: A total of 71 GPs from 43 different practices were included along with 3,854 of their patients with diabetes mellitus. Throughout the study, the proportion of patients with annual HbA1c measurements was stable in the intervention group (78.8–78.9%) and decreased slightly in the control group (81.5–80.2%) [odds ratio (OR): 1.21; 95% CI: 1.04–1.42, p < 0.05]. The proportion of patients achieving blood pressure levels below 140/85 mmHg decreased in the control group (51.2–47.2%) and increased in the intervention group (49.7–51.9%) (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04–1.35, p < 0.05) where it peaked at 54.9% after 18 months and decreased steadily over the last 6 months. Conclusion: After the withdrawal of financial incentives for the GPs after 12 months, some QIs still improved, indicating that 1 year might be too short to observe the full effect of such interventions. The decrease in QI achievement rates after 18 months suggests that the positive effects of time-limited financial incentives eventually wane.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahel Meier
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Corinne Chmiel
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Valeri
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Leander Muheim
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Senn
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Rosemann
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mason T, Whittaker W, Jones A, Sutton M. Did paying drugs misuse treatment providers for outcomes lead to unintended consequences for hospital admissions? Difference-in-differences analysis of a pay-for-performance scheme in England. Addiction 2021; 116:3082-3093. [PMID: 33739485 DOI: 10.1111/add.15486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To estimate how a scheme to pay substance misuse treatment service providers according to treatment outcomes affected hospital admissions. DESIGN A controlled, quasi-experimental (difference-in-differences) observational study using negative binomial regression. SETTING Hospitals in all 149 organisational areas in England for the period 2009-2010 to 2015-2016. PARTICIPANTS 572 545 patients admitted to hospital with a diagnosis indicating drug misuse, defined based on International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes (37 964 patients in 8 intervention areas and 534 581 in 141 comparison areas). INTERVENTION AND COMPARATORS Linkage of provider payments to recovery outcome indicators in 8 intervention organisational areas compared with all 141 comparison organisational areas in England. Outcome indicators included: abstinence from presenting substance, abstinent completion of treatment and non-re-presentation to treatment in the 12 months following completion. MEASUREMENTS Annual counts of hospital admissions, emergency admissions and admissions including a diagnosis indicating drugs misuse. Covariates included age, sex, ethnic origin and deprivation. FINDINGS For 37 245 patients in the intervention areas, annual emergency admissions were 1.073 times higher during the operation of the scheme compared with non-intervention areas (95% CI = 1.049; 1.097). There were an estimated additional 3 352 emergency admissions in intervention areas during the scheme. These findings were robust to a range of secondary analyses. CONCLUSION A programme in England from 2012 to 2014 to pay substance misuse treatment service providers according to treatment outcomes appeared to increase emergency hospital admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Mason
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - William Whittaker
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew Jones
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Melbourne Institute, Applied Economic and Social Research, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Evans JM, Gilbert JE, Bacola J, Hagens V, Simanovski V, Holm P, Harvey R, Blake PG, Matheson G. What do end-users want to know about managing the performance of healthcare delivery systems? Co-designing a context-specific and practice-relevant research agenda. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:131. [PMID: 34635106 PMCID: PMC8504563 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00779-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite increasing interest in joint research priority-setting, few studies engage end-user groups in setting research priorities at the intersection of the healthcare and management disciplines. With health systems increasingly establishing performance management programmes to account for and incentivize performance, it is important to conduct research that is actionable by the end-users involved with or impacted by these programmes. The aim of this study was to co-design a research agenda on healthcare performance management with and for end-users in a specific jurisdictional and policy context. Methods We undertook a rapid review of the literature on healthcare performance management (n = 115) and conducted end-user interviews (n = 156) that included a quantitative ranking exercise to prioritize five directions for future research. The quantitative rankings were analysed using four methods: mean, median, frequency ranked first or second, and frequency ranked fifth. The interview transcripts were coded inductively and analysed thematically to identify common patterns across participant responses. Results Seventy-three individual and group interviews were conducted with 156 end-users representing diverse end-user groups, including administrators, clinicians and patients, among others. End-user groups prioritized different research directions based on their experiences and information needs. Despite this variation, the research direction on motivating performance improvement had the highest overall mean ranking and was most often ranked first or second and least often ranked fifth. The research direction was modified based on end-user feedback to include an explicit behaviour change lens and stronger consideration for the influence of context. Conclusions Joint research priority-setting resulted in a practice-driven research agenda capable of generating results to inform policy and management practice in healthcare as well as contribute to the literature. The results suggest that end-users are keen to open the “black box” of performance management to explore more nuanced questions beyond “does performance management work?” End-users want to know how, when and why performance management contributes to behaviour change (or fails to) among front-line care providers. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00779-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna M Evans
- DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S4M4, Canada.
| | - Julie E Gilbert
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jasmine Bacola
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Philip Holm
- Ontario Health (Ontario Renal Network), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca Harvey
- Ontario Health (Ontario Renal Network), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter G Blake
- Ontario Health (Ontario Renal Network), Toronto, ON, Canada.,London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Garth Matheson
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Khanna M, Loevinsohn B, Pradhan E, Fadeyibi O, McGee K, Odutolu O, Fritsche GB, Meribole E, Vermeersch CMJ, Kandpal E. Decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Nigeria. BMC Med 2021; 19:224. [PMID: 34544415 PMCID: PMC8452448 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02092-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health system financing presents a challenge in many developing countries. We assessed two reform packages, performance-based financing (PBF) and direct facility financing (DFF), against each other and business-as-usual for maternal and child healthcare (MCH) provision in Nigeria. METHODS We sampled 571 facilities (269 in PBF; 302 in DFF) in 52 districts randomly assigned to PBF or DFF, and 215 facilities in 25 observable-matched control districts. PBF facilities received $2 ($1 for operating grants plus $1 for bonuses) for every $1 received by DFF facilities (operating grants alone). Both received autonomy, supervision, and enhanced community engagement, isolating the impact of additional performance-linked facility and health worker payments. Facilities and households with recent pregnancies in facility catchments were surveyed at baseline (2014) and endline (2017). Outcomes were Penta3 immunization, institutional deliveries, modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR), four-plus antenatal care (ANC) visits, insecticide-treated mosquito net (ITN) use by under-fives, and directly observed quality of care (QOC). We estimated difference-in-differences with state fixed effects and clustered standard errors. RESULTS PBF increased institutional deliveries by 10% points over DFF and 7% over business-as-usual (p<0.01). PBF and DFF were more effective than business-as-usual for Penta3 (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively); PBF also for mCPR (p<0.05). Twenty-one of 26 QOC indicators improved in both PBF and DFF relative to business-as-usual (p<0.05). However, except for deliveries, PBF was as or less effective than DFF: Penta3 immunization and ITN use were each 6% less than DFF (p<0.1 for both) and QOC gains were also comparable. Utilization gains come from the middle of the rural wealth distribution (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that both PBF and DFF represent significant improvements over business-as-usual for service provision and quality of care. However, except for institutional delivery, PBF and DFF do not differ from each other despite PBF disbursing $2 for every dollar disbursed by DFF. These findings highlight the importance of direct facility financing and decentralization in improving PHC and suggest potential complementarities between the two approaches in strengthening MCH service delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03890653 ; May 8, 2017. Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin Loevinsohn
- The Global Fund, Global Health Campus, Chemin du Pommier 40, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Elina Pradhan
- Health, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA
| | - Opeyemi Fadeyibi
- Health, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank, 102 Yakubu Gowon Cres, Asokoro, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Kevin McGee
- Development Data Group, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA
| | - Oluwole Odutolu
- Health, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank, 102 Yakubu Gowon Cres, Asokoro, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Gyorgy Bela Fritsche
- Health, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA
| | - Emmanuel Meribole
- The Federal Ministry of Health of Nigeria, New Federal Secretariat Complex, Phase III, Ahmadu Bello Way, Central Business District, FCT, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Christel M J Vermeersch
- Health, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA
| | - Eeshani Kandpal
- Development Data Group, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA. .,Development Research Group, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Harrington A, Malone D, Doucette W, Vaffis S, Bhattacharjee S, Chan C, Warholak T. A conceptual framework for evaluation of community pharmacy pay-for-performance programs. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2021; 61:804-812. [PMID: 34413002 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent interest in initiating pay-for-performance (P4P) programs indicates an underlying belief that economic incentives will have a direct impact on health care quality and efficiency. Evaluations of the impact of P4P programs on health care organizations and providers have been presented in the literature; however, none have focused on the impact of an incentive targeting community pharmacies. OBJECTIVE To propose a theory-derived conceptual framework of how a financial incentive might work in a community pharmacy. METHODS Studies from the fields of economics (agency theory), psychology (intrinsic and extrinsic motivators; expectancy theory), and organizational theory (ownership, institutional layers, organizational culture, and change management; quality improvement) were reviewed to inform the framework's components. This proposed conceptual framework also integrated and expanded on previous health care-related P4P models. RESULTS P4P programs inherently use financial incentives to catalyze change; however, elements from psychology and organizational theories along with economic theory were identified as important considerations in how a financial incentive may operate when targeting a community pharmacy. Through the incorporation of these theories along with other P4P frameworks in health care, a conceptual framework was derived comprising 4 domains: incentive, pharmacy, other influencing factors, and P4P program measures. Hypothesized relationships among these domains were depicted. CONCLUSION As focus on improving the quality of health care provision develops, opportunities for pharmacists to provide patient care services beyond dispensing will continue to advance, along with expanded reimbursement mechanisms extending beyond traditional product dispensing. The proposed theory-derived conceptual framework serves to depict how the integration of P4P and other factors may affect the pharmacy environment and subsequently affect a pharmacy's capability to perform well on medication-related quality measures. This framework may be used as a foundation on which to design studies to investigate the association between community pharmacy factors and performance in a P4P program.
Collapse
|
42
|
Veen A, Bartram T, Cooke FL. Potential, challenges and pitfalls of pay-for-performance schemes: a narrative review evaluating the merits for the Australian home care sector. J Health Organ Manag 2021; ahead-of-print. [PMID: 34406719 DOI: 10.1108/jhom-01-2020-0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This qualitative narrative review aims to identify and evaluate the potential, challenges and pitfalls of pay-for-performance (P4P) schemes for the home care of adults with a disability. Due to a limited experimentation with P4P schemes in the context of the home and disability care sectors, the authors conducted a narrative review focusing on related areas of care, primarily nursing home care, to better understand the effectiveness of P4P schemes as a care intervention and evaluate the challenges associated with the introduction of these schemes. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH The authors employed a narrative review approach to examine the effectiveness of P4P schemes as a care intervention. The approach included a manual content analysis of the relevant academic and grey literature, focusing on the potential, challenges and pitfalls of P4P for care funders and providers. FINDINGS There is some, albeit limited, evidence from other related areas of care to support the effectiveness of P4P to improve the quality of care or the efficiency of its delivery for the home care sector. The results of prior studies are, however, often mixed and inconclusive, due to flaws with the design of schemes, including the nature of the incentives. Limited duration and poor-quality evaluations have further hampered the ability of studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of P4P schemes, which diminishes the credibility of these care interventions. When undertaken systematically, there seems to be some evidence that P4P can work; however, it requires careful design, implementation, measurement and evaluation. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Based on the challenges associated with the successful implementation of P4P schemes, the authors identified lessons for the design, implementation, measurement and evaluation of P4P schemes for care funders and policymakers. ORIGINALITY/VALUE This study critically evaluates the potential of P4P as a care intervention for the home care and disability sectors. By evaluating the potential, challenges and pitfalls associated with P4P in related areas of care, the study provides guidance to home care funders, providers and policymakers in care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Veen
- University of Sydney SDN, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ogundeji YK, Quinn A, Lunney M, Chong C, Chew D, Hopkin G, Senior P, Sumner G, Williams J, Manns B. Optimizing Physician Payment Models to Address Health System Priorities: Perspectives from Specialist Physicians. Healthc Policy 2021; 17:58-72. [PMID: 34543177 PMCID: PMC8437248 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite well-documented data on the mixed impact of physician payment models, there is limited evidence on how to enhance existing payment model designs. This study examines the approaches to optimizing payment models from the perspective of specialist physicians to better support patient and physician experience and other health system objectives. METHOD Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 specialist physicians across Alberta, Canada. Data from the interviews were analyzed using a framework approach. RESULTS Respondents emphasized the need to incentivize physicians with the right blend of financial and non-financial incentives, including physician wellness. Respondents also highlighted the need for physician involvement and accountability to optimize the value of physician payment models. CONCLUSION To optimize physician payment models, it may be useful to include a blend of financial and non-financial incentives with clear accountability measures as this may better align physician practice with health system priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yewande Kofoworola Ogundeji
- Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - Amity Quinn
- Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - Meaghan Lunney
- Research Associate, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - Christy Chong
- Research Assistant, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - Derek Chew
- Research Fellow, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Gareth Hopkin
- Research Fellow, Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB
| | - Peter Senior
- Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| | - Glen Sumner
- Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - Jennifer Williams
- Clinical Associate Professor, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - Braden Manns
- Professor, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute of Public Health and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Khedmati Morasae E, Rose TC, Gabbay M, Buckels L, Morris C, Poll S, Goodall M, Barnett R, Barr B. Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Local Primary Care Incentive Scheme: A Difference-in-Differences Study. Med Care Res Rev 2021; 79:394-403. [PMID: 34323143 PMCID: PMC9052704 DOI: 10.1177/10775587211035280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
National financial incentive schemes for improving the quality of primary care
have come under criticism in the United Kingdom, leading to calls for localized
alternatives. This study investigated whether a local general practice
incentive-based quality improvement scheme launched in 2011 in a city in the
North West of England was associated with a reduction in all-cause emergency
hospital admissions. Difference-in-differences analysis was used to compare the
change in emergency admission rates in the intervention city, to the change in a
matched comparison population. Emergency admissions rates fell by 19 per 1,000
people in the years following the intervention (95% confidence interval [17,
21]) in the intervention city, relative to the comparison population. This
effect was greater among more disadvantaged populations, narrowing socioeconomic
inequalities in emergency admissions. The findings suggest that similar
approaches could be an effective component of strategies to reduce unplanned
hospital admissions elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Laura Buckels
- Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Sharon Poll
- Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Rob Barnett
- Liverpool Local Medical Committee, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ben Barr
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
The organizational and environmental characteristics associated with hospitals' use of intensivists. Health Care Manage Rev 2021; 47:218-226. [PMID: 34319278 DOI: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As large numbers of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in 2020 and 2021, the United States faced a shortage of critical care providers. Intensivists are physicians specializing in providing care in the ICU. Although studies have explored the clinical and financial benefits associated with the use of intensivists, little is known about the organizational and market factors associated with a hospital administrator's strategic decision to use intensivists. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to use the resource dependence theory to better understand the organizational and market factors associated with a hospital administrator's decision to use intensivists. METHODOLOGY The sample consisted of the national acute care hospitals (N = 4,986) for the period 2007-2017. The dependent variable was the number of full-time equivalent intensivists staffed in hospitals. The independent variables were organizational and market-level factors. A negative binomial regression model with state and year fixed effects, clustered at the hospital level, was used to examine the relationship between the use of intensivists and organizational and market factors. RESULTS The results from the analyses show that administrators of larger, not-for-profit hospitals that operate in competitive urban markets with relatively high levels of munificence are more likely to utilize intensivists. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS When significant strains are placed on ICUs like what was experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is imperative that hospital administrators understand how to best staff their ICUs. With a better understanding of the organizational and market factors associated with the use of intensivists, practitioners and policymakers alike can better understand how to strategically utilize intensivists in the ICU, especially in the face of a continuing pandemic.
Collapse
|
46
|
Van Wilder A, Bruyneel L, De Ridder D, Seys D, Brouwers J, Claessens F, Cox B, Vanhaecht K. Is a hospital quality policy based on a triad of accreditation, public reporting and inspection evidence-based? A narrative review. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33:6278849. [PMID: 34013956 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2009, hospital quality policy in Flanders, Belgium, is built around a quality-of-care triad, which encompasses accreditation, public reporting (PR) and inspection. Policy makers are currently reflecting on the added value of this triad. METHODS We performed a narrative review of the literature published between 2009 and 2020 to examine the evidence base of the impact accreditation, PR and inspection, both individually and combined, has on patient processes and outcomes. The following patient outcomes were examined: mortality, length of stay, readmissions, patient satisfaction, adverse outcomes, failure to rescue, adherence to process measures and risk aversion. The impact of accreditation, PR and inspection on these outcomes was evaluated as either positive, neutral (i.e. no impact observed or mixed results reported) or negative. OBJECTIVES To assess the current evidence base on the impact of accreditation, PR and inspection on patient processes and outcomes. RESULTS We identified 69 studies, of which 40 were on accreditation, 24 on PR, three on inspection and two on accreditation and PR concomitantly. Identified studies reported primarily low-level evidence (level IV, n = 53) and were heterogeneous in terms of implemented programmes and patient populations (often narrow in PR research). Overall, a neutral categorization was determined in 30 articles for accreditation, 23 for PR and four for inspection. Ten of these recounted mixed results. For accreditation, a high number (n = 12) of positive research on adherence to process measures was discovered. CONCLUSION The individual impact of accreditation, PR and inspection, the core of Flemish hospital quality, was found to be limited on patient outcomes. Future studies should investigate the combined effect of multiple quality improvement strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Van Wilder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3rd floor, box 3001, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
| | - Luk Bruyneel
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3rd floor, box 3001, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium.,Department of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3rd floor, box 3001, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium.,Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
| | - Deborah Seys
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3rd floor, box 3001, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium.,Department of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
| | - Jonas Brouwers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3rd floor, box 3001, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
| | - Fien Claessens
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3rd floor, box 3001, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
| | - Bianca Cox
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3rd floor, box 3001, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
| | - Kris Vanhaecht
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3rd floor, box 3001, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium.,Department of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hodgson A, Bernardin T, Westermeyer B, Hagopian E, Radtke T, Noman A. Development of a specialty intensity score to estimate a patient's need for care coordination across physician specialties. Health Sci Rep 2021; 4:e303. [PMID: 34084946 PMCID: PMC8142625 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS This article develops a Specialty Intensity Score, which uses patient diagnosis codes to estimate the number of specialist physicians a patient will need to access. Conceptually, the score can serve as a proxy for a patient's need for care coordination across doctors. Such a measure may be valuable to researchers studying care coordination practices for complex patients. In contrast with previous comorbidity scores, which focus primarily on mortality and utilization, this comorbidity score approximates the complexity of a patient's the interaction with the health care system. METHODS We use 2015 inpatient claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to model the relationship between a patient's diagnoses and physician specialty usage. We estimate usage of specialist doctors by using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Poisson model. The Specialty Intensity Score is then constructed using this predicted specialty usage. To validate our score, we test its power to predict the occurrence of patient safety incidents and compare that with the predictive power of the Charlson comorbidity index. RESULTS Our model uses 127 of the 279 International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis subchapters to predict specialty usage, thus creating the Specialty Intensity Score. This score has significantly greater power in predicting patient safety complications than the widely used Charlson comorbidity index. CONCLUSION The Specialty Intensity Score developed in this article can be used by health services researchers and administrators to approximate a patient's need for care coordination across multiple specialist doctors. It, therefore, can help with evaluation of care coordination practices by allowing researchers to restrict their analysis of outcomes to the patients most impacted by those practices.
Collapse
|
48
|
McManus E, Elliott J, Meacock R, Wilson P, Gellatly J, Sutton M. The effects of structure, process and outcome incentives on primary care referrals to a national prevention programme. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2021; 30:1393-1416. [PMID: 33786914 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Despite widespread use, evidence is sparse on whether financial incentives in healthcare should be linked to structure, process or outcome. We examine the impact of different incentive types on the quantity and effectiveness of referrals made by general practices to a new national prevention programme in England. We measured effectiveness by the number of referrals resulting in programme attendance. We surveyed local commissioners about their use of financial incentives and linked this information to numbers of programme referrals and attendances from 5170 general practices between April 2016 and March 2018. We used multivariate probit regressions to identify commissioner characteristics associated with the use of different incentive types and negative binomial regressions to estimate their effect on practice rates of referral and attendance. Financial incentives were offered by commissioners in the majority of areas (89%), with 38% using structure incentives, 69% using process incentives and 22% using outcome incentives. Compared to practices without financial incentives, neither structure nor process incentives were associated with statistically significant increases in referrals or attendances, but outcome incentives were associated with 84% more referrals and 93% more attendances. Outcome incentives were the only form of pay-for-performance to stimulate more participation in this national disease prevention programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma McManus
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Services, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jack Elliott
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Services, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Meacock
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Services, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Wilson
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Judith Gellatly
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Services, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rand CM, Humiston SG. Provider Focused Interventions to Improve Child and Adolescent Vaccination Rates. Acad Pediatr 2021; 21:S34-S39. [PMID: 33958090 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia M Rand
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (CM Rand), Rochester, NY.
| | - Sharon G Humiston
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine and Children's Mercy Kansas City (SG Humiston), Mo
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mousaloo A, Amir-Behghadami M, Janati A, Gholizadeh M. Exploring the challenges and features of implementing performance-based payment plan in hospitals: a protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 2021; 10:114. [PMID: 33863372 PMCID: PMC8052724 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01657-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementing performance-based payment (PBP) plan has led to developing a number of significant potentialities such as performance improvement and effectiveness, quality improvement of provided services, and decline in health system expenditure in hospitals. Despite the fact that PBP plan has a variety of potential advantages, its implementation still may face some challenges. Hence, it seems crucial to identify these barriers and challenges in order to devise some strategies and interventions to pave the way for better implementation of PBP in hospitals. The aim of this proposed protocol is to identify, summarize, and synthesize the existing evidence by undertaking a systematic review to explore the challenges, barriers, and features of implementing PBP in hospitals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS An inclusive search of the literature will be conducted in seven international and national databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, Magiran, Scientific Information Database (SID), and Barakat knowledge network system (BKNS). The search will be limited to the studies published in English or Persian language. Database search will be supplemented by hand-search of citation, reference lists, and grey literature sources. Based on the pre-established criteria in all steps of the review, two researchers will independently screen all of the retrieved studies. Any discrepancies will be resolved through a discussion between two researchers. In cases where consensus is not reached, it will be referred to a third researcher. The methodological quality of all the included studies will be appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The data will be extracted by means of using a data extraction form, which will be developed and piloted by the research team. The findings will be synthesized through directed content analysis method. DISCUSSION With the growth and development of payment systems all over the world, it is expected that recognizing the challenges of implementing a PBP plan in hospitals will be useful in developing and designing strategies to better implement this plan. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number CRD42020152569.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asieh Mousaloo
- Student Research Committee (SRC), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.,Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management (IceHM), Department of Health Service Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, University Rd, Golbad, EAZN, Tabriz, 5165665811, Iran
| | - Mehrdad Amir-Behghadami
- Student Research Committee (SRC), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. .,Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management (IceHM), Department of Health Service Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, University Rd, Golbad, EAZN, Tabriz, 5165665811, Iran. .,Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Ali Janati
- Student Research Committee (SRC), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.,Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management (IceHM), Department of Health Service Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, University Rd, Golbad, EAZN, Tabriz, 5165665811, Iran.,Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Masoumeh Gholizadeh
- Student Research Committee (SRC), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.,Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management (IceHM), Department of Health Service Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, University Rd, Golbad, EAZN, Tabriz, 5165665811, Iran.,Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|