1
|
Msangi SJ, Mponzi WP, Muyaga LL, Nkya JD, Mwalugelo YA, Msuya HM, Lwetoijera DW, Kaindoa EW. Challenges of proper disposal of old long-lasting insecticidal nets and its alternative uses in rural south-eastern Tanzania. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0279143. [PMID: 38358973 PMCID: PMC10868818 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), specifically long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), are the most commonly used, scalable, and cost-effective tools for controlling malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. However, the multiple alternative uses of retired LLINs have been associated with poor disposal practices. The World Health Organization (WHO) has provided guidelines and recommendations for the proper management of worn-out LLINs. This study assessed the existing alternative uses and disposal practices of old LLINs. METHODS An explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used to assess LLINs existing alternative uses, disposal practices, knowledge, and perceptions regarding WHO recommendations on proper disposal of old LLINs among stakeholders in Kilombero and Ulanga districts, south-eastern Tanzania. A survey questionnaire was administered to 384 participants. Furthermore, the study employed focus group discussions (FGD) and key informant interviews (KII) to elucidate responses regarding existing disposal practices, associated challenges, and alternative uses of LLINs. The insights derived from both study components were subsequently used for inferential analysis. RESULTS The major challenge influencing the proper disposal of LLINs was limited awareness of how to properly dispose of them. Of the 384 people surveyed, 97.0% were not aware of the WHO recommendations for the proper disposal of old LLINs. All key informants were unaware of the WHO guidelines for proper disposal of old LLINs. The common methods used to dispose of LLINs were burning (30.7%), disposing them into garbage pits (14.8%), and alternative uses (12.2%). Of the 239 respondents with LLINs, 41.0% had alternative use, while 59.0% had no alternative use. The common alternative uses were ropes for tying or covering items (20.9%), garden fencing (7.5%), chicken coops (5.0%), and 7.5% for other minor alternative uses. CONCLUSION Strengthening awareness and education on proper LLIN disposal practices among community members and key stakeholders is essential for enhancing malaria control efforts and preventing environmental pollution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila J. Msangi
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
- School of Life Sciences and Bio Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Winifrida P. Mponzi
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Letus L. Muyaga
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Joel D. Nkya
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Yohana A. Mwalugelo
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Bondo, Kenya
| | - Hajirani M. Msuya
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Dickson W. Lwetoijera
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
- School of Life Sciences and Bio Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Emmanuel W. Kaindoa
- Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania
- School of Life Sciences and Bio Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Pathology, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand and the Centre for Emerging Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hiruy HN, Irish SR, Abdelmenan S, Wuletaw Y, Zewde A, Woyessa A, Haile M, Chibsa S, Lorenz L, Worku A, Yukich J, Berhane Y, Keating J. Durability of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) in Ethiopia. Malar J 2023; 22:109. [PMID: 36967389 PMCID: PMC10041722 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04540-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The functional survival time of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), which varies across different field contexts, is critical for the successful prevention of malaria transmission. However, there is limited data on LLIN durability in field settings in Ethiopia. METHODS A three-year longitudinal study was conducted to monitor attrition, physical integrity, and bio-efficacy and residual chemical concentration of LLINs in four regions in Ethiopia. World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines were used to determine sample size, measure physical integrity, and calculate attrition rates, and functional survival time. Yearly bio-efficacy testing was done on randomly selected LLINs. An excel tool developed by vector works project was used to calculate the median functional survival time of the LLINs. Predictors of functional survival were identified by fitting binary and multivariate cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS A total of 3,396 LLINs were included in the analysis. A total of 3,396 LLINs were included in the analysis. By the end of 36 months, the proportion of LLINs functionally surviving was 12.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5, 15.6], the rates of attrition due to physical damage and repurposing were 48.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.0, 52.6] and 13.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.6, 14.6], respectively. The estimated median functional survival time was 19 months (95%CI 17, 21). Factors associated with shorter functional survival time include being in a low malaria transmission setting [Adjusted Hazards Ratio (AHR) (95%CI) 1.77 (1.22, 2.55)], rural locations [AHR (95%CI) 1.83 (1.17, 2.84)], and in a room where cooking occurs [AHR (95%CI) 1.28 (1.05, 1.55)]. Bioassay tests revealed that 95.3% (95%CI 86.4, 98.5) of the LLINs met the WHO criteria of bio-efficacy after 24 months of distribution. CONCLUSION The LLIN survival time was shorter than the expected three years due to high attrition rates and rapid loss of physical integrity. National malaria programmes may consider, procuring more durable LLINs, educating communities on how to prevent damage of LLINs, and revising the current three-year LLIN distribution schedule to ensure sufficient protection is provided by LLINs against malaria transmission. While this paper contributes to the understanding of determinants impacting functional survival, further research is needed to understand factors for the rapid attrition rates and loss of physical integrity of LLINs in field settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honelgn Nahusenay Hiruy
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Seth R Irish
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Entomology Branch, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Semira Abdelmenan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | - Yonas Wuletaw
- Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Ayele Zewde
- Department of Global Health and Policy, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Adugna Woyessa
- Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Mebrahtom Haile
- Ethiopia Federal Ministry of Health, National Malaria Elimination Program, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Sheleme Chibsa
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, USA Agency for International Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Lena Lorenz
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, USA Agency for International Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Ifakara Health Institute, Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Alemayehu Worku
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Josh Yukich
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Yemane Berhane
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Joseph Keating
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mbuba E, Odufuwa OG, Moore J, Mmbaga S, Tchicaya E, Edi C, Chalageri V, Uragayala S, Sharma A, Rahi M, Raghavendra K, Eapen A, Koenker H, Ross A, Moore SJ. Multi-country evaluation of the durability of pyrethroid plus piperonyl-butoxide insecticide-treated nets: study protocol. Malar J 2023; 22:30. [PMID: 36707886 PMCID: PMC9881340 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04465-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mass distributions of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) have contributed to large reductions in the malaria burden. However, this success is in jeopardy due in part to the increasing pyrethroid-resistant mosquito population as well as low LLINs coverage in various areas because the lifespan of LLINs is often shorter than the interval between replenishment campaigns. New insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) containing pyrethroid and piperonyl-butoxide (PBO) have shown a greater reduction in the incidence of malaria than pyrethroid LLINs in areas with pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. However, the durability (attrition, bio-efficacy, physical integrity and chemical retainment) of pyrethroid-PBO ITNs under operational settings has not been fully characterized. This study will measure the durability of pyrethroid-PBO ITNs to assess whether they meet the World Health Organization (WHO) three years of operational performance criteria required to be categorized as "long-lasting". METHODS A prospective household randomized controlled trial will be conducted simultaneously in Tanzania, India and Côte d'Ivoire to estimate the field durability of three pyrethroid-PBO ITNs (Veeralin®, Tsara® Boost, and Olyset® Plus) compared to a pyrethroid LLIN: MAGNet®. Durability monitoring will be conducted up to 36 months post-distribution and median survival in months will be calculated. The proportion of ITNs: (1) lost (attrition), (2) physical integrity, (3) resistance to damage score, (4) meeting WHO bio-efficacy (≥ 95% knockdown after 1 h or ≥ 80% mortality after 24 h for WHO cone bioassay, or ≥ 90% blood-feeding inhibition or ≥ 80% mortality after 24 h for WHO Tunnel tests) criteria against laboratory-reared resistant and susceptible mosquitoes, and insecticidal persistence over time will be estimated. The non-inferiority of Veeralin® and Tsara® Boost to the first-in-class, Olyset® Plus will additionally be assessed for mortality, and the equivalence of 20 times washed ITNs compared to field aged ITNs will be assessed for mortality and blood-feeding inhibition endpoints in the Ifakara Ambient Chamber Test, Tanzania. CONCLUSION This will be the first large-scale prospective household randomized controlled trial of pyrethroid-PBO ITNs in three different countries in East Africa, West Africa and South Asia, simultaneously. The study will generate information on the replenishment intervals for PBO nets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Mbuba
- grid.414543.30000 0000 9144 642XVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania ,grid.416786.a0000 0004 0587 0574Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland ,grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642University of Basel, St. Petersplatz 1, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Olukayode G. Odufuwa
- grid.414543.30000 0000 9144 642XVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania ,grid.416786.a0000 0004 0587 0574Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland ,grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642University of Basel, St. Petersplatz 1, 4002 Basel, Switzerland ,grid.8991.90000 0004 0425 469XEpidemiology and Population Health Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Jason Moore
- grid.414543.30000 0000 9144 642XVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania ,grid.416786.a0000 0004 0587 0574Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Selemani Mmbaga
- grid.414543.30000 0000 9144 642XVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
| | - Emile Tchicaya
- grid.462846.a0000 0001 0697 1172Swiss Centre for Scientific Research in Côte d’Ivoire, 1303 Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire ,Vegro Aps, Copenhagen, Denmark Refshalevej 213A,
| | - Constant Edi
- grid.462846.a0000 0001 0697 1172Swiss Centre for Scientific Research in Côte d’Ivoire, 1303 Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
| | - Vani Chalageri
- grid.419641.f0000 0000 9285 6594Field Unit, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Bangalore, Karnataka India
| | - Sreehari Uragayala
- grid.419641.f0000 0000 9285 6594Field Unit, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Bangalore, Karnataka India
| | - Amit Sharma
- grid.419641.f0000 0000 9285 6594ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector-8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077 India
| | - Manju Rahi
- grid.19096.370000 0004 1767 225XICMR-Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Kamaraju Raghavendra
- grid.419641.f0000 0000 9285 6594ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector-8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077 India
| | - Alex Eapen
- grid.19096.370000 0004 1767 225XField Unit, ICMR-Indian Council of Medical Research, Chennai, India
| | | | - Amanda Ross
- grid.416786.a0000 0004 0587 0574Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland ,grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642University of Basel, St. Petersplatz 1, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sarah J. Moore
- grid.414543.30000 0000 9144 642XVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania ,grid.416786.a0000 0004 0587 0574Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland ,grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642University of Basel, St. Petersplatz 1, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diouf M, Faye BT, Diouf EH, Dia AK, Konate A, Fall FB, Sene D, Diouf MB, Gadiaga L, Konate L, Dione DA, Tine RC, Faye O. Survival of eight LLIN brands 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after a mass distribution campaign in rural and urban settings in Senegal. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:719. [PMID: 35410149 PMCID: PMC9004050 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13051-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) are one of the core components of global malaria prevention and control. The lifespan of LLIN varies widely depending on the population or environment, and randomized studies are required to compare LLIN inaccording to arbitrary thresholds households under different field conditions. This study investigated survival of different LLIN brands in Senegal. Methods Ten thousand six hundred eight LLINs were distributed in five regions, each stratified by rural and urban setting. As part of the longitudinal follow-up, 2222 nets were randomly sampled and monitored from 6 to 36 months. Using random effects for households, Bayesian models were used to estimate independent survival by net type (Interceptor®, Life Net®, MAGNet™, Netprotect®, Olyset® Net, PermaNet® 2.0 R, PermaNet® 2.0 C, Yorkool® LN) and by area (rural/urban). In addition to survival, median survival time and attrition of each LLIN brand was determined. Attrition was defined as nets that were missing because they were reported given away, destroyed and thrown away, or repurposed. Results Three net types had a proportion of survival above 80% after 24 months: Interceptor®87.8% (95% CI 80–93.4); conical PermaNet® 2.0 86.9% (95% CI 79.3–92.4) and Life Net® 85.6% (95% CI 75–93). At 36 months, conical PermaNet® 2.0 maintained a good survival rate, 79.5% (95% CI 65.9–88.8). The attrition due to redistributed nets showed that the two conical net types (PermaNet® 2.0 and Interceptor®) were more often retained by households and their median retention time was well above 3 years (median survival time = 3.5 years for PermaNet® 2.0 and median survival time = 4 years for Interceptor®). Despite this good retention, Interceptor® had weak physical integrity and its median survival due to wear and tear was below 3 years (median survival time = 2.4 years). The odds ratio of survival was 2.5 times higher in rural settings than in urban settings (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.7–3.7). Conclusions Differences in survival among LLIN may be driven by brand, shape or environmental setting. In this study in Senegal, conical PermaNet® 2.0 were retained in households while rectangular PermaNet® 2.0 had lower retention, suggesting that net shape may play a role in retention and should be further investigated. Distribution of preferred LLIN shape, accompanied by good communication on care and repair, could lead to increased effective lifespan, and allow for longer intervals between universal coverage campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mbaye Diouf
- Laboratory of Vector and Parasite Ecology (UCAD), Dakar, Senegal.
| | | | - El Hadji Diouf
- Laboratory of Vector and Parasite Ecology (UCAD), Dakar, Senegal
| | | | - Abdoulaye Konate
- Laboratory of Vector and Parasite Ecology (UCAD), Dakar, Senegal
| | - Fatou Ba Fall
- National Malaria Control Program (NMCP/Senegal), Dakar, Senegal
| | - Doudou Sene
- National Malaria Control Program (NMCP/Senegal), Dakar, Senegal
| | - Mame Birame Diouf
- President's Malaria Initiative/ United State Agency International Development/Senegal (USAID/PMI), Dakar, Senegal
| | - Libasse Gadiaga
- National Malaria Control Program (NMCP/Senegal), Dakar, Senegal
| | - Lassana Konate
- Laboratory of Vector and Parasite Ecology (UCAD), Dakar, Senegal
| | - Demba Anta Dione
- Health and Development Solution-Africa (HDS-Africa/Dakar), Dakar, Senegal
| | - Roger Clément Tine
- President's Malaria Initiative/ United State Agency International Development/Senegal (USAID/PMI), Dakar, Senegal
| | - Ousmane Faye
- Laboratory of Vector and Parasite Ecology (UCAD), Dakar, Senegal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Madumla EP, Moore SJ, Moore J, Mbuba E, Mbeyela EM, Kibondo UA, C S, Mmbaga, Kobe D, Baraka J, Msellemu D, Swai JK, Mboma ZM, Odufuwa OG. "In starvation, a bone can also be meat": a mixed methods evaluation of factors associated with discarding of long-lasting insecticidal nets in Bagamoyo, Tanzania. Malar J 2022; 21:101. [PMID: 35331242 PMCID: PMC8944021 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04126-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Between 2000 and 2019, more than 1.8 billion long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) were distributed in Africa. While the insecticidal durability of LLINs is around 3 years, nets are commonly discarded 2 years post distribution. This study investigated the factors associated with the decision of users to discard LLINs. Methods A mixed-method sequential explanatory approach using a structured questionnaire followed by focus group discussions (FGDs) to collect information on experiences, views, reasons, how and when LLINs are discarded. Out of 6,526 households that responded to the questionnaire of LLINs durability trial, 160 households were randomly selected from the households in four villages in Bagamoyo Tanzania for FGDs but only 155 households participated in the FGDs. Five of the household representatives couldn’t participate due to unexpected circumstances. A total of sixteen FGDs each comprising of 8–10 adults were conducted; older women (40–60 years), older men (40–60 years), younger women (18–39 years), younger men (18–39 years). During the FGDs, participants visually inspected seven samples of LLINs that were “too-torn” based on Proportionate Hole Index recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on LLIN testing, the nets were brought to the discussion and participants had to determine if such LLINs were to be kept or discarded. The study assessed responses from the same participants that attended FGD and also responded to the structured questionnaire, 117 participants fulfilled the criteria, thus data from only 117 participants are analysed in this study. Results In FGDs, integrity of LLIN influenced the decision to discard or keep a net. Those of older age, women, and householders with lower income were more likely to classify a WHO “too-torn” net as “good”. The common methods used to discard LLINs were burning and burying. The findings were seen in the quantitative analysis. For every additional hole, the odds of discarding a WHO “too-torn” LLIN increased [OR = 1.05 (95%CI (1.04–1.07)), p < 0.001]. Younger age group [OR = 4.97 (95%CI (3.25–7.32)), p < 0.001], male-headed households [OR = 6.85 (95%CI (4.44 –10.59)), p < 0.001], and wealthy households [OR = 3.88 (95%CI (2.33–6.46)), p < 0.001] were more likely to discard LLINs. Conclusion Integrity of LLIN was the main determinant for discarding or keeping LLINs and the decision to discard the net is associated with socioeconomic status of the household, and the age and gender of respondents. WHO “too torn” nets are encouraged to be used instead of none until replacement, and disposal of nets should be based on recommendation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04126-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edith P Madumla
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania. .,Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania.
| | - Sarah J Moore
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania.,Vector Biology Unit, Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, Allschwil, 4123, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, St. Petersplatz 1, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jason Moore
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Vector Biology Unit, Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, Allschwil, 4123, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Emmanuel Mbuba
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Vector Biology Unit, Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, Allschwil, 4123, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, St. Petersplatz 1, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Edgar M Mbeyela
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
| | - Ummi A Kibondo
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
| | | | - Mmbaga
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
| | - Dickson Kobe
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
| | - Jitihada Baraka
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
| | - Daniel Msellemu
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Vector Biology Unit, Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, Allschwil, 4123, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, St. Petersplatz 1, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Johnson K Swai
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
| | - Zawadi M Mboma
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
| | - Olukayode G Odufuwa
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Vector Biology Unit, Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, Allschwil, 4123, Basel, Switzerland.,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kumoji E'K, Awantang GN, Toso M, Kamara D, Bleu T, Lahai W, Sillah-Kanu M, Dosso A, Achu D, Babalola S. Ideational factors associated with net care behaviour: a multi-country analysis. Malar J 2022; 21:53. [PMID: 35177086 PMCID: PMC8851768 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04053-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malaria is endemic to sub-Saharan African countries. Mass and routine distribution, promotion, and use of ITNs are critical components of malaria prevention programmes. Correct and consistent use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITN) is an effective strategy for malaria prevention. To extend bed-net lifespan, the World Health Organization recommends folding or tying up ITNs when they are not in use. This study analyses factors associated with net care practices in three African countries. Methods Researchers collected household data nationwide in Côte d’Ivoire, from the North and Far North regions of Cameroon, and from Port Loko and Bo districts in Sierra Leone, between 2018 and 2019. The dependent variable was respondents reporting that they fold or tie up their nets. The study adjusted for selected sociodemographic, ideational (psychosocial), and household variables using multilevel models. The analysis was limited to women of reproductive age and their male spouses/partners from households with at least one ITN: 2,940 respondents in Cameroon, 6,105 in Côte d’Ivoire, and 2,730 in Sierra Leone. Results Among respondents, 50.2% in Cameroon, 52.0% in Côte d’Ivoire and 75.6% in Sierra Leone reported folding or tying up their net when it was not in use. In all three countries, the data showed significant clustering at both household and community levels, indicating the influence of factors operating at these levels on net-care behaviour. The odds of reporting the behaviour varied significantly by geographic unit in each country. Consistent use of nets was strongly correlated with net-care behaviour. Furthermore, five ideational variables were positively associated with the outcome behaviour in all three countries: positive attitude towards net care, perceived susceptibility for malaria, response-efficacy of ITNs, perceived self-efficacy for net use, and the perception that net use was a community norm. Additional significant ideational variables included positive attitudes towards net use (Cameroon and Côte d’Ivoire), perceived severity of malaria (Côte d’Ivoire), and interpersonal communication about malaria (Côte d’Ivoire). Conclusions The study identified ideational variables associated with recommended net-care practice. Programme efforts designed to promote net-care practices and extend average lifespan of ITNs may be more effective if they emphasize positive attitudes towards net care, perceived susceptibility of malaria infection, response-efficacy of ITNs, perceived self-efficacy for net use, and promote net-care behaviour as a positive community norm. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04053-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E 'Kuor Kumoji
- Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.
| | - Grace N Awantang
- Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA
| | - Michael Toso
- Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA
| | - Diarra Kamara
- Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA
| | - Thérèse Bleu
- Programme National de Lutte Contre Le Paludisme, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Wani Lahai
- National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Musa Sillah-Kanu
- National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Abdul Dosso
- Programme National de Lutte Contre Le Paludisme, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Dorothy Achu
- Programme National de Lutte Contre Le Paludisme Au Cameroun, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | - Stella Babalola
- Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lukole E, Cook J, Mosha JF, Messenger LA, Rowland M, Kleinschmidt I, Charlwood JD, Mosha FW, Manjurano A, Wright A, Protopopoff N. Protective efficacy of holed and aging PBO-pyrethroid synergist-treated nets on malaria infection prevalence in north-western Tanzania. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 2:e0000453. [PMID: 36962517 PMCID: PMC10022078 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Two billion pyrethroid long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) have been distributed since 2004 for malaria prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa. Current malaria control strategies rely on an assumed effective 3-year lifespan for LLINs. PBO synergist LLINs are a newly recommended class of net but there is limited information on their life span and long-term protective efficacy in communities. To assess their operational survival, a cohort of 390 PBO LLINs (Olyset Plus) and 367 standard pyrethroid LLIN (Olyset net) from 396 households were followed for 36 months in Western Tanzania. To assess the association between the condition of the LLIN and malaria infection, nets from at least 480 randomly selected households were assessed during malaria prevalence cross-sectional surveys at 4, 9, 16, 21, 28, and 33 months post-distribution. Information on the presence and condition of nets, and demographic information from the household, were collected to evaluate factors influencing net durability. After 3 years less than 17% of nets distributed still remained in the households. The fabric condition was not associated with malaria infection in either type of net. The difference between the net types was highest when nets were between 1-2 years old, when PBO nets appeared to be similarly protective as nets less than a year old, whereas standard nets were considerably less protective as they aged, regardless of fabric condition. There was no statistical difference in the estimated median functional survival time between net types with 1.6 years (95% CI 1.38-1.87) for PBO LLIN and 1.9 years (95% CI 1.67-2.06) for standard LLINs. After 3 years, there was a loss of 55% of permethrin (pyrethroid) content for both nets, and 97% of PBO content was lost in PBO LLIN. These results highlight that functional survival is less than the recommended 3 years for both net types. However, even as the nets age, the PBO nets remained more protective than standard nets, regardless of their condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliud Lukole
- Department of Parasitology, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Medical Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Jackie Cook
- MRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacklin F Mosha
- Department of Parasitology, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Medical Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Louisa A Messenger
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Rowland
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Immo Kleinschmidt
- MRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Southern African Development Community Malaria Elimination Eight Secretariat, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Jacques D Charlwood
- MRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Franklin W Mosha
- Department of Parasitology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Alphaxard Manjurano
- Department of Parasitology, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Medical Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Alexandra Wright
- MRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natacha Protopopoff
- MRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mechan F, Katureebe A, Tuhaise V, Mugote M, Oruni A, Onyige I, Bumali K, Thornton J, Maxwell K, Kyohere M, Kamya MR, Mutungi P, Kigozi SP, Yeka A, Opigo J, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Gonahasa S, Hemingway J, Dorsey G, Reimer LJ, Staedke SG, Donnelly MJ, Lynd A. LLIN evaluation in Uganda project (LLINEUP): The fabric integrity, chemical content and bioefficacy of long-lasting insecticidal nets treated with and without piperonyl butoxide across two years of operational use in Uganda. CURRENT RESEARCH IN PARASITOLOGY & VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES 2022; 2:100092. [PMID: 35734077 PMCID: PMC9207544 DOI: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) supplemented with the synergist piperonyl butoxide have been developed in response to growing pyrethroid resistance; however, their durability in the field remains poorly described. A pragmatic cluster-randomised trial was embedded into Ugandaʼs 2017–2018 LLIN distribution to compare the durability of LLINs with and without PBO. A total of 104 clusters (health sub-districts) were included with each receiving one of four LLIN products, two with pyrethroid + PBO (Olyset Plus and PermaNet 3.0) and two pyrethroid-only (Olyset Net and PermaNet 2.0). Nets were sampled at baseline, 12 and 25 months post-distribution to assess physical condition, chemical content, and bioefficacy. Physical condition was quantified using proportionate Hole Index and chemical content measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. Bioefficacy was assessed with three-minute World Health Organisation (WHO) Cone and Wireball assays using pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae, with 1-h knockdown and 24-h mortality recorded. There was no difference in physical durability between LLIN products assessed (P = 0.644). The pyrethroid content of all products remained relatively stable across time-points but PBO content declined by 55% (P < 0.001) and 58% (P < 0.001) for Olyset Plus and PermaNet 3.0 respectively. Both PBO LLINs were highly effective against pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes when new, knocking down all mosquitoes. However, bioefficacy declined over time with Olyset Plus knocking down 45.72% (95% CI: 22.84–68.62%, P = 0.021) and Permanent 3.0 knocking down 78.57% (95% CI: 63.57–93.58%, P < 0.001) after 25 months. Here we demonstrate that both Olyset Plus and PermaNet 3.0 are as durable as their pyrethroid-only equivalents and had superior bioefficacy against pyrethroid-resistant An. gambiae. However, the superiority of PBO-LLINs decreased with operational use, correlating with a reduction in total PBO content. This decline in bioefficacy after just two years is concerning and there is an urgent need to assess the durability of PBO LLINs in other settings. Olyset Plus and PermaNet 3.0 nets effective against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae when new. Killing effect of both nets halved after two years. Nets in ‘traditional’ thatched-roof housing at high risk of damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Mechan
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
- Corresponding author.
| | | | | | | | - Ambrose Oruni
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Jonathan Thornton
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kilama Maxwell
- Department of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Mary Kyohere
- Department of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Moses R. Kamya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Uganda
- Makerere University - Johns Hopkins University (MUJHU) Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Adoke Yeka
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Uganda
| | - Jimmy Opigo
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Janet Hemingway
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Grant Dorsey
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Lisa J. Reimer
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sarah G. Staedke
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Uganda
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Martin J. Donnelly
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Amy Lynd
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith T, Denz A, Ombok M, Bayoh N, Koenker H, Chitnis N, Briet O, Yukich J, Gimnig JE. Incidence and consequences of damage to insecticide-treated mosquito nets in Kenya. Malar J 2021; 20:476. [PMID: 34930254 PMCID: PMC8686568 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03978-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts to improve the impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) should be informed by understanding of the causes of decay in effect. Holes in LLINs have been estimated to account for 7-11% of loss in effect on vectorial capacity for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in an analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys of LLINs in Kenya. This does not account for the effect of holes as a cause of net attrition or non-use, which cannot be measured using only cross-sectional data. There is a need for estimates of how much these indirect effects of physical damage on use and attrition contribute to decay in effectiveness of LLINs. METHODS Use, physical integrity, and survival were assessed in a cohort of 4514 LLINs followed for up to 4 years in Kenya. Flow diagrams were used to illustrate how the status of nets, in terms of categories of use, physical integrity, and attrition, changed between surveys carried out at 6-month intervals. A compartment model defined in terms of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) was used to estimate the transition rates between the categories. Effects of physical damage to LLINs on use and attrition were quantified by simulating counterfactuals in which there was no damage. RESULTS Allowing for the direct effect of holes, the effect on use, and the effect on attrition, 18% of the impact on vectorial capacity was estimated to be lost because of damage. The estimated median lifetime of the LLINs was 2.9 years, but this was extended to 5.7 years in the counterfactual without physical damage. Nets that were in use were more likely to be in a damaged state than unused nets but use made little direct difference to LLIN lifetimes. Damage was reported as the reason for attrition for almost half of attrited nets, but the model estimated that almost all attrited nets had suffered some damage before attrition. CONCLUSIONS Full quantification of the effects of damage will require measurement of the supply of new nets and of household stocks of unused nets, and also of their impacts on both net use and retention. The timing of mass distribution campaigns is less important than ensuring sufficient supply. In the Kenyan setting, nets acquired damage rapidly once use began and the damage led to rapid attrition. Increasing the robustness of nets could substantially increase their lifetime and impact but the impact of LLIN programmes on malaria transmission is ultimately limited by levels of use. Longitudinal analyses of net integrity data from different settings are needed to determine the importance of physical damage to nets as a driver of attrition and non-use, and the importance of frequent use as a cause of physical damage in different contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Smith
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
- University of Basel, 4001, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Adrian Denz
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, 4001, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maurice Ombok
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Nabie Bayoh
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya
| | | | - Nakul Chitnis
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, 4001, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Briet
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, 4001, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Joshua Yukich
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - John E Gimnig
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Maps and metrics of insecticide-treated net access, use, and nets-per-capita in Africa from 2000-2020. Nat Commun 2021; 12:3589. [PMID: 34117240 PMCID: PMC8196080 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23707-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are one of the most widespread and impactful malaria interventions in Africa, yet a spatially-resolved time series of ITN coverage has never been published. Using data from multiple sources, we generate high-resolution maps of ITN access, use, and nets-per-capita annually from 2000 to 2020 across the 40 highest-burden African countries. Our findings support several existing hypotheses: that use is high among those with access, that nets are discarded more quickly than official policy presumes, and that effectively distributing nets grows more difficult as coverage increases. The primary driving factors behind these findings are most likely strong cultural and social messaging around the importance of net use, low physical net durability, and a mixture of inherent commodity distribution challenges and less-than-optimal net allocation policies, respectively. These results can inform both policy decisions and downstream malaria analyses.
Collapse
|
11
|
Evaluation of the durability of long-lasting insecticidal nets in Guatemala. Malar J 2021; 20:219. [PMID: 33990197 PMCID: PMC8120849 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03722-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) are widely used for the prevention and control of malaria. In Guatemala, since 2006, ITNs have been distributed free of charge in the highest risk malaria-endemic areas and constitute one of the primary vector control measures in the country. Despite relying on ITNs for almost 15 years, there is a lack of data to inform the timely replacement of ITNs whose effectiveness becomes diminished by routine use. Methods The survivorship, physical integrity, insecticide content and bio-efficacy of ITNs were assessed through cross-sectional surveys conducted at 18, 24 and 32 months after a 2012 distribution of PermaNet® 2.0 in a malaria focus in Guatemala. A working definition of ‘LLIN providing adequate protection’ was developed based on the combination of the previous parameters and usage of the net. A total of 988 ITNs were analysed (290 at 18 months, 349 at 24 months and 349 at 32 months). Results The functional survivorship of bed nets decreased over time, from 92% at 18 months, to 81% at 24 months and 69% at 32 months. Independent of the time of the survey, less than 80% of the bed nets that were still present in the household were reported to have been used the night before. The proportion of bed nets categorized as “in good condition” per World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines of the total hole surface area, diminished from 77% to 18 months to 58% at 32 months. The portion of ITNs with deltamethrin concentration less than 10 mg/m2 increased over time. Among the bed nets for which bioassays were conducted, the percentage that met WHO criteria for efficacy dropped from 90% to 18 months to 52% at 32 months. The proportion of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) providing adequate protection was 38% at 24 months and 21% at 32 months. Conclusions At 32 months, only one in five of the LLINs distributed in the campaign provided adequate protection in terms of survivorship, physical integrity, bio-efficacy and usage. Efforts to encourage the community to retain, use, and properly care for the LLINs may improve their impact. Durability assessments should be included in future campaigns. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-021-03722-1.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kilian A, Obi E, Mansiangi P, Abílio AP, Haji KA, Guillemois E, Chetty V, Wheldrake A, Blaufuss S, Olapeju B, Babalola S, Russell SJ, Koenker H. Correlation of textile 'resistance to damage' scores with actual physical survival of long-lasting insecticidal nets in the field. Malar J 2021; 20:29. [PMID: 33413383 PMCID: PMC7792112 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03570-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attempts have been made to link procurement of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) not only to the price but also the expected performance of the product. However, to date it has not been possible to identify a specific textile characteristic that predicts physical durability in the field. The recently developed resistance to damage (RD) score could provide such a metric. This study uses pooled data from durability monitoring to explore the usefulness of the RD methodology. METHODS Data from standardized, 3-year, prospective LLIN durability monitoring for six LLIN brands in 10 locations and four countries involving 4672 campaign LLIN were linked to the RD scores of the respective LLIN brands. The RD score is a single quantitative metric based on a suite of standardized textile tests which in turn build on the mechanisms of damage to a mosquito net. Potential RD values range from 0 to 100 where 100 represents optimal resistance to expected day-to-day stress during reasonable net use. Survival analysis was set so that risk of failure only started when nets were first hung. Cox regression was applied to explore RD effects on physical survival adjusting for known net use environment variables. RESULTS In a bivariate analysis RD scores showed a linear relationship with physical integrity suggesting that the proportion of LLIN with moderate damage decreased by 3%-points for each 10-point increase of the RD score (p = 0.02, R2 = 0.65). Full adjustment for net care and handling behaviours as well as other relevant determinants and the country of study showed that increasing RD score by 10 points resulted in a 36% reduction of risk of failure to survive in serviceable condition (p < 0.0001). LLINs with RD scores above 50 had an additional useful life of 7 months. CONCLUSIONS This study provides proof of principle that the RD metric can predict physical durability of LLIN products in the field and could be used to assess new products and guide manufacturers in creating improved products. However, additional validation from other field data, particularly for next generation LLIN, will be required before the RD score can be included in procurement decisions for LLINs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Kilian
- PMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Montagut, Spain.
| | - Emmanuel Obi
- PMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Paul Mansiangi
- Ecole de Santé Publique, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | | | - Khamis Ameir Haji
- Zanzibar Malaria Elimination Programme, Stone Town, Zanzibar, Tanzania
| | | | - Vera Chetty
- Nonwovens Innovation and Research Institute Ltd. (NIRI), Leeds, UK
| | - Amy Wheldrake
- Nonwovens Innovation and Research Institute Ltd. (NIRI), Leeds, UK
| | - Sean Blaufuss
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bolanje Olapeju
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stella Babalola
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Hannah Koenker
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Briet O, Koenker H, Norris L, Wiegand R, Vanden Eng J, Thackeray A, Williamson J, Gimnig JE, Fortes F, Akogbeto M, Yadouleton AW, Ombok M, Bayoh MN, Mzilahowa T, Abílio AP, Mabunda S, Cuamba N, Diouf E, Konaté L, Hamainza B, Katebe-Sakala C, Ponce de León G, Asamoa K, Wolkon A, Smith SC, Swamidoss I, Green M, Gueye S, Mihigo J, Morgan J, Dotson E, Craig AS, Tan KR, Wirtz RA, Smith T. Attrition, physical integrity and insecticidal activity of long-lasting insecticidal nets in sub-Saharan Africa and modelling of their impact on vectorial capacity. Malar J 2020; 19:310. [PMID: 32859210 PMCID: PMC7456088 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03383-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the primary malaria prevention and control intervention in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa. While LLINs are expected to last at least 3 years under normal use conditions, they can lose effectiveness because they fall out of use, are discarded, repurposed, physically damaged, or lose insecticidal activity. The contributions of these different interrelated factors to durability of nets and their protection against malaria have been unclear. Methods Starting in 2009, LLIN durability studies were conducted in seven countries in Africa over 5 years. WHO-recommended measures of attrition, LLIN use, insecticidal activity, and physical integrity were recorded for eight different net brands. These data were combined with analyses of experimental hut data on feeding inhibition and killing effects of LLINs on both susceptible and pyrethroid resistant malaria vectors to estimate the protection against malaria transmission—in terms of vectorial capacity (VC)—provided by each net cohort over time. Impact on VC was then compared in hypothetical scenarios where one durability outcome measure was set at the best possible level while keeping the others at the observed levels. Results There was more variability in decay of protection over time by country than by net brand for three measures of durability (ratios of variance components 4.6, 4.4, and 1.8 times for LLIN survival, use, and integrity, respectively). In some countries, LLIN attrition was slow, but use declined rapidly. Non-use of LLINs generally had more effect on LLIN impact on VC than did attrition, hole formation, or insecticide loss. Conclusions There is much more variation in LLIN durability among countries than among net brands. Low levels of use may have a larger impact on effectiveness than does variation in attrition or LLIN degradation. The estimated entomological effects of chemical decay are relatively small, with physical decay probably more important as a driver of attrition and non-use than as a direct cause of loss of effect. Efforts to maximize LLIN impact in operational settings should focus on increasing LLIN usage, including through improvements in LLIN physical integrity. Further research is needed to understand household decisions related to LLIN use, including the influence of net durability and the presence of other nets in the household.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Briet
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, 4001, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Hannah Koenker
- PMI VectorWorks, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Tropical Health LLP, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laura Norris
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ryan Wiegand
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jodi Vanden Eng
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - John Williamson
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - John E Gimnig
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Filomeno Fortes
- National Malaria Control Program (NMCP), Ministry of Health, Luanda, Angola.,Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Martin Akogbeto
- Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin
| | - Anges W Yadouleton
- Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.,Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP), Ministry of Health, Cotonou, Bénin
| | - Maurice Ombok
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya
| | - M Nabie Bayoh
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya.,PMI VectorLink Project, Abt Associates, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Themba Mzilahowa
- College of Medicine, Malaria Alert Centre, P/Bag 360, Blantyre 3, Malawi
| | - Ana Paula Abílio
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde (INS), Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Samuel Mabunda
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde (INS), Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.,National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Nelson Cuamba
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde (INS), Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.,National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Elhadji Diouf
- Faculté des Sciences et Techniques (FST), Université Cheikh Anta Diop (UCAD), Dakar, Senegal
| | - Lassana Konaté
- Faculté des Sciences et Techniques (FST), Université Cheikh Anta Diop (UCAD), Dakar, Senegal
| | | | | | - Gabriel Ponce de León
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kwame Asamoa
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adam Wolkon
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stephen C Smith
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Isabel Swamidoss
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mike Green
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Salam Gueye
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jules Mihigo
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Juliette Morgan
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ellen Dotson
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Allen S Craig
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kathrine R Tan
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Robert A Wirtz
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tom Smith
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, 4001, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mosha JF, Lukole E, Charlwood JD, Wright A, Rowland M, Bullock O, Manjurano A, Kisinza W, Mosha FW, Kleinschmidt I, Protopopoff N. Risk factors for malaria infection prevalence and household vector density between mass distribution campaigns of long-lasting insecticidal nets in North-western Tanzania. Malar J 2020; 19:297. [PMID: 32819368 PMCID: PMC7441624 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03369-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the most widely deployed vector control intervention in sub-Saharan Africa to prevent malaria. Recent reports indicate selection of pyrethroid insecticide resistance is widespread in mosquito vectors. This paper explores risk factors associated with malaria infection prevalence and vector density between mass distribution campaigns, changes in net coverage, and loss of protection in an area of high pyrethroid resistance in Northwest Tanzania. METHODS A cross sectional malaria survey of 3456 children was undertaken in 2014 in Muleba district, Kagera region west of Lake Victoria. Vector density was assessed using indoor light traps and outdoor tent traps. Anophelines were identified to species using PCR and tested for Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein. Logistic regression was used to identify household and environmental factors associated with malaria infection and regression binomial negative for vector density. RESULTS LLIN use was 27.7%. Only 16.9% of households had sufficient nets to cover all sleeping places. Malaria infection was independently associated with access to LLINs (OR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.34-0.98). LLINs less than 2 years old were slightly more protective than older LLINs (53 vs 65% prevalence of infection); however, there was no evidence that LLINs in good condition (hole index < 65) were more protective than LLINs, which were more holed. Other risk factors for malaria infection were age, group, altitude and house construction quality. Independent risk factors for vector density were consistent with malaria outcomes and included altitude, wind, livestock, house quality, open eaves and LLIN usage. Indoor collections comprised 4.6% Anopheles funestus and 95.4% Anopheles gambiae of which 4.5% were Anopheles arabiensis and 93.5% were Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. CONCLUSION Three years after the mass distribution campaign and despite top-ups, LLIN usage had declined considerably. While children living in households with access to LLINs were at lower risk of malaria, infection prevalence remained high even among users of LLINs in good condition. While effort should be made to maintain high coverage between campaigns, distribution of standard pyrethroid-only LLINs appears insufficient to prevent malaria transmission in this area of intense pyrethroid resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacklin F Mosha
- National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Medical Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania.
| | - Eliud Lukole
- National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Medical Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - J Derek Charlwood
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Alexandra Wright
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mark Rowland
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Olivia Bullock
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Alphaxard Manjurano
- National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Medical Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - William Kisinza
- Amani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical Research, Muheza, Tanzania
| | - Franklin W Mosha
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Immo Kleinschmidt
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Natacha Protopopoff
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Santos EM, Coalson JE, Munga S, Agawo M, Jacobs ET, Klimentidis YC, Hayden MH, Ernst KC. "After those nets are torn, most people use them for other purposes": an examination of alternative bed net use in western Kenya. Malar J 2020; 19:272. [PMID: 32727452 PMCID: PMC7390200 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03342-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alternative long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) use for purposes other than sleeping protection from mosquitoes is widely debated as a limitation to successful malaria control efforts, yet rarely rigorously studied. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of 1217 households in an epidemic highland site and an endemic lowland site in western Kenya collected information on alternative use in three ways: direct observations, participant self-report, and participant reporting of community-level practices. LLIN misuse was defined as use of an intact net for alternative purposes and repurposing as alternatively using an old or damaged net. Associations between households with observed repurposed nets and universal access and household net use were examined. RESULTS Households describe repurposing nets when they are torn and/or old. Repurposed nets were observed in 8.1% (52/643) highlands households and 33.0% (184/574) lowlands households. Repurposed nets served as chicken coops (33% highlands, 20% lowlands), fences (37% highlands, 25% lowlands), tree covers (22% lowlands), curtains (3% highlands), covering bathrooms (1.5% highlands, 9% lowlands), and washing sponges (13% lowlands). No association was found between repurposing and universal access or household net use. Misuse was rare. Of 379 repurposed nets, 4 (1.06%) were in good condition with no holes. Of 1,758 active nets, 13 (0.74%) were misused. CONCLUSIONS Alternative net use in this study involved repurposing rather than misuse. Repurposing was not detrimental to malaria prevention efforts in these communities. Standardized measurement of alternative net use should be used to better understand the practice and its potential impact on the success of malaria interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M Santos
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N Martin Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
| | - Jenna E Coalson
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N Martin Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Stephen Munga
- Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, PO Box 1578, Kisumu, 40100, Nyanza, Kenya
| | - Maurice Agawo
- Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, PO Box 1578, Kisumu, 40100, Nyanza, Kenya
| | - Elizabeth T Jacobs
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N Martin Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Yann C Klimentidis
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N Martin Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Mary H Hayden
- National Institute for Human Resilience, University of Colorado, University Office Park Building 1867 Suite 200, Boulder, CO, 80918, USA
| | - Kacey C Ernst
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N Martin Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abílio AP, Obi E, Koenker H, Babalola S, Saifodine A, Zulliger R, Swamidoss I, Ponce de Leon G, Alfai E, Blaufuss S, Olapeju B, Harig H, Kilian A. Monitoring the durability of the long-lasting insecticidal nets MAGNet and Royal Sentry in three ecological zones of Mozambique. Malar J 2020; 19:209. [PMID: 32552819 PMCID: PMC7301518 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03282-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malaria prevention with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) has seen a tremendous scale-up in sub-Saharan Africa in the last decade. To sustain this success, it is important to understand how long LLINs remain in the households and continue to protect net users, which is termed durability. This information is needed to decide the appropriate timing of LLIN distribution and also to identify product(s) that may be underperforming relative to expectations. Following guidance from the U.S. President’s Malaria Initiative, durability monitoring of polyethylene 150-denier LLIN (Royal Sentry® and MAGNet®) distributed during a 2017 mass campaign in Mozambique was implemented in three ecologically different sites: Inhambane, Tete, and Nampula. Methods This was a prospective cohort study in which representative samples of households from each district were recruited at baseline, 1 to 6 months after the mass campaign. All campaign LLINs in these households were labelled and followed up over a period of 36 months. The primary outcome was the “proportion of LLINs surviving in serviceable condition” based on attrition and integrity measures and the median survival in years. The outcome for insecticidal durability was determined by bio-assay from subsamples of campaign LLINs. Results A total of 998 households (98% of target) and 1998 campaign LLIN (85% of target) were included in the study. Definite outcomes could be determined for 80% of the cohort LLIN in Inhambane, 45% in Tete, and 72% in Nampula. The highest all-cause attrition was seen in Nampula with 74% followed by Inhambane at 56% and Tete at 50%. Overall, only 2% of campaign LLINs were used for other purposes. Estimated survival in serviceable condition of campaign LLINs after 36 months was 57% in Inhambane, 43% in Tete, and 33% in Nampula, corresponding to median survival of 3.0, 2.8, and 2.4 years, respectively. Factors that were associated with better survival were exposure to social and behavioural change communication, a positive net care attitude, and folding up the net during the day. Larger household size negatively impacted survival. Insecticidal performance was optimal up to 24 months follow-up, but declined at 36 months when only 3% of samples showed optimal effectiveness in Inhambane, 11% in Tete and 29% in Nampula. However, 96% of LLIN still had minimal effectiveness at 36 months. Conclusions Differences in median survival could be attributed at least in part to household environment and net care and repair behaviours. This means that in two of the three sites the assumption of a three-year cycle of campaign distributions holds, while in the Nampula site either continuous distribution channels could be expanded or more intense or targeted social and behaviour change activities to encourage net care and retention could be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emmanuel Obi
- PMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Hannah Koenker
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Stella Babalola
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Abuchahama Saifodine
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Rose Zulliger
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Isabel Swamidoss
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Gabriel Ponce de Leon
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Eunice Alfai
- National Malaria Control Programme, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Sean Blaufuss
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bolanle Olapeju
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hunter Harig
- PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Albert Kilian
- PMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Montagut, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Toé KH, Mechan F, Tangena JAA, Morris M, Solino J, Tchicaya EFS, Traoré A, Ismail H, Maas J, Lissenden N, Pinder M, Lindsay SW, Tiono AB, Ranson H, Sagnon N. Assessing the impact of the addition of pyriproxyfen on the durability of permethrin-treated bed nets in Burkina Faso: a compound-randomized controlled trial. Malar J 2019; 18:383. [PMID: 31791332 PMCID: PMC6889366 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-3018-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) treated with pyrethroids are the foundation of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa. Rising pyrethroid resistance in vectors, however, has driven the development of alternative net formulations. Here the durability of polyethylene nets with a novel combination of a pyrethroid, permethrin, and the insect juvenile hormone mimic, pyriproxyfen (PPF), compared to a standard permethrin LLIN, was assessed in rural Burkina Faso. METHODS A compound-randomized controlled trial was completed in two villages. In one village 326 of the PPF-permethrin nets (Olyset Duo) and 327 standard LLINs (Olyset) were distributed to assess bioefficacy. In a second village, 170 PPF-permethrin nets and 376 LLINs were distributed to assess survivorship. Nets were followed at 6-monthly intervals for 3 years. Bioefficacy was assessed by exposing permethrin-susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato mosquito strains to standard World Health Organization (WHO) cone and tunnel tests with impacts on fertility measured in the resistant strain. Insecticide content was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. LLIN survivorship was recorded with a questionnaire and assessed by comparing the physical integrity using the proportionate hole index (pHI). RESULTS The PPF-permethrin net met WHO bioefficacy criteria (≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 95% knockdown) for the first 18 months, compared to 6 months for the standard LLIN. Mean mosquito mortality for PPF-permethrin nets, across all time points, was 8.6% (CI 2.6-14.6%) higher than the standard LLIN. Fertility rates were reduced after PPF-permethrin net exposure at 1-month post distribution, but not later. Permethrin content of both types of nets remained within the target range of 20 g/kg ± 25% for 242/248 nets tested. The pyriproxyfen content of PPF-permethrin nets declined by 54%, from 10.4 g/kg (CI 10.2-10.6) to 4.7 g/kg (CI 3.5-6.0, p < 0.001) over 36 months. Net survivorship was poor, with only 13% of PPF-permethrin nets and 12% of LLINs still present in the original household after 36 months. There was no difference in the fabric integrity or survivorship between the two net types. CONCLUSION The PPF-permethrin net, Olyset Duo, met or exceeded the performance of the WHO-recommended standard LLIN (Olyset) in the current study but both net types failed the 3-year WHO bioefficacy criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kobié H Toé
- Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Frank Mechan
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Marion Morris
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Joanna Solino
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Emile F S Tchicaya
- Swiss Centre for Scientific Research in Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Alphonse Traoré
- Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Hanafy Ismail
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - James Maas
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Natalie Lissenden
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Margaret Pinder
- Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.,Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia
| | | | - Alfred B Tiono
- Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Hilary Ranson
- Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
| | - N'Falé Sagnon
- Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Malede A, Aemero M, Gari SR, Kloos H, Alemu K. Barriers of persistent long-lasting insecticidal nets utilization in villages around Lake Tana, Northwest Ethiopia: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1303. [PMID: 31619208 PMCID: PMC6796332 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7692-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malaria remains a major public health problem in Ethiopia. The use of LLINs is an effective approach to reducing transmission. Persistent use of LLINs is determined by numerous factors. Quantitative studies have assessed LLIN ownership and utilization, but the behavioral, socio-cultural, socioeconomic and net distribution contexts that impact their use have not been examined in depth. This study aimed to explore barriers of persistent LLIN use among communities around Lake Tana. Methods Twenty-three community residents who owned LLINs (15) or not (8) during the study period and 38 key informants were interviewed from April to June 2017. Phenomenological study was employed to explore the local contexts and factors that influence persistent use of LLINs. Individuals were purposefully selected to capture different views. Community residents were selected based on their permanent residence and LLIN use experience. Key informants were health extension workers, local leaders, students, and health professionals. The data were managed using QSR International NVivo Version 10 software and coded, and themes were identified. Results Killing ability of nets against arthropods other than mosquitoes reportedly made use of LLINs a favored malaria prevention method despite their ineffectiveness after 3 months. Conical nets were preferred due to their compatibility with varied sleeping structures. Numerous factors influenced persistent use, notably erroneous perceptions about LLINs, malaria and mosquitoes; bedbug infestation; inconvenience; unintended uses; distribution problem of nets; and socio-cultural and economic factors. Unintended uses were often associated with local needs and seldom linked with social issues and deficiencies in information about malaria and LLINs. Collateral benefits were considered important, principally in terms of disinfestation of bedbugs. Conclusions Non-persistent LLIN use was associated with inconvenient bed net design and early damage; non-potency of the insecticide against other arthropods; facilitation of bedbug infestation; unintended uses; wrong perceptions about malaria, mosquitoes, and LLINs; and inadequate follow-up regarding LLINs utilization. Distribution of conical nets and provision of adequate information on LLINs and malaria may promote persistent use. Using an insecticide that also kills arthropods other than mosquitoes may reduce unintended uses and increase persistent use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmamaw Malede
- Ethiopian Institute of Water Resources, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | - Mulugeta Aemero
- Department of Medical Parasitology, School of Biomedical & Laboratory Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Sirak Robele Gari
- Ethiopian Institute of Water Resources, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Helmut Kloos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Kassahun Alemu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Massue DJ, Lorenz LM, Moore JD, Ntabaliba WS, Ackerman S, Mboma ZM, Kisinza WN, Mbuba E, Mmbaga S, Bradley J, Overgaard HJ, Moore SJ. Comparing the new Ifakara Ambient Chamber Test with WHO cone and tunnel tests for bioefficacy and non-inferiority testing of insecticide-treated nets. Malar J 2019; 18:153. [PMID: 31039788 PMCID: PMC6492396 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2741-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insecticide-treated net (ITN) durability, measured through physical integrity and bioefficacy, must be accurately assessed in order to plan the timely replacement of worn out nets and guide procurement of longer-lasting, cost-effective nets. World Health Organization (WHO) guidance advises that new intervention class ITNs be assessed 3 years after distribution, in experimental huts. In order to obtain information on whole-net efficacy cost-effectively and with adequate replication, a new bioassay, the Ifakara Ambient Chamber Test (I-ACT), a semi-field whole net assay baited with human host, was compared to established WHO durability testing methods. METHODS Two experiments were conducted using pyrethroid-susceptible female adult Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto comparing bioefficacy of Olyset®, PermaNet® 2.0 and NetProtect® evaluated by I-ACT and WHO cone and tunnel tests. In total, 432 nets (144/brand) were evaluated using I-ACT and cone test. Olyset® nets (132/144) that did not meet the WHO cone test threshold criteria (≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 95% knockdown) were evaluated using tunnel tests with threshold criteria of ≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 90% feeding inhibition for WHO tunnel and I-ACT. Pass rate of nets tested by WHO combined standard WHO bioassays (cone/tunnel tests) was compared to pass in I-ACT only by net brand and time after distribution. RESULTS Overall, more nets passed WHO threshold criteria when tested with I-ACT than with standard WHO bioassays 92% vs 69%, (OR: 4.1, 95% CI 3.5-4.7, p < 0.0001). The proportion of Olyset® nets that passed differed if WHO 2005 or WHO 2013 LN testing guidelines were followed: 77% vs 71%, respectively. Based on I-ACT results, PermaNet® 2.0 and NetProtect® demonstrated superior mortality and non-inferior feeding inhibition to Olyset® over 3 years of field use in Tanzania. CONCLUSION Ifakara Ambient Chamber Test may have use for durability studies and non-inferiority testing of new ITN products. It measures composite bioefficacy and physical integrity with both mortality and feeding inhibition endpoints, using fewer mosquitoes than standard WHO bioassays (cone and tunnel tests). The I-ACT is a high-throughput assay to evaluate ITN products that work through either contact toxicity or feeding inhibition. I-ACT allows mosquitoes to interact with a host sleeping underneath a net as encountered in the field, without risk to human participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis J Massue
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Institute of Tropical and Public Health, Soccinstrase 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
- University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland.
- National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, P. O. Box 81, Muheza, Tanga, Tanzania.
- Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Pwani, Tanzania.
| | - Lena M Lorenz
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Jason D Moore
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Institute of Tropical and Public Health, Soccinstrase 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
- Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Pwani, Tanzania
| | | | - Samuel Ackerman
- Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Pwani, Tanzania
| | - Zawadi M Mboma
- Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Pwani, Tanzania
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - William N Kisinza
- National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, P. O. Box 81, Muheza, Tanga, Tanzania
| | - Emmanuel Mbuba
- Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Pwani, Tanzania
| | - Selemani Mmbaga
- Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Pwani, Tanzania
| | - John Bradley
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Hans J Overgaard
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
| | - Sarah J Moore
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Institute of Tropical and Public Health, Soccinstrase 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
- Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Pwani, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Moscibrodzki P, Dobelle M, Stone J, Kalumuna C, Chiu YHM, Hennig N. Free versus purchased mosquito net ownership and use in Budondo sub-county, Uganda. Malar J 2018; 17:363. [PMID: 30326909 PMCID: PMC6191916 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2515-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the distribution of mosquito bed nets is a widely adopted approach for malaria prevention, studies exploring how the usage of a net may be influenced by its source and other factors remain sparse. METHODS A standardized questionnaire and home-visit observations were used to collect data from 9 villages in Budondo sub-county, Uganda in 2016. Household- and individual-level data were collected, such as bed net ownership (at least one net versus none), acquirement source (free versus purchased), demographics, as well as knowledge of malaria and preventative measures. Net-level data, including alternative uses, and bed net quantity and integrity, were also collected. Mixed effects logistic regression models were performed to identify the key determinants of bed net use. RESULTS Overall, the proportion of households with at least one bed net was 40%, while bed net availability was only reported among 27% of all household members. Awareness of the benefits of bed net use was statistically significantly associated with ownership of at least one net (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.11-2.68, p = 0.02). Among those who own net(s), the odds of a bed net being correctly used (i.e., to sleep under) after adjusting for potential confounders were significantly lower for nets that were obtained free compared to nets that were purchased by the owners themselves (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.51, p < 0.01), resulting in an alternative use of the net. Other factors such as female gender, children ≤ 5 years old, and pregnancy status were also significantly associated with having a net to sleep under (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Understanding inter- and intra-household net-use factors will help malaria control programmes more effectively direct their efforts to increase public health impact. Future studies may additionally consider socioeconomic status and track the lifetime of the net.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Moscibrodzki
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Molly Dobelle
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Jessie Stone
- Soft Power Health Uganda, P.O. Box 392, Kyabirwa, Uganda
| | | | | | - Nils Hennig
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mboma ZM, Overgaard HJ, Moore S, Bradley J, Moore J, Massue DJ, Kramer K, Lines J, Lorenz LM. Mosquito net coverage in years between mass distributions: a case study of Tanzania, 2013. Malar J 2018; 17:100. [PMID: 29490649 PMCID: PMC5831856 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2247-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Government of Tanzania is the main source of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) for its population. Mosquito nets (treated and untreated) are also available in the commercial market. To sustain investments and health gains in the fight against malaria, it is important for the National Malaria Control Programme to monitor LLIN coverage especially in the years between mass distributions and to understand what households do if their free nets are deemed unusable. The aim of this paper was to assess standard LLIN indicators by wealth status in Tanzania in 2013, 2 years after the last mass campaign in 2011, and extend the analysis to untreated nets (UTNs) to investigate how households adapt when nets are not continuously distributed. Methods Between October–December 2013, a household survey was conducted in 3398 households in eight districts in Tanzania. Using the Roll Back Malaria indicators, the study analysed: (1) household net ownership; (2) access to nets; (3) population net use and (4) net use:access ratio. Outcomes were calculated for LLINs and UTNs. Results were analysed by socio-economic quintiles and by district. Results Only three of the eight districts had household LLIN ownership of more than 80%. In 2013, less than a quarter of the households had one LLIN for every two people and only half of the population had access to an LLIN. Only the wealthier quintiles increased their net ownership and access to levels above 80% through the addition of UTNs. Overall net use of the population was low (LLINs: 32.8%; UTNs: 9.5%) and net use:access ratio was below target level (LLINs: 0.66; UTN: 0.50). Both measures varied significantly by district. Conclusions Two years after the last mass campaign, the percentage of households or population with access to LLINs was low. These findings indicate the average rate at which households in Tanzania lose their nets is higher than the rate at which they acquire new nets. The wealthiest households topped up their household net ownership with UTNs. Efforts to make LLINs available through commercial markets should be promoted, so those who can afford to buy nets purchase LLINs rather than UTNs. Net use was low around 40% and mostly explained by lack of access to nets. However, the use:access ratio was poor in Mbozi and Kahama districts warranting further investigations to understand other barriers to net use. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-018-2247-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zawadi M Mboma
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Hans J Overgaard
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
| | - Sarah Moore
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
| | - John Bradley
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jason Moore
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Dennis J Massue
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland.,National Institute for Medical Research, Muheza, Tanzania
| | - Karen Kramer
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jo Lines
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Lena M Lorenz
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.,Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Doda Z, Solomon T, Loha E, Gari T, Lindtjørn B. A qualitative study of use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) for intended and unintended purposes in Adami Tullu, East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia. Malar J 2018; 17:69. [PMID: 29409511 PMCID: PMC5801687 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2209-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malaria poses a significant public health threat globally, across Africa and in Ethiopia. The use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) is currently a proven prevention mechanism. Evidence is building on what happens to LLINs following mass distribution campaigns, with mixed results from different studies, some reporting very low use for intended purposes, others an encouraging level of using for intended purposes. In Ethiopia, between 2005 and 2015, about 64 million LLINs were distributed through periodic mass campaigns with the aims to achieve 100% coverage and 80% utilization. However, studies from rural Ethiopia showed variable LLINs coverage and utilization rate. The MalTrial Project, a collaborative venture between Hawassa University, Ethiopia and NROAID, Norway, has started a trial project in 2014 in Adami Tullu District of central Ethiopia. Quantitative surveys have established evidence on LLINs ownership and utilization, but the behavioural, sociocultural and socioeconomic dynamics of why LLINs’ use for intended purposes is low or why they are employed for other purposes remained elusive. The present qualitative study, building on the quantitative findings and framework, therefore, attempted to fill gaps in these areas using qualitative methods in selected localities of the district. Methods The study employed 7 focus groups, 16 individual interviews and observation to undertake data collection in January 2017. The data were analysed using NVivo Version 11 (QSR International) to transcribe, code and identify themes using thematic analysis approach. Results The study found out that certain households were more likely to use nets for intended needs in proper ways; a range of factors, notably socio-cultural and poverty, highly influence users’ ideas about the right ways and decisions to use and care for the nets; knowledge gaps and wrong perception exist regarding the purposes and life cycle of the nets; LLINs are employed for repurposed uses once they are considered non-viable, old, or lose their physical integrity; existence of misuse was acknowledged and understood as wrong; and values about gender roles further shape uses, misuses and repurposed use of the nets. Conclusions Behavioural, socio-cultural, economic and ecological conditions coupled with deficiencies in perceived bed net design and distribution policies; weak education, communication and social support structures were important in understanding and accounting for why a low level of intended use and a rampant misuse and repurposed use in Adami Tullu community of Ethiopia. A major nexus to address in order to improve intended use of LLINs lies, first and foremost, in economic poverty and socio-cultural factors that underlie much of the misuse and repurposed use of the nets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zerihun Doda
- College of Social Sciences & Humanities, Hawassa University, P.O. Box 005, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
| | - Tarekegn Solomon
- School of Public and Environmental Health, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Eskindir Loha
- School of Public and Environmental Health, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Taye Gari
- School of Public and Environmental Health, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.,Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bernt Lindtjørn
- Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
McCann RS, van den Berg H, Diggle PJ, van Vugt M, Terlouw DJ, Phiri KS, Di Pasquale A, Maire N, Gowelo S, Mburu MM, Kabaghe AN, Mzilahowa T, Chipeta MG, Takken W. Assessment of the effect of larval source management and house improvement on malaria transmission when added to standard malaria control strategies in southern Malawi: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17:639. [PMID: 28938876 PMCID: PMC5610449 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2749-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to outdoor and residual transmission and insecticide resistance, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) will be insufficient as stand-alone malaria vector control interventions in many settings as programmes shift toward malaria elimination. Combining additional vector control interventions as part of an integrated strategy would potentially overcome these challenges. Larval source management (LSM) and structural house improvements (HI) are appealing as additional components of an integrated vector management plan because of their long histories of use, evidence on effectiveness in appropriate settings, and unique modes of action compared to LLINs and IRS. Implementation of LSM and HI through a community-based approach could provide a path for rolling-out these interventions sustainably and on a large scale. METHODS/DESIGN We will implement community-based LSM and HI, as additional interventions to the current national malaria control strategies, using a randomised block, 2 × 2 factorial, cluster-randomised design in rural, southern Malawi. These interventions will be continued for two years. The trial catchment area covers about 25,000 people living in 65 villages. Community participation is encouraged by training community volunteers as health animators, and supporting the organisation of village-level committees in collaboration with The Hunger Project, a non-governmental organisation. Household-level cross-sectional surveys, including parasitological and entomological sampling, will be conducted on a rolling, 2-monthly schedule to measure outcomes over two years (2016 to 2018). Coverage of LSM and HI will also be assessed throughout the trial area. DISCUSSION Combining LSM and/or HI together with the interventions currently implemented by the Malawi National Malaria Control Programme is anticipated to reduce malaria transmission below the level reached by current interventions alone. Implementation of LSM and HI through a community-based approach provides an opportunity for optimum adaptation to the local ecological and social setting, and enhances the potential for sustainability. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered with The Pan African Clinical Trials Registry on 3 March 2016, trial number PACTR201604001501493.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S McCann
- Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. .,College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. .,Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700, AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Michèle van Vugt
- Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dianne J Terlouw
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.,Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Kamija S Phiri
- College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Aurelio Di Pasquale
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Maire
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Steven Gowelo
- College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Monicah M Mburu
- Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.,College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Alinune N Kabaghe
- College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.,Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michael G Chipeta
- College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.,Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.,Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Willem Takken
- Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhu L, Müller GC, Marshall JM, Arheart KL, Qualls WA, Hlaing WM, Schlein Y, Traore SF, Doumbia S, Beier JC. Is outdoor vector control needed for malaria elimination? An individual-based modelling study. Malar J 2017; 16:266. [PMID: 28673298 PMCID: PMC5496196 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1920-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Residual malaria transmission has been reported in many areas even with adequate indoor vector control coverage, such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs). The increased insecticide resistance in Anopheles mosquitoes has resulted in reduced efficacy of the widely used indoor tools and has been linked with an increase in outdoor malaria transmission. There are considerations of incorporating outdoor interventions into integrated vector management (IVM) to achieve malaria elimination; however, more information on the combination of tools for effective control is needed to determine their utilization. Methods A spatial individual-based model was modified to simulate the environment and malaria transmission activities in a hypothetical, isolated African village setting. LLINs and outdoor attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) stations were used as examples of indoor and outdoor interventions, respectively. Different interventions and lengths of efficacy periods were tested. Simulations continued for 420 days, and each simulation scenario was repeated 50 times. Mosquito populations, entomologic inoculation rates (EIRs), probabilities of local mosquito extinction, and proportion of time when the annual EIR was reduced below one were compared between different intervention types and efficacy periods. Results In the village setting with clustered houses, the combinational intervention of 50% LLINs plus outdoor ATSBs significantly reduced mosquito population and EIR in short term, increased the probability of local mosquito extinction, and increased the time when annual EIR is less than one per person compared to 50% LLINs alone; outdoor ATSBs alone significantly reduced mosquito population in short term, increased the probability of mosquito extinction, and increased the time when annual EIR is less than one compared to 50% LLINs alone, but there was no significant difference in EIR in short term between 50% LLINs and outdoor ATSBs. In the village setting with dispersed houses, the combinational intervention of 50% LLINs plus outdoor ATSBs significantly reduced mosquito population in short term, increased the probability of mosquito extinction, and increased the time when annual EIR is less than one per person compared to 50% LLINs alone; outdoor ATSBs alone significantly reduced mosquito population in short term, but there were no significant difference in the probability of mosquito extinction and the time when annual EIR is less than one between 50% LLIN and outdoor ATSBs; and there was no significant difference in EIR between all three interventions. A minimum of 2 months of efficacy period is needed to bring out the best possible effect of the vector control tools, and to achieve long-term mosquito reduction, a minimum of 3 months of efficacy period is needed. Conclusions The results highlight the value of incorporating outdoor vector control into IVM as a supplement to traditional indoor practices for malaria elimination in Africa, especially in village settings of clustered houses where LLINs alone is far from sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zhu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Günter C Müller
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Kuvin Centre for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.,Malaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Bamako, BP 1805, Bamako, Mali
| | - John M Marshall
- Divisions of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Kristopher L Arheart
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Whitney A Qualls
- Zoonosis Control Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA
| | - WayWay M Hlaing
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Yosef Schlein
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Kuvin Centre for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sekou F Traore
- Malaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Bamako, BP 1805, Bamako, Mali
| | - Seydou Doumbia
- Malaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Bamako, BP 1805, Bamako, Mali
| | - John C Beier
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Messenger LA, Rowland M. Insecticide-treated durable wall lining (ITWL): future prospects for control of malaria and other vector-borne diseases. Malar J 2017; 16:213. [PMID: 28532494 PMCID: PMC5441104 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1867-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
While long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are the cornerstones of malaria vector control throughout sub-Saharan Africa, there is an urgent need for the development of novel insecticide delivery mechanisms to sustain and consolidate gains in disease reduction and to transition towards malaria elimination and eradication. Insecticide-treated durable wall lining (ITWL) may represent a new paradigm for malaria control as a potential complementary or alternate longer-lasting intervention to IRS. ITWL can be attached to inner house walls, remain efficacious over multiple years and overcome some of the operational constraints of first-line control strategies, specifically nightly behavioural compliance required of LLINs and re-current costs and user fatigue associated with IRS campaigns. Initial experimental hut trials of insecticide-treated plastic sheeting reported promising results, achieving high levels of vector mortality, deterrence and blood-feeding inhibition, particularly when combined with LLINs. Two generations of commercial ITWL have been manufactured to date containing either pyrethroid or non-pyrethroid formulations. While some Phase III trials of these products have demonstrated reductions in malaria incidence, further large-scale evidence is still required before operational implementation of ITWL can be considered either in a programmatic or more targeted community context. Qualitative studies of ITWL have identified aesthetic value and observable entomological efficacy as key determinants of household acceptability. However, concerns have been raised regarding installation feasibility and anticipated cost-effectiveness. This paper critically reviews ITWL as both a putative mechanism of house improvement or more conventional intervention and discusses its future prospects as a method for controlling malaria and other vector-borne diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa A Messenger
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Mark Rowland
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zinszer K, Stone J, Mpaata JC, Muwanguzi S, Adler S, McGowan CL, Levy PD. Success and failure: a firsthand look into Uganda's most recent bednet distribution campaign. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2017; 17:251-253. [PMID: 28244377 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30057-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/27/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Zinszer
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | - Cheri L McGowan
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine and Integrative Biosciences Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Phillip D Levy
- Soft Power Health, Jinja, Uganda; Department of Emergency Medicine and Integrative Biosciences Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Clark S, Berrang-Ford L, Lwasa S, Namanya D, Twesigomwe S, Kulkarni M. A Longitudinal Analysis of Mosquito Net Ownership and Use in an Indigenous Batwa Population after a Targeted Distribution. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0154808. [PMID: 27145034 PMCID: PMC4856310 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 04/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Major efforts for malaria prevention programs have gone into scaling up ownership and use of insecticidal mosquito nets, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa where the malaria burden is high. Socioeconomic inequities in access to long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are reduced with free distributions of nets. However, the relationship between social factors and retention of nets after a free distribution has been less studied, particularly using a longitudinal approach. Our research aimed to estimate the ownership and use of LLINs, and examine the determinants of LLIN retention, within an Indigenous Batwa population after a free LLIN distribution. Two LLINs were given free of charge to each Batwa household in Kanungu District, Uganda in November 2012. Surveyors collected data on LLIN ownership and use through six cross-sectional surveys pre- and post-distribution. Household retention, within household access, and individual use of LLINs were assessed over an 18-month period. Socioeconomic determinants of household retention of LLINs post-distribution were modelled longitudinally using logistic regression with random effects. Direct house-to-house distribution of free LLINs did not result in sustainable increases in the ownership and use of LLINs. Three months post-distribution, only 73% of households owned at least one LLIN and this period also saw the greatest reduction in ownership compared to other study periods. Eighteen-months post distribution, only a third of households still owned a LLIN. Self-reported age-specific use of LLINs was generally higher for children under five, declined for children aged 6–12, and was highest for older adults aged over 35. In the model, household wealth was a significant predictor of LLIN retention, controlling for time and other variables. This research highlights on-going socioeconomic inequities in access to malaria prevention measures among the Batwa in southwestern Uganda, even after free distribution of LLINs, and provides critical information to inform local malaria programs on possible intervention entry-points to increase access and use among this marginalized population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sierra Clark
- Dept of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- * E-mail: (LBF); (SC)
| | - Lea Berrang-Ford
- Dept of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- * E-mail: (LBF); (SC)
| | - Shuaib Lwasa
- Dept of Geography, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - IHACC Research Team
- Indigenous Health Adaptation to Climate Change Research Team, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Manisha Kulkarni
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Massue DJ, Moore SJ, Mageni ZD, Moore JD, Bradley J, Pigeon O, Maziba EJ, Mandike R, Kramer K, Kisinza WN, Overgaard HJ, Lorenz LM. Durability of Olyset campaign nets distributed between 2009 and 2011 in eight districts of Tanzania. Malar J 2016; 15:176. [PMID: 26993981 PMCID: PMC4797150 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1225-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the first line choice for malaria vector control in sub-Saharan Africa, with most countries adopting universal coverage campaigns. However, there is only limited information on LLIN durability under user conditions. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the durability of Olyset® LLINs distributed during campaigns between 2009 and 2011 in Tanzania. Methods A retrospective field survey was conducted in eight districts in Tanzania mainland to assess the durability of Olyset campaign nets. Household questionnaires were used to assess attrition, i.e. net loss. All nets remaining in households were collected. A sub-sample of 198 Olyset campaign nets was examined for bio-efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s. mosquitoes, permethrin content and physical integrity following standard World Health Organization (WHO) methods. Results Of 6067 campaign nets reported to have been received between 2009 and 2011, 35 % (2145 nets) were no longer present. Most of those nets had been discarded (84 %) mainly because they were too torn (94 %). Of the 198 sub-sampled Olyset LLINs, 61 % were still in serviceable physical condition sufficient to provide personal protection while 39 % were in unserviceable physical condition according to WHO proportionate Hole Index (pHI). More than 96 % (116/120) of nets in serviceable condition passed WHO bioefficacy criteria while all nets in unserviceable condition passed WHO bioefficacy criteria. Overall mean permethrin content was 16.5 g/kg (95 % CI 16.2–16.9) with 78 % of the sub-sampled nets retaining recommended permethrin content regardless of their age or physical condition. Nets aged 4 years and above had a mean permethrin content of 14 g/kg (95 % CI 12.0–16.0). The only statistically significant predictor of reduced physical net integrity was rats in the house. Conclusions Two-to-four years after a mass campaign, only 39 % of distributed nets remain both present and in serviceable physical condition, a functional survival considerably below WHO assumptions of 50 % survival of a ‘three-year’ net. However, the majority of nets still retained substantial levels of permethrin and could still be bio-chemically useful against mosquitoes if their holes were repaired, adding evidence to the value of net care and repair campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis J Massue
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Institute of Tropical and Public Health, Soccinstrase 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland. .,National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, Muheza, P. O. Box 81, Tanga, Tanzania.
| | - Sarah J Moore
- University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland.,National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, Muheza, P. O. Box 81, Tanga, Tanzania.,Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo Research and Training Centre, Bagamoyo, P.O. Box 74, Pwani, Tanzania
| | - Zawadi D Mageni
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo Research and Training Centre, Bagamoyo, P.O. Box 74, Pwani, Tanzania.,Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Jason D Moore
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo Research and Training Centre, Bagamoyo, P.O. Box 74, Pwani, Tanzania.,Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - John Bradley
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Olivier Pigeon
- Plant Protection Products and Biocides Physico-chemistry and Residues Unit, Agriculture and Natural Environment Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium
| | - Erasto J Maziba
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo Research and Training Centre, Bagamoyo, P.O. Box 74, Pwani, Tanzania
| | - Renata Mandike
- National Malaria Control Programme, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Karen Kramer
- University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland.,National Malaria Control Programme, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - William N Kisinza
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Institute of Tropical and Public Health, Soccinstrase 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Hans J Overgaard
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), MIVEGEC, Montpellier, France.,Department of Entomology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
| | - Lena M Lorenz
- Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo Research and Training Centre, Bagamoyo, P.O. Box 74, Pwani, Tanzania.,Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kilian A, Koenker H, Obi E, Selby RA, Fotheringham M, Lynch M. Field durability of the same type of long-lasting insecticidal net varies between regions in Nigeria due to differences in household behaviour and living conditions. Malar J 2015; 14:123. [PMID: 25890233 PMCID: PMC4376338 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0640-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background With the recent publication of WHO-recommended methods to estimate net survival, comparative analyses from different areas have now become possible. With this in mind, a study was undertaken in Nigeria to compare the performance of a specific long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) product in three socio-ecologically different areas. In addition, the objective was to assess the feasibility of a retrospective study design for durability. Methods In three states, Zamfara in the north, Nasarawa in the centre and Cross River in the south, four local government areas were selected one year after mass distribution of 100-denier polyester LLINs. From a representative sample of 300 households per site that had received campaign nets, an assessment of net survival was made based on rate of loss of nets and the physical condition of surviving nets measured by the proportionate hole index (pHI). Surveys were repeated after two and three years. Results Over the three-year period 98% of the targeted sample size of 3,720 households was obtained and 94% of the 5,669 campaign nets found were assessed for damage. With increasing time since distribution, recall of having received campaign nets dropped by 11-22% and only 31-87% of nets actually lost were reported. Using a recall bias adjustment, attrition rates were fairly similar in all three sites. The proportion of surviving nets in serviceable condition differed dramatically, however, resulting in an estimated median net survival of 3.0 years in Nasarawa, 4.5 years in Cross River and 4.7 years in Zamfara. Although repairs on damaged nets increased from around 10% at baseline to 21-38% after three years, the average pHI value for each of the four hole size categories did not differ between repaired and unrepaired nets. Conclusions First, the differences observed in net survival are driven by living conditions and household behaviours and not the LLIN material. Second, recall bias in a retrospective durability study can be significant and while adjustments can be made, enough uncertainty remains that prospective studies on durability are preferable wherever possible. Third, repair does not seem to measurably improve net condition and focus should, therefore, be on improving preventive behaviour. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-015-0640-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Kilian
- Tropical Health LLP, Montagut, Spain. .,Malaria Consortium, London, UK.
| | - Hannah Koenker
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Emmanuel Obi
- Malaria Consortium Nigeria Office, Abuja, Nigeria.
| | | | - Megan Fotheringham
- United States Agency for International Development, President's Malaria Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Matthew Lynch
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Smith DL, Moyes CL, Tatem AJ, Lynch M, Fergus CA, Yukich J, Bennett A, Eisele TP, Kolaczinski J, Cibulskis RE, Hay SI, Gething PW. Coverage and system efficiencies of insecticide-treated nets in Africa from 2000 to 2017. eLife 2015; 4:e09672. [PMID: 26714109 PMCID: PMC4758960 DOI: 10.7554/elife.09672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2015] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) for malaria control are widespread but coverage remains inadequate. We developed a Bayesian model using data from 102 national surveys, triangulated against delivery data and distribution reports, to generate year-by-year estimates of four ITN coverage indicators. We explored the impact of two potential 'inefficiencies': uneven net distribution among households and rapid rates of net loss from households. We estimated that, in 2013, 21% (17%-26%) of ITNs were over-allocated and this has worsened over time as overall net provision has increased. We estimated that rates of ITN loss from households are more rapid than previously thought, with 50% lost after 23 (20-28) months. We predict that the current estimate of 920 million additional ITNs required to achieve universal coverage would in reality yield a lower level of coverage (77% population access). By improving efficiency, however, the 920 million ITNs could yield population access as high as 95%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Bhatt
- Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel J Weiss
- Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Bonnie Mappin
- Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ursula Dalrymple
- Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ewan Cameron
- Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Donal Bisanzio
- Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David L Smith
- Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom,Sanaria Institute of Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Rockville, United States,Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
| | - Catherine L Moyes
- Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Tatem
- Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States,Flowminder Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Lynch
- Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cristin A Fergus
- Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Joshua Yukich
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, United States
| | - Adam Bennett
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
| | - Thomas P Eisele
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, United States
| | - Jan Kolaczinski
- Strategy, Investment and Impact Division, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Simon I Hay
- Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States,Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom,Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
| | - Peter W Gething
- Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom,
| |
Collapse
|