Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a revolution in care

Paediatric Rheumatology Fails to Meet Current Benchmarks, a Call for Health Equity for Children Living with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Using Digital Health Technologies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This critical review begins by presenting the history of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) management. To move the conversation forward in addressing the current shortcomings that exist in the clinical management of children living with JIA, we argue that to date, the advancement of successful treatments for JIA has been historically slow. Factors implicated in this situation include a lack of rigorous research, JIA being considered a rare disease, and JIA's idiopathic and complex pathophysiology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the well-intended legislative changes to increase paediatric research, and the major advancements seen in molecular medicine over the last 30 years, globally, paediatric rheumatology services are still failing to meet the current benchmarks of best practice. Provoking questions on how the longstanding health care disparities of poor access and delayed treatment for children living with JIA can be improved, to improve healthcare outcomes. Globally, paediatric rheumatology services are failing to meet the current benchmarks of best practice. Raising awareness of the barriers hindering JIA management is the first step in reducing the current health inequalities experienced by children living with JIA. Action must be taken now, to train and well-equip the paediatric rheumatology interdisciplinary workforce. We propose, a resource-efficient way to improve the quality of care provided could be achieved by embedding digital health into clinical practice, to create an integrative care model between the children, general practice and the paediatric rheumatology team. To improve fragmented service delivery and the coordination of interdisciplinary care, across the healthcare system.

Increasing the etanercept dose in a treat-to-target approach in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: does it help to reach the target? A post-hoc analysis of the BeSt for Kids randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Etanercept has been studied in doses up to 0.8 mg/kg/week (max 50 mg/week) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. In clinical practice higher doses are used off-label, but evidence regarding the relation with outcomes is lacking. We describe the clinical course of JIA-patients receiving high-dose etanercept (1.6 mg/kg/week; max 50 mg/week) in the BeSt for Kids trial.

METHODS

92 patients with oligoarticular JIA, RF-negative polyarticular JIA or juvenile psoriatic arthritis were randomised across three treat-to-target arms: (1) sequential DMARD-monotherapy (sulfasalazine or methotrexate (MTX)), (2) combination-therapy MTX + 6 weeks prednisolone and (3) combination therapy MTX + etanercept. In any treatment-arm, patients could eventually escalate to high-dose etanercept alongside MTX 10mg/m2/week.

RESULTS

32 patients received high-dose etanercept (69% female, median age 6 years (IQR 4-10), median 10 months (7-16) from baseline). Median follow-up was 24.6 months. Most clinical parameters improved within 3 months after dose-increase: median JADAS10 from 7.2 to 2.8 (p = 0.008), VAS-physician from 12 to 4 (p = 0.022), VAS-patient/parent from 38.5 to 13 (p = 0.003), number of active joints from 2 to 0.5 (p = 0.12) and VAS-pain from 35.5 to 15 (p = 0.030). Functional impairments (CHAQ-score) improved more gradually and ESR remained stable. A comparable pattern was observed in 11 patients (73% girls, median age 8 (IQR 6-9)) who did not receive high-dose etanercept despite eligibility (comparison group). In both groups, 56% reached inactive disease at 6 months. No severe adverse events (SAEs) occurred after etanercept dose-increase. In the comparison group, 2 SAEs consisting of hospital admission occurred. Rates of non-severe AEs per subsequent patient year follow-up were 2.27 in the high-dose and 1.43 in the comparison group.

CONCLUSIONS

Escalation to high-dose etanercept in JIA-patients who were treated to target was generally followed by meaningful clinical improvement. However, similar improvements were observed in a smaller comparison group who did not escalate to high-dose etanercept. No SAEs were seen after escalation to high-dose etanercept. The division into the high-dose and comparison groups was not randomised, which is a potential source of bias. We advocate larger, randomised studies of high versus regular dose etanercept to provide high level evidence on efficacy and safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trial Register; NTR1574; 3 December 2008; https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/26585 .

Advancements and progress in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A Review of pathophysiology and treatment

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic clinical condition characterized by arthritic features in children under the age of 16, with at least 6 weeks of active symptoms. The etiology of JIA remains unknown, and it is associated with prolonged synovial inflammation and structural joint damage influenced by environmental and genetic factors. This review aims to enhance the understanding of JIA by comprehensively analyzing relevant literature. The focus lies on current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and investigations into the pathoaetiologies using diverse research modalities, including in vivo animal models and large-scale genome-wide studies. We aim to elucidate the multifactorial nature of JIA with a strong focus towards genetic predilection, while proposing potential strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes and enhance diagnostic risk stratification in light of recent advancements. This review underscores the need for further research due to the idiopathic nature of JIA, its heterogeneous phenotype, and the challenges associated with biomarkers and diagnostic criteria. Ultimately, this contribution seeks to advance the knowledge and promote effective management strategies in JIA.

Treatment of non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

In the past two decades, the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has evolved markedly, owing to the availability of a growing number of novel, potent and relatively safe therapeutic agents and the shift of management strategies towards early achievement of disease remission. However, JIA encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases that require distinct treatment approaches. Furthermore, some old drugs, such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine and intraarticular glucocorticoids, still maintain an important therapeutic role. In the past 5 years, information on the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for JIA has been further enriched through the accomplishment of several randomized controlled trials of newer biologic and synthetic targeted DMARDs. In addition, a more rational therapeutic approach has been fostered by the promulgation of therapeutic recommendations and guidelines. A multinational collaborative effort has led to the development of the recommendations for the treat-to-target strategy in JIA. There is currently increasing interest in establishing the optimal time and modality for discontinuation of treatment in children with JIA who achieve sustained clinical remission. The aim of this Review is to summarize the current evidence and discuss the therapeutic approaches to the management of non-systemic phenotypes of JIA, including oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

Increase in stress contributes to impaired jaw function in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a two-year prospective study

BACKGROUND

Stress in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) has been found to be associated with orofacial pain, psychological distress, jaw dysfunction and loss of daily activities in a cross-sectional study. The aim of this study was to investigate the relations between stress and change of stress over time versus changes in orofacial pain, psychosocial factors and jaw function over a two-year period in patients with JIA.

METHODS

This is a two-year prospective follow-up study involving 40 JIA patients. At baseline (2015) the median age was 12 years and at two-year follow up (2018) 14 years. The JIA patients were examined clinically and with questionnaires at baseline and follow-up with the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) and completed the same set of DC/TMD questionnaires regarding orofacial pain symptoms and psychosocial factors.

RESULTS

Change in stress was associated with change in catastrophizing, psychological distress as well as limitation in general function and jaw function.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the importance of maintaining a low stress level in patients with JIA since an increase in stress level over a two-year period seems to impair jaw function as well as psychological distress and catastrophizing.

Barriers and Solutions for Pediatric Rheumatology Referrals in a Rural Area: Physician Survey Results From Montana State

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are 9 states across the United States that do not have a pediatric rheumatologist, including the state of Montana. Patients in these states are often cared for by outreach clinics staffed by pediatric rheumatology (PR) providers from other states or looked after by in-state adult rheumatologists or in-state primary care providers.

METHODS

Using a web-based survey, we determined barriers and potential solutions to PR referrals from referring providers (including primary care providers and subspecialists) in Montana state.

RESULTS

Eighty-five Montana referring providers responded, with 44% being pediatric physicians and 33% being family medicine physicians. Other respondents were adult rheumatologists, pediatric and family medicine advanced practice providers, orthopedic surgeons, and pediatric subspecialists. Eighty-five percent of providers had previously referred a patient to PR. Referring providers rated difficulty referring MT patients to PR as 27 (on a linear numeric scale of 0-100, with 0 being very difficult) and noted lack of access to local pediatric rheumatologist as the most significant barrier to referral. The top patient barrier as perceived by 95% of providers was travel time. Potential solutions to improve care included presence of local pediatric rheumatologist with 50 miles, development of algorithms for common PR complaints, and outreach clinics.

CONCLUSION

Referring providers in Montana report difficulty in referring to PR, with lack of access and travel time being key barriers. Improving access through expanding local PR workforce and increasing access through outreach clinics may help reduce these barriers.

Treatment with Methotrexate in Infants and Toddlers with Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Multi-Center Study

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting up to 20% of children. Methotrexate (MTX) is used off-label as a systemic treatment for AD patients unresponsive to topical therapies, but limited data exist regarding its safety and efficacy in children, especially in those < 4 years old. To further investigate MTX in younger patients, we screened the medical records of three referral centers between 2016 and 2022 and identified 28 infants and toddlers < 4 years old with AD treated with MTX. Mean age upon MTX initiation was 2.7 ± 1.2 years and mean investigator global assessment (IGA) score was 3.78 ± 0.4. Median duration of MTX treatment was five months. Following 12 and 24 weeks of MTX treatment, the response rate was 50% and IGA 0/1 was achieved in 14.2% and 21.4% of patients, respectively. Most treatment cessations were attributed to a lack of efficacy or parental concern. Although adverse events were reported in 57.1% of patients, MTX was discontinued due to such adverse events only in two patients (7.1%). Taken together, MTX demonstrated a high safety profile in AD patients <4 years old. MTX efficacy was moderate and presumably underestimated by parents who opted for premature treatment cessation due to concerns associated with an immunomodulatory drug.

Immune Effector Cell-Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis-Like Syndrome

T cell-mediated hyperinflammatory responses, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), are now well-established toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. As the field of CAR T cells advances, however, there is increasing recognition that hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-like toxicities following CAR T cell infusion are occurring broadly across patient populations and CAR T cell constructs. Importantly, these HLH-like toxicities are often not as directly associated with CRS and/or its severity as initially described. This emergent toxicity, however ill-defined, is associated with life-threatening complications, creating an urgent need for improved identification and optimal management. With the goal of improving patient outcomes and formulating a framework to characterize and study this HLH-like syndrome, we established an American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy panel composed of experts in primary and secondary HLH, pediatric and adult HLH, infectious disease, rheumatology and hematology, oncology, and cellular therapy. Through this effort, we provide an overview of the underlying biology of classical primary and secondary HLH, explore its relationship with similar manifestations following CAR T cell infusions, and propose the term "immune effector cell-associated HLH-like syndrome (IEC-HS)" to describe this emergent toxicity. We also delineate a framework for identifying IEC-HS and put forward a grading schema that can be used to assess severity and facilitate cross-trial comparisons. Additionally, given the critical need to optimize outcomes for patients experiencing IEC-HS, we provide insight into potential treatment approaches and strategies to optimize supportive care and delineate alternate etiologies that should be considered in a patient presenting with IEC-HS. By collectively defining IEC-HS as a hyperinflammatory toxicity, we can now embark on further study of the pathophysiology underlying this toxicity profile and make strides toward a more comprehensive assessment and treatment approach.

Individual and environmental determinants associated with longer times to access pediatric rheumatology centers for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, a JIR cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite guidelines, poor access to appropriate care for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients remains a global issue. Prompt referral to a pediatric rheumatology (PR) center and effective care is known to be critical for changing the natural history of the disease and improving long-term prognosis. This project assesses socio-economic factors of delayed referral to a pediatric rheumatologist (PRst) for JIA patients in France and Switzerland within the Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism (JIR) Cohort.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with JIA, presenting at one center of the JIRcohort in France or Switzerland with additional data on referral pathway were included. Patient characteristics at first visit to the PR center, dates of visits to healthcare providers during referral, and parent characteristics were extracted from the JIRcohort database.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty children were included. The overall median time to first PR assessment was 2.4 months [1.3; 6.9] and ranged widely across the JIA subtypes, from 1.4 months [0.6; 3.8] for children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) to 5.3 months [2.0; 19.1] for children with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA). A diagnosis of ERA and an appointment with an orthopedist during the referral pathway were significantly associated with a longer time before the first PR visit (hazard ratio HR 0.50 [95% CI: 0.29; 0.84]) and HR 0.68 [95% CI: 0.49; 0.93], respectively) in multivariable analysis. Having a mother with a post-graduate educational attainment level was tendentially associated with a shorter time before the first PR visit, (HR 1.32 [95% CI: 0.99; 1.78]).

CONCLUSIONS

Time to first PRst visit was most often short compared to other studies and close to the British recommendations. However, this time remained too long for many patients. We observed no social inequities in access to a PRst, but we show the need to improve effective pathway and access to a PR center for JIA patients.

Biologic Disease-Modifying and Other Anti-Rheumatic Drugs Use in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Based on a Japanese Nationwide Claims Database

Purpose

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are highly effective and safe against juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), which is classified into systemic JIA (sJIA) and the other JIA categories (non-sJIA) according to differences in clinical symptoms and pathophysiology. The purpose of the current study was to investigate trends in patterns of prescribing bDMARDs for moderate-to-severe JIA using a relatively large sample size in Japan.

Patients and Methods

A descriptive epidemiological study based on a nationwide claims database in Japan was conducted from 2012 to 2018 using the “JMDC Claims Database” to explain annual changes based on the number of patients prescribed bDMARDs. Study drugs were identified based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes, such as methotrexate, glucocorticoids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and bDMARDs.

Results

From a database of 6,862,244 patients, the following exclusion criteria were applied: aged ≥16 years, without “M08” in their ICD-10 code as disease, and missing the information of prescription date in the database during the study period, resulting in a final number of 111 JIA patients. We found an increasing trend for adalimumab and tocilizumab and a decreasing trend for methotrexate. Differences in medication use between sJIA and non-sJIA patients were also evident, being consistent with national and international guidelines.

Conclusion

Although the introduction of bDMARDs has markedly improved the efficacy of JIA therapy, there are still many short- and long-term safety issues to be examined, including the risk of infection and potential risk of associated malignancy. Future studies are needed to clarify these issues.

Probability of Response in the First Sixteen Weeks After Starting Biologics: An Analysis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Biologics Trials

OBJECTIVES

Most juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) trials used an open-label run-in period followed by randomized medication withdrawal. We used data from the run-in period of 4 bDMARD trials to 1) delineate early response trajectory to bDMARDs and 2) identify predictors of early response.

METHODS

Data from the first 16 weeks of 4 bDMARD trials were used. The primary outcome was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 50 (Pedi 50) response criteria: clinically significant response defined as ACR Pedi 50 or greater. The secondary outcome was the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints (cJADAS10) minimal disease activity state. Response transition rates and predictors were modeled using an inhomogeneous Markov multistate model.

RESULTS

Five hundred thirty-two participants (70% receiving methotrexate, 41% prednisone) were included. By month 4, the probability of attaining ACR Pedi 50 or greater was 0.698. If ACR Pedi 50 or more was not achieved by month 1, the probability of achieving it by month 4 was 0.60. If ACR Pedi 50 or more was not achieved by month 3, the probability of achieving this by month 4 was 0.31. Age at diagnosis, disease duration, baseline rheumatoid factor, and active joint counts predicted ACR and cJADAS state transitions, adjusted for concomitant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

No response ACR Pedi 50 or more by month 1 after treatment was associated with a 0.60 probability of responding by month 4, but not responding by month 3 was associated with a 0.31 probability of response by month 4. Baseline disease duration, rheumatoid factor, and active joint counts predicted early treatment response (ACR and cJADAS10 states).

Latent classes of early response trajectories to biologics initiation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an analysis of four trials

AIMS

1) To delineate latent classes of treatment response to biologics in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients in the first 16 weeks after initiation. 2) To identify predictors of early disease response.

METHODS

The study population was drawn from four biologics trials in polyarticular course JIA: Etanercept 2000, Abatacept 2008, TRial of Early Aggressive Therapy (TREAT) 2012 and Tocilizumab 2014. The outcome was active joint counts (AJC). Semiparametric latent class trajectory analysis was applied to identify latent classes of response to treatment; AJC was transformed for this modelling. We tested baseline disease and treatment characteristics for their abilities to predict class membership of response.

RESULTS

There were 480 participants, 74% females. At baseline, 26% were rheumatoid factor positive. 67% were on methotrexate at enrollment. Three latent class solution provided the best fit. Baseline AJC was the sole best predictor of class membership. Participants classified by their highest membership probabilities into high baseline AJC (> 30) and slow response (26.5%), low baseline AJC (< 10), early and sustained response (29.7%), and moderate baseline AJC progressive response (43.8%). Participants were classified into the latent classes with a mean class membership posterior probability of 0.97. Those on methotrexate at baseline were less likely to belong to high baseline AJC class.

CONCLUSIONS

Three latent classes of responses were detectable in the first 16 weeks of biologics therapy. Those with the highest baseline AJC demonstrated very slow response in this window and were less likely to be on concomitant methotrexate.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

TREAT 2012 (NCT NCT00443430 ) (Wallace et. al, Arthritis Rheum 64:2012-21, 2012), tocilizumab trial 2014 ( NCT00988221 ), abatacept trial 2008 ( NCT00095173 ). Etanercept 2000 from Amgen does not have a trial registration number.

Sacroiliitis at diagnosis as a protective predictor against disease flare after stopping medication: outcomes of a Southeast Asian enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) longitudinal cohort

OBJECTIVES

To assess short- and long-term outcomes of ERA in a large monocentric cohort in Singapore.

METHODS

Children diagnosed with ERA according to ILAR criteria from 2002 to 2021 were recruited. Nonparametric statistics were used to describe the data. Outcomes were defined according to modified Wallace criteria, and probabilities and predictors were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-one ERA patients (male 86%; Chinese 81%) were included. The median age at onset was 11.9 years (IQR: 9.4-13.9), and disease duration was 5.3 years (IQR: 2.9-8.4). At diagnosis, 39% of the patients had sacroiliitis. HLA-B27 was positive in 83%, and biologics were used in 72% of the patients. Clinical inactive disease (CID) was achieved in 92% of the patients, of which 27% achieved within 6 months. Sacroiliitis at diagnosis is an unfavorable predictor of early CID at 6 months. Medication was discontinued in one-third of the patients. Favorable predictor of medication withdrawal includes male gender, while unfavorable predictors include positive HLA-B27 and ANA. Two-thirds of the patients with CID had at least one disease flare. Sacroiliitis at diagnosis is a protective predictor of flare after stopping medication.

CONCLUSION

Despite a high proportion of ERA patients achieving CID, only one-third could stop medication with high rates of disease flare. Unfavorable predictors include older age at onset, HLA-B27, and ANA positivity. While sacroiliitis at diagnosis is a negative predictor of CID at 6 months, it is associated with less disease flare after discontinuing medication.

B Cells on the Stage of Inflammation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Leading or Supporting Actors in Disease Pathogenesis?

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a term that collectively refers to a group of chronic childhood arthritides, which together constitute the most common rheumatic condition in children. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria define seven categories of JIA: oligoarticular, polyarticular rheumatoid factor (RF) negative (RF-), polyarticular RF positive (RF+), systemic, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis. The ILAR classification includes persistent and extended oligoarthritis as subcategories of oligoarticular JIA, but not as distinct categories. JIA is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process affecting the synovia that begins before the age of 16 and persists at least 6 weeks. If not treated, JIA can cause significant disability and loss of quality of life. Treatment of JIA is adjusted according to the severity of the disease as combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), synthetic and/ or biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although the disease etiology is unknown, disturbances in innate and adaptive immune responses have been implicated in JIA development. B cells may have important roles in JIA pathogenesis through autoantibody production, antigen presentation, cytokine release and/ or T cell activation. The study of B cells has not been extensively explored in JIA, but evidence from the literature suggests that B cells might have indeed a relevant role in JIA pathophysiology. The detection of autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA), RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in JIA patients supports a breakdown in B cell tolerance. Furthermore, alterations in B cell subpopulations have been documented in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from JIA patients. In fact, altered B cell homeostasis, B cell differentiation and B cell hyperactivity have been described in JIA. Of note, B cell depletion therapy with rituximab has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in children with JIA, which further supports B cell intervention in disease development.

Good result for twelve years after bilateral hip and knee arthroplasties for ankylosis with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case report

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) can lead to joint deformity and bone destruction, which can cause gait disturbances. To the best of our knowledge, there are no case reports with over 10 years of follow-up on quadruple joint arthroplasties (QJA) for bilateral hip and knee ankylosis associated with JIA. We present the case of a 29-year-old woman with JIA. The patient suffered from bilateral ankylosis of the hips and knees and developed a swing gait requiring double crutches. We performed staged QJA with careful attention to postoperative rehabilitation and her physical features, which included excessive pelvic anteversion, poor bone quality, and short statue of bones. Twelve years after surgery, the patient was able to walk without any support and showed good clinical functional scores. In addition, no radiological loosening following QJA was observed. We hereby introduce a surgical strategy for total hip arthroplasty for excessive pelvic anteversion, which involves two methods to calculate pelvic tilt on a pelvic anteroposterior radiograph. These methods were able to approximately predict postoperative pelvic changes.

Feasibility of T2 Mapping of the Sacroiliac Joints in Healthy Control Subjects and Children and Young Adults with Sacroiliitis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of T2 mapping for evaluating pediatric SIJ cartilage at 3 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Healthy control subjects and adolescents with sacroiliitis underwent a 3T MRI dedicated pelvic protocol that included a T2 mapping sequence consisting of multislice, multiecho acquisition. Healthy control subjects were prospectively recruited from our primary care practices as part of a larger imaging study, whereas adolescents with sacroiliitis were recruited specifically for this study. Regions of interest (ROIs) were hand-drawn by a senior pediatric radiologist twice and a radiology fellow twice to calibrate and test reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). T2 relaxation time between control subjects and cases was compared using univariate linear regression. We tested the association of T2 relaxation time in adolescents with sacroiliitis with patient-reported outcomes and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada sacroiliac joint (SIJ) inflammation and structural scores using Pearson correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Fourteen subjects were evaluable (six control subjects: median age 13.7 years [interquartile range (IQR): 12.2-15.5], 67% male patients; eight cases: median age 17.4 years [IQR: 12.5-20], 88% male patients]. Acquisition time for T2 mapping sequences was approximately 6 minutes, and segmenting the ROI for each SIJ took approximately 3 minutes. The intrarater and inter-rater ICCs were 0.67 and 0.46, respectively, indicating good to fair reliability. There was a trend, albeit statistically insignificant, in longer median T2 relaxation time in cases (43.04 ms; IQR: 41.25-49.76 ms) versus healthy control subjects (40.0 ms; IQR: 38.9-48.6 ms). Although not statistically significant, cases with longer T2 relaxation time tended to occur with poorer patient-reported outcomes. Correlations with the SIJ inflammation and structural lesion scores were weak.

CONCLUSION

T2 mapping of the SIJ cartilage in children was feasible and reliable. Larger controlled and longitudinal assessments are needed to assess the validity and utility of these measurements for routine clinical practice and trials.

Implementation Science in Pediatric Rheumatology: A Path to Health Equity

Implementation science is the study of processes that promote reliable uptake of evidence-based practices into clinical care. The integration of implementation science and health disparities research approaches has been proposed as a method to reduce health inequity through detection, understanding, and implementation of health equity-focused interventions. In this review, we provide an argument for the study of implementation science in pediatric rheumatology in light of previously observed health disparities, present a framework for the study of health equity and implementation science in pediatric rheumatology, and propose next steps to accelerate action.

Precision medicine in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-has the time arrived?

The introduction of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapies for treating children and adolescents with chronic arthritis (ie, juvenile idiopathic arthritis [JIA]) has revolutionised care and outcomes. The biologic revolution continues to expand, with ever-changing immunological targets coming to market after basic research and clinical trials. The first class of biologics that was beneficial for children with JIA was tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. If used early and aggressively, TNF inhibitors are capable of inducing disease remission for most of the seven subtypes of JIA, with the exception of systemic JIA (which more frequently responds to interleukin [IL]-1 or IL-6 inhibition). Nevertheless, there are still subsets of patients with JIA with disease that is difficult to treat or who develop extra-articular features that require a different therapeutic approach. Although finding an effective biological therapy for individual children with JIA can be trial and error, ongoing research and clinical trials are providing insight into a more personalised approach to care. In addition, redefining the JIA classification, in part based on shared similarities with various adult arthritides, could allow for extrapolation of knowledge from studies in adults with chronic arthritis.

Comparative effectiveness and persistence of TNFi and non-TNFi in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a large paediatric rheumatology centre in the USA

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the persistence and effectiveness of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) vs non-TNFi among newly diagnosed JIA patients after initiation of biologic DMARD (bDMARD).

METHODS

Using longitudinal patient-level data extracted from electronic medical records in a large Midwestern paediatric hospital from 2009 to 2018, we identified JIA patients initiating TNFi and non-TNFi treatment. Treatment effectiveness was assessed based on disease activity. Inverse probability of treatment weighting of propensity score was used to estimate the treatment effectiveness and Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted to assess persistence.

RESULTS

Of 667 JIA patients, most (92.0%) were prescribed one of the class of TNFi as their initial biologic treatment. Etanercept was the most frequently prescribed (67.1%) treatment, followed by adalimumab (27.5%). Only around 5% of patients were prescribed off-label bDMARDs as their first-course treatment; however, >20% were prescribed off-label biologics as their second-course therapy. Some 7.2% of patients received four or more bDMARDs. The median persistence of the first-course bDMARD is 320 days, with TNFi being significantly longer than the non-TNFi (395 vs 320 days, P = 0.010). The clinical Juvenile Disease Activity Score (cJADAS) reduction of TNFi users (6.6, 95% CI 5.7, 7.5) was significant greater compared with non-TNFi users (3.0, 95% CI 1.5, 4.6, P < 0.0001) at 6-month follow-up visit.

CONCLUSION

Persistence was significantly longer among patients initiating TNFi as their first biologic therapy than those receiving non-TNFi. Patients receiving TNF therapy had significant greater reduction of cJADAS at the 6-month follow-up visit compared with patients in the non-TNF cohort.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: from aetiopathogenesis to therapeutic approaches

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common paediatric rheumatological disorder and is classified by subtype according to International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria. Depending on the number of joints affected, presence of extra-articular manifestations, systemic symptoms, serology and genetic factors, JIA is divided into oligoarticular, polyarticular, systemic, psoriatic, enthesitis-related and undifferentiated arthritis. This review provides an overview of advances in understanding of JIA pathogenesis focusing on aetiology, histopathology, immunological changes associated with disease activity, and best treatment options. Greater understanding of JIA as a collective of complex inflammatory diseases is discussed within the context of therapeutic interventions, including traditional non-biologic and up-to-date biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Whilst the advent of advanced therapeutics has improved clinical outcomes, a considerable number of patients remain unresponsive to treatment, emphasising the need for further understanding of disease progression and remission to support stratification of patients to treatment pathways.

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Marriage and Parenthood: A Nationwide Matched Cohort Study

Objectives

To compare trajectories of marriage and parenthood in individuals with JIA vs the general population.

Methods

Patients with JIA (n = 4399) were identified in the Swedish National Patient Register (2001–2016) and individually matched to up to five general population comparators on birthyear, sex and residence county (n = 21 981). Marriage and parenthood data were retrieved from the Total Population Register from age 18 y, and parenthood from the Multigeneration Register from age 15 y, respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox regression adjusted for parental education, parental marital status and number of siblings.

Results

During a median of 6.3 years of follow-up, 362 patients with JIA and 1744 comparators got married (12.9 vs. 12.5 per 1000 person-years; HR 1.03, 95%CI 0.93-1.15). During a median of 8.8 years of follow-up, 680 patients with JIA and 3477 matched comparators became parents (17.1 vs 17.8 per 1000 person-years; HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.87-1.01). In the subgroup of patients with systemic onset JIA (SJIA), the adjusted hazard ratios for marriage and parenthood were 0.79 (95%CI 0.53-1.17) and 0.73 (95%CI 0.55-0.97), respectively.

Conclusion

The times to first marriage and first parenthood are similar for patients with JIA and the general population, suggesting that adolescents with JIA transition into family life along a trajectory resembling their community peers. One exception is the subgroup of patients with systemic onset JIA, who become parents for the first time at a lower rate than general population comparators.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the temporomandibular joint - no longer the forgotten joint

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is common in children, with an increasing awareness of the condition in all healthcare professionals. TMJ involvement presents a challenge in both diagnosis and treatment, as late presentation can still occur as the disease often develops asymptomatically. This can result in facial deformity and/or functional difficulties including obstructive sleep apnoea. Early diagnosis is therefore essential, requiring a high index of clinical suspicion coupled with the judicious use of gadolinium contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Long-term management is best provided by a multidisciplinary team as patients often need a combination of pharmacological management, surgical interventions, orthodontics, and psychological support. End stage deformity can be treated by different surgical options, each with their own risks and benefits, however recently there is increasing recognition for the role of total alloplastic TMJ replacement. This review focuses on the diagnosis and management of TMJ arthritis and aims to highlight the important role of maxillofacial surgeons in JIA treatment.

Recent progress in the treatment of non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the joints and other organs that occurs in 1 in 1,000 children in the United States. Given the various categories of JIA, interpretation of the literature can be difficult. In this review, new developments in understanding non-systemic JIA and its treatment will be covered. Recent advances in the journey toward personalized treatment in JIA will be highlighted, including a review of currently available biologic modifiers. Uveitis and the temporomandibular joint will be discussed as particularly challenging treatment issues. Recent guideline updates and literature-guided treatment decisions will be reviewed.

Response to influenza vaccination in immunocompromised children with rheumatic disease: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prevention of illness due to infection by influenza viruses is important for children with rheumatic diseases. Biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs have become increasingly important in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and combinations of immunosuppressive drugs are used for the treatment of systemic disorders, which increase the risk of secondary immunodeficiency. Therefore, we investigated whether children with rheumatic disease can mount a protective antibody response after influenza immunization.

METHODS

The prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted in Denmark during the influenza season 2015-2016. Children with rheumatic disease aged six months to 19 years were eligible. Controls were immunologically healthy children. A blood sample was collected before and after vaccination and analysed by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay for the 2015-2016 influenza vaccine-strains. In case of flu-like symptoms the child was tested for influenza. For statistical analyses the patients were grouped according to medical treatment or disease.

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients and 15 controls were enrolled. No differences were found for the increase of antibodies from pre-vaccine to post-vaccine between the groups in our primary analyses: A/Cal H1N1pdm09 (p = 0.28), A/Swi H3N2 (p = 0.15) and B/Phu Yamagata (p = 0.08). Only when combining patients across groups a lower increase in antibodies was found compared to controls. Among all patients the pre-vaccine rates for seroprotection using the HI-titer cut-off ≥ 40 were 93.1-97.0 % for all three strains. For seroprotection using the HI-titer cut-off ≥ 110 the pre-vaccine rates for all patients were 14.9-43.6 % for all three strains and an increase in the proportions of patients being seroprotected after vaccination was found for A/Cal H1N1pdm09 and A/Swi H3N2. None of the children with flu-like symptoms tested positive for the vaccine strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with rheumatic diseases increase in antibody titres after influenza immunization, however, it remains uncertain whether a protective level is achieved.

Prescribing Patterns and Impact of Factors Associated with Time to Initial Biologic Therapy among Children with Non-systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine patterns of initial prescriptions, investigate time to initiation of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), and evaluate the impact of clinical and other baseline factors associated with the time to first bDMARD in treating children with newly diagnosed non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

Using longitudinal patient-level data extracted from electronic medical records (EMR) in a large Midwestern pediatric hospital from 2009 to 2018, the initial prescriptions and prescribing patterns of bDMARDs, conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and glucocorticoids within 3 months of JIA diagnosis were examined. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to assess time to initiation of bDMARDs. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with time to first bDMARD.

RESULTS

Of 821 children, the proportion of patients with initial csDMARDs increased from 45.3% in 2009 to 60.3% in 2018. Around 57.5% of polyarthritis rheumatoid factor-positive (Poly RF+) patients and 43.2% of polyarthritis rheumatoid factor-negative (Poly RF-) patients received a bDMARD therapy within 3 months of diagnosis, 14.4% as monotherapy and 28.3% in combination with a csDMARD. Among patients who received combination therapy, combination of methotrexate with adalimumab increased from 16.7% in 2009 to 40% in 2018. The proportion of patients treated with adalimumab gradually increased and passed etanercept in 2016. The predictors of earlier initiation of biologic therapy were JIA category enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) [hazard ratio (HR) vs persistent oligoarthritis 4.82; p < 0.0001], psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (HR 2.46; p = 0.0002), or Poly RF- (HR 2.43; p = 0.0002); the number of joints with limited range of motion (HR 1.02; p = 0.0222), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, HR 1.01; p = 0.0033).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a substantial increase in the proportion of patients receiving the combination of methotrexate and adalimumab among patients receiving combination therapy. Adalimumab overtook etanercept as the most frequently prescribed bDMARD. Multiple factors affect the time to biologic initiation, including the number of joints with limited range of motion, ESR, and JIA category.

Model-Based Selection and Recommendation for Subcutaneous Abatacept Dose in Patients With Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

The selective T‐cell costimulation modulator abatacept is approved for treatment of adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA; 6‐17 years [intravenous] and 2‐17 years [subcutaneous]). An extrapolation approach was taken to determine subcutaneous weight‐tiered doses of abatacept to evaluate in patients with pJIA. Population pharmacokinetic (PPK) and exposure‐response (E‐R) analyses were conducted to determine whether the weight‐tiered subcutaneous regimen provides near‐maximal efficacy and is therapeutically comparable to the intravenous regimen in patients with pJIA aged 2‐17 years. Combined study data from intravenous or subcutaneous abatacept were used to assess clinically relevant exposure outcomes. The PPK model was developed with data from 13 phase 2/3 studies in RA and pJIA; the E‐R model for the American College of Rheumatology pediatric scores (JIA‐ACR 30/50/70/100 responses) in month 4 was developed with data from 2 phase 3 pJIA studies. Predefined covariates were investigated in both analyses. PPK model‐predicted exposures were steady‐state peak, trough (C_minss), and time‐averaged concentrations. Abatacept PK was characterized by a linear 2‐compartment model (zero‐order intravenous infusion, first‐order subcutaneous absorption, first‐order elimination); body weight was the only clinically relevant covariate. C_minss was the best exposure predictor for the JIA‐ACR response: log odds for response increased in proportion to log‐transformed C_minss; JIA‐ACR30 approached a plateau when C_minss ≥ 10 μg/mL. The PPK and E‐R analyses demonstrated that the weight‐tiered subcutaneous and intravenous abatacept dosing regimens provide near‐maximal efficacy and are clinically comparable across children with pJIA who are > 2 years old.

Efficacy and safety of fumaric acid esters in young patients aged 10-17 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Apart from biologics, no systemic drugs are approved in Europe for children with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Retrospective observational studies have shown promising results for fumaric acid esters (FAE) in this setting.

OBJECTIVES

To show superiority of FAE over placebo in terms of treatment response after 20 weeks in children and adolescents aged 10-17 years.

METHODS

In a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study, patients aged 10-17 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis requiring systemic therapy were randomized 2 : 1 to receive FAE (n = 91) or placebo (n = 43) over 20 weeks, followed by an open-label FAE treatment phase. The coprimary endpoints were ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) at week 20. The study was registered with EudraCT number 2012-000035-82.

RESULTS

At week 20, 55% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·44-0·65] of FAE-treated patients achieved a PASI 75 response vs. 19% (95% CI 0·08-0·33) in the placebo group (absolute difference 36%, 95% CI 0·20-0·53; P < 0·001). In total, 42% (95% CI 0·32-0·53) in the FAE group vs. 7% (95% CI 0·01-0·19) in the placebo group achieved a PGA score of 0 or 1 at week 20 (absolute difference 35%, 95% CI 0·21-0·49; P < 0·001). During the double-blind period, drug-related adverse events occurred more frequently in patients receiving FAE compared with placebo (76% vs. 47%). Gastrointestinal disorders were the most common adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

FAE administered over a period of 20 weeks demonstrated a better response than placebo; the difference was statistically significant and clinically meaningful. Application up to 40 weeks was generally well tolerated. However, further studies are required.

Treatment of Juvenile Spondyloarthritis: Where We Stand

Juvenile spondyloarthritis is a subset of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with onset in late childhood and adolescence and a strong association with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B-27 positivity and familial aggregation that has the potential for axial involvement, potentially leading to ankylosing spondylitis. Current therapy for severe disease relies heavily on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Treatment paradigms in children largely consist of extrapolation from studies on adults with spondyloarthritis. Additional therapies studied in adults include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), blockade of the interleukin-17 (IL-17) and IL-23 axes, blockade of T-cell stimulation, phosphodiesterase (PDE)-4 inhibition, and Janus-activated kinase (JAK) pathway alteration. IL-17 blockade and IL-23 blockade are guideline approved after TNFi failure (and even as an alternative to TNFi) in adults, depending on concomitant inflammatory bowel and skin disease, with JAK and PDE-4 inhibition options following biologic failure. Neither pediatric nor adult guidelines address IL-6 blockade, T-cell co-stimulation blockade, or combination biologic therapy.

Adverse drug reactions associated with treatment in patients with chronic rheumatic diseases in childhood: a retrospective real life review of a single center cohort

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are the sixth leading causes of death worldwide; monitoring them is fundamental, especially in patients with disorders like chronic rheumatic diseases (CRDs). The study aimed to describe the ADRs investigating their severity and associated factors and resulting interventions in pediatric patients with CRDs.

METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive and analytical study was conducted on a cohort of children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). The study evaluated medical records of the patients to determine the causality and the management of ADRs. In order to investigate the risk factors that would increase the risk of ADRs, a logistic regression model was carried out on a group of patients treated with the main used drug.

RESULTS

We observed 949 ADRs in 547 patients studied. Methotrexate (MTX) was the most frequently used medication and also the cause of the most ADRs, which occurred in 63.3% of patients, followed by glucocorticoids (GCs). Comparing synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) vs biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), the ADRs attributed to the former were by far higher than the latter. In general, the severity of ADRs was moderate and manageable. Drug withdrawal occurred in almost a quarter of the cases. In terms of risk factors, most patients who experienced ADRs due to MTX, were 16 years old or younger and received MTX in doses equal or higher than 0.6 mg/kg/week. Patients with JIA and JDM had a lower risk of ADRs than patients with JSLE. In the multiple regression model, the use of GCs for over 6 months led to an increase of 0.5% in the number of ADRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the ADRs highly likely affect a wide range of children and adolescents with CRDs they were considered moderate and manageable cases mostly. However, triggers of ADRs need further investigations.

Tocilizumab Employment in the Treatment of Resistant Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Associated Uveitis

AIM

To determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous tocilizumab in refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective observational case series. Patients with refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis, who had received tocilizumab were included in this study.

RESULTS

8 patients (14 eyes) were included in this study. The average age of the patients at the first visit was 16.8 ± 11.2 years (7-40). The average duration of follow-up period after starting treatment was 28.6 ± 24.6 months (9-70). Intravenous tocilizumab infusions induced and maintained remission in 5 patients (8 eyes). Vasculitis was resolved within 8 months in all but one patient. The presence of papillitis before starting treatment was directly correlated with visual acuity improvement. No side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous tocilizumab infusion can be an effective and safe method of treatment to induce and maintain remission in resistant juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis.

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Arthritis in Children and Adults: New Perspectives on Applied Photobiomodulation

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult rheumatoid arthritis are two major groups with chronic joint pain and inflammation, extra-articular manifestations, and high risk of comorbidities, which can cause physical and ocular disability, as well as create great socio-economic pressure worldwide. The pathogenesis of arthritis manifested in childhood and adulthood is multifactorial, unclear, and overly complex, in which immunity plays an important role. Although there are more and more biological agents with different mechanisms of action for the treatment of arthritis, the results are not as expected, because there are partial responses or non-responsive patients to these compounds, high therapeutic costs, side effects, and so on; therefore, we must turn our attention to other therapeutic modalities. Updating knowledge on molecular and cellular mechanisms in the comparative pathogenesis of chronic arthritis in both children and adults is necessary in the early and correct approach to treatment. Photobiomodulation (PBM) represents a good option, offering cost-effective advantages over drug therapy, with a quicker, more positive response to treatment and no side effects. The successful management of PBM in arthritis is based on the clinician’s ability to evaluate correctly the inflammatory status of the patient, to seek the optimal solution, to choose the best technology with the best physical parameters, and to select the mode of action to target very precisely the immune system and the molecular signaling pathways at the molecular level with the exact amount of quantum light energy in order to obtain the desired immune modulation and the remission of the disease. Light is a very powerful tool in medicine because it can simultaneously target many cascades of immune system activation in comparison with drugs, so PBM can perform very delicate tasks inside our cells to modulate cellular dysfunctions, helping to initiate self-organization phenomena and finally, healing the disease. Interdisciplinary teams should work diligently to meet these needs by also using single-cell imaging devices for multispectral laser photobiomodulation on immune cells.

A controversial topic in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Association between biologic agents and malignancy

OBJECTIVE

Over the last 2 decades, the usage of biological agents in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has been a successful and promising approach in controlling disease activity and preventing chronic sequelae. However, there are ongoing concerns about the long-term safety data and side-effect profile. We aimed to present preliminary data on the incidence of malignancy in patients with JIA treated with biological agents versus the general population rates in Turkey.

METHOD

A single-center hospital-based cohort study was performed to analyze cancer occurrence among JIA patients treated with biologic agents during the observation period between January 2004 and May 2019. As reference data for direct standardization, age, gender, and calendar year-specific incidence rates from the Turkish cancer registry were used. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR, ratio of cancers observed to expected) was generated with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The study sample consisted of 1023 JIA patients who had been treated with biologic or non-biologic agents. In the biologic-experienced group (n = 656), the mean age (at the study) was 16.7 ± 5.6 years. The mean length of follow-up was 9.9 ± 5.0 years. One cancer was detected within the observation period (SIR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.06-6.3). The patient was an 18-year-old male who had previously received etanercept and tocilizumab until the diagnosis of the hematologic malignancy (SIR: 2.5, 95% CI: 0.1-12.6).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with biologic agents appeared to have an increased rate of incident hematologic malignancy versus the general population in Turkey. However, before mentioning a clear causal relationship, other potential contributing factors should be taken into consideration.

Factors impacting referral of JIA patients to a tertiary level pediatric rheumatology center in North India: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

JIA studies demonstrate that there is a "window of opportunity" early in the disease course during which appropriate management improves outcomes. No data is available regarding patients' pathway, before first pediatric rheumatology (PR) evaluation in India, a country where health-care costs are self- paid by patients and where a significant shortage of pediatric rheumatologists (PRsts) is known. This study aimed to describe time from onset of symptoms to first PR visit of JIA patients to a tertiary center in India and factors that impact this.

METHODS

This retrospective study is from data collected at the PR center, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (SGRH) in New Delhi. JIA patients fulfilling ILAR 2004 criteria and seen at least twice from 1st October 2013 to 30th September 2018 were included. Data collected were: demographic details, history of disease, referral practitioner, clinical and laboratory features, treatments. Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi square and logistic regression were used as appropriate to study factors that determined time to first PR visit.

RESULTS

Five hundred and twenty patients were included: 396 were diagnosed at this PR center (group A), 124 were previously diagnosed as JIA and managed by non PRsts before first PR visit (group B). Median time from symptom onset to first PR visit was 4.1 months and median distance travelled 119.5 km. Despite ongoing treatment, group B patients had more aggressive disease and resided further away as compared to Group A patients. On univariate analysis, factors that predicted PR visit within 3 months were private patients, short distance to travel, family history of inflammatory disease, history of fever, history of acute uveitis or high ESR. On multivariate analysis all these factors were significant except high ESR and acute uveitis.

CONCLUSION

Time to first PR assessment at this center was comparable to that seen in western countries. Cost of care and long distance to the center delayed consultation; acuity of complaints and family history of rheumatologic condition hastened referral. Possible solutions to improve referral to PR centers would be to increase the number of PRsts and to improve medical insurance coverage.

Pediatric macrophage activation syndrome, recognizing the tip of the Iceberg

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is the name given to secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) associated with rheumatic diseases. Previously, MAS has been best studied in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), who are at high risk of developing MAS. MAS/sHLH is a cytokine storm that results in multi-organ system failure and is frequently fatal. Early diagnosis and treatment is critical for improving survival. Various diagnostic tools have been developed for identifying MAS in the setting of sJIA, as well as for all forms of MAS/sHLH. These are largely based on clinical (e.g., fever) and laboratory features (e.g., cytopenias). None are perfectly sensitive and specific, however, increasing awareness of this condition is also paramount in making the diagnosis. Rare familial forms of HLH can also be diagnosed based on homozygous mutation in genes largely involved in perforin-mediated cytolytic function of lymphocytes (natural killer cells and CD8 T cells). Intriguingly, heterozygous defects in these same genes are frequently identified in patients with sHLH and MAS. Decreased cytolytic function results in prolonged interaction of the lytic lymphocytes and their target antigen presenting cells, thus resulting in the pro-inflammatory cytokine storm believed responsible for the multi-organ failure. Novel cytokine-targeted therapies are currently being explored for a less toxic yet effective alternative to chemotherapeutic approaches to treating children with sHLH/MAS. As increased recognition and diagnosis of MAS is on the rise, an earlier and cytokine-targeted approach to therapy will likely save many lives of children with this disorder.

Infliximab therapy and outcomes in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a single-center study in China

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that includes seven heterogeneous subgroups with different prognoses. In particular, polyarticular JIA (pJIA) has a longer period of active disease and a poorer prognosis. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors are effective in patients with pJIA, but the therapeutic regimen remains controversial. Here, we performed a single-center study to determine the potential correlation between TNF-alpha inhibitor (infliximab) therapy and outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Clinical data of 40 pJIA patients were collected at our center from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2018, and patients were grouped according to the timing of infliximab therapy. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), the number of joints with active disease, and the 27-point juvenile arthritis disease activity score (JADAS-27) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The ESR, the active joint count, and the JADAS-27 decreased significantly in all groups after 3 months (P = 0.041/0.415/0.008, 0.022/0.030/ < 0.001, and 0.05/0.012/ < 0.001, respectively) and 6 months (P = 0.036/0.045/0.041, 0.076/0.037/ < 0.001, and 0.096/0.006/ < 0.001, respectively) of infliximab treatment, although the rates of change of these parameters were similar. However, after 12 months, only patients treated with infliximab within 3 months of disease onset had a stable ESR, active joint count, and JADAS-27, while these parameters increased sharply when infliximab was administered 3 months and especially 1 year after disease onset.

CONCLUSIONS

TNF-alpha is a pleiotropic pro-inflammatory cytokine of crucial importance in the pathogenesis of JIA. Infliximab can improve the outcomes of patients with pJIA significantly, and should be introduced early during the clinical course.

Characteristics of coexisting localized scleroderma and inflammatory arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Localized scleroderma (LS), including morphea and linear scleroderma, is an autoimmune disease where excessive subcutaneous collagen deposits lead to thickening, scarring, and fibrosis of the tissues. LS coexisting with inflammatory arthritis is less well-described but has been reported in as many as 20% of 53 LS patients in a recent cohort. Herein, we describe a cohort of 8 children with both LS and inflammatory arthritis. The objective of this study is to determine the characteristics of inflammatory arthritis in children with LS and their response to treatment regimens.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was completed on patients less than 19 years of age who were diagnosed with either morphea or linear scleroderma at the Children of Alabama center from 2004-2018. Patients were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnostic codes. Records were reviewed for additional diagnostic codes, exams, and laboratory findings confirming coexisting inflammatory arthritis and LS.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients with a diagnosis of either morphea or linear scleroderma were identified. Eight (9%) had coexisting inflammatory arthritis according to the diagnostic codes with documented active arthritis. Median age of initial rheumatic disease diagnosis was 7.5 years. A majority of patients with both LS and inflammatory arthritis were female (62.5%). Half of the patients (n=4, 50%) had LS lesions over arthritic joints. All of the identified patients were diagnosed with a form of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The JIA diagnoses varied widely in 3 (37.5%) patients with rheumatoid factor (RF) negative polyarticular JIA, 2 (25%) with oligoarticular JIA, 2 (25%) with psoriatic JIA, and 1 (12.5%) with enthesitis-related JIA. The timing of onset of LS and inflammatory arthritis varied widely. Three (37.5%) patients had LS lesions preceding clinical arthritis, and three (37.5%) had arthritis before the appearance of LS. Two (25%) patients had both LS and arthritis at the time of diagnosis. All patients received methotrexate (MTX) during their disease course with only 3 (37.5%) receiving systemic steroids during treatment. All 8 patients showed resolution of LS lesions. However, 6 of the 8 patients demonstrated active arthritis on combination MTX and TNFi therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of pediatric LS, 9% of patients had coexisting inflammatory arthritis. The characteristics of this cohort varied widely. All patients received MTX initially and showed a resolution of LS lesions. However, in the majority of patients, the arthritis failed to respond to MTX and TNFi combination therapy. These results suggest that inflammatory arthritis coexisting with LS may be less likely to respond to traditional inflammatory arthritis or JIA therapies.

Quantitative analysis of facial asymmetry based on three-dimensional photography: a valuable indicator for asymmetrical temporomandibular joint affection in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients?

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) can cause osseous deformity in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and may impair mandibular growth. This study aimed to evaluate whether facial asymmetry determined clinically or by morphometric analysis of three-dimensional (3D) photographs in JIA patients is associated with an asymmetric affection of theTMJ.

METHODS

Of 76 consecutive JIA patients with a mean age of 11.7 years (range: 6.3-17.9), facial asymmetry was evaluated clinically (chin asymmetry, gonion asymmetry), and stereophotogrammetrically with 3D photographs. The facial surfaces were demarcated, then mirrored, superimposed using semi-automated landmarks, and quantitatively assessed (chin asymmetry, Hausdorff distances). Clinical and digital measurements were related to the diagnosis of right and left TMJ involvement derived from magnetic resonance images (MRI).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (34%) patients had an asymmetrical osseous deformity of the TMJ. By clinical evaluation, chin asymmetry was related to asymmetrical osseous destruction (p = 0.02), but gonion asymmetry was not (p = 0.14). In regard to 3D-photograph based morphometric measurements, chin asymmetry was also related to asymmetrical osseous destruction (p = 0.01), but neither the mean (p = 0.06) nor the maximal Hausdorff distance (p = 0.67). Despite the attested significance, none of the chin asymmetry evaluation methods appeared to hold sufficient predictive value (positive predictive values ≤54%; coefficient of determination ≤7%).

CONCLUSIONS

For the assessment of facial asymmetry in JIA patients, morphometric measurements originating from 3D-photographs seem to deliver results comparable to the clinical assessment methods. The asymmetry of the face, especially around the chin, appears to be related to asymmetrical TMJ destruction, but none of the investigated measurement methods of the face were able to reliably predict the TMJ affection. Thus, facial asymmetry assessments, both qualitatively in a clinical setting and quantitatively based on 3D-photographs, have limited diagnostic value for TMJ involvement in JIA patients.

Comparison of Adults With Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis to Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Clinical Features and Medication Use

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Many individuals with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have persistent disease into adulthood. Polyarticular JIA (pJIA) is often mislabeled as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adult rheumatology clinics, and treatment for adult pJIA patients is not well defined. We aimed to describe clinical features and medication use in the adult pJIA population in relation to an RA control cohort.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of 45 adults with pJIA and 94 with RA seen from 2013 to 2017. Clinical characteristics including RA classification criteria were compared using χ and McNemar tests. Medication use was analyzed focusing on tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) survival, and an accelerated failure-time model was developed for time to methotrexate initiation.

RESULTS

Polyarticular JIA patients were less likely to be rheumatoid factor or cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive; fewer than half of pJIA subjects met the RA 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria. Time from diagnosis to methotrexate initiation was associated with longer disease duration in both groups (p < 0.01). Current TNFi use was more prevalent in pJIA patients (49% vs. 18%, p < 0.01), and TNFi use, particularly for etanercept, was sustained longer with a median drug survival of 4.41 years compared with 0.70 years in RA patients (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although often considered together in adult rheumatology practice, adults with pJIA are distinct from patients with RA. Medication use markedly differed between the 2 populations with greater prevalence and duration of TNFi use in pJIA patients. Further study is needed to improve outcomes in this unique population.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and risk of cancer before and after the introduction of biological therapies

Background

The risk of cancer, including any secular trends in risk, in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is incompletely understood.

Methods

We performed a register-based cohort study of patients with JIA from 2001 until 2017, identified via the Swedish Patient Register. Patients with JIA were matched to five population reference subjects. Patients and referents were followed up for incident cancers (via linkage to the Swedish Cancer Register) until 18 years of age or 31 December 2016.

Results

Among the 6721 patients with JIA, we observed 10 incident malignancies (5 lymphoproliferative cancers) during 34 951 person-years of follow-up, corresponding to an excess incidence of 0.09 cancers per 1000 person-years (one extra case per 11 000 patients per year), an HR for cancer (all sites) of 1.4 (95% CI 0.7 to 2.9) and an HR for lymphoproliferative malignancies of 3.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 11.2). The rates of cancer in JIA did not increase over the study period. We noted no differences in the excess risk comparing periods before and after the introduction of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

Discussion

Children and adolescents with JIA are at a slightly increased risk of lymphoproliferative (but not of other) malignancies. At the group level, there is no sign that this risk has increased further after the introduction of bDMARDs.

Validation and adaptation of a German screening tool to identify patients at risk of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

The primary objective was twofold: (1) to determine whether the German version of a screening instrument for clinical practice for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SICJIA) is reliable in identifying patients at risk for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and (2) secondly whether a weighting scheme of individual questions improves its sensitivity. Data were collected and retrospectively analyzed based upon completed SICJIA questionnaires from patients and their guardians at their first clinical visit at the Hamburg Centre for Pediatric and Adolescence Rheumatology. All patients visited the center between August 2015 and July 2017. The survey included 12 disease-orientated questions. For evaluation, only questionnaires of patients diagnosed with JIA or with a non-inflammatory joint pain (NJP) were selected. Standard statistical techniques were used for evaluation. In total, 165 of 800 questionnaires could be used for evaluation. Of the 800 patients who completed questionnaires, 133 were diagnosed with JIA and 32 with NJP. The analysis of the individual questions was performed by comparing the rate of a positive response to the questions between the two groups. Four questions showed a significant difference by comparing the groups, using JIA patients with at least one active joint. The diagnostic accuracy of the weighted sum score increased from 64 to 68% to discriminate between the groups in comparison to the ordinary sum score. An optimal cutoff of 6.0 for referral to a pediatric rheumatologist was calculated. The validation of the SICJIA showed a discriminative difference in patients with clinical diagnosed JIA and a control group diagnosed with NJP. The weighted sum score performed better to differentiate between JIA and NJP patients. The modified SICJIA can be useful to identify patients at risk of JIA.

Tocilizumab for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a single-center case series

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the commonest chronic rheumatic disease among children. When not treated effectively, JIA can lead to functional disability, due to joint damage, along with long-term morbidities.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the use of tocilizumab therapy for 11 patients with polyarticular JIA (pJIA) and systemic JIA (sJIA) who presented inadequate response or were refractory to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or other biological therapies; and to evaluate its benefits, safety and tolerability.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Observational retrospective case series at a tertiary-level training and research hospital.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 11 consecutive patients with JIA who received tocilizumab (anti-IL-6) therapy in our pediatric nephrology and rheumatology outpatient clinic. We analyzed their demographic data, clinical and laboratory findings, treatment response and adverse reactions. We determined the efficacy of tocilizumab treatment using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric (Pedi) response criteria, including ACR Pedi 30, 50, 70 and 90 scores. We used the Wilcoxon test to compare measurements before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Tocilizumab was given to seven patients with sJIA and four with pJIA (one of the pJIA patients was rheumatoid factor-positive). In most patients, we observed improvement of symptoms, absence of articular and extra-articular inflammation and continued inactive disease. ACR Pedi 30, 50 and 70 scores were achieved by 90.9% of the patients. Five patients showed minor side effects, possibly due to use of tocilizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Tocilizumab therapy should be considered for treating patients with diagnoses of pJIA or sJIA who are resistant to non-biological DMARDs and/or other biological therapies.

Successful treatment in a child with enthesitis-related arthritis involving the sternoclavicular joint: a case report

Background

Although the sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) may be involved in ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatic arthritis, and Behçet’s disease and participates in the systemic inflammatory process of arthritis, it is often neglected during routine rheumatologic clinical examinations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report etanercept treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with SCJ involvement.

Case presentation

In this study, we describe an unusual case of a child with juvenile idiopathic arthritis with an initial presentation of sternoclavicular mass. The patient (age, 14 years 10 months) presented with an insidious onset atraumatic swelling of the left SCJ and complained of right hip and bilateral ankle tenderness without an apparent cause. Initial ultrasonography indicated a heterogeneous mass in the left SCJ, while computed tomography identified mild swelling of the left SCJ with a thickened synovial lining, mild bone erosion, and some turbid fluid. The patient ultimately underwent left SCJ arthrotomy, during which tapping of the SCJ revealed 2 cc of yellowish fluid, inflammation and necrosis of tissues within the SCJ. A clear yellow joint fluid was aspirated, and testing revealed a negative culture result. The patient was diagnosed with JIA. The joint tenderness improved and erythrocyte sedimentation rate decreased after administering anti-tumor necrosis factor etanercept. An additional ultrasonography demonstrated that the initial imaging findings have been resolved. At the end of a 2-year follow-up period, the patient was completely symptom-free.

Conclusions

JIA with SCJ involvement is an uncommon presentation in adolescents. Etanercept may be a beneficial treatment for SCJ involvement in patients with JIA. The upper limbs showed no signs of limited range of motion during the follow-up period. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the efficacy of etanercept in JIA with sternoclavicular joint involvement.

Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Lung Disease: Characterization and Risk Factors

OBJECTIVE

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is associated with a recently recognized, albeit poorly defined and characterized, lung disease (LD). The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and histopathologic and immunologic features of this novel inflammatory LD associated with systemic JIA (designated SJIA-LD).

METHODS

Clinical data collected since 2010 were abstracted from the medical records of patients with systemic JIA from the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Epidemiologic, cellular, biochemical, genomic, and transcriptional profiling analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with SJIA-LD were identified. Radiographic findings included diffuse ground-glass opacities, subpleural reticulation, interlobular septal thickening, and lymphadenopathy. Pathologic findings included patchy, but extensive, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates and mixed features of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) and endogenous lipoid pneumonia. Compared to systemic JIA patients without LD, those with SJIA-LD were younger at the diagnosis of systemic JIA (odds ratio [OR] 6.5, P = 0.007), more often had prior episodes of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) (OR 14.5, P < 0.001), had a greater frequency of adverse reactions to biologic therapy (OR 13.6, P < 0.001), and had higher serum levels of interleukin-18 (IL-18) (median 27,612 pg/ml versus 5,413 pg/ml; P = 0.047). Patients with SJIA-LD lacked genetic, serologic, or functional evidence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor pathway dysfunction, a feature that is typical of familial or autoimmune PAP. Moreover, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from patients with SJIA-LD rarely demonstrated proteinaceous material and had less lipid-laden macrophages than that seen in patients with primary PAP (mean 10.5% in patients with SJIA-LD versus 66.1% in patients with primary PAP; P < 0.001). BAL fluid from patients with SJIA-LD contained elevated levels of IL-18 and the interferon-γ-induced chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10. Transcriptional profiling of the lung tissue from patients with SJIA-LD identified up-regulated type II interferon and T cell activation networks. This signature was also present in SJIA-LD human lung tissue sections that lacked substantial histopathologic findings, suggesting that this activation signature may precede and drive the lung pathology in SJIA-LD.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary disease is increasingly detected in children with systemic JIA, particularly in association with MAS. This entity has distinct clinical and immunologic features and represents an uncharacterized inflammatory LD.

The frequency of macrophage activation syndrome and disease course in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Objectives: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the frequency of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) cases, to compare the laboratory tests at the time of diagnosis of sJIA and MAS and to see whether sJIA cases complicated with MAS follow a more severe disease course in the long-term follow-up.Methods: Files of children with sJIA that were followed between May 2010 and September 2017 were reviewed.Results: The cohort consisted of 53 sJIA cases. Mean duration of follow-up was 39.0 ± 24.1 months. The frequency of MAS was 33.9%. Initial laboratory tests at the time of diagnosis of sJIA were compared in between patients with MAS and without MAS. Only ferritin and fibrinogen levels showed significant differences in between the groups (p < .01). Patients who developed MAS had higher ferritin (4482 mg/dL) and lower fibrinogen (371 mg/dL) values than patients without MAS (ferritin 2060 mg/dL, fibrinogen 466 mg/dL) at the time of diagnosis of sJIA. Long-term follow-up results showed that monocyclic course was observed in 45.2%, polycyclic course in 30.1% and persistent course in 24.5% of the cases. It was seen that patients with MAS segregated equally into three groups.Conclusions: Higher ferritin and relatively lower fibrinogen levels at the time of diagnosis of sJIA may be early warning signs of an impending MAS. sJIA patients who develop MAS do not seem to warrant more guarded prognosis in the long-term follow-up.

Infectious adverse events in children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis treated with Biological Agents in a real-life setting: Data from the JIRcohorte

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of our study is to assess the infectious adverse events occurring in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) children treated with biological agents.

METHODS

Patients were selected from the retrospective module of the JIRcohorte, data concerning the period between January 2001 and August 2015. All infectious adverse events (IAE) were retrieved. For every infectious side effect, the date, the severity, the need for a hospitalization, the type of pathogen and the affected organ were noted. Incidence rates were expressed in number of events per 100 person-years (100p-y), and OR were calculated.

RESULTS

Six hundred seventy-seven patients with JIA were included in the study. A total of 3075.4 person-years of exposure were analyzed. One hundred eighty-four infectious events were described (6.0 events/100 p-y): 15.5/100 p-y with tocilizumab (TCZ), 9.6/100 p-y with Canakinumab (CAN), 7.4/100 p-y with abatacept (ABA), 6.9/100 p-y with Golimumab (GOL), 6.7/100 p-y with Anakinra (ANA), 6.3/100 p-y with Infliximab, 4.8/100 p-y with Etanercept, and 3.7/100 p-y with Adalimumab. Risk of developing an infection was significantly higher with IL-6 antagonists or IL-1 antagonists than with TNF-inhibitor. Forty point eight percent of the infectious adverse events (IAE) affected the upper respiratory tract or the Ear, nose and throat (ENT) system. Twelve infectious adverse events were described as severe or very severe (0.4/100p-y). No case of tuberculosis or death was reported.

CONCLUSION

Infectious complications with biologics occurring in children treated for JIA are rare, and in most of the cases have a mild or moderate severity, affecting mainly the upper respiratory tract or the ENT.