1
|
Tan HQ, Lew KS, Koh CWY, Lee KH, Chua CGA, Wibawa A, Master Z, Lee JCL, Park SY. Denoising proton reference dosimetry spectrum using a large area ionization chamber-physical basis and type A uncertainty. Phys Med Biol 2025; 70:025003. [PMID: 39689430 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ada085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2024] [Accepted: 12/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Reference dosimetry measurement in a pencil beam scanning system can exhibit dose fluctuation due to intra-spill spot positional drift. This results in a noisy reference dosimetry measurement against energy which could introduce errors in monitor unit calibration. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of smoothing the reference dosimetry measurements on the type A uncertainty.Methods.The reference dosimetry measurement (Dw/MU)with a PTW 34045 advanced Markus chamber placed at 2 cm depth and a 10 × 10cm2scanned field are performed for 98 energy layers on five non-consecutive days using a water tank. The PTW 34089 large area ionization chamber (LAIC) is placed at the same depth and the charges are measured with a single spot irradiation (MspotLAIC). (Dw/MU)andMspotLAICare fitted with a linear and quadratic function to obtain a smooth plot of (Dw/MU)against the proton energy (reference dosimetry curve). Type A uncertainty of the measured reference dosimetry curve is compared against the de-noised fitted curve.Results.The repeatability of reference dosimetry measurement shows relative difference of up to 2.3% across the five days. The linear and quadratic fits between LAIC charges and the (Dw/MU)from PTW 34045 show a highR2values of more than 0.95. The maximum type A uncertainty of the de-noised reference dosimetry curve is lower (0.69% at 70.2 MeV) compared to the measured one (0.88% at 77.5 MeV). However, the average type A uncertainty of the denoised curve across all energies is higher compared to the measurements (0.50% versus 0.43%).Conclusion.We have presented the physical basis and procedure for fitting the charges measured with a LAIC to the reference dosimetry curve. The fitted reference dosimetry curve avoids large error in any energy layer but increases the average type A uncertainty across energies and should be used with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Qi Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- School of Physics and Mathematical Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kah Seng Lew
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- School of Physics and Mathematical Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Calvin Wei Yang Koh
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kang Hao Lee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clifford Ghee Ann Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- School of Physics and Mathematical Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrew Wibawa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zubin Master
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - James Cheow Lei Lee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- School of Physics and Mathematical Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sung Yong Park
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meijer KM, van Dijk IWEM, Schonk TJ, Balgobind BV, Loginova A, van Wieringen N, Bel A. Timing matters: diurnal spine length variation in pediatric patients during radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:166. [PMID: 39568059 PMCID: PMC11580553 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02548-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 10/25/2024] [Indexed: 11/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the day-night cycle, gravity and applied stress to the body mass and spine causes a decrease in body height, which is restored overnight. This diurnal spine length variation has not yet been quantified during radiotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to quantify diurnal spine length variation on cone beam CTs (CBCTs) of pediatric patients (< 18 years) who underwent radiotherapy. METHODS For this retrospective study, we included 32 patients (mean age 10.0, range 2.7-16.1 years) who received image guided radiotherapy between 2012 and 2018 in two institutes. Patients were included when they had two fractions per day, or when fractions were scheduled on varying time slots over the course of treatment. Daily CBCTs were registered to the planning CTs using two automatic registrations relative to the bony anatomy; one to vertebra T11 and one to vertebra L4. For each CBCT, the differences between the cranial-caudal (CC) position of the T11 and L4 vertebrae were calculated. To determine the diurnal spine length variation, the difference in vertebrae position between the morning and afternoon CBCTs was calculated. Furthermore, we investigated the possible correlation of diurnal spine length variation with the time slot differences (time interval) between CBCTs (Spearman's ρ). RESULTS Overall, the median spine length variation was -1.0 (range -3.9-0.1) mm, and we found a significant reduction in spine length over the day (p < 0.001) with substantial variations between patients. Time intervals between CBCTs ranging from 4.0 to 9.5 h were not correlated with spine length reduction (ρ=-0.01; p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS We found a small but significant reduction in spine length (vertebrae T11 to L4) over the course of day in pediatric patients undergoing radiotherapy, measured on CBCT imaging. Spine length reduction did not correlate with CBCT time intervals. However, our results indicate that diurnal spine length reduction could induce a setup error during treatment, and therefore should be considered in pediatric radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin M Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Irma W E M van Dijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tamara J Schonk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brian V Balgobind
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Loginova
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Niek van Wieringen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Bel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Upadhyay R, Paulino AC. Risk-Stratified Radiotherapy in Pediatric Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3530. [PMID: 39456624 PMCID: PMC11506666 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16203530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2024] [Revised: 10/15/2024] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
While the cure rate of cancer in children has markedly improved in the last few decades, late effects continue to be a problem in survivors. Radiotherapy, which is a major component of treatment in many cancers, is one of the major agents responsible for late toxicity. In the past decade, radiotherapy has been omitted in patients achieving excellent response to chemotherapy, such as in Hodgkin lymphoma and some Wilms tumors with lung metastases. Likewise, response to chemotherapy has been used to determine whether lower doses of radiation can be delivered in intracranial germinoma and pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Molecular subtyping in medulloblastoma is currently being employed, and in WNT-pathway M0 tumors, the reduction in radiotherapy dose to the craniospinal axis and tumor bed is currently being investigated. Finally, dose escalation was recently evaluated in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma > 5 cm who do not achieve a complete response to initial 9 weeks of chemotherapy as well as for unresectable Ewing sarcoma patients to improve local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43212, USA;
| | - Arnold C. Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tan HQ, Koh CWY, Lew KS, Yeap PL, Chua CGA, Lee JKH, Wong YM, Wibawa A, Master Z, Lee JCL, Park SY. Repurposing DailyQA3 for an efficient and spot position sensitive daily quality assurance tool for proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14348. [PMID: 38561975 PMCID: PMC11244688 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Daily quality assurance is an integral part of a radiotherapy workflow to ensure the dose is delivered safely and accurately to the patient. It is performed before the first treatment of the day and needs to be time and cost efficient for a multiple gantries proton center. In this study, we introduced an efficient method to perform QA for output constancy, range verification, spot positioning accuracy and imaging and proton beam isocenter coincidence with DailyQA3. METHODS A stepped acrylic block of specific dimensions is fabricated and placed on top of the DailyQA3 device. Treatment plans comprising of two different spread-out Bragg peaks and five individual spots of 1.0 MU each are designed to be delivered to the device. A mathematical framework to measure the 2D distance between the detectors and individual spot is introduced and play an important role in realizing the spot positioning and centering QA. Lastly, a 5 months trends of the QA for two gantries are presented. RESULTS The outputs are monitored by two ion chambers in the DailyQA3 and a tolerance of± 3 % $ \pm 3\% $ are used. The range of the SOBPs are monitored by the ratio of ion chamber signals and a tolerance of± 1 mm $ \pm 1\ {\mathrm{mm}}$ is used. Four diodes at± 10 cm $ \pm 10\ {\mathrm{cm}}$ from the central ion chambers are used for spot positioning QA, while the central ion chamber is used for imaging and proton beam isocenter coincidence QA. Using the framework, we determined the absolute signal threshold corresponding to the offset tolerance between the individual proton spot and the detector. A1.5 mm $1.5\ {\mathrm{mm}}$ tolerances are used for both the positioning and centering QA. No violation of the tolerances is observed in the 5 months trends for both gantries. CONCLUSION With the proposed approach, we can perform four QA items in the TG224 within 10 min.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Qi Tan
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical ProgrammeDuke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingaporeSingapore
| | - Calvin Wei Yang Koh
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Kah Seng Lew
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Division of Physics and Applied PhysicsNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
| | - Ping Lin Yeap
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | | | | | - Yun Ming Wong
- Division of Physics and Applied PhysicsNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
| | - Andrew Wibawa
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Zubin Master
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - James Cheow Lei Lee
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Division of Physics and Applied PhysicsNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
| | - Sung Yong Park
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical ProgrammeDuke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingaporeSingapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tan HQ, Koh CWY, Lew KS, Yeap PL, Chua CGA, Lee JKH, Wibawa A, Master Z, Lee JCL, Park SY. Real-time gated proton therapy with a reduced source to imager distance: Commissioning and quality assurance. Phys Med 2024; 122:103380. [PMID: 38805761 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Real-time gated proton therapy (RGPT) is a motion management technique unique to the Hitachi particle therapy system. It uses pulsed fluoroscopy to track an implanted fiducial marker. There are currently no published guidelines on how to conduct the commissioning and quality assurance. In this work we reported on our centre's commissioning workflow and our daily and monthly QA procedures. METHODS Six commissioning measurements were designed for RGPT. The measurements include imaging qualities, fluoroscopic exposures, RGPT marker tracking accuracy, temporal gating latency, fiducial marker tracking fidelity and an end-to-end proton dosimetry measurement. Daily QA consists of one measurement on marker localization accuracy. Four months daily QA trends are presented. Monthly QA consists of three measurementson the gating latency, fluoroscopy imaging quality and dosimetry verification of gating operation with RGPT. RESULTS The RGPT was successfully commissioned in our centre. The air kerma rates were within 15 % from specifications and the marker tracking accuracies were within 0.245 mm. The gating latencies for turning the proton beam on and off were 119.5 and 50.0 ms respectively. The 0.4x10.0 mm2 Gold AnchorTM gave the best tracking results with visibility up to 30 g/cm2. Gamma analysis showed that dose distribution of a moving and static detectors had a passing rate of more than 95 % at 3 %/3mm. The daily marker localization QA results were all less than 0.2 mm. CONCLUSION This work could serve as a good reference for other upcoming Hitachi particle therapy centres who are interested to use RGPT as their motion management solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Qi Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| | | | - Kah Seng Lew
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ping Lin Yeap
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Andrew Wibawa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zubin Master
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Sung Yong Park
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Briere TM, Agrusa JE, Martel MK, Jackson A, Olch AJ, Ronckers CM, Kremer LCM, Constine LS, McAleer MF. Acute and Late Pulmonary Effects After Radiation Therapy in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:533-548. [PMID: 35525723 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) pulmonary task force reviewed dosimetric and clinical factors associated with radiation therapy (RT)-associated pulmonary toxicity in children. METHODS Comprehensive search of PubMed (1965-2020) was conducted to assess available evidence and predictive models of RT-induced lung injury in pediatric cancer patients (<21 years old). Lung dose for radiation pneumonitis (RP) was obtained from dose-volume histogram (DVH) data. RP grade was obtained from standard criteria. Clinical pulmonary outcomes were evaluated using pulmonary function tests (PFTs), clinical assessment, and questionnaires. RESULTS More than 2,400 abstracts were identified; 460 articles had detailed treatment and toxicity data; and 11 articles with both detailed DVH and toxicity data were formally reviewed. Pooled cohorts treated during 1999 to 2016 included 277 and 507 patients age 0.04 to 22.7 years who were evaluable for acute and late RP analysis, respectively. After partial lung RT, there were 0.4% acute and 2.8% late grade 2, 0.4% acute and 0.8% late grade 3, and no grade 4 to 5 RP. RP risk after partial thoracic RT with mean lung dose (MLD) <14 Gy and total lung V20Gy <30% is low. Clinical and self-reported pulmonary outcomes data included 8,628 patients treated during 1970 to 2013, age 0 to 21.9 years. At a median 2.9- to 21.9-year follow-up, patients were often asymptomatic; abnormal PFTs were common and severity correlated with lung dose. At ≥10-year follow-up, multi-institutional studies suggested associations between total or ipsilateral lung doses >10 Gy and pulmonary complications and deaths. After whole lung irradiation (WLI), pulmonary toxicity is higher; no dose response relationship was identified. Bleomycin and other chemotherapeutics at current dose regimens do not contribute substantially to adverse pulmonary outcomes after partial lung irradiation but increase risk with WLI. CONCLUSIONS After partial lung RT, acute pulmonary toxicity is uncommon; grade 2 to 3 RP incidences are <1%. Late toxicities, including subclinical/asymptomatic impaired pulmonary function, are more common (<4%). Incidence and severity appear to increase over time. Upon review of available literature, there appears to be low risk of pulmonary complications in children with MLD < 14 Gy and V20Gy <30% using standard fractionated RT to partial lung volumes. A lack of robust data limit guidance on lung dose/volume constraints, highlighting the need for additional work to define factors associated with RT-induced lung injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Marie Briere
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer E Agrusa
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Mary K Martel
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Department of Pediatrics, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Medical University Brandenburg Medical School-Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Department of Pediatrics, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics, UMC Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Louis S Constine
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Şenkesen Ö, Tezcanlı E, Alkaya F, İspir B, Çatlı S, Yeşil A, Bezirganoglu E, Turan S, Köksal C, Güray G, Hacıislamoğlu E, Durmuş İF, Çavdar Ş, Aksu T, Çolak N, Küçükmorkoç E, Doğan M, Ercan T, Karaköse F, Alpan V, Ceylan C, Poyraz G, Nalbant N, Kınay Ş, İpek S, Kayalılar N, Tatlı H, Zhu M. Current practices of craniospinal irradiation techniques in Turkey: a comprehensive dosimetric analysis. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:49. [PMID: 38627747 PMCID: PMC11022438 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02435-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluates various craniospinal irradiation (CSI) techniques used in Turkish centers to understand their advantages, disadvantages and overall effectiveness, with a focus on enhancing dose distribution. METHODS Anonymized CT scans of adult and pediatric patients, alongside target volumes and organ-at-risk (OAR) structures, were shared with 25 local radiotherapy centers. They were tasked to develop optimal treatment plans delivering 36 Gy in 20 fractions with 95% PTV coverage, while minimizing OAR exposure. The same CT data was sent to a US proton therapy center for comparison. Various planning systems and treatment techniques (3D conformal RT, IMRT, VMAT, tomotherapy) were utilized. Elekta Proknow software was used to analyze parameters, assess dose distributions, mean doses, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for both target volumes and OARs. Comparisons were made against proton therapy. RESULTS All techniques consistently achieved excellent PTV coverage (V95 > 98%) for both adult and pediatric patients. Tomotherapy closely approached ideal Dmean doses for all PTVs, while 3D-CRT had higher Dmean for PTV_brain. Tomotherapy excelled in CI and HI for PTVs. IMRT resulted in lower pediatric heart, kidney, parotid, and eye doses, while 3D-CRT achieved the lowest adult lung doses. Tomotherapy approached proton therapy doses for adult kidneys and thyroid, while IMRT excelled for adult heart, kidney, parotid, esophagus, and eyes. CONCLUSION Modern radiotherapy techniques offer improved target coverage and OAR protection. However, 3D techniques are continued to be used for CSI. Notably, proton therapy stands out as the most efficient approach, closely followed by Tomotherapy in terms of achieving superior target coverage and OAR protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Öznur Şenkesen
- Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem Ataşehir Hospital, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Kayışdağı Cad. No:32, Ataşehir, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Evrim Tezcanlı
- Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fadime Alkaya
- Health Sciences Institute, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Burçin İspir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Serap Çatlı
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Yeşil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medicana Bursa Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | | | - Sezgi Turan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Neolife Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Canan Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gülay Güray
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medikal Park Bahçelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emel Hacıislamoğlu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University Farabi Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - İsmail Faruk Durmuş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeni Yuzyıl University Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Şeyma Çavdar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medicana Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Telat Aksu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Nurten Çolak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Esra Küçükmorkoç
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Doğan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Tülay Ercan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatih Karaköse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Vildan Alpan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cemile Ceylan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Onkology Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gökhan Poyraz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nilgül Nalbant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Basaksehir Cam Ve Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Şeyda Kınay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Servet İpek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Namık Kayalılar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hamza Tatlı
- Elekta Instrument AB, Barbaros Mah. Begonya Sok. Nidakule, Ataşehir, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mingyao Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tan HQ, Lew KS, Koh CWY, Wibawa A, Yeap PL, Master Z, Lee JCL, Beltran CJ, Park SY, Furutani KM. Implementing dispersion measurement as part of scanning proton therapy commissioning and quality assurance. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:225001. [PMID: 37857314 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Introduction. Dispersion in an accelerator quantifies the deviation of the proton trajectory when there is a momentum deviation. We present for the first time a safe method of measuring dispersion in the clinic, using a scintillator detector and the momentum deviations within a spill. This is an important accelerator quantity as we found that this is the reason behind the large dose fluctuation in our absolute dosimetry measurement.Methods. Dispersions are measured for nine energies in a Hitachi ProBeat system at three locations (isocenter and at two profile monitors) and at two gantry angles (0 and 90 degrees) by first measuring the spot position and momentum drift within a spill. The spot position drift is measured by the XRV-4000 at the isocenter, and by the two profile monitors located at 0.57 and 2.27 m from the isocenter. The momentum drift is calculated from the intra-spill range drift which is measured using the Ranger accessory. The dispersion at isocenter and its gradient are calculated using the weighted least square regression on the measured dispersions at the three locations. A constraint is formulated on the dispersion and its gradient to ensure minimal intra-spill spot position deviation around the isocenter.Results. The measured intra-spill range and spot positional drift at isocenter are less than0.25mmand0.7mmrespectively. The momentum spread calculated from the range drift are less than 0.08%. The dispersion at the isocenter ranged from0.50to4.30mand the zero-crossing happens upstream of isocenter for all energies. 2 of the 9 energies (168.0 and 187.5 MeV) violated the constraint and has an intra-spill spot positional deviation greater than1.0within5cmfrom the isocenter.Conclusion. This measurement is recommended as part of commissioning and annual quality assurance for accelerator monitoring and to ensure intra-spill spot deviations remain low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Qi Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Kah Seng Lew
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Andrew Wibawa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ping Lin Yeap
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zubin Master
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Chris J Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - Sung Yong Park
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Keith M Furutani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fukumitsu N, Kubota H, Mima M, Demizu Y, Suzuki T, Hasegawa D, Kosaka Y, Kawamura A, Soejima T. Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101251. [PMID: 37408669 PMCID: PMC10318217 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study compared craniospinal irradiation using proton beam therapy (PBT) according to irradiation method and investigated the initial effects. Methods and Materials Twenty-four pediatric patients (1-24 years old) who received proton craniospinal irradiation were examined. Passive scattered PBT (PSPT) and intensity modulated PBT (IMPT) were used in 8 and 16 patients, respectively. The whole vertebral body technique was used for 13 patients <10 years old, and the vertebral body sparing (VBS) technique was used for the remaining 11 patients aged ≥10 years. The follow-up period was 17 to 44 (median, 27) months. Organ-at-risk and planning target volume (PTV) doses and other clinical data were examined. Results The maximum lens dose using IMPT was lower than that using PSPT (P = .008). The mean thyroid, lung, esophagus, and kidney doses were lower in patients treated using the VBS technique compared with the whole vertebral body technique (all P < .001). The minimum PTV dose of IMPT was higher than that of PSPT (P = .01). The inhomogeneity index of IMPT was lower than that of PSPT (P = .004). Conclusions IMPT is better than PSPT at reducing the dose to the lens. The VBS technique can decrease the doses to neck-chest-abdomen organs. The PTV coverage of IMPT is superior to that of PSPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Atsufumi Kawamura
- Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectual Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang Y, Liu R, Zhang Q, Dong M, Wang D, Chen J, Ou Y, Luo H, Yang K, Wang X. Charged particle therapy for high-grade gliomas in adults: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:29. [PMID: 36755321 PMCID: PMC9906872 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02187-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
High-grade gliomas are the most common intracranial malignancies, and their current prognosis remains poor despite standard aggressive therapy. Charged particle beams have unique physical and biological properties, especially high relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ion beam might improve the clinical treatment outcomes of malignant gliomas. We systematically reviewed the safety, efficacy, and dosimetry of carbon-ion or proton radiotherapy to treat high-grade gliomas. The protocol is detailed in the online PROSPERO database, registration No. CRD42021258495. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases were collected for data analysis on charged particle radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas. Until July 2022, two independent reviewers extracted data based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eleven articles were eligible for further analysis. Overall survival rates were marginally higher in patients with the current standard of care than those receiving concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus temozolomide. The most common side effects of carbon-ion-related therapy were grade 1-2 (such as dermatitis, headache, and alopecia). Long-term toxicities (more than three to six months) usually present as radiation necrosis; however, toxicities higher than grade 3 were not observed. Similarly, dermatitis, headache, and alopecia are among the most common acute side effects of proton therapy treatment. Despite improvement in survival rates, the method of dose-escalation using proton boost is associated with severe brain necrosis which should not be clinically underestimated. Regarding dosimetry, two studies compared proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans. Proton therapy plans aimed to minimize dose exposure to non-target tissues while maintaining target coverage. The use of charged-particle radiotherapy seems to be effective with acceptable adverse effects when used either alone or as a boost. The tendency of survival outcome shows that carbon ion boost is seemingly superior to proton boost. The proton beam could provide good target coverage, and it seems to reduce dose exposure to contralateral organs at risk significantly. This can potentially reduce the treatment-related dose- and volume-related side effects in long-term survivors, such as neurocognitive impairment. High-quality randomized control trials should be conducted in the future. Moreover, Systemic therapeutic options that can be paired with charged particles are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhang Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ruifeng Liu
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Meng Dong
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Dandan Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Junru Chen
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuhong Ou
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hongtao Luo
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Kehu Yang
- grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China. .,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Franceschi E, Giannini C, Furtner J, Pajtler KW, Asioli S, Guzman R, Seidel C, Gatto L, Hau P. Adult Medulloblastoma: Updates on Current Management and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153708. [PMID: 35954372 PMCID: PMC9367316 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant embryonal tumor of the posterior fossa belonging to the family of primitive neuro-ectodermic tumors (PNET). MB generally occurs in pediatric age, but in 14–30% of cases, it affects the adults, mostly below the age of 40, with an incidence of 0.6 per million per year, representing about 0.4–1% of tumors of the nervous system in adults. Unlike pediatric MB, robust prospective trials are scarce for the post-puberal population, due to the low incidence of MB in adolescent and young adults. Thus, current MB treatments for older patients are largely extrapolated from the pediatric experience, but the transferability and applicability of these paradigms to adults remain an open question. Adult MB is distinct from MB in children from a molecular and clinical perspective. Here, we review the management of adult MB, reporting the recent published literature focusing on the effectiveness of upfront chemotherapy, the development of targeted therapies, and the potential role of a reduced dose of radiotherapy in treating this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Franceschi
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Caterina Giannini
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 59005, USA;
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Julia Furtner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Kristian W. Pajtler
- Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sofia Asioli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
- Pituitary Unit, IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy
| | - Raphael Guzman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Lidia Gatto
- Department of Oncology, AUSL of Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Peter Hau
- Wilhelm Sander NeuroOncology Unit & Department of Neurology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93055 Regensburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nogueira LM, Sineshaw HM, Jemal A, Pollack CE, Efstathiou JA, Yabroff KR. Association of Race With Receipt of Proton Beam Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer in the US, 2004-2018. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e228970. [PMID: 35471569 PMCID: PMC9044116 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Black patients are less likely than White patients to receive guideline-concordant cancer care in the US. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a potentially superior technology to photon radiotherapy for tumors with complex anatomy, tumors surrounded by sensitive tissues, and childhood cancers. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether there are racial disparities in the receipt of PBT among Black and White individuals diagnosed with all PBT-eligible cancers in the US. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study evaluated Black and White individuals diagnosed with PBT-eligible cancers between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018, in the National Cancer Database, a nationwide hospital-based cancer registry that collects data on radiation treatment, even when it is received outside the reporting facility. American Society of Radiation Oncology model policies were used to classify patients into those for whom PBT is the recommended radiation therapy modality (group 1) and those for whom evidence of PBT efficacy is still under investigation (group 2). Propensity score matching was used to ensure comparability of Black and White patients' clinical characteristics and regional availability of PBT according to the National Academy of Medicine's definition of disparities. Data analysis was performed from October 4, 2021, to February 22, 2022. EXPOSURE Patients' self-identified race was ascertained from medical records. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was receipt of PBT, with disparities in this therapy's use evaluated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of the 5 225 929 patients who were eligible to receive PBT and included in the study, 13.6% were Black, 86.4% were White, and 54.3% were female. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 63.2 (12.4) years. Black patients were less likely to be treated with PBT than their White counterparts (0.3% vs 0.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.64-0.71). Racial disparities were greater for group 1 cancers (0.4% vs 0.8%; OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.55) than group 2 cancers (0.3% vs 0.4%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80). Racial disparities in PBT receipt among group 1 cancers increased over time (annual percent change = 0.09, P < .001) and were greatest in 2018, the most recent year of available data. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cross-sectional study, Black patients were less likely to receive PBT than their White counterparts, and disparities were greatest for cancers for which PBT was the recommended radiation therapy modality. These findings suggest that efforts other than increasing the number of facilities that provide PBT will be needed to eliminate disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leticia M. Nogueira
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Helmneh M. Sineshaw
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Craig E. Pollack
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - K. Robin Yabroff
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wu YY, Fan KH. Proton therapy for prostate cancer: current state and future perspectives. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210670. [PMID: 34558308 PMCID: PMC8978248 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Localized prostate cancer can be treated with several radiotherapeutic approaches. Proton therapy (PT) can precisely target tumors, thus sparing normal tissues and reducing side-effects without sacrificing cancer control. However, PT is a costly treatment compared with conventional photon radiotherapy, which may undermine its overall efficacy. In this review, we summarize current data on the dosimetric rationale, clinical benefits, and cost of PT for prostate cancer. METHODS An extensive literature review of PT for prostate cancer was performed with emphasis on studies investigating dosimetric advantage, clinical outcomes, cost-effective strategies, and novel technology trends. RESULTS PT is safe, and its efficacy is comparable to that of standard photon-based therapy or brachytherapy. Data on gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and sexual function toxicity profiles are conflicting; however, PT is associated with a low risk of second cancer and has no effects on testosterone levels. Regarding cost-effectiveness, PT is suboptimal, although evolving trends in radiation delivery and construction of PT centers may help reduce the cost. CONCLUSION PT has several advantages over conventional photon radiotherapy, and novel approaches may increase its efficacy and safety. Large prospective randomized trials comparing photon therapy with proton-based treatments are ongoing and may provide data on the differences in efficacy, toxicity profile, and quality of life between proton- and photon-based treatments for prostate cancer in the modern era. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE PT provides excellent physical advantages and has a superior dose profile compared with X-ray radiotherapy. Further evidence from clinical trials and research studies will clarify the role of PT in the treatment of prostate cancer, and facilitate the implementation of PT in a more accessible, affordable, efficient, and safe way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Yu Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Hsing Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Majer M, Ambrožová I, Davídková M, De Saint-Hubert M, Kasabašić M, Knežević Ž, Kopeć R, Krzempek D, Krzempek K, Miljanić S, Mojżeszek N, Veršić I, Stolarczyk L, Harrison RM, Olko P. Out-of-field doses in pediatric craniospinal irradiations with 3D-CRT, VMAT and scanning proton radiotherapy - a phantom study. Med Phys 2022; 49:2672-2683. [PMID: 35090187 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) has greatly increased survival rates for patients with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and other primitive neuroectodermal tumors. However, as it includes exposure of a large volume of healthy tissue to unwanted doses, there is a strong concern about the complications of the treatment, especially for the children. To estimate the risk of second cancers and other unwanted effects, out-of-field dose assessment is necessary. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare out-of-field doses in pediatric CSI treatment using conventional and advanced photon radiotherapy (RT) and advanced proton therapy. To our knowledge, it is the first such comparison based on in-phantom measurements. Additionally, for out-of-field doses during photon RT in this and other studies, comparisons were made using analytical modeling. METHODS In order to describe the out-of-field doses absorbed in a pediatric patient during actual clinical treatment, an anthropomorphic phantom which mimics the 10-year-old child was used. Photon 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and two advanced, highly conformal techniques: photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and active pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiotherapy were used for CSI treatment. Radiophotoluminescent (RPL) and poly-allyl-diglycol-carbonate (PADC) nuclear track detectors were used for photon and neutron dosimetry in the phantom, respectively. Out-of-field doses from neutrons were expressed in terms of dose equivalent. A two-Gaussian model was implemented for out-of-field doses during photon RT. RESULTS The mean VMAT photon doses per target dose to all organs in this study were under 50% of the target dose (i.e., <500 mGy/Gy), while the mean 3D-CRT photon dose to oesophagus, gall bladder and thyroid, exceeded that value. However, for 3D-CRT, better sparing was achieved for eyes and lungs. The mean PBS photon doses for all organs were up to 3 orders of magnitude lower compared to VMAT and 3D-CRT and exceeded 10 mGy/Gy only for the oesophagus, intestine and lungs. The mean neutron dose equivalent during PBS for 8 organs of interest (thyroid, breasts, lungs, liver, stomach, gall bladder, bladder, prostate) ranged from 1.2 mSv/Gy for bladder to 23.1 mSv/Gy for breasts. Comparison of out-of-field doses in this and other phantom studies found in the literature showed that a simple and fast two-Gaussian model for out-of-field doses as a function of distance from the field edge can be applied in a CSI using photon RT techniques. CONCLUSIONS PBS is the most promising technique for out-of-field dose reduction in comparison to photon techniques. Among photon techniques, VMAT is a preferred choice for most of out-of-field organs and especially for the thyroid, while doses for eyes, breasts and lungs, are lower for 3D-CRT. For organs outside the field edge, a simple analytical model can be helpful for clinicians involved in treatment planning using photon RT but also for retrospective data analysis for cancer risk estimates and epidemiology in general. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marija Majer
- Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
| | - Iva Ambrožová
- Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Řež, CZ-250 68, Czech Republic
| | - Marie Davídková
- Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Řež, CZ-250 68, Czech Republic
| | | | - Mladen Kasabašić
- Osijek University Hospital, Osijek, 31000, Croatia.,Faculty of Medicine Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, 31000, Croatia
| | | | - Renata Kopeć
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | - Dawid Krzempek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Krzempek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | | | - Natalia Mojżeszek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | - Ivan Veršić
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
| | - Liliana Stolarczyk
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland.,Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Roger M Harrison
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
| | - Paweł Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Seidel C, Heider S, Hau P, Glasow A, Dietzsch S, Kortmann RD. Radiotherapy in Medulloblastoma-Evolution of Treatment, Current Concepts and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235945. [PMID: 34885055 PMCID: PMC8657317 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is the backbone of medulloblastoma treatment and the first treatment to achieve a cure in many patients. Within the last decades, significant efforts have been made to enhance efficacy in combination with chemotherapy. With this approach, a majority of low- and standard-risk patients can be cured. In parallel, many clinical trials have dealt with CSI-dose reduction and reduction of boost volume in order to decrease long-term toxicity, particularly neurotoxicity. Within these trials, standardized quality assurance has helped to increase the accuracy of treatment and improve prognosis. More recently, advances of radiotherapy techniques such as proton treatment allowed for better sparing of healthy tissue in order to further diminish detrimental long-term effects. Major future challenges are the adaption of radiotherapy regimens to different molecularly defined disease groups alone or together with new targeted agents. Moreover, and even more importantly, innovative combinatorial treatments are needed in high- and very-high risk situations. Abstract Medulloblastoma is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in children. During the last decades, the therapeutic landscape has changed significantly with craniospinal irradiation as the backbone of treatment. Survival times have increased and treatments were stratified according to clinical and later molecular risk factors. In this review, current evidence regarding the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy in medulloblastoma is summarized and discussed mainly based on data of controlled trials. Current concepts and future perspectives based on current risk classification are outlined. With the introduction of CSI, medulloblastoma has become a curable disease. Due to combination with chemotherapy, survival rates have increased significantly, allowing for a reduction in radiation dose and a decrease of toxicity in low- and standard-risk patients. Furthermore, modern radiotherapy techniques are able to avoid side effects in a fragile patient population. However, high-risk patients remain with relevant mortality and many patients still suffer from treatment related toxicity. Treatment needs to be continually refined with regard to more efficacious combinatorial treatment in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Sina Heider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Peter Hau
- Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Annegret Glasow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Stefan Dietzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shen CJ, Terezakis SA. The Evolving Role of Radiotherapy for Pediatric Cancers With Advancements in Molecular Tumor Characterization and Targeted Therapies. Front Oncol 2021; 11:679701. [PMID: 34604027 PMCID: PMC8481883 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.679701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Ongoing rapid advances in molecular diagnostics, precision imaging, and development of targeted therapies have resulted in a constantly evolving landscape for treatment of pediatric cancers. Radiotherapy remains a critical element of the therapeutic toolbox, and its role in the era of precision medicine continues to adapt and undergo re-evaluation. Here, we review emerging strategies for combining radiotherapy with novel targeted systemic therapies (for example, for pediatric gliomas or soft tissue sarcomas), modifying use or intensity of radiotherapy when appropriate via molecular diagnostics that allow better characterization and individualization of each patient’s treatments (for example, de-intensification of radiotherapy in WNT subgroup medulloblastoma), as well as exploring more effective targeted systemic therapies that may allow omission or delay of radiotherapy. Many of these strategies are still under investigation but highlight the importance of continued pre-clinical and clinical studies evaluating the role of radiotherapy in this era of precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colette J Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Stephanie A Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Balasubramanian S, Shobana MK. Pediatric Craniospinal Irradiation - The implementation and Use of Normal Tissue Complication Probability in Comparing Photon versus Proton Planning. J Med Phys 2021; 46:244-252. [PMID: 35261494 PMCID: PMC8853445 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_75_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The preferred radiotherapy treatment for medulloblastoma is craniospinal irradiation (CSI). With the aim of developing the potential to reduce normal tissue dose and associated post-treatment complications with photon and proton radiotherapy techniques for CSI. This report aims to carefully compare and rank treatment planning and dosimetric outcomes for pediatric medulloblastoma patients using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) formalism between photon (three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT], volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT], and HT) and proton CSI. Methods and Materials: The treatment data of eight pediatric patients who typically received CSI treatment were used in this study. The patients were 7 years of age on average, with ages ranging from 3 to 11 years. A prescription dose of 3600 cGy was delivered in 20 fractions by the established planning methods. The Niemierko's and Lyman–Kutcher–Burman models were followed to carefully estimate NTCP and compare different treatment plans. Results: The NTCP of VMAT plans in upper and middle thoracic volumes was relatively high compared to helical tomotherapy (HT) and pencil beam scanning (PBS) (all P < 0.05). PBS rather than IMRT and VMAT in the middle thoracic region (P < 0.06) could significantly reduce the NTCP of the heart. PBS significantly reduced NTCP of the lungs and liver (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: The NTCP and tumor control probability (TCP) model-based plan ranking along with dosimetric indices will help the clinical practitioner or medical physicists to choose the best treatment plan for each patient based on their anatomical or clinical challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Balasubramanian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Max Super Specialty Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.,Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - M K Shobana
- Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shrestha S, Bates JE, Liu Q, Smith SA, Oeffinger KC, Chow EJ, Gupta AC, Owens CA, Constine LS, Hoppe BS, Leisenring WM, Qiao Y, Weathers RE, Court LE, Pinnix CC, Kry SF, Mulrooney DA, Armstrong GT, Yasui Y, Howell RM. Radiation therapy related cardiac disease risk in childhood cancer survivors: Updated dosimetry analysis from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:199-208. [PMID: 34454975 PMCID: PMC9036604 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We previously evaluated late cardiac disease in long-term survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) based on heart radiation therapy (RT) doses estimated from an age-scaled phantom with a simple atlas-based heart model (HAtlas). We enhanced our phantom with a high-resolution CT-based anatomically realistic and validated age-scalable cardiac model (HHybrid). We aimed to evaluate how this update would impact our prior estimates of RT-related late cardiac disease risk in the CCSS cohort. METHODS We evaluated 24,214 survivors from the CCSS diagnosed from 1970 to 1999. RT fields were reconstructed on an age-scaled phantom with HHybrid and mean heart dose (Dm), percent volume receiving ≥ 20 Gy (V20) and ≥ 5 Gy with V20 = 0 ( [Formula: see text] ) were calculated. We reevaluated cumulative incidences and adjusted relative rates of grade 3-5 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events outcomes for any cardiac disease, coronary artery disease (CAD), and heart failure (HF) in association with Dm, V20, and [Formula: see text] (as categorical variables). Dose-response relationships were evaluated using piecewise-exponential models, adjusting for attained age, sex, cancer diagnosis age, race/ethnicity, time-dependent smoking history, diagnosis year, and chemotherapy exposure and doses. For relative rates, Dm was also considered as a continuous variable. RESULTS Consistent with previous findings with HAtlas, reevaluation using HHybrid dosimetry found that, Dm ≥ 10 Gy, V20 ≥ 0.1%, and [Formula: see text] ≥ 50% were all associated with increased cumulative incidences and relative rates for any cardiac disease, CAD, and HF. While updated risk estimates were consistent with previous estimates overall without statistically significant changes, there were some important and significant (P < 0.05) increases in risk with updated dosimetry for Dm in the category of 20 to 29.9 Gy and V20 in the category of 30% to 79.9%. When changes in the linear dose-response relationship for Dm were assessed, the slopes of the dose response were steeper (P < 0.001) with updated dosimetry. Changes were primarily observed among individuals with chest-directed RT with prescribed doses ≥ 20 Gy. CONCLUSION These findings present a methodological advancement in heart RT dosimetry with improved estimates of RT-related late cardiac disease risk. While results are broadly consistent with our prior study, we report that, with updated cardiac dosimetry, risks of cardiac disease are significantly higher in two dose and volume categories and slopes of the Dm-specific RT-response relationships are steeper. These data support the use of contemporary RT to achieve lower heart doses for pediatric patients, particularly those requiring chest-directed RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suman Shrestha
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - James E Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, United States
| | - Qi Liu
- University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Susan A Smith
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, United States
| | - Eric J Chow
- Clinical Research and Public Health Sciences Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
| | - Aashish C Gupta
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - Constance A Owens
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, United States
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, United States
| | - Wendy M Leisenring
- Clinical Research and Public Health Sciences Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
| | - Ying Qiao
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Rita E Weathers
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Laurence E Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Stephen F Kry
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - Daniel A Mulrooney
- Oncology Department, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States; Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
| | - Gregory T Armstrong
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
| | - Yutaka Yasui
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Paulino AC, Ludmir EB, Grosshans DR, Su JM, McGovern SL, Okcu MF, McAleer MF, Baxter PA, Mahajan A, Chintagumpala MM. Overall survival and secondary malignant neoplasms in children receiving passively scattered proton or photon craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma. Cancer 2021; 127:3865-3871. [PMID: 34254296 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT) and passively scattered proton therapy have a risk of secondary malignant neoplasm (SMN) in children. To determine the influence of RT modality on the incidence of SMN after craniospinal irradiation (CSI), the authors compared the incidence of SMN in children who had medulloblastoma treated with either photon CSI plus an intensity-modulated RT boost (group I) or passively scattered proton CSI plus a boost (group II). METHODS From 1996 to 2014, 115 children with medulloblastoma (group I, n = 63; group II, n = 52) received CSI followed by a boost to the tumor bed. Most patients had standard-risk disease (63.5%). The median follow-up was 12.8 years for group I and 8.7 years for group II. RESULTS The 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 88.8% and 85.1%, respectively, for standard-risk patients and 63.1% and 57.3%, respectively, for high-risk patients, with no OS difference by RT modality (P = .81). Six SMNs were identified (4 in group I, 2 in group II). The 5-year and 10-year SMN incidence rates were 1.0% and 6.9%, respectively (0.0% and 8.0%, respectively, in group I; 2.2% and 4.9%, respectively, in group II; P = .74). Two SMNs occurred in the clinical target volume in the brain, 2 occurred in the exit dose region from the photon spinal field, 1 occurred in the entrance path of a proton beam, and 1 occurred outside the radiation field. There were no reported cases of secondary leukemia. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrates no difference in OS or SMN incidence between patients in groups I and II 10 years after RT. LAY SUMMARY One hundred fifteen children with medulloblastoma received radiotherapy (RT) with either photon craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and an intensity-modulated RT boost (group I; n = 63) or passively scattered proton CSI and a boost (group II;, n = 52). The majority of children had standard-risk disease (63.5%). The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 88.8% and 85.1% for standard-risk patients, respectively, and 63.1% and 57.3% for high-risk patients, respectively, with no difference in overall survival by RT group (P = .81). The 5-year and 10-year second malignant neoplasm incidence rates were 1.0% and 6.9%, respectively, with no difference in second malignant neoplasm incidence according to RT group (P = .74).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jack M Su
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - M Fatih Okcu
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patricia A Baxter
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Murali M Chintagumpala
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liu IC, Holtzman AL, Rotondo RL, Indelicato DJ, Gururangan S, Cavaliere R, Carter B, Morris CG, Tavanaiepour D, Rutenberg MS. Proton therapy for adult medulloblastoma: Acute toxicity and disease control outcomes. J Neurooncol 2021; 153:467-476. [PMID: 34105033 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03783-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report disease control, survival outcomes, and treatment-related toxicity among adult medulloblastoma patients who received proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) as part of multimodality therapy. METHODS We reviewed 20 adults with medulloblastoma (≥ 22 years old) who received postoperative proton CSI ± chemotherapy between 2008 and 2020. Patient, disease, and treatment details and prospectively obtained patient-reported acute CSI toxicities were collected. Acute hematologic data were analyzed. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 27 years; 45% of patients had high-risk disease; 75% received chemotherapy, most (65%) after CSI. Eight (40%) patients received concurrent vincristine with radiotherapy. Median CSI dose was 36GyE with a median tumor bed boost of 54GyE. Median duration of radiotherapy was 44 days. No acute ≥ grade 3 gastrointestinal or hematologic toxicities attributable to CSI occurred. Grade 2 nausea and vomiting affected 25% and 5% of patients, respectively, while 36% developed acute grade 2 hematologic toxicity (36% grade 2 leukopenia and 7% grade 2 neutropenia). Those receiving concurrent chemotherapy with CSI had a 38% rate of grade 2 hematologic toxicity compared to 33% among those not receiving concurrent chemotherapy. Among patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 13), 100% completed ≥ 4 cycles and 85% completed all planned cycles. With a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 4-year actuarial local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 90%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Proton CSI in adult medulloblastoma patients is very well tolerated and shows promising disease control and survival outcomes. These data support the standard use of proton CSI for adult medulloblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Chia Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Ronny L Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Sridharan Gururangan
- Department of Neurosurgery and the Preston A. Wells Jr. Center for Brain Tumor Therapy, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Bridgette Carter
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Daryoush Tavanaiepour
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Michael S Rutenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shen CJ, Perkins SM, Bradley JA, Mahajan A, Marcus KJ. Radiation therapy for infants with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28700. [PMID: 33818894 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The clinical outcomes for infants with malignant tumors are often worse than older children due to a combination of more biologically aggressive disease in some cases, and increased toxicity-or deintensification of therapies due to concern for toxicity-in others. Especially in infants and very young children, finding the appropriate balance between maximizing treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity-in particular late side effects-is crucial. We review here the management of malignant tumors in infants and very young children, focusing on central nervous system (CNS) malignancies and rhabdomyosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colette J Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stephanie M Perkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Karen J Marcus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mizumoto M, Fuji H, Miyachi M, Soejima T, Yamamoto T, Aibe N, Demizu Y, Iwata H, Hashimoto T, Motegi A, Kawamura A, Terashima K, Fukushima T, Nakao T, Takada A, Sumi M, Oshima J, Moriwaki K, Nozaki M, Ishida Y, Kosaka Y, Ae K, Hosono A, Harada H, Ogo E, Akimoto T, Saito T, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Matsuo T, Matsumura A, Masaki H, Hosoi H, Shigematsu N, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs): JASTRO and JSPHO Guidelines. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102209. [PMID: 33984606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are often treated with a multidisciplinary approach. This includes use of radiotherapy, which is important for local control, but may also cause adverse events in the long term, including second cancer. The risks for limited growth and development, endocrine dysfunction, reduced fertility and second cancer in children and AYAs are reduced by proton beam therapy (PBT), which has a dose distribution that decreases irradiation of normal organs while still targeting the tumor. To define the outcomes and characteristics of PBT in cancer treatment in pediatric and AYA patients, this document was developed by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiology and National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsufumi Kawamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keita Terashima
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukushima
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomohei Nakao
- Department of Pediatrics, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Takada
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Moriwaki
- Department of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Miwako Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Department of Pediatrics, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ako Hosono
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Division of Radiation Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akira Matsumura
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Masaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Hajime Hosoi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Shigematsu
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yang TJ, Wijetunga NA, Yamada J, Wolden S, Mehallow M, Goldman DA, Zhang Z, Young RJ, Kris MG, Yu HA, Seidman AD, Gavrilovic IT, Lin A, Santomasso B, Grommes C, Piotrowski AF, Schaff L, Stone JB, DeAngelis LM, Boire A, Pentsova E. Clinical trial of proton craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal metastases. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:134-143. [PMID: 32592583 PMCID: PMC7850116 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are associated with limited survival and treatment options. While involved-field radiotherapy is effective for local palliation, it lacks durability. We evaluated the toxicities of proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI), a treatment encompassing the entire central nervous system (CNS) compartment, for patients with LM from solid tumors. METHODS We enrolled patients with LM to receive hypofractionated proton CSI in this phase I prospective trial. The primary endpoint was to describe treatment-related toxicity, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as any radiation-related grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity or grade 4 hematologic toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events that occurred during or within 4 weeks of completion of proton CSI. Secondary endpoints included CNS progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We enrolled 24 patients between June 2018 and April 2019. Their median follow-up was 11 months. Twenty patients were evaluable for protocol treatment-related toxicities and 21 for CNS PFS and OS. Two patients in the dose expansion cohort experienced DLTs consisted of grade 4 lymphopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and/or grade 3 fatigue. All DLTs resolved without medical intervention. The median CNS PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 5-13) and the median OS was 8 months (95% CI: 6 to not reached). Four patients (19%) were progression-free in the CNS for more than 12 months. CONCLUSION Hypofractionated proton CSI using proton therapy is a safe treatment for patients with LM from solid tumors. We saw durable disease control in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Jonathan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- PROMISE (Precision Radiation for OligoMetastatIc and MetaStatic DiseasE) Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Neil A Wijetunga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Josh Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- PROMISE (Precision Radiation for OligoMetastatIc and MetaStatic DiseasE) Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Suzanne Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michelle Mehallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Debra A Goldman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mark G Kris
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Helena A Yu
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew D Seidman
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Igor T Gavrilovic
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Lin
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bianca Santomasso
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christian Grommes
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anna F Piotrowski
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lauren Schaff
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jacqueline B Stone
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lisa M DeAngelis
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elena Pentsova
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Su Z, Hsi W, Forthomme J, Rossomme S. Evaluations of a flat-panel based compact daily quality assurance device for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) system. Phys Med 2020; 80:243-250. [PMID: 33202363 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the flat-panel detector quenching effect and clinical usability of a flat-panel based compact QA device for PBS daily constancy measurements. MATERIALS & METHOD The QA device, named Sphinx Compact, is composed of a 20x20 cm2 flat-panel imager mounted on a portable frame with removable plastic modules for constancy checks of proton energy (100 MeV, 150 MeV, 200 MeV), Spread-Out-Bragg-Peak (SOBP) profile, and machine output. The potential quenching effect of the flat-panel detector was evaluated. Daily PBS QA tests of X-ray/proton isocenter coincidence, the constancy of proton spot position and sigma as well as the energy of pristine proton beam, and the flatness of SOBP proton beam through the 'transformed' profile were performed and analyzed. Furthermore, the sensitivity of detecting energy changes of pristine proton beam was also evaluated. RESULTS The quenching effect was observed at depths near the pristine peak regions. The flat-panel measured range of the distal 80% is within 0.9 mm to the defined ranges of the delivered proton beams. X-ray/proton isocenter coincidence tests demonstrated maximum mismatch of 0.3 mm between the two isocenters. The device can detect 0.1 mm change of spot position and 0.1 MeV energy changes of pristine proton beams. The measured transformed SOBP beam profile through the wedge module rendered as flat. CONCLUSIONS Even though the flat-panel detector exhibited quenching effect at the Bragg peak region, the proton range can still be accurately measured. The device can fulfill the requirements of the daily QA tests recommended by the AAPM TG224 Report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| | - Wen Hsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Assessing the Need for Adjusted Organ-at-Risk Planning Goals for Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer with Proton Radiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 11:108-118. [PMID: 33109494 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Locally advanced breast cancer requires surgical management via lumpectomy or mastectomy with or without systemic therapy followed by chest wall or breast (CW) and comprehensive nodal irradiation (CNI). Radiation (RT) dose constraints for the heart and ipsilateral lung have been developed based on photon RT. Proton therapy (PBT) can deliver significantly lower doses of RT to these organs-at-risk (OARs) and may warrant adjustments to OAR planning goals. METHODS AND MATERIALS The RT plans of consecutive patients undergoing adjuvant CW-CNI RT with PBT within a single center were reviewed. A inital treatment volume, comprised of CW/intact breast + CNI (CTV_init) structure, including the CW and CNI but excluding any boost plans was analyzed. Frequency distributions were generated based on doses received by the heart, lungs, and esophagus for validated dosimetric parameters. Frequency distributions were generated and then stratified by laterality and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The 75th, 85th, and 95th percentiles for each dosimetric parameter were calculated, overall and by laterality. The 75th percentile (Q3), was used as a suggested primary goal, and the 95th percentile was used as a suggested secondary goal. RESULTS One hundred and seventy-two plans were analyzed. Forty-nine plans were right-sided, 107 were left-sided, and 16 were bilateral. The overall Q3 of the mean and V25 of the heart were 1.5 Gy and 1.7%, respectively. The mean and V25 to the heart differed significantly by laterality. Pulmonary values were similar to current recommendations. For all lateralites, the median volume of the esophagus receiving 70% prescription dose was ≤1 cm3. CONCLUSIONS We present the first dosimetric study providing complete OAR dose-volume histograms data for patients undergoing adjuvant pencil-beam scanning-PBT for locally advanced breast cancer, with detailed information on central tendencies, ranges and distributions of data. We have provided suggested planning goals and metrics for the lungs, heart, and esophagus; the latter 2 differing significantly from current Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) constraints and classical photon goals.
Collapse
|
26
|
Jouglar E, Escande A, Martin V, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Carrie C, Claude L, Bernier-Chastagner V. [Influence of age on indications and modalities of radiation therapy: What to keep in mind for adolescents and young adults?]. Bull Cancer 2020; 108:203-209. [PMID: 33051053 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
When using radiation therapy for adolescents and young adults (AYA), paediatricians, adults' oncologists and radiation oncologists need to keep in mind several particularities through the whole therapeutic process. They embrace the indication, target volumes, prescribed dose, treatment techniques and follow-up. Indeed, the young age and the cancer features that characterised this population influence the modalities of irradiation. This article highlights the key points of AYA care with radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Jouglar
- Institut de cancérologie de l'ouest, service de radiothérapie, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France.
| | - Alexandre Escande
- Centre Oscar-Lambret, département universitaire de radiothérapie, 59800 Lille, France; Université de Lille 3, faculté Henri-Warembourg, Laboratoire cristal UMR 9189, 59800 Lille, France
| | - Valentine Martin
- Gustave-Roussy, département universitaire de radiothérapie, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, cancer et radiothérapie, Inserm U1018, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Christian Carrie
- Centre Léon-Berard, département de radiothérapie, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Line Claude
- Centre Léon-Berard, département de radiothérapie, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Valérie Bernier-Chastagner
- Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, département de radiothérapie, 3, avenue de Bourgogne, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Carbonara R, Di Rito A, Monti A, Rubini G, Sardaro A. Proton versus Photon Radiotherapy for Pediatric Central Nervous System Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Dosimetric Comparison Studies. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:5879723. [PMID: 31885580 PMCID: PMC6900940 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5879723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) plays a fundamental role in the treatment of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) malignancies, but its late sequelae are still a challenging question. Despite developments in modern high-conformal photon techniques and proton beam therapy (PBT) are improving the normal tissues dose-sparing while maintaining satisfactory target coverage, clinical advantages supporting the optimal treatment strategy have to be better evaluated in long-term clinical studies and assessed in further radiobiological analyses. Our analysis aimed to systematically review current knowledge on the dosimetric advantages of PBT in the considered setting, which should be the basis for future specific studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A PubMed and Google Scholar search was conducted in June 2019 to select dosimetric studies comparing photon versus proton RT for pediatric patients affected by CNS tumors. Then, a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA statement was performed. Average and standard deviation values of Conformity Index, Homogeneity Index, and mean and maximum doses to intracranial and extracranial organs at risk (OARs) were specifically evaluated for secondary dosimetric comparisons. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) for target parameters and the mean differences (MDs) for OARs were summarized in forest plots (P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). Publication bias was also assessed by the funnel plot and Egger's regression test. RESULTS Among the 88 identified papers, a total of twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. PBT showed dosimetric advantages in target homogeneity (significant especially in the subgroup comparing PBT and 3D conformal RT), as well as in the dose sparing of almost all analyzed OARs (significantly superior results for brainstem, normal brain, and hippocampal dose constraints and for extracranial OARs parameters, excluding the kidneys). Publication bias was observed for Conformity Index. CONCLUSION Our analysis supports the evidence of dosimetric advantages of PBT over photon RT, especially in the dose sparing of normal growing tissues. Confirmations from wider well-designed studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Carbonara
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Alessia Di Rito
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Monti
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rubini
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Proton beam therapy is a highly conformal form of radiation therapy, which currently represents an important therapeutic component in multidisciplinary management in paediatric oncology. The precise adjustability of protons results in a reduction of radiation-related long-term side-effects and secondary malignancy induction, which is of particular importance for the quality of life. Proton irradiation has been shown to offer significant advantages over conventional photon-based radiotherapy, although the biological effectiveness of both irradiation modalities is comparable. This review evaluates current data from clinical and dosimetric studies on the treatment of tumours of the central nervous system, soft tissue and bone sarcomas of the head and neck region, paraspinal or pelvic region, and retinoblastoma. To date, the clinical results of irradiating childhood tumours with high-precision proton therapy are promising both with regard to tumour cure and the reduction of adverse events. Modern proton therapy techniques such as pencil beam scanning and intensity modulation are increasingly established modern facilities. However, further investigations with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required, in order to be able to have clear evidence on clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Thomas
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sun Y, Liu G, Chen W, Chen T, Liu P, Zeng Q, Hong J, Wei R. Dosimetric comparisons of craniospinal axis irradiation using helical tomotherapy, volume-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for medulloblastoma. Transl Cancer Res 2019; 8:191-202. [PMID: 35116748 PMCID: PMC8797767 DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2019.01.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background To evaluate the potential dosimetric gains of helical tomotherapy (HT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) of medulloblastoma. Methods A total of 36 treatment plans were calculated retrospectively for 12 patients with medulloblastoma receiving CSI using HT with TomoTherapy Hi-Art Software (Version 2.0.7) (Accuray, Madison, WI, USA). For each case, the other two different delivery techniques were re-planned with IMRT/VMAT optimized with Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) (Version 11.0.31). Homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) sparing were analyzed. Differences in plans were evaluated using paired-samples t-test for various dosimetric parameters. Results HT yielded the highest CI in all PTV coverage including PTV of gross tumor volume (PGTV) (HT: 0.7163; VMAT: 0.6688; IMRT: 0.6096), PTVbrain (HT: 0.8490; VMAT: 0.8384; IMRT: 0.7815) and PTVspine (HT: 0.5904; VMAT: 0.5862; IMRT: 0.5797). Meanwhile, HT yielded better HI in PGTV (HT: 0.0543; VMAT: 0.0759; IMRT: 0.0736), PTVbrain (HT: 0.5525; VMAT: 0.5619; IMRT: 0.5554) and PTVspine (HT: 0.0700; VMAT: 0.0782; IMRT: 0.0877). As for OARs, HT demonstrated marked superiority in critical organs including maximal/mean doses of brainstem PRV, optical chiasm and optic nerves. Conclusions For CSI of medulloblastoma, HT offers superior outcomes in terms of PTV conformity, PTV homogeneity and critical OAR sparing as compared with IMRT/VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangqing Sun
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Gui Liu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Wen Chen
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Taili Chen
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Pei Liu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Qian Zeng
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Jidong Hong
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Rui Wei
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jaramillo S, Grosshans DR, Philip N, Varan A, Akyüz C, McAleer MF, Mahajan A, McGovern SL. Radiation for ETMR: Literature review and case series of patients treated with proton therapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018; 15:31-37. [PMID: 30582019 PMCID: PMC6297264 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Revised: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes (ETMRs) are aggressive tumors that typically occur in young children. Radiation is often deferred or delayed for these patients due to late effects; proton therapy may mitigate some of these concerns. This study reviews the role of radiation in ETMR and describes initial results with proton therapy. Materials and methods Records of patients with embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes (ETANTR), medulloepithelioma (MEP), and ependymoblastoma (EPL) treated with proton therapy at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. A literature review of cases of CNS ETANTR, MEP, and EPL published since 1990 was also conducted. Results Seven patients were treated with proton therapy. Their median age at diagnosis was 33 months (range 10-57 months) and their median age at radiation start was 42 months (range 17-58 months). Their median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (range 8-64 months), with three patients surviving 36 months or longer. Five patients had disease progression prior to starting radiation; all 5 of these patients failed in the tumor bed. A search of the literature identified 204 cases of ETMR with a median OS of 10 months (range 0.03-161 months). Median OS of 18 long-term survivors (≥36 months) in the literature was 77 months (range 37-184 months). Of these 18 long-term survivors, 17 (94%) received radiotherapy as part of their initial treatment; 14 of them were treated with craniospinal irradiation. Conclusions Outcomes of patients with ETMR treated with proton therapy are encouraging compared to historical results. Further study of this rare tumor is warranted to better define the role of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Jaramillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nancy Philip
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ali Varan
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University, Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Canan Akyüz
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University, Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
De B, Cahlon O, Sine K, Mah D, Hug EB, Wolden SL. Early Axial Growth Outcomes of Pediatric Patients Receiving Proton Craniospinal Irradiation. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2018; 40:574-579. [PMID: 29889805 PMCID: PMC6197896 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Guidelines on proton craniospinal irradiation (p-CSI) target volume selection in children are lacking. We examined the impact of target volume selection on growth of children receiving p-CSI at a institution. Records of 58 patients who received p-CSI were reviewed. Median age at treatment initiation was 8 years (range, 2 to 18 y). Spinal target volumes included whole vertebral body (WVB) in 67% and partial vertebral body (PVB) in 33%. Height z-scores before and after p-CSI were assessed using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stature-for-age charts. Maximal Cobb angle and height z-score change were compared for WVB versus PVB p-CSI using a t test. Among 93% of patients with detailed data, median follow-up was 19 months (range, 2 to 58 mo) after radiation therapy initiation. Quantitative growth evaluations were available for 64% of patients. Median change in height z-score was -0.5 (range, -2.1 to +0.7) after treatment, representing a decrease (P<0.001) in age-adjusted height. WVB patients had significantly greater reduction in height z-score versus PVB patients (P=0.004) but no difference in Cobb angle change (P>0.05). Despite reluctance surrounding its use in younger patients, PVB p-CSI was associated with similar spinal curvature and less growth suppression as compared with WVB p-CSI; a trial comparing WVB versus PVB in children may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, 103 Cedar Grove Lane, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, 103 Cedar Grove Lane, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
| | - Kevin Sine
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, 103 Cedar Grove Lane, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
| | - Dennis Mah
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, 103 Cedar Grove Lane, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
| | - Eugen B. Hug
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, 103 Cedar Grove Lane, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
| | - Suzanne L. Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, 103 Cedar Grove Lane, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Radiation-Induced Cerebral Microbleeds in Pediatric Patients With Brain Tumors Treated With Proton Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1465-1471. [PMID: 30092336 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) has been increasingly used to treat pediatric brain tumors; however, limited information exists regarding radiation-induced cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) among these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and imaging appearance of CMBs in pediatric patients with brain tumors treated with PBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was performed of 100 pediatric patients with primary brain tumors treated with PBT. CMBs were diagnosed by examination of serial magnetic resonance imaging scans, including susceptibility-weighted imaging. Radiation therapy plans were analyzed to determine doses to individual CMBs. Clinical records were used to determine risk factors associated with the development of CMBs in these patients. RESULTS The mean age at time of PBT was 8.1 years. The median follow-up duration was 57 months. The median time to development of CMBs was 8 months (mean, 11 months; range, 3-28 months). The percentage of patients with CMBs was 43%, 66%, 80%, 81%, 83%, and 81% at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, and >5 years from completion of proton radiation therapy. Most of the CMBs (87%) were found in areas of brain exposed to ≥30 Gy. Risk factors included maximum radiation therapy dose (P = .001), percentage and volume of brain exposed to ≥30 Gy (P = .0004, P = .0005), and patient age at time of PBT (P = .0004). Chemotherapy was not a significant risk factor (P = .35). No CMBs required surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS CMBs develop in a high percentage of pediatric patients with brain tumors treated with proton radiation therapy within the first few years after treatment. Significant risk factors for development of CMBs include younger age at time of PBT, higher maximum radiation therapy dose, and higher percentage and volume of brain exposed to ≥30 Gy. These findings demonstrate similarities with CMBs that develop in pediatric patients with brain tumor treated with photon radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
33
|
Lewis DJ, Taylor PA, Followill DS, Sahoo N, Mahajan A, Stingo FC, Kry SF. A New Anthropomorphic Pediatric Spine Phantom for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing. Int J Part Ther 2018; 4:20-27. [PMID: 30214913 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-17-00024.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To design and evaluate an anthropomorphic spine phantom for use in credentialing proton therapy facilities for clinical trial participation by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston QA Center. Materials and Methods A phantom was designed to perform an end-to-end audit of the proton spine treatment process, including simulation, dose calculation, and proton treatment delivery. Because plastics that simulate bone in proton beams are unknown, 11 potential materials were tested to identify suitable phantom materials. Once built, preliminary testing using passive scattering and spot scanning treatment plans (including a field junction) were created in-house and delivered 3 times to test reproducibility. The following measured attributes were compared with the calculated values: absolute dose agreement using thermoluminescent dosimeters, planar gamma agreement, distal range, junction match, and right and left profile alignment using radiochromic film. Finally, credentialing results from 10 institutions were also assessed. Results A suitable bone substitute was identified (Techtron HPV Bearing Grade), which had a measured relative stopping power that agreed within 1.1% of its value calculated by Eclipse. In-house passive scatter testing of the phantom demonstrated that the phantom was suitable for assessing craniospinal irradiation dose delivery. However, the in-house scanning beam results were more mixed, highlighting challenges in treatment delivery. Seven of ten institutions passed the proposed criteria for this phantom, a pass rate consistent with other Imaging and Radiation Oncology phantoms. Conclusions An anthropomorphic proton spine phantom was developed to evaluate proton therapy delivery. This phantom provides a realistic challenge for centers wishing to participate in proton clinical trials and highlights the need for caution in applying advanced treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana J Lewis
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Quality Assurance Office, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston TX, USA
| | - Paige A Taylor
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Quality Assurance Office, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston TX, USA
| | - David S Followill
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Quality Assurance Office, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston TX, USA
| | - Narayan Sahoo
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston TX, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Francesco C Stingo
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston TX, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen F Kry
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Quality Assurance Office, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cachia D, Johnson DR, Kaufmann TJ, Lowe S, Andersen S, Olar A, Cooper SL, Frankel BM, Gilbert MR. Case-based review: ependymomas in adults. Neurooncol Pract 2018; 5:142-153. [PMID: 31386035 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npy026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ependymomas are rare primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors in adults. They occur most commonly in the spinal cord, and have classically been graded histologically into World Health Organization (WHO) grades I, II, or III based on the level of anaplasia. Recent data are showing that genetic heterogeneity occurs within the same histological subgroup and that ependymomas arising from different CNS locations have different molecular signatures. This has renewed interest in developing targeting therapies based on molecular profiles especially given the variable outcomes with radiation and the poor results with cytotoxic agents. In this paper, we present the case of a 46-year-old woman with a classic presentation of spinal cord ependymoma and discuss the current histopathological and molecular classification for ependymomas as well as current guidelines for patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cachia
- Department of Neuro-surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Derek R Johnson
- Department of Neurology and Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Stephen Lowe
- Department of Neuro-surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Samuel Andersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Adriana Olar
- Department of Neuro-surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Samuel Lewis Cooper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Bruce M Frankel
- Department of Neuro-surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pinnix CC, Yahalom J, Specht L, Dabaja BS. Radiation in Central Nervous System Leukemia: Guidelines From the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:53-58. [PMID: 30102203 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joachim Yahalom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bouthaina Shbib Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ahmed SK, Kruse JJ, Bradley TB, Beltran CJ, Laack NNI. Clinical efficacy and safety of a highly conformal, supine, hybrid forward and inverse planned intensity modulated radiation therapy technique for craniospinal irradiation. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:629-636. [PMID: 29129125 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1400686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of a highly conformal, supine, hybrid forward and inverse planned intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique for photon craniospinal irradiation (CSI). METHODS Patients who received supine, hybrid IMRT CSI from 2009 to 2014 were included in this retrospective review. Clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as intracranial contents and thecal sac, including nerve roots. Dose was prescribed such that >99% of CTV received >99% of prescription and >95% of the planning target volume received >95% of prescription, with no attempt to include vertebral bodies. Lateral fields were utilized at the cranium and upper cervical spine. Spine fields were either single posterior or 2-3 obliques. Plans were generated with a hybrid of forward and inverse planned IMRT. Inferior borders of the cranium fields and superior border of the lower spine field were designed with 6-15 cm long, gradual dose gradients by sequential closing of multileaf collimator leaves using forward planned multiple static segment IMRT delivery. The sliding window upper spine IMRT field was created by the inverse planning system to match gradients of the brain and lower spine fields. The lower spine field gradient was similarly completed. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 34 patients. Median CSI dose was 36 Gy (range: 18-39.6 Gy). With a median follow up of 59.4 months, there were no isolated recurrences or spinal myelopathies at CTV margins or field gradients. Eleven patients had recurrence, all of which were intracranial. CONCLUSIONS Our hybrid forward and inverse planned IMRT supine CSI technique did not result in any isolated recurrences or myelopathies at CTV margins or field gradients. This suggests our target volumes and blended gradients are appropriate for highly conformal three-dimensional planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safia K Ahmed
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | - Jon J Kruse
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | - Thomas B Bradley
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | - Chris J Beltran
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Taddei PJ, Khater N, Youssef B, Howell RM, Jalbout W, Zhang R, Geara FB, Giebeler A, Mahajan A, Mirkovic D, Newhauser WD. Low- and middle-income countries can reduce risks of subsequent neoplasms by referring pediatric craniospinal cases to centralized proton treatment centers. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2018; 4:025029. [PMID: 30038799 PMCID: PMC6054490 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aaa1ce] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Few children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have access to proton therapy. Evidence exists to support replacing photon therapy with proton therapy to reduce the incidence of secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) in childhood cancer survivors. The purpose of this study was to estimate the potential reduction in SMN incidence and in SMN mortality for pediatric medulloblastoma patients in LMICs if proton therapy were made available to them. For nine children of ages 2 to 14 years, we calculated the equivalent dose in organs or tissues at risk for radiogenic SMNs from therapeutic and stray radiation for photon craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in a LMIC and proton CSI in a high-income country. We projected the lifetime risks of SMN incidence and SMN mortality for every SMN site with a widely-used model from the literature. We found that the average total lifetime attributable risks of incidence and mortality were very high for both photon CSI (168% and 41%, respectively) and proton CSI (88% and 26%, respectively). SMNs having the highest risk of mortality were lung cancer (16%), non-site-specific solid tumors (16%), colon cancer (5.9%), leukemia (5.4%), and for girls breast cancer (5.0%) after photon CSI and non-site-specific solid tumors (12%), lung cancer (11%), and leukemia (4.8%) after proton CSI. The risks were higher for younger children than for older children and higher for girls than for boys. The ratios of proton CSI to photon CSI of total risks of SMN incidence and mortality were 0.56 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.75) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.82), respectively, averaged over this sample group. In conclusion, proton therapy has the potential to lessen markedly subsequent SMNs and SMN fatalities in survivors of childhood medulloblastoma in LMICs, for example, through regional centralized care. Additional methods should be explored urgently to reduce therapeutic-field doses in organs and tissues at risk for SMN, especially in the lungs, colon, and breast tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip J Taddei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Nabil Khater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, University of St. Joseph, P.O. Box 166830, Alfred Naccache Blvd, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Bassem Youssef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Wassim Jalbout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Rui Zhang
- Medical Physics Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA
- Department of Physics, Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70809, USA
| | - Fady B. Geara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Annelise Giebeler
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Dragan Mirkovic
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Wayne D Newhauser
- Medical Physics Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA
- Department of Physics, Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70809, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Radiation-Induced Large Vessel Cerebral Vasculopathy in Pediatric Patients With Brain Tumors Treated With Proton Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:817-824. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Revised: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
39
|
Gunther JR, Rahman AR, Dong W, Yehia ZA, Kebriaei P, Rondon G, Pinnix CC, Milgrom SA, Allen PK, Dabaja BS, Smith GL. Craniospinal irradiation prior to stem cell transplant for hematologic malignancies with CNS involvement: Effectiveness and toxicity after photon or proton treatment. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:e401-e408. [PMID: 28666906 PMCID: PMC6033267 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Revised: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 05/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) improves local control of leukemia/lymphoma with central nervous system (CNS) involvement; however, for adult patients anticipating stem cell transplant (SCT), cumulative treatment toxicity is a major concern. We evaluated toxicities and outcomes for patients receiving proton or photon CSI before SCT. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 37 consecutive leukemia/lymphoma patients with CNS involvement who received CSI before SCT at our institution. Photon versus proton toxicities during CSI, transplant, and through 100 days posttransplant were compared using Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Long-term neurotoxicity, disease response, and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients (23 photon, 14 proton) underwent CSI for CNS involvement of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (49%), acute myeloblastic leukemia (22%), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (3%), chronic myelocytic leukemia (14%), lymphoma (11%), and myeloma (3%). CSI was used for consolidation (30 patients, 81%) and gross disease treatment (7 patients, 19%). Median radiation dose (interquartile range) was 24 Gy (23.4-24) for photons and 21.8 Gy (21.3-23.6) for protons (P = .03). Proton CSI was associated with lower rates of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 1-3 mucositis during CSI (7% vs 44%, P = .03): 1 grade 3 with protons versus 5 grade 1, 3 grade 2, and 2 grade 3 with photons. During CSI, other toxicities (infection, gastrointestinal symptoms) did not differ. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) was used in 95% of patients, with 53% of patients in remission before SCT. Myeloablative conditioning was used for 76%. During SCT admission and 100 days post-SCT, toxicities did not differ by CSI technique. Successful engraftment occurred in 95% of patients (P = .67). Progression or death occurred for 47% of patients, with only 1 CNS relapse. CONCLUSION In our cohort, CSI offered excellent local control for CNS-involved hematologic malignancies in the pre-SCT setting. Acute mucositis occurred less frequently with proton CSI with comparable peritransplant/long-term toxicity profile, suggesting the need to further explore the benefit/toxicity profile of this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian R Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ahmad R Rahman
- Department of University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Wenli Dong
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Zeinab Abou Yehia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gabriela Rondon
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sarah A Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Pamela K Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ho ESQ, Barrett SA, Mullaney LM. A review of dosimetric and toxicity modeling of proton versus photon craniospinal irradiation for pediatrics medulloblastoma. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1031-1042. [PMID: 28509599 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1324207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is the standard radiation therapy treatment for medulloblastoma. Conventional CSI photon therapy (Photon-CSI) delivers significant dose to surrounding normal tissue (NT). Research into pediatric CSI with proton therapy (Proton-CSI) has increased, with the aim of exploiting the potential to reduce NT dose and associated post-treatment complications. This review aims to compare treatment outcomes of pediatric medulloblastoma patients between Proton- and Photon-CSI treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS A search and review of studies published between 1990 and 2016 comparing pediatric (2-18 years) medulloblastoma Proton- and Photon-CSI in three aspects - normal organ sparing and target coverage; normal organ dysfunction and second malignancy risks - was completed. RESULTS Fifteen studies were selected for review and the results were directly compared. Proton-CSI reported improved out-of-field organ sparing while target coverage improvements were inconsistent. Normal organ dysfunction risks were predicted to be lower following Proton-CSI. Secondary malignancy risks (SMRs) were generally lower with Proton-CSI based on several different risk models. CONCLUSIONS Proton-CSI conferred better treatment outcomes than Photon-CSI for pediatric medulloblastoma patients. This review serves to compare the current literature in the absence of long-term data from prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangeline S. Q. Ho
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sarah A. Barrett
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Laura M. Mullaney
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shen CJ, Hu C, Ladra MM, Narang AK, Pollack CE, Terezakis SA. Socioeconomic factors affect the selection of proton radiation therapy for children. Cancer 2017; 123:4048-4056. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Colette J. Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore Maryland
| | - Chen Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore Maryland
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore Maryland
| | - Matthew M. Ladra
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore Maryland
| | - Amol K. Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore Maryland
| | - Craig E. Pollack
- Department of Medicine; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore Maryland
| | - Stephanie A. Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mizumoto M, Oshiro Y, Yamamoto T, Kohzuki H, Sakurai H. Proton Beam Therapy for Pediatric Brain Tumor. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2017; 57:343-355. [PMID: 28603224 PMCID: PMC5566707 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2017-0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a major cause of childhood death, with central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms being the second most common pediatric malignancy, following hematological cancer. Treatment of pediatric CNS malignancies requires multimodal treatment using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, and advances in these treatments have given favorable results and longer survival. However, treatment-related toxicities have also occurred, particularly for radiotherapy, after which secondary cancer, reduced function of irradiated organs, and retarded growth are significant problems. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a particle radiotherapy with excellent dose localization that permits treatment of liver and lung cancer by administration of a high dose to the tumor while minimizing damage to surrounding normal tissues. Thus, PBT has the potential advantages for pediatric cancer. In this context, we review the current knowledge on PBT for treatment of pediatric CNS malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yoshiko Oshiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
De Saint-Hubert M, Verellen D, Poels K, Crijns W, Magliona F, Depuydt T, Vanhavere F, Struelens L. Out-of-field doses from pediatric craniospinal irradiations using 3D-CRT, IMRT, helical tomotherapy and electron-based therapy. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:5293-5311. [PMID: 28398210 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6c9e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Medulloblastoma treatment involves irradiation of the entire central nervous system, i.e. craniospinal irradiation (CSI). This is associated with the significant exposure of large volumes of healthy tissue and there is growing concern regarding treatment-associated side effects. The current study compares out-of-field organ doses in children receiving CSI through 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), helical tomotherapy (HT) and an electron-based technique, and includes radiation doses resulting from imaging performed during treatment. An extensive phantom study is performed, using an anthropomorphic phantom corresponding to a five year old child, in which organ absorbed doses are measured using thermoluminescent detectors. Additionally, the study evaluates and explores tools for calculating out-of-field patient doses using the treatment planning system (TPS) and analytical models. In our study, 3D-CRT resulted in very high doses to a limited number of organs, while it was able to spare organs such as the lungs and breast when compared to IMRT and HT. Both IMRT and HT spread the dose over more organs and were able to spare the heart, thyroid, bladder, uterus and testes when compared to 3D-CRT. The electron-based technique considerably decreased the out-of-field doses in deep-seated organs but could not avoid nearby out-of-field organs such as the lungs, ribs, adrenals, kidneys and uterus. The daily imaging dose is small compared to the treatment dose burden. The TPS error for out-of-field doses was most pronounced for organs further away from the target; nevertheless, no systematic underestimation was observed for any of the studied TPS systems. Finally, analytical modeling was most optimal for 3D-CRT although the number of organs that could be modeled was limited. To conclude, none of the techniques studied was capable of sparing all organs from out-of-field doses. Nevertheless, the electron-based technique showed the most promise for out-of-field organ dose reduction during CSI when compared to photon techniques.
Collapse
|
44
|
MacEwan I, Chou B, Moretz J, Loredo L, Bush D, Slater JD. Effects of vertebral-body-sparing proton craniospinal irradiation on the spine of young pediatric patients with medulloblastoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2017; 2:220-227. [PMID: 28740935 PMCID: PMC5514252 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Revised: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the long-term effects of vertebral-body-sparing proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) on the spine of young patients with medulloblastoma. Methods and materials Six children between the ages of 3 and 5 years with medulloblastoma were treated with vertebral-body-sparing proton CSI after maximal safe resection. Radiation therapy was delivered in the supine position with posterior beams targeting the craniospinal axis, and the proton beam was stopped anterior to the thecal sac. Patients were treated with a dose of either 23.4 Gy or 36 Gy to the craniospinal axis followed by a boost to the posterior fossa and any metastatic lesions. Chemotherapy varied by protocol. Radiographic effects on the spine were evaluated with serial imaging, either with magnetic resonance imaging scans or plain film using Cobb angle calculations, the presence of thoracic lordosis, lumbar vertebral body-to-disc height ratios, and anterior-posterior height ratios. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by patient/family interview and medical chart review. Results Overall survival and disease free survival were 83% (5/6) at follow-up. Median clinical and radiographic follow-up were 13.6 years and 12.3 years, respectively. Two patients were clinically diagnosed with scoliosis and treated conservatively. At the time of follow-up, no patients had experienced chronic back pain or required spine surgery. No patients were identified to have thoracic lordosis. Diminished growth of the posterior portions of vertebral bodies was identified in all patients, with an average posterior to anterior ratio of 0.88, which was accompanied by compensatory hypertrophy of the posterior intervertebral discs. Conclusion Vertebral-body-sparing CSI with proton beam did not appear to cause increased severe spinal abnormalities in patients treated at our institution. This approach could be considered in future clinical trials in an effort to reduce toxicity and the risk of secondary malignancy and to improve adult height.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain MacEwan
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda, California
| | - Brian Chou
- Loma Linda University, School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California
| | - Jeremy Moretz
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Loma Linda, California
| | - Lilia Loredo
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda, California
| | - David Bush
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda, California
| | - Jerry D Slater
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda, California
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schiopu SR, Habl G, Häfner M, Katayama S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Sterzing F. Craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy for central nervous system tumors. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2017; 58:238-246. [PMID: 28096196 PMCID: PMC5439401 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrw095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2016] [Revised: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe early and late toxicity, survival and local control in 45 patients with primary brain tumors treated with helical tomotherapy craniospinal irradiation (HT-CSI). From 2006 to 2014, 45 patients with central nervous system malignancies were treated with HT-CSI. The most common tumors were medulloblastoma in 20 patients, ependymoma in 10 patients, intracranial germinoma (ICG) in 7 patients, and primitive neuroectodermal tumor in 4 patients. Hematological toxicity during treatment included leukopenia Grades 1-4 (6.7%, 33.3%, 37.8% and 17.8%, respectively), anemia Grades 1-4 (44.4%, 22.2%, 22.2% and 0%, respectively) and thrombocytopenia Grades 1-4 (51.1%, 15.6%, 15.6% and 6.7%, respectively). The most common acute toxicities were nausea, vomiting, fatigue, loss of appetite, alopecia and neurotoxicity. No Grade 3 or higher late toxicity occurred. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 80% and 70%, respectively. Survival for the main tumor entities included 3- and 5-year survival rates of 80% and 70%, respectively, for patients with medulloblastoma, 70% for both in patients with ependymoma, and 100% for both in patients with ICG. Relapse occurred in 11 patients (24.4%): 10 with local and 1 with multifocal relapse. One patient experienced a secondary cancer. M-status and the results of the re-evaluation at the end of treatment were significantly related to survival. Survival after HT-CSI was in line with the existing literature, and acute treatment-induced toxicity resolved quickly. Compared with conventional radiotherapy, HT offers benefits such as avoiding gaps and junctions, sparing organs, and better and more homogeneous dose distribution and coverage of the target volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanziana R.I. Schiopu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Gregor Habl
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Matthias Häfner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Florian Sterzing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yamashita H, Kase Y, Murayama S. Simplified estimation method for dose distributions around field junctions in proton craniospinal irradiation. Radiol Phys Technol 2016; 10:95-105. [PMID: 27586848 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-016-0373-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Revised: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
In radiotherapy involving craniospinal irradiation (CSI), field junctions of therapeutic beams are necessary, because a CSI target is generally several times larger than the maximum field size of the beams. The purpose of this study was to develop a simplified method for estimating dose uniformity around the field junctions in proton CSI. We estimated the dose profiles around the field junctions of proton beams using a simplified field-junction model, in which partial lateral dose distributions around the field edge were assumed to be approximated using the error function. We measured the lateral dose distributions of the proton beams planned for the CSI treatment using a two-dimensional (2D) ionization chamber array. Although dose hot spots and cold spots tend to be underestimated by a chamber array because of the partial volume effect of the sensitive volume and discrete chamber positions, the model estimation results were fairly consistent with the measurements obtained using a 2D chamber array subjected to CSI-simulated serial irradiation. The simplified junction model enabled us to estimate the dose distributions and dependence of the setup position gap on the dose uniformity around the field junctions on the basis of the field-by-field dose profiles measured using the 2D chamber array.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haruo Yamashita
- Proton Therapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan. .,Proton Therapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
| | - Yuki Kase
- Proton Therapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.,Proton Therapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Murayama
- Proton Therapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.,Proton Therapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Proton therapy in craniospinal irradiation: a systematic review. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2016. [DOI: 10.1017/s146039691500045x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAimCraniospinal irradiation is a technique indicated when a patient has a malignancy that has either disseminated, or is at risk of disseminating, throughout the subarachnoid space. While the craniospinal axis is treatable with conventional radiotherapy, the high doses to organs at risk carry an increased risk of acute and late side effects. Proton craniospinal irradiation is an expensive technique that shows great theoretical promise arising from reduced exit doses. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the potential role of proton therapy as a standard modality for craniospinal irradiation.Materials and methodsA literature review was performed to determine the efficacy and cost of proton craniospinal irradiation. The Cochrane Library and the Inspec, Medline (via Pubmed) and Scopus databases were searched. After exclusion criteria were applied, the remaining papers were systematically appraised utilising the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network critical appraisal checklists.ResultsA total of 14 articles remained following the application of the screening and critical appraisal processes. In total, five of the articles concluded that the risk of secondary malignancy was lower with proton therapy, while ten of the articles included data showing that toxicity rates and organs at risk doses were lower with proton therapy. Doses to most thoracic and abdominal organs at risk analysed in the literature were reduced when proton therapy was used, with the sole exception of the oesophagus, the dose to which depended on whether or not the entire vertebral body was treated. Proton therapy also delivered optimal doses to organs at risk in the head and neck compared with conformal radiation therapy. However, in one study that compared tomotherapy to proton therapy, tomotherapy outperformed proton therapy by delivering lower doses to organs at risk in the head and neck, as well as the kidneys. The two cost-effectiveness studies did not indicate proton therapy as an optimal modality for all treatment sites; however, one of the studies found that for medulloblastoma, protons were more cost effective than conventional radiation therapy.FindingsProton therapy is a superior treatment option for craniospinal irradiation. The reduction in risk of toxicity and radiocarcinogenesis offered by proton craniospinal irradiation appear to outweigh the increased costs.
Collapse
|
48
|
Proton Therapy in Children: A Systematic Review of Clinical Effectiveness in 15 Pediatric Cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:267-278. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2015] [Revised: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
49
|
Howell RM, Burgett EA, Isaacs D, Price Hedrick SG, Reilly MP, Rankine LJ, Grantham KK, Perkins S, Klein EE. Measured Neutron Spectra and Dose Equivalents From a Mevion Single-Room, Passively Scattered Proton System Used for Craniospinal Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:249-257. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.12.356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2015] [Revised: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
50
|
Newhauser WD, de Gonzalez AB, Schulte R, Lee C. A Review of Radiotherapy-Induced Late Effects Research after Advanced Technology Treatments. Front Oncol 2016; 6:13. [PMID: 26904500 PMCID: PMC4748041 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2015] [Accepted: 01/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of incident cancers and long-term cancer survivors is expected to increase substantially for at least a decade. Advanced technology radiotherapies, e.g., using beams of protons and photons, offer dosimetric advantages that theoretically yield better outcomes. In general, evidence from controlled clinical trials and epidemiology studies are lacking. To conduct these studies, new research methods and infrastructure will be needed. In the paper, we review several key research methods of relevance to late effects after advanced technology proton-beam and photon-beam radiotherapies. In particular, we focus on the determination of exposures to therapeutic and stray radiation and related uncertainties, with discussion of recent advances in exposure calculation methods, uncertainties, in silico studies, computing infrastructure, electronic medical records, and risk visualization. We identify six key areas of methodology and infrastructure that will be needed to conduct future outcome studies of radiation late effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne D. Newhauser
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
- Department of Physics, Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | | | - Reinhard Schulte
- Department of Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|