1
|
Ailani J, Gandhi P, Lalla A, Halker Singh R, McAllister P, Smith JH, Dabruzzo B, Chalermpalanupap N, Kelton K, Nahas SJ. Cost per treatment responder analysis of atogepant compared to rimegepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. Headache 2024. [PMID: 39248007 DOI: 10.1111/head.14824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the number needed to treat and cost per additional responder for atogepant and rimegepant versus placebo for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine (EM) in the United States. BACKGROUND Migraine has an enormous impact on a person's daily activities and quality of life, and results in significant clinical and economic burden to both individuals and society. It is important to understand the comparative efficacy and economic value of oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists (gepants) for preventive treatment of EM. Currently, atogepant and rimegepant are US Food and Drug Administration approved for preventive treatment of migraine (rimegepant for EM and atogepant for EM and for chronic migraine). In the absence of head-to-head trials, we utilized an indirect treatment comparison on efficacy data from clinical trials conducted for the preventive treatment of EM. We estimated number needed to treat, a valuable metric used in clinical practice to compare treatment efficacy, and cost per additional responder, which can be used to establish the cost effectiveness of a treatment. METHODS An indirect treatment comparison was conducted to compare the efficacy of atogepant 60 mg once daily and rimegepant 75 mg once every other day as preventive treatments for EM using published data from the registrational trials of atogepant (ADVANCE) and rimegepant (BHV3000-305). The efficacy outcome of interest was ≥50% reduction from baseline in mean monthly migraine/headache days (≥50% responder rate), which was variably defined for a base case and two scenario analyses. Number needed to treat and cost per additional responder versus placebo were calculated and compared between both treatments (weeks 9-12 in the base case analysis; weeks 1-12 and 9-12 for atogepant and during weeks 9-12 for rimegepant in the scenario analyses). RESULTS In the base case analysis, ≥50% responder rates were 64.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.9-74.5) for atogepant and 51.8% (95% CI, 42.9-60.6) for rimegepant, compared to 44.1% (95% CI, 39.4-49.0) for placebo. The median number needed to treat versus placebo in the base case scenario was 4.8 (95% CI, 3.1-9.0) for atogepant compared to 13.0 (95% CI, 5.9-75.1) for rimegepant. The cost per additional responder versus placebo in the base case scenario was estimated to be $15,823 (95% CI, $11,079-$29,516) for atogepant compared to $73,029 (95% CI, $32,901-$422,104) for rimegepant. Results of the two scenario analyses were consistent with the base case analysis. CONCLUSIONS Atogepant had substantially lower numbers needed to treat and costs per additional responder versus placebo than rimegepant for the preventive treatment of EM across all evaluated scenarios. These analyses suggest that atogepant may be more cost effective than rimegepant for the preventive treatment of EM. Limitations include differences in inclusion/exclusion criteria and in reporting of the ≥50% responder rates between trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ailani
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Peter McAllister
- New England Institute for Neurology & Headache, Stamford, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kari Kelton
- Medical Decision Modeling Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stephanie J Nahas
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vives-Mestres M, Casanova A, Silberstein SD, Hershey AD, Orr SL. Clinical factors associated with day-to-day peak pain severity in individuals with chronic migraine: A cohort study using daily prospective diary data. Headache 2024; 64:995-1004. [PMID: 38932610 DOI: 10.1111/head.14745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the association between day-to-day peak pain severity and clinical factors in individuals with chronic migraine (CM). BACKGROUND Little is known about how clinical factors relate to day-to-day pain severity in individuals with CM. METHODS Adults with CM were enrolled into this observational prospective cohort study that collected daily data about headache, associated symptoms, and lifestyle factors using a digital health platform (N1-Headache™) for 90 days. "Migraine days" were defined as days in which a headache occurred that had features described by the International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria. On these days, peak pain severity was recorded on a 4-point scale; on non-headache days peak pain severity was imputed as "0/none". The associations between peak pain severity and 12 clinical factors were modeled and adjusted for sex, age, daily headache, presence of menstrual bleeding, day of the week, and disability. All numerical and Likert scale variables were standardized prior to analysis. RESULTS Data were available for 392 participants (35,280 tracked days). The sample was predominantly female (90.6%), with a mean (standard deviation) age of 39.9 (12.8) years. In the final multivariable model with random intercept and slopes, higher than typical self-reported levels of standardized stress (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.11), standardized irritability (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08), standardized sadness (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.07), fatigue (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.36), eyestrain (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.26-1.52), neck pain (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.76-2.13), skin sensitivity (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.44-1.80), and dehydration (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.18-1.42) were associated with higher reported peak pain severity levels, while standardized sleep quality (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99) and standardized waking feeling refreshed (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.88) were associated with lower reported peak pain severity levels. The inclusion of a random intercept and random slopes improved upon more parsimonious models and illustrated large differences in individuals' reporting of peak severity according to the levels of the associated clinical factors. CONCLUSION Our data showed that the experience of CM, from a pain severity perspective, is complex, related to multiple clinical variables, and highly individualized. These results suggest that future work should aim to study a personalized approach to both medical and behavioral interventions for CM based on which clinical factors relate to the individual's experience of pain severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Vives-Mestres
- Department of Clinical Statistics, Curelator Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Amparo Casanova
- Department of Clinical Statistics, Curelator Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew D Hershey
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Serena L Orr
- Section of Neurology, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cho S, Kim BK. Long-Term Outcome After Discontinuation of CGRP-Targeting Therapy for Migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024; 28:743-751. [PMID: 38683278 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01259-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeting agents are potential candidates for disease-modifying migraine drugs. However, most studies on CGRP-targeting agents have assessed efficacy outcomes rather than long-term effects after discontinuation. This review aimed to synthesize and scrutinize the latest clinical data on the outcomes after the discontinuation of CGRP-targeting therapy in patients with episodic and chronic migraine, with a particular focus on chronic migraine. RECENT FINDINGS Real-world studies involving patients with migraine have reported consistent findings of worsened headache frequency and quality of life after the discontinuation of CGRP monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs). Although many patients maintain improvements for up to 4 months after discontinuation compared to baseline (before starting CGRP mAbs), no studies have evaluated the effects of stopping treatment for > 5 months, which is the five-half-life of CGRP mAbs. Several studies have suggested that patients treated with CGRP receptor mAbs experience more rapid deterioration than those treated with CGRP ligand mAbs after discontinuing CGRP mAbs. The results of real-world studies suggest that for many patients with migraine, the benefits of CGRP mAbs diminish months after discontinuation. Therefore, anti-CGRP therapies may not be considered disease-modifying. However, the comprehensive assessment of the disease-modifying potential of these drugs requires studies with extended treatment and cessation durations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soohyun Cho
- Department of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Byung-Kun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dumkrieger GM, Ishii R, Goadsby PJ. Flexible modeling of headache frequency fluctuations in migraine with hidden Markov models. Headache 2024. [PMID: 39077877 DOI: 10.1111/head.14782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore hidden Markov models (HMMs) as an approach for defining clinically meaningful headache-frequency-based groups in migraine. BACKGROUND Monthly headache frequency in patients with migraine is known to vary over time. This variation has not been completely characterized and is not well accounted for in the classification of individuals as having chronic or episodic migraine, a diagnosis with potentially significant impacts on the individual. This study investigated variation in reported headache frequency in a migraine population and proposed a model for classifying individuals by frequency while accounting for natural variation. METHODS The American Registry for Migraine Research (ARMR) was a longitudinal multisite study of United States adults with migraine. Study participants completed quarterly questionnaires and daily headache diaries. A series of HMMs were fit to monthly headache frequency data calculated from the diary data of ARMR. RESULTS Changes in monthly headache frequency tended to be small, with 47% of transitions resulting in a change of 0 or 1 day. A substantial portion (24%) of months reflected daily headache with individuals ever reporting daily headache likely to consistently report daily headache. An HMM with four states with mean monthly headache frequency emissions of 3.52 (95% Prediction Interval [PI] 0-8), 10.10 (95% PI 4-17), 20.29 (95% PI 12-28), and constant 28 days/month had the best fit of the models tested. Of sequential month-to-month headache frequency transitions, 12% were across the 15-headache days chronic migraine cutoff. Under the HMM, 38.7% of those transitions involved a change in the HMM state, and the remaining 61.3% of the time, a change in chronic migraine classification was not accompanied by a change in the HMM state. CONCLUSION A divide between the second and third states of this model aligns most strongly with the current episodic/chronic distinction, although there is a meaningful overlap between the states that supports the need for flexibility. An HMM has appealing properties for classifying individuals according to their headache frequency while accounting for natural variation in frequency. This empirically derived model may provide an informative classification approach that is more stable than the use of a single cutoff value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryotaro Ishii
- Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ornello R, Baldini F, Onofri A, Rosignoli C, De Santis F, Burgalassi A, Chiarugi A, Geppetti P, Sacco S, Iannone LF. Impact of duration of chronic migraine on long-term effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway-A real-world study. Headache 2024. [PMID: 39012070 DOI: 10.1111/head.14788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We assessed whether the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway changes according to the duration of chronic migraine (CM) over 12 months. BACKGROUND In most patients, CM is a progressive disease starting with episodic migraine. Longer CM duration might be associated with more difficult treatment, probably because the mechanisms underlying chronicization are strengthened. Therefore, early treatment of CM could lead to better outcomes compared with later treatment. METHODS This cohort study included individuals with CM treated with anti-CGRP mAbs in two tertiary headache centers from April 2019 to May 2023. The primary outcome included a change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) from baseline to the third trimester of treatment, 10-12 months. Secondary outcomes established whether response to anti-CGRP mAbs has a more rapid onset in individuals with shorter CM duration compared with longer duration; they included change in MMDs, monthly headache days (MHDs), and days and number of intakes of acute medication during each trimester compared to baseline. Additional outcomes included persisting MMDs, MHDs, and days and number of intakes of acute medication during each trimester of treatment. Patients were compared across tertiles of the overall CM duration. RESULTS The study included 335 individuals with CM, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 48 (39-57) years; 270 (80.6%) were women. Patients in the highest tertile of CM duration (aged 18-60 years) were older than patients in the lower duration tertiles (0-7 years and 8-18 years, respectively), with a median (IQR) age of 56 (48-64) years compared with 42 (31-50) years, and 48 (39-56)years, respectively (p = 0.025); however, this difference was likely due to a correlation between age and disease duration. The change in MMDs from baseline to the last trimester of treatment (10-12 months) was comparable across tertiles of CM duration (median [IQR] -12 [-18 to -5] days, -12 [-17 to -6] days, and -12 [-18 to -4] days; p = 0.946). No difference emerged in secondary outcomes, suggesting a similar time to onset of anti-CGRP mAbs effect across all tertiles of CM duration. CONCLUSIONS Our data showed that anti-CGRP mAbs are effective and have a rapid onset of action in CM regardless of disease duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesca Baldini
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Agnese Onofri
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Chiara Rosignoli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Federico De Santis
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Burgalassi
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Chiarugi
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Department of Pathobiology, School of Dentistry, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Luigi Francesco Iannone
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bovenzi R, Noce A, Conti M, Di Lauro M, Chiaramonte B, Della Morte D, Stefani A, De Lorenzo A, Mercuri NB, Albanese M. Poor Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Sleep Disturbances Are Associated with Migraine Chronification and Disability among an Adult Population in the Lazio Region, Italy. Nutrients 2024; 16:2169. [PMID: 38999916 PMCID: PMC11243412 DOI: 10.3390/nu16132169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Lifestyle factors, such as diet and sleep quality, are receiving increasing interest as accessible therapeutic approaches to migraine. The Mediterranean diet (MD) has shown clear benefits in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, as well as in sleep patterns. Here, our objective was to identify the impact of adherence to the MD and other lifestyle factors on the clinical burden of migraine. For this purpose, we enrolled 170 migraine patients and 100 controls, assessing the clinical disability of headache using standardized clinical scales (HIT-6 and MIDAS) in the migraineur cohort and lifestyle patterns in both groups through the PREDIMED score for MD adherence, the IPAQ scale for physical activity, and BMI. Subjects were also screened for sleep-wake disturbances based on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). We found that migraine patients had lower adherence to the MD compared to the controls and that the HIT-6 scale had a significant negative relationship with MD adherence in patients with high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine. Additionally, in the same migraine patients, the presence of sleep-wake disturbances was correlated with greater migraine disability as assessed by the MIDAS score. In conclusion, this study found that among different lifestyle factors, poor adherence to the MD and the presence of sleep-wake disturbances were closely associated with migraine disability and chronification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Bovenzi
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.B.); (A.N.); (M.C.); (A.S.); (N.B.M.)
| | - Annalisa Noce
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.B.); (A.N.); (M.C.); (A.S.); (N.B.M.)
- UOSD Nephrology and Dialysis, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Matteo Conti
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.B.); (A.N.); (M.C.); (A.S.); (N.B.M.)
| | - Manuela Di Lauro
- UOSD Nephrology and Dialysis, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Barbara Chiaramonte
- Istituto Nazionale per l’Assicurazione Contro Gli Infortuni sul Lavoro (INAIL), Actuarial-Statistic Consultancy Office, Via Stefano Gradi, 55, 00143 Rome, Italy;
| | - David Della Morte
- Section of Clinical Nutrition and Nutrigenomic, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (D.D.M.); (A.D.L.)
- Department of Neurology, Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Alessandro Stefani
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.B.); (A.N.); (M.C.); (A.S.); (N.B.M.)
- Parkinson’s Disease Unit, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of “Nostra Signora del Buonconsiglio” UnizKm, 1000 Tirana, Albania
| | - Antonino De Lorenzo
- Section of Clinical Nutrition and Nutrigenomic, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (D.D.M.); (A.D.L.)
| | - Nicola Biagio Mercuri
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.B.); (A.N.); (M.C.); (A.S.); (N.B.M.)
- Regional Referral Headache Center, Neurology Unit, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Albanese
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (R.B.); (A.N.); (M.C.); (A.S.); (N.B.M.)
- Regional Referral Headache Center, Neurology Unit, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Frattale I, Ferilli MAN, Ursitti F, Sforza G, Monte G, Proietti Checchi M, Tarantino S, Mazzone L, Valeriani M, Papetti L. Unsatisfactory response to acute medications does not affect the medication overuse headache development in pediatric chronic migraine. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:61. [PMID: 38649822 PMCID: PMC11036745 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01766-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine (CM) negatively impacts the quality of life of 2 to 4% of pediatric patients. In adults, CM is frequently linked to medication overuse headache (MOH), but there is a much lower prevalence of MOH in children. A suboptimal response to acute therapies may lead to their reduced use, thus preventing MOH development in children and adolescents. The frequency of patients with CM who do not respond to acute therapies was examined in the present study. We investigated whether the prevalence of MOH was different between responders and non-responders. We also examined whether patients receiving prophylactic therapy had an improved response to acute therapy. Finally, we investigated if there was a difference in the frequency of psychiatric comorbidities between responders and non-responders. METHODS We retrospectively analysed clinical data of all chronic pediatric migraineurs under the age of 18 referred to the Headache Centre at Bambino Gesù Children Hospital in June 2021 and February 2023. ICHD3 criteria were used to diagnose CM and MOH. We collected demographic data, including the age at onset of migraine and the age of the CM course. At baseline and after 3 months of preventive treatment, we evaluated the response to acute medications. Neuropsychiatric comorbidities were referred by the children's parents during the first attendance evaluation. RESULTS Seventy patients with CM were assessed during the chosen period. Paracetamol was tried by 41 patients (58.5%), NSAIDs by 56 patients (80.0%), and triptans by 1 patient (1.4%). Fifty-one participants (73%) were non-responder to the abortive treatment. The presence of MOH was detected in 27.1% of the whole populations. Regarding our primary aim, MOH was diagnosed in 29% of non-responder patients and 22% of responders (p > 0.05). All patients received preventative treatment. After 3 months of preventive pharmacological therapy, 65.4% of patients who did not respond to acute medications achieved a response, while 34.6% of patients who were non-responder remain non-responder (p < 0.05). Prophylactic therapy was also effective in 69% of patients who responded to acute medication (p < 0.05). Psychiatric comorbidities were detected in 68.6% of patients, with no difference between responders and non-responders (72.2% vs. 67.3%; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Despite the high prevalence of unresponsiveness to acute therapies in pediatric CM, it does not act as a protective factor for MOH. Moreover, responsiveness to acute drugs is improved by pharmacological preventive treatment and it is not affected by concomitant psychiatric comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Frattale
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Department of Wellbeing of Mental and Neurological, Dental and Sensory Organ Health, Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Ada Noris Ferilli
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabiana Ursitti
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Sforza
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Monte
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Proietti Checchi
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Samuela Tarantino
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Mazzone
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Department of Wellbeing of Mental and Neurological, Dental and Sensory Organ Health, Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Valeriani
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
- System Medicine Department, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
- Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Laura Papetti
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Griffin E, Shirley G, Lee XY, Awad SF, Tyagi A, Goadsby PJ. An economic evaluation of eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of migraine in the UK, with consideration for natural history and work productivity. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:59. [PMID: 38637754 PMCID: PMC11027549 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01749-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a highly prevalent neurological disease with a substantial societal burden due to lost productivity. From a societal perspective, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of migraine. METHODS An individual patient simulation of discrete competing events was developed to evaluate eptinezumab cost-effectiveness compared to best supportive care for adults in the United Kingdom with ≥ 4 migraine days per month and prior failure of ≥ 3 preventive migraine treatments. Individuals with sampled baseline characteristics were created to represent this population, which comprised dedicated episodic and chronic migraine subpopulations. Clinical efficacy, utility, and work productivity inputs were based on results from the DELIVER randomised controlled trial (NCT04418765). Timing of natural history events and treatment holidays-informed by the literature-were simulated to unmask any natural improvement of the disease unrelated to treatment. The primary outcomes were monthly migraine days, migraine-associated costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and net monetary benefit, each evaluated over a 5-year time horizon from 2020. Secondary analyses explored a lifetime horizon and an alternative treatment stopping rule. RESULTS Treatment with eptinezumab resulted in an average of 0.231 QALYs gained at a saving of £4,894 over 5 years, making eptinezumab dominant over best supportive care (i.e., better health outcomes and less costly). This result was confirmed by the probabilistic analysis and all alternative assumption scenarios under the same societal perspective. Univariate testing of inputs showed net monetary benefit was most sensitive to the number of days of productivity loss, and monthly salary. CONCLUSIONS This economic evaluation shows that from a societal perspective, eptinezumab is a cost-effective treatment in patients with ≥ 4 migraine days per month and for whom ≥ 3 other preventive migraine treatments have failed. TRIAL REGISTRATION N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Alok Tyagi
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland, UK
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, and Wolfson SPaRC, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lipton RB. Preventive Treatment of Migraine. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2024; 30:364-378. [PMID: 38568488 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article describes strategies for the preventive treatment of migraine including the emerging role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapies and introduces novel paradigms for the preventive treatment of migraine. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Multiple migraine medications targeting CGRP have been introduced since 2018, including injectable monoclonal antibodies (ie, eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) and oral small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (ie, ubrogepant, rimegepant, atogepant, and zavegepant). With the exceptions of ubrogepant and zavegepant, which are approved only as acute treatments, all of these agents have demonstrated efficacy in the preventive treatment of migraine; the monoclonal antibodies and atogepant have evidence of effectiveness in adults with either episodic or chronic migraine. The safety and tolerability profiles of CGRP-targeted therapies in migraine are favorable. ESSENTIAL POINTS The goals of preventive migraine therapy include reducing the frequency, severity, duration, and disability associated with attacks, reducing the need for acute treatment and the risk of medication overuse, enhancing self-efficacy and health-related quality of life, and reducing headache-related distress and interictal burden. Six drugs targeting CGRP (four monoclonal antibodies and two gepants) are now available for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults. The efficacy of CGRP-targeted medications in the acute and preventive treatment of migraine, together with good safety and tolerability, has led to the emergence of new approaches to preventive treatment.
Collapse
|
10
|
Charles AC, Digre KB, Goadsby PJ, Robbins MS, Hershey A. Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting therapies are a first-line option for the prevention of migraine: An American Headache Society position statement update. Headache 2024; 64:333-341. [PMID: 38466028 DOI: 10.1111/head.14692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a position statement update from The American Headache Society specifically regarding therapies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) for the prevention of migraine. BACKGROUND All migraine preventive therapies previously considered to be first-line treatments were developed for other indications and adopted later for migraine. Adherence to these therapies is often poor due to issues with efficacy and tolerability. Multiple new migraine-specific therapies have been developed based on a broad foundation of pre-clinical and clinical evidence showing that CGRP plays a key role in the pathogenesis of migraine. These CGRP-targeting therapies have had a transformational impact on the management of migraine but are still not widely considered to be first-line approaches. METHODS Evidence regarding migraine preventive therapies including primary and secondary endpoints from randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials, post hoc analyses and open-label extensions of these trials, and prospective and retrospective observational studies were collected from a variety of sources including PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The results and conclusions based upon these results were reviewed and discussed by the Board of Directors of The American Headache Society to confirm consistency with clinical experience and to achieve consensus. RESULTS The evidence for the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of CGRP-targeting migraine preventive therapies (the monoclonal antibodies: erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab, and the gepants: rimegepant and atogepant) is substantial, and vastly exceeds that for any other preventive treatment approach. The evidence remains consistent across different individual CGRP-targeting treatments and is corroborated by extensive "real-world" clinical experience. The data indicates that the efficacy and tolerability of CGRP-targeting therapies are equal to or greater than those of previous first-line therapies and that serious adverse events associated with CGRP-targeting therapies are rare. CONCLUSION The CGRP-targeting therapies should be considered as a first-line approach for migraine prevention along with previous first-line treatments without a requirement for prior failure of other classes of migraine preventive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew C Charles
- Department of Neurology, UCLA Goldberg Migraine Program, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kathleen B Digre
- Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- Department of Neurology, UCLA Goldberg Migraine Program, Los Angeles, California, USA
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew S Robbins
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Hershey
- Department of Pediatrics and Neurology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rizvi BA, Kuziek J, Cho LY, Ronksley PE, Noel MN, Orr SL. Anxiety and depressive symptoms and migraine-related outcomes in children and adolescents. Headache 2024; 64:342-351. [PMID: 38581204 DOI: 10.1111/head.14701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore the longitudinal relationship between anxiety and depressive symptoms and migraine outcomes in children and adolescents. BACKGROUND Children and adolescents with migraine experience more anxiety and depressive symptoms than their peers without migraine, but it is unknown if these symptoms are associated with differential migraine outcomes. METHODS In this prospective clinical cohort study, children and adolescents aged 8.0-18.0 years with migraine completed headache questionnaires and validated measures of anxiety and depressive symptoms (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) at an initial consultation and at their first follow-up visit with a neurologist. Changes in monthly headache frequency and changes in migraine-related disability (Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment) were tracked at each time point. The relationships between these migraine outcomes and anxiety and depressive symptoms were estimated using models controlling for sex, age, headache frequency, and treatment type. RESULTS There were 123 consenting participants. In models adjusted for age, sex, baseline disability score, and treatment type, baseline anxiety and depressive symptom levels were not significantly associated with change in headache frequency (for anxiety symptoms: β = -0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.268 to 0.166, p = 0.639; for depressive symptoms: β = 0.14, 95% CI = -0.079 to 0.359, p = 0.209). Similarly, in models adjusted for age, sex, baseline headache frequency, and treatment type, the change in disability was not associated with baseline anxiety (β = -0.45, 95% CI = -1.69 to 0.78, p = 0.470), nor with baseline depressive symptom scores (β = 0.16, 95% CI = -1.07 to 1.40, p = 0.796). In post hoc exploratory analyses (N = 84 with anxiety and N = 82 with depressive symptom data at both visits), there were also no significant associations between change in mental health symptoms and change in headache frequency (for anxiety symptoms: β = -0.084, 95% CI = -0.246 to 0.078, p = 0.306; for depressive symptoms: β = -0.013, 95% CI = -0.164 to 0.138, p = 0.865). Similarly, the change in disability scores between visits was not related to the change in anxiety (β = 0.85, 95% CI = -0.095 to 1.78, p = 0.077) nor depressive symptom scores (β = 0.32, 95% CI = -0.51 to 1.15, p = 0.446). CONCLUSION Baseline anxiety and depressive symptom levels were not associated with longitudinal migraine outcomes and neither were longitudinal changes in anxiety and depressive symptom levels; this contradicts popular clinical belief that mental health symptoms predict or consistently change in tandem with migraine outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilal Ahmed Rizvi
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jonathan Kuziek
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lydia Y Cho
- Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paul E Ronksley
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Melanie N Noel
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Mathison Centre for Mental Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Serena Laura Orr
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Mathison Centre for Mental Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Takizawa T, Kitano T, Iijima M, Togo K, Yonemoto N. Treatment patterns and characteristics of patients with migraine: results from a retrospective database study in Japan. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:19. [PMID: 38331739 PMCID: PMC10854051 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01722-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical characteristics and treatment practice of patients with migraine in Japan in real-world setting have not been fully investigated. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using claims database to understand the clinical practice of migraine in recent years and to characterize patients potentially not managed well by current treatment options. METHODS Our study used data from the large claims database maintained by JMDC Inc. Patients with diagnosis of headache or migraine between January 1, 2018, and July 31, 2022, were defined as the headache cohort, and those with migraine diagnosis and prescription of migraine treatments among the headache cohort were included in the migraine cohort. In the headache cohort, characteristics of medical facilities and status of imaging tests to distinguish secondary headache were examined. Treatment patterns and characteristics of patients potentially not managed well by acute/preventive treatment were described in migraine cohort. RESULTS In the headache cohort, 989,514 patients were included with 57.0% females and mean age of 40.3 years; 77.0% patients visited clinics (with ≤ 19 bed capacities) for their primary diagnosis, and 30.3% patients underwent imaging tests (computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging). In the migraine cohort, 165,339 patients were included with 65.0% females and mean age of 38.8 years. In the migraine cohort, 95.6% received acute treatment while 20.8% received preventive treatment. Acetaminophen/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were most common (54.8%) as the initial prescription for migraine treatment followed by triptan (51.4%). First treatment prescription included preventive treatment in 15.6%, while the proportion increased to 82.2% in the fourth treatment prescription. Among patients with more than 12 months of follow-up, 3.7% had prescription patterns suggestive of risk of medication-overuse headache, and these patients were characterized by a higher percentage of females and a higher prevalence of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that approximately one-fifth of the patients with migraine visiting medical facilities use preventive drugs. The presence of potential patients at risk of medication-overuse headache and the role of clinics in migraine treatment were also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsubasa Takizawa
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kitano
- Health & Venue, Pfizer Japan Inc., Shinjuku Bunka Quint Building, 3-22-7, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Iijima
- Internal Medicine & Hospital Medical Affairs, Pfizer Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kanae Togo
- Health & Venue, Pfizer Japan Inc., Shinjuku Bunka Quint Building, 3-22-7, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| | - Naohiro Yonemoto
- Health & Venue, Pfizer Japan Inc., Shinjuku Bunka Quint Building, 3-22-7, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ashina M, Lipton RB, Ailani J, Versijpt J, Sacco S, Mitsikostas DD, Christoffersen CL, Sperling B, Ettrup A. Responder rates with eptinezumab over 24 weeks in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures: post hoc analysis of the DELIVER randomized clinical trial. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16131. [PMID: 37955557 PMCID: PMC11235785 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Eptinezumab reduced monthly migraine days more than placebo in the DELIVER study, a clinical trial with patients with difficult-to-treat migraine and prior preventive treatment failures. This post hoc analysis assesses the sustained response to eptinezumab at the population and patient level and evaluates the potential for response in initial non-responders. METHODS Adults with chronic or episodic migraine and two to four prior preventive treatment failures were randomized to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg or placebo every 12 weeks. Primary outcomes in this post hoc analysis are the proportion of patients with ≥30%, ≥50% or ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days (i.e., migraine responder rates [MRRs]) during weeks 1-12 and weeks 13-24 and across 4-week intervals. Secondary outcomes are maintenance and shifts in MRRs from weeks 1-12 to weeks 13-24. RESULTS Between weeks 1-12 and 13-24, ≥30% MRRs increased from 65.9% to 70.4% (100 mg) and from 71.0% to 74.5% (300 mg), versus 36.9% to 43.1% (placebo). The ≥50% and ≥75% MRRs were sustained or increased over the 24-week period. The largest increase in ≥30% MRRs occurred after the second infusion with eptinezumab. The percentage of initial non-responders (<30% MRRs during weeks 1-12) who experienced response (≥30% MRRs during weeks 13-24) to the second dose was 34.7% (100 mg) and 30.4% (300 mg) with eptinezumab versus 21.1% with placebo. CONCLUSION Across MRR thresholds, most patients who responded to eptinezumab during weeks 1-12 maintained or improved response during weeks 13-24. More than one-third of initial non-responders became responders after their second infusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet GlostrupUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Richard B. Lipton
- Department of NeurologyAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronxNYUSA
| | - Jessica Ailani
- Department of NeurologyGeorgetown University HospitalWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of NeurologyVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel)BrusselsBelgium
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical SciencesUniversity of L'AquilaL'AquilaItaly
| | - Dimos D. Mitsikostas
- First Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical SchoolNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mangrum R, Bryant AL, Gerstein MT, McCarrier KP, Houts CR, McGinley JS, Buse DC, Lipton RB, Wirth RJ. The impacts of migraine on functioning: Results from two qualitative studies of people living with migraine. Headache 2024; 64:156-171. [PMID: 38235605 PMCID: PMC10922598 DOI: 10.1111/head.14664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the impact of migraine on functioning based on comprehensive data collection, analysis, and reporting of patients' experiences. BACKGROUND Qualitative research conducted to understand patients' perspectives on living with migraine has often focused on narrow topics or specific groups of patients or has been selectively reported. METHODS Qualitative interviews with 71 participants were conducted during two concept elicitation studies as part of the Migraine Clinical Outcome Assessment System (MiCOAS) project, an FDA grant-funded program designed to develop a core set of patient-centered outcome measures for migraine clinical trials. Participants self-reported being diagnosed with migraine by a healthcare professional and participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews about their experiences with the symptoms and impacts of migraine. Interview transcripts were coded to identify and define concepts, which were then grouped into broad domains based on conceptual similarities. RESULTS A total of 66 concepts were identified: 12 for physical functioning, 16 for cognitive functioning, 10 for social role functioning, 19 for emotional and psychological functioning, and 9 related to migraine management. Participants described a complex and varied relationship between migraine attack symptoms and impacts on functioning. Impacts from migraine were further influenced by numerous contextual factors, such as people's individual social environments and the level of day-to-day demand for functioning they face. CONCLUSION Findings showed that migraine impacted individual functioning in multiple ways and the nature of these impacts was dependent on social-contextual factors. The results are being used in the development of core measures designed to improve our understanding of the burden of migraine and the efficacy of migraine therapies. The results also offer new insights and raise new questions about migraine experience that can be used to guide future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikki Mangrum
- Vector Psychometric Group, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Maya T Gerstein
- Patient Centered Outcomes, Open Health Group, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kelly P McCarrier
- Patient Centered Outcomes, Open Health Group, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Carrie R Houts
- Vector Psychometric Group, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Dawn C Buse
- Vector Psychometric Group, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - R J Wirth
- Vector Psychometric Group, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lipton RB, Buse DC, Nahas SJ, Tietjen GE, Martin VT, Löf E, Brevig T, Cady R, Diener HC. Risk factors for migraine disease progression: a narrative review for a patient-centered approach. J Neurol 2023; 270:5692-5710. [PMID: 37615752 PMCID: PMC10632231 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11880-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In individuals with migraine, attacks may increase in frequency, severity, or both. Preventing migraine progression has emerged as a treatment goal in headache subspecialty practice, but there may be less awareness in general neurology or primary care settings where most people with migraine who seek treatment consult. Herein, we review the definition of and risk factors for migraine progression and consider strategies that could reduce its risk. METHODS A group of headache expert healthcare professionals, clinicians, and researchers reviewed published evidence documenting factors associated with increased or decreased rates of migraine progression and established expert opinions for disease management recommendations. Strength of evidence was rated as good, moderate, or based solely on expert opinion, using modified criteria for causation developed by AB Hill. RESULTS Migraine progression is commonly operationally defined as the transition from ≤ 15 to ≥ 15 monthly headache days among people with migraine; however, this does not necessarily constitute a fundamental change in migraine biology and other definitions should be considered. Established and theoretical key risk factors for migraine progression were categorized into five domains: migraine disease characteristics, treatment-related factors, comorbidities, lifestyle/exogenous factors, and demographic factors. Within these domains, good evidence supports the following risk factors: poorly optimized acute headache treatment, cutaneous allodynia, acute medication overuse, selected psychiatric symptoms, extra-cephalic chronic pain conditions, metabolism-related comorbidities, sleep disturbances, respiratory conditions, former/current high caffeine intake, physical inactivity, financial constraints, tobacco use, and personal triggers as risk factors. Protective actions that may mitigate migraine progression are sparsely investigated in published literature; our discussion of these factors is primarily based on expert opinion. CONCLUSIONS Recognizing risk factors for migraine progression will allow healthcare providers to suggest protective actions against migraine progression (Supplementary Fig. 1). Intervention studies are needed to weight the risk factors and test the clinical benefit of hypothesized mitigation strategies that emerge from epidemiological evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Vector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie J Nahas
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Headache Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gretchen E Tietjen
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Vincent T Martin
- University of Cincinnati Headache and Facial Pain Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Elin Löf
- H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Roger Cady
- Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA
- RK Consults, Ozark, MO, USA
- Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, USA
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The distinction between a pre-existing primary headache and a secondary headache at the onset of a disorder is important and has not been taken into account in the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3. This study aimed to improve the general diagnostic criteria for secondary headaches using results of our previous studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed characteristics of headaches including their changes in intensity, duration, frequency, localization and side, development of new accompanying symptoms, and therapeutic response at the onset of transient ischemic attacks (TIA) (n = 120, mean age 56.1, 55% females) and ischemic stroke (n = 550, mean age 63.1, 56% females) compared to the control group (n = 192, mean age 58.7, 64% females). RESULTS Headache of a new type occurred in 8.4% of ischemic stroke patients and 5% of TIA patients on the day of admission but did not occur at all in the control group. Pre-existing headache with a change of at least one characteristic occurred significantly more often in stroke (5.4%) and TIA (7.5%) than in the control group (1%) (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively). CONCLUSION The presence of a new type of headache and a pre-existing headache with altered characteristics in close temporal relation to a disorder indicates causality. Based on these data we propose revised general diagnostic criteria for secondary headaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena R Lebedeva
- Department of Neurology, the Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
- International Headache Centre "Europe-Asia", Yekaterinburg, Russia
| | - Jes Olesen
- Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vernieri F, Brunelli N, Guerzoni S, Iannone LF, Baraldi C, Rao R, Schiano di Cola F, Ornello R, Cevoli S, Lovati C, Albanese M, Perrotta A, Cetta I, Rossi SS, Taranta V, Filippi M, Geppetti P, Sacco S, Altamura C. Retreating migraine patients in the second year with monoclonal antibodies anti-CGRP pathway: the multicenter prospective cohort RE-DO study. J Neurol 2023; 270:5436-5448. [PMID: 37468621 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11872-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcome of migraine patients retreated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRPr) is not completely known. METHODS This multicentric prospective observational cohort study assessed monthly migraine days (MMDs), migraine acute medication intake (MAMI), and HIT-6 at baseline, after 90-112 days (Rev-1), after 84-90 days since Rev-1 (Rev-2) and 30 days after the last injection of anti-CGRP/CGRPr mAbs (Year-end), in the first and the second year after a discontinuation period. RESULTS We enrolled 226 patients (79.6% with chronic migraine; 55.3% on erenumab and 44.7% on galcanezumab or fremanezumab). MMDs, MAMI, and HIT-6-did not differ at the respective first and second-year evaluations in the entire cohort, and comparing anti-CGRP with anti-CGRPr Abs. MMDs (18.1 ± 7.8 vs. 3.4 ± 7.8), MAMI (26.7 ± 28.3 vs.17.7 ± 17.2), and HIT-6 scores (63.1 ± 5.9 vs. 67.1 ± 10.3) were lower in the second year than in the pre-treatment baseline (consistently, p < 0.0001). Second-year baseline MMDs were lower in patients on anti-CGRP mAbs (p = 0.001) and with lower pre-treatment baseline MMDs (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION Anti-CGRP/CGRPr mAbs are effective in the second as in the first year. The use of anti-CGRP or CGRPr mAbs influenced the second-year baseline MMDs, but their effectiveness did not differ during the two treatment years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Vernieri
- Unità Cefalee e Neurosonologia, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
- Neurologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Unità Cefalee e Neurosonologia, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology, Headache Center and Drug Abuse, Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Luigi Francesco Iannone
- Headache Center, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology, Headache Center and Drug Abuse, Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Renata Rao
- Headache Center, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department Continuity of Care and Fragility, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurological Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca Schiano di Cola
- Headache Center, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department Continuity of Care and Fragility, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurological Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Lovati
- Headache Center, Neurology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Albanese
- Neurology Unit, Headache Center, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Cetta
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience; Neurology Unit and Neurophysiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Soeren Rossi
- Neurologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Taranta
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience; Neurology Unit and Neurophysiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Headache Center, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Claudia Altamura
- Unità Cefalee e Neurosonologia, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Neurologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Martelletti P, Leonardi M, Ashina M, Burstein R, Cho SJ, Charway-Felli A, Dodick DW, Gil-Gouveia R, Grazzi L, Lampl C, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Minen MT, Mitsikostas DD, Olesen J, Owolabi MO, Reuter U, Ruiz de la Torre E, Sacco S, Schwedt TJ, Serafini G, Surya N, Tassorelli C, Wang SJ, Wang Y, Wijeratne T, Raggi A. Rethinking headache as a global public health case model for reaching the SDG 3 HEALTH by 2030. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:140. [PMID: 37884869 PMCID: PMC10604921 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01666-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development sets out, through 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a path for the prosperity of people and the planet. SDG 3 in particular aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages and includes several targets to enhance health. This review presents a "headache-tailored" perspective on how to achieve SDG 3 by focusing on six specific actions: targeting chronic headaches; reducing the overuse of acute pain-relieving medications; promoting the education of healthcare professionals; granting access to medication in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); implementing training and educational opportunities for healthcare professionals in low and middle income countries; building a global alliance against headache disorders. Addressing the burden of headache disorders directly impacts on populations' health, as well as on the possibility to improve the productivity of people aged below 50, women in particular. Our analysis pointed out several elements, and included: moving forward from frequency-based parameters to define headache severity; recognizing and managing comorbid diseases and risk factors; implementing a disease management multi-modal management model that incorporates pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments; early recognizing and managing the overuse of acute pain-relieving medications; promoting undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education of healthcare professionals with specific training on headache; and promoting a culture that favors the recognition of headaches as diseases with a neurobiological basis, where this is not yet recognized. Making headache care more sustainable is an achievable objective, which will require multi-stakeholder collaborations across all sectors of society, both health-related and not health-related. Robust investments will be needed; however, considering the high prevalence of headache disorders and the associated disability, these investments will surely improve multiple health outcomes and lift development and well-being globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Matilde Leonardi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, 20133, Italy
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rami Burstein
- John Hedley-Whyte Professor of Anesthesia and Neuroscience at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Soo-Jin Cho
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Military Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea
| | | | - David W Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Hospital da Luz Lisboa., Lisbon, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Neuroalgology Unit and Headache Center, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Koventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Linz, Austria
- Headache Medical Center Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mia T Minen
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, NY, New York, USA
| | - Dimos Dimitrios Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jes Olesen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mayowa Ojo Owolabi
- Faculty of Clinical Sciences; Center for Genomic and Precision Medicine, College of Medicine,, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Todd J Schwedt
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Gianluca Serafini
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, The Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yonggang Wang
- Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Tissa Wijeratne
- Department of Neurology, Sunshine Hospital, St Albans, VIC, Australia
| | - Alberto Raggi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, 20133, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kaniecki RG, Friedman DI, Asher D, Hirman J, Cady R. Improving to Four or Fewer Monthly Headache Days Per Month Provides a Clinically Meaningful Therapeutic Target for Patients with Chronic Migraine. Pain Ther 2023; 12:1179-1194. [PMID: 37378754 PMCID: PMC10444931 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00525-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment target goals for patients receiving preventive migraine treatment are complicated to assess and not achieved by most patients. A headache "number" could establish an understandable treatment target goal for patients with chronic migraine (CM). This study investigates the clinical impact of reduced headache frequency to ≤ 4 monthly headache days (MHDs) as a treatment-related migraine prevention target goal. METHODS All treatment arms were pooled for analysis from the PROMISE-2 trial evaluating eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of CM. Patients (N = 1072) received eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo. Data for the 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and acute medication use days were combined for all post-baseline assessments and analyzed by MHD frequency (≤ 4, 5-9, 10-15, > 15) in the 4 weeks preceding assessment. RESULTS Based on pooled data, the percentage of patient-months with ≤ 4 MHDs associated with "very much improved" PGIC was 40.9% (515/1258) versus 22.9% (324/1415), 10.4% (158/1517), and 3.2% (62/1936) of patient-months with 5-9, 10-15, and > 15 MHDs, respectively. Rates of patient-months with ≥ 10 days of acute medication use were 1.9% (21/1111, ≤ 4 MHDs), 4.9% (63/1267, 5-9 MHDs), 49.5% (670/1351, 10-15 MHDs), and 74.1% (1232/1662, > 15 MHDs). Of patient-months with ≤ 4 MHDs, 37.1% (308/830) were associated with "little to none" HIT-6 impairment versus 19.9% (187/940), 10.1% (101/999), and 3.7% (49/1311) of patient-months with 5-9, 10-15, and > 15 MHDs, respectively. CONCLUSION Participants improving to ≤ 4 MHDs reported less acute medication use and improved patient-reported outcomes, suggesting that 4 MHDs may be a useful patient-centric treatment target when treating CM. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02974153) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02974153 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert G Kaniecki
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Headache Center, 120 Lytton Ave, Suite 300, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Deborah I Friedman
- Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Woodinville, WA, USA
| | - Roger Cady
- Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA
- RK Consults, Ozark, MO, USA
- Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Alturaiki HM, Aldawood MA, Alghirash F, Alhajji AM, Almubarak A, Al Boesa S, Hakami F, AlMuslim N. Headache Characteristics and Risk Factors Among Healthcare Providers in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2023; 15:e45377. [PMID: 37849600 PMCID: PMC10578969 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Headache is a considerable factor in decreased productivity and work efficiency. This study aims to measure the characteristics of headaches and the risk factors among healthcare providers in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. Methods This cross-sectional study included 353 healthcare providers from Al-Alhsa, Saudi Arabia. An online questionnaire was conducted to assess the demographic and occupational characteristics, headaches, numerous factors such as smoking, caffeine intake, physical activity, and medical conditions to determine their associations with headaches, as well as the impact of headaches on productivity. Results Among participants who reported headaches, 15.6% and 4.5% had been previously diagnosed with tension headaches and migraines, respectively. The mean duration of headaches was 7.09±18.16 hours; 38.5% of headaches were throbbing in nature, while 61.5% were pressing. The headache was on one side in 51.6% and accompanied by nausea and vomiting in 41.1% and 24.1%, respectively. Moreover, 53% and 41.9% experienced worsening of headaches by exercise and light, respectively. Tension headaches occurred more in older healthcare providers (P <0.05) and those who reported working night shifts (P=0.002). Healthcare providers with tension headaches reported having an intrusive leader and violence at work (P=0.038 and P=0.013, respectively). Caffeine consumption, emotional stress, and using oral contraceptive pills (OCP) were significantly correlated with migraine (P=0.023, P=0.017, and P=0.004, respectively). The reported headache affected the productivity of 62.59% of individuals. Conclusions Headache is common among healthcare providers in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. The study indicates that tension headache is associated with aging, night shifts, having an intrusive leader, and violence at work. In contrast, migraine is correlated with caffeine consumption, emotional stress, and OCP use. The productivity of healthcare providers is affected negatively by headaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Shima Al Boesa
- College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU
| | | | - Nora AlMuslim
- College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU
- Neurology, University of Dammam, Dammam, SAU
- Neuroimaging, King's College London, London, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gazerani P. Intelligent Digital Twins for Personalized Migraine Care. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1255. [PMID: 37623505 PMCID: PMC10455577 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Intelligent digital twins closely resemble their real-life counterparts. In health and medical care, they enable the real-time monitoring of patients, whereby large amounts of data can be collected to produce actionable information. These powerful tools are constructed with the aid of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning; the Internet of Things; and cloud computing to collect a diverse range of digital data (e.g., from digital patient journals, wearable sensors, and digitized monitoring equipment or processes), which can provide information on the health conditions and therapeutic responses of their physical twins. Intelligent digital twins can enable data-driven clinical decision making and advance the realization of personalized care. Migraines are a highly prevalent and complex neurological disorder affecting people of all ages, genders, and geographical locations. It is ranked among the top disabling diseases, with substantial negative personal and societal impacts, but the current treatment strategies are suboptimal. Personalized care for migraines has been suggested to optimize their treatment. The implementation of intelligent digital twins for migraine care can theoretically be beneficial in supporting patient-centric care management. It is also expected that the implementation of intelligent digital twins will reduce costs in the long run and enhance treatment effectiveness. This study briefly reviews the concept of digital twins and the available literature on digital twins for health disorders such as neurological diseases. Based on these, the potential construction and utility of digital twins for migraines will then be presented. The potential and challenges when implementing intelligent digital twins for the future management of migraines are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parisa Gazerani
- Department of Life Sciences and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway;
- Centre for Intelligent Musculoskeletal Health (CIM), Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, 9260 Gistrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Piccininni M, Brinks R, Rohmann JL, Kurth T. Estimation of migraine prevalence considering active and inactive states across different age groups. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:83. [PMID: 37430201 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01624-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a very common headache disorder on the population level, characterized by symptomatic attacks (activity). For many people with migraine, the migraine symptoms intermittently or permanently cease during their lifetime (inactive migraine). The current diagnostic classification of migraine considers two states: active migraine (having migraine symptoms within the last year) and not having active migraine (including both individuals with inactive migraine and those who never had migraine). Defining a state of inactive migraine that has gone into remission may better capture the trajectories of migraine across the lifespan and contribute to a better understanding of its biological processes. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of never, active, and inactive migraine separately, using modern prevalence and incidence estimation methodology to better describe the complexity of migraine trajectories at the population level. METHODS Using a multistate modeling approach, data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, and results from a population-based study, we estimated the transition rates by which individuals moved between migraine disease states and estimated prevalences of never, active and inactive migraine. We used data from the GBD project and a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 people with a starting age of 30 and 30 years of follow-up, both in Germany and globally, stratified by sex. RESULTS In Germany, the estimated rate of transition from active to inactive migraine (remission rate) increased after the age of 22.5 in women and 27.5 in men. The pattern for men in Germany was similar to the one observed on the global level. The prevalence of inactive migraine among women reaches 25.7% in Germany and 16.5% globally at age 60. For men, the inactive migraine prevalence estimates at the same age were 10.4% in Germany and 7.1% globally. CONCLUSIONS Considering an inactive migraine state explicitly reflects a different epidemiological picture of migraine across the lifecourse. We have demonstrated that many women of older ages may be in an inactive migraine state. Many pressing research questions can only be answered if population-based cohort studies collect information not only on active migraine but also on inactive migraine states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Piccininni
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph Brinks
- Chair for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health/School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 45, 58455, Witten, Germany
| | - Jessica L Rohmann
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Robert-Rössle-Straße 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Kurth
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tiberio P, Viganò A, Ilieva MB, Pindilli S, Bianchi A, Zambelli A, Santoro A, De Sanctis R. The Role of Female Reproductive Hormones in the Association between Migraine and Breast Cancer: An Unanswered Question. Biomedicines 2023; 11:1613. [PMID: 37371707 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11061613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Accumulating epidemiological studies have investigated a possible interconnection between migraine (Mi) and breast cancer (BC) because of the strong link between these diseases and female reproductive hormones. This review aims to consolidate findings from epidemiological studies and explore biologically plausible hypothetical mechanisms related to hormonal pathways. Current evidence suggests a protective role of Mi in BC development, particularly in case-control studies but not in cohort ones. The inconsistency among studies may be due to several reasons, including diagnostic criteria for Mi and the age gap between the development of these two diseases. Furthermore, recent research has challenged the concept of a net beneficial effect of Mi on BC, suggesting a more complex relationship between the two conditions. Many polymorphisms/mutations in hormone-related pathways are involved in at least one of the two conditions. The most promising evidence has emerged for a specific alteration in the estrogen receptor 1 gene (rs2228480). However, the possible specific mutation or polymorphism involved in this association has not yet been identified. Further studies with robust methodologies are needed to validate the protective role of Mi in BC and fully elucidate the precise nature of this causal relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Tiberio
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Viganò
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 20148 Milan, Italy
| | - Mariya Boyanova Ilieva
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Anna Bianchi
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 20148 Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Zambelli
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Rita De Sanctis
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Martinelli D, Pocora MM, De Icco R, Allena M, Vaghi G, Sances G, Castellazzi G, Tassorelli C. Searching for the Predictors of Response to BoNT-A in Migraine Using Machine Learning Approaches. Toxins (Basel) 2023; 15:364. [PMID: 37368665 DOI: 10.3390/toxins15060364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OnabotulinumtoxinA (BonT-A) reduces migraine frequency in a considerable portion of patients with migraine. So far, predictive characteristics of response are lacking. Here, we applied machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify clinical characteristics able to predict treatment response. We collected demographic and clinical data of patients with chronic migraine (CM) or high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) treated with BoNT-A at our clinic in the last 5 years. Patients received BoNT-A according to the PREEMPT (Phase III Research Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy) paradigm and were classified according to the monthly migraine days reduction in the 12 weeks after the fourth BoNT-A cycle, as compared to baseline. Data were used as input features to run ML algorithms. Of the 212 patients enrolled, 35 qualified as excellent responders to BoNT-A administration and 38 as nonresponders. None of the anamnestic characteristics were able to discriminate responders from nonresponders in the CM group. Nevertheless, a pattern of four features (age at onset of migraine, opioid use, anxiety subscore at the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS-a) and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score correctly predicted response in HFEM. Our findings suggest that routine anamnestic features acquired in real-life settings cannot accurately predict BoNT-A response in migraine and call for a more complex modality of patient profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Martinelli
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Magdalena Pocora
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto De Icco
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Marta Allena
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Gloria Vaghi
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Grazia Sances
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Gloria Castellazzi
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Altamura C, Brunelli N, Viticchi G, Salvemini S, Cecchi G, Marcosano M, Fofi L, Silvestrini M, Vernieri F. Quantitative and Qualitative Pain Evaluation in Response to OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine: An Observational Real-Life Study. Toxins (Basel) 2023; 15:toxins15040284. [PMID: 37104222 PMCID: PMC10145239 DOI: 10.3390/toxins15040284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Randomized controlled trials and real-life studies demonstrated the efficacy of OnabotulinumtoxinA (OBT-A) for CM prevention. However, no studies specifically addressed its effect on pain's quantitative intensity and qualitative characteristics. (2) Methods: This is an ambispective study: a post-hoc retrospective analysis of real-life prospectively collected data from two Italian headache centers on CM patients treated with OBT-A over one year (i.e., Cy1-4). The primary endpoint was the changes in pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS; the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) scale, the 6-point Behavioral Rating Scale (BRS-6)) and quality scale (the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)) scores. We also assessed the relationship between changes in intensity and quality of pain and disability scale (MIDAS; HIT-6) scores, monthly headache days (MHDs), and monthly acute medication intake (MAMI) (3) Results: We retrieved 152 cases (51.5 years SD 11.3, 80.3% females). From baseline to Cy-4, MHDs, MAMI, NRS, PPI, and BRS-6 scores decreased (consistently p < 0.001). Only the throbbing (p = 0.004), splitting (p = 0.018), and sickening (p = 0.017) qualities of pain collected in the SF-MPQ were reduced. Score variations in MIDAS related to those in PPI scales (p = 0.035), in the BRS-6 (p = 0.001), and in the NRS (p = 0.003). Similarly, HIT-6 score changes related to PPI score modifications (p = 0.027), in BRS-6 (p = 0.001) and NRS (p = 0.006). Conversely, MAMI variation was not associated with qualitative or quantitative pain score modifications except BRS-6 (p = 0.018). (4) Conclusions: Our study shows that OBT-A alleviates migraine by reducing its impact on multiple aspects, such as frequency, disability, and pain intensity. The beneficial effect on pain intensity seems specific to pain characteristics related to C-fiber transmission and is associated with a reduction in migraine-related disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Altamura
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanna Viticchi
- Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca 1, 60020 Ancona, Italy
| | - Sergio Salvemini
- Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca 1, 60020 Ancona, Italy
| | - Gianluca Cecchi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Marilena Marcosano
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Luisa Fofi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Mauro Silvestrini
- Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca 1, 60020 Ancona, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Al-Hassany L, Lyons HS, Boucherie DM, Farham F, Lange KS, Marschollek K, Onan D, Pensato U, Storch E, Torrente A, Waliszewska-Prosół M, Reuter U. The sense of stopping migraine prophylaxis. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:9. [PMID: 36792981 PMCID: PMC9933401 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01539-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine prophylactic therapy has changed over recent years with the development and approval of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway. As new therapies emerged, leading headache societies have been providing guidelines on the initiation and escalation of such therapies. However, there is a lack of robust evidence looking at the duration of successful prophylaxis and the effects of therapy discontinuation. In this narrative review we explore both the biological and clinical rationale for prophylactic therapy discontinuation to provide a basis for clinical decision-making. METHODS Three different literature search strategies were conducted for this narrative review. These include i) stopping rules in comorbidities of migraine in which overlapping preventives are prescribed, notably depression and epilepsy; ii) stopping rules of oral treatment and botox; iii) stopping rules of antibodies targeting the CGRP (receptor). Keywords were utilized in the following databases: Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core collection, Cochran Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. DISCUSSION Reasons to guide decision-making in stopping prophylactic migraine therapies include adverse events, efficacy failure, drug holiday following long-term administration, and patient-specific reasons. Certain guidelines contain both positive and negative stopping rules. Following withdrawal of migraine prophylaxis, migraine burden may return to pre-treatment level, remain unchanged, or lie somewhere in-between. The current suggestion to discontinue CGRP(-receptor) targeted mAbs after 6 to 12 months is based on expert opinion, as opposed to robust scientific evidence. Current guidelines advise the clinician to assess the success of CGRP(-receptor) targeted mAbs after three months. Based on excellent tolerability data and the absence of scientific data, we propose if no other reasons apply, to stop the use of mAbs when the number of migraine days decreases to four or fewer migraine days per month. There is a higher likelihood of developing side effects with oral migraine preventatives, and so we suggest stopping these drugs according to the national guidelines if they are well tolerated. CONCLUSION Translational and basic studies are warranted to investigate the long-term effects of a preventive drug after its discontinuation, starting from what is known about the biology of migraine. In addition, observational studies and, eventually, clinical trials focusing on the effect of discontinuation of migraine prophylactic therapies, are essential to substantiate evidence-based recommendations on stopping rules for both oral preventives and CGRP(-receptor) targeted therapies in migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Al-Hassany
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hannah S. Lyons
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Deirdre M. Boucherie
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fatemeh Farham
- grid.411705.60000 0001 0166 0922Department of Headache, Iranian Centre of Neurological Researchers, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kristin S. Lange
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Karol Marschollek
- grid.4495.c0000 0001 1090 049XDepartment of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Dilara Onan
- grid.14442.370000 0001 2342 7339Spine Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey ,grid.7841.aDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Pensato
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Neurology and Stroke Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy ,grid.452490.eHumanitas University, Pieve Emanuale, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabeth Storch
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Angelo Torrente
- grid.10776.370000 0004 1762 5517Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marta Waliszewska-Prosół
- grid.4495.c0000 0001 1090 049XDepartment of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Khazraee H, Bakhtiari M, Kianimoghadam AS, Hajmanouchehri R. The Effectiveness of Mindful Hypnotherapy on Psychological Inflexibility, Pain Acceptance, Headache Disability and Intensity in Females with Chronic Migraine Headache: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13010131. [PMID: 36676080 PMCID: PMC9865410 DOI: 10.3390/life13010131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This study was a randomized controlled design and examined the feasibility and effectiveness of mindful hypnotherapy on psychological inflexibility, pain acceptance, headache disability, and headache intensity in patients with chronic migraine headaches. The sample consisted of 38 females with chronic migraine who were randomly assigned to mindful hypnotherapy and medical treatment as usual groups. Psychological inflexibility pain scale (PIPS), chronic pain acceptance questionnaire-revised (CPAQ-R), headache disability inventory (HDI), diary scale for headache, and short-form McGill pain questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ-2) were administered at baseline and post-treatment in both groups. The psychological inflexibility mean (SD) score was 81.00 (12.15) at baseline, which significantly decreased to 53.28 (17.06) after the intervention (p < 0.001). Additionally, the mean (SD) score of the pain acceptance was 46.44 (11.16), which significantly increased to 73.61 (15.65) in post-intervention (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean (SD) score of headache disability was 73.55 (19.48), which significantly decreased to 23.33 (19.88) in post-intervention (p < 0.001). Finally, headache intensity was 7.33 (0.98) and 5.78 (1.83), which significantly decreased to 2.77 (2.04), and 1.38 (1.48) after the intervention based on the Diary Scale for Headache and McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2), respectively (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the results show that mindful hypnotherapy is a feasible and effective treatment for chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Khazraee
- Clinical Psychologist, Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Bakhtiari
- Clinical Psychologist, Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Correspondence:
| | - Amir Sam Kianimoghadam
- Clinical Psychologist, Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Hajmanouchehri
- Neurologist, Legal Medicine Research Center, Legal Medicine Organization, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Paemeleire K, Vandenbussche N, Stark R. Migraine without aura. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2023; 198:151-167. [PMID: 38043959 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823356-6.00007-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Migraine without aura is the commonest form of migraine in both children and adults. The diagnosis is made by applying the International Classification of Headache Disorders Third Edition subsection for migraine without aura (ICHD-3 subsection 1.1). Attacks in patients with migraine without aura are characterized by their polyphasic presentation (prodrome, headache phase, postdromal phase). The symptomatology of attacks is diverse and heterogeneous, with most common symptoms being photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, vomiting, and aggravation of pain by movement. The clinician and researcher who wants to learn about migraine without aura needs to be able to apply the ICHD-3 criteria with its specific symptomatology to make a correct diagnosis, but also needs to be aware about the plethora of symptoms patients may experience. In this chapter, the reader will explore the clinical phenotypical features of migraine without aura.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | - Richard Stark
- Department of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ali MD, Gayasuddin Qur F, Alam MS, M Alotaibi N, Mujtaba MA. Global Epidemiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Current Therapeutic Novelties in Migraine Therapy and their Prevention: A Narrative Review. Curr Pharm Des 2023; 29:3295-3311. [PMID: 38270151 DOI: 10.2174/0113816128266227231205114320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The current article reviews the latest information on epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, recent advancements in clinical management, current therapeutic novelties, and the prevention of migraines. In a narrative review, all studies as per developed MeSH terms published until February 2023, excluding those irrelevant, were identified through a PubMed literature search. METHODS Overall, migraine affects more than a billion people annually and is one of the most common neurological illnesses. A wide range of comorbidities is associated with migraines, including stress and sleep disturbances. To lower the worldwide burden of migraine, comprehensive efforts are required to develop and enhance migraine treatment, which is supported by informed healthcare policy. Numerous migraine therapies have been successful, but not all patients benefit from them. RESULTS CGRP pathway-targeted therapy demonstrates the importance of translating mechanistic understanding into effective treatment. In this review, we discuss clinical features, diagnosis, and recently approved drugs, as well as a number of potential therapeutic targets, including pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), adenosine, opioid receptors, potassium channels, transient receptor potential ion channels (TRP), and acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC). CONCLUSION In addition to providing more treatment options for improved clinical care, a better understanding of these mechanisms facilitates the discovery of novel therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Daud Ali
- Department of Pharmacy, Mohammed Al-Mana College for Medical Sciences, Abdulrazaq Bin Hammam Street, Al Safa, Dammam 34222, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fehmida Gayasuddin Qur
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Princess Royal Maternity Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Md Sarfaraz Alam
- Department of Pharmaceutics, HIMT College of Pharmacy, Rajpura 8, Institutional Area, Knowledge Park I, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India
| | - Nawaf M Alotaibi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Rafha Campus, Arar, Saudi Arabia
| | - Md Ali Mujtaba
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Rafha Campus, Arar, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ashina M, Tepper SJ, Reuter U, Blumenfeld AM, Hutchinson S, Xia J, Miceli R, Severt L, Finnegan M, Trugman JM. Once-daily oral atogepant for the long-term preventive treatment of migraine: Findings from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial. Headache 2023; 63:79-88. [PMID: 36651532 PMCID: PMC10107835 DOI: 10.1111/head.14439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of once-daily oral atogepant 60 mg in adults with migraine. BACKGROUND Atogepant is an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. METHODS A 52-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of adults (18-80 years) with migraine. Lead-in trial completers or newly enrolled participants with 4-14 migraine days/month were enrolled and randomized (5:2) to atogepant 60 mg once daily or oral standard care (SC) migraine preventive medication. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of atogepant; safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), clinical laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale scores. Efficacy assessments (atogepant only) included change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) and the proportion of participants with reductions from baseline of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% in MMDs. RESULTS The trial included 744 participants randomized to atogepant 60 mg (n = 546) or SC (n = 198). The atogepant safety population was 88.2% female (n = 479/543) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 42.5 (12.0) years. TEAEs occurred in 67.0% (n = 364/543) of participants treated with atogepant 60 mg. The most commonly reported TEAEs (≥5%) were upper respiratory tract infection (10.3%; 56/543), constipation (7.2%; 39/543), nausea (6.3%; 34/543), and urinary tract infection (5.2%; 28/543). Serious TEAEs were reported in 4.4% (24/543) for atogepant. Mean (standard error) change in MMDs for atogepant was -3.8 (0.1) for weeks 1-4 and -5.2 (0.2) at weeks 49-52. Similarly, the proportion of participants with ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reductions in MMDs increased from 60.4% (310/513), 37.2% (191/513), and 20.7% (106/513) at weeks 1-4 to 84.2% (282/335), 69.9% (234/335), and 48.4% (162/335), at weeks 49-52. CONCLUSION Daily use of oral atogepant 60 mg for preventive treatment of migraine during this 1-year, open-label trial was safe, well tolerated, and efficacious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of NeurologyRigshospitalet Glostrup Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Stewart J. Tepper
- Department of NeurologyGeisel School of Medicine at DartmouthHanoverNew HampshireUSA
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of NeurologyCharité Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
[Consensus statement of the migraine and headache societies (DMKG, ÖKSG, and SKG) on the duration of pharmacological migraine prophylaxis]. Schmerz 2023; 37:5-16. [PMID: 36287263 PMCID: PMC9607711 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-022-00671-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is the most common neurological disorder and can be associated with a high degree of disability. In addition to non-pharmacological approaches to reduce migraine frequency, pharmacological migraine preventatives are available. Evidence-based guidelines from the German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG), and German Society for Neurology (DGN), Austrian Headache Society (ÖKSG), and Swiss Headache Society (SKG) are available for indication and application. For therapy-relevant questions such as the duration of a pharmacological migraine prevention, no conclusions can be drawn from currently available study data. The aim of this review is to present a therapy consensus statement that integrates the current data situation and, where data are lacking, expert opinions. The resulting current recommendations on the duration of therapy for pharmacological migraine prophylaxis are shown here.
Collapse
|
32
|
Gantenbein AR, Agosti R, Kamm CP, Landmann G, Meier N, Merki-Feld GS, Petersen JA, Pohl H, Ryvlin P, Schankin CJ, Viceic D, Zecca C, Schäfer E, Meyer I, Arzt ME. Swiss QUality of life and healthcare impact Assessment in a Real-world Erenumab treated migraine population (SQUARE study): interim results. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:142. [PMID: 36401172 PMCID: PMC9673191 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01515-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The fully human monoclonal antibody erenumab, which targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor, was licensed in Switzerland in July 2018 for the prophylactic treatment of migraine. To complement findings from the pivotal program, this observational study was designed to collect and evaluate clinical data on the impact of erenumab on several endpoints, such as quality of life, migraine-related impairment and treatment satisfaction in a real-world setting. Methods An interim analysis was conducted after all patients completed 6 months of erenumab treatment. Patients kept a headache diary and completed questionnaires at follow up visits. The overall study duration comprises 24 months. Results In total, 172 adults with chronic or episodic migraine from 19 different sites across Switzerland were enrolled to receive erenumab every 4 weeks. At baseline, patients had 16.6 ± 7.2 monthly migraine days (MMD) and 11.6 ± 7.0 acute migraine-specific medication days per month. After 6 months, erenumab treatment reduced Headache Impact Test (HIT-6™) scores by 7.7 ± 8.4 (p < 0.001), the modified Migraine Disability Assessment (mMIDAS) by 14.1 ± 17.8 (p < 0.001), MMD by 7.6 ± 7.0 (p < 0.001) and acute migraine-specific medication days per month by 6.6 ± 5.4 (p < 0.001). Erenumab also reduced the impact of migraine on social and family life, as evidenced by a reduction of Impact of Migraine on Partners and Adolescent Children (IMPAC) scores by 6.1 ± 6.7 (p < 0.001). Patients reported a mean effectiveness of 67.1, convenience of 82.4 and global satisfaction of 72.4 in the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9). In total, 99 adverse events (AE) and 12 serious adverse events (SAE) were observed in 62 and 11 patients, respectively. All SAE were regarded as not related to the study medication. Conclusions Overall quality of life improved and treatment satisfaction was rated high with erenumab treatment in real-world clinical practice. In addition, the reported impact of migraine on spouses and children of patients was reduced. Trial registration BASEC ID 2018–02,375 in the Register of All Projects in Switzerland (RAPS). Graphical Abstract ![]()
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01515-8.
Collapse
|
33
|
Johnston KM, Powell L, Popoff E, Harris L, Croop R, Coric V, L’Italien G. Rimegepant, Ubrogepant, and Lasmiditan in the Acute Treatment of Migraine Examining the Benefit-Risk Profile Using Number Needed to Treat/Harm. Clin J Pain 2022; 38:680-685. [PMID: 36125279 PMCID: PMC9555761 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and compare benefit-risk profiles for rimegepant, ubrogepant, and lasmiditan based on a network meta-analysis (NMA) of published clinical trials. METHODS A fixed-effects Bayesian NMA of randomized controlled trials of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of adults with migraine were used to determine risk differences for efficacy and safety outcomes of the 3 treatments compared with pooled placebo. Risk differences were used to calculate number needed to treat (NNT) for pain relief and pain freedom at 2 and 2 to 24 hours and freedom from most bothersome symptoms at 2 hours; and number needed to harm (NNH) for dizziness and nausea, relative to placebo. RESULTS Results were based on 5 randomized controlled trials (NCT03461757, NCT02828020, NCT02867709, NCT02439320, and NCT02605174). NNT to achieve sustained pain relief at 2 to 24 hours was lowest for rimegepant 75 mg (5; 95% credible interval [Crl]: 4, 7) and ubrogepant 100 mg (5; 95% Crl: 4, 8) and highest for ubrogepant 25 mg (8; 95% Crl: 5, 16). Rimegepant had the lowest NNT to achieve sustained pain freedom at 2 to 24 hours and lasmiditan 50 mg had the highest (7; 95% Crl: 5, 12 vs. 26; 95% Crl: 13, 95). NNH for dizziness and nausea was highest for ubrogepant 25 mg (28; 95% Crl: 15, 62 and 99; 95% Crl: -2580, 2378, respectively). Lasmiditan 200 mg had the lowest NNH for dizziness and rimegepant 75 mg had the lowest NNH for nausea. CONCLUSIONS The benefit-risk profiles of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant may improve clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lauren Powell
- Broadstreet Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Evan Popoff
- Broadstreet Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Goßrau G, Förderreuther S, Ruscheweyh R, Ruschil V, Sprenger T, Lewis D, Kamm K, Freilinger T, Neeb L, Malzacher V, Meier U, Gehring K, Kraya T, Dresler T, Schankin CJ, Gantenbein AR, Brössner G, Zebenholzer K, Diener HC, Gaul C, Jürgens TP. [Consensus statement of the migraine and headache societies (DMKG, ÖKSG, and SKG) on the duration of pharmacological migraine prophylaxis]. DER NERVENARZT 2022; 94:306-317. [PMID: 36287216 PMCID: PMC9607745 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01403-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is the most common neurological disorder and can be associated with a high degree of disability. In addition to non-pharmacological approaches to reduce migraine frequency, pharmacological migraine preventatives are available. Evidence-based guidelines from the German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG), and German Society for Neurology (DGN), Austrian Headache Society (ÖKSG), and Swiss Headache Society (SKG) are available for indication and application. For therapy-relevant questions such as the duration of a pharmacological migraine prevention, no conclusions can be drawn from currently available study data. The aim of this review is to present a therapy consensus statement that integrates the current data situation and, where data are lacking, expert opinions. The resulting current recommendations on the duration of therapy for pharmacological migraine prophylaxis are shown here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gudrun Goßrau
- Kopfschmerzambulanz, Universitätsschmerzcentrum, Medizinische Fakultät der TU Dresden, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Stefanie Förderreuther
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland ,Deutsche Migräne- und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft, Frankfurt, Deutschland ,Klinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Victoria Ruschil
- Abteilung Neurologie mit Schwerpunkt Epileptologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Till Sprenger
- Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, DKD Helios Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Deutschland
| | | | - Katharina Kamm
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | | | - Lars Neeb
- Helios Global Health, Berlin, Deutschland ,Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Institut für Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin und Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - Uwe Meier
- Berufsverband Deutscher Neurologen, Wulffstr. 8, 12165 Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Klaus Gehring
- Berufsverband Deutscher Nervenärzte, Wulffstr. 8, 12165 Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Torsten Kraya
- Neurologische Klinik, Krankenhaus Sankt Georg Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland ,Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Halle-Saale, Halle-Saale, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Dresler
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Tübingen Zentrum für seelische Gesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland ,LEAD Graduiertenschule & Forschungsnetzwerk, Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Christoph J. Schankin
- Neurologische Klinik, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz ,Universitätsspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz
| | - Andreas R. Gantenbein
- Neurologie & Schmerz, ZURZACH Care, Bad Zurzach, Schweiz ,Praxis Neurologie am Untertor, Bülach, Schweiz
| | - Gregor Brössner
- Universitätsklinik für Neurologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich
| | - Karin Zebenholzer
- Universitätsklinik für Neurologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IMIBE), Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Charly Gaul
- Kopfschmerzzentrum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - Tim P. Jürgens
- Kopfschmerzzentrum Nordost, Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinik Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland ,Neurologische Klinik, KMG Krankenhaus Güstrow, Güstrow, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Dodick DW, Ettrup A, Hirman J, Cady R. Shift in diagnostic classification of migraine after initiation of preventive treatment with eptinezumab: post hoc analysis of the PROMISE studies. BMC Neurol 2022; 22:394. [PMID: 36284281 PMCID: PMC9594902 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02914-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monthly headache frequency directly correlates with personal/societal burden and impacts severity and preventive treatment decisions. This post hoc analysis identified shifts from higher to lower frequency headache categories over 6 months in patients with migraine participating in the PROMISE clinical trials receiving two eptinezumab doses. METHODS Headache frequency at baseline and over study months 1-6 was categorized into 4 groups: chronic migraine (CM; ≥ 15 monthly headache days [MHDs]), high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM; 10-14 MHDs), low-frequency episodic migraine (LFEM; 4-9 MHDs), and ≤ 3 MHDs. Outcomes included the percentage of patients within each MHD category, the percentage of patients improving by ≥ 1 MHD category, and the number of months with reduction of ≥ 1 MHD category. Data from patients who received approved eptinezumab doses (100 mg or 300 mg) or placebo were included. RESULTS Mean headache frequency at baseline in PROMISE-1 was 10 MHDs; most patients were classified as having HFEM (48.6%) or LFEM (43.9%). At Month 1, 62/221 (28.1%), 75/222 (33.8%), and 45/222 (20.3%) patients who received eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo had ≤ 3 MHDs, with 97/221 (43.9%), 108/222 (48.6%), and 84/222 (37.8%), respectively, falling below the diagnostic EM threshold at Month 6. More than one-third (79/221 [35.7%], 83/222 [37.4%], and 68/222 [30.6%] of patients in the eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively), had 6 months of reduction of ≥ 1 frequency category. At baseline in PROMISE-2, mean headache frequency was 20.5 MHDs. All patients (100%) in the eptinezumab 100 mg and placebo groups had CM, as did 99.4% of patients receiving eptinezumab 300 mg. At Month 1, 209/356 (58.7%), 216/350 (61.7%), and 167/366 (45.6%) patients treated with eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo had ≤ 14 MHDs, with 240/356 (67.4%), 249/350 (71.1%), and 221/366 (60.4%), respectively, falling below CM threshold at Month 6. Additionally, 153/356 (43.0%), 169/350 (48.3%), and 116/366 (31.7%) patients in the eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, had 6 months of reduction of ≥ 1 frequency category. CONCLUSION In the PROMISE studies, episodic and chronic migraine patients treated with eptinezumab were more likely to reduce their headache frequency versus placebo, which directly and in a sustained way improved their diagnostic category classification. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02559895, NCT02974153.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Vall d’Hebron, University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department de Medicina, Vall d’Hebron, University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David W. Dodick
- grid.417468.80000 0000 8875 6339Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ USA ,Atria Institute, New York, NY USA
| | - Anders Ettrup
- grid.424580.f0000 0004 0476 7612H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc., Woodinville, WA USA
| | - Roger Cady
- grid.419796.4Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL USA ,RK Consults, Ozark, MO USA ,grid.260126.10000 0001 0745 8995Missouri State University, Springfield, MO USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Davis L, Torphy B. Managing migraine on the frontline: Identifying disease, understanding burden, and incorporating CGRP pathway-targeting therapies in primary care. Br J Pain 2022; 16:560-573. [PMID: 36389011 PMCID: PMC9644104 DOI: 10.1177/20494637221104292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a common neurologic disorder with clinical phenotypes encompassing a variety of symptoms which all contribute to the burden felt by patients. In addition to negative impacts on a patient's quality of life, migraine has both direct medical costs and indirect costs related to missed work and decreased productivity that affect individuals as well as society at large. Unfortunately, migraine diagnoses are often missed, and many patients do not receive appropriate treatment. Primary care providers are in a key position to provide timely diagnosis and effectively manage migraine for many patients. This review aims to be a guide for improving migraine management in the primary care setting by providing strategies to overcome common challenges in migraine diagnosis; summarizing current knowledge on the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway-targeting therapies; and reviewing approaches to incorporate traditional and emerging treatment options into a patient-centric migraine management strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Davis
- Kolvita Family Medical
Group, Mission Viejo, CA, USA
| | - Brad Torphy
- Chicago Headache Center and Research
Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rosignoli C, Ornello R, Onofri A, Caponnetto V, Grazzi L, Raggi A, Leonardi M, Sacco S. Applying a biopsychosocial model to migraine: rationale and clinical implications. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:100. [PMID: 35953769 PMCID: PMC9367111 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01471-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a complex condition in which genetic predisposition interacts with other biological and environmental factors determining its course. A hyperresponsive brain cortex, peripheral and central alterations in pain processing, and comorbidities play a role from an individual biological standpoint. Besides, dysfunctional psychological mechanisms, social and lifestyle factors may intervene and impact on the clinical phenotype of the disease, promote its transformation from episodic into chronic migraine and may increase migraine-related disability.Thus, given the multifactorial origin of the condition, the application of a biopsychosocial approach in the management of migraine could favor therapeutic success. While in chronic pain conditions the biopsychosocial approach is already a mainstay of treatment, in migraine the biomedical approach is still dominant. It is instead advisable to carefully consider the individual with migraine as a whole, in order to plan a tailored treatment. In this review, we first reported an analytical and critical discussion of the biological, psychological, and social factors involved in migraine. Then, we addressed the management implications of the application of a biopsychosocial model discussing how the integration between non-pharmacological management and conventional biomedical treatment may provide advantages to migraine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Rosignoli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Agnese Onofri
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Valeria Caponnetto
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Neuroalgology Unit and Headache Centre, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Raggi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Matilde Leonardi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gallardo VJ, Alpuente A, Pozo-Rosich P. Association of a Cyclical Migraine Phenotype With Disease Progression: A One-Year Time Series Analysis. Neurology 2022; 99:e1326-e1334. [PMID: 35953289 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Longitudinal studies assessing cyclic fluctuations of migraine attacks using time-series analysis are scarce. Here we analyze headache frequency fluctuations over a year in a cohort of migraine patients and we then evaluate how this behaviour has an impact on clinical evolution. METHODS Monthly headache frequency was prospectively collected using an eDiary. Prognosis after one year was calculated as the headache frequency change rate after 12 months (HCR-M12) as a dependent variable. Monthly headache time series was decomposed into all the possible sum of sinusoids through a Fast Fourier Transform algorithm (FFT) and the frequencies with the highest power were used to define the patient's cyclic phenotype during one year (patient's number of cycles per year, c/y). Patients with a cyclic phenotype were those with >2 cycles/year. Finally, we studied how this cyclic phenotype was associated to HCR-M12 using Generalized Linear Models (GLM). RESULTS 142 patients were included (85.2% female; mean age 48.0±9.7 years), 50.0% fulfilled IHCD-3 criteria for chronic migraine (CM). After one year, a 50.7% (72/142) of patients changed their initial diagnosis and progression (frequency worsening) was observed in 14.1% (10/71) of episodic migraine (EM) patients. After applying a FFT, 45.1% (64/142) of patients fitted into a cyclic phenotype. In GLM, statistically significant main effects associated to HCR-M12 were the use of preventive therapy (Beta [SE]: 74.1 [34.6]; p=0.034) and cyclic phenotype (Beta [SE]: 158.33 [55.1]; p=0.005). A post-hoc analysis found that EM patients with cyclic phenotype without adequate preventive therapy were statistically significantly associated to progression. CONCLUSIONS Monthly headache frequency data can be fitted by sinusoidal models. Having a cyclic phenotype has an impact on clinical evolution and has been statistically significantly associated to migraine progression after one year. Particularly, EM patients with cyclic phenotype tend to increase their headache frequency over time. Preventive treatment seems to play a fundamental role in modulating this cyclic behaviour, especially in low-frequency EM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor J Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; .,Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bandara S, Bicket MC, McGinty EE. Trends in opioid and non-opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain and cancer pain among privately insured adults in the United States, 2012–2019. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272142. [PMID: 35947577 PMCID: PMC9365134 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent clinical guidelines have emphasized non-opioid treatments in lieu of prescription opioids for chronic non-cancer pain, exempting cancer patients from these recommendations. In this study, we determine trends in opioid and non-opioid treatment among privately insured adults with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) or cancer. Using administrative claims data from IBM MarketScan Research Databases, we identified privately-insured adults who were continuously enrolled in insurance for at least one calendar year from 2012 to 2019. We identified individuals with CNCP diagnosis, defined as a diagnosis of arthritis, headache, low back pain, and/or neuropathic pain, and a individuals with cancer diagnosis in a calendar year. Outcomes included receipt of any opioid, non-opioid medication, or non-pharmacologic CNCP therapy and opioid prescribing volume, MME-per-day, and days’ supply. Estimates were regression-adjusted for age, sex, and region. Between 2012 and 2019, the proportion of patients who received any opioid decreased across both groups (CNCP: 49.7 to 30.5%, p<0.01; cancer: 86.0 to 78.7%, p<0.01). Non-opioid pain medication receipt remained steady for individuals with CNCP (66.7 to 66.4%, p<0.01) and increased for individuals with cancer (74.4 to 78.8%, p<0.01), while non-pharmacologic therapy use rose among individuals with CNCP (62.4 to 66.1%, p<0.01). Among those prescribed opioids, there was a decrease in the receipt of at least one prescription with >90 MME/day (CNCP: 13.9% in 2012 to 4.9% in 2019, p<0.01; Cancer: 26.2% to 7.6%, p<0.01); >7 days of supply (CNCP: 56.3% to 30.7%, p <0.01; Cancer: 47.5% to 22.7%, p<0.01), the mean number of opioid prescriptions (CNCP: 5.2 to 3.9, p<0.01; Cancer: 4.0 to 2.7, p<0.01) and mean MME/day (CNCP: 49.9 to 38.0, p<0.01; Cancer: 62.4 to 44.7, p<0.01). Overall, from 2012–2019, opioid prescribing declined for CNCP and cancer, with larger reductions for patients with CNCP. For both groups, reductions in prescribed opioids outpaced increases in non-opioid alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachini Bandara
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Center for Mental Health and Addiction Policy Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Mark C. Bicket
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Emma E. McGinty
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Center for Mental Health and Addiction Policy Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rattanawong W, Rapoport A, Srikiatkhachorn A. Neurobiology of migraine progression. NEUROBIOLOGY OF PAIN (CAMBRIDGE, MASS.) 2022; 12:100094. [PMID: 35720639 PMCID: PMC9204797 DOI: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2022.100094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Chronic migraine is one of the most devastating headache disorders. The estimated prevalence is 1.4-2.2% in the population. The factors which may predispose to the process of migraine progression include high frequency of migraine attacks, medication overuse, comorbid pain syndromes, and obesity. Several studies showed that chronic migraine results in the substantial anatomical and physiological changes in the brain. Despite no clear explanation regarding the pathophysiologic process leading to the progression, certain features such as increased sensory sensitivity, cutaneous allodynia, impaired habituation, identify the neuronal hyperexcitability as the plausible mechanism. In this review, we describe two main mechanisms which can lead to this hyperexcitability. The first is persistent sensitization caused by repetitive and prolonged trigeminal nociceptive activation. This process results in changes in several brain networks related to both pain and non-pain behaviours. The second mechanism is the decrease in endogenous brainstem inhibitory control, hence increasing the excitability of neurons in the trigeminal noceptive system and cerebral cortex. The combination of increased pain matrix connectivity, including hypothalamic hyperactivity and a weak serotonergic system, may contribute to migraine chronification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanakorn Rattanawong
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 10520, Thailand
| | - Alan Rapoport
- Department of Neurology, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Anan Srikiatkhachorn
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 10520, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cowan RP, Rapoport AM, Blythe J, Rothrock J, Knievel K, Peretz AM, Ekpo E, Sanjanwala BM, Woldeamanuel YW. Diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence online engine in migraine: A multi‐center study. Headache 2022; 62:870-882. [PMID: 35657603 PMCID: PMC9378575 DOI: 10.1111/head.14324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study assesses the concordance in migraine diagnosis between an online, self‐administered, Computer‐based, Diagnostic Engine (CDE) and semi‐structured interview (SSI) by a headache specialist, both using International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD‐3) criteria. Background Delay in accurate diagnosis is a major barrier to headache care. Accurate computer‐based algorithms may help reduce the need for SSI‐based encounters to arrive at correct ICHD‐3 diagnosis. Methods Between March 2018 and August 2019, adult participants were recruited from three academic headache centers and the community via advertising to our cross‐sectional study. Participants completed two evaluations: phone interview conducted by headache specialists using the SSI and a web‐based expert questionnaire and analytics, CDE. Participants were randomly assigned to either the SSI followed by the web‐based questionnaire or the web‐based questionnaire followed by the SSI. Participants completed protocols a few minutes apart. The concordance in migraine/probable migraine (M/PM) diagnosis between SSI and CDE was measured using Cohen’s kappa statistics. The diagnostic accuracy of CDE was assessed using the SSI as reference standard. Results Of the 276 participants consented, 212 completed both SSI and CDE (study completion rate = 77%; median age = 32 years [interquartile range: 28–40], female:male ratio = 3:1). Concordance in M/PM diagnosis between SSI and CDE was: κ = 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75–0.91). CDE diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity = 90.1% (118/131), 95% CI: 83.6%–94.6%; specificity = 95.8% (68/71), 95% CI: 88.1%–99.1%. Positive and negative predictive values = 97.0% (95% CI: 91.3%–99.0%) and 86.6% (95% CI: 79.3%–91.5%), respectively, using identified migraine prevalence of 60%. Assuming a general migraine population prevalence of 10%, positive and negative predictive values were 70.3% (95% CI: 43.9%–87.8%) and 98.9% (95% CI: 98.1%–99.3%), respectively. Conclusion The SSI and CDE have excellent concordance in diagnosing M/PM. Positive CDE helps rule in M/PM, through high specificity and positive likelihood ratio. A negative CDE helps rule out M/PM through high sensitivity and low negative likelihood ratio. CDE that mimics SSI logic is a valid tool for migraine diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P. Cowan
- Division of Headache and Facial Pain, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA
| | | | - Jim Blythe
- Information Sciences Institute University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - John Rothrock
- Neurology The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA
| | - Kerry Knievel
- Neurology Barrow Neurological Institute Phoenix Arizona USA
| | - Addie M. Peretz
- Division of Headache and Facial Pain, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA
| | - Elizabeth Ekpo
- Neurology University of California Davis Davis California USA
| | - Bharati M. Sanjanwala
- Division of Headache and Facial Pain, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA
| | - Yohannes W. Woldeamanuel
- Division of Headache and Facial Pain, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Conversion from chronic to episodic migraine in patients treated with galcanezumab in real life in Italy: the 12-month observational, longitudinal, cohort multicenter GARLIT experience. J Neurol 2022; 269:5848-5857. [PMID: 35763113 PMCID: PMC9243974 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11226-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective To investigate in real-life the conversion from chronic migraine (CM) to episodic migraine (EM), specifically to EM with High-Frequency (HFEM: 8–14 monthly migraine days, MMDs), Medium-Frequency (MFEM, 4–7 MMDs), and Low-Frequency EM (LFEM, 0–3 MMDs), and its persistence during 1 year of treatment with galcanezumab. Methods Consecutive CM patients treated with galcanezumab completing 1 year of observation were enrolled. We collected data on MMDs, pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS score), and monthly acute medication intake (MAMI) from baseline (V1) to the 12-month visit (V12). Results Of the 155 enrolled patients, 116 (around 75%) reverted to EM at every visit and 81 (52.3%) for the entire 1-year treatment. Patients with older onset age (p = 0.010) and fewer baseline MMDs (p = 0.005) reverted more frequently to EM. At V12, 83 participants (53.5%) presented MFEM or LFEM. Patients reverted to MFEM or LFEM for 7 months (25th 1, 75th 11). The medication overuse discontinuation rate at V12 was 82.8% and occurred for 11 months (25th 8, 75th 12). From baseline to V12, the MAMI decreased by 17 symptomatic drugs (p < 0.000001) while the NRS score reduced by almost 2 points (p < 0.000001). A consistent transition to EM for the entire treatment year was observed in 81 (52.3%) patients. Discussion The 1-year GARLIT experience suggests that more than half of CM patients treated with galcanezumab persistently reverted to EM in real life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04803513. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11226-4.
Collapse
|
43
|
Santos-Lasaosa S, Belvís R, Cuadrado ML, Díaz-Insa S, Gago-Veiga A, Guerrero-Peral AL, Huerta M, Irimia P, Láinez JM, Latorre G, Leira R, Pascual J, Porta-Etessam J, Sánchez Del Río M, Viguera J, Pozo-Rosich P. Calcitonin gene-related peptide in migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment. NEUROLOGÍA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2022; 37:390-402. [PMID: 35672126 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2019.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It has been observed in recent years that levels of such molecules as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and, to a lesser extent, the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide are elevated during migraine attacks and in chronic migraine, both in the cerebrospinal fluid and in the serum. Pharmacological reduction of these proteins is clinically significant, with an improvement in patients' migraines. It therefore seems logical that one of the main lines of migraine research should be based on the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of this entity. DEVELOPMENT The Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group decided to draft this document in order to address the evidence on such important issues as the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and the mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies and gepants; and to critically analyse the results of different studies and the profile of patients eligible for treatment with monoclonal antibodies, and the impact in terms of pharmacoeconomics. CONCLUSIONS The clinical development of gepants, which are CGRP antagonists, for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, and CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies offer promising results for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Santos-Lasaosa
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - R Belvís
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M L Cuadrado
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Díaz-Insa
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Gago-Veiga
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - A L Guerrero-Peral
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación de Salamanca (IBSAL), Spain
| | - M Huerta
- Sección de Neurología, Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Irimia
- Departamento de Neurología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - J M Láinez
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - G Latorre
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Leira
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - J Pascual
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla e IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - J Porta-Etessam
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Sánchez Del Río
- Departamento de Neurología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Viguera
- Consulta de Cefalea, Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neurociencias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - P Pozo-Rosich
- Unidad de Cefalea, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Grupo de Investigación en Cefalea, VHIR, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Santos-Lasaosa S, Belvís R, Cuadrado ML, Díaz-Insa S, Gago-Veiga A, Guerrero-Peral AL, Huerta M, Irimia P, Láinez JM, Latorre G, Leira R, Pascual J, Porta-Etessam J, Sánchez Del Río M, Viguera J, Pozo-Rosich P. Calcitonin gene-related peptide in migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment. Neurologia 2022; 37:390-402. [PMID: 31326215 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2019.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It has been observed in recent years that levels of such molecules as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and, to a lesser extent, the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide are elevated during migraine attacks and in chronic migraine, both in the cerebrospinal fluid and in the serum. Pharmacological reduction of these proteins is clinically significant, with an improvement in patients' migraines. It therefore seems logical that one of the main lines of migraine research should be based on the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of this entity. DEVELOPMENT The Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group decided to draft this document in order to address the evidence on such important issues as the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and the mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies and gepants; and to critically analyse the results of different studies and the profile of patients eligible for treatment with monoclonal antibodies, and the impact in terms of pharmacoeconomics. CONCLUSIONS The clinical development of gepants, which are CGRP antagonists, for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, and CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies offer promising results for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Santos-Lasaosa
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, España; Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud, Zaragoza, España.
| | - R Belvís
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, España
| | - M L Cuadrado
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España; Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - S Díaz-Insa
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - A Gago-Veiga
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Madrid, España
| | - A L Guerrero-Peral
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, España; Instituto de Investigación de Salamanca (IBSAL), España
| | - M Huerta
- Sección de Neurología, Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, España
| | - P Irimia
- Departamento de Neurología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | - J M Láinez
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia. Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - G Latorre
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, España
| | - R Leira
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España
| | - J Pascual
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla e IDIVAL, Santander, España
| | - J Porta-Etessam
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España; Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - M Sánchez Del Río
- Departamento de Neurología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, España
| | - J Viguera
- Consulta de Cefalea, Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neurociencias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, España
| | - P Pozo-Rosich
- Unidad de Cefalea, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, España; Grupo de Investigación en Cefalea; VHIR; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mays I, Flynn J, McGuire B, Egan J. The Role of Attachment Style, Adverse Childhood Experiences and Dissociation in Migraine. J Trauma Dissociation 2022; 23:245-278. [PMID: 34706630 DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2021.1989114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Migraine and chronic migraine are caused by a combination of modifiable and non-modifiable genetic, social, behavioral and environmental risk factors. Further research of possible modifiable risk factors for this headache disorder is merited, given its role as one of the leading causes of years lived with disability per year. The first aim of this online cross-sectional study was to investigate the psychosocial risk factors that predicted chronic migraine and severe migraine-related disability in 507 Irish and UK participants, focusing specifically on childhood maltreatment, attachment and tendency to dissociate, or experience depressed mood and/or anxiety. Additionally, this study aimed to examine variables that mediated the relationships between these psychosocial risk factors and migraine chronicity or severe migraine-related disability. Adjusted binary logistic regression revealed that shutdown dissociation (Odds Ratio [OR] 4.57, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.66-7.85) and severe physical abuse (OR 4.30, 95% CI 1.44-12.83 had significant odds of predicting migraine chronicity, while depression (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.86-5.77) significantly predicted severe migraine-related disability. Mediation analyses indicated that shutdown dissociation mediated the relationship between seven predictor variables and both chronicity and severe disability including possible predisposing factors emotional abuse, physical neglect, avoidant attachment and anxious attachment. These findings suggest that early life stressors (such as childhood trauma and avoidant attachment style), shutdown dissociation and depression may impact on migraine trajectory. To investigate whether these psychosocial factors are risk factors for migraine chronicity or disability, prospective research should be conducted in this area to account for fluctuations in migraine chronicity over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain Mays
- Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jack Flynn
- Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Brian McGuire
- School of Psychology & Centre for Pain Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jonathan Egan
- Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Practical Insights on the Identification and Management of Patients with Chronic Migraine. Pain Ther 2022; 11:447-457. [PMID: 35445326 PMCID: PMC9098750 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00387-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic migraine (CM) is one of the most disabling diseases, and it is commonly misdiagnosed and mistreated. Despite the importance of a timely and accurate diagnosis for the effective management of CM, recent surveys have shown that only 20–25% of individuals with CM receive a correct diagnosis. The obvious consequences of misdiagnosed CM are prolongation of symptoms and their associated effects on disability and health-related quality of life. Additionally, mistreatment of CM can lead to acute medication overuse headache with escalation of headache and end organ damage. Ideally, a diagnosis of CM should be made in the primary care setting, based on a thorough medical history including detailed descriptions of headaches occurring earlier in life as well as current headaches, and the range of headaches (not just the worst headaches). In our experience, it is often equally informative to ask the patient about the number of headache-free days (HFDs) and no accompanying symptoms (i.e., crystal-clear days) to quantify headache days and accurately estimate headache frequency/impact. Headache frequency is important, as this count is one key means of diagnosing CM, which requires ≥ 15 headache days/month, noting that these do not need to be migraine days. A headache day is defined as more than 4 h a day of headache. Comorbidities are common in CM and may affect the treatment choice and increase disability. Every CM patient should be offered a preventive migraine treatment. In this commentary, we provide practical insights and tips for diagnosing CM and cover issues of medication overuse, patient communication, diagnostic testing, and when to make a referral. Our key message to physicians for a patient who comes to the clinic with frequent disabling headaches having features of migraine is to assume CM until proven otherwise.
Collapse
|
47
|
Apelian R, Boyle L, Hirman J, Asher D. Measuring dose-related efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention: post hoc analysis of PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:48. [PMID: 35436857 PMCID: PMC9014586 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01418-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Eptinezumab 100 mg and 300 mg met the primary efficacy endpoint in both PROMISE clinical trials, significantly reducing frequency of monthly migraine days over Weeks 1‒12. The objective of this analysis was to assess the clinical response to eptinezumab 100 mg and 300 mg within the pivotal phase 3 PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2 studies to potentially identify subsets of patients with meaningful differences between doses. Methods Patients from PROMISE-1 (NCT02559895) and PROMISE-2 (NCT02974153) trials were divided into subgroups based on demographic and migraine characteristics, and baseline questionnaire responses. For each subgroup, the overall likelihood of achieving ≥ 50% migraine responder rate (MRR) over Weeks 1–12 and Weeks 13–24 with either eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg was calculated using odds ratios (with associated confidence intervals) and compared. Results In PROMISE-1 (episodic migraine) and PROMISE-2 (chronic migraine), the likelihood of achieving ≥ 50% MRR over Weeks 1–12 and Weeks 13–24 was roughly equivalent for patients receiving either dose level of eptinezumab. Given the number of comparisons performed, sporadic apparent differences were seen but no replicated patterns between studies emerged. In PROMISE-1, no differences were observed in any subgroup over Weeks 1–12. In PROMISE-2, patients reporting < 15 monthly migraine days at baseline, any problems with mobility per the EQ-5D-5L, or a social functioning score > 45.0 per the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), appeared more likely to achieve ≥ 50% MRR with 300 mg over Weeks 1–12, with none of these being apparent in PROMISE-1. Conclusions Overall, these data suggest that across PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2, there were no meaningful differences in the likelihood of achieving ≥ 50% MRR between the eptinezumab dose levels in the majority of patient subgroups. In the few subgroups that displayed small, but potentially meaningful differences, patients were more likely to achieve ≥ 50% MRR with eptinezumab 300 mg; however, minimal consistency across both studies and time periods was noted. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov. PROMISE-1: NCT02559895. PROMISE-2: NCT02974153.
Collapse
|
48
|
Scher AI, Bendtsen L. Patient-Centered Treatment of Chronic Migraine With Medication Overuse: More Is Not Always Better. Neurology 2022; 98:563-564. [PMID: 35169016 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ann I Scher
- From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics (A.I.S.), Uniformed Services University, Bethesda MD; Department of Neurology (L.B.), Danish Headache Centre, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Lars Bendtsen
- From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics (A.I.S.), Uniformed Services University, Bethesda MD; Department of Neurology (L.B.), Danish Headache Centre, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Harris L, L’Italien G, Kumar A, Seelam P, LaVallee C, Coric V, Lipton RB. Real‐world assessment of the relationship between migraine‐related disability and healthcare costs in the United States. Headache 2022; 62:473-481. [PMID: 35343590 PMCID: PMC9313575 DOI: 10.1111/head.14289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to determine the associations among migraine disability assessment scores, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU; medical visits and pharmacy use) and direct medical costs among people with episodic migraine in a real‐world setting. Background Migraine is a public health concern associated with a substantial economic burden in the United States. However, the association between migraine disability and direct medical costs among people with migraine is unknown. Method This retrospective, cohort study used claims and electronic health record data from the Decision Resources Group database. Adults with migraine with or without aura, defined by International Classification of Disease Revision 9 (ICD‐9) or ICD Revision 10 (ICD‐10) codes, and a completed Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) questionnaire from January 2016 to December 2018 were included (chronic migraine codes not included). The associations of MIDAS score with the cost of HCRU for the 6 months after MIDAS assessment were explored. Results were stratified by treatment setting. Results Among 7662 included patients, MIDAS scores were distributed as: 3348 (43.7%; I, little/none), 1107 (14.4%; II, mild), 1225 (16.0%; III, moderate), 893 (11.7%; IVa, severe), and 1089 (14.2%; IVb, very severe). Worsening disability was associated with higher medical costs (adjusted from a multivariable model). In the primary care setting, healthcare visit costs were $206 (95% confidence interval: $144–294) for grade I and $631 ($384–1036) for grade IVb patients; corresponding pharmacy costs were $203 (grade I; $136–301) and $719 (grade IVb; $410–1259). For specialty care (e.g., neurologist), healthcare visits cost $509 ($411–629) for grade I and $885 ($634–1236) for grade IVb patients; corresponding pharmacy costs were $494 (grade I; $378–645) and $1020 (grade IVb; $643–1620). Conclusion Higher levels of migraine‐related disability (MIDAS assessed) are associated with increased HCRU costs among Americans with episodic migraine. Migraine disability assessment could be useful in the development, testing, and prescription of cost‐effective treatments for people with high migraine‐related disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Harris
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals New Haven Connecticut USA
| | | | - Anil Kumar
- Data & Analytics, Decision Resources Group Bangalore India
| | | | - Chris LaVallee
- Health Outcomes Research Decision Resources Group Burlington Massachusetts USA
| | | | - Richard B. Lipton
- Headache Center, Department of Neurology Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vernieri F, Altamura C, Brunelli N, Costa CM, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Fofi L, Favoni V, Lovati C, Bertuzzo D, d'Onofrio F, Doretti A, Di Fiore P, Finocchi C, Schiano Di Cola F, Ranieri A, Colombo B, Bono F, Albanese M, Cevoli S, Barbanti P. Rapid response to galcanezumab and predictive factors in chronic migraine patients: A 3-month observational, longitudinal, cohort, multicenter, Italian real-life study. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:1198-1208. [PMID: 34826192 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A rapid response to preventive therapy is of pivotal importance in severely disabled patients with chronic migraine (CM) and diverse preventive treatment failures. This prospective, observational, multicenter real-life study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of galcanezumab in the first 3 months of treatment of CM patients at 14 Italian headache centers. METHODS All consecutive adult patients with CM diagnosis with the clinical indication for galcanezumab were considered. We collected patients' baseline characteristics, monthly headache days, monthly painkiller intake, migraine clinical characteristics, and disability scale scores during a 1-month run-in period (baseline) and the first 3 months of therapy. Possible predictive factors of treatment were considered. RESULTS A total of 156 patients (82.4% female, aged 47.3 ± 12.3 years) were enrolled. The 65 (41.7%) patients with a consecutive ≥50% response rate (RR) in the 3 months of therapy presented a lower body mass index (p = 0.004) and more frequently presented unilateral migraine pain (p = 0.002) and good response to triptans (p = 0.003). Persistent conversion from CM to episodic migraine was observed in 55.8% (87/156) of patients. They more frequently presented a good response to triptans (p = 0.003) and unilateral pain (p = 0.046). At baseline, 131 of 156 (83.9%) patients presented medication overuse (MO). Of these, 61.8% (81/131) no longer displayed MO consistently during the 3 months. These patients were more frequently responders to triptans (p = 0.002) and less frequently suffered from gastrointestinal comorbidity (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Unilateral pain, good response to triptans, and normal weight may be associated with a persistent positive response in the first 3 months of therapy with galcanezumab in CM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Altamura
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Cinzia Aurilia
- Headache and Pain Unit, San Raffaele Pisana, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Egeo
- Headache and Pain Unit, San Raffaele Pisana, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Fofi
- Headache and Pain Unit, San Raffaele Pisana, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Favoni
- Bologna Institute of Neurological Sciences, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Lovati
- Neurology Unit, Headache Center, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Doretti
- Department of Neurology, Stroke Unit and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Italian Auxological Institute, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Di Fiore
- Headache Center, Neurology and Stroke Unit, S. Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Cinzia Finocchi
- San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Schiano Di Cola
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Angelo Ranieri
- Headache Center, Neurology and Stroke Unit, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Bruno Colombo
- San Raffaele Hospital, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Bono
- Center for Headache and Intracranial Pressure Disorders, Neurology Unit, Mater Domini University Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Maria Albanese
- Headache Center, Neurology Unit, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.,Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- Bologna Institute of Neurological Sciences, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Bologna, Italy
| | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, San Raffaele Pisana, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Rome, Italy.,San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|