Ocular inflammatory events following COVID-19 vaccination: a multinational case series

Unilateral Anterior Scleritis Following the Booster Shot of Inactivated COVID-19 (Sinopharm) Vaccine in a 52-Year-Old Woman: A Case Report

The only way to mitigate the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was vaccines. While effective in decreasing the rate and severity of the disease, there also have been considerable adverse events. Since the birth of vaccines, adverse reactions accompanied the immunity, and COVID-19 vaccines are no exceptions. This is a report about a 52-year-old female patient who presented with bilateral redness of the eyes, with normal bilateral visual acuity, postbooster dose of the Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine. She had no significant past history of any disease or any similar reactions after previous doses. All her physical examinations were normal. Ophthalmic examination disclosed diffuse erythema, and mild scleral edema consistent with bilateral anterior diffused scleritis with negative phenylephrine test. Thereafter, with a course of tapering doses of prednisolone (30 mg at the onset) combined with azathioprine (100 mg/day), over a 2-week period, the condition completely resolved. Very few vaccination-related adverse events may manifest an unrecognized underlying autoimmune vasculopathy which may also require urgent management. As in this case, ocular adverse events, as highlighted, are highly associated with undiagnosed autoimmune diseases and therefore warrant careful assessment by clinicians.

The Set up and the Triggers: An Update on the Risk Factors for Giant Cell Arteritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe recent research relevant to factors which predispose to giant cell arteritis (GCA) and those which trigger its manifestation, with particular emphasis on the more recent and controversial associations (COVID-19, vaccination, novel medications) which have changed the medical landscape and perhaps GCA prevalence.

RECENT FINDINGS

GCA remains more prevalent in Caucasians but nevertheless affects other racial groups. Certain HLA haplotypes (i.e. DRB1*04) incurs risk of GCA. Polymyalgia rheumatica remains a strong association, and recent evidence also associates GCA with hematologic malignancy. COVID-19 infection may trigger GCA, in addition to vaccination (particularly the COVID-19 vaccine) and reactivated VZV infection, though the latter may be related to a common trigger. PD1-inhibitors may be associated with GCA. Previously establish patterns in geography and latitude are supported. A seasonal pattern of GCA in the summer/spring months is suggested but not proven. Controversy regarding GCA risk factors exists, as well as to whether the overall prevalence of GCA is rising. Given the growing aging population, the total number of cases of GCA will certainly increase, a challenge to which that our healthcare system must continue to rise to meet.

Optic neuritis following COVID-19 vaccination: Case series and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To review cases of optic neuritis after COVID-19 vaccination and add similar cases to the literature.

METHODS

Thorough PubMed and Scopus searches were conducted, and data from studies describing optic neuritis after COVID-19 vaccination were extracted, tabulated, pooled, and reviewed.

RESULTS

We present 6 cases of optic neuritis following COVID-19 vaccination. Our literature search yielded 48 similar cases. All 54 cases were divided into 3 groups with respect to their serostatus: (1) double-seronegative or unknown serostatus optic neuritis cases, (2) myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-associated optic neuritis cases, and (3) aquaporin-4-associated optic neuritis cases. Data from each group were separately pooled and reviewed. While the most frequent vaccine among the anti-AQP4+ subgroup was BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) (2/3), recombinant vaccines, e.g., AZD122 and Ad26.Cov2.s were mostly injected in the other subgroups (23/51). No significant gender inclination was seen among different subgroups. The mean interval from vaccination to symptom onset was less than one month in all subgroups; symptom manifestations mainly occurred after the first dose (28/54). Almost all cases showed improvement after steroid therapy±plasma exchange (52/54).

CONCLUSION

Despite having rare side effects such as optic neuritis, vaccination remains our most helpful protection against SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, larger studies are needed to ascertain the pathophysiology of such adverse effects. Likewise, the association between COVID-19 vaccination and optic neuritis warrants further investigation.

Ocular Inflammatory Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination in the Paediatric Population: A Multinational Case Series

BACKGROUND

Ocular inflammatory events following COVID-19 vaccination have been reported in the adult population.

METHODS

Multinational case series of patients under the age of 18 diagnosed with ocular inflammatory events within 28 days of COVID-19 vaccination.

RESULTS

Twenty individuals were included. The most common event was anterior uveitis (n = 8, 40.0%), followed by intermediate uveitis (7 patients, 35%), panuveitis (4 patients, 20%), and posterior uveitis (1 patient, 5%). The event was noticed in the first week after vaccination in 11 patients (55.0%). Twelve patients (60.0%) had a previous history of intraocular inflammatory event. Patients were managed with topical corticosteroids (n = 19, 95.0%), oral corticosteroids (n = 10, 50.0%), or increased dose of immunosuppressive treatment (n = 6, 30.0%). Thirteen patients (65.0%) had a complete resolution of the ocular event without complications. All patients had a final visual acuity unaffected or less than three lines of loss.

CONCLUSION

Ocular inflammatory events may happen in the paediatric population following COVID-19 vaccination. Most events were successfully treated, and all showed a good visual outcome.

Infectious eye disease in the 21st century-an overview

Infectious diseases affecting the eye often cause unilateral or asymmetric visual loss in children and people of working age. This group of conditions includes viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic diseases, both common and rare presentations which, in aggregate, may account for a significant portion of the global visual burden. Diagnosis is frequently challenging even in specialist centres, and many disease presentations are highly regional. In an age of globalisation, an understanding of the various modes of transmission and the geographic distribution of infections can be instructive to clinicians. The impact of eye infections on global disability is currently not sufficiently captured in global prevalence studies on visual impairment and blindness, which focus on bilateral disease in the over-50s. Moreover, in many cases it is hard to differentiate between infectious and immune-mediated diseases. Since infectious eye diseases can be preventable and frequently affect younger people, we argue that in future prevalence studies they should be considered as a separate category, including estimates of disability-adjusted life years (DALY) as a measure of overall disease burden. Numbers of ocular infections are uniquely affected by outbreaks as well as endemic transmission, and their control frequently relies on collaborative partnerships that go well beyond the remit of ophthalmology, encompassing domains as various as vaccination, antibiotic development, individual healthcare, vector control, mass drug administration, food supplementation, environmental and food hygiene, epidemiological mapping, and many more. Moreover, the anticipated impacts of global warming, conflict, food poverty, urbanisation and environmental degradation are likely to magnify their importance. While remote telemedicine can be a useful aide in the diagnosis of these conditions in resource-poor areas, enhanced global reporting networks and artificial intelligence systems may ultimately be required for disease surveillance and monitoring.

Medication-associated orbital inflammation: A systematic review

We performed a comprehensive systematic review to identify medication-associated orbital inflammation and to characterize its clinico-radiological features. We reviewed English-language articles describing medication-associated orbital inflammation (i.e., orbital myositis, dacryoadenitis and orbital fat) published to June, 2023. Isolated inflammation of the intraocular structures or globe alone (i.e. uveitis, scleritis, optic neuritis and perineuritis) were excluded. In medication-associated orbital inflammation, the extraocular muscles are preferentially affected, occurring in isolation or in combination with other orbital and/or intraocular structures. Clinico-radiological manifestations may be non-specific; however, certain medications may be distinguished according to the presence of systemic prodrome, laterality, associated intraocular inflammation, and predisposition to involve certain orbital structures. Rapid identification, discontinuation of the provoking medication, and systemic corticosteroid therapy (if appropriate) typically achieves a favorable visual prognosis. As new medications become adopted by clinicians, rare adverse effects will be further delineated.Medication-associated orbital inflammation is an important diagnostic consideration in orbital inflammatory disease. A careful medication history and clinical assessment may be revealing, permitting timely discontinuation of the offending agent and initiation of appropriate management.

Unraveling the Complexities of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2: A Comprehensive Ophthalmic and Systemic Perspective

The editorial explores the profound implications of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, which emerged in December 2019 and rapidly evolved into a global health crisis. Despite initial focus on respiratory symptoms, the virus revealed significant ocular implications, prompting a reevaluation of the eye's role in its transmission, diagnosis, and systemic effects. The paradoxical nature of SARS-CoV-2-simultaneously novel and familiar within the coronavirus family-has been central to guiding the global medical response, including the swift development of vaccines. The pandemic has intensified research into the eye's susceptibility to viral infections, enhancing our understanding of virus-host interactions and the systemic impacts of viral diseases. The editorial delves into the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2, highlighting its potential to trigger autoinflammatory and autoimmune reactions with significant ocular repercussions. It examines the rapid vaccine development and deployment, the associated ocular side effects, and the ongoing research necessary to mitigate these outcomes. As the World Health Organization declared the end of COVID-19 as a public health emergency, the focus has shifted toward understanding the virus's long-term implications, including its effects on ocular health. This work underscores the critical role of interdisciplinary collaboration in addressing the systemic impacts of viral infections. It emphasizes the importance of ophthalmology in the broader context of public health and highlights the need for continued vigilance, research, and adaptation in a postpandemic world. The editorial calls for an integrated approach to health care, emphasizing the lessons learned from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic to prepare for future health challenges, with a particular focus on the intersection of virology, immunology, and ophthalmology.

Increased incidence and diverse manifestations of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic

The advent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the incidence and course of various diseases and numerous studies have investigated ocular involvement associated with COVID-19 and corresponding vaccines. In this study, we compared the incidence of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a single center in Korea and analyzed the demographic and clinical features of patients with MEWDS presenting during the COVID-19 pandemic. We categorized patients with MEWDS into two groups according to date of diagnosis. Pre-COVID19 group included patients diagnosed during the pre-pandemic period (between March 11, 2017, and March 10, 2020), whereas post-COVID19 group included patients diagnosed during the pandemic period (between March 11, 2020, and March 10, 2023). 6 and 12 patients were included in pre-COVID19 group and post-COVID19 group, respectively. Among all hospital visits during the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, 0.011% and 0.030% were due to MEWDS, indicating a significant increase during the pandemic (p = 0.029, B = 2.756). The annual incidence of patients with MEWDS in 2017-2022 were 0.73, 0.75, 0.78, 1.32, 2.49, and 2.07 per 10,000 population, respectively, corresponding to a significant increase (p = 0.039, B = 1.316). Our results imply that the incidence and manifestation of MEWDS are likely to become more diverse in the COVID-19 pandemic era.

Mimickers of anterior uveitis, scleritis and misdiagnoses- tips and tricks for the cornea specialist

BACKGROUND

Anterior uveitis, inflammation of the anterior chamber and related structures, is a cohort of diseases that can present to almost any general or sub-specialty Ophthalmology practice. Its features classically involve anterior chamber cell and flare. Below the surface of these two signs exist a panoply of diagnoses. BODY: The purpose of this review is to provide a general framework for diagnoses of anterior uveitis that are often missed as well as non-uveitic pathologies that often mimic anterior uveitis. Diagnostic deviation in either direction can have vision-threatening and rarely life-threatening consequences for patients. Using a comprehensive literature review we have collected a broad spectrum of etiologies of anterior uveitis that are easily missed and non-uveitic pathologies that can masquerade as anterior uveitis.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a focused review on specific misdiagnosed anterior uveitis pathologies and some of the conditions that can masquerade as anterior uveitis and scleritis.

Ocular Complications after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic affects various populations worldwide. The discovery of vaccinations was necessary for the prevention and elimination of the disease. Despite the high importance of these vaccinations, they may cause some complications, such as ocular complications. This study aims to draw attention to the possible complications of the vaccination and highlight its importance. Materials and Methods: Systematic review of the literature from January 2021 to January 2023. A total of 20 published articles were included and reported cases of ocular complications in patients who received COVID-19 vaccines. Results: A total of 243 patients with verified ocular complications following the COVID-19 vaccination were included, ranging in age from 18 to 84 years. The most common ocular complications reported in the current study were ocular inflammatory complications, which represented 47.3%, followed by optic neuritis (24.3%). Retinal artery occlusion, retinal vein occlusion, acute macular neuroretinopathy, and paracentral acute middle maculopathy represented 10.7%. Herpetic ocular infections and herpetic eye disease (14%). Nearly half (42%) of the patients with ocular problems received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination. Conclusions: Despite the high importance of the COVID-19 vaccination, it was found that it is associated with the occurrence of some ocular complications. Future projects should come with more extensive prospective studies to further elucidate the underlying mechanisms and risk factors associated with ocular complications following COVID-19 vaccination, thereby enhancing our understanding and guiding appropriate management strategies.

Management of COVID-19 in Ophthalmology

From its outbreak in early 2020, the new SARS-CoV-2 infection has deeply affected the entire eye care system for several reasons. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, ophthalmologists were among the "high-risk category" for contracting the SARS-CoV-2 infection based on the notion that the eye was suspected to be a site of inoculation, infection, and transmission. Clinical ophthalmologists have been required to learn and promptly recognize the ocular manifestations associated with the COVID-19 disease, with its treatments and vaccinations. Restriction measures, lockdown periods, guidelines to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection transmission, and the use of telemedicine and artificial intelligence modalities have induced profound modifications. These changes, which are most likely to be irreversible, influence routine clinical practice, education, and research, thus giving rise to a "new ophthalmology in the COVID era". This book chapter aims to provide several notions regarding COVID-19 in ophthalmology, including the SARS-CoV-2 virus infection and transmission modalities; the ocular manifestation associated with the COVID-19 disease; the drugs and vaccines used for COVID-19; the precautions adopted in the ophthalmic practice to limit the spread of the virus; the consequences of the pandemic on the ophthalmic patients, clinicians, and the entire eye care system; and, the future of ophthalmology in the era of "COVID new normal".

Posterior scleritis following COVID-19 vaccination or infection simulating uveal melanoma in 8 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine clinical features and outcomes of posterior scleritis masquerading as uveal melanoma following vaccination against COVID-19 and/or COVID-19 infection.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

All patients with posterior scleritis referred to our service to rule out intraocular tumour between February 2021 and June 2022, who previously had COVID-19 vaccination and/or infection (n = 8). A retrospective detailed review of patient charts and imaging was carried out.

RESULTS

Previous COVID-19 vaccination was documented in 6 patients (75%) and previous COVID-19 infection and vaccination in 2 patients (25%). Demographic features included mean age of 59 years (median 68, range 5-86 years), white race (n = 7, 87%), and male sex (n = 5, 63%). Mean visual acuity at presentation was 0.24 LogMAR (median 0.18, range 0.0-0.70). The main presenting symptom was blurred vision with pain (n = 5, 63%). Features that suggested scleritis and not uveal melanoma included pain (n = 6, 75%), anterior scleritis (n = 3, 38%), disc oedema (n = 1, 13%), choroidal detachment (n = 3, 38%), choroidal folds (n = 3, 38%), diffusely thickened scleral wall on ultrasonography (n = 2, 25%), Tenon's oedema (n = 5, 63%), and scleral nodule with medium/high internal reflectivity on ultrasonography (n = 4, 50%). Follow-up information at mean of 2 months (range 0.25-7 months) revealed visual acuity at date last seen was mean 0.30 LogMAR (median 0.29, range 0.0-0.54). By 2 months, resolution of "tumour" was noted in 5/6 (83%) patients with follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior scleritis following COVID-19 vaccination and/or infection can masquerade as choroidal melanoma. At 2 months duration, partial or complete resolution of features with minimal visual consequence was noted.

Increased Incidence of Pediatric Uveitis Associated with the COVID-19 Pandemic Occurring Before COVID-19 Vaccine Implementation: A Time-Series Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increased incidence of uveitis in children.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a time-series analysis of patient records from a national, hospital-based, French surveillance system. All children hospitalized for uveitis in France between January 2012 and March 2022 were included. The incidence of newly diagnosed uveitis per 100 000 children per trimester in France was analyzed by a quasi-Poisson regression. A cohort of children diagnosed with uveitis at Robert-Debré Hospital was used to compare the characteristics of uveitis after and before the onset of the pandemic.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2492 children were hospitalized for uveitis in France. The COVID-19 pandemic, which started in March 2020, was associated with a significant increase in the occurrence of uveitis (estimated cumulative change, 44.9%; 95% CI 11.4-78.4; P < .001). The increase in the incidence of pediatric uveitis started in October 2020, while the national immunization program targeting children aged less than 18 years began in June 2021. This increase involved all forms of uveitis, regardless of location, and clincial characteristics were similar to those diagnosed before the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study evidenced a significant increase in the incidence of pediatric uveitis following the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase occurred 6 months before the implementation of the national COVID-19 vaccination program for children, suggesting that the resurgence of this rare disease is independent of COVID-19 vaccination.

Panuveitis and optic neuropathy following SARS-COV-2 in the absence of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in a child

Purpose

To describe the presentation of a healthy 8-year-old female referred to a pediatric ophthalmology clinic with blurred vision and concern for bilateral uveitis.

Observations

The patient was diagnosed with COVID-19 two weeks prior to the onset of ocular symptoms. An examination revealed bilateral pan-uveitis and patient underwent an extensive work-up for an underlying cause that was unremarkable. Two years following the initial presentation, she has not had any evidence of recurrence.

Conclusions and Importance

This case highlights the potential for COVID-19 to be temporally associated with ocular inflammation and underscores the importance of recognizing and investigating such manifestations in pediatric patients. The mechanism by which COVID-19 may lead to an immune response that affects the eyes is not fully understood, but it is believed to be related to an overactive immune response triggered by the virus. Further studies are needed to better understand the potential relationship between COVID-19 and ocular manifestations in pediatric patients.

Update on coronavirus disease 2019: Ophthalmic Manifestations and Adverse Reactions to Vaccination

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was one of the most devastating public health issues in recent decades. The ophthalmology community is as concerned about the COVID-19 pandemic as the global public health community is, as COVID-19 was recognized to affect multiple organs in the human body, including the eyes, early in the course of the outbreak. Ophthalmic manifestations of COVID-19 are highly variable and could range from mild ocular surface abnormalities to potentially sight and life-threatening orbital and neuro-ophthalmic diseases. Furthermore, ophthalmic manifestations may also be the presenting or the only findings in COVID-19 infections. Meanwhile, global vaccination campaigns to attain herd immunity in different populations are the major strategy to mitigate the pandemic. As novel vaccinations against COVID-19 emerged, so were reports on adverse ophthalmic reactions potentially related to such. As the world enters a post-pandemic state where COVID-19 continues to exist and evolve as an endemic globally, the ophthalmology community ought to be aware of and keep abreast of the latest knowledge of ophthalmic associations with COVID-19 and its vaccinations. This review is a summary of the latest literature on the ophthalmic manifestations of COVID-19 and the adverse ophthalmic reactions related to its vaccinations.

Case Report: Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Post-mRNA SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccination

SIGNIFICANCE

Systemic thromboembolic complications are well documented to be associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, there have been a growing number of reports regarding ocular complications stemming from COVID-19 vaccinations. This case illustrates a clear temporal and possible causal relationship of COVID-19 vaccination with an ocular microvascular disorder, namely, retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to report a case of inferotemporal branch retinal vein occlusion after messenger RNA Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination.

CASE REPORT

A middle-aged woman developed right eye central scotoma 2 days after COVID-19 vaccination. She had transient hypertension during the first 2 days post-vaccination. A decrease in visual acuity (6/18) was documented. Initial retinal findings included flame-shaped hemorrhages and cotton-wool spots along inferotemporal branch retinal vessels. Optical coherence tomography revealed right eye cystoid macular edema. Laboratory investigation revealed mildly raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. Other systemic examinations were unremarkable. She was treated for right eye inferotemporal branch retinal vein occlusion with cystoid macular edema and was given intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monthly in three doses. Her visual acuity improved to 6/6 with resolved cystoid macular edema.

CONCLUSIONS

This case illustrates a clear temporal and possible causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and retinal vein occlusion. Post-vaccination transient hypertension or the immunological and inflammatory response to the vaccine may have contributed to the venous occlusive event in this case. Eye care providers should remain aware of this possibility. The effectiveness of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion was demonstrated in this patient.

Ocular posterior segment complications following COVID-19 vaccination

BACKGROUND

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare, including eye care, worldwide. Effective and safe vaccines have been developed using both conventional and novel technologies to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection. While vaccination has been shown to be remarkably effective in reducing the spread and associated morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 disease, there have been reports of complications to the posterior segment of the eye.

METHODS

We present a case-based analysis of reported complications of COVID-19 vaccination to the posterior segment of the eye. The study aims to highlight the diversity of possible complications and discuss the plausible involved pathophysiologic mechanisms.

RESULTS

The most significant complications reported were retinal macro or microvascular occlusions, uveitis, and central serous chorioretinopathy. These complications are rare but require prompt diagnosis and management to prevent serious visual morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the need for ophthalmologists to be aware of possible complications related to COVID-19 vaccination and the importance of prompt diagnosis and management. The findings of this study may help ophthalmologists to better understand and manage these rare complications.

Ocular manifestations following COVID-19 vaccination

BACKGROUND

Immunologic and inflammatory adverse effects following vaccination against COVID-19 are being reported. While some reactions may develop denovo others concern its immunogenic effect in patients with pre-existing inflammatory conditions.

METHODS

Retrospective consecutive patients diagnosed with ocular inflammatory manifestations within 8 weeks of receiving COVID-19 vaccination who presented to a tertiary eye care centre in South India.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight eyes of 67 patients presenting with ocular inflammatory manifestations within 8 weeks following COVID-19 vaccination were studied. The mean age was 43 years (+/- 14.82; range 19-80 years). The most common presentations were anterior uveitis (n = 31, 31.7%), followed by panuveitis (n = 24, 24.5%). The mean time to onset of symptoms was 25 days (+/- 15.48; range 2-55 days) following a dose of vaccine. Among all patients, 39 (58.2%) had a previous history of ocular inflammation. Mean presenting visual acuity was 0.4 (0-4) logMAR units and mean final visual acuity was 0.2 (0-4) logMAR units. The causes for reduced vision included of cystoid macular edema (n=2, 2%), chorioretinal atrophy (n=2.2%), optic atrophy (n=1.1%), retinal vascular occlusion (n=1.1%) and acute retinal necrosis (n=1.1%).

CONCLUSION

Infective and immunogenic adverse events should be watched out for after COVID-19 vaccination. It is difficult to establish causality for such manifestations, nevertheless, most of them were mild and had good final visual outcomes.

Herpetic anterior uveitis following COVID-19 vaccines: a case series

Purpose

To report a case series of herpetic uveitis following COVID-19 vaccinations.

Methods

Demographic, clinical and treatment-related data of herpetic anterior uveitis cases was collected at five tertiary eye hospitals between January 2021 and June 2022. A retrospective database review at one of the centers comparing the number of cases of herpetic eye disease before and after the introduction of COVID-19 vaccination was performed as well.

Results

Twenty-four patients (9 female, 15 male) with a mean age of 54 years (range 28-83 years) were diagnosed with herpetic uveitis, reporting an onset of symptoms 3-42 days after the first, second or third dose of COVID-19 vaccination. Median time between vaccination and onset of herpetic eye disease was 10 days (mean 12.7 ± 10.15 days) days. The administered vaccines were BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, BBIBP-CorV and Ad26.COV2.S. The cases included 11 HSV, 10 VZV and 1 CMV anterior uveitis, 2 were not further specified. There was an equal number of first episodes (n = 12, 50%) and recurrent episodes (n = 12, 50%). Response to established regimens was generally good. The retrospective database review revealed the exact same incidence of herpetic uveitis during the pandemic and ongoing vaccination compared to prior SARS-CoV-2.

Conclusion

This report includes 24 cases of herpetic anterior uveitis in a temporal relationship to various COVID-19 vaccines. This study supports the potential risk of herpetic eye disease following COVID-19 vaccines, but proof of a direct, causal relationship is missing.

Challenges in posterior uveitis-tips and tricks for the retina specialist

PURPOSE

Posterior uveitis is a common chorioretinal pathology affecting all ages worldwide and is a frequent reason for referral to the retina clinic. The spectrum of etiologies for uveitis is very broad and includes infectious and auto-immune diseases. Inflammation can be confined to the eye or may be a part of systemic disease. A useful outline is therefore proposed to aid in the correct diagnosis of these challenging entities. The situation is further complicated by the fact that many neoplastic conditions resemble features of posterior uveitis; they are known as "masqueraders of uveitis". Here, we summarize different posterior uveitides that present with rare findings, along with masqueraders that can be difficult to distinguish. These conditions pose a diagnostic dilemma resulting in delay in treatment because of diagnostic uncertainty.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed on the MEDLINE/PUBMED, EBSCO and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from January 1985 to January 2022 for original studies and reviews of predetermined diagnoses that include posterior uveitic entities, panuveitis and masquerade syndromes.

RESULTS

We described conditions that can present as mimickers of posterior uveitis (i.e., immune check-points inhibitors and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like uveitis; leukemia and lymphoma associated posterior uveitis), inflammatory conditions that present as mimickers of retinal diseases (i.e., Purtscher-like retinopathy as a presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus; central serous chorioretinopathy masquerading inflammatory exudative retinal detachment), and uveitic conditions with rare and diagnostically challenging etiologies (i.e., paradoxical inflammatory effects of anti-TNF-α; post vaccination uveitis; ocular inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs).

CONCLUSION

This review of unique posterior uveitis cases highlights the overlapping features of posterior uveitis (paradoxical inflammatory effects of anti -TNF α and uveitis; Purtscher-like retinopathy as a presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus, …) and the nature of retinal conditions (ischemic ocular syndrome, or central retinal vein occlusion, amyloidosis, inherited conditions like retinitis pigmentosa, autosomal dominant neovascular inflammatory vitreoretinopathy (ADNIV), etc.…) that may mimic them is represented. Careful review of past uveitis history, current medications and recent vaccinations, detailed examination of signs of past or present inflammation, eventually genetic testing and/ or multimodal retinal imaging (like fluorescein angiography, EDI-OCT, OCT-angiography for lupus Purtscher-like retinopathy evaluation, or ICG for central serous retinopathy, or retinal amyloid angiopathy) may aid in correct diagnosis.

Single cell characteristics of patients with vaccine-related adverse reactions following inactivated COVID-19 vaccination

A good safety and immunogenicity profile was reported in Phase I and II clinical trials of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Here, we report two cases associated with vaccine-associated adverse events, including one patient with fever and another with anaphylactic shock resulting from inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Cell sub-types and the importance of genetic characteristics were assessed using single-cell mRNA sequencing and machine learning. Overall, the patient with fever showed a significant increase in the numbers of cytotoxic CD8 T cells and MKI67high CD8 T cells. A potential concurrent infection with the Epstein-Barr virus enhanced interferon type I responses to vaccination against the virus. STAT1, E2F1, YBX1, and E2F7 played a key role in the transcription regulation of MKI67high CD8 T cells. In contrast, the patient with allergic shock displayed predominant increases in the numbers of S100A9high monocytes, activated CD4 T cells, and PPBPhigh megakaryocytes. The decision tree showed that LYZ and S100A8 in S100A9high monocytes contributed to the degranulation of neutrophils and activation of neutrophils involved in allergic shock. PPBP and PF4 were major contributors to platelet degranulation. These findings highlight the diversity of adverse reactions following inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and show the emerging role of cellular subtypes and central genes in vaccine-associated adverse reactions.

Acute Uveitis Following AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccination

PURPOSE

To report a case of bilateral acute uveitis following the first and subsequent doses of Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination.

METHOD

A case report.

RESULTS

A 74-year-old Caucasian woman was presented with a one-day history of blurred vision, pain, photophobia, and redness in both eyes after receiving her first dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Clinical evaluation confirmed bilateral anterior and intermediate uveitis six days later. Targeted diagnostic testing excluded infectious or autoimmune etiologies. After treatment with topical and oral corticosteroids, the patient had a resolution of symptoms with the recovery of visual function within seven weeks. Subsequently, she developed a recurrence of uveitis following the second dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, which required similar treatment, with slower tapering of corticosteroids over ten weeks. The patient had a full visual recovery.

CONCLUSION

Our case highlights the possibility of uveitis as an ocular complication of Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination.

Intraocular inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination: the clinical presentations

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to describe the cases of intraocular inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination (Comirnaty mRNA vaccine and CoronaVac vaccine) in Hong Kong.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series.

RESULTS

This series includes 16 eyes among 10 female patients, with a mean age of 49.4 ± 17.4 years. Eight patients (80%) received the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccination. Anterior uveitis was the most common presentation of postvaccination uveitis (50%) observed in our series, followed by intermediate uveitis (30%) and posterior uveitis (20%), respectively. A case of retinal vasculitis in the form of frosted branch angiitis, previously only reported following COVID-19 infection, was observed following COVID-19 vaccination. The median time from vaccination to uveitis onset was 15.2 days (range: 0-6 weeks). Inflammation in 11 out 16 eyes (68.75%) was completely resolved with topical steroids.

CONCLUSION

Anterior uveitis was the predominant presentations of uveitis flare-ups following COVID-19 in our case series, followed by intermediate uveitis. Aligning with the current global literature concerning this issue, most of the uveitis attacks presented as anterior uveitis and were completely resolved with topical steroids. Consequently, the risk of uveitis flare-ups should not deter the public from receiving COVID-19 vaccines.

Recurring nodular scleritis following inactivated vaccination for COVID-19

Key Clinical Message

Though COVID-19 vaccination saved many lives all around the world, it has had many adverse effects including ophthalmologic side effects. It is important to report such adverse effects to provide timely diagnosis and management.

Abstract

Since the COVID-19 global outbreak, many types of vaccines have been introduced. These vaccines have been associated with some adverse effects including ocular manifestations. Herein, we report a case of a patient who developed nodular scleritis shortly after receiving the first and second doses of the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, Sinopharm.

A COVID-19 perspective of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease, a bilateral granulomatous panuveitis associated with multisystem involvement, is a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disorder in which cytotoxic T-cell target melanocytes in genetically susceptible individuals. Recently, there has been an increase in literature on the new onset of uveitis and reactivation of previously diagnosed cases of uveitis following Covid-19 vaccinations. It has been postulated that Covid-19 vaccines can lead to an immunomodulatory change resulting in an autoimmune phenomenon in the recipients. VKH following COVID-19 infection was reported in four patients and a total of 46 patients developing VKH or VKH-like disease following COVID-19 vaccinations. There are reports of four patients who had been recovering or recovered from VKH after receiving the first dosage of the vaccine and developed worsening of ocular inflammation after receiving the second dose of the vaccine.

A case of APMPPE-like panuveitis presenting with extensive outer retinal layer impairment following COVID-19 vaccination

BACKGROUND

Vaccination against the worldwide pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is underway; however, some cases of new onset uveitis after vaccination have been reported. We report a case of bilateral acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy-like (AMPPE-like) panuveitis after COVID-19 vaccination in which the patient's pathological condition was evaluated using multimodal imaging.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 31-year-old woman experienced bilateral hyperemia and blurred vision starting 6 days after her second inoculation of the COVID-19 vaccination. At her first visit, her visual acuity was decreased bilaterally, and severe bilateral anterior chamber inflammation and bilateral scattering of cream-white placoid lesions on the fundus were detected. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed serous retinal detachment (SRD) and choroidal thickening in both eyes (OU). Fluorescein angiography (FA) revealed hypofluorescence in the early phase and hyperfluorescence in the late phase corresponding to the placoid legions. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) showed sharply marginated hypofluorescent dots of various sizes throughout the mid-venous and late phases OU. The patient was diagnosed with APMPPE and was observed without any medications. Three days later, her SRD disappeared spontaneously. However, her anterior chamber inflammation continued, and oral prednisolone (PSL) was given to her. Seven days after the patient's first visit, the hyperfluorescent lesions on FA and hypofluorescent dots on ICGA partially improved; however, the patient's best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recovered only to 0.7 OD and 0.6 OS, and the impairment of the outer retinal layer was broadly detected as hyperautofluorescent lesions on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) examination and as irregularity in or disappearance of the ellipsoid and interdigitation zones on OCT, which were quite atypical for the findings of APMPPE. Steroid pulse therapy was performed. Five days later, the hyperfluorescence on FAF had disappeared, and the outer retinal layer improved on OCT. Moreover, the patient's BCVA recovered to 1.0 OU. Twelve months after the end of treatment, the patient did not show any recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a case of APMPPE-like panuveitis after COVID-19 vaccination featuring some atypical findings for APMPPE. COVID-19 vaccination may induce not only known uveitis but also atypical uveitis, and appropriate treatment is required for each case.

Orbital inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination: A case series and literature review

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to report three cases of orbital inflammation following administration of the COVID-19 vaccination, manifesting as Tolosa-Hunt syndrome (THS) and orbital myositis.

METHOD

A retrospective case series and literature review of patients who developed orbital inflammation following a COVID-19 vaccination.

RESULTS

One patient presented with Tolosa-Hunt syndrome (THS) 14 days following her third (booster) COVID-19 vaccination, one patient developed orbital myositis 10 days following his first COVID-19 vaccination and one patient developed recurrent orbital myositis 1 and 7 days following her second and fourth COVID-19 vaccination. All patients received the Comirnaty vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). A thorough systemic autoimmune disease workup in both patients was unremarkable. Two patients had a prior history of orbital inflammation, with previous involvement of other different orbital structures. Characteristic MRI features for each pathology were observed, supporting the clinical presentation of THS and orbital myositis. There was complete resolution of THS following corticosteroids, with no recurrence at 2 months. Meanwhile, one case of orbital myositis self-resolved at 2 months without use of systemic corticosteroids, while the other patient with orbital myositis required treatment with intra-orbital steroid injections and oral corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

Orbital inflammation has been recognised as a rare adverse effect following COVID-19 vaccination. We present a case series of THS and orbital myositis as varied presentations of this entity.

COVID Vaccine-Associated Uveitis

PURPOSE

Following the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, different vaccines were developed and approved by the main medical authorities under emergency protocol regulations. Although highly effective and well-tolerated in most patients, vaccines can uncommonly cause ocular adverse effects. In this article, the current evidence related to vaccine-associated uveitis is reviewed.

METHODS

A literature review of uveitis post various SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations.

RESULTS

Uveitis was reported following various forms of vaccinations but was more commonly seen following the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which is the most used vaccination worldwide. In western countries, the most common uveitis is mild anterior uveitis, developing within a week of first or subsequent vaccination with good resolution following appropriate topical steroid therapy in most cases. Posterior uveitis and particularly Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease was more prevalent in Asia. Uveitis may develop among known uveitis patients and those with other autoimmune diseases.

CONCLUSION

Uveitis following Covid vaccinations is uncommon and has a good prognosis.

COVID-19 vaccination, dengue hepatitis, and recurrent unilateral anterior uveitis

A 36-year-old Asian Indian male presented with redness and pain in his right eye of 1 week duration. He was diagnosed to have right acute anterior uveitis and had a history of being admitted at a local hospital for dengue hepatitis a month earlier. He had been on adalimumab 40 mg three weekly once and oral methotrexate 20 mg/week for human leucocyte antigen (HLA) B27 spondyloarthropathy and recurrent anterior uveitis. Our patient had re-activation of his anterior chamber inflammation on three distinct occasions: first, 3 weeks following recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the second after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination, and the third after recovery from dengue fever-associated hepatitis. We propose molecular mimicry and bystander activation as the postulated mechanisms for the re-activation of his anterior uveitis. In conclusion, patients with auto-immune diseases can have recurrent ocular inflammation following COVID-19 or its vaccination or dengue fever as seen in our patient. The anterior uveitis is usually mild and responds to topical steroids. Additional immuno-suppression may not be needed. Mild ocular inflammation following vaccination should not deter individuals from getting COVID-19 vaccination.

Navigating Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination and Uveitis: Identifying the Rates and Risk of Recurrent Uveitis after Coronavirus Disease Vaccination

PURPOSE

To identify rates of uveitis reactivation both before and after the coronavirus disease (COVID) 2019 vaccine in subjects with a previous diagnosis of uveitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects were identified from the Inflammatory Eye Disease Registry at Auckland District Health Board diagnosed with uveitis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020.

METHODS

Date of COVID vaccination was determined from the patient clinical record. Rate of flare was calculated for 3 months before vaccination and 3 months after each vaccination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Uveitis flare was defined as the presence of new uveitis activity or increased activity that required a change in uveitis treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 4184 eyes of 3008 patients were included in the study with a total of 8474 vaccinations given during the study period. Median age was 54.8 years, and 1474 (49.0%) were female. Noninfectious etiology was most common, occurring in 2296 patients (76.3%) and infectious etiology occurring in 712 patients (23.7%). Rate of uveitis flare was 12.3 per 1000 patient-months at baseline, 20.7 after the first dose, 15.0 after the second dose, 12.8 after the third dose, and 23.9 after the fourth dose. The median period of quiescence before flare was 3.9 years. An increase in uveitis flare was seen in both infectious uveitis (baseline 13.1 compared with 20.2 after first dose, 154% increase) and noninfectious uveitis (baseline 12.4 compared with 20.9 after first dose, 169% increase). Risk factors for uveitis flare were identified to be recurrent uveitis, chronic uveitis, shorter period of quiescence, and first dose of vaccine. Median time to uveitis flare was 0.53 months after the first vaccination, 1.74 months after the second vaccination, and 1.35 months after the third vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates an increased risk of uveitis flare after the first dose of COVID vaccination. This risk was highest in those with previous recurrences, chronic uveitis, and shorter period of quiescence.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and mRNA-1273 vaccination

Almost all vaccines have been reported to be associated with ocular inflammation, which has caused some concern regarding global mass COVID-19 vaccination efforts. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKHD) is a granulomatous inflammation caused by an autoimmune response against antigens in melanocytes, including those in the eyes. The mechanism by which COVID-19 vaccines are associated with VKHD is still unclear. Here, we report two cases of VKHD following COVID-19 vaccination. The first is a case of probable VKHD that presented with bilateral vision loss after administration of the adenovirus-vectored vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca). The condition improved after intravenous methylprednisolone 1g daily for 3days, followed by oral methotrexate and a slow taper of oral corticosteroids. The second case is a patient with an established diagnosis of well-controlled VKHD who developed a reactivation of the disease after receiving the mRNA-based vaccine (mRNA-1273, Moderna). VKHD is a potential ocular event that could follow COVID-19 vaccination. Awareness of this association is key to early detection and treatment to prevent loss of vision.

A Case of Neuroretinitis following Inactivated Virion COVID-19 Vaccination

PURPOSE

We report a rare presentation of neuroretinitis following vaccination with inactivated virion vaccine (COVAXIN).

METHODS

Interventional Case Report.

OBSERVATION

A 14-year-old female presented with sudden unilateral vision loss 3 days following COVID-19 vaccination. The clinical and radiological evaluation was consistent with classical neuroretinitis; the serological and immunological workup was negative. The patient responded well to the pulse steroid therapy and regained complete vision.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 vaccine related adverse ocular events are beginning to emerge slowly and thus warrants close monitoring of all such cases. Also, ophthalmologists should be encouraged to seek vaccination status of patients presenting with inflammatory ocular conditions.

Central Retinal Vein Occlusion after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination

A 47-year-old man presented with visual loss in the right eye 8 h after the first dose of a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine developed by Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2). The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/200. Fundus examination showed dilated and tortuous retinal veins at the posterior pole, retinal hemorrhages throughout the fundus, and macular edema. Fluorescein angiography showed multiple hypofluorescent spots that appeared to be fluorescent block due to retinal hemorrhages and hyperfluorescent leakage from the retinal veins. The eye was diagnosed with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). For the treatment of macular edema, intravitreal injection of aflibercept (IVA) was administered and treated with one plus pro re nata regimen. Five IVAs were performed over a 10-month follow-up period, with resolution of macular edema, and the BCVA recovered to 20/20. The patient was young and had no history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or atherosclerotic diseases, and his blood tests showed no abnormal findings. Both antigen test and polymerase chain reaction test for COVID-19 were negative, and the antibody test was positive due to vaccination. The development of CRVO in this patient may have been related to COVID-19 vaccination, and the appropriate IVA treatment resulted in a good visual prognosis.

A multicenter study of ocular inflammation after COVID-19 vaccination

PURPOSE

To report the characteristics of a case series of ocular inflammatory events following COVID-19 vaccination in Japan.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter survey, a questionnaire was sent to 16 Japanese hospitals that had uveitis specialty clinics. Information on patients who developed ocular inflammatory events within 14 days of COVID-19 vaccination between February 2021 and December 2021 was collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were diagnosed with ocular inflammatory events following COVID-19 vaccination. The mean age was 53.4 ± 16.4 years (range, 26-86 years), and the mean time to onset after vaccination was 6.3 ± 4.2 days (range, 1-14 days). Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) was the most common event (n = 17 patients, 46%), followed by anterior uveitis (n = 6), infectious uveitis (n = 3), acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR) (n = 2), sarcoidosis-associated uveitis (n = 1), acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE) (n = 1), optic neuritis (n = 1), multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) (n = 1), Posner-Schlossman syndrome (n = 1), and unclassified uveitis (n = 4). Twenty-eight cases occurred after BNT162b2 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech) and 8 after mRNA-1273 vaccination (Moderna), whilst 1 patient had no information about vaccine type.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 vaccination can be related to various types of ocular inflammatory events. When we encounter patients with ocular inflammatory disease, we should consider that it may be an adverse effect of COVID-19 vaccination.

Relentless placoid chorioretinitis: A review of four cases in pediatric and young adult patients with a discussion of therapeutic strategies

Introduction

Relentless placoid chorioretinitis (RPC) is a rare, bilateral disease of the retinal pigment epithelium. The clinical course is prolonged and relapsing. No standard treatment has been established to date. The purpose of this case series is to report four cases of RPC in pediatric and young adult patients in which varying treatments were used, comparing them to previously published cases.

Methods

A literature review was conducted to investigate currently published presentations and treatment options for RPC. A multicenter retrospective chart review was also performed on four consecutive patients. These patients were diagnosed with RPC because of new chorioretinitis lesions continuing to appear without or despite therapy for 5-36 months (2 patients), with a clinical course prolonged and relapsing, or because of the atypical location of the multiple lesions (>50) extending from the posterior pole to the equator and mid-peripheral retina (all four patients), which were not consistent with other entities like acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy and serpiginous choroiditis.

Results

All four cases of RPC received oral or IV steroids acutely, and three of these patients were transitioned to a steroid-sparing agent and biologic therapy: anti-TNF alpha or anti-IL-6. Quiescence of the chorioretinitis lesions was obtained after 7 months, 1 month, and 36 months; however, the latter had issues with treatment adherence. Mycophenolate mofetil was insufficient to control the disease in one patient, but tocilizumab and infliximab thereafter were effective after cessation of adalimumab due to side effects. Adalimumab when started the first month after the presentation was effective in controlling the disease in one patient. After the failure of interferon-alpha-2a, one patient displayed long-term control with infliximab. One patient did not require a steroid-sparing agent after oral prednisone taper as there was no evidence of progression or recurrence.

Conclusion

This case series adds to the current knowledge regarding potential treatments for RPC, specifically the use of anti-TNF-alpha treatment and anti-IL-6 tocilizumab. In this case study, relapses of RPC were found among patients on mycophenolate mofetil and interferon-alpha-2a, and one case did not relapse on oral steroids without a steroid-sparing agent. Our findings suggest that adalimumab, infliximab, and tocilizumab may be useful medications to obtain quiescence of RPC.

Unilateral Episcleritis Following COVID-19 Booster Vaccination of a Crohn's Disease Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Purpose

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic spurred vaccine development and resulted in the development of the novel mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and with it, a growing public concern of vaccine side effects. There are reports of ocular inflammatory processes such as episcleritis being possible side effects of COVID-19 vaccination. Here we reported the first case of unilateral episcleritis in a Crohn's disease patient following her third mRNA COVID-19 vaccination booster shot.

Patient and Methods

A 27-year-old female presented with a 1-day history of right eye redness, itching, and burning. Patient reported developing these symptoms within 3-4 hours after vaccination. Her past medical history was relevant for Crohn's disease. Ophthalmic examination revealed right 2+ conjunctival injection that blanched with phenylephrine drops. Otherwise, her ophthalmic exam was unremarkable. The patient was started on artificial tears and ibuprofen 200 mg three times daily for one week. After one week all symptoms resolved, and ophthalmic examination was back to baseline.

Conclusion

This is the first case in the literature of ophthalmic side effects in a Crohn's disease patient after the third mRNA COVID-19 booster. Patients with Crohn's disease may respond differently to booster vaccination. This case report may help healthcare providers when counselling Crohn's disease patients about future COVID-19 mRNA vaccine side effects.

The Characteristics of COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Uveitis: A Summative Systematic Review

Numerous complications following COVID-19 vaccination has been reported in the literature, with an increasing body of evidence reporting vaccination-associated uveitis (VAU). In this systematic review, we searched six electronic databases for articles reporting the occurrence of VAU following COVID-19 vaccination. Data were synthesized with emphasis on patients' characteristics [age, gender], vaccination characteristics [type, dose], and outcome findings [type, nature, laterality, course, location, onset, underlying cause, and associated findings]. Data are presented as numbers (percentages) for categorical data and as mean (standard deviation) for continuous data. Sixty-five studies were finally included [43 case reports, 16 case series, four cohort, one cross-sectional, and one registry-based study]. VAU occurred in 1526 cases, most commonly in females (68.93%) and middle-aged individuals (41-50 years: 19.71%), following the first dose (49.35%) of vaccination, especially in those who received Pfizer (77.90%). VAU occurred acutely (71.77%) as an inflammatory reaction (88.29%) in unilateral eyes (77.69%), particularly in the anterior portion of the uvea (54.13%). Importantly, most cases had a new onset (69.92%) while only a limited portion of cases had a reactivation of previous uveitis condition. In conclusion, although rare, uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination should be considered in new-onset and recurrent cases presenting with either acute or chronic events.

Bilateral choroidal effusion following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 virus

An 80-year-old systemically stable female presented with sudden blurring of vision post the first dose of Covishield^TM, a non-replicating viral vector vaccine. On examination, she was found to have bilateral serous choroidal effusions. A thorough systemic and ocular workup was performed to rule out other causes of choroidal effusion. The effusions resolved with tapering doses of oral and systemic steroids. To the best of our knowledge, at the time of submission, this is the first case of choroidal effusion being reported after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine.

COVID-19 vaccination and recurrent anterior uveitis

A 35-year-old Asian Indian female previously diagnosed with bilateral anterior uveitis and on oral methotrexate developed bilateral anterior uveitis following first/second dose of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. She had skipped her weekly dose of oral methotrexate following first dose of vaccination. Following the second dose, she reduced her oral methotrexate from 25 to 15 mg on her own, but did not stop like the previous occasion. She had extensive workup for her uveitis in the past with only positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies. She developed unilateral anterior uveitis after she had COVID-19 in July 2022, which resolved with topical steroids and continuation of immunosuppression. This report illustrates that COVID-19 or its vaccination may presumably play a role in triggering the immune system and can cause recurrent ocular inflammation even in the absence of an extraocular inflammation.

Inflammatory ocular events after inactivated COVID-19 vaccination

To report potential vaccine-induced inflammatory ocular adverse events following inactivated COVID-19 vaccination. Retrospective study of patients with uveitis and other ocular complications following inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination at a tertiary referral center between May 2021 and August 2021. Data collection consisted of demographic and clinical data. The study included 8 eyes of 5 patients (4 females, 1 male), with a mean age of 37.2 ± 12.5 years (range 28-59 years). Mean time between vaccination and ocular complications onset was 13.2 ± 11.9 days (range 3-30 days), including two patients after the first dose of the vaccine and 3 patients after the second dose. The cases reported were three anterior uveitis, one herpetic keratitis and iridocyclitis, and one posterior uveitis. Patients received treatment with local and/or systemic steroids and all the patients had good visual outcomes. Ocular inflammatory events may occur after vaccination with possible gender preponderance. However, they are rare and manageable. Overall, the efficacy and safety of vaccination should be emphasized.

COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Ocular Adverse Effects: An Overview

BACKGROUND

To address the pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), vaccination efforts were initiated across the globe in December 2020 and are continuing. We report the onset interval and clinical presentations of ocular adverse effects following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

METHODS

For this narrative review, articles in the English language, published between 1 January 2020 to 1 September 2022, were included to formulate a list of the reported ocular adverse effects of different COVID-19 vaccines.

RESULTS

During this period, ocular adverse effects have been reported with BNT162b2 (Pfizer), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), AZD-1222 (AstraZeneca), and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson) vaccines. Endothelial graft rejection, herpes simplex virus keratitis, herpes zoster ophthalmicus, anterior uveitis, eyelid edema, purpuric rashes, ischemic optic neuropathy, and cranial nerve palsies were the most reported with BNT163b2. Retinal hemorrhages, vascular occlusions, and angle closure glaucoma were the most reported with AZD-1222. Most of the ocular adverse effects reported in the literature had a good to fair prognosis with appropriate management.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence regarding the ocular adverse effects does not outweigh the benefits of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with pre-existing systemic or ophthalmic diseases. This review provides insights into the possible temporal association between reported ocular adverse events and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines; however, further investigations are required to identify the link between potential causality and pathological mechanisms.

Simultaneous unilateral central retinal vein occlusion and branch retinal artery occlusion after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine

A 51-year-old non-obese woman presented with a one-week history of progressive blurry vision within the inferior visual field of her left eye. Her only relevant past medical history was long-standing hypothyroidism and recent vaccination against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with an mRNA vaccine 12 days before the onset of symptoms. At examination, the anterior segment was unremarkable, but the retinal fundus revealed a central retinal vein occlusion associated with a branch retinal artery occlusion of the superior temporal branch in her left eye. Ancillary tests to rule out thrombophilia, hyperviscosity, hypercoagulability, or inflammation were negative. Ultrasound tests were also negative for a cardiac or carotid origin of the branch retinal artery occlusion. At two-month follow-up, no new retinal vascular occlusive events were observed. Although the best-corrected visual acuity at presentation was 8/10 in the left eye, the final best-corrected visual acuity remained 3/10.

Central retinal vein occlusion post ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination - can it be explained by the two-hit hypothesis?

PURPOSE

To report a case of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) seven days following the first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and propose a hypothesis for the possible underlying pathogenesis.

OBSERVATION

A 31-year-old male presented with CRVO with cystoid macular edema, one week after receiving his first ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine dose. Apart from mild hyperhomocysteinemia, no major thrombophilic or systemic risk factors were found. Anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies, specific for vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, were also negative. However, he tested strongly positive (> 250 U/mL) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG spike antibodies, 2 weeks post the first dose - suggestive of a prior subclinical infection.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 is known to be associated with an altered host one-carbon metabolism resulting in hyperhomocysteinemia. We hypothesize that a prior subclinical infection with COVID-19, the first hit, may have led to hyperhomocysteinemia in our patient and vaccination must have been the second hit that triggered the thrombotic event. Further studies, including correlation of thrombotic complications with IgG antibody titres post-vaccination, are essential in order to better understand the pathogenesis of such events.