Clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Risk Factors of Young-Onset Gastric Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The characteristics of gastric carcinoma in young individuals differ from that in older individuals. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the clinicopathological features and risk factors associated with young-onset (younger than 50 years) gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

We searched for studies published between January 1, 1990, and September 1, 2023, on patients with young-onset gastric carcinoma in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and MEDLINE to explore clinicopathological characteristics among this specific patient group. Extracted information included the proportion of patients with symptoms or family history of gastric cancer, tumor location, and histological features such as Lauren or World Health Organization histological classification and degree of differentiation. Additional analyses were conducted on risk factors such as positive family history, Helicobacter pylori infection, or high-risk nutritional or behavioral factors. The estimates were derived using random or fixed-effect models and included subgroup analyses based on different sex and age groups. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023466131).

RESULTS

We identified 5,696 records, 1,292 were included in the quality assessment stage. Finally, 84 studies from 18 countries or regions including 89,447 patients with young-onset gastric carcinoma were included. Young-onset gastric carcinoma has slight female predominance (53.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 51.6-55.7%), with most having symptoms (87.0%, 95% CI: 82.4%-91.7%). Family history was reported in 12.1% (95% CI: 9.5%-14.7%). H. pylori infection was detected in 60.0% of cases (95% CI: 47.1%-72.8%). Most of these carcinomas were in the non-cardia region (89.6%, 95% CI: 82.4%-96.8%), exhibiting Lauren diffuse-type histology (71.1%, 95% CI: 66.8%-75.3%) and poor/undifferentiated features (81.9%, 95% CI%: 79.7-84.2%). A positive family history of gastric cancer was the most important risk factor associated with the development of gastric carcinoma in young individuals (pooled odds ratios 4.0, 95% CI: 2.8-5.2), followed by H. pylori infection (odds ratio 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.2) and dietary and other lifestyle risk factors.

DISCUSSION

Young-onset gastric carcinoma exhibits specific clinicopathological characteristics, with positive family history being the most important risk factor. Most of the patients were symptomatic at diagnosis. These findings could help to inform future strategies for the early detection of gastric carcinoma among young individuals.

Abnormal arginine synthesis confers worse prognosis in patients with middle third gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer at different locations has distinct prognoses and biological behaviors, but the specific mechanism is unclear.

METHODS

Non-targeted metabolomics was performed to examine the differential metabolite phenotypes that may be associated with the effects of tumor location on the prognosis of gastric cancer. And silencing of the rate-limiting enzyme to evaluate the effect of abnormal changes in metabolic pathway on the functional biological assays of gastric cancer cells HGC-27 and MKN28.

RESULTS

In a retrospective study of 94 gastric cancer patients, the average survival time of patients with gastric cancer in the middle third of the stomach was significantly lower than that of patients with gastric cancer in other locations (p < 0.05). The middle third location was also found to be an independent risk factor for poor prognosis (HR = 2.723, 95%CI 1.334-5.520), which was closely associated with larger tumors in this location. Non-targeted metabolomic analysis showed that the differential metabolites affected 16 signaling pathways including arginine synthesis, retrograde endocannabinoid signaling, arginine biosynthesis, and alanine and aspartate and glutamate metabolism between gastric cancer and normal tissue, as well as between tumors located in the middle third of the stomach and other locations. Argininosuccinate synthetase 1 (ASS1), the rate-limiting enzyme of the arginine biosynthesis pathway, catalyzes the production of argininosuccinic acid. Here, knockdown of ASS1 significantly inhibited the proliferation, colony formation, and migration/invasion of gastric cancer cells, and promoted apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that abnormal arginine synthesis may lead to larger tumor size and worse prognosis in gastric cancer located in the middle third position of the stomach. These findings may provide the basis for the stratification and targeted treatment of gastric cancer in different locations.

Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in young patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the Spanish AGAMENON-SEOM registry

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in young adults (GCYA) counts for 10-15% of diagnoses. Previous studies have mainly focused on surgical outcomes in patients with resectable tumors; however, systemic therapy for advanced GCYA remains under-evaluated. This study aims to assess the efficacy-related outcomes and safety of first-line chemotherapy (CT) in younger versus older patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry treated with first-line polychemotherapy between January 2008 and October 2022 were included. We compared clinicopathological features, therapies received, efficacy-related outcomes, and toxicity between individuals aged < and ≥ 45 years.

RESULTS

Out of 3386 patients, 263 (7.8%) were < 45 years. Young patients exhibited a higher proportion of females affected, lower ECOG-PS ≥ 2, fewer comorbidities, and more aggressive disease-related features, such as higher proportion of diffuse subtype, signet-ring cells, plastic linitis, grade 3, peritoneal metastases and metastatic disease at diagnosis. They received more triple-agent combinations and underwent more surgeries in metastatic setting. No significant differences were observed between groups in overall response rate (53.1% vs. 52.3% in < and ≥ 45 years, respectively, p = 0.579), progression-free survival (6.1 vs. 6.83 months, p = 0.158) and overall survival (11.07 vs. 10.81 months, p = 0.82), even after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Grade 3-4 adverse events were comparable in both groups, although toxicity leading to treatment discontinuation was more frequent in older patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, younger patients with GCYA exhibited more aggressive clinicopathological features, and despite receiving more aggressive treatments, similar efficacy outcomes and toxicity profiles were achieved compared to their older counterparts. In the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, GEAC in < 45 years showed more aggressive clinicopathological features and, although treated with more intense first-line CT regimens, similar efficacy outcomes and toxicity were achieved compared to older patients.

Aggressive Histology and Extensive Metastasis Characteristic of Very Young Gastric Cancer (Less Than 30 Years): A Retrospective Clinical Audit

Narendran KrishnamoorthiObjectives  Gastric cancer (GC) is an aggressive disease and remains one of the most common causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Incidence of gastric cancer in young (GCY) varies between 2 and 8%. GCY faces unique challenges such as biological variation, diagnosis at an advanced stage, issues related to fertility preservation, and psychosocial considerations. This study aimed to find the differences in clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of GCY compared to gastric cancer in older adults (GCO). Material and Methods  This is a retrospective study from a tertiary care center. We screened records from 2015 to 2020, identified 33 records of GCY (less than 30 years), and compared the data with GCO (greater than 30 years) during 2015 and 2018. Results  We identified 33 patients with GCY with a median age of 28 years (21-30) and a female to male ratio of 2:1. In GCY, 60% of patients presented with metastatic disease. Diffuse-type histology was more common in the GCY than in GCO (66.7% vs. 41.7%, p  = 0.001). In patients with metastasis, multiple metastases were common in GCY compared to GCO (45% vs. 15%, p  = 0.003). The median duration of follow-up for all patients was 27 (24-29) months. In GCY, the median OS was not reached for patients treated with curative intent, and it was 13 months for those treated with palliative intent. Conclusion  The incidence of GCY in our study was like the western literature. Female patients with aggressive diffuse histology and multiple extensive metastases were characteristic of GCY. The survival outcomes were identical to GCO.

Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia in Children: Natural History and Clinicopathological Correlation

INTRODUCTION

Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is defined as the replacement of the normal gastric epithelium by intestinal-type epithelium. GIM is considered a preneoplastic lesion for gastric adenocarcinoma in adults and is found in 25% of Helicobacter pylori ( H pylori ) exposed adults. However, the significance of GIM in pediatric gastric biopsies is still unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of children with GIM on gastric biopsies at Boston Children's Hospital between January 2013 and July 2019. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data were collected and compared to age and sex-matched cohort without GIM. Gastric biopsies were reviewed by the study pathologist. GIM was classified as complete/incomplete based on Paneth cell presence or absence and limited/extensive based on its distribution in the antrum or both antrum and corpus.

RESULTS

Of 38 patients with GIM, 18 were male (47%), mean age of detection was 12.5 ± 5.05 years (range, 1-18 years). The most common histologic was chronic gastritis (47%). Complete GIM was present in 50% (19/38) and limited GIM was present in 92% (22/24). H pylori was positive in 2 patients. Two patients had persistent GIM on repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy (2/12). No dysplasia or carcinoma was identified. Proton-pump inhibitor use and chronic gastritis were more common in GIM patients compared to control ( P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Most children with GIM had low-risk histologic subtype (complete/limited) for gastric cancer; GIM was rarely associated with H pylori gastritis in our cohort. Larger multicenter studies are needed to better understand outcomes and risk factors in children with GIM.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of adolescents and young adults with gastric cancer after gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs, aged 15-39 years) has limited data on clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and long-term outcomes of AYAs and older adults (OAs, aged > 39 years) with GC who underwent curative gastrectomy.

Methods

From January 1994 to June 2019, patients with GC undergoing curative gastrectomy were enrolled and divided into AYA group and OA group. The clinicopathological characteristics, treatment variables, perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups, both before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

AYAs had fewer comorbid conditions and were more likely to be females, have normal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, poorly differentiated tumors with perineural invasion, and receive adjuvant chemotherapy. AYA patients had lower incidence of postoperative complications and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay than OA patients. No significant differences in postoperative 30-day or 90-day mortality were observed between AYAs and OAs, both before and after PSM. In the entire cohort, AYAs had similar median overall survival (OS) to OAs. However, in the PSM cohort, AYAs had significantly shorter median OS. Young age (15-39 years) was an independent risk factor for OS in GC patients following gastrectomy.

Conclusion

The clinicopathological characteristics were significantly different between AYA and OA patients with GC. AYA patients with GC had worse long-term prognosis than OA patients, and young age was an independent risk factor for OS in GC patients following gastrectomy.

Non-hereditary early onset gastric cancer: An unmet medical need

Gastric cancer (GC) is a lethal disease and the diagnosis in the young population is a major challenge from both individual and social point of views. Early-onset GC accounts for ∼5% of GC; among them, 3% are part of a hereditary syndrome and the majority are sporadic. However, even if the early-onset forms were less frequent in the past, the increasing number in the last decades has improved the interest and awareness of them in the society and in the scientific community. In particular, the different behaviour and characteristics of early-onset GC suggest that it is a completely different entity, which requires a tailored and personalized management. Here we provide an updated overview about non-hereditary early-onset GC, which is an unmet clinical need today, along with future perspectives in this field.

Comparisons of pathologic findings and outcomes of gastric cancer patients younger and older than 40: a propensity score matching study in a single center of Korea

Background and Aim

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with a high incidence rate in Korean men. However, comparative studies are scarce on the pathologic findings and treatment effects of GC in patients aged less than 40 years. We evaluated the characteristics and pathologic findings of GC patients aged younger and older than 40 years.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 2307 patients diagnosed with GC between January 2010 and May 2018. Eighty-eight (3.8%) and 2219 (96.2%) patients were younger and older than 40 years, respectively. The patients were divided into younger (n = 70) and older (n = 62) age groups through propensity matching.

Results

Overall, compared to the younger group, the older group (n = 2219) had a significantly higher proportion of male patients (66.7% vs 39.8%; P < 0.001) and patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (2.3% vs 23.1%; P < 0.001). However, young patients more often underwent operations compared to older patients (78.4% vs 60.1%; P = 0.001). In the propensity-matched group, older patients more often showed differentiated carcinoma, including well-differentiated (5.7% vs 11.3%) and moderately differentiated (1.4% vs 32.3%). However, younger patients more often showed signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) (70.0% vs 25.8%). In multivariate analysis, Helicobacter pylori infection (odds ratio, 12.643; 95% confidence interval, 1.068-1449.665; P = 0.044) independently correlated with SRC risk.

Conclusions

Patients below 40 years were more likely to undergo surgery compared to ESD, and pathologic findings were more common in SRC. Therefore, more active screening and H. pylori eradication are needed even in patients aged less than 40 years.

Gastric cancer clinical characteristics and their altered trends in South China: An epidemiological study with 2,800 cases spanning 26 years

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is a serious threat to human health. The clinical GC characteristics in China may be impacted by changes in people's lifestyles and the promotion of early GC (EGC) screening. The present study aims to evaluate the recent trends of GC characteristics in South China and search for hazardous factors limiting the survival time of GC patients.

METHODS

Data on GC patients that were hospitalized in the Department of Digestive Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, from 1994 to 2019 were collected and divided into two categories according to the time when the EGC screening began in China: the PRE group (previous 13 years, 1994-2006) and the PAS group (past 13 years, 2007-2019).

RESULTS

We found that, although the 5-year survival rate increased in the PAS group compared with the PRE group (P < 0.0001), patients with age ≥60 years or Borrmann type IV still had a worse prognosis. In the PAS group, the larger percentages of elderly patients and patients with Borrmann type IV in the lymphatic metastases (N1) group (41.0% vs. 51.1%, P = 0.0014) and stage IV subgroup (20.7% vs. 32.2%, P = 0.016), respectively, when compared with the PRE group, may have contributed to the poor outcome of GC. By comparing the odds ratio (OR) of 5-year overall survival (OS) in the two 13-year periods, female sex and T2 turned into risk factors because of a greater proportion of Borrmann type IV or elderly patients in the PAS group (OR = 0.983, 95% CI = 0.723-1.336 vs. OR = 1.277, 95% CI = 1.028-1.586 and OR = 1.545, 95% CI = 0.499-4.775 vs. OR = 2.227, 95% CI = 1.124-4.271, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the GC epidemiology changes, the overall prognosis of GC patients has improved in South China. However, old age and Borrmann type IV are still the major restrictions affecting the survival of GC patients, a situation which calls for additional attention.

Characterization of pyruvate metabolism and citric acid cycle patterns predicts response to immunotherapeutic and ferroptosis in gastric cancer

Background

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the digestive system with a high lethal rate. Studies have shown that inherited and acquired mutations in pyruvate metabolism and citric acid cycle (P-CA) enzymes are involved in tumorigenesis and tumor development. However, it is unclear how different P-CA patterns affect the tumor microenvironment (TME), which is critical for cancer progression.

Methods

This study mainly concentrated on investigating the role of the P-CA patterns in multicellular immune cell infiltration of GC TME. First, the expression levels of P-CA regulators were profiled in GC samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus cohorts to construct a consensus clustering analysis and identify three distinct P-CA clusters. GSVA was conducted to reveal the different biological processes in three P-CA clusters. Subsequently, 1127 cluster-related differentially expressed genes were identified, and prognostic-related genes were screened using univariate Cox regression analysis. A scoring system was then set up to quantify the P-CA gene signature and further evaluate the response of the patients to the immunotherapy.

Results

We found that GC patients in the high P-CA score group had a higher tumor mutational burden, higher microsatellite instability, and better prognosis. The opposite was observed in the low P-CA score group. Interestingly, we demonstrated P-CA gene cluster could predict the sensitivity to immunotherapy and ferroptosis-induced therapy.

Conclusion

Collectively, the P-CA gene signature in this study exhibits potential roles in the tumor microenvironment and predicts the response to immunotherapeutic. The identification of these P-CA patterns may significantly accelerate the strategic development of immunotherapy for GC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02739-z.

Open and minimally invasive gastrectomy in Eastern and Western patient populations: A review of the literature and reasons for differences in outcomes

Randomized trials in the East have established minimally invasive gastrectomy as possibly superior for short-term outcomes and noninferior for long-term survival. Smaller randomized studies from Western countries have supported these findings. However, there are marked disparities in morbidity, mortality, and overall survival noted between Eastern and Western studies. In this article, we review the literature comparing open and minimally invasive gastrectomy in the East and West, and describe the possible reasons for differences in outcomes.

Clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and genetic alterations of younger patients with gastric cancer: Results from the China National Cancer Center and cBioPortal datasets

Background

The survival outcomes of younger patients with gastric cancer (GC) have remained controversial. This study explores the clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and genetic alterations of younger and older patients with GC.

Methods

Patients with GC were identified from the China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer Database (NCCGCDB) during 1998–2018. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. Sequencing datasets were enrolled from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) databases.

Results

A total of 1146 younger (<40 years of age) and 16,988 older (≥40 years of age) cases were included in the study. Younger patients had more poorly differentiated lesions than older patients (53.7% vs. 33.8%, respectively; p < 0.0001), and were more often pTNM stage IV (19.5% vs. 11.8%, respectively; p < 0.001). The 5‐year overall survival (OS) of patients from the NCCGCDB increased from 1998 to 2018. Younger patients with pTNM stage III had a lower survival rate than older patients (p = 0.014), while no differences by age were observed at other stages. The mutation frequency of the LRP1B, GNAS, APC, and KMT2D genes was higher for older than younger patients (p < 0.05 for all genes). While not significantly different, younger patients from the TCGA and MSKCC databases were more likely to have CDH1, RHOA, and CTNNB1 gene mutations.

Conclusions

A stable proportion and improved survival of younger patients were reported using NCCGCDB data. Younger patients with pTNM stage III had lower rates of survival than older patients. Distinct molecular characteristics were identified in younger GC patients which may partly explain the histopathology and prognosis specific to this subpopulation.

Gene Fusions in Gastrointestinal Tract cancers

Fusion genes have been identified a wide array of human neoplasms including hematologic and solid tumors, including gastrointestinal tract neoplasia. A fusion gene is the product of parts of two genes which are joined together following a deletion, translocation or chromosomal inversion. Together with single nucleotide variants, insertions, deletions, and amplification, fusion genes represent one of the key genomic mechanisms for tumor development. Detecting fusions in the clinic is accomplished by a variety of techniques including break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Some recurrent gene fusions have been successfully targeted by small molecule or monoclonal antibody therapies (i.e. targeted therapies), while others are used for as biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The purpose of this review article is to discuss the clinical utility of detection of gene fusions in carcinomas and neoplasms arising primarily in the digestive system. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Nomogram: Potential to Predict Local Recurrence of Gastric Cancer After Radical Resection

Objective

Accurate prediction of postoperative recurrence risk of gastric cancer (GC) is critical for individualized precision therapy. We aimed to investigate whether a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram can be used as a tool for predicting the local recurrence (LR) of GC after radical resection.

Materials and Methods

342 patients (194 in the training cohort, 78 in the internal validation cohort, and 70 in the external validation cohort) with pathologically proven GC from two centers were included. Radiomics features were extracted from the preoperative CT imaging. The clinical model, radiomics signature, and radiomics nomogram, which incorporated the radiomics signature and independent clinical risk factors, were developed and verified. Furthermore, the performance of these three models was assessed by using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The radiomics signature, which was comprised of two selected radiomics features, namely, contrast_GLCM and dissimilarity_GLCM, showed better performance than the clinical model in predicting the LR of GC, with AUC values of 0.83 in the training cohort, 0.84 in the internal validation cohort, and 0.73 in the external cohort, respectively. By integrating the independent clinical risk factors (N stage, bile acid duodenogastric reflux and nodular or irregular outer layer of the gastric wall) into the radiomics signature, the radiomics nomogram achieved the highest accuracy in predicting LR, with AUC values of 0.89, 0.89 and 0.80 in the three cohorts, respectively. DCA in the validation cohort showed that radiomics nomogram added more net benefit than the clinical model within the range of 0.01-0.98.

Conclusion

The CT-based radiomics nomogram has the potential to predict the LR of GC after radical resection.

Prognostic performance of different lymph node classification systems in young gastric cancer

Background

Accurate staging plays a pivotal role in cancer care. The lymph node (LN) ratio (LNR) and the log odds of positive LNs (LODDS) have been suggested as alternatives to the N staging since the TNM system has the risk of stage migration. The prognostic significance of LNR and LODDS in young patients with gastric cancer (GC) has not been reported. This study aims to investigate the correlations between LNR and LODDS and survival of young patients with GC, and compare the predictive performance of these LN staging methods.

Methods

GC patients before the age of 40 from 2004 to 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database were enrolled. The prognostic evaluation of the N factor, LNR and LODDS was compared using the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area under the curve (AUC), C-index and Akaike information criterion (AIC).

Results

Multivariate survival analysis identified that the LNR and LODDS were significantly independent prognostic indicators for overall survival (OS) in young patients with GC and in the subgroups comprised of patients with ≤15 LNs examined. The time-dependent ROC curves of the LNR and LODDS were continuously superior to that of the N factor in predicting OS during the observation period. And the AUCs revealed that the predictive accuracy of the LNR and LODDS was remarkably superior to the N factor at 1 and 3 years (P<0.05). The model incorporating LNR or LODDS had higher C-index and lower AIC when comparing to the model incorporating the N factor.

Conclusions

The LNR and LODDS improve accuracy of survival risk prediction in young patients with GC when comparing to the N factor. These two novel LN classification methods should be considered as alternatives to the N staging for the prognostic prediction of young patients with GC.

Three-Tier Prognostic Index in Young Adults With Advanced Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

To characterize clinical features and identify baseline prognostic factors for survival in young adults with advanced gastric cancer (YAAGC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 220 young inpatients (age less than or equal to 40 years) with an initial diagnosis of advanced gastric cancer were retrospectively enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

Of a consecutive cohort of 220 patients with YAAGC, the median overall survival (OS) time was 16.3 months. One-year survival rate was 43.6% (95% CI: 36.5 to 50.7). In this cohort, a female (71.4%, n = 157) predominance and a number of patients with poorly differentiated tumors (95.9%, n = 211) were observed. In the univariate analysis, OS was significantly associated with neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (≥3.12), hypoproteinemia (<40 g/L), presence of peritoneal or bone metastases, and previous gastrectomy of primary tumor or radical gastrectomy. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, hypoproteinemia [hazard ratio (HR) 1.522, 95% CI 1.085 to 2.137, p = 0.015] and high NLR level (HR 1.446, 95% CI 1.022 to 2.047, p = 0.021) were two independent poor prognostic factors, while previous radical gastrectomy was associated with a favorable OS (HR 0.345, 95% CI 0.205 to 0.583, p = 0.000). A three-tier prognostic index was constructed dividing patients into good-, intermediate-, or poor-risk groups. Median OS for good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups was 36.43, 17.87, and 11.27 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Three prognostic factors were identified, and a three-tier prognostic index was devised. The reported prognostic index may aid clinical decision-making, patient risk stratification, and planning of future clinical studies on YAAGC.

Analysis of the Factors Affecting Survival in the Patients who Underwent Curative-Intent Gastrectomy due to Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Objectives:

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of clinicopathological factors on overall survival in the patients who underwent curative-intent gastrectomy due to gastric adenocarcinoma.

Methods:

The medical records of 644 patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2007 and January 2017 in our clinic were retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 359 patients were included in this study. The impact of several prognostic factors on survival was investigated.

Results:

The mean age was 59.2±11.6 (29-83). Male/female ratio was 2.12. The median follow-up time was 19 months (CI=10.1-31.1). Median overall survival was 23±2.3 months (CI=18.3-27.6). Splenectomy, R1 (microscopically incomplete) resection, and advanced stage were independent risk factors for poor prognosis.

Conclusion:

R1 resection, splenectomy, and advanced TNM stage were associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Splenectomy should be avoided in the absence of direct invasion of the tumour or metastasis of lymph nodes on splenic hilum to prevent postoperative infectious complication-related mortality.

Inhibition or Reversal of the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Gastric Cancer: Pharmacological Approaches

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) constitutes one of the hallmarks of carcinogenesis consisting in the re-differentiation of the epithelial cells into mesenchymal ones changing the cellular phenotype into a malignant one. EMT has been shown to play a role in the malignant transformation and while occurring in the tumor microenvironment, it significantly affects the aggressiveness of gastric cancer, among others. Importantly, after EMT occurs, gastric cancer patients are more susceptible to the induction of resistance to various therapeutic agents, worsening the clinical outcome of patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need to search for the newest pharmacological agents targeting EMT to prevent further progression of gastric carcinogenesis and potential metastases. Therapies targeted at EMT might be combined with other currently available treatment modalities, which seems to be an effective strategy to treat gastric cancer patients. In this review, we have summarized recent advances in gastric cancer treatment in terms of targeting EMT specifically, such as the administration of polyphenols, resveratrol, tangeretin, luteolin, genistein, proton pump inhibitors, terpenes, other plant extracts, or inorganic compounds.

The clinicopathological features and prognosis of serum AFP positive gastric cancer: a report of 16 cases

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-producing gastric cancer (AFPGC) is a relatively rare type of gastric cancer (GC). To improve the early diagnosis and treatment of AFPGC, we thoroughly investigated the clinicopathological features and prognosis of AFPGC. 139 GC patients who had received treatment from January 2013 to March 2016 in Jinan Central Hospital were included in this study. Blood samples for the pretreatment AFP examinations were collected. The relationship between the serum AFP and the clinicopathological features and prognosis were analyzed. Among the 139 GC cases, 16 cases (11.5%) were AFPGC patients. Compared with the AFP-negative (non-AFPGC) group, the AFPGC patients were prone to have distant metastasis (P=0.029), particularly in the liver, and the abdominal metastasis accounted for 79.4% (27/34). AFPGC patients' cancer is clearly prone to occur in the upper third of the stomach (P=0.008) and among younger (≤60 years old) patients (P=0.044). Furthermore, among the young and middle-aged (≤60 years old) patients, there were no significant differences in the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), the cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), or the combined (CEA+CA19-9) positive rate between the AFPGC and the non-AFPGC patients. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the median overall survival (mOS) of patients with AFPGC was significantly less than it was among the non-AFPGC patients (P=0.042). The serum AFP level (<100 ng/ml vs ≥100 ng/ml) is a prognostic factor for overall survival in AFPGC patients (P=0.041). In conclusion, the real-time examination of serum AFP has great diagnostic and prognostic value for managing AFPGC, especially for young and middle-aged patients.

Gastric Carcinoma in Young Patients and Its Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis

Background

Gastric cancer is usually an age-related disease and mostly diagnosed after the sixth decade of life, though it may also be diagnosed earlier.

Objective

The aim of this study is to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of gastric carcinoma in young patients.

Methods

A total of 1379 patients younger than 75 years histologically diagnosed with primary gastric carcinoma underwent gastrectomy. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their age which included young age group (≤40 years), middle-aged group (age 41-60 years), and elderly group (age 61-75 years). The young age group was further subdivided into two groups: Group A (age ≤35 years) and Group B (age 35-40 years). The analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis followed thereafter.

Results

Females predominate in young group (p < 0.001). A significantly higher undifferentiated histological pattern was found in the young age group from the other two groups (p < 0.001). Tumor location in the lower third of the stomach was significantly higher in the young group than the other groups (p < 0.001). T4 stage was common in young patients similar to the middle and old age group (p = 0.049). Distal gastrectomy was performed more in the young age group rather than the middle and old age groups with the following percentage ratios: young group 74.5% (123/165), middle age group 59.9% (429/716), and old age group 52.2% (260/498) (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rate of the young, middle, and old age groups were 46%, 48%, and 39%, respectively, whereas the 5-year overall survival rates of the subgroups of young patients, Group A and Group B, were 33% and 49%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent negative prognostic factors were as follows: tumor location (L), p = 0.016, OR = 0.795, 95%CI = [0.659; 0.959]; larger tumor size, p = 0.026, OR = 1.727, 95%CI = [1.067; 2.797]; resection margin, p < 0.001, OR = 2.167, 95%CI = [1.751; 2.682]; tumor stage (T4), p < 0.001, OR = 2.572, 95%CI = [1.709; 3.870]; and nodal involvement N1, p = 0.005, OR = 1.506, 95%CI = [1.123; 2.020]; N2, p < 0.001, OR = 1.708, 95%CI = [1.289; 2.263]; and N3, p < 0.001, OR = 2.986, 95%CI = [2.314; 3.854].

Conclusion

The young age groups of patients were predominantly female and had a higher proportion of poorly differentiated and undifferentiated type of tumor; moreover, patients aged <35 years had a poor prognosis. In addition, gastric cancer can occur in patients less than 30 years old, and symptoms suggestive of gastric cancer should be investigated aggressively; therefore, a close scrutiny and monitoring should be done in younger patients especially those associated with high-risk factors which could indicate the presence of the disease at an early stage.

Prognostic factors in stage I gastric cancer: A retrospective analysis

Purpose

The purpose of this research is to investigate the prognostic factors of patients with stage I gastric cancer (GC) and to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis for high-risk patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences from January 2001 to December 2015. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier were used to evaluate the relationship between the patients’ clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis.

Results

A total of 1,550 patients were eligible for the study. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of all enrolled patients was 96.5%. The pT and pN stages were significantly associated with the prognosis. The 5-year DFS rates of the three subgroups (T1N0, T2N0, and T1N1) were 97.8%, 95.7%, and 90.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the T1N1 subgroup, patients not undergoing chemotherapy showed a lower 5-year DFS rate compared to those undergoing chemotherapy, although the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Both the pT and pN stages were closely associated with the prognosis of patients with stage I GC. We also found that the danger coefficient of the pN stage was higher than that of the pT stage, and that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy might be a reasonable approach to improve outcomes of high-risk patients, particularly in the T1N1 group.

Comparison of clinicopathologic profiles and prognosis of gastric cancer in the upper, middle and lower third of the stomach: A retrospective cohort study

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cancer in the world and the second most common cancer in China. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic profiles and prognosis of GC in the upper third (UT), middle third (MT) and low third (LT) of the stomach.Five hundred and forty-two patients with GC resected between January 2010 and January 2014 were retrospectively studied and divided in 3 groups according to cancer location: upper third gastric cancer (UTGC) (n = 62); MTGC (n = 131) and LTGC (n = 349). Clinical and pathological parameters including gender, age, tumor size, macroscopic types, histological types, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, venous infiltration and lymph embolism were compared among groups. Overall survival (OS) was calculated based on the aforementioned parameters. Univariate and multivariate survival was analyzed and Cox regression was conducted for each location. The prognostic accuracy was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.Patients with UTGC was similar to those with MTGC and both were distinct from those with LTGC based on the tumor size, macroscopic types, depth of invasion and 5-year OS. Patients with MTGC were similar to those with LTGC and distinct from UTGC patients based on gender. 5-year OS were lower for patients with UTGC than those with LTGC (P = .001) and were comparable between MTGC and LTGC. No significant differences in 5-year OS were observed between UTGC and MTGC. Cox regression revealed that macroscopic types, depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis were the independent prognostic factors for GC patients regardless of locations. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that macroscopic types, depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis were the significantly effective prognosis for the 5-year OS in GC patients regardless of locations.Our results showed that UTGC is distinct from LTGC whereas MTGC shares some characteristics from both UTGC and LTGC.

Gastric Carcinoma in Young Patients and Its Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis

Background. Gastric cancer is usually an age-related disease and mostly diagnosed after the sixth decade of life, though it may also be diagnosed earlier. Objective. The aim of this study is to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of gastric carcinoma in young patients. Methods. A total of 1379 patients younger than 75 years histologically diagnosed with primary gastric carcinoma underwent gastrectomy. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their age which included young age group (≤40 years), middle-aged group (age 41-60 years), and elderly group (age 61-75 years). The young age group was further subdivided into two groups: Group A (age ≤35 years) and Group B (age 35-40 years). The analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis followed thereafter. Results. Females predominate in young group (p<0.001). A significantly higher undifferentiated histological pattern was found in the young age group from the other two groups (p<0.001). Tumor location in the lower third of the stomach was significantly higher in the young group than the other groups (p<0.001). T4 stage was common in young patients similar to the middle and old age group (p=0.049). Distal gastrectomy was performed more in the young age group rather than the middle and old age groups with the following percentage ratios: young group 74.5% (123/165), middle age group 59.9% (429/716), and old age group 52.2% (260/498) (p<0.001). The 5-year overall survival rate of the young, middle, and old age groups were 46%, 48%, and 39%, respectively, whereas the 5-year overall survival rates of the subgroups of young patients, Group A and Group B, were 33% and 49%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent negative prognostic factors were as follows: tumor location (L), p=0.016, OR=0.795, 95%CI=0.659;0.959; larger tumor size, p=0.026, OR=1.727, 95%CI=1.067;2.797; resection margin, p<0.001, OR=2.167, 95%CI=1.751;2.682; tumor stage (T4), p<0.001, OR=2.572, 95%CI=1.709;3.870; and nodal involvement N1, p=0.005, OR=1.506, 95%CI=1.123;2.020; N2, p<0.001, OR=1.708, 95%CI=1.289;2.263; and N3, p<0.001, OR=2.986, 95%CI=2.314;3.854. Conclusion. The young age groups of patients were predominantly female and had a higher proportion of poorly differentiated and undifferentiated type of tumor; moreover, patients aged <35 years had a poor prognosis. In addition, gastric cancer can occur in patients less than 30 years old, and symptoms suggestive of gastric cancer should be investigated aggressively; therefore, a close scrutiny and monitoring should be done in younger patients especially those associated with high-risk factors which could indicate the presence of the disease at an early stage.

Gastric Carcinoma in Young Patients and Its Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis

Background. Gastric cancer is usually an age-related disease and mostly diagnosed after the sixth decade of life, though it may also be diagnosed earlier. Objective. The aim of this study is to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of gastric carcinoma in young patients. Methods. A total of 1379 patients younger than 75 years histologically diagnosed with primary gastric carcinoma underwent gastrectomy. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their age which included young age group (≤40 years), middle-aged group (age 41-60 years), and elderly group (age 61-75 years). The young age group was further subdivided into two groups: Group A (age ≤35 years) and Group B (age 35-40 years). The analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis followed thereafter. Results. Females predominate in young group (p<0.001). A significantly higher undifferentiated histological pattern was found in the young age group from the other two groups (p<0.001). Tumor location in the lower third of the stomach was significantly higher in the young group than the other groups (p<0.001). T4 stage was common in young patients similar to the middle and old age group (p=0.049). Distal gastrectomy was performed more in the young age group rather than the middle and old age groups with the following percentage ratios: young group 74.5% (123/165), middle age group 59.9% (429/716), and old age group 52.2% (260/498) (p<0.001). The 5-year overall survival rate of the young, middle, and old age groups were 46%, 48%, and 39%, respectively, whereas the 5-year overall survival rates of the subgroups of young patients, Group A and Group B, were 33% and 49%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent negative prognostic factors were as follows: tumor location (L), p=0.016, OR=0.795, 95%CI=0.659;0.959; larger tumor size, p=0.026, OR=1.727, 95%CI=1.067;2.797; resection margin, p<0.001, OR=2.167, 95%CI=1.751;2.682; tumor stage (T4), p<0.001, OR=2.572, 95%CI=1.709;3.870; and nodal involvement N1, p=0.005, OR=1.506, 95%CI=1.123;2.020; N2, p<0.001, OR=1.708, 95%CI=1.289;2.263; and N3, p<0.001, OR=2.986, 95%CI=2.314;3.854. Conclusion. The young age groups of patients were predominantly female and had a higher proportion of poorly differentiated and undifferentiated type of tumor; moreover, patients aged <35 years had a poor prognosis. In addition, gastric cancer can occur in patients less than 30 years old, and symptoms suggestive of gastric cancer should be investigated aggressively; therefore, a close scrutiny and monitoring should be done in younger patients especially those associated with high-risk factors which could indicate the presence of the disease at an early stage.

Clinical characteristics and comparison of the outcome in young versus older patients with upper gastrointestinal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical behaviour and outcome of young patients with gastroesophageal tumours (GET) is surmised to differ from older patients, yet data on the comparison of these two patient subgroups is scarce. This study focuses on the investigation of the clinical characteristics and survival outcome of younger-age people with GET, when compared to older patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with GET at the Medical University of Vienna between 2004 and 2016 were included in this study. Clinical parameters and the overall survival (OS) were compared between young (≤ 45 years) and elderly (≥ 65 years) patients.

RESULTS

Among 796 patients, who were eligible for this analysis, fifty-eight patients (7%) were ≤ 45 years at the initial onset of the disease. These 58 young patients were then matched to elderly patients based on the gender, tumour stage, histology and tumour location. The number of metastatic lesions was significantly higher among young patients (p < 0.05). In a non-metastatic setting younger patients showed a significant longer OS than older patients (median 1226 versus 801 days, p = 0.028). Furthermore, young patients with extensive metastatic disease (2 or more metastatic site) had a significantly poorer OS than elderly patients (median 450 versus 646 days, p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that young patients might be diagnosed very late, which might lead to the development of a more aggressive disease compared to older patients, but a relatively long OS when diagnosed and treated in a non-metastatic setting. Thus, screening methods for younger patients might be considerable to enhance the outcome of young patients with GET.

Gastric cancer in young patients: a separate entity with aggressive features and poor prognosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between young and old patients with gastric cancer (GC), and further determine the role of young age in the prognosis of GC.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-III gastric adenocarcinomas undergoing curative surgery were enrolled, divided into young (aged 18-49 years, YG), middle-aged (50-59 years, MG), and old (≥ 60 years, OG) groups. Exclusion criteria were neoadjuvant therapy and history of malignant tumors. Clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence patterns were compared among three groups.

RESULTS

1131 patients were finally included, with 270, 314, and 547 cases in the YG, MG, and OG, respectively. Compared to others, YG had higher proportion of female, middle-third gastric cancer, poor differentiation, N3b stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy. YG demonstrated poorer 5-year OS than MG (62.4% vs. 70.8%, P = 0.019), but better than OG (62.4% vs. 58.7%, P = 0.031). YG also suffered inferior 5-year DFS (75.2% vs. 82.8%, P = 0.040) compared with MG, and higher incidence of peritoneal recurrence than MG (15.1% vs. 5.2%, P < 0.001) and OG (15.1% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified young age as the independent prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.347, 95% CI 1.018-1.781, P = 0.037], DFS (HR = 1.601, 95% CI 1.079-2.376, P = 0.019), and peritoneal recurrence (HR = 2.936, 95% CI 1.505-5.726, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Young GC patients demonstrated aggressive features with poor prognosis and enhanced management may be warranted for this subgroup.

Prognosis factors of advanced gastric cancer according to sex and age

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer has a relatively high prevalence and is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. However, the prognosis for gastric cancer remains poor, especially in the advanced stages, despite many improvements in diagnosis and treatment.

AIM

To evaluate the outcomes regarding advanced gastric cancer development according to sex and age.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 2005 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer between 2002 and 2007 at a single Korean centre. Prognosis and risk factors for nodal involvement were evaluated according to sex and age.

RESULTS

In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the cases of 2005 patients [sex, 1384 men (69%), 621 women (31%)] with advanced gastric cancer. The patients’ age range was 22-87 years (mean age: 57.7 ± 12.3 years), with approximately 53.3% of the patients being ≤ 60 years old. Based on a Cox proportional hazards model, overall survival was independently predicted by older age, larger tumour size, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, deeper tumour invasion, moderately-to-poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma, and signet ring cell carcinoma. The same model revealed that relapse-free survival was independently predicted by advanced age, larger tumour size, lymphovascular invasion, deeper tumour invasion, poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma, and signet ring cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with advanced gastric cancer, older age independently predicted poor overall survival and relapse-free survival. However, there were no significant sex-based differences in relapse-free and overall survival.

Prognostic value of serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

A nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in different age groups for operable gastric cancer: a population-based study

Background

The age thresholds for differentiating young and elderly patients are still under debate. This study aimed to evaluate the cut-off age for differentiating patients along with the prognostic value of age for operable gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with resected gastric adenocarcinoma were identified from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (training cohort and internal validation cohort) and Liaoning Cancer Hospital (external validation cohort). Kaplan-Meier plots were used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS) across different age groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted using a Cox regression model. Predictive ability of the nomogram was determined by the Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC).

Results

A total of 17,339 patients with GC were included. According to the univariate analysis results, CSS was similar among patients aged 20–69 years old, started to worsen for patients over the age of 70, and was the worst for patients older than 79 years in the training cohort. Thus, we further divided the age groups into 20–69, 70–79, and >79, and multivariate analysis showed that patients above 70 years of age had worse CSS. The nomogram was established based on the results of the multivariate analysis. The C-indexes for the training, internal, and external validation cohorts were 0.7531, 0.7344, and 0.7431, respectively.

Conclusions

This study showed that age had a relative predictive ability for CSS, 70 years should be the cut-off age, and age ≥70 years is an independent prognostic risk factor for GC patients who undergo surgery. These data highlight the importance of individualized treatment to improve the prognosis of patients with GC.

Gastric Cancer in Young Adults: A Different Clinical Entity from Carcinogenesis to Prognosis

Approximately 5.0% of gastric cancer (GC) patients are diagnosed before the age of 40 and are not candidates for screening programs in most countries and regions. The incidence of gastric cancer in young adults (GCYA) has declined over time in most countries except in the United States. Genetic alterations, environmental factors, and lifestyle may predispose some young adults to GC. According to molecular classifications, the cancer of most GCYA patients belongs to the genomically stable or microsatellite stable/epithelial-mesenchymal transition subtype, with the common genetic aberrations being mutations in CDH1. What characterizes GCYA are a higher prevalence in females, more aggressive tumor behaviors, diagnosis at advanced stages, fewer comorbidities and being better treatment candidates, and a similar or better survival outcome when compared with older patients. Considering the greater loss of life-years in younger patients, lowering the incidence of GC and diagnosing at a relatively early stage are the two most effective ways to decrease GC mortality. To achieve these goals, the low awareness of GCYA among general people, policy-makers, clinicians, and researchers should be changed.

Clinicopathologic Features, Survival Outcome, and Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancer Patients 18-40 Years of Age

Purpose: Whether young patients with gastric cancer (GC) had a distinct prognostic outcome from older patients remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of young GC patients and evaluate the survival outcome in comparison to their older counterparts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathologic and survival data of 2022 patients who underwent curative resection for GC. All patients were divided into the young patient group (18-40 years) and older patient group (>40 years) according to the patient age. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of young GC patients were analyzed, and the survival difference between the two groups was compared. Results: The incidence of GC in the patients 18-40 years of age was 8.1% (164/2022). The young patient group had different clinicopathologic features from the older group, including a significant female predominance, a larger number of retrieved lymph nodes, a higher proportion of undifferentiated histology type, and middle or lower 1/3 GC. However, the survival outcome of young patients was similar to that of their older counterparts (5-year disease free survival [DFS]: 47.0% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.247), even when comparison based on the TNM stage was made. Deeper tumor invasion (T3-T4 stage, hazard ratios [HR]: 5.791, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 2.908-11.533, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (HR: 2.500, 95% CIs: 1.308-4.781, p = 0.006), and lymphovascular invasion (HR: 2.191, 95% CIs: 1.306-3.677, p = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors for young GC patients. Conclusions: Young age (18-40 years) was not associated with poorer survival outcome in GC patients. However, early diagnosis and curative resection with adequate lymphadenectomy will still be necessary for improving the survival outcome of young GC patients.

Thirty-year trends in clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single institution in Northern China

Background: We integrated changes in the trends in clinicopathologic characteristics and postoperative prognosis in patients with gastric cancer Northern China over a 30-year period. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing gastric cancer resection and complete follow-up information from January 1981 to December 2010 in the first affiliated Hospital of China Medical University was carried out. We divided the patients into three consecutive periods. Results: A total of 3,520 patients were included in this study. The proportion of lower tumors increased (from 58.8 to 66.9%), while that of upper tumors decreased (from 21.3 to 13.4%). The proportion of tumors > 5cm decreased (from 58.6 to 41.1 %), but the increasing trend of poorly differentiated gastric cancer was obvious (from 60.1 to 75.7%). The percentage of early gastric cancer increased from 10.0 to 15.5 during the study periods, and that of TNM stage Ⅳ cancer decreased from 38.6 to 28.1. In surgery treatment, the rate of radical resection increased to 92.1% in recent period, and the average number of retrieved lymph nodes increased. The 5-year survival rate gradually increased from 36.5% to 48.5% (p<0.001). The Multivariate analysis showed that age, tumor size, T stage, N stage, number of retrieved lymph nodes and resection type were independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer. Conclusion: The patterns of clinicopathologic features for gastric cancer changed during the 30-year period in North China. Overall survival (OS) could be increased by early detection of tumors and standard surgical treatment.

A 21‑gene Support Vector Machine classifier and a 10‑gene risk score system constructed for patients with gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks fifth in terms of incidence and third in terms of tumor mortality worldwide. The present study was designed to construct a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier and risk score system for GC. The GSE62254 (training set) and GSE26253 (validation set 2) datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Furthermore, the gene expression profile of GC (validation set 1) was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between recurrent and non‑recurrent samples were determined using the limma package. The feature genes were selected using the Caret package, and an SVM classifier was built using the e1071 package. Using the penalized package, the optimal predictive genes for constructing a risk score system were screened. Finally, stratification analysis of clinical factors and pathway enrichment analysis were performed using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. A total of 239 DEGs were identified in GSE62254, among which 114 DEGs were significantly associated with both recurrence‑free survival and overall survival. Subsequently, 21 feature genes were screened from the 114 DEGs, and an SVM classifier was built. A risk score system for survival prediction was constructed, following the selection of 10 optimal genes, including A‑kinase anchoring protein 12, angiopoietin‑like protein 1, cysteine‑rich sequence 1, myeloid/lymphoid or mixed‑lineage leukemia, translocated to chromosome 11, neuron navigator 3, neurobeachin, nephroblastoma overexpressed, pleiotrophin, tumor suppressor candidate 3 and zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 18. The stratification analysis revealed that pathological stage was an independent prognostic clinical factor in the high‑risk group. Additionally, eight significant pathways were associated with the 10‑gene signature. The SVM classifier and risk score system may be applied for classifying and predicting the prognosis of patients with GC, respectively.

A multicentric Spanish study on the characteristics and survival of gastric adenocarcinoma under the age of 60

INTRODUCTION

In Europe, gastric adenocarcinoma (GADC) is commonly regarded as a disease of the elderly. This study aims to assess the proportion, characteristics, and survival of patients diagnosed with GADC under the age of 60.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, multicentric, and analytical study conducted at four tertiary Spanish hospitals. All patients diagnosed with GADC between 2008 and 2015 were included. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and survival data were retrieved. A multivariate analysis was performed to compare GADC in young (age≤60 years) and elderly patients.

RESULTS

A total of 1374 patients with GADC were included. The mean age was 74 years (SD:11.1); 62.2% were males. There were 177 patients under the age of 60 (12.9%, 95% CI: 11.2-14.8%). GADC was frequently encountered as a metastatic disease in both young and elderly patients (Stage IV: 45.7% and 41%, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, alcohol abuse, ASA functional status I-II, diffuse subtype, neoadjuvant, and palliative therapy were independently associated (P<0.05) with age ≤60 years. No differences were found in 2-year survival (GADC ≤60: 39% vs. 35%, P=0.45). Curative-intent surgery, TNM stage I-II, body mass index<30kg/m², and better functional status at diagnosis were independent predictors of survival in GADC under the age of 60.

CONCLUSIONS

One out of eight cases of GADC were diagnosed under the age of 60. Metastatic disease was frequent at diagnosis and overall survival was poor regardless of age. Factors associated with localized disease correlated with improved survival in younger patients. Our results underline the need for early diagnosis strategies in our country.

Higher Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Young Patients with Early Gastric Cancer

Objective: Whether age affects lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) is currently inconclusive. This study investigates the effect of age on LNM in patients with GC. Methods: From January 1988 to December 2013, 22,808 GC patients underwent gastrectomy at the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were included. The relationship between age and LNM was analyzed. Results: The median number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) was 12 (interquartile range [IQR], 7-20) among the 22,808 patients with GC, and the median numbers of ELNs were 10 (IQR, 5-18), 12 (IQR, 6-19), 13 (IQR, 7-21) and 13 (IQR, 7-21) in patients with T1 to T4 disease, respectively. A total of 13,780 (60.4%) patients presented with LNM. The LNM rates were 69.6%, 66.1%, 64.7%, 61.8%, 57.8% and 55.6% for patients in the 20-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79 and ≥ 80 age groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The LNM rates and the number of positive lymph nodes were correlated with age among patients whose diseases were of the same T stage (all P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that age was an independent predictor for LNM in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) (P < 0.05), and linear regression analysis showed that the LNM rate was higher in young patients with EGC (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Age is an independent predictor for LNM in EGC. Moreover, LNM is more common in young patients with EGC than in other age groups, which indicates that limited lymph node dissection may not be appropriate for young patients with EGC.

Benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with pathological stage III gastric cancer

Background

For patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) after D2 gastrectomy, the survival benefits of receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy are unclear. This study aimed to compare the 5- and 7-year overall survival (OS) in the two groups and to identify which patients can benefit more from adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

Retrospective data were collected from January 2009 to December 2014. The 5- and 7-year OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the two groups using the Chi-square test. The association of OS with prognostic factors was identified using the Cox’s proportional hazard model, which was then adjusted for survival coparison using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis. The association of OS with each clinical/demographic factor was compared between the two groups using the Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

A total of 415 eligible patients were identified (135 adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 280 adjuvant chemotherapy). Significant 5- and 7-year OS and DFS benefits were found in the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy group versus chemotherapy group. Multivariate analysis showed that age, TNM stage, lymph node (LN) ratio, tumor deposits, and total/subtotal gastrectomy were independent prognostic factors. When the PSM analysis was adjusting by these factors, 135 patients were matched with an improved survival benefit from adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Patients in the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy group had a lower locoregional relapse. Subset analysis also identified significant OS benefits of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with LN ratio <50%, pIIIA, and pIIIB stage disease, while OS benefits were not observed in patients with tumor deposits, pN3b classification, or pIIIC stage disease.

Conclusion

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was shown to be superior in improving the OS in a certain population of patients compared with adjuvant chemotherapy. This finding may help to better guide the individualized treatments of patients with stage III LAGC after D2 gastrectomy.

A multicenter observational study on the clinicopathological features of gastric cancer in young patients

BACKGROUND

The details of gastric cancer in young patients remain unclear because of the low prevalence of the disease. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients.

METHODS

From January 2007 to January 2016, patients in their 20s and 30s who were diagnosed with primary gastric cancer at 4 hospitals were enrolled. Their clinical characteristics and prognosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

The total number of patients was 72. The median age was 36 years, and the ratio of males to females was 1:1. The dominant histological type was undifferentiated type (66/72, 92%). Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) was positive in 81% (54/67). Although there were some asymptomatic patients in stages I-III, all stage IV patients had some clinical symptoms at the diagnosis. The percentage of stage IV was significantly higher in patients in their 20s than in those in their 30s (75% vs. 25%, P < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier method showed that the overall survival of patients in their 20s was significantly lower than that of patients in their 30s (P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

A high rate of H. pylori infection was revealed in young gastric cancer patients. The patients in their 20s had a worse prognosis than those in their 30s. We should consider examining the H. pylori infection status for young patients as well as older patients to identify high-risk populations.

Enrichment of CLDN18-ARHGAP fusion gene in gastric cancers in young adults

Gastric cancer in young adults has been pointed out to comprise a subgroup associated with distinctive clinicopathological features, including an equal gender distribution, advanced disease, and diffuse‐type histology. Comprehensive molecular analyses of gastric cancers have led to molecular‐based classifications and to specific and effective treatment options. The molecular traits of gastric cancers in young adults await investigations, which should provide a clue to explore therapeutic strategies. Here, we studied 146 gastric cancer patients diagnosed at the age of 40 years or younger at the Cancer Institute Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). Tumor specimens were examined for Helicobacter pylori infection, Epstein‐Barr virus positivity, and for the expression of mismatch repair genes to indicate microsatellite instability. Overexpression, gene amplifications, and rearrangements of 18 candidate driver genes were examined by immunohistochemistry and FISH. Although only a small number of cases were positive for Epstein‐Barr virus and microsatellite instability (n = 2 each), we repeatedly found tumors with gene fusion between a tight‐junction protein claudin, CLDN18, and a regulator of small G proteins, ARHGAP, in as many as 22 cases (15.1%), and RNA sequencing identified 2 novel types of the fusion. Notably, patients with the CLDN18‐ARHGAP fusion revealed associations between aggressive disease and poor prognosis, even when grouped by their clinical stage. These observations indicate that a fusion gene between CLDN18 and ARHGAP is enriched in younger age‐onset gastric cancers, and its presence could contribute to their aggressive characteristics.

Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics, MYB rearrangement and prognostic factors in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma

Recent studies have indicated that a recurrent t(6;9)(q22-23;p23-24) chromosomal translocation in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) results in a MYB proto-oncogene transcription factor-nuclear factor I/B (MYB-NFIB) gene fusion, which has not previously been detected in any non-ACC carcinomas of the head and neck. In the present study, data on clinical factors affecting the survival rate of patients with salivary ACC from a single institution was retrospectively analyzed, and the frequency of MYB gene rearrangement determined. A total of 97 patient cases were analyzed, and young adults presenting with ACC (<40 years old) accounted for 19.6% of all patients (n=19). A total of 70.1% (n=68) displayed neurological symptoms, including pain, paraesthesia, tongue deviation, and facial paralysis. A marked majority of the analyzed tumors (85.6%) displayed evidence of MYB rearrangement. MYB rearrangement was significantly higher in patients with late Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage cancer compared with that in patients with early TNM stage (P=0.033), as detected by a dual color MYB break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization probe. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in patient overall survival (OS) time with regard to age, gender, TNM stage, neurological symptoms, margin status and MYB rearrangement. Specifically, young age was significantly associated with a shorter OS time. In summary, the present study suggested that young patients with salivary ACC presented with a worse prognosis, in contrast to the majority of patients with salivary ACC. Moreover, MYB alterations exhibited a high positive rate in salivary ACC, and therefore, the absence of MYB rearrangements may be associated with a better prognosis.

Gastric cancer in young adults: a worse prognosis group?

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics and survival of young patients with gastric cancer, regardless of the intention of treatment.

METHODS

we conducted a retrospective analysis of all gastric cancer patients undergoing any surgical treatment between 2008 and 2017. We considered patients under 45 years old as young adults and those over 45 years old, as of advanced age.

RESULTS

of the 875 patients evaluated, 84 (9.6%) were young adults and 791 (90.4%) were older. Younger patients were associated with female gender (p<0.001), lower Charlson score (p=0.002), ASA I/II (p<0.001), diffuse Lauren type (p<0.001) and poorly differentiated tumors (p<0.001). There was no difference between groups regarding treatment intention (palliative versus curative) (p=0.267) and cTNM clinical stage (p=0.120). Disease-free survival was worse in younger individuals (p=0.049), but overall survival was similar between groups (p=0.578). Multivariate analysis identified total gastrectomy, pT3/T4, pN+, and diffuse Lauren type as prognostic factors associated with worse disease-free survival and overall survival. Age was not an independent factor associated with worse prognosis.

CONCLUSION

although younger patients had lower disease-free survival, overall survival was similar between groups, and age was not a significant independent prognostic factor.

More attention should be paid to adult gastric cancer patients younger than 35 years old: extremely poor prognosis was found

Purpose: Several studies have reported controversial results about prognosis of gastric cancer in young age patients. The difference may partially result from variable definitions of young age. The aim of this study was to find out the relation between age and prognosis of gastric cancer patients, and to analyze the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors in young gastric cancer patients.

Methods: Data queried for this analysis included GC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database from 1973 to 2014. Gastric cancer patients (N=79,505) diagnosed with an age≥18 were included. By combining patients with similar prognosis, we figured out 3 cutoff values of age, 35 years old, 65 years old and 75 years old. We divided patients into 4 groups: young age patients: 18-34 years; middle-age patients: 35-64 years; elderly patients: 65-74 years; extremely elderly patients: >74 years. GC patients from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) were used as external validation data.

Results: The clinicopathological features of young age gastric cancer patients included: poor-differentiated, diffuse type of cancer, and advanced stage at diagnosis. The median survival of patients <35 years old was significantly lower than middle-age patients (35-64 years) and elderly patients (65-74 years) (12 months vs. 15 and 16 months, respectively, both p <0.001). Location of tumor, ethnicity, tumor size, surgery and TNM stage were independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis in young patients. The poor prognosis for young patients remained valid in the SYSUCC database.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that gastric cancer patients <35 years old had an extremely poor prognosis. Early detection of gastric cancer is of paramount importance in young age people.

Effect of age on the clinical outcomes of patients with early gastric cancer with undifferentiated-type histology

BACKGROUND

Undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers account for a large proportion of gastric cancers in younger patients. Therefore, the clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection in younger patients are a major concern. We aimed to investigate the influence of age on lymph node metastasis and long-term survival after surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers.

METHODS

We identified 4,236 patients who underwent surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers. For each T stage, the correlation between age and lymph node metastasis was analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression. Lymph node metastasis rates were compared between younger (<40 years) and older patients (≥40 years) who fulfilled the expanded criteria for endoscopic resection. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare long-term survival between younger and older patients.

RESULTS

Younger age groups (20-29 and 30-39 years) had the highest lymph node metastasis rate within each T stage (5.7% and 5.7% for T1a, 26.3% and 24.1% for T1b, respectively). After adjusting for possible covariates, however, age did not have a significant effect on lymph node metastasis in either T stage (P = .127 for T1a, P = .114 for T1b). Among patients fulfilling the expanded indication for endoscopic resection, younger patients had a slightly higher lymph node metastasis rate compared with older patients (2.7% versus 2.0%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Although younger patients had a significantly better overall survival (P < .001), no significant age-related differences were observed in recurrence-free and disease-specific survival (P = .051 and P = .069) CONCLUSION: Endoscopic resection may be feasible in young patients with undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers because these patients share a similar lymph node metastasis rate and long-term survival outcomes with older patients.

Treatment features of systemic chemotherapy in young adults with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

Purpose

Gastric cancer in young adults (GCYA) is known to have distinct clinicopathological features, including a female predominance and diffuse-type histology. Previous reports have focused on patients who had undergone gastrectomy with curative intent. Information concerning the treatment of unresectable advanced- or recurrent-stage GCYA is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether the distinct clinicopathological features of GCYA affect the outcome of systemic chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single institution in Japan. GCYA was classified as a disease in individuals who were <40 years of age at diagnosis. Initial systemic chemotherapy regimens for GCYA were investigated with a focus on patients who received S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as a representative standard regimen. The efficacy, safety, and feasibility of systemic chemotherapy were evaluated.

Results

Eighty-nine (7.5%) of 1,184 consecutive patients who received systemic chemotherapy at our institute between December 2005 and June 2016 were enrolled. As reported previously, the female sex (57.3%) and diffuse-type histology (91.0%) were the dominant features of GCYA. Thirty-two patients (36.0%) received SP as first-line treatment. The median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 13.2 (95.0% CI: 9.5-18.7) and 5.6 (95.0% CI: 4.7-7.9) months, respectively. The median number of treatment cycles, relative dose intensity, and cumulative dose of cisplatin were 4.5 (range: 1-10), 92.0% (IQR: 83.5-98.3), and 286.5 mg/m² (IQR: 172.5-367.5), respectively. The most common adverse event of Grade 3 or higher was neutropenia (n=5 patients; 15.6%). No patient had febrile neutropenia. Non-hematological adverse events of Grade 3 or higher were only observed in 2 (6.3%) of 32 patients.

Conclusion

Standard chemotherapy used for general-aged GC patients has similar efficacy, reduced toxicity, and higher intensity in GCYA patients.

Clinicopathologic characteristics in patients with upper third gastric cancer following radical surgical treatment: A retrospective cohort study

The incidences of upper third gastric cancer (UTGC) have been increasing. However, the prognostic factors for UTGC following radical surgical treatment remains largely unknown. This study was to investigate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), lymph node metastasis and recurrence of UTGC.Clinicopathologic data of 126 UTGC patients who underwent radical surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. OS and univariate analysis were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the significance of the difference between curves was calculated with the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to perform multivariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the prognostic accuracy.The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS for patients with UTGC were 81%, 47.6%, and 38.6% respectively. Univariate analysis showed that tumor size (P = .019), tumor invasion depth (P < .001), and lymph node metastasis (P < .001) were the risk factors for 5-year OS. Multivariate analysis identified tumor invasion depth (P < .001) and lymph node metastasis (P < .001) as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC. In addition, ROC curve analysis showed that tumor invasion depth (P = .017) or lymph node metastasis (P = .001) alone showed significantly effective prognosis for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC. For UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis, tumor size (P = .023), lym embolism (P = .003), tumor invasion depth (P = .002), and invasion of tunica serosa (P = .004) were the risk factors for the 5-year OS. Multivariate analysis identified tumor size (P = .048), lym embolism (P = .032), tumor invasion depth (P = .004), and invasion of tunica serosa (P = .031) as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS. For UTGC patients with distant metastasis or tumor recurrence, univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that tumor invasion depth and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS.The results suggested that for UPGC patients undergoing the radical surgical treatment, tumor invasion depth and/or lymph node metastasis are the independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and tumor recurrence.

Diverse Expression of IL-32 in Diffuse and Intestinal Types of Gastric Cancer

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) represents one of the most common cancers worldwide, frequently diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognosis, indicating on need for new diagnostic and prognostic markers. The aim of the study was to determine the expression of IL-32, proinflammatory and angiogenic mediators, in patients with diffuse and intestinal gastric cancer and the relationship with clinicopathological aspects.

Material and Methods

The tissue samples of diffuse and intestinal types of tumor of 70 patients with gastric cancer were analyzed. Expression of IL-32, VEGF, IL-17, and CD31 was measured by immunohistochemistry.

Results

IL-32 expression was significantly lower in tissue samples from patients with diffuse type of gastric cancer that is also a severe and more progressive form (TNM stages III and IV, poor histological differentiation, and higher nuclear grade III). Expression of IL-17 was also decreased in patients with diffuse type of gastric cancer. Microvascular density was diminished in diffuse type of gastric cancer.

Conclusions

Downregulated expression of IL-32 in tumor tissue of patients with diffuse type of gastric cancer may implicate on its role in limiting ongoing proinflammatory and proangiogenic processes. This emphasizes on unrecognized role of IL-32 in biology of diffuse type of gastric cancer.

Survival and prognosis of young adults with gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES

Survival data for young adults (YA) with gastric cancer is conflicting and scarce in Brazil. The aim of this study was to compare the clinicopathological factors and survival rates of younger and older patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

Hospital registries for 294 gastric cancer patients from a reference cancer hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, were consulted for the retrieval of clinicopathological information and follow-up time. Patients were placed into the following groups: YA (≤40 years; N=71), older adult (OA: 41 to 65 years; N=129) and elderly (E: ≥66 years; N=94). Differences were assessed through Pearson's χ2 test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, Log rank test and Cox regression.

RESULTS

More YA were diagnosed with advanced disease (clinical stage III/IV: 86.7% YA, 69.9% OA, and 67% E); however, fewer E patients underwent surgery (64.3% YA, 72.7% OA, and 52.4% E). The median overall survival among all patients was 16 months, and the overall survival rate was not significantly different among the age groups (p=0.129). There were no significant differences in the disease-free survival rate. Metastatic disease at diagnosis (HR=4.84; p<0.01) was associated with an increased hazard of death for YA.

CONCLUSION

Overall survival was similar among age groups. Metastatic disease at diagnosis was the only factor associated with a poorer prognosis in YA. These results suggest that younger patients deserve special attention regarding the detection of early stage disease.

Young Age and Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Differentiated Type Early Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Young patients with gastric cancer reportedly have a worse prognosis than older patients due to delayed diagnosis and more aggressive tumor behavior. However, it is unclear whether this applies to early gastric cancer (EGC), for which endoscopic resection is indicated. We investigated the association between age and lymph node metastasis (LNM).

METHODS

We identified 4055 patients diagnosed with EGC of differentiated histology who underwent surgery. The association between age and LNM was examined using logistic regression for each T stage separately with adjustments for multiple covariates. We compared LNM rates for each of the Japanese Endoscopic Resection Guidelines criteria in younger (< 40 years) and older patients (40 years).

RESULTS

The median number of lymph nodes examined was the same for T1a and T1b stages (n = 34). The median number of lymph nodes examined was not significantly different within T1a stage (P = 0.093), but within T1b stage, the number of lymph nodes examined was significantly different (P = 0.019). The highest number was between 50 and 59 years (median = 37), and the lowest number was in the 20 to 49 years and older than 70 age brackets (median = 34). LNM rate and age were not significantly associated within each stage (P values 0.269, 0.783 for T1a and T1b, respectively). Among patients fulfilling endoscopic resection criteria, the LNM rate in younger patients was lower than in older patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In differentiated-type EGC, young age at diagnosis was not associated with LNM rate. Therefore, endoscopic resection criteria for early gastric cancer can be applied to younger patients.