1
|
Simmons C, Pot M, Lorenz-Dant K, Leichsenring K. Disentangling the impact of alternative payment models and associated service delivery models on quality of chronic care: A scoping review. Health Policy 2024; 143:105034. [PMID: 38508061 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Payment reforms are frequently implemented alongside service delivery reforms, thus rendering it difficult to disentangle their impact. This scoping review aims to link alternative payment arrangements within their context of service delivery, to assess their impact on quality of chronic care, and to disentangle, where possible, the impact of payment reforms from changes to service delivery. A search of literature published between 2013 and 2022 resulted in 34 relevant articles across five types of payment models: capitation/global budget (n = 13), pay-for-coordination (n = 10), shared savings/shared risk (n = 6), blended capitation (n = 3), and bundled payments (n = 1). The certainty of evidence was generally low due to biases associated with voluntary participation in reforms. This scoping review finds that population-based payment reforms are better suited for collaborative, person-centred approaches of service delivery spanning settings and providers, but also highlights the need for a wider evidence base of studies disentangling the impact of financing from service delivery reforms. Limited evidence disentangling the two suggests that transforming service delivery to a team-based model of care alongside a purchasing reform shifting to blended capitation was more impactful in improving quality of chronic care, than the individual components of payment and service delivery. Further comparative studies employing causal inference methods, accounting for biases and quantifying aspects of service delivery, are needed to better disentangle the mechanisms impacting quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra Simmons
- European Centre for Social Welfare Policy & Research, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Mirjam Pot
- European Centre for Social Welfare Policy & Research, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klara Lorenz-Dant
- General Practice, Institute of General Practice, University Hospital of Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Kai Leichsenring
- European Centre for Social Welfare Policy & Research, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noor F, Gulis G, Karlsson LE. Exploration of understanding of integrated care from a public health perspective: A scoping review. J Public Health Res 2023; 12:22799036231181210. [PMID: 37435440 PMCID: PMC10331197 DOI: 10.1177/22799036231181210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Many health care systems attempt to develop an integrated care approach that is a whole population health-oriented system. However, knowledge of strategies to support this effort are scarce and fragmented. The aim of the current paper is to investigate existing concepts of integrated care and their elements from a public health perspective and to propose an elaborated approach that could be applied to explore the public health orientation of integrated care. Design and methods We applied a scoping review approach. A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science for the period 2000-2020 yielding 16 studies for inclusion. Results Across the papers, 14 frameworks were identified. Nine of these referred to the Chronic Care Model (CCM). Service delivery, person-centeredness, IT systems design and utilization and decision support were identified as the core elements of most of the included frameworks. The descriptions of these elements were mainly clinical-oriented focusing particularly on clinical care processes and treatment of diseases instead of wider determinants of population health. Conclusions A synthesized model is proposed that emphasizes the importance of mapping the unique needs and characteristics of the population it aims to serve, leans on the social determinants approach with a commitment to individual and community empowerment, health literacy and suggests reorienting services to meet the expressed needs of the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fadumo Noor
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campus Esbjerg, Esbjerg Ø, Denmark
| | - Gabriel Gulis
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campus Esbjerg, Esbjerg Ø, Denmark
| | - Leena Eklund Karlsson
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campus Esbjerg, Esbjerg Ø, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yous ML, Ganann R, Ploeg J, Markle-Reid M, Northwood M, Fisher K, Valaitis R, Chambers T, Montelpare W, Légaré F, Beleno R, Gaudet G, Giacometti L, Levely D, Lindsay C, Morrison A, Tang F. Older adults' experiences and perceived impacts of the Aging, Community and Health Research Unit-Community Partnership Program (ACHRU-CPP) for diabetes self-management in Canada: a qualitative descriptive study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068694. [PMID: 37019487 PMCID: PMC10083734 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the experiences and perceived impacts of the Aging, Community and Health Research Unit-Community Partnership Program (ACHRU-CPP) from the perspectives of older adults with diabetes and other chronic conditions. The ACHRU-CPP is a complex 6-month self-management evidence-based intervention for community-living older adults aged 65 years or older with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and at least one other chronic condition. It includes home and phone visits, care coordination, system navigation support, caregiver support and group wellness sessions delivered by a nurse, dietitian or nutritionist, and community programme coordinator. DESIGN Qualitative descriptive design embedded within a randomised controlled trial was used. SETTING Six trial sites offering primary care services from three Canadian provinces (ie, Ontario, Quebec and Prince Edward Island) were included. PARTICIPANTS The sample was 45 community-living older adults aged 65 years or older with diabetes and at least one other chronic condition. METHODS Participants completed semistructured postintervention interviews by phone in English or French. The analytical process followed Braun and Clarke's experiential thematic analysis framework. Patient partners informed study design and interpretation. RESULTS The mean age of older adults was 71.7 years, and the mean length of time living with diabetes was 18.8 years. Older adults reported positive experiences with the ACHRU-CPP that supported diabetes self-management, such as improved knowledge in managing diabetes and other chronic conditions, enhanced physical activity and function, improved eating habits, and opportunities for socialisation. They reported being connected to community resources by the intervention team to address social determinants of health and support self-management. CONCLUSIONS Older adults perceived that a 6-month person-centred intervention collaboratively delivered by a team of health and social care providers helped support chronic disease self-management. There is a need for providers to help older adults connect with available health and social services in the community. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03664583; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Lee Yous
- School of Nursing, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca Ganann
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenny Ploeg
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maureen Markle-Reid
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melissa Northwood
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathryn Fisher
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ruta Valaitis
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tracey Chambers
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Montelpare
- Department of Applied Human Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ron Beleno
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary Gaudet
- Department of Applied Human Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
| | - Luisa Giacometti
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deborah Levely
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig Lindsay
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Morrison
- Department of Applied Human Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
| | - Frank Tang
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Glosser LD, Lombardi CV, Lang JJ, Zakeri BS, Smith J, Knauss HM, Kaw D, Malhotra D, Ratnam S, Sindhwani P, Ortiz J, Rees M, Ekwenna O. Electronic Patient Portal Use After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. J Surg Res 2023; 284:252-263. [PMID: 36608415 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Online patient portals have become a core component of patient-centered care. Limited research exists on such portal use in patients after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to examine preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors associated with post-transplantation portal use. METHODS This cross-sectional study included all patients who underwent kidney transplantation from April 2016 to May 2019 at the University of Toledo Medical Center. Exclusion criteria included international travel for transplantation and those without available postoperative lab or follow-up records. Data were collected for 2 y post-transplantation. Univariable and multivariable linear regression was performed to determine associations with portal use. RESULTS Two hundred and forty-seven kidney transplant recipients were included in the study; 35.6% (n = 88) used the portal versus 64.4% (n = 159) did not. Preoperative factors associated with increased use included income >$40,000 (odds ratio [OR], 2.95; P = 0.006) and cancer history (OR, 2.46; P = 0.007), whereas diabetes history had reduced use (OR, 0.51; P = 0.021). The Black race had the least use. Perioperatively, reduced use was associated with dialysis before transplant (OR, 0.25; P < 0.001) and hospital stay ≥4 d (OR, 0.49; P = 0.009). Postoperatively, associations with increased use included average eGFR >30 (P = 0.04) and hospital readmissions (n = 102), whereas those with ER (n = 138) visits had decreased use. Multivariable analysis revealed increased use with income >$40,000 (OR, 2.51; P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS There was no observed difference in clinical outcomes for portal users and nonusers undergoing kidney transplantation, although portal use may decrease the likelihood of ER visits. Socioeconomic status and ethnicity may play a role on who utilizes the patient portals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan D Glosser
- Department of Medical Education, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Conner V Lombardi
- Department of Medical Education, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Jacob J Lang
- Department of Medical Education, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Brandon S Zakeri
- Department of Medical Education, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Justin Smith
- Department of Medical Education, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Hanna M Knauss
- Department of Medical Education, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Dinkar Kaw
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Deepak Malhotra
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Shobha Ratnam
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Puneet Sindhwani
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Jorge Ortiz
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Albany Medcial College, Albany, New York
| | - Michael Rees
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Obi Ekwenna
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Duda-Sikuła M, Kurpas D. Barriers and Facilitators in the Implementation of Prevention Strategies for Chronic Disease Patients-Best Practice GuideLines and Policies' Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020288. [PMID: 36836522 PMCID: PMC9959826 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Visits of chronically ill patients account for 80% of primary care consultations. Approximately 15-38% of patients have three or more chronic diseases, and 30% of hospitalisations result from the deteriorating clinical condition of these patients. The burden of chronic disease and multimorbidity is increasing in combination with the growing population of elderly people. However, many interventions found to be effective in health service studies fail to translate into meaningful patient care outcomes across multiple contexts. With the growing burden of chronic diseases, healthcare providers, health policymakers, and other healthcare system stakeholders are re-examining their strategies and opportunities for more effective prevention and clinical interventions. The study aimed to find the best practice guidelines and policies influencing effective intervention and making it possible to personalize prevention strategies. Apart from clinical treatment, it is essential to increase the effectiveness of non-clinical interventions that could empower chronic patients to increase their involvement in therapy. The review focuses on the best practice guidelines and policies in non-medical interventions and the barriers to and facilitators of their implementation into everyday practice. A systematic review of practice guidelines and policies was conducted to answer the research question. The authors screened databases and included 47 full-text recent studies in the qualitative synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Duda-Sikuła
- Clinical Trial Department, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
- Correspondence:
| | - Donata Kurpas
- Department of Family Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-141 Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leithaus M, Fakha A, Flamaing J, Verbeek H, Deschodt M, van Pottelbergh G, Goderis G. Stakeholders' experiences and perception on transitional care initiatives within an integrated care project in Belgium: a qualitative interview study. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:41. [PMID: 36690954 PMCID: PMC9868499 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03746-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2015, a plan for integrated care was launched by the Belgium government that resulted in the implementation of 12 integrated care pilot project across Belgium. The pilot project Zorgzaam Leuven consists of a multidisciplinary local consortium aiming to bring lasting change towards integrated care for the region of Leuven. This study aims to explore experiences and perceptions of stakeholders involved in four transitional care actions that are part of Zorgzaam Leuven. METHODS This qualitative case study is part of the European TRANS-SENIOR project. Four actions with a focus on improving transitional care were selected and stakeholders involved in those actions were identified using the snow-ball method. Fourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted and inductive thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS Professionals appreciated to be involved in the decision making early onwards either by proposing own initiatives or by providing their input in shaping actions. Improved team spirit and community feeling with other health care professionals (HCPs) was reported to reduce communication barriers and was perceived to benefit both patients and professionals. The actions provided supportive tools and various learning opportunities that participants acknowledged. Technical shortcomings (e.g. lack of integrated patient records) and financial and political support were identified as key challenges impeding the sustainable implementation of the transitional care actions. CONCLUSION The pilot project Zorgzaam Leuven created conditions that triggered work motivation for HCPs. It supported the development of multidisciplinary care partnerships at the local level that allowed early involvement and increased collaboration, which is crucial to successfully improve transitional care for vulnerable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel Leithaus
- Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Amal Fakha
- Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Flamaing
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Verbeek
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mieke Deschodt
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Competence Center of Nursing, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gijs van Pottelbergh
- Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Geert Goderis
- Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Riordan F, O'Mahony L, Sheehan C, Murphy K, O'Donnell M, Hurley L, Dinneen S, McHugh SM. Implementing a community specialist team to support the delivery of integrated diabetes care: experiences in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic. HRB Open Res 2023. [DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13635.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: While models of integrated care for people with chronic conditions have demonstrated promising results, there are still knowledge gaps about how these models are implemented in different contexts and which strategies may best support implementation. We aimed to evaluate the implementation of a multidisciplinary diabetes Community Specialist Team (CST) to support delivery of integrated type 2 diabetes care during COVID-19 in two health networks. Methods: A mixed methods approach was used. Quantitative data included administrative data on CST activity and caseload, and questionnaires with GPs, practice nurses (PN) and people with type 2 diabetes. Qualitative data were collected using semi-structured interviews and focus groups about the service from CST members, GPs, PNs and people with type 2 diabetes. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework to explain what influences implementation and to integrate different stakeholder perspectives. Results: Over a 6-month period (Dec 2020-May 2021), 516 patients were seen by podiatrists, 435 by dieticians, and 545 by CNS. Of patients who had their first CST appointment within the previous 6 months (n=29), 69% (n=20) waited less than 4 weeks to see the HCP. During initial implementation, CST members used virtual meetings to build ‘rapport’ with general practice staff, supporting ‘upskilling’ and referrals to the CST. Leadership from the local project team and change manager provided guidance on how to work as a team and ‘iron out’ issues. Where available, shared space enhanced networking between CST members and facilitated joint appointments. Lack of administrative support for the CST impacted on clinical time. Conclusions: This study illustrates how the CST benefited from shared space, enhanced networking, and leadership. When developing strategies to support implementation of integrated care, the need for administrative support, the practicalities of co-location to facilitate joint appointments, and relative advantages of different delivery models should be considered.
Collapse
|
8
|
Values Underpinning Integrated, People-Centred Health Services: Similarities and Differences among Actor Groups Across Europe. Int J Integr Care 2022; 22:6. [PMID: 36043027 PMCID: PMC9374025 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In addition to the functional aspects of healthcare integration, an understanding of its normative aspects is needed. This study explores the importance of values underpinning integrated, people-centred health services, and examines similarities and differences among the values prioritised by actors across Europe. Methods: Explorative cross-sectional design with quantitative analysis. A questionnaire of 18 values was conducted across Europe. A total of 1,013 respondents indicated the importance of each of the values on a nine-point scale and selected three most important values. Respondents were clustered in four actor groups, and countries in four European sub-regions. Results: The importance scores of values ranged from 7.62 to 8.55 on a nine-point scale. Statistically significant differences among actor groups were found for ten values. Statistically significant differences across European sub-regions were found for six values. Our analysis revealed two clusters of values: ‘people related’ and ‘governance and organisation’. Discussion and conclusion: The study found that all 18 values in the set are considered important by the respondents. Additionally, it revealed distinctions in emphasis among the values prioritised by actor groups and across sub-regions. The study uncovered two clusters of values that contribute to a conceptually based definition of integrated, people-centred health services.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ploeg J, Markle-Reid M, Valaitis R, Fisher K, Ganann R, Blais J, Chambers T, Connors R, Gruneir A, Légaré F, MacIntyre J, Montelpare W, Paquette JS, Poitras ME, Riveroll A, Yous ML. The Aging, Community and Health Research Unit Community Partnership Program (ACHRU-CPP) for older adults with diabetes and multiple chronic conditions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:99. [PMID: 35120457 PMCID: PMC8814798 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02651-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults (≥65 years) with diabetes and multiple chronic conditions (MCC) (> 2 chronic conditions) experience reduced function and quality of life, increased health service use, and high mortality. Many community-based self-management interventions have been developed for this group, however the evidence for their effectiveness is limited. This paper presents the protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness and implementation of the Aging, Community and Health Research Unit-Community Partnership Program (ACHRU-CPP) to usual care in older adults with diabetes and MCC and their caregivers. METHODS We will conduct a cross-jurisdictional, multi-site implementation-effectiveness type II hybrid RCT. Eligibility criteria are: ≥65 years, diabetes diagnosis (Type 1 or 2) and at least one other chronic condition, and enrolled in a primary care or diabetes education program. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention (ACHRU-CPP) or control arm (1:1 ratio). The intervention arm consists of home/telephone visits, monthly group wellness sessions, multidisciplinary case conferences, and system navigation support. It will be delivered by registered nurses and registered dietitians/nutritionists from participating primary care or diabetes education programs and program coordinators from community-based organizations. The control arm consists of usual care provided by the primary care setting or diabetes education program. The primary outcome is the change from baseline to 6 months in mental functioning. Secondary outcomes will include, for example, the change from baseline to 6 months in physical functioning, diabetes self-management, depressive symptoms, and cost of use of healthcare services. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models will be used to analyze all outcomes, with intention-to-treat analysis using multiple imputation to address missing data. Descriptive and qualitative data from older adults, caregivers and intervention teams will be used to examine intervention implementation, site-specific adaptations, and scalability potential. DISCUSSION An interprofessional intervention supporting self-management may be effective in improving health outcomes and client/caregiver experience and reducing service use and costs in this complex population. This pragmatic trial includes a scalability assessment which considers a range of effectiveness and implementation criteria to inform the future scale-up of the ACHRU-CPP. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov Identifier NCT03664583 . Registration date: September 10, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Ploeg
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Room HSc3N25, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Maureen Markle-Reid
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Room HSc3N25, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Ruta Valaitis
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Room HSc3N25, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Kathryn Fisher
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Room HSc3N25, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Rebecca Ganann
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Room HSc3N25, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Johanne Blais
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Local 4617, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Tracey Chambers
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Room HSc3N25, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Robyn Connors
- Department of Applied Human Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Prince Edward Island, Room 111, Steel Building, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, C1A 4P3, Canada
| | - Andrea Gruneir
- Department of Family Medicine Research Program, University of Alberta, 6-40 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada and Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, G1K 7P4, Canada
| | - Janet MacIntyre
- Faculty of Nursing, Room 116, Health Sciences Building, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, C1A 4P3, Canada
| | - William Montelpare
- Margaret and Wallace McCain Chair in Human Development and Health, Department of Applied Human Sciences, Faculty of Science, Room 122, Health Sciences Building, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, C1A 4P3, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Paquette
- Groupe de Médecine de Famile Universitaire (GMF-U) du Nord de Lanaudière and Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050, Avenue de la Médecine, Local 4617, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Marie-Eve Poitras
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke - Campus Saguenay, 305 Rue Saint Vallier, Chicoutimi, QC, G7H 5H6, Canada
| | - Angela Riveroll
- Department of Applied Human Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Prince Edward Island, Room 115, Steel Building, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, C1A 4P3, Canada
| | - Marie-Lee Yous
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Room HSc3N25, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Optimising Integrated Stroke Care in Regional Networks: A Nationwide Self-Assessment Study in 2012, 2015 and 2019. Int J Integr Care 2021; 21:12. [PMID: 34621148 PMCID: PMC8462476 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To help enhance the quality of integrated stroke care delivery, regional stroke services networks in the Netherlands participated in a self-assessment study in 2012, 2015 and 2019. Methods: Coordinators of the regional stroke services networks filled out an online self-assessment questionnaire in 2012, 2015 and 2019. The questionnaire, which was based on the Development Model for Integrated Care, consisted of 97 questions in nine clusters (themes). Cluster scores were calculated as proportions of the activities implemented. Associations between clusters and features of stroke services were assessed by regression analysis. Results: The response rate varied from 93.1% (2012) to 85.5% (2019). Over the years, the regional stroke services networks increased in ‘size’: the median number of organisations involved and the volume of patients per network increased (7 and 499 in 2019, compared to 5 and 364 in 2012). At the same time, fewer coordinators were appointed for more than 1 day a week in 2019 (35.1%) compared to 2012 (45.9%). Between 2012 and 2019, there were statistically significantly more elements implemented in four out of nine clusters: ‘Transparent entrepreneurship’ (MD = 18.0% F(1) = 10.693, p = 0.001), ‘Roles and tasks’ (MD = 14.0% F(1) = 9.255, p = 0.003), ‘Patient-centeredness’ (MD = 12.9% F(1) = 9.255, p = 0.003), and ‘Commitment’ (MD = 11.2%, F(1) = 4.982, p = 0.028). A statistically significant positive correlation was found for all clusters between implementation of activities and age of the network. In addition, the number of involved organisations is associated with better execution of implemented activities for ‘Transparent entrepreneurship’, ‘Result-focused learning’ and ‘Quality of care’. Conversely, there are small but negative associations between the volume of patients and implementation rates for ‘Interprofessional teamwork’ and ‘Patient-centredness’. Conclusion: This long-term analyses of stroke service development in the Netherlands, showed that between 2012 and 2019, integrated care activities within the regional stroke networks increased. Experience in collaboration between organisations within a network benefits the uptake of integrated care activities.
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen TT, Oldenburg B, Hsueh YS. Chronic care model in the diabetes pay-for-performance program in Taiwan: Benefits, challenges and future directions. World J Diabetes 2021; 12:578-589. [PMID: 33995846 PMCID: PMC8107979 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i5.578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In this review, we discuss the chronic care model (CCM) in relation to the diabetes pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan. We first introduce the 6 components of the CCM and provide a detailed description of each of the activities in the P4P program implemented in Taiwan, mapping them onto the 6 components of the CCM. For each CCM component, the following three topics are described: the definition of the CCM component, the general activities implemented related to this component, and practical and empirical practices based on hospital or local government cases. We then conclude by describing the possible successful features of this P4P program and its challenges and future directions. We conclude that the successful characteristics of this P4P program in Taiwan include its focus on extrinsic and intrinsic incentives (i.e., shared care network), physician-led P4P and the implementation of activities based on the CCM components. However, due to the low rate of P4P program coverage, approximately 50% of patients with diabetes cannot enjoy the benefits of CCM-related activities or receive necessary examinations. In addition, most of these CCM-related activities are not allotted an adequate amount of incentives, and these activities are mainly implemented in hospitals, which compared with primary care providers, are unable to execute these activities flexibly. All of these issues, as well as insufficient implementation of the e-CCM model, could hinder the advanced improvement of diabetes care in Taiwan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Tai Chen
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei 24205, Taiwan
| | - Brian Oldenburg
- Noncommunicable Disease Control Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3053, Australia
| | - Ya-Seng Hsueh
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3053, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Delameillieure A, Dobbels F, Vandekerkhof S, Wuyts WA. Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives on the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis care journey: a qualitative study. BMC Pulm Med 2021; 21:93. [PMID: 33736646 PMCID: PMC7972327 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01431-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) highly impacts patients on several life dimensions and challenges healthcare practices in providing high-quality care. Consequently, it is crucial to establish integrated care processes, maximizing patient value and patients’ individual needs. The aim of the study was to shed light on the care trajectory based on the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals. Methods The study was conducted at a tertiary Belgian IPF centre of excellence. We conducted individual interviews with patients and healthcare professionals, guided by the Chronic Care Model (CCM) as a framework for integrated care. Thematic analysis was used to underpin data analysis. Results Experiences were gathered of nine patients with IPF (aged 57–83 years, of which the informal caregivers were present at five interviews) and nine professionals involved in the IPF care trajectory. Our findings identified pitfalls and suggestions for improvement covering all elements of the CCM, primarily at the level of the individual patient and the care team. We covered suggestions to improve the team-based care and pro-active follow-up of patients’ needs. Self-management support was highlighted as an important area and we identified possibilities, but also challenges regarding the use of patient-reported outcomes and eHealth-tools. Furthermore, the importance of continuous training for professionals and the implementation of guidelines in routine care was pointed out. Also, participants mentioned an opportunity to collaborate with community-based organizations and raised challenges regarding the overall health system. Lastly, the pertaining lack of IPF awareness and the disease burden on patients and their caregivers were covered. Conclusions Our research team has initiated a project aiming to optimize the current care delivery practice for IPF patients at a Belgian centre of excellence. These results will inform the further optimisation of the care program and the development of feasible supportive interventions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-021-01431-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk Delameillieure
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok D-box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Fabienne Dobbels
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok D-box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Sarah Vandekerkhof
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok D-box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wim A Wuyts
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Respiratory Diseases, Unit for Interstitial Lung Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cheng AYY, Bajaj HS, Clement M, Sherifali D, Eisen D, Heisel O, Keown P, Richard JF. Assessing the Effect of Quality-Improvement Strategies for Organization of Care in Type 2 Diabetes Outcomes in Adults: Aim-Strait. Can J Diabetes 2020; 45:319-326.e5. [PMID: 33223422 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To observe the effect of an organization-of-care improvement process on the achievement of therapeutic goals for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS This single-arm cohort study analyzed the electronic medical records of patients with T2DM in 5 primary care practices in Ontario, Canada, before and 2 years after implementation of an individualized quality-improvement program. The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (A1C) between baseline and follow up, with secondary analyses including change in other metabolic parameters, medication patterns and clinic visits. Prespecified subgroup analysis of patients with baseline values above guideline therapeutic targets was performed. RESULTS In the overall population of 1,886 patients, A1C improved from 7.1% (baseline) to 7.0% (follow up) (p<0.001); low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) improved from 2.1 to 1.9 mmol/L (p<0.001); and diastolic blood pressure (BP) improved from 75 to 74 mmHg (p<0.001), with no significant change observed in systolic BP. Of those patients who were above guideline-recommended therapeutic targets at baseline, improvements were observed at follow-up: A1C 8.3±1.3% to 7.8±1.3% (p<0.001), LDL-C 2.9±0.7 mmol/L to 2.4±0.9 mmol/L (p<0.001), systolic BP 144±11 to 134±16 mmHg (p<0.001) and diastolic BP 80±10 to 75±11 mmHg (p<0.001), with the percentages of patients achieving target at follow up being 32% for A1C, 40% for LDL-C and 49% for systolic BP. Overall, 22% of patients achieved all 3 targets at baseline compared to 28% at follow up (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The implementation of an organization-of-care improvement program in primary care was associated with improved metabolic control, which was most pronounced in patients with baseline levels above guideline-recommended therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Y Y Cheng
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Trillium Health Partners and Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - Maureen Clement
- Department of Family Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Diana Sherifali
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doron Eisen
- West Durham Family Health Team, Pickering, Ontario, Canada
| | - Olaf Heisel
- Syreon Corporation, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul Keown
- Syreon Corporation, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Goderis G, Colman E, Irusta LA, Van Hecke A, Pétré B, Devroey D, Van Deun E, Faes K, Charlier N, Verhaeghe N, Remmen R, Anthierens S, Sermeus W, Macq J. Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium. Int J Integr Care 2020; 20:12. [PMID: 33024426 PMCID: PMC7518071 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The twelve Integrated Care Program pilot projects (ICPs) created by the government plan 'Integrated Care for Better Health' aim to achieve four outcome types (the Quadruple Aim) for people with chronic diseases in Belgium: improved population health, improved patient and provider experiences and improved cost efficiency. The aim of this article is to present the development of a mixed methods realist evaluation of this large-scale, whole system change programme. METHODS A scientific team was commissioned to co-design and implement an evaluation protocol in close collaboration with the government, the ICPs and several other involved stakeholders. RESULTS A protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation was developed to gain insights into the mechanisms that foster successful results in ICPs. The qualitative evaluation proposed will be based on the document analysis of yearly ICP progress reports, selected case studies and focus group interviews with stakeholders. Processes and outcomes of all the projects will be monitored using indicators based on administrative data on population health and the quality and costs of care. A yearly survey will be organized to collect data on patient-reported outcomes and experiences and on provider-reported measures of inter-professional collaboration and proper wellbeing. Using both quantitative and qualitative data, we will develop theories about the mechanisms and the associated contextual factors that lead to integrated care and the Quadruple Aim outcomes. DISCUSSION The objective of this study is to deliver policy recommendations on strategies and best practices to improve care integration in Belgium and to implement a sustainable monitoring system that serves both policy makers and the stakeholders within the ICPs. Some challenges due to the large scale of the project and the multiple stakeholders involved may impede the successful implementation of this proposal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert Goderis
- Academic Center of General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer Leuven, BE
| | - Elien Colman
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA)—Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat Antwerp, BE
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, BE
- Department of Nursing, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, BE
| | - Lucia Alvarez Irusta
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Clos chapelle aux champs Brussels, BE
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, BE
- Department of Nursing, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, BE
| | - Benoit Pétré
- Public Health Department, University of Liege, Quartier Hôpital, Avenue Hippocrate, Liège, BE
| | - Dirk Devroey
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, BE
| | | | - Kristof Faes
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, BE
| | - Nathan Charlier
- Public Health Department, University of Liege, Quartier Hôpital, Avenue Hippocrate, Liège, BE
| | - Nick Verhaeghe
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, BE
- Research Group Social and Economic Policy and Social Inclusion, KU Leuven, Parkstraat, Leuven, BE
| | - Roy Remmen
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA)—Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat Antwerp, BE
| | - Sibyl Anthierens
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA)—Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat Antwerp, BE
| | | | - Jean Macq
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Clos chapelle aux champs Brussels, BE
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Correa VC, Lugo-Agudelo LH, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Contreras JAP, Borrero AMP, Patiño-Lugo DF, Valencia DAC. Individual, health system, and contextual barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic metareview. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:74. [PMID: 32600417 PMCID: PMC7322919 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00588-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are designed to improve the quality of care and reduce unjustified individual variation in clinical practice. Knowledge of the barriers and facilitators that influence the implementation of the CPG recommendations is the first step in creating strategies to improve health outcomes. The present systematic meta-review sought to explore the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of CPGs. Methods A search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Health System Evidence and International Guideline Library (G-I-N) databases. Systematic reviews of qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods studies that identified barriers or facilitators for the implementation of CPGs were included. The selection of the title and abstract, the evaluation of the full text, extraction of the data and the quality assessment were carried out by two independent reviewers. To summarise the evidence, we grouped the barriers and facilitators according to the following contexts: political and social, health organisational system, guidelines, health professionals and patients. Results Overall, 25 systematic reviews were selected. The relevant barriers in the social-political context were the absence of a leader, difficulties with teamwork and a lack of agreement with colleagues. Relevant barriers in the health system were a lack of time, financial problems and a lack of specialised personnel. Barriers of the CPGs included a lack of clarity and a lack of credibility in the evidence. Regarding the health professional, a lack of knowledge about the CPG and confidence in oneself were relevant. Regarding patients, a negative attitude towards implementation, a lack of knowledge about the CPG and sociocultural beliefs played a role. Some of the most frequent facilitators were consistent leadership, commitment of the members of the team, administrative support of the institution, existence of multidisciplinary teams, application of technology to improve the practice and education regarding the guidelines. Conclusions The barriers and facilitators described in this review are factors that influence the implementation of evidence in clinical practice. Knowledge of these factors should contribute to the development of a theoretical basis for the creation of CPG implementation strategies to improve professional practice and health outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verónica Ciro Correa
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de Investigación Rehabilitación en Salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Luz Helena Lugo-Agudelo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de Investigación Rehabilitación en Salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Daniel Camilo Aguirre-Acevedo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de Investigación Rehabilitación en Salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Jesús Alberto Plata Contreras
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de Investigación Rehabilitación en Salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Ana María Posada Borrero
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de Investigación Rehabilitación en Salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Daniel F Patiño-Lugo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de Investigación Rehabilitación en Salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia.
| | - Dolly Andrea Castaño Valencia
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de Investigación Rehabilitación en Salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Timpel P, Lang C, Wens J, Contel JC, Schwarz PEH. The Manage Care Model - Developing an Evidence-Based and Expert-Driven Chronic Care Management Model for Patients with Diabetes. Int J Integr Care 2020; 20:2. [PMID: 32346360 PMCID: PMC7181948 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most current care models are disease- or symptom-focused and mostly do not account for the individual needs of patients with chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to develop an innovative, evidence-based and expert-based practice model for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHOD An iterative approach was used combining systematic literature search with qualitative methods, including a standardised survey of experts in chronic care (n = 92), an expert workshop of professionals (n = 22) and a multilingual online survey (n = 659). Using three consensus meetings involving researchers, policy makers and experts in chronic care, a limited number of core components and care recommendations was set up to develop a new chronic care model. RESULTS The developed 'MANAGE CARE MODEL' includes aspects of the health and social care system, resources derived from the living environment, aspects of health promotion and prevention, as well as an expanded understanding of improved outcomes as an integral part of chronic care. CONCLUSION The MANAGE CARE MODEL provides guidance for the development and implementation of chronic care programs, regional networks and national strategies. Future research is needed to validate the model as an instrument of regional chronic care management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Timpel
- Prevention and Care of Diabetes, Department of Medicine III, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, DE
| | - Caroline Lang
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, DE
| | - Johan Wens
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BE
| | - Juan Carlos Contel
- Chronic Care Program, Department of Health, Integrated Health and Social Care Plan, Generalitat de Catalunya, ES
| | - Peter E. H. Schwarz
- Prevention and Care of Diabetes, Department of Medicine III, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, DE
- Paul Langerhans Institut Dresden, German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Dresden, DE
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
van den Driessen Mareeuw FA, Coppus AMW, Delnoij DMJ, de Vries E. Quality of health care according to people with Down syndrome, their parents and support staff-A qualitative exploration. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2019; 33:496-514. [PMID: 31833622 PMCID: PMC7187228 DOI: 10.1111/jar.12692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Background People with Down syndrome (PDS) have complex healthcare needs. Little is known about the quality of health care for PDS, let alone how it is appraised by PDS and their caregivers. This study explores the perspectives of PDS, their parents and support staff regarding quality in health care for PDS. Method The present authors conducted semi‐structured interviews with 18 PDS and 15 parents, and focus groups with 35 support staff members (of PDS residing in assisted living facilities) in the Netherlands. Results According to the participants, healthcare quality entails well‐coordinated health care aligned with other support and care systems, a person‐centred and holistic approach, including respect, trust and provider–patient communication adapted to the abilities of PDS. Conclusions Our findings may be used to improve health care for PDS, and provide insight into how health care could match the specific needs of PDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francine A van den Driessen Mareeuw
- Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ME's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Antonia M W Coppus
- Department for Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Dichterbij, Center for the Intellectually Disabled, Gennep, The Netherlands
| | - Diana M J Delnoij
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Esther de Vries
- Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ME's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schwarz PEH, Timpel P, Harst L, Greaves CJ, Ali MK, Lambert J, Weber MB, Almedawar MM, Morawietz H. Reprint of: Blood Sugar Regulation for Cardiovascular Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: JACC Health Promotion Series. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 72:3071-3086. [PMID: 30522637 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to analyze the most up-to-date evidence regarding whether and how blood sugar regulation influences cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention by carrying out an umbrella review. Three separate, systematic literature searches identified 2,343 papers in total. Overall, 44 studies were included for data extraction and analysis. The included systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were of good to very good quality (median Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire score = 17). Identified evidence suggests that cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention services should consider regulation of blood glucose as a key target for intervention. Furthermore, the recommendations for effective intervention and service development/training described here for prevention of CVD should be adopted into evidence-based practice guidelines. Multidisciplinary teams should be formed to deliver multicomponent interventions in community-based settings. There may be substantial opportunities for integrating CVD and diabetes prevention services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter E H Schwarz
- Department for Prevention and Care of Diabetes, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden of the Helmholtz Center Munich at University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Patrick Timpel
- Department for Prevention and Care of Diabetes, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Lorenz Harst
- Research Association Public Health Saxony/Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Colin J Greaves
- School for Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammed K Ali
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jeffrey Lambert
- The Institute of Health Research, Primary Care, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Beth Weber
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mohamad M Almedawar
- Dresden International Graduate School for Biomedicine and Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Division of Vascular Endothelium and Microcirculation, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Henning Morawietz
- Division of Vascular Endothelium and Microcirculation, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schwarz PEH, Timpel P, Harst L, Greaves CJ, Ali MK, Lambert J, Weber MB, Almedawar MM, Morawietz H. Blood Sugar Regulation for Cardiovascular Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: JACC Health Promotion Series. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 72:1829-1844. [PMID: 30286928 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to analyze the most up-to-date evidence regarding whether and how blood sugar regulation influences cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention by carrying out an umbrella review. Three separate, systematic literature searches identified 2,343 papers in total. Overall, 44 studies were included for data extraction and analysis. The included systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were of good to very good quality (median Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire score = 17). Identified evidence suggests that cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention services should consider regulation of blood glucose as a key target for intervention. Furthermore, the recommendations for effective intervention and service development/training described here for prevention of CVD should be adopted into evidence-based practice guidelines. Multidisciplinary teams should be formed to deliver multicomponent interventions in community-based settings. There may be substantial opportunities for integrating CVD and diabetes prevention services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter E H Schwarz
- Department for Prevention and Care of Diabetes, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden of the Helmholtz Center Munich at University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Patrick Timpel
- Department for Prevention and Care of Diabetes, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Lorenz Harst
- Research Association Public Health Saxony/Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Colin J Greaves
- School for Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammed K Ali
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jeffrey Lambert
- The Institute of Health Research, Primary Care, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Beth Weber
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mohamad M Almedawar
- Dresden International Graduate School for Biomedicine and Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Division of Vascular Endothelium and Microcirculation, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Henning Morawietz
- Division of Vascular Endothelium and Microcirculation, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Janssen MM, Vos W, Luijkx KG. Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:206. [PMID: 31375079 PMCID: PMC6679545 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1213-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geriatric rehabilitation care (GRC) is short-term and multidisciplinary rehabilitation care for older vulnerable clients. Studies were conducted about its effects. However, elements that influence the quality of GRC have not been studied previously. METHODS In this study realist evaluation is used to find out which are the mechanisms and outcomes and which (groups of) persons are the context for GRC, according to GRC professionals. The mechanisms, outcomes and context of GRC were explored in three consecutive phases of qualitative data gathering, i.e. individual interviews, expert meeting, and focus groups. RESULTS Eight mechanisms - client centeredness, client satisfaction during rehabilitation, therapeutic climate, information provision to client and informal care givers, consultation about the rehabilitation (process), cooperation within the MultiDisciplinary Team (MDT), professionalism of GRC professionals, and organizational aspects - were found. Four context groups-the client, his family and/or informal care giver(s), the individual GRC professional, and the MDT-were mentioned by the respondents. Last, two outcome factors were determined, i.e. client satisfaction at discharge and rehabilitation goals accomplished. CONCLUSIONS In order to translate these insights into a practical tool that can be used by MDTs in the practice of GRC, identified mechanisms, contexts, and outcomes were visualized in a GRC evaluation tool. A graphic designer developed an interactive PDF which is the GRC evaluation tool. This tool may enable MDTs to discuss, prioritize, evaluate, and improve the quality of their GRC practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meriam M Janssen
- Tranzo Department, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| | - Willeke Vos
- Tranzo Department, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Katrien G Luijkx
- Tranzo Department, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
EMBULDENIYA GAYATHRI, KIRST MARITT, WALKER KEVIN, WODCHIS WALTERP. The Generation of Integration: The Early Experience of Implementing Bundled Care in Ontario, Canada. Milbank Q 2018; 96:782-813. [PMID: 30417941 PMCID: PMC6287073 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy Points Policymakers interested in advancing integrated models of care may benefit from understanding how integration itself is generated. Integration is analyzed as the generation of connectivity and consensus-the coming together of people, practices, and things. Integration was mediated by chosen program structures and generated by establishing partnerships, building trust, developing thoughtful models, engaging clinicians in strategies, and sharing data across systems. This study provides examples of on-the-ground integration strategies in 6 programs, suggests contexts that better lend themselves to integration initiatives, and demonstrates how programs may be examined for the very thing they seek to implement-integration itself. CONTEXT By bundling services and encouraging interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration, integrated health care models counter fragmented health care delivery and rising system costs. Building on a policy impetus toward integration, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in the Canadian province of Ontario chose 6 programs, each comprising multiple hospital and community partners, to implement bundled care, also referred to as integrated-funding models. While research has been conducted on the facilitators and challenges of integration, there is less known about how integration is generated. This article explores the generation of integration through the dynamic interplay of contexts and mechanisms and of structures and subjects. METHODS For this qualitative study, we conducted 48 interviews with program stakeholders, from organization leaders and managers to physicians and integrated care coordinators, across the hospital-community spectrum. We then used content analysis to explore the extent to which themes were shared across programs and to identify idiosyncrasies, followed by a realist evaluation approach to understand how integration was produced in structural and everyday ways in local program contexts. FINDINGS Integration was generated through the successful production of connectivity and consensus-the coming together of people, practice, and things, as perceived and experienced by stakeholders. When able, the programs harnessed existing cultures of clinician engagement, and leveraged established partnerships. However, integration could be achieved even without these histories, by building trust, developing thoughtful models, using clinicians' existing engagement strategies, and implementing shared systems and technologies. The programs' structures (from their scale to their chosen patient population) also contextualized and mediated integration. CONCLUSIONS This article has both practical and theoretical implications. It provides transferable insights into the strategies by which integration is generated. It also contributes conceptually to realist approaches to evaluation by advancing an understanding of mechanisms as contextually and temporally contingent, with the capacity to produce new contexts, which in turn generate new sets of mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - MARITT KIRST
- Institute of Health PolicyManagement and Evaluation, University of Toronto
- Wilfrid Laurier University
| | - KEVIN WALKER
- Institute of Health PolicyManagement and Evaluation, University of Toronto
| | - WALTER P. WODCHIS
- Institute of Health PolicyManagement and Evaluation, University of Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bower P, Reeves D, Sutton M, Lovell K, Blakemore A, Hann M, Howells K, Meacock R, Munford L, Panagioti M, Parkinson B, Riste L, Sidaway M, Lau YS, Warwick-Giles L, Ainsworth J, Blakeman T, Boaden R, Buchan I, Campbell S, Coventry P, Reilly S, Sanders C, Skevington S, Waheed W, Checkland K. Improving care for older people with long-term conditions and social care needs in Salford: the CLASSIC mixed-methods study, including RCT. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe Salford Integrated Care Programme (SICP) was a large-scale transformation project to improve care for older people with long-term conditions and social care needs. We report an evaluation of the ability of the SICP to deliver an enhanced experience of care, improved quality of life, reduced costs of care and improved cost-effectiveness.ObjectivesTo explore the process of implementation of the SICP and the impact on patient outcomes and costs.DesignQualitative methods (interviews and observations) to explore implementation, a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial to assess patient outcomes through quasi-experiments and a formal trial, and an analysis of routine data sets and appropriate comparators using non-randomised methodologies.SettingSalford in the north-west of England.ParticipantsOlder people aged ≥ 65 years, carers, and health and social care professionals.InterventionsA large-scale integrated care project with three core mechanisms of integration (community assets, multidisciplinary groups and an ‘integrated contact centre’).Main outcome measuresPatient self-management, care experience and quality of life, and health-care utilisation and costs.Data sourcesProfessional and patient interviews, patient self-report measures, and routine quantitative data on service utilisation.ResultsThe SICP and subsequent developments have been sustained by strong partnerships between organisations. The SICP achieved ‘functional integration’ through the pooling of health and social care budgets, the development of the Alliance Agreement between four organisations and the development of the shared care record. ‘Service-level’ integration was slow and engagement with general practice was a challenge. We saw only minor changes in patient experience measures over the period of the evaluation (both improvements and reductions), with some increase in the use of community assets and care plans. Compared with other sites, the difference in the rates of admissions showed an increase in emergency admissions. Patient experience of health coaching was largely positive, although the effects of health coaching on activation and depression were not statistically significant. Economic analyses suggested that coaching was likely to be cost-effective, generating improvements in quality of life [mean incremental quality-adjusted life-year gain of 0.019, 95% confidence interval (CI) –0.006 to 0.043] at increased cost (mean incremental total cost increase of £150.58, 95% CI –£470.611 to £711.776).LimitationsThe Comprehensive Longitudinal Assessment of Salford Integrated Care study represents a single site evaluation, with consequent limits on external validity. Patient response rates to the cohort survey were < 40%.ConclusionsThe SICP has been implemented in a way that is consistent with the original vision. However, there has been more rapid success in establishing new integrated structures (such as a formal integrated care organisation), rather than in delivering mechanisms of integration at sufficient scale to have a large impact on patient outcomes.Future workFurther research could focus on each of the mechanisms of integration. The multidisciplinary groups may require improved targeting of patients or disease subgroups to demonstrate effectiveness. Development of a proven model of health coaching that can be implemented at scale is required, especially one that would provide cost savings for commissioners or providers. Similarly, further exploration is required to assess the longer-term benefits of community assets and whether or not health impacts translate to reductions in care use.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN12286422.FundingThis project was funded by the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 6, No. 31. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Bower
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David Reeves
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Amy Blakemore
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Hann
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kelly Howells
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Meacock
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Luke Munford
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Maria Panagioti
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Beth Parkinson
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lisa Riste
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Yiu-Shing Lau
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lynsey Warwick-Giles
- Policy Research Unit in Commissioning and the Healthcare System, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Thomas Blakeman
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth Boaden
- National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Greater Manchester, Alliance Business School Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Iain Buchan
- Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen Campbell
- National Institute for Health Research Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Caroline Sanders
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Suzanne Skevington
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Waquas Waheed
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Checkland
- Policy Research Unit in Commissioning and the Healthcare System, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mewes JC, Ahmed SA, Vrijhoef HJM. How do integrated care programmes work for patients with cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, diabetes and multi-morbidity? A rapid realist review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE COORDINATION 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/2053434518788593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background In previous years, many multi-faceted initiatives have been set up to improve outcomes for people with chronic diseases. Evaluation studies about the (cost-)effectiveness of these integrated care programs showed heterogeneity in outcomes. Hence, it has been suggested to use realist evaluation for the evaluation of integrated care programmes. Thus, our aim was to gain insight into whether and how existing integrated care programmes work for people with cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, diabetes and multi-morbidity, and under what conditions within the Dutch healthcare setting. Methods A rapid realist review was conducted to identify the context and mechanisms that are associated with the outcomes of integrated care programmes. From a selection of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and Dutch literature, data on the context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care programmes were extracted. The data were analysed by placing the extracted variables in context-mechanism-outcome configurations which showed their interrelatedness. A panel of executives from Dutch care groups assessed the face validity of the context-mechanism-outcome configurations. Results Based on the existing literature, context-mechanism-outcome configurations were compiled for all five diseases. Some configurations could be filled with more detail than others, with the configuration of integrated care for people with diabetes being the most complete. Context-mechanism-outcome configurations were completed and confirmed by executives from Dutch care groups. Conclusion The configurations together with the identified factors in them reveal the underlying preliminary program theories of integrated care programmes. These theories need to be tested in further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - HJM Vrijhoef
- Panaxea b.v., The Netherlands
- Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vugts M, Liu H, Boumans J, Boydell E. The need for theory-based evaluation of care coordination initiatives: Considerations from the 2017 International Conference on Realist Research, Evaluation and Synthesis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE COORDINATION 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/2053434518779751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Research in the field of care coordination faces the challenge of providing transferable explanatory insights regarding what principles and initiatives work in practice and why. Such insights are crucial in developing effective solutions for global disease burdens. Realist research approaches have demonstrated potential to deliver stronger theoretical contributions of evaluation studies across fields of research. These were discussed at the International Conference for Realist Research, Evaluation and Synthesis in Brisbane (from 24 to 26 October 2017). This paper provides an overview and reflection on the conference by four participants. It focuses on (1) topical debates and challenges for the application of realistic methodology in health services research, as presented at the conference and (2) implied opportunities and challenges for (realist) evaluation of care coordination initiatives. Based on the reflections, future realist evaluation on evaluating complex care coordination initiatives is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miel Vugts
- Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joge Boumans
- Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sheaff R, Brand SL, Lloyd H, Wanner A, Fornasiero M, Briscoe S, Valderas JM, Byng R, Pearson M. From programme theory to logic models for multispecialty community providers: a realist evidence synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
The NHS policy of constructing multispecialty community providers (MCPs) rests on a complex set of assumptions about how health systems can replace hospital use with enhanced primary care for people with complex, chronic or multiple health problems, while contributing savings to health-care budgets.
Objectives
To use policy-makers’ assumptions to elicit an initial programme theory (IPT) of how MCPs can achieve their outcomes and to compare this with published secondary evidence and revise the programme theory accordingly.
Design
Realist synthesis with a three-stage method: (1) for policy documents, elicit the IPT underlying the MCP policy, (2) review and synthesise secondary evidence relevant to those assumptions and (3) compare the programme theory with the secondary evidence and, when necessary, reformulate the programme theory in a more evidence-based way.
Data sources
Systematic searches and data extraction using (1) the Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC) database for policy statements and (2) topically appropriate databases, including MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA). A total of 1319 titles and abstracts were reviewed in two rounds and 116 were selected for full-text data extraction. We extracted data using a formal data extraction tool and synthesised them using a framework reflecting the main policy assumptions.
Results
The IPT of MCPs contained 28 interconnected context–mechanism–outcome relationships. Few policy statements specified what contexts the policy mechanisms required. We found strong evidence supporting the IPT assumptions concerning organisational culture, interorganisational network management, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), the uses and effects of health information technology (HIT) in MCP-like settings, planned referral networks, care planning for individual patients and the diversion of patients from inpatient to primary care. The evidence was weaker, or mixed (supporting some of the constituent assumptions but not others), concerning voluntary sector involvement, the effects of preventative care on hospital admissions and patient experience, planned referral networks and demand management systems. The evidence about the effects of referral reductions on costs was equivocal. We found no studies confirming that the development of preventative care would reduce demands on inpatient services. The IPT had overlooked certain mechanisms relevant to MCPs, mostly concerning MDTs and the uses of HITs.
Limitations
The studies reviewed were limited to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries and, because of the large amount of published material, the period 2014–16, assuming that later studies, especially systematic reviews, already include important earlier findings. No empirical studies of MCPs yet existed.
Conclusions
Multidisciplinary teams are a central mechanism by which MCPs (and equivalent networks and organisations) work, provided that the teams include the relevant professions (hence, organisations) and, for care planning, individual patients. Further primary research would be required to test elements of the revised logic model, in particular about (1) how MDTs and enhanced general practice compare and interact, or can be combined, in managing referral networks and (2) under what circumstances diverting patients from in-patient to primary care reduces NHS costs and improves the quality of patient experience.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016038900.
Funding
The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rod Sheaff
- School of Law, Criminology and Government, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Sarah L Brand
- Y Lab Public Service Innovation Lab for Wales, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Helen Lloyd
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Amanda Wanner
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Mauro Fornasiero
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Simon Briscoe
- NIHR CLAHRC for the South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Jose M Valderas
- NIHR CLAHRC for the South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Richard Byng
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Mark Pearson
- NIHR CLAHRC for the South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Clement M, Filteau P, Harvey B, Jin S, Laubscher T, Mukerji G, Sherifali D. Organization of Diabetes Care. Can J Diabetes 2018; 42 Suppl 1:S27-S35. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
27
|
Abstract
Purpose
Integration is policy, practice as well as object of systematic investigation. What we do not know is whether or not integration can be understood as a science. In his book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn formulated a notion of (natural) sciences based on the emergence of commitments amongst a community of scientists to a set of logics, model and exemplars. He called this a paradigm. The purpose of this paper is to assess the scientific nature of integration by perceiving it as a paradigm in Kuhn’s sense.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper proceeds by conceptual reflection through matching existing components, theories and exemplifications of integration to Kuhn’s model of a scientific paradigm. Integration is understood broadly, either vertical or horizontal, and located within the practical domains of policy formulation, policy implementation and evaluation research. The nature, scope and depth of group commitments amongst students and practitioners of integration receive particular attention in line with Kuhn’s social interactionist approach.
Findings
Employing Kuhn’s notion of paradigm in the context of integration highlights the fundamental tension between integration efforts and integration outcomes. Whilst integration defines itself in contradistinction to professional boundaries and fragmentation, the paper argues that it fails to develop a strong theoretical and empirical foundation for a robust and stable group commitment. The reason is that the key motivational force that may create a stable group commitment amongst those engaged in integration, the patient perspective, remains outside the integration paradigm. This leaves integration as a practice and policy model underdeveloped, mainly paradigmatically illustrated by singular exemplars and rooted in aspirational policy vocabulary, while clustered around a near dogmatic belief that working together between services must lead to improved quality of care. To become a scientific paradigm the group commitment in integration would have to coalesce around a clear ontology (symbolic generalisations), epistemology (models of knowledge) and manifestations in practice (exemplars).
Research limitations/implications
At present both the ontology and epistemological foundations of integration practice and research are insufficiently clear. This hampers the development of integration practice as well as a better understanding of how to evaluate integration outcomes. Future studies should focus on the depth, nature and subject of group commitments to assess whether integration is a viable candidate for scientific paradigm or an assorted construct of policy aspirations.
Originality/value
The paper questions the rigour and trajectory of integration practice, policy and research. It identifies a tension at the centre of the field between group commitments to scientific exemplars (case studies) and symbolic generalisations, encapsulated in the desire to improve patient care. The notion of a scientific paradigm thus helps to re-frame the discussion about research and practice in integration.
Collapse
|
28
|
Struckmann V, Leijten FRM, van Ginneken E, Kraus M, Reiss M, Spranger A, Boland MRS, Czypionka T, Busse R, Rutten-van Mölken M. Relevant models and elements of integrated care for multi-morbidity: Results of a scoping review. Health Policy 2017; 122:23-35. [PMID: 29031933 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2016] [Revised: 08/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In order to provide adequate care for the growing group of persons with multi-morbidity, innovative integrated care programmes are appearing. The aims of the current scoping review were to i) identify relevant models and elements of integrated care for multi-morbidity and ii) to subsequently identify which of these models and elements are applied in integrated care programmes for multi-morbidity. METHODS A scoping review was conducted in the following scientific databases: Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, and Web of Science. A search strategy encompassing a) models, elements and programmes, b) integrated care, and c) multi-morbidity was used to identify both models and elements (aim 1) and implemented programmes of integrated care for multi-morbidity (aim 2). Data extraction was done by two independent reviewers. Besides general information on publications (e.g. publication year, geographical region, study design, and target group), data was extracted on models and elements that publications refer to, as well as which models and elements are applied in recently implemented programmes in the EU and US. RESULTS In the review 11,641 articles were identified. After title and abstract screening, 272 articles remained. Full text screening resulted in the inclusion of 92 articles on models and elements, and 50 articles on programmes, of which 16 were unique programmes in the EU (n=11) and US (n=5). Wagner's Chronic Care Model (CCM) and the Guided Care Model (GCM) were most often referred to (CCM n=31; GCM n=6); the majority of the other models found were only referred to once (aim 1). Both the CCM and GCM focus on integrated care in general and do not explicitly focus on multi-morbidity. Identified elements of integrated care were clustered according to the WHO health system building blocks. Most elements pertained to 'service delivery'. Across all components, the five elements referred to most often are person-centred care, holistic or needs assessment, integration and coordination of care services and/or professionals, collaboration, and self-management (aim 1). Most (n=10) of the 16 identified implemented programmes for multi-morbidity referred to the CCM (aim 2). Of all identified programmes, the elements most often included were self-management, comprehensive assessment, interdisciplinary care or collaboration, person-centred care and electronic information system (aim 2). CONCLUSION Most models and elements found in the literature focus on integrated care in general and do not explicitly focus on multi-morbidity. In line with this, most programmes identified in the literature build on the CCM. A comprehensive framework that better accounts for the complexities resulting from multi-morbidity is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Struckmann
- Berlin University of Technology, Department of Health Care Management, Germany.
| | - Fenna R M Leijten
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ewout van Ginneken
- WHO Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Berlin University of Technology, Department of Health Care Management, Germany
| | | | | | - Anne Spranger
- Berlin University of Technology, Department of Health Care Management, Germany
| | - Melinde R S Boland
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Reinhard Busse
- Berlin University of Technology, Department of Health Care Management, Germany
| | - Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Borgermans L, Marchal Y, Busetto L, Kalseth J, Kasteng F, Suija K, Oona M, Tigova O, Rösenmuller M, Devroey D. How to Improve Integrated Care for People with Chronic Conditions: Key Findings from EU FP-7 Project INTEGRATE and Beyond. Int J Integr Care 2017; 17:7. [PMID: 29588630 PMCID: PMC5854097 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Political and public health leaders increasingly recognize the need to take urgent action to address the problem of chronic diseases and multi-morbidity. European countries are facing unprecedented demand to find new ways to deliver care to improve patient-centredness and personalization, and to avoid unnecessary time in hospitals. People-centred and integrated care has become a central part of policy initiatives to improve the access, quality, continuity, effectiveness and sustainability of healthcare systems and are thus preconditions for the economic sustainability of the EU health and social care systems. PURPOSE This study presents an overview of lessons learned and critical success factors to policy making on integrated care based on findings from the EU FP-7 Project Integrate, a literature review, other EU projects with relevance to this study, a number of best practices on integrated care and our own experiences with research and policy making in integrated care at the national and international level. RESULTS Seven lessons learned and critical success factors to policy making on integrated care were identified. CONCLUSION The lessons learned and critical success factors to policy making on integrated care show that a comprehensive systems perspective should guide the development of integrated care towards better health practices, education, research and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth Borgermans
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BE
| | - Yannick Marchal
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BE
| | - Loraine Busetto
- Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, NL
| | - Jorid Kalseth
- SINTEF Technology and Society, Health Services Research, Trondheim, NO
| | - Frida Kasteng
- SINTEF Technology and Society, Health Services Research, Trondheim, NO
| | - Kadri Suija
- Department of Family Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, EE
| | - Marje Oona
- Department of Family Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, EE
| | - Olena Tigova
- Center for Research in Healthcare Innovation Management, IESE Business School, ES
| | - Magda Rösenmuller
- Center for Research in Healthcare Innovation Management, IESE Business School, ES
| | - Dirk Devroey
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BE
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vrijhoef HJ, de Belvis AG, de la Calle M, de Sabata MS, Hauck B, Montante S, Moritz A, Pelizzola D, Saraheimo M, Guldemond NA. IT-supported integrated care pathways for diabetes: A compilation and review of good practices. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE COORDINATION 2017; 20:26-40. [PMID: 28690856 PMCID: PMC5476194 DOI: 10.1177/2053434517714427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Integrated Care Pathways (ICPs) are a method for the mutual decision-making and organization of care for a well-defined group of patients during a well-defined period. The aim of a care pathway is to enhance the quality of care by improving patient outcomes, promoting patient safety, increasing patient satisfaction, and optimizing the use of resources. To describe this concept, different names are used, e.g. care pathways and integrated care pathways. Modern information technologies (IT) can support ICPs by enabling patient empowerment, better management, and the monitoring of care provided by multidisciplinary teams. This study analyses ICPs across Europe, identifying commonalities and success factors to establish good practices for IT-supported ICPs in diabetes care. Methods A mixed-method approach was applied, combining desk research on 24 projects from the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA) with follow-up interviews of project participants, and a non-systematic literature review. We applied a Delphi technique to select process and outcome indicators, derived from different literature sources which were compiled and applied for the identification of successful good practices. Results Desk research identified sixteen projects featuring IT-supported ICPs, mostly derived from the EIP on AHA, as good practices based on our criteria. Follow-up interviews were then conducted with representatives from 9 of the 16 projects to gather information not publicly available and understand how these projects were meeting the identified criteria. In parallel, the non-systematic literature review of 434 PubMed search results revealed a total of eight relevant projects. On the basis of the selected EIP on AHA project data and non-systematic literature review, no commonalities with regard to defined process or outcome indicators could be identified through our approach. Conversely, the research produced a heterogeneous picture in all aspects of the projects’ indicators. Data from desk research and follow-up interviews partly lacked information on outcome and performance, which limited the comparison between practices. Conclusion Applying a comprehensive set of indicators in a multi-method approach to assess the projects included in this research study did not reveal any obvious commonalities which might serve as a blueprint for future IT-supported ICP projects. Instead, an unexpected high degree of heterogeneity was observed, that may reflect diverse local implementation requirements e.g. specificities of the local healthcare system, local regulations, or preexisting structures used for the project setup. Improving the definition of and reporting on project outcomes could help advance research on and implementation of effective integrated care solutions for chronic disease management across Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hubertus Jm Vrijhoef
- Department of Patient & Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.,Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium.,Panaxea b.v., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Sabrina Montante
- Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli - Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Nick A Guldemond
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Department of Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bongaerts BWC, Müssig K, Wens J, Lang C, Schwarz P, Roden M, Rathmann W. Effectiveness of chronic care models for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e013076. [PMID: 28320788 PMCID: PMC5372084 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated the effectiveness of European chronic care programmes for type 2 diabetes mellitus (characterised by integrative care and a multicomponent framework for enhancing healthcare delivery), compared with usual diabetes care. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL from January 2000 to July 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials focussing on (1) adults with type 2 diabetes, (2) multifaceted diabetes care interventions specifically designed for type 2 diabetes and delivered in primary or secondary care, targeting patient, physician and healthcare organisation and (3) usual diabetes care as the control intervention. DATA EXTRACTION Study characteristics, characteristics of the intervention, data on baseline demographics and changes in patient outcomes. DATA ANALYSIS Weighted mean differences in change in HbA1c and total cholesterol levels between intervention and control patients (95% CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS Eight cluster randomised controlled trials were identified for inclusion (9529 patients). One year of multifaceted care improved HbA1c levels in patients with screen-detected and newly diagnosed diabetes, but not in patients with prevalent diabetes, compared to usual diabetes care. Across all seven included trials, the weighted mean difference in HbA1c change was -0.07% (95% CI -0.10 to -0.04) (-0.8 mmol/mol (95% CI -1.1 to -0.4)); I2=21%. The findings for total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and blood pressure were similar to HbA1c, albeit statistical heterogeneity between studies was considerably larger. Compared to usual care, multifaceted care did not significantly change quality of life of the diabetes patient. Finally, measured for screen-detected diabetes only, the risk of macrovascular and mircovascular complications at follow-up was not significantly different between intervention and control patients. CONCLUSIONS Effects of European multifaceted diabetes care patient outcomes are only small. Improvements are somewhat larger for screen-detected and newly diagnosed diabetes patients than for patients with prevalent diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda W C Bongaerts
- Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Partner Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Karsten Müssig
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Partner Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Johan Wens
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Caroline Lang
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Prevention and Care of Diabetes, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Schwarz
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Prevention and Care of Diabetes, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Roden
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Partner Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Rathmann
- Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Partner Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|