Physicians' knowledge and practices regarding screening adult patients for adverse childhood experiences: a survey

Exploring clinicians' knowledge and attitudes toward the care needs of complex adult users of an Emergency Department: A descriptive mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Adults who frequently present (FPAs) to emergency departments (EDs) often have a history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and related adult health sequelae. Implications for ED care of this group remains poorly understood. This study explored clinicians' knowledge and attitudes toward the care needs of FPAs who have an ACEs history, providing preliminary evidence to inform further research and interventions.

METHODS

A purposive sample of ED clinicians completed an investigator developed mixed-methods survey. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were applied.

RESULTS

Forty-three ED clinicians completed the survey. Most perceived that ACEs were common among FPAs and influenced their ED presentations. Clinicians were more aware of the psychosocial impacts of ACEs than the risks to physical health. While most clinicians agreed that FPAs should be asked about ACEs for management planning, most never asked, describing multiple barriers to doing so. Consumer's healthcare needs were often described as unmet by clinicians who desired additional support to provide care for this group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights clinicians' perceptions of gaps in healthcare for this patient group and introduces requirements for appropriate knowledge and resources to partner with consumers to provide patient-centred and trauma-informed health care responses.

'I've got to go in there with my armour on': Adverse Childhood Experiences Among Adults Who Frequently Attend Emergency Departments

Frequent presentations to emergency departments contribute to increased service demands and healthcare costs. Literature suggests these adult presentations may be influenced by childhood adversity. This qualitatively driven, mixed methods study explored the self-perceived role of childhood adversity in the health of adults who frequently attended Australian Emergency Departments and their perceptions of the healthcare they received. Data were collected using validated instruments and semi-structured interviews with 12 purposefully sampled adults who frequently attended emergency departments. Qualitative data were analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Three major themes were identified-The experience of childhood adversity: articulating challenges related to childhood trauma, and the subsequent impacts on participants' health, behaviours, relationships and sense of control; Pursuing safety: exploring action participants took to keep themselves and others safe, with this requirement extending into adulthood and influencing Emergency Department presentations; and Seeking humanising healthcare: identifying challenges participants experienced while seeking care in the Emergency Department. Participants perceived their mental health to be profoundly affected by their past experiences of trauma, leaving them feeling vulnerable at times and more likely to experience re-traumatisation in the Emergency Department. Feelings of stigmatisation during Emergency Department encounters led participants to employ self-protection strategies creating further barriers to recovery. Participants described Emergency Departments as often failing to comprehensively address their healthcare needs. They offered suggestions for more effective care interventions. Findings highlight the need for further research to inform policy and practice when designing and implementing interventions for these adults. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guided study reporting.

Understanding College Students' Healthcare Avoidance: From Early Maladaptive Schemas, through Healthcare Institutional Betrayal and Betrayal Trauma Appraisal of Worst Healthcare Experiences

Understanding healthcare avoidance among college students is critical. In this study, we consider two broad cognitive contributors to greater healthcare avoidance: specific early maladaptive schema and negative appraisals of students' prior worst healthcare experiences. From schema theory, we proposed college students holding greater levels of two early maladaptive schema (disconnection/rejection and impaired autonomy/performance EMS) would be more likely to appraise their problematic healthcare experience as both containing healthcare institutional betrayal (HIB) behaviors and as traumatic and betrayal-inducing; both EMS and these appraisals would predict healthcare avoidance. Using a cross-sectional survey in a large, diverse college student sample (n = 1383, 61.1% female, 18.9% African American, 7.2% Asian, 6.4% Hispanic/Latino), as predicted, both EMS were significantly related to healthcare avoidance. Furthermore, a sequential mediation model was supported, indicating students holding greater EMS of disconnection/rejection or impaired autonomy/rejection reported more HIB in their worst healthcare experience, and appraised that experience as more betraying. Taken altogether, this model accounted for 23% of the variance in students' reports of healthcare avoidance. Core beliefs formed early in life may be a foundational lens through which potentially traumatic healthcare experiences are processed in ways that can impact emerging adults' future healthcare engagement. Findings also support the importance of addressing HIB actions and repairing trauma appraisals accrued during problematic healthcare experiences to prevent healthcare avoidance by emerging adults.

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Sleep Disturbances Among Puerto Rican Young Adults

Importance

Sleep quality is a known marker of overall health. Studies suggest that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with sleep disturbances among children and adults.

Objective

To examine the association of retrospective and prospective ACEs with sleep quality among a cohort of Puerto Rican young adults from 2 sociocultural contexts.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study used data from the Boricua Youth Study (BYS), a population-based study representing Puerto Rican children from the South Bronx, New York, and Puerto Rico conducted from August 2000 to August 2003. Participants who were 5 to 9 years of age at enrollment in the BYS and who participated in wave 4 of the BYS took part in the Health Assessment (HA) when they were 18 to 29 years of age, from April 2013 to August 2017. Of the eligible 982 participants, 813 (82.8%) participated in the HA. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 2023 to January 2024.

Exposures

Prospective ACEs measured from parent and youth responses and retrospective ACEs measured among young adults using questions from the validated ACE questionnaire from the original ACEs study conducted by Kaiser Permanente and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and published in 1998. Analysis included 8 overlapping items from both questionnaires.

Outcomes

Sleep quality was assessed in the HA with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The summary score included 7 components of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The hypothesis was formulated after data collection. Sleep quality information was gathered at the same time as retrospective ACEs in the HA.

Results

Of the 813 participants, 438 (53.9%) lived in Puerto Rico as children, 411 (50.6%) identified as female, and the mean (SE) age of participants was 22.9 (0.07) years. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, retrospective ACEs had a significant association with worse sleep outcomes (β [SE] = 0.29 [0.07]; 95% CI, 0.15-0.44; P < .001). Prospective ACEs did not have a significant association with sleep quality, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (β [SE] = 0.05 [0.10]; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.24; P = .59).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that there is a significant association between retrospective ACEs and sleep quality among Puerto Rican young adults, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Prospective ACEs were not significantly associated with sleep disturbances, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Addressing ACEs reported in young adulthood may help reduce sleep disorders.

Medical Students' Knowledge, Attitudes Toward, and Identification of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Trauma-Informed Care

INTRODUCTION

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are traumatic experiences that occur prior to age 18 years and can have a long-term impact on adult physical and mental health. Knowledge of ACEs, including the link between ACEs and health, and trauma-informed care (TIC), is essential for medical professionals to ensure respectful and compassionate care for those with a history of childhood adversity. This study examined medical students' knowledge, attitudes toward, and identification of ACEs and TIC to inform curricular efforts.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional design, students were recruited from 2 medical schools, one allopathic (medical degree) and one osteopathic (doctor of osteopathic medicine degree) to complete an electronic needs assessment survey. The survey included a patient vignette to assess students' ability to identify ACEs as contributing factors to patient health. The students were blind to the full purpose of the study to obtain an objective measurement of their ability to identify ACEs as contributors to patient health. Additional questions targeting knowledge and attitudes of ACEs and TIC were devised from previously published surveys with supplemental study-designed questions.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty students completed the survey. Results demonstrated variable ability to identify ACEs; strong general knowledge of ACEs, with less developed practical knowledge; and overall positive attitudes toward ACEs and TIC. No differences were found between the medical degree and doctor of osteopathic medicine degree, or year in program.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical students would benefit from curricular efforts that help to increase knowledge of the link between ACEs and health, increase practical application of ACEs and TIC, and improve their ability to identify ACEs in clinical scenarios.

Implementation and Evaluation of Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening in Pediatrics and Obstetrics Settings

BACKGROUND

Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in prenatal and pediatric populations is recommended by the California ACEs Aware initiative and is a promising practice to interrupt ACEs in children and mitigate ACEs-related health complications in children and families. Yet, integrating ACEs screening into clinical practice poses several challenges.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this report was to evaluate the Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Southern California pilots and implementation of ACEs screening into routine prenatal (Kaiser Permanente Northern California) and pediatric (Kaiser Permanente Southern California) care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

These pilots were evaluated and compared to identify common challenges to implementation and offer promising practices for negotiating these challenges. Evaluation methods included feedback from staff, clinicians, and patients, as well as comparisons of methods to overcome various barriers to screening implementation.

RESULTS

Implementing ACEs screening, like implementation of any new component of clinical care, takes careful planning, education, creation of content and workflows, and continuous integration of feedback from both patients and staff.

CONCLUSION

This evaluation can serve as support for care teams who are considering implementing ACEs screening or who are already screening for ACEs. More research is needed regarding the relationship between ACEs and preventable and treatable health outcomes to improve health for patients and their families.

Conceptualizing the Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Health Influences of Adverse Childhood Experiences and the Application of Primary Care Behavioral Health for Their Treatment

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are common and affect the overall functioning of adults, but there is a need to understand how to better address the health impact of ACEs on adults in primary healthcare settings. A narrative review was utilized to extract data from seminal articles to (1) operationalize the influence of ACEs on health outcomes, (2) assess the primary care behavioral health (PCBH) model as a mechanism to address the influence of ACEs, and (3) identify mechanisms to expand the PCBH model to explicitly address spiritual determinants of health. The extracted data revealed that ACEs influence the biological, psychological, social, and spiritual health of patients providing a rationale for integrating psychosocial and spiritual treatment within primary healthcare settings. Simultaneously, the PCBH model integrates psychosocial interventions into existing primary care services but does not explicitly address spiritual determinants. Recommendations for expansion include (1) training for clinicians on evidence-based interventions to address spirituality, (2) spiritual screening tools in PCBH settings, and (3) consultation with chaplains as needed.

Adverse childhood events and mental health problems in cancer survivors: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the association between adverse childhood events (ACEs) and mental health problems in cancer survivors.

METHODS

This review was conducted in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Four databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane) were searched on 27-08-2023.

RESULTS

Of the 1413 references yielded by the literature search, 25 papers met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Most studies were performed in the USA, most included breast cancer survivors, and the number of included participants ranged between 20 and 1343. ACEs were relatively prevalent, with self-report rates ranging between 40 and 95%. Having been exposed to ACEs was a risk factor for heightened levels of emotional distress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and fatigue during cancer treatment. Results varied depending on the variables included, and per subscale, but were consistent across different cultures and heterogenous patient groups.

CONCLUSION

The association between ACE and mental health outcomes was significant in most studies. In order to improve treatment for this vulnerable population, it may be necessary to screen for ACEs before cancer treatment and adjust treatment, for example, by means of trauma-informed care (TIC), which recognizes and responds to the impact of trauma on individuals seeking healthcare.

Primary care nurse practitioners' perceptions and experiences communicating with adults about adverse childhood experiences

BACKGROUND

Clinical communication focused on childhood adversity has not been well described in the extant literature. There is a wealth of knowledge about patient-centered communication, including patient-centered communication techniques involving the discussion of health risks in primary care. However, there remain gaps in our understanding of the role that communication plays in exploring adverse childhood experience (ACE) exposure among adults in the clinical context.

PURPOSE

To better understand factors that influence how nurse practitioners (NPs) communicate with adults about ACEs in the context of primary care while simultaneously exploring NPs' perceptions and experiences of their ability to communicate with adults about ACE exposure.

METHODOLOGY

Guided by the Patient-to-Provider Communication of Adverse Childhood Experiences in Primary Care (PPC-ACE) Model, an exploratory, qualitative, descriptive study was conducted among 15 US-based primary care NPs. Nurse practitioner's participated in semistructured interviews, which were recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Atlas.ti provided supplemental data visualization. Demographic data, practice characteristics, and baseline ACEs knowledge were collected by means of Qualtrics.

RESULTS

Key themes described communication approaches and perceived barriers and facilitators to ACE-related conversations. Scope of practice, provider biases, diversity in practice models, and secondary trauma were factors NPs' perceived as positively or negatively influencing ACE-related communication in primary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes from this study provided deeper insights into the various influencers of NP-perceived, ACE-related, patient-centered communication among adults in primary care.

IMPLICATIONS

Findings will inform future research focused on ACE-related communication in primary care in the domains of NP education, practice, and health policy.

Use of Metaphor as an Explanation Tool in Adverse Childhood Experiences Simulation Training

INTRODUCTION

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have profound implications for adult health. Health care practitioners need effective communication tools for trauma-sensitive inquiries with patients. This study aimed to describe characteristics of effective metaphor use by health care trainees when discussing ACEs and health with adult patients, and to provide example metaphors for clinicians to use to sensitively address ACEs.

METHODS

Trainees engaged in a videorecorded simulation as part of a model to teach health care practitioners communication skills related to ACEs. Videos were identified in which the trainee used a metaphor to help explain ACEs during the encounter. Encounter segments that used metaphors were transcribed and metaphor type, duration, and recurrence were coded using a standardized rubric. Each metaphor was scored for effectiveness and basic statistical analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 122 videos reviewed, 24 types of metaphors were used, with the most common being the overloaded backpack (n = 24). Mean metaphor duration was 37 s (SD = 24 s). Metaphors rated as effective were shorter and less variable in duration (31.8 s, SD = 14.7 s) than those rated as ineffective (39 s, SD = 34 s). No one metaphor performed significantly better and most of the metaphors were evaluated as being adequate or effective.

CONCLUSION

Literary devices like metaphors may be efficient and effective explanatory tools to improve clinician communication skills and patient understanding in addressing sensitive topics, such as ACEs. Minimal time investment is required to employ metaphors in ACEs discussions. The authors found no single metaphor that to be clearly superior, indicating that patient-centered metaphor use may improve communication between clinicians and patients who experienced childhood trauma.

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Primary Headache Disorders: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Application of a Biological Theory

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Headache disorders are among the leading causes of disability worldwide. While an association between adverse childhood experiences and primary headaches has been reported, the pooled magnitude across studies and pathways of the association are unknown. Our objectives were (1) to estimate the pooled effect of ≥1 adverse childhood experience (ACE) on primary headache disorders in adulthood and (2) to test the hypothesis that ACEs categorized as "threat" traumas or "deprivation" traumas have distinct effects on primary headaches based on a selected theory from our narrative review of how ACEs affect human development along the life course.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Biological Psychiatry, and gray literature were searched up to March 16, 2023 (PROSPERO, CRD42020223403). Selected articles included (1) observational studies with a comparator group, (2) ACEs that occurred before 18 years of age, and (3) primary headaches occurring at or after 21 years of age. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multilevel linear random-effects modeling. The narrative review included theories that describe how ACEs affect human development and disease across the life course. We selected a theory from our narrative review and tested ACEs categorized according to this theory for any modification of point estimates.

RESULTS

Our search identified 32 studies, of which 28 were eligible for meta-analysis (n = 154,739 participants, 19 countries). The occurrence of ≥1 adverse childhood experience(s) was associated with primary headaches (pooled OR = 1.48 [95% CI 1.36-1.61]; high-quality evidence, 134,696 participants). As the number of ACEs increased, the odds of primary headaches increased (range: 1 ACE OR = 1.24 [95% CI 1.14-1.35] to ≥4 ACEs OR = 2.09 [95% CI 1.83-2.38], p for trend <0.0001). From the narrative review, a neurodevelopmental theory that categorizes ACEs into threat or deprivation was tested, and both were independently associated with primary headaches (threat OR = 1.46 [95% CI 1.32-1.60] and deprivation OR = 1.35 [95% CI 1.23-1.49], respectively), accounting for heterogeneity (p = 0.021).

DISCUSSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis confirm that ACEs are important risk factors of primary headache disorders in adulthood. Our findings provide epidemiologic support that ACEs categorized as threat and deprivation may manifest as distinct pathways of early adversity.

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Family-Centered Care

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) include experiences of child maltreatment and household dysfunction. Prior work has shown that children with ACEs may have suboptimal utilization of preventive health care, including annual well-visits, however little is known about the relationship between ACEs and quality of patient care. Using data from the 2020 National Survey of Children's Health (N = 22,760) a series of logistic regression models estimated associations between ACEs, both individually and cumulatively, and five components of family-centered care. Most ACEs were consistently associated with lower odds of family-centered care (e.g. financial hardship was associated with doctors always spend enough time with children, AOR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.47, 0.61), except for having a parent or guardian die, which was associated with higher odds. Cumulative ACE score was also associated with lower odds of family-centered care (e.g. doctors always listened carefully to the parent, AOR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.81, 0.90). These findings emphasize the importance of the consideration of ACEs in the context of family-centered care, and support the need for ACEs screening in the clinical setting. Future work should focus on mechanisms explaining the observed associations.

Performance and acceptability of the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire in a chronic pain population: a mixed-methods study

Introduction

Pain-related fear, anxiety, and avoidance may play key roles in the chronification of pain and related disability. For practitioners, knowledge about the source or drivers of these fears, including patients' exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and related posttraumatic stress symptoms, could be particularly helpful in guiding their treatment approach.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate whether the use of a brief screening for PTEs could help inform chronic pain treatment.

Methods

The performance and acceptability of the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire (SLESQ) was assessed among 567 adult patients (59% women, mean age 48.1 years) meeting at a hospital outpatient pain clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, and 20 months temporal stability of the SLESQ, assessing exposure to 14 specific trauma types followed by a 15th item capturing exposure to "other events," were assessed through digital administration and follow-up interviews with 55 participants. The qualitative responses of 158 participants reporting exposure to "other events" were reviewed and assessed based on fulfillment of the A Criterion for traumatic events in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. The acceptability of the SLESQ was assessed in clinical interviews with 12 participants.

Results

The SLESQ demonstrated acceptable sensitivity (70.0%), high specificity (94.9%), and moderate temporal stability (κ = 0.66, P < 0.001). Participants' qualitative elaborations of "other events" were largely (76.3%) consistent with Criterion A events. The screening was well accepted and welcomed.

Conclusion

The results indicate that the use of a brief screening for potential trauma may be helpful to guide clinical practice in chronic pain settings.

Does screening or routine enquiry for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) meet criteria for a screening programme? A rapid evidence summary

BACKGROUND

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are traumatic events in childhood that can have impacts throughout life. It has been suggested that ACEs should be 'screened' for, or routinely enquired about, in childhood or adulthood. The aim of this work is to review evidence for this against the United Kingdom National Screening Committee (UKNSC) programme criteria.

METHODS

A rapid review of evidence on ACEs screening was conducted using the approach of the UKNSC.

RESULTS

Good quality evidence was identified from meta-analyses for associations between ACEs and a wide range of adverse outcomes. There was no consistent evidence on the most suitable screening tool, setting of administration, and time or frequency of use. Routine enquiry among adults was feasible and acceptable to service users and professionals in various settings. A wide range of potentially effective interventions was identified. Limited evidence was available on the potential for screening or routine enquiry to reduce morbidity and mortality or possible harms of screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the application of available evidence to UKNSC screening criteria, there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the implementation of a screening programme for ACEs. Further research is needed to determine whether routine enquiry can improve morbidity, mortality, health and wellbeing.

Exposure to unpredictability and mental health: Validation of the brief version of the Questionnaire of Unpredictability in Childhood (QUIC-5) in English and Spanish

Unpredictability is increasingly recognized as a primary dimension of early life adversity affecting lifespan mental health trajectories; screening for these experiences is therefore vital. The Questionnaire of Unpredictability in Childhood (QUIC) is a 38-item tool that measures unpredictability in childhood in social, emotional and physical domains. The available evidence indicates that exposure to unpredictable experiences measured with the QUIC predicts internalizing symptoms including depression and anxiety. The purpose of the present study was to validate English and Spanish brief versions (QUIC-5) suitable for administration in time-limited settings (e.g., clinical care settings, large-scale epidemiological studies). Five representative items were identified from the QUIC and their psychometric properties examined. The predictive validity of the QUIC-5 was then compared to the QUIC by examining mental health in four cohorts: (1) English-speaking adult women assessed at 6-months postpartum (N = 116), (2) English-speaking male veterans (N = 95), (3) English-speaking male and female adolescents (N = 155), and (4) Spanish-speaking male and female adults (N = 285). The QUIC-5 demonstrated substantial variance in distributions in each of the cohorts and is correlated on average 0.84 (r's = 0.81-0.87) with the full 38-item version. Furthermore, the QUIC-5 predicted internalizing symptoms (anxiety and depression) in all cohorts with similar effect sizes (r's = 0.16-0.39; all p's < 0.05) to the full versions (r's = 0.19-0.42; all p's < 0.05). In sum, the QUIC-5 exhibits good psychometric properties and is a valid alternative to the full QUIC. These findings support the future use of the QUIC-5 in clinical and research settings as a concise way to measure unpredictability, identify risk of psychopathology, and intervene accordingly.

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Cardiovascular Risk among Young Adults: Findings from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Background: Heart disease is the fourth leading cause of death for young adults aged 18-34 in the United States. Recent research suggests that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may shape cardiovascular health and its proximate antecedents. In the current study, we draw on a contemporary, national sample to examine the association between ACEs and cardiovascular health among young adults in the United States, as well as potential mediating pathways. Methods: The present study uses data from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to examine associations between ACEs and cardiovascular risk, as well as the role of cumulative disadvantage and poor mental health in these associations. Results: Findings indicate that young adults who have experienced a greater number of ACEs have a higher likelihood of having moderate to high cardiovascular risk compared to those who have zero or few reported ACEs. Moreover, both poor mental health and cumulative disadvantage explain a significant proportion of this association. Conclusions: The present findings suggest that young adulthood is an appropriate age for deploying prevention efforts related to cardiovascular risk, particularly for young adults reporting high levels of ACEs.

A Conceptual Model to Guide Patient-to-Provider Communication of Adverse Childhood Experiences in Primary Care

Communicating with adults about childhood adversity is not an innate clinical skill nor is it a routine assessment element. Nurse practitioners may be aware of the significance adverse childhood experience (ACE) exposure has on adult health and well-being; however, they may not be prepared to identify, interpret, and subsequently act on that information. This article presents the development of a conceptual model to guide patient-to-provider communication of adverse childhood experiences in primary care (the PPC-ACE model). This includes a description of the model and its associated foundational elements, underlying assumptions, implications for nursing practice, and opportunities to use this model to guide future ACEs-related research.

The current state of patient-to-provider communication of childhood adversity in primary care

BACKGROUND

There is a wealth of literature focused on the task of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) screening; however, little literature exists describing the broader process of ACE-related communication, specifically between nurse practitioners (NPs) and adult primary care patients. Consequently, there is no standardized process for communicating about ACEs in primary care and significant gaps remain related to how, when, and where these conversations occur.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically examine peer-reviewed published literature from 2011 to 2021 to describe the current state of patient-to-provider communication about ACEs in primary care.

DATA SOURCES

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a focused literature search for the dates January 1, 2011 through January 1, 2021 using the search engines CINAHL, PubMed, Ovid, and PsycINFO with inclusion criteria of "adverse childhood experiences," "communication," and "primary care" provided boundaries for this systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings revealed that effective communication about childhood adversity is an integral and understated element when addressing ACE exposure among adult primary care patients. Further research focused on how primary care NPs apply the concepts of effective communication while providing clinical care to adults with histories of childhood adversity is warranted.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This systematic review will serve as a catalyst for informing future research, theory development, and curricular initiatives focused on enhancing communication between primary care NPs and adult patients with histories of childhood adversity. From a clinical perspective, this will illuminate opportunities to develop NP-centered approaches that emphasize identification, interpretation, documentation, and development of individual, ACE-specific interventions among adults with ACE exposure in primary care.

The assessment of adverse childhood experiences in clinical settings: Practitioner competencies and perceptions

Issues concerning the screening and assessment of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in healthcare settings have been subject to growing scrutiny in recent years, yet relatively little is known about practitioner perceptions and competencies related to such practices. This study examined practitioner knowledge, ability and concerns about the assessment of ACEs among parents and children in clinical settings and the acceptability of a newly validated measure (The Adverse Life Experiences Scale, ALES) for this purpose. Participants were (N = 144) healthcare practitioners (predominantly psychologists, nurses, social workers and psychiatrists). Measures were completed online, and the effects of family characteristics on practitioner perceptions were tested experimentally using case vignettes. Participants indicated moderate-to-high levels of knowledge and ability regarding the assessment of ACEs, and the ALES demonstrated high levels of acceptability across hypothetical cases involving various levels of risk. Practitioner concerns about such assessment were also found to be influenced by the level of risk indicated by case referral information. Specifically, concerns that assessment would be too upsetting or time-consuming were greater in response to a case with a high level of ACEs, compared to one with low-to-moderate ACEs (p < .05; large effect size). Practitioners demonstrated relatively high competencies regarding the assessment of ACEs and supported the use of the ALES for this purpose. Those families with the highest levels of ACEs may nonetheless be the least likely to receive such assessment in clinical settings.

The association of childhood maltreatment, somatization and health-related quality of life in adult age: Results from a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Population-based data regarding the relationship between childhood maltreatment (CM), somatization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of CM history (emotional and physical abuse and neglect, sexual abuse) with somatization and with physical and mental HRQoL in adults.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Data from 2305 participants from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania were analyzed (aged 20 to 80 years).

METHODS

We applied the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Somatoform disorders were diagnosed according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) in a clinical interview. Using a self-administered questionnaire, we assessed the number of somatic symptoms and physical and mental HRQoL.

RESULTS

Sexual abuse was related to the diagnosis of a somatoform disorder (odds ratio [OR] 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29, 2.69). Emotional abuse and physical neglect were associated with the number of somatic symptoms (B = 0.93; 95% CI 0.42, 1.45 and B = 0.50; 95% CI 0.17, 1.83, respectively). Sexual abuse and physical neglect were related to lower physical HRQoL (B = -1.87; 95% CI -3.17, -0.57 and B = -1.26; 95% CI -2.02, -0.49, respectively), and emotional abuse was associated with lower mental HRQoL (B = -2.83; 95% CI -4.03, -1.62).

CONCLUSIONS

A history of CM, in particular sexual abuse, emotional abuse and physical neglect, is a risk factor for somatization and impaired HRQoL in adults. Individuals with somatic symptoms are an important target group for CM screening. Addressing HRQoL might be significant in psychotherapy for individuals with CM experience.

Bitten by the System that Cared for them: Towards a Trauma-Informed Understanding of Patients' Healthcare Engagement

The BITTEN theoretical framework of trauma-informed healthcare proposes that each patient presents to a healthcare encounter with a baseline level of historical institutional Betrayal and trauma exposure that interacts with their Indicator for healthcare engagement to potentially Trigger trauma symptoms, impacting patients' Trust in healthcare providers and shaping their current and future Expectations of and Needs for healthcare. The current study sought to test and extend components of the BITTEN theoretical framework to better understand the link between trauma exposure (childhood trauma and institutional betrayal) and healthcare engagement. Results largely supported the propositions of the BITTEN theoretical framework: childhood trauma was directly related to healthcare avoidance behaviors. The relation between childhood trauma and healthcare avoidance was partially mediated by patients' reduced trust in healthcare providers. Further, the relation between childhood trauma and reduced trust in healthcare providers was potentiated by experiences of institutional betrayal. Interpreting patients' interactions with healthcare providers and the healthcare system as a whole in light of their interpersonal and institutional trauma histories is needed to more fully embody trauma-informed healthcare. The BITTEN theoretical framework of trauma-informed healthcare appears to be a viable foundation for developing a trauma-informed understanding of patients' healthcare engagement.

The "3 Es" of trauma-informed care in a federally qualified health center: Traumatic Event- and Experience-related predictors of physical and mental health Effects among female patients

Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a fast-growing source of healthcare for women with intersectional identities, or those most frequently exposed to and negatively impacted by interpersonal trauma. According to the "3 E" conceptualization of trauma, certain Event- and Experience-related characteristics of a trauma predict victims' physical and mental health Effects. The "3 Es" have yet to be studied in female FQHC patients. The current study examined the prevalence of interpersonal trauma and interrelationships among traumatic Event-related factors (e.g., cumulative trauma by victim-perpetrator relationship), Experience-related factors (e.g., betrayal, resilience), and Effects (e.g., somatic symptoms, posttraumatic stress (PTS), anxiety/depression, mistrust, reduced sense of safety) among 138 predominantly Black (89.1%) women receiving care at an FQHC in the southeastern U.S. Roughly 65% of participants (n = 86) endorsed exposure to at least one type of interpersonal trauma. More cumulative trauma was significantly correlated with more somatic, PTS, and anxious/depressive symptoms, and a reduced sense of safety. Experiences of betrayal and/or resilience were better predictors of PTS and anxious/depressive symptoms and lack of safety than Event-related factors. Findings support the need for the implementation of trauma-informed care within community-based health centers. Healthcare providers should consider women's subjective experience of trauma when screening for exposure and providing trauma-sensitive care.