1
|
Jomy J, Lin KX, Huang RS, Chen A, Malik A, Hwang M, Bhate TD, Sharfuddin N. Closing the gap on healthcare quality for equity-deserving groups: a scoping review of equity-focused quality improvement interventions in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf 2024:bmjqs-2023-017022. [PMID: 38866468 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-017022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Quality improvement (QI) efforts are critical to promoting health equity and mitigating disparities in healthcare outcomes. Equity-focused QI (EF-QI) interventions address the unique needs of equity-deserving groups and the root causes of disparities. This scoping review aims to identify themes from EF-QI interventions that improve the health of equity-deserving groups, to serve as a resource for researchers embarking on QI. METHODS In adherence with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, several healthcare and medical databases were systematically searched from inception to December 2022. Primary studies that report results from EF-QI interventions in healthcare were included. Reviewers conducted screening and data extraction using Covidence. Inductive thematic analysis using NVivo identified key barriers to inform future EF-QI interventions. RESULTS Of 5,330 titles and abstracts screened, 36 articles were eligible for inclusion. They reported on EF-QI interventions across eight medical disciplines: primary care, obstetrics, psychiatry, paediatrics, oncology, cardiology, neurology and respirology. The most common focus was racialised communities (15/36; 42%). Barriers to EF-QI interventions included those at the provider level (training and supervision, time constraints) and institution level (funding and partnerships, infrastructure). The last theme critical to EF-QI interventions is sustainability. Only six (17%) interventions actively involved patient partners. DISCUSSION EF-QI interventions can be an effective tool for promoting health equity, but face numerous barriers to success. It is unclear whether the demonstrated barriers are intrinsic to the equity focus of the projects or can be generalised to all QI work. Researchers embarking on EF-QI work should engage patients, in addition to hospital and clinic leadership in the design process to secure funding and institutional support, improving sustainability. To the best of our knowledge, no review has synthesised the results of EF-QI interventions in healthcare. Further studies of EF-QI champions are required to better understand the barriers and how to overcome them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Jomy
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ke Xin Lin
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ryan S Huang
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alisia Chen
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aleena Malik
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tahara D Bhate
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nazia Sharfuddin
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McGinty EE, Alegria M, Beidas RS, Braithwaite J, Kola L, Leslie DL, Moise N, Mueller B, Pincus HA, Shidhaye R, Simon K, Singer SJ, Stuart EA, Eisenberg MD. The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: transforming mental health implementation research. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11:368-396. [PMID: 38552663 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00040-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Margarita Alegria
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rinad S Beidas
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Lola Kola
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria; Kings College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Rahul Shidhaye
- Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences University, Loni, India; Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Sara J Singer
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Uche UI, Stearns J, Lee K. Capabilities, opportunities, motivations, and practices of different sector professionals working on community environments to improve health. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH = REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE 2024; 115:132-142. [PMID: 37919543 PMCID: PMC10853135 DOI: 10.17269/s41997-023-00824-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With rising healthcare costs in Canada from chronic conditions, individual behaviour change interventions in the clinical settings need to be complemented by a determinants of health approach, where multi-sector professionals assist in the creation of healthier community environments. This study sought to gain insights into capabilities, opportunities, motivations, and behaviours (COM-B) of Canadian multi-sector professionals for working together to improve built environments (BE) for health. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted with 61 multi-sector professionals. A 49-item questionnaire measuring constructs of COM-B for healthy BE practices was administered. RESULTS Public health (PH) professionals were more motivated by personal interest/values in healthy BE and the presence of scientific evidence on BE design health impacts as compared with planning and policy/program development (PPD) professionals. Planning professionals were more likely to be motivated by healthy BE legislation/regulations/codes than PPD professionals. The practice of taking responsibility for the inclusion of healthy features into BE designs was reported more often by planning and other professionals compared to PH professionals. Results trended towards significance for opportunities as a predictor of healthy BE practices among all professionals. CONCLUSION Though motivators vary among different sector professionals, opportunities may be the most important driver of healthy BE practices and potentially a target to improve multi-sector professional practices in Canada. Future research should confirm findings of this first study of professional practice drivers guided by a theoretical behaviour change framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uloma Igara Uche
- Housing for Health, Division of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Jodie Stearns
- Housing for Health, Division of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Karen Lee
- Housing for Health, Division of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mustanski B, Queiroz A, Merle JL, Zamantakis A, Zapata JP, Li DH, Benbow N, Pyra M, Smith JD. A Systematic Review of Implementation Research on Determinants and Strategies of Effective HIV Interventions for Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States. Annu Rev Psychol 2024; 75:55-85. [PMID: 37722749 PMCID: PMC10872355 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-035725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV, accounting for two-thirds of HIV cases in the United States despite representing ∼5% of the adult population. Delivery and use of existing and highly effective HIV prevention and treatment strategies remain suboptimal among MSM. To summarize the state of the science, we systematically review implementation determinants and strategies of HIV-related health interventions using implementation science frameworks. Research on implementation barriers has focused predominantly on characteristics of individual recipients (e.g., ethnicity, age, drug use) and less so on deliverers (e.g., nurses, physicians), with little focus on system-level factors. Similarly, most strategies target recipients to influence their uptake and adherence, rather than improving and supporting implementation systems. HIV implementation research is burgeoning; future research is needed to broaden the examination of barriers at the provider and system levels, as well as expand knowledge on how to match strategies to barriers-particularly to address stigma. Collaboration and coordination among federal, state, and local public health agencies; community-based organizations; health care providers; and scientists are important for successful implementation of HIV-related health innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Mustanski
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- Third Coast Center for AIDS Research, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Artur Queiroz
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - James L Merle
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Alithia Zamantakis
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Juan Pablo Zapata
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Dennis H Li
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- Third Coast Center for AIDS Research, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nanette Benbow
- Third Coast Center for AIDS Research, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Maria Pyra
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
| | - Justin D Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adsul P, Islam J, Chebli P, Kranick J, Nash S, Arem H, Wheeler S, Lopez-Pentecost M, Foster V, Sharma RK, Felder T, Risendal B, Chavarria EA, Kwon S, Hirschey R, Trinh-Shevrin C. Identifying research practices toward achieving health equity principles within the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:15-21. [PMID: 36826623 PMCID: PMC9950692 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01674-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although there is national recognition for health equity-oriented research, there is limited guidance for researchers to engage partnerships that promote health equity in cancer research. The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network's (CPCRN) Health Equity Work Group developed a toolkit to guide researchers in equitable collaborations. METHODS The CPCRN's Health Equity Work Group collectively outlined health and racial equity principles guiding research collaborations with partners that include communities, community-based organizations, implementing partners in the clinical setting including providers and health care organizations, and policy makers. Using a network-wide survey to crowdsource information around ongoing practices, we leveraged and integrated the network's experience and collaborations. RESULTS Data from the survey formed the preliminary basis for the toolkit, with a focus on sharing fiscal resources with partners, training and capacity building, collaborative decision-making, community-driven research agenda setting, and sustainability. The final toolkit provides reflection considerations for researchers and collated exemplary resources, supported by the contemporary research. CONCLUSIONS The toolkit provides a guide to researchers at all experience levels wanting to engage in equitable research collaborations. Future efforts are underway to evaluate whether and how researchers within and outside CPCRN are able to incorporate these principles in research collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prajakta Adsul
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
- Cancer Control and Populations Sciences Research Program, Cancer Research Facility (CRF), University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | | | - Perla Chebli
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Section for Health Equity, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julie Kranick
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Section for Health Equity, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Nash
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Hannah Arem
- MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Stephanie Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Victoria Foster
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Section for Health Equity, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rashmi K Sharma
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Betsy Risendal
- Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Enmanuel A Chavarria
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Simona Kwon
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Section for Health Equity, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Hirschey
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Chau Trinh-Shevrin
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Section for Health Equity, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Still CH, Flores DD, Brooks J, Santa Maria D. Advancing health equity through nursing research. Nurs Outlook 2023; 71:102049. [PMID: 37718191 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2023.102049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health inequities are major predictors of poor health and remain a complex and persistent challenge globally and in the United States. Research has documented the underlying causes and mechanisms that give rise to health disparities. However, it lacks adequate attention to the strategies needed to build upon promulgated research to address equity-based challenges to improve health. PURPOSE This paper describes how building and supporting diverse research teams can play a central role in increasing the research capacity and participation of diverse populations to improve the health of individuals, families, and communities. METHODS Exemplars from work and discussion of strategies to grow nursing's health equity workforce are presented. DISCUSSION Actions to build and leverage partnerships to expand capacity, maximize the impact of health equity outcomes, and cultivate a supportive environment to grow the health equity scientific workforce are discussed. CONCLUSION Nurse scientists can address health equity through the research process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Harmon Still
- Center for the Advancement of Community-Engaged Innovation in Health Equity (CACHE), Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
| | | | - Jada Brooks
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Diane Santa Maria
- Cizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aschbrenner KA, Oh AY, Tabak RG, Hannon PA, Angier HE, Moore WT, Likumahuwa-Ackman S, Carroll JK, Baumann AA, Beidas RS, Mazzucca-Ragan S, Waters EA, Sadasivam RS, Shelton RC. Integrating a focus on health equity in implementation science: Case examples from the national cancer institute's implementation science in cancer control centers (ISC 3) network. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e226. [PMID: 38028358 PMCID: PMC10643915 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A Health Equity Task Force (HETF) of members from seven Centers funded by the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Implementation Science in Cancer Control Centers (ISC3) network sought to identify case examples of how Centers were applying a focus on health equity in implementation science to inform future research and capacity-building efforts. Methods HETF members at each ISC3 collected information on how health equity was conceptualized, operationalized, and addressed in initial research and capacity-building efforts across the seven ISC3 Centers funded in 2019-2020. Each Center completed a questionnaire assessing five health equity domains central to implementation science (e.g., community engagement; implementation science theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs); and engaging underrepresented scholars). Data generated illustrative examples from these five domains. Results Centers reported a range of approaches focusing on health equity in implementation research and capacity-building efforts, including (1) engaging diverse community partners/settings in making decisions about research priorities and projects; (2) applying health equity within a single TMF applied across projects or various TMFs used in specific projects; (3) evaluating health equity in operationalizing and measuring health and implementation outcomes; (4) building capacity for health equity-focused implementation science among trainees, early career scholars, and partnering organizations; and (5) leveraging varying levels of institutional resources and efforts to engage, include, and support underrepresented scholars. Conclusions Examples of approaches to integrating health equity across the ISC3 network can inform other investigators and centers' efforts to build capacity and infrastructure to support growth and expansion of health equity-focused implementation science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A. Aschbrenner
- Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - April Y. Oh
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Rachel G. Tabak
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Peggy A. Hannon
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Heather E. Angier
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - W. Todd Moore
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Ana A. Baumann
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rinad S. Beidas
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Erika A. Waters
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rajani S. Sadasivam
- Division of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Rachel C. Shelton
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beck McGreevy P, Wood S, Thomson E, Burmeister C, Spence H, Pelletier J, Giesinger W, McDougall J, McLeod R, Hutchison A, Lock K, Norton A, Barker B, Urbanoski K, Slaunwhite A, Nosyk B, Pauly B. Doing community-based research during dual public health emergencies (COVID and overdose). Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:135. [PMID: 37715202 PMCID: PMC10504762 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00852-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Meaningful engagement and partnerships with people who use drugs are essential to conducting research that is relevant and impactful in supporting desired outcomes of drug consumption as well as reducing drug-related harms of overdose and COVID-19. Community-based participatory research is a key strategy for engaging communities in research that directly affects their lives. While there are growing descriptions of community-based participatory research with people who use drugs and identification of key principles for conducting research, there is a gap in relation to models and frameworks to guide research partnerships with people who use drugs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework for research partnerships between people who use drugs and academic researchers, collaboratively developed and implemented as part of an evaluation of a provincial prescribed safer supply initiative introduced during dual public health emergencies (overdose and COVID-19) in British Columbia, Canada. The framework shifts from having researchers choose among multiple models (advisory, partnership and employment) to incorporating multiple roles within an overall community-based participatory research approach. Advocacy by and for drug users was identified as a key role and reason for engaging in research. Overall, both academic researchers and Peer Research Associates benefited within this collaborative partnerships approach. Each offered their expertise, creating opportunities for omni-directional learning and enhancing the research. The shift from fixed models to flexible roles allows for a range of involvement that accommodates varying time, energy and resources. Facilitators of involvement include development of trust and partnering with networks of people who use drugs, equitable pay, a graduate-level research assistant dedicated to ongoing orientation and communication, technical supports as well as fluidity in roles and opportunities. Key challenges included working in geographically dispersed locations, maintaining contact and connection over the course of the project and ensuring ongoing sustainable but flexible employment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoenix Beck McGreevy
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Shawn Wood
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Erica Thomson
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
- BCYADWS (BC Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors), Vancouver, Canada
| | - Charlene Burmeister
- PWLLE Stakeholder Engagement Lead, Professionals for Ethical Engagement of Peers (PEEP), BC Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
- CSUN (Coalition of Substance Users of the North), Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Heather Spence
- KANDU (Knowledging All Nations and Developing Unity), Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Josh Pelletier
- KANDU (Knowledging All Nations and Developing Unity), Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Willow Giesinger
- BCYADWS (BC Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors), Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jenny McDougall
- CSUN (Coalition of Substance Users of the North), Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Rebecca McLeod
- CSUN (Coalition of Substance Users of the North), Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Abby Hutchison
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Kurt Lock
- BCCDC (British Columbia Centre for Disease Control) Harm Reduction Program, 655 West 12Th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada
| | - Alexa Norton
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
- First Nations Health Authority, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Brittany Barker
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
- First Nations Health Authority, Vancouver, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Karen Urbanoski
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
- School of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Amanda Slaunwhite
- BCCDC (British Columbia Centre for Disease Control) Harm Reduction Program, 655 West 12Th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada
| | - Bohdan Nosyk
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Blusson Hall, Room 11300, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Bernie Pauly
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada.
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Box 1700 Stn CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Crane ME, Triplett NS, Nelson KL, Larson MF, Wright B, Pelt AEV. Recommendations for Writing a National Institutes of Health Individual Predoctoral Fellowship (F31) Training Grant in Dissemination and Implementation Science. GLOBAL IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS 2023; 3:299-310. [PMID: 39297023 PMCID: PMC11410365 DOI: 10.1007/s43477-023-00096-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2024]
Abstract
Early career training is an essential component of building the future of dissemination and implementation (D&I) science. The United States National Institutes of Health Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA) Individual Predoctoral Fellowship (F31) award offers a mechanism for doctoral students to acquire specialized D&I training and mentorship, to pursue independent research in D&I science, and to receive financial support for their graduate studies. Due to scarce resources on preparing early career grant proposals focused on D&I science, this commentary offers guidance to doctoral students on developing a successful application for a specific type of early career proposal - the NIH F31 mechanism. We offer strategies for the research and training components based on themes identified across six funded F31 grant applications and on our experiences in the application process (grants funded from 2019-2020). We are from diverse fields (clinical psychology, school psychology, public health, and epidemiology) with varied research foci (global health, mental health, and infectious diseases). Applications were funded on both the F31 and F31-Diversity mechanisms. Funded F31 research projects included dissemination strategies, treatment adaptions, piloting new methods, and pre-implementation inquiry. Common training goals included developing content expertise in D&I science, understanding specific D&I science methodologies, learning strategies for working with community partners, and enhancing knowledge of analytic methods. D&I training activities included journal clubs, meeting with consultants, attending D&I science trainings, and attending conferences. Mentored research training is essential for learning D&I science methods and developing research-practice partnerships as students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret E Crane
- Department of Psychology, Temple University, Weiss Hall, 1701 N 13 St, Philadelphia, PA United States, 19122
- Department of Psychiatry, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 E 61 St, New York, NY United States, 10065
| | - Noah S Triplett
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, 119A Guthrie Hall Box 351525 Seattle, WA United States, 98195
| | - Katherine L Nelson
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Drexel University, 3215 Market Street Philadelphia PA United States 19104
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 East Lincoln Ave., P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, NJ United States 07065
| | - Madeline F Larson
- Character Strong, 4227 S. Meridian Ste., C #320, Puyallup, WA United States 98373
| | - Blanche Wright
- Department of Health Policy & Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Dr. S., 31-269 CHS Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA, United States 90095
| | - Amelia E Van Pelt
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 N Michigan Ave Office 21-078, Chicago, IL, United States 60611
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 19104
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 19104
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 19104
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3600 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 19104
- Center for Global Health, University of Pennsylvania, 240 John Morgan Building, 3620 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 19104
- Center for Public Health Initiatives, University of Pennsylvania, Anatomy Chemistry Building, Room 148, 3620 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 19104
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Harper K, Bode B, Gupta K, Terhaar A, Baltaci A, Asada Y, Lane H. Challenges and Opportunities for Equity in US School Meal Programs: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Literature Regarding the COVID-19 Emergency. Nutrients 2023; 15:3738. [PMID: 37686770 PMCID: PMC10490348 DOI: 10.3390/nu15173738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The emergency school meals program provided free meals to children in the United States (US) during COVID-19-related school closures. This scoping review aims to synthesize the existing qualitative empirical evidence published between March 2020 and January 2023 on the operations and utilization of emergency school meal programs during the pandemic. Qualitative, US-based peer-reviewed literature was collected from three sources: (1) parent review of all federal nutrition assistance programs; (2) systematic search of four databases; and (3) manual search of grey literature. Identified scientific articles and grey literature reports (n = 183) were uploaded into Covidence and screened for duplicates and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Our final sample included 21 articles/reports, including 14 mixed methods and seven qualitative-only projects. Articles spanned all U.S. states. Articles had similar research questions to understand school meals and/or general food access during COVID-19, with an emphasis on long-term policy implications. Hybrid deductive/inductive analytic coding was used to analyze data, utilizing domains from the Getting to Equity Framework (GTE). GTE considers multi-level factors that influence nutrition behavior while centering more equitable pathways to improve nutrition security and reduce adverse health. Findings were sorted into two categories: operational challenges during the pandemic and solutions to address inequities in school meal distribution during and after the pandemic, particularly during school closures such as summers or future emergencies. Key challenges related to supply chain issues, safety, and balancing families' needs with limited staff capacity. Programs addressed equity by (a) reducing deterrents through federally issued waivers and increased communications which allowed the serving of meals by programs to families who previously did not have access, (b) building community capacity through collaborations and partnerships which allowed for increased distribution, and (c) preparing and distributing healthy options unless barriers in supply chain superseded the effort. This review highlights the importance of emergency school meal programs and provides insights into addressing challenges and promoting equity in future out-of-school times. These insights could be applied to policy and practice change to optimize program budgets, increase reach equitably, and improve access to nutritious meals among populations at highest risk for nutrition insecurity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Harper
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Bree Bode
- Michigan Fitness Foundation, Lansing, MI 48906, USA
| | - Kritika Gupta
- Department of Nutrition & Hospitality Management, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA
| | - Ally Terhaar
- Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA
| | - Aysegul Baltaci
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Yuka Asada
- Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
| | - Hannah Lane
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Woodward EN, Ball IA. Perspectives on learning to practice reflexivity while engaging communities in implementation science. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 2:1070444. [PMID: 36925788 PMCID: PMC10012695 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1070444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Background As implementation scientists and practitioners engage community members and service users, reflexivity rises as a critical approach for managing power imbalances and effective collaborative work to promote equity. Reflexivity is an approach for acknowledging scientists' own positions, including their understanding and limits of how they view their phenomena of inquiry. We describe our perspective practicing reflexivity as an implementation science team new to community engagement. Methods We spent over two years learning principles of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) to inform implementation science and practice, then applied CPBR principles into a new community-academic partnership in August 2020 for and with veterans of the United States Military living in rural Arkansas. We used five methods to practice reflexivity for the first time: identifying positionality, writing fieldnotes, obtaining mentorship on technical aspects, comparing head notes, and consulting reference materials. Discussion We found multiple methods for practicing reflexivity to be feasible, although difficult to stay consistent with busy schedules. Fieldnotes especially required commitment and were important not to minimize. Written fieldnotes enabled us to reflect on successes and missteps, funneling into action planning. Head notes allowed emotional catharsis and to generate insights based on each other's perspectives. Referencing books or course modules reminded us of ideal CBPR principles. Discussion with mentors helped us with technical aspects and balancing real-world challenges with ideal CBPR principles. Our methods to practice reflexivity were valuable and directly impacted process and research outcomes. Future training for implementation science and practice might consider reflexivity practice as a core competency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva N. Woodward
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Irenia A. Ball
- VA Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Adsul P, Chambers D, Brandt HM, Fernandez ME, Ramanadhan S, Torres E, Leeman J, Baquero B, Fleischer L, Escoffery C, Emmons K, Soler M, Oh A, Korn AR, Wheeler S, Shelton RC. Grounding implementation science in health equity for cancer prevention and control. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:56. [PMID: 35659151 PMCID: PMC9164317 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00311-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The past decade of research has seen theoretical and methodological advances in both implementation science and health equity research, opening a window of opportunity for facilitating and accelerating cross-disciplinary exchanges across these fields that have largely operated in siloes. In 2019 and 2020, the National Cancer Institute's Consortium for Cancer Implementation Science convened an action group focused on 'health equity and context' to identify opportunities to advance implementation science. In this paper, we present a narrative review and synthesis of the relevant literature at the intersection of health equity and implementation science, highlight identified opportunities (i.e., public goods) by the action group for advancing implementation science in cancer prevention and control, and integrate the two by providing key recommendations for future directions. DISCUSSION In the review and synthesis of the literature, we highlight recent advances in implementation science, relevant to promoting health equity (e.g., theories/models/frameworks, adaptations, implementation strategies, study designs, implementation determinants, and outcomes). We acknowledge the contributions from the broader field of health equity research and discuss opportunities for integration and synergy with implementation science, which include (1) articulating an explicit focus on health equity for conducting and reviewing implementation science; (2) promoting an explicit focus on health equity in the theories, models, and frameworks guiding implementation science; and (3) identifying methods for understanding and documenting influences on the context of implementation that incorporate a focus on equity. To advance the science of implementation with a focus on health equity, we reflect on the essential groundwork needed to promote bi-directional learning between the fields of implementation science and health equity research and recommend (1) building capacity among researchers and research institutions for health equity-focused and community-engaged implementation science; (2) incorporating health equity considerations across all key implementation focus areas (e.g., adaptations, implementation strategies, study design, determinants, and outcomes); and (3) continuing a focus on transdisciplinary opportunities in health equity research and implementation science. We believe that these recommendations can help advance implementation science by incorporating an explicit focus on health equity in the context of cancer prevention and control and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prajakta Adsul
- Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA
| | - David Chambers
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD USA
| | - Heather M. Brandt
- HPV Cancer Prevention Program, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Maria E. Fernandez
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| | | | - Essie Torres
- East Carolina University, 2309 Carol Belk Bldg, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
| | | | - Barbara Baquero
- University of Washington, 3980 15th Ave. NE, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | | | - Cam Escoffery
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Karen Emmons
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Montserrat Soler
- Ob/Gyn and Women’s Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - April Oh
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Ariella R. Korn
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Implementation Science, Office of the Director, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - Stephanie Wheeler
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7411, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Rachel C. Shelton
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA
| |
Collapse
|