The relationship between frailty, nutritional status, co-morbidity, CT-body composition and systemic inflammation in patients with COVID-19

A Novel Facet of In-Hospital Food Consumption Associated with Hospital Mortality in Patients with Scheduled Admission-Addition of a Study Protocol to Test the Existence of Effects of COVID-19 in the Same Study in the Post-COVID-19 Period

BACKGROUND

Humankind has faced unexperienced pandemic events since 2020. Since the COVID-19 pandemic has calmed down, we felt the need to verify whether in-hospital mortality had worsened compared to pre-pandemic conditions due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that daily food consumption is associated with in-hospital mortality during hospitalization and to provide baseline data to examine whether the effects of COVID-19 exist or not in post-pandemic period.

METHODS

All hospitalized patients staying in a single institution on the third Thursday of May, August, November, and the following February were included. Compared data: (1) among four seasons, (2) between age < 75 vs. ≥75 years, (3) between <75% vs. ≥75% of in-hospital food, and (4) logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

In 365 inpatients, the following results were obtained: (1) no seasonality or age effect in in-hospital mortality, (2) the novel cutoff value of 75% of the hospital food requirement was used to identify poor in-hospital survivors, (3) logistic regression analysis showed low food consumption, with <75% of the hospital food requirement as the predictor of high in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

A small eater of in-hospital food < 75% during hospitalization was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality in patients with scheduled hospitalization in the pre-pandemic period. Then, a study protocol is proposed to test the existence of the effects of COVID-19 in the same study in the post-COVID-19 period. This study protocol is, to our knowledge, the first proposal to test the effects of food consumption in the post-COVID-19 period on in-hospital mortality in the clinical nutritional areas.

The Relationship between Clinical Frailty Score, CT-Derived Body Composition, Systemic Inflammation, and Survival in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a chronic condition with complex etiology and impaired functional performance that has been associated with altered body composition and chronic inflammation. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) carries significant morbidity and mortality and is associated with poor quality of life. The present study aims to examine these relationships and their prognostic value in patients with CLTI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting as unscheduled admissions to a single tertiary center with CLTI were included over a 12-month period. Frailty was diagnosed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Body composition was assessed using computerised tomography (CT) at the L3 vertebral level (CT-BC) to generate visceral and subcutaneous fat indices, skeletal muscle index, and skeletal muscle density. Skeletal muscle index and skeletal muscle density were combined to form the CT-sarcopenia score (CT-SS). Systemic inflammation was assessed by the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS). The primary outcome was overall mortality.

RESULTS

There were 190 patients included with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 22 (6) months (range 15-32 months) and 79 deaths during the follow-up period. One hundred patients (53%) had a CFS >4. CFS >4 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-3.66, P < 0.01), CT-SS (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03-2.09, P < 0.05), and mGPS (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.11-2.13, P < 0.01) were independently associated with increased mortality. CT-SS (odds ratio 1.88, 95% CI 1.09-3.24, P < 0.01) was independently associated with CFS >4. Patients with CT-SS 0 and CFS ≤4 had 90% (standard error [SE] 5%) 1-year survival, compared with 35% (SE 9%) in patients with CT-SS 2 and CFS >4 (P < 0.001). Patients with mGPS 0 and CFS ≤4 had 94% (SE 4%) 1-year survival compared with 44% (SE 6%) in the mGPS 2 and CFS >4 subgroup (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty assessed by CFS was associated with CT-BC. CFS, CT-SS, and mGPS were associated with poorer survival in patients presenting as unscheduled admissions with CLTI. CT-SS and mGPS may contribute to part of frailty and prognostic assessment in this patient cohort.

Do Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio Need to Be Stratified for Age and Comorbidities in COVID-19 Disease? A Subgroup Analysis of Two Distinct Cohorts over Disease Course

Several studies described neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as markers of COVID-19 severity. In a recently published study, age and frailty affected NLR and PLR more than disease severity. The study compared two distinct cohorts. The first comprised older frailer patients positive for SARS-CoV-2, with mild or asymptomatic disease, admitted to designated COVID-19 departments in a large geriatric medical center (GMC). The second cohort comprised COVID-19 patients admitted to a large general hospital (GH) for symptomatic disease. This was a follow-up study comparing a subgroup of patients who had NLR and PLR values measured a week after admission. Only 100 of 177 patients in the original GMC cohort had a second NLR test compared to almost all (287 of 289) patients in the general hospital (GH) cohort. The subgroup baseline characteristics did not change significantly from that of the original cohort. Disease symptoms were more prevalent in the GH cohort. In the GMC group, the median second NLR rose from 3.9 to 4.6, while in the GH cohort, the NLR value dropped from 3.5 to 2.8, enhancing the NLR differences between the groups. Smaller changes were observed in the second PLR. These results strengthen the prior results that age and frailty seem to have a stronger impact on NLR and PLR than disease severity.

Effectiveness and safety of azvudine in older adults with mild and moderate COVID-19: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Azvudine has clinical benefits and acceptable safety against COVID-19, including in patients with comorbidities, but there is a lack of available data for its use in older adult patients. This study explored the effectiveness and safety of azvudine in older adults with mild or moderate COVID-19.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥80 diagnosed with COVID-19 at the Central Hospital of Shaoyang between October and November 2022. According to the therapies they received, the eligible patients were divided into the azvudine, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and standard-of-care (SOC) groups. The outcomes were the proportion of patients progressing to severe COVID-19, time to nucleic acid negative conversion (NANC), and the 5-, 7-, 10-, and 14-day NANC rates from admission.

RESULTS

The study included 55 patients treated with azvudine (n = 14), nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n = 18), and SOC (n = 23). The median time from symptom onset to NANC of the azvudine, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and SOC groups was 14 (range, 6-25), 15 (range, 11-24), and 19 (range, 18-23) days, respectively. The median time from treatment initiation to NANC of the azvudine and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir groups was 8 (range, 4-20) and 9 (range, 5-16) days, respectively. The median length of hospital stay in the three groups was 10.5 (range, 5-23), 13.5 (range, 10-21), and 17 (range, 10-23) days, respectively. No treatment-related adverse events or serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Azvudine showed satisfactory effectiveness and acceptable safety in older adults with mild or moderate COVID-19. Therefore, azvudine could be a treatment option for this special patient population.

Risk factors for super-refractory and mortality in generalized convulsive status epilepticus: a 10-year retrospective cohort study

Background

Generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is one of the most challenging life-threatening neurological emergencies. If GCSE becomes super-refractory, it is associated with significant mortality. Although aggressive management of prolonged status epilepticus was conducted, the mortality has not decreased since the late 1990s.

Objectives

The present study aimed to explore the risk factors for progression to super-refractory in patients with generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE). Moreover, we illustrated the risk factors for mortality in GCSE patients.

Design

An observational retrospective cohort study.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with GCSE admitted to our neurocritical unit, in Guangzhou, China, from October 2010 to February 2021. The data of sociodemographic information, etiology, laboratory results, treatment, and prognosis were collected and analyzed.

Results

A total of 106 patients were enrolled; 51 (48%) of them developed super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients with autoimmune encephalitis (p = 0.015) and intracranial infection (p = 0.019) are likely to progress to SRSE. The in-hospital mortality was 11.8% and 9.1% for patients in the SRSE and non-SRSE groups, respectively (p = 0.652). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) at admission were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Up to 31.4% of SRSE patients and 29.1% of non-SRSE patients died within 6 months after discharge (p = 0.798). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that plasma exchange (PE) was a protective factor for 6-month mortality. A high NLR at discharge was a risk factor for 6-month mortality.

Conclusion

In the current study, about 48% of GCSE patients progressed to SRSE. Regarding etiology, autoimmune encephalitis or intracranial infection was prone to SRSE. No significant differences were observed in the in-hospital and 6-month mortality between SRSE and non-SRSE groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that NLR at admission and discharge was an independent predictor of in-hospital and 6-month mortality, respectively. Moreover, PE significantly reduced the 6-month mortality.

Approach to COVID-19 in older adults and indications for improving the outcomes

Background: COVID-19 continues to present challenges in the care of older adults with frailty and/or comorbidities and very old patients, who can be hospitalized with severe COVID-19 despite full vaccination. Frailty is a heterogeneous syndrome characterized by an increased aging-related vulnerability due to a reduced physiological reserve and function of systemic organs, and is associated with an impairment of activities of daily living. Frail older adults remain at elevated risk of mortality from COVID-19 compared to older adults without frailty, and some pre-existing risk factors such as malnutrition, prolonged bed rest, and the association with comorbidities can aggravate the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, the severity of COVID-19 can impact on long-term functioning of older patients surviving from the infection. Persistent symptoms are another emerging problem of the post-vaccination phase of pandemic, as most patients suffer from chronic symptoms which can become debilitating and affect the daily routine. Aim of this review: In this complex relationship, the evaluation of COVID-19 in vulnerable categories is still a matter of high interest and personalized care plans based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment, tailored interventions; specific therapeutic algorithms among older adults are thus recommended in order to improve the outcomes.

Assessment of body composition in adults hospitalized with acute COVID-19: a scoping review

Introduction

Body composition (BC) assessment can supply accurate information for in-hospital nutritional evaluation. The aim of this study was to explore in the literature how the studies assessed BC, for what purpose, and investigate the role of BC findings in COVID-19 hospitalized patients' outcomes.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted according to the methodology available on the Joanna Briggs Institute website. We used the PCC acronym for the systematic search (population: adults with COVID-19, concept: assessment of BC, context: hospital setting) and performed it on PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science on 16 September 2022. Eligibility criteria consisted of the utilization of BC assessment tools in COVID-19 patients. Studies in which BC was solely measured with anthropometry (perimeters and skinfolds) were excluded. No language restriction was applied.

Results

Fifty-five studies were eligible for the review. Out of the 55 studies, 36 used computed tomography (CT), 13 used bioelectrical impedance (BIA), and 6 used ultrasound (US). No studies with D3-creatinine, 24  h urine excretion, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, or magnetic resonance were retrieved. BC was mainly assessed to test associations with adverse outcomes such as disease severity and mortality.

Discussion

Studies assessing BC in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 used mainly CT and BIA and associated the parameters with severity and mortality. There is little evidence of BC being assessed by other methods, as well as studies on BC changes during hospitalization.

Which vertebral level should be used to calculate sarcopenia in covid-19 patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Evidence shows that CT-derived sarcopenia can predict adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients. However, discrepancies exist as to which vertebral level can be used to calculate sarcopenia which can effectively serve as a prognostic tool. Thus, we aim to investigate the difference in sarcopenia calculated at the Thoracic and Lumbar vertebral levels.

METHODS

An online literature search was conducted on Electronic databases such as PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google scholar. Meta-analysis was performed by using Revman 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 14 articles were selected for meta-analysis. The prevalence of sarcopenia calculated at the Thoracic level was 31% (95%CI 24%-37%; p < 0.00001; I² = 86%), while sarcopenia calculated at the Lumbar vertebral level was 63% (95%CI 51%-75%; p < 0.00001; I² = 88%). Meanwhile, sarcopenia calculated at the Upper thoracic level was a significant predictor of mortality OR 3.47 (95%CI 1.74-6.91; p = 0.0004; I² = 56%)as compared to sarcopenia calculated at the lower thoracic OR 1.74 (95%Cl 0.91-3.33; p = 0.10; I² = 60%)or lumbar level OR 2.49 (95%CI 0.45-13.72; p = 0.30; I² = 57%). In addition to this sarcopenia calculated at the Upper thoracic level was also a significant predictor of severe illness OR 3.92 (95%CI 2.33-6.58; p < 0.00001; I² = 0%) as compared to lower thoracic OR 1.40 (95%CI 0.78-2.53; p = 0.26; I² = 67%) or lumbar level OR 1.64 (95%CI 0.26-10.50; p = 0.60; I² = 81%) CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia calculated at the thoracic vertebrae and lumber level has different prognostic values. Sarcopenia is prevalent at the lumbar level. Sarcopenia at the thoracic level has a higher mortality and severity rate.

The relationship between micronutrient status, frailty, systemic inflammation, and clinical outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Micronutrients have been associated with disease severity and poorer clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. However, there is a paucity of studies examining if the relationship with micronutrient status and clinical outcomes is independent of recognised prognostic factors, specifically frailty and the systemic inflammatory response (SIR). The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between micronutrient status, frailty, systemic inflammation, and clinical outcomes in patients admitted with COVID-19.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on patients with confirmed COVID-19, admitted to hospital between the 1st April 2020-6th July 2020. Clinicopathological characteristics, frailty assessment, biochemical and micronutrient laboratory results were recorded. Frailty status was determined using the Clinical Frailty scale. SIR was determined using serum CRP. Clinical outcomes of interest were oxygen requirement, ITU admission and 30-day mortality. Categorical variables were analysed using chi-square test and binary logistics regression analysis. Continuous variables were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal Wallis tests.

RESULTS

281 patients were included. 55% (n = 155) were aged ≥ 70 years and 39% (n = 109) were male. 49% (n = 138) of patients were frail (CFS > 3). 86% (n = 242) of patients had a serum CRP > 10 mg/L. On univariate analysis, frailty was significantly associated with thirty-day mortality (p < 0.001). On univariate analysis, serum CRP was found to be significantly associated with an oxygen requirement on admission in non-frail patients (p = 0.004). Over a third (36%) of non-frail patients had a low vitamin B1, despite having normal reference range values of red cell B2, B6 and selenium. Furthermore, serum CRP was found to be significantly associated with a lower median red cell vitamin B1 (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Vitamin B1 stores may be depleted in COVID-19 patients experiencing a significant SIR and providing rationale for thiamine supplementation. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to delineate the trend in thiamine status following COVID-19.

Efficacy of blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio for predicting prognostic outcomes of inpatients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The associations between blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/albumin ratio and poor prognosis in patients with diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain to be clarified.

METHODS

A search based on 4 electronic databases (i.e., EMBASE, Google scholar, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library) was performed on June 23, 2022. The association of BUN/Albumin ratio with poor prognostic outcomes, defined as patients with mortality/severe illnesses, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Results from analysis of 7 cohort studies (3600 individuals with COVID-19) published between 2020 and 2022 showed a higher BUN/Albumin ratio in the poor-prognosis group (Mean difference:  = 2.838, 95% confidence interval: 2.015-3.66, P < .001, I2 = 92.5%) than the good-prognosis group. Additional investigation into the connection between BUN/Albumin ratio as a binary variable (i.e., high or low) and the risk of poor outcome also supported an association between a higher BUN/Albumin ratio and a poor prognostic risk (odd ratio = 3.009, 95% confidence interval: 1.565-5.783, P = .001, I2 = 93.7%, 5 studies). Merged analysis of poor prognosis produced a sensitivity of 0.76, specificity of 0.72, and area under curve of 0.81.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between BUN/albumin ratio and poor outcome in patients with COVID-19. Additional large-scale prospective studies are needed to verify our findings.

Admission eGFR predicts in-hospital mortality independently of admission glycemia and C-peptide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and impaired kidney function are associated with a higher risk of poor outcomes of COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective study in hospitalized T2DM patients with COVID-19 to assess the association between in-hospital mortality and admission values of different hematological/biochemical parameters, including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), plasma glucose and C-peptide (as a marker of beta-cell function).

METHODS

The study included T2DM patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were consecutively admitted to our Institution between October 1, 2020 and April 1, 2021.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 74) were categorized into survivors (n = 55) and non-survivors (n = 19). Non-survivors exhibited significantly higher median WBC count, D-dimer, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, hsCRP, and procalcitonin levels, as well as significantly lower median serum 25(OH)D levels compared to survivors. Non-survivors exhibited significantly higher median admission plasma glucose (APG) values compared to survivors (210 vs 166 mg/dL; p = 0.026). There was no statistically significant difference in median values of plasma C-peptide between non-survivors and survivors (3.55 vs 3.24 ng/mL; p = 0.906). A significantly higher percentage of patients with an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² was observed in the non-survivor group as compared to the survivor group (57.9% vs 23.6%; p = 0.006). A multivariate analysis performed by a logistic regression model after adjusting for major confounders (age, sex, body mass index, major comorbidities) showed a significant inverse association between eGFR values and risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.956; 95% CI, 0.931-0.983; p = 0.001). We also found a significant positive association between WBC count and risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.210; 95% CI, 1.043-1.404; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Admission eGFR and WBC count predict in-hospital COVID-19 mortality among T2DM patients, independently of traditional risk factors, APG and random plasma C-peptide. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and comorbid T2DM associated with impaired kidney function at admission should be considered at high risk for adverse outcomes and death.

Low thoracic skeletal muscle index is associated with negative outcomes in 244 patients with respiratory COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is associated with negative outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and during chronic diseases. We aimed to evaluate if low skeletal muscle index (SMI) measured by computed tomography (CT) at the thoracic level is associated with poor outcomes in hospitalized patients with respiratory COVID-19.

METHODS

Patients admitted to the hospital between March 1st and June 9, 2020 with a confirmed diagnosis of respiratory COVID-19 in the Emergency Department were included in this retrospective cohort study. SMI was assessed from a transverse CT image at the T12 level. We analysed the association between thoracic SMI and mortality, ICU admissions, infections, length of stay and gravity scores.

RESULTS

We included 244 patients, whose median age was 62 (20-95) years, mean body mass index was 28,6 kg/m2, and 34% were obese patients. 102 patients (41,8%) had low thoracic SMI. On multivariable analysis, low thoracic SMI was associated with more infections (OR = 1,88 [1,06-2,98]) and increased length of stay (OR = 1,87 [1,14-3,49]) but not with mortality (OR = 1.37 [0.54-3.52]), whereas it was inversely associated with ICU admission (OR = 5,56 [1,96-16,67].

CONCLUSION

Low SMI measured by CT at the thoracic level T12 is associated with negative outcomes in patients with respiratory COVID-19.

Risk of Malnutrition in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: Studies have reported that COVID-19 may increase the risk of malnutrition among patients. However, the prevalence of such risk in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is uncertain due to the inconsistent use of assessment methods. (2) Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched to identify studies on the nutritional status of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A pooled prevalence of malnutrition risk evaluated by Nutrition Risk Score (NRS-2002) was obtained using a random effects model. Differences by study-level characteristics were examined by hospitalization setting, time of assessment, age, and country. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle−Ottawa Scale. (3) Results: 53 studies from 17 countries were identified and summarized. A total of 17 studies using NRS-2002, including 3614 COVID-19 patients were included in the primary meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of risk of malnutrition was significantly higher among ICU patients (92.2%, 95% CI: 85.9% to 96.8%) than among general ward patients (70.7%, 95% CI: 56.4% to 83.2%) (p = 0.002). No significant differences were found between age groups (≥65 vs. <65 years, p = 0.306) and countries (p = 0.893). (4) Conclusions: High risk of malnutrition is common and concerning in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, suggesting that malnutrition screening and nutritional support during hospitalization are needed.

Association between Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio and Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (F/R ratio) has been used as an inflammation marker to predict clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases, its association with the prognosis of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 20 June 2022. The associations of F/R ratio with poor prognosis (defined as the occurrence of mortality or severe disease) were investigated in patients with COVID-19. A total of 10 studies (seven from Turkey, two from China, one from Croatia) involving 3675 patients published between 2020 and 2022 were eligible for quantitative syntheses. Merged results revealed a higher F/R ratio in the poor prognosis group (standardized mean difference: 0.529, p < 0.001, I2 = 84.8%, eight studies) than that in the good prognosis group. In addition, a high F/R ratio was associated with an increased risk of poor prognosis (odds ratio: 2.684, I2 = 59.5%, five studies). Pooled analysis showed a sensitivity of 0.75, specificity of 0.66, and area under curve of 0.77 for poor prognosis prediction. In conclusion, this meta-analysis revealed a positive correlation between F/A ratio and poor prognostic outcomes of COVID-19. Because of the limited number of studies included, further investigations are warranted to support our findings.

Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

It has been speculated that patients with sarcopenia are aggravated by the current novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic. However, there is substantial uncertainty regarding the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with COVID-19.

Objectives

The purpose of the study was to systematically evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with COVID-19, including stratification by gender, study location, study population, study design, and diagnostic criteria.

Design

This is the systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Methods

An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science and Scopus to identify observational studies reporting a prevalence estimate for sarcopenia in patients with COVID-19. Studies were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a meta-analysis was performed. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) manual for cross-sectional studies, and Stata 14.0 was used to perform meta-analyses.

Results

A total of 4,639 studies were initially identified. After removing the duplicates and applying the selection criteria, we reviewed 151 full-text studies. A total of 21 studies, including 5,407 patients, were eligible for inclusion in this review finally. The prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with COVID-19 in individual studies varied from 0.8 to 90.2%. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia in COVID-19 was 48.0% (95% confidence interval, CI: 30.8 to 65.1%, I² = 99.68%, p = 0.000). We did not find any significant differences in the prevalence estimates between gender specificity (OR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.80–2.26; p = 0.001). By sex, the prevalence was 42.5% (95% CI: 31.7 to 53.4%) in men and 35.7% (95% CI: 24.2 to 47.2%) in women. The prevalence estimates significantly varied based on population settings and different diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia. ICU patients (69.7, 95% CI: 51.7 to 85.2%) were more likely to suffer from sarcopenia compared to other population settings.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis reporting on the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with COVID-19. Sarcopenia is frequently observed in patients with COVID-19, with varying prevalence across population settings. This study would be useful for clinicians to prompt the increasing awareness of identifying sarcopenia and developing interventions at patients with COVID-19 with high risk of sarcopenia. Further prospective longitudinal studies to define the association of sarcopenia and its prognostic outcomes in COVID-19 survivors are urgently needed to propose the most appropriate treatment strategies during their admission and discharge.

Systematic Review Registration

[www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022300431].

Association of Prognostic Nutritional Index with Severity and Mortality of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The associations of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) with disease severity and mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain unclear. Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google scholar, and Cochrane Library, were searched from inception to 10 May 2022. The associations of PNI with risk of mortality (primary outcome) and disease severity (secondary outcome) were investigated. Merged results from meta-analysis of 13 retrospective studies (4204 patients) published between 2020 and 2022 revealed a lower PNI among patients in the mortality group [mean difference (MD): −8.65, p < 0.001] or severity group (MD: −5.19, p < 0.001) compared to those in the non-mortality or non-severity groups. A per-point increase in PNI was associated with a reduced risk of mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.9, p < 0.001, I2 = 67.3%, seven studies] and disease severity (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.92, p < 0.001, I2 = 83%, five studies). The pooled diagnostic analysis of mortality yielded a sensitivity of 0.76, specificity of 0.71, and area under curve (AUC) of 0.79. Regarding the prediction of disease severity, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.8, 0.61, and 0.65, respectively. In conclusion, this study demonstrated a negative association between PNI and prognosis of COVID-19. Further large-scale trials are warranted to support our findings.