1
|
Ross RE, Saladin ME, George MS, Gregory CM. Acute effects of aerobic exercise on corticomotor plasticity in individuals with and without depression. J Psychiatr Res 2024; 176:108-118. [PMID: 38852541 PMCID: PMC11283944 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although complex in nature, the pathophysiology of depression involves reduced or impaired neuroplastic capabilities. Restoring or enhancing neuroplasticity may serve as a treatment target for developing therapies for depression. Aerobic exercise (AEx) has antidepressant benefits and may enhance neuroplasticity in depression although the latter has yet to be substantiated. Therefore, we sought to examine the acute effect of AEx on neuroplasticity in depression. METHODS Sixteen individuals with (DEP; 13 female; age = 28.5 ± 7.3; Montgomery-Äsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] = 21.3 ± 5.2) and without depression (HC; 13 female; age 27.2 ± 7.5; MADRS = 0.8 ± 1.2) completed three experimental visits consisting of 15 min of low intensity AEx (LO) at 35% heart rate reserve (HRR), high intensity AEx (HI) at 70% HRR, or sitting (CON). Following AEx, excitatory paired associative stimulation (PAS25ms) was employed to probe neuroplasticity. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were assessed via transcranial magnetic stimulation before and after PAS25ms to indicate acute changes in neuroplasticity. RESULTS PAS25ms primed with HI AEx led to significant increases in MEP amplitude compared to LO and CON. HI AEx elicited enhanced PAS25ms-induced neuroplasticity for up to 1-h post-PAS. There were no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSION HI AEx enhances PAS measured neuroplasticity in individuals with and without depression. HI AEx may have a potent influence on the brain and serve as an effective primer, or adjunct, to therapies that seek to harness neuroplasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan E Ross
- Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Michael E Saladin
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Chris M Gregory
- Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ali MU, Kwan C, Fong KNK, Kranz GS, Winser SJ, Kannan P. Evaluating repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neurogenic overactive bladder management in stroke survivors: A randomized sham-controlled trial protocol. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 300:182-189. [PMID: 39018659 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB) is a distressing condition in stroke. Existing neurogenic OAB management is expensive, unstandardized regimens, or invasive. Evaluating the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) remains crucial. We aimed to (1) compare the effectiveness of active-rTMS with sham-rTMS on neurogenic OAB symptoms, (2) analyze whether rTMS is cost-effective, and (3) explore the rTMS's experiences on participants' symptoms. METHODS This is a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial with embedded qualitative and cost-effectiveness studies. A total of 110 stroke survivors with neurogenic OAB symptoms were screened for eligibility; 60 participants were eligible for inclusion and were randomly assigned to either the active (n = 30) or sham-rTMS (n = 30) groups using a computer-generated randomization schedule. The active-rTMS group received low-frequency rTMS of 1200 pulses per session lasting 20 min thrice weekly to pelvic floor muscle representation at the contralesional primary motor cortex. The sham-rTMS group received low-frequency stimulation at a 20 % resting motor threshold using the same coil as the active-rTMS but was configured to reduce the TMS-induced electrical fields significantly. The primary and secondary outcome measures were assessed at baseline, post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 8). The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analysis compared changes in the study groups. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) were measured to evaluate the cost-effectiveness while EQ-5D-5L estimated QALY changes. Additionally, the focus group discussion data were thematically analyzed. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this rTMS intervention study will be useful in alleviating neurogenic OAB symptoms and enhancing patient satisfaction in a cost-effective way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Usman Ali
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Crystal Kwan
- Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Kenneth Nai-Kuen Fong
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Georg S Kranz
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Stanley John Winser
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong; Research Centre for SHARP Vision (RCSV), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Priya Kannan
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matilainen N, Kataja J, Laakso I. Verification of neuronavigated TMS accuracy using structured-light 3D scans. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:085004. [PMID: 38479018 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad33b8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Objective.To investigate the reliability and accuracy of the manual three-point co-registration in neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The effect of the error in landmark pointing on the coil placement and on the induced electric and magnetic fields was examined.Approach.The position of the TMS coil on the head was recorded by the neuronavigation system and by 3D scanning for ten healthy participants. The differences in the coil locations and orientations and the theoretical error values for electric and magnetic fields between the neuronavigated and 3D scanned coil positions were calculated. In addition, the sensitivity of the coil location on landmark accuracy was calculated.Main results.The measured distances between the neuronavigated and 3D scanned coil locations were on average 10.2 mm, ranging from 3.1 to 18.7 mm. The error in angles were on average from two to three degrees. The coil misplacement caused on average a 29% relative error in the electric field with a range from 9% to 51%. In the magnetic field, the same error was on average 33%, ranging from 10% to 58%. The misplacement of landmark points could cause a 1.8-fold error for the coil location.Significance.TMS neuronavigation with three landmark points can cause a significant error in the coil position, hampering research using highly accurate electric field calculations. Including 3D scanning to the process provides an efficient method to achieve a more accurate coil position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noora Matilainen
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Juhani Kataja
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Ilkka Laakso
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
- Aalto Neuroimaging, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McMackin R, Tadjine Y, Fasano A, Mitchell M, Heverin M, Awiszus F, Nasseroleslami B, Carson RG, Hardiman O. Examining short interval intracortical inhibition with different transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced current directions in ALS. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2024; 9:120-129. [PMID: 38595691 PMCID: PMC11002888 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To establish if induced current direction across the motor cortex alters the sensitivity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) as an ALS biomarker. Methods Threshold tracking-TMS was undertaken in 35 people with ALS and 39 controls. Using a coil orientation which induces posterior-anterior (PA)-directed current across the motor cortex, SICI (1 ms and 3 ms interstimulus intervals) and intracortical facilitation (ICF, 10 ms interstimulus interval) were recorded. SICI3ms was also recorded using a coil orientation which induces anterior-posterior (AP)-directed current across the motor cortex. Results At group level, SICI3ms-PA (AUROC = 0.7), SICI3ms-AP (AUROC = 0.8) and SICI1ms (AUROC = 0.66) were substantially lower in those with ALS, although there was considerable interindividual heterogeneity. Averaging across interstimulus intervals (ISIs) marginally improved SICIPA sensitivity (AUROC = 0.76). Averaging SICI values across ISIs and orientations into a single SICI measure did not substantially improve sensitivity (AUROC = 0.81) compared to SICI3ms-AP alone. SICI3ms-AP and SICI3ms-PA did not significantly correlate (rho = 0.19, p = 0.313), while SICI1ms-PA and SICI3ms-PA did (rho = 0.37, p = 0.006). Further, those with ALS with the lowest SICI3ms-PA were not those with the lowest SICI3ms-AP. ICF was similar between groups (AUROC = 0.50). Conclusions SICIPA and SICIAP are uncorrelated measures of motor cortical inhibitory functions which are useful as distinct, unequally affected, measures of disinhibition in ALS. Significance Examining both SICIPA and SICIAP may facilitate more comprehensive characterisation of motor cortical disinhibition in ALS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roisin McMackin
- Discipline of Physiology, School of Medicine, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland
- Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland
| | - Yasmine Tadjine
- Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland
| | - Antonio Fasano
- Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland
| | - Matthew Mitchell
- Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mark Heverin
- Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland
| | - Friedemann Awiszus
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Bahman Nasseroleslami
- Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland
| | - Richard G Carson
- Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland
- School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast
| | - Orla Hardiman
- Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ren M, Liou L, Vinit S, Lee K. Trans-spinal magnetic stimulation induces co-activation of the diaphragm and biceps in healthy subjects. Physiol Rep 2024; 12:e15941. [PMID: 38325910 PMCID: PMC10849884 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The present study was designed to examine the effect of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation on bilateral respiratory and forelimb muscles in healthy subjects. Two wings of a figure-of-eight magnetic coil were placed on the dorsal vertebrae, from the fifth cervical to the second thoracic dorsal vertebra with a center at the seventh cervical vertebra. The surface electromyograms of bilateral diaphragm and biceps were recorded in response to trans-spinal magnetic stimulation with 20%-100% maximum output of the stimulatory device in male (n = 12) and female participants (n = 8). Trans-spinal magnetic stimulation can induce a co-activation of bilateral diaphragm and biceps when the stimulation intensity is above 60%. The onset latency was comparable between the left and right sides of the muscles, suggesting bilateral muscles could be simultaneously activated by trans-spinal magnetic stimulation. In addition, the intensity-response curve of the biceps was shifted upward compared with that of the diaphragm in males, indicating that the responsiveness of the biceps was greater than that of the diaphragm. This study demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing trans-spinal magnetic stimulation to co-activate the bilateral diaphragm and biceps. We proposed that this stimulatory configuration can be an efficient approach to activate both respiratory and forelimb muscles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming‐Yue Ren
- Department of Biological SciencesNational Sun Yat‐sen UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Li‐Min Liou
- Department of NeurologyKaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, College of MedicineKaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of MedicineKaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Stéphane Vinit
- Université Paris‐Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, END‐ICAPVersaillesFrance
| | - Kun‐Ze Lee
- Department of Biological SciencesNational Sun Yat‐sen UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
- Department of Biomedical Science and Environmental BiologyKaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hehl M, Van Malderen S, Geraerts M, Meesen RLJ, Rothwell JC, Swinnen SP, Cuypers K. Probing intrahemispheric interactions with a novel dual-site TMS setup. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 158:180-195. [PMID: 38232610 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.12.128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (dsTMS), the effective connectivity between the primary motor cortex (M1) and adjacent brain areas such as the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) can be investigated. However, stimulating two brain regions in close proximity (e.g., ±2.3 cm for intrahemispheric PMd-M1) is subject to considerable spatial restrictions that potentially can be overcome by combining two standard figure-of-eight coils in a novel dsTMS setup. METHODS After a technical evaluation of its induced electric fields, the dsTMS setup was tested in vivo (n = 23) by applying a short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) protocol. Additionally, the intrahemispheric PMd-M1 interaction was probed. E-field modelling was performed using SimNIBS. RESULTS The technical evaluation yielded no major alterations of the induced electric fields due to coil overlap. In vivo, the setup reliably elicited SICI. Investigating intrahemispheric PMd-M1 interactions was feasible (inter-stimulus interval 6 ms), resulting in modulation of M1 output. CONCLUSIONS The presented dsTMS setup provides a novel way to stimulate two adjacent brain regions with fewer technical and spatial limitations than previous attempts. SIGNIFICANCE This dsTMS setup enables more accurate and repeatable targeting of brain regions in close proximity and can facilitate innovation in the field of effective connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Hehl
- Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium; KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), Leuven, Belgium; Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Shanti Van Malderen
- Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium; KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), Leuven, Belgium; Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Marc Geraerts
- Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Raf L J Meesen
- Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium; Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - John C Rothwell
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephan P Swinnen
- Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium; KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Cuypers
- Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium; KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), Leuven, Belgium; Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ma L, Zhong G, Yang Z, Lu X, Fan L, Liu H, Chu C, Xiong H, Jiang T. In-vivoverified anatomically aware deep learning for real-time electric field simulation. J Neural Eng 2023; 20:066018. [PMID: 37939483 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad0add] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged as a prominent non-invasive technique for modulating brain function and treating mental disorders. By generating a high-precision magnetically evoked electric field (E-field) using a TMS coil, it enables targeted stimulation of specific brain regions. However, current computational methods employed for E-field simulations necessitate extensive preprocessing and simulation time, limiting their fast applications in the determining the optimal coil placement.Approach.We present an attentional deep learning network to simulate E-fields. This network takes individual magnetic resonance images and coil configurations as inputs, firstly transforming the images into explicit brain tissues and subsequently generating the local E-field distribution near the target brain region. Main results. Relative to the previous deep-learning simulation method, the presented method reduced the mean relative error in simulated E-field strength of gray matter by 21.1%, and increased the correlation between regional E-field strengths and corresponding electrophysiological responses by 35.0% when applied into another dataset.In-vivoTMS experiments further revealed that the optimal coil placements derived from presented method exhibit comparable stimulation performance on motor evoked potentials to those obtained using computational methods. The simplified preprocessing and increased simulation efficiency result in a significant reduction in the overall time cost of traditional TMS coil placement optimization, from several hours to mere minutes.Significance.The precision and efficiency of presented simulation method hold promise for its application in determining individualized coil placements in clinical practice, paving the way for personalized TMS treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Ma
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
| | - Gangliang Zhong
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhengyi Yang
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuefeng Lu
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
| | - Lingzhong Fan
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
- Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Liu
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
| | - Congying Chu
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Xiong
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
| | - Tianzi Jiang
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
- Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People's Republic of China
- Research Center for Augmented Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 311100, People's Republic of China
- Xiaoxiang Institute for Brain Health and Yongzhou Central Hospital, Yongzhou, Hunan Province 425000, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Van Hoornweder S, Nuyts M, Frieske J, Verstraelen S, Meesen RLJ, Caulfield KA. Outcome measures for electric field modeling in tES and TMS: A systematic review and large-scale modeling study. Neuroimage 2023; 281:120379. [PMID: 37716590 PMCID: PMC11008458 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electric field (E-field) modeling is a potent tool to estimate the amount of transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation (TMS and tES, respectively) that reaches the cortex and to address the variable behavioral effects observed in the field. However, outcome measures used to quantify E-fields vary considerably and a thorough comparison is missing. OBJECTIVES This two-part study aimed to examine the different outcome measures used to report on tES and TMS induced E-fields, including volume- and surface-level gray matter, region of interest (ROI), whole brain, geometrical, structural, and percentile-based approaches. The study aimed to guide future research in informed selection of appropriate outcome measures. METHODS Three electronic databases were searched for tES and/or TMS studies quantifying E-fields. The identified outcome measures were compared across volume- and surface-level E-field data in ten tES and TMS modalities targeting two common targets in 100 healthy individuals. RESULTS In the systematic review, we extracted 308 outcome measures from 202 studies that adopted either a gray matter volume-level (n = 197) or surface-level (n = 111) approach. Volume-level results focused on E-field magnitude, while surface-level data encompassed E-field magnitude (n = 64) and normal/tangential E-field components (n = 47). E-fields were extracted in ROIs, such as brain structures and shapes (spheres, hexahedra and cylinders), or the whole brain. Percentiles or mean values were mostly used to quantify E-fields. Our modeling study, which involved 1,000 E-field models and > 1,000,000 extracted E-field values, revealed that different outcome measures yielded distinct E-field values, analyzed different brain regions, and did not always exhibit strong correlations in the same within-subject E-field model. CONCLUSIONS Outcome measure selection significantly impacts the locations and intensities of extracted E-field data in both tES and TMS E-field models. The suitability of different outcome measures depends on the target region, TMS/tES modality, individual anatomy, the analyzed E-field component and the research question. To enhance the quality, rigor, and reproducibility in the E-field modeling domain, we suggest standard reporting practices across studies and provide four recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sybren Van Hoornweder
- REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
| | - Marten Nuyts
- REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Joana Frieske
- REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium; Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefanie Verstraelen
- REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Raf L J Meesen
- REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium; Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kevin A Caulfield
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Capozio A, Chakrabarty S, Astill S. Acute Effects of Strength and Skill Training on the Cortical and Spinal Circuits of Contralateral Limb. J Mot Behav 2023; 56:119-131. [PMID: 37788807 DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2023.2265316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Unilateral strength and skill training increase strength and performance in the contralateral untrained limb, a phenomenon known as cross-education. Recent evidence suggests that similar neural mechanisms might be responsible for the increase in strength and skill observed in the untrained hand after unimanual training. The aims of this study were to: investigate whether a single session of unimanual strength and skill (force-tracking) training increased strength and skill in the opposite hand; measure ipsilateral (untrained) brain (via transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS) and spinal (via the monosynaptic reflex) changes in excitability occurring after training; measure ipsilateral (untrained) pathway-specific changes in neural excitability (via TMS-conditioning of the monosynaptic reflex) occurring after training. Participants (N = 13) completed a session of unimanual strength (ballistic isometric wrist flexions) and skill (force-tracking wrist flexions) training on two separate days. Strength increased after training in the untrained hand (p = 0.025) but not in the trained hand (p = 0.611). Force-tracking performance increased in both the trained (p = 0.007) and untrained (p = 0.010) hand. Corticospinal excitability increased after force-tracking and strength training (p = 0.027), while spinal excitability was not affected (p = 0.214). TMS-conditioned monosynaptic reflex increased after force-tracking (p = 0.001) but not strength training (p = 0.689), suggesting a possible role of polysynaptic pathways in the increase of cortical excitability observed after training. The results suggest that cross-education of strength and skill at the acute stage is supported by increased excitability of the untrained motor cortex.New & Noteworthy: A single session of isometric wrist flexion strength and skill straining increased strength and skill in the untrained limb. The excitability of the untrained motor cortex increased after strength and skill training. TMS-conditioned H-reflexes increased after skill but not strength training in the untrained hand, indicating that polysynaptic pathways in the increase of cortical excitability observed after skill training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Capozio
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Sarah Astill
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith MC, Sievenpiper DF. A new synthesis method for complex electric field patterning using a multichannel dense array system with applications in low-intensity noninvasive neuromodulation. Bioelectromagnetics 2023; 44:156-180. [PMID: 37453053 DOI: 10.1002/bem.22476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Multichannel coil array systems offer precise spatiotemporal electronic steering and patterning of electric and magnetic fields without the physical movement of coils or magnets. This capability could potentially benefit a wide range of biomagnetic applications such as low-intensity noninvasive neuromodulation or magnetic drug delivery. In this regard, the objective of this work is to develop a unique synthesis method, that enabled by a multichannel dense array system, generates complex current pattern distributions not previously reported in the literature. Simulations and experimental results verify that highly curved or irregular (e.g., zig-zag) patterns at singular and multiple sites can be efficiently formed using this method. The synthesis method is composed of three primary components; a pixel cell (basic unit of pattern formation), a template array ("virtual array": code that disseminates the coil current weights to the "physical" dense array), and a hexagonal coordinate system. Low-intensity or low-field magnetic stimulation is identified as a potential application that could benefit from this work in the future and as such is used as an example to frame the research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Smith
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Daniel F Sievenpiper
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Capozio A, Ichiyama R, Astill SL. The acute effects of motor imagery and cervical transcutaneous electrical stimulation on manual dexterity and neural excitability. Neuropsychologia 2023; 187:108613. [PMID: 37285931 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TCES) of the spinal cord induces changes in spinal excitability. Motor imagery (MI) elicits plasticity in the motor cortex. It has been suggested that plasticity occurring in both cortical and spinal circuits might underlie the improvements in performance observed when training is combined with stimulation. We investigated the acute effects of cervical TCES and MI delivered in isolation or combined on corticospinal excitability, spinal excitability and manual performance. Participants (N = 17) completed three sessions during which they engaged in 20 min of: 1) MI, listening to an audio recording instructing to complete the purdue pegboard test (PPT) of manual performance; 2) TCES at the spinal level of C5-C6; 3) MI + TCES, listening to the MI script while receiving TCES. Before and after each condition, we measured corticospinal excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at 100% and 120% motor threshold (MT), spinal excitability via single-pulse TCES and manual performance with the PPT. Manual performance was not improved by MI, TCES or MI + TCES. Corticospinal excitability assessed at 100% MT intensity increased in hand and forearm muscles after MI and MI + TCES, but not after just TCES. Conversely, corticospinal excitability assessed at 120% MT intensity was not affected by any of the conditions. The effects on spinal excitability depended on the recorded muscle: it increased after all conditions in biceps brachii (BB) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR); did not change after any conditions in the abductor pollicis brevis (APB); increased after TCES and MI + TCES, but not after just MI in the extensor carpi radialis (ECR). These findings suggest that MI and TCES increase the excitability of the central nervous system through different but complementary mechanisms, inducing changes in the excitability of spinal and cortical circuits. MI and TCES can be used in combination to modulate spinal/cortical excitability, an approach particularly relevant for people with limited residual dexterity who cannot engage in motor practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Capozio
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
| | - Ronaldo Ichiyama
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah L Astill
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scheinok TJ, D'Haeseleer M, Nagels G, De Bundel D, Van Schependom J. Neuronal activity and NIBS in developmental myelination and remyelination - current state of knowledge. Prog Neurobiol 2023; 226:102459. [PMID: 37127087 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Oligodendrocytes are responsible for myelinating central nervous system (CNS) axons. and rapid electrical transmission through saltatory conduction of action potentials. Myelination and myelin repair rely partially on oligodendrogenesis, which comprises. oligodendrocyte precursor cell (OPC) migration, maturation, and differentiation into. oligodendrocytes (OL). In multiple sclerosis (MS), demyelination occurs due to an. inflammatory cascade with auto-reactive T-cells. When oligodendrogenesis fails, remyelination becomes aberrant and conduction impairments are no longer restored. Although current disease modifying therapies have achieved results in modulating the. faulty immune response, disease progression continues because of chronic. inflammation, neurodegeneration, and failure of remyelination. Therapies have been. tried to promote remyelination. Modulation of neuronal activity seems to be a very. promising strategy in preclinical studies. Additionally, studies in people with MS. (pwMS) have shown symptom improvement following non-invasive brain stimulation. (NIBS) techniques. The aforementioned mechanisms are yet unknown and probably. involve both the activation of neurons and glial cells. Noting neuronal activity. contributes to myelin plasticity and that NIBS modulates neuronal activity; we argue. that NIBS is a promising research horizon for demyelinating diseases. We review the. hypothesized pathways through which NIBS may affect both neuronal activity in the. CNS and how the resulting activity can affect oligodendrogenesis and myelination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Scheinok
- AIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussel, Belgium; Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Research Group Experimental Pharmacology (EFAR), Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Miguel D'Haeseleer
- Nationaal Multiple Sclerose Centrum, Vanheylenstraat 16, 1820 Melsbroek, Belgium
| | - Guy Nagels
- AIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussel, Belgium; St Edmund Hall, University of Oxford, Queen's Lane, Oxford, UK
| | - Dimitri De Bundel
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Research Group Experimental Pharmacology (EFAR), Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Van Schependom
- AIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussel, Belgium; Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gogulski J, Ross JM, Talbot A, Cline CC, Donati FL, Munot S, Kim N, Gibbs C, Bastin N, Yang J, Minasi C, Sarkar M, Truong J, Keller CJ. Personalized Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2023; 8:351-360. [PMID: 36792455 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Personalized treatments are gaining momentum across all fields of medicine. Precision medicine can be applied to neuromodulatory techniques, in which focused brain stimulation treatments such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) modulate brain circuits and alleviate clinical symptoms. rTMS is well tolerated and clinically effective for treatment-resistant depression and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Despite its wide stimulation parameter space (location, angle, pattern, frequency, and intensity can be adjusted), rTMS is currently applied in a one-size-fits-all manner, potentially contributing to its suboptimal clinical response (∼50%). In this review, we examine components of rTMS that can be optimized to account for interindividual variability in neural function and anatomy. We discuss current treatment options for treatment-resistant depression, the neural mechanisms thought to underlie treatment, targeting strategies, stimulation parameter selection, and adaptive closed-loop treatment. We conclude that a better understanding of the wide and modifiable parameter space of rTMS will greatly improve the clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juha Gogulski
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; HUS Diagnostic Center, Clinical Neurophysiology, Clinical Neurosciences, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jessica M Ross
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California
| | - Austin Talbot
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California
| | - Christopher C Cline
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California
| | - Francesco L Donati
- Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Saachi Munot
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California
| | - Naryeong Kim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California
| | - Ciara Gibbs
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nikita Bastin
- Department of Radiology and Orthopedics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessica Yang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California
| | - Christopher Minasi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California
| | - Manjima Sarkar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California
| | - Jade Truong
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California
| | - Corey J Keller
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, California.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Van Hoornweder S, Nuyts M, Frieske J, Verstraelen S, Meesen RLJ, Caulfield KA. A Systematic Review and Large-Scale tES and TMS Electric Field Modeling Study Reveals How Outcome Measure Selection Alters Results in a Person- and Montage-Specific Manner. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.02.22.529540. [PMID: 36865243 PMCID: PMC9980068 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.22.529540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Background Electric field (E-field) modeling is a potent tool to examine the cortical effects of transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation (TMS and tES, respectively) and to address the high variability in efficacy observed in the literature. However, outcome measures used to report E-field magnitude vary considerably and have not yet been compared in detail. Objectives The goal of this two-part study, encompassing a systematic review and modeling experiment, was to provide an overview of the different outcome measures used to report the magnitude of tES and TMS E-fields, and to conduct a direct comparison of these measures across different stimulation montages. Methods Three electronic databases were searched for tES and/or TMS studies reporting E-field magnitude. We extracted and discussed outcome measures in studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Additionally, outcome measures were compared via models of four common tES and two TMS modalities in 100 healthy younger adults. Results In the systematic review, we included 118 studies using 151 outcome measures related to E-field magnitude. Structural and spherical regions of interest (ROI) analyses and percentile-based whole-brain analyses were used most often. In the modeling analyses, we found that there was an average of only 6% overlap between ROI and percentile-based whole-brain analyses in the investigated volumes within the same person. The overlap between ROI and whole-brain percentiles was montage- and person-specific, with more focal montages such as 4Ã-1 and APPS-tES, and figure-of-eight TMS showing up to 73%, 60%, and 52% overlap between ROI and percentile approaches respectively. However, even in these cases, 27% or more of the analyzed volume still differed between outcome measures in every analyses. Conclusions The choice of outcome measures meaningfully alters the interpretation of tES and TMS E-field models. Well-considered outcome measure selection is imperative for accurate interpretation of results, valid between-study comparisons, and depends on stimulation focality and study goals. We formulated four recommendations to increase the quality and rigor of E-field modeling outcome measures. With these data and recommendations, we hope to guide future studies towards informed outcome measure selection, and improve the comparability of studies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Khadka N, Bikson M. Neurocapillary-Modulation. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:1299-1311. [PMID: 33340187 PMCID: PMC8213863 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We consider two consequences of brain capillary ultrastructure in neuromodulation. First, blood-brain barrier (BBB) polarization as a consequence of current crossing between interstitial space and the blood. Second, interstitial current flow distortion around capillaries impacting neuronal stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed computational models of BBB ultrastructure morphologies to first assess electric field amplification at the BBB (principle 1) and neuron polarization amplification by the presence of capillaries (principle 2). We adapt neuron cable theory to develop an analytical solution for maximum BBB polarization sensitivity. RESULTS Electrical current crosses between the brain parenchyma (interstitial space) and capillaries, producing BBB electric fields (EBBB) that are >400x of the average parenchyma electric field (ĒBRAIN), which in turn modulates transport across the BBB. Specifically, for a BBB space constant (λBBB) and wall thickness (dth-BBB), the analytical solution for maximal BBB electric field (EABBB) is given as: (ĒBRAIN × λBBB)/dth-BBB. Electrical current in the brain parenchyma is distorted around brain capillaries, amplifying neuronal polarization. Specifically, capillary ultrastructure produces ∼50% modulation of the ĒBRAIN over the ∼40 μm inter-capillary distance. The divergence of EBRAIN (Activating function) is thus ∼100 kV/m2 per unit ĒBRAIN. CONCLUSIONS BBB stimulation by principle 1 suggests novel therapeutic strategies such as boosting metabolic capacity or interstitial fluid clearance. Whereas the spatial profile of EBRAIN is traditionally assumed to depend only on macroscopic anatomy, principle 2 suggests a central role for local capillary ultrastructure-which impact forms of neuromodulation including deep brain stimulation (DBS), spinal cord stimulation (SCS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)/transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niranjan Khadka
- Department of Psychiatry, Laboratory for Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yuasa A, Uehara S, Sawada Y, Otaka Y. Systematic determination of muscle groups and optimal stimulation intensity for simultaneous TMS mapping of multiple muscles in the upper limb. Physiol Rep 2022; 10:e15527. [PMID: 36461646 PMCID: PMC9718942 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 05/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation has been used to assess plastic changes in the cortical motor representations of targeted muscles. The present study explored the optimal settings and stimulation intensity for simultaneous motor mapping of multiple upper-limb muscles across segments. In 15 healthy volunteers, we evaluated cortical representations simultaneously from one muscle in the shoulder, two in the upper arm, two in the forearm, and two intrinsic hand muscles, using five stimulation intensities, ranging from 40% to 100% of the maximum stimulator output. We represented the motor map area acquired at each intensity as a percentage of the maximum for each muscle. We defined a motor map area between 25% and 75% of the maximum as the optimal area size with sufficient scope for both up- and down-regulation, and stimulation intensities producing the map area size within this range as the optimal intensities. We found that motor maps with optimal area sizes could be produced simultaneously for the four distal muscles of the forearm and hand in most participants when the stimulation intensity was set at 120-140% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) of the first dorsal interosseous. For the remaining three proximal muscles, motor maps with optimal area sizes were produced only in a few participants, even when using a higher intensity (180-220% RMT). These findings suggest that cortical representations can be assessed simultaneously in a group of distal muscles using a relatively low stimulation intensity, while a separate operation is required to assess that of the proximal muscles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiko Yuasa
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine IFujita Health University School of MedicineToyoakeAichiJapan
| | - Shintaro Uehara
- Faculty of RehabilitationFujita Health University School of Health SciencesToyoakeAichiJapan
| | - Yusuke Sawada
- Fujita Health University Nanakuri Memorial HospitalTsuMieJapan
| | - Yohei Otaka
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine IFujita Health University School of MedicineToyoakeAichiJapan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ye H, Hendee J, Ruan J, Zhirova A, Ye J, Dima M. Neuron matters: neuromodulation with electromagnetic stimulation must consider neurons as dynamic identities. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2022; 19:116. [PMID: 36329492 PMCID: PMC9632094 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01094-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuromodulation with electromagnetic stimulation is widely used for the control of abnormal neural activity, and has been proven to be a valuable alternative to pharmacological tools for the treatment of many neurological diseases. Tremendous efforts have been focused on the design of the stimulation apparatus (i.e., electrodes and magnetic coils) that delivers the electric current to the neural tissue, and the optimization of the stimulation parameters. Less attention has been given to the complicated, dynamic properties of the neurons, and their context-dependent impact on the stimulation effects. This review focuses on the neuronal factors that influence the outcomes of electromagnetic stimulation in neuromodulation. Evidence from multiple levels (tissue, cellular, and single ion channel) are reviewed. Properties of the neural elements and their dynamic changes play a significant role in the outcome of electromagnetic stimulation. This angle of understanding yields a comprehensive perspective of neural activity during electrical neuromodulation, and provides insights in the design and development of novel stimulation technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Ye
- grid.164971.c0000 0001 1089 6558Department of Biology, Quinlan Life Sciences Education and Research Center, Loyola University Chicago, 1032 W. Sheridan Rd., Chicago, IL 60660 USA
| | - Jenna Hendee
- grid.164971.c0000 0001 1089 6558Department of Biology, Quinlan Life Sciences Education and Research Center, Loyola University Chicago, 1032 W. Sheridan Rd., Chicago, IL 60660 USA
| | - Joyce Ruan
- grid.164971.c0000 0001 1089 6558Department of Biology, Quinlan Life Sciences Education and Research Center, Loyola University Chicago, 1032 W. Sheridan Rd., Chicago, IL 60660 USA
| | - Alena Zhirova
- grid.164971.c0000 0001 1089 6558Department of Biology, Quinlan Life Sciences Education and Research Center, Loyola University Chicago, 1032 W. Sheridan Rd., Chicago, IL 60660 USA
| | - Jayden Ye
- grid.164971.c0000 0001 1089 6558Department of Biology, Quinlan Life Sciences Education and Research Center, Loyola University Chicago, 1032 W. Sheridan Rd., Chicago, IL 60660 USA
| | - Maria Dima
- grid.164971.c0000 0001 1089 6558Department of Biology, Quinlan Life Sciences Education and Research Center, Loyola University Chicago, 1032 W. Sheridan Rd., Chicago, IL 60660 USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
The Relation between Induced Electric Field and TMS-Evoked Potentials: A Deep TMS-EEG Study. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12157437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in humans induces electric fields (E-fields, EF) that perturb and modulate the brain’s endogenous neuronal activity and result in the generation of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). The exact relation of the characteristics of the induced E-field and the intensity of the brains’ response, as measured by electroencephalography (EEG), is presently unclear. In this pilot study, conducted on three healthy subjects and two patients with generalized epilepsy (total: 3 males, 2 females, mean age of 26 years; healthy: 2 males, 1 female, mean age of 25.7 years; patients: 1 male, 1 female, mean age of 26.5 years), we investigated the temporal and spatial relations of the E-field, induced by single-pulse stimuli, and the brain’s response to TMS. Brain stimulation was performed with a deep TMS device (BrainsWay Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel) and an H7 coil placed over the central area. The induced EF was computed on personalized anatomical models of the subjects through magneto quasi-static simulations. We identified specific time instances and brain regions that exhibit high positive or negative associations of the E-field with brain activity. In addition, we identified significant correlations of the brain’s response intensity with the strength of the induced E-field and finally prove that TEPs are better correlated with E-field characteristics than with the stimulator’s output. These observations provide further insight in the relation between E-field and the ensuing cortical activation, validate in a clinically relevant manner the results of E-field modeling and reinforce the view that personalized approaches should be adopted in the field of non-invasive brain stimulation.
Collapse
|
19
|
Turi Z, Hananeia N, Shirinpour S, Opitz A, Jedlicka P, Vlachos A. Dosing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortices With Multi-Scale Modeling. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:929814. [PMID: 35898411 PMCID: PMC9309210 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.929814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can depolarize cortical neurons through the intact skin and skull. The characteristics of the induced electric field (E-field) have a major impact on specific outcomes of TMS. Using multi-scale computational modeling, we explored whether the stimulation parameters derived from the primary motor cortex (M1) induce comparable macroscopic E-field strengths and subcellular/cellular responses in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). To this aim, we calculated the TMS-induced E-field in 16 anatomically realistic head models and simulated the changes in membrane voltage and intracellular calcium levels of morphologically and biophysically realistic human pyramidal cells in the M1 and DLPFC. We found that the conventional intensity selection methods (i.e., motor threshold and fixed intensities) produce variable macroscopic E-fields. Consequently, it was challenging to produce comparable subcellular/cellular responses across cortical regions with distinct folding characteristics. Prospectively, personalized stimulation intensity selection could standardize the E-fields and the subcellular/cellular responses to repetitive TMS across cortical regions and individuals. The suggested computational approach points to the shortcomings of the conventional intensity selection methods used in clinical settings. We propose that multi-scale modeling has the potential to overcome some of these limitations and broaden our understanding of the neuronal mechanisms for TMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsolt Turi
- Department of Neuroanatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nicholas Hananeia
- Faculty of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Centre for 3Rs in Animal Research, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Sina Shirinpour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Alexander Opitz
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Peter Jedlicka
- Faculty of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Centre for 3Rs in Animal Research, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Andreas Vlachos
- Department of Neuroanatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center BrainLinks-BrainTools, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Basics in Neuromodulation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Andreas Vlachos
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ross JM, Sarkar M, Keller CJ. Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography sensory potentials. Hum Brain Mapp 2022; 43:5141-5153. [PMID: 35770956 PMCID: PMC9812254 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The sensory experience of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes cortical responses measured in electroencephalography (EEG) that confound interpretation of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). Methods for sensory masking have been proposed to minimize sensory contributions to the TEP, but the most effective combination for suprathreshold TMS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is unknown. We applied sensory suppression techniques and quantified electrophysiology and perception from suprathreshold dlPFC TMS to identify the best combination to minimize the sensory TEP. In 21 healthy adults, we applied single pulse TMS at 120% resting motor threshold (rMT) to the left dlPFC and compared EEG vertex N100-P200 and perception. Conditions included three protocols: No masking (no auditory masking, no foam, and jittered interstimulus interval [ISI]), Standard masking (auditory noise, foam, and jittered ISI), and our ATTENUATE protocol (auditory noise, foam, over-the-ear protection, and unjittered ISI). ATTENUATE reduced vertex N100-P200 by 56%, "click" loudness perception by 50%, and scalp sensation by 36%. We show that sensory prediction, induced with predictable ISI, has a suppressive effect on vertex N100-P200, and that combining standard suppression protocols with sensory prediction provides the best N100-P200 suppression. ATTENUATE was more effective than Standard masking, which only reduced vertex N100-P200 by 22%, loudness by 27%, and scalp sensation by 24%. We introduce a sensory suppression protocol superior to Standard masking and demonstrate that using an unjittered ISI can contribute to minimizing sensory confounds. ATTENUATE provides superior sensory suppression to increase TEP signal-to-noise and contributes to a growing understanding of TMS-EEG sensory neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M. Ross
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental IllnessResearch, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC)Palo AltoCaliforniaUSA,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford University Medical CenterStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Manjima Sarkar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford University Medical CenterStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Corey J. Keller
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental IllnessResearch, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC)Palo AltoCaliforniaUSA,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford University Medical CenterStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Luber B, Beynel L, Spellman T, Gura H, Ploesser M, Termini K, Lisanby SH. Effects of Online Single Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices in Deceptive Processing: A Preliminary Study. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:883337. [PMID: 35795258 PMCID: PMC9250982 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.883337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to test the functional role of parietal and prefrontal cortical regions activated during a playing card Guilty Knowledge Task (GKT). Single-pulse TMS was applied to 15 healthy volunteers at each of three target sites: left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and midline parietal cortex. TMS pulses were applied at each of five latencies (from 0 to 480 ms) after the onset of a card stimulus. TMS applied to the parietal cortex exerted a latency-specific increase in inverse efficiency score and in reaction time when subjects were instructed to lie relative to when asked to respond with the truth, and this effect was specific to when TMS was applied at 240 ms after stimulus onset. No effects of TMS were detected at left or right DLPFC sites. This manipulation with TMS of performance in a deception task appears to support a critical role for the parietal cortex in intentional false responding, particularly in stimulus selection processes needed to execute a deceptive response in the context of a GKT. However, this interpretation is only preliminary, as further experiments are needed to compare performance within and outside of a deceptive context to clarify the effects of deceptive intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Luber
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
- *Correspondence: Bruce Luber
| | - Lysianne Beynel
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Timothy Spellman
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States
| | - Hannah Gura
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Markus Ploesser
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States
- Forensic Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kate Termini
- Clinical and Forensic Psychology, Fifth Avenue Forensics, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sarah H. Lisanby
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Barhoun P, Fuelscher I, Do M, He JL, Cerins A, Bekkali S, Youssef GJ, Corp D, Major BP, Meaney D, Enticott PG, Hyde C. The role of the primary motor cortex in motor imagery: A theta burst stimulation study. Psychophysiology 2022; 59:e14077. [PMID: 35503930 PMCID: PMC9540768 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
While mentally simulated actions activate similar neural structures to overt movement, the role of the primary motor cortex (PMC) in motor imagery remains disputed. The aim of the study was to use continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to modulate corticospinal activity to investigate the putative role of the PMC in implicit motor imagery in young adults with typical and atypical motor ability. A randomized, double blind, sham‐controlled, crossover, offline cTBS protocol was applied to 35 young adults. During three separate sessions, adults with typical and low motor ability (developmental coordination disorder [DCD]), received active cTBS to the PMC and supplementary motor area (SMA), and sham stimulation to either the PMC or SMA. Following stimulation, participants completed measures of motor imagery (i.e., hand rotation task) and visual imagery (i.e., letter number rotation task). Although active cTBS significantly reduced corticospinal excitability in adults with typical motor ability, neither task performance was altered following active cTBS to the PMC or SMA, compared to performance after sham cTBS. These results did not differ across motor status (i.e., typical motor ability and DCD). These findings are not consistent with our hypothesis that the PMC (and SMA) is directly involved in motor imagery. Instead, previous motor cortical activation observed during motor imagery may be an epiphenomenon of other neurophysiological processes and/or activity within brain regions involved in motor imagery. This study highlights the need to consider multi‐session theta burst stimulation application and its neural effects when probing the putative role of motor cortices in motor imagery. A controlled continuous theta burst stimulation protocol was adopted to examine the role of the primary motor cortex in motor imagery. While corticospinal excitability was suppressed in individuals with typical motor ability, no changes in imagery performance were detected after applying active stimulation to the motor regions. This suggests that motor regions may not be causally implicated in motor imagery and/or that multiple stimulation sessions may be required when inducing cognitive‐behavioral changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Barhoun
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian Fuelscher
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Do
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason L He
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andris Cerins
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Soukayna Bekkali
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - George J Youssef
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel Corp
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brendan P Major
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dwayne Meaney
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter G Enticott
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christian Hyde
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gomez-Feria J, Fernandez-Corazza M, Martin-Rodriguez JF, Mir P. TMS intensity and focality correlation with coil orientation at three non-motor regions. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4ef9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this study is to define the best coil orientations for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for three clinically relevant brain areas: pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and posterior parietal cortex (PPC), by means of simulations in 12 realistic head models of the electric field (E-field). Methods. We computed the E-field generated by TMS in our three volumes of interest (VOI) that were delineated based on published atlases. We then analysed the maximum intensity and spatial focality for the normal and absolute components of the E-field considering different percentile thresholds. Lastly, we correlated these results with the different anatomical properties of our VOIs. Results. Overall, the spatial focality of the E-field for the three VOIs varied depending on the orientation of the coil. Further analysis showed that differences in individual brain anatomy were related to the amount of focality achieved. In general, a larger percentage of sulcus resulted in better spatial focality. Additionally, a higher normal E-field intensity was achieved when the coil axis was placed perpendicular to the predominant orientations of the gyri of each VOI. A positive correlation between spatial focality and E-field intensity was found for PPC and IFG but not for pre-SMA. Conclusions. For a rough approximation, better coil orientations can be based on the individual’s specific brain morphology at the VOI. Moreover, TMS computational models should be employed to obtain better coil orientations in non-motor regions of interest. Significance. Finding better coil orientations in non-motor regions is a challenge in TMS and seeks to reduce interindividual variability. Our individualized TMS simulation pipeline leads to fewer inter-individual variability in the focality, likely enhancing the efficacy of the stimulation and reducing the risk of stimulating adjacent, non-targeted areas.
Collapse
|
24
|
Vrba D, Malena L, Albrecht J, Fricova J, Anders M, Rokyta R, Rodrigues D, Vrba J. Numerical analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation application in patients with orofacial pain. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2022; 30:590-599. [PMID: 35239486 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2022.3156703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, we monitored the accuracy of non-navigated application of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in 10 patients suffering from orofacial pain by using functional magnetic resonance (fMRI), computer modeling and numerical simulation. Through a unique process, each fMRI scan was used to define a Region of Interest (ROI) where the source of the orofacial pain was located, which was to be stimulated using rTMS. For each patient, MRI scans with a spatial resolution of 0.7 mm were converted into an anatomically accurate head model. The head model including the ROI was then co-registered with a model of the stimulation coil in an electromagnetic field numerical simulator. The accuracy of rTMS application was evaluated based on the calculations of electric field intensity distribution in the ROI. The research has yielded unique insight into ROIs (with average volume 904mm3) in patients with orofacial pain and has also extended further possibilities of human head MRI image semi-automatic segmentation. According to the calculations performed, the average ROI volume that was stimulated by an electric field with an intensity of over 80 V/m was only 4.4%, with the maximum ROI volume being 20.5%. Furthermore, a numerical study of the impact of coil rotation and translation was performed. It demonstrated a) the optimal placement of the stimulation coil can significantly increase the volume of the stimulated ROI up to 60% and b) patients with orofacial pain would need precise coil positioning with a navigation error lower than 10 mm. Due to an acceptable proccessing time of up to 6 hours, described numerical simulation opens up new options for precise rTMS treatment planning. This planning platform together withpatient-specific navigated rTMS, could lead to significant increase of treatment outcomes in patients suffering from orofacial pain.
Collapse
|
25
|
Tervo AE, Nieminen JO, Lioumis P, Metsomaa J, Souza VH, Sinisalo H, Stenroos M, Sarvas J, Ilmoniemi RJ. Closed-loop optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography feedback. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:523-531. [PMID: 35337598 PMCID: PMC8940636 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in brain research and treatment of various brain dysfunctions. However, the optimal way to target stimulation and administer TMS therapies, for example, where and in which electric field direction the stimuli should be given, is yet to be determined. Objective To develop an automated closed-loop system for adjusting TMS parameters (in this work, the stimulus orientation) online based on TMS-evoked brain activity measured with electroencephalography (EEG). Methods We developed an automated closed-loop TMS–EEG set-up. In this set-up, the stimulus parameters are electronically adjusted with multi-locus TMS. As a proof of concept, we developed an algorithm that automatically optimizes the stimulation orientation based on single-trial EEG responses. We applied the algorithm to determine the electric field orientation that maximizes the amplitude of the TMS–EEG responses. The validation of the algorithm was performed with six healthy volunteers, repeating the search twenty times for each subject. Results The validation demonstrated that the closed-loop control worked as desired despite the large variation in the single-trial EEG responses. We were often able to get close to the orientation that maximizes the EEG amplitude with only a few tens of pulses. Conclusion Optimizing stimulation with EEG feedback in a closed-loop manner is feasible and enables effective coupling to brain activity. Closed-loop set-up for guiding TMS with brain activity feedback. Automatic stimulus orientation optimization based on TMS-evoked EEG responses. Adjusting TMS parameters electronically allows fast and effortless procedures. TMS-evoked EEG responses depend on the stimulus orientation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aino E Tervo
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; AMI Centre, Aalto NeuroImaging, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| | - Jaakko O Nieminen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Pantelis Lioumis
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Metsomaa
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; Department of Neurology & Stroke and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Victor H Souza
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heikki Sinisalo
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Matti Stenroos
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| | - Jukka Sarvas
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| | - Risto J Ilmoniemi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Paradigms as Treatment Options for Recovery of Language Deficits in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia. Behav Neurol 2022; 2022:7274115. [PMID: 35069929 PMCID: PMC8767406 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7274115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In an effort to boost aphasia recovery, modern rehabilitation, in addition to speech and language therapy (SALT), is increasingly incorporating noninvasive methods of brain stimulation. The present study is aimed at investigating the effectiveness of two paradigms of neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): (i) 1 Hz rTMS and (ii) continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) each as a standalone treatment for chronic aphasia poststroke. Methods A single subject experimental design (SSED) trial was carried out in which six people with aphasia (PWA) were recruited, following a single left hemispheric stroke more than six months prior to the study. Three individuals were treated with 1 Hz rTMS, and the remaining three were treated with cTBS. In all cases, TMS was applied over the right pars triangularis (pTr). Language assessment, with standardized and functional measures, and cognitive evaluations were carried out at four time points: twice prior to treatment (baseline), one day immediately posttreatment, and at follow-up two months after treatment was terminated. Quality of life (QoL) was also assessed at baseline and two months posttreatment. In addition, one of the participants with severe global aphasia was followed up again one and two years posttherapy. Results For all participants, both rTMS paradigms (1 Hz rTMS and cTBS) generated trends towards improvement in several language skills (i.e., verbal receptive language, expressive language, and naming and reading) one day after treatment and/or two months after therapy. Rated QoL remained stable in three individuals, but for the other three, the communication scores of the QoL were reduced, while two of them also showed a decline in the psychological scores. The participant that was treated with cTBS and followed for up to two years showed that the significant improvement she had initially exhibited in comprehension and reading skills two months after TMS (1st follow-up) was sustained for at least up to two years. Conclusion From the current findings, it is suggested that inhibitory TMS over the right pTr has the potential to drive neuroplastic changes as a standalone treatment that facilitates language recovery in poststroke aphasia.
Collapse
|
27
|
Harita S, Momi D, Mazza F, Griffiths JD. Mapping Inter-individual Functional Connectivity Variability in TMS Targets for Major Depressive Disorder. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:902089. [PMID: 35815008 PMCID: PMC9260048 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.902089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an emerging alternative to existing treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD). The effects of TMS on both brain physiology and therapeutic outcomes are known to be highly variable from subject to subject, however. Proposed reasons for this variability include individual differences in neurophysiology, in cortical geometry, and in brain connectivity. Standard approaches to TMS target site definition tend to focus on coordinates or landmarks within the individual brain regions implicated in MDD, such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Additionally considering the network connectivity of these sites (i.e., the wider set of brain regions that may be mono- or poly-synaptically activated by TMS stimulation) has the potential to improve subject-specificity of TMS targeting and, in turn, improve treatment outcomes. In this study, we looked at the functional connectivity (FC) of dlPFC and OFC TMS targets, based on induced electrical field (E-field) maps, estimated using the SimNIBS library. We hypothesized that individual differences in spontaneous functional brain dynamics would contribute more to downstream network engagement than individual differences in cortical geometry (i.e., E-field variability). We generated individualized E-field maps on the cortical surface for 121 subjects (67 female) from the Human Connectome Project database using tetrahedral head models generated from T1- and T2-weighted MR images. F3 and Fp1 electrode positions were used to target the left dlPFC and left OFC, respectively. We analyzed inter-subject variability in the shape and location of these TMS target E-field patterns, their FC, and the major functional networks to which they belong. Our results revealed the key differences in TMS target FC between the dlPFC and OFC, and also how this connectivity varies across subjects. Three major functional networks were targeted across the dlPFC and OFC: the ventral attention, fronto-parietal and default-mode networks in the dlPFC, and the fronto-parietal and default mode networks in the OFC. Inter-subject variability in cortical geometry and in FC was high. Our analyses showed that the use of normative neuroimaging reference data (group-average or representative FC and subject E-field) allows prediction of which networks are targeted, but fails to accurately quantify the relative loading of TMS targeting on each of the principal networks. Our results characterize the FC patterns of canonical therapeutic TMS targets, and the key dimensions of their variability across subjects. The high inter-individual variability in cortical geometry and FC, leading to high variability in distributions of targeted brain networks, may account for the high levels of variability in physiological and therapeutic TMS outcomes. These insights should, we hope, prove useful as part of the broader effort by the psychiatry, neurology, and neuroimaging communities to help improve and refine TMS therapy, through a better understanding of the technology and its neurophysiological effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shreyas Harita
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Davide Momi
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Frank Mazza
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John D Griffiths
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dave S, VanHaerents S, Bonakdarpour B, Mesulam MM, Voss JL. Stimulation of distinct parietal locations differentiates frontal versus hippocampal network involvement in memory formation. CURRENT RESEARCH IN NEUROBIOLOGY 2022; 3:100030. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
29
|
da Silva Machado CB, da Silva LM, Gonçalves AF, Andrade PRD, Mendes CKTT, de Assis TJCF, Godeiro Júnior CDO, Andrade SM. Multisite non-invasive brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: A scoping review. NeuroRehabilitation 2021; 49:515-531. [PMID: 34776426 PMCID: PMC8764602 DOI: 10.3233/nre-210190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, characterized by cardinal motor symptoms in addition to cognitive impairment. New insights concerning multisite non-invasive brain stimulation effects have been gained, which can now be used to develop innovative treatment approaches. OBJECTIVE: Map the researchs involving multisite non-invasive brain stimulation in PD, synthesize the available evidence and discuss future directions. METHODS: The databases PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception until April 2020, without restrictions on the date of publication or the language in which it was published. The reviewers worked in pairs and sequentially evaluated the titles, abstracts and then the full text of all publications identified as potentially relevant. RESULTS: Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. The target brain regions included mainly the combination of a motor and a frontal area, such as stimulation of the primary motor córtex associated with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Most of the trials showed that this modality was only more effective for the motor component, or for the cognitive and/or non-motor, separately. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the results being encouraging for the use of the multisite aproach, the indication for PD management should be carried out with caution and deserves scientific deepening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Clécio de Oliveira Godeiro Júnior
- Division of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University, La Tronche, Grenoble, France.,Division of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tugin S, Souza VH, Nazarova MA, Novikov PA, Tervo AE, Nieminen JO, Lioumis P, Ziemann U, Nikulin VV, Ilmoniemi RJ. Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257554. [PMID: 34550997 PMCID: PMC8457500 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Besides stimulus intensities and interstimulus intervals (ISI), the electric field (E-field) orientation is known to affect both short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) in paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, it has yet to be established how distinct orientations of the conditioning (CS) and test stimuli (TS) affect the SICI and SICF generation. With the use of a multi-channel TMS transducer that provides electronic control of the stimulus orientation and intensity, we aimed to investigate how changes in the CS and TS orientation affect the strength of SICI and SICF. We hypothesized that the CS orientation would play a major role for SICF than for SICI, whereas the CS intensity would be more critical for SICI than for SICF. In eight healthy subjects, we tested two ISIs (1.5 and 2.7 ms), two CS and TS orientations (anteromedial (AM) and posteromedial (PM)), and four CS intensities (50, 70, 90, and 110% of the resting motor threshold (RMT)). The TS intensity was fixed at 110% RMT. The intensities were adjusted to the corresponding RMT in the AM and PM orientations. SICI and SICF were observed in all tested CS and TS orientations. SICI depended on the CS intensity in a U-shaped manner in any combination of the CS and TS orientations. With 70% and 90% RMT CS intensities, stronger PM-oriented CS induced stronger inhibition than weaker AM-oriented CS. Similar SICF was observed for any CS orientation. Neither SICI nor SICF depended on the TS orientation. We demonstrated that SICI and SICF could be elicited by the CS perpendicular to the TS, which indicates that these stimuli affected either overlapping or strongly connected neuronal populations. We concluded that SICI is primarily sensitive to the CS intensity and that CS intensity adjustment resulted in similar SICF for different CS orientations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Tugin
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
- BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Helsinki, Finland
- * E-mail:
| | - Victor H. Souza
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
- BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Helsinki, Finland
- School of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil
| | - Maria A. Nazarova
- Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
- Federal State Budgetary Institution “Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies” of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pavel A. Novikov
- Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
| | - Aino E. Tervo
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
- BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jaakko O. Nieminen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
- BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pantelis Lioumis
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
- BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Vadim V. Nikulin
- Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Risto J. Ilmoniemi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
- BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lasagna CA, Taylor SF, Lee TG, Rutherford S, Greathouse T, Gu P, Tso IF. Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation to the Secondary Visual Cortex at 80% Active Motor Threshold Does Not Impair Central Vision in Humans During a Simple Detection Task. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:709275. [PMID: 34512296 PMCID: PMC8429821 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.709275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a powerful form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation capable of suppressing cortical excitability for up to 50 min. A growing number of studies have applied cTBS to the visual cortex in human subjects to investigate the neural dynamics of visual processing, but few have specifically examined its effects on central vision, which has crucial implications for safety and inference on downstream cognitive effects. The present study assessed the safety of offline, neuronavigated cTBS to V2 by examining its effects on central vision performance. In this single-blind, randomized sham-controlled, crossover study, 17 healthy adults received cTBS (at 80% active motor threshold) and sham to V2 1–2 weeks apart. Their central vision (≤8°) was tested at 1-min (T1) and again at 50-min (T50) post-stimulation. Effects of condition (cTBS vs. sham) and time (T1 vs. T50) on accuracy and reaction time were examined using Bayes factor. Bayes factor results suggested that cTBS did not impair stimulus detection over the entire central visual field nor subfields at T1 or T50. Our results offer the first explicit evidence supporting that cTBS applied to V2 does not create blind spots in the central visual field in humans during a simple detection task. Any subtler changes to vision and downstream visual perception should be investigated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly A Lasagna
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Stephan F Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Taraz G Lee
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Saige Rutherford
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Tristan Greathouse
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Pan Gu
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Ivy F Tso
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tani K, Hirata A, Gomez-Tames J, Tanaka S. Coil orientation affects pain sensation during single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over Broca's area. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2021; 6:234-238. [PMID: 34466758 PMCID: PMC8382968 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Pain sensation at the site of stimulation is a side effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The purpose of this study was to investigate how or whether the coil orientation affected TMS-induced pain on Broca's area (BA) or primary motor cortex (M1). Methods In Experiment 1, we measured pain thresholds during single-pulse TMS delivered over BA or left M1 at seven coil orientation angles (-90° to 90°, in 30° increments) relative to the posterior-anterior (PA) orientation. In Experiment 2, we evaluated subjective pain intensity when delivering TMS at an intensity of 110% of the resting motor threshold, which is commonly used in conventional TMS studies. Results In Experiment 1, we found a significant relationship between coil orientation and pain thresholds during BA stimulation but not M1 stimulation. During BA stimulation, pain thresholds were significantly lower when the coil orientation was 30° upward (-30° condition) relative to the PA orientation compared with 60° downward (60° condition). In Experiment 2, pain sensations were significantly stronger in the -30° condition compared with those in the 60° condition. We also confirmed that the averaged location of pain on the head in both conditions were more than 25 mm from the left lateral orbital rim. Conclusions The coil orientation of TMS over BA affects pain sensations. This might be attributable to the activation of nociceptors and nociceptive fibers in the muscle tissues above BA, rather than the orbicularis oculi muscle. Significance Although the influence of coil orientation on the TMS efficacy is unclear, this study suggests that manipulating the orientation of the TMS coil may be helpful in reducing pain when applying TMS to BA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Tani
- Laboratory of Psychology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3125, Japan.,Faculty of Psychology, Otemon Gakuin University, 2-1-15 Nishi-Ai, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-8502, Japan
| | - Akimasa Hirata
- Department of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8555, Japan
| | - Jose Gomez-Tames
- Department of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8555, Japan
| | - Satoshi Tanaka
- Laboratory of Psychology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3125, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zito GA, Worbe Y, Lamy JC, Kälin J, Bühler J, Weber S, Müri RM, Aybek S. Behavioral Differences Across Theta Burst Stimulation Protocols. A Study on the Sense of Agency in Healthy Humans. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:658688. [PMID: 34305515 PMCID: PMC8299722 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.658688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method. Various stimulation protocols have been proposed, for instance, stimulation at 50 Hz with pattern at 5 Hz, or at 30 Hz with pattern at 6 Hz. To identify better stimulation parameters for behavioral applications, we investigated the effects of 50-Hz continuous TBS (cTBS) on the sense of agency (SoA), and compared them with a previously published study with 30-Hz cTBS. Methods Based on power analysis from a previous sample using two applications of 30-Hz cTBS, we recruited 20 healthy subjects in a single-blind, Vertex-controlled, randomized, crossover trial. Participants were stimulated with one application of 50-Hz cTBS over the right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC), a key area for agency processing, and the vertex, in a random order. A behavioral task targeting the SoA was done before and after stimulation. After controlling for baseline differences across samples, we studied the effect of stimulation in the two protocols separately. Results Compared to the previously published 30-Hz protocol, 50-Hz cTBS over the rPPC did not reveal significant changes in the SoA, similar to sham Vertex stimulation. Conclusion One application of 50-Hz cTBS was not sufficient to elicit behavioral effects, compared to two applications of 30-Hz cTBS, as previously described. This may be due to a mechanism of synaptic plasticity, consolidated through consecutive stimulation cycles. Our results are relevant for future studies aiming at modulating activity of the rPPC in cognitive domains other than agency, and in patients affected by abnormal agency, who could benefit from treatment options based on TBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe A Zito
- Movement Investigation and Therapeutics Team, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, UM75, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Yulia Worbe
- Movement Investigation and Therapeutics Team, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, UM75, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Department of Neurophysiology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP.6 - Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Charles Lamy
- Movement Investigation and Therapeutics Team, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, UM75, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Joel Kälin
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Janine Bühler
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Samantha Weber
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - René M Müri
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Biomedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Selma Aybek
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Guan M, Liu X, Guo L, Zhang R, Tan Q, Wang H, Wang H. Improved Pre-attentive Processing With Occipital rTMS Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder Patients Revealed by MMN. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:648816. [PMID: 34234657 PMCID: PMC8256852 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.648816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the improvement effect of occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with escitalopram oxalate tablets on pre-attentive processing in patients with first-episode, medication-naive depression. METHODS Patients who were hospitalized between January and December 2019 were selected. They were randomly allocated to real occipital rTMS stimulation group with 27 cases receiving intermittent theta-burst (iTBS) and sham stimulation group with 24 cases over 20 days. The rTMS treatment target is located at the Oz point of the occipital region. Both groups took escitalopram oxalate tablets, and the average daily drug dose was 15.294 ± 5.041 mg. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) was used to assess the symptoms of depression before and after treatment, and mismatch negativity (MMN) was used to assess the improvement of pre-attentive processing before and after treatment. RESULTS After 20 days of treatment, the total score of HAMD (13.495 ± 3.700) in both groups was significantly lower than that before treatment [21.910 ± 3.841, F(1, 49) = 46, 3.690, p < 0.001]. After treatment, the latency of MMN in the real stimulation group (182.204 ± 31.878 ms) was significantly lower than that in the sham stimulation group (219.896 ± 42.634 ms, p < 0.001), and the amplitude of MMN in the real stimulation group (-7.107 ± 3.374 ms) was significantly higher than that in the sham stimulation group (-2.773 ± 3.7 32 ms, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Occipital rTMS treatment can enhance the early therapeutic effect and effectively improve the pre-attentive processing of patients with depression and provide a scientific basis for the new target of rTMS therapy in clinical patients with depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muzhen Guan
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, China
- Department of Mental Health, Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Xufeng Liu
- School of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Li Guo
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Ruiguo Zhang
- Department of Psychiatry, Xi’an No. 3 Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an, China
| | - Qingrong Tan
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Huaihai Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Xi’an Union Hospital, Xi’an, China
| | - Huaning Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ji GJ, Xie W, Yang T, Wu Q, Sui P, Bai T, Chen L, Chen L, Chen X, Dong Y, Wang A, Li D, Yang J, Qiu B, Yu F, Zhang L, Luo Y, Wang K, Zhu C. Pre-supplementary motor network connectivity and clinical outcome of magnetic stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42:3833-3844. [PMID: 34050701 PMCID: PMC8288080 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A large proportion of patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) respond unsatisfactorily to pharmacological and psychological treatments. An alternative novel treatment for these patients is repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). This study aimed to investigate the underlying neural mechanism of rTMS treatment in OCD patients. A total of 37 patients with OCD were randomized to receive real or sham 1‐Hz rTMS (14 days, 30 min/day) over the right pre‐supplementary motor area (preSMA). Resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were collected before and after rTMS treatment. The individualized target was defined by a personalized functional connectivity map of the subthalamic nucleus. After treatment, patients in the real group showed a better improvement in the Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale than the sham group (F1,35 = 6.0, p = .019). To show the neural mechanism involved, we identified an “ideal target connectivity” before treatment. Leave‐one‐out cross‐validation indicated that this connectivity pattern can significantly predict patients' symptom improvements (r = .60, p = .009). After real treatment, the average connectivity strength of the target network significantly decreased in the real but not in the sham group. This network‐level change was cross‐validated in three independent datasets. Altogether, these findings suggest that personalized magnetic stimulation on preSMA may alleviate obsessive–compulsive symptoms by decreasing the connectivity strength of the target network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gong-Jun Ji
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Wen Xie
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Mental Health Center, Hefei, China
| | - Tingting Yang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Qianqian Wu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Pengjiao Sui
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Tongjian Bai
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Lu Chen
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Lu Chen
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Xingui Chen
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Yi Dong
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Mental Health Center, Hefei, China
| | - Anzhen Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Mental Health Center, Hefei, China
| | - Dandan Li
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Jinying Yang
- Laboratory Center for Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Bensheng Qiu
- Hefei National Lab for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and the Centers for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Fengqiong Yu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Yudan Luo
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Chunyan Zhu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Van Hoornweder S, Debeuf R, Verstraelen S, Meesen R, Cuypers K. Unravelling Ipsilateral Interactions Between Left Dorsal Premotor and Primary Motor Cortex: A Proof of Concept Study. Neuroscience 2021; 466:36-46. [PMID: 33971265 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Few studies have identified the intrahemispheric functional connectivity between the ipsilateral dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and the primary motor hand area (M1hand) due to technical limitations. In this proof-of-concept study, a novel neuronavigated dsTMS set-up was employed, combining stimulation over left PMd and left M1hand using the edge of a butterfly coil and a small cooled-coil. This arrangement was warranted because coil (over)heating and inter coil distance are limiting factors when investigating connectivity between stimulation targets in close proximity and over a longer duration. The proposed set-up was designed to deal with these limitations. Specifically, the effect of four dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (dsTMS) protocols on twenty-eight right-handed participants (12 males) was evaluated. These protocols differed in stimulus order, interstimulus interval and current direction induced in PMd. A structural scan with electric (E-)field modeling was obtained from seven participants prior to dsTMS, demonstrating that PMd and M1hand were effectively stimulated. Results indicate that one protocol, in which a latero-medial current was induced in PMd 2.8 ms prior to stimulation over M1hand, induced a sex-mediated effect. In males, significant inhibition of motor-evoked potentials was identified, whereas females demonstrated a facilitatory effect that did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. E-field simulations revealed that the E-field induced by the coil targeting PMd was maximal in PMd, with weaker E-field strengths extending to regions beyond PMd. Summarizing, the current dsTMS set-up enabled stimulating at an inter-target distance of 35 mm without any indications of coil-overheating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sybren Van Hoornweder
- Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium; Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
| | - Ruben Debeuf
- Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium; Rehabilitation Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefanie Verstraelen
- Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Raf Meesen
- Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Koen Cuypers
- Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium; Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Perceptual Learning beyond Perception: Mnemonic Representation in Early Visual Cortex and Intraparietal Sulcus. J Neurosci 2021; 41:4476-4486. [PMID: 33811151 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2780-20.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The ability to discriminate between stimuli relies on a chain of neural operations associated with perception, memory and decision-making. Accumulating studies show learning-dependent plasticity in perception or decision-making, yet whether perceptual learning modifies mnemonic processing remains unclear. Here, we trained human participants of both sexes in an orientation discrimination task, while using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to separately examine training-induced changes in working memory (WM) representation. fMRI decoding revealed orientation-specific neural patterns during the delay period in primary visual cortex (V1) before, but not after, training, whereas neurodisruption of V1 during the delay period led to behavioral deficits in both phases. In contrast, both fMRI decoding and disruptive effect of TMS showed that intraparietal sulcus (IPS) represented WM content after, but not before, training. These results suggest that training does not affect the necessity of sensory area in representing WM information, consistent with the sensory recruitment hypothesis in WM, but likely alters the coding format of the stored stimulus in this region. On the other hand, training can render WM content to be maintained in higher-order parietal areas, complementing sensory area to support more robust maintenance of information.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT There has been accumulating progresses regarding experience-dependent plasticity in perception or decision-making, yet how perceptual experience moulds mnemonic processing of visual information remains less explored. Here, we provide novel findings that learning-dependent improvement of discriminability accompanies altered WM representation at different cortical levels. Critically, we suggest a role of training in modulating cortical locus of WM representation, providing a plausible explanation to reconcile the discrepant findings between human and animal studies regarding the recruitment of sensory or higher-order areas in WM.
Collapse
|
38
|
Application of transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: Coil design and neuroanatomical variability considerations. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2021; 45:73-88. [PMID: 31285123 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2018] [Revised: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
High-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) has received FDA clearance for both the figure-of-8 coil (figure-8 coil) and the H1 coil. The FDA-cleared MDD protocols for both coils include high frequency (10-18 Hz) stimulation targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) at an intensity that is 120% of the right-hand resting motor threshold. Despite these similar parameters, the two coils generate distinct electrical fields (e-fields) which result in differences in the cortical stimulation they produce. Due to the differences in coil designs, the H1 coil induces a stimulation e-field that is broader and deeper than the one induced by the figure-8 coil. In this paper we review theoretical and clinical implications of these differences between the two coils and compare evidence of their safety and efficacy in treating MDD. We present the design principles of the coils, the challenges of identifying, finding, and stimulating the optimal brain target of each individual (both from functional and connectivity perspectives), and the possible implication of stimulating outside that target. There is only one study that performed a direct comparison between clinical effectiveness of the two coils, using the standard FDA-approved protocols in MDD patients. This study indicated clinical superiority of the H1 coil but did not measure long-term effects. Post-marketing data suggest that both coils have a similar safety profile in clinical practice, whereas effect size comparisons of the two respective FDA pivotal trials suggests that the H1 coil may have an advantage in efficacy. We conclude that further head-to-head experiments are needed, especially ones that will compare long-term effects and usage of similar temporal stimulation parameters and similar number of pulses.
Collapse
|
39
|
Seo H, Jun SC. Computational exploration of epidural cortical stimulation using a realistic head model. Comput Biol Med 2021; 135:104290. [PMID: 33775416 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Motor cortex stimulation, either non-invasively or with implanted electrodes, has been applied worldwide as a treatment for intractable neuropathic pain syndromes. Although computer simulations of non-invasive brain stimulation have been investigated largely to optimize protocols and improve our understanding of underlying mechanisms using a realistic head model, computational studies of invasive cortical stimulation are rare and limited to very simplified cortical models. In this paper, we present an anatomically realistic head model for epidural cortical stimulation that includes the most sophisticated epidural electrodes with an insulating paddle. The head model predicted the stimulus-induced field strengths according to two different stimulation techniques, bipolar and monopolar stimulations. We found that the stimulus-induced field focused on the precentral and postcentral gyri because of the epidural lead's invasiveness. Different stimulation configurations influenced the shape of the field markedly, and complex patterns of inward and outward directions of the radial field were observed in bipolar stimulation compared to those in monopolar stimulation. The spatial distributions of field strength showed that the optimal stimulation varied according to the target areas. In conclusion, we proposed an anatomically realistic head model and a sophisticated epidural lead to simulate epidural cortical stimulation-induced field strengths and identified the importance of such detailed modeling for epidural cortical stimulation because of the current's shunting through the cerebrospinal fluid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeon Seo
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science & Technology, South Korea; Medical Device Development Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Sung Chan Jun
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science & Technology, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Colella M, Paffi A, De Santis V, Apollonio F, Liberti M. Effect of skin conductivity on the electric field induced by transcranial stimulation techniques in different head models. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:035010. [PMID: 33496268 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcde7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
This study aims at quantifying the effect that using different skin conductivity values has on the estimation of the electric (E)-field distribution induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the brain of two anatomical models. The induced E-field was calculated with numerical simulations inside MIDA and Duke models, assigning to the skin a conductivity value estimated from a multi-layered skin model and three values taken from literature. The effect of skin conductivity variations on the local E-field induced by tDCS in the brain was up to 70%. In TMS, minor local differences, in the order of 20%, were obtained in regions of interest for the onset of possible side effects. Results suggested that an accurate model of the skin is necessary in all numerical studies that aim at precisely estimating the E-field induced during TMS and tDCS applications. This also highlights the importance of further experimental studies on human skin characterization, especially at low frequencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micol Colella
- Department of Information Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications (DIET), University of Rome 'La Sapienza', Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Paffi
- Department of Information Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications (DIET), University of Rome 'La Sapienza', Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio De Santis
- Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics (DIIEE), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesca Apollonio
- Department of Information Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications (DIET), University of Rome 'La Sapienza', Rome, Italy
| | - Micaela Liberti
- Department of Information Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications (DIET), University of Rome 'La Sapienza', Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gomez LJ, Dannhauer M, Peterchev AV. Fast computational optimization of TMS coil placement for individualized electric field targeting. Neuroimage 2020; 228:117696. [PMID: 33385544 PMCID: PMC7956218 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: During transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) a coil placed on the scalp is used to non-invasively modulate activity of targeted brain networks via a magnetically induced electric field (E-field). Ideally, the E-field induced during TMS is concentrated on a targeted cortical region of interest (ROI). Determination of the coil position and orientation that best achieve this objective presently requires a large computational effort. Objective: To improve the accuracy of TMS we have developed a fast computational auxiliary dipole method (ADM) for determining the optimum coil position and orientation. The optimum coil placement maximizes the E-field along a predetermined direction or, alternatively, the overall E-field magnitude in the targeted ROI. Furthermore, ADM can assess E-field uncertainty resulting from precision limitations of TMS coil placement protocols. Method: ADM leverages the electromagnetic reciprocity principle to compute rapidly the TMS induced E-field in the ROI by using the E-field generated by a virtual constant current source residing in the ROI. The framework starts by solving for the conduction currents resulting from this ROI current source. Then, it rapidly determines the average E-field induced in the ROI for each coil position by using the conduction currents and a fast-multipole method. To further speed-up the computations, the coil is approximated using auxiliary dipoles enabling it to represent all coil orientations for a given coil position with less than 600 dipoles. Results: Using ADM, the E-fields generated in an MRI-derived head model when the coil is placed at 5900 different scalp positions and 360 coil orientations per position (over 2.1 million unique configurations) can be determined in under 15 min on a standard laptop computer. This enables rapid extraction of the optimum coil position and orientation as well as the E-field variation resulting from coil positioning uncertainty. ADM is implemented in SimNIBS 3.2. Conclusion: ADM enables the rapid determination of coil placement that maximizes E-field delivery to a specific brain target. This method can find the optimum coil placement in under 15 min enabling its routine use for TMS. Furthermore, it enables the fast quantification of uncertainty in the induced E-field due to limited precision of TMS coil placement protocols, enabling minimization and statistical analysis of the E-field dose variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis J Gomez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Moritz Dannhauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Angel V Peterchev
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, NC 27708, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, NC 27710, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, NC 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Konakanchi D, de Jongh Curry AL, Waters RS, Narayana S. Focality of the Induced E-Field Is a Contributing Factor in the Choice of TMS Parameters: Evidence from a 3D Computational Model of the Human Brain. Brain Sci 2020; 10:E1010. [PMID: 33353125 PMCID: PMC7766380 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10121010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising, non-invasive approach in the diagnosis and treatment of several neurological conditions. However, the specific results in the cortex of the magnitude and spatial distribution of the secondary electrical field (E-field) resulting from TMS at different stimulation sites/orientations and varied TMS parameters are not clearly understood. The objective of this study is to identify the impact of TMS stimulation site and coil orientation on the induced E-field, including spatial distribution and the volume of activation in the cortex across brain areas, and hence demonstrate the need for customized optimization, using a three-dimensional finite element model (FEM). A considerable difference was noted in E-field values and distribution at different brain areas. We observed that the volume of activated cortex varied from 3000 to 7000 mm3 between the selected nine clinically relevant coil locations. Coil orientation also changed the induced E-field by a maximum of 10%, and we noted the least optimal values at the standard coil orientation pointing to the nose. The volume of gray matter activated varied by 10% on average between stimulation sites in homologous brain areas in the two hemispheres of the brain. This FEM simulation model clearly demonstrates the importance of TMS parameters for optimal results in clinically relevant brain areas. The results show that TMS parameters cannot be interchangeably used between individuals, hemispheres, and brain areas. The focality of the TMS induced E-field along with its optimal magnitude should be considered as critical TMS parameters that should be individually optimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepika Konakanchi
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA; (A.L.d.J.C.); (R.S.W.)
| | - Amy L. de Jongh Curry
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA; (A.L.d.J.C.); (R.S.W.)
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
| | - Robert S. Waters
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA; (A.L.d.J.C.); (R.S.W.)
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
| | - Shalini Narayana
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
- Neuroscience Institute, Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gomez-Tames J, Laakso I, Hirata A. Review on biophysical modelling and simulation studies for transcranial magnetic stimulation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 65:24TR03. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aba40d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
44
|
Primary motor cortex in Parkinson's disease: Functional changes and opportunities for neurostimulation. Neurobiol Dis 2020; 147:105159. [PMID: 33152506 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Movement abnormalities of Parkinson's disease (PD) arise from disordered neural activity in multiple interconnected brain structures. The planning and execution of movement requires recruitment of a heterogeneous collection of pyramidal projection neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1). The neural representations of movement in M1 single-cell and field potential recordings are directly and indirectly influenced by the midbrain dopaminergic neurons that degenerate in PD. This review examines M1 functional alterations in PD as uncovered by electrophysiological recordings and neurostimulation studies in patients and experimental animal models. Dysfunction of the parkinsonian M1 depends on the severity and/or duration of dopamine-depletion and the species examined, and is expressed as alterations in movement-related firing dynamics; functional reorganisation of local circuits; and changes in field potential beta oscillations. Neurostimulation methods that modulate M1 activity directly (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation) or indirectly (subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation) improve motor function in PD patients, showing that targeted neuromodulation of M1 is a realistic therapy. We argue that the therapeutic profile of M1 neurostimulation is likely to be greatly enhanced with alternative technologies that permit cell-type specific control and incorporate feedback from electrophysiological biomarkers measured locally.
Collapse
|
45
|
Cerebellar Theta and Beta Noninvasive Stimulation Rhythms Differentially Influence Episodic Memory versus Semantic Prediction. J Neurosci 2020; 40:7300-7310. [PMID: 32817245 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0595-20.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The human cerebellum is thought to interact with distributed brain networks to support cognitive abilities such as episodic memory and semantic prediction. Hippocampal and fronto-temporo-parietal networks that respectively support episodic memory versus semantic prediction have been associated with distinct endogenous oscillatory activity frequency bands: theta (∼3-8 Hz) versus beta (∼13-30 Hz) respectively. We sought to test whether it is possible to toggle cerebellar participation in episodic memory versus semantic prediction by noninvasively stimulating with theta versus beta rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation. In human subjects of both sexes, cerebellar theta stimulation improved episodic memory encoding but did not influence neural signals of semantic prediction, whereas beta stimulation of the same cerebellar location increased neural signals of semantic prediction but did not influence episodic memory encoding. This constitutes evidence for double dissociation of cerebellar contributions to semantic prediction versus episodic memory based on stimulation rhythm, supporting the hypothesis that the cerebellum can be biased to support these distinct cognitive abilities at the command of network-specific rhythmic activity.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The cerebellum interacts with several distinct large-scale brain networks for cognitive function, but the factors governing selectivity of such interactions for particular functions are not fully understood. We tested the hypothesis that cerebellar contributions to cognition are guided by neural oscillations with function-specific frequency bands. We demonstrated that matching noninvasive stimulation to network-specific frequencies selectively enhanced episodic memory versus semantic prediction. These findings suggest that cerebellar contributions to cognitive networks are selected based on corresponding activity rhythms and could be used to develop cerebellar stimulation interventions for specific neurocognitive impairments.
Collapse
|
46
|
Klichowski M, Kroliczak G. Mental Shopping Calculations: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study. Front Psychol 2020; 11:1930. [PMID: 32849133 PMCID: PMC7417662 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the most critical skills behind consumer's behavior is the ability to assess whether a price after a discount is a real bargain. Yet, the neural underpinnings and cognitive mechanisms associated with such a skill are largely unknown. While there is general agreement that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) on the left is critical for mental calculations, and there is also recent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) evidence pointing to the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) of the right PPC as crucial for consumer-like arithmetic (e.g., multi-digit mental addition or subtraction), it is still unknown whether SMG is involved in calculations of sale prices. Here, we show that the neural mechanisms underlying discount arithmetic characteristic for shopping are different from complex addition or subtraction, with discount calculations engaging left SMG more. We obtained these outcomes by remodeling our laboratory to resemble a shop and asking participants to calculate prices after discounts (e.g., $8.80-25 or $4.80-75%), while stimulating left and right SMG with neuronavigated rTMS. Our results indicate that such complex shopping calculations as establishing the price after a discount involve SMG asymmetrically, whereas simpler calculations such as price addition do not. These findings have some consequences for neural models of mathematical cognition and shed some preliminary light on potential consumer's behavior in natural settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Klichowski
- Faculty of Educational Studies, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
| | - Gregory Kroliczak
- Action and Cognition Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Raffin E, Harquel S, Passera B, Chauvin A, Bougerol T, David O. Probing regional cortical excitability via input-output properties using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography coupling. Hum Brain Mapp 2020; 41:2741-2761. [PMID: 32379389 PMCID: PMC7294059 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The modular organization of the cortex refers to subsets of highly interconnected nodes, sharing specific cytoarchitectural and dynamical properties. These properties condition the level of excitability of local pools of neurons. In this study, we described TMS evoked potentials (TEP) input-output properties to provide new insights into regional cortical excitability. We combined robotized TMS with EEG to disentangle region-specific TEP from threshold to saturation and describe their oscillatory contents. Twenty-two young healthy participants received robotized TMS pulses over the right primary motor cortex (M1), the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the right superior occipital lobe (SOL) at five stimulation intensities (40, 60, 80, 100, and 120% resting motor threshold) and one short-interval intracortical inhibition condition during EEG recordings. Ten additional subjects underwent the same experiment with a realistic sham TMS procedure. The results revealed interregional differences in the TEPs input-output functions as well as in the responses to paired-pulse conditioning protocols, when considering early local components (<80 ms). Each intensity in the three regions was associated with complex patterns of oscillatory activities. The quality of the regression of TEPs over stimulation intensity was used to derive a new readout for cortical excitability and dynamical properties, revealing lower excitability in the DLPFC, followed by SOL and M1. The realistic sham experiment confirmed that these early local components were not contaminated by multisensory stimulations. This study provides an entirely new analytic framework to characterize input-output relations throughout the cortex, paving the way to a more accurate definition of local cortical excitability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estelle Raffin
- University of Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut NeurosciencesGrenobleFrance
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)GenevaSwitzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de RéadaptationSionSwitzerland
| | - Sylvain Harquel
- CNRS, UMR5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et NeuroCognition, LPNCUniversity of Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance
- University of Grenoble‐Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CNRS, IRMaGeGrenobleFrance
| | - Brice Passera
- University of Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut NeurosciencesGrenobleFrance
- CNRS, UMR5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et NeuroCognition, LPNCUniversity of Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance
| | - Alan Chauvin
- CNRS, UMR5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et NeuroCognition, LPNCUniversity of Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance
- University of Grenoble‐Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CNRS, IRMaGeGrenobleFrance
| | - Thierry Bougerol
- University of Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut NeurosciencesGrenobleFrance
- CNRS, UMR5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et NeuroCognition, LPNCUniversity of Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance
| | - Olivier David
- University of Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut NeurosciencesGrenobleFrance
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mancino AV, Milano FE, Bertuzzi FM, Yampolsky CG, Ritacco LE, Risk MR. Obtaining accurate and calibrated coil models for transcranial magnetic stimulation using magnetic field measurements. Med Biol Eng Comput 2020; 58:1499-1514. [PMID: 32385790 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-020-02156-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Currently, simulations of the induced currents in the brain produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are used to elucidate the regions reached by stimuli. However, models commonly found in the literature are too general and neglect imperfections in the windings. Aiming to predict the stimulation sites in patients requires precise modeling of the electric field (E-field), and a proper calibration to adequate to the empirical data of the particular coil employed. Furthermore, most fabricators do not provide precise information about the coil geometries, and even using X-ray images may lead to subjective interpretations. We measured the three components of the vector magnetic field induced by a TMS figure-8 coil with spatial resolutions of up to 1 mm. Starting from a computerized tomography-based coil model, we applied a multivariate optimization algorithm to automatically modify the original model and obtain one that optimally fits the measurements. Differences between models were assessed in a human brain mesh using the finite-elements method showing up to 6% variations in the E-field magnitude. Our calibrated model could increase the precision of the estimated E-field induced in the brain during TMS, enhance the accuracy of delivered stimulation during functional brain mapping, and improve dosimetry for repetitive TMS. Graphical Abstract Geometrical model of TMS coil based on TAC images is optimally deformed to match magnetic field measurements. The calibrated model's induced electric field in the brain differs from the original.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Mancino
- Departamento de Bioingenieria, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires, AR 1106, Buenos Aires, Argentina. .,Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina. .,Instituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingeniería Biomédica, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - F E Milano
- Departamento de Bioingenieria, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires, AR 1106, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - F Martin Bertuzzi
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - C G Yampolsky
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - L E Ritacco
- Departamento de Bioingenieria, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires, AR 1106, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Instituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingeniería Biomédica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M R Risk
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Instituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingeniería Biomédica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
D'Amico JM, Dongés SC, Taylor JL. High-intensity, low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances excitability of the human corticospinal pathway. J Neurophysiol 2020; 123:1969-1978. [PMID: 32292098 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00607.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS) is the repeated pairing of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with peripheral nerve stimulation to modify corticospinal synapses; however, it has yet to be determined whether PCMS modulates cortical excitability in a manner similar to paired-associative stimulation protocols. In this study, we first examined the effects of PCMS on adductor pollicis motor evoked potentials (MEPs). In experiment 1, on 2 separate days PCMS (repetitive, high-intensity TMS and ulnar nerve stimulation pairs; 1.5-ms interstimulus interval; 0.1 Hz) was compared with control conditioning of repetitive high-intensity TMS-only stimuli (0.1 Hz). Before and after conditioning, adductor pollicis MEPs were elicited using low-intensity TMS in three different coil orientations to preferentially activate corticospinal axons directly (thus bypassing cortical effects) or indirectly (cortical effects present). Unexpectedly, similar MEP increases were seen for all orientations on both PCMS (129 to 136% of baseline) and control days (108 to 129% of baseline). Given the common factor between conditioning protocols was repeated, high-intensity TMS, further experiments were performed to characterize this repetitive TMS (rTMS) protocol. In experiment 2, an intensity dependence of the rTMS protocol was revealed by a lack of change in MEPs elicited after repetitive low-intensity TMS (0.1 Hz; P = 0.37). In experiment 3, MEP recruitment curve and paired pulse analyses showed that the high-intensity rTMS protocol increased MEPs over a range of stimulus intensities but that effects were not accompanied by changes in intracortical inhibition or facilitation (P > 0.12). These experiments reveal a novel high-intensity, low-frequency rTMS protocol for enhancing corticospinal excitability.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this study, we present a novel, intensity-dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol that induces lasting, plastic changes within the corticospinal tract. High-intensity rTMS at a frequency of 0.1 Hz induces facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) lasting at least 35 min. Additionally, these changes are not limited only to small MEPs but occur throughout the recruitment curve. Finally, facilitation of MEPs following high-intensity rTMS does not appear to be due to changes in intracortical inhibition or facilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Janet L Taylor
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Beynel L, Davis SW, Crowell CA, Dannhauer M, Lim W, Palmer H, Hilbig SA, Brito A, Hile C, Luber B, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV, Cabeza R, Appelbaum LG. Site-Specific Effects of Online rTMS during a Working Memory Task in Healthy Older Adults. Brain Sci 2020; 10:E255. [PMID: 32349366 PMCID: PMC7287855 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10050255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The process of manipulating information within working memory is central to many cognitive functions, but also declines rapidly in old age. Improving this process could markedly enhance the health-span in older adults. The current pre-registered, randomized and placebo-controlled study tested the potential of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied at 5 Hz over the left lateral parietal cortex to enhance working memory manipulation in healthy elderly adults. rTMS was applied, while participants performed a delayed-response alphabetization task with two individually titrated levels of difficulty. Coil placement and stimulation amplitude were calculated from fMRI activation maps combined with electric field modeling on an individual-subject basis in order to standardize dosing at the targeted cortical location. Contrary to the a priori hypothesis, active rTMS significantly decreased accuracy relative to sham, and only in the hardest difficulty level. When compared to the results from our previous study, in which rTMS was applied over the left prefrontal cortex, we found equivalent effect sizes but opposite directionality suggesting a site-specific effect of rTMS. These results demonstrate engagement of cortical working memory processing using a novel TMS targeting approach, while also providing prescriptions for future studies seeking to enhance memory through rTMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lysianne Beynel
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
| | - Simon W. Davis
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, 3116 N Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704, USA;
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, 308 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA;
| | - Courtney A. Crowell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, 308 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA;
| | - Moritz Dannhauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
| | - Wesley Lim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
| | - Hannah Palmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
| | - Susan A. Hilbig
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
| | - Alexandra Brito
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
| | - Connor Hile
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
| | - Bruce Luber
- National Institute of Mental Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA;
| | - Sarah H. Lisanby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
- National Institute of Mental Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA;
| | - Angel V. Peterchev
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 305 Teer Engineering Building, Box 90271, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, 305 Teer Engineering Building, Box 90271, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3807 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Roberto Cabeza
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, 308 Research Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA;
- Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, 417 Chapel Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Lawrence G. Appelbaum
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Trent Drive, Box 3620 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (C.A.C.); (M.D.); (W.L.); (H.P.); (S.A.H.); (A.B.); (C.H.); (S.H.L.); (A.V.P.); (L.G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|