1
|
Johnson G, Singh H, Helewa RM, Sibley KM, Reynolds KA, El-Kefraoui C, Doupe MB. Gastroenterologist and surgeon perceptions of recommendations for optimal endoscopic localization of colorectal neoplasms. Sci Rep 2024; 14:13157. [PMID: 38849393 PMCID: PMC11161634 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63753-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
National consensus recommendations have recently been developed to standardize colorectal tumour localization and documentation during colonoscopy. In this qualitative semi-structured interview study, we identified and contrast the perceived barriers and facilitators to using these new recommendations according to gastroenterologists and surgeons in a large central Canadian city. Interviews were analyzed according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) through directed content analysis. Solutions were categorized using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework. Eleven gastroenterologists and ten surgeons participated. Both specialty groups felt that the new recommendations were clearly written, adequately addressed current care practice tensions, and offered a relative advantage versus existing practices. The new recommendations appeared appropriately complex, applicable to most participants, and could be trialed and adapted prior to full implementation. Major barriers included a lack of relevant external or internal organizational incentives, non-existing formal feedback processes, and a lack of individual familiarity with the evidence behind some recommendations. With application of the ERIC framework, common barriers could be addressed through accessing new funding, altering incentive structures, changing record systems, educational interventions, identifying champions, promoting adaptability, and employing audit/feedback processes. Future research is needed to test strategies for feasibility and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, AE101-820 Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
- Clinician Investigator Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
| | - Harminder Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, and CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Ramzi M Helewa
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, AE101-820 Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada
| | - Kathryn M Sibley
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Kristin A Reynolds
- Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Charbel El-Kefraoui
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, AE101-820 Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada
| | - Malcolm B Doupe
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coury J, Coronado G, Currier JJ, Kenzie ES, Petrik AF, Badicke B, Myers E, Davis MM. Methods for scaling up an outreach intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in rural areas. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:6. [PMID: 38191536 PMCID: PMC10775579 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00540-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach and patient navigation are evidence-based practices shown to improve rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) and follow-up in various settings, yet these programs have not been broadly adopted by health systems and organizations that serve diverse populations. Reasons for low adoption rates are multifactorial, and little research explores approaches for scaling up a complex, multi-level CRC screening outreach intervention to advance equity in rural settings. METHODS SMARTER CRC, a National Cancer Institute Cancer Moonshot project, is a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mailed FIT and patient navigation program involving 3 Medicaid health plans and 28 rural primary care practices in Oregon and Idaho followed by a national scale-up trial. The SMARTER CRC intervention combines mailed FIT outreach supported by clinics, health plans, and vendors and patient navigation for colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT result. We applied the framework from Perez and colleagues to identify the intervention's components (including functions and forms) and scale-up dissemination strategies and worked with a national advisory board to support scale-up to additional organizations. The team is recruiting health plans, primary care clinics, and regional and national organizations in the USA that serve a rural population. To teach organizations about the intervention, activities include Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) tele-mentoring learning collaboratives, a facilitation guide and other materials, a patient navigation workshop, webinars, and individualized technical assistance. Our primary outcome is program adoption (by component), measured 6 months after participation in an ECHO learning collaborative. We also assess engagement and adaptations (implemented and desired) to learn how the multicomponent intervention might be modified to best support broad scale-up. DISCUSSION Findings may inform approaches for adapting and scaling evidence-based approaches to promote CRC screening participation in underserved populations and settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04890054) and at the NCI's Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP no.: NCI-2021-01032) on May 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | | | - Jessica J Currier
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, USA
| | - Erin S Kenzie
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, OHSU, Portland, USA
| | | | - Brittany Badicke
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Emily Myers
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, OHSU, Portland, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, OHSU, Portland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weber MB, Rhodes EC, Ranjani H, Jeemon P, Ali MK, Hennink MM, Anjana RM, Mohan V, Narayan KMV, Prabhakaran D. Adapting and scaling a proven diabetes prevention program across 11 worksites in India: the INDIA-WORKS trial. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:134. [PMID: 37957783 PMCID: PMC10642065 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00516-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Structured lifestyle change education reduces the burden of cardiometabolic diseases such as diabetes. Delivery of these programs at worksites could overcome barriers to program adoption and improve program sustainability and reach; however, tailoring to the worksite setting is essential. METHODS The Integrating Diabetes Prevention in Workplaces (INDIA-WORKS) study tested the implementation and effectiveness of a multi-level program for reducing cardiometabolic disease risk factors at 11 large and diverse worksites across India. Herein, we describe and classify program adaptations reported during in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with worksite managers, program staff, and peer educators involved in program delivery, and program participants and drop-outs. We used thematic analysis to identify key themes in the data and classified reported program adaptations using the FRAME classification system. RESULTS Adaptations were led by worksite managers, peer educators, and program staff members. They occurred both pre- and during program implementation and were both planned (proactive) and unplanned (proactive and reactive). The most frequently reported adaptations to the individual-level intervention were curriculum changes to tailor lessons to the local context, make the program more appealing to the workers at the site, or add a wider variety of exercise options. Other content adaptations included improvements to the screening protocol, intervention scheduling, and outreach plans to tailor participant recruitment and retention to the sites. Environment-level content adaptations included expanding or leveraging healthy food and exercise options at the worksites. Challenges to adaptation included scheduling and worksite-level challenges. Participants discussed the need to continue adapting the program in the future to continue making it relevant for worksite settings and engaging for employees. CONCLUSION This study describes and classifies site-specific modifications to a structured lifestyle change education program with worksite-wide health improvements in India. This adds to the literature on implementation adaptation in general and worksite wellness in India, a country with a large and growing workforce with, or at risk of, serious cardiometabolic diseases. This information is key for program scale-up, dissemination, and implementation in other settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02813668. Registered June 27, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Beth Weber
- Emory Global Diabetes Research Center, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Elizabeth C Rhodes
- Emory Global Diabetes Research Center, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Harish Ranjani
- Madras Diabetes Research Foundation/Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Panniyammakal Jeemon
- Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India
| | - Mohammed K Ali
- Emory Global Diabetes Research Center, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Monique M Hennink
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ranjit M Anjana
- Madras Diabetes Research Foundation/Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Viswanathan Mohan
- Madras Diabetes Research Foundation/Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai, India
| | - K M Venkat Narayan
- Emory Global Diabetes Research Center, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dorairaj Prabhakaran
- Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India
- Centre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weber MB, Rhodes EC, Ranjani H, Jeemon P, Ali MK, Hennink MM, Anjana RM, Mohan V, Narayan KV, Prabhakaran D. Adapting and scaling a proven diabetes prevention program across 11 worksites in India: the INDIA-WORKS trial. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3143470. [PMID: 37577514 PMCID: PMC10418536 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3143470/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Background Delivery of proven structured lifestyle change education for reducing the burden of cardiometabolic diseases such as diabetes at worksites could overcome barriers to program adoption and improve sustainability and reach of these programs; however, tailoring to the worksite setting is essential. Methods The Integrating Diabetes Prevention in Workplaces (INDIA-WORKS) study tested the implementation and effectiveness of a multi-level program for reducing cardiometabolic disease risk factors at eleven large and diverse worksites across India. Herein, we describe and classify program adaptations reported during in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with worksite managers, program staff, peer educators involved in program delivery, and program participants and drop-outs. We used thematic analysis to identify key themes in the data and classified reported program adaptations using the FRAME classification system. Results Adaptations were led by worksite managers, peer educators, and program staff members. They occurred both pre- and during program implementation and were both planned (proactive) and unplanned (proactive and reactive). The most frequently reported adaptations to the individual-level intervention were curriculum changes to tailor lessons to the local context, make the program more appealing to the workers at the site, or add exercise options. Other content adaptations included improvements to the screening protocol, intervention scheduling, and outreach plans to tailor participant recruitment and retention to the sites. Environment-level content adaptations included expanding or leveraging healthy food and exercise options at the worksites. Challenges to adaptation included scheduling and worksite-level challenges. Participants discussed the need to continue adapting the program in the future to continue making it relevant for worksite settings and engaging for employees. Conclusion This study describes and classifies site-specific modifications to a structured lifestyle change education program with worksite-wide health improvements in India. This adds to the literature on implementation adaptation in general and worksite wellness in India, a country with a large and growing workforce with, or at risk of, serious cardiometabolic diseases. This information is key for program scale-up, dissemination, and implementation in other settings. Trial Registration Clinicaltrial.gov NCT02813668, registered June 27, 2016.
Collapse
|
5
|
Strayer TE, Spalluto LB, Burns A, Lindsell CJ, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Moghanaki D, Dittus RS, Vogus TJ, Audet C, Kripalani S, Roumie CL, Lewis JA. Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) to study adaptations in lung cancer screening delivery in the Veterans Health Administration: a cohort study. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:5. [PMID: 36635719 PMCID: PMC9836333 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00388-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer screening is a complex clinical process that includes identification of eligible individuals, shared decision-making, tobacco cessation, and management of screening results. Adaptations to the delivery process for lung cancer screening in situ are understudied and underreported, with the potential loss of important considerations for improved implementation. The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) allows for a systematic enumeration of adaptations to implementation of evidence-based practices. We applied FRAME to study adaptations in lung cancer screening delivery processes implemented by lung cancer screening programs in a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Enterprise-Wide Initiative. METHODS We prospectively conducted semi-structured interviews at baseline and 1-year intervals with lung cancer screening program navigators at 10 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) between 2019 and 2021. Using this data, we developed baseline (1st) process maps for each program. In subsequent years (year 1 and year 2), each program navigator reviewed the process maps. Adaptations in screening processes were identified, documented, and mapped to FRAME categories. RESULTS We conducted a total of 16 interviews across 10 VHA lung cancer screening programs (n=6 in year 1, n=10 in year 2) to collect adaptations. In year 1 (2020), six programs were operational and eligible. Of these, three reported adaptations to their screening process that were planned or in response to COVID-19. In year 2 (2021), all 10 programs were operational and eligible. Programs reported 14 adaptations in year 2. These adaptations were planned and unplanned and often triggered by increased workload; 57% of year 2 adaptations were related to the identification and eligibility of Veterans and 43% were related to follow-up with Veterans for screening results. Throughout the 2 years, adaptations related to data management and patient tracking occurred in 60% of programs to improve the data collection and tracking of Veterans in the screening process. CONCLUSIONS Using FRAME, we found that adaptations occurred primarily in the areas of patient identification and communication of results due to increased workload. These findings highlight navigator time and resource considerations for sustainability and scalability of existing and future lung cancer screening programs as well as potential areas for future intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas E Strayer
- Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lucy B Spalluto
- Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Abby Burns
- Veterans Health Administration-Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christopher J Lindsell
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Claudia I Henschke
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Veterans Health Administration - Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - David F Yankelevitz
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Drew Moghanaki
- Veterans Health Administration - Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert S Dittus
- Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Timothy J Vogus
- Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Carolyn Audet
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sunil Kripalani
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Christianne L Roumie
- Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jennifer A Lewis
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
- Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) and Medicine Service, Nashville, TN, USA.
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 1200, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arena L, Soloe C, Schlueter D, Ferriola-Bruckenstein K, DeGroff A, Tangka F, Hoover S, Melillo S, Subramanian S. Modifications in Primary Care Clinics to Continue Colorectal Cancer Screening Promotion During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Community Health 2023; 48:113-126. [PMID: 36308666 PMCID: PMC9617236 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-022-01154-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
COVID-19 caused significant declines in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Health systems and clinics, faced with a new rapidly spreading infectious disease, adapted to maintain patient safety and address the effects of the pandemic on healthcare delivery. This study aimed to understand how CDC-funded Colorectal Cancer Control Program recipients and their partner health systems and clinics may have modified evidence-based intervention (EBI) implementation to promote CRC screening during the COVID-19 pandemic; to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing modifications; and to extract lessons that can be applied to support CRC screening, chronic disease management, and clinic resilience in the face of future public health crises. Nine recipients were selected to reflect the diversity inherent among all CRCCP recipients. Recipient and clinic partner staff answered unique sets of pre-interview questions to inform tailoring of interview guides that were developed using constructs from the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The study team then interviewed recipient, health system, and clinic partner staff incorporating pre-interview responses to focus each conversation. We employed a rapid qualitative analysis approach then conducted virtual focus groups with recipient representatives to validate emergent themes. Three modifications that emerged from thematic analysis include: (1) offering mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits for CRC screening with mail or drop off return; (2) increasing the use of patient education and engagement strategies; and (3) increasing the use of or improving automated patient messaging systems. With improved tracking and automated reminder systems, mailed FIT kits paired with tailored patient education and clear instructions for completing the test could help primary care clinics catch up on the backlog of missed screenings during COVID-19. Future research can assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of offering mailed FIT kits on maintaining or improving CRC screening, especially among people who are medically underserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Arena
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
| | - Cindy Soloe
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA
| | - Dara Schlueter
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | - Amy DeGroff
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Florence Tangka
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Sonja Hoover
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA
| | - Stephanie Melillo
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Sujha Subramanian
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Coronado GD, Leo MC, Ramsey K, Coury J, Petrik AF, Patzel M, Kenzie ES, Thompson JH, Brodt E, Mummadi R, Elder N, Davis MM. Mailed fecal testing and patient navigation versus usual care to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening and follow-up colonoscopy in rural Medicaid enrollees: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:42. [PMID: 35418107 PMCID: PMC9006522 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00285-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Screening reduces incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC), yet US screening rates are low, particularly among Medicaid enrollees in rural communities. We describe a two-phase project, SMARTER CRC, designed to achieve the National Cancer Institute Cancer MoonshotSM objectives by reducing the burden of CRC on the US population. Specifically, SMARTER CRC aims to test the implementation, effectiveness, and maintenance of a mailed fecal test and patient navigation program to improve rates of CRC screening, follow-up colonoscopy, and referral to care in clinics serving rural Medicaid enrollees. Methods Phase I activities in SMARTER CRC include a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mailed fecal test and patient navigation program involving three Medicaid health plans and 30 rural primary care practices in Oregon and Idaho; the implementation of the program is supported by training and practice facilitation. Participating clinic units were randomized 1:1 into the intervention or usual care. The intervention combines (1) mailed fecal testing outreach supported by clinics, health plans, and vendors and (2) patient navigation for colonoscopy following an abnormal fecal test result. We will evaluate the effectiveness, implementation, and maintenance of the intervention and track adaptations to the intervention and to implementation strategies, using quantitative and qualitative methods. Our primary effectiveness outcome is receipt of any CRC screening within 6 months of enrollee identification. Our primary implementation outcome is health plan- and clinic-level rates of program delivery, by component (mailed FIT and patient navigation). Trial results will inform phase II activities to scale up the program through partnerships with health plans, primary care clinics, and regional and national organizations that serve rural primary care clinics; scale-up will include webinars, train-the-trainer workshops, and collaborative learning activities. Discussion This study will test the implementation, effectiveness, and scale-up of a multi-component mailed fecal testing and patient navigation program to improve CRC screening rates in rural Medicaid enrollees. Our findings may inform approaches for adapting and scaling evidence-based approaches to promote CRC screening participation in underserved populations and settings. Trial registration Registered at clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04890054) and at the NCI’s Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP #: NCI-2021-01032) on May 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Katrina Ramsey
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU Biostatistics and Design Program, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: CB669, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Mary Patzel
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Erin S Kenzie
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Jamie H Thompson
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Erik Brodt
- OHSU Family Medicine, OHSU School of Medicine, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Raj Mummadi
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Nancy Elder
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU Family Medicine, OHSU School of Medicine, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU Family Medicine, OHSU School of Medicine, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Davis MM, Schneider JL, Petrik AF, Miech EJ, Younger B, Escaron AL, Rivelli JS, Thompson JH, Nyongesa D, Coronado GD. Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff. Ann Fam Med 2022; 20:123-129. [PMID: 35346927 PMCID: PMC8959740 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) programs can facilitate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We sought to identify modifiable, clinic-level factors that distinguish primary care clinics with higher vs lower FIT completion rates in response to a centralized mailed FIT program. METHODS We used baseline observational data from 15 clinics within a single urban federally qualified health center participating in a pragmatic trial to optimize a mailed FIT program. Clinic-level data included interviews with leadership using a guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and FIT completion rates. We used template analysis to identify explanatory factors and configurational comparative methods to identify specific combinations of clinic-level conditions that uniquely distinguished clinics with higher and lower FIT completion rates. RESULTS We interviewed 39 clinic leaders and identified 58 potential explanatory factors representing clinic workflows and the CFIR inner setting domain. Clinic-level FIT completion rates ranged from 30% to 56%. The configurational model for clinics with higher rates (≥37%) featured any 1 of the following 3 factors related to support staff: (1) adding back- or front-office staff in past 12 months, (2) having staff help patients resolve barriers to CRC screening, and (3) having staff hand out FITs/educate patients. The model for clinics with lower rates involved the combined absence of these same 3 factors. CONCLUSIONS Three factors related to support staff differentiated clinics with higher and lower FIT completion rates. Adding nonphysician support staff and having those staff provide enabling services might help clinics optimize mailed FIT screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Department of Family Medicine, and School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Amanda F Petrik
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Edward J Miech
- Regenstrief Institute, Center for Health Services Research, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Brittany Younger
- AltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anne L Escaron
- AltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer S Rivelli
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jamie H Thompson
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Denis Nyongesa
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baldwin LM, Coronado GD, West II, Schwartz MR, Meenan RT, Vollmer WM, Petrik AF, Shapiro JA, Kulkarni-Sharma YR, Green BB. Health plan-based mailed fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening among dual-eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees: Outcomes of 2 program models. Cancer 2022; 128:410-418. [PMID: 34586630 PMCID: PMC9793727 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health insurance plans are increasingly offering mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but few studies have compared the outcomes of different program models (eg, invitation strategies). METHODS This study compares the outcomes of 2 health plan-based mailed FIT program models. In the first program (2016), FIT kits were mailed to all eligible enrollees; in the second program (2018), FIT kits were mailed only to enrollees who opted in after an outreach phone call. Participants in this observational study included dual-eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees who were aged 50 to 75 years and were due for CRC screening (1799 in 2016 and 1906 in 2018). Six-month FIT completion rates, implementation outcomes (eg, mailed FITs sent and reminders attempted), and program-related health plan costs for each program are described. RESULTS All 1799 individuals in 2016 were sent an introductory letter and a FIT kit. In 2018, all 1906 were sent an introductory letter, and 1905 received at least 1 opt-in call attempt, with 410 (21.5%) sent a FIT. The FIT completion rate was 16.2% (292 of 1799 [95% CI, 14.5%-17.9%]) in 2016 and 14.6% (278 of 1906 [95% CI, 13.0%-16.2%]) in 2018 (P = .36). The overall implementation costs were higher in 2016 ($40,156) than 2018 ($34,899), with the cost per completed FIT slightly higher in 2016 ($138) than 2018 ($126). CONCLUSIONS An opt-in mailed FIT program achieved FIT completion rates similar to those of a program mailing to all dual-eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees. LAY SUMMARY Health insurance plans can use different program models to successfully mail fecal test kits for colorectal cancer screening to dual-eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees, with nearly 1 in 6 enrollees completing fecal testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura-Mae Baldwin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Gloria D. Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Imara I. West
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Malaika R. Schwartz
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Richard T. Meenan
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - William M. Vollmer
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Amanda F. Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jean A. Shapiro
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Beverly B. Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kirk JW, Nilsen P, Andersen O, Stefánsdóttir NT, Grønfeldt B, Brødsgaard R, Pedersen BS, Bandholm T, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Pedersen MM. Adaptations and modifications to a co-designed intervention and its clinical implementation: a qualitative study in Denmark. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1108. [PMID: 34656126 PMCID: PMC8520628 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07142-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a long-standing debate in implementation research on whether adaptations to evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are desirable in health care. If an intervention is adapted and not delivered as conceived and planned, it is said to have low fidelity. The WALK-Cph project was developed based on the assumption that involving stakeholders in co-design processes would facilitate the fidelity of an intervention to increase the mobility of acutely admitted older medical patients and its implementation in two hospitals in Denmark. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyse adaptations and modifications that were made to the co-designed WALK-Cph intervention and its implementation. METHODS This study used a qualitative design. An ethnographic field study was performed using participant observations, workshops and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed twice using the Framework Method. The first analysis was based on the frameworks from Stirman, Moore and Proctor. The second analysis, a retrospective modifications analysis, was based on the Adaptation-Impact Framework. RESULTS Many different types of adaptations and modifications were made to the WALK-Cph intervention and its implementation plan. Most of the modifications were made on the contents of the intervention. In total, 44 adaptations and modifications were made, of which 21 were planned (adaptations) and 23 were made haphazardly (modifications). Most of the content and context adaptations and modifications made on the intervention had a mixed result regarding enhanced fidelity. The retrospective modifications analysis showed that modifications were ongoing and both situationally and contextually shaped. CONCLUSIONS Although an extensive co-design process was carried out to facilitate the fidelity of the WALK-Cph intervention, this study showed that many adaptations and modifications were still made to both the intervention and its implementation plan. It could indicate that the co-design process had a small effect or that adaptations and modifications are ongoing and both situationally and contextually shaped, which challenge the assumption and the desire to be able to plan and control changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Wassar Kirk
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark. .,Department of Public Health, Nursing, Aarhus University, Nordre Ringgade 1, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Per Nilsen
- Department of Health, Medical and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sandbäcksgatan 7, 582 25, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ove Andersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark
| | - Nina Thórný Stefánsdóttir
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark
| | - Birk Grønfeldt
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark
| | - Rasmus Brødsgaard
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark
| | - Britt Stævnsbo Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark.,Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Thomas Bandholm
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, and Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research-Copenhagen (PMR-C), Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen
- Department of Health and Social Context, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Mette Merete Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Low LL, A. B. Rahim FI, Hamzah NAR, Ismail MS. Process evaluation of enhancing primary health care for non-communicable disease management in Malaysia: Uncovering the fidelity & feasibility elements. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0245125. [PMID: 33428645 PMCID: PMC7799751 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In combating the increasing trend of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) over the last two decades in the country, the Ministry of Health Malaysia developed the Enhanced Primary Health Care (EnPHC) initiative to improve care management across different levels of the public service delivery network. An evaluation research component was embedded to explore the implementation issues in terms of fidelity, feasibility, adaptation and benefit of the initiative's components which were triage, care coordination, screening, risk management and referral system. METHODS A mixed methods study was conducted at 20 participating EnPHC clinics in Johor and Selangor, two months after the intervention was initiated. Data collected from self-reported forms and a structured observation checklist were descriptively analysed. In-depth interviews were also conducted with 20 participants across the clinics selected to clarify any information gaps observed in each clinic, and data were thematically analysed. RESULTS Evaluation showed that all components of EnPHC intervention had been successfully implemented except for the primary triage counter and visit checklist. The challenges were mainly discovered in terms of human resource and physical structure. Although human resource was a common implementation challenge across all interventions, clinic-specific issues could still be identified. Among the adaptive measures taken were task sharing among staff and workflow modification to match the clinic's capacity. Despite the challenges, early benefits of implementation were highlighted especially in terms of service outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The evaluation study disclosed issues of human resource and physical infrastructure when a supplementary intervention is implemented. To successfully achieve a scaled-up PHC service delivery model based on comprehensive management of NCDs patient-centred care, the adaptive measures in local clinic context highlight the importance of collaboration between good organisational process and good clinical practice and process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Lan Low
- Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Fathullah Iqbal A. B. Rahim
- Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Nur Aqlili Riana Hamzah
- Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Safiee Ismail
- Family Health Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|