Effect of contact with podiatry in a team approach context on diabetic foot ulcer and lower extremity amputation: systematic review and meta-analysis

Enhancing diabetic foot management: Advocating for independent prescribing rights for podiatrists in South Africa

Diabetic foot complications are serious issues resulting from uncontrolled diabetes, primarily affecting the feet. Common complications include diabetic neuropathy, ulcers, PAD, Charcot foot, and gangrene. Preventive measures include controlling blood glucose levels, regular foot inspections, proper foot care, wearing appropriate footwear, and seeking prompt medical attention. A holistic approach to diabetic foot management is crucial due to the complex interplay of physiological, psychological, and environmental factors. Glycaemic control is essential for mitigating neuropathy and vasculopathy, while cardiovascular risk factors like hypertension and dyslipidemia are crucial for preventing complications. In South Africa, podiatrists play a crucial role in diabetic foot care, offering specialized expertise in the assessment, management, and prevention of foot complications associated with diabetes mellitus. They collaborate closely with other healthcare professionals to ensure comprehensive and coordinated care.Pharmacological management is a crucial aspect of podiatric care in the UK, where podiatrists use various medications to treat foot conditions effectively. In South Africa, podiatrists lack prescribing authority, leading to limited treatment options, dependency on referrals, and disparities in access to care. This fragmented approach can compromise patient outcomes, especially in chronic conditions like diabetes. To improve patient outcomes and promote optimal foot condition management, policy reforms, interdisciplinary collaboration, and professional advocacy efforts are needed.Policy recommendations for expanding podiatrist prescribing privileges include legislative reforms, regulatory framework updates, and professional accreditation. Legislative reforms could involve amending existing healthcare laws or introducing new regulations that recognize podiatrists as authorized prescribers. Regulatory framework updates should involve working with regulatory bodies to establish prescribing standards, prescribing limitations, and mechanisms for ongoing oversight and accountability. Professional accreditation should ensure educational programs for podiatrists incorporate training in pharmacology, pharmacotherapy, and prescribing practices to prepare graduates for the expanded scope of practice.Stakeholders in South Africa can improve diabetes management by advocating for policy reforms, professional recognition, and patient empowerment initiatives. By aligning policy, practice, education, research, and advocacy efforts, stakeholders can create a supportive ecosystem that fosters innovation, collaboration, and continuous improvement in diabetic foot care.

A systematic review of diabetic foot infections: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management strategies

Background

Diabetic foot infection represents a significant complication of diabetes mellitus, contributing substantially to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure worldwide. Accurate diagnosis relies on a comprehensive assessment integrating clinical evaluation, imaging studies, and microbiological analysis. Management necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, encompassing surgical intervention, antimicrobial therapy, and advanced wound care strategies. Preventive measures are paramount in reducing the incidence and severity, emphasizing patient education, regular foot screenings, and early intervention.

Methods

The researchers performed a systematic review of literature using PUBMED MESH keywords. Additionally, the study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews at the Center for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York (CRD42021277788). This review provides a comprehensive overview of the microbial spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility patterns observed in diabetic foot infections.

Results

The search through the databases finally identified 13 articles with 2545 patients from 2021 to 2023. Overall, the predominant Gram-positive microbial species isolated were Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus fecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Whereas the predominant Gram-negative included Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Conclusion

Diabetic foot infections represent a complex and multifaceted clinical entity, necessitating a holistic approach to diagnosis, management, and prevention. Limited high-quality research data on outcomes and the effectiveness of guideline recommendations pose challenges in updating and refining existing DFI management guidelines.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021277788, identifier CRD42021277788.

Effect of a multidisciplinary team approach in patients with diabetic foot ulcers on major adverse limb events (MALEs): systematic review and meta-analysis for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome

The treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is extremely complex, requiring a comprehensive approach that involves a variety of different healthcare professionals. Several studies have shown that a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is useful to achieve good clinical outcomes, reducing major and minor amputation and increasing the chance of healing. Despite this, the multidisciplinary approach is not always a recognized treatment strategy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effects of an MDT approach on major adverse limb events, healing, time-to-heal, all-cause mortality, and other clinical outcomes in patients with active DFUs. The present meta-analysis was performed for the purpose of developing Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot with the support of the Italian Society of Diabetology (Società Italiana di Diabetologia, SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD). The study was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. All randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with a duration of at least 26 weeks, which compared the MDT approach with any other organizational strategy in the management of patients with DFUs were considered. Animal studies were excluded. A search of Medline and Embase databases was performed up until the May 1st, 2023. Patients managed by an MDT were reported to have better outcomes in terms of healing, minor and major amputation, and survival in comparison with those managed using other approaches. No data were found on quality of life, returning-to-walking, and emergency admission. Authors concluded that the MDT may be effective in improving outcomes in patients with DFUs.

Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on an Interdisciplinary Team Approach: Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study of Patients' Views on Quality of Care

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' perception and quality of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care delivered by an interdisciplinary team approach (ITA).

DESIGN

Exploratory cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Twenty patients with a healed plantar DFU were recruited from an interdisciplinary Wound Care clinic of a Canadian University affiliated hospital. Their mean age was 64 years (75% were males [n = 15]), 18 (90%) were living with type 2 diabetes, and 45% (n = 9) had osteomyelitis in the previous year of their enrollment in the study.

METHODS

The validated short form of the Quality From the Patient's Perspective questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of care dimensions (medical-technical competence of the caregivers; physical-technical conditions of the care organization; degree of identity-orientation in the attitudes and actions of the caregivers; and sociocultural atmosphere of the care organization).

RESULTS

Respondents reported experiencing a high level of quality care with an ITA. All indicators of patient-perceived reality of care delivered were superior or equal related to their subjective importance in all dimensions of quality care (with scores ranging from 3.85 to 4.00 on a 4-Point Likert scale). Patients' satisfaction regarding the ITA was high.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings suggest that an ITA model provided high quality of care for treating DFUs for all quality dimensions judged important for patients.

Developing an interprofessional decision support tool for diabetic foot ulcers management in primary care within the family medicine group model: a Delphi study in Canada

BACKGROUND

Primary care professionals encounter difficulties coordinating the continuum of care between primary care providers and second-line specialists and adhere to practice guidelines pertaining to diabetic foot ulcers management. Family medicine groups are providing primary care services aimed to improve access, interdisciplinary care, coordination and quality of health services, and reduce emergency department visits. Most professionals working in family medicine groups are primary care physicians and registered nurses. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an interprofessional decision support tool to guide the management of diabetic foot ulcers for primary care professionals working within the family medicine group model.

METHODS

A one-page decision tool developed by the research team was validated by an expert panel using a three-round Delphi protocol held between December 2019 and August 2021. The tool includes 43 individual actions and a care pathway from initial presentation to secondary prevention. Data collection was realized with both paper and electronic questionnaires, and answers were compiled in an electronic spreadsheet. Data was analyzed with use of descriptive statistics, and consensus for each item was defined as ≥ 80% agreement.

RESULTS

Experts from 12 pre-identified professions of the diabetic foot ulcer interdisciplinary care team were included, 39 participants out of the 59 invited to first round (66.1%), 34 out of 39 for second (87.2%) and 22 out of 34 for third (64.7%) rounds. All items included in the final version of the decision support tool reached consensus and were deemed clear, relevant and feasible. One or more professionals were identified to be responsible for every action to be taken.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided a comprehensive decision support tool to guide primary care professionals in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Implementation and evaluation in the clinical setting will need to be undertaken in the future.

Experiences and impact of a rural Australian high-risk foot service: A multiple-methods study

OBJECTIVE

Most podiatry-led high-risk foot services (HRFS) in Australia are located in metropolitan areas or large regional centres. In rural areas, where there are limited specialist services, individuals with diabetes-related foot ulceration are more likely to undergo amputation. This study aimed to explore clinicians' perceptions of a recently implemented HRFS in rural New South Wales, Australia, and compare trends of amputation and hospitalisation prior to and post-implementation of the service.

SETTING

Rural HRFS in Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Health professionals working within the HRFS were recruited to participate.

DESIGN

This was a multiple-methods study. For the qualitative arm, semi-structured interviews were conducted, which were analysed using a reflexive thematic approach. The quantitative arm of the study utilised a retrospective analytic design which applied an interrupted time series to compare amputation and hospitalisation trends pre- and post-implementation of the HRFS utilising diagnostic and procedural ICD codes.

RESULTS

The qualitative arm of the study derived three themes: (1) navigating the divide, (2) rural community and rural challenges and (3) professional identity. Results of the interrupted time series indicate that there was a downward trend in major amputations following implementation of the HRFS; however, this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians were aware of the inequity in DFD outcomes between rural and metropolitan areas and were committed to improving outcomes, particularly with respect to First Nations peoples. Future research will explore service use and amputation rates in the longer term to further evaluate this specialised multidisciplinary care in a rural community.

Podiatrist intervention could reduce the incidence of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes: a hospital survey in China

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of podiatrists in preventing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in China.

METHOD

The study was a prospective investigation. A total of 300 patients were enrolled from May 2016 to May 2018 in Handan Central Hospital, China. All patients who participated in this study had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). All participants underwent our survey, which included basic patient data and information about DFUs. The patients were followed for one year, during which time they received appropriate intervention from podiatrists, including lifestyle guidance, callus resection, tinea grinding and ingrown nail correction. At the end of the year all the patients were surveyed again. The data before and after the year were statistically compared.

RESULTS

The results showed that the incidence of DFUs in patients with diabetes was significantly decreased after one year of intervention from podiatrists (20.7% versus 6.7%, p<0.001). Additionally, there was a negative correlation between the number of intervention visits and the number of DFU occurrences (Spearman correlation coefficient: -0.496, p<0.001). Furthermore, we found that 68 patients with a history of DFUs or amputation had an obviously reduced incidence of DFUs after intervention by a podiatrist (89.7% versus 27.9%, p<0.001). We also investigated other foot risk factors in all participants, such as limb neuropathy (76.3%), lower extremity vascular disease (65.7%) and foot paralysis (43.7%).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study help in understanding the situation of patients with diabetes in China and to prove that standardised podiatrist intervention has an important role in inhibiting the occurrence and development of DFUs.

Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Program in Reducing Regional Hospitalization Rates for Patients With Diabetes-Related Foot Complications

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the toe and flow model (TFM), a limb preservation program led by podiatric surgeons in Alberta, Canada, for its impact on hospitalization rates and length of stay (LOS) in patients with diabetic foot complication (DFC). Diabetes, a leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations (LEAs) in Canada, often results in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), a major cause of infection, amputation, and hospitalization. TFM has reportedly reduced amputation rates by 39% to 56%.

METHODS

The study analyzed Alberta's health database from 2007 to 2017, focusing on diabetes patients aged 20 and above. It included patients with various DFCs and compared outcomes in regions using TFM and standard of care (SOC). The study also examined data from two major cities, one with TFM and the other without, including rural referrals to Calgary and Edmonton. The data were normalized for the diabetic population and analyzed using a standard Student's t-test.

RESULTS

TFM regions showed significantly lower hospitalization rates (p = 1.22E-12) than SOC regions. Over 11 years, TFM maintained lower average and median LOS by 0.13 and 0.26 days, respectively. TFM access reduced hospitalization risk by up to 30%, and patients in TFM regions had a 21% shorter LOS compared to SOC regions.

CONCLUSION

Despite similar demographics and healthcare systems, the TFM region benefited from a dedicated multidisciplinary program and comprehensive limb preservation services. The study shows that TFM effectively reduces hospitalizations and LOS for DFCs, with significantly better outcomes in the TFM region than in SOC regions.

Foot and Ankle Care by Podiatrists and Amputations in Patients With Diabetes and Kidney Failure

Importance

Patients with kidney failure have an increased risk of diabetes-related foot complications. The benefit of regular foot and ankle care in this at-risk population is unknown.

Objective

To investigate foot and ankle care by podiatrists and the outcomes of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in patients with kidney failure.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes receiving dialysis who had a new DFU diagnosis. The analysis of the calendar year 2016 to 2019 data from the United States Renal Data System was performed on June 15, 2023, with subsequent updates on December 11, 2023.

Exposures

Foot and ankle care by podiatrists during 3 months prior to DFU diagnosis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcomes were a composite of death and/or major amputation, as well as major amputation alone. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate 2 to 3 years of amputation-free survival. Foot and ankle care by podiatrists and the composite outcome was examined using inverse probability-weighted Cox regression, while competing risk regression models were used for the analysis of amputation alone.

Results

Among the 14 935 adult patients with kidney failure and a new DFU (mean [SD] age, 59.3 [12.7] years; 35.4% aged ≥65 years; 8284 men [55.4%]; Asian, 2.7%; Black/African American, 35.0%; Hispanic, 17.7%; White, 58.5%), 18.4% (n = 2736) received care by podiatrists in the 3 months before index DFU diagnosis. These patients were older, more likely to be male, and have more comorbidities than those without prior podiatrist visits. Over a mean (SD) 13.5 (12.0)-month follow-up, 70% of those with podiatric care experienced death and/or major amputation, compared with 74% in the nonpodiatric group. Survival probabilities at 36 months were 26.3% vs 22.8% (P < .001, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis). In multivariate regression analysis, foot and ankle care was associated with an 11% lower likelihood of death and/or amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 95% CI, 0.84-0.93) and a 9% lower likelihood of major amputation (above or below knee) (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99) than those who did not.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest that patients with kidney failure at risk for DFUs who receive foot and ankle care from podiatrists may be associated with a reduced likelihood of diabetes-related amputations.

The impact of community teaching sessions on onward referral to specialist diabetic foot services

INTRODUCTION

Prompt referral of patients with diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) to specialist services can lead to more timely assessment of these patients and subsequent improved rates of limb salvage and patient outcomes. In this study we wanted to determine the impact of education in the primary care setting on onward referrals to our specialist Diabetic Foot multi-disciplinary team (MDT) clinic.

METHODS

As part of a Diabetic Foot Roadshow, four teaching sessions were delivered in primary care settings across Shropshire by our specialist team from 17th March to the 25th May 2022. Attendees included podiatrists, tissue viability nurses, district nurses and wound care practitioners. Hospital records were used to identify all onward referrals to our Diabetic Foot MDT clinic in the weeks before and after delivery of the roadshow education sessions.

RESULTS

184 referrals were made to the diabetic foot clinic from January to July 2022. There were 0.3 referrals per day in the months prior to the commencement of the education sessions, compared to 1.5 referrals per day following the commencement of the teaching sessions. This increase in referrals was statistically significant (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Teaching sessions delivered to community specialist healthcare professionals significantly increase onward referral of patients to specialist services, facilitating more timely assessment and management of patients with DFUs.

Adjunctive topical oxygen therapy in the management of complex diabetes-related wounds: A South African case study series

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The essential role of oxygen in the treatment of DFUs is documented. Indicated for use on a variety of wound types, topical haemoglobin therapy (Granulox®) is a novel therapeutic technology that binds atmospheric oxygen and improves the availability of oxygen at the wound site. When used as part of the wound management strategy, this therapy helps to reduce inflammation, exudate and slough, and promotes wound healing. In South Africa, health resources, coordinated foot care and podiatry, and data on diabetic foot complications are limited. Twelve patient case studies assessing the impact of adding topical haemoglobin therapy to the management regimes for DFUs and surgical (post-amputation) wounds were undertaken in South Africa. Patients were aged 50-71 years, and all had diabetes mellitus. At baseline, the area of the wounds ranged from 10.2 to 149.6 cm2 with depths ranging from 0.2 to 0.9 cm. Clinical signs of wound infection and high levels of viscous exudate were recorded in all cases. Wound dressings were changed twice weekly and sharp debridement of the wound performed as necessary. The wounds were cleansed and then completely coated with a thin film of Granulox® and dressings applied. Treatment was monitored over periods ranging from 57 to 276 days, during which dressings were changed and Granulox® administered to the wounds, ranging from 16 to 79 times. During the period of evaluation, wound size steadily reduced (by 87.1-100%), the condition of the wound bed tissue and peri-wound skin improved, and clinical signs of wound infection steadily resolved. Wounds significantly improved in two patients, almost healed in six patients, and healed in four patients. All patients reported a reduction in malodour and pain; seven patients were pain-free at the final followup assessment. The overall impression of Granulox® was rated as 'very good' by the clinicians, who considered that Granulox® facilitated an increase in tissue viability, with the promotion of granulation tissue, and stimulated epithelialisation.

Development of the Italian clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome: design and methodological aspects

AIMS

Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) and its complications are a growing public health concern. The Italian Society of Diabetology (SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (AMD), in collaboration with other scientific societies, will develop the first Italian guidelines for the treatment of DFS.

METHODS

The creation of SID/AMD Guidelines is based on an extended work made by 19 panelists and 12 members of the Evidence Review Team. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology has been used to decide aims, reference population, and target health professionals. Clinical questions have been created using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) conceptual framework. The definition of questions has been performed using a two-step web-based Delphi methodology, a structured technique aimed at obtaining by repeated rounds of questionnaires a consensus opinion from a panel of experts in areas wherein evidence is scarce or conflicting, and opinion is important.

RESULTS

The mean age of panelists (26.3% women) was 53.7 ± 10.6 years. The panel proposed 34 questions. A consensus was immediately reached for all the proposed questions, 32 were approved and 2 were rejected.

CONCLUSIONS

The areas covered by clinical questions included diagnosis of ischemia and infection, treatment of ischemic, neuropathic, and infected ulcers, prevention of foot ulceration, organization and education issues, and surgical management. The PICO presented in this paper are designed to provide indications for healthcare professionals in charge of diabetic foot treatment and prevention, primarily based on clinical needs of people with diabetic foot syndrome and considering the existing organization of health care.

Impact of Podiatric Surgery Consultation for Foot and Ankle Wounds on Patient Outcomes in a Community Hospital

Previous studies have demonstrated that timely podiatric surgery consultation results in positive patient outcomes. However, there are limited studies focused on readmission rates in teaching community hospitals. The primary aim of this study is to determine if consulting podiatric services was associated with lower 30-day readmission rates and impact on length of stay in patients with lower extremity wounds. The secondary aim was to investigate medical and socio-economic factors associated with better outcomes. This study was a cross-sectional descriptive study. A retrospective chart review utilizing the hospital's electronic medical record system identified patients with lower extremity wounds (based on ICD-10 codes) admitted between July 2018 and December 2020. The results showed a 3-fold decrease in 30-day readmission rates in patients with podiatric surgery consultation compared to patients without consultation with lower extremity wounds (4.2% vs 11.3%, p = .03). Multivariate regression models showed patients with gangrene (AOR = 7.61; p = .04) or osteomyelitis (AOR = 9.07; p = .013) had a higher likelihood of readmission than patients with venous ulcer (reference category) after controlling for podiatric consultation. Among the group of patients with podiatric consultation, earlier podiatric consultations resulted in decreased length of stay. This study identifies prior amputation history and lack of podiatric consultation increased 30-day readmission rates.

Risk Factors for Ulcer Recurrence in Diabetic Patients Managed by an Integrated Foot Care Protocol

The aim of our study was to identify risk factors for the recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in a selected population of patients in secondary prevention treated, according to International Guidelines, with an integrated foot care protocol by a referral diabetic foot clinic. A retrospective study was performed with the inclusion of selected outpatients with diabetes at higher risk for ulceration with a history of previous ulcer and/or amputation followed in our diabetic foot clinic between January 2015 and December 2021. According to the presence or absence of recurrence, patients were divided into 2 groups: ulcer recurrence and without ulcer recurrence. One hundred twenty-seven (127) patients were included, 47 patients (37%) developed an ulcer recurrence while 80 patients (63%) did not. The mean age was 71.7 years; 65% were male; 97% were affected by type 2 diabetes with a mean duration of 21.1 years, the mean HbA1c was 63 + 21 mmol/mol. Both groups of patients had foot deformities, such as claw and hammertoes; hallux valgus, and prominent metatarsal heads (MTHs). The presence of deformity was significantly associated with ulceration. The group with ulcer recurrence showed a higher rate of prominence MTHs in comparison to a group without ulcer recurrence. The MTHs resulted as the only independent predictor for recurrence. This study shows that the presence of the prominent MTH is a significant risk factor for ulcer recurrence in a selected population of diabetic foot patients treated in the best way with integrated foot care.

Diabetic foot complications among Indigenous peoples in Canada: a scoping review through the PROGRESS-PLUS equity lens

Introduction

Indigenous peoples in Canada face a disproportionate burden of diabetes-related foot complications (DRFC), such as foot ulcers, lower extremity amputations (LEA), and peripheral arterial disease. This scoping review aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of DRFC among First Nations, Métis, and Inuit peoples in Canada, incorporating an equity lens.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted based on Arksey and O'Malley refined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The PROGRESS-Plus framework was utilized to extract data and incorporate an equity lens. A critical appraisal was performed, and Indigenous stakeholders were consulted for feedback. We identified the incorporation of patient-oriented/centered research (POR).

Results

Of 5,323 records identified, 40 studies were included in the review. The majority of studies focused on First Nations (92%), while representation of the Inuit population was very limited populations (< 3% of studies). LEA was the most studied outcome (76%). Age, gender, ethnicity, and place of residence were the most commonly included variables. Patient-oriented/centered research was mainly included in recent studies (16%). The overall quality of the studies was average. Data synthesis showed a high burden of DRFC among Indigenous populations compared to non-Indigenous populations. Indigenous identity and rural/remote communities were associated with the worse outcomes, particularly major LEA.

Discussion

This study provides a comprehensive understanding of DRFC in Indigenous peoples in Canada of published studies in database. It not only incorporates an equity lens and patient-oriented/centered research but also demonstrates that we need to change our approach. More data is needed to fully understand the burden of DRFC among Indigenous peoples, particularly in the Northern region in Canada where no data are previously available. Western research methods are insufficient to understand the unique situation of Indigenous peoples and it is essential to promote culturally safe and quality healthcare.

Conclusion

Efforts have been made to manage DRFC, but continued attention and support are necessary to address this population's needs and ensure equitable prevention, access and care that embraces their ways of knowing, being and acting.

Systematic review registration

Open Science Framework https://osf.io/j9pu7, identifier j9pu7.

Development of the consensus-based recommendations for Podiatry care of Neuropathy In Cancer Survivors (PodNICS): a Delphi consensus study of Australian podiatrists

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) is the most common presenting side effect of chemotherapy. As a sensory based neuropathy, this condition can persist for a long time after cessation of chemotherapy and impact the quality of life of cancer survivors. Podiatrists in Australia have been managing people with CIPN related lower limb complications, however guidelines on management of CIPN do not exist. The aim of this study was to achieve consensus and agreement of Australian podiatrists on strategies to best manage people presenting with symptoms of CIPN.

METHODS

An online three-round modified Delphi survey of Australian podiatrists with expertise in CIPN was conducted in line with recommendations for conducting and reporting of Delphi studies (CREDES). Panellists responded to open-ended questions in Round 1, whereupon their responses were themed into statements and analysed for existing consensus. Statements not reaching consensus were returned during Round 2 to seek agreement from responders using a five-point Likert scale and to allow responders to make further comments. For a statement to reach consensus or agreement, 70% or more of panellists needed to make the same comment or agree or strongly agree with the same themed statement. Statements reaching 50 to 69% consensus or agreement were returned to panellists in Round 3 for them to consider their responses in the light of group outcomes.

RESULTS

Round one resulted in 229 comments from 21 of 26 podiatrists who agreed to participate. These comments were themed into 53 statements with 11 consensus statements accepted. Round 2 resulted in 22 statements reaching agreement, and 15 new statements being generated from 18 comments made by 17 respondents. Round 3 resulted in 11 statements reaching agreement. Outcomes were developed into a set of clinical recommendations for diagnosis and management of people presenting with CIPN. These recommendations provide guidance on 1) identifying common signs and symptoms of CIPN including sensory, motor and autonomic symptoms; 2) diagnosis and assessment of CIPN including neurological, motor and dermatological assessment modalities; and 3) best clinical practice and management strategies for CIPN identified by podiatrists including both podiatry and non-podiatry specific care.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study in podiatry literature to develop expert-informed consensus-based recommendations for clinical presentation, diagnosis and assessment and management of people with CIPN. These recommendations aim to help guide podiatrists in the consistent care of people with CIPN.

Diabetic foot ulcers: weekly versus second-weekly conservative sharp wound debridement

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a serious and costly long-term complication of diabetes, and are one of the most prevalent hard-to-heal (chronic) wound types. Conservative sharp wound debridement (CSWD) is a mainstay of care. It is performed regularly until healing is achieved (when there is adequate blood flow for healing) to support endogenous healing and improve the efficacy of advanced healing therapies. CSWD is supported by evidence-based treatment guidelines, despite a lack of prospective studies. The first prospective randomised study to compare different frequencies of CSWD-the Diabetes Debridement Study (DDS)-showed no difference in healing outcomes at 12 weeks between those ulcers debrided weekly and those debrided every second week. A DFU may require more or less frequent debridement according to individual wound characteristics; however, the new data from DDS can inform clinical decisions and service provision. The implications of weekly versus second-weekly debridement are discussed.

A Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Case Study

ABSTRACT

A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is the most efficient way to treat many chronic and serious diseases. In this case report, providers sought to implement an MDT approach to treat a patient with diabetes and foot ulcers, actively involving the patient's caregiving family members. Comprehensive evaluation, blood sugar control, and timely referral were established as the primary treatment course. Negative-pressure wound therapy was applied to completely remove necrotic tissue debris and seropurulent discharge from the foot ulcers under the consultation of the MDT team. Local wound management, protection of the periwound skin, and health education for the patient's wound care nurse specialists were integral to the treatment outcome. After 3 months of treatment, the patient's right foot wound bed was improved, and further skin-grafting surgery was performed to accelerate the healing process during follow-up treatments.

What are the current diabetic foot assessment methods in private podiatry practices in Flanders, Belgium: an exploratory mixed method study

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot assessments detect patients at risk for developing a diabetes-related foot ulceration and can significantly reduce the risk of amputation. In order to organize this assessment effectively, diabetic foot assessment guidelines are required according to the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot. However, these international guidelines have not been adapted into a national guideline for podiatrists in Flanders, Belgium. This study aims to identify the methods and guidelines currently used to assess the diabetic foot in private podiatry practices in Flanders, Belgium and to explore the podiatrists' opinions on developing a national diabetic foot assessment guideline.

METHODS

This exploratory mixed method study was composed of an anonymous online survey comprising of open- and closed-ended questions followed by 1:1 online semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited via e-mail and a closed private Facebook group of podiatry alumni. Data was analyzed using SPSS statistics and thematic analysis described by Braun and Clarke.

RESULTS

This study showed that the vascular assessment of the diabetic foot exists solely of a medical history and palpation of the pedal pulses. Non-invasive tests such as doppler, toe brachial pressure index or ankle brachial pressure index are seldom used. Only 66% reported to use a guideline for the diabetic foot assessment. There was a variety of reported guidelines and risk stratification systems in use in private podiatry practices in Flanders, Belgium.

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive tests such as the doppler, ankle brachial pressure index or toe brachial pressure index are rarely used for the vascular assessment of the diabetic foot. Diabetic foot assessment guidelines and risk stratification systems to identify patients at risk for developing a diabetic foot ulcer were not frequently used. International guidelines of the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot have not yet been implemented in private podiatry practices in Flanders, Belgium. This exploratory research has provided useful information for future research studies.

Upstream comprehensive management of individuals with diabetes with multimorbidity and frailty to act against amputation

This manuscript constitutes a commentary on: "Retrospective cohort study of long-term outcomes and prognostic factors for survival after lower extremity amputation in patients with diabetes" by Vuorlaakso et al. (2023). We aim to contribute to the reflection of their findings to support the comprehensive management of vulnerable individuals with multimorbidity and/frailty for limb preservation. There is an urgent need to understand the effects of frailty on overall survival after amputation, survival without major amputation, and the effect modification with multimorbidity.

Disparities in limb preservation and associated socioeconomic burden among patients with diabetes and/or peripheral artery disease in the United States

Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in limb preservation and nontraumatic lower extremity amputation (LEA) are consistently demonstrated in populations with diabetes and peripheral artery disease (PAD). Higher rates of major LEA in disadvantaged groups are associated with increased health care utilization and higher costs of care. Functional decline that often follows major LEA confers substantial risk of disability and premature mortality, and the burden of these outcomes is more prevalent in racial and ethnic minority groups, people with low socioeconomic status, and people in geographic regions where limited resources or distance from specialty care are barriers to access. We present a narrative review of the existing literature on estimated costs of diabetic foot disease and PAD, inequalities in care that contribute to excess costs, and disparities in outcomes that lead to a disproportionate burden of diabetes- and PAD-related LEA on systematically disadvantaged populations.

Retrospective cohort study of long-term outcomes and prognostic factors for survival after lower extremity amputation in patients with diabetes

AIMS

Lower extremity amputation (LEA) is a pivotal event for patients with diabetes. This study aimed to provide updated data on the outcomes and prognostic factors after LEA for patients with diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all LEAs (n = 1081) performed at Tampere University Hospital between February 2007 and September 2020. Overall survival (OS) and major amputation-free survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

Index amputation level was below ankle in 65 % (n = 704) of patients, below knee in 14 % (n = 154) of patients, and above knee in 21 % (n = 223) of patients. In the whole population, OS was 75.8 % (CI 95 %: 73.3-78.3) at one year and 38.3 % (CI 95 %: 34.7-41.7) at five years. Higher age, peripheral artery disease (PAD), more proximal amputation level, and lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduced OS. Multiple amputations and diagnosed dyslipidemia or hypertension associated with improved OS. Further, age, PAD, and GFR were identified as significant factors for major amputation free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

OS after LEA is poor. After major amputation, the risk for death is higher compared to minor amputation. Recurrent amputation is associated with improved OS. Further, ischemia and renal disease are significant factors for inferior OS.

Reliability of the evidence to guide decision-making in foot ulcer prevention in diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews

Background

Reliable evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent diabetes-related foot ulceration is essential to inform clinical practice. Well-conducted systematic reviews that synthesise evidence from all relevant trials offer the most robust evidence for decision-making. We conducted an overview to assess the comprehensiveness and utility of the available secondary evidence as a reliable source of robust estimates of effect with the aim of informing a cost-effective care pathway using an economic model. Here we report the details of the overview. [PROSPERO Database (CRD42016052324)].

Methods

Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Epistomonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE), and the Health Technology Assessment Journals Library were searched to 17th May 2021, without restrictions, for systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of preventive interventions in people with diabetes. The primary outcomes of interest were new primary or recurrent foot ulcers. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included reviews.

Findings

The overview identified 30 systematic reviews of patient education, footwear and off-loading, complex and other interventions. Many are poorly reported and have fundamental methodological shortcomings associated with increased risk of bias. Most concerns relate to vague inclusion criteria (60%), weak search or selection strategies (70%) and quality appraisal methods (53%) and inexpert conduct and interpretation of quantitative and narrative evidence syntheses (57%). The 30 reviews have collectively assessed 26 largely poor-quality RCTs with substantial overlap.

Interpretation

The majority of these systematic reviews of the effectiveness of interventions to prevent diabetic foot ulceration are at high risk of bias and fail to provide reliable evidence for decision-making. Adherence to the core principles of conducting and reporting systematic reviews is needed to improve the reliability of the evidence generated to inform clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01738-y.

Outcomes of Hallux Amputation Versus Partial First Ray Resection in People with Non-Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pragmatic Observational Cohort Study

There are few data comparing outcomes after hallux amputation or partial first ray resection after diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). In a similar context, the choice to perform one of these two surgeries is attributable to clinician preference based on experience and characteristics of the patient and the DFU. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the more definitive surgery between hallux amputation and partial first ray resection. We abstracted data from a cohort of 70 patients followed for a 1-year postoperative period to support clinical practice. We also attempted to identify patient characteristics leading to these outcomes. Our results suggested no statistical difference between the type of surgery and outcomes such as recurrence of DFU and amputation at 3, 6, and 12 months or death. However, there was a statistically significantly increased likelihood of re-ulceration for patients with CAD who underwent hallux amputation (p = 0.02). There was also a significantly increased likelihood of re-ulceration for people with depression or a history when the partial ray resection was performed (p = 0.02). Patients with prior amputation showed a higher probability of undergoing another re-amputation with partial ray resection (p = 0.01). Although the trends that emerge from this project are limited to what is observed in this statistical context, where the number of patients included and the number of total observations per outcome were limited, it highlights interesting data for future research to inform clinical decisions to support best practices for the benefit of patients.

Evolution of WIfI: Expansion of WIfI Notation After Intervention

Nearly a decade ago, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS)'s wound, ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification was first developed to help assess overall limb threat. However, managing conditions such as diabetic foot ulcer and chronic limb-threatening ischemia can be complex. For instance, certain investigative findings might initially be pending such as the level of ischemia or extent of infection before the final classification is established. In addition, wounds evolve rapidly, and the current classification does not allow for tracking their progression over time during treatment. Therefore, we propose a supplemental consistent notation for scoring WifI re-assessment during treatment of a threatened limb inspired by the cancer staging before and after neoadjuvant treatment classification system. Thus, we describe the re-scoring system and how to use it. Our suggestion supports a coherent method to longitudinally communicate characteristics of a threatened limb. This has potential to support high quality interdisciplinary, patient-centered care and enhance the use of this classification in research. Further work is required to validate this modification of a common language of risk.

Multidisciplinary extremity preservation program improves quality of life for patients with advanced limb threat

INTRODUCTION

The need for multidisciplinary care of patients with advanced limb threat is well established. We examined patient reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) for those who completed a multidisciplinary extremity preservation program (EPP) at our institution.

METHODS

Patients with advanced limb threat, who had previously failed standard management at a tertiary-care center, were referred to EPP for evaluation by a multidisciplinary panel of vascular, plastic, orthopedic and podiatric surgeons, along with infectious disease, prosthetics, orthotics, imaging, palliative care, social work and wound nursing specialists. HR-QoL was quantified before and after EPP participation with the RAND-36 questionnaire. The validated RAND-36 assesses physical function, role limitations caused by physical and emotional health problems, social functioning, emotional well-being, energy, pain and general health perceptions.

RESULTS

From 2018 to 2020, 185 patients were referred to EPP. After review by the multidisciplinary panel, 120 were accepted into the program, 63 of whom completed their course of care; 9 were one-time consultations. The median number of EPP in-person care visits was 23 (13-54) per participant; 87.3% of patients received one or more surgical procedure, including operative debridement (73%), revascularization (44%), soft tissue reconstruction or transplantation (46%), as well as hyperbaric oxygen therapy (11%) during their course of treatment. 85.7% of patients achieved complete wound healing, 41.5% occurring within 6 months. Ultimately, 14.3% required a major amputation. Graduates noted improvement in all categories of the HR-QoL upon completion, including those undergoing major amputation. On adjusted multivariate regression analysis, patients with immunocompromised status were more likely to show greater improvement in their social function (OR: 10.1; P<0.044) and emotional role limitation (OR:8.1; P=0.042), while patients with larger wound volume at presentation were more likely to have greater improvement in their general health (OR: 1.1; P<0.049). Conversely, patients with a smoking history had less improvement in energy level (OR:0.4; P=0.044) and patients with dialysis-dependence had less improvement in social function (OR:0.2; P=0.034).

CONCLUSION

Coordinated, multidisciplinary extremity preservation program improves HR-QoL of patients with complex limb threat, including those who are immunocompromised with impaired social function and emotional role limitations. Further study is warranted to better characterize the generalizability of this approach, including considerations of cost-effectiveness, wound recidivism, and limiting the number of in-person visits required to achieve complete healing.

Multiple factors predict longer and shorter time-to-ulcer-free in people with diabetes-related foot ulcers: Survival analyses of a large prospective cohort followed-up for 24-months

AIMS

To investigate factors independently associated with time-to-(being)-ulcer-free, time-varying effects and predict adjusted ulcer-free probabilities, in a large prospective cohort with diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFU) followed-up for 24 months.

METHODS

Patients presenting with DFU(s) to 65 Diabetic Foot Services across Queensland, Australia, between July-2011 and December-2017 were included. Demographic, comorbidity, limb, ulcer, and treatment factors were captured at presentation. Patients were followed-up until ulcer-free (all DFU(s) healed), amputation, death or two years. Factors associated with time-to-ulcer-free were investigated using both Cox proportional hazards and flexible parametric survival models to explore time-varying effects and plot predicted adjusted ulcer-free probability graphs.

RESULTS

Of 4,709 included patients (median age 63 years, 69.5% male), median time-to-ulcer-free was 112 days (IQR:40->730), with 68.4% ulcer-free within two years. Factors independently associated with longer time-to-ulcer-free were each year of age younger than 60 years, living in a regional or remote area, smoking, neuropathy, peripheral artery disease (PAD), ulcer size >1 cm², deep ulcer and mild infection (all p < 0.05). Time-varying effects were found for PAD and ulcer size limiting their association to six months only. Shorter time-to-ulcer-free was associated with recent DFU treatment by a podiatrist and receiving knee-high offloading treatment (both p < 0.05). Predicted adjusted ulcer-free probability graphs reported largest differences in time-to-ulcer-free over 24-months for geographical remoteness and PAD factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple factors predicted longer and shorter time-to-ulcer-free in people presenting with DFUs. Considering these factors, their time-varying effects and adjusted ulcer-free probability graphs, should aid the prediction of the likely time-to-(being)-ulcer-free for DFU patients.

Dialysis Treatment is an Independent Risk Factor for Foot Morbidity

Aim: To determine the prevalence of foot morbidity among patients with ESRD on dialysis. Methods: A prospective, non-experimental, quantitative time series design was employed. Forty-seven participants were recruited in the study. Medical records were reviewed followed by non-invasive foot assessments which included: Neurological, Arterial, Biomechanical, and Dermatological Assessment. Participants were assessed twice during the study. Results: Foot morbidity was found to be high among participants with ESRD on dialysis. 95.74% of participants presented with foot deformities, 76.60% had skin and nail conditions. 15% of participants had a history of ulceration and amputation. Moreover, active ulceration and history of revascularisation were also observed. Findings demonstrated overall poor foot health and footcare behavior within this population with 40.43% of participants having inappropriate footwear. The majority of participants did not check feet regularly, did not attend to podiatry appointments, and were unable to reach their feet for self-care. The Toe Brachial Pressure Index (TBPI), Spectral Doppler Waveform Analysis, and the Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) were re-measured at each visit. Monophasic continuous doppler waveforms increased while triphasic waveforms decreased during the study period. Protective sensation did not decrease during the study period. The mean TBPI decreased during the study period. The relationship between the TBPI and duration of dialysis was found to be significant. Both DM and dialysis duration were identified as significant predictors of reduction in TBPI. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a high prevalence of foot morbidity among patients with ESRD on dialysis. This study highlighted the importance of expanding practice by introducing a podiatry service within the renal unit to provide foot screening, foot assessments, and foot care education, with the aim to reduce severe foot complications.

Establishing the national top 10 priority research questions to improve diabetes-related foot health and disease: a Delphi study of Australian stakeholders

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes-related foot disease is a large cause of the global disease burden yet receives very little research funding to address this large burden. To help address this gap, it is recommended to first identify the consensus priority research questions of relevant stakeholders, yet this has not been performed for diabetes-related foot disease. The aim of this study was to determine the national top 10 priority research questions for diabetes-related foot health and disease from relevant Australian stakeholders.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A modified three-round Delphi online survey design was used to seek opinions from relevant Australian stakeholders including those with diabetes or diabetes-related foot disease or their carers (consumers), health professionals, researchers and industry. Participants were recruited via multiple public invitations and invited to propose three research questions of most importance to them (Round 1), prioritize their 10 most important questions from all proposed questions (Round 2), and then rank questions in order of importance (Round 3).

RESULTS

After Round 1, a total of 226 unique questions were proposed by 210 participants (including 121 health professionals and 72 consumers). Of those participants, 95 completed Round 2 and 69 completed Round 3. The top 10 priority research questions covered a range of topics, including health economics, peripheral neuropathy, education, infection, technology, exercise, and nutrition. Consumers prioritized peripheral neuropathy and prevention-related questions. Health professionals prioritized management-related questions including Australia's First Peoples foot health, health economics and infection questions.

CONCLUSIONS

These priority research questions should guide future national research agendas, funding and projects to improve diabetes-related foot disease burdens in Australia and globally. Future research should focus on consumer priority research questions to improve the burden of diabetes-related foot disease on patients and nations. Further research should also investigate reasons for different priorities between consumers and health professionals.

Clinical and economic outcomes of a multidisciplinary team approach in a lower extremity amputation prevention programme for diabetic foot ulcer care in an Asian population: A case-control study

Present guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care, but relevant data from Asia are lacking. We aim to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of an MDT approach in a lower extremity amputation prevention programme (LEAPP) for DFU care in an Asian population. We performed a case‐control study of 84 patients with DFU between January 2017 and October 2017 (retrospective control) vs 117 patients with DFU between December 2017 and July 2018 (prospective LEAPP cohort). Comparing the clinical outcomes between the retrospective cohort and the LEAPP cohort, there was a significant decrease in mean time from referral to index clinic visit (38.6 vs 9.5 days, P < .001), increase in outpatient podiatry follow‐up (33% vs 76%, P < .001), decrease in 1‐year minor amputation rate (14% vs 3%, P = .007), and decrease in 1‐year major amputation rate (9% vs 3%, P = .05). Simulation of cost avoidance demonstrated an annualised cost avoidance of USD $1.86m (SGD $2.5m) for patients within the LEAPP cohort. In conclusion, similar to the data from Western societies, an MDT approach in an Asian population, via a LEAPP for patients with DFU, demonstrated a significant reduction in minor and major amputation rates, with annualised cost avoidance of USD $1.86m.

Opportunities for diabetes and peripheral artery disease-related lower limb amputation prevention in an Appalachian state: A longitudinal analysis

•

Patients in the rural state of WV are at high-risk for atraumatic amputation.

•

There are opportunities for improved diabetes and vascular disease management in WV.

•

Patients at risk for vascular disease require preventive foot care and medication.

•

Amputation may represent a sentinel event that promotes patient behavior change.

Lower extremity amputation due to peripheral artery disease (PAD) and diabetes (DM) is a life-altering event that identifies disparities in access to healthcare and management of disease. West Virginia (WV), a highly rural state, is an ideal location to study these disparities. The WVU longitudinal health system database was used to identify 1) risk factors for amputation, 2) how disease management affects the risk of amputation, and 3) whether the event of amputation is associated with a change in HbA1c and LDL levels.

Adults (≥18 years) with diagnoses of DM and/or PAD between 2011 and 2016 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed on patients with lab information for both HbA1c and LDL while adjusting for patient factors to examine associations with amputations. In patients who underwent amputation, we compared laboratory values before and after using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

50,276 patients were evaluated, 369 (7.3/1000) underwent amputation. On multivariable analyses, Male sex and Self-pay insurance had higher odds for amputation. Compared to patients with DM alone, PAD patients had 12.3 times higher odds of amputation, while patients with DM and PAD had 51.8 times higher odds of amputation compared to DM alone. We found significant associations between odds of amputation and HbA1c (OR 1.31,CI = 1.15–1.48), but not LDL. Following amputation, we identified significant decreases in lab values for HbA1c and LDL.

These findings highlight the importance of medical optimization and patient education and suggest that an amputation event may provide an important opportunity for changes in disease management and patient behavior.

Nationwide prevalence and clinical characteristics of inpatient diabetic foot complications: A Peruvian multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the burden of diabetic foot complications amongst inpatients in Peru.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional multicenter study, performed in public hospitals, in one-day enrollment between October and December 2018.

RESULTS

We included 8346 patients from 39 national hospitals. Diabetic foot (DF) inpatient point prevalence was 2.8% (CI 95% 2.4-3.1), and DF point prevalence among Diabetes Mellitus (DM) inpatients was 18.9% (CI 95% 16.7-21.1). DF prevalence was higher in jungle and coastal hospitals than highlands ones, and there was no difference according to its care complexity level. Of the 234 patients with DF, 73% were males, age average was 62 ± 12 years, with DM mean time duration of 15 ± 9.9 years. Regarding to DF etiology, 91% and 68% had some degree of peripheral neuropathy and peripheral artery disease, respectively. According to the Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria, 61% presented moderate to severe infections, and 40% had bone involvement. Debridement within 48 h was performed in 36% of sepsis cases.

CONCLUSION

Peru has a substantial burden of DF disease, with a greater share of that burden falling on less equipped hospitals in the country's jungle and coastal regions. Interdisciplinary teams and pathways may improve the time of surgical debridement in the highest risk patients.

Evaluation of the Complementary Health Provision of the Podiatric Foot Care Program for Diabetic Patients in Catalonia (Spain)

The Catalan diabetic foot health program was established in 2009 in order to prevent complications caused by type 2 diabetes. This study aims to describe its application from 2009 to 2018. The objective was to describe diabetic foot care provision in the National Health System of Catalonia between 2009 and 2018, including the number of patients and professionals involved, the causes behind patients’ visits, and the most demanded codes for diagnosis and treatment filled by the podiatrist in each consultation during 2018–2020. This description was addressed through an analysis of the database provided by the Association of Podiatrists to evaluate the implementation of the program. The results for the diabetic foot health program in Catalonia showed a growth in demand from 2009 (1726) to 2018 (213,095) in terms of visits and from 2009 (1541) to 2018 (104,629) in terms of patients. The number of registered podiatrists from 2009 to 2018 increased from 165 to 470. The most commonly used diagnosis codes were (a) without sensory alterations in control and treatment of grade 1 lesions; (b) grade 0 without neuropathic, vascular, structural, or biomechanical alteration; (c) no sensory structural alterations in the foot; (d) keratopathies. The treatments most commonly used were (a) conservative (chiropody), (b) without ortho-podiatric treatment, and (c) plantar supports. The conclusions show that the health program is in great demand amongst the population. Similarly, the coding system has made it possible to identify the diagnosis and treatment of such demand.

Medicare Support for Dental and Podiatry Graduate Medical Education Programs

IMPORTANCE

Oral health care faces ongoing workforce challenges that affect patient access and outcomes. While the Medicare program provides an estimated $14.6 billion annually in graduate medical education (GME) payments to teaching hospitals, including explicit support for dental and podiatry programs, little is known about the level or distribution of this public investment in the oral health and podiatry workforce.

OBJECTIVE

To examine Medicare GME payments to teaching hospitals for dental and podiatry residents from 1998 to 2018, as well as the distribution of federal support among states, territories, and the District of Columbia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study was conducted using data from 1252 US teaching hospitals. Data were analyzed from May through August 2020.

EXPOSURES

Dental and podiatry residency training.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Medicare dental and podiatry GME payments were examined.

RESULTS

Among 1252 teaching hospitals, Medicare provided nearly $730 million in dental and podiatry GME payments in 2018. From 1998 to 2018, the number of residents supported more than doubled, increasing from 2340 residents to 4856 residents, for a 2.1-fold increase, while Medicare payments for dental and podiatry GME increased from $279 950 531 to $729 277 090, for a 2.6-fold increase. In 2018, an estimated 3504 of 4856 supported positions (72.2%) were dental. Medicare GME payments varied widely among states, territories, and the District of Columbia, with per capita payments by state, territory, and district population ranging from $0.05 in Puerto Rico to $14.24 in New York, while 6 states received no support for dental or podiatry residency programs.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that dental and podiatry GME represents a substantial public investment, and deliberate policy decisions are needed to target this nearly $730 million and growing investment to address the nation's priority oral and podiatry health needs.

I fear COVID but diabetic foot (DF) is worse: a survey on patients' perception of a telemedicine service for DF during lockdown

AIMS

To evaluate the patients' perceptions of telemedicine visits during COVID-19 lockdown and their level of anxiety about COVID and diabetic foot (DF).

METHODS

In May 2020, we contacted by phone all the patients who underwent in March and April to remote monitoring visits for DF during the lockdown for COVID-19, with a structured interview, focusing on their perceptions about telemedicine service for DF and on the anxiety toward COVID and DF.

RESULTS

We analyzed 257 remote monitoring visits in 211 patients. Two hundred and six patients answered the follow-up interview; 177 patients (85.9%) remembered the monitoring visit, 140 (67.9%) the health care professional and 181 patients (87.9%) the reason of contact; 169 patients were alone during the visit, 37 with a relative. Patients judged useful both the monitoring during pandemic (4.35 ± 0.28 on a maximum of five) and the possibility to continue after the lockdown (4.34 ± 0.23 on a maximum of five). Eventually, we observed that DF patients were more worried by DF than by COVID on a scale from 0 (not fear at all) to 5 (terrified) (4.79 ± 0.05 vs. 3.27 ± 1.03, p < 0.05). This difference was higher in previously ulcerated patients (4.84 ± 0.03 vs. 3.03 ± 1.13, p < 0.05) and even more in amputees (4.93 ± 0.03 vs. 2.73 ± 1.21, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DF patients appreciated televisits during lockdown and the continuation of this service after its end. In this context DF prevails on COVID in the worries of patients, especially if they are recurrent ones.

Characteristics of general practitioner referrals to podiatrists in Australia, 2000-2016

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to describe patterns of referral to podiatrists by general practitioners (GPs) in Australia.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a continuous cross-sectional study of Australian general practice activity.

METHODS

We analysed data from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health program, collected from April 2000 to March 2016 inclusive. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals around point estimates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify GP and patient characteristics independently associated with referral.

RESULTS

The data set included 1,568,100 encounters, including 5,912 podiatry referrals. Referrals increased from 7.0 to 39.5 per 1000 population over the evaluation period. In multivariate analyses, female GPs were more likely than male GPs to refer, and GPs aged ≥55 years were less likely to refer. Patients referred to podiatrists were more likely to be aged ≥85 years, be Indigenous, be from an English-speaking background and have previously been seen at the practice. The problem generating the highest number of referrals was diabetes. After the introduction of Medicare funding, referred patients were more likely to be women, be aged >45 years, have a healthcare card, be socio-economically disadvantaged and have previously been seen at the practice.

CONCLUSIONS

GP referral to podiatrists in Australia increased markedly after the introduction of Medicare funding and appears to be targeted to those with the greatest need. Further research is required to determine whether this policy has improved outcomes and is cost-effective.

Wound care during the COVID-19 pandemic: improving outcomes through the integration of telemedicine

COVID-19 is highly contagious and its rapid spread burdens the healthcare system. As the number of confirmed cases goes up, the shortage of medical resources has become a challenge. To avoid the collapse of the healthcare system during the fight with COVID-19, all healthcare workers, including wound care practitioners, should adapt to new roles and use any appropriate methods available to slow the spread of the virus. Integrating telemedicine into wound care during the outbreak helps maintain social distancing, preserve personal protective equipment and medical resources, and eliminate unnecessary exposure for both vulnerable patients and high-risk healthcare workers.

[Multidisciplinary management of diabetic foot ulcer infection]

Infection is one of the most common complications of diabetic foot ulceration resulting in lower extremity amputations and early mortality in this population. Several factors influence the course of diabetic foot ulceration infection and in that context, integrated multidisciplinary management is required as soon as possible. In fact, a holistic interdisciplinary approach should be the standard of care. Whether the infection is categorized as mild, moderate or severe, with or without bone infection, the overall individual's characteristics must be addressed, in addition to local wound care, offloading and antibiotic therapy. Some severe infections have potential indications for hospitalization and are considered as surgical emergencies. In some DFU cases, surgical revascularization of the limb is mandatory to treat the infection. However, surgical interventions and amputations, are sometimes inevitable, they are predictors of bad prognosis. Although some adjuvant therapies are effective to promote wound healing, their use is not recommended to treat diabetic foot ulcer infection. Infection management can be divided into three general interventions: proper clinical diagnosis, microbiological and imaging investigations, and treatment. This review is an update on the up-to-date evidences in scientific literature and includes the latest recommendations from the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF).