External validation of urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) for prediction of persistent acute kidney injury

Assessing the role of Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 14 in AKI: a European consensus meeting

BACKGROUND

Urinary Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 14 (CCL14) is a biomarker associated with persistent severe acute kidney injury (AKI). There is limited data to support the implementation of this AKI biomarker to guide therapeutic actions.

METHODS

Sixteen AKI experts with clinical CCL14 experience participated in a Delphi-based method to reach consensus on when and how to potentially use CCL14. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement (participants answered with 'Yes', or three to four points on a five-point Likert Scale).

RESULTS

Key consensus areas for CCL14 test implementation were: identifying challenges and mitigations, developing a comprehensive protocol and pairing it with a treatment plan, and defining the target population. The majority agreed that CCL14 results can help to prioritize AKI management decisions. CCL14 levels above the high cutoff (> 13 ng/mL) significantly changed the level of concern for modifying the AKI treatment plan (p < 0.001). The highest level of concern to modify the treatment plan was for discussions on renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation for CCL14 levels > 13 ng/mL. The level of concern for discussion on RRT initiation between High and Low, and between Medium and Low CCL14 levels, showed significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Real world urinary CCL14 use appears to provide improved care options to patients at risk for persistent severe AKI. Experts believe there is a role for CCL14 in AKI management and it may potentially reduce AKI-disease burden. There is, however, an urgent need for evidence on treatment decisions and adjustments based on CCL14 results.

CCL14 testing to guide clinical practice in patients with AKI: Results from an international expert panel

PURPOSE

Urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) is a strong predictor of persistent stage 3 acute kidney injury (AKI). Multiple clinical actions are recommended for AKI but how these are applied in individual patients and how the CCL14 test results may impact their application is unknown.

METHODS

We assembled an international panel of 12 experts and conducted a modified Delphi process to evaluate patients at risk for persistent stage 3 AKI (lasting 72 hours or longer). Using a Likert scale, we rated 11 clinical actions based on international guidelines applied to each case before and after CCL14 testing and analyzed the association between the strength and direction of recommendations and CCL14 results.

RESULTS

The strength and direction of clinical recommendations were strongly influenced by CCL14 results (P < 0.001 for the interaction). Nine (82%) recommendations for clinical actions were significantly impacted by CCL14 results (P < 0.001 comparing low to highest CCL14 risk category).

CONCLUSIONS

Most recommendations for care of patients with stage 2-3 by an international panel of experts were strongly modified by CCL14 test results. This work should set the stage for clinical practice protocols and studies to determine the effects of recommended actions informed by CCL14.

Prognostic Biomarkers and AKI: Potential to Enhance the Identification of Post-Operative Patients at Risk of Loss of Renal Function

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after surgery and the more complex the surgery, the greater the risk. During surgery, patients are exposed to a combination of factors all of which are associated with the development of AKI. These include hypotension and hypovolaemia, sepsis, systemic inflammation, the use of nephrotoxic agents, tissue injury, the infusion of blood or blood products, ischaemia, oxidative stress and reperfusion injury. Given the risks of AKI, it would seem logical to conclude that early identification of patients at risk of AKI would translate into benefit. The conventional markers of AKI, namely serum creatinine and urine output are the mainstay of defining chronic kidney disease but are less suited to the acute phase. Such concerns are compounded in surgical patients given they often have significantly reduced mobility, suboptimal levels of nutrition and reduced muscle bulk. Many patients may also have misleadingly low serum creatinine and high urine output due to aggressive fluid resuscitation, particularly in intensive care units. Over the last two decades, considerable information has accrued with regard to the performance of what was termed "novel" biomarkers of AKI, and here, we discuss the most examined molecules and performance in surgical settings. We also discuss the application of biomarkers to guide patients' postoperative care.

From Acute to Chronic: Unraveling the Pathophysiological Mechanisms of the Progression from Acute Kidney Injury to Acute Kidney Disease to Chronic Kidney Disease

This article provides a thorough overview of the biomarkers, pathophysiology, and molecular pathways involved in the transition from acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) to chronic kidney disease (CKD). It categorizes the biomarkers of AKI into stress, damage, and functional markers, highlighting their importance in early detection, prognosis, and clinical applications. This review also highlights the links between renal injury and the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AKI and AKD, including renal hypoperfusion, sepsis, nephrotoxicity, and immune responses. In addition, various molecules play pivotal roles in inflammation and hypoxia, triggering maladaptive repair, mitochondrial dysfunction, immune system reactions, and the cellular senescence of renal cells. Key signaling pathways, such as Wnt/β-catenin, TGF-β/SMAD, and Hippo/YAP/TAZ, promote fibrosis and impact renal function. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) triggers a cascade leading to renal fibrosis, with aldosterone exacerbating the oxidative stress and cellular changes that promote fibrosis. The clinical evidence suggests that RAS inhibitors may protect against CKD progression, especially post-AKI, though more extensive trials are needed to confirm their full impact.

New biomarkers in acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a commonly encountered clinical syndrome. Although it often complicates community acquired illness, it is more common in hospitalized patients, particularly those who are critically ill or who have undergone major surgery. Approximately 20% of hospitalized adult patients develop an AKI during their hospital care, and this rises to nearly 60% in the critically ill, depending on the population being considered. In general, AKI is more common in older adults, in those with preexisting chronic kidney disease and in those with known risk factors for AKI (including diabetes and hypertension). The development of AKI is associated with an increase in both mortality and morbidity, including the development of post-AKI chronic kidney disease. Currently, AKI is defined by a rise in serum creatinine from either a known or derived baseline value and/or oliguria or anuria. However, clinicians may fail to recognize the initial development of AKI because of a delay in the rise of serum creatinine or because of inaccurate urine output monitoring. This, in turn, delays any putative measures to treat AKI or to limit its degree. Consequently, efforts have focused on new biomarkers associated with AKI that may allow early recognition of this syndrome with the intent that this will translate into improved patient outcomes. Here we outline current biomarkers associated with AKI and explore their potential in aiding diagnosis, understanding the pathophysiology and directing therapy.

Personalized acute kidney injury treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complex syndrome that might be induced by different causes and is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is a very heterogeneous syndrome and establishing a "one size fits all" treatment approach might not work. This review aims to examine the potential of personalized treatment strategies for AKI.

RECENT FINDINGS

The traditional diagnosis of AKI is based on changes of serum creatinine and urine output, but these two functional biomarkers have several limitations. Recent research identified different AKI phenotypes based on clinical features, biomarkers, and pathophysiological pathways. Biomarkers, such as Cystatin C, NGAL, TIMP2∗IGFBP7, CCL14, and DKK-3, have shown promise in predicting AKI development, renal recovery, and prognosis. Biomarker-guided interventions, such as the implementation of the KDIGO bundle, have demonstrated an improvement in renal outcomes in specific patient groups.

SUMMARY

A personalized approach to AKI treatment as well as research is becoming increasingly important as it allows the identification of distinct AKI phenotypes and the potential for targeted interventions. By utilizing biomarkers and clinical features, physicians might be able to stratify patients into subphenotypes, enabling more individualized treatment strategies. This review highlights the potential of personalized AKI treatment, emphasizing the need for further research and large-scale clinical trials to validate the efficacy of these approaches.

Update on persistent acute kidney injury in critical illnesses

Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects about half of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and worsens their short- and long-term outcomes. Apparently self-limiting AKI episodes initiate a progression toward chronic kidney disease (CKD) through cellular and molecular mechanisms that are yet to be explained. In particular, persistent AKI, defined in 2016 by the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative as an AKI which lasts more than 48 h from its onset, has been correlated with higher morbidity and mortality, and with a higher progression to acute kidney disease (AKD) and CKD than transient AKI (i.e. AKI with a reversal within 48 h). This classification has been also used in the setting of solid organ transplantation, demonstrating similar outcomes. Due to its incidence and poor prognosis and because prompt interventions seem to change its course, persistent AKI should be recognized early and followed-up also after its recovery. However, while AKI and CKD are well-described syndromes, persistent AKI and AKD are relatively new entities. The purpose of this review is to highlight the key phases of persistent AKI in ICU patients in terms of both clinical and mechanistic features in order to offer to clinicians and researchers an updated basis from which to start improving patients' care and direct future research.

Dynamic nomogram for predicting acute kidney injury in patients with community-acquired pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and negatively affects both short-term and long-term prognosis in patients with CAP. However, no study has been conducted on developing a clinical tool for predicting AKI in CAP patients. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a predictive tool based on a dynamic nomogram for AKI in CAP patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted from January 2014 to May 2017, and data from adult inpatients with CAP at Nanjing First Hospital were analysed. Demographic data and clinical data were obtained. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used to select important variables, which were entered into logistic regression to construct the predictive model for AKI. A dynamic nomogram was based on the results of the logistic regression model. Calibration and discrimination were used to assess the performance of the dynamic nomogram. A decision curve analysis was used to assess clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 2883 CAP patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 76 years (IQR 63-84), and 61.3% were male. AKI developed in 827 (28.7%) patients. The LASSO regression analysis selected five important factors for AKI (albumin, acute respiratory failure, CURB-65 score, Cystatin C and white cell count), which were then entered into the logistic regression to construct the predictive model for AKI in CAP patients. The dynamic nomogram model showed good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.870 and good calibration with a Brier score of 0.129 and a calibration plot. The decision curve analysis showed that the dynamic nomogram prediction model had good clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSION

This easy-to-use dynamic nomogram may help physicians predict AKI in patients with CAP.

NephroCheck at 10: addressing unmet needs in AKI diagnosis and risk stratification

Despite its name, the current diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) still depends on markers of decreased kidney function and not on markers of injury. This results in a delayed diagnosis: AKI is diagnosed based on serum creatinine criteria only when the severity of injury is enough to decrease glomerular filtration rate. Moreover, by the time AKI is diagnosed, the insult may have already ceased, and even appropriate therapy targeted at the specific insult and its associated pathogenic pathways may no longer be effective. Biomarkers of injury are needed that allow the diagnosis of AKI based on injury criteria. At least three commercially available immunoassays assessing urinary or plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 × insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7 ([TIMP2]*[IGFBP7]) (NephroCheck®) have generated promising data regarding prediction and early diagnosis of AKI, although their relative performance may depend on clinical context. Recently, a urinary peptidomics classifier (PeptAKI) was reported to predict AKI better than current biomarkers. Focusing on [TIMP2]*[IGFBP7], the cellular origin of urinary TIMP2 and IGFBP7 remains unclear, especially under the most common predisposing condition for AKI, i.e. chronic kidney disease. We now discuss novel data on the kidney cell expression of TIMP2 and IGFBP7 and its clinical implications.

Precision management of acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit: current state of the art

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a prototypical example of a common syndrome in critical illness defined by consensus. The consensus definition for AKI, traditionally defined using only serum creatinine and urine output, was needed to standardize the description for epidemiology and to harmonize eligibility for clinical trials. However, AKI is not a simple disease, but rather a complex and multi-factorial syndrome characterized by a wide spectrum of pathobiology. AKI is now recognized to be comprised of numerous sub-phenotypes that can be discriminated through shared features such as etiology, prognosis, or common pathobiological mechanisms of injury and damage. The characterization of sub-phenotypes can serve to enable prognostic enrichment (i.e., identify subsets of patients more likely to share an outcome of interest) and predictive enrichment (identify subsets of patients more likely to respond favorably to a given therapy). Existing and emerging biomarkers will aid in discriminating sub-phenotypes of AKI, facilitate expansion of diagnostic criteria, and be leveraged to realize personalized approaches to management, particularly for recognizing treatment-responsive mechanisms (i.e., endotypes) and targets for intervention (i.e., treatable traits). Specific biomarkers (e.g., serum renin; olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4); interleukin (IL)-9) may further enable identification of pathobiological mechanisms to serve as treatment targets. However, even non-specific biomarkers of kidney injury (e.g., neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, NGAL; [tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2, TIMP2]·[insulin like growth factor binding protein 7, IGFBP7]; kidney injury molecule 1, KIM-1) can direct greater precision management for specific sub-phenotypes of AKI. This review will summarize these evolving concepts and recent innovations in precision medicine approaches to the syndrome of AKI in critical illness, along with providing examples of how they can be leveraged to guide patient care.

Subphenotypes of Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is seen frequently in hospitalized patients and is associated with increased risk of mortality and adverse short- and long-term renal and systemic complications. Emerging data suggest that AKI is a heterogenous syndrome with a variety of underlying causes, predisposing illnesses, and range of clinical trajectories and outcomes. This mini-review aims to discuss emerging AKI subphenotype classifications as our understanding of the heterogeneity and underlying pathophysiology has improved.

Performance of urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 for the prediction of persistent acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) has been described as an effective marker for delayed recovery of acute kidney injury (AKI), yet its efficacy has been found to vary between different trials. The goal of this research was to assess the predictive performance of urinary CCL14 as a marker for persistent AKI.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to April 2023 for studies of adults (> 18 years) that reported the diagnostic performance of urinary CCL14. The sensitivity, specificity, number of events, true positive, and false positive results were extracted and evaluated. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves (HSROCs) were used to summarize the pooled test performance, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria were used to appraise the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

We included six studies with 952 patients in this meta-analysis. The occurrence of persistent AKI among these patients was 39.6% (377/952). The pooled sensitivity and specificity results of urinary CCL14 in predicting persistent AKI were 0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.84), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 2.75 (95% CI 1.63-4.66), and the negative LR was 0.27 (95% CI 0.18-0.41). The HSROC with pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.84.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that urinary CCL14 can be used as an effective marker for predicting persistent AKI.

Analysis of urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) and first-generation urinary biomarkers for predicting renal recovery from acute kidney injury: a prospective exploratory study

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent syndrome in the intensive care unit (ICU). AKI patients with kidney function recovery have better short-term and long-term prognoses compared with those with non-recovery. Numerous studies focus on biomarkers to distinguish them. To better understand the predictive performance of urinary biomarkers of renal recovery in patients with AKI, we evaluated C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) and two first-generation biomarkers (cell cycle arrest biomarkers and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) in two ICU settings.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study to analyze urinary biomarkers for predicting renal recovery from AKI. Patients who developed AKI after ICU admission were enrolled and urinary biomarkers including tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7), CCL14, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were detected on the day of AKI diagnosis. The primary endpoint was non-recovery from AKI within 7 days. The individual discriminative ability of CCL14, [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] and NGAL to predict renal non-recovery were evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Of 164 AKI patients, 64 (39.0%) failed to recover from AKI onset. CCL14 showed a fair prediction ability for renal non-recovery with an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.63-0.77, p < 0.001). [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] showed the best prediction for renal non-recovery with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.71-0.84, p < 0.001). However, NGAL had no use in predicting non-recovery with an AUC of 0.53 (95% CI 0.45-0.60, p = 0.562). A two-parameter model (non-renal SOFA score and AKI stage) predicted renal non-recovery with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.77-0.83, p = 0.004). When [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] was combined with the clinical factors, the AUC was significantly improved to 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.87, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary CCL14 and [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] were fair predictors of renal non-recovery from AKI. Combing urinary [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] with a clinical model consisting of non-renal SOFA score and AKI stage enhanced the predictive power for renal non-recovery. Urinary CCL14 showed no significant advantage in predicting renal non-recovery compared to [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7].

Measurement of renal congestion and compliance following intravenous fluid administration using shear wave elastography

Objective

Ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) is a novel technique that may provide non-invasive measurements of renal compliance. We aimed to investigate the relationship between intravenous (IV) fluid administration and change in SWE measurements. We hypothesised that following IV fluid administration in healthy volunteers, global kidney stiffness would increase and that this increase in stiffness could be quantified using SWE. Our second hypothesis was that graduated doses of IV fluids would result in a dose-dependent increase in global kidney stiffness measured by SWE.

Design

Randomised prospective study.

Setting

Intensive Care Unit.

Participants

Healthy volunteers aged 18-40 years.

Interventions

Participants were randomised to receive 20 ml/kg, 30 ml/kg, or 40 ml/kg of normal saline. The volume of fluid infused was based on the actual body weight recorded.

Main outcome measures

We recorded average SWE stiffness (kPa with standard deviation of the mean), median SWE stiffness (kPa), and the interquartile range.

Results

Ninety-eight percent of participants (44/45) demonstrated an increase in global kidney stiffness following administration of IV fluids. The average SWE pre fluid administration was 7.572 kPa ± 2.38 versus 14.9 kPa ± 4.81 post fluid administration (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, there were significant changes in global kidney stiffness pre and post fluid administration with each volume (ml/kg) of fluid administered. Average percentage change in global kidney stiffness from baseline was compared between the three groups. There was no significant difference when comparing groups 1 and 2 (197.1% increase ± 49.5 vs 216.1% ± 72.0, p ¼ 0.398), groups 2 and 3 (216.1% increase ± 72.0 vs 197.8% ± 59.9, p ¼ 0.455), or groups 1 and 3 (197.1% increase ± 49.5 vs 197.8% ± 59.9, p ¼ 0.972).

Conclusions

Fluid administration results in immediately visible and quantifiable changes in global kidney stiffness across all infused volumes of fluid.

Serial Urinary C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 14 and Risk of Persistent Severe Acute Kidney Injury

To assess the added prognostic value of serial monitoring of urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (uCCL14) over that of single measurements, which have been shown to be prognostic for development of persistent severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Data derived from two multinational ICU studies (Ruby and Sapphire).

PATIENTS

Critically ill patients with early stage 2-3 AKI.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We analyzed three consecutive uCCL14 measurements at 12-hour intervals after diagnosis of stage 2-3 AKI by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Primary outcome was persistent severe AKI, defined as 72 consecutive hours of stage 3 AKI, death, or receipt of dialysis prior to 72 hours. uCCL14 was measured using the NEPHROCLEAR uCCL14 Test on the Astute 140 Meter (Astute Medical, San Diego, CA). Based on predefined, validated cutoffs, we categorized uCCL14 as: low (≤ 1.3 ng/mL), medium (> 1.3 to ≤ 13 ng/mL), or high (> 13 ng/mL). Seventy-five of 417 patients with three consecutive uCCL14 measurements developed persistent severe AKI. Initial uCCL14 category strongly correlated with primary endpoint and, in most cases (66%), uCCL14 category was unchanged over the first 24 hours. Compared with no change and accounting for baseline category, decrease in category was associated with decreased odds of persistent severe AKI (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08-0.45; p < 0.001) and an increase in category with increased odds (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.75-9.46; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In one-third of patients with moderate to severe AKI uCCL14 risk category altered over three serial measurements and such changes were associated with altered risk for persistent severe AKI. Serial CCL-14 measurement may detect progression or resolution of underlying kidney pathology and help refine AKI prognosis.

Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs of Persistent Severe Acute Kidney Injury (PS-AKI) Among Hospitalized Stage 2/3 AKI Patients

Key Points

Among hospitalized patients with stage 2/3 AKI, persistent severe acute kidney injury (PS-AKI) is associated with significantly longer length of stay (LOS) and higher costs during index hospitalization and 30 days postdischarge. Relative differences in LOS and costs for PS-AKI versus NPS-AKI were similar for intensive care (ICU) and non-ICU patients. Preventing PS-AKI among patients with stage 2/3 AKI may reduce hospital LOS and costs.

Background

Persistent severe acute kidney injury (PS-AKI) is associated with worse clinical outcomes, but there are no data on costs of PS-AKI. We compared costs and health care resource utilization for inpatients with PS-AKI versus not persistent severe AKI (NPS-AKI) overall and by ICU use.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 126,528 adult US inpatients in the PINC AI Healthcare Database (PHD), discharged from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, with KDIGO stage 2 or 3 AKI (by serum creatinine [SCr] criteria) during hospitalization, length of stay (LOS) ≥3 days, and ≥3 SCr measurements. Patients were categorized as PS-AKI (defined as stage 3 AKI lasting ≥3 days or with death within 3 days or stage 2/3 AKI (by SCr criteria) with dialysis within 3 days) or NPS-AKI. Generalized linear model regression compared LOS and costs during index hospitalization (total cohort) and 30 days postdischarge (survivors of index hospitalization), adjusted for patient, hospital, and clinical characteristics.

Results

Among 126,528 patients with stage 2/3 AKI, 30,916 developed PS-AKI. In adjusted models, compared with NPS-AKI, patients with PS-AKI had 32% longer total LOS (+3.3 days), 45% longer ICU LOS (+2.6 days), 46% higher total costs (+$13,143), 58% higher ICU costs (+$15,908), and during 30 days postdischarge 13% longer readmission LOS (+1.0 day), 22% higher readmission costs (+$4049), and 12% higher outpatient costs (+$206) (P <0.005 for all). Relative LOS and cost differences for PS-AKI versus NPS-AKI were similar for ICU (n=57,947) and non-ICU (n =68,581) patients.

Conclusions:

Among hospitalized patients with stage 2/3 AKI, PS-AKI was associated with significantly longer LOS and higher costs during index hospitalization and 30 days postdischarge, overall, and in ICU and non-ICU patients. Preventing PS-AKI among patients with stage 2/3 AKI may reduce hospital LOS and costs.

Predictability performance of urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 and renal resistive index for persistent sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in ICU patients

OBJECTIVES

The performance of renal resistance index (RRI) in predicting persistent sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI) remains debatable, and the value of urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) in predicting persistent S-AKI has not been validated yet. Therefore, we aimed to determine the applicability of a urinary biomarker CCL14 for the early detection of persistent S-AKI. Furthermore, the use of RRI obtained from renal Doppler ultrasonography was applied to differentiate transient from persistent S-AKI. Finally, we aimed to evaluate the use of these techniques in predicting different subtypes of S-AKI.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted at the internal medicine intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. The RRI was determined within 12 h of ICU admission and the urinary CCL14 was evaluated at T0, T6, T12, and T24. The reversibility of renal dysfunction was assessed within 48 h. The receiver operating characteristic curves were then plotted to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the RRI and urinary CCL14 in predicting persistent S-AKI.

RESULTS

Out of 48 patients, 23 developed persistent S-AKI upon admission. The RRI was higher in the persistent S-AKI group (P = 0.02) and the RRI ≥ 0.679 could predict persistent S-AKI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.93), a sensitivity of 91.30% (95% CI 70-98%), and a specificity of 65.20% (95% CI 43-83%). Urinary CCL14 was not significantly different between the two groups at the tested period, showing poor diagnostic performance at T0, T6, T12, and T24, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.56 (95% CI 0.38-0.73), 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.79), 0.52 (95% CI 0.35-0.68), and 0.60 (95% CI 0.43-0.77), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The RRI obtained from renal Doppler ultrasound is extremely effective in predicting persistent S-AKI in critically ill patients, and urinary CCL14 could not distinguish between transient and persistent S-AKIs.

Subphenotypes of acute kidney injury in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe acute kidney injury (AKI) phenotypes in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

AKI is a heterogenous disease that imposes significant morbidity and mortality on critically ill and noncritically ill patients across the age spectrum. As our understanding of AKI and its association with outcomes has improved, it is becoming increasingly apparent that there are distinct AKI subphenotypes that vary by cause or associated conditions. We have also learned that severity, duration, and repeated episodes of AKI impact outcomes, and that integration of novel urinary biomarkers of tubular injury can also reveal unique subphenotypes of AKI that may not be otherwise readily apparent.

SUMMARY

Studies that further delineate these unique AKI subphenotypes are needed to better understand the impact of AKI in children. Further delineation of these phenotypes has both prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Proenkephalin A 119-159 predicts early and successful liberation from renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a post hoc analysis of the ELAIN trial

BACKGROUND

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) remains the key rescue therapy for critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI). However, there are currently no tools available to predict successful liberation from RRT. Biomarkers may allow for risk stratification and individualization of treatment strategies. Proenkephalin A 119-159 (penKid) has been suggested as a promising marker of kidney function in the context of AKI, but has not yet been evaluated for RRT liberation in critically ill patients with AKI.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included 210 patients from the randomized clinical ELAIN trial and penKid levels were measured in the blood of these patients. Competing risk time-to-event analyses were performed for pre-RRT penKid at initiation of RRT and in a landmark analysis at day 3 after initiation of RRT. Competing risk endpoints were successful liberation from RRT or death without prior liberation from RRT.

RESULTS

Low pre-RRT penKid levels (penKid ≤ 89 pmol/l) at RRT initiation were associated with early and successful liberation from RRT compared to patients with high pre-RRT penKid levels (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.83, 95%CI 1.26-2.67, p = 0.002, estimated 28d-cumulative incidence function (28d-CIF) of successful liberation from RRT 61% vs. 45%, p = 0.022). This association persisted in the landmark analysis on day 3 of RRT (sHR 1.78, 95%CI 1.17-2.71, p = 0.007, 28d-CIF of successful liberation from RRT 67% vs. 47%, p = 0.018). For both time points, no difference in the competing event of death was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients with RRT-dependent AKI, plasma penKid appears to be a useful biomarker for the prediction of shorter duration and successful liberation from RRT and may allow an individualized approach to guide strategies of RRT liberation in critically ill patients with RRT-dependent AKI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The ELAIN trial was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trial Registry (Identifier: DRKS00004367) on 28th of May 2013.

Delivering optimal renal replacement therapy to critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

Critical illness is often complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI). In patients with severe AKI, renal replacement therapy (RRT) is deployed to address metabolic dysfunction and volume excess until kidney function recovers. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive update on key aspects of RRT prescription and delivery to critically ill patients. Recently completed trials have enhanced the evidence base regarding several RRT practices, most notably the timing of RRT initiation and anticoagulation for continuous therapies. Better evidence is still needed to clarify several aspects of care including optimal targets for ultrafiltration and effective strategies for RRT weaning and discontinuation.

Advances in laboratory detection of acute kidney injury

Recent advances have improved our understanding of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of acute kidney injury (AKI). So far, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome guidelines define and stratify kidney injury based on increases in serum creatinine level and/or decreases in urine output. Although the term AKI acknowledges the existence of cellular injury, its diagnosis is still only defined by the reduced excretory function of the kidney. New biomarkers that aid a better understanding of the relationship between acute tubular injury and kidney dysfunction have been identified, reflecting the advances in molecular biology. The expression of some of these novel biomarkers precedes changes in conventional biomarkers or can increase their predictive power. Therefore, they might enhance the clinical accuracy of the definition of AKI. This review summarizes the limitations of the current AKI classification and a panel of candidate biomarkers for augmenting AKI classification and recognition of AKI subphenotypes. We expect that the integration of appropriately selected biomarkers in routine clinical practice can improve AKI care.

Overview of Diagnostic Criteria and Epidemiology of Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Kidney Disease in the Critically Ill Patient

Since the description ischuria renalis by William Heberden (1), AKI has remained a prominent complication of critical illness. Beyond KRT, treatment has been limited by the capacity to phenotype this condition. Here, we chronicle the evolution of attempts to classify AKI, including the adoption of consensus definitions, the expansion of diagnosis and prognosis with novel biomarkers, and emerging tools such as artificial intelligence (AI).

Performance of a Standardized Clinical Assay for Urinary C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 14 (CCL14) for Persistent Severe Acute Kidney Injury

Background

Clinical use of biomarkers requires the development of standardized assays and establishment of cutoffs. Urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) has been validated to predict persistent severe AKI in critically ill patients with established AKI. We now report on the performance of standardized cutoffs using a clinical assay.

Methods

A second aim of the multicenter RUBY Study was to establish two cutoffs for the prediction of persistent severe AKI (defined as KDIGO stage 3 AKI for at least 72 consecutive hours). Patients who received renal replacement therapy (RRT) or died before achieving 72 hours in stage 3 AKI were also considered to have reached the end point.

Results

A cutoff value for urinary CCL14 of 1.3 ng/ml was determined to achieve high sensitivity (91%; 95% CI, 84% to 96%), and 13 ng/ml achieved high specificity (93%; 95% CI, 89% to 96%). The cutoff of 1.3 ng/ml identifies the majority (91%) of patients who developed persistent severe AKI with a negative predictive value of 92%. The cutoff at 13 ng/ml had a positive predictive value of 72% (with a negative predictive value of 75%). In multivariable adjusted analyses, a CCL14 concentration between 1.3 and 13 ng/ml had an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 3.82 (95% CI, 1.73 to 9.12; P=0.001) for the development of persistent severe AKI compared with those with a CCL14 ≤1.3 ng/ml, whereas a CCL14 >13 ng/ml had an aOR of 10.4 (95% CI, 3.89 to 29.9; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Using a clinical assay, these standardized cutoffs (1.3 and 13 ng/ml) allow for the identification of patients at high risk for the development of persistent severe AKI. These results have immediate utility in helping to guide AKI patient care and may facilitate future clinical trials.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Identification and Validation of Biomarkers of Acute Kidney Injury Recovery, NCT01868724.

Timing of renal-replacement therapy in intensive care unit-related acute kidney injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The optimal timing of renal-replacement therapy (RRT) initiation for the management of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is frequently controversial. An earlier-strategy has biological rationale, even in the absence of urgent indications; however, a delayed-strategy may prevent selected patients from receiving RRT and avoid complications related to RRT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Previous studies assessing the optimal timing of RRT initiation found conflicting results, contributing to variation in clinical practice. The recent multinational trial, standard vs. accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (STARRT-AKI) found no survival benefit and a higher risk of RRT dependence with an accelerated compared to a standard RRT initiation strategy in critically ill patients with severe AKI. Nearly 40% of patients allocated to the standard-strategy group did not receive RRT. The Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury-2 (AKIKI-2) trial further assessed delayed compared to more-delayed strategies for RRT initiation. The more-delayed strategy did not confer an increase in RRT-free days and was associated with a higher risk of death.

SUMMARY

Early preemptive initiation of RRT in critically ill patients with AKI does not confer clear clinical benefits. However, protracted delays in RRT initiation may be harmful.