1
|
Cai LT, Brett BL, Palacios EM, Yuh EL, Bourla I, Wren-Jarvis J, Wang Y, Mac Donald C, Diaz-Arrastia R, Giacino JT, Okonkwo DO, Levin HS, Robertson CS, Temkin N, Markowitz AJ, Manley GT, Stein MB, McCrea MA, Zafonte RD, Nelson LD, Mukherjee P. Emotional Resilience Predicts Preserved White Matter Microstructure Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2024; 9:164-175. [PMID: 36152948 PMCID: PMC10065831 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adult patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) exhibit distinct phenotypes of emotional and cognitive functioning identified by latent profile analysis of clinical neuropsychological assessments. When discerned early after injury, these latent clinical profiles have been found to improve prediction of long-term outcomes from mTBI. The present study hypothesized that white matter (WM) microstructure is better preserved in an emotionally resilient mTBI phenotype compared with a neuropsychiatrically distressed mTBI phenotype. METHODS The present study used diffusion magnetic resonance imaging to investigate and compare WM microstructure in major association, projection, and commissural tracts between the two phenotypes and over time. Diffusion magnetic resonance images from 172 patients with mTBI were analyzed to compute individual diffusion tensor imaging maps at 2 weeks and 6 months after injury. RESULTS By comparing the diffusion tensor imaging parameters between the two phenotypes at global, regional, and voxel levels, emotionally resilient patients were shown to have higher axial diffusivity compared with neuropsychiatrically distressed patients early after mTBI. Longitudinal analysis revealed greater compromise of WM microstructure in neuropsychiatrically distressed patients, with greater decrease of global axial diffusivity and more widespread decrease of regional axial diffusivity during the first 6 months after injury compared with emotionally resilient patients. CONCLUSIONS These results provide neuroimaging evidence of WM microstructural differences underpinning mTBI phenotypes identified from neuropsychological assessments and show differing longitudinal trajectories of these biological effects. These findings suggest that diffusion magnetic resonance imaging can provide short- and long-term imaging biomarkers of resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lanya T Cai
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Benjamin L Brett
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Eva M Palacios
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Esther L Yuh
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ioanna Bourla
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jamie Wren-Jarvis
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Christine Mac Donald
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David O Okonkwo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Harvey S Levin
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Nancy Temkin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Amy J Markowitz
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Murray B Stein
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Michael A McCrea
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Ross D Zafonte
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lindsay D Nelson
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
| | - Pratik Mukherjee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fins JJ, Wright MS, Shulman KS, Henderson JM, Schiff ND. Subject and Family Perspectives from the Central Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Trial for Traumatic Brain Injury: Part II. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2023:1-24. [PMID: 37850455 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180123000518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
This is the second paper in a two-part series describing subject and family perspectives from the CENTURY-S (CENtral Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain InjURY-Safety) first-in-human invasive neurological device trial to achieve cognitive restoration in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI). To participate, subjects were independently assessed to formally establish decision-making capacity to provide voluntary informed consent. Here, we report on post-operative interviews conducted after a successful trial of thalamic stimulation. All five msTBI subjects met a pre-selected primary endpoint of at least a 10% improvement in completion time on Trail-Making-Test Part B, a marker of executive function. We describe narrative responses of subjects and family members, refracted against that success. Interviews following surgery and the stimulation trial revealed the challenge of adaptation to improvements in cognitive function and emotional regulation as well as altered (and restored) relationships and family dynamics. These improvements exposed barriers to social reintegration made relevant by recoveries once thought inconceivable. The study's success sparked concerns about post-trial access to implanted devices, financing of device maintenance, battery replacement, and on-going care. Most subjects and families identified the need for supportive counseling to adapt to the new trajectory of their lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph J Fins
- Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Solomon Center for Health Law & Policy, Yale Law School, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Megan S Wright
- Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- School of Law, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - Kaiulani S Shulman
- Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jaimie M Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas D Schiff
- Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Madsen BÅ, Fure SCR, Andelic N, Løke D, Løvstad M, Røe C, Howe EI. Exploring the Association between Personality Traits, Symptom Burden, and Return to Work after Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4654. [PMID: 37510769 PMCID: PMC10380528 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 30% of individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) experience persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS). Personality factors have been linked to PPCS, yet, the association between personality traits and outcomes after mTBI is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between personality traits, PPCS, and return to work (RTW) in patients with mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). Data from eighty-seven participants with mild-to-moderate TBI were analyzed. Sociodemographic, injury, and work characteristics and depressive symptoms were recorded 2-3 months post-injury. Personality traits were measured using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3. PPCS and RTW were assessed 15 months post-injury. Multiple linear regression models were performed. The factors associated with more severe PPCS were female sex, higher levels of neuroticism, openness to experience and conscientiousness, extra-cranial injuries, and depressive symptoms. The factors associated with lower RTW were female sex, higher levels of neuroticism, and conscientiousness. However, after controlling for PPCS, personality traits were no longer significantly associated with RTW. In conclusion, specific personality traits were associated with more severe PPCS and may be indirectly associated with RTW via PPCS. Hence, personality traits may be important to assess to identify patients at risk of less favorable outcomes after mild-to-moderate TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikte Å Madsen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje C R Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel Løke
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, 1453 Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, 1453 Nesoddtangen, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fure SCR, Howe EI, Andelic N, Brunborg C, Olsen A, Rike PO, Spjelkavik Ø, Enehaug H, Røe C, Løvstad M. Workplace Factors Associated With Return to Work After Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2023; 38:E1-E9. [PMID: 35293367 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sociodemographic and injury-related predictors for return to work (RTW) after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been extensively explored. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding work-related predictors of RTW. The main aim of this study was to explore work-related predictors of work participation 6 and 12 months after mild-to-moderate TBI. SETTING Data were collected at baseline 8 to 12 weeks after injury, and 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline, at a specialized TBI rehabilitation outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. PARTICIPANTS Eligible patients had suffered a mild-to-moderate TBI 8 to 12 weeks previously, were employed 50% or more at time of injury, were between 18 and 60 years of age, and sick listed 50% or more at time of inclusion due to symptoms of TBI (based on the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire). In total, 116 patients were included in a randomized controlled trial, of whom 113 were included in the 1-year analysis. DESIGN Patients were originally included in a randomized controlled trial. There were no between-group differences in RTW after 1 year. Thus, the participants were evaluated as one cohort in this study. MAIN MEASURES The primary outcome measure was work participation 1 year after study inclusion. Work-related predictors were chosen on the basis of previous research and expert opinion and entered into a multivariable linear regression model. The model controlled for sociodemographic and injury-related factors. RESULTS The best-fitting model explained 25% of variation in work participation at 1 year. Significant predictors were predictability, quantitative demands and rewards (recognition) at the workplace, private or public employment, symptom burden at baseline, and sex. CONCLUSION In this study, several work-related predictors outperformed some of the established sociodemographic and injury-related predictors of RTW after TBI, thus stressing the need for further focus and research on amendable predictors of RTW after mild-to-moderate TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Christine Reistad Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Drs Fure, Howe, Andelic, and Røe), and Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services (Ms Brunborg), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society (Drs Fure, Andelic, and Røe), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Drs Howe and Røe), and Department of Psychology (Dr Løvstad), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway (Dr Olsen); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway (Dr Olsen); Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway (Drs Rike and Løvstad); Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway (Mr Spjelkavik and Dr Enehaug)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lindamer L, Almklov E, Pittman JOE, Shi S, Maye J, Jak A, Twamley E, Rabin B. Multi-method study of the implementation of Cognitive Symptom Management and Rehabilitation Training (CogSMART) in real-world settings. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1542. [PMID: 36528588 PMCID: PMC9758865 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08941-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cognitive Symptom Management and Rehabilitation Training (CogSMART) and Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) are evidence-based compensatory cognitive training interventions that improve cognition in persons with a history of traumatic brain injury or other neuropsychiatric disorders. Despite demonstrated efficacy, use and effectiveness of CogSMART/CCT in real-world settings is not known.We used a multi-method design to collect and analyze quantitative and qualitative survey data from several domains of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to gather information about use of CogSMART/CCT in real-world settings from provider and patient perspectives. Surveys were sent to email addresses from persons who registered on the CogSMART website seeking access to training manuals and other resources. Descriptive statistics were generated, and we used Natural Language Processing methods to study the self-report free responses. Using n-gram analysis, we identified the most frequently reported responses.We found CogSMART/CCT was broadly used in real-world settings and delivered by a variety of providers for several patient groups with high attendance and overall high satisfaction. CogSMART/CCT seemed to be offered in VA- or university-related clinics more than in private practice or rehabilitation centers. The diversity of providers and variety of formats by which to deliver CogSMART/CCT (i.e., individual, group, telehealth) seemed to play a role in its widespread implementation, as did its adaptability. Most providers made adaptations to the intervention that reduced the length or number of sessions. These changes were most likely to be based on client characteristics. The low rates of formal training, however, may have contributed to lower levels of perceived helpfulness among patients.Reach and Adoption of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention improved by increasing access to the manuals. Attention to characteristics of dissemination and implementation in the design of an intervention may enhance its use in real-world settings. The relevant outcomes, easy access to training manuals, and adaptability of CogSMART/CCT seem to have been important factors in its use in a variety of settings and for several disorders with cognitive impairment. The adoption of CogSMART/CCT by a variety of providers other than neuropsychologists suggests its use may be broadened to other healthcare providers, if adequately trained, to increase access to an intervention with demonstrated efficacy for cognitive rehabilitation for several neuropsychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie Lindamer
- VA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161 USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
| | - Erin Almklov
- VA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161 USA
| | - James O. E. Pittman
- VA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161 USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
| | - Shuyuan Shi
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada
| | - Jacqueline Maye
- VA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161 USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
| | - Amy Jak
- VA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161 USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
| | - Elizabeth Twamley
- VA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161 USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
| | - Borsika Rabin
- VA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161 USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spjelkavik Ø, Enehaug H, Klethagen P, Howe EI, Fure SC, Terjesen HCA, Løvstad M, Andelic N. Workplace accommodation in return to work after mild traumatic brain injury. Work 2022; 74:1149-1163. [PMID: 36442182 DOI: 10.3233/wor-211440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While a vast amount of research focuses on unmodifiable and individual factors that may impact return to work (RTW) for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), less knowledge exists of the relationship between specific workplace factors and work retention. OBJECTIVE: Identify types of accommodation in the workplace that influence the RTW process for employees with TBI and the challenges associated with them. METHODS: A multiple case study consisting of 38 cases and 109 interviews of employees with TBI and their managers conducted between 2017 and 2020 at two time points. RESULTS: Accommodation of both the organizational and psychosocial work environment influences RTW for employees with TBI. Social support and supportive management may have positive and negative effects. RTW is often not a linear process. Over time, maintaining and developing customized accommodation in the work organization is challenging. CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty about accommodation in RTW for employees with TBI is closely linked to lack of knowledge in the workplace of how to handle complex and nonlinear RTW processes. Work-oriented rehabilitation should to a greater extent provide managers with relevant information and support to develop the person-environment fit over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heidi Enehaug
- Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål Klethagen
- Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje C.R. Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sagstad K, Howe EI, Fure SCR, Løvstad M, Enehaug H, Ugelstad H, Feiring M, Andelic N, Sveen U. Transition back to work after mild TBI: a qualitative study. Scand J Occup Ther 2022; 30:527-538. [PMID: 36084237 DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2022.2120067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While many persons who sustain a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) can resume work shortly after their injury, some experience persisting symptoms leading to longer-term sickness absence. In-depth knowledge about how these persons experience the return to work (RTW) process is needed. AIMS To explore how persons with MTBI experience the process of returning to ordinary competitive work after a prolonged period of sickness absence. MATERIAL AND METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six persons (four women) approximately 12 months after sustaining an MTBI. Data were analysed using a stepwise-deductive inductive method. RESULTS When starting work the participants experienced a crisis. They described the importance of making the actual decision to RTW. Being present at the workplace was significant. In the process of increased workload, they expressed having challenges related to time perception and capacity restrictions. The importance of being seen and valued was emphasised. When reintegrated into the workplace revaluing work tasks and priorities shaped the RTW process as well as a further professional career. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE The process of RTW contained the experience of unpredictability and incompatibility with own identity and performance. Working had an impact on social participation, self-worth, daily structure, as well as reconstructing occupational biography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjersti Sagstad
- Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje C R Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway.,Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Heidi Enehaug
- The Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene Ugelstad
- Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marte Feiring
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Unni Sveen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zheng L, Pang Q, Xu H, Guo H, Liu R, Wang T. The Neurobiological Links between Stress and Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of Research to Date. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23179519. [PMID: 36076917 PMCID: PMC9455169 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurological dysfunctions commonly occur after mild or moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although most TBI patients recover from such a dysfunction in a short period of time, some present with persistent neurological deficits. Stress is a potential factor that is involved in recovery from neurological dysfunction after TBI. However, there has been limited research on the effects and mechanisms of stress on neurological dysfunctions due to TBI. In this review, we first investigate the effects of TBI and stress on neurological dysfunctions and different brain regions, such as the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and hypothalamus. We then explore the neurobiological links and mechanisms between stress and TBI. Finally, we summarize the findings related to stress biomarkers and probe the possible diagnostic and therapeutic significance of stress combined with mild or moderate TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lexin Zheng
- Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medicine and Biological Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Qiuyu Pang
- Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medicine and Biological Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Heng Xu
- Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medicine and Biological Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Hanmu Guo
- Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medicine and Biological Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medicine and Biological Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medicine and Biological Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
- Shanghai Key Lab of Forensic Medicine, Key Lab of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, China (Academy of Forensic Science), Shanghai 200063, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Linnestad AM, Løvstad M, Groven KS, Howe EI, Fure SCR, Spjelkavik Ø, Sveen U. "Manoeuvring in uncharted waters - a balancing act": A qualitative exploration of treatment and improvement after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2022; 33:592-612. [PMID: 35168477 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2022.2034651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Background: Individuals who have sustained mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) with a protracted course of recovery may experience long-lasting somatic, cognitive, and emotional symptoms affecting activities of daily living. There is limited knowledge regarding individuals' lived experiences with treatments and advice provided.Purpose: To explore how individuals with mTBI describe and make sense of their injury, recovery process, and their experiences with various treatment approaches.Methods: Eight participants with mTBI were recruited from the intervention group in an ongoing randomized controlled trial regarding return-to-work. They were interviewed once after treatment delivery using a qualitative hermeneutical approach. Thematic analysis was applied, and findings are discussed in light of a salutogenic theory.Results: Participants expressed uncertainty regarding conflicting advice they received in the early phase of recovery. Three main themes were developed: (1) "Ambiguity and hope"; (2) "Uncertainty concerning activity and rest"; and (3) "To become the person I used to be vs. to become a new version of myself."Conclusion: The findings showed that the participants experienced both uncertainty and hope for further recovery. The recovery process is challenged by the variability of TBI symptoms that affects participation in everyday life, as well as the conflicting advice received by the participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway.,Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karen Synne Groven
- Faculty of Health, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje Christine Reistad Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Unni Sveen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cost-effectiveness analysis of combined cognitive and vocational rehabilitation in patients with mild-to-moderate TBI: results from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:185. [PMID: 35151285 PMCID: PMC8840547 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07585-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a financial burden to the healthcare system, patients, their families and society. Rehabilitation interventions with the potential for reducing costs associated with TBI are demanded. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a randomized, controlled, parallel group trial that compared the effectiveness of a combined cognitive and vocational intervention to treatment as usual (TAU) on vocational outcomes.
Methods
One-hundred sixteen participants with mild-to-moderate TBI were recruited from an outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. They were randomized to a cognitive rehabilitation intervention (Compensatory Cognitive Training, CCT) and Supported Employment (SE) or TAU in a 1:1 ratio. Costs of CCT-SE and TAU, healthcare services, informal care and productivity loss were assessed 3, 6 and 12 months after study inclusion. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the difference in number of days until return to pre-injury work levels between CCT-SE and TAU and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L across 12 months follow-up. Cost-utility was expressed in incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Results
The mean total costs of healthcare services was € 3,281 in the CCT-SE group and € 2,300 in TAU, informal care was € 2,761 in CCT-SE and € 3,591 in TAU, and productivity loss was € 30,738 in CCT-SE and € 33,401 in TAU. Costs related to productivity loss accounted for 84% of the total costs. From a healthcare perspective, the ICER was € 56 per day earlier back to work in the CCT-SE group. Given a threshold of € 27,500 per QALY gained, adjusting for baseline difference in EQ-5D-5L index values revealed a net monetary benefit (NMB) of € -561 (0.009*27,500–979) from the healthcare perspective, indicating higher incremental costs for the CCT-SE group. From the societal perspective, the NMB was € 1,566 (0.009*27,500-(-1,319)), indicating that the CCT-SE intervention was a cost-effective alternative to TAU.
Conclusions
Costs associated with productivity loss accounted for the majority of costs in both groups and were lower in the CCT-SE group. The CCT-SE intervention was a cost-effective alternative to TAU when considering the societal perspective, but not from a healthcare perspective.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrails.gov NCT03092713.
Collapse
|
11
|
Fure SCR, Howe EI, Spjelkavik Ø, Røe C, Rike PO, Olsen A, Ponsford J, Andelic N, Løvstad M. Post-concussion symptoms three months after mild-to-moderate TBI: characteristics of sick-listed patients referred to specialized treatment and consequences of intracranial injury. Brain Inj 2021; 35:1054-1064. [PMID: 34314269 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1953593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To present pre-injury, injury-related, work-related and post-injury characteristics, and to compare patients with and without traumatic intracranial abnormalities, in a treatment-seeking sample with persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS) after mild-to-moderate TBI.Methods: Cross-sectional design in the context of a specialized TBI outpatient clinic. Eligible patients were aged 18-60 years, employed ≥ 50% at time of injury, and sick listed ≥ 50% at inclusion due to PPCS. Data were collected 8-12 weeks after injury through review of medical records, semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and neuropsychological screening.Results: The study included 116 patients, of whom 60% were women, and predominantly white-collar workers in full-time positions. Ninety-four percent had a mild TBI, and 23% had intracranial abnormalities. The full sample reported high somatic, emotional, and cognitive symptom burden, and decreased health-related quality of life. Patients with normal CT/MRI results reported higher overall symptom burden, while patients with intracranial abnormalities had worse memory function.Conclusion: Injury severity and traumatic intracranial radiological findings should not be the sole ground for planning of rehabilitation service provision in patients with PPCS, as subjective complaints do not necessarily co-vary with these variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Christine Reistad Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per-Ola Rike
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Alexander Olsen
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Jennie Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway.,Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fure SCR, Howe EI, Andelic N, Brunborg C, Sveen U, Røe C, Rike PO, Olsen A, Spjelkavik Ø, Ugelstad H, Lu J, Ponsford J, Twamley EW, Hellstrøm T, Løvstad M. Cognitive and vocational rehabilitation after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury: A randomised controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 64:101538. [PMID: 33957293 DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Returning to work is often a primary rehabilitation goal after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the evidence base for treatment options regarding return to work (RTW) and stable work maintenance remains scarce. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the effect of a combined cognitive and vocational intervention on work-related outcomes after mild-to-moderate TBI. METHODS In this study, we compared 6 months of a combined compensatory cognitive training and supported employment (CCT-SE) intervention with 6 months of treatment as usual (TAU) in a randomised controlled trial to examine the effect on time to RTW, work percentage, hours worked per week and work stability. Eligible patients were those with mild-to-moderate TBI who were employed ≥50% at the time of injury, 18 to 60 years old and sick-listed ≥50% at 8 to 12 weeks after injury due to post-concussion symptoms, assessed by the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. Both treatments were provided at the outpatient TBI department at Oslo University Hospital, and follow-ups were conducted at 3, 6 and 12 months after inclusion. RESULTS We included 116 individuals, 60 randomised to CCT-SE and 56 to TAU. The groups did not differ in characteristics at the 12-month follow-up. Overall, a high proportion had returned to work at 12 months (CCT-SE, 90%; TAU, 84%, P=0.40), and all except 3 were stably employed after the RTW. However, a significantly higher proportion of participants in the CCT-SE than TAU group had returned to stable employment at 3 months (81% vs. 60%, P=0.02). CONCLUSION These results suggest that the CCT-SE intervention might help patients with mild-to-moderate TBI who are still sick-listed 8 to 12 weeks after injury in an earlier return to stable employment. However, the results should be replicated and a cost-benefit analysis performed before concluding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje C R Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Unni Sveen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per-Ola Rike
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Alexander Olsen
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Helene Ugelstad
- Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration, Oslo, Norway
| | - Juan Lu
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jennie Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth W Twamley
- Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, Veterans Affairs (VA) San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Howe EI, Fure SCR, Løvstad M, Enehaug H, Sagstad K, Hellstrøm T, Brunborg C, Røe C, Nordenmark TH, Søberg HL, Twamley E, Lu J, Andelic N. Effectiveness of Combining Compensatory Cognitive Training and Vocational Intervention vs. Treatment as Usual on Return to Work Following Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: Interim Analysis at 3 and 6 Month Follow-Up. Front Neurol 2020; 11:561400. [PMID: 33240196 PMCID: PMC7683428 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.561400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims: Knowledge regarding the most effective return to work (RTW) approaches after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is lacking. This trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of a combined cognitive and vocational intervention to treatment as usual (TAU) on RTW and work stability after TBI. Methods: We performed a parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) at a TBI outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Norway. Patients with a history of mild-to-moderate TBI (n = 116) aged 18–60 were randomized (1:1) by an independent investigator to receive group-based compensatory cognitive training (CCT) and supported employment (SE) (n = 60) or TAU consisting of individualized multidisciplinary treatment (n = 56). Participants were enrolled 2–3 months post-injury. The nature of the intervention prevented blinding of patients and therapists, however, outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome measure was RTW at 3 and 6 months following study inclusion. Secondary outcomes were work percentage, stability, and productivity. The present study provides results from an interim analysis from the first two planned follow ups, while subsequent publications will present results up to 12 months following study inclusion. Results: Mixed effects models showed no between-group differences in the RTW proportion, work percentage, and hours worked between CCT-SE and TAU from baseline to 6 months. A significantly higher proportion of participants in CCT-SE had returned to work at 3 months when adjusting for baseline differences. The majority of participants who were employed at 3 and 6 months were stably employed. There was a statistically significant within-group improvement on RTW proportion, hours worked and work percentage in both groups. Conclusion: The results revealed no difference between CCT-SE and TAU on work-related outcomes from baseline to 6 months. However, there was a higher RTW proportion in the CCT-SE group compared to TAU at 3 months. Future publications will assess the effectiveness of CCT-SE vs. TAU up to 12 months. Clinical Trial Registration: US National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier #NCT03092713.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje C R Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway.,Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Heidi Enehaug
- The Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjersti Sagstad
- Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tonje Haug Nordenmark
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene L Søberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elizabeth Twamley
- Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, Veterans Affairs (VA) San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Juan Lu
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kamdar BB, Suri R, Suchyta MR, Digrande KF, Sherwood KD, Colantuoni E, Dinglas VD, Needham DM, Hopkins RO. Return to work after critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax 2020; 75:17-27. [PMID: 31704795 PMCID: PMC7418481 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of critical illness often experience poor outcomes after hospitalisation, including delayed return to work, which carries substantial economic consequences. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of return to work after critical illness. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library from 1970 to February 2018. Data were extracted, in duplicate, and random-effects meta-regression used to obtain pooled estimates. RESULTS Fifty-two studies evaluated return to work in 10 015 previously employed survivors of critical illness, over a median (IQR) follow-up of 12 (6.25-38.5) months. By 1-3, 12 and 42-60 months' follow-up, pooled return to work prevalence (95% CI) was 36% (23% to 49%), 60% (50% to 69%) and 68% (51% to 85%), respectively (τ2=0.55, I2=87%, p=0.03). No significant difference was observed based on diagnosis (acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) vs non-ARDS) or region (Europe vs North America vs Australia/New Zealand), but was observed when comparing mode of employment evaluation (in-person vs telephone vs mail). Following return to work, 20%-36% of survivors experienced job loss, 17%-66% occupation change and 5%-84% worsening employment status (eg, fewer work hours). Potential risk factors for delayed return to work include pre-existing comorbidities and post-hospital impairments (eg, mental health). CONCLUSION Approximately two-thirds, two-fifths and one-third of previously employed intensive care unit survivors are jobless up to 3, 12 and 60 months following hospital discharge. Survivors returning to work often experience job loss, occupation change or worse employment status. Interventions should be designed and evaluated to reduce the burden of this common and important problem for survivors of critical illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42018093135.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biren B Kamdar
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Rajat Suri
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mary R Suchyta
- InstaCare, Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kyle F Digrande
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Kyla D Sherwood
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth Colantuoni
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University-Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Victor D Dinglas
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dale M Needham
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ramona O Hopkins
- Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Health Care, Murray, Utah, USA
- Psychology Department and Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maillard J, De Pretto M, Delhumeau C, Walder B. Prediction of long-term quality of life after severe traumatic brain injury based on variables at hospital admission. Brain Inj 2019; 34:203-212. [PMID: 31648571 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1683227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Variables collected early after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) could predict health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our aim was to determine the prevalence of patients with a low HRQoL 4 years after sTBI and to develop a prediction model including early variables.Methods: Adult patients with both sTBI [abbreviated injury score of the head region (HAIS) >3] and disease-specific HRQoL assessments using the 'Quality of Life after Brain Injury' (QOLIBRI) were included. The outcome was the total score (TS) of QOLIBRI; cutoff for low HRQoL: <60 points. A multivariate logistic regression model and prediction model were performed.Results: One hundred-sixteen patients [median age 50.8 years (IQR 25.9-62.8; 21.6% >65 years)] were included; 68 (58.6%) with HAIS = 4, 48 (41.4%) with HAIS = 5. Median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 13 (IQR 3-15). Median TS was 77 (IQR 60-88). Low HRQoL was observed in 28 patients (24.1%). Two variables were associated with low HRQoL: GCS <13, working situation other than employed or retired. The prediction model had an AUROC of 0.765; calibration was moderate (Hosmer Lemeshow Chi2 6.82, p = .556).Conclusion: One in four patients had a low HRQoL after 4 years. A lower GCS and working situations were associated with low HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Maillard
- Division of Anaesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Geneva Perioperative Basic, Translational and Clinical Research Group, Division of Anaesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michael De Pretto
- Division of Anaesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Cecile Delhumeau
- Division of Anaesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bernhard Walder
- Division of Anaesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Geneva Perioperative Basic, Translational and Clinical Research Group, Division of Anaesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mild, moderate and severe: terminology implications for clinical and experimental traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Neurol 2019; 31:672-680. [PMID: 30379702 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000000624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW When describing clinical or experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI), the adjectives 'mild,' 'moderate' and 'severe' are misleading. 'Mild' clinical TBI frequently results in long-term disability. 'Severe' rodent TBI actually resembles mild or complicated mild clinical TBI. RECENT FINDINGS Many mild TBI patients appear to have recovered completely but have postconcussive symptoms, deficits in cognitive and executive function and reduced cerebral blood flow. After moderate TBI, 31.8% of patients died or were discharged to skilled nursing or hospice. Among survivors of moderate and severe TBI, 44% were unable to return to work. On MRI, 88% of mild TBI patients have evidence of white matter damage, based on measurements of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity/apparent diffusion coefficient. After sports concussion, clinically recovered patients have abnormalities in functional connectivity on functional MRI. Methylphenidate improved fatigue and cognitive impairment and, combined with cognitive rehabilitation, improved memory and executive functioning. In comparison to clinical TB, because the entire spectrum of experimental rodent TBI, although defined as moderate or severe, more closely resembles mild or complicated mild clinical TBI. SUMMARY Many patients after mild or moderate TBI suffer long-term sequelae and should be considered a major target for translational research. Treatments that improve outcome in rodent TBI, even when the experimental injuries are defined as severe, might be most applicable to mild or moderate TBI.
Collapse
|
17
|
Bond GR, Drake RE, Pogue JA. Expanding Individual Placement and Support to Populations With Conditions and Disorders Other Than Serious Mental Illness. Psychiatr Serv 2019; 70:488-498. [PMID: 30813865 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A systematic review of studies of individual placement and support (IPS) for populations other than those with serious mental illness was conducted. METHODS The authors searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) for studies of IPS and modified IPS. Eligibility criteria for the systematic review included randomized controlled trials with prospective data collection on competitive employment rate and at least 10 study participants from a well-defined population other than people with serious mental illness. Results were compiled for competitive employment rates, IPS fidelity, and other outcomes. RESULTS Three clinical groups other than people with serious mental illness have been studied: people with psychiatric disorders other than serious mental illness, people with substance use disorders, and people with musculoskeletal or neurological disorders. Nine controlled trials with a total of 2,902 participants included six trials with people who had psychiatric disorders other than serious mental illness, two with people who had substance use disorders, and one with people who had spinal cord injuries. In eight studies, results for competitive employment rates significantly favored IPS. Meta-analysis yielded an overall weighted odds ratio of 2.23 (95% confidence interval=1.53-3.24, p<.001). Findings for other employment outcomes also favored IPS, but findings on symptom reduction and quality of life were inconsistent. The strongest (and only replicated) findings were for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methodological limitations included small samples, major modifications to IPS fidelity, and short follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS IPS, often with modifications, is a promising employment intervention for several populations in addition to people with serious mental illnesses. The strongest evidence pertains to veterans with PTSD. IPS should be offered to these veterans. Research on other populations, including people with anxiety, depression, substance use disorder, musculoskeletal or neurological conditions, or pain syndromes, needs development, amplification, and replication.
Collapse
|
18
|
Psychological Intervention in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. Behav Neurol 2019; 2019:6937832. [PMID: 31191738 PMCID: PMC6525953 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6937832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To provide a brief and comprehensive summary of recent research regarding psychological interventions for patients surviving a traumatic brain injury. Methods A bibliographical search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycNET, Scopus, ResearchGate, and Google Scholar online databases. Analysis included distribution by year of publication, age stage of participants (paediatric, adult), location of the research team, study design, type of intervention, and main outcome variables. Results The initial search eliciting 1541 citations was reduced to 62 relevant papers. Most publications had adult samples (88.7%). The United States outstands as the country with more research (58.1%); Latin America countries provided no results. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) was the most widely used approach for treatment of (sub)clinical mental disturbances (41.9%). Neuropsychological interventions were scarce (4.8%). Outcome measures included psychiatric disorders (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety) (37.1%), postconcussive symptoms (16.1%), cognitive and functional deficits (48.1%), and social and psychological dimensions (62.9%). Conclusions CBT outstands as the preferred therapeutic approach for treating behavioural and emotional disturbances. Also, other related therapies such as dialectical behaviour, mindfulness, and acceptance and commitment therapies have been proposed, and probably in the years to come, more literature regarding their effectiveness will be available. On the other hand, evidence showed that interventions from the field of neuropsychology are minimal if compared with its contribution to assessment. Future research should be aimed at performing studies on more diverse populations (e.g., nonmilitary communities and paediatric and Latin American populations) and at controlling designs to examine the therapeutic efficacy of psychotherapeutic and neurocognitive rehabilitation interventions and compare amelioration by injury severity, age of patients, and clinical profile, in the hopes of creating better guidelines for practitioners.
Collapse
|
19
|
Howe EI, Løvstad M, Langlo KPS, Hellstrøm T, Spjelkavik Ø, Ugelstad H, Twamley EW, Andelic N. Feasibility of a cognitive rehabilitation program for individuals with mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury: Participants’ engagement and satisfaction. COGENT MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/2331205x.2019.1565614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut-Petter S. Langlo
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Helene Ugelstad
- Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elizabeth W. Twamley
- Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|