Dapagliflozin improves treatment satisfaction in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a patient reported outcome study (PRO study)

Effect of Luseogliflozin, a Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor, and Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 Inhibitors on the Quality-of-Life and Treatment Satisfaction of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Subanalysis of a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized-Controlled Trial (J-SELECT Study)

INTRODUCTION

The effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction have not been directly compared. This sub-analysis of a randomized-controlled trial with an SGLT2i, luseogliflozin, and DPP-4is compared their effects on QOL and treatment satisfaction of patients.

METHODS

This study recruited 623 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were drug-naïve or treated with antidiabetic agents other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is. The patients were randomized into luseogliflozin or DPP-4i group and followed for 52 weeks. This sub-analysis assessed QOL and treatment satisfaction using Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire (OHA-Q) version 2 in the drug-naïve subgroup who were drug-naïve at baseline and with monotherapy with luseogliflozin or DPP-4i throughout the observation period (256 patients) at 24 and 52 weeks and in the add-on subgroup who were treated with OHAs other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is (204 patients) at baseline, 24 and 52 weeks.

RESULTS

In the drug-naïve subgroup, total (50.8 ± 8.2 in luseogliflozin group and 53.1 ± 10.0 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.048) and somatic symptom scores (22.4 ± 5.0 in luseogliflozin group and 24.4 ± 5.8 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.005) at 52 weeks (but not at 24 weeks) were significantly higher in DPP-4i group than in luseogliflozin group. In add-on subgroup, changes in total (3.3 ± 7.8 in luseogliflozin group and 0.9 ± 7.6 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.030) and treatment convenience (1.2 ± 3.9 in luseogliflozin group and - 0.6 ± 4.2 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.002) from baseline to 24 weeks (but not at 52 weeks) were significantly greater in luseogliflozin group than in DPP-4i group. The QOL related to safety or glycemic control was comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should pay attention to side effects of SGLT2is to maintain the patients' QOL when SGLT2is are initiated or added-on. Add-on of luseogliflozin increased patients' QOL more than DPP-4is. Considering patients' QOL and treatment satisfaction is important for selecting SGLT2is or DPP-4is.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000030128 and jRCTs031180241.

Association of SGLT-2 Inhibitors With Treatment Satisfaction and Diabetes-Specific and General Health Status in Adults With Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes

Background It is unknown if initiation of a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) is associated with changes in patient-reported health status outside of clinical trials. Methods and Results Using a prospective observational study design, adults with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease were recruited from 14 US hospitals between November 2019 and December 2021 if they were new users of noninsulin antidiabetic medications. The primary outcome was change in 6-month diabetes treatment satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included diabetes-related symptom distress, diabetes-specific quality of life, and general health status for all patients and based on cardiovascular disease type. Inverse probability of treatment weight using propensity score was performed to compare outcome changes based on medication use. Of 887 patients (SGLT-2i: n=242) included in the inverse probability of treatment weight analyses, there was no difference in changes in treatment satisfaction in SGLT-2i users compared with other diabetes medication users (0.99 [95% CI, -0.14 to 2.13] versus 1.54 [1.08 to 2.00], P=0.38). Initiating an SGLT-2i versus other diabetes medications was associated with a greater reduction in ophthalmological symptoms (-3.09 [95% CI, -4.99 to -1.18] versus -0.38 [-1.54 to 0.77], P=0.018) but less improvement in hyperglycemia (1.08 [-2.63 to 4.79] versus -3.60 [-5.34 to -1.86], P=0.026). In subgroup analyses by cardiovascular disease type, SGLT-2i use was associated with a greater reduction in total diabetes symptom burden and neurological sensory symptoms in patients with heart failure. Conclusions Among patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, initiating an SGLT-2i was not associated with changes in diabetes treatment satisfaction, total diabetes symptoms, diabetes-specific quality of life, or general health status.

Impact of 24-week dapagliflozin treatment on body weight, body composition, and cardiac risk indicators of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus

Background/aim

To reveal the impacts of dapagliflozin, a sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i), on body weight and body composition, cardiovascular risk indices, and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT).

Materials and methods

The data of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who applied to Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Disorders between September 2019 and 2020, and had started dapagliflozin treatment along with their current medications were recorded retrospectively. Body weights, body compositions measured through bioelectrical impedance, and CIMT with T2DM receiving SGLT-2i treatment and medication were measured at weeks 1, 12, and 24 of 42. The visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP), and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) were used to determine the lipid measurements and anthropometric values.

Results

The mean change in the total body weight and total fat mass was -2.96 and -1.97 kg, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a reduction in total fat mass of 1.23 kg (from 31.4 to 29.3 kg, p < 0.001) and in body fat percentage of 2.5% (from 35.8% to 34.4%, p < 0.001) in the first 12 weeks. A mild increase was observed in both the total fat mass and body fat percentage between weeks 12 and 24, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.783 and p = 0.925, respectively), whereas there was a statistically significant reduction in high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), AIP, and CIMT values (p = 0.006, p = 0.035, and p = 0.007, respectively). No changes were observed in the VAI and LAP values (p = 0.985 and p = 0.636, respectively).

Conclusion

It was observed that dapagliflozin not only contributes to weight and fat loss but also has positive impacts on cardiovascular and atherosclerotic indicators.

Knowledge and practice of community pharmacists towards SGLT2 inhibitors

Background: Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a new class of oral anti-diabetic drugs which improve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by preventing the kidney from reabsorbing glucose back to blood. Community pharmacists have long-term relationships with most of their chronic patients, so they play a key role in care for people with diabetes. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess pharmacists’ knowledge and practice towards SGLT2 inhibitors. Thus, improving pharmacists’ knowledge about this group of medications could improve the treatment outcome of people with diabetes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to meet the study objectives. A convenience sample of 348 community pharmacists in Jordan was recruited. knowledge and practice were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire created for the purpose of this study. Results: A total of 400 community pharmacists were reached, of whom 348 answered the survey (response rate 87%). The results indicated that SGLT2 inhibitors knowledge score among community pharmacists in Jordan was 6.61 (out of 12). Factors like age, gender, location of the pharmacy, years of pharmacists’ experience had no effect on knowledge score; however, pharmacists who attended training courses on diabetes had higher knowledge scores. Additionally, pharmacists’ dispensing practice toward SGLT2 inhibitors had insufficient knowledge, such as lack of knowledge about the superiority of SGLT2 inhibitors over other anti-diabetics and inability to give the best advice to patients. Conclusions: Our findings reflect a moderate knowledge among community pharmacists about SGLT2 inhibitors which may negatively affect the patients’ outcome; thus, continuous education for the pharmacists is essential.

The Place and Value of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in the Evolving Treatment Paradigm for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review

Over recent years, the expanding evidence base for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapies has revealed benefits beyond their glucose-lowering efficacy in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), resulting in their recognition as cardiorenal medicines. While SGLT2is continue to be recommended among the second-line therapies for the treatment of hyperglycaemia, their true value now extends to the prevention of debilitating and costly cardiovascular and renal events for high-risk individuals, with particular benefit shown in reducing major adverse cardiac events and heart failure (HF) and slowing the progression of chronic kidney disease. However, SGLT2i usage is still suboptimal among groups considered to be at greatest risk of cardiorenal complications. The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has intensified financial pressures on healthcare systems, which may hamper further investment in newer effective medicines. Emerging evidence indicates that glycaemic control should be prioritised for people with T2DM in the era of COVID-19 and practical advice on the use of T2DM medications during periods of acute illness remains important, particularly for healthcare professionals working in primary care who face multiple competing priorities. This article provides the latest update from the Improving Diabetes Steering Committee, including perspectives on the value of SGLT2is as cost-effective therapies within the T2DM treatment paradigm, with particular focus on the latest published evidence relating to the prevention or slowing of cardiorenal complications. The implications for ongoing and future approaches to diabetes care are considered in the light of the continuing coronavirus pandemic, and relevant aspects of international treatment guidelines are highlighted with practical advice on the appropriate use of SGLT2is in commonly occurring T2DM clinical scenarios. The 'SGLT2i Prescribing Tool for T2DM Management', previously published by the Steering Committee, has been updated to reflect the latest evidence and is provided in the Supplementary Materials to help support clinicians delivering T2DM care.

Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors Use Improves the Satisfaction With Anti-diabetic Agent Treatment: A Questionnaire-based Propensity Score-matched Study

Background: Specific safety issues with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors such as infection, fractures, worsening of renal function and euglycemic ketoacidosis have been raised. Concerns about adverse events might limit the use of this drug class. The satisfaction with SGLT2 inhibitors treatment in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is unknown.

Material and Methods: Patients with T2DM who visited the hospital between October 2019 and June 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into SGLT2 inhibitors used group or not. The Satisfaction with Oral Anti-Diabetic Agent Scale (SOADAS) questionnaire and self-reported AEs were obtained at 3 months of follow-up. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for confounding factors. Univariate and multivariable linear regression models were used to explore potential risk factors associated with overall satisfaction.

Results: A total of 145 T2DM patients were included, with 76 SGLT2 inhibitors users and 69 non-users. Patients administered with SGLT2 inhibitors presented with increased overall satisfaction (mean [SE]: 22.8 [0.67] vs. 20.6 [0.64], p = 0.016) and overall satisfaction rate (n [%]: 40 [52.6%] vs 21 [30.4%], p = 0.007) when compared to other anti-diabetic agents. The use of SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved satisfaction of glycemic control ability (mean [SE]:3.9 [0.12] vs. 3.5 [0.12], p = 0.027), diabetic symptom’s control ability (3.5 [0.15] vs. 3.0 [0.15], p = 0.027), glycemic control speed (3.9 [0.11] vs. 3.4 [0.12], p = 0.011), medication tolerability (3.9 [0.10] vs. 3.5 [0.12], p = 0.012), and overall satisfaction (4.0 [0.11] vs. 3.6 [0.12], p = 0.037), but it did not improve satisfaction of medication effect on bodyweight (3.8 [0.11] vs. 3.4 [0.11], p = 0.166). After adjusting confounding factors (47 patients for each group), consistent results were obtained. No significant differences of self-reported clinical AEs were observed between SGLT2 inhibitors users and non-users. Multivariable regression analyses verified that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with increased levels of satisfaction.

Conclusions: The use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with increased levels of satisfaction in T2DM patients, but not associated with overall clinical safety. Self-reported AEs were not related to the satisfaction with the use of anti-diabetic agents.

A registry-based randomised trial comparing an SGLT2 inhibitor and metformin as standard treatment of early stage type 2 diabetes (SMARTEST): Rationale, design and protocol

AIM

SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiovascular and renal complications in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients at high cardiovascular risk. Metformin is currently widely used as initial monotherapy in T2D but lacks convincing data to show that it reduces risk of complications. We aim to compare the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin and metformin as first-line T2D medication with regard to development of complications in a registry-based randomised controlled trial.

METHODS

The SGLT2 inhibitor or metformin as standard treatment of early stage type 2 diabetes (SMARTEST) trial will enrol 4300 subjects at 30-40 study sites in Sweden who will be randomised 1:1 to either metformin or dapagliflozin. Participants must have T2D duration <4 years, no prior cardiovascular disease, and be either drug-naïve or on monotherapy for T2D.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular events and occurrence or progression of microvascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, diabetic foot lesions). Secondary endpoints include individual components of the primary endpoint, start of insulin therapy, risk factor biomarkers, patient-reported outcome measures, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcomes will primarily be assessed using nationwide healthcare registries.

CONCLUSIONS

The SMARTEST trial will investigate whether dapagliflozin is superior to metformin in preventing complications in early stage T2D. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03982381, EudraCT 2019-001046-17).

The Influence of Tofogliflozin on Treatment-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Treatment-related quality of life (QOL) is an important aspect of diabetes management. We evaluated the influence of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, tofogliflozin, on treatment-related QOL in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

This is the prespecified subanalysis study of the "Using TOfogliflozin for Possible better Intervention against Atherosclerosis for type 2 diabetes patients (UTOPIA)" trial. Treatment-related QOL was evaluated at baseline, week 26, week 52, and week 104 after the initiation of the study using the Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL questionnaire (DTR-QOL). Among the 340 patients in the original UTOPIA study, a total of 252 patients (127, tofogliflozin group; 125, conventional treatment group) who completed the DTR-QOL questionnaire at baseline were the study subjects of the current subanalysis.

RESULTS

The tofogliflozin and conventional treatment groups exhibited almost comparable baseline clinical characteristics, while the use of antihypertensive drugs and lipid-lowering agents was significantly lower in the tofogliflozin treatment group than in the conventional treatment group. Tofogliflozin treatment increased the total score of DTR-QOL7 from baseline (P < 0.001), while conventional treatment did not change it. There were statistically significant differences in delta change in the total DTR-QOL7 score and DTR-QOL7 Q4, Q5, Q6, and Q7 scores from the baseline to week 104 between the treatment groups. Delta changes in HbA1c (Spearman's correlation coefficient, ρ =  - 0.30, P < 0.001), fasting blood glucose (ρ =  - 0.16, P = 0.031), BMI (ρ =  - 0.19, P = 0.008), and waist circumference (ρ =  - 0.17, P = 0.024) at week 104 were negatively associated with delta change in the total QOL7 score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicated that tofogliflozin treatment improved treatment-related QOL compared to conventional treatment in Japanese patients with T2DM, in accordance with the improvement of major cardiovascular risk factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000017607.

Medical management of resistant hypertension: the role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Controlling hypertension to the desired target is commonly unsuccessful and requires multi-drug regimen, which can lead to undesirable side effects. Resistant hypertension (RH) is more cumbersome to deal with and has robust morbidity and mortality burden even with current multiple medical options. Herein, we review the literature for the potential role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as a treatment option for hypertension and RH.

RECENT FINDINGS

With more recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs), SGLT2i have gained more recognition for their renal and cardiovascular protection as well as mortality benefit that are believed to be medication class-related effects. Multiple RCTs have evaluated blood pressure (BP) lowering properties of SGLT2i, as a primary or secondary end point, in diabetic and nondiabetic patients, yet trials are scarce in studying SGLT2i as first-line antihypertensives, or as add-on agents for treating RH.

SUMMARY

Finding the right medical therapy in treating hypertension, especially RH, is commonly onerous when it comes to achieving BP targets, avoiding medication side effects, and aiming for the best outcomes. Utilizing existing drugs like SGLT2i or exploring other novel agents with more RCTs for these purposes will be beneficial. The addition of SGLT2i to the therapeutic armamentarium in patients with RH should be considered as a target for upcoming RCTs.

A considerable proportion of metabolic syndrome-free adults from Bratislava Region, Slovakia, display an increased cardiometabolic burden

Although the dichotomous classification of metabolic syndrome (MS) enables the classification of individuals as MS-free or presenting MS, it is inconvenient for assessing cardiometabolic risk in MS-free individuals. Continuous MS score allows for estimation of cardiometabolic burden even in MS-free subjects. We used the scores to estimate the proportion of MS-free subjects on high cardiometabolic risk. A total of 876 subjects (62% females) of Central European descent, aged 20-81 years, were included. International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria were employed to classify MS. Continuous scores were calculated. We used the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to estimate the cutoff value to determine the proportion of MS-free subjects on increased risk. Using the waist circumference, 38% of males and 23% of females presented MS. ROC area under the curves (90%-98%) showed an acceptable performance of both scores to classify the presence of MS. Up to 18% of MS-free males and up to 10% of females displayed continuous score ≥ the relevant cutoff point. The waist-to-height ratio performed similar results. Both continuous scores were proven credible for assessing cardiometabolic risk in MS-free subjects. Clinically, this is important for earlier intervention. Despite minor differences between waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio, it would be appropriate to objectify it using reference population. Novelty: The first study using Z-MSS/siMSS (population-specific Z-score/continuous score of MS) to estimate cardiometabolic risk in Slovak adults. A proportion of MS-free Slovak adults is on high cardiometabolic risk. Difference between using waist circumference and the waist-to-height ratio does not seem to be major in our cohort.

Quality-of-Life Comparison of Dapagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial (J-BOND Study)

INTRODUCTION

No study has compared the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is) on patients' quality-of-life (QOL).

METHODS

We enrolled 253 drug-naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), randomly assigned them into a dapagliflozin (SGLT2i) group or DPP4i group in approximately 1:1 ratio, and monitored them for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects indicating improvement in the "overall quality of life" domain of SHIELD-WQ-9 at week 24. Secondary endpoints included other domains of SHIELD-WQ-9, DTR-QOL, EQ-5D-5L, medication preference, medication adherence, diet therapy adherence, body weight, body mass index (BMI), abdominal circumference, HbA1c, and frequency of adverse events.

RESULTS

The proportion of subjects indicating improvement in the "overall quality of life" domain of SHIELD-WQ-9 at week 24 was higher in the dapagliflozin group (28.4%) than in the DPP4i group (18.6%) (p = 0.08). The proportion of subjects indicating improvement in the "physical health" domain of SHIELD-WQ-9 at week 24 was significantly higher in the dapagliflozin group (42.2%) than in the DPP4i group (23.7%) (p = 0.004). Total scores and domain 1 scores of DTR-QOL showed greater improvement in the dapagliflozin group (14.3 ± 15.6 and 15.5 ± 20.8, respectively) than in the DPP4i group (10.2 ± 15.6 and 10.3 ± 19.5, respectively) (both p = 0.05). EQ-5D-5L scores had significantly improved in the DPP4i group (0.023 ± 0.088) (p = 0.005); the intergroup difference was not significant (p = 0.14). Body weight (p < 0.001), BMI (p < 0.001), and abdominal circumference (p = 0.019) had significantly decreased in the dapagliflozin group compared with the corresponding values in the DPP4i group.

CONCLUSION

Dapagliflozin showed a comparable or more favorable benefit on Japanese patients' QOL compared with DPP4is. Dapagliflozin was well tolerated. It significantly reduced body weight, which was significantly correlated with improvement in the patients' QOL. This study demonstrates that dapagliflozin can be used as a first-line drug for T2DM in Japan with a beneficial impact on patients' QOL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000030514); Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs051180165).

A randomized trial of dapagliflozin and metformin, alone and combined, in overweight women after gestational diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus are at a substantially increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus recurrence and type 2 diabetes. Weight gain, particularly increased central adiposity after delivery, is strongly associated with deterioration of pancreatic beta cell compensation for insulin resistance. Weight management after gestational diabetes mellitus could have a significant benefit in these women who are at a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the treatment efficacy of dapagliflozin and metformin, alone and in combination, on body weight and anthropometric, cardiovascular, and metabolic parameters in overweight women with a recent history of gestational diabetes mellitus.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, single-blind, randomized, outpatient clinical trial with 3 parallel treatment groups. Overweight or obese (body mass index>25) females (n=66; ≥18-45 years) with gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnancy in the past 12 months were randomized in a single-blind manner to dapagliflozin, metformin, or dapagliflozin-metformin for 24 weeks. Body weight, height, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, and blood pressure were determined at baseline and trial completion. Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed at baseline and 24 weeks to assess glycemia and mean blood glucose and calculate insulin sensitivity and secretion measures. Plasma lipid fractions, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and liver enzymes were also assessed in the fasting sample at the beginning and completion of the study trial.

RESULTS

The study was completed by 49 participants (74%). Significant reduction of weight, waist circumference, and waist-to-height ratio and improved glycemia and insulin sensitivity index derived from oral glucose tolerance test were found with dapagliflozin-metformin vs metformin monotherapy. Both dapagliflozin and dapagliflozin-metformin therapy were superior to metformin in increasing high-density lipoprotein levels, reducing triglyceride concentrations, lowering the triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, and improving glucose excursion after an oral glucose tolerance test. The early insulin response to a glucose challenge significantly improved with only dapagliflozin-metformin compared with single-drug treatments.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report comparing the efficacy of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor alone and in combination with metformin in this patient population. We found that combination dapagliflozin-metformin treatment over a 24-week period had a greater positive effect on body weight, waist circumference, and glycemic, cardiovascular, and metabolic parameters than metformin monotherapy in overweight or obese at-risk women with a recent history of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Canagliflozin Increases Calorie Intake in Type 2 Diabetes Without Changing the Energy Ratio of the Three Macronutrients: CANA-K Study

Background: Sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve glycemic control and reduce body weight by increasing glycosuria. Although a compensatory increase of food intake has been reported, the long-term effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on food intake remains unclear. This study investigated the influence of canagliflozin on calorie and nutrient intake over 1 year. Materials and Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 107) were enrolled and followed prospectively while receiving canagliflozin at 100 mg/day for 12 months. Intake of nutrients was investigated by using the food frequency questionnaire. Hemoglobin A1c, body weight, and satisfaction with diabetes treatment (assessed by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: DTSQ) were also investigated. Results: The baseline total energy intake was 1723 ± 525 kcal/day and it showed a persistent increase during treatment with canagliflozin, being 132 kcal higher at 6 months (P = 0.0058) and 113 kcal higher at 12 months (P = 0.0516). Intake of all three macronutrients (carbohydrate, protein, and fat) was significantly increased after 6 months of canagliflozin treatment (P = 0.0129, P = 0.0160, and P = 0.0314, respectively), but their ratio was unchanged. The DTSQ score improved significantly and both hemoglobin A1c and body weight showed a significant decrease throughout treatment (all P < 0.0001). Conclusions: After patients with type 2 diabetes commenced canagliflozin, their calorie intake increased without changing the ratio of the three macronutrients. Despite elevation of the calorie intake, glycemic control improved and weight loss was achieved. Satisfaction with treatment of diabetes also increased.

Use of SGLT-2 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Abdominal Obesity: An Asian Perspective and Expert Recommendations

The prevalence of obesity in Asia is of epidemic proportions, with an estimated 1 billion overweight/obese individuals in the region. The majority of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are overweight/obese, which increases the risk of cardiorenal outcomes in these patients; hence, sustained reductions in body weight and visceral adiposity are important management goals. However, most of the glucose-lowering therapies such as insulin, sulfonylureas, glinides, and thiazolidinediones induce weight gain, which makes the management of overweight/obese T2DM patients challenging. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are the only oral glucose-lowering agents that have been shown to reduce body weight and visceral adiposity. In addition, SGLT-2 inhibitors therapy reduces ectopic fat deposition and improves adipose tissue function and weight-related quality of life. In this article, we aim to consolidate the existing literature on the effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors in Asian patients with T2DM and to produce clinical recommendations on their use in overweight or obese patients with T2DM. Recommendations from international and regional guidelines, as well as published data from clinical trials in Asian populations and cardiovascular outcomes trials are reviewed. Based on the available data, SGLT-2 inhibitors represent an evidence-based therapeutic option for the management of overweight/obese patients with T2DM.

Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on body composition, fluid status and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in type 2 diabetes: a prospective study using bioimpedance spectroscopy

Background

SGLT2-inhibitors are potent antihyperglycemic drugs for patients with type 2 diabetes and have been shown to reduce body weight. However, it is unclear which body compartments are reduced and to what extent.

Methods

In this longitudinal observational study, we analyzed the body composition of 27 outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during the first week and up to 6 months after initiation of treatment with SGLT2-inhibitors (n = 18 empagliflozin, n = 9 dapagliflozin) using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BCM, Fresenius). Fluid status of hypertensive patients taking medication with hydrochlorothiazide (n = 14) and healthy persons (n = 16) were analyzed for comparison.

Results

At 6 months, HbA1c decreased by 0.8% (IQR 2.3; 0.4), body weight and BMI by 2.6 kg (1.5; 9.3) and 0.9 kg/m² (0.4; 3.3), respectively. Bioimpedance spectroscopy revealed significant decrease in adipose tissue mass and fat tissue index while lean tissue parameters remained stable. Overhydration (OH) and extracellular water (ECW) decreased by − 0.5 L/1.73 m² (− 0.1; − 0.9) and − 0.4 L/1.73 m² (− 0.1; − 0.8) at day 3, respectively, and returned to the initial value after 3 and 6 months. Plasma renin activity increased by 2.1-fold (0.5; 3.6) at 1 month and returned to the initial level at month 3 and 6. Fluid status of patients with SGLT2 inhibitors after 6 months showed no difference from that of hypertensive patients taking hydrochlorothiazide or healthy persons.

Conclusions

Body weight reduction under the treatment with SGLT2-inhibitors is caused by reduction of adipose tissue mass and transient loss of extracellular fluid, which is accompanied by upregulation of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). Permanent loss of extracellular water does not occur under SGLT2 inhibition.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12933-019-0852-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Effect of Linagliptin versus Metformin Treatment-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION

There have been no studies directly comparing the effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors with that of metformin on treatment-related quality of life (QOL) when used as first-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

This study is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group, comparative study. Forty-four participants who failed to achieve target glycemic control with diet and exercise therapy were randomly allocated to receive linagliptin or metformin therapy. We compared treatment-related QOL among the two groups using the Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire, version 2 (OHA-Q version 2) and the self-administered Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL (DTR-QOL) questionnaire.

RESULTS

After randomization, 21 patients in the linagliptin group and 22 patients in the metformin treatment group were included in the full analysis set. Biochemical parameters, incidence of adverse effects, and rate of adherence to medication were comparable between the two groups. Over the 24-week treatment period, no significant differences in overall OHA-Q scores between the groups were observed, although the subscale 1 (treatment convenience) score was significantly higher in the linagliptin group than in the metformin group. The overall DTR-QOL score did not differ between the two groups; however, the DTR-QOL scores significantly improved after 24 weeks of linagliptin treatment, but not after metformin treatment.

CONCLUSION

We did not find significantly better treatment-related QOL with linagliptin among Japanese patients with T2DM. In terms of treatment convenience, our data showed that linagliptin was superior to metformin.

FUNDING

This study was financially supported by Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd. and Eli Lilly and Company. The journal's article processing fees were covered by a research fund from Juntendo University.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000022953.

Efficacy of intermittent empagliflozin supplementation on dietary self-management and glycaemic control in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A 24-week randomized controlled trial

AIMS

To explore the effects of intermittent use of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, on dietary self-management and glycaemic control in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel-group, comparative clinical trial of 50 patients with type 2 diabetes, treated with no more than three oral antidiabetic drugs (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] ≥52 mmol/mol but <86 mmol/mol). The participants were randomized to take 10 mg/d empagliflozin either every day (regular group, n = 25) or on the day on which they considered they had overeaten (intermittent group, n = 25) for 24 weeks. We limited empagliflozin prescription to half of the required period in the intermittent group. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c at the end of the 24-week treatment period relative to baseline. The secondary outcomes included changes in body weight, daily energy intake and diabetes treatment-related quality of life (QoL). Energy intake was assessed using a diet-specific validated questionnaire rather than actual assessments of food intake.

RESULTS

The intake rate of empagliflozin was 96.7 ± 7.2% for the regular group and 45.7 ± 7.0% for the intermittent group. Interestingly, ΔHbA1c was identical in the two groups (-0.64 ± 0.19% and - 0.65 ± 0.17%, respectively). Body weight decreased (-2.72 ± 0.52 and - 1.50 ± 0.45 kg, respectively) and diabetes treatment-related QoL increased significantly from baseline in both groups. Energy intake, however, decreased significantly only in the intermittent group (-221.0 ± 108.3 kcal/d).

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent empagliflozin supplementation is a useful therapeutic option that empowers dietary self-management, improves glycaemic control and is accompanied by body weight loss and an increase in diabetes treatment-related QoL in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

Study Protocol for the Initial Choice of DPP-4 Inhibitor in Japanese Patients with Type 2 diabetes Mellitus: Effect of Linagliptin on QOL (INTEL-QOL) Trial

INTRODUCTION

Consideration of treatment-related quality of life (QOL) is important in diabetes management. However, no studies have compared the influence of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors versus metformin on treatment-related QOL when used as first-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

This study is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group, comparative study. Between June 2016 and December 2017, 44 participants who failed to achieve glycemic control despite diet and exercise therapy were recruited at 14 clinics and randomly allocated to linagliptin or metformin therapy. Treatment-related QOL was assessed with the Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire, version 2 (OHA-Q ver. 2) and the self-administered Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL (DTR-QOL) questionnaire. The primary study outcome is the difference in total OHA-Q ver. 2 score between the two treatment groups at the end of the study. The secondary outcomes include differences in the scores for each OHA-Q ver. 2 subscale between the two treatment groups at the end of the study, change in total DTR-QOL score and for each domain from baseline to the end of treatment, changes in glycemic control, and adverse events.

PLANNED OUTCOME

The present study is designed to assess the effects of linagliptin on the treatment-related QOL. Results will be available in the near future. Study findings are expected to provide useful information on how to maintain or improve QOL in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin.

FUNDING

Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd. and Eli Lilly and Company.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000022953.