1
|
By S, Kahl A, Cogswell PM. Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials: What Have We Learned From Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024. [PMID: 39031716 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of cognitive impairment and dementia worldwide with rising prevalence, incidence and mortality. Despite many decades of research, there remains an unmet need for disease-modifying treatment that can significantly alter the progression of disease. Recently, with United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approvals, there have been tremendous advances in this area, with agents demonstrating effects on cognition and biomarkers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an instrumental role in these trials. This review article aims to outline how MRI is used for screening eligibility, monitoring safety and measuring efficacy in clinical trials, leaning on the landscape of past and recent AD clinical trials that have used MRI as examples; further, insight on promising MRI biomarkers for future trials is provided. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha By
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey, USA
| | - Anja Kahl
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ten Kate M, Barkhof F, Schwarz AJ. Consistency between Treatment Effects on Clinical and Brain Atrophy Outcomes in Alzheimer's Disease Trials. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2024; 11:38-47. [PMID: 38230715 PMCID: PMC10994869 DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2023.92] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Longitudinal changes in volumetric MRI outcome measures have been shown to correlate well with longitudinal changes in clinical instruments and have been widely used as biomarker outcomes in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD). While instances of discordant findings have been noted in some trials, especially the recent amyloid-removing therapies, the overall relationship between treatment effects on brain atrophy and clinical outcomes, and how it might depend on treatment target or mechanism, clinical instrument or imaging variable is not yet clear. OBJECTIVE To systematically assess the consistency and therapeutic class-dependence of treatment effects on clinical outcomes and on brain atrophy in published reports of clinical trials conducted in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or AD. DESIGN Quantitative review of the published literature. The consistency of treatment effects on clinical and brain atrophy outcomes was assessed in terms of statistical agreement with hypothesized equal magnitude effects (e.g., 30% slowing of both) and nominal directional concordance, as a function of therapeutic class. SETTING Interventional randomized clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS MCI or AD trial participants. INTERVENTION Treatments included were those that involved ingestion or injection of a putatively active substance into the body, encompassing both pharmacological and controlled dietary interventions. MEASUREMENTS Each trial included in the analysis reported at least one of the required clinical outcomes (ADAS-Cog, CDR-SB or MMSE) and at least one of the required imaging outcomes (whole brain, ventricular or hippocampal volume). RESULTS Data from 35 trials, comprising 185 pairwise comparisons, were included. Overall, the 95% confidence bounds overlapped with the line of identity for 150/185 (81%) of the imaging-clinical variable pairs. The greatest proportion of outliers was found in trials of anti-amyloid antibodies that have been shown to dramatically reduce the level of PET-detectable amyloid plaques, for which only 13/33 (39%) of observations overlapped the identity line. A Deming regression calculated using all data points yielded a slope of 0.54, whereas if data points from the amyloid remover class were excluded, the Deming regression line had a slope of 0.92. Directional discordance of treatment effects was also most pronounced for the amyloid-removing class, and for comparisons involving ventricular volume. CONCLUSION Our results provide a frame of reference for the interpretation of clinical and brain atrophy results from future clinical trials and highlight the importance of mechanism of action in the interpretation of imaging results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ten Kate
- Adam J Schwarz, PhD, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., 40 Landsdowne St., Cambridge MA 02139, USA Tel: (+1) 317 282 3557,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elghanam Y, Purja S, Kim EY. Biomarkers as Endpoints in Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 99:693-703. [PMID: 38669547 DOI: 10.3233/jad-240008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease that imposes economic and societal burden. Biomarkers have played a crucial role in the recent approval of aducanumab and lecanemab as disease-modifying therapies which marked a significant milestone for the treatment of AD. The inclusion of biomarkers in AD trials facilitates precise diagnosis, monitors safety, demonstrates target engagement, and supports disease modification. Objective This study analyzed the utilization state and trends of biomarkers as endpoints in AD trials. Methods In this retrospective study, trials were collected by searching clinicaltrials.gov using the term "Alzheimer". Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed separately for each phase. Results Among the 1,048 analyzed trials, 313 (29.87%) adopted biomarkers as primary endpoints and 364 (34.73%) as secondary endpoints, mainly in phases 1 and 2. The top three biomarkers adopted as primary endpoints in phases 1, 2, and 3 were amyloid-PET, tau-PET, and MRI. The top three biomarkers adopted as secondary endpoints, in phase 1, were cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β (Aβ), blood Aβ and amyloid-PET; in phase 2, they were MRI, CSF Aβ, and CSF phospho-tau; and in phase 3, they were amyloid PET, MRI, and blood Aβ. There was a statistically significant increase in the adoption of biomarkers as primary endpoints in phase 2 trials (p = 0.001) and secondary endpoints in phase 3 trials (p = 0.001). Conclusions The growing recognition of the importance of biomarkers in AD trial' design and drug development is evident by the significant steady increase in biomarkers' utilization in phases 2 and 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yomna Elghanam
- Department of Health, Evidence-Based and Clinical Research Laboratory, Social, and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sujata Purja
- Department of Health, Evidence-Based and Clinical Research Laboratory, Social, and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Young Kim
- Department of Health, Evidence-Based and Clinical Research Laboratory, Social, and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
- The Graduate School for Pharmaceutical Industry Management, College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
- The Department of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Sciences, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schell M, Foltyn-Dumitru M, Bendszus M, Vollmuth P. Automated hippocampal segmentation algorithms evaluated in stroke patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:11712. [PMID: 37474622 PMCID: PMC10359355 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38833-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep learning segmentation algorithms can produce reproducible results in a matter of seconds. However, their application to more complex datasets is uncertain and may fail in the presence of severe structural abnormalities-such as those commonly seen in stroke patients. In this investigation, six recent, deep learning-based hippocampal segmentation algorithms were tested on 641 stroke patients of a multicentric, open-source dataset ATLAS 2.0. The comparisons of the volumes showed that the methods are not interchangeable with concordance correlation coefficients from 0.266 to 0.816. While the segmentation algorithms demonstrated an overall good performance (volumetric similarity [VS] 0.816 to 0.972, DICE score 0.786 to 0.921, and Hausdorff distance [HD] 2.69 to 6.34), no single out-performing algorithm was identified: FastSurfer performed best in VS, QuickNat in DICE and average HD, and Hippodeep in HD. Segmentation performance was significantly lower for ipsilesional segmentation, with a decrease in performance as a function of lesion size due to the pathology-based domain shift. Only QuickNat showed a more robust performance in volumetric similarity. Even though there are many pre-trained segmentation methods, it is important to be aware of the possible decrease in performance for the segmentation results on the lesion side due to the pathology-based domain shift. The segmentation algorithm should be selected based on the research question and the evaluation parameter needed. More research is needed to improve current hippocampal segmentation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Schell
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martha Foltyn-Dumitru
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hu F, Chen AA, Horng H, Bashyam V, Davatzikos C, Alexander-Bloch A, Li M, Shou H, Satterthwaite TD, Yu M, Shinohara RT. Image harmonization: A review of statistical and deep learning methods for removing batch effects and evaluation metrics for effective harmonization. Neuroimage 2023; 274:120125. [PMID: 37084926 PMCID: PMC10257347 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography from multiple batches (e.g. sites, scanners, datasets, etc.) are increasingly used alongside complex downstream analyses to obtain new insights into the human brain. However, significant confounding due to batch-related technical variation, called batch effects, is present in this data; direct application of downstream analyses to the data may lead to biased results. Image harmonization methods seek to remove these batch effects and enable increased generalizability and reproducibility of downstream results. In this review, we describe and categorize current approaches in statistical and deep learning harmonization methods. We also describe current evaluation metrics used to assess harmonization methods and provide a standardized framework to evaluate newly-proposed methods for effective harmonization and preservation of biological information. Finally, we provide recommendations to end-users to advocate for more effective use of current methods and to methodologists to direct future efforts and accelerate development of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengling Hu
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
| | - Andrew A Chen
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Hannah Horng
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Vishnu Bashyam
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine, United States
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine, United States
| | - Aaron Alexander-Bloch
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Penn-CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, United States; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States
| | - Mingyao Li
- Statistical Center for Single-Cell and Spatial Genomics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Haochang Shou
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine, United States
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Penn-CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, United States; The Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Meichen Yu
- Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aramadaka S, Mannam R, Sankara Narayanan R, Bansal A, Yanamaladoddi VR, Sarvepalli SS, Vemula SL. Neuroimaging in Alzheimer's Disease for Early Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e38544. [PMID: 37273363 PMCID: PMC10239271 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly, affecting roughly half of those over the age of 85. We briefly discussed the risk factors, epidemiology, and treatment options for AD. The development of therapeutic therapies operating very early in the disease cascade has been spurred by the realization that the disease process begins at least a decade or more before the manifestation of symptoms. Thus, the clinical significance of early diagnosis was emphasized. Using various keywords, a literature search was carried out using PubMed and other databases. For inclusion, pertinent articles were chosen and reviewed. This article has reviewed different neuroimaging techniques that are considered advanced tools to aid in establishing a diagnosis and highlighted the advantages as well as disadvantages of those techniques. Besides, the prevalence of several in vivo biomarkers aided in discriminating affected individuals from healthy controls in the early stages of the disease. Each imaging method has its advantages and disadvantages, hence no single imaging approach can be the optimum modality for diagnosis. This article also commented on a better approach to using these techniques to increase the likelihood of an early diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raam Mannam
- Research, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, IND
| | | | - Arpit Bansal
- Research, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, IND
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang P, Zhang M. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies of Neurodegenerative Disease: From Methods to Translational Research. Neurosci Bull 2023; 39:99-112. [PMID: 35771383 PMCID: PMC9849544 DOI: 10.1007/s12264-022-00905-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) have become a significant threat to an aging human society. Numerous studies have been conducted in the past decades to clarify their pathologic mechanisms and search for reliable biomarkers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful tool for investigating structural and functional brain alterations in NDs. With the advantages of being non-invasive and non-radioactive, it has been frequently used in both animal research and large-scale clinical investigations. MRI may serve as a bridge connecting micro- and macro-level analysis and promoting bench-to-bed translational research. Nevertheless, due to the abundance and complexity of MRI techniques, exploiting their potential is not always straightforward. This review aims to briefly introduce research progress in clinical imaging studies and discuss possible strategies for applying MRI in translational ND research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peiyu Huang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009 China
| | - Minming Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009 China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Assunção SS, Sperling RA, Ritchie C, Kerwin DR, Aisen PS, Lansdall C, Atri A, Cummings J. Meaningful benefits: a framework to assess disease-modifying therapies in preclinical and early Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2022; 14:54. [PMID: 35440022 PMCID: PMC9017027 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-022-00984-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need for preventive therapies that interrupt the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) before the onset of symptoms or when symptoms are emerging is urgent and has spurred the ongoing development of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in preclinical and early AD (mild cognitive impairment [MCI] to mild dementia). Assessing the meaningfulness of what are likely small initial treatment effects in these earlier stages of the AD patho-clinical disease continuum is a major challenge and warrants further consideration. BODY: To accommodate a shift towards earlier intervention in AD, we propose meaningful benefits as a new umbrella concept that encapsulates the spectrum of potentially desirable outcomes that may be demonstrated in clinical trials and other studies across the AD continuum, with an emphasis on preclinical AD and early AD (i.e., MCI due to AD and mild AD dementia). The meaningful benefits framework applies to data collection, assessment, and communication across three dimensions: (1) multidimensional clinical outcome assessments (COAs) including not only core disease outcomes related to cognition and function but also patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes, health and economic outcomes, and neuropsychiatric symptoms; (2) complementary analyses that help contextualize and expand the understanding of COA-based assessments, such as number-needed-to-treat or time-to-event analyses; and (3) assessment of both cumulative benefit and predictive benefit, where early changes on cognitive, functional, or biomarker assessments predict longer-term clinical benefit. CONCLUSION The concept of meaningful benefits emphasizes the importance of multidimensional reporting of clinical trial data while, conceptually, it advances our understanding of treatment effects in preclinical AD and mild cognitive impairment due to AD. We propose that such an approach will help bridge the gap between the emergence of DMTs and their clinical use, particularly now that a DMT is available for patients diagnosed with MCI due to AD and mild AD dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila Seleri Assunção
- US Medical Affairs - Neuroscience, Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Reisa A Sperling
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Craig Ritchie
- Edinburgh Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Diana R Kerwin
- Kerwin Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Paul S Aisen
- University of Southern California Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Alireza Atri
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ, USA
- Center for Brain/Mind Medicine, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Cummings
- Chambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Verdi S, Marquand AF, Schott JM, Cole JH. Beyond the average patient: how neuroimaging models can address heterogeneity in dementia. Brain 2021; 144:2946-2953. [PMID: 33892488 PMCID: PMC8634113 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Dementia is a highly heterogeneous condition, with pronounced individual differences in age of onset, clinical presentation, progression rates and neuropathological hallmarks, even within a specific diagnostic group. However, the most common statistical designs used in dementia research studies and clinical trials overlook this heterogeneity, instead relying on comparisons of group average differences (e.g. patient versus control or treatment versus placebo), implicitly assuming within-group homogeneity. This one-size-fits-all approach potentially limits our understanding of dementia aetiology, hindering the identification of effective treatments. Neuroimaging has enabled the characterization of the average neuroanatomical substrates of dementias; however, the increasing availability of large open neuroimaging datasets provides the opportunity to examine patterns of neuroanatomical variability in individual patients. In this update, we outline the causes and consequences of heterogeneity in dementia and discuss recent research that aims to tackle heterogeneity directly, rather than assuming that dementia affects everyone in the same way. We introduce spatial normative modelling as an emerging data-driven technique, which can be applied to dementia data to model neuroanatomical variation, capturing individualized neurobiological 'fingerprints'. Such methods have the potential to detect clinically relevant subtypes, track an individual's disease progression or evaluate treatment responses, with the goal of moving towards precision medicine for dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Verdi
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Andre F Marquand
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6525EN, The Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, 6525EN, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathan M Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - James H Cole
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A comparison of automated atrophy measures across the frontotemporal dementia spectrum: Implications for trials. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2021; 32:102842. [PMID: 34626889 PMCID: PMC8503665 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a common cause of young onset dementia, and whilst there are currently no treatments, there are several promising candidates in development and early phase trials. Comprehensive investigations of neuroimaging markers of disease progression across the full spectrum of FTD disorders are lacking and urgently needed to facilitate these trials. Objective To investigate the comparative performance of multiple automated segmentation and registration pipelines used to quantify longitudinal whole-brain atrophy across the clinical, genetic and pathological subgroups of FTD, in order to inform upcoming trials about suitable neuroimaging-based endpoints. Methods Seventeen fully automated techniques for extracting whole-brain atrophy measures were applied and directly compared in a cohort of 226 participants who had undergone longitudinal structural 3D T1-weighted imaging. Clinical diagnoses were behavioural variant FTD (n = 56) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA, n = 104), comprising semantic variant PPA (n = 38), non-fluent variant PPA (n = 42), logopenic variant PPA (n = 18), and PPA-not otherwise specified (n = 6). 49 of these patients had either a known pathogenic mutation or postmortem confirmation of their underlying pathology. 66 healthy controls were included for comparison. Sample size estimates to detect a 30% reduction in atrophy (80% power; 0.05 significance) were computed to explore the relative feasibility of these brain measures as surrogate markers of disease progression and their ability to detect putative disease-modifying treatment effects. Results Multiple automated techniques showed great promise, detecting significantly increased rates of whole-brain atrophy (p<0.001) and requiring sample sizes of substantially less than 100 patients per treatment arm. Across the different FTD subgroups, direct measures of volume change consistently outperformed their indirect counterparts, irrespective of the initial segmentation quality. Significant differences in performance were found between both techniques and patient subgroups, highlighting the importance of informed biomarker choice based on the patient population of interest. Conclusion This work expands current knowledge and builds on the limited longitudinal investigations currently available in FTD, as well as providing valuable information about the potential of fully automated neuroimaging biomarkers for sporadic and genetic FTD trials.
Collapse
|
11
|
Barber P, Nestor SM, Wang M, Wu P, Ursenbach J, Munir A, Gupta R, Tariq SS, Smith E, Frayne R, Black SE, Sajobi T, Coutts S. Hippocampal atrophy and cognitive function in transient ischemic attack and minor stroke patients over three years. CEREBRAL CIRCULATION - COGNITION AND BEHAVIOR 2021; 2:100019. [PMID: 36324718 PMCID: PMC9616379 DOI: 10.1016/j.cccb.2021.100019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Transient ischemic attack (TIA) and minor ischemic stroke (IS) is associated with a increased risk of late life dementia. In this study we aim to study the extent to which the rates of hippocampal atrophy in TIA/IS differ from healthy controls, and how they are correlated to neuropsychological measurements. Methods TIA or minor stroke patients were tested with a neuropsychological battery including tests of executive function, and verbal and non-verbal memory at three time points out to 3 years. Annualized rates of hippocampal atrophy in TIA/IS patients were compared to controls. A linear-mixed regression model was used to assess the difference in rates of hippocampal atrophy after adjusting for time and demographic characteristics. Results TIA/IS patients demonstrated a higher hippocampal atrophy rate than healthy controls over a 3-year interval: the annual percentage change of the left hippocampal volume was 2.5% (78 mm3 per year (SD 60)) for TIA/IS patients compared to 0.9% (29 mm3 per year (SD 32)) for controls (p < 0.01); and the annual percentage change of the right hippocampal volume was 2.5% (80 mm3 per year (SD 46)) for TIA/IS patients compared to 0.5% (17 mm3 per year (SD 33)) for controls (P < 0.01). Patients with higher annual hippocampal atrophy were more likely to report higher TMT B times, but lower ROC total score, lower California Verbal Learning Test-II total recall, and lower ROC Figure recall scores longitudinally. Conclusion TIA/IS patients experience a higher rate of hippocampal atrophy independent of TIA/IS recurrence that are associated with changes in episodic memory and executive function over 3 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Barber
- Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sean M. Nestor
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Meng Wang
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Canada
| | - Pauline Wu
- Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
| | - Jake Ursenbach
- Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Seaman Family MR Center, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB, Canada
| | - Amlish Munir
- Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Seaman Family MR Center, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB, Canada
| | - Rani Gupta
- Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Seaman Family MR Center, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB, Canada
| | - Sah Sana Tariq
- Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB, Canada
| | - Eric Smith
- Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB, Canada
| | - Richard Frayne
- Seaman Family MR Center, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sandra E. Black
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tolupe Sajobi
- Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Canada
| | - Shelagh Coutts
- Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary AB, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alosco ML, Culhane J, Mez J. Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Targets for the Academic Memory Disorders Clinic. Neurotherapeutics 2021; 18:772-791. [PMID: 33847906 PMCID: PMC8423967 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-021-01028-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative disease associated with exposure to repetitive head impacts, such as those from contact sports. The pathognomonic lesion for CTE is the perivascular accumulation of hyper-phosphorylated tau in neurons and other cell process at the depths of sulci. CTE cannot be diagnosed during life at this time, limiting research on risk factors, mechanisms, epidemiology, and treatment. There is an urgent need for in vivo biomarkers that can accurately detect CTE and differentiate it from other neurological disorders. Neuroimaging is an integral component of the clinical evaluation of neurodegenerative diseases and will likely aid in diagnosing CTE during life. In this qualitative review, we present the current evidence on neuroimaging biomarkers for CTE with a focus on molecular, structural, and functional modalities routinely used as part of a dementia evaluation. Supporting imaging-pathological correlation studies are also presented. We targeted neuroimaging studies of living participants at high risk for CTE (e.g., aging former elite American football players, fighters). We conclude that an optimal tau PET radiotracer with high affinity for the 3R/4R neurofibrillary tangles in CTE has not yet been identified. Amyloid PET scans have tended to be negative. Converging structural and functional imaging evidence together with neuropathological evidence show frontotemporal and medial temporal lobe neurodegeneration, and increased likelihood for a cavum septum pellucidum. The literature offers promising neuroimaging biomarker targets of CTE, but it is limited by cross-sectional studies of small samples where the presence of underlying CTE is unknown. Imaging-pathological correlation studies will be important for the development and validation of neuroimaging biomarkers of CTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Alosco
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University CTE Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, Suite B7800, MA, 02118, Boston, USA.
| | - Julia Culhane
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University CTE Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, Suite B7800, MA, 02118, Boston, USA
| | - Jesse Mez
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University CTE Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, Suite B7800, MA, 02118, Boston, USA
- Framingham Heart Study, Boston University School of Medicine, MA, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Oostveen WM, de Lange ECM. Imaging Techniques in Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of Applications in Early Diagnosis and Longitudinal Monitoring. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22042110. [PMID: 33672696 PMCID: PMC7924338 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22042110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting many individuals worldwide with no effective treatment to date. AD is characterized by the formation of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, followed by neurodegeneration, which leads to cognitive decline and eventually death. INTRODUCTION In AD, pathological changes occur many years before disease onset. Since disease-modifying therapies may be the most beneficial in the early stages of AD, biomarkers for the early diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring of disease progression are essential. Multiple imaging techniques with associated biomarkers are used to identify and monitor AD. AIM In this review, we discuss the contemporary early diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring of AD with imaging techniques regarding their diagnostic utility, benefits and limitations. Additionally, novel techniques, applications and biomarkers for AD research are assessed. FINDINGS Reduced hippocampal volume is a biomarker for neurodegeneration, but atrophy is not an AD-specific measure. Hypometabolism in temporoparietal regions is seen as a biomarker for AD. However, glucose uptake reflects astrocyte function rather than neuronal function. Amyloid-β (Aβ) is the earliest hallmark of AD and can be measured with positron emission tomography (PET), but Aβ accumulation stagnates as disease progresses. Therefore, Aβ may not be a suitable biomarker for monitoring disease progression. The measurement of tau accumulation with PET radiotracers exhibited promising results in both early diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring, but large-scale validation of these radiotracers is required. The implementation of new processing techniques, applications of other imaging techniques and novel biomarkers can contribute to understanding AD and finding a cure. CONCLUSIONS Several biomarkers are proposed for the early diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring of AD with imaging techniques, but all these biomarkers have their limitations regarding specificity, reliability and sensitivity. Future perspectives. Future research should focus on expanding the employment of imaging techniques and identifying novel biomarkers that reflect AD pathology in the earliest stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wieke M. van Oostveen
- Faculty of Science, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - Elizabeth C. M. de Lange
- Division of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre of Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-71-527-6330
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tosun D, Veitch D, Aisen P, Jack CR, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Saykin AJ, Bollinger J, Ovod V, Mawuenyega KG, Bateman RJ, Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Weiner MW. Detection of β-amyloid positivity in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative participants with demographics, cognition, MRI and plasma biomarkers. Brain Commun 2021; 3:fcab008. [PMID: 33842885 PMCID: PMC8023542 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In vivo gold standard for the ante-mortem assessment of brain β-amyloid pathology is currently β-amyloid positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid measures of β-amyloid42 or the β-amyloid42/β-amyloid40 ratio. The widespread acceptance of a biomarker classification scheme for the Alzheimer's disease continuum has ignited interest in more affordable and accessible approaches to detect Alzheimer's disease β-amyloid pathology, a process that often slows down the recruitment into, and adds to the cost of, clinical trials. Recently, there has been considerable excitement concerning the value of blood biomarkers. Leveraging multidisciplinary data from cognitively unimpaired participants and participants with mild cognitive impairment recruited by the multisite biomarker study of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, here we assessed to what extent plasma β-amyloid42/β-amyloid40, neurofilament light and phosphorylated-tau at threonine-181 biomarkers detect the presence of β-amyloid pathology, and to what extent the addition of clinical information such as demographic data, APOE genotype, cognitive assessments and MRI can assist plasma biomarkers in detecting β-amyloid-positivity. Our results confirm plasma β-amyloid42/β-amyloid40 as a robust biomarker of brain β-amyloid-positivity (area under curve, 0.80-0.87). Plasma phosphorylated-tau at threonine-181 detected β-amyloid-positivity only in the cognitively impaired with a moderate area under curve of 0.67, whereas plasma neurofilament light did not detect β-amyloid-positivity in either group of participants. Clinical information as well as MRI-score independently detected positron emission tomography β-amyloid-positivity in both cognitively unimpaired and impaired (area under curve, 0.69-0.81). Clinical information, particularly APOE ε4 status, enhanced the performance of plasma biomarkers in the detection of positron emission tomography β-amyloid-positivity by 0.06-0.14 units of area under curve for cognitively unimpaired, and by 0.21-0.25 units for cognitively impaired; and further enhancement of these models with an MRI-score of β-amyloid-positivity yielded an additional improvement of 0.04-0.11 units of area under curve for cognitively unimpaired and 0.05-0.09 units for cognitively impaired. Taken together, these multi-disciplinary results suggest that when combined with clinical information, plasma phosphorylated-tau at threonine-181 and neurofilament light biomarkers, and an MRI-score could effectively identify β-amyloid+ cognitively unimpaired and impaired (area under curve, 0.80-0.90). Yet, when the MRI-score is considered in combination with clinical information, plasma phosphorylated-tau at threonine-181 and plasma neurofilament light have minimal added value for detecting β-amyloid-positivity. Our systematic comparison of β-amyloid-positivity detection models identified effective combinations of demographics, APOE, global cognition, MRI and plasma biomarkers. Promising minimally invasive and low-cost predictors such as plasma biomarkers of β-amyloid42/β-amyloid40 may be improved by age and APOE genotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duygu Tosun
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dallas Veitch
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paul Aisen
- Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute (ATRI), Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - William J Jagust
- School of Public Health and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Ronald C Petersen
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Center for Neuroimaging, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - James Bollinger
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Vitaliy Ovod
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kwasi G Mawuenyega
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Randall J Bateman
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Leslie M Shaw
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
| | - Michael W Weiner
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Klibanov AL. Early-Stage Alzheimer Disease Image-guided Therapy Clinical Trial Serendipity: Glymphatic Efflux and Prolonged Meningeal Venous Permeability Enhancement. Radiology 2021; 298:663-664. [PMID: 33404362 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander L Klibanov
- From the Cardiovascular Division and Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, 409 Lane Rd, Charlottesville VA 22908
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Luo C, Li M, Qin R, Chen H, Huang L, Yang D, Ye Q, Liu R, Xu Y, Zhao H, Bai F. Long Longitudinal Tract Lesion Contributes to the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurol 2020; 11:503235. [PMID: 33178095 PMCID: PMC7597387 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.503235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The degenerative pattern of white matter (WM) microstructures during Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its relationship with cognitive function have not yet been clarified. The present research aimed to explore the alterations of the WM microstructure and its impact on amnestic mild cognitive (aMCI) and AD patients. Mechanical learning methods were used to explore the validity of WM microstructure lesions on the classification in AD spectrum disease. Methods: Neuropsychological data and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) images were collected from 28 AD subjects, 31 aMCI subjects, and 27 normal controls (NC). Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) were used to extract diffusion parameters in WM tracts. We performed ANOVA analysis to compare diffusion parameters and clinical features among the three groups. Partial correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between diffusion metrics and cognitive functions controlling for age, gender, and years of education. Additionally, we performed the support vector machine (SVM) classification to determine the discriminative ability of DTI metrics in the differentiation of aMCI and AD patients from controls. Results: As compared to controls or aMCI patients, AD patients displayed widespread WM lesions, including in the inferior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculi, and superior longitudinal fasciculus. Significant correlations between fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and radial diffusion (RD) of the long longitudinal tract and memory deficits were found in aMCI and AD groups, respectively. Furthermore, through SVM classification, we found DTI indicators generated by FA and MD parameters can effectively distinguish AD patients from the control group with accuracy rates of up to 89 and 85%, respectively. Conclusion: The WM microstructure is extensively disrupted in AD patients, and the WM integrity of the long longitudinal tract is closely related to memory, which would hold potential value for monitoring the progression of AD. The method of classification based on SVM and WM damage features may be objectively helpful to the classification of AD diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caimei Luo
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| | - Mengchun Li
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| | - Ruomeng Qin
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| | - Haifeng Chen
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| | - Lili Huang
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| | - Dan Yang
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| | - Qing Ye
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| | - Renyuan Liu
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| | - Yun Xu
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| | - Hui Zhao
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| | - Feng Bai
- The State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,Jiangsu Province Stroke Center for Diagnosis and Therapy, Nanjing, China.,Nanjing Neuropsychiatry Clinic Medical Center, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Butler T, Bowen R, Atwood CS. Septal hypertrophy and cell cycle re-entry in AD. Aging (Albany NY) 2020; 11:297-298. [PMID: 30668543 PMCID: PMC6366959 DOI: 10.18632/aging.101777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Butler
- Center for Brain Health, Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Richard Bowen
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Craig S Atwood
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hampel H, Vergallo A, Afshar M, Akman-Anderson L, Arenas J, Benda N, Batrla R, Broich K, Caraci F, Cuello AC, Emanuele E, Haberkamp M, Kiddle SJ, Lucía A, Mapstone M, Verdooner SR, Woodcock J, Lista S. Blood-based systems biology biomarkers for next-generation clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease
. DIALOGUES IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 2020. [PMID: 31636492 PMCID: PMC6787542 DOI: 10.31887/dcns.2019.21.2/hhampel] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD)-a complex disease showing multiple pathomechanistic alterations-is triggered by nonlinear dynamic interactions of genetic/epigenetic and environmental risk factors, which, ultimately, converge into a biologically heterogeneous disease. To tackle the burden of AD during early preclinical stages, accessible blood-based biomarkers are currently being developed. Specifically, next-generation clinical trials are expected to integrate positive and negative predictive blood-based biomarkers into study designs to evaluate, at the individual level, target druggability and potential drug resistance mechanisms. In this scenario, systems biology holds promise to accelerate validation and qualification for clinical trial contexts of use-including proof-of-mechanism, patient selection, assessment of treatment efficacy and safety rates, and prognostic evaluation. Albeit in their infancy, systems biology-based approaches are poised to identify relevant AD "signatures" through multifactorial and interindividual variability, allowing us to decipher disease pathophysiology and etiology. Hopefully, innovative biomarker-drug codevelopment strategies will be the road ahead towards effective disease-modifying drugs.
.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Hampel
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Andrea Vergallo
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Mohammad Afshar
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Leyla Akman-Anderson
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Joaquín Arenas
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Norbert Benda
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Richard Batrla
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Karl Broich
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Filippo Caraci
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - A Claudio Cuello
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Enzo Emanuele
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Marion Haberkamp
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Steven J Kiddle
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Alejandro Lucía
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Mark Mapstone
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Steven R Verdooner
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Janet Woodcock
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | - Simone Lista
- Author affiliations: AXA Research Fund & Sorbonne University Chair, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France; Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France (Harald Hampel, Andrea Vergallo, Simone Lista); Ariana Pharma, Paris, France (Mohammad Afshar); NeuroVision Imaging, Inc., Sacramento, California, USA (Leyla Akman-Anderson, Steven R. Verdooner); Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain (Joaquín Arenas, Alejandro Lucía); Biostatistics and Special Pharmacokinetics Unit/Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Norbert Benda); Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (Richard Batrla); Head and President, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Karl Broich); Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S., Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy (Filippo Caraci); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (A. Claudio Cuello); 2E Science, Robbio, Pavia, Italy (Enzo Emanuele); Neurology/Psychiatry/Ophthalmology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany (Marion Haberkamp); MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Steven J. Kiddle); Universidad Europea de Madrid (Sports Science Department), Madrid, Spain (Alejandro Lucía); Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA (Mark Mapstone); Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (Janet Woodcock). Address for correspondence: Professor Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Whole Picture: From Isolated to Global MRI Measures of Neurovascular and Neurodegenerative Disease. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2020. [PMID: 31894568 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31904-5_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to characterise the appearance of the brain in cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), ischaemic stroke, cognitive impairment, and dementia. SVD is a major cause of stroke and dementia; features of SVD include white matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin, lacunes of presumed vascular origin, microbleeds, and perivascular spaces. Cognitive impairment and dementia have traditionally been stratified into subtypes of varying origin, e.g., vascular dementia versus dementia of the Alzheimer's type (Alzheimer's disease; AD). Vascular dementia is caused by reduced blood flow in the brain, often as a result of SVD, and AD is thought to have its genesis in the accumulation of tau and amyloid-beta leading to brain atrophy. But after early seminal studies in the 1990s found neurovascular disease features in around 30% of AD patients, it is becoming recognised that so-called "mixed pathologies" (of vascular and neurodegenerative origin) exist in many more patients diagnosed with stroke, only one type of dementia, or cognitive impairment. On the back of these discoveries, attempts have recently been made to quantify the full extent of degenerative and vascular disease in the brain in vivo on MRI. The hope being that these "global" methods may one day lead to better diagnoses of disease and provide more sensitive measurements to detect treatment effects in clinical trials. Indeed, the "Total MRI burden of cerebral small vessel disease", the "Brain Health Index" (BHI), and "MRI measure of degenerative and cerebrovascular pathology in Alzheimer disease" have all been shown to have stronger associations with clinical and cognitive phenotypes than individual brain MRI features. This chapter will review individual structural brain MRI features commonly seen in SVD, stroke, and dementia. The relationship between these features and differing clinical and cognitive phenotypes will be discussed along with developments in their measurement and quantification. The chapter will go on to review emerging methods for quantifying the collective burden of structural brain MRI findings and how these "whole picture" methods may lead to better diagnoses of neurovascular and neurodegenerative disorders.
Collapse
|
20
|
La Joie R, Visani AV, Baker SL, Brown JA, Bourakova V, Cha J, Chaudhary K, Edwards L, Iaccarino L, Janabi M, Lesman-Segev OH, Miller ZA, Perry DC, O'Neil JP, Pham J, Rojas JC, Rosen HJ, Seeley WW, Tsai RM, Miller BL, Jagust WJ, Rabinovici GD. Prospective longitudinal atrophy in Alzheimer's disease correlates with the intensity and topography of baseline tau-PET. Sci Transl Med 2020; 12:eaau5732. [PMID: 31894103 PMCID: PMC7035952 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 328] [Impact Index Per Article: 82.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
β-Amyloid plaques and tau-containing neurofibrillary tangles are the two neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and are thought to play crucial roles in a neurodegenerative cascade leading to dementia. Both lesions can now be visualized in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers, opening new opportunities to study disease mechanisms and improve patients' diagnostic and prognostic evaluation. In a group of 32 patients at early symptomatic AD stages, we tested whether β-amyloid and tau-PET could predict subsequent brain atrophy measured using longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging acquired at the time of PET and 15 months later. Quantitative analyses showed that the global intensity of tau-PET, but not β-amyloid-PET, signal predicted the rate of subsequent atrophy, independent of baseline cortical thickness. Additional investigations demonstrated that the specific distribution of tau-PET signal was a strong indicator of the topography of future atrophy at the single patient level and that the relationship between baseline tau-PET and subsequent atrophy was particularly strong in younger patients. These data support disease models in which tau pathology is a major driver of local neurodegeneration and highlight the relevance of tau-PET as a precision medicine tool to help predict individual patient's progression and design future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renaud La Joie
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Adrienne V Visani
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Suzanne L Baker
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Jesse A Brown
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Viktoriya Bourakova
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jungho Cha
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kiran Chaudhary
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren Edwards
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Leonardo Iaccarino
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mustafa Janabi
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Orit H Lesman-Segev
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Zachary A Miller
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David C Perry
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - James P O'Neil
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Julie Pham
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Julio C Rojas
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Howard J Rosen
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - William W Seeley
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Richard M Tsai
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bruce L Miller
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - William J Jagust
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cole JH, Jolly A, de Simoni S, Bourke N, Patel MC, Scott G, Sharp DJ. Spatial patterns of progressive brain volume loss after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. Brain 2019; 141:822-836. [PMID: 29309542 PMCID: PMC5837530 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury leads to significant loss of brain volume, which continues into the chronic stage. This can be sensitively measured using volumetric analysis of MRI. Here we: (i) investigated longitudinal patterns of brain atrophy; (ii) tested whether atrophy is greatest in sulcal cortical regions; and (iii) showed how atrophy could be used to power intervention trials aimed at slowing neurodegeneration. In 61 patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (mean age = 41.55 years ± 12.77) and 32 healthy controls (mean age = 34.22 years ± 10.29), cross-sectional and longitudinal (1-year follow-up) brain structure was assessed using voxel-based morphometry on T1-weighted scans. Longitudinal brain volume changes were characterized using a novel neuroimaging analysis pipeline that generates a Jacobian determinant metric, reflecting spatial warping between baseline and follow-up scans. Jacobian determinant values were summarized regionally and compared with clinical and neuropsychological measures. Patients with traumatic brain injury showed lower grey and white matter volume in multiple brain regions compared to controls at baseline. Atrophy over 1 year was pronounced following traumatic brain injury. Patients with traumatic brain injury lost a mean (± standard deviation) of 1.55% ± 2.19 of grey matter volume per year, 1.49% ± 2.20 of white matter volume or 1.51% ± 1.60 of whole brain volume. Healthy controls lost 0.55% ± 1.13 of grey matter volume and gained 0.26% ± 1.11 of white matter volume; equating to a 0.22% ± 0.83 reduction in whole brain volume. Atrophy was greatest in white matter, where the majority (84%) of regions were affected. This effect was independent of and substantially greater than that of ageing. Increased atrophy was also seen in cortical sulci compared to gyri. There was no relationship between atrophy and time since injury or age at baseline. Atrophy rates were related to memory performance at the end of the follow-up period, as well as to changes in memory performance, prior to multiple comparison correction. In conclusion, traumatic brain injury results in progressive loss of brain tissue volume, which continues for many years post-injury. Atrophy is most prominent in the white matter, but is also more pronounced in cortical sulci compared to gyri. These findings suggest the Jacobian determinant provides a method of quantifying brain atrophy following a traumatic brain injury and is informative in determining the long-term neurodegenerative effects after injury. Power calculations indicate that Jacobian determinant images are an efficient surrogate marker in clinical trials of neuroprotective therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James H Cole
- Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Imperial College London, Division of Brain Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Amy Jolly
- Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Imperial College London, Division of Brain Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sara de Simoni
- Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Imperial College London, Division of Brain Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Niall Bourke
- Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Imperial College London, Division of Brain Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Maneesh C Patel
- Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Imperial College London, Division of Brain Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gregory Scott
- Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Imperial College London, Division of Brain Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - David J Sharp
- Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Imperial College London, Division of Brain Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bartel F, Visser M, de Ruiter M, Belderbos J, Barkhof F, Vrenken H, de Munck JC, van Herk M. Non-linear registration improves statistical power to detect hippocampal atrophy in aging and dementia. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 23:101902. [PMID: 31233953 PMCID: PMC6595082 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of different methods for determining hippocampal atrophy rates using longitudinal MRI scans in aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD). BACKGROUND Quantifying hippocampal atrophy caused by neurodegenerative diseases is important to follow the course of the disease. In dementia, the efficacy of new therapies can be partially assessed by measuring their effect on hippocampal atrophy. In radiotherapy, the quantification of radiation-induced hippocampal volume loss is of interest to quantify radiation damage. We evaluated plausibility, reproducibility and sensitivity of eight commonly used methods to determine hippocampal atrophy rates using test-retest scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS Manual, FSL-FIRST, FreeSurfer, multi-atlas segmentation (MALF) and non-linear registration methods (Elastix, NiftyReg, ANTs and MIRTK) were used to determine hippocampal atrophy rates on longitudinal T1-weighted MRI from the ADNI database. Appropriate parameters for the non-linear registration methods were determined using a small training dataset (N = 16) in which two-year hippocampal atrophy was measured using test-retest scans of 8 subjects with low and 8 subjects with high atrophy rates. On a larger dataset of 20 controls, 40 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 20 AD patients, one-year hippocampal atrophy rates were measured. A repeated measures ANOVA analysis was performed to determine differences between controls, MCI and AD patients. For each method we calculated effect sizes and the required sample sizes to detect one-year volume change between controls and MCI (NCTRL_MCI) and between controls and AD (NCTRL_AD). Finally, reproducibility of hippocampal atrophy rates was assessed using within-session rescans and expressed as an average distance measure DAve, which expresses the difference in atrophy rate, averaged over all subjects. The same DAve was used to determine the agreement between different methods. RESULTS Except for MALF, all methods detected a significant group difference between CTRL and AD, but none could find a significant difference between the CTRL and MCI. FreeSurfer and MIRTK required the lowest sample sizes (FreeSurfer: NCTRL_MCI = 115, NCTRL_AD = 17 with DAve = 3.26%; MIRTK: NCTRL_MCI = 97, NCTRL_AD = 11 with DAve = 3.76%), while ANTs was most reproducible (NCTRL_MCI = 162, NCTRL_AD = 37 with DAve = 1.06%), followed by Elastix (NCTRL_MCI = 226, NCTRL_AD = 15 with DAve = 1.78%) and NiftyReg (NCTRL_MCI = 193, NCTRL_AD = 14 with DAve = 2.11%). Manually measured hippocampal atrophy rates required largest sample sizes to detect volume change and were poorly reproduced (NCTRL_MCI = 452, NCTRL_AD = 87 with DAve = 12.39%). Atrophy rates of non-linear registration methods also agreed best with each other. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Non-linear registration methods were most consistent in determining hippocampal atrophy and because of their better reproducibility, methods, such as ANTs, Elastix and NiftyReg, are preferred for determining hippocampal atrophy rates on longitudinal MRI. Since performances of non-linear registration methods are well comparable, the preferred method would mostly depend on computational efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Bartel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M Visser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M de Ruiter
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Belderbos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL institutes of Neurology and healthcare engineering, London, United Kingdom
| | - H Vrenken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J C de Munck
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M van Herk
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chelban V, Bocchetta M, Hassanein S, Haridy NA, Houlden H, Rohrer JD. An update on advances in magnetic resonance imaging of multiple system atrophy. J Neurol 2019; 266:1036-1045. [PMID: 30460448 PMCID: PMC6420901 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-9121-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
In this review, we describe how different neuroimaging tools have been used to identify novel MSA biomarkers, highlighting their advantages and limitations. First, we describe the main structural MRI changes frequently associated with MSA including the 'hot cross-bun' and 'putaminal rim' signs as well as putaminal, pontine, and middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) atrophy. We discuss the sensitivity and specificity of different supra- and infratentorial changes in differentiating MSA from other disorders, highlighting those that can improve diagnostic accuracy, including the MCP width and MCP/superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP) ratio on T1-weighted imaging, raised putaminal diffusivity on diffusion-weighted imaging, and increased T2* signal in the putamen, striatum, and substantia nigra on susceptibility-weighted imaging. Second, we focus on recent advances in structural and functional MRI techniques including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), resting-state functional MRI (fMRI), and arterial spin labelling (ASL) imaging. Finally, we discuss new approaches for MSA research such as multimodal neuroimaging strategies and how such markers may be applied in clinical trials to provide crucial data for accurately selecting patients and to act as secondary outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viorica Chelban
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Toma Ciorbă 1, 2052, Chisinau, Moldova
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, UK
| | - Sara Hassanein
- Diagnostic Radiology department, Faculty of Medicine Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
- Department of Brain, Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, UK
| | - Nourelhoda A Haridy
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Henry Houlden
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Selvaganesan K, Whitehead E, DeAlwis PM, Schindler MK, Inati S, Saad ZS, Ohayon JE, Cortese ICM, Smith B, Steven Jacobson, Nath A, Reich DS, Inati S, Nair G. Robust, atlas-free, automatic segmentation of brain MRI in health and disease. Heliyon 2019; 5:e01226. [PMID: 30828660 PMCID: PMC6383003 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Brain- and lesion-volumes derived from magnetic resonance images (MRI) serve as important imaging markers of disease progression in neurodegenerative diseases and aging. While manual segmentation of these volumes is both tedious and impractical in large cohorts of subjects, automated segmentation methods often fail in accurate segmentation of brains with severe atrophy or high lesion loads. The purpose of this study was to develop an atlas-free brain Classification using DErivative-based Features (C-DEF), which utilizes all scans that may be acquired during the course of a routine MRI study at any center. Methods Proton-density, T2-weighted, T1-weighted, brain-free water, 3D FLAIR, 3D T2-weighted, and 3D T2*-weighted images, collected routinely on patients with neuroinflammatory diseases at the NIH, were used to optimize the C-DEF algorithm on healthy volunteers and HIV + subjects (cohort 1). First, manually marked lesions and eroded FreeSurfer brain segmentation masks (compiled into gray and white matter, globus pallidus, CSF labels) were used in training. Next, the optimized C-DEF was applied on a separate cohort of HIV + subjects (cohort two), and the results were compared with that of FreeSurfer and Lesion-TOADS. Finally, C-DEF segmentation was evaluated on subjects clinically diagnosed with various other neurological diseases (cohort three). Results C-DEF algorithm was optimized using leave-one-out cross validation on five healthy subjects (age 36 ± 11 years), and five subjects infected with HIV (age 57 ± 2.6 years) in cohort one. The optimized C-DEF algorithm outperformed FreeSurfer and Lesion-TOADS segmentation in 49 other subjects infected with HIV (cohort two, age 54 ± 6 years) in qualitative and quantitative comparisons. Although trained only on HIV brains, sensitivity to detect lesions using C-DEF increased by 45% in HTLV-I-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (n = 5; age 58 ± 7 years), 33% in multiple sclerosis (n = 5; 42 ± 9 years old), and 4% in subjects with polymorphism of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 gene (n = 5; age 24 ± 12 years) compared to Lesion-TOADS. Conclusion C-DEF outperformed other segmentation algorithms in the various neurological diseases explored herein, especially in lesion segmentation. While the results reported are from routine images acquired at the NIH, the algorithm can be easily trained and optimized for any set of contrasts and protocols for wider application. We are currently exploring various technical aspects of optimal implementation of CDEF in a clinical setting and evaluating a larger cohort of patients with other neurological diseases. Improving the accuracy of brain segmentation methodology will help better understand the relationship of imaging abnormalities to clinical and neuropsychological markers in disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kartiga Selvaganesan
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Emily Whitehead
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Paba M DeAlwis
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Matthew K Schindler
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | | | - Ziad S Saad
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Joan E Ohayon
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Irene C M Cortese
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Bryan Smith
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Steven Jacobson
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Avindra Nath
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Sara Inati
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| | - Govind Nair
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, 20893, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mayo CD, Garcia-Barrera MA, Mazerolle EL, Ritchie LJ, Fisk JD, Gawryluk JR. Relationship Between DTI Metrics and Cognitive Function in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2019; 10:436. [PMID: 30687081 PMCID: PMC6333848 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with a clinical presentation characterized by memory impairment and executive dysfunction. Our group previously demonstrated significant alterations in white matter microstructural metrics in AD compared to healthy older adults. We aimed to further investigate the relationship between white matter microstructure in AD and cognitive function, including memory and executive function. Methods: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and neuropsychological data were downloaded from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative database for 49 individuals with AD and 48 matched healthy older adults. The relationship between whole-brain fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AxD), radial diffusivity (RD), and composite scores of memory and executive function was examined. We also considered voxel-wise relationships using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics. Results: As expected, individuals with AD had lower composite scores on tests of memory and executive function, as well as disrupted white matter integrity (low FA, high MD, AxD, and RD) relative to healthy older adults in widespread regions, including the hippocampus. When the AD and healthy older adult groups were combined, we found significant relationships between DTI metrics (FA/MD/AxD/RD) and memory scores across widespread regions of the brain, including the medial temporal regions. We also found significant relationships between DTI metrics (FA/MD/AxD/RD) and executive function in widespread regions, including the frontal areas in the combined group. However, when the groups were examined separately, no significant relationships were found between DTI metrics (FA/MD/AxD/RD) and memory performance for either group. Further, we did not find any significant relationships between DTI metrics (FA/MD/AxD/RD) and executive function in the AD group, but we did observe significant relationships between FA/RD, and executive function in healthy older adults. Conclusion: White matter integrity is disrupted in AD. In a mixed sample of AD and healthy elderly persons, associations between measures of white matter microstructure and memory and executive cognitive test performance were evident. However, no significant linear relationship between the degree of white matter disruption and level of cognitive functioning (memory and executive abilities) was found in those with AD. Future longitudinal studies of the relations between DTI metrics and cognitive function in AD are required to determine whether DTI has potential to measure progression of AD and/or treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantel D Mayo
- Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | | | - Erin L Mazerolle
- Department of Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lesley J Ritchie
- Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - John D Fisk
- Department of Psychology, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jodie R Gawryluk
- Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
ten Kate M, Ingala S, Schwarz AJ, Fox NC, Chételat G, van Berckel BNM, Ewers M, Foley C, Gispert JD, Hill D, Irizarry MC, Lammertsma AA, Molinuevo JL, Ritchie C, Scheltens P, Schmidt ME, Visser PJ, Waldman A, Wardlaw J, Haller S, Barkhof F. Secondary prevention of Alzheimer's dementia: neuroimaging contributions. Alzheimers Res Ther 2018; 10:112. [PMID: 30376881 PMCID: PMC6208183 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-018-0438-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Alzheimer's disease (AD), pathological changes may arise up to 20 years before the onset of dementia. This pre-dementia window provides a unique opportunity for secondary prevention. However, exposing non-demented subjects to putative therapies requires reliable biomarkers for subject selection, stratification, and monitoring of treatment. Neuroimaging allows the detection of early pathological changes, and longitudinal imaging can assess the effect of interventions on markers of molecular pathology and rates of neurodegeneration. This is of particular importance in pre-dementia AD trials, where clinical outcomes have a limited ability to detect treatment effects within the typical time frame of a clinical trial. We review available evidence for the use of neuroimaging in clinical trials in pre-dementia AD. We appraise currently available imaging markers for subject selection, stratification, outcome measures, and safety in the context of such populations. MAIN BODY Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is a validated in-vivo marker of fibrillar amyloid plaques. It is appropriate for inclusion in trials targeting the amyloid pathway, as well as to monitor treatment target engagement. Amyloid PET, however, has limited ability to stage the disease and does not perform well as a prognostic marker within the time frame of a pre-dementia AD trial. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), providing markers of neurodegeneration, can improve the identification of subjects at risk of imminent decline and hence play a role in subject inclusion. Atrophy rates (either hippocampal or whole brain), which can be reliably derived from structural MRI, are useful in tracking disease progression and have the potential to serve as outcome measures. MRI can also be used to assess comorbid vascular pathology and define homogeneous groups for inclusion or for subject stratification. Finally, MRI also plays an important role in trial safety monitoring, particularly the identification of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). Tau PET to measure neurofibrillary tangle burden is currently under development. Evidence to support the use of advanced MRI markers such as resting-state functional MRI, arterial spin labelling, and diffusion tensor imaging in pre-dementia AD is preliminary and requires further validation. CONCLUSION We propose a strategy for longitudinal imaging to track early signs of AD including quantitative amyloid PET and yearly multiparametric MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara ten Kate
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7056, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Silvia Ingala
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adam J. Schwarz
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals Comparny, Cambridge, MA USA
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana USA
| | - Nick C. Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Gaël Chételat
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Inserm UMR-S U1237, Université de Caen-Normandie, GIP Cyceron, Caen, France
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Ewers
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Adriaan A. Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Craig Ritchie
- Centre for Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7056, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7056, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adam Waldman
- Centre for Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joanna Wardlaw
- Centre for Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sven Haller
- Affidea Centre de Diagnostic Radiologique de Carouge, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Insititutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sui X, Rajapakse JC. Profiling heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease using white-matter impairment factors. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2018; 20:1222-1232. [PMID: 30412925 PMCID: PMC6226553 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The clinical presentation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is not unitary as heterogeneity exists in the disease's clinical and anatomical characteristics. MRI studies have revealed that heterogeneous gray matter atrophy patterns are associated with specific traits of cognitive decline. Although white matter (WM) impairment also contributes to AD pathology, its heterogeneity remains unclear. The Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) method is a suitable framework to study heterogeneity and allows to identify latent impairment factors of AD instead of simply mapping an overall disease effect. By exploring whole brain WM skeleton images by using LDA, three latent factors were revealed in AD: a temporal-frontal impairment factor (temporal and frontal lobes, especially hippocampus and para-hippocampus), a parietal factor (parietal lobe, especially precuneus), and a long fibre bundle factor (corpus callosum and superior longitudinal fasciculus). As revealed by longitudinal analysis, the latent factors have distinct impact on cognitive decline: for executive function (EF), the temporal-frontal factor was more strongly associated with baseline EF compared with the parietal factor, while the long-fibre bundle factor was most associated with decline rate of EF; for memory, the three factors showed almost equal effect on the baseline memory and decline rate. For each participant, LDA estimates his/her composition profile of latent impairment factors, which indicates disease subtype. We also found that the APOE genotype affects the AD subtype. Specifically, APOE ε4 was more associated with the long fibre bundle factor and APOE ε2 was more associated with temporal-frontal factor. By investigating heterogeneity and subtypes of AD through white matter impairment factors, our study could facilitate precision medicine. LDA revealed three latent white matter impairment factors in Alzheimer’s disease. Latent factors associate with executive function and memory decline differently. Individual factor composition indicates disease subtype. The APOE genotype is associated with the factor composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuchao Sui
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 639798, Singapore
| | - Jagath C Rajapakse
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 639798, Singapore.
| | -
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 639798, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fujishima M, Kawaguchi A, Maikusa N, Kuwano R, Iwatsubo T, Matsuda H. Sample Size Estimation for Alzheimer's Disease Trials from Japanese ADNI Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 56:75-88. [PMID: 27911297 PMCID: PMC5240548 DOI: 10.3233/jad-160621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the sample sizes required for clinical trials of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-modifying treatments using atrophy measures from serial brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the Japanese population. Objective: The primary objective of the present study was to estimate how large a sample size would be needed for future clinical trials for AD-modifying treatments in Japan using atrophy measures of the brain as a surrogate biomarker. Methods: Sample sizes were estimated from the rates of change of the whole brain and hippocampus by the k-means normalized boundary shift integral (KN-BSI) and cognitive measures using the data of 537 Japanese Alzheimer’s Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI) participants with a linear mixed-effects model. We also examined the potential use of ApoE status as a trial enrichment strategy. Results: The hippocampal atrophy rate required smaller sample sizes than cognitive measures of AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Inclusion of ApoE status reduced sample sizes for AD and MCI patients in the atrophy measures. Conclusion: These results show the potential use of longitudinal hippocampal atrophy measurement using automated image analysis as a progression biomarker and ApoE status as a trial enrichment strategy in a clinical trial of AD-modifying treatment in Japanese people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motonobu Fujishima
- Integrative Brain Imaging Center (IBIC), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kojinkai Josai Clinic, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kawaguchi
- Center for Comprehensive Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Norihide Maikusa
- Integrative Brain Imaging Center (IBIC), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryozo Kuwano
- Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takeshi Iwatsubo
- Department of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Matsuda
- Integrative Brain Imaging Center (IBIC), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Scarapicchia V, Mazerolle EL, Fisk JD, Ritchie LJ, Gawryluk JR. Resting State BOLD Variability in Alzheimer's Disease: A Marker of Cognitive Decline or Cerebrovascular Status? Front Aging Neurosci 2018; 10:39. [PMID: 29515434 PMCID: PMC5826397 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that may benefit from early diagnosis and intervention. Therefore, there is a need to identify early biomarkers of AD using non-invasive techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Recently, novel approaches to the analysis of resting-state fMRI data have been developed that focus on the moment-to-moment variability in the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal. The objective of the current study was to investigate BOLD variability as a novel early biomarker of AD and its associated psychophysiological correlates. Method: Data were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) 2 database from 19 participants with AD and 19 similarly aged controls. For each participant, a map of BOLD signal variability (SDBOLD) was computed as the standard deviation of the BOLD timeseries at each voxel. Group comparisons were performed to examine global differences in resting state SDBOLD in AD versus healthy controls. Correlations were then examined between participant SDBOLD maps and (1) ADNI-derived composite scores of memory and executive function and (2) neuroimaging markers of cerebrovascular status. Results: Between-group comparisons revealed significant (p < 0.05) increases in SDBOLD in patients with AD relative to healthy controls in right-lateralized frontal regions. Lower memory scores and higher WMH burden were associated with greater SDBOLD in the healthy control group (p < 0.1), but not individuals with AD. Conclusion: The current study provides proof of concept of a novel resting state fMRI analysis technique that is non-invasive, easily accessible, and clinically compatible. To further explore the potential of SDBOLD as a biomarker of AD, additional studies in larger, longitudinal samples are needed to better understand the changes in SDBOLD that characterize earlier stages of disease progression and their underlying psychophysiological correlates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erin L. Mazerolle
- Department of Radiology and The Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - John D. Fisk
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Lesley J. Ritchie
- Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Jodie R. Gawryluk
- Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kinnunen KM, Cash DM, Poole T, Frost C, Benzinger TLS, Ahsan RL, Leung KK, Cardoso MJ, Modat M, Malone IB, Morris JC, Bateman RJ, Marcus DS, Goate A, Salloway SP, Correia S, Sperling RA, Chhatwal JP, Mayeux RP, Brickman AM, Martins RN, Farlow MR, Ghetti B, Saykin AJ, Jack CR, Schofield PR, McDade E, Weiner MW, Ringman JM, Thompson PM, Masters CL, Rowe CC, Rossor MN, Ourselin S, Fox NC. Presymptomatic atrophy in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: A serial magnetic resonance imaging study. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14:43-53. [PMID: 28738187 PMCID: PMC5751893 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.2268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Revised: 06/10/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Identifying at what point atrophy rates first change in Alzheimer's disease is important for informing design of presymptomatic trials. METHODS Serial T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans of 94 participants (28 noncarriers, 66 carriers) from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network were used to measure brain, ventricular, and hippocampal atrophy rates. For each structure, nonlinear mixed-effects models estimated the change-points when atrophy rates deviate from normal and the rates of change before and after this point. RESULTS Atrophy increased after the change-point, which occurred 1-1.5 years (assuming a single step change in atrophy rate) or 3-8 years (assuming gradual acceleration of atrophy) before expected symptom onset. At expected symptom onset, estimated atrophy rates were at least 3.6 times than those before the change-point. DISCUSSION Atrophy rates are pathologically increased up to seven years before "expected onset". During this period, atrophy rates may be useful for inclusion and tracking of disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsi M. Kinnunen
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - David M. Cash
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK,Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK,Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 203 448 3054; Fax: +44 (0)20 3448 3104.,
| | - Teresa Poole
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK,Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Chris Frost
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK,Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - R. Laila Ahsan
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Kelvin K. Leung
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - M. Jorge Cardoso
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK,Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marc Modat
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK,Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ian B. Malone
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - John C. Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Randall J. Bateman
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Daniel S. Marcus
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alison Goate
- Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen P. Salloway
- Department of Neurology, Butler Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Stephen Correia
- Department of Neurology, Butler Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Reisa A. Sperling
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jasmeer P. Chhatwal
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard P. Mayeux
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adam M. Brickman
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ralph N. Martins
- Centre of Excellence for Alzheimer’s Disease Research and Care, School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Martin R. Farlow
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Bernardino Ghetti
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Andrew J. Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Centre for Neuroimaging, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Peter R. Schofield
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia,School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Eric McDade
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael W. Weiner
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John M. Ringman
- Department of Neurology, Keck USC School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul M. Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Stevens Neuroimaging & Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
| | - Colin L. Masters
- The Florey Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher C. Rowe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Martin N. Rossor
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Sebastien Ourselin
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK,Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nick C. Fox
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wen YR, Yang JH, Wang X, Yao ZB. Induced dural lymphangiogenesis facilities soluble amyloid-beta clearance from brain in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neural Regen Res 2018; 13:709-716. [PMID: 29722325 PMCID: PMC5950683 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.230299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Impaired amyloid-β clearance from the brain is a core pathological event in Alzheimer's disease. The therapeutic effect of current pharmacotherapies is unsatisfactory, and some treatments cause severe side effects. The meningeal lymphatic vessels might be a new route for amyloid-β clearance. This study investigated whether promoting dural lymphangiogenesis facilitated the clearance of amyloid-β from the brain.First, human lymphatic endothelial cells were treated with 100 ng/mL recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor-C (rhVEGF-C) protein. Light microscopy verified that rhVEGF-C, a specific ligand for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 (VEGFR-3), significantly promoted tube formation of human lymphatic endothelial cells in vitro. In an in vivo study, 200 μg/mL rhVEGF-C was injected into the cisterna magna of APP/PS1 transgenic mice, once every 2 days, four times in total. Immunofluorescence staining demonstrated high levels of dural lymphangiogenesis in Alzheimer's disease mice. One week after rhVEGF-C administration, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results showed that levels of soluble amyloid-β were decreased in cerebrospinal fluid and brain. The Morris water maze test demonstrated that spatial cognition was restored. These results indicate that the upregulation of dural lymphangiogenesis facilities amyloid-β clearance from the brain of APP/PS1 mice, suggesting the potential of the VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 signaling pathway as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Ru Wen
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jun-Hua Yang
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zhi-Bin Yao
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Harper L, Bouwman F, Burton EJ, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, O'Brien JT, Fox NC, Ridgway GR, Schott JM. Patterns of atrophy in pathologically confirmed dementias: a voxelwise analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2017; 88:908-916. [PMID: 28473626 PMCID: PMC5740544 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Imaging is recommended to support the clinical diagnoses of dementias, yet imaging research studies rarely have pathological confirmation of disease. This study aims to characterise patterns of brain volume loss in six primary pathologies compared with controls and to each other. METHODS One hundred and eighty-six patients with a clinical diagnosis of dementia and histopathological confirmation of underlying pathology, and 73 healthy controls were included in this study. Voxel-based morphometry, based on ante-mortem T1-weighted MRI, was used to identify cross-sectional group differences in brain volume. RESULTS Early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer's disease exhibited different patterns of grey matter volume loss, with more extensive temporoparietal involvement in the early-onset group, and more focal medial temporal lobe loss in the late-onset group. The Presenilin-1 group had similar parietal involvement to the early-onset group with localised volume loss in the thalamus, medial temporal lobe and temporal neocortex. Lewy body pathology was associated with less extensive volume loss than the other pathologies, although precentral/postcentral gyri volume was reduced in comparison with other pathological groups. Tau and TDP43A pathologies demonstrated similar patterns of frontotemporal volume loss, although less extensive on the right in the 4-repeat-tau group, with greater parietal involvement in the TDP43A group. The TDP43C group demonstrated greater left anterior-temporal involvement. CONCLUSIONS Pathologically distinct dementias exhibit characteristic patterns of regional volume loss compared with controls and other dementias. Voxelwise differences identified in these cohorts highlight imaging signatures that may aid in the differentiation of dementia subtypes during life. The results of this study are available for further examination via NeuroVault (http://neurovault.org/collections/ADHMHOPN/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna Harper
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Femke Bouwman
- Alzheimer Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma J Burton
- Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU Medical Center, MS Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK.,Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London Faculty of Engineering Sciences, London, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John T O'Brien
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nick C Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Gerard R Ridgway
- FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Jonathan M Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article argues that the time is approaching for data-driven disease modelling to take centre stage in the study and management of neurodegenerative disease. The snowstorm of data now available to the clinician defies qualitative evaluation; the heterogeneity of data types complicates integration through traditional statistical methods; and the large datasets becoming available remain far from the big-data sizes necessary for fully data-driven machine-learning approaches. The recent emergence of data-driven disease progression models provides a balance between imposed knowledge of disease features and patterns learned from data. The resulting models are both predictive of disease progression in individual patients and informative in terms of revealing underlying biological patterns. RECENT FINDINGS Largely inspired by observational models, data-driven disease progression models have emerged in the last few years as a feasible means for understanding the development of neurodegenerative diseases. These models have revealed insights into frontotemporal dementia, Huntington's disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and other conditions. For example, event-based models have revealed finer graded understanding of progression patterns; self-modelling regression and differential equation models have provided data-driven biomarker trajectories; spatiotemporal models have shown that brain shape changes, for example of the hippocampus, can occur before detectable neurodegeneration; and network models have provided some support for prion-like mechanistic hypotheses of disease propagation. The most mature results are in sporadic Alzheimer's disease, in large part because of the availability of the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative dataset. Results generally support the prevailing amyloid-led hypothetical model of Alzheimer's disease, while revealing finer detail and insight into disease progression. SUMMARY The emerging field of disease progression modelling provides a natural mechanism to integrate different kinds of information, for example from imaging, serum and cerebrospinal fluid markers and cognitive tests, to obtain new insights into progressive diseases. Such insights include fine-grained longitudinal patterns of neurodegeneration, from early stages, and the heterogeneity of these trajectories over the population. More pragmatically, such models enable finer precision in patient staging and stratification, prediction of progression rates and earlier and better identification of at-risk individuals. We argue that this will make disease progression modelling invaluable for recruitment and end-points in future clinical trials, potentially ameliorating the high failure rate in trials of, e.g., Alzheimer's disease therapies. We review the state of the art in these techniques and discuss the future steps required to translate the ideas to front-line application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil P Oxtoby
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Iyappan A, Younesi E, Redolfi A, Vrooman H, Khanna S, Frisoni GB, Hofmann-Apitius M. Neuroimaging Feature Terminology: A Controlled Terminology for the Annotation of Brain Imaging Features. J Alzheimers Dis 2017; 59:1153-1169. [PMID: 28731430 PMCID: PMC5611802 DOI: 10.3233/jad-161148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Ontologies and terminologies are used for interoperability of knowledge and data in a standard manner among interdisciplinary research groups. Existing imaging ontologies capture general aspects of the imaging domain as a whole such as methodological concepts or calibrations of imaging instruments. However, none of the existing ontologies covers the diagnostic features measured by imaging technologies in the context of neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, the Neuro-Imaging Feature Terminology (NIFT) was developed to organize the knowledge domain of measured brain features in association with neurodegenerative diseases by imaging technologies. The purpose is to identify quantitative imaging biomarkers that can be extracted from multi-modal brain imaging data. This terminology attempts to cover measured features and parameters in brain scans relevant to disease progression. In this paper, we demonstrate the systematic retrieval of measured indices from literature and how the extracted knowledge can be further used for disease modeling that integrates neuroimaging features with molecular processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anandhi Iyappan
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, Sankt Augustin, Germany.,Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn-Aachen International Center for Information Technology, Bonn, Germany
| | - Erfan Younesi
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | - Alberto Redolfi
- Laboratory of Epidemiology and Neuroimaging, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Henri Vrooman
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Shashank Khanna
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, Sankt Augustin, Germany.,Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn-Aachen International Center for Information Technology, Bonn, Germany
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory of Epidemiology and Neuroimaging, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.,Memory Clinic and Laboratoire de Neuroimagerie du Vieillissement (LANVIE), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Martin Hofmann-Apitius
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, Sankt Augustin, Germany.,Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn-Aachen International Center for Information Technology, Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gordon E, Rohrer JD, Fox NC. Advances in neuroimaging in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurochem 2017; 138 Suppl 1:193-210. [PMID: 27502125 DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Revised: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a clinically and neuroanatomically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder with multiple underlying genetic and pathological causes. Whilst initial neuroimaging studies highlighted the presence of frontal and temporal lobe atrophy or hypometabolism as the unifying feature in patients with FTD, more detailed studies have revealed diverse patterns across individuals, with variable frontal or temporal predominance, differing degrees of asymmetry, and the involvement of other cortical areas including the insula and cingulate, as well as subcortical structures such as the basal ganglia and thalamus. Recent advances in novel imaging modalities including diffusion tensor imaging, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and molecular positron emission tomography imaging allow the possibility of investigating alterations in structural and functional connectivity and the visualisation of pathological protein deposition. This review will cover the major imaging modalities currently used in research and clinical practice, focusing on the key insights they have provided into FTD, including the onset and evolution of pathological changes and also importantly their utility as biomarkers for disease detection and staging, differential diagnosis and measurement of disease progression. Validating neuroimaging biomarkers that are able to accomplish these tasks will be crucial for the ultimate goal of powering upcoming clinical trials by correctly stratifying patient enrolment and providing sensitive markers for evaluating the effects and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies. This review describes the key insights provided by research into the major neuroimaging modalities currently used in research and clinical practice, including what they tell us about the onset and evolution of FTD and how they may be used as biomarkers for disease detection and staging, differential diagnosis and measurement of disease progression. This article is part of the Frontotemporal Dementia special issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Gordon
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Nick C Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Shenkin SD, Pernet C, Nichols TE, Poline JB, Matthews PM, van der Lugt A, Mackay C, Lanyon L, Mazoyer B, Boardman JP, Thompson PM, Fox N, Marcus DS, Sheikh A, Cox SR, Anblagan D, Job DE, Dickie DA, Rodriguez D, Wardlaw JM. Improving data availability for brain image biobanking in healthy subjects: Practice-based suggestions from an international multidisciplinary working group. Neuroimage 2017; 153:399-409. [PMID: 28232121 PMCID: PMC5798604 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 02/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain imaging is now ubiquitous in clinical practice and research. The case for bringing together large amounts of image data from well-characterised healthy subjects and those with a range of common brain diseases across the life course is now compelling. This report follows a meeting of international experts from multiple disciplines, all interested in brain image biobanking. The meeting included neuroimaging experts (clinical and non-clinical), computer scientists, epidemiologists, clinicians, ethicists, and lawyers involved in creating brain image banks. The meeting followed a structured format to discuss current and emerging brain image banks; applications such as atlases; conceptual and statistical problems (e.g. defining 'normality'); legal, ethical and technological issues (e.g. consents, potential for data linkage, data security, harmonisation, data storage and enabling of research data sharing). We summarise the lessons learned from the experiences of a wide range of individual image banks, and provide practical recommendations to enhance creation, use and reuse of neuroimaging data. Our aim is to maximise the benefit of the image data, provided voluntarily by research participants and funded by many organisations, for human health. Our ultimate vision is of a federated network of brain image biobanks accessible for large studies of brain structure and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan D Shenkin
- Geriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK; Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK; Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Cyril Pernet
- Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Thomas E Nichols
- Department of Statistics & WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Jean-Baptiste Poline
- Henry H. Wheeler, Jr. Brain Imaging Center Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, 132 Barker Hall, Office 210S, MC 3190, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Paul M Matthews
- Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Aad van der Lugt
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Clare Mackay
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Linda Lanyon
- International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 15A, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bernard Mazoyer
- Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, Institut des maladies neurodégénératives, Université de Bordeaux, CEA, CNRS, UMR5293, France
| | - James P Boardman
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
| | - Paul M Thompson
- Keck USC School of Medicine; NIH ENIGMA Center for Worldwide Medicine, Imaging and Genomics; Professor of Neurology, Psychiatry, Radiology, Pediatrics, Engineering & Ophthalmology; USC Imaging Genetics Center, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
| | - Nick Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Daniel S Marcus
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Simon R Cox
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK; Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK
| | - Devasuda Anblagan
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK; Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Dominic E Job
- Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Alexander Dickie
- Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Rodriguez
- Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joanna M Wardlaw
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK; Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh,UK; Department of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fagan ES, Pihlstrøm L. Genetic risk factors for cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease: a review of the literature. Eur J Neurol 2017; 24:561-e20. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.13258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- E. S. Fagan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine; University of Oslo; Oslo Norway
| | - L. Pihlstrøm
- Institute of Clinical Medicine; University of Oslo; Oslo Norway
- Department of Neurology; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo Norway
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Steiner GZ, Mathersul DC, MacMillan F, Camfield DA, Klupp NL, Seto SW, Huang Y, Hohenberg MI, Chang DH. A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies Examining Nutritional and Herbal Therapies for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Using Neuroimaging Methods: Study Characteristics and Intervention Efficacy. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE : ECAM 2017; 2017:6083629. [PMID: 28303161 PMCID: PMC5337797 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6083629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Neuroimaging facilitates the assessment of complementary medicines (CMs) by providing a noninvasive insight into their mechanisms of action in the human brain. This is important for identifying the potential treatment options for target disease cohorts with complex pathophysiologies. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate study characteristics, intervention efficacy, and the structural and functional neuroimaging methods used in research assessing nutritional and herbal medicines for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Six databases were searched for articles reporting on CMs, dementia, and neuroimaging methods. Data were extracted from 21/2,742 eligible full text articles and risk of bias was assessed. Nine studies examined people with Alzheimer's disease, 7 MCI, 4 vascular dementia, and 1 all-cause dementia. Ten studies tested herbal medicines, 8 vitamins and supplements, and 3 nootropics. Ten studies used electroencephalography (EEG), 5 structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 2 functional MRI (fMRI), 3 cerebral blood flow (CBF), 1 single photon emission tomography (SPECT), and 1 positron emission tomography (PET). Four studies had a low risk of bias, with the majority consistently demonstrating inadequate reporting on randomisation, allocation concealment, blinding, and power calculations. A narrative synthesis approach was assumed due to heterogeneity in study methods, interventions, target cohorts, and quality. Eleven key recommendations are suggested to advance future work in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Z. Steiner
- National Institute of Complementary Medicine (NICM), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
- School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
| | - Danielle C. Mathersul
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Freya MacMillan
- School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
| | - David A. Camfield
- School of Psychology and Illawarra Health & Medical Research Institute (IHMRI), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2252, Australia
- Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorne, VIC 3122, Australia
| | - Nerida L. Klupp
- National Institute of Complementary Medicine (NICM), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
- School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
| | - Sai W. Seto
- National Institute of Complementary Medicine (NICM), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
- School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
| | - Yong Huang
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Mark I. Hohenberg
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Campbelltown Hospital, South Western Sydney Area Health Service, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
| | - Dennis H. Chang
- National Institute of Complementary Medicine (NICM), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
- School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the primary cause of dementia in the elderly. It remains incurable and poses a huge socio-economic challenge for developed countries with an aging population. AD manifests by progressive decline in cognitive functions and alterations in behaviour, which are the result of the extensive degeneration of brain neurons. The AD pathogenic mechanism involves the accumulation of amyloid beta peptide (Aβ), an aggregating protein fragment that self-associates to form neurotoxic fibrils that trigger a cascade of cellular events leading to neuronal injury and death. Researchers from academia and the pharmaceutical industry have pursued a rational approach to AD drug discovery and targeted the amyloid cascade. Schemes have been devised to prevent the overproduction and accumulation of Aβ in the brain. The extensive efforts of the past 20 years have been translated into bringing new drugs to advanced clinical trials. The most progressed mechanism-based therapies to date consist of immunological interventions to clear Aβ oligomers, and pharmacological drugs to inhibit the secretase enzymes that produce Aβ, namely β-site amyloid precursor-cleaving enzyme (BACE) and γ-secretase. After giving an update on the development and current status of new AD therapeutics, this review will focus on BACE inhibitors and, in particular, will discuss the prospects of verubecestat (MK-8931), which has reached phase III clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Evin
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mayo CD, Mazerolle EL, Ritchie L, Fisk JD, Gawryluk JR. Longitudinal changes in microstructural white matter metrics in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage Clin 2016; 13:330-338. [PMID: 28066707 PMCID: PMC5200876 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2016] [Revised: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Current avenues of AD research focus on pre-symptomatic biomarkers that will assist with early diagnosis of AD. The majority of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based biomarker research to date has focused on neuronal loss in grey matter and there is a paucity of research on white matter. METHODS Longitudinal DTI data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 database were used to examine 1) the within-group microstructural white matter changes in individuals with AD and healthy controls at baseline and year one; and 2) the between-group microstructural differences in individuals with AD and healthy controls at both time points. RESULTS 1) Within-group: longitudinal Tract-Based Spatial Statistics revealed that individuals with AD and healthy controls both had widespread reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) and increased mean diffusivity (MD) with changes in the hippocampal cingulum exclusive to the AD group. 2) Between-group: relative to healthy controls, individuals with AD had lower FA and higher MD in the hippocampal cingulum, as well as the corpus callosum, internal and external capsule; corona radiata; posterior thalamic radiation; superior and inferior longitudinal fasciculus; fronto-occipital fasciculus; cingulate gyri; fornix; uncinate fasciculus; and tapetum. CONCLUSION The current results indicate that sensitivity to white matter microstructure is a promising avenue for AD biomarker research. Additional longitudinal studies on both white and grey matter are warranted to further evaluate potential clinical utility.
Collapse
Key Words
- AD, Alzheimer's disease
- ADNI, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
- Aging
- Alzheimer's disease
- DTI, diffusion tensor imaging
- Diffusion tensor imaging
- FA, fractional anisotropy
- FSL, Functional MRI of the Brain Software Library
- HC, healthy controls
- MCI, mild cognitive impairment
- MD, mean diffusivity
- MMSE, Mini Mental Status Exam
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- Magnetic resonance imaging
- ROI, region of interest
- TBSS, Tract-Based Spatial Statistics
- WMS, Wechsler Memory Scale
- White matter
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantel D. Mayo
- Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
| | - Erin L. Mazerolle
- Department of Radiology and the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, HSC 2905, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Lesley Ritchie
- Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, 350-771 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3N4, Canada
| | - John D. Fisk
- Psychology, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Queen Elizabeth II Health Centre, 4066, 4th Floor, Abbie J. Lane Memorial Building, 5909 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 2E2, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, 4066, Abbie J. Lane Memorial Building, 5909 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 2E2, Canada
- Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, 4066, Abbie J. Lane Memorial Building, 5909 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 2E2, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 4066, Abbie J. Lane Memorial Building, 5909 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 2E2, Canada
| | - Jodie R. Gawryluk
- Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Harrison TM, Bookheimer SY. Neuroimaging genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease in preclinical individuals: From candidate genes to polygenic approaches. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY: COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2016; 1:14-23. [PMID: 26858991 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2015.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Better characterization of the preclinical phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is needed in order to develop effective interventions. Neuropathological changes in AD, including neuronal loss and the formation of proteinaceous deposits, begin up to 20 years before the onset of clinical symptoms. As such, the emergence of cognitive impairment should not be the sole basis used to diagnose AD nor to evaluate individuals for enrollment in clinical trials for preventative AD treatments. Instead, early preclinical biomarkers of disease and genetic risk should be used to determine most likely prognosis and enroll individuals in appropriate clinical trials. Neuroimaging-based biomarkers and genetic analysis together present a powerful system for classifying preclinical pathology in patients. Disease modifying interventions are more likely to produce positive outcomes when administered early in the course of AD. In this review, we examine the utility of the neuroimaging genetics field as it applies to AD and early detection during the preclinical phase. Neuroimaging studies focused on single genetic risk factors are summarized. However, we particularly focus on the recent increased interest in polygenic methods and discuss the benefits and disadvantages of these approaches. We discuss challenges in the neuroimaging genetics field, including limitations of statistical power arising from small effect sizes and the over-use of cross-sectional designs. Despite the limitations, neuroimaging genetics has already begun to influence clinical trial design and will play a major role in the prevention of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa M Harrison
- Neuroscience Interdepartmental Graduate Program, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Susan Y Bookheimer
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Byun MS, Kim SE, Park J, Yi D, Choe YM, Sohn BK, Choi HJ, Baek H, Han JY, Woo JI, Lee DY. Heterogeneity of Regional Brain Atrophy Patterns Associated with Distinct Progression Rates in Alzheimer's Disease. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0142756. [PMID: 26618360 PMCID: PMC4664412 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2015] [Accepted: 10/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to identify and characterize subtypes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) exhibiting different patterns of regional brain atrophy on MRI using age- and gender-specific norms of regional brain volumes. AD subjects included in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study were classified into subtypes based on standardized values (Z-scores) of hippocampal and regional cortical volumes on MRI with reference to age- and gender-specific norms obtained from 222 cognitively normal (CN) subjects. Baseline and longitudinal changes of clinical characteristics over 2 years were compared across subtypes. Whole-brain-level gray matter (GM) atrophy pattern using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of the subtypes were also investigated. Of 163 AD subjects, 58.9% were classified as the “both impaired” subtype with the typical hippocampal and cortical atrophy pattern, whereas 41.1% were classified as the subtypes with atypical atrophy patterns: “hippocampal atrophy only” (19.0%), “cortical atrophy only” (11.7%), and “both spared” (10.4%). Voxel-based morphometric analysis demonstrated whole-brain-level differences in overall GM atrophy across the subtypes. These subtypes showed different progression rates over 2 years; and all subtypes had significantly lower CSF amyloid-β1–42 levels compared to CN. In conclusion, we identified four AD subtypes exhibiting heterogeneous atrophy patterns on MRI with different progression rates after controlling the effects of aging and gender on atrophy with normative information. CSF biomarker analysis suggests the presence of Aβ neuropathology irrespective of subtypes. Such heterogeneity of MRI-based neuronal injury biomarker and related heterogeneous progression patterns should be considered in clinical trials and practice with AD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Soo Byun
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Song E. Kim
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsick Park
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dahyun Yi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Min Choe
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Bo Kyung Sohn
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Choi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyewon Baek
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Young Han
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Inn Woo
- Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Young Lee
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- * E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Magierski R, Sobow T. Benefits and risks of add-on therapies for Alzheimer's disease. Neurodegener Dis Manag 2015; 5:445-62. [DOI: 10.2217/nmt.15.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite three decades of intensive research, the efforts of scientific society and industry and the expenditures, numerous attempts to develop effective treatments for Alzheimer's disease have failed. Currently, approved and widely used medications to treat cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease are symptomatic only and show at best modest efficacy. In this context, the need to develop a successful, disease-modifying treatment is loudly expressed. One way to achieve this goal is the use of add-on therapies or various combinations of existing ‘conventional’ drugs. Results of several clinical studies and post hoc analyses of combination therapy with all cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine are published. Moreover, there is a need for studies on long-term efficacy of combination therapy in Alzheimer's.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radoslaw Magierski
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry & Psychotic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, 92–216 Lodz, Czechoslowacka Street 8/10, Poland
| | - Tomasz Sobow
- Department of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Lodz, 91–425 Lodz, Sterlinga Street 5, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lin L, Fu Z, Xu X, Wu S. Mouse brain magnetic resonance microscopy: Applications in Alzheimer disease. Microsc Res Tech 2015; 78:416-24. [PMID: 25810274 DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, various Alzheimer's disease (AD) trangenetic mice models harboring genes with mutation known to cause familial AD have been created. Today, high-resolution magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM) technology is being widely used in the study of AD mouse models. It has greatly facilitated and advanced our knowledge of AD. In this review, most of the attention is paid to fundamental of MRM, the construction of standard mouse MRM brain template and atlas, the detection of amyloid plaques, following up on brain atrophy and the future applications of MRM in transgenic AD mice. It is believed that future testing of potential drugs in mouse models with MRM will greatly improve the predictability of drug effect in preclinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Lin
- Biomedical Engineering Department, College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|