Risk factors for the flare of systemic lupus erythematosus and its influence on prognosis: a single-center retrospective analysis

Clinical features of flare in Japanese patients with new-onset SLE and risk factors for SLE flare in daily clinical practice: a single-center cohort study

This study aimed to elucidate the clinical features, outcomes and risk factors of flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Data were collected from patients with newly diagnosed SLE at the Fukushima Medical University Hospital between 2011 and 2022. Patients who experienced a flare during the study period constituted the flare group, and their clinical features were compared with those of the no-flare group. The cumulative flare-free survival regarding several clinical items was compared between the two groups using Kaplan-Meier's curves. Among 387 patients with SLE, 83 patients with newly diagnosed SLE were included. Their mean age was 37.9 years, and 29 patients experienced flares during the study period. The general characteristics were similar between the two groups, with the exception of the observation period and anti-SS-A antibody positivity. Regarding therapy, a significantly increased frequency of hydroxychloroquine intake and combination with immunosuppressive agents were observed in the no-flare group. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly higher cumulative flare-free survival in the anti-SS-A negative group and combination immunosuppressive therapy group. In conclusion, anti-SS-A positivity may be a risk factor for SLE flare. In turn, combination immunosuppressive therapy may be beneficial for SLE treatment in daily clinical practice.

Accuracy and adequacy of photoprotection in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus patients, and the effect of education on photoprotection: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease that is associated with multiple organ involvement and leads to significant morbidity and mortality. One of the important environmental factors that influences the exacerbation of preexisting SLE is ultraviolet (UV) radiation, so photoprotection is essential. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy and adequacy of photoprotection in pediatric SLE patients, and to investigate the effect of education on photoprotection.

METHODS

SLE patients aged ≤ 18 years who attended pediatric outpatient clinics were prospectively enrolled. The accuracy and adequacy of photoprotection were assessed by the questionnaire, and compared between baseline and the ≥ 3-month follow-up timepoint. Comprehensive written and verbal photoprotection education was provided to all patients and parents/caregivers after the first assessment.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included (mean age 13.6 ± 2.5, 92% female). At the first assessment, 79% of patients used sunscreen with a sunburn protection factor ≥ 30 (77%) and protection grade of ultraviolet A +  +  + (63%). Fifty-two percent of patients applied sunscreen every day. A minority of patients applied an adequate amount of sunscreen (32%), used water-resistant sunscreen (34%), used lip balm with sunscreen (23%) and reapplied sunscreen when sweating (13%). The most commonly missed areas when applying sunscreen were the ears and dorsum of the feet. The least often practiced sun protection behavior was wearing sunglasses. The most often reported activities during the peak UV index, were playing with friends and walking to the cafeterias. At the second assessment, the majority of photoprotection practices were improved in all aspects except using water-resistant sunscreen, reapplying sunscreen when sweating, applying sunscreen on the ears and dorsum of feet, and wearing sunglasses. The main reason for not using sunscreen switched from thinking it was unnecessary at the first assessment to disliking its texture at the second assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Education on photoprotection was effective in improving photoprotection practices. The photoprotection practices that need to be specifically emphasized are applying an adequate amount of sunscreen and using lip balm with sunscreen. The photoprotection which were least practiced at both the first and seconds assessments were reapplying sunscreen when sweating, applying sunscreen on the ears and dorsum of the feet, and wearing sunglasses.

A Flare Risk Index Informed by Select Immune Mediators in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is marked by immune dysregulation linked to varied clinical disease activity. Using a unique longitudinal cohort of SLE patients, this study sought to identify optimal immune mediators informing an empirically refined flare risk index (FRI) reflecting altered immunity prior to clinical disease flare.

METHODS

Thirty-seven SLE-associated plasma mediators were evaluated by microfluidic immunoassay in 46 samples obtained in SLE patients with an imminent clinical disease flare (preflare) and 53 samples obtained in SLE patients without a flare over a corresponding period (pre-nonflare). SLE patients were selected from a unique longitudinal cohort of 106 patients with classified SLE (meeting the American College of Rheumatology 1997 revised criteria for SLE or the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 revised criteria for SLE). Autoantibody specificities, hybrid SLE Disease Activity Index (hSLEDAI) scores, clinical features, and medication usage were also compared at preflare (mean ± SD 111 ± 47 days prior to flare) versus pre-nonflare (99 ± 21 days prior to nonflare) time points. Variable importance was determined by random forest analysis with logistic regression subsequently applied to determine the optimal number and type of analytes informing a refined FRI.

RESULTS

Preflare versus pre-nonflare differences were not associated with demographics, autoantibody specificities, hSLEDAI scores, clinical features, nor medication usage. Forward selection and backward elimination of mediators ranked by variable importance resulted in 17 plasma mediator candidates differentiating preflare from pre-nonflare visits. A final combination of 11 mediators best informed a newly refined FRI, which achieved a maximum sensitivity of 97% and maximum specificity of 98% after applying decision curve analysis to define low, medium, and high FRI scores.

CONCLUSION

We verified altered immune mediators associated with imminent disease flare, and a subset of these mediators improved the FRI to identify SLE patients at risk of imminent flare. This molecularly informed, proactive management approach could be critical in prospective clinical trials and the clinical management of lupus.

Risk factors of significant relapse and appropriate maintenance therapy strategy in SLE-associated immune thrombocytopenia

Background:

Systemic lupus erythematosus–associated immune thrombocytopenia (SLE-ITP) is characterized by relapse. The risk factors of relapse and appropriate maintenance therapy strategy deserve further exploration.

Objectives:

To determine the risk factors for relapse and appropriate maintenance therapy in significant SLE-ITP patients (a platelet count ⩽30 × 10⁹/l) after the first complete response.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study using the medical records of 105 patients diagnosed as significant SLE-ITP in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital during December 2012 to March 2021. Patients were followed through a call for observations in January 2022.

Methods:

Data including demographics, initial clinical feature, induction and maintenance therapy, and outcome at the end of follow-up were analyzed. Risk factors for significant relapse were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models. The cumulative hazard of significant relapse and the duration of response were estimated, and the differences in outcome between groups were compared using the Cox regression analysis.

Results:

A total of 65 significant SLE-ITP patients were eligible for the final analysis. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] follow-up duration and median [IQR] duration of response were 62.2 [41.0–79.6] months and 43.4 [20.3–68.7] months, respectively. After the first complete response, 19/65 (29.2%) had a significant relapse. Compared with sustained clinical remission (SCR) + sustained response (SR) group, significant relapse group had a higher proportion of discontinued patients (47.4% versus 8.7%, p = 0.001). Among the 13 discontinued patients, the duration of maintenance therapy of the patients in significant relapse group was significantly shorter than that of the patients in SCR + SR group (months, median [IQR], 43.1 [32.0–62.4] versus 12.0 [5.1–22.0], p = 0.009). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that drug withdrawal was an independent risk factor for significant relapse [odds ratio (OR) = 10.4, confidence interval (CI) 95% 2.2–47.8, p = 0.003]. There was no significant difference between glucocorticoids (GCs) + hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) group and GCs + HCQ + immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) group in significant relapse rate (26.7% versus 22.2%, p > 0.05). The two SR curves of GCs + HCQ and GCs + HCQ+ ISA group basically coincided by the Cox regression analysis, demonstrating comparable long-term outcomes (p > 0.05).

Conclusion:

Drug withdrawal, especially abrupt withdrawal with insufficient duration of maintenance therapy, is an independent risk factor for significant relapse of SLE-ITP. HCQ combined with GCs is expected to be the first choice of the maintenance therapy for SLE-ITP patients.

Risk of systemic lupus erythematosus flares according to autoantibody positivity at the time of diagnosis

To estimate the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares based on the autoantibody positivity at the time of SLE diagnosis. This retrospective cohort study included 228 patients with newly diagnosed SLE. Clinical characteristics including autoantibody positivity at the time of diagnosis of SLE were reviewed. Flares were defined as a new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A score or BILAG B score for at least one organ system. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate the risk of flares according to autoantibody positivity. Anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-U1RNP, anti-Ro, and anti-La antibodies (Abs) were positive in 50.0%, 30.7%, 42.5%, 54.8%, and 22.4% of the patients, respectively. The incidence rate of flares was 28.2/100 person-years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis, adjusted for potential confounders, revealed that anti-dsDNA Ab positivity (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46, p = 0.037) and anti-Sm Ab positivity (adjusted HR: 1.81, p = 0.004) at the time of diagnosis of SLE were associated with higher risk of flares. To better delineate the flare risk, patients were categorized as double-negative, single-positive, double-positive for anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm Abs. Compared with double-negativity, double-positivity (adjusted HR: 3.34, p < 0.001) was associated with higher risk of flares, while anti-dsDNA Ab single-positivity (adjusted HR: 1.11, p = 0.620) or anti-Sm Ab single-positivity (adjusted HR: 1.32, p = 0.270) was not associated with higher risk of flares. Patients who are double-positive for anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm Abs at the time of the diagnosis of SLE are at higher risk of flares and may benefit from stringent monitoring and early preventive treatment.

Systemic lupus erythematosus in China: a cross-sectional survey-based study on healthcare-seeking behaviors, disease progression, medication, knowledge of and attitudes toward the disease (Preprint)

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease involving multiple organs throughout the body. The health care-seeking behaviors, disease progression of SLE, and patients' knowledge of and attitudes toward SLE have not been characterized in China.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to depict the health care-seeking behaviors, disease progression, and medications in patients with SLE and to examine the factors associated with their disease flares, knowledge, and attitudes toward SLE in China.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey in 27 provinces in China. Descriptive statistical methods were used to depict the demographic characteristics, health care-seeking behaviors, medications, and health status. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the factors associated with disease flares, medication changes, and attitudes toward SLE. An ordinal regression model was used to examine the factors associated with the knowledge of the treatment guidelines.

RESULTS

We recruited 1509 patients with SLE, and 715 had lupus nephritis (LN). Approximately 39.96% (603/1509) of the patients with SLE were primarily diagnosed with LN, and 12.4% (112/906) developed LN (mean time 5.2 years) from non-LN. Patients whose registered permanent residences or workplaces in other cities from the same province and adjacent provinces seeking health care accounted for 66.9% (569/850) and 48.8% (479/981) of the patients with SLE in the provincial capital cities, respectively. Mycophenolate mofetil was the most commonly used immunosuppressive drug in patients without LN (185/794, 23.3%) and patients with LN (307/715, 42.9%). Femoral head necrosis (71/228, 31.1%) and hypertension (99/229, 43.2%) were the most common adverse event (AE) and chronic disease during treatment, respectively. Change of hospitals for medical consultation (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.24-2.90) and development of 1 chronic disease (OR 3.60, 95% CI 2.04-6.24) and AE (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.46-2.92) and more were associated with disease flares. A pregnancy plan (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.18-2.13) was associated with changes in medication. Only 242 (16.03%) patients with SLE were familiar with the treatment guidelines, and patients with LN tended to be more familiar with the disease (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.81-2.68). After receiving treatment, 891 (59.04%) patients changed their attitudes toward SLE from fear to acceptance, and patients with college education or higher (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.10-4.04) were associated with a positive attitude toward SLE.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of patients seeking health care in the provincial capital cities of China migrated from other cities. Persistent monitoring of potential AEs and chronic diseases during SLE treatment and managing patients who changed hospitals for medical consultation are essential for controlling disease flares. Patients had insufficient knowledge about SLE treatment guidelines and would benefit from health education to maintain a positive attitude toward SLE.

COVID-19 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review

The objectives of the study were to review the articles to identify (a) the epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); (b) the clinical characteristics of SLE patients with COVID-19; (c) the treatment of COVID-19 in SLE patients; and (d) the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on SLE patients. PubMed was systematically reviewed for literature published from December 2019 to June 2021. Our search was limited to human studies, with language restriction of English. Studies were included if they reported COVID-19 in SLE patients. Our systematic review included 52 studies. The prevalence of COVID-19 infection ranged from 0.0% to 18.1% in SLE patients, and the hospitalisation rates ranged from 0.24% to 10.6%. COVID-19 infection is likely to mimic SLE flare. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was ineffective in prevention of COVID-19, and SLE patients with COVID-19 faced difficulty in healthcare access, had financial constraints and suffered from psychological distress during the pandemic. The pandemic had a significant effect on mental and physical health. Adequate healthcare access, along with containment policies, social distancing measures and psychological nursing was required.