1
|
Capaldi JM, Shabanian J, Finster LB, Asher A, Wertheimer JC, Zebrack BJ, Shirazipour CH. Post-traumatic stress symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder, and post-traumatic growth among cancer survivors: a systematic scoping review of interventions. Health Psychol Rev 2024; 18:41-74. [PMID: 36632776 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2162947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The detrimental effects of Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms (PTSS) and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and the benefits of Post-Traumatic Growth (PTG) are well established for cancer survivors. Increased cancer survival rates necessitate an understanding of how these two paradoxical outcomes, PTSS/PTSD and PTG, are targeted through interventions. This systematic scoping review aims to (a) examine existing evidence on interventions targeting PTSS/PTSD and/or PTG among cancer survivors and (b) identify knowledge gaps to inform future research. Following the six steps of a scoping review, 76 articles met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative articles were examined using descriptive analysis. Frequency counts of the collated data were tabulated into summary tables. Qualitative articles were reviewed using meta-synthesis. Most articles were quantitative (n = 52) and targeted PTG (n = 68) through promising intervention approaches such as psychotherapy, mindfulness, physical activity, and psilocybin-assisted therapy. Three key implications for future research and practice were synthesized: (1) mechanistic considerations for intervention design that provide a roadmap for rigorous and theoretically-grounded research; (2) the need for improved representation of cancer survivors in trials; and (3) potential facilitators of intervention efficacy. Together, these findings can direct future research to optimize interventions to reduce PTSS/PTSD and promote PTG achievement among cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Capaldi
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Julia Shabanian
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laurel B Finster
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Arash Asher
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Celina H Shirazipour
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taylor J, Fradgley EA, Clinton‐McHarg T, Hall A, Paul CL. Perceived importance of emotional support provided by health care professionals and social networks: Should we broaden our focus for the delivery of supportive care? Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:681-689. [PMID: 36698247 PMCID: PMC10947305 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emotional support provided by health care professionals (HCPs) for people diagnosed with cancer is associated with improved outcomes. Support via social networks may also be important. AIMS To report among a sample of distressed patients and caregivers, (1) the importance attributed to different sources of emotional support (HCPs and social networks) by distressed cancer patients and caregivers; (2) the proportion who indicate they did not receive sufficient levels of emotional support; and (3) potential associations between respondents' demographic and clinical characteristics and reported lack of emotional support. METHODS This study utilised cross-sectional data from telephone interviews collected during the usual-care phase of the Structured Triage and Referral by Telephone (START) trial. Participants completed a telephone interview 6 months after their initial call to the Cancer Council Information and Support service and included recall of importance and sufficiency of emotional support. RESULTS More than two-thirds of patients (n = 234) and caregivers (n = 152) reported that family and friends were very important sources of emotional support. Nurses (69% and 42%) and doctors (68% and 47%) were reported very important, while a lower proportion reported that psychologists and psychiatrists were very important (39%, and 43%). Insufficient levels of support were reported by 36% of participants. Perceptions of insufficient support were significantly associated with distress levels (p < .0001) and not having a partner (p = .0115). CONCLUSION Social networks, particularly family, are an important source of emotional support. Higher levels of distress, those without partners, and caregivers may require targeted interventions to increase their access to emotional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Taylor
- School of Medicine and Public healthUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Priority Research Centre for Health BehaviourUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and TranslationUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Hunter Medical Research InstituteNew Lambton HeightsNewcastleNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Elizabeth A. Fradgley
- School of Medicine and Public healthUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Priority Research Centre for Health BehaviourUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and TranslationUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Hunter Medical Research InstituteNew Lambton HeightsNewcastleNew South WalesAustralia
- Cancer Institute New South WalesCancer Institute New South Wales, EveleighSydneyAustralia
| | - Tara Clinton‐McHarg
- Priority Research Centre for Health BehaviourUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and TranslationUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- School of PsychologyUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alix Hall
- School of Medicine and Public healthUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Priority Research Centre for Health BehaviourUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Hunter Medical Research InstituteNew Lambton HeightsNewcastleNew South WalesAustralia
- Hunter New England Population HealthHunter New England Area Health ServiceNewcastleNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Christine L. Paul
- School of Medicine and Public healthUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Priority Research Centre for Health BehaviourUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and TranslationUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Hunter Medical Research InstituteNew Lambton HeightsNewcastleNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Civilotti C, Lucchini D, Fogazzi G, Palmieri F, Benenati A, Buffoli A, Girardi V, Ruzzenenti N, Di Betta A, Donarelli E, Veglia F, Di Fini G, Gandino G. The role of integrated psychological support in breast cancer patients: a randomized monocentric prospective study evaluating the Fil-Rouge Integrated Psycho-Oncological Support (FRIPOS) program. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:266. [PMID: 37058253 PMCID: PMC10104919 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07732-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined the effects of Fil-Rouge Integrated Psycho-Oncological Support (FRIPOS) in a group of women with breast cancer compared with a group receiving treatment as usual (TAU). METHODS The research design was a randomized, monocentric, prospective study with three time points of data collection: after the preoperative phase (T0), in the initial phase of treatments (T1), and 3 months after the start of treatments (T2). The FRIPOS group (N = 103) and the TAU group (N = 79) completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R) at T0; the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 at T1; and SCL-90-R, EORTC QLQ-C30, and EORTC QLQ-BR23 at T2. RESULTS A series of independent and paired t tests showed that patients in the FRIPOS group performed better on all scales related to symptomatic manifestations and on some quality of life scales (fatigue, dyspnea, and sleep disturbances) at T2. In addition, a series of ten multiple regressions were performed to predict each SCL subscale at T2 from the SCL score at T0 and the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores at T2. In nine of ten regression models (all except somatization), both FRIPOS group membership and QoL subscale contributed significantly to prediction. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that patients in the FRIPOS group have more benefits in emotional, psychological, and collateral symptoms than patients in the TAU group and that these improvements are due to integrated psycho-oncology care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Civilotti
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Salesian University Institute (IUSTO), Turin, Italy
| | - Diana Lucchini
- Breast Psycho-Oncology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy
- Associazione Priamo, Via della Lama, 61, 25133, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Fogazzi
- Breast Medical Oncology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Palmieri
- Breast Surgery, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alice Benenati
- Breast Surgery, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alberto Buffoli
- Radiation Oncology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy
| | - Veronica Girardi
- Breast Radiology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy
| | - Nella Ruzzenenti
- Breast Pathology, EUSOMA-Certified Breast Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Anna, Via del Franzone 31, 25127, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Fabio Veglia
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giulia Di Fini
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Witzig Brändli V, Lange C, Kobleder A, Kohler M. Effectiveness and content components of nursing counselling interventions on self‐ and symptom management of patients in oncology rehabilitation—A systematic review. Nurs Open 2022; 10:2757-2769. [PMID: 36528868 PMCID: PMC10077385 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness and content components of nurse-led counselling interventions on the self-and symptom management of patients in oncology rehabilitation. DESIGN A systematic review METHODS: The electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Grey Literature were searched for randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental trials. Following data extraction, a quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The findings were synthesized in narrative and tabular formats. RESULTS Seven studies were included in the analysis. Two RCTs measured a statistically significant increase in self-efficacy compared to the control group, and one quasi-experimental study showed a statistically significant increase compared to the pre-intervention period. Symptom anxiety was statistically significantly reduced in two RCTs and one quasi-experimental trial. Self-management similarities in the components of the interventions were seen as identifying patients' concerns, setting goals, developing action plans and evaluating the goals and giving patient-tailored information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Witzig Brändli
- OST ‐ Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, IPW‐OST – Institute of Applied Nursing Science St. Gallen Switzerland
| | - Cordula Lange
- OST ‐ Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, IPW‐OST – Institute of Applied Nursing Science St. Gallen Switzerland
| | - Andrea Kobleder
- OST ‐ Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, IPW‐OST – Institute of Applied Nursing Science St. Gallen Switzerland
| | - Myrta Kohler
- OST ‐ Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, IPW‐OST – Institute of Applied Nursing Science St. Gallen Switzerland
- Rehabilitation Centre Valens St. Gallen Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baralo B, Paravathaneni M, Jain A, Buragamadagu B, Khanam A, Iqbal S, Hossain S, Mulla S, Choi E, Thirumaran R. Video education about side effects of chemotherapy and immunotherapy and its impact on the anxiety, depression, and distress level of cancer patients. BMC Psychol 2022; 10:278. [PMID: 36434673 PMCID: PMC9700903 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-00994-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients diagnosed with cancer are at higher risk of anxiety, depression, and overall distress. These mood disturbances are risk factors for non-adherence to cancer treatment, increased length of stay during hospital admissions, increased number of visits to the emergency department, and also impact survival. Although paper handouts about the potential side effects are widely used in the oncology practice studies have shown that digital educational material is known to work better when compared to traditional methods. However, the impact of video education on anxiety, depression, and distress have not been previously evaluated. Our study aimed to assess whether video education about potential chemotherapy and immunotherapy can reduce anxiety, depression, and distress levels. METHODS After IRB approval, we enrolled patients who were fluent in English, younger than 80 years of age, and who were able to provide informed consent. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Distress Thermometer were used to assess distress, as well as depression and anxiety before and after watching video educational material. Paired t-test was used to compare the differences between the scores before and after watching educational videos. The statistical software GraphPad Prism 9, San Diego, California, was used to perform the statistical analysis. RESULTS We enrolled 29 patients, of whom 20 completed the study, six withdrew, two were lost to follow-up, and one did not complete the initial questionnaire. Of all patients that completed the study 85% of the patient found videos helpful, and they were 7/10 likely to recommend them to other patients who may experience symptoms. The mean depression score changed from 4.75 before to 4.9 after watching the videos (p 0.77), distress score from 2.3 to 2.65 (p 0.52), and anxiety scores changed from 4.85 to 6.15 (p 0.03). The feedback provided by the patients indicated that they were more willing to watch the videos related to the side effects they experienced at their free time and convenience. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that patients were open to video education and found it helpful and worth watching. However, the exposure of the patients to the videos about potential side effects of cancer treatment, including those patients do not experience, may lead to increased anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bohdan Baralo
- grid.492469.40000 0004 0440 1055Internal Medicine, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA 19023 USA
| | - Mahati Paravathaneni
- grid.492469.40000 0004 0440 1055Internal Medicine, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA 19023 USA
| | - Akhil Jain
- grid.492469.40000 0004 0440 1055Internal Medicine, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA 19023 USA
| | - Bhanusowmya Buragamadagu
- grid.492469.40000 0004 0440 1055Internal Medicine, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA 19023 USA
| | - Aliza Khanam
- grid.492469.40000 0004 0440 1055Internal Medicine, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA 19023 USA
| | - Sabah Iqbal
- grid.492469.40000 0004 0440 1055Internal Medicine, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA 19023 USA
| | - Samia Hossain
- grid.492469.40000 0004 0440 1055Internal Medicine, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA 19023 USA
| | - Sana Mulla
- grid.492469.40000 0004 0440 1055Internal Medicine, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA 19023 USA
| | - Eugene Choi
- grid.492469.40000 0004 0440 1055Medical Oncology, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA USA
| | - Rajesh Thirumaran
- grid.492469.40000 0004 0440 1055Medical Oncology, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Johnston EA, Goodwin BC, Myers L, March S, Aitken JF, Chambers SK, Dunn J. Support-seeking by cancer caregivers living in rural Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2022; 46:850-857. [PMID: 36121279 DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.13304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Rural cancer caregivers report poor wellbeing and high unmet needs for support. This study investigates sources of support sought by cancer caregivers living in rural Australia, and factors associated with support-seeking. METHODS Informal caregivers of people with cancer completed a questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, caregiver factors and support-seeking. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and logistic regression were used to identify common sources of support and factors associated with support-seeking. Alluvial and radar plots were used to identify and describe support-seeking profiles. FINDINGS Of 244 rural caregivers, 64% reported seeking support for themselves, 72% for the cancer patient, and 22% did not seek any support. The most common sources of support were general practitioners and online. Higher caregiver burden, higher income, caring for someone with anxiety/depression or caring for someone who has difficulty completing their usual activities were associated with seeking support from a greater number of sources. The 'No support-seekers' profile had the highest proportions of caregivers who were male, caring for someone <12 months post-diagnosis and lower income earners. CONCLUSIONS Many rural caregivers seek support for themselves and the cancer patient, commonly from medical and online sources. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH Further work may be needed to reduce caregiver burden and support caregivers who are male, caring for someone recently diagnosed, and those with lower incomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Johnston
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Queensland.,School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland.,Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland
| | - Belinda C Goodwin
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Queensland.,Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland
| | - Larry Myers
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Queensland.,School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland
| | - Sonja March
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland.,School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Queensland.,Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland.,School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland.,School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Queensland
| | - Suzanne K Chambers
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Queensland.,St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, New South Wales.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Queensland.,Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Queensland.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland.,Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia.,Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, New South Wales
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nicklas L, Albiston M, Dunbar M, Gillies A, Hislop J, Moffat H, Thomson J. A systematic review of economic analyses of psychological interventions and therapies in health-related settings. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1131. [PMID: 36071425 PMCID: PMC9450839 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08158-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This review aims to synthesise evidence on the economic impact of psychological interventions and therapies when applied to a broad range of physical health conditions. Methods The following bibliographic databases were searched for relevant articles: MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and PsycINFO (Ebsco). As this review was intended to update an earlier review, the date range for the search was restricted to between January 2012 and September 2018. Reference lists from the review articles were also searched for relevant articles. Study quality was evaluated using the Scottish Intercollegiate Network Guidelines (SIGN) appraisal checklists for both economic studies and Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs). When the economic analyses did not provide sufficient detail for quality evaluation, the original RCT papers were sought and these were also evaluated. Half of the papers were quality rated by a second author. Initial agreement was high and all disagreements were resolved by discussion. Results This yielded 1408 unique articles, reduced to 134 following screening of the title and abstract. The full texts of the remaining articles were reviewed by at least one team member and all exclusions were discussed and agreed by the team. This left 46 original research articles, alongside five systematic reviews. Fifty-seven per cent of the articles were deemed to be of high quality, with the remainder of acceptable quality. Fifteen different medical conditions were covered, with chronic pain (10 articles) and cancer (9 articles) being the two most investigated health conditions. Three quarters of the papers reviewed showed evidence for the cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions in physical health, with the clearest evidence being in the field of chronic pain and cancer. Conclusions This paper provides a comprehensive integration of the research on the cost-effectiveness of psychological therapies in physical health. Whilst the evidence for cost-effectiveness in chronic pain and cancer is encouraging, some health conditions require further study. Clearly, as the primary research is international, and was therefore conducted across varying health care systems, caution must be exercised when applying the results to counties outside of those covered. Despite this, the results are of potential relevance to service providers and funders. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08158-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leeanne Nicklas
- NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
| | - Mairi Albiston
- NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Martin Dunbar
- Stobhill Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Alan Gillies
- NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | | | - Helen Moffat
- NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Judy Thomson
- NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pang X, Jin Y, Wang H. Effectiveness and moderators of cancer patient-caregiver dyad interventions in improving psychological distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2022; 9:100104. [PMID: 35990241 PMCID: PMC9382138 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective As patients and family caregivers are increasingly viewed as a dyadic whole, growing studies have emerged that identify ways to improve the two parties’ emotional distress. However, the specific effectiveness, quality, and optimal intervention details of these studies are unclear. Our objective is to synthesize the effectiveness of existing dyadic interventions for improving the psychological distress of cancer patient-caregiver dyads and identify potential moderators that influence intervention effectiveness. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINHAL, Embase, and Clinical Trials were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials from inception until June 2021. Two reviewers performed the process independently. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for quality assessment. We calculated effect sizes (Hedges’ adjusted g) by standard mean difference. Potential moderators influencing the intervention effects were explored. Results We included 28 articles, of which 12 were available for meta-analysis. In total, 4784 participants were included, who were primarily middle-aged (M = 58 years old), with the highest proportion reporting a diagnosis of “mixed cancer” (30%). Patients’ anxiety (g = −0.31; 95% CI: −0.51 to −0.12; P = 0.001; I2 = 17%) and cancer-related distress (g = −0.32; 95% CI: −0.46 to −0.18; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0%) were statistically significantly improved from baseline to post-intervention. Interventionist, delivery type, duration, and frequency were potential moderators for psychosocial interventions on negative emotions. Conclusions Face-to-face, relatively shorter interventions led by psychologists in moderator analysis seem to have better performance. Cancer dyad-based interventions were efficacious in improving the emotional distress of both parties in the dyad, but the effect was more apparent in patients than in family caregivers. However, the long-term effects were modest for both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuenan Pang
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yanfei Jin
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Honghong Wang
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Seib C, Lazenby M, Dunn J, Chambers S. Considerations about risk of ongoing distress: what can we learn from repeat screening? Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:1011-1014. [PMID: 34697675 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06621-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The importance of routine distress screening in cancer patients is widely acknowledged, though non-compliance with screening protocols is common. Cited reasons for non-adherence include lack of time and expertise and concerns about the resources associated with the identification and management of clinically relevant distress. This commentary examines changes in distress among people with cancer who participated in a tele-based psychosocial intervention, from the point of initial distress screening to 12 months after commencing the intervention. The goal is to contribute to the discussion about the potential infrastructure requirements of implementing screening programs among screening 'hesitant' cancer care services. Secondary analysis showed a general downward distress trajectory though the greatest reduction occurred between recruitment and baseline and before receiving a low-intensity psychosocial intervention (β = - 1.84, 95% CI - 2.12, - 1.56). While acknowledging transience of distress in some patients, our results support the possible therapeutic benefit of assessing and validating individuals' distress in the hope of preventing the development of more overt health problems associated with undiagnosed and untreated symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charrlotte Seib
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Clinical Sciences 2 Building, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4215, Australia.
| | - Mark Lazenby
- School of Nursing, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, CT, USA
| | - Jeffrey Dunn
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Darling Heights, Australia.,Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Clinical Sciences 2 Building, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4215, Australia.,Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Darling Heights, Australia.,Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.,Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Applebaum AJ, Panjwani AA, Buda K, O'Toole MS, Hoyt MA, Garcia A, Fresco DM, Mennin DS. Emotion regulation therapy for cancer caregivers-an open trial of a mechanism-targeted approach to addressing caregiver distress. Transl Behav Med 2021; 10:413-422. [PMID: 30395306 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/iby104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Informal caregivers (ICs) are integral to care provided to patients facing life-threatening or incurable illnesses. This responsibility causes considerable burden, as approximately one half of ICs report clinically significant symptoms of depression and/or anxiety that persist when left untreated. Psychosocial interventions containing efficacious treatment principles (e.g., cognitive behavior therapy [CBT]) show disappointing results in reducing anxiety and depression in ICs. This may reflect failure of these interventions to specifically target crucial mechanisms underlying the central feature of distress caused by the patient's illness-notably, perseverative negative thinking (PNT). Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT) is an efficacious CBT developed to explicitly target mechanisms underlying PNT and the emotional concomitants that arise in response to stressful situations. This open trial was conducted to evaluate the acceptability and initial efficacy of ERT adapted to the experience of cancer ICs (ERT-C). Thirty-one ICs provided informed consent and completed eight weekly individual sessions of ERT-C. Participants completed self-report measures of depression and anxiety symptoms, PNT, emotion regulation deficits, and caregiver burden before and after treatment. ERT-C was well tolerated as indicated by 22 treatment completers and feedback provided in exit interviews. ICs demonstrated reduced depression and anxiety symptoms, PNT, and emotion regulation deficits with moderate to large effect sizes (Hedge's g range: 0.36-0.92). Notably, caregiver burden was not reduced but ICs expressed more ability to confront caregiving-related challenges. Findings offer promising but preliminary support for ERT-C as a conceptual model and treatment modality for distressed cancer ICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison J Applebaum
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Kara Buda
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mia S O'Toole
- Department of Psychology & Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Adam Garcia
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David M Fresco
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH
| | - Douglas S Mennin
- Department of Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Samuelsson M, Wennick A, Jakobsson J, Bengtsson M. Models of support to family members during the trajectory of cancer: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2021; 30:3072-3098. [PMID: 33973285 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To map the existing literature on support models provided to family members during the cancer trajectory. BACKGROUND Cancer diagnosis, treatment and survivorship have a profound influence on the surrounding family members. This scoping review is part of the development of a support model for family members of persons diagnosed with colorectal cancer. DESIGN The method was guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework, described in the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, and the reporting is compliant with PRISMA-ScR Checklist. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO from November 2019-February 2020 with no limitation in publication year or study design. Complementing searches were conducted in reference lists and for grey literature, followed by an additional search in September 2020. Inclusion criteria were primary research about support provided by health care, to family members, during cancer, of an adult person, in Swedish or English, of moderate or high methodological quality. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data were extracted using a charting form. RESULT A total of 32 studies were included in the review describing 39 support models. CONCLUSION The mapping of the existing literature resulted in the identification of three themes of support models: psychoeducation, caregiver training and psychological support. In addition, that future research should target a specific diagnosis and trajectory phase as well as include family members and intervention providers in model development. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE Knowledge from the literature on both the needs of the family members and existing support models should be incorporated with the prerequisites of clinical practice. Clinical practice should also be complemented with structured assessments of family members' needs conducted regularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Samuelsson
- Faculty of Health and Society, Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Pediatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anne Wennick
- Faculty of Health and Society, Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jenny Jakobsson
- Faculty of Health and Society, Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Mariette Bengtsson
- Faculty of Health and Society, Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Peixoto TADSM, Peixoto NMDSM, Pinto CAS, Santos CSVDB. Nursing strategies to support psychological adaptation in adult cancer patients: a scoping review. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2021; 55:e03690. [PMID: 33886916 DOI: 10.1590/s1980-220x2019039203690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To map the scientific evidence published in the literature about nursing strategies and intervention programs directed at supporting psychological adaptation in adult cancer patients. METHOD A scoping review based on Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2015 Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews was conducted. Twelve databases were searched between 1 January 2012 and 31 January 2019. RESULTS From 2203 studies, 32 were included. Evidence was grouped in five subjects: procedures, outcome assessment measures, nursing feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The cognitive-behavioral therapy was most frequent intervention. These interventions were developed between 5 to 10 weeks, included 3 to 6 sessions and lasted up to 60 minutes. Despite a wide range of outcome measures employed, three main areas were identified, adjustment and coping; stress, anxiety and fear of recurrence; and quality of life. CONCLUSION This review allowed to identify nursing strategies to support psychological adaptation in adult cancer patients, to assess vulnerabilities and difficulties related to nurse interventions and to recognize the need for further insights into the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
|
13
|
Housten AJ, Gunn CM, Paasche-Orlow MK, Basen-Engquist KM. Health Literacy Interventions in Cancer: a Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:240-252. [PMID: 33155097 PMCID: PMC8005416 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01915-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Approximately one-third of adults in the United States (U.S.) have limited health literacy. Those with limited health literacy often have difficultly navigating the health care environment, including navigating care across the cancer continuum (e.g., prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment). Evidence-based interventions to assist adults with limited health literacy improve health outcomes; however, little is known about health literacy interventions in the context of cancer and their impact on cancer-specific health outcomes. The purpose of this review was to identify and characterize the literature on health literacy interventions across the cancer care continuum. Specifically, our aim was to review the strength of evidence, outcomes assessed, and intervention modalities within the existing literature reporting health literacy interventions in cancer. Our search yielded 1036 records (prevention/screening n = 174; diagnosis/treatment n = 862). Following deduplication and review for inclusion criteria, we analyzed 87 records of intervention studies reporting health literacy outcomes, including 45 pilot studies (prevention/screening n = 24; diagnosis/treatment n = 21) and 42 randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental trials (prevention/screening n = 31; diagnosis/treatment n = 11). This literature included 36 unique interventions (prevention/screening n = 28; diagnosis/treatment n = 8), mostly in the formative stages of intervention development, with few assessments of evidence-based interventions. These gaps in the literature necessitate further research in the development and implementation of evidence-based health literacy interventions to improve cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Housten
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave. Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - C M Gunn
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M K Paasche-Orlow
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - K M Basen-Engquist
- Department of Behavioral Science, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Whitmore C, Bird M, McGillion MH, Carter N, Chen R, Pierazzo J, Carroll SL. Impact of nurse scientist-led digital health interventions on management of chronic conditions. Nurs Outlook 2020; 68:745-762. [PMID: 32912641 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic conditions are a major contributor to the burden of disease worldwide. Using innovative digital health technologies, nurse scientists are well-positioned to lead efforts to reduce the burden of chronic conditions on individuals, communities, and systems. PURPOSE The purpose of this review was to summarize the outcomes commonly measured in nurse-led digital health interventions that target chronic conditions and pose recommendations for the education of future nurse scientists to lead these studies. METHODS A rapid review of the literature was completed using CINAHL and Ovid Emcare. Studies were included if the research: a) was led by a nurse; b) described outcomes of a digital health intervention; and c) included any population with a prevalent chronic condition. FINDINGS 26 studies were included in this review. Nurse-led digital health interventions are being used to support and manage a range of chronic conditions in varied settings. DISCUSSION Digital health interventions are changing the delivery of healthcare for individuals living with chronic conditions. These interventions are bridging the gaps between the digital and physical worlds and are rapidly evolving. CONCLUSION The recommendations posed in this review reiterate the importance of robust content and methods education for nurse scientists to address future research needs in a digital era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Whitmore
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Marissa Bird
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Hugh McGillion
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Population Health Research Unit, Hamilton ON, Canada
| | - Nancy Carter
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ruth Chen
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Joanna Pierazzo
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sandra L Carroll
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Population Health Research Unit, Hamilton ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ream E, Hughes AE, Cox A, Skarparis K, Richardson A, Pedersen VH, Wiseman T, Forbes A, Bryant A. Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 6:CD007568. [PMID: 32483832 PMCID: PMC7264015 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007568.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with cancer experience a variety of symptoms as a result of their disease and the therapies involved in its management. Inadequate symptom management has implications for patient outcomes including functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life (QoL). Attempts to reduce the incidence and severity of cancer symptoms have involved the development and testing of psycho-educational interventions to enhance patients' symptom self-management. With the trend for care to be provided nearer patients' homes, telephone-delivered psycho-educational interventions have evolved to provide support for the management of a range of cancer symptoms. Early indications suggest that these can reduce symptom severity and distress through enhanced symptom self-management. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of telephone-delivered interventions for reducing symptoms associated with cancer and its treatment. To determine which symptoms are most responsive to telephone interventions. To determine whether certain configurations (e.g. with/without additional support such as face-to-face, printed or electronic resources) and duration/frequency of intervention calls mediate observed cancer symptom outcome effects. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 1); MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to January 2019); Embase via OVID (1980 to January 2019); (CINAHL) via Athens (1982 to January 2019); British Nursing Index (1984 to January 2019); and PsycINFO (1989 to January 2019). We searched conference proceedings to identify published abstracts, as well as SIGLE and trial registers for unpublished studies. We searched the reference lists of all included articles for additional relevant studies. Finally, we handsearched the following journals: Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Psycho-oncology, Cancer Practice, Cancer Nursing, Oncology Nursing Forum, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, and Palliative Medicine. We restricted our search to publications published in English. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared one or more telephone interventions with one other, or with other types of interventions (e.g. a face-to-face intervention) and/or usual care, with the stated aim of addressing any physical or psychological symptoms of cancer and its treatment, which recruited adults (over 18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of cancer, regardless of tumour type, stage of cancer, type of treatment, and time of recruitment (e.g. before, during, or after treatment). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used Cochrane methods for trial selection, data extraction and analysis. When possible, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, emotional distress, pain, uncertainty, sexually-related and lung cancer symptoms as well as secondary outcomes are reported as standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and we presented a descriptive synthesis of study findings. We reported on findings according to symptoms addressed and intervention types (e.g. telephone only, telephone combined with other elements). As many studies included small samples, and because baseline scores for study outcomes often varied for intervention and control groups, we used change scores and associated standard deviations. The certainty of the evidence for each outcome was interpreted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS Thirty-two studies were eligible for inclusion; most had moderate risk of bias,often related to blinding. Collectively, researchers recruited 6250 people and studied interventions in people with a variety of cancer types and across the disease trajectory, although many participants had breast cancer or early-stage cancer and/or were starting treatment. Studies measured symptoms of anxiety, depression, emotional distress, uncertainty, fatigue, and pain, as well as sexually-related symptoms and general symptom intensity and/or distress. Interventions were primarily delivered by nurses (n = 24), most of whom (n = 16) had a background in oncology, research, or psychiatry. Ten interventions were delivered solely by telephone; the rest combined telephone with additional elements (i.e. face-to-face consultations and digital/online/printed resources). The number of calls delivered ranged from 1 to 18; most interventions provided three or four calls. Twenty-one studies provided evidence on effectiveness of telephone-delivered interventions and the majority appeared to reduce symptoms of depression compared to control. Nine studies contributed quantitative change scores (CSs) and associated standard deviation results (or these could be calculated). Likewise, many telephone interventions appeared effective when compared to control in reducing anxiety (16 studies; 5 contributed quantitative CS results); fatigue (9 studies; 6 contributed to quantitative CS results); and emotional distress (7 studies; 5 contributed quantitative CS results). Due to significant clinical heterogeneity with regards to interventions introduced, study participants recruited, and outcomes measured, meta-analysis was not conducted. For other symptoms (uncertainty, pain, sexually-related symptoms, dyspnoea, and general symptom experience), evidence was limited; similarly meta-analysis was not possible, and results from individual studies were largely conflicting, making conclusions about their management through telephone-delivered interventions difficult to draw. Heterogeneity was considerable across all trials for all outcomes. Overall, the certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes in the review. Outcomes were all downgraded due to concerns about overall risk of bias profiles being frequently unclear, uncertainty in effect estimates and due to some inconsistencies in results and general heterogeneity. Unsubstantiated evidence suggests that telephone interventions in some capacity may have a place in symptom management for adults with cancer. However, in the absence of reliable and homogeneous evidence, caution is needed in interpreting the narrative synthesis. Further, there were no clear patterns across studies regarding which forms of interventions (telephone alone versus augmented with other elements) are most effective. It is impossible to conclude with any certainty which forms of telephone intervention are most effective in managing the range of cancer-related symptoms that people with cancer experience. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Telephone interventions provide a convenient way of supporting self-management of cancer-related symptoms for adults with cancer. These interventions are becoming more important with the shift of care closer to patients' homes, the need for resource/cost containment, and the potential for voluntary sector providers to deliver healthcare interventions. Some evidence supports the use of telephone-delivered interventions for symptom management for adults with cancer; most evidence relates to four commonly experienced symptoms - depression, anxiety, emotional distress, and fatigue. Some telephone-delivered interventions were augmented by combining them with face-to-face meetings and provision of printed or digital materials. Review authors were unable to determine whether telephone alone or in combination with other elements provides optimal reduction in symptoms; it appears most likely that this will vary by symptom. It is noteworthy that, despite the potential for telephone interventions to deliver cost savings, none of the studies reviewed included any form of health economic evaluation. Further robust and adequately reported trials are needed across all cancer-related symptoms, as the certainty of evidence generated in studies within this review was very low, and reporting was of variable quality. Researchers must strive to reduce variability between studies in the future. Studies in this review are characterised by clinical and methodological diversity; the level of this diversity hindered comparison across studies. At the very least, efforts should be made to standardise outcome measures. Finally, studies were compromised by inclusion of small samples, inadequate concealment of group allocation, lack of observer blinding, and short length of follow-up. Consequently, conclusions related to symptoms most amenable to management by telephone-delivered interventions are tentative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Ream
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Anna Cox
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Katy Skarparis
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Alison Richardson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Vibe H Pedersen
- Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- Health Services Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Angus Forbes
- Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jadalla A, Ginex P, Coleman M, Vrabel M, Bevans M. Family Caregiver Strain and Burden: A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Interventions When Caring for Patients With Cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2020; 24:31-50. [DOI: 10.1188/20.cjon.31-50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
17
|
Eways KR, Bennett KK, Hamilton JL, Harry KM, Marszalek J, Marsh MJO, Wilson EJ. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Self-Blame Attributions for Cancer Scale. Oncol Nurs Forum 2020; 47:79-88. [PMID: 31845915 DOI: 10.1188/20.onf.79-88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To adapt the Cardiac Self-Blame Attributions Scale into the Self-Blame Attributions for Cancer Scale (SBAC) for use in patients with cancer and analyze its psychometric properties. SAMPLE & SETTING 113 patients receiving radiation therapy at the University of Kansas Cancer Center. METHODS & VARIABLES The SBAC and other self-report measures were administered during outpatient oncology appointments for radiation therapy to establish the psychometric properties of the SBAC. RESULTS A two-factor structure represented behavioral and characterological self-blame attributions. Reliability estimates for each factor were excellent and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was found, indicating support for the SBAC as a valid and reliable measure of self-blame attributions in patients with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING The SBAC may help healthcare providers, including nursing staff, to identify the self-blame patterns exhibited by patients with cancer. Future research can assess the reliability and validity of SBAC across stages of treatment and establish the predictive validity of the scale in individuals with cancer.
Collapse
|
18
|
Taylor J, Fradgley EA, Clinton-McHarg T, Roach D, Paul CL. Distress screening and supportive care referrals used by telephone-based health services: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:2059-2069. [PMID: 31872298 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05252-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE People affected by chronic diseases such as cancer report high levels of distress and a need for psychosocial support. It is unclear whether telephone-based services for people affected by chronic disease are a practical setting for implementing distress screening, referral protocols and rescreening to direct supportive care where it is needed. This systematic review aimed to describe the published literature regarding distress screening and supportive care referral practices in telephone-based services for people affected by chronic diseases such as cancer. METHODS A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane and Scopus was conducted in February 2018. Included quantitative studies involved: patients or caregivers affected by chronic diseases including cancer and describe a health service assessing psychosocial needs or distress via telephone. Extracted data included the type of cancer or other chronic disease, sample size, screening tool, referral or rescreening protocols, and type of health service. RESULTS The search identified 3989 potential articles with additional searches returning 30 studies (n = 4019); fourteen were eligible for full-text review. Of the 14 studies, 13 included cancer patients. Studies were across multiple settings and identified nine distress screening tools in use. CONCLUSION The reviewed studies indicate that validated distress-screening tools are being used via telephone to identify distress, particularly in relation to cancer. Screening-driven supportive care referrals are also taking place in telephone-based services. However, not all services use an established referral protocol. Ongoing rescreening of callers' distress is also limited despite it being an important recommendation from psycho-oncology guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Taylor
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. .,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. .,Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and Translation, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
| | - Elizabeth A Fradgley
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and Translation, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Cancer Institute New South Wales, Level 9, 8 Central Ave, Australian Technology Park, Eveleigh, NSW, 2015, Australia
| | - Tara Clinton-McHarg
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and Translation, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Della Roach
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Chris L Paul
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and Translation, Level 4 West, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tuffaha HW, Aitken J, Chambers S, Scuffham PA. A Framework to Prioritise Health Research Proposals for Funding: Integrating Value for Money. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2019; 17:761-770. [PMID: 31257553 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00495-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
When making funding decisions, research organisations largely consider the merits (e.g. scientific rigour and feasibility) of submitted research proposals; yet, there is often little or no reference to their value for money. This may be attributed to the challenges of assessing and integrating value of research into existing research prioritisation processes. We propose a framework that considers both the merits of research and its value for money to guide health research funding decisions. A practical framework is developed based on current processes followed by funding organizations for assessing investigator-initiated research proposals, and analytical methods for evaluating the expected value of research. We apply the analytical methods to estimate the expected return on investment of two real-world grant applications. The framework comprises four sequential steps: (1) initial screening of applications for eligibility and completeness; (2) merit assessment of eligible proposals; (3) estimating the expected value of research for the shortlisted proposals that pass the first two steps and ranking of proposals based on return on investment; and (4) selecting research proposals for funding. We demonstrate how the expected value for money can be efficiently estimated using certain information provided in funding applications. The proposed framework integrates value-for-money assessment into the existing research prioritisation processes. Considering value for money to inform research funding decisions is vital to achieve efficient utilisation of research budgets and maximise returns on research investments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitham W Tuffaha
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
- School of Medicine, Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Nathan, 4111, QLD, Australia.
| | - Joanne Aitken
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Spring Hill, QLD, Australia
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Spring Hill, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul A Scuffham
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
- School of Medicine, Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Nathan, 4111, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Riba MB, Donovan KA, Andersen B, Braun II, Breitbart WS, Brewer BW, Buchmann LO, Clark MM, Collins M, Corbett C, Fleishman S, Garcia S, Greenberg DB, Handzo RGF, Hoofring L, Huang CH, Lally R, Martin S, McGuffey L, Mitchell W, Morrison LJ, Pailler M, Palesh O, Parnes F, Pazar JP, Ralston L, Salman J, Shannon-Dudley MM, Valentine AD, McMillian NR, Darlow SD. Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17:1229-1249. [PMID: 31590149 PMCID: PMC6907687 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 347] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Distress is defined in the NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management as a multifactorial, unpleasant experience of a psychologic (ie, cognitive, behavioral, emotional), social, spiritual, and/or physical nature that may interfere with the ability to cope effectively with cancer, its physical symptoms, and its treatment. Early evaluation and screening for distress leads to early and timely management of psychologic distress, which in turn improves medical management. The panel for the Distress Management Guidelines recently added a new principles section including guidance on implementation of standards of psychosocial care for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Barbara Andersen
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - IIana Braun
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sofia Garcia
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | - Laura Hoofring
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Janice P Pazar
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | - Laurel Ralston
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Heckel L, Heynsbergh NL, Livingston PM. Are cancer helplines effective in supporting caregivers? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:3219-3231. [PMID: 31098794 PMCID: PMC6660576 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04807-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aims of this systematic review were to summarize the profile of caregivers accessing cancer helplines, to evaluate caregiver satisfaction with the helpline service, and to review the evidence base of intervention studies testing the efficacy of community-based cancer helplines in improving caregiver health and well-being. METHODS Four electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and EMBASE) were systematically searched to identify relevant literature, including all articles published in English until May 2018. Reference lists of accepted papers were reviewed for the inclusion of additional potentially relevant articles, gray literature was excluded. RESULTS Forty-five publications met the inclusion criteria for this review. Forty-one papers reported on the proportion of caregivers accessing cancer helplines. Twenty-six studies described demographic and clinical characteristics of caregivers and eight reported on call characteristics. Reasons for contacting the service were stated in 21 studies and caregiver satisfaction with the helpline service was assessed in 12 articles. Fourteen studies investigated specific topics of interest (e.g., prevalence of sleep problems, distress screening, or clinical trial participation). Two randomized controlled trials examined the efficacy of cancer helplines in improving caregiver outcomes, with findings showing interventions to be effective in reducing distress and unmet needs, and in increasing positive adjustment. CONCLUSIONS There is limited scientific evidence regarding the efficacy of cancer helplines to improve caregivers' health and well-being. More intervention studies are needed to examine the benefits of cancer helplines to this study population to ensure structured referral pathways can be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Heckel
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| | - Natalie L Heynsbergh
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
| | - Patricia M Livingston
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Carrillo G, Mesa M, Gómez OJ, Numpaque O, Laguna M. Educational intervention (CUIDAR) in cancer patients treated with surgery: A quasi-experimental study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1475-1482. [PMID: 30878163 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of an educational intervention (CUIDAR) in cancer patients during the post-operatory, aimed to strength the competence to care patients at home in the dimensions knowledge, instrumental unicity, enjoy, anticipation and social relationships and interactions. METHODS Quantitative quasi-experimental design with control and intervention groups, 192 patients who received surgery in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Bogotá, Colombia. The intervention was conducted since the admission to the sixth week after release. Measurements of the home care competence and number of readmissions were made before and after the treatment. RESULTS In the intervention group a positive and statistically significant effect was observed in six dimensions, as well as the reduction of hospital readmissions. CONCLUSION The educational intervention CUIDAR is a feasible strategy that increases the capacity to care at home and significantly reduces the readmissions to emergency services in cancer patients treated with surgery. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Educational intervention (CUIDAR) may be used as a tool in cancer patients treated with surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Carrillo
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 48 No. 22-80 Manzana B, Casa 44, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
| | - Mónica Mesa
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Olga Janeth Gómez
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 48 No. 22-80 Manzana B, Casa 44, Bogotá 111321, Colombia
| | | | - María Laguna
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Treanor CJ, Santin O, Prue G, Coleman H, Cardwell CR, O'Halloran P, Donnelly M. Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 6:CD009912. [PMID: 31204791 PMCID: PMC6573123 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009912.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasingly, cancer is recognised as a chronic condition with a growing population of informal caregivers providing care for cancer patients. Informal caregiving can negatively affect the health and well-being of caregivers. We need a synthesised account of best evidence to aid decision-making about effective ways to support caregivers for individuals 'living with cancer'. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions designed to improve the quality of life (QoL), physical health and well-being of informal caregivers of people living with cancer compared with usual care. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Open SIGLE, Web of Science from inception up to January 2018, trial registries and citation lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing psychosocial interventions delivered to adult informal caregivers of adults affected by cancer on a group or individual basis with usual care. Psychosocial interventions included non-pharmacological interventions that involved an interpersonal relationship between caregivers and healthcare professionals. We included interventions delivered also to caregiver-patient dyads. Interventions delivered to caregivers of individuals receiving palliative or inpatient care were excluded. Our primary outcome was caregiver QoL. Secondary outcomes included patient QoL, caregiver and patient depression, anxiety, psychological distress, physical health status and intervention satisfaction and adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pairs of review authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and conducted 'Risk of bias' assessments. We synthesised findings using meta-analysis, where possible, and reported remaining results in a narrative synthesis. MAIN RESULTS Nineteen trials (n = 3, 725) were included in the review. All trials were reported in English and were undertaken in high-income countries. Trials targeted caregivers of patients affected by a number of cancers spanning newly diagnosed patients, patients awaiting treatment, patients who were being treated currently and individuals post-treatment. Most trials delivered interventions to caregiver-patient dyads (predominantly spousal dyads) and there was variation in intervention delivery to groups or individual participants. There was much heterogeneity across interventions though the majority were defined as psycho-educational. All trials were rated as being at 'high risk of bias'.Compared to usual care, psychosocial interventions may improve slightly caregiver QoL immediately post intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.53; studies = 2, 265 participants) and may have little to no effect on caregiver QoL at 12 months (SMD 0.14, 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.40; studies = 2, 239 participants) post-intervention (both low-quality evidence).Psychosocial interventions probably have little to no effect on caregiver depression immediately to one-month post-intervention (SMD 0.01, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.15; studies = 9, 702 participants) (moderate-quality evidence). Psychosocial interventions may have little to no effect on caregiver anxiety immediately post-intervention (SMD -0.12, 95 % CI -0.33 to 0.10; studies = 5, 329 participants), depression three-to-six months (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.38; studies = 5. 379 participants) post-intervention and patient QoL six to 12 months (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.26; studies = 3, 294 participants) post-intervention (all low-quality evidence). There was uncertainty whether psychosocial interventions improve patient QoL immediately (SMD -0.03, 95 %CI -0.50 to 0.44; studies = 2, 292 participants) or caregiver anxiety three-to-six months (SMD-0.25, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.13; studies = 4, 272 participants) post-intervention (both very low-quality evidence). Two studies which could not be pooled in a meta-analysis for caregiver physical health status found little to no effect immediately post-intervention and a small intervention effect 12 months post-intervention. Caregiver or patient satisfaction or cost-effectiveness of interventions were not assessed in any studies. Interventions demonstrated good feasibility and acceptability.Psychosocial interventions probably have little to no effect on patient physical health status immediately post-intervention (SMD 0.17, 95 % CI -0.07 to 0.41; studies = 4, 461 participants) and patient depression three to six months post-intervention (SMD-0.11, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.12; studies = 6, 534 participants) (both moderate-quality evidence).Psychosocial interventions may have little to no effect on caregiver psychological distress immediately to one-month (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.26; studies = 3, 134 participants), and seven to 12 months (SMD 0.08, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.58; studies = 2, 62 participants) post-intervention; patient depression immediately (SMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.07; studies = 9, 852 participants); anxiety immediately (SMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.15;studies = 4, 422 participants), and three to six months (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.02; studies = 4, 370 participants); psychological distress immediately (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.44; studies = 2, 74 participants) and seven to 12 months (SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.24; studies = 2, 61 participants); and physical health status six to 12 months (SMD 0.06, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.30; studies = 2, 275 participants) post-intervention (all low-quality evidence).Three trials reported adverse effects associated with the interventions, compared with usual care, including higher distress, sexual function-related distress and lower relationship satisfaction levels for caregivers, higher distress levels for patients, and that some content was perceived as insensitive to some participants.Trials not able to be pooled in a meta-analysis did not tend to report effect size and it was difficult to discern intervention effectiveness. Variable intervention effects were reported for patient and caregiver outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Heterogeneity across studies makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for this population. There is an immediate need for rigorous trials with process evaluations and clearer, detailed intervention descriptions. Cost-effectiveness studies should be conducted alongside future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene J Treanor
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Olinda Santin
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Gillian Prue
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Helen Coleman
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Chris R Cardwell
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Peter O'Halloran
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Corry M, Neenan K, Brabyn S, Sheaf G, Smith V. Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 5:CD012533. [PMID: 31087641 PMCID: PMC6516056 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012533.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining care for ill persons in the community is heavily dependent on support from unpaid caregivers. Many caregivers, however, find themselves in a caring role for which they are ill prepared and may require professional support. The telephone is an easily accessible method of providing support irrespective of geographical location. OBJECTIVES The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of telephone support interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, when compared to usual care or non-telephone-based support interventions for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of people with acute and chronic diagnosed illnesses, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of telephone interventions in this population. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases from inception to 16 November 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I; and CINAHL Complete. We also searched 11 caregiver-specific websites, three conference links, and two clinical trial registries. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (including cluster-RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. We excluded cross-over trials because of the high risk of carry-over effects from one intervention to another. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened citations against the review's inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the included studies using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. The review's prespecified primary (quality of life and burden) and secondary outcomes (skill acquisition, psychological health, knowledge, health status and well-being, family functioning, satisfaction, and economic outcomes), where reported, were assessed at the end of intervention delivery and at short-term (≤ 3 months), medium-term (> 3 to ≤ 6 months) and longer-term time points (> 6 to 12 months) following the intervention. Where possible, meta-analyses were conducted, otherwise results were reported narratively. MAIN RESULTS We included 21 randomised studies involving 1,690 caregivers; 19 studies compared telephone support interventions and usual care, of which 18 contributed data to the analyses. Two studies compared telephone and non-telephone professional support interventions. Caregiver ages ranged from 19 years to 87 years across studies. The majority of participants were female (> 70.53%), with two trials including females only. Most caregivers were family members, educated beyond secondary or high school level or had the equivalent in years of education. All caregivers were based in the community. Overall risk of bias was high for most studies.The results demonstrated that there is probably little or no difference between telephone support interventions and usual care for the primary outcome of quality of life at the end of intervention (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.19, 4 studies, 364 caregivers) (moderate-certainty evidence) or burden at the end of intervention (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.07, 9 studies, 788 caregivers) (low-certainty evidence). For one study where quality of life at the end of intervention was reported narratively, the findings indicated that a telephone support intervention may result in slightly higher quality of life, compared with usual care. Two further studies on caregiver burden were reported narratively; one reported that telephone support interventions may decrease burden, the other reported no change in the intervention group, compared with usual care.We are uncertain about the effects of telephone support interventions on caregiver depression at the end of intervention (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.05, 9 studies, 792 caregivers) due to very low-certainty evidence for this outcome. Depression was reported narratively for three studies. One reported that the intervention may reduce caregiver depression at the end of intervention, but this effect was not sustained at short-term follow-up. The other two studies reported there may be little or no difference between telephone support and usual care for depression at the end of intervention. Six studies measured satisfaction with the intervention but did not report comparative data. All six reported high satisfaction scores with the intervention. No adverse events, including suicide or suicide ideation, were measured or reported by any of the included studies.Our analysis indicated that caregiver anxiety may be slightly reduced (MD -6.0, 95% CI -11.68 to -0.32, 1 study, 61 caregivers) and preparedness to care slightly improved (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.64, 2 studies, 208 caregivers) at the end of intervention, following telephone-only support interventions compared to usual care. Findings indicated there may be little or no difference between telephone support interventions and usual care for all of the following outcomes at the end of intervention: problem-solving, social activity, caregiver competence, coping, stress, knowledge, physical health, self-efficacy, family functioning, and satisfaction with supports (practical or social). There may also be little or no effect of telephone support interventions for quality of life and burden at short-term follow-up or for burden and depression at medium-term follow-up.Litttle or no difference was found between groups for any of the reported outcomes in studies comparing telephone and non-telephone professional support interventions. We are uncertain as to the effects of telephone support interventions compared to non-telephone support interventions for caregiver burden and depression at the end of intervention. No study reported on quality of life or satisfaction with the intervention and no adverse events were reported or noted in the two studies reporting on this comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although our review indicated slight benefit may exist for telephone support interventions on some outcomes (e.g. anxiety and preparedness to care at the end of intervention), for most outcomes, including the primary outcomes, telephone-only interventions may have little or no effect on caregiver outcomes compared to usual care. The findings of the review were mainly based on studies with overall high risk of bias, and few participants. Further high-quality trials, with larger sample sizes are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarita Corry
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing and MidwiferyDublinIreland
| | - Kathleen Neenan
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing and MidwiferyDublinIreland
| | - Sally Brabyn
- University of YorkDepartment of Health SciencesHeslingtonYorkUKYO10 5DD
| | - Greg Sheaf
- The Library of Trinity College DublinCollege StreetDublinIreland
| | - Valerie Smith
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing and MidwiferyDublinIreland
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ehlers SL, Davis K, Bluethmann SM, Quintiliani LM, Kendall J, Ratwani RM, Diefenbach MA, Graves KD. Screening for psychosocial distress among patients with cancer: implications for clinical practice, healthcare policy, and dissemination to enhance cancer survivorship. Transl Behav Med 2019; 9:282-291. [PMID: 30566662 PMCID: PMC6610173 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/iby123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Accreditation standards are at the forefront of evolving healthcare systems, setting metrics for high-quality care. Healthcare outcomes (health, experience, cost, provider satisfaction/burn out) are becoming mutual goals of the patient, provider, payer, and healthcare system. Achieving high-quality outcomes in cancer care necessitates collaboration among interdisciplinary teams of clinical providers, administrators, patient advocates, caregivers, and researchers. Dissemination and implementation science provides necessary frameworks to organize the efforts of these implementation teams, inclusive of identifying facilitators and barriers to implementation of accreditation standards. Since 2015, cancer distress screening has been mandated for continued cancer center accreditation by the American College of Surgeon's Commission on Cancer. Cancer centers have thus become real world implementation laboratories. We present the current context of distress screening, highlighting prior research and key areas of future research. We consider multiple levels of cancer care delivery and the use of interdisciplinary teams to help cancer center teams adopt, implement, and maintain efficient distress screening programs. Finally, we present a case study to identify methods for successful implementation of distress screening at one cancer center and then describe efficiencies that can be introduced using elements from human factors engineering, e- and m-health screening platforms, and community partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawna L Ehlers
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kimberly Davis
- Departments of Oncology and Psychiatry, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Shirley M Bluethmann
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Lisa M Quintiliani
- Section of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Boston University, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Kendall
- Oncology Service Line, University of Minnesota Cancer Care, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Raj M Ratwani
- National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michael A Diefenbach
- Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Center for Health Innovation and Outcomes Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Kristi D Graves
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tuominen L, Stolt M, Meretoja R, Leino-Kilpi H. Effectiveness of nursing interventions among patients with cancer: An overview of systematic reviews. J Clin Nurs 2019; 28:2401-2419. [PMID: 30585667 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To explore nursing interventions used among patients with cancer and summarise the results of their effectiveness. The ultimate goal was to improve the quality of care and provide best evidence for clinicians to refer to while developing effective nursing interventions. BACKGROUND Nursing interventions refer to actions that nurses take with the aim of improving the well-being of people with cancer-related health and care needs. A plethora of systematic reviews has been conducted in this research area, although with scattered results. We conducted a comprehensive review to identify and summarise the existing evidence. METHODS This overview of systematic reviews adheres to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched. Nine reviews reporting findings from 112 original studies published 2007-2017 met the selection criteria. The results of intervention effectiveness were analysed using descriptive quantification and a narrative summary of the quantitative data. RESULTS The effectiveness of educational nursing interventions was inconsistent on quality of life (QoL), attitudes, anxiety and distress, but positive on level of knowledge, symptom severity, sleep and uncertainty. Psychosocial nursing interventions had a significant effect on spiritual well-being, meaning of life, fatigue and sleep. Psychological nursing interventions reduced cancer-related fatigue. Nursing interventions supporting patients' coping had a significant impact on anxiety, distress, fatigue, sleep, dyspnoea and functional ability. Activity-based interventions may prevent cancer-related fatigue. CONCLUSIONS Nursing interventions achieved significant physical and psychological effects on the lives of patients with cancer. Multidimensional nature of interventions by combining different elements reinforces the effect. Priorities for future research include identifying the most beneficial components of these interventions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Implementation of these nursing interventions into clinical practice is important to improve patients' knowledge and QoL as well as reducing various symptoms and side effects related to cancer and its treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leena Tuominen
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Minna Stolt
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Riitta Meretoja
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Corporate Headquarters, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Helena Leino-Kilpi
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hu Y, Liu T, Li F. Association between dyadic interventions and outcomes in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:745-761. [PMID: 30604008 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4556-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-caregiver dyadic interventions are when "interventions are offered to cancer patients and their family caregivers together as the unit of care." The purpose of the present study was to determine the association of dyadic intervention for cancer patients and their family caregivers with quality of life (QOL), and other outcomes for people with cancer. METHODS Literature searches were conducted using the electronic databases to identify all randomized clinical trials on cancer patient-caregiver dyads. Meta-analysis was used to analyze data. RESULTS Twenty-three RCTs provided data on 2317 patient-caregiver dyads. In the meta-analysis, at the 0- to 3-month follow-up, dyadic intervention was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvements in patient total QOL (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.50); the total spiritual aspect of QOL (SMD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-0.50); the emotional (SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.02-0.29), social (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.36), and mental (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07-0.46) aspects of QOL; depression (SMD, - 0.35; 95% CI, - 0.65 to - 0.05); anxiety (SMD, - 0.42; 95% CI, - 0.70 to - 0.13); relatedness (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.32); and marital functioning (SMD, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.05-1.97). At the 3.1- to 6-month follow-up, dyadic intervention was associated with significant improvements in patient social aspect (SMD, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03-0.35) and depression (SMD, - 0.29; 95% CI, - 0.56 to - 0.03). There was no association between dyadic interventions and the patient functional and physical aspects of QOL. Dyadic intervention was associated consistently with no improvements in hopelessness, pain, fatigue, and survival. CONCLUSIONS In this review, dyadic interventions for caregivers and cancer patients were associated with improvements in multiple psychosocial aspects of patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanli Hu
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Tao Liu
- Medical Research Center, Second Teaching Hospital, University of Jilin School of Medicine, Changchun, China
| | - Fan Li
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
- School of Nursing, The Key Laboratory of Zoonosis, Chinese Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, No. 126 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hyde MK, Zajdlewicz L, Lazenby M, Dunn J, Laurie K, Lowe A, Chambers SK. The validity of the Distress Thermometer in female partners of men with prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 28:e12924. [PMID: 30252180 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Female partners of prostate cancer (PCa) survivors experience heightened psychological distress that may be greater than that expressed by PCa patients. However, optimal approaches to detect distressed, or at risk of distress, partners are unclear. This study applied receiver operating characteristics analysis to evaluate diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer (DT) compared to widely used measures of general (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and cancer-specific (Impact of Events Scale-Revised) distress. Participants were partners of men with localised PCa (recruited around diagnosis) about to undergo or had received surgical treatment (N = 189), and partners of men diagnosed with PCa who were 2-4 years post-treatment (N = 460). In both studies, diagnostic utility of the DT overall was not optimal. Although area under the curve scores were acceptable (ranges: 0.71-0.92 and 0.83-0.94 for general and cancer-specific distress, respectively), sensitivity, specificity and optimal DT cut-offs for partner distress varied for general (range: ≥2 to ≥5) and cancer-specific (range: ≥3 to ≥5) distress both across time and between cohorts. Thus, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the diagnostic capabilities of the DT for partners or recommend its use in this population. More comprehensive screening measures may be needed to detect partners needing psychological intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa K Hyde
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Mark Lazenby
- School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.,School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kirstyn Laurie
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anthony Lowe
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Suzanne K Chambers
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Marzorati C, Renzi C, Russell-Edu SW, Pravettoni G. Telemedicine Use Among Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e223. [PMID: 29914858 PMCID: PMC6028768 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of published studies and systematic reviews examining different telehealth interventions targeting patients and their effects on patients' well-being and quality of life have grown in recent decades. However, the use of telemedicine tools aimed at the family members and caregivers of adult cancer patients is less defined. OBJECTIVE We aimed to conduct a systematic review to provide a more complete picture regarding telemedicine tools for informal caregivers (usually family members or close friends) implemented in all phases of cancer care. More specifically, the review aimed to better describe the study samples' characteristics, to analyze measured outcomes and the specific questionnaires used to assess them, and to describe in depth the implemented interventions and their formats. Finally, we examined the role of telehealth, and usability and feasibility trends in supporting patients' caregivers. METHODS We systematically searched the literature in the following databases: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO. Inclusion criteria were being written in English, published in peer-reviewed journals, describing a telehealth-implemented intervention, and focusing on caregivers of adult cancer patients at any stage of the disease. We selected studies published up to November 2017. We critically appraised included articles using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and graded the quality of evidence by outcome using the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine framework. RESULTS We included 24 studies in the final selection. In 21 of the 24 studies, the patient-caregiver dyad was analyzed, and the study population dealt with different types of cancer at different stages. Included studies considered the caregiver's condition from both an individual and a relational point of view. Along with psychosocial variables, some studies monitored engagement and user satisfaction regarding Web-based platforms or telehealth interventions. All studies reported significant improvements in some of the investigated areas, but they often showed small effect sizes. Two types of telehealth intervention formats were used: Web-based platforms and telephone calls. Some of the included studies referred to the same project, but on study samples with different cancer diagnoses or with new versions of previously developed interventions. CONCLUSIONS Reported outcomes seem to suggest that we are in an exploratory phase. More detailed and targeted research hypotheses are still needed. Clarifying caregivers' needs related to telehealth tools and better defining outcome measures may yield more significant results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Marzorati
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Renzi
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Heckel L, Fennell KM, Orellana L, Boltong A, Byrnes M, Livingston PM. A telephone outcall program to support caregivers of people diagnosed with cancer: utility, changes in levels of distress, and unmet needs. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26:3789-3799. [PMID: 29766259 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4246-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 05/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the utility of a telephone outcall program for cancer caregivers and to examine longitudinal changes in their distress levels and supportive care needs. METHODS As part of the PROTECT trial, caregivers assigned to the intervention arm (N = 108) received three telephone outcalls from a Cancer Council 13 11 20 nurse at three time points (7-10 days post-randomization, 1 and 4 months later). During each call, caregivers were screened for distress using the Distress Thermometer (range: 0-10) then six supportive care issues were raised for discussion. Participants completed a utility survey 1 month post-intervention. RESULTS The outcall program was highly acceptable and perceived as beneficial by caregivers. Overall, 95% reported it was worth their time to take part in the outcall program and 82% stated that the program was very relevant to them. Level of distress and impact of distress decreased over time (p = 0.0031, p < 0.0001, respectively). Average call duration decreased over time (p < 0.0001) and was longer for female than male caregivers (p = 0.0009). The frequency of caregivers discussing issues related to psychological distress (p = 0.0003), health literacy (p < 0.0001), financial (p = 0.0014), and practical concerns (p = 0.0121) decreased over time. Psychological distress was more often discussed by female than male caregivers (p = 0.0153), and family issues more often by younger (< 55 years) than older caregivers (p = 0.0071). CONCLUSIONS Utility of this outcall program was high. Caregivers' level of distress and unmet needs decreased over time. Gender and age differences emerged, which warrants the need for tailored support. Further research is necessary to identify the best method of improving access to 13 11 20 services for caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Heckel
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
| | - Kate M Fennell
- Cancer Council SA, 202 Greenhill Road, Eastwood, South Australia, 5063, Australia.,Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.,Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, City East Campus, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia
| | - Liliana Orellana
- Faculty of Health, Biostatistics Unit, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| | - Anna Boltong
- Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.,Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Monica Byrnes
- Cancer Council SA, 202 Greenhill Road, Eastwood, South Australia, 5063, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Xu LL, Xiao JF, Xu PP. Effect of humanistic nursing combined with situational health education on negative psychology, treatment compliance, and quality of life in patients undergoing radical resection for gastric cancer. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2018; 26:729-734. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v26.i12.729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To observe the influence of humanistic nursing combined with situational health education on negative psychology, treatment compliance, and quality of life in patients undergoing radical resection for gastric cancer.
METHODS A total of 100 patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical resection were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 50 cases in each group. Both groups were given routine nursing, and the observation group was additionally given humanistic nursing combined with situational health education. Scores of the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS), treatment compliance, and quality of life questionnaire-core 30 (QLQ-C30) score were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS The SAS and SDS scores of the observation group after intervention were significantly lower than those of the control group (50.67 ± 4.84 vs 54.69 ± 4.77, 52.36 ± 4.13 vs 55.89 ± 4.69, P < 0.05). The rates of complete compliance in terms of regular examination, persisting chemotherapy, taking medicine on time, reasonable diet, and rehabilitation exercise at 3 mo after discharge were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (82.00% vs 54.00%, 84.00% vs 56.00%, 86.00% vs 58.00%, 84.00% vs 56.00%, 70.00% vs 52.00%, P < 0.05). The scores of physical function, emotional function, role function, social function, cognitive function and general health in the QLQ-C30 scale at 3 mo after discharge were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (88.36 ± 6.74 vs 82.54 ± 6.13, 85.25 ± 5.14 vs 76.43 ± 4.58, 84.12 ± 4.36 vs 76.35 ± 4.21, 63.58 ± 3.96 vs 57.54 ± 3.46, 90.12 ± 7.48 vs 84.56 ± 6.92, 78.21 ± 4.62 vs 69.58 ± 4.35, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION Humanistic nursing combined with situational health education can relieve anxiety and depression and improve treatment compliance and quality of life in patients undergoing radical resection for gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan-Lan Xu
- Department of Nursing and Human Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Jia-Fang Xiao
- Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Ping-Ping Xu
- Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, Hubei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chambers SK, Ritterband LM, Thorndike F, Nielsen L, Aitken JF, Clutton S, Scuffham PA, Youl P, Morris B, Baade PD, Dunn J. Web-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Distressed Cancer Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e42. [PMID: 29386173 PMCID: PMC5812983 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Web-based interventions present a potentially cost-effective approach to supporting self-management for cancer patients; however, further evidence for acceptability and effectiveness is needed. OBJECTIVE The goal of our research was to assess the effectiveness of an individualized Web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention on improving psychological and quality of life outcomes in cancer patients with elevated psychological distress. METHODS A total of 163 distressed cancer patients (111 female, 68.1%) were recruited through the Queensland Cancer Registry and the Cancer Council Queensland Cancer Helpline and randomly assigned to either a Web-based tailored CBT intervention (CancerCope) (79/163) or a static patient education website (84/163). At baseline and 8-week follow-up we assessed primary outcomes of psychological and cancer-specific distress and unmet psychological supportive care needs and secondary outcomes of positive adjustment and quality of life. RESULTS Intention-to-treat analyses showed no evidence of a statistically significant intervention effect on primary or secondary outcomes. However, per-protocol analyses found a greater decrease for the CancerCope group in psychological distress (P=.04), cancer-specific distress (P=.02), and unmet psychological care needs (P=.03) from baseline to 8 weeks compared with the patient education group. Younger patients were more likely to complete the CancerCope intervention. CONCLUSIONS This online CBT intervention was associated with greater decreases in distress for those patients who more closely adhered to the program. Given the low costs and high accessibility of this intervention approach, even if only effective for subgroups of patients, the potential impact may be substantial. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613001026718; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=364768&isReview=true (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6uPvpcovl).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne K Chambers
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, Australia
- Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
- Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Lee M Ritterband
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
- BeHealth Solutions, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | | | | | - Joanne F Aitken
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia
| | | | - Paul A Scuffham
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Philippa Youl
- University of Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Peter D Baade
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia
- School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
A person who faces the diagnosis of cancer is subjected to changes within his body, but also with regard to his view of himself and his social relationships. Cancer related psychological distress occurs frequently and has a different prevalence according to-among other factors-cancer type and stage of disease. The main psychiatric disturbances observed in patients with cancer are adjustment disorders and affective disorders (anxiety and depression), which in the majority of patients are due to stressors related to the occurrence and threat of the disease and pre-existing psychological vulnerabilities; however, they might also be a direct consequence of biological causes either resulting from bodily modifications induced by the cancer or from treatment side effects. This chapter provides theoretical and practical information on the main psychotherapeutic approaches for cancer patients, complemented by some reflections on their clinical and scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam de Vries
- Service de Psychiatrie de Liaision, Département de Psychiatrie, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois, Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Friedrich Stiefel
- Service de Psychiatrie de Liaision, Département de Psychiatrie, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois, Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculté de Biologie et Médecine, Université de Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 44, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
This article contains a review of literature published from 2010 to 2016 on family caregiving in oncology. An analysis of 810 citations resulted in 50 randomized trials. These trials describe the need to prepare family caregivers for the complex role they play in cancer care. Several studies have demonstrated improved quality of life for family caregivers and improved emotional support from interventions. Several studies addressed communication and relational intimacy, which are key concerns. An additional focus of these trials was in the area of caregiving tasks and ways to diminish the burden of caregiving and preparedness for this role. Further research is needed in this area given the shift to outpatient care and as family caregivers become the primary providers of care. Future research should include expanding tested models of family caregiver support in clinical practice and in diverse populations. CA Cancer J Clin 2017. © 2017 American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:318-325. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betty Ferrell
- Director, Division of Nursing Research and Education, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Elaine Wittenberg
- Associate Professor, Division of Nursing Research and Education, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chambers SK, Ritterband L, Thorndike F, Nielsen L, Aitken JF, Clutton S, Scuffham P, Youl P, Morris B, Baade P, Dunn J. A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an interactive web-based intervention: CancerCope. BMJ Open 2017. [PMID: 28645985 PMCID: PMC5541614 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 35% of patients with cancer experience clinically significant distress, and unmet psychological supportive care needs are prevalent. This study describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an internet-based psychological intervention for distressed patients with cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In phase I, the intervention was developed on an interactive web platform and pilot tested for acceptability using a qualitative methodology with 21 patients with cancer. Phase II is an RCT underway with patients with or at risk of elevated psychological distress comparing: (1) static patient education website with (2) individualised web-delivered cognitive behavioural intervention (CancerCope). Participants were recruited through the Queensland Cancer Registry and Cancer Council Helpline and met the following inclusion criteria: (1) recently diagnosed with cancer; (2) able to read and speak English; (3) no previous history of head injury, dementia or psychiatric illness; (4) no other concurrent cancer; (5) phone and internet access; (5) scored ≥4 on the Distress Thermometer. Participants are assessed at four time points: baseline/recruitment and 2, 6 and 12 months after recruitment and intervention commencement. Of the 163 participants recruited, 50% met caseness for distress. The area of highest unmet supportive care needs were psychological followed by physical and daily living needs. Primary outcomes are psychological and cancer-specific distress and unmet psychological supportive care needs. Secondary outcomes are positive adjustment, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval: PSY/70/13/HREC) and the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/13/QPAH/601). All participants provide informed consent prior to taking part in the study. Once completed, this study will provide recommendations about the efficacy of web-based cognitive behavioural interventions to facilitate better psychosocial adjustment for people with cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ANZCTR (ACTRN12613001026718).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne K Chambers
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, Australia
- Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Joanne F Aitken
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | - Philippa Youl
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia
| | | | - Peter Baade
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Dunn
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia
- School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Correlates of the positive psychological byproducts of cancer: Role of family caregivers and informational support. Palliat Support Care 2017; 15:693-703. [DOI: 10.1017/s1478951517000050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACTObjective:Experiencing a life-threatening illness such as cancer can elicit both negative (e.g., distress) and positive (e.g., growth) psychological responses. The present study sought to determine the correlates of four positive psychological byproducts in cancer survivors: becoming a stronger person, coping better with life's challenges, making positive changes in life, and adopting healthier habits.Method:Data for this cross-sectional study were taken from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS) Experiences with Cancer Survivorship Supplement (Yabroff et al., 2012). Cancer survivors (N = 785) reported their sociodemographic and cancer-related characteristics. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize cancer survivor characteristics, including demographic factors, cancer factors, and stressors and resources related to cancer. Multivariable logistic regressions were employed to assess the independent association of the stressors and resources with each psychological response, controlling for covariates. All analyses were weighted to account for the complex sampling design of the MEPS.Results:In multivariable analyses, those with a family caregiver were 50% more likely to report better coping with challenges, and around 70% were more likely to report making positive changes in life or adopting healthier habits because of their cancer. Receiving informational support from healthcare providers was also consistently associated with positive byproducts (odds ratios ranging from 1.6 to 2.0). Few of the stressors were associated with positive byproducts: having insurance problems due to cancer was positively associated with becoming a stronger person, and work limitations were associated with making positive changes in life; those who reported high perceived chances of recurrence were less likely to report becoming a stronger person.Significance of Results:Having a family caregiver and receiving detailed informational support from healthcare providers were associated with reporting positive experiences with cancer. The hypotheses and future research stimulated by these findings may improve our understanding of the process by which positive byproducts develop and may ultimately help improve psychological well-being among cancer survivors.
Collapse
|
37
|
Watson M, White C, Lynch A, Mohammed K. Telephone-delivered individual cognitive behavioural therapy for cancer patients: An equivalence randomised trial. Psychooncology 2017; 26:301-308. [PMID: 27943570 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate Telephone-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (T-CBT) compared to CBT face to face treatment as usual (TAU-CBT), in cancer patients with high psychological needs, in terms of mental health and coping. METHOD A prospective randomised equivalence trial with Patient Reported Outcome (PRO's), measured pre- and post-therapy including; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale: Helpless/Hopeless subscale only (MAC H/H), Checklist of Cancer Concerns (CLCC) and the Cancer Coping Questionnaire (CCQ). A study-specific Service Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) was include. RESULTS Assessment of change scores, in n = 118 randomised patients referred for psychological care, indicate significant improvements (P < 0.01 or greater) for both therapy groups pre- and post-therapy in HADS anxiety, depression and total scores and cancer concerns (CLCC). Overall, for the groups combined, there is a significant shift towards reduction of CCQ stress (P = 0.028) and worry (P = 0.003) post-therapy when compared to baseline levels. Median number of therapy sessions was four. For cancer coping (CCQ) and for Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) there were significant change scores only for Positive Focus and Helpless/hopeless scores respectively, in the TAU-CBT group. Although equivalence was not observed, the data demonstrate that T-CBT was non-inferior to TAU-CBT. CONCLUSIONS Delivery of CBT to patients with clinician identified high need can be offered according to patient choice without loss of mental health benefit. Both TAU-CBT and T-CBT are effective at reducing mental health problems on the specific outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Watson
- Pastoral and Psychological Care, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, UK.,Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, Kings Cross, UK
| | - C White
- Pastoral and Psychological Care, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, UK.,Psychology Research Group, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - A Lynch
- Pastoral and Psychological Care, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - K Mohammed
- Research and Development Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Watson M, Dunn J. The multidisciplinary art and science of cancer care: integrating psycho-oncology. Future Oncol 2016; 12:2775-2778. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Watson
- Pastoral & Psychological Care, Compton House, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Jeffrey Dunn
- Cancer Council Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Social Science, University of Queensland, Australia
- Institute of Resilient Regions, USQ, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Youl PH, Dasgupta P, Youlden D, Aitken JF, Garvey G, Zorbas H, Chynoweth J, Wallington I, Baade PD. A systematic review of inequalities in psychosocial outcomes for women with breast cancer according to residential location and Indigenous status in Australia. Psychooncology 2016; 25:1157-1167. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Revised: 11/29/2015] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- PH Youl
- Cancer Research Centre; Cancer Council Queensland; Brisbane Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland; Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus; Southport Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work; Queensland University of Technology; Kelvin Grove Australia
| | - P Dasgupta
- Cancer Research Centre; Cancer Council Queensland; Brisbane Australia
| | - D Youlden
- Cancer Research Centre; Cancer Council Queensland; Brisbane Australia
| | - JF Aitken
- Cancer Research Centre; Cancer Council Queensland; Brisbane Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work; Queensland University of Technology; Kelvin Grove Australia
- School of Population Health; University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
| | - G Garvey
- Menzies School of Health Research; Charles Darwin University; Brisbane Australia
| | - H Zorbas
- Cancer Australia; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - J Chynoweth
- Cancer Australia; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - I Wallington
- Cancer Australia; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - PD Baade
- Cancer Research Centre; Cancer Council Queensland; Brisbane Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland; Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus; Southport Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work; Queensland University of Technology; Kelvin Grove Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relatives are the primary and existential resource of cancer patients, while at the same time experiencing substantial distress themselves. OBJECTIVES This article presents a description of tasks, roles and distress factors, the prevalence of psychosocial distress, description of risk factors in families contributing to dysfunctional coping, options and empirical evidence for the efficacy of psychosocial support. METHODS Evaluation of registry data, analysis of case reports, discussion of basic research findings, meta-analyses and expert judgments. RESULTS Psychosocial distress in relatives of cancer patients is comparable to the degree of distress experienced by the patients and is sometimes even higher. Distress in relatives is still underrecognized, underreported and undertreated. Hostile interaction patterns, low emotional expression and high conflict tendencies impair coping with cancer and its treatment. Psychosocial support for the family of cancer patients improves coping behavior and the quality of life both in relatives and patients. CONCLUSION Professional and lay caregivers need to adopt a social perspective on cancer whereby participation and inclusion of relatives in the treatment, acknowledgment of their engagement and recognition of their distress is beneficial for both patients and their relatives. Screening for psychosocial distress in relatives is recommended, attention should be drawn to psychosocial support services and utilization should be encouraged.
Collapse
|
41
|
Chatterton ML, Chambers S, Occhipinti S, Girgis A, Dunn J, Carter R, Shih S, Mihalopoulos C. Economic evaluation of a psychological intervention for high distress cancer patients and carers: costs and quality-adjusted life years. Psychooncology 2015; 25:857-64. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Revised: 10/04/2015] [Accepted: 10/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Griffith Health Institute; Griffith University; Brisbane Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland; Brisbane Australia
- Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia; Sydney Australia
| | | | - Afaf Girgis
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School; University of New South Wales; Sydney Australia
| | - Jeffrey Dunn
- Griffith Health Institute; Griffith University; Brisbane Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland; Brisbane Australia
- School of Medicine; Griffith University; Brisbane Australia
- School of Social Science; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tan YY, Blackford J. 'Rapid discharge': issues for hospital-based nurses in discharging cancer patients home to die. J Clin Nurs 2015; 24:2601-10. [PMID: 26010267 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2015] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To explore issues for hospital-based nurses in arranging rapid home discharge for imminently dying cancer patients in a Singapore acute hospital. BACKGROUND Dying at home is an important measure of a 'good death'. For hospitalised terminally ill patients, achieving home death can be of paramount importance to them and their family. Nurses experience many challenges in discharging imminently dying cancer patients home, due to time limitations and complex needs of patients and their families. DESIGN Qualitative interpretive description. METHOD Using purposive sampling, 14 registered nurses from an oncology ward in a Singapore hospital were recruited to participate in individual, semi-structured interviews. RESULTS Nursing issues in facilitating rapid discharge fell into three categories: time, discharge processes and family preparation. Decisions to die at home appeared solely family/patient driven, and were made when death appeared imminent. Discharge then became time-critical, as nurses needed to complete multiple tasks within short timeframes. Stress was further exacerbated by nurses' inexperience and the infrequent occurrence of rapid discharge, as well as absence of standardised discharge framework for guidance. Together, the lack of time and discharge processes to enable smooth hospital-to-home transition potentially affected nurses' capacity to adequately prepare families, and may contribute to caregiver anxiety. CONCLUSION Rapid discharge processes are needed as sudden patient/family decisions to die at home will continue. Earlier involvement of palliative care and implementation of a discharge pathway can potentially help nurses address their multiple responsibilities to ensure a successful transition from hospital to home. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Recognition of nursing issues and challenges during rapid discharge has implications for clinical improvements in supporting nurses during this challenging situation. Results of this study can be used to inform the conceptualisation of clinical interventions to facilitate urgent discharges of imminently dying patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung Ying Tan
- Division of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jeanine Blackford
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Schofield P, Chambers S. Effective, clinically feasible and sustainable: Key design features of psycho-educational and supportive care interventions to promote individualised self-management in cancer care. Acta Oncol 2015; 54:805-12. [PMID: 25813474 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1010016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED As the global burden of cancer increases healthcare services will face increasing challenges in meet the complex needs of these patients, their families and the communities in which they live. This raises the question of how to meet patient need where direct clinical contact may be constrained or not readily available. Patients and families require resources and skills to manage their illness outside of the hospital setting within their own communities. AIM To propose a framework for the development and delivery of psycho-educational and supportive care interventions drawing on theoretical principles of behaviour change and evidence-based interventions, and based on extensive experience in developing and testing complex interventions in oncology. APPROACH At the core of this intervention framework are considerations of efficiency: interventions are designed to cater for individuals' unique needs; to place minimal demands on the health system infrastructure and to be rapidly disseminated into usual care if successful. There are seven key features: 1) Targeting cancer type and stage; 2) Tailoring to unique individual needs; 3) Promotion of patient self-management of their disease and treatment side effects; 4) Efficient delivery of the intervention; 5) Training and adherence to protocol; 6) Ensuring the intervention is evidence-based; 7) Confirming stakeholder acceptability of the intervention. APPLICATION A case study of a randomised controlled trial which tested psycho-educational oncology interventions using this framework is presented. These interventions were designed to cater for individuals' unique needs and promote self-management while placing minimal demands on the acute health care setting. DISCUSSION Innovative ways to realise the potentially major impact that psycho-educational and supportive care interventions can have on psychological morbidity, coping, symptoms and quality of life in serious and chronic illness are needed. This framework, which is driven by theory, evidence, and experience, is designed to ensure that interventions are effective, clinically feasible and sustainable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology , Melbourne, Victoria , Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Turner J. The changing landscape of cancer care - the impact of psychosocial clinical practice guidelines. Psychooncology 2015; 24:365-70. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.3803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2015] [Revised: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Turner
- University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chambers SK, Hyde MK. Underserved groups and barriers to cancer care. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2014; 24:1-3. [PMID: 25532740 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S K Chambers
- Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland; Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia; Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales; Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Perth; Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chambers SK, Morris BA, Clutton S, Foley E, Giles L, Schofield P, O'Connell D, Dunn J. Psychological wellness and health-related stigma: a pilot study of an acceptance-focused cognitive behavioural intervention for people with lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2014; 24:60-70. [PMID: 25053458 PMCID: PMC4309461 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
People with lung cancer experience health-related stigma that is related to poorer psychosocial and quality of life outcomes. The present Phase 1 study applied mixed methods to test the acceptability of an acceptance-focused cognitive behavioural intervention targeting stigma for this patient group. Fourteen lung cancer patients completed a 6-week Psychological Wellness intervention with pre- and post-test outcome measures of psychological and cancer-specific distress, depression, health-related stigma and quality of life. In-depth interviews applying interpretative phenomenological analysis assessed participants' experiences of the intervention. Moderate to large improvements were observed in psychological (ηp (2) = 0.182) and cancer-specific distress (ηp (2) = 0.056); depression (ηp (2) = 0.621); health-related stigma (ηp (2) = 0.139). In contrast, quality of life declined (ηp (2) = 0.023). The therapeutic relationship; self-management of distress; and relationship support were highly valued aspects of the intervention. Barriers to intervention included avoidance and practical issues. The lung cancer patients who completed the Psychological Wellness intervention reported improvements in psychological outcomes and decreases in stigma in the face of declining quality of life with patients reporting personal benefit from their own perspectives. A randomised controlled trial is warranted to establish the effectiveness of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Chambers
- Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Health & Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|