1
|
Williams J, McGrath R, Ang K, Bakolis I, Healey A, Arias de la Torre J, Mdudu I, Gaughran F, Sadler E, Pinto da Costa M, Green E, Stepan N, Tredget G, Khadjesari Z, Cross S, Sevdalis N. Evaluating a volunteer 'Health Champions' intervention supporting people with severe mental illness to manage their physical health: feasibility hybrid randomised controlled trial. BJPsych Open 2024; 10:e172. [PMID: 39364642 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population. There is evidence that support from volunteers can help the mental health of people with SMI, but little evidence regarding the support they can give for physical health. AIMS To evaluate the feasibility of an intervention where volunteer 'Health Champions' support people with SMI in managing their physical health. METHOD A feasibility hybrid randomised controlled trial conducted in mental health teams with people with SMI. Volunteers delivered the Health Champions intervention. We collected data on the feasibility of delivering the intervention, and clinical and cost-effectiveness. Participants were randomised by a statistician independent of the research team, to either having a Health Champion or treatment as usual. Blinding was not done. RESULTS We recruited 48 participants: 27 to the intervention group and 21 to the control group. Data were analysed for 34 participants. No changes were found in clinical effectiveness for either group. Implementation outcomes measures showed high acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness, but with low response rates. No adverse events were identified in either group. Interviews with participants found they identified changes they had made to their physical health. The cost of implementing the intervention was £312 per participant. CONCLUSIONS The Health Champion intervention was feasible to implement, but the implementation of the study measures was problematic. Participants found the intervention acceptable, feasible and appropriate, and it led them to make changes in their physical health. A larger trial is recommended, with tailored implementation outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Williams
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Ray McGrath
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Karen Ang
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Ioannis Bakolis
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Andy Healey
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Jorge Arias de la Torre
- Care in Long Term Conditions Research Division, King's College London, UK; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Madrid, Spain; and Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, Spain
| | - Isabel Mdudu
- Volunteer Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fiona Gaughran
- National Psychosis Unit, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Euan Sadler
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, UK
| | - Mariana Pinto da Costa
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and King's College London, UK
| | - Errol Green
- Quality Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalia Stepan
- Mind and Body Programme, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Gracie Tredget
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Zarnie Khadjesari
- Behavioural and Implementation Science (BIS) Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, UK
| | - Sean Cross
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and Mind and Body Programme, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Nick Sevdalis
- Centre for Behavioural and Implementation Science Interventions, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carlton J, Powell P, Rowen D, Williams C, Griffiths AW, Hobson E, McDermott C. Development of a novel patient reported outcome measure for health-related quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PROQuALS): study protocol. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:69. [PMID: 39215326 PMCID: PMC11365122 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02286-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to assess the impact of health conditions upon an individual's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Whilst PROMs have been used to quantify the HRQoL impact of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), existing instruments may not fully capture what matters to people living with ALS (plwALS) or be appropriate to be used directly to inform the cost-effectiveness of new treatments. This highlights a need for a new condition-specific PROM that can both capture what's important to plwALS and be used in economic evaluation. This study has two key aims: 1) to produce a novel PROM for measuring HRQoL in plwALS (PROQuALS). 2) to value a set of items from the novel PROM to generate an associated preference-weighted measure (PWM) that will enable utility values to be generated. METHODS A mixed-methods study design will be conducted across three stages. Stage 1 involves concept elicitation and the generation of draft PROM content from a robust and comprehensive systematic review of HRQoL in ALS, with input from plwALS. Stage 2 consists of cognitive debriefing of the draft PROM content to ascertain its content validity (Stage 2a), followed by a psychometric survey (Stage 2b) to assess statistical performance. Evidence from Stage 2 will be used to make decisions on the final content and format of the novel PROM. Stage 3 will involve valuation and econometric modeling using health economics methods to generate preference weights, so a PWM derived from the novel PROM can be used in the cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments. Patient and clinical advisory groups will have critical, collaborative input throughout the project. DISCUSSION The novel PROM will be designed to comprehensively assess important aspects of HRQoL to plwALS and to quantify HRQoL in terms of subjective impact. The PROQuALS measure will be available for use in research and healthcare settings. The associated PWM component will extend and enable the use of PROQuALS in cost-effective analyses of new treatments for ALS. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Carlton
- Sheffield Centre of Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Philip Powell
- Sheffield Centre of Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- Sheffield Centre of Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Claire Williams
- Sheffield Centre of Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Esther Hobson
- Division of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Farrer LM, Jackson HM, Gulliver A, Calear AL, Leach L, Hasking P, Katruss N, Batterham PJ. A Transdiagnostic Video-Based Internet Intervention (Uni Virtual Clinic-Lite) to Improve the Mental Health of University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e53598. [PMID: 39137012 DOI: 10.2196/53598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of digital interventions for improving the mental health of university students. However, low rates of engagement with these interventions are an ongoing challenge and can compromise effectiveness. Brief, transdiagnostic, web-based video interventions are capable of targeting key mental health and related issues affecting university students and may be more engaging and accessible for this population. OBJECTIVE This study used a 2-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Uni Virtual Clinic-Lite (UVC-Lite), a fully automated, transdiagnostic, web-based video intervention, relative to an attention-control condition. The primary outcomes were symptoms of depression and generalized anxiety disorder. The secondary outcomes included psychological distress, social anxiety symptoms, body appreciation, quality of life, well-being, functioning, general self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy, and help seeking. Program use (intervention uptake and engagement) and satisfaction were also assessed. METHODS University students (n=487) with mild to moderate symptoms of distress were recruited from universities across Australia and randomly allocated to receive access to the UVC-Lite intervention or an attention-control condition targeting general health for a period of 6 weeks. UVC-Lite includes 12 modules, each comprising a brief animated video and an accompanying exercise. Of the 12 modules, 7 also included a brief symptom screening quiz. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and 3- and 6-months postintervention. RESULTS The primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis using mixed models repeated measures ANOVA. The intervention was not found to be effective relative to the control condition on any of the primary or secondary outcomes. While 67.9% (114/168) of participants accessed at least 1 module of the intervention, module completion was extremely low. Subgroup analyses among those who engaged with the program (completed at least 1 video) and those with higher baseline distress (Distress Questionnaire-5 score ≥15) did not reveal any differences between the conditions over time. However, uptake (accessing at least 1 video) and engagement (completing at least 1 video) were higher among those with higher baseline symptoms. Satisfaction with the intervention was high. CONCLUSIONS The UVC-Lite intervention was not effective relative to a control program, although it was associated with high satisfaction among students and was not associated with symptom deterioration. Given the challenges faced by universities in meeting demand for mental health services, flexible and accessible interventions such as UVC-Lite have the potential to assist students to manage symptoms of mental health problems. However, low uptake and engagement (particularly among students with lower levels of symptomatology) are significant challenges that require further attention. Future studies should examine the effectiveness of the intervention in a more highly symptomatic sample, as well as implementation pathways to optimize effective engagement with the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621000375853; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380146.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise M Farrer
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Hayley M Jackson
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Amelia Gulliver
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Alison L Calear
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Liana Leach
- Department of Health Economics Wellbeing and Society, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Penelope Hasking
- Curtin enAble Institute and School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Curtin, Australia
| | - Natasha Katruss
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Philip J Batterham
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bray G, Moncrieff J, Priebe S, Marston L, Lewis G, Haynes N, Pinfold V, Johnson S, Hunter RM. Cost-Utility Analysis of Antipsychotic Reduction and Discontinuation in Patients With Long-Term Schizophrenia and Psychosis in English Mental Health Trusts: The RADAR Study. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024:S1098-3015(24)02800-6. [PMID: 39127250 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The current recommended treatment for patients with recurrent episodes of schizophrenia and related conditions is antipsychotic medication. However, many antipsychotic users remain functionally impaired and experience serious physical and mental side effects. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of a gradual antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation strategy compared with maintenance treatment over 24 months from mental health services, health and social care, and societal perspectives. METHODS Nineteen mental health trusts recruited patients to the Research into Antipsychotic Discontinuation and Reduction (RADAR) randomized controlled trial. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from patient-reported EQ-5D-5L, with years of full capability calculated from the patient-reported ICECAP-A. Mental health services use and medication was collected from medical records. Other resource use and productivity loss was collected using self-completed questionnaires. Costs were calculated from published sources. RESULTS A total of 253 participants were randomized: 126 assigned to antipsychotic dose reduction and 127 to maintenance. There were no significant differences between arms in total costs for any perspectives. There were no significant difference in quality-adjusted life-years (-0.035; 95% CI: -0.123 to 0.052), whereas years of full capability were significantly lower in the reduction arm compared with the maintenance arm (baseline-adjusted difference: -0.103; 95% CI: -0.192 to -0.014). The reduction strategy was dominated by maintenance for all analyses and was not likely to be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS It is unlikely that gradual antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation strategy is cost-effective compared with maintenance over 2-years for patients with schizophrenia and other recurrent psychotic disorders who are on long-term antipsychotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Bray
- Office of Health Economics, London, England, UK
| | - Joanna Moncrieff
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London and North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK
| | - Stefan Priebe
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, England, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London and North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK
| | - Nadia Haynes
- Research and Development Department, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK
| | | | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London and North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK
| | - Rachael Maree Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yamaguchi S, Ojio Y, Koike J, Matsunaga A, Ogawa M, Kikuchi A, Kawashima T, Tachimori H, Bernick P, Kimura H, Inagaki A, Watanabe H, Kishi Y, Yoshida K, Hirooka T, Oishi S, Matsuda Y, Fujii C. Associations between readmission and patient-reported measures in acute psychiatric inpatients: a multicenter prospective longitudinal study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2024:10.1007/s00127-024-02710-5. [PMID: 39102067 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-024-02710-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined whether patient-reported measures (PRMs) addressing quality of life, personal agency, functional impairment, and treatment satisfaction at hospital discharge were associated with future readmission during a 12-month follow-up period. The study also examined whether readmission influenced changes in the same measures. METHODS A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted at 21 psychiatric hospitals in Japan. Participants completed the EuroQol-five-dimensions-five-level (EQ-5D), the Five-item Subjective Personal Agency Scale, and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at the time of index admission (T1), discharge from index admission (T2), and 6 months (T3) and 12 months (T4) after discharge. Inpatient treatment satisfaction was assessed at T2. Readmission and variables potentially associated with hospitalization and PRMs were evaluated using mixed-effects logistic regression models and mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS A total of 491 participants were followed for 12 months (attrition rate: 19.4%), and 480 were included in the EQ-5D analysis. The most common diagnoses were schizophrenia (59%), depression (14%), and bipolar disorder (13%). No patient-reported measures were significantly associated with readmission over the follow-up period. Interaction of readmission and time did not significantly affect changes in EQ-5D. Readmission did significantly influence SDS score changes between T2 and T3 (B = 1.78, 95% CI = 0.30-3.25, p = 0.018) and between T3 and T4 (B = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.14-2.72, p = 0.029). The same influence of readmission on SDS score changes was not observed in the model which adjusted for all potential covariates. CONCLUSION Readmission was potentially associated with changes in self-reported functional impairment. Findings highlight the potential role of intensive post-discharge services in preventing readmission, rather than relying on time-of-discharge PRMs in order to predict readmission risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000034220).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sosei Yamaguchi
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan.
| | - Yasutaka Ojio
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
| | - Junko Koike
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
| | - Asami Matsunaga
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
- Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makoto Ogawa
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
| | - Akiko Kikuchi
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
- Faculty of Human Sciences, Musashino University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kawashima
- Department of Information Medicine, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Neuroscience, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisateru Tachimori
- Department of Information Medicine, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Neuroscience, Tokyo, Japan
- Endowed Course for Health System Innovation, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Bernick
- Student Accessibility Office, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kimura
- Department of Psychiatry, Gakuji-Kai Kimura Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chaba, Japan
| | - Ataru Inagaki
- College of Education, Psychology and Human Studies, Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Watanabe
- Department of Psychiatry, Gakuji-Kai Kimura Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Division of Medical Treatment and Rehabilitation, Center of Forensic Mental Health, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Kishi
- Department of Psychiatry, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koji Yoshida
- Department of Human Care and Support, Toyo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaaki Hirooka
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Satoru Oishi
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Matsuda
- Osaka Psychiatric Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Nara Medical University School of Medicine, Nara, Japan
| | - Chiyo Fujii
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, 187-8553, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Batterham PJ, Martin M, Calear AL, Cherbuin N, Romaniuk M, Banfield M, Butterworth P, Burvill M, Massang D. Staff and client preferences for the design and delivery of an outcomes monitoring system in a mental health service. J Eval Clin Pract 2024. [PMID: 38993031 DOI: 10.1111/jep.14085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 06/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcome monitoring can support the delivery of quality service that meets the needs of clients, clinicians and services. However, few studies have examined client or staff perspectives on the design and implementation of outcomes monitoring within a service. Implementation of outcomes monitoring requires understanding the preferences and expectations of relevant stakeholders. OBJECTIVE Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, this study aimed to investigate the preferences and priorities of relevant staff, clients and family members to inform the design and implementation of an effective outcomes monitoring system in the context of a mental health service for military veterans and their families. METHOD Twenty-nine staff participated across five online focus groups, including clinical staff, peer workers, policy staff and supervisors. Ten clients participated in online or telephone semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes from the data. RESULTS Clients and staff agreed that outcomes monitoring should cover more than symptoms, particularly by incorporating functional outcomes. Assessing mental health over time was considered a valuable tool for supporting treatment processes and providing actionable information. Challenges identified by clients and staff included the need for efficient processes, ensuring measures are relevant and acceptable, and maintaining client privacy. The ability to personalise data collection and have a streamlined, responsive system were key attributes of a quality outcomes monitoring framework. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that an effective outcome monitoring framework should be client-led, tailored to the individual's needs, and provide feedback on progress. Outcomes monitoring should also be efficient, accessible and allow for safe information sharing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J Batterham
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Melonie Martin
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Centre of Epidemiology for Policy and Practice, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Alison L Calear
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Nicolas Cherbuin
- Department of Health Economics Wellbeing and Society, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Madeline Romaniuk
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Michelle Banfield
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Peter Butterworth
- Department of Health Economics Wellbeing and Society, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- SEED Lifespan, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Burvill
- Department of Veterans' Affairs, Australian Government, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Daniel Massang
- Department of Veterans' Affairs, Australian Government, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pyle M, Loftus L, Emsley R, Freeman D, Gillard S, Gumley A, Sierpatowska J, Wood L, O'Connor RC, Pfeiffer P, Simpson SA, Cockayne N, Shields G, Beckley A, Beckwith H, Filippidou M, Glen C, Allan S, Hazzard R, Longden E, Peel H, Larsen M, Bucci S, Morrison AP. Study protocol for an adaptive, multi-arm, multi-stage (MAMS) randomised controlled trial of brief remotely delivered psychosocial interventions for people with serious mental health problems who have experienced a recent suicidal crisis: Remote Approaches to Psychosocial Intervention Delivery (RAPID). Trials 2024; 25:460. [PMID: 38971788 PMCID: PMC11227697 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08293-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with serious mental health problems (SMHP) are more likely to be admitted to psychiatric hospital following contact with crisis services. Admissions can have significant personal costs, be traumatic and are the most expensive form of mental health care. There is an urgent need for treatments to reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviours and reduce avoidable psychiatric admissions. METHODS A multi-stage, multi-arm (MAMS) randomised controlled trial (RCT) with four arms conducted over two stages to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of three psychosocial treatments, compared to treatment as usual (TAU), for people with SMHP who have had recent suicidal crisis. Primary outcome is any psychiatric hospital admissions over a 6-month period. We will assess the impact on suicidal thoughts and behaviour, hope, recovery, anxiety and depression. The remote treatments delivered over 3 months are structured peer support (PREVAIL); a safety planning approach (SAFETEL) delivered by assistant psychologists; and a CBT-based suicide prevention app accessed via a smartphone (BrighterSide). Recruitment is at five UK sites. Stage 1 includes an internal pilot with a priori progression criteria. In stage 1, the randomisation ratio was 1:1:1:2 in favour of TAU. This has been amended to 2:2:3 in favour of TAU following an unplanned change to remove the BrighterSide arm following the release of efficacy data from an independent RCT. Randomisation is via an independent remote web-based randomisation system using randomly permuted blocks, stratified by site. An interim analysis will be performed using data from the first 385 participants from PREVAIL, SAFETEL and TAU with outcome data at 6 months. If one arm is dropped for lack of benefit in stage 2, the allocation ratio of future participants will be 1:1. The expected total sample size is 1064 participants (1118 inclusive of BrighterSide participants). DISCUSSION There is a need for evidence-based interventions to reduce psychiatric admissions, via reduction of suicidality. Our focus on remote delivery of established brief psychosocial interventions, utilisation of different modalities of delivery that can provide sustainable and scalable solutions, which are also suitable for a pandemic or national crisis context, will significantly advance treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN33079589. Registered on June 20, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Pyle
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lucy Loftus
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Freeman
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Steven Gillard
- School of Health & Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Gumley
- School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Lisa Wood
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Research and Development, Northeast London NHS Foundation Trust, Essex, UK
| | - Rory C O'Connor
- School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Paul Pfeiffer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Nicole Cockayne
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gemma Shields
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ariane Beckley
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Helen Beckwith
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Callum Glen
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Stephanie Allan
- School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Raj Hazzard
- McPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover Street, London, UK
| | - Eleanor Longden
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Heather Peel
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Larsen
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sandra Bucci
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony P Morrison
- The Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brophy L, Fletcher J, Dawadi S, Reece J, Edan V, Enticott J, Farhall J, Fossey E, Hamilton B, Harvey C, Meadows G, Mihalopoulos C, Morrisroe E, Newton R, Palmer V, Vine R, Waks S, Pirkis J. A longitudinal study of the impacts of a stay in a Prevention and Recovery Care service in Victoria, Australia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2024; 58:615-626. [PMID: 38679852 PMCID: PMC11193319 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241242943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevention and Recovery Care services are residential sub-acute services in Victoria, Australia, guided by a commitment to recovery-oriented practice. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of this service model is limited, largely relying on small, localised evaluations. This study involved a state-wide investigation into the personal recovery, perceived needs for care, well-being and quality-of-life outcomes experienced by Prevention and Recovery Care services' consumers. METHODS A longitudinal cohort design examined the trajectory of self-reported personal recovery and other outcomes for consumers in 19 Victorian Prevention and Recovery Care services over 4 time points (T1 - 1 week after admission; T2 - within 1 week of discharge; T3 - 6 months after discharge; T4 - 12 months after discharge). T2-T4 time frames were extended by approximately 3 weeks due to recruitment challenges. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS At T1, 298 consumers were recruited. By T4, 114 remained in the study. Participants scored higher on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery at all three time points after T1. There were also sustained improvements on all secondary outcome measures. Improvements were then sustained at each subsequent post-intervention time point. Community inclusion and having needs for care met also improved. CONCLUSION The findings provide a consistent picture of benefits for consumers using Prevention and Recovery Care services, with significant improvement in personal recovery, quality of life, mental health and well-being following an admission to a Prevention and Recovery Care service. Further attention needs to be given to how to sustain the gains made through a Prevention and Recovery Care service admission in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Brophy
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Justine Fletcher
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shrinkhala Dawadi
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John Reece
- Discipline of Psychological Sciences, Australian College of Applied Professions, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Vrinda Edan
- Centre for Mental Health Nursing, Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanne Enticott
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John Farhall
- Department of Psychology, Counselling and Therapy, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Ellie Fossey
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bridget Hamilton
- Centre for Mental Health Nursing, Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Carol Harvey
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- North West Area Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Northern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Graham Meadows
- School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Emma Morrisroe
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Newton
- Peninsula Mental Health Service, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Victoria Palmer
- The ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ruth Vine
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shifra Waks
- Discipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Chippendale, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane Pirkis
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kar N, Barreto S. Influence of Lifestyle Factors on Metabolic Syndrome in Psychiatric Patients Attending a Community Mental Health Setting: A Cross-sectional Study. Indian J Psychol Med 2024; 46:313-322. [PMID: 39056040 PMCID: PMC11268271 DOI: 10.1177/02537176231219770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a concern in psychiatric patients. We aimed to study the influence of the modifiable lifestyle factors on MetS in adult psychiatric patients along with associated clinical factors and quality of life. Methods Factors such as diet (Healthy Eating Index), exercise, substance use, cardiovascular risk (QRISK), illness severity (Clinical Global Impression), medications, adverse events (Systematic Monitoring of Adverse Events Related to Treatments), and quality of life (Recovering Quality of Life Scale) were assessed along with clinical components for MetS in 323 psychiatric patients receiving routine care and monitoring in a Community Mental Health Team. Results MetS was present in 50.5% (95% CI: 45.0-55.9). It was significantly associated with higher age, duration of mental illness, body mass index (BMI), QTc, QRISK, and antipsychotic drugs. In logistic regression, age, QTc, QRISK, and BMI remained significantly linked to MetS. Patients with or without MetS were comparable in their lifestyle factors such as diet, exercise, and substance use, along with the family history of metabolic disorders, age at onset of mental illness, duration of antipsychotic medication, side effects, psychiatric diagnoses, and quality of life. However, many patients with or without MetS had poorer diet and physical inactivity, indicating scope for interventions. Conclusions Around half of the psychiatric patients had MetS, and modifiable lifestyle factors did not differentiate individuals with or without MetS. The need for further research on the prevention and management of MetS in psychiatric patients is highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilamadhab Kar
- University of Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| | - Socorro Barreto
- Dept. of Psychiatry, Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Batterham PJ, Gulliver A, Heffernan C, Calear AL, Werner-Seidler A, Turner A, Farrer LM, Chatterton ML, Mihalopoulos C, Berk M. A Brief Workplace Training Program to Support Help-Seeking for Mental Ill-Health: Protocol for the Helipad Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e55529. [PMID: 38787608 PMCID: PMC11161717 DOI: 10.2196/55529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most people with mental health problems do not seek help, with delays of even decades in seeking professional help. Lack of engagement with professional mental health services can lead to poor outcomes and functional impairment. However, few effective interventions have been identified to improve help-seeking in adults, and those that exist are not widely implemented to deliver public health impact. Co-designing interventions with people with lived experience of mental ill-health and other relevant stakeholders is critical to increase the likelihood of uptake and engagement with these programs. OBJECTIVE This study aims to (1) test the effectiveness of a co-designed help-seeking program on increasing professional help-seeking intentions in employees in a workplace setting; (2) determine whether the program reduces mental illness stigma and improves help-seeking intentions and behavior, mental health literacy, mental health symptoms, and work and activity functioning relative to the control condition; (3) explore factors that facilitate broader implementation of the co-designed program; and (4) explore the cost-effectiveness of the co-designed program compared to the control condition over 6 months. METHODS A 2-arm cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted (target sample: N=900 from 30 to 36 workplaces, with n=25 to 35 participants per workplace). The trial will compare the relative effectiveness of an enhanced interactive program (intervention condition) with a standard psychoeducation-alone program (active control condition) on the primary outcome of professional help-seeking intentions as measured by the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include the impact on mental illness stigma; mental health literacy; help-seeking attitudes and behavior; work and activity functioning; quality of life; and symptoms of mental ill-health including depression, anxiety, and general psychological distress. RESULTS Facilitators of and risks to the trial are identified and addressed in this protocol. Recruitment of workplaces is scheduled to commence in the first quarter of 2024. CONCLUSIONS If effective, the program has the potential to be ready for rapid dissemination throughout Australia, with the potential to increase appropriate and efficient service use across the spectrum of evidence-based services. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12623000270617p; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385376. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/55529.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J Batterham
- Centre for Mental Health Research, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
| | - Amelia Gulliver
- Centre for Mental Health Research, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
| | - Cassandra Heffernan
- Centre for Mental Health Research, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
| | - Alison L Calear
- Centre for Mental Health Research, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
| | | | - Alyna Turner
- Deakin University, School of Medicine, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Geelong, Australia
| | - Louise M Farrer
- Centre for Mental Health Research, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
| | - Mary Lou Chatterton
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin University, School of Medicine, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Geelong, Australia
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Centre for Youth Mental Health, Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Furlanetto K, Khopade R, Phutane V, Bhat R, Stolee P. From not knowing to doing: An interprofessional approach to clinician training in use of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) as a recovery-oriented outcome measure in a rural mental health service. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024. [PMID: 38685694 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
Outcome measurement and feedback are key to quality improvement in healthcare. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is a tool that could be used to measure outcomes of mental health services delivering recovery-oriented care. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tailored, interprofessional, multilevel and adaptable GAS training on clinician views, learning, competence, performance and confidence in the use of GAS. Thematic analysis of eight clinician participant views was done using the method proposed by Braun and Clarke (Thematic analysis: a practical guide to understanding and doing, 2022). Four main themes were generated: clinicians found that this type of training is useful, GAS influenced the way they thought about their roles in goal setting and recovery-oriented care and COVID-19 pandemic impacts. Furthermore, clinicians' skills to set scalable GAS goals with consumers and clinician confidence in using GAS improved. The results of this study show a positive impact of tailored, interprofessional, multilevel and adaptable training supporting development of clinician skills in the GAS process. The training design had a favourable effect on clinician views, learning, competence, performance and confidence of GAS as a recovery-oriented outcome measure. The approach to GAS training and use of GAS as a recovery-oriented outcome measure should be considered in response to mental health service reform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vivek Phutane
- Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ravi Bhat
- Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul Stolee
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gandy M, Coleman H, Cutler H, Jones MP, Karin E, Kwan P, Nikpour A, Parratt K, Rayner G, Titov N, Todd L, Seil E, Winton‐Brown T, Wu W, Dear BF. Comparative effectiveness of digital mental healthcare models for adults with epilepsy: A study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:808-818. [PMID: 38345357 PMCID: PMC10984311 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mental health complaints are prevalent among people with epilepsy, yet there are major barriers that prevent access to psychological care, including high out-of-pocket costs and a lack of accessible specialized services. The purpose of the current study is to examine the comparative efficacy, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, and long-term outcomes of a digital psychological intervention when delivered under two models of care (i.e., guided vs. unguided) in supporting the mental health and functioning of adults with epilepsy. METHOD Approximately 375 participants across Australia will be enrolled. Eligible participants will have a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy, experience difficulties with their emotional health, be at least 18 years of age, and live in Australia. Participants will be randomized (2:2:1) to receive the Wellbeing Neuro Course, a 10-week internet-delivered program, with (i.e., guided) or without guidance by a mental health clinician (i.e., unguided), or be allocated to a treatment-as-usual waiting-list control group. Participants will complete online questionnaires at pre-, post-treatment, and 3- and 12-month follow-up and consent to have their data linked to their medical records to capture healthcare system resource use and costs. ANALYSIS Primary outcome measures will be symptoms of depression and anxiety. A cost-utility analysis will be undertaken using the Australian healthcare system perspective and according to current economic evaluation guidelines. Resource use and costs to the healthcare system during the study period will be captured via data linkage to relevant administrative datasets in Australia. SIGNIFICANCE The results of this trial will provide important data concerning the relative outcomes of these different models of care and will inform the integration of digital psychological interventions translation into healthcare services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Human Research Ethics Committee of Macquarie University approved the proposed study (Reference No: 520231325151475). The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication(s). ANZCTR TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12623001327673. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY This study seeks to find out if a 10-week online psychological treatment can improve the mental health and well-being of Australian adults with epilepsy. Around 375 participants will be randomly assigned to different groups: one will receive treatment with guidance from mental health clinician (guided group), one without guidance (unguided group), and one starting later (waiting control group). All participants will fill out the same outcome measures online. The main goal of this research is to compare these groups and assess how well the treatment works in improving mental health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Gandy
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Honor Coleman
- Melbourne School of Psychological SciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Australian Institute of Health InnovationMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Business SchoolSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Michael P. Jones
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Eyal Karin
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Patrick Kwan
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Armin Nikpour
- Department of NeurologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kaitlyn Parratt
- Department of NeurologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- The Epilepsy Society of AustraliaSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Genevieve Rayner
- Melbourne School of Psychological SciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Comprehensive Epilepsy ProgramAlfred HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Nickolai Titov
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- MindSpotMQ Health, Macquarie UniversityNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lisa Todd
- Epilepsy Action AustraliaSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Elizabeth Seil
- Australian Institute of Health InnovationMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Business SchoolSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Toby Winton‐Brown
- Comprehensive Epilepsy ProgramAlfred HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Wendy Wu
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Blake F. Dear
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- MindSpotMQ Health, Macquarie UniversityNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carney R, El-Metaal H, Law H, Savage S, Small I, Hann M, Shields G, Shiers D, Carmichael-Murphy P, Jones R, Kimber E, McDonald A, Parker S. Motiv8: a study protocol for a cluster-randomised feasibility trial of a weight management intervention for adults with severe mental illness in secure forensic services. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:48. [PMID: 38429815 PMCID: PMC10908020 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01458-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People with severe mental illness have physical comorbidities which result in significant reductions in quality of life and premature mortality. Effective interventions are required that are suitable for people in secure forensic mental health services. We conducted pilot work of a multidisciplinary weight management intervention (Motiv8) which showed improvements in physical and mental health and high levels of satisfaction. We aim to test the feasibility of Motiv8 under cluster randomised conditions, with an aim to investigate the acceptability, feasibility and potential effectiveness of this intervention to supplement standard secure care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A randomised waitlist-controlled feasibility trial of a lifestyle intervention (Motiv8) + TAU compared with TAU (+ Motiv8 waitlist) for adults on secure mental health units will be conducted. Thirty-two people (4 cohorts) will be recruited from secure services in Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust. Participants will be randomly allocated to Motiv8 or TAU + Motiv8 waitlist. All participants will receive Motiv8 during the trial. Assessor-blinded physical/mental health and lifestyle assessments will be conducted at baseline, 10 weeks (post-intervention/waitlist), and after 12 weeks (post-waitlist intervention/follow-up). Motiv8 is a multidisciplinary intervention including exercise sessions, cooking/nutrition classes, physical health education, psychology sessions, sleep hygiene, peer support and medication review by pharmacy. A nested qualitative study will be conducted with a subsample of participants (n = 10) to explore their experiences of taking part. The analysis will focus on feasibility outcomes and tabulated success indicators of the study (e.g. Recruitment rates, retention rates, follow-up retention and response rates, attendance at sessions, the experience of involvement in the trial and delivery of the intervention, assessment of safety, development of a manualised intervention). Thematic analysis will be conducted through qualitative interviews. The analysis will aim to inform the development of a definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial has been granted ethical approval from the NHS Health Research Authority and adopted onto the UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, professional and public networks, conferences and clinical services. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN13539285.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Carney
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Hany El-Metaal
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Heather Law
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Siobhan Savage
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ingrid Small
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Hann
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gemma Shields
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Parise Carmichael-Murphy
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Jones
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elizabeth Kimber
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew McDonald
- Lancashire and South Cumbria, NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK
| | - Sophie Parker
- Youth Mental Health Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lathe J, Silverwood RJ, Hughes AD, Patalay P. Examining how well economic evaluations capture the value of mental health. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11:221-230. [PMID: 38281493 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00436-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Health economics evidence informs health-care decision making, but the field has historically paid insufficient attention to mental health. Economic evaluations in health should define an appropriate scope for benefits and costs and how to value them. This Health Policy provides an overview of these processes and considers to what extent they capture the value of mental health. We suggest that although current practices are both transparent and justifiable, they have distinct limitations from the perspective of mental health. Most social value judgements, such as the exclusion of interindividual outcomes and intersectoral costs, diminish the value of improving mental health, and this reduction in value might be disproportionate compared with other types of health. Economic analyses might have disadvantaged interventions that improve mental health compared with physical health, but research is required to test the size of such differential effects and any subsequent effect on decision-making systems such as health technology assessment systems. Collaboration between health economics and the mental health sciences is crucial for achieving mental-physical health parity in evaluative frameworks and, ultimately, improving population mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Lathe
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Richard J Silverwood
- Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alun D Hughes
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Praveetha Patalay
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Johnson S, Birken M, Nyikavaranda P, Kular A, Gafoor R, Parkinson J, Hutchings-Hay C, Gant T, Molai J, Rivera J, Fenwick J, Bendall C, Blakley L, Bacarese-Hamilton T, White VC, Holden MK, Seale J, Hardy J, Fraser KL, Mitchell L, Lay B, Mbeah-Bankas H, McCrone P, Freemantle N, Wood L, Lobban F, Lloyd-Evans B. A crisis planning and monitoring intervention to reduce compulsory hospital readmissions (FINCH study): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:35. [PMID: 38378694 PMCID: PMC10877855 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01453-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rates of compulsory (also known as involuntary) detention under mental health legislation have been rising over several decades in countries including England. Avoiding such detentions should be a high priority given their potentially traumatic nature and departure from usual ethical principles of consent and collaboration. Those who have been detained previously are at high risk of being detained again, and thus a priority group for preventive interventions. In a very sparse literature, interventions based on crisis planning emerge as having more supporting evidence than other approaches to preventing compulsory detention. METHOD We have adapted and manualised an intervention previously trialled in Zürich Switzerland, aimed at reducing future compulsory detentions among people being discharged following a psychiatric admission that has included a period of compulsory detention. A co-production group including people with relevant lived and clinical experience has co-designed the adaptations to the intervention, drawing on evidence on crisis planning and self-management and on qualitative interviews with service users and clinicians. We will conduct a randomised controlled feasibility trial of the intervention, randomising 80 participants to either the intervention in addition to usual care, or usual care only. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and trial procedures will be assessed through process evaluation (including rates of randomisation, recruitment, and retention) and qualitative interviews. We will also assess and report on planned trial outcomes. The planned primary outcome for a full trial is repeat compulsory detention within one year of randomisation, and secondary outcomes include compulsory detention within 2 years, and symptoms, service satisfaction, self-rated recovery, self-management confidence, and service engagement. A health economic evaluation is also included. DISCUSSION This feasibility study, and any subsequent full trial, will add to a currently limited literature on interventions to prevent involuntary detention, a goal valued highly by service users, carers, clinicians, and policymakers. There are significant potential impediments to recruiting and retaining this group, whose experiences of mental health care have often been negative and traumatising, and who are at high risk of disengagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN11627644. Registered 25th May 2022, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11627644 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Mary Birken
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Patrick Nyikavaranda
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Ariana Kular
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Rafael Gafoor
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Chloe Hutchings-Hay
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomas Gant
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jazmin Molai
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - James Fenwick
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Theresa Bacarese-Hamilton
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Valerie Christina White
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Mark Keith Holden
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Janet Seale
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Jackie Hardy
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Kathleen Lindsay Fraser
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Lizzie Mitchell
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | | | | | - Paul McCrone
- Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Nick Freemantle
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lisa Wood
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fiona Lobban
- Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6Th Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Casetta C, Santosh P, Bayley R, Bisson J, Byford S, Dixon C, Drake RJ, Elvins R, Emsley R, Fung N, Hayes D, Howes O, James A, James K, Jones R, Killaspy H, Lennox B, Marchant L, McGuire P, Oloyede E, Rogdaki M, Upthegrove R, Walters J, Egerton A, MacCabe JH. CLEAR - clozapine in early psychosis: study protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of clozapine vs other antipsychotics for young people with treatment resistant schizophrenia in real world settings. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:122. [PMID: 38355533 PMCID: PMC10865566 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05397-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clozapine is an antipsychotic drug with unique efficacy, and it is the only recommended treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS: failure to respond to at least two different antipsychotics). However, clozapine is also associated with a range of adverse effects which restrict its use, including blood dyscrasias, for which haematological monitoring is required. As treatment resistance is recognised earlier in the illness, the question of whether clozapine should be prescribed in children and young people is increasingly important. However, most research to date has been in older, chronic patients, and evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of clozapine in people under age 25 is lacking. The CLEAR (CLozapine in EARly psychosis) trial will assess whether clozapine is more effective than treatment as usual (TAU), at the level of clinical symptoms, patient rated outcomes, quality of life and cost-effectiveness in people below 25 years of age. Additionally, a nested biomarker study will investigate the mechanisms of action of clozapine compared to TAU. METHODS AND DESIGN This is the protocol of a multi-centre, open label, blind-rated, randomised controlled effectiveness trial of clozapine vs TAU (any other oral antipsychotic monotherapy licenced in the British National Formulary) for 12 weeks in 260 children and young people with TRS (12-24 years old). AIM AND OBJECTIVES The primary outcome is the change in blind-rated Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores at 12 weeks from baseline. Secondary outcomes include blind-rated Clinical Global Impression, patient-rated outcomes, quality of life, adverse effects, and treatment adherence. Patients will be followed up for 12 months and will be invited to give consent for longer term follow-up using clinical records and potential re-contact for further research. For mechanism of action, change in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers and peripheral inflammatory markers will be measured over 12 weeks. DISCUSSION The CLEAR trial will contribute knowledge on clozapine effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness compared to standard antipsychotics in young people with TRS, and the results may guide future clinical treatment recommendation for early psychosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Number: 37176025, IRAS Number: 1004947. TRIAL STATUS In set-up. Protocol version 4.0 01/08/23. Current up to date protocol available here: https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR131175# /.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Casetta
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - P Santosh
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Bayley
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Bisson
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Byford
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C Dixon
- Wonford House Hospital, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - R J Drake
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - R Elvins
- Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - R Emsley
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Fung
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Hayes
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - O Howes
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A James
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - K James
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - R Jones
- Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - H Killaspy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - B Lennox
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - L Marchant
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - P McGuire
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - E Oloyede
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Rogdaki
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Upthegrove
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Early Intervention Service, Birmingham Womens and Childrens NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Walters
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - A Egerton
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J H MacCabe
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Killaspy H, Dalton-Locke C, Clarke CS, Leavey G, Igoumenou A, Arbuthnott M, Barrett K, Omar R. Assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of inpatient mental health rehabilitation services provided by the NHS and independent sector (ACER): protocol. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:104. [PMID: 38321443 PMCID: PMC10848497 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05524-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health rehabilitation services provide specialist treatment to people with particularly severe and complex problems. In 2018, the Care Quality Commission reported that over half the 4,400 mental health inpatient rehabilitation beds in England were provided by the independent sector. They raised concerns that the length of stay and cost of independent sector care was double that of the NHS and that their services tended to be provided much further from people's homes. However, there has been no research comparing the two sectors and we therefore do not know if these concerns are justified. The ACER Study (Assessing the Clinical and cost-Effectiveness of inpatient mental health Rehabilitation services provided by the NHS and independent sector) is a national programme of research in England, funded from 2021 to 2026, that aims to investigate differences in inpatient mental health rehabilitation provided by the NHS and independent sector in terms of: patient characteristics; service quality; patient, carer and staff experiences; clinical and cost effectiveness. METHODS ACER comprises a:1) detailed survey of NHS and independent sector inpatient mental health rehabilitation services across England; 2) qualitative investigation of patient, family, staff and commissioners' experiences of the two sectors; 3) cohort study comparing clinical outcomes in the two sectors over 18 months; 4) comprehensive national comparison of inpatient service use in the two sectors, using instrumental variable analysis of routinely collected healthcare data over 18 months; 5) health economic evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of the two sectors. In Components 3 and 4, our primary outcome is 'successful rehabilitation' defined as a) being discharged from the inpatient rehabilitation unit without readmission and b) inpatient service use over the 18 months. DISCUSSION The ACER study will deliver the first empirical comparison of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of NHS and independent sector inpatient mental health rehabilitation services. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN17381762 retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Killaspy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, UK.
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, 4 St Pancras Way, NW1 0PE, London, UK.
| | - Christian Dalton-Locke
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, UK
| | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UCL Medical School, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, NW3 2PF, London, UK
| | - Gerard Leavey
- Bamford Centre for Mental Health & Wellbeing, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine, County, BT52 1SA, Londonderry, UK
| | - Artemis Igoumenou
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, UK
- Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, St. Ann's Hospital, St Ann's Rd, N15 3TH, London, UK
| | - Maurice Arbuthnott
- North London Service User Research Forum, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, UK
| | - Katherine Barrett
- North London Service User Research Forum, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, UK
| | - Rumana Omar
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, WC1E 7HB, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Keetharuth AD, Gray LA, McGrane E, Worboys H, Orozco-Leal G. Mapping Short Warwick and Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) to Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) to estimate health utilities. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:7. [PMID: 38221610 PMCID: PMC10789009 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02220-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Short Warwick and Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) is a widely used non-preference-based measure of mental health in the UK. The primary aim of this paper is to construct an algorithm to translate the SWEMWBS scores to utilities using the Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index (ReQoL-UI) measure. METHODS Service users experiencing mental health difficulties were recruited in two separate cross-sectional studies in the UK. The following direct mapping functions were used: Ordinary Least Square, Tobit, Generalised Linear Models. Indirect (response) mapping was performed using seemingly unrelated ordered probit to predict responses to each of the ReQoL-UI items and subsequently to predict using UK tariffs of the ReQoL-UI from SWEMWBS. The performance of all models was assessed by the mean absolute errors, root mean square errors between the predicted and observed utilities and graphical representations across the SWEMWBS score range. RESULTS Analyses were based on 2573 respondents who had complete data on the ReQoL-UI items, SWEMWBS items, age and sex. The direct mapping methods predicted ReQoL-UI scores across the range of SWEMWBS scores reasonably well. Very little differences were found among the three regression specifications in terms of model fit and visual inspection when comparing modelled and actual utility values across the score range of the SWEMWBS. However, when running simulations to consider uncertainty, it is clear that response mapping is superior. CONCLUSIONS This study presents mapping algorithms from SWEMWBS to ReQoL as an alternative way to generate utilities from SWEMWBS. The algorithm from the indirect mapping is recommended to predict utilities from the SWEMWBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anju Devianee Keetharuth
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Laura A Gray
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ellen McGrane
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hannah Worboys
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Giovany Orozco-Leal
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Freeman D, Freeman J, Rovira A, Miguel AL, Ward R, Bousfield M, Riffiod L, Leal J, Kabir T, Yu LM, Beckwith H, Waite F, Rosebrock L. Randomised controlled trial of automated VR therapy to improve positive self-beliefs and psychological well-being in young people diagnosed with psychosis: a study protocol for the Phoenix VR self-confidence therapy trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e076559. [PMID: 38149422 PMCID: PMC10711910 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The confidence of young people diagnosed with psychosis is often low. Positive self-beliefs may be few and negative self-beliefs many. A sense of defeat and failure is common. Young people often withdraw from many aspects of everyday life. Psychological well-being is lowered. Psychological techniques can improve self-confidence, but a shortage of therapists means that very few patients ever receive such help. Virtual reality (VR) offers a potential route out of this impasse. By including a virtual coach, treatment can be automated. As such, delivery of effective therapy is no longer reliant on the availability of therapists. With young people with lived experience, we have developed a staff-assisted automated VR therapy to improve positive self-beliefs (Phoenix). The treatment is based on established cognitive behavioural therapy and positive psychology techniques. A case series indicates that this approach may lead to large improvements in positive self-beliefs and psychological well-being. We now aim to conduct the first randomised controlled evaluation of Phoenix VR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS 80 patients with psychosis, aged between 16 and 30 years old and with low levels of positive self-beliefs, will be recruited from National Health Service (NHS) secondary care services. They will be randomised (1:1) to the Phoenix VR self-confidence therapy added to treatment as usual or treatment as usual. Assessments will be conducted at 0, 6 (post-treatment) and 12 weeks by a researcher blind to allocation. The primary outcome is positive self-beliefs at 6 weeks rated with the Oxford Positive Self Scale. The secondary outcomes are psychiatric symptoms, activity levels and quality of life. All main analyses will be intention to treat. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial has received ethical approval from the NHS Health Research Authority (22/LO/0273). A key output will be a high-quality VR treatment for patients to improve self-confidence and psychological well-being. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN10250113.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Freeman
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jason Freeman
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aitor Rovira
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Rupert Ward
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew Bousfield
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ludovic Riffiod
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jose Leal
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford, UK
| | - Thomas Kabir
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Helen Beckwith
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Felicity Waite
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Laina Rosebrock
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jiang H, Wang W, Mei Y, Zhao Z, Lin B, Zhang Z. A scoping review of the self-reported compassion measurement tools. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:2323. [PMID: 37996796 PMCID: PMC10668436 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17178-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compassion is closely linked to psychological well-being, and several assessment tools have been developed and studied to assess the level of compassion in different populations and for more precise measurement. There is currently a scarcity of comprehensive knowledge about compassion-related assessment tools, and our research provides an overview of these tools. AIMS To identify scales used to measure compassion from different flows, and to assess their measurement properties and quality. METHODS Focusing on compassion assessment tools, the authors conducted a thorough search of 10 Chinese and English databases from their establishment until August 14, 2022. Data extracted included the author, year, country, objectives, target population, as well as the primary evaluation content. Using the COSMIN checklist, the methodological quality and measurement properties of the included studies were appraised. This scoping review was registered with the Open Science Framework and followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. RESULTS There were 15,965 papers searched, and 36 compassion-related measurement tools were identified in this study. None of the 36 studies provided possessed all nine psychometric properties, as outlined by the COSMIN criteria. On the basis of a systematic evaluation of quality, measurement qualities were ranked. The results for internal consistency and content validity were relatively favorable, whereas the results for structural validity were variable and the results for the remaining attributes were either uncertain or negative. A Venn diagram was used to illustrate the overlapping groups of compassion measurement tools based on the three-way flow of compassion. An overview of the reference instrument and theoretical basis for the included studies was provided, and half of them did not contain any theoretical or scale-based evidence. CONCLUSION In this study, 36 compassion-related measuring instruments were identified, and the methodological quality and measurement properties of the included studies were acceptable. The included measurements were consistent with flows of compassion. A further focus of further research should be on developing theories in the compassion domain and developing instruments for measuring compassion that are multidimensional, multi-populations, and culturally relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hu Jiang
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China
- Nursing Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Zunyi), Zunyi, China
| | - Wenna Wang
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China
| | - Yongxia Mei
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China
| | - Zhixin Zhao
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China
| | - Beilei Lin
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China
| | - Zhenxiang Zhang
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hughes E, Domoney J, Knights N, Price H, Rutsito S, Stefanidou T, Majeed-Ariss R, Papamichail A, Ariss S, Gilchrist G, Hunter R, Kendal S, Lloyd-Evans B, Lucock M, Maxted F, Shallcross R, Tocque K, Trevillion K. The effectiveness of sexual assault referral centres with regard to mental health and substance use: a national mixed-methods study - the MiMoS Study. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2023; 11:1-117. [PMID: 37953648 DOI: 10.3310/ytrw7448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Background Sexual assault referral centres have been established to provide an integrated service that includes forensic examination, health interventions and emotional support. However, it is unclear how the mental health and substance use needs are being addressed. Aim To identify what works for whom under what circumstances for people with mental health or substance use issues who attend sexual assault referral centres. Setting and sample Staff and adult survivors in English sexual assault referral centres and partner agency staff. Design A mixed-method multistage study using realist methodology comprising five work packages. This consisted of a systematic review and realist synthesis (work package 1); a national audit of sexual assault referral centres (work package 2); a cross-sectional prevalence study of mental health and drug and alcohol needs (work package 3); case studies in six sexual assault referral centre settings (work package 4), partner agencies and survivors; and secondary data analysis of outcomes of therapy for sexual assault survivors (work package 5). Findings There is a paucity of evidence identified in the review to support specific ways of addressing mental health and substance use. There is limited mental health expertise in sexual assault referral centres and limited use of screening tools based on the audit. In the prevalence study, participants (n = 78) reported high levels of psychological distress one to six weeks after sexual assault referral centre attendance (94% of people had symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder). From work package 4 qualitative analysis, survivors identified how trauma-informed care potentially reduced risk of re-traumatisation. Sexual assault referral centre staff found having someone with mental health expertise in the team helpful not only in helping plan onward referrals but also in supporting staff. Both sexual assault referral centre staff and survivors highlighted challenges in onward referral, particularly to NHS mental health care, including gaps in provision and long waiting times. Work package 5 analysis demonstrated that people with recorded sexual assault had higher levels of baseline psychological distress and received more therapy but their average change scores at end point were similar to those without sexual trauma. Limitations The study was adversely affected by the pandemic. The data were collected during successive lockdowns when services were not operating as usual, as well as the overlay of anxiety and isolation due to the pandemic. Conclusions People who attend sexual assault centres have significant mental health and substance use needs. However, sexual assault referral centres vary in how they address these issues. Access to follow-up support from mental health services needs to be improved (especially for those deemed to have 'complex' needs) and there is some indication that co-located psychological therapies provision improves the survivor experience. Routine data analysis demonstrated that those with sexual assault can benefit from therapy but require more intensity than those without sexual assault. Future work Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of providing co-located psychological therapy in the sexual assault referral centres, as well as evaluating the long-term needs and outcomes of people who attend these centres. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (16/117/03) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 21. Trial registration This trial is registered as PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018119706 and ISRCTN 18208347.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Hughes
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jill Domoney
- Section of Womens' Mental Health, Kings College London, London, UK
| | | | - Holly Price
- Section of Womens' Mental Health, Kings College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Gail Gilchrist
- National Addiction Centre, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Kendal
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Mike Lucock
- University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | | | - Rebekah Shallcross
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Feminist Therapy Centre, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Kylee Trevillion
- Section of Womens' Mental Health, Kings College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hickie IB, Iorfino F, Rohleder C, Song YJC, Nichles A, Zmicerevska N, Capon W, Guastella AJ, Leweke FM, Scott J, McGorry P, Mihalopoulos C, Killackey E, Chong MK, McKenna S, Aji M, Gorban C, Crouse JJ, Koethe D, Battisti R, Hamilton B, Lo A, Hackett ML, Hermens DF, Scott EM. EMPOWERED trial: protocol for a randomised control trial of digitally supported, highly personalised and measurement-based care to improve functional outcomes in young people with mood disorders. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072082. [PMID: 37821139 PMCID: PMC10583041 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many adolescents and young adults with emerging mood disorders do not achieve substantial improvements in education, employment, or social function after receiving standard youth mental health care. We have developed a new model of care referred to as 'highly personalised and measurement-based care' (HP&MBC). HP&MBC involves repeated assessment of multidimensional domains of morbidity to enable continuous and personalised clinical decision-making. Although measurement-based care is common in medical disease management, it is not a standard practice in mental health. This clinical effectiveness trial tests whether HP&MBC, supported by continuous digital feedback, delivers better functional improvements than standard care and digital support. METHOD AND ANALYSIS This controlled implementation trial is a PROBE study (Prospective, Randomised, Open, Blinded End-point) that comprises a multisite 24-month, assessor-blinded, follow-up study of 1500 individuals aged 15-25 years who present for mental health treatment. Eligible participants will be individually randomised (1:1) to 12 months of HP&MBC or standardised clinical care. The primary outcome measure is social and occupational functioning 12 months after trial entry, assessed by the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale. Clinical and social outcomes for all participants will be monitored for a further 12 months after cessation of active care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This clinical trial has been reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Sydney Local Health District (HREC Approval Number: X22-0042 & 2022/ETH00725, Protocol ID: BMC-YMH-003-2018, protocol version: V.3, 03/08/2022). Research findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, presentations at scientific conferences, and to user and advocacy groups. Participant data will be deidentified. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12622000882729.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian B Hickie
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frank Iorfino
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cathrin Rohleder
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yun Ju Christine Song
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alissa Nichles
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalia Zmicerevska
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - William Capon
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adam J Guastella
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - F Markus Leweke
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jan Scott
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Patrick McGorry
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne Australia, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eoin Killackey
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne Australia, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Min K Chong
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah McKenna
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melissa Aji
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carla Gorban
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jacob J Crouse
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dagmar Koethe
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Blake Hamilton
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- headspace Camperdown, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alice Lo
- Mind Plasticity, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maree L Hackett
- George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel F Hermens
- Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia
| | - Elizabeth M Scott
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wedema D, Wardenaar KJ, Alma MA, van Asselt ADI, Korevaar EL, Schoevers RA. A blended module (STAIRS) to promote functional and personal recovery in patients with a major depressive disorder in remission: study protocol of a concurrent mixed methods randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:727. [PMID: 37805486 PMCID: PMC10560411 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05213-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the availability of a wide variety of evidence-based treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD), many patients still experience impairments in their lives after remission. Programs are needed that effectively support patients in coping with these impairments. The program Storytelling and Training to Advance Individual Recovery Skills (STAIRS) was developed to address this need and combines the use of peer contact, expert-by-experience guidance, family support and professional blended care. The aim of the planned study is (1) to assess the efficacy of the STAIRS program in patients with remitted MDD, (2) to investigate patients' subjective experiences with STAIRS, and (3) to evaluate the program's cost-effectiveness. METHODS A concurrent mixed-methods randomized controlled trial design will be used. Patients aged between 18 and 65 years with remitted MDD (N = 140) will be randomized to either a group receiving care as usual (CAU) + the STAIRS-program or a control group receiving CAU + some basic psychoeducation. Quantitative efficacy data on functional and personal recovery and associated aspects will be collected using self-report questionnaires at the start of the intervention, immediately following the intervention, and at the six-month follow-up. Insights into patients' experiences on perceived effects and the way in which different program elements contribute to this effect, as well as the usability and acceptability of the program, will be gained by conducting qualitative interviews with patients from the experimental group, who are selected using maximum variation sampling. Finally, data on healthcare resource use, productivity loss and quality of life will be collected and analysed to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the STAIRS-program. DISCUSSION Well-designed recovery-oriented programs for patients suffering from MDD are scarce. If efficacy and cost-effectiveness are demonstrated with this study and patients experience the STAIRS program as usable and acceptable, this program can be a valuable addition to CAU. The qualitative interviews may give insights into what works for whom, which can be used to promote implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 1 July 2021, registration number NCT05440812.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Wedema
- Research and Innovation Centre for Rehabilitation, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Klaas J Wardenaar
- Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Manna A Alma
- Department of Health Sciences, Applied Health Research, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Antoinette D I van Asselt
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Eliza L Korevaar
- Research and Innovation Centre for Rehabilitation, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Schoevers
- Department of Psychiatry, Research School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences (BCN), University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Stefanidou T, Ambler G, Bartl G, Barber N, Billings J, Bogatsu T, Carroll R, Chipp B, Conneely M, Downey AM, Evlat G, Hunter R, Le Novere M, Lewis G, Mackay T, Marwaha S, Matin Z, Naughton G, Nekitsing C, O'Sullivan M, Pinfold V, Pan S, Sobers A, Thompson KJ, Vasikaran J, Webber M, Johnson S, Lloyd-Evans B. Randomised controlled trial of the Community Navigator programme to reduce loneliness and depression for adults with treatment-resistant depression in secondary community mental health services: trial protocol. Trials 2023; 24:652. [PMID: 37803385 PMCID: PMC10559405 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07684-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New treatments are needed for people with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), who do not benefit from anti-depressants and many of whom do not recover fully with psychological treatments. The Community Navigator programme was co-produced with service users and practitioners. It is a novel social intervention which aims to reduce loneliness and thus improve health outcomes for people with TRD. Participants receive up to 10 individual meetings with a Community Navigator, who helps them to map their social world and set and enact goals to enhance their social connections and reduce loneliness. Participants may also access group meet-ups with others in the programme every 2 months, and may be offered modest financial support to enable activities to support social connections. METHODS A researcher-blind, multi-site, 1:1 randomised controlled trial with N = 306 participants will test the effectiveness of the Community Navigator programme for people with TRD in secondary community mental health teams (CMHTs). Our primary hypothesis is that people who are offered the Community Navigator programme as an addition to usual CMHT care will be less depressed, assessed using the PHQ-9 self-report measure, at 8-month, end-of-treatment follow-up, compared to a control group receiving usual CMHT care and a booklet with information about local social groups and activities. We will follow participants up at end-of-treatment and at 14 months, 6 months after end-of-treatment follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the following: loneliness, anxiety, personal recovery, self-efficacy, social network, social identities. We will collect data about health-related quality of life and service use to investigate the cost-effectiveness of the Community Navigator programme. DISCUSSION This trial will provide definitive evidence about the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Community Navigator programme and whether it can be recommended for use in practice. The trial is due to finish in August 2025. TRIAL REGISTRATION Prospectively registered on 8th July 2022 at: ISRCTN13205972.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodora Stefanidou
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Gareth Ambler
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gergely Bartl
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Nick Barber
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- The McPin Foundation, London, UK
| | - Jo Billings
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Tumelo Bogatsu
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Beverley Chipp
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- The McPin Foundation, London, UK
| | - Maev Conneely
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | | | - Gamze Evlat
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marie Le Novere
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Steven Marwaha
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zubair Matin
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | | | | | - Millie O'Sullivan
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Shengning Pan
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Angela Sobers
- Barnet, Enfield and Haringey, NHS Mental Health Trust, London, UK
| | - Keith J Thompson
- The McPin Foundation, London, UK
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valley, NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK
| | - Jerusaa Vasikaran
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Martin Webber
- School for Business and Society, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Franklin M, Hernández Alava M. Enabling QALY estimation in mental health trials and care settings: mapping from the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 to the ReQoL-UI or EQ-5D-5L using mixture models. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:2763-2778. [PMID: 37314661 PMCID: PMC10474206 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03443-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly collected in trials and some care settings, but preference-based PROMs required for economic evaluation are often missing. For these situations, mapping models are needed to predict preference-based (aka utility) scores. Our objective is to develop a series of mapping models to predict preference-based scores from two mental health PROMs: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; depression) and Generalised Anxiety Questionnaire-7 (GAD-7; anxiety). We focus on preference-based scores for the more physical-health-focussed EQ-5D (five-level England and US value set, and three-level UK cross-walk) and more mental-health-focussed Recovering Quality-of-Life Utility Index (ReQoL-UI). METHODS We used trial data from the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) mental health services (now called NHS Talking Therapies), England, with a focus on people with depression and/or anxiety caseness. We estimated adjusted limited dependent variable or beta mixture models (ALDVMMs or Betamix, respectively) using GAD-7, PHQ-9, age, and sex as covariates. We followed ISPOR mapping guidance, including assessing model fit using statistical and graphical techniques. RESULTS Over six data collection time-points between baseline and 12-months, 1340 observed values (N ≤ 353) were available for analysis. The best fitting ALDVMMs had 4-components with covariates of PHQ-9, GAD-7, sex, and age; age was not a probability variable for the final ReQoL-UI mapping model. Betamix had practical benefits over ALDVMMs only when mapping to the US value set. CONCLUSION Our mapping functions can predict EQ-5D-5L or ReQoL-UI related utility scores for QALY estimation as a function of variables routinely collected within mental health services or trials, such as the PHQ-9 and/or GAD-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Franklin
- Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Monica Hernández Alava
- Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Waite F, Černis E, Kabir T, Iredale E, Johns L, Maughan D, Diamond R, Seddon R, Williams N, Yu LM, Freeman D. A targeted psychological treatment for sleep problems in young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis in England (SleepWell): a parallel group, single-blind, randomised controlled feasibility trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2023; 10:706-718. [PMID: 37562423 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00203-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleep disturbance is common and problematic for young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis. Sleep disruption is a contributory causal factor in the occurrence of mental health problems, including psychotic experiences, anxiety, and depression. The implication is that treating sleep problems might have additional benefits on mental health outcomes in individuals at high risk. The present study had two aims: first, to establish the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial to treat sleep problems with the aim of reducing psychotic experiences in young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis; and second, to provide proof of concept of the clinical efficacy of the treatment. METHODS We did a parallel group, single-blind, randomised controlled feasibility trial in two National Health Service trusts in England. Eligible participants were aged 14-25 years, a patient of mental health services, assessed as being at ultra-high risk of psychosis on the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States, and having current sleep problems (score of ≥15 on the self-report Insomnia Severity Index [ISI]). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a targeted psychological therapy for sleep problems (SleepWell) plus usual care or usual care alone via an automated online system, with non-deterministic minimisation that balanced participants for ISI score and referring service. The SleepWell therapy was delivered on an individual basis in approximately eight 1-h sessions over 12 weeks. Assessments were done at 0, 3, and 9 months, with trial assessors masked to treatment allocation. The key feasibility outcomes were the numbers of patients identified, recruited, and retained, treatment uptake, and data completion. Treatment acceptability was measured with the Abbreviated Acceptability Rating Profile (AARP). In preliminary clinical assessments, the primary clinical outcome was insomnia at 3 and 9 months assessed with the ISI, reported by randomised group (intention-to-treat analysis). Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned participants. The trial was prospectively registered on ISRCTN, 85601537, and is completed. FINDINGS From Nov 18, 2020, to Jan 26, 2022, 67 young people were screened, of whom 40 (60%) at ultra-high risk of psychosis were recruited. Mean age was 16·9 years (SD 2·5; range 14-23), and most participants identified as female (n=19 [48%]) or male (n=19 [48%]) and as White (n=32 [80%]). 21 participants were randomly assigned to SleepWell therapy plus usual care and 19 to usual care alone. All participants provided data on at least one follow-up visit. 39 (98%) of 40 participants completed the primary outcome assessment at 3 and 9 months. 20 (95%) of 21 participants assigned to SleepWell therapy received the prespecified minimum treatment dose of at least four sessions. The median treatment acceptability score on the AARP was 48 (IQR 46 to 48; n=17; maximum possible score 48). At the post-intervention follow-up (3 months), compared with the usual care alone group, the SleepWell therapy group had a reduction in insomnia severity (ISI adjusted mean difference -8·12 [95% CI -11·60 to -4·63]; Cohen's d=-2·67 [95% CI -3·81 to -1·52]), which was sustained at 9 months (ISI adjusted mean difference -5·83 [-9·31 to -2·35]; Cohen's d=-1·91 [-3·06 to -0·77]). Among the 40 participants, eight adverse events were reported in six participants (two [11%] participants in the usual care group and four [19%] participants in the SleepWell therapy group). One serious adverse event involving hospital admission for a physical health problem was reported in the SleepWell therapy group, and one patient in the usual care alone group transitioned to psychosis. None of these events were classed as being related to trial treatment or procedures. INTERPRETATION A randomised controlled trial of a targeted psychological sleep therapy for young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis is feasible. Patients can be retained in the trial and assessments done by masked assessors. Uptake of the sleep therapy was high, and we found preliminary evidence of sustained reductions in sleep problems. A definitive multicentre trial is now needed. FUNDING NIHR Research for Patient Benefit and NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicity Waite
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Psychological Therapies Theme, NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
| | - Emma Černis
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Ellen Iredale
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Johns
- Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Maughan
- Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rowan Diamond
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Seddon
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicola Williams
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Freeman
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Psychological Therapies Theme, NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Uka F, Konjufca J, Ramadani F, Arënliu A, Bërxulli D, Jovanović N, Russo M. The relations between socio-demographic information and negative symptoms, mental health, and quality of life: a latent profile analysis with psychotic patients in Kosovo. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1135385. [PMID: 37564239 PMCID: PMC10410071 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1135385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The current study aims to identify meaningful psychotic patients' profiles by examining certain combinations of patient's demographic and socio-economic variables (sex, age, marital status, number of children, cohabitant and level of education). Moreover, we aim to assess whether there is any significant effect of class membership (profile) on negative symptoms, health state, and quality of life among psychotic patients. A convenience sample of 103 patients (age: M = 22, SD = 1.75), was drawn from the clinical populations of Kosovo. Demographic and socio-economic data was obtained through individual interviews, meanwhile a battery of questionnaires was used to assess negative symptoms, mental health, and quality of life of patients. The 4-class solution was selected as the best fitting model and used in subsequent analyses. Results indicated a significant effect of class membership on health state, quality of life and negative symptoms. Practical implications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fitim Uka
- Department of Psychology, University of Pristina “Hasan Prishtina”, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | - Jon Konjufca
- Department of Psychology, University of Pristina “Hasan Prishtina”, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | - Fjolla Ramadani
- Department of Psychology, University of Pristina “Hasan Prishtina”, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | - Aliriza Arënliu
- Department of Psychology, University of Pristina “Hasan Prishtina”, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | - Dashamir Bërxulli
- Department of Psychology, University of Pristina “Hasan Prishtina”, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | - Nikolina Jovanović
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Manuela Russo
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Grochtdreis T, König HH, Keetharuth AD, Gallinat J, Konnopka A, Schulz H, Lambert M, Karow A, Dams J. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measures in patients with affective disorders. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:499-512. [PMID: 35776388 PMCID: PMC10175471 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01489-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The generic self-reported Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measures were developed for measuring recovery-focused health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in persons with mental health conditions. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the German version of the ReQoL measures in patients with affective disorders in Germany. METHODS Data from a patient sub-sample in a randomized controlled trial have been used (N = 393). The internal consistency and the test-retest reliability of the ReQoL measures were assessed using Cronbach's Alpha and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The concurrent validity and the known-group validity of the ReQoL measures were assessed using Pearson's Correlation coefficient and Cohen's d. The responsiveness was assessed using Glass' Δ and the standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS The reliability among the items of the ReQoL-20 was overall excellent. The ICC of the ReQoL-20 was r = 0.70, indicating moderate test-retest reliability. The concurrent validity of the ReQoL-20 with the clinical measure PHQ-9 was strong with a correlation coefficient of r = - 0.76. The known-group validity of the ReQoL-20 using PHQ-9 cut-off points was large with an effect size of d = 1.63. The ReQoL measures were sensitive to treatment response and remission of symptoms measured by the PHQ-9 with large effect sizes/SRM. DISCUSSION The psychometric properties of the ReQoL measures for the assessment of patients with affective disorders were overall good. With the ReQoL, valid and reliable measures for the assessment of recovery-focused HrQoL for persons with affective disorders are available in German language.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Grochtdreis
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Gallinat
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Konnopka
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Schulz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Lambert
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Karow
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Judith Dams
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Huckvale K, Hoon L, Stech E, Newby JM, Zheng WY, Han J, Vasa R, Gupta S, Barnett S, Senadeera M, Cameron S, Kurniawan S, Agarwal A, Kupper JF, Asbury J, Willie D, Grant A, Cutler H, Parkinson B, Ahumada-Canale A, Beames JR, Logothetis R, Bautista M, Rosenberg J, Shvetcov A, Quinn T, Mackinnon A, Rana S, Tran T, Rosenbaum S, Mouzakis K, Werner-Seidler A, Whitton A, Venkatesh S, Christensen H. Protocol for a bandit-based response adaptive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of brief self-guided digital interventions for reducing psychological distress in university students: the Vibe Up study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066249. [PMID: 37116996 PMCID: PMC10151864 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Meta-analytical evidence confirms a range of interventions, including mindfulness, physical activity and sleep hygiene, can reduce psychological distress in university students. However, it is unclear which intervention is most effective. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven adaptive trials may be an efficient method to determine what works best and for whom. The primary purpose of the study is to rank the effectiveness of mindfulness, physical activity, sleep hygiene and an active control on reducing distress, using a multiarm contextual bandit-based AI-adaptive trial method. Furthermore, the study will explore which interventions have the largest effect for students with different levels of baseline distress severity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Vibe Up study is a pragmatically oriented, decentralised AI-adaptive group sequential randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of one of three brief, 2-week digital self-guided interventions (mindfulness, physical activity or sleep hygiene) or active control (ecological momentary assessment) in reducing self-reported psychological distress in Australian university students. The adaptive trial methodology involves up to 12 sequential mini-trials that allow for the optimisation of allocation ratios. The primary outcome is change in psychological distress (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, 21-item version, DASS-21 total score) from preintervention to postintervention. Secondary outcomes include change in physical activity, sleep quality and mindfulness from preintervention to postintervention. Planned contrasts will compare the four groups (ie, the three intervention and control) using self-reported psychological distress at prespecified time points for interim analyses. The study aims to determine the best performing intervention, as well as ranking of other interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was sought and obtained from the UNSW Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC A, HC200466). A trial protocol adhering to the requirements of the Guideline for Good Clinical Practice was prepared for and approved by the Sponsor, UNSW Sydney (Protocol number: HC200466_CTP). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12621001223820.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit Huckvale
- Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leonard Hoon
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eileen Stech
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jill M Newby
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wu Yi Zheng
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jin Han
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rajesh Vasa
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott Barnett
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Manisha Senadeera
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stuart Cameron
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stefanus Kurniawan
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Akash Agarwal
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joost Funke Kupper
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joshua Asbury
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Willie
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alasdair Grant
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Joanne R Beames
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rena Logothetis
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marya Bautista
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jodie Rosenberg
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Artur Shvetcov
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Quinn
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Mackinnon
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Santu Rana
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Truyen Tran
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon Rosenbaum
- School of Psychiatry, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kon Mouzakis
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Alexis Whitton
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Svetha Venkatesh
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Christensen
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sandin K, Shields G, Gjengedal RGH, Osnes K, Bjørndal MT, Reme SE, Hjemdal O. Responsiveness to change in health status of the EQ-5D in patients treated for depression and anxiety. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023; 21:35. [PMID: 37061712 PMCID: PMC10105922 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02116-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EQ-5D is a commonly used generic measure of health but evidence on its responsiveness to change in mental health is limited. This study aimed to explore the responsiveness of the five-level version of the instrument, the EQ-5D-5 L, in patients receiving treatment for depression and anxiety. METHODS Patient data (N = 416) were collected at baseline and at end of treatment in an observational study in a Norwegian outpatient clinic. Patients were adults of working age (18-69 years) and received protocol-based metacognitive or cognitive therapy for depression or anxiety according to diagnosis. Responsiveness in the EQ-5D was compared to change in the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Effect sizes (Cohen's d), Standardised response mean (SRM), and Pearson's correlation were calculated. Patients were classified as "Recovered", "Improved", or "Unchanged" during treatment using the BDI-II and the BAI. ROC analyses determined whether the EQ-5D could correctly classify patient outcomes. RESULTS Effect sizes were large for the BAI, the BDI-II, the EQ-5D value and the EQ VAS, ranging from d = 1.07 to d = 1.84. SRM were also large (0.93-1.67). Pearson's correlation showed strong agreement between change scores of the EQ-5D value and the BDI-II (rs -0.54) and moderate between the EQ-5D value and the BAI (rs -0.43). The EQ-5D consistently identified "Recovered" patients versus "Improved" or "Unchanged" in the ROC analyses with AUROC ranging from 0.72 to 0.84. CONCLUSION The EQ-5D showed good agreement with self-reported symptom change in depression and anxiety, and correctly identified recovered patients. These findings indicate that the EQ-5D may be appropriately responsive to change in patients with depression and anxiety disorders, although replication in other clinical samples is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Sandin
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway.
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway.
| | - Gemma Shields
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - Ragne G H Gjengedal
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
| | - Kåre Osnes
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway
| | - Marianne T Bjørndal
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
| | - Silje E Reme
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Odin Hjemdal
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
McDaid D, Park AL. Making an economic argument for investment in global mental health: The case of conflict-affected refugees and displaced people. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2023; 10:e10. [PMID: 37854391 PMCID: PMC10579650 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2023.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mental health expenditure accounts for just 2.1% of total domestic governmental health expenditure per capita. There is an economic, as well as moral, imperative to invest more in mental health given the long-term adverse impacts of mental disorders. This paper focuses on how economic evidence can be used to support the case for action on global mental health, focusing on refugees and people displaced due to conflict. Refugees present almost unique challenges as some policy makers may be reluctant to divert scarce resources away from the domestic population to these population groups. A rapid systematic scoping review was also undertaken to identify economic evaluations of mental health-related interventions for refugees and displaced people and to look at how this evidence base can be strengthened. Only 11 economic evaluations focused on the mental health of refugees, asylum seekers and other displaced people were identified. All but two of these intervention studies potentially could be cost-effective, but only five studies reported cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, a metric allowing the economic case for investment in refugee mental health to be compared with any other health-focused intervention. There is a need for more consistent collection of data on quality of life and the longer-term impacts of intervention. The perspective adopted in economic evaluations may also need broadening to include intersectoral benefits beyond health, as well as identifying complementary benefits to host communities. More use can be also made of modelling, drawing on existing evidence on the effectiveness and resource requirements of interventions delivered in comparable settings to expand the current evidence base. The budgetary impact of any proposed strategy should be considered; modelling could also be used to look at how implementation might be adapted to contain costs and take account of local contextual factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David McDaid
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - A-La Park
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pokhilenko I, Janssen LMM, Paulus ATG, Drost RMWA, Hollingworth W, Thorn JC, Noble S, Simon J, Fischer C, Mayer S, Salvador-Carulla L, Konnopka A, Hakkaart van Roijen L, Brodszky V, Park AL, Evers SMAA. Development of an Instrument for the Assessment of Health-Related Multi-sectoral Resource Use in Europe: The PECUNIA RUM. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:155-166. [PMID: 36622541 PMCID: PMC9931843 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00780-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measuring objective resource-use quantities is important for generating valid cost estimates in economic evaluations. In the absence of acknowledged guidelines, measurement methods are often chosen based on practicality rather than methodological evidence. Furthermore, few resource-use measurement (RUM) instruments focus on the measurement of resource use in multiple societal sectors and their development process is rarely described. Thorn and colleagues proposed a stepwise approach to the development of RUM instruments, which has been used for developing cost questionnaires for specific trials. However, it remains unclear how this approach can be translated into practice and whether it is applicable to the development of generic self-reported RUM instruments and instruments measuring resource use in multiple sectors. This study provides a detailed description of the practical application of this stepwise approach to the development of a multi-sectoral RUM instrument developed within the ProgrammE in Costing, resource use measurement and outcome valuation for Use in multi-sectoral National and International health economic evaluAtions (PECUNIA) project. METHODS For the development of the PECUNIA RUM, the methodological approach was based on best practice guidelines. The process included six steps, including the definition of the instrument attributes, identification of cost-driving elements in each sector, review of methodological literature and development of a harmonized cross-sectorial approach, development of questionnaire modules and their subsequent harmonization. RESULTS The selected development approach was, overall, applicable to the development of the PECUNIA RUM. However, due to the complexity of the development of a multi-sectoral RUM instrument, additional steps such as establishing a uniform methodological basis, harmonization of questionnaire modules and involvement of a broader range of stakeholders (healthcare professionals, sector-specific experts, health economists) were needed. CONCLUSION This is the first study that transparently describes the development process of a generic multi-sectoral RUM instrument in health economics and provides insights into the methodological aspects and overall validity of its development process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Pokhilenko
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Luca M M Janssen
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Aggie T G Paulus
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruben M W A Drost
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - William Hollingworth
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanna C Thorn
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian Noble
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Claudia Fischer
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susanne Mayer
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Luis Salvador-Carulla
- Mental Health Policy Unit, Faculty of Health, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- School of Public Health, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander Konnopka
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Leona Hakkaart van Roijen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valentin Brodszky
- Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - A-La Park
- Department of Health Policy, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Trimbos Institute National Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wickramasekera N, Tubeuf S. Measuring quality of life for people with common mental health problems. J Ment Health 2023; 32:3-10. [PMID: 32915686 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1818190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is important to identify valid and acceptable outcome measures so that interventions evaluating common mental health problems can be assessed appropriately. Some advocate the use of generic preference-based measures claimed to be applicable for all health interventions, but others argue that they are insensitive for common mental health problems. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), to be used in cost-effectiveness studies in people with common mental health problems. METHOD The CORE-OM measure was tested for completeness, acceptability and responsiveness in a pilot study. Analyses for missing data, distribution of scores, and standardised response means (SRMs) were calculated. RESULTS Missing data did not exceed 5% for any of the CORE-6D items both at baseline and follow-up. The overall comprehension rate was high, and only 19 participants (14%) requested clarifications to complete the questionnaire. As expected in a feasibility study, there was a small and non-significant SRM. CONCLUSION CORE-OM is a valid and acceptable instrument to evaluate quality of life for people with common mental health problems. More research is needed with larger sample sizes to compare CORE-6D with other condition specific quality of life instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sandy Tubeuf
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS) and Institute of Economic and Social Research (IRES), Université Catholique de Louvain, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chapdelaine A, Vasiliadis HM, Provencher MD, Norton PJ, Roberge P. Cost-effectiveness of transdiagnostic group cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders v. treatment as usual: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial over an 8-month time horizon using self-reported data. Psychol Med 2023; 53:1-13. [PMID: 36695038 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291722003920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This economic evaluation supplements a pragmatic randomized controlled trial conducted in community care settings, which showed superior improvement in the symptoms of adults with anxiety disorders who received 12 sessions of transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioural group therapy in addition to treatment as usual (tCBT + TAU) compared to TAU alone. METHODS This study evaluates the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of tCBT + TAU over an 8-month time horizon. For the reference case, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) obtained using the EQ-5D-5L, and the health system perspective were chosen. Alternatively, anxiety-free days (AFDs), derived from the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the limited societal perspective were considered. Unadjusted incremental cost-effectiveness/utility ratios were calculated. Net-benefit regressions were done for a willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds range to build cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEAC). Sensitivity analyses were included. RESULTS Compared to TAU (n = 114), tCBT + TAU (n = 117) generated additional QALYs, AFDs, and higher mental health care costs from the health system perspective. From the health system and the limited societal perspectives, at a WTP of Can$ 50 000/QALY, the CEACs showed that the probability of tCBT + TAU v. TAU being cost-effective was 97 and 89%. Promising cost-effectiveness results using AFDs are also presented. The participation of therapists from the public health sector could increase cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS From the limited societal and health system perspectives, this first economic evaluation of tCBT shows favourable cost-effectiveness results at a WTP threshold of Can$ 50 000/QALY. Future research is needed to replicate findings in longer follow-up studies and different health system contexts to better inform decision-makers for a full-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Chapdelaine
- PRIMUS Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e avenue Nord, local Z7-3004, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Helen-Maria Vasiliadis
- Université de Sherbrooke - Campus de Longueuil, Charles-Le Moyne Research Center, 150 Place Charles Lemoyne, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Martin D Provencher
- École de psychologie, Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, 2325, rue des Bibliothèques, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Peter J Norton
- The Cairnmillar Institute, 391-393 Tooronga Rd, Hawthorn East, Victoria 3123, Australia
| | - Pasquale Roberge
- Department of family medicine and emergency medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e avenue Nord, local Z7-3004, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wiegmann C, Quinlivan E, Michnevich T, Pittrich A, Ivanova P, Rohrbach AM, Kaminski J. A digital patient-reported outcome (electronic patient-reported outcome) system for patients with severe psychiatric disorders: User-centered development study and study protocol of a multicenter-controlled trial. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231191009. [PMID: 37900257 PMCID: PMC10605665 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231191009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The effective treatment of patients with severe psychiatric disorders primarily relies on subjective reporting of symptoms and side-effects. This information is crucial for a clinician's decision regarding medication adjustment. Treatment adjustment usually happens at a low frequency (∼4-8 weeks). In between points of care, patients are left alone with their symptoms and side-effects. This leads to uncertainty regarding the treatment, non-adherence, possible relapse, and rehospitalization. Objectives We aim to design a flexible electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system, which allows patients with severe psychiatric disorders to: (a) record their symptoms using an app; (b) share the data with the clinical team at points of care; and (c) utilize the data to support therapy decisions. Methods In this article, we describe the development process which included the following steps: (a) formation of a co-design team; (b) stakeholder interviews with patients, practitioners, and digital health experts to access needs, requirements, and barriers; (c) prototype conceptualization and design; (d) user acceptance testing and refinement; and (e) finalization of the system for testing in a pilottrial. Results We included input from patients with lived experience of psychiatric disorders, clinical team members, software engineers, and researchers. A prototype system was refined, and iterative changes were made before finalization during a series of operational meetings. The system allows patients to digitally self-report their symptoms and provides longitudinal ePRO symptom data for export into the electronic health record. Conclusions Routine ePRO collection has the potential to improve outcomes and hereby also reduce health service costs. We have successfully developed a trial-ready ePRO system for severe psychiatric disorders. The findings were incorporated in the planning of a feasibility pilot trial. Assuming feasibility will be established, the system might be subjected to a certification process evaluation of safety and efficacy including a randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caspar Wiegmann
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Kliniken im Theodor-Wenzel-Werk, Berlin, Germany
| | - Esther Quinlivan
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences CCM, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Twyla Michnevich
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences CCM, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Petja Ivanova
- Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Jakob Kaminski
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences CCM, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Granholm Valmari E, Melander M, Hariz GM, Naesström M, Lindström M. Translation and linguistic validation of the Swedish recovering quality of life (ReQoL) - A brief research report. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1059406. [PMID: 36824668 PMCID: PMC9941141 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1059406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
In research and among clinicians, the focus has shifted from mainly symptom reduction and increasing functionality to a more recovery-oriented focus. Although there are instruments measuring recovery, there has been a lack of instruments sensitive enough to measure the quality of life for people with severe mental health disorders. Therefore, this study aimed to obtain a Swedish version of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) questionnaire adhering to best practice guidelines using various steps of translation, linguistic validation, and cognitive debriefing. The cognitive debriefing was conducted with seven participants, and all felt the items in the questionnaire were relevant to their health, apprehensible, and easy to complete. However, some issues were raised regarding wording and the concepts behind certain items. All feedback was considered, and some items were revised in response to criticism after continuous discussions. A Swedish version of ReQoL now exists, and although there is a need for ReQoL in different clinical research settings in Sweden, further research is required to psychometrically test the construct validity as well as reliability of the Swedish version in Sweden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Granholm Valmari
- Occupational Therapy Unit, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Marianne Melander
- Psychiatric Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Gun-Marie Hariz
- Occupational Therapy Unit, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science, Neurosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Matilda Naesström
- Psychiatric Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Maria Lindström
- Occupational Therapy Unit, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Grochtdreis T, König HH, Gallinat J, Konnopka A, Schulz H, Lambert M, Karow A, Dams J. Validation of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) questionnaires for patients with anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, stress-related, somatoform and personality disorders in Germany. J Psychiatr Res 2023; 157:202-211. [PMID: 36495602 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
The health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and the recovery process of persons with mental health conditions can be assessed with the Recovering Quality of Life questionnaires (ReQoL-20 and ReQoL-10). The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the German version of the ReQoL measures in patients with anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, stress-related, and somatoform disorders and in patients with disorders of adult personality and behavior. This study was based on a sub-sample of patients that were included in a randomized controlled trial evaluating an evidence-based, stepped and coordinated care service model for mental disorders (RECOVER). The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha and the test-retest reliability was assessed by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Concurrent validity was assessed by Pearson's Correlation Coefficient and the known-group validity was assessed using the Cohen's d. The internal consistency of the ReQoL-20 and ReQoL-10 was excellent and good with Cronbach's alpha of α = 0.91 and α = 0.83 for all items. The test-retest reliability of the ReQoL measures was moderate with ICC of r = 0.72 to 0.74. The concurrent validity of the ReQoL measures with the Global Severity Index was overall high with a correlation coefficient of r = -0.70. In conclusion, for patients with anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, stress-related, somatoform and personality disorders, the German version of the ReQoL measures is valid and reliable for the assessment of HrQoL and the recovery process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Grochtdreis
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Gallinat
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Konnopka
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Schulz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Lambert
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Karow
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Judith Dams
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Thomas T, Aggar C, Baker J, Massey D, Thomas M, D’Appio D, Brymer E. Social prescribing of nature therapy for adults with mental illness living in the community: A scoping review of peer-reviewed international evidence. Front Psychol 2022; 13:1041675. [PMID: 36562055 PMCID: PMC9765656 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Social prescribing of nature therapy "green social prescribing" facilitates access to local nature-based activities that improve biopsychosocial wellbeing outcomes, are affordable, accessible, and can be adapted to context. These are becoming increasingly popular and gray literature is emerging, however, peer-reviewed scientific evidence is exiguous. This scoping review aimed to identify and critique peer-reviewed evidence for green social prescribing interventions and develop recommendations for research and clinical practice. Included studies were published in peer-reviewed journals in English on/after 1 January 2000. Participants were community-living adults with mental illness; Intervention was any green social prescribing program; Comparator was not restricted/required; Outcomes were any biopsychosocial measures; and any/all Study Designs were included. Twelve databases were searched on 15 October 2022; these were Academic Search Premier, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, JSTOR, ProQuest, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess quality. Seven publications describing 6 unique studies (5 UK, 1 Australia) were identified including 3 mixed-methods, 2 qualitative, and 1 RCT. Participants included 334 adults (45% female, aged 35-70 years); sample sizes ranged from 9 to 164. All studies showed improvements in biopsychosocial wellbeing, and participants from most studies (n = 5) reported increased connection to the earth and intention to further access nature. Participant demographics and diagnoses were poorly reported, and intervention activities and assessments varied considerably. However, MMAT scores were good overall suggesting these studies may reliably demonstrate intervention outcomes. We conclude that socially prescribed nature therapy can improve biopsychosocial wellbeing and is a potentially important intervention for mental illness. Recommendations for research and clinical practice are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamsin Thomas
- Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, QLD, Australia
| | - Christina Aggar
- Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, QLD, Australia
- Northern NSW Local Health District, Lismore, NSW, Australia
| | - James Baker
- Primary and Community Care Services, Thornleigh, NSW, Australia
| | - Debbie Massey
- Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, QLD, Australia
| | - Megan Thomas
- Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Keiraville, NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel D’Appio
- Primary and Community Care Services, Thornleigh, NSW, Australia
| | - Eric Brymer
- Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, QLD, Australia
- Manna Institute, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Freeman D, Lambe S, Galal U, Yu LM, Kabir T, Petit A, Rosebrock L, Dudley R, Chapman K, Morrison A, O'Regan E, Murphy E, Aynsworth C, Jones J, Powling R, Grabey J, Rovira A, Freeman J, Clark DM, Waite F. Agoraphobic avoidance in patients with psychosis: Severity and response to automated VR therapy in a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled clinical trial. Schizophr Res 2022; 250:50-59. [PMID: 36343472 PMCID: PMC10914663 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The social withdrawal of many patients with psychosis can be conceptualised as agoraphobic avoidance due to a range of long-standing fears. We hypothesised that greater severity of agoraphobic avoidance is associated with higher levels of psychiatric symptoms and lower levels of quality of life. We also hypothesised that patients with severe agoraphobic avoidance would experience a range of benefits from an automated virtual reality (VR) therapy that allows them to practise everyday anxiety-provoking situations in simulated environments. METHODS 345 patients with psychosis in a randomised controlled trial were categorised into average, moderate, high, and severe avoidance groups using the Oxford Agoraphobic Avoidance Scale. Associations of agoraphobia severity with symptom and functioning variables, and response over six months to brief automated VR therapy (gameChange), were tested. RESULTS Greater severity of agoraphobic avoidance was associated with higher levels of persecutory ideation, auditory hallucinations, depression, hopelessness, and threat cognitions, and lower levels of meaningful activity, quality of life, and perceptions of recovery. Patients with severe agoraphobia showed the greatest benefits with gameChange VR therapy, with significant improvements at end of treatment in agoraphobic avoidance, agoraphobic distress, ideas of reference, persecutory ideation, paranoia worries, recovering quality of life, and perceived recovery, but no significant improvements in depression, suicidal ideation, or health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Patients with psychosis with severe agoraphobic avoidance, such as being unable to leave the home, have high clinical need. Automated VR therapy can deliver clinical improvement in agoraphobia for these patients, leading to a number of wider benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| | - Sinéad Lambe
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Ushma Galal
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Ariane Petit
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Laina Rosebrock
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Dudley
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne, and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kate Chapman
- Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership (AWP) NHS Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Anthony Morrison
- Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eileen O'Regan
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Murphy
- Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Charlotte Aynsworth
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne, and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Julia Jones
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rosie Powling
- Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership (AWP) NHS Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Jenna Grabey
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aitor Rovira
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jason Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David M Clark
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Felicity Waite
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Altunkaya J, Craven M, Lambe S, Beckley A, Rosebrock L, Dudley R, Chapman K, Morrison A, O'Regan E, Grabey J, Bergin A, Kabir T, Waite F, Freeman D, Leal J. Estimating the Economic Value of Automated Virtual Reality Cognitive Therapy for Treating Agoraphobic Avoidance in Patients With Psychosis: Findings From the gameChange Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e39248. [PMID: 36399379 PMCID: PMC9719058 DOI: 10.2196/39248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An automated virtual reality cognitive therapy (gameChange) has demonstrated its effectiveness to treat agoraphobia in patients with psychosis, especially for high or severe anxious avoidance. Its economic value to the health care system is not yet established. OBJECTIVE In this study, we aimed to estimate the potential economic value of gameChange for the UK National Health Service (NHS) and establish the maximum cost-effective price per patient. METHODS Using data from a randomized controlled trial with 346 patients with psychosis (ISRCTN17308399), we estimated differences in health-related quality of life, health and social care costs, and wider societal costs for patients receiving virtual reality therapy in addition to treatment as usual compared with treatment as usual alone. The maximum cost-effective prices of gameChange were calculated based on UK cost-effectiveness thresholds. The sensitivity of the results to analytical assumptions was tested. RESULTS Patients allocated to gameChange reported higher quality-adjusted life years (0.008 QALYs, 95% CI -0.010 to 0.026) and lower NHS and social care costs (-£105, 95% CI -£1135 to £924) compared with treatment as usual (£1=US $1.28); however, these differences were not statistically significant. gameChange was estimated to be worth up to £341 per patient from an NHS and social care (NHS and personal social services) perspective or £1967 per patient from a wider societal perspective. In patients with high or severe anxious avoidance, maximum cost-effective prices rose to £877 and £3073 per patient from an NHS and personal social services perspective and societal perspective, respectively. CONCLUSIONS gameChange is a promising, cost-effective intervention for the UK NHS and is particularly valuable for patients with high or severe anxious avoidance. This presents an opportunity to expand cost-effective psychological treatment coverage for a population with significant health needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN17308399; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17308399. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031606.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Altunkaya
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Craven
- National Institute for Health and Care Research MindTech Med-Tech Co-operative, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Human Factors Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Mental Health & Technology Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sinéad Lambe
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ariane Beckley
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Laina Rosebrock
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Dudley
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne, and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Chapman
- Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership (AWP) NHS Trust, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony Morrison
- Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Eileen O'Regan
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jenna Grabey
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Aislinn Bergin
- National Institute for Health and Care Research MindTech Med-Tech Co-operative, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Mental Health & Technology Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Felicity Waite
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - José Leal
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pemovska T, Jovanović N. Physical health of individuals with psychosis - a mixed method study. Int Rev Psychiatry 2022; 34:827-836. [PMID: 36645188 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2151341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
People with psychosis have poorer physical health than the general population and this aspect of care delivery has largely been neglected. The IMPULSE trial (ISRCTN 11913964) investigated a psychosocial intervention prompting people with psychosis to discuss their physical health concerns with mental health clinicians. This mixed-method study explored a series of clinical meetings over 6 months to understand how physical health is discussed, what actions are taken, and if these translated into benefits for the participating individuals with psychosis. 221 individuals with psychosis were included, attending 847 clinical meetings over 6 months. Results show that, when prompted, most participants (54%) took up the opportunity to discuss their physical health at least once. These individuals were keen to make changes such as adopt healthy diet, stop smoking, lose weight, etc. Despite taking steps to achieve these goals, after 6 months no improvement was detected in subjective satisfaction with physical health, severity of physical health problems or satisfaction with services. Adopting healthier lifestyle behaviours is difficult even in motivated individuals. Future research is needed to determine innovative approaches to promote lifestyle change in individuals with psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Pemovska
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.,NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolina Jovanović
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Barnes S, Carson J, Gournay K. Enhanced supported living for people with severe and persistent mental health problems: A qualitative investigation. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e4293-e4302. [PMID: 35524392 PMCID: PMC10084301 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Supported living has been shown to improve functioning and social inclusion in people with severe and persistent mental health problems, reduce hospitalisation and provide secure accommodation in a population where housing needs are often unmet. Conversely, living in supported accommodation has been depicted by some as depersonalising, marginalising and an ordeal to survive. Discussions regarding housing and support often lack a thorough consideration of individual experiences, with a reliance on quantitative surveys. The question remains how to assure that supported accommodations actually are supportive of the residents' ongoing recovery process. The present study sought to shed light on the experiences of residents in an enhanced supported living service in the United Kingdom. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine residents of the service between July 2020 and February 2021. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis and indicated three superordinate themes of experiences considered valuable to residents: (1) support from care staff which was readily available; (2), a sense of community and daily activity offered by the residence and on-site activities; and (3) the experience of supported living as a stepping-stone in an ongoing recovery process. Findings indicate the power of comprehensive care with supportive staff, peer-relations, autonomy and fostering hope in empowering individuals in their ongoing recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kevin Gournay
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKings College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wood L, Williams C, Pinfold V, Nolan F, Morrison AP, Morant N, Lloyd-Evans B, Lewis G, Lay B, Jones R, Greenwood K, Johnson S. Crisis-focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) in acute mental health inpatient settings (the CRISIS study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:205. [PMID: 36088373 PMCID: PMC9463503 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01160-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) has an established evidence base and is recommended by clinical guidelines to be offered during the acute phases of psychosis. However, few research studies have examined the efficacy of CBTp interventions specifically adapted for the acute mental health inpatient context with most research trials being conducted with white European community populations.
Aims
The aim of this study is to conduct a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT), which incorporates the examination of feasibility markers, of a crisis-focused CBTp intervention adapted for an ethnically diverse acute mental health inpatient population, in preparation for a large-scale randomised controlled trial. The study will examine the feasibility of undertaking the trial, the acceptability and safety of the intervention and the suitability of chosen outcome measures. This will inform the planning of a future, fully powered RCT.
Methods
A single-site, parallel-group, pilot RCT will be conducted examining the intervention. Drawing on principles of coproduction, the intervention has been adapted in partnership with key stakeholders: service users with lived experience of psychosis and of inpatient care (including those from ethnic minority backgrounds), carers, multi-disciplinary inpatient clinicians and researchers. Sixty participants with experience of psychosis and in current receipt of acute mental health inpatient care will be recruited. Participants will be randomly allocated to either the crisis-focused CBTp intervention or treatment as usual (TAU).
Discussion
Findings of this pilot RCT will indicate whether a larger multi-site RCT is needed to investigate the efficacy of the intervention. If the initial results demonstrate that this trial is feasible and the intervention is acceptable, it will provide evidence that a full-scale effectiveness trial may be warranted.
Trial registration
This trial has been prospectively registered on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN59055607) on the 18th of February 2021.
Collapse
|
44
|
Lindström M, Lindholm L, Liv P. Study protocol for a pragmatic cluster RCT on the effect and cost-effectiveness of Everyday Life Rehabilitation versus treatment as usual for persons with severe psychiatric disability living in sheltered or supported housing facilities. Trials 2022; 23:657. [PMID: 35971130 PMCID: PMC9377097 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06622-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People with severe psychiatric disabilities and impaired autonomy, living in sheltered or supported housing facilities, often lead sedentary, solitary lives indoors and have significantly poorer health than others in the population. Meaningful everyday activities are important for the recovery towards an enrichening, agentic, social, and hopeful everyday life. The Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) model—a person-centred activity- and recovery-oriented intervention—has shown positive outcomes in feasibility studies, and thus a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is required to establish the effectiveness of ELR, along with calculations of cost-effectiveness. Methods The ELR-RCT is a pragmatic, two-parallel-armed cluster RCT evaluating the effect and cost-effectiveness of using ELR from two measurement points over 6 months (pre-post intervention) and in three waves over 3 years. The primary outcome is recovering quality of life (ReQoL) at 6 months, and the secondary outcome is self-perceived recovery and daily functioning (RAS-DS) at 6 months. Additionally, Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) will be used for the intervention group. Power analysis has been conducted for primary outcome measure. The first wave will include an internal pilot, to be evaluated after 6 months, used as basis for decisions on updating the required sample size and any other need for adaptations before continuing with the full-scale RCT in the second and third wave. All municipalities within a geographic area in northern Sweden, with a minimum of one sheltered or supported housing facility for people with severe psychiatric or neuropsychiatric disability, including access to occupational therapy, will be enrolled. Participants will be block-randomised to receive ELR plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone for a control period. The control group will thereafter receive delayed ELR. Occupational therapists and housing staff will receive an educational package, manuals, and tools, as well as reflections with colleagues during the intervention period. Housing managers will receive questions for monthly follow-up and coaching with staff. Discussion This is a protocol for both an internal pilot and full trial of the first RCT study using the ELR intervention model in sheltered or supported housing facilities, evaluating the effects together with cost-effectiveness. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05056415. Registered on 24 September 2021. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06622-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Lindström
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Lars Lindholm
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Per Liv
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå university, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tomlin J, Walker K, Yates J, Dening T, Völlm B, Griffiths C. Older forensic mental healthcare patients in England: demographics, physical health, mental wellbeing, cognitive ability and quality of life. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2022; 2:9. [PMID: 36447787 PMCID: PMC7613860 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13248.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Background Older individuals (e.g., 55 years and over) constitute a growing proportion of the forensic mental health patient population. As a group, they are vulnerable to health outcomes similar to other individuals with serious mental disorders of the same age; however, these concerns can be compounded by complex forensic-related care backgrounds and clinical presentations, lengthy periods of time spent in prison or psychiatric hospitals, substance use histories, and crime perpetration or victimisation. The healthcare needs and strengths of this group are not well understood.The aim of this study was to identify and describe the demographic, physical health, mental wellbeing, cognitive ability, and quality of life profiles of older forensic patients in community, low, medium, and high security settings in England. Methods A cross-sectional quantitative study design was used. N=37 forensic patients aged 55 years and over completed six questionnaires. Data were also collected from patient records. Results Most patients were male and were diagnosed with psychosis. The most frequently committed index offence types were violent offences. Patients were prescribed 7.6 medications on average and had average anticholinergic effect on cognition scores of 2.4. Nearly half the sample had diabetes, with an average BMI score of 31.7 (indicating obesity). Possible cognitive impairment was identified in 65% of the sample. Patients' assessments of their recovery-related quality of life and mental wellbeing were comparable to published UK general population values. Assessments of quality of life were positively correlated with the ability to undertake everyday activities and cognitive performance. Conclusions We suggest that forensic services are well-placed to provide holistic mental and physical care to this group but that they should co-develop with patients a greater range of age-appropriate meaningful activities that are mindful of mobility issues and consider implementing more cognition-based and physical health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Tomlin
- School of Law and Criminology, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Kate Walker
- Innovation and Research Department, Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northampton, UK
| | - Jen Yates
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tom Dening
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Birgit Völlm
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Chris Griffiths
- Innovation and Research Department, Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Franklin M, Hunter RM, Enrique A, Palacios J, Richards D. Estimating Cost-Effectiveness Using Alternative Preference-Based Scores and Within-Trial Methods: Exploring the Dynamics of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Using the EQ-5D 5-Level Version and Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1018-1029. [PMID: 35667775 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and subsequent cost-effectiveness estimates based on the more physical health-focused EQ-5D 5-level version (EQ-5D-5L) value set for England or cross-walked EQ-5D 3-level version UK value set scores or more mental health recovery-focused Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index (ReQoL-UI), when using alternative within-trial statistical methods. We describe possible reasons for the different QALY estimates based on the interaction between item scores, health state profiles, preference-based scores, and mathematical and statistical methods chosen. METHODS QALYs are calculated over 8 weeks from a case study 2:1 (intervention:control) randomized controlled trial in patients with anxiety or depression. Complete case and with missing cases imputed using multiple-imputation analyses are conducted, using unadjusted and regression baseline-adjusted QALYs. Cost-effectiveness is judged using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and acceptability curves. We use previously established psychometric results to reflect on estimated QALYs. RESULTS A total of 361 people (241:120) were randomized. EQ-5D-5L crosswalk produced higher incremental QALYs than the value set for England or ReQoL-UI, which produced similar unadjusted QALYs, but contrasting baseline-adjusted QALYs. Probability of cost-effectiveness <£30 000 per QALY ranged from 6% (complete case ReQoL-UI baseline-adjusted QALYs) to 64.3% (multiple-imputation EQ-5D-5L crosswalk unadjusted QALYs). The control arm improved more on average than the intervention arm on the ReQoL-UI, a result not mirrored on the EQ-5D-5L nor condition-specific (Patient-Health Questionnaire-9, depression; Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, anxiety) measures. CONCLUSIONS ReQoL-UI produced contradictory cost-effectiveness results relative to the EQ-5D-5L. The EQ-5D-5L's better responsiveness and "anxiety/depression" and "usual activities" items drove the incremental QALY results. The ReQoL-UI's single physical health item and "personal recovery" construct may have influenced its lower 8-week incremental QALY estimates in this patient sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Franklin
- Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Rachael Maree Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Royal Free Medical School, University College London, London, England, UK
| | - Angel Enrique
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland; E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jorge Palacios
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland; E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Derek Richards
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland; E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gumley AI, Bradstreet S, Ainsworth J, Allan S, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Birchwood M, Briggs A, Bucci S, Cotton S, Engel L, French P, Lederman R, Lewis S, Machin M, MacLennan G, McLeod H, McMeekin N, Mihalopoulos C, Morton E, Norrie J, Reilly F, Schwannauer M, Singh SP, Sundram S, Thompson A, Williams C, Yung A, Aucott L, Farhall J, Gleeson J. Digital smartphone intervention to recognise and manage early warning signs in schizophrenia to prevent relapse: the EMPOWER feasibility cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-174. [PMID: 35639493 DOI: 10.3310/hlze0479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relapse is a major determinant of outcome for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Early warning signs frequently precede relapse. A recent Cochrane Review found low-quality evidence to suggest a positive effect of early warning signs interventions on hospitalisation and relapse. OBJECTIVE How feasible is a study to investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a digital intervention to recognise and promptly manage early warning signs of relapse in schizophrenia with the aim of preventing relapse? DESIGN A multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group cluster randomised controlled trial involving eight community mental health services, with 12-month follow-up. SETTINGS Glasgow, UK, and Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS Service users were aged > 16 years and had a schizophrenia spectrum disorder with evidence of a relapse within the previous 2 years. Carers were eligible for inclusion if they were nominated by an eligible service user. INTERVENTIONS The Early signs Monitoring to Prevent relapse in psychosis and prOmote Wellbeing, Engagement, and Recovery (EMPOWER) intervention was designed to enable participants to monitor changes in their well-being daily using a mobile phone, blended with peer support. Clinical triage of changes in well-being that were suggestive of early signs of relapse was enabled through an algorithm that triggered a check-in prompt that informed a relapse prevention pathway, if warranted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcomes were feasibility of the trial and feasibility, acceptability and usability of the intervention, as well as safety and performance. Candidate co-primary outcomes were relapse and fear of relapse. RESULTS We recruited 86 service users, of whom 73 were randomised (42 to EMPOWER and 31 to treatment as usual). Primary outcome data were collected for 84% of participants at 12 months. Feasibility data for people using the smartphone application (app) suggested that the app was easy to use and had a positive impact on motivations and intentions in relation to mental health. Actual app usage was high, with 91% of users who completed the baseline period meeting our a priori criterion of acceptable engagement (> 33%). The median time to discontinuation of > 33% app usage was 32 weeks (95% confidence interval 14 weeks to ∞). There were 8 out of 33 (24%) relapses in the EMPOWER arm and 13 out of 28 (46%) in the treatment-as-usual arm. Fewer participants in the EMPOWER arm had a relapse (relative risk 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.98), and time to first relapse (hazard ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.74) was longer in the EMPOWER arm than in the treatment-as-usual group. At 12 months, EMPOWER participants were less fearful of having a relapse than those in the treatment-as-usual arm (mean difference -4.29, 95% confidence interval -7.29 to -1.28). EMPOWER was more costly and more effective, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3041. This incremental cost-effectiveness ratio would be considered cost-effective when using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. LIMITATIONS This was a feasibility study and the outcomes detected cannot be taken as evidence of efficacy or effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS A trial of digital technology to monitor early warning signs that blended with peer support and clinical triage to detect and prevent relapse is feasible. FUTURE WORK A main trial with a sample size of 500 (assuming 90% power and 20% dropout) would detect a clinically meaningful reduction in relapse (relative risk 0.7) and improvement in other variables (effect sizes 0.3-0.4). TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN99559262. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 27. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Funding in Australia was provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1095879).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew I Gumley
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Simon Bradstreet
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephanie Allan
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Maximillian Birchwood
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Andrew Briggs
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sandra Bucci
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sue Cotton
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lidia Engel
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul French
- Department of Nursing, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Reeva Lederman
- School of Computing and Information Systems, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shôn Lewis
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Machin
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Hamish McLeod
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicola McMeekin
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Cathy Mihalopoulos
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Emma Morton
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - John Norrie
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Swaran P Singh
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Suresh Sundram
- Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Thompson
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Chris Williams
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alison Yung
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lorna Aucott
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Farhall
- Department of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,NorthWestern Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John Gleeson
- Healthy Brain and Mind Research Centre, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Peters E, Hardy A, Dudley R, Varese F, Greenwood K, Steel C, Emsley R, Keen N, Bowe S, Swan S, Underwood R, Longden E, Byford S, Potts L, Heslin M, Grey N, Turkington D, Fowler D, Kuipers E, Morrison A. Multisite randomised controlled trial of trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis to reduce post-traumatic stress symptoms in people with co-morbid post-traumatic stress disorder and psychosis, compared to treatment as usual: study protocol for the STAR (Study of Trauma And Recovery) trial. Trials 2022; 23:429. [PMID: 35606886 PMCID: PMC9125351 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06215-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People with psychosis have high rates of trauma, with a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) prevalence rate of approximately 15%, which exacerbates psychotic symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations. Pilot studies have shown that trauma-focused (TF) psychological therapies can be safe and effective in such individuals. This trial, the largest to date, will evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a TF therapy integrated with cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis (TF-CBTp) on post-traumatic stress symptoms in people with psychosis. The secondary aims are to compare groups on cost-effectiveness; ascertain whether TF-CBTp impacts on a range of other meaningful outcomes; determine whether therapy effects endure; and determine acceptability of the therapy in participants and therapists. Methods Rater-blind, parallel arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing TF-CBTp + treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU only. Adults (N = 300) with distressing post-traumatic stress and psychosis symptoms from five mental health Trusts (60 per site) will be randomised to the two groups. Therapy will be manualised, lasting 9 months (m) with trained therapists. We will assess PTSD symptom severity (primary outcome); percentage who show loss of PTSD diagnosis and clinically significant change; psychosis symptoms; emotional well-being; substance use; suicidal ideation; psychological recovery; social functioning; health-related quality of life; service use, a total of four times: before randomisation; 4 m (mid-therapy); 9 m (end of therapy; primary end point); 24 m (15 m after end of therapy) post-randomisation. Four 3-monthly phone calls will be made between 9 m and 24 m assessment points, to collect service use over the previous 3 months. Therapy acceptability will be assessed through qualitative interviews with participants (N = 35) and therapists (N = 5–10). An internal pilot will ensure integrity of trial recruitment and outcome data, as well as therapy protocol safety and adherence. Data will be analysed following intention-to-treat principles using generalised linear mixed models and reported according to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Social and Psychological Interventions Statement. Discussion The proposed intervention has the potential to provide significant patient benefit in terms of reductions in distressing symptoms of post-traumatic stress, psychosis, and emotional problems; enable clinicians to implement trauma-focused therapy confidently in this population; and be cost-effective compared to TAU through reduced service use. Trial registration ISRCTN93382525 (03/08/20) Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06215-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Peters
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Amy Hardy
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. .,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Robert Dudley
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle University, London, UK
| | - Filippo Varese
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kathryn Greenwood
- Research and Development, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, London, UK
| | - Craig Steel
- Oxford Centre for Psychological Health, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training and Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nadine Keen
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Samantha Bowe
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Swan
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raphael Underwood
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Eleanor Longden
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Potts
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Margaret Heslin
- Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nick Grey
- Research and Development, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, London, UK
| | - Doug Turkington
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle University, London, UK
| | - David Fowler
- Research and Development, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Kuipers
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anthony Morrison
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Botter L, Gerritsen DL, Oude Voshaar RC. Schema Therapy in the Nursing Home Setting: A Case Study of a Cognitively Impaired Patient. Clin Case Stud 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/15346501221091790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The use of schema therapy to treat personality disorders in older adults is gaining scientific attention. Personality disorders are prevalent in one out of ten older adults and have a detrimental effect on quality of life. Although 24% or more of nursing home residents may have personality disorders, psychotherapeutic treatment options in the case of comorbid cognitive impairment have not yet been studied. This study concerns a 63-year-old care-dependent male nursing home resident with a personality disorder, a substance use disorder, and several cognitive impairments due to cerebrovascular disease, who presented with complaints of loneliness, low self-esteem, sleeping problems and anger outbursts. Schema therapy was delivered based on the schema mode model for a period of 27 months. Post-treatment assessment demonstrated a decrease in early maladaptive schemas and dysfunctional schema modes and improved personality functioning overall. Although situational psychological distress fluctuated throughout treatment, quality of life improved after 7 months and remained stable onwards. Presented complaints either remitted or strongly diminished. Substance use was also addressed and was in remission for the last 20 months of therapy. This case study suggests that schema therapy is a viable treatment for older adults with personality disorders who present with cognitive impairments in nursing homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Botter
- Atlant, Markenhaven, Center for Specialized Chronic Psychiatric Nursing Home Care, Beekbergen, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Debby L. Gerritsen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Richard C. Oude Voshaar
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Freeman D, Lambe S, Kabir T, Petit A, Rosebrock L, Yu LM, Dudley R, Chapman K, Morrison A, O'Regan E, Aynsworth C, Jones J, Murphy E, Powling R, Galal U, Grabey J, Rovira A, Martin J, Hollis C, Clark DM, Waite F. Automated virtual reality therapy to treat agoraphobic avoidance and distress in patients with psychosis (gameChange): a multicentre, parallel-group, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial in England with mediation and moderation analyses. Lancet Psychiatry 2022; 9:375-388. [PMID: 35395204 PMCID: PMC9010306 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00060-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Automated delivery of psychological therapy using immersive technologies such as virtual reality (VR) might greatly increase the availability of effective help for patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an automated VR cognitive therapy (gameChange) to treat avoidance and distress in patients with psychosis, and to analyse how and in whom it might work. METHODS We did a parallel-group, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial across nine National Health Service trusts in England. Eligible patients were aged 16 years or older, with a clinical diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder or an affective diagnosis with psychotic symptoms, and had self-reported difficulties going outside due to anxiety. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either gameChange VR therapy plus usual care or usual care alone, using a permuted blocks algorithm with randomly varying block size, stratified by study site and service type. gameChange VR therapy was provided in approximately six sessions over 6 weeks. Trial assessors were masked to group allocation. Outcomes were assessed at 0, 6 (primary endpoint), and 26 weeks after randomisation. The primary outcome was avoidance of, and distress in, everyday situations, assessed using the self-reported Oxford Agoraphobic Avoidance Scale (O-AS). Outcome analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all participants who were assigned to a study group for whom data were available). We performed planned mediation and moderation analyses to test the effects of gameChange VR therapy when added to usual care. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, 17308399. FINDINGS Between July 25, 2019, and May 7, 2021 (with a pause in recruitment from March 16, 2020, to Sept 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions), 551 patients were assessed for eligibility and 346 were enrolled. 231 (67%) patients were men and 111 (32%) were women, 294 (85%) were White, and the mean age was 37·2 years (SD 12·5). 174 patients were randomly assigned to the gameChange VR therapy group and 172 to the usual care alone group. Compared with the usual care alone group, the gameChange VR therapy group had significant reductions in agoraphobic avoidance (O-AS adjusted mean difference -0·47, 95% CI -0·88 to -0·06; n=320; Cohen's d -0·18; p=0·026) and distress (-4·33, -7·78 to -0·87; n=322; -0·26; p=0·014) at 6 weeks. Reductions in threat cognitions and within-situation defence behaviours mediated treatment outcomes. The greater the severity of anxious fears and avoidance, the greater the treatment benefits. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of serious adverse events between the gameChange VR therapy group (12 events in nine patients) and the usual care alone group (eight events in seven patients; p=0·37). INTERPRETATION Automated VR therapy led to significant reductions in anxious avoidance of, and distress in, everyday situations compared with usual care alone. The mediation analysis indicated that the VR therapy worked in accordance with the cognitive model by reducing anxious thoughts and associated protective behaviours. The moderation analysis indicated that the VR therapy particularly benefited patients with severe agoraphobic avoidance, such as not being able to leave the home unaccompanied. gameChange VR therapy has the potential to increase the provision of effective psychological therapy for psychosis, particularly for patients who find it difficult to leave their home, visit local amenities, or use public transport. FUNDING National Institute of Health Research Invention for Innovation programme, National Institute of Health Research Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| | - Sinéad Lambe
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Ariane Petit
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Laina Rosebrock
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Dudley
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne, and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kate Chapman
- Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Anthony Morrison
- Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eileen O'Regan
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte Aynsworth
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne, and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Julia Jones
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Murphy
- Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rosie Powling
- Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Ushma Galal
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jenna Grabey
- Oxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aitor Rovira
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jennifer Martin
- National Institute for Health Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Nottingham, UK; Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Mental Health & Technology Theme, Nottingham, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Nottingham, UK; Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Mental Health & Technology Theme, Nottingham, UK
| | - David M Clark
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Felicity Waite
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|