1
|
Hernando-Calvo A, Rossi A, Vieito M, Voest E, Garralda E. Agnostic drug development revisited. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 128:102747. [PMID: 38763053 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
The advent of molecular profiling and the generalization of next generation sequencing in oncology has enabled the identification of patients who could benefit from targeted agents. Since the tumor-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab for patients with MSI-High tumors in 2017, different molecularly-guided therapeutics have been awarded approvals and progressively incorporated in the treatment landscape across multiple tumor types. As the number of tumor-agnostic targets considered druggable expands in the clinic, novel challenges will reshape the drug development field involving all the stakeholders in oncology. In this review, we provide an overview of current tumor-agnostic approvals and discuss promising candidate therapeutics for tumor-agnostic designation and challenges for their broad implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Hernando-Calvo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d́Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d́Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alice Rossi
- Vall d́Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Vieito
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d́Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d́Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Emile Voest
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Elena Garralda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d́Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d́Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Easter M, Hirsch MJ, Harris E, Howze PH, Matthews EL, Jones LI, Bollenbecker S, Vang S, Tyrrell DJ, Sanders YY, Birket SE, Barnes JW, Krick S. FGF receptors mediate cellular senescence in the cystic fibrosis airway epithelium. JCI Insight 2024; 9:e174888. [PMID: 38916962 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.174888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
The number of adults living with cystic fibrosis (CF) has already increased significantly because of drastic improvements in life expectancy attributable to advances in treatment, including the development of highly effective modulator therapy. Chronic airway inflammation in CF contributes to morbidity and mortality, and aging processes like inflammaging and cell senescence influence CF pathology. Our results show that single-cell RNA sequencing data, human primary bronchial epithelial cells from non-CF and CF donors, a CF bronchial epithelial cell line, and Cftr-knockout (Cftr-/-) rats all demonstrated increased cell senescence markers in the CF bronchial epithelium. This was associated with upregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38. Inhibition of FGFRs, specifically FGFR4 and to some extent FGFR1, attenuated cell senescence and improved mucociliary clearance, which was associated with MAPK p38 signaling. Mucociliary dysfunction could also be improved using a combination of senolytics in a CF ex vivo model. In summary, FGFR/MAPK p38 signaling contributes to cell senescence in CF airways, which is associated with impaired mucociliary clearance. Therefore, attenuation of cell senescence in the CF airways might be a future therapeutic strategy improving mucociliary dysfunction and lung disease in an aging population with CF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Easter
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Meghan June Hirsch
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Elex Harris
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
- Gregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, and
| | - Patrick Henry Howze
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Emma Lea Matthews
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Luke I Jones
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Seth Bollenbecker
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Shia Vang
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Daniel J Tyrrell
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Department of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Yan Y Sanders
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| | - Susan E Birket
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
- Gregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, and
| | - Jarrod W Barnes
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Stefanie Krick
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
- Gregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, and
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang P, Yue L, Leng Q, Chang C, Gan C, Ye T, Cao D. Targeting FGFR for cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol 2024; 17:39. [PMID: 38831455 PMCID: PMC11149307 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-024-01558-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The FGFR signaling pathway is integral to cellular activities, including proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Dysregulation of this pathway is implicated in numerous human cancers, positioning FGFR as a prominent therapeutic target. Here, we conduct a comprehensive review of the function, signaling pathways and abnormal alterations of FGFR, as well as its role in tumorigenesis and development. Additionally, we provide an in-depth analysis of pivotal phase 2 and 3 clinical trials evaluating the performance and safety of FGFR inhibitors in oncology, thereby shedding light on the current state of clinical research in this field. Then, we highlight four drugs that have been approved for marketing by the FDA, offering insights into their molecular mechanisms and clinical achievements. Our discussion encompasses the intricate landscape of FGFR-driven tumorigenesis, current techniques for pinpointing FGFR anomalies, and clinical experiences with FGFR inhibitor regimens. Furthermore, we discuss the inherent challenges of targeting the FGFR pathway, encompassing resistance mechanisms such as activation by gatekeeper mutations, alternative pathways, and potential adverse reactions. By synthesizing the current evidence, we underscore the potential of FGFR-centric therapies to enhance patient prognosis, while emphasizing the imperative need for continued research to surmount resistance and optimize treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei Zhang
- Division of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Lin Yue
- Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Cancer and Liver Disease, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - QingQing Leng
- Division of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Chen Chang
- Division of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Cailing Gan
- Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Cancer and Liver Disease, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Tinghong Ye
- Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Cancer and Liver Disease, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Dan Cao
- Division of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodón J, Damian S, Furqan M, García-Donas J, Imai H, Italiano A, Spanggaard I, Ueno M, Yokota T, Veronese ML, Oliveira N, Li X, Gilmartin A, Schaffer M, Goyal L. Pemigatinib in previously treated solid tumors with activating FGFR1-FGFR3 alterations: phase 2 FIGHT-207 basket trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:1645-1654. [PMID: 38710951 PMCID: PMC11186762 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02934-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations drive oncogenesis in multiple tumor types. Here we studied pemigatinib, a selective, potent, oral FGFR1-FGFR3 inhibitor, in the phase 2 FIGHT-207 basket study of FGFR-altered advanced solid tumors. Primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) in cohorts A (fusions/rearrangements, n = 49) and B (activating non-kinase domain mutations, n = 32). Secondary end points were progression-free survival, duration of response and overall survival in cohorts A and B, and safety. Exploratory end points included ORR of cohort C (kinase domain mutations, potentially pathogenic variants of unknown significance, n = 26) and analysis of co-alterations associated with resistance and response. ORRs for cohorts A, B and C were 26.5% (13/49), 9.4% (3/32) and 3.8% (1/26), respectively. Tumors with no approved FGFR inhibitors or those with alterations not previously confirmed to be sensitive to FGFR inhibition had objective responses. In cohorts A and B, the median progression-free survival was 4.5 and 3.7 months, median duration of response was 7.8 and 6.9 months and median overall survival was 17.5 and 11.4 months, respectively. Safety was consistent with previous reports. The most common any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events were hyperphosphatemia (84%) and stomatitis (53%). TP53 co-mutations were associated with lack of response and BAP1 alterations with higher response rates. FGFR1-FGFR3 gatekeeper and molecular brake mutations led to acquired resistance. New therapeutic areas for FGFR inhibition and drug failure mechanisms were identified across tumor types. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03822117 .
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3/genetics
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3/antagonists & inhibitors
- Female
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/genetics
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/antagonists & inhibitors
- Pyrimidines/adverse effects
- Pyrimidines/therapeutic use
- Male
- Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Neoplasms/genetics
- Neoplasms/pathology
- Middle Aged
- Adult
- Aged
- Mutation
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
- Progression-Free Survival
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects
- Morpholines
- Pyrroles
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Rodón
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Silvia Damian
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Hiroo Imai
- Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai-Shi, Japan
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Iben Spanggaard
- Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | - Xin Li
- Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | | | | | - Lipika Goyal
- Mass General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peng Y, Zhang P, Mei W, Zeng C. Exploring FGFR signaling inhibition as a promising approach in breast cancer treatment. Int J Biol Macromol 2024; 267:131524. [PMID: 38608977 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
As our grasp of cancer genomics deepens, we are steadily progressing towards the domain of precision medicine, where targeted therapy stands out as a revolutionary breakthrough in the landscape of cancer therapeutics. The fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) pathway has been unveiled as a fundamental instigator in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying breast carcinoma, paving the way for the exhilarating development of precision-targeted therapeutics. In the pursuit of exploring inhibitors that specifically target the FGFR signaling pathways, a multitude of kinase inhibitors targeting FGFR has been assiduously engineered to address the heterogeneous landscape of human malignancies. This review offers an exhaustive exploration of aberrations within the FGFR pathway and their functional implications in breast cancer. Additionally, we delve into cutting-edge therapeutic approaches for the treatment of breast cancer patients bearing FGFR alterations and the management of toxicity associated with FGFR inhibitors. Furthermore, our contemplation of the evolution of cutting-edge FGFR inhibitors foresees their potential to spearhead innovative therapeutic approaches in the ongoing combat against cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Peng
- Department of Obstetrics, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, China
| | - Pengfei Zhang
- Department of Medical Laboratory, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, China
| | - Wuxuan Mei
- Xianning Medical College, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning 437100, China
| | - Changchun Zeng
- Department of Medical Laboratory, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, China; Department of General Medicine, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parthasarathy G. Fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors mitigate the neuropathogenicity of Borrelia burgdorferi or its remnants ex vivo. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1327416. [PMID: 38638441 PMCID: PMC11024320 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1327416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
In previous studies, we showed that fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) contribute to inflammatory mediator output from primary rhesus microglia in response to live Borrelia burgdorferi. We also demonstrated that non-viable B. burgdorferi can be as pathogenic as live bacteria, if not more so, in both CNS and PNS tissues. In this study we assessed the effect of live and non-viable B. burgdorferi in inducing FGFR expression from rhesus frontal cortex (FC) and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) tissue explants as well as their neuronal/astrocyte localization. Specific FGFR inhibitors were also tested for their ability to attenuate inflammatory output and apoptosis in response to either live or non-viable organisms. Results show that in the FC, FGFR2 was the most abundantly expressed receptor followed by FGFR3 and FGFR1. Non-viable B. burgdorferi significantly upregulated FGFR3 more often than live bacteria, while the latter had a similar effect on FGFR1, although both treatments did affect the expressions of both receptors. FGFR2 was the least modulated in the FC tissues by the two treatments. FGFR1 expression was more prevalent in astrocytes while FGFR2 and FGFR3 showed higher expression in neurons. In the DRG, all three receptor expressions were also seen, but could not be distinguished from medium controls by immunofluorescence. Inhibition of FGFR1 by PD166866 downregulated both inflammation and apoptosis in both FC and DRG in response to either treatment in all the tissues tested. Inhibition of FGFR1-3 by AZD4547 similarly downregulated both inflammation and apoptosis in both FC and DRG in response to live bacteria, while with sonicated remnants, this effect was seen in one of the two FC tissues and 2 of 3 DRG tissues tested. CCL2 and IL-6 were the most downregulated mediators in the FC, while in the DRG it was CXCL8 and IL-6 in response to FGFR inhibition. Downregulation of at least two of these three mediators was observed to downregulate apoptosis levels in general. We show here that FGFR inhibition can be an effective anti-inflammatory treatment in antibiotic refractive neurological Lyme. Alternatively, two biologics may be needed to effectively curb neuroinflammation and pathology in the CNS and PNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geetha Parthasarathy
- Division of Immunology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University, Covington, LA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fieuws C, Van der Meulen J, Proesmans K, De Jaeghere EA, Loontiens S, Van Dorpe J, Tummers P, Denys H, Van de Vijver K, Claes KBM. Identification of potentially actionable genetic variants in epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:71. [PMID: 38519644 PMCID: PMC10959961 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00565-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, mainly due to late-stage diagnosis, frequent recurrences, and eventually therapy resistance. To identify potentially actionable genetic variants, sequencing data of 351 Belgian ovarian cancer patients were retrospectively captured from electronic health records. The cohort included 286 (81%) patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, 17 (5%) with low-grade serous ovarian cancer, and 48 (14%) with other histotypes. Firstly, an overview of the prevalence and spectrum of the BRCA1/2 variants highlighted germline variants in 4% (11/250) and somatic variants in 11% (37/348) of patients. Secondly, application of a multi-gene panel in 168 tumors revealed a total of 214 variants in 28 genes beyond BRCA1/2 with a median of 1 (IQR, 1-2) genetic variant per patient. The ten most often altered genes were (in descending order): TP53, BRCA1, PIK3CA, BRCA2, KRAS, ERBB2 (HER2), TERT promotor, RB1, PIK3R1 and PTEN. Of note, the genetic landscape vastly differed between the studied histotypes. Finally, using ESCAT the clinical evidence of utility for every genetic variant was scored. Only BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were classified as tier-I. Nearly all patients (151/168; 90%) had an ESCAT tier-II variant, most frequently in TP53 (74%), PIK3CA (9%) and KRAS (7%). In conclusion, our findings imply that although only a small proportion of genetic variants currently have direct impact on ovarian cancer treatment decisions, other variants could help to identify novel (personalized) treatment options to address the poor prognosis of ovarian cancer, particularly in rare histotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Fieuws
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joni Van der Meulen
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Emiel A De Jaeghere
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Siebe Loontiens
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Tummers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Van de Vijver
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kathleen B M Claes
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Keogh RJ, Barr MP, Keogh A, McMahon D, O’Brien C, Finn SP, Naidoo J. Genomic Landscape of NSCLC in the Republic of Ireland. JTO Clin Res Rep 2024; 5:100627. [PMID: 38333230 PMCID: PMC10850121 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The identification of genomic "targets" through next-generation sequencing (NGS) of patient's NSCLC tumors has resulted in a rapid expansion of targeted treatment options for selected patients. This retrospective study aims to identify the proportion of patients with advanced NSCLC in the Republic of Ireland whose tumors harbor actionable genomic alterations through broad NGS panel testing. Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained before study initiation. Patients with NSCLC whose tumors underwent genomic testing through the largest available NGS panel at a nationally funded Cancer Molecular Diagnostics laboratory (St. James's Hospital) between June 2017 and June 2022 were identified. Patient demographics and tumor-related data were collected by retrospective review from all cancer centers in Ireland, referring to the Cancer Molecular Diagnostics laboratory. A total of 203 (9%) tumor samples were excluded due to insufficient neoplastic cell content. Genomic data were collected through retrospective search of Ion Reporter software. The spectrum and proportion of patients with oncogenic driver mutations were evaluated using descriptive statistics (SPSS version 29.0). Results In total, 2052 patients were identified. Patients were referred from 23 different hospital sites and all four geographic regions (Leinster = 1091, 53%; Munster = 763, 37.2%; Connacht = 191, 9.3%; Ulster = 7, 0.3%). Median age was 69 (range: 26-94) years; 53% were male. The most common tumor histologic subtype was adenocarcinoma (77%, n = 1577). An actionable genomic alteration was identified in 1099 cases (53%), the most common of which was KRAS (n = 657, 32%). Less frequently, NSCLC tumors harbored the following: MET exon 14 skipping (n = 53, 2.6%), MET amplification (n = 26, 1.3%), EGFR (n = 181, 8.8%), HER2 (n = 35, 1.7%), and BRAF (n = 72, 3.5%) mutations. Fusions were detected in 76 patients (3.7%) including ALK (n = 44, 58%), RET (n = 11, 14.5%), ROS1 (n = 16, 21%), and FGFR3 (n = 5, 6.6%), whereas no NTRK fusion was identified. Co-alterations were detected in 114 patients (5.6%), the most common of which was KRAS/PIK3CA (n = 19, 17%), EGFR/PIK3CA (n = 10, 8.5%), and KRAS/IDH1 (n = 9, 8%). Other co-alterations of interest identified included KRAS G12A/ROS1 fusion (n = 1) and KRAS G12C/BRAF G469A (n = 2). Conclusions This is the first retrospective study to comprehensively characterize the genomic landscape of NSCLC in Ireland, using the broadest available NGS panel. Actionable alterations were identified in 53.4% of the patients, and KRAS was the most common oncogenic driver alteration. Our study revealed a lower prevalence of patients whose tumor harbors ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions, compared with similar data sets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel J. Keogh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Martin P. Barr
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anna Keogh
- School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Histopathology, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David McMahon
- Department Medical Oncology, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cathal O’Brien
- Cancer Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Stephen P. Finn
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Histopathology, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Cancer Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jarushka Naidoo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre, Dublin, Ireland
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- RCSI University of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Centre at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Calfa CJ, Rothe M, Mangat PK, Garrett-Mayer E, Ahn ER, Burness ML, Gogineni K, Rohatgi N, Al Baghdadi T, Conlin A, Gaba A, Hamid O, Krishnamurthy J, Gavini NJ, Gold PJ, Rodon J, Rueter J, Thota R, Grantham GN, Hinshaw DC, Gregory A, Halabi S, Schilsky RL. Sunitinib in Patients With Breast Cancer With FGFR1 or FGFR2 Amplifications or Mutations: Results From the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry Study. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300513. [PMID: 38354330 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry Study is a phase II basket trial evaluating the antitumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in patients with advanced cancer and genomic alterations known to be drug targets. Results from cohorts of patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC) with FGFR1 and FGFR2 alterations treated with sunitinib are reported. METHODS Eligible patients had measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, and no standard treatment options. Simon's two-stage design was used with a primary end point of disease control (DC), defined as objective response (OR) or stable disease of at least 16 weeks duration (SD16+) according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary end points included OR, progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, duration of stable disease, and safety. RESULTS Forty patients with BC with FGFR1 (N = 30; amplification only n = 26, mutation only n = 1, both n = 3) or FGFR2 (N = 10; amplification only n = 2, mutation only n = 6, both n = 2) alterations were enrolled. Three patients in the FGFR1 cohort were not evaluable for efficacy; all patients in the FGFR2 cohort were evaluable. For the FGFR1 cohort, two patients with partial response and four with SD16+ were observed for DC and OR rates of 27% (90% CI, 13 to 100) and 7% (95% CI, 1 to 24), respectively. The null hypothesis of 15% DC rate was not rejected (P = .169). No patients achieved DC in the FGFR2 cohort (P = 1.00). Thirteen of the 40 total patients across both cohorts had at least one grade 3-4 adverse event or serious adverse event at least possibly related to sunitinib. CONCLUSION Sunitinib did not meet prespecified criteria to declare a signal of antitumor activity in patients with BC with either FGFR1 or FGFR2 alterations. Other treatments and clinical trials should be considered for these patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen J Calfa
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Michael Rothe
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Pam K Mangat
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tareq Al Baghdadi
- Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI
| | | | | | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, A Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Jordi Rodon
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shan KS, Dalal S, Thaw Dar NN, McLish O, Salzberg M, Pico BA. Molecular Targeting of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Pathway across Various Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:849. [PMID: 38255923 PMCID: PMC10815772 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25020849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are a family of receptor tyrosine kinases that are involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, survival, and development. FGFR alterations including amplifications, fusions, rearrangements, and mutations can result in the downstream activation of tyrosine kinases, leading to tumor development. Targeting these FGFR alterations has shown to be effective in treating cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms, and there are currently four FGFR inhibitors approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There have been developments in multiple agents targeting the FGFR pathway, including selective FGFR inhibitors, ligand traps, monoclonal antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates. However, most of these agents have variable and low responses, with some intolerable toxicities and acquired resistances. This review will summarize previous clinical experiences and current developments in agents targeting the FGFR pathway, and will also discuss future directions for FGFR-targeting agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khine S. Shan
- Memorial Health Care, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Pembroke Pines, FL 33028, USA; (S.D.); (N.N.T.D.); (O.M.); (M.S.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hsu J, Francis JH, Ahmad S. Ocular toxicities of fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors: A review. Surv Ophthalmol 2024; 69:34-41. [PMID: 37777119 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors are an emerging class of small molecule targeted cancer drugs with promising therapeutic possibilities for a wide variety of malignancies. While ocular adverse events from FGFR inhibitors are reported in clinical trials, subsequent case studies continue to reveal new toxicities. Disease pathology affecting multiple parts of the eye has been reported, but the ocular surface and the retina are the most commonly encountered areas affected by FGFR inhibitors, manifesting as dry eye and FGFR inhibitor-associated retinopathy, respectively. Corneal thinning and melt is a rare but serious and potentially vision-threatening complication of FGFR inhibitor toxicity. Similarities between toxicities observed from other targeted cancer therapy drugs and FGFR inhibitors may help us understand underlying pathophysiological changes. The management of these adverse events requires close ophthalmologic follow-up and may require discontinuation of the offending agents in some cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerry Hsu
- New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jasmine H Francis
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sumayya Ahmad
- New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Blücher RO, Lim RS, Jarred EG, Ritchie ME, Western PS. FGF-independent MEK1/2 signalling in the developing foetal testis is essential for male germline differentiation in mice. BMC Biol 2023; 21:281. [PMID: 38053127 PMCID: PMC10696798 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01777-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disrupted germline differentiation or compromised testis development can lead to subfertility or infertility and are strongly associated with testis cancer in humans. In mice, SRY and SOX9 induce expression of Fgf9, which promotes Sertoli cell differentiation and testis development. FGF9 is also thought to promote male germline differentiation but the mechanism is unknown. FGFs typically signal through mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) to phosphorylate ERK1/2 (pERK1/2). We explored whether FGF9 regulates male germline development through MAPK by inhibiting either FGF or MEK1/2 signalling in the foetal testis immediately after gonadal sex determination and testis cord formation, but prior to male germline commitment. RESULTS pERK1/2 was detected in Sertoli cells and inhibition of MEK1/2 reduced Sertoli cell proliferation and organisation and resulted in some germ cells localised outside of the testis cords. While pERK1/2 was not detected in germ cells, inhibition of MEK1/2 after somatic sex determination profoundly disrupted germ cell mitotic arrest, dysregulated a broad range of male germline development genes and prevented the upregulation of key male germline markers, DPPA4 and DNMT3L. In contrast, while FGF inhibition reduced Sertoli cell proliferation, expression of male germline markers was unaffected and germ cells entered mitotic arrest normally. While male germline differentiation was not disrupted by FGF inhibition, a range of stem cell and cancer-associated genes were commonly altered after 24 h of FGF or MEK1/2 inhibition, including genes involved in the maintenance of germline stem cells, Nodal signalling, proliferation, and germline cancer. CONCLUSIONS Together, these data demonstrate a novel role for MEK1/2 signalling during testis development that is essential for male germline differentiation, but indicate a more limited role for FGF signalling. Our data indicate that additional ligands are likely to act through MEK1/2 to promote male germline differentiation and highlight a need for further mechanistic understanding of male germline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rheannon O Blücher
- Centre for Reproductive Health, Hudson Institute of Medical Research and Department of Molecular and Translational Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Rachel S Lim
- Epigenetics and Development Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Ellen G Jarred
- Centre for Reproductive Health, Hudson Institute of Medical Research and Department of Molecular and Translational Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Matthew E Ritchie
- Epigenetics and Development Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Patrick S Western
- Centre for Reproductive Health, Hudson Institute of Medical Research and Department of Molecular and Translational Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Deng T, Zhang L, Shi Y, Bai G, Pan Y, Shen A, Han X, Yang Z, Chen M, Zhou H, Luo Y, Zheng S, Ba Y. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of pemigatinib (a selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3) monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase i clinical trial. Invest New Drugs 2023; 41:808-815. [PMID: 37889382 PMCID: PMC10663244 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-023-01396-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Pemigatinib is a selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-3 inhibitor and has demonstrated acceptable tolerability and clinical activity in advanced solid tumors in Western population. This phase I trial evaluated pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) characteristics, preliminary safety and efficacy of pemigatinib in Chinese patients with advanced, solid tumors. Patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic solid tumors bearing FGF/FGFR1-3 alterations received oral pemigatinib at 13.5 mg once daily (QD) on a 2-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule. The primary endpoint was PK/PD characteristics; secondary endpoints were safety and efficacy. Twelve patients were enrolled (median age: 61 years, 58.3% males). PK data demonstrated pemigatinib (13.5 mg QD) was rapidly absorbed with a geometric mean elimination half-life of 11.3 h. The geometric mean values of maximum serum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state were 215.1 nmol/L and 2636.9 h·nmol/L, respectively. The mean clearance adjusted by bioavailability at steady state was low (11.8 L/h), and the apparent oral volume of distribution was moderate (170.5 L). The PD marker, serum phosphate level, increased on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1 (mean: 2.25 mg/dL, CV% [percent coefficient of variation]: 31.3%) and decreased to baseline post 1 week off. Three (25.0%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Partial response was confirmed in one patient with FGFR1-mutant esophageal carcinoma and one with FGFR2-mutant cholagiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib had similar PK/PD characteristics to Western population and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and potential anti-cancer benefit in Chinese patients with FGF/FGFR1-3 altered, advanced, solid tumor. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258527 [prospectively registered February 6, 2020]).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Deng
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and Tianjin's Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Le Zhang
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and Tianjin's Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Yehui Shi
- Phase I Clinical Trial Ward, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, & Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, & Tianjin's Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Guiying Bai
- Phase I Clinical Trial Ward, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, & Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, & Tianjin's Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Yueyin Pan
- Oncology Department, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Aizong Shen
- Pharmacy Department, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Xinghua Han
- Oncology Department, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Zhaoyi Yang
- Pharmacy Department, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Mingxia Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Information, Innovent Biologics, Inc, Suzhou, China
| | - Hui Zhou
- Department of Medical Science and Oncology, Innovent Biologics, Inc, Suzhou, China
| | - Yang Luo
- Department of Medical Science and Oncology, Innovent Biologics, Inc, Suzhou, China
| | - Shirui Zheng
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Innovent Biologics, Inc, Suzhou, China
| | - Yi Ba
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and Tianjin's Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
- Department of Cancer Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Saridogan T, Akcakanat A, Zhao M, Evans KW, Yuca E, Scott S, Kirby BP, Zheng X, Ha MJ, Chen H, Ng PKS, DiPeri TP, Mills GB, Rodon Ahnert J, Damodaran S, Meric-Bernstam F. Efficacy of futibatinib, an irreversible fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, in FGFR-altered breast cancer. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20223. [PMID: 37980453 PMCID: PMC10657448 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46586-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Several alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genes have been found in breast cancer; however, they have not been well characterized as therapeutic targets. Futibatinib (TAS-120; Taiho) is a novel, selective, pan-FGFR inhibitor that inhibits FGFR1-4 at nanomolar concentrations. We sought to determine futibatinib's efficacy in breast cancer models. Nine breast cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) with various FGFR1-4 alterations and expression levels were treated with futibatinib. Antitumor efficacy was evaluated by change in tumor volume and time to tumor doubling. Alterations indicating sensitization to futibatinib in vivo were further characterized in vitro. FGFR gene expression between patient tumors and matching PDXs was significantly correlated; however, overall PDXs had higher FGFR3-4 expression. Futibatinib inhibited tumor growth in 3 of 9 PDXs, with tumor stabilization in an FGFR2-amplified model and prolonged regression (> 110 days) in an FGFR2 Y375C mutant/amplified model. FGFR2 overexpression and, to a greater extent, FGFR2 Y375C expression in MCF10A cells enhanced cell growth and sensitivity to futibatinib. Per institutional and public databases, FGFR2 mutations and amplifications had a population frequency of 1.1%-2.6% and 1.5%-2.5%, respectively, in breast cancer patients. FGFR2 alterations in breast cancer may represent infrequent but highly promising targets for futibatinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Turcin Saridogan
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Basic Oncology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, 06100, Turkey
| | - Argun Akcakanat
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ming Zhao
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Kurt W Evans
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Erkan Yuca
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Stephen Scott
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bryce P Kirby
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Zheng
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Min Jin Ha
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Huiqin Chen
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Patrick K S Ng
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA
| | - Timothy P DiPeri
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Gordon B Mills
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Precision Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Jordi Rodon Ahnert
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- The Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Senthil Damodaran
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 455, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- The Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Javle M, King G, Spencer K, Borad MJ. Futibatinib, an Irreversible FGFR1-4 Inhibitor for the Treatment of FGFR-Aberrant Tumors. Oncologist 2023; 28:928-943. [PMID: 37390492 PMCID: PMC10628593 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) are emerging as an important therapeutic target for patients with advanced, refractory cancers. Most selective FGFR inhibitors under investigation show reversible binding, and their activity is limited by acquired drug resistance. This review summarizes the preclinical and clinical development of futibatinib, an irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor. Futibatinib stands out among FGFR inhibitors because of its covalent binding mechanism and low susceptibility to acquired resistance. Preclinical data indicated robust activity of futibatinib against acquired resistance mutations in the FGFR kinase domain. In early-phase studies, futibatinib showed activity in cholangiocarcinoma, and gastric, urothelial, breast, central nervous system, and head and neck cancers harboring various FGFR aberrations. Exploratory analyses indicated clinical benefit with futibatinib after prior FGFR inhibitor use. In a pivotal phase II trial, futibatinib demonstrated durable objective responses (42% objective response rate) and tolerability in previously treated patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. A manageable safety profile was observed across studies, and patient quality of life was maintained with futibatinib treatment in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Hyperphosphatemia, the most common adverse event with futibatinib, was well managed and did not lead to treatment discontinuation. These data show clinically meaningful benefit with futibatinib in FGFR2-rearrangement-positive cholangiocarcinoma and provide support for further investigation of futibatinib across other indications. Future directions for this agent include elucidating mechanisms of resistance and exploration of combination therapy approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gentry King
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kristen Spencer
- Perlmutter Cancer Center of NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY,USA
| | - Mitesh J Borad
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ,USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gillman R, Field MA, Schmitz U, Karamatic R, Hebbard L. Identifying cancer driver genes in individual tumours. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 21:5028-5038. [PMID: 37867967 PMCID: PMC10589724 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a heterogeneous disease with a strong genetic component making it suitable for precision medicine approaches aimed at identifying the underlying molecular drivers within a tumour. Large scale population-level cancer sequencing consortia have identified many actionable mutations common across both cancer types and sub-types, resulting in an increasing number of successful precision medicine programs. Nonetheless, such approaches fail to consider the effects of mutations unique to an individual patient and may miss rare driver mutations, necessitating personalised approaches to driver-gene prioritisation. One approach is to quantify the functional importance of individual mutations in a single tumour based on how they affect the expression of genes in a gene interaction network (GIN). These GIN-based approaches can be broadly divided into those that utilise an existing reference GIN and those that construct de novo patient-specific GINs. These single-tumour approaches have several limitations that likely influence their results, such as use of reference cohort data, network choice, and approaches to mathematical approximation, and more research is required to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo applicability of their predictions. This review examines the current state of the art methods that identify driver genes in single tumours with a focus on GIN-based driver prioritisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhys Gillman
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Molecular and Cell Biology, College of Public Health, Medical, and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Matt A. Field
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Molecular and Cell Biology, College of Public Health, Medical, and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
- Immunogenomics Lab, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Ulf Schmitz
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Molecular and Cell Biology, College of Public Health, Medical, and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rozemary Karamatic
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Townsville University Hospital, PO Box 670, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lionel Hebbard
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Molecular and Cell Biology, College of Public Health, Medical, and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Institute for Tropical Health and Medicine, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Liu Q, Huang J, Yan W, Liu Z, Liu S, Fang W. FGFR families: biological functions and therapeutic interventions in tumors. MedComm (Beijing) 2023; 4:e367. [PMID: 37750089 PMCID: PMC10518040 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
There are five fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs), namely, FGFR1-FGFR5. When FGFR binds to its ligand, namely, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), it dimerizes and autophosphorylates, thereby activating several key downstream pathways that play an important role in normal physiology, such as the Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, phospholipase C gamma/diacylglycerol/protein kinase c, and signal transducer and activator of transcription pathways. Furthermore, as an oncogene, FGFR genetic alterations were found in 7.1% of tumors, and these alterations include gene amplification, gene mutations, gene fusions or rearrangements. Therefore, FGFR amplification, mutations, rearrangements, or fusions are considered as potential biomarkers of FGFR therapeutic response for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, it is worth noting that with increased use, resistance to TKIs inevitably develops, such as the well-known gatekeeper mutations. Thus, overcoming the development of drug resistance becomes a serious problem. This review mainly outlines the FGFR family functions, related pathways, and therapeutic agents in tumors with the aim of obtaining better outcomes for cancer patients with FGFR changes. The information provided in this review may provide additional therapeutic ideas for tumor patients with FGFR abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Liu
- Cancer CenterIntegrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Jiyu Huang
- Cancer CenterIntegrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Weiwei Yan
- Cancer CenterIntegrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Zhen Liu
- Cancer CenterIntegrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
- Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and DegradationBasic School of Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Shu Liu
- Department of Breast SurgeryThe Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical UniversityGuiyangGuizhouChina
| | - Weiyi Fang
- Cancer CenterIntegrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Markezana A, Paldor M, Liao H, Ahmed M, Zorde-Khvalevsky E, Rozenblum N, Stechele M, Salvermoser L, Laville F, Goldmann S, Rosenberg N, Andrasina T, Ricke J, Galun E, Goldberg SN. Fibroblast growth factors induce hepatic tumorigenesis post radiofrequency ablation. Sci Rep 2023; 13:16341. [PMID: 37770545 PMCID: PMC10539492 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42819-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is used to treat focal tumors in the liver and other organs. Despite potential advantages over surgery, hepatic RFA can promote local and distant tumor growth by activating pro-tumorigenic growth factor and cytokines. Thus, strategies to identify and suppress pro-oncogenic effects of RFA are urgently required to further improve the therapeutic effect. Here, the proliferative effect of plasma of Hepatocellular carcinoma or colorectal carcinoma patients 90 min post-RFA was tested on HCC cell lines, demonstrating significant cellular proliferation compared to baseline plasma. Multiplex ELISA screening demonstrated increased plasma pro-tumorigenic growth factors and cytokines including the FGF protein family which uniquely and selectively activated HepG2. Primary mouse and immortalized human hepatocytes were then subjected to moderate hyperthermia in-vitro, mimicking thermal stress induced during ablation in the peri-ablational normal tissue. Resultant culture medium induced proliferation of multiple cancer cell lines. Subsequent non-biased protein array revealed that these hepatocytes subjected to moderate hyperthermia also excrete a similar wide spectrum of growth factors. Recombinant FGF-2 activated multiple cell lines. FGFR inhibitor significantly reduced liver tumor load post-RFA in MDR2-KO inflammation-induced HCC mouse model. Thus, Liver RFA can induce tumorigenesis via the FGF signaling pathway, and its inhibition suppresses HCC development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelia Markezana
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Mor Paldor
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Haixing Liao
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Muneeb Ahmed
- Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elina Zorde-Khvalevsky
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nir Rozenblum
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Matthias Stechele
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Salvermoser
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Flinn Laville
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Salome Goldmann
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nofar Rosenberg
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Tomas Andrasina
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Eithan Galun
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Shraga Nahum Goldberg
- The Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel.
- Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Division of Image-Guided Therapy and Interventional Oncology, Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Forster S, Radpour R, Ochsenbein AF. Molecular and immunological mechanisms of clonal evolution in multiple myeloma. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1243997. [PMID: 37744361 PMCID: PMC10516567 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1243997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the proliferation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow (BM). It is known that early genetic mutations in post-germinal center B/plasma cells are the cause of myelomagenesis. The acquisition of additional chromosomal abnormalities and distinct mutations further promote the outgrowth of malignant plasma cell populations that are resistant to conventional treatments, finally resulting in relapsed and therapy-refractory terminal stages of MM. In addition, myeloma cells are supported by autocrine signaling pathways and the tumor microenvironment (TME), which consists of diverse cell types such as stromal cells, immune cells, and components of the extracellular matrix. The TME provides essential signals and stimuli that induce proliferation and/or prevent apoptosis. In particular, the molecular pathways by which MM cells interact with the TME are crucial for the development of MM. To generate successful therapies and prevent MM recurrence, a thorough understanding of the molecular mechanisms that drive MM progression and therapy resistance is essential. In this review, we summarize key mechanisms that promote myelomagenesis and drive the clonal expansion in the course of MM progression such as autocrine signaling cascades, as well as direct and indirect interactions between the TME and malignant plasma cells. In addition, we highlight drug-resistance mechanisms and emerging therapies that are currently tested in clinical trials to overcome therapy-refractory MM stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Forster
- Tumor Immunology, Department for BioMedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ramin Radpour
- Tumor Immunology, Department for BioMedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Adrian F. Ochsenbein
- Tumor Immunology, Department for BioMedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hiranuma K, Asami Y, Kato MK, Murakami N, Shimada Y, Matsuda M, Yazaki S, Fujii E, Sudo K, Kuno I, Komatsu M, Hamamoto R, Makinoshima H, Matsumoto K, Ishikawa M, Kohno T, Terao Y, Itakura A, Yoshida H, Shiraishi K, Kato T. Rare FGFR fusion genes in cervical cancer and transcriptome-based subgrouping of patients with a poor prognosis. Cancer Med 2023; 12:17835-17848. [PMID: 37537783 PMCID: PMC10524028 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although cervical cancer is often characterized as preventable, its incidence continues to increase in low- and middle-income countries, underscoring the need to develop novel therapeutics for this disease.This study assessed the distribution of fusion genes across cancer types and used an RNA-based classification to divide cervical cancer patients with a poor prognosis into subgroups. MATERIAL AND METHODS RNA sequencing of 116 patients with cervical cancer was conducted. Fusion genes were extracted using StarFusion program. To identify a high-risk group for recurrence, 65 patients who received postoperative adjuvant therapy were subjected to non-negative matrix factorization to identify differentially expressed genes between recurrent and nonrecurrent groups. RESULTS We identified three cases with FGFR3-TACC3 and one with GOPC-ROS1 fusion genes as potential targets. A search of publicly available data from cBioPortal (21,789 cases) and the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (32,608 cases) showed that the FGFR3 fusion is present in 1.5% and 0.6% of patients with cervical cancer, respectively. The frequency of the FGFR3 fusion gene was higher in cervical cancer than in other cancers, regardless of ethnicity. Non-negative matrix factorization identified that the patients were classified into four Basis groups. Pathway enrichment analysis identified more extracellular matrix kinetics dysregulation in Basis 3 and more immune system dysregulation in Basis 4 than in the good prognosis group. CIBERSORT analysis showed that the fraction of M1 macrophages was lower in the poor prognosis group than in the good prognosis group. CONCLUSIONS The distribution of FGFR fusion genes in patients with cervical cancer was determined by RNA-based analysis and used to classify patients into clinically relevant subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kengo Hiranuma
- Division of Genome BiologyNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyJuntendo University Faculty of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yuka Asami
- Division of Genome BiologyNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyShowa University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Mayumi Kobayashi Kato
- Division of Genome BiologyNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
- Department of GynecologyNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Yoko Shimada
- Division of Genome BiologyNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
| | - Maiko Matsuda
- Division of Genome BiologyNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
| | - Shu Yazaki
- Division of Genome BiologyNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
- Department of Medical OncologyNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Erisa Fujii
- Division of Genome BiologyNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
- Department of GynecologyNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Kazuki Sudo
- Department of Medical OncologyNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Ikumi Kuno
- Department of GynecologyNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Masaaki Komatsu
- Division of Medical AI Research and DevelopmentNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
- Cancer Translational Research TeamRIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence ProjectTokyoJapan
| | - Ryuji Hamamoto
- Division of Medical AI Research and DevelopmentNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
- Cancer Translational Research TeamRIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence ProjectTokyoJapan
| | | | - Koji Matsumoto
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyShowa University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Mitsuya Ishikawa
- Department of GynecologyNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Takashi Kohno
- Division of Genome BiologyNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
| | - Yasuhisa Terao
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyJuntendo University Faculty of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Atsuo Itakura
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyJuntendo University Faculty of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Diagnostic PathologyNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Kouya Shiraishi
- Division of Genome BiologyNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
- Department of Clinical GenomicsNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
| | - Tomoyasu Kato
- Department of GynecologyNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cui G, Qu D, Bai Y, Sun X, Li Y, Yang Y. Postoperative pathological complete response in a patient with PD‑L1‑negative stage IIIB lung squamous cell carcinoma following neoadjuvant tislelizumab treatment combined with chemotherapy: A case report and literature review. Oncol Lett 2023; 26:388. [PMID: 37559583 PMCID: PMC10407863 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.13974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncological treatment has increased in recent years. The therapeutic strategy of targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway has altered the management of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Tislelizumab, a novel anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody developed in China, has demonstrated efficacy in treating advanced NSCLC. However, its potential role as a neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced NSCLC has not been definitively established. Current guidelines do not specify which patient populations may gain the most benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy coupled with chemotherapy, nor do they indicate the optimal timing, dose or duration of adjuvant maintenance therapy post-NSCLC surgery. Similarly, data concerning the safety and practicability of surgical resection following neoadjuvant tislelizumab treatment for NSCLC remain limited. The present study describes the case of a patient diagnosed with stage IIIB NSCLC, which was initially deemed unresectable. A preoperative biopsy of the tumor mass revealed squamous cell carcinoma and a negative PD-L1 gene test. Notably, after two cycles of neoadjuvant tislelizumab treatment coupled with chemotherapy, the tumor exhibited marked shrinkage. This permitted the patient to undergo thoracoscopic radical lung cancer resection, which resulted in a pathological complete response. Postoperative pathology identified a large infiltration of lymphoplasmacytic cells and foamy histiocytes. The patient experienced grade 2 myelosuppression, a condition that was successfully addressed with the administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The present case indicates the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant immunotherapy integrated with chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced, PD-L1-negative NSCLC prior to surgical intervention. Moreover, the case suggests the potential of this therapeutic combination to alter the tumor microenvironment. However, the generalization of these findings necessitates further validation through randomized multicenter trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanghua Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 1500811, P.R. China
| | - Di Qu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 1500811, P.R. China
| | - Yun Bai
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 1500811, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoke Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 1500811, P.R. China
| | - Yingjue Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 1500811, P.R. China
| | - Yu Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 1500811, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Neureiter D, Ellinghaus P, Ocker M. FGFR inhibitor resistance in cholangiocarcinoma: current understanding and future directions. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1833-1837. [PMID: 37710362 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2259802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Neureiter
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University/University Hospital Salzburg (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Peter Ellinghaus
- Global Clinical Development Oncology, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Matthias Ocker
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology Campus Charité Mitte, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- EO Translational Insights Consulting GmbH, Berlin, Germany
- Tacalyx GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Benjamin DJ, Hsu R. Treatment approaches for FGFR-altered urothelial carcinoma: targeted therapies and immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1258388. [PMID: 37675102 PMCID: PMC10477976 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1258388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma has dramatically changed over the past decade with the approval of several therapies from multiple drug classes including immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, and antibody drug conjugates. Although next generation sequencing of urothelial carcinoma has revealed multiple recurring mutations, only one targeted therapy has been developed and approved to date. Erdafitinib, a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, has been approved for treating patients with select FGFR2 and FGFR3 alterations and fusions since 2019. Since then, emerging data has demonstrated efficacy of combining erdafitinib with immunotherapy in treating FGFR-altered urothelial carcinoma. Ongoing trials are evaluating the use of erdafitinib in non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma as well as in combination with enfortumab vedotin in the metastatic setting, while other FGFR targeted agents such as infigratinib, AZD4547, rogaratinib and pemigatinib continue to be in development. Future challenges will include strategies to overcome FGFR acquired resistance and efficacy and safety of combination therapies with erdafitinib and other FGFR targeted agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert Hsu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Morrison L, Okines A. Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3801. [PMID: 37568617 PMCID: PMC10417818 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Until recently, despite its heterogenous biology, metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) was treated as a single entity, with successive lines of palliative chemotherapy being the only systemic option. Significant gene expression studies have demonstrated the diversity of TNBC, but effective differential targeting of the four main (Basal-like 1 and 2, mesenchymal and luminal androgen receptor) molecular sub-types has largely eluded researchers. The introduction of immunotherapy, currently useful only for patients with PD-L1 positive cancers, led to the stratification of first-line therapy using this immunohistochemical biomarker. Germline BRCA gene mutations can also be targeted with PARP inhibitors in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings. In contrast, the benefit of the anti-Trop-2 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) does not appear confined to patients with tumours expressing high levels of Trop-2, leading to its potential utility for any patient with an estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Most recently, low levels of HER2 expression, detected in up to 60% of TNBC, predicts benefit from the potent HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), defining an additional treatment option for this sub-group. Regrettably, despite recent advances, the median survival of TNBC continues to lag far behind the approximately 5 years now expected for patients with ER-positive or HER2-positive breast cancers. We review the data supporting immunotherapy, ADCs, and targeted agents in subgroups of patients with TNBC, and current clinical trials that may pave the way to further advances in this challenging disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alicia Okines
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Du S, Zhang Y, Xu J. Current progress in cancer treatment by targeting FGFR signaling. Cancer Biol Med 2023; 20:j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0137. [PMID: 37493315 PMCID: PMC10466438 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Du
- Department of Graduate Administration, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Graduate Administration, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Jianming Xu
- Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100071, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nitulescu GM, Stancov G, Seremet OC, Nitulescu G, Mihai DP, Duta-Bratu CG, Barbuceanu SF, Olaru OT. The Importance of the Pyrazole Scaffold in the Design of Protein Kinases Inhibitors as Targeted Anticancer Therapies. Molecules 2023; 28:5359. [PMID: 37513232 PMCID: PMC10385367 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28145359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The altered activation or overexpression of protein kinases (PKs) is a major subject of research in oncology and their inhibition using small molecules, protein kinases inhibitors (PKI) is the best available option for the cure of cancer. The pyrazole ring is extensively employed in the field of medicinal chemistry and drug development strategies, playing a vital role as a fundamental framework in the structure of various PKIs. This scaffold holds major importance and is considered a privileged structure based on its synthetic accessibility, drug-like properties, and its versatile bioisosteric replacement function. It has proven to play a key role in many PKI, such as the inhibitors of Akt, Aurora kinases, MAPK, B-raf, JAK, Bcr-Abl, c-Met, PDGFR, FGFRT, and RET. Of the 74 small molecule PKI approved by the US FDA, 8 contain a pyrazole ring: Avapritinib, Asciminib, Crizotinib, Encorafenib, Erdafitinib, Pralsetinib, Pirtobrutinib, and Ruxolitinib. The focus of this review is on the importance of the unfused pyrazole ring within the clinically tested PKI and on the additional required elements of their chemical structures. Related important pyrazole fused scaffolds like indazole, pyrrolo[1,2-b]pyrazole, pyrazolo[4,3-b]pyridine, pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine, or pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine are beyond the subject of this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Georgiana Nitulescu
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Traian Vuia 6, 020956 Bucharest, Romania; (G.M.N.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nicolò E, Munoz-Arcos L, Vagia E, D'Amico P, Reduzzi C, Donahue J, Lorico-Rappa M, Manai M, Behdad A, Zhang Y, Curigliano G, Shah A, Cristofanilli M. Circulating Tumor DNA and Unique Actionable Genomic Alterations in the Longitudinal Monitoring of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Case of FGFR2-KIAA1598 Gene Fusion. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200702. [PMID: 37437229 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Nicolò
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Laura Munoz-Arcos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Elena Vagia
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Paolo D'Amico
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Carolina Reduzzi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Jeannine Donahue
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Marco Lorico-Rappa
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Royal College of Surgeons School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maroua Manai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Amir Behdad
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Youbin Zhang
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ami Shah
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Massimo Cristofanilli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
O'Dwyer PJ, Gray RJ, Flaherty KT, Chen AP, Li S, Wang V, McShane LM, Patton DR, Tricoli JV, Williams PM, Iafrate AJ, Sklar J, Mitchell EP, Takebe N, Sims DJ, Coffey B, Fu T, Routbort M, Rubinstein LV, Little RF, Arteaga CL, Marinucci D, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Harris LN, Doroshow JH. The NCI-MATCH trial: lessons for precision oncology. Nat Med 2023; 29:1349-1357. [PMID: 37322121 PMCID: PMC10612141 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02379-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The NCI-MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) trial ( NCT02465060 ) was launched in 2015 as a genomically driven, signal-seeking precision medicine platform trial-largely for patients with treatment-refractory, malignant solid tumors. Having completed in 2023, it remains one of the largest tumor-agnostic, precision oncology trials undertaken to date. Nearly 6,000 patients underwent screening and molecular testing, with a total of 1,593 patients (inclusive of continued accrual from standard next-generation sequencing) being assigned to one of 38 substudies. Each substudy was a phase 2 trial of a therapy matched to a genomic alteration, with a primary endpoint of objective tumor response by RECIST criteria. In this Perspective, we summarize the outcomes of the initial 27 substudies in NCI-MATCH, which met its signal-seeking objective with 7/27 positive substudies (25.9%). We discuss key aspects of the design and operational conduct of the trial, highlighting important lessons for future precision medicine studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert J Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shuli Li
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David R Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - P Mickey Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - A John Iafrate
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Naoko Takebe
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David J Sims
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Brent Coffey
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tony Fu
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Mark Routbort
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard F Little
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Barbara A Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James H Doroshow
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Colomer R, Miranda J, Romero-Laorden N, Hornedo J, González-Cortijo L, Mouron S, Bueno MJ, Mondéjar R, Quintela-Fandino M. Usefulness and real-world outcomes of next generation sequencing testing in patients with cancer: an observational study on the impact of selection based on clinical judgement. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 60:102029. [PMID: 37304496 PMCID: PMC10248077 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels are increasingly used in advanced patients with cancer to guide therapy. There is, however, controversy about when should these panels be used, and about their impact on the clinical course. Methods In an observational study of 139 patients with cancer having an NGS test [from January 1st, 2017 to December 30th, 2020, in two hospitals (Hospital Universitario de La Princesa and Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid) from Spain], we evaluated whether the clinical course (progression-free survival, PFS) was influenced by drug-based criteria [druggable alterations, receiving a recommended drug, having a favourable ESCAT category (ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets)] or clinical judgement criteria. Findings In 111 of 139 cases that were successfully profiled, PFS was not significantly influenced by either having druggable alterations [median PFS for patients with druggable alterations was 170 (95% C.I.: 139-200) days compared to 299 (95% C.I.: 114-483) for those without; p = 0.37], receiving a proposed matching agent [median PFS for patients receiving a genomics-informed drug was 195 days (95% C.I.: 144-245), compared with 156 days for those that did not (95% C.I.: 85-226); p = 0.50], or having favourable ESCAT categories [median PFS for patients with ESCAT I-III was 183 days (95% C.I.: 104-261), compared with 180 (95% C.I.:144-215) for patients with ESCAT IV-X; p = 0.87]. In contrast, NGS testing performed within clinical judgement showed a significantly improved PFS [median PFS for patients that were profiled under the recommended scenarios was 319 days (95% C.I.: 0-658), compared to 123 days (95% C.I.: 89-156) in the non-recommended categories; p = 0.0020]. Interpretation According to our data, real-world outcomes after NGS testing provide evidence of the benefit of clinical judgement in patients with either advanced cancers that routinely need multiple genetic markers, patients with advanced rare cancers, or patients that are screened for molecular clinical trials. By contrast, NGS does not seem to be valuable when performed in cases with a poor PS, rapidly progressing cancer, short expected lifetime, or cases with no standard therapeutic options. Funding RC, NR-L and MQF are recipients of the PMP22/00032 grant, funded by the ISCIII and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). The study also received funds from the CRIS Contra el Cancer Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon Colomer
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
- Chair of Personalised Precision Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (UAM – Fundación Instituto Roche), Madrid, Spain
- Medical Oncology Division, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Breast Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Miranda
- University Hospital Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Silvana Mouron
- Breast Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria J. Bueno
- Breast Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebeca Mondéjar
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
- Chair of Personalised Precision Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (UAM – Fundación Instituto Roche), Madrid, Spain
- Medical Oncology Division, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Quintela-Fandino
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
- Chair of Personalised Precision Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (UAM – Fundación Instituto Roche), Madrid, Spain
- Breast Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Qin BD, Jiao XD, Wang Z, Liu K, Wu Y, Ling Y, Chen SQ, Zhong X, Duan XP, Qin WX, Xue L, Guo ZH, Zang YS. Pan-cancer efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in refractory solid tumor: A single-arm, open-label, phase II trial. Int J Cancer 2023. [PMID: 37155342 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
The combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of refractory solid tumor has not been well investigated. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new regimen of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor to treat refractory solid tumor. APICAL-RST is an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial in patients with heavily treated, refractory, metastatic solid tumor. Eligible patients experienced disease progression during prior therapy without further effective regimen. All patients received anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitor. The primary endpoints were objective response and disease control rates. The secondary endpoints included the ratio of progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)/PFS1, overall survival (OS) and safety. Forty-one patients were recruited in our study; 9 patients achieved a confirmed partial response and 21 patients had stable disease. Objective response rate and disease control rate were 22.0% and 73.2% in the intention-to-treat cohort, and 24.3% and 81.1% in the efficacy-evaluable cohort, respectively. A total of 63.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46.9%-77.4%) of the patients (26/41) presented PFS2/PFS1 >1.3. The median OS was 16.8 months (range: 8.23-24.4), and the 12- and 36-month OS rates were 62.8% and 28.9%, respectively. No significant association was observed between concomitant mutation and efficacy. Thirty-one (75.6%) patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event. The most common adverse events were hypothyroidism, hand-foot syndrome and malaise. This phase II trial showed that anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor exhibits favorable efficacy and tolerability in patients with refractory solid tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao-Dong Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Jiao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhan Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ke Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Ling
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shi-Qi Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xue Zhong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Peng Duan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Xing Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Xue
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen-Hong Guo
- National Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology & Institute of Immunology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan-Sheng Zang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhang W, Lee AM, Jena S, Huang Y, Ho Y, Tietz KT, Miller CR, Su MC, Mentzer J, Ling AL, Li Y, Dehm SM, Huang RS. Computational drug discovery for castration-resistant prostate cancers through in vitro drug response modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2218522120. [PMID: 37068243 PMCID: PMC10151558 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2218522120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy and a leading cause of cancer deaths in US men. Many PC cases metastasize and develop resistance to systemic hormonal therapy, a stage known as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective therapeutic strategies for CRPC. Traditional drug discovery pipelines require significant time and capital input, which highlights a need for novel methods to evaluate the repositioning potential of existing drugs. Here, we present a computational framework to predict drug sensitivities of clinical CRPC tumors to various existing compounds and identify treatment options with high potential for clinical impact. We applied this method to a CRPC patient cohort and nominated drugs to combat resistance to hormonal therapies including abiraterone and enzalutamide. The utility of this method was demonstrated by nomination of multiple drugs that are currently undergoing clinical trials for CRPC. Additionally, this method identified the tetracycline derivative COL-3, for which we validated higher efficacy in an isogenic cell line model of enzalutamide-resistant vs. enzalutamide-sensitive CRPC. In enzalutamide-resistant CRPC cells, COL-3 displayed higher activity for inhibiting cell growth and migration, and for inducing G1-phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the utility of a computational framework for independent validation of drugs being tested in CRPC clinical trials, and for nominating drugs with enhanced biological activity in models of enzalutamide-resistant CRPC. The efficiency of this method relative to traditional drug development approaches indicates a high potential for accelerating drug development for CRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Zhang
- Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
- The Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Adam M. Lee
- The Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Sampreeti Jena
- The Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Yingbo Huang
- The Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Yeung Ho
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, The University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Kiel T. Tietz
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, The University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Conor R. Miller
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, The University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Mei-Chi Su
- The Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Joshua Mentzer
- The Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Alexander L. Ling
- The Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Yingming Li
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, The University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Scott M. Dehm
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, The University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - R. Stephanie Huang
- Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
- The Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Meric-Bernstam F, Ford JM, O'Dwyer PJ, Shapiro GI, McShane LM, Freidlin B, O'Cearbhaill RE, George S, Glade-Bender J, Lyman GH, Tricoli JV, Patton D, Hamilton SR, Gray RJ, Hawkins DS, Ramineni B, Flaherty KT, Grivas P, Yap TA, Berlin J, Doroshow JH, Harris LN, Moscow JA. National Cancer Institute Combination Therapy Platform Trial with Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (ComboMATCH). Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:1412-1422. [PMID: 36662819 PMCID: PMC10102840 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, multiple trials, including the precision medicine trial National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH, EAY131, NCT02465060) have sought to determine if treating cancer based on specific genomic alterations is effective, irrespective of the cancer histology. Although many therapies are now approved for the treatment of cancers harboring specific genomic alterations, most patients do not respond to therapies targeting a single alteration. Further, when antitumor responses do occur, they are often not durable due to the development of drug resistance. Therefore, there is a great need to identify rational combination therapies that may be more effective. To address this need, the NCI and National Clinical Trials Network have developed NCI-ComboMATCH, the successor to NCI-MATCH. Like the original trial, NCI-ComboMATCH is a signal-seeking study. The goal of ComboMATCH is to overcome drug resistance to single-agent therapy and/or utilize novel synergies to increase efficacy by developing genomically-directed combination therapies, supported by strong preclinical in vivo evidence. Although NCI-MATCH was mainly comprised of multiple single-arm studies, NCI-ComboMATCH tests combination therapy, evaluating both combination of targeted agents as well as combinations of targeted therapy with chemotherapy. Although NCI-MATCH was histology agnostic with selected tumor exclusions, ComboMATCH has histology-specific and histology-agnostic arms. Although NCI-MATCH consisted of single-arm studies, ComboMATCH utilizes single-arm as well as randomized designs. NCI-MATCH had a separate, parallel Pediatric MATCH trial, whereas ComboMATCH will include children within the same trial. We present rationale, scientific principles, study design, and logistics supporting the ComboMATCH study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James M. Ford
- Department of Medicine – Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Geoffrey I. Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Boris Freidlin
- Biometric Research Program, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Roisin E. O'Cearbhaill
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Suzanne George
- Sarcoma and Bone Oncology Division, Medical Oncology Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Julia Glade-Bender
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gary H. Lyman
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - James V. Tricoli
- Diagnostic Biomarkers and Technology Branch, Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - David Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Stanley R. Hamilton
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas S. Hawkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bhanumati Ramineni
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Regulatory Affairs Branch, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Keith T. Flaherty
- Division of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Timothy A. Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jordan Berlin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - James H. Doroshow
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey A. Moscow
- Investigational Drug Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wang ZW, Zou FM, Wang AL, Yang J, Jin R, Wang BL, Shen LJ, Qi S, Liu J, Liu J, Wang WC, Liu QS. Repurposing of the FGFR inhibitor AZD4547 as a potent inhibitor of necroptosis by selectively targeting RIPK1. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2023; 44:801-810. [PMID: 36216899 PMCID: PMC10042809 DOI: 10.1038/s41401-022-00993-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrosis involved in various pathological diseases. The process of necroptosis is controlled by receptor-interacting kinase 1 (RIPK1), RIPK3, and pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL), and pharmacological inhibition of these kinases has been shown to have therapeutic potentials in a variety of diseases. In this study, using drug repurposing strategy combined with high-throughput screening (HTS), we discovered that AZD4547, a previously reported FGFR inhibitor, is able to interfere with necroptosis through direct targeting of RIPK1 kinase. In both human and mouse cell models, AZD4547 blocked RIPK1-dependent necroptosis. In addition, AZD4547 rescued animals from TNF-induced lethal shock and inflammatory responses. Together, our study demonstrates that AZD4547 is a potent and selective inhibitor of RIPK1 with therapeutic potential for the treatment of inflammatory disorders that involve necroptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuo-Wei Wang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China
| | - Feng-Ming Zou
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
- Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
| | - Ao-Li Wang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
- Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
- Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
| | - Rui Jin
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
- Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
| | - Bei-Lei Wang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
- Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
| | - Li-Juan Shen
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China
| | - Shuang Qi
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
- Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
| | - Juan Liu
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
- Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China.
- Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China.
| | - Wen-Chao Wang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China.
- Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China.
| | - Qing-Song Liu
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China.
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China.
- Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China.
- Precision Medicine Research Laboratory of Anhui Province, Hefei, 230088, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zhou I, Plana D, Palmer AC. Tumor-specific activity of precision medicines in the NCI-MATCH trial. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.03.30.23287951. [PMID: 37034644 PMCID: PMC10081392 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.30.23287951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Background NCI-MATCH is a precision medicine basket trial designed to test the effectiveness of treating cancers based on specific genetic changes in patients' tumors, regardless of cancer type. Multiple subprotocols have each tested different targeted therapies matched to specific genetic aberrations. Most subprotocols exhibited low rates of tumor shrinkage as evaluated across all tumor types enrolled. We hypothesized that these results may arise because these precision cancer therapies have tumor type-specific efficacy, as is common among other cancer therapies. Methods To test the hypothesis that certain tumor types are more sensitive to specific therapies than other tumor types, we applied permutation testing to tumor volume change and progression-free survival data from ten published NCI-MATCH subprotocols (together n=435 patients). False discovery rate was controlled by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Results Six of ten subprotocols exhibited statistically significant evidence of tumor-specific drug sensitivity, four of which were previously considered negative based on response rate across all tumors. This signal-finding analysis highlights potential uses of FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition in urothelial carcinomas with actionable FGFR aberrations, MEK inhibition in lung cancers with BRAF non-V600E mutations, and MEK inhibition in cholangiocarcinomas with NRAS mutations. Conclusions These findings support the value of basket trials because even when precision medicines do not have tumor-agnostic activity, basket trials can identify tumor-specific activity for future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivvone Zhou
- Department of Pharmacology, Computational Medicine Program, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
| | - Deborah Plana
- Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, and the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, USA
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA
| | - Adam C. Palmer
- Department of Pharmacology, Computational Medicine Program, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Song IW, Vo HH, Chen YS, Baysal MA, Kahle M, Johnson A, Tsimberidou AM. Precision Oncology: Evolving Clinical Trials across Tumor Types. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1967. [PMID: 37046628 PMCID: PMC10093499 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in molecular technologies and targeted therapeutics have accelerated the implementation of precision oncology, resulting in improved clinical outcomes in selected patients. The use of next-generation sequencing and assessments of immune and other biomarkers helps optimize patient treatment selection. In this review, selected precision oncology trials including the IMPACT, SHIVA, IMPACT2, NCI-MPACT, TAPUR, DRUP, and NCI-MATCH studies are summarized, and their challenges and opportunities are discussed. Brief summaries of the new ComboMATCH, MyeloMATCH, and iMATCH studies, which follow the example of NCI-MATCH, are also included. Despite the progress made, precision oncology is inaccessible to many patients with cancer. Some patients' tumors may not respond to these treatments, owing to the complexity of carcinogenesis, the use of ineffective therapies, or unknown mechanisms of tumor resistance to treatment. The implementation of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and bioinformatic analyses of complex multi-omic data may improve the accuracy of tumor characterization, and if used strategically with caution, may accelerate the implementation of precision medicine. Clinical trials in precision oncology continue to evolve, improving outcomes and expediting the identification of curative strategies for patients with cancer. Despite the existing challenges, significant progress has been made in the past twenty years, demonstrating the benefit of precision oncology in many patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Wen Song
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ying-Shiuan Chen
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mehmet A. Baysal
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael Kahle
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Amber Johnson
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Apostolia M. Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ashai N, Swain SM. Post-CDK 4/6 Inhibitor Therapy: Current Agents and Novel Targets. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061855. [PMID: 36980743 PMCID: PMC10046856 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Front-line therapy for advanced and metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is endocrine therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). The introduction of CDK4/6i has dramatically improved progression-free survival and, in some cases, overall survival. The optimal sequencing of post-front-line therapy must be personalized to patients' overall health and tumor biology. This paper reviews approved next lines of therapy for mBC and available data on efficacy post-progression on CDK4/6i. Given the success of endocrine front-line therapy, there has been an expansion in therapies under clinical investigation targeting the estrogen receptor in novel ways. There are also clinical trials ongoing attempting to overcome CDK4/6i resistance. This paper will review these drugs under investigation, review efficacy data when possible, and provide descriptions of the adverse events reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Ashai
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and MedStar Health, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Sandra M Swain
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and MedStar Health, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ma F, Zhu X, Niu Y, Nai A, Bashir S, Xiong Y, Dong Y, Li Y, Song J, Xu M. FGFR inhibitors combined with nab-paclitaxel - A promising strategy to treat non-small cell lung cancer and overcome resistance. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1088444. [PMID: 36845692 PMCID: PMC9950728 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1088444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer has high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide, and NSCLC accounts for 85% of all lung cancer cases. Despite the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, many NSCLC patients do not effectively respond to treatment, and new treatment strategies are urgently needed. Aberrant activation of the FGFR signaling pathway is closely related to the initiation and progression of tumors. AZD4547, which is a selective inhibitor of FGFR 1-3, can suppress the growth of tumor cells with deregulated FGFR expression in vivo and in vitro. However, further exploration is needed to determine whether AZD4547 can play an antiproliferative role in tumor cells without deregulated FGFR expression. We investigated the antiproliferative effect of AZD4547 on NSCLC cells without deregulated FGFR expression. In vivo and in vitro experiments showed that AZD4547 exerted a weak antiproliferative effect on NSCLC cells without deregulated FGFR expression, but it significantly enhanced the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to nab-paclitaxel. We found that AZD4547 combined with nab-paclitaxel suppressed the phosphorylation of the MAPK signaling pathway, led to cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase, promoted apoptosis, and inhibited cell proliferation more substantially than nab-paclitaxel alone. These findings provide insight into the rational use of FGFR inhibitors and personalized treatment of NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Ma
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China,Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, China
| | - Xinhai Zhu
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuchun Niu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Aitao Nai
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanhua University, Hengyang, China
| | - Shoaib Bashir
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Xiong
- Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yunlong Dong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tianjin Baodi Hospital, Baodi Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yin Li
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China,*Correspondence: Meng Xu, ; Jian Song, ; Yin Li,
| | - Jian Song
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Torch Development Zone People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, China,*Correspondence: Meng Xu, ; Jian Song, ; Yin Li,
| | - Meng Xu
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China,*Correspondence: Meng Xu, ; Jian Song, ; Yin Li,
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mueller SH, Lai AG, Valkovskaya M, Michailidou K, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Dennis J, Lush M, Abu-Ful Z, Ahearn TU, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova NN, Arndt V, Aronson KJ, Augustinsson A, Baert T, Freeman LEB, Beckmann MW, Behrens S, Benitez J, Bermisheva M, Blomqvist C, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Bonanni B, Brenner H, Brucker SY, Buys SS, Castelao JE, Chan TL, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Choi JY, Chung WK, Colonna SV, Cornelissen S, Couch FJ, Czene K, Daly MB, Devilee P, Dörk T, Dossus L, Dwek M, Eccles DM, Ekici AB, Eliassen AH, Engel C, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Fletcher O, Flyger H, Gago-Dominguez M, Gao YT, García-Closas M, García-Sáenz JA, Genkinger J, Gentry-Maharaj A, Grassmann F, Guénel P, Gündert M, Haeberle L, Hahnen E, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Hall P, Harkness EF, Harrington PA, Hartikainen JM, Hartman M, Hein A, Ho WK, Hooning MJ, Hoppe R, Hopper JL, Houlston RS, Howell A, Hunter DJ, Huo D, Ito H, Iwasaki M, Jakubowska A, Janni W, John EM, Jones ME, Jung A, Kaaks R, Kang D, Khusnutdinova EK, Kim SW, Kitahara CM, Koutros S, Kraft P, Kristensen VN, Kubelka-Sabit K, Kurian AW, Kwong A, Lacey JV, Lambrechts D, Le Marchand L, Li J, Linet M, Lo WY, Long J, Lophatananon A, Mannermaa A, Manoochehri M, Margolin S, Matsuo K, Mavroudis D, Menon U, Muir K, Murphy RA, Nevanlinna H, Newman WG, Niederacher D, O'Brien KM, Obi N, Offit K, Olopade OI, Olshan AF, Olsson H, Park SK, Patel AV, Patel A, Perou CM, Peto J, Pharoah PDP, Plaseska-Karanfilska D, Presneau N, Rack B, Radice P, Ramachandran D, Rashid MU, Rennert G, Romero A, Ruddy KJ, Ruebner M, Saloustros E, Sandler DP, Sawyer EJ, Schmidt MK, Schmutzler RK, Schneider MO, Scott C, Shah M, Sharma P, Shen CY, Shu XO, Simard J, Surowy H, Tamimi RM, Tapper WJ, Taylor JA, Teo SH, Teras LR, Toland AE, Tollenaar RAEM, Torres D, Torres-Mejía G, Troester MA, Truong T, Vachon CM, Vijai J, Weinberg CR, Wendt C, Winqvist R, Wolk A, Wu AH, Yamaji T, Yang XR, Yu JC, Zheng W, Ziogas A, Ziv E, Dunning AM, Easton DF, Hemingway H, Hamann U, Kuchenbaecker KB. Aggregation tests identify new gene associations with breast cancer in populations with diverse ancestry. Genome Med 2023; 15:7. [PMID: 36703164 PMCID: PMC9878779 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-022-01152-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-frequency variants play an important role in breast cancer (BC) susceptibility. Gene-based methods can increase power by combining multiple variants in the same gene and help identify target genes. METHODS We evaluated the potential of gene-based aggregation in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium cohorts including 83,471 cases and 59,199 controls. Low-frequency variants were aggregated for individual genes' coding and regulatory regions. Association results in European ancestry samples were compared to single-marker association results in the same cohort. Gene-based associations were also combined in meta-analysis across individuals with European, Asian, African, and Latin American and Hispanic ancestry. RESULTS In European ancestry samples, 14 genes were significantly associated (q < 0.05) with BC. Of those, two genes, FMNL3 (P = 6.11 × 10-6) and AC058822.1 (P = 1.47 × 10-4), represent new associations. High FMNL3 expression has previously been linked to poor prognosis in several other cancers. Meta-analysis of samples with diverse ancestry discovered further associations including established candidate genes ESR1 and CBLB. Furthermore, literature review and database query found further support for a biologically plausible link with cancer for genes CBLB, FMNL3, FGFR2, LSP1, MAP3K1, and SRGAP2C. CONCLUSIONS Using extended gene-based aggregation tests including coding and regulatory variation, we report identification of plausible target genes for previously identified single-marker associations with BC as well as the discovery of novel genes implicated in BC development. Including multi ancestral cohorts in this study enabled the identification of otherwise missed disease associations as ESR1 (P = 1.31 × 10-5), demonstrating the importance of diversifying study cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alvina G Lai
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, 2371, Nicosia, Cyprus
- Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, 2371, Nicosia, Cyprus
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Michael Lush
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Zomoruda Abu-Ful
- Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, 35254, Haifa, Israel
| | - Thomas U Ahearn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Medicine, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA
| | - Natalia N Antonenkova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, 223040, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristan J Aronson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, and Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Annelie Augustinsson
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 222 42, Lund, Sweden
| | - Thais Baert
- Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Laura E Beane Freeman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Javier Benitez
- Biomedical Network On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), 28029, Madrid, Spain
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Bermisheva
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, 450054, Russia
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00290, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, 70185, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Natalia V Bogdanova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, 223040, Minsk, Belarus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Jose E Castelao
- Oncology and Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS), Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo-SERGAS, 36312, Vigo, Spain
| | - Tsun L Chan
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Ji-Yeob Choi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, 03080, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 03080, Korea
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Sarah V Colonna
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Sten Cornelissen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Laure Dossus
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research On Cancer (IARC-WHO), 69372, Lyon, France
| | - Miriam Dwek
- School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, W1W 6UW, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Arif B Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Heather Eliassen
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, 04107, Leipzig, Germany
- LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Olivia Fletcher
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Genomic Medicine Group, International Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology Group, Fundación Pœblica Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Yu-Tang Gao
- Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - José A García-Sáenz
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jeanine Genkinger
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | | | - Felix Grassmann
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden
- Health and Medical University, 14471, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Team Exposome and Heredity, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Melanie Gündert
- Molecular Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), C08069120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Lothar Haeberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, 118 83, Sšdersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Patricia A Harrington
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Jaana M Hartikainen
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, 70210, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, 70210, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, 119077, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Weang-Kee Ho
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, 43500, Semenyih, Selangor, Malaysia
- Breast Cancer Research Programme, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, 72074, Tübingen, Germany
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Richard S Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - David J Hunter
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Dezheng Huo
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Hidemi Ito
- Division of Cancer Information and Control, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Motoki Iwasaki
- Division of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Audrey Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daehee Kang
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 03080, Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Elza K Khusnutdinova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, 450054, Russia
- Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State University, Ufa, 450000, Russia
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Daerim Saint Mary's Hospital, Seoul, 07442, Korea
| | - Cari M Kitahara
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Stella Koutros
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0450, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, 0379, Oslo, Norway
| | - Katerina Kubelka-Sabit
- Department of Histopathology and Cytology, Clinical Hospital Acibadem Sistina, Skopje, 1000, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Ava Kwong
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Genetics Center, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - James V Lacey
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, 3001, Louvain, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, 3000, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA
| | - Jingmei Li
- Human Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, 138672, Singapore
| | - Martha Linet
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Wing-Yee Lo
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, 72074, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jirong Long
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Artitaya Lophatananon
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, 70210, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, 70210, Kuopio, Finland
- Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mehdi Manoochehri
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology, 118 83, Sšdersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Sšdersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, 711 10, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Usha Menon
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Kenneth Muir
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Rachel A Murphy
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00290, Helsinki, Finland
| | - William G Newman
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Dieter Niederacher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Katie M O'Brien
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Nadia Obi
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | | | - Andrew F Olshan
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 222 42, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sue K Park
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 03080, Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea
- Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Alpa V Patel
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA
| | - Achal Patel
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Charles M Perou
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Julian Peto
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology "Georgi D. Efremov", MASA, Skopje, 1000, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - Nadege Presneau
- School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, W1W 6UW, UK
| | - Brigitte Rack
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori (INT), 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Dhanya Ramachandran
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Muhammad U Rashid
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Basic Sciences, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH & RC), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan
| | - Gad Rennert
- Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, 35254, Haifa, Israel
| | - Atocha Romero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, 28222, Madrid, Spain
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Elinor J Sawyer
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Guy's Campus, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael O Schneider
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christopher Scott
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, 66205, USA
| | - Chen-Yang Shen
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan
- School of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada
| | - Harald Surowy
- Molecular Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), C08069120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - William J Tapper
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Jack A Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
- Epigenetic and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Soo Hwang Teo
- Breast Cancer Research Programme, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Lauren R Teras
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Rob A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Diana Torres
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Human Genetics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 110231, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Gabriela Torres-Mejía
- Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, 62100, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Team Exposome and Heredity, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Celine M Vachon
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Joseph Vijai
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Clarice R Weinberg
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Camilla Wendt
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Sšdersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Robert Winqvist
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, 90570, Oulu, Finland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre Oulu, 90570, Oulu, Finland
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 05, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Taiki Yamaji
- Division of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Xiaohong R Yang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Jyh-Cherng Yu
- Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, 114, Taiwan
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Medicine, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA
| | - Elad Ziv
- Department of Medicine, Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute for Human Genetics, UCSF Helen, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Harry Hemingway
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- Health Data Research UK, University College London, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (UCLH BRC), London, UK
- The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karoline B Kuchenbaecker
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
- UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rebecca VW, Xiao M, Kossenkov A, Godok T, Brown GS, Fingerman D, Alicea GM, Wei M, Ji H, Bravo J, Chen Y, Fane ME, Villanueva J, Nathanson K, Liu Q, Gopal YNV, Davies MA, Herlyn M. Dasatinib Resensitizes MAPK Inhibitor Efficacy in Standard-of-Care Relapsed Melanomas. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.01.20.524923. [PMID: 36711814 PMCID: PMC9882271 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.20.524923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Resistance to combination BRAF/MEK inhibitor (BRAFi/MEKi) therapy arises in nearly every patient with BRAFV600E/K melanoma, despite promising initial responses. Achieving cures in this expanding BRAFi/MEKi-resistant cohort represents one of the greatest challenges to the field; few experience additional durable benefit from immunotherapy and no alternative therapies exist. To better personalize therapy in cancer patients to address therapy relapse, umbrella trials have been initiated whereby genomic sequencing of a panel of potentially actionable targets guide therapy selection for patients; however, the superior efficacy of such approaches remains to be seen. We here test the robustness of the umbrella trial rationale by analyzing relationships between genomic status of a gene and the downstream consequences at the protein level of related pathway, which find poor relationships between mutations, copy number amplification, and protein level. To profile candidate therapeutic strategies that may offer clinical benefit in the context of acquired BRAFi/MEKi resistance, we established a repository of patient-derived xenograft models from heavily pretreated patients with resistance to BRAFi/MEKi and/or immunotherapy (R-PDX). With these R-PDXs, we executed in vivo compound repurposing screens using 11 FDA-approved agents from an NCI-portfolio with pan-RTK, non-RTK and/or PI3K-mTOR specificity. We identify dasatinib as capable of restoring BRAFi/MEKi antitumor efficacy in ~70% of R-PDX tested. A systems-biology analysis indicates elevated baseline protein expression of canonical drivers of therapy resistance (e.g., AXL, YAP, HSP70, phospho-AKT) as predictive of MAPKi/dasatinib sensitivity. We therefore propose that dasatinib-based MAPKi therapy may restore antitumor efficacy in patients that have relapsed to standard-of-care therapy by broadly targeting proteins critical in melanoma therapy escape. Further, we submit that this experimental PDX paradigm could potentially improve preclinical evaluation of therapeutic modalities and augment our ability to identify biomarker-defined patient subsets that may respond to a given clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vito W Rebecca
- The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Min Xiao
- The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Gretchen M Alicea
- The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meihan Wei
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hongkai Ji
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeremy Bravo
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Mitchell E Fane
- The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Qin Liu
- The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Genetic Interference of FGFR3 Impedes Invasion of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Cells by Alleviating RAS/MAPK Signal Activity. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24021776. [PMID: 36675289 PMCID: PMC9863353 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is a less common disease in Western countries but has a high level of prevalence in Asian populations. Compared to bladder cancer, unique etiologic and genomic factors are involved in UTUC. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) up-regulation has been proposed as a promising target for bladder cancer therapy. In this study, we aimed to profile the expression of FGFR3 in Asian and Caucasian UTUC tissues and to evaluate the in vitro therapeutic efficacy of small interference RNA (siRNA)-mediated FGFR3 silencing in UTUC treatment. The FGFR3 expression levels in renal pelvis tissues and microarray sections from Asian and Caucasian patients with UTUC, respectively, were measured via immunohistochemistry. The BFTC-909 and UM-UC-14 UTUC cell lines were used to examine the effects of FGFR3 silencing on proliferation, migration, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker expression, and signaling machinery. FGFR3 expression increased as the TNM stage increased in both Asian and Caucasian UTUC tumors, and no statistical difference was identified between the two groups. In vitro studies demonstrated that FGFR3 siRNA delivery significantly inhibited proliferation and migration and suppressed the expression of EMT markers and transcription factors in UTUC cells. Mechanistically, FGFR3 silencing alleviated the constitutive expression of RAS and the phosphorylation of MAPK signaling mediators, including ERK1/2 and JNK1/2. FGFR3 silencing elicited an apoptosis-inducing effect similar to that of FGFR inhibition. Conclusion: siRNA-targeted FGFR3 expression may impede the expansion and invasion of UTUC cells by alleviating the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway. The genetic interference of FGFR3 expression via siRNA in UTUC cells may constitute a useful therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
|
41
|
Jiao XD, Qin BD, Wang Z, Liu K, Wu Y, Ling Y, Qin WX, Wang MM, Yuan LY, Barreto SG, Kim AW, Mak K, Li H, Xu YY, Qiu XM, Wu M, Jin M, Xu LC, Zhong Y, Yang H, Chen XQ, Zeng Y, Shi J, Zhu WY, Ding QQ, Jia W, Liu SF, Zhou JJ, Shen H, Yao SH, Guo ZJ, Li T, Zhou PJ, Dong XW, Lu WF, Coleman RL, Akce M, Akladios C, Puccetti F, Zang YS. Targeted therapy for intractable cancer on the basis of molecular profiles: An open-label, phase II basket trial (Long March Pathway). Front Oncol 2023; 13:860711. [PMID: 36910668 PMCID: PMC9995917 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.860711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We evaluated he effects of molecular guided-targeted therapy for intractable cancer. Also, the epidemiology of druggable gene alterations in Chinese population was investigated. Materials and methods The Long March Pathway (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03239015) is a non-randomized, open-label, phase II trial consisting of several basket studies examining the molecular profiles of intractable cancers in the Chinese population. The trial aimed to 1) evaluate the efficacy of targeted therapy for intractable cancer and 2) identify the molecular epidemiology of the tier II gene alterations among Chinese pan-cancer patients. Results In the first stage, molecular profiles of 520 intractable pan-cancer patients were identified, and 115 patients were identified to have tier II gene alterations. Then, 27 of these 115 patients received targeted therapy based on molecular profiles. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29.6% (8/27), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 44.4% (12/27). The median duration of response (DOR) was 4.80 months (95% CI, 3.33-27.2), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.67 months (95% CI, 2.33-9.50). In the second stage, molecular epidemiology of 17,841 Chinese pan-cancer patients demonstrated that the frequency of tier II gene alterations across cancer types is 17.7%. Bladder cancer had the most tier-II alterations (26.1%), followed by breast cancer (22.4%), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 20.2%). Conclusion The Long March Pathway trial demonstrated a significant clinical benefit for intractable cancer from molecular-guided targeted therapy in the Chinese population. The frequency of tier II gene alterations across cancer types supports the feasibility of molecular-guided targeted therapy under basket trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Dong Jiao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bao-Dong Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhan Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ke Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Ling
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Xing Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Miao-Miao Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling-Yan Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Anthony W Kim
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Kimberley Mak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Hao Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Xu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Qiu
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Min Wu
- Department Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Min Jin
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Li-Chao Xu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Zhong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine-Integrated Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xue-Qin Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yu Zeng
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Shanghai Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Shi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Wen-Yu Zhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Qing-Qing Ding
- Department of Geriatric Oncology, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Wei Jia
- Department of Respiratory, Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine-Integrated Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Su-Fen Liu
- Department of Gynecology, Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Jun-Jing Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Wuxi No.4 People's Hospital, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
| | - Hong Shen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shi-Hua Yao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhao-Ji Guo
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Ting Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Pei-Juan Zhou
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xue-Wei Dong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Wen-Feng Lu
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mehmet Akce
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Chérif Akladios
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Francesco Puccetti
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Yuan-Sheng Zang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lee SHR, Yang W, Gocho Y, John A, Rowland L, Smart B, Williams H, Maxwell D, Hunt J, Yang W, Crews KR, Roberts KG, Jeha S, Cheng C, Karol SE, Relling MV, Rosner GL, Inaba H, Mullighan CG, Pui CH, Evans WE, Yang JJ. Pharmacotypes across the genomic landscape of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and impact on treatment response. Nat Med 2023; 29:170-179. [PMID: 36604538 PMCID: PMC9873558 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02112-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Contemporary chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is risk-adapted based on clinical features, leukemia genomics and minimal residual disease (MRD); however, the pharmacological basis of these prognostic variables remains unclear. Analyzing samples from 805 children with newly diagnosed ALL from three consecutive clinical trials, we determined the ex vivo sensitivity of primary leukemia cells to 18 therapeutic agents across 23 molecular subtypes defined by leukemia genomics. There was wide variability in drug response, with favorable ALL subtypes exhibiting the greatest sensitivity to L-asparaginase and glucocorticoids. Leukemia sensitivity to these two agents was highly associated with MRD although with distinct patterns and only in B cell ALL. We identified six patient clusters based on ALL pharmacotypes, which were associated with event-free survival, even after adjusting for MRD. Pharmacotyping identified a T cell ALL subset with a poor prognosis that was sensitive to targeted agents, pointing to alternative therapeutic strategies. Our study comprehensively described the pharmacological heterogeneity of ALL, highlighting opportunities for further individualizing therapy for this most common childhood cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn H. R. Lee
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA ,grid.412106.00000 0004 0621 9599Khoo Teck Puat–National University Children’s Medical Institute, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore ,grid.4280.e0000 0001 2180 6431Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wenjian Yang
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Yoshihiro Gocho
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - August John
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Lauren Rowland
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Brandon Smart
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Hannah Williams
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Dylan Maxwell
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Jeremy Hunt
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Wentao Yang
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Kristine R. Crews
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Kathryn G. Roberts
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Sima Jeha
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Cheng Cheng
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Seth E. Karol
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Mary V. Relling
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Gary L. Rosner
- grid.280502.d0000 0000 8741 3625Quantitative Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Hiroto Inaba
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Charles G. Mullighan
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Ching-Hon Pui
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - William E. Evans
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Jun J. Yang
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA ,grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Targeting the FGF/FGFR axis and its co-alteration allies. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100647. [PMID: 36455506 PMCID: PMC9808461 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We analyzed the FGF/FGFR and co-alteration cancer landscape, hypothesizing that combination therapy might be useful in the presence of co-drivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS We describe FGF/FGFR-altered pathways, prognosis, and co-alterations [cBioPortal (N = 7574)] and therapeutic outcomes [University of California San Diego Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) (N = 16)]. RESULTS Patients whose cancers harbored FGF/FGFR alterations (N = 1074) versus those without them (N = 6500) had shorter overall survival (OS) (median: 23.1 versus 26.4 months, P = 0.038) (cBioPortal). Only 6.1% (65/1074 patients) had no pathogenic co-alterations accompanying FGF/FGFR axis abnormalities. The most frequently co-altered pathways/genes involved: TP53 (70%); cell cycle (58%); PI3K (55%); and receptor tyrosine kinases and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (65%). Harboring alterations in both FGF/FGFR and in the TP53 pathway or in the cell cycle pathway correlated with shorter OS (versus FGF/FGFR-altered without those co-altered signals) (P = 0.0001 and 0.0065). Four of 16 fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor-treated patients presented at MTB attained durable partial responses (PRs) (9, 12, 22+, and 52+ months); an additional two, stable disease (SD) of ≥6 months (13+ and 15 months) [clinical benefit rate (SD ≥ 6 months/PR) = 38%]. Importantly, six patients with cyclin pathway co-alterations received the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (75 mg p.o. 3 weeks on, 1 week off) and the multikinase FGFR inhibitor lenvatinib (10 mg p.o. daily); three (50%) achieved a PR [9 (ovarian), 12 (biliary), and 52+ months (osteosarcoma)]. Palbociclib and lenvatinib were tolerated well. CONCLUSIONS FGF/FGFR alterations portend a poor prognosis and are frequently accompanied by pathogenic co-aberrations. Malignancies harboring co-alterations that activate both cyclin and FGFR pathways can be co-targeted by CDK4/6 and FGFR inhibitors.
Collapse
|
44
|
Patient Selection Approaches in FGFR Inhibitor Trials-Many Paths to the Same End? Cells 2022; 11:cells11193180. [PMID: 36231142 PMCID: PMC9563413 DOI: 10.3390/cells11193180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Inhibitors of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling have been investigated in various human cancer diseases. Recently, the first compounds received FDA approval in biomarker-selected patient populations. Different approaches and technologies have been applied in clinical trials, ranging from protein (immunohistochemistry) to mRNA expression (e.g., RNA in situ hybridization) and to detection of various DNA alterations (e.g., copy number variations, mutations, gene fusions). We review, here, the advantages and limitations of the different technologies and discuss the importance of tissue and disease context in identifying the best predictive biomarker for FGFR targeting therapies.
Collapse
|
45
|
Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Servetto A, Formisano L, Sánchez V, Mayer IA, Arteaga CL, Sanders ME. FGFR1 Antibody Validation and Characterization of FGFR1 Protein Expression in ER+ Breast Cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2022; 30:600-608. [PMID: 36083147 PMCID: PMC9547979 DOI: 10.1097/pai.0000000000001058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Clinical trials in patients with ER+ breast cancer with or without FGFR pathway somatic alterations have shown limited clinical benefit from treatment with FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone or in combination with endocrine therapy. This is likely because of an inadequate predictive biomarker to select appropriate patients. In this study, we evaluated 4 anti-FGFR1 antibodies in breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts with FGFR1 amplification. We correlated D8E4 expression in 209 tumors from postmenopausal patients with stage I-III operable ER+ breast cancer with FGFR1 amplification status as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. FGFR1 amplification was identified in 10% of tumors (21/209), 80% of which exhibited membranous FGFR1 expression; however, only 50% of amplified cases showed strong, complete membranous staining (3+) based on established criteria to score HER2 by immunohistochemistry. These findings suggest the combined evaluation of FGFR1 status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization may need to be incorporated into the selection of patients for trials with FGFR inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula I. Gonzalez-Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Alberto Servetto
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Luigi Formisano
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Violeta Sánchez
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ingrid A. Mayer
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Carlos L. Arteaga
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Melinda E. Sanders
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Xie T, Du K, Liu W, Liu C, Wang B, Tian Y, Li R, Huang X, Lin J, Jian H, Zhang J, Yuan Y. LHX2 facilitates the progression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma via activation of the FGF1/FGFR axis. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1239-1253. [PMID: 35864158 PMCID: PMC9519904 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01902-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distant metastasis and recurrence remain the main obstacle to nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying NPC growth and metastasis are poorly understood. METHODS LHX2 expression was examined in NPC cell lines and NPC tissues using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, western blotting and Immunohistochemistry assay. NPC cells overexpressing or silencing LHX2 were used to perform CCK-8 assay, colony-formation assay, EdU assay, wound-healing and invasion assays in vitro. Xenograft tumour models and lung metastasis models were involved for the in vivo assays. The Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), ELISA assay, western blot, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay and Luciferase reporter assay were applied for the downstream target mechanism investigation. RESULTS LIM-homeodomain transcription factor 2 (LHX2) was upregulated in NPC tissues and cell lines. Elevated LHX2 was closely associated with poor survival in NPC patients. Ectopic LHX2 overexpression dramatically promoted the growth, migration and invasion of NPC cells both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, LHX2 transcriptionally increased the fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) expression, which in turn activated the phosphorylation of STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), ERK1/2 (extracellular regulated protein kinases 1/2) and AKT signalling pathways in an autocrine and paracrine manner, thereby promoting the growth and metastasis of NPC. Inhibition of FGF1 with siRNA or FGFR inhibitor blocked LHX2-induced nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell growth, migration and invasion. CONCLUSIONS Our study identifies the LHX2-FGF1-FGFR axis plays a key role in NPC progression and provides a potential target for NPC therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Kunpeng Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Chunshan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Baiyao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunhong Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Rong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoting Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Haifeng Jian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yawei Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Morales-Guadarrama G, Méndez-Pérez EA, García-Quiroz J, Avila E, Larrea F, Díaz L. AZD4547 and calcitriol synergistically inhibited BT-474 cell proliferation while modified stemness and tumorsphere formation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2022; 223:106132. [PMID: 35659529 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2022.106132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) overamplification/activation in cancer leads to increased cell proliferation. AZD4547, a FGFR selective inhibitor, hinders breast cancer cells growth. Although luminal B breast tumors may respond to chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, this subtype is associated with poor prognosis, inadequate response and/or acquired drug resistance. Calcitriol, the vitamin D most active metabolite, exerts anti-neoplastic effects and enhances chemotherapeutic drugs activity. In this study, we sought to decrease the concentration of AZD4547 needed to inhibit the luminal-B breast cancer cell line BT-474 proliferation by its combination with calcitriol. Anti-proliferative inhibitory concentrations, combination index and dose-reduction index were analyzed from Sulforhodamine B assays. Western blot and qPCR were used to study FGFR molecular targets. The compound's ability to inhibit BT-474 cells tumorigenic capacity was assessed by tumorspheres formation. Results: BT-474 cells were dose-dependently growth-inhibited by calcitriol and AZD4547 (IC50 = 2.9 nM and 3.08 μM, respectively). Calcitriol at 1 nM synergistically improved AZD4547 antiproliferative effects, allowing a 2-fold AZD4547 dose-reduction. Mechanistically, AZD4547 downregulated p-FGFR1, p-Akt and tumorsphere formation. Calcitriol also decreased tumorspheres, while induced cell differentiation. Both compounds inhibited MYC and CCND1 expression, as well as ALDH, a stemness marker that positively correlated with FGFR1 and negatively with VDR expression in breast cancer transcriptomic data. In conclusion, the drugs impaired self-aggregation capacity, reduced stemness features, induced cell-differentiation and when combined, synergistically inhibited cell proliferation. Overall, our results suggest that calcitriol, at low pharmacological doses, may be a suitable candidate to synergize AZD4547 effects in luminal B breast tumors, allowing to reduce dose and adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Morales-Guadarrama
- Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Dr. Carlos Gual Castro, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Av. Vasco de Quiroga No. 15, Belisario Domínguez Sección XVI, Tlalpan 14080, Ciudad de México, Mexico; Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
| | - Edgar A Méndez-Pérez
- Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Dr. Carlos Gual Castro, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Av. Vasco de Quiroga No. 15, Belisario Domínguez Sección XVI, Tlalpan 14080, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
| | - Janice García-Quiroz
- Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Dr. Carlos Gual Castro, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Av. Vasco de Quiroga No. 15, Belisario Domínguez Sección XVI, Tlalpan 14080, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
| | - Euclides Avila
- Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Dr. Carlos Gual Castro, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Av. Vasco de Quiroga No. 15, Belisario Domínguez Sección XVI, Tlalpan 14080, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
| | - Fernando Larrea
- Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Dr. Carlos Gual Castro, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Av. Vasco de Quiroga No. 15, Belisario Domínguez Sección XVI, Tlalpan 14080, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
| | - Lorenza Díaz
- Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Dr. Carlos Gual Castro, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Av. Vasco de Quiroga No. 15, Belisario Domínguez Sección XVI, Tlalpan 14080, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jiang Y, Zeng Q, Jiang Q, Peng X, Gao J, Wan H, Wang L, Gao Y, Zhou X, Lin D, Feng H, Liang S, Zhou H, Ding J, Ai J, Huang R. 18F-FDG PET as an imaging biomarker for the response to FGFR-targeted therapy of cancer cells via FGFR-initiated mTOR/HK2 axis. Am J Cancer Res 2022; 12:6395-6408. [PMID: 36168616 PMCID: PMC9475468 DOI: 10.7150/thno.74848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: The overall clinical response to FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi) is far from satisfactory in cancer patients stratified by FGFR aberration, the current biomarker in clinical practice. A novel biomarker to evaluate the therapeutic response to FGFRi in a non-invasive and dynamic manner is thus greatly desired. Methods: Six FGFR-aberrant cancer cell lines were used, including four FGFRi-sensitive ones (NCI-H1581, NCI-H716, RT112 and Hep3B) and two FGFRi-resistant ones (primary for NCI-H2444 and acquired for NCI-H1581/AR). Cell viability and tumor xenograft growth analyses were performed to evaluate FGFRi sensitivities, accompanied by corresponding 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake assay. mTOR/PLCγ/MEK-ERK signaling blockade by specific inhibitors or siRNAs was applied to determine the regulation mechanism. Results: FGFR inhibition decreased the in vitro accumulation of 18F-FDG only in four FGFRi-sensitive cell lines, but in neither of FGFRi-resistant ones. We then demonstrated that FGFRi-induced transcriptional downregulation of hexokinase 2 (HK2), a key factor of glucose metabolism and FDG trapping, via mTOR pathway leading to this decrease. Moreover, 18F-FDG PET imaging successfully differentiated the FGFRi-sensitive tumor xenografts from primary or acquired resistant ones by the tumor 18F-FDG accumulation change upon FGFRi treatment. Of note, both 18F-FDG tumor accumulation and HK2 expression could respond the administration/withdrawal of FGFRi in NCI-H1581 xenografts correspondingly. Conclusion: The novel association between the molecular mechanism (FGFR/mTOR/HK2 axis) and radiological phenotype (18F-FDG PET uptake) of FGFR-targeted therapy was demonstrated in multiple preclinical models. The adoption of 18F-FDG PET biomarker-based imaging strategy to assess response/resistance to FGFR inhibition may benefit treatment selection for cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchen Jiang
- School of Pharmacy, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.,Division of Antitumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Qinghe Zeng
- Molecular Imaging Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Qinghui Jiang
- Molecular Imaging Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Xia Peng
- Division of Antitumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Jing Gao
- Analytical Research Center for Organic and Biological Molecules, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.,CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Haiyan Wan
- Division of Antitumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Luting Wang
- Molecular Imaging Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Yinglei Gao
- Division of Antitumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhou
- Molecular Imaging Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Dongze Lin
- Division of Antitumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Hanyi Feng
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
| | - Sheng Liang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Hu Zhou
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.,Analytical Research Center for Organic and Biological Molecules, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.,CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Jian Ding
- School of Pharmacy, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.,Division of Antitumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Jing Ai
- Division of Antitumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Ruimin Huang
- Molecular Imaging Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.,School of Chinese Materia Medica, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jia X, Xin M, Xu J, Xiang X, Li X, Jiao Y, Wang L, Jiang J, Pang F, Zhang X, Zhang J. Inhibition of autophagy potentiates the cytotoxicity of the irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor FIIN-2 on lung adenocarcinoma. Cell Death Dis 2022; 13:750. [PMID: 36042213 PMCID: PMC9428205 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-05201-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
For patients with platinum-resistant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the exploration of new effective drug candidates is urgently needed. Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) have been identified as promising targets for LUAD therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the exact role of the irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor FIIN-2 in LUAD and to clarify its underlying molecular mechanisms. Our results demonstrated that FIIN-2 significantly inhibited the proliferation, colony formation, and migration of A549 and A549/DDP cells but induced the mitochondria-mediated apoptosis of these cells. Meanwhile, FIIN-2 increased the autophagy flux of A549 and A549/DDP cells by inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and further activating the class III PI3K complex pathway. More importantly, in vivo and in vitro experiments showed that autophagy inhibitors could enhance the cytotoxicity of FIIN-2 on A549 and A549/DDP cells, confirming that FIIN-2 induced protective autophagy. These findings indicated that FIIN-2 is a potential drug candidate for LUAD treatment, and its use in combination with autophagy inhibitors might be an efficient treatment strategy, especially for patients with cisplatin resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuqin Jia
- grid.27255.370000 0004 1761 1174Institute of Immunopharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 Shandong Province China ,grid.415912.a0000 0004 4903 149XThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000 Shandong Province China
| | - Ming Xin
- grid.415912.a0000 0004 4903 149XThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000 Shandong Province China
| | - Juanjuan Xu
- grid.415912.a0000 0004 4903 149XThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000 Shandong Province China
| | - Xindong Xiang
- grid.415912.a0000 0004 4903 149XThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000 Shandong Province China
| | - Xuan Li
- grid.415912.a0000 0004 4903 149XThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000 Shandong Province China
| | - Yuhan Jiao
- grid.415912.a0000 0004 4903 149XThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000 Shandong Province China
| | - Lulin Wang
- grid.415912.a0000 0004 4903 149XThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000 Shandong Province China
| | - Jingjing Jiang
- grid.415912.a0000 0004 4903 149XThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000 Shandong Province China
| | - Feng Pang
- grid.415912.a0000 0004 4903 149XDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000 Shandong Province China
| | - Xianzhen Zhang
- grid.415912.a0000 0004 4903 149XDepartment of Oncology, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000 Shandong Province China
| | - Jian Zhang
- grid.27255.370000 0004 1761 1174Institute of Immunopharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 Shandong Province China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Persha HE, Kato S, De P, Adashek JJ, Sicklick JK, Subbiah V, Kurzrock R. Osteosarcoma with cell-cycle and fibroblast growth factor genomic alterations: case report of Molecular Tumor Board combination strategy resulting in long-term exceptional response. J Hematol Oncol 2022; 15:119. [PMID: 36031605 PMCID: PMC9420268 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01344-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractThere is a paucity of information about molecularly driven therapy in osteosarcomas. We report a 31-year-old woman with chemotherapy–refractory metastatic osteosarcoma who was successfully treated with the combination of palbociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) and lenvatinib (multikinase FGFR inhibitor), selected based on next generation sequencing that showed CDK4 and CCND2 amplifications (upregulates CDK4/6), and FGF6 (ligand for FGFR1,2 and 4), FGF23 (ligand for FGFR1,2,3, and 4) and FRS2 (adaptor protein for FGFR signaling) amplifications. The patient’s tumor showed 68% reduction in positron emission tomography (PET) avidity, lasting 31 months after therapy initiation, when a solitary recurrence occurred, was resected, and treatment continued. The patient remains on matched targeted therapy at 51 + months from the start of the combination. Treatment was given at reduced dosing (lenvatinib 10 mg oral daily (approved dose = 24 mg daily)) and palbociclib 75 mg oral daily, one week on and one week off (approved dose = 125 mg oral daily, three weeks on/one week off) and is tolerated well. Therefore, co-targeting the aberrant cyclin and FGFR pathways resulted in long-term exceptional response in a patient with refractory advanced osteosarcoma.
Collapse
|