CD4/CD8 T-Cell Selection Affects Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Potency and Toxicity: Updated Results From a Phase I Anti-CD22 CAR T-Cell Trial

A bibliometric and knowledge-map study on the treatment of hematological malignancies with CAR-T cells from 2012 to 2023

Recently, CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies has received extensive attention. The objective of this study is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the current research status, development trends, research hotspots, and emerging topics pertaining to CAR-T cells in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Articles pertaining to CAR-T cell therapy for hematological malignancies from the years 2012 to 2023 were obtained and assessed from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). A bibliometric approach was employed to conduct a scientific, comprehensive, and objective quantitative analysis, as well as a visual analysis, of this particular research domain. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on a corpus of 3643 articles, which were collaboratively authored by 72 countries and various research institutions. CAR-T cell research in treating hematological malignancies shows an increasing trend each year. Notably, the study identified the countries and institutions displaying the highest level of activity, the journals with the most citations and output, as well as the authors who garnered the highest frequency of citations and co-citations. Furthermore, the analysis successfully identified the research hotspots and highlighted six emerging topics within this domain. This study conducted a comprehensive exploration and analysis of the research status, development trends, research hotspots, and emerging topics about CAR-T cells in the treatment of hematological malignancies from 2012 to 2023. The findings of this study will serve as a valuable reference and guide for researchers seeking to delve deeper into this field and determine the future direction of their research.

T cell-redirecting therapies in hematological malignancies: Current developments and novel strategies for improved targeting

T cell-redirecting therapies (TCRTs), such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) or T cell receptor (TCR) T cells and T cell engagers, have emerged as a highly effective treatment modality, particularly in the B and plasma cell-malignancy setting. However, many patients fail to achieve deep and durable responses; while the lack of truly unique tumor antigens, and concurrent on-target/off-tumor toxicities, have hindered the development of TCRTs for many other cancers. In this review, we discuss the recent developments in TCRT targets for hematological malignancies, as well as novel targeting strategies that aim to address these, and other, challenges.

Coagulation abnormalities associated with CAR-T-cell therapy in haematological malignancies: A review

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy has demonstrated considerable efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory haematological malignancies. Owing to significant advances, CAR-T-cell therapeutic modality has undergone substantial shifts in its clinical application. Coagulation abnormalities, which are prevalent complications in CAR-T-cell therapy, can range in severity from simple abnormalities in coagulation parameters to serious haemorrhage or disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with life-threatening multiorgan dysfunction. Nonetheless, there is a lack of a comprehensive overview concerning the coagulation abnormalities associated with CAR-T-cell therapy. With an aim to attract heightened clinical focus and to enhance the safety of CAR-T-cell therapy, this review presents the characteristics of the coagulation abnormalities associated with CAR-T-cell therapy, including clinical manifestations, coagulation parameters, pathogenesis, risk factors and their influence on treatment efficacy in patients receiving CAR-T-cell infusion. Due to limited data, these conclusions may undergo changes as more experience accumulates.

ACT To Sustain: Adoptive Cell Therapy To Sustain Access to Non-Commercialized Genetically Modified Cell Therapies

Genetically modified cell therapies (GMCT), particularly immune effector cells (IEC) such as chimeric receptor antigen (CAR) T cells, have shown promise in curing cancer and rare diseases after a single treatment course. Following close behind CAR T approvals are GMCT based on hematopoietic stem cells, such as products developed for hemoglobinopathies and other disorders. Academically sponsored GMCT products, often developed in academic centers without industry involvement, face challenges in sustaining access after completion of early phase studies when there is no commercial partner invested in completing registration trials for marketing applications. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) formed a task force named ACT To Sustain (Adoptive Cell Therapy to Sustain) to address the "valley of death" of academic GMCT products. This paper presents the task force's findings and considerations regarding financial sustainability of academically sponsored GMCT products in the absence of commercial development. We outline case scenarios illustrating barriers to maintaining access to promising GMCT developed by academic centers. The paper also delves into the current state of GMCT development, commercialization, and reimbursement, citing examples of abandoned products, cost estimates associated with GMCT manufacturing and real-world use of cost recovery. We propose potential solutions to address the financial, regulatory, and logistical challenges associated with sustaining access to academically sponsored GMCT products and to ensure that products with promising results do not languish in a "valley of death" due to financial or implementational barriers. The suggestions include aligning US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) designations with benefit coverage, allowing for cost recovery of certain products as a covered benefit, and engaging with regulators and policy makers to discuss alternative pathways for academic centers to provide access. We stress the importance of sustainable access to GMCT and call for collaborative efforts to develop regulatory pathways that support access to academically sponsored GMCT products.

CD22-directed CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphomas progressing after CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy: a dose-finding phase 1 study

BACKGROUND

Outcomes are poor for patients with large B-cell lymphoma who relapse after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR19). CD22 is a nearly universally expressed B-cell surface antigen and the efficacy of a CD22-directed CAR T-cell therapy (CAR22) in large B-cell lymphoma is unknown, which was what we aimed to examine in this study.

METHODS

In this single centre, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trial, we intravenously administered CAR22 at two dose levels (1 million and 3 million CAR22-positive T cells per kg of bodyweight) to adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who relapsed after CAR19 or had CD19-negative large B-cell lymphoma. The primary endpoints were manufacturing feasibility, safety measured by the incidence and severity of adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities, and identification of the maximum tolerated dose (ie, the recommended phase 2 dose). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04088890) and is active, but closed for enrolment.

FINDINGS

From Oct 17, 2019, to Oct 19, 2022, a total of 41 patients were assessed for eligibility; however, one patient withdrew. 40 patients underwent leukapheresis and 38 (95%) had CAR T-cell products manufactured successfully. The median age was 65 years (range 25-84), 17 (45%) were women, 32 (84%) had elevated pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase, 11 (29%) had refractory disease to all previous therapies, and patients had received a median of four lines of previous therapy (range 3-8). Of the 38 patients treated, 37 (97%) had relapsed after previous CAR19. The identified maximum tolerated dose was 1 million CAR T cells per kg. Of 29 patients who received the maximum tolerated dose, no patients developed a dose-limiting toxicity or grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, or immune effector cell-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome.

INTERPRETATION

This trial identifies CD22 as an immunotherapeutic target in large B-cell lymphoma and demonstrates the durable clinical activity of CAR22 in patients with disease progression after CAR19 therapy. Although these findings are promising, it is essential to recognise that this is a phase 1 dose-finding study. Further investigations are warranted to establish the long-term efficacy and to delineate the patient subgroups that will derive the most benefit from this therapeutic approach.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Stanford Cancer Institute, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Lymph & Co, and the European Hematology Association.

Overcoming the challenges of primary resistance and relapse after CAR-T cell therapy

INTRODUCTION

While CAR T-cell therapy has led to remarkable responses in relapsed B-cell hematologic malignancies, only 50% of patients ultimately have a complete, sustained response. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance and relapse after CAR T-cell therapy is crucial to future development and improving outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

We review reasons for both primary resistance and relapse after CAR T-cell therapies. Reasons for primary failure include CAR T-cell manufacturing problems, suboptimal fitness of autologous T-cells themselves, and intrinsic features of the underlying cancer and tumor microenvironment. Relapse after initial response to CAR T-cell therapy may be antigen-positive, due to CAR T-cell exhaustion or limited persistence, or antigen-negative, due to antigen-modulation on the target cells. Finally, we discuss ongoing efforts to overcome resistance to CAR T-cell therapy with enhanced CAR constructs, manufacturing methods, alternate cell types, combinatorial strategies, and optimization of both pre-infusion conditioning regimens and post-infusion consolidative strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a continued need for novel approaches to CAR T-cell therapy for both hematologic and solid malignancies to obtain sustained remissions. Opportunities for improvement include development of new targets, optimally combining existing CAR T-cell therapies, and defining the role for adjunctive immune modulators and stem cell transplant in enhancing long-term survival.

Current understanding and management of CAR T cell-associated toxicities

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of several haematological malignancies and is being investigated in patients with various solid tumours. Characteristic CAR T cell-associated toxicities such as cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are now well-recognized, and improved supportive care and management with immunosuppressive agents has made CAR T cell therapy safer and more feasible than it was when the first regulatory approvals of such treatments were granted in 2017. The increasing clinical experience with these therapies has also improved recognition of previously less well-defined toxicities, including movement disorders, immune effector cell-associated haematotoxicity (ICAHT) and immune effector cell-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS), as well as the substantial risk of infection in patients with persistent CAR T cell-induced B cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinaemia. A more diverse selection of immunosuppressive and supportive-care pharmacotherapies is now being utilized for toxicity management, yet no universal algorithm for their application exists. As CAR T cell products targeting new antigens are developed, additional toxicities involving damage to non-malignant tissues expressing the target antigen are a potential hurdle. Continued prospective evaluation of toxicity management strategies and the design of less-toxic CAR T cell products are both crucial for ongoing success in this field. In this Review, we discuss the evolving understanding and clinical management of CAR T cell-associated toxicities.

CAR-T cell expansion platforms yield distinct T cell differentiation states

With investigators looking to expand engineered T cell therapies such as CAR-T to new tumor targets and patient populations, a variety of cell manufacturing platforms have been developed to scale manufacturing capacity using closed and/or automated systems. Such platforms are particularly useful for solid tumor targets, which typically require higher CAR-T cell doses. Although T cell phenotype and function are key attributes that often correlate with therapeutic efficacy, how manufacturing platforms influence the final CAR-T cell product is currently unknown. We compared 4 commonly used T cell manufacturing platforms (CliniMACS Prodigy, Xuri W25 rocking platform, G-Rex gas-permeable bioreactor, static bag culture) using identical media, stimulation, culture length, and donor starting material. Selected CD4+CD8+ cells were transduced with lentiviral vector incorporating a CAR targeting FGFR4, a promising target for pediatric sarcoma. We observed significant differences in overall expansion over the 14-day culture; bag cultures had the highest capacity for expansion while the Prodigy had the lowest (481-fold versus 84-fold, respectively). Strikingly, we also observed considerable differences in the phenotype of the final product, with the Prodigy significantly enriched for CCR7+CD45RA+ naïve/stem central memory (Tn/scm)-like cells at 46% compared to bag and G-Rex with 16% and 13%, respectively. Gene expression analysis also showed that Prodigy CAR-Ts are more naïve, less cytotoxic and less exhausted than bag, G-Rex, and Xuri CAR-Ts, and pointed to differences in cell metabolism that were confirmed via metabolic assays. We hypothesized that dissolved oxygen level, which decreased substantially during the final 3 days of the Prodigy culture, may contribute to the observed differences in T cell phenotype. By culturing bag and G-Rex cultures in 1% O2 from day 5 onward, we could generate >60% Tn/scm-like cells, with longer time in hypoxia correlating with a higher percentage of Tn/scm-like cells. Intriguingly, our results suggest that oxygenation is responsible, at least in part, for observed differences in T cell phenotype among bioreactors and suggest hypoxic culture as a potential strategy prevent T cell differentiation during expansion. Ultimately, our study demonstrates that selection of bioreactor system may have profound effects not only on the capacity for expansion, but also on the differentiation state of the resulting CAR-T cells.

A meta-analysis to assess the risk of bleeding and thrombosis following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Hemostasis and Malignancy

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy is increasingly utilized for treatment of hematologic malignancies. Hematologic toxicities including thrombosis and bleeding complications have been reported. Accurate estimates for thrombotic and bleeding outcomes are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in patients who received CAR T-cell therapy for an underlying hematologic malignancy with the objective to: a) assess the thrombosis and bleeding risk associated with CAR T-cell therapy, b) assess the impact of CRS and ICANS on the risks of thrombosis and bleeding, and c) assess the safety of anticoagulant or antiplatelet use in the period following treatment with CAR T-cell therapy.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to February 2022 for studies reporting thrombotic or bleeding outcomes in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Pooled event rates were calculated using a random-effects model. We performed subgroup analyses stratified by follow-up duration, CAR T-cell target antigen, and underlying hematologic malignancy.

RESULTS

We included 47 studies with a total of 7040 patients. High heterogeneity between studies precluded reporting of overall pooled rates of thrombotic and bleeding events. In studies with follow-up duration of ≤6 months, the pooled incidence of venous thrombotic events was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.4%-3.4%; I2 = 0%) per patient-month, whereas the rate was 0.1% (95% CI, 0%-0.1%; I2 = 0%) per patient-month for studies with longer follow-up periods (>6 months). The pooled incidences of any bleeding events per patient-month in studies with follow-up duration of ≤6 months and >6 months were 1.9% (95% CI, 0.6%-3.1%; I2 = 78%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0%-0.8%, I2 = 40%), respectively. Secondary analyses by CAR T-cell target antigen, underlying malignancy, and primary outcome of the studies did not reveal significant differences in the rates of thromboembolism, any bleeding events, or major bleeding events.

CONCLUSION

The risk of both thrombosis and bleeding following CAR T-cell therapy appears to be highest in the initial months following infusion.

Enhancing pediatric access to cell and gene therapies

Increasing numbers of cell and gene therapies (CGTs) are emerging to treat and cure pediatric diseases. However, small market sizes limit the potential return on investment within the traditional biopharmaceutical drug development model, leading to a market failure. In this Perspective, we discuss major factors contributing to this failure, including high manufacturing costs, regulatory challenges, and licensing practices that do not incorporate pediatric development milestones, as well as potential solutions. We propose the creation of a new entity, the Pediatric Advanced Medicines Biotech, to lead late-stage development and commercialize pediatric CGTs outside the traditional biopharmaceutical model in the United States-where organized efforts to solve this problem have been lacking. The Pediatric Advanced Medicines Biotech would partner with the academic ecosystem, manufacture products in academic good manufacturing practice facilities and work closely with regulatory bodies, to ferry CGTs across the drug development 'valley of death' and, ultimately, increase access to lifesaving treatments for children in need.

Reactions and adverse events induced by T-cell engagers as anti-cancer immunotherapies, a comprehensive review

T-cell engagers (TCE) are cancer immunotherapies that have recently demonstrated meaningful benefit for patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors. The anticipated widespread use of T cell engagers poses implementation challenges and highlights the need for guidance to anticipate, mitigate, and manage adverse events. By mobilizing T-cells directly at the contact of tumor cells, TCE mount an obligatory and immediate anti-tumor immune response that could result in diverse reactions and adverse events. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most common reaction and is largely confined to the first drug administrations during step-up dosage. Cytokine release syndrome should be distinguished from infusion related reaction by clinical symptoms, timing to occurrence, pathophysiological aspects, and clinical management. Other common reactions and adverse events with TCE are immune effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), infections, tumor flare reaction and cytopenias. The toxicity profiles of TCE and CAR-T cells have commonalities and distinctions that we sum-up in this review. As compared with CAR-T cells, TCE are responsible for less frequently severe CRS or ICANS. This review recapitulates terminology, pathophysiology, severity grading system and management of reactions and adverse events related to TCE.

T Cell Activators Exhibit Distinct Downstream Effects on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Phenotype and Function

T cell activation is an essential step in chimeric Ag receptor (CAR) T (CAR T) cell manufacturing and is accomplished by the addition of activator reagents that trigger the TCR and provide costimulation. We explore several T cell activation reagents and examine their effects on key attributes of CAR T cell cultures, such as activation/exhaustion markers, cell expansion, gene expression, and transduction efficiency. Four distinct activators were examined, all using anti-CD3 and anti-CD28, but incorporating different mechanisms of delivery: Dynabeads (magnetic microspheres), TransAct (polymeric nanomatrix), Cloudz (alginate hydrogel), and Microbubbles (lipid membrane containing perfluorocarbon gas). Clinical-grade lentiviral vector was used to transduce cells with a bivalent CD19/CD22 CAR, and cell counts and flow cytometry were used to monitor the cells throughout the culture. We observed differences in CD4/CD8 ratio when stimulating with the Cloudz activator, where there was a significant skewing toward CD8 T cells. The naive T cell subset expressing CD62L+CCR7+CD45RA+ was the highest in all donors when stimulating with Dynabeads, whereas effector/effector memory cells were highest when using the Cloudz. Functional assays demonstrated differences in killing of target cells and proinflammatory cytokine secretion, with the highest killing from the Cloudz-stimulated cells among all donors. This study demonstrates that the means by which these stimulatory Abs are presented to T cells contribute to the activation, resulting in differing effects on CAR T cell function. These studies highlight important differences in the final product that should be considered when manufacturing CAR T cells for patients in the clinic.

DMPK perspective on quantitative model analysis for chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy: Advances and challenges

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) cells are genetically engineered immune cells that specifically target tumor-associated antigens and have revolutionized cancer treatment, particularly in hematological malignancies, with ongoing investigations into their potential applications in solid tumors. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status and challenges in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK) for CAR cell therapy, specifically emphasizing on quantitative modeling and simulation (M&S). Furthermore, the recent advances in quantitative model analysis have been reviewed, ranging from clinical data characterization to mechanism-based modeling that connects in vitro and in vivo nonclinical and clinical study data. Additionally, the future perspectives and areas for improvement in CAR cell therapy translation have been reviewed. This includes using formulation quality considerations, characterization of appropriate animal models, refinement of in vitro models for bottom-up approaches, and enhancement of quantitative bioanalytical methodology. Addressing these challenges within a DMPK framework is pivotal in facilitating the translation of CAR cell therapy, ultimately enhancing the patients' lives through efficient CAR cell therapies.

Charting the Course: Sequencing Immunotherapy for Multiple Myeloma

Multiple chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell and bispecific antibody (bsAb) therapies have been approved, demonstrating impressive clinical efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Currently, these treatment share overlapping approval indications in the relapsed/refractory space, highlighting the importance of optimal selection and sequencing to maximize clinical efficacy. For patients previously unexposed to T-cell-directed therapies, several factors should be weighed when both options are available. These factors include access and logistical challenges associated with CAR T-cell therapy, disease-specific factors such as tempo of disease relapse, in addition to patient-specific factors such as frailty, and distinct toxicity profiles across these agents. Sequential therapy, whether it involves CAR T-cell therapy followed by bsAb or vice versa, has demonstrated clinical efficacy. When sequencing these agents, it is crucial to consider various factors that contribute to treatment resistance with careful selection of treatments for subsequent therapy in order to achieve favorable long-term patient outcomes.

Mechanisms and management of CAR T toxicity

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have dramatically improved treatment outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Despite unprecedented efficacy, treatment with CAR T cell therapies can cause a multitude of adverse effects which require monitoring and management at specialized centers and contribute to morbidity and non-relapse mortality. Such toxicities include cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, neurotoxicity distinct from ICANS, immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome, and immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity that can lead to prolonged cytopenias and infectious complications. This review will discuss the current understanding of the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and provide guidelines for the grading and management of such toxicities.

The role of chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting more than one antigen in the treatment of B-cell malignancies

Several products containing chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD19 (CART19) have been approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Despite very impressive response rates, a significant percentage of patients experience disease relapse and die of progressive disease. A major cause of CART19 failure is loss or downregulation of CD19 expression in tumour cells, which has prompted a myriad of novel strategies aimed at targeting more than one antigen (e.g. CD19 and CD20 or CD22). Dual targeting can the accomplished through co-administration of two separate products, co-transduction with two different vectors, bicistronic cassettes or tandem receptors. In this manuscript, we review the pros and cons of each strategy and the clinical results obtained so far.

CD22 CAR T cells demonstrate high response rates and safety in pediatric and adult B-ALL: Phase 1b results

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD22 (CD22-CAR) provide a therapeutic option for patients with CD22+ malignancies with progression after CD19-directed therapies. Using on-site, automated, closed-loop manufacturing, we conducted parallel Phase 1b clinical trials investigating a humanized CD22-CAR with 41BB costimulatory domain in children and adults with heavily treated, relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-ALL. Of 19 patients enrolled, 18 had successful CD22-CAR manufacturing, and 16 patients were infused. High grade (3-4) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector-cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) each occurred in only one patient; however, three patients experienced immune-effector-cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS). Twelve of 16 patients (75%) achieved CR with an overall 56% MRD-negative CR rate. Duration of response was overall limited (median 77 days), and CD22 expression was downregulated in 4/12 (33%) available samples at relapse. In summary, we demonstrate that closed-loop manufacturing of CD22-CAR T cells is feasible and is associated with a favorable safety profile and high CR rates in pediatric and adult r/r B-ALL, a cohort with limited CD22-CAR reporting.

Expanding the role of CAR T-cell therapy: From B-cell hematological malignancies to autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a form of immunotherapy where the lymphocytes, mostly T-cells, are redirected to specifically recognize and eliminate a target antigen by coupling them with CARs. The binding of CAR and target cell surface antigens leads to vigorous T cell activation and robust anti-tumor immune responses. Areas of implication of CAR T-cell therapies include mainly hematological malignancies (i.e., advanced B-cell cancers); however, recent studies have proven the unprecedented success of the new immunotherapy also in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. We aim to review the recent advances in CAR T-cell therapies in rheumatology but also to address the limitations of their use in the real clinical practice based on the data on their efficacy and safety.

Development of a Safety Surveillance Plan for the Academic Medicine Sponsor Performing First-in-Human Cellular Therapy Clinical Trials: A Report from the Consortium for Pediatric Cellular Immunotherapy

Pharmacovigilance (PV), also known as drug safety, is the science of risk management involving the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects related to a medication. This discipline has traditionally focused on the postmarketing period, with less attention to early-phase clinical trials. However, during the immunotherapy and cellular therapy investigational stage, regulatory agencies are increasingly emphasizing the need to identify and characterize safety signals earlier in clinical development as part of a comprehensive safety surveillance plan. Compliance with PV and safety regulations are further heightened as cell and gene therapy (CGT) trials grow in complexity and scope owing to ever-changing and increasingly rigorous regulatory mandates. Based on this changing landscape, a critical aspect of early-phase trials of cellular products where significant safety events are anticipated is to ensure that every effort is made to protect clinical trial participants by maximizing attention to the risk-versus-benefit profile. This includes the development of robust plans for safety surveillance that provide a continual assessment of safety signals to enable safety reporting to regulatory bodies and the Food and Drug Administration, a regular analysis of aggregate safety data, and a plan to communicate safety findings. This report focuses on PV in early-phase clinical trials of first-in-human investigational products sponsored by academic centers in which the availability of PV resources and subject matter experts is limited. To more fully understand the challenges of CGT PV oversight within pediatric academic medical centers conducting early-phase clinical trials, a working group from institutions participating in the Consortium for Pediatric Cellular Immunotherapy composed of faculty and regulatory professionals was convened to compare experiences, identify best practices, and review published literature to identify commonalities and opportunities for alignment. Here we present guidelines on PV planning in early-phase CGT clinical trials occurring in academic medical centers and offer strategies to mitigate risk to trial participants. Standards to address regulatory requirements and governance for safety signal identification and risk assessment are discussed.

The Evolving Landscape of Flowcytometric Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is a major independent prognostic marker in the clinical management of pediatric and adult B-cell precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (BCP-ALL), and risk stratification nowadays heavily relies on MRD diagnostics. MRD can be detected using flow cytometry based on aberrant expression of markers (antigens) during malignant B-cell maturation. Recent advances highlight the significance of novel markers (e.g., CD58, CD81, CD304, CD73, CD66c, and CD123), improving MRD identification. Second and next-generation flow cytometry, such as the EuroFlow consortium's eight-color protocol, can achieve sensitivities down to 10-5 (comparable with the PCR-based method) if sufficient cells are acquired. The introduction of targeted therapies (especially those targeting CD19, such as blinatumomab or CAR-T19) introduces several challenges for flow cytometric MRD analysis, such as the occurrence of CD19-negative relapses. Therefore, innovative flow cytometry panels, including alternative B-cell markers (e.g., CD22 and CD24), have been designed. (Semi-)automated MRD assessment, employing machine learning algorithms and clustering tools, shows promise but does not yet allow robust and sensitive automated analysis of MRD. Future directions involve integrating artificial intelligence, further automation, and exploring multicolor spectral flow cytometry to standardize MRD assessment and enhance diagnostic and prognostic robustness of MRD diagnostics in BCP-ALL.

Scrutiny of chimeric antigen receptor activation by the extracellular domain: experience with single domain antibodies targeting multiple myeloma cells highlights the need for case-by-case optimization

Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable, despite the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy. This unfulfilled potential can be attributed to two untackled issues: the lack of suitable CAR targets and formats. In relation to the former, the target should be highly expressed and reluctant to shedding; two characteristics that are attributed to the CS1-antigen. Furthermore, conventional CARs rely on scFvs for antigen recognition, yet this withholds disadvantages, mainly caused by the intrinsic instability of this format. VHHs have been proposed as valid scFv alternatives. We therefore intended to develop VHH-based CAR-T cells, targeting CS1, and to identify VHHs that induce optimal CAR-T cell activation together with the VHH parameters required to achieve this.

Methods

CS1-specific VHHs were generated, identified and fully characterized, in vitro and in vivo. Next, they were incorporated into second-generation CARs that only differ in their antigen-binding moiety. Reporter T-cell lines were lentivirally transduced with the different VHH-CARs and CAR-T cell activation kinetics were evaluated side-by-side. Affinity, cell-binding capacity, epitope location, in vivo behavior, binding distance, and orientation of the CAR-T:MM cell interaction pair were investigated as predictive parameters for CAR-T cell activation.

Results

Our data show that the VHHs affinity for its target antigen is relatively predictive for its in vivo tumor-tracing capacity, as tumor uptake generally decreased with decreasing affinity in an in vivo model of MM. This does not hold true for their CAR-T cell activation potential, as some intermediate affinity-binding VHHs proved surprisingly potent, while some higher affinity VHHs failed to induce equal levels of T-cell activation. This could not be attributed to cell-binding capacity, in vivo VHH behavior, epitope location, cell-to-cell distance or binding orientation. Hence, none of the investigated parameters proved to have significant predictive value for the extent of CAR-T cell activation.

Conclusions

We gained insight into the predictive parameters of VHHs in the CAR-context using a VHH library against CS1, a highly relevant MM antigen. As none of the studied VHH parameters had predictive value, defining VHHs for optimal CAR-T cell activation remains bound to serendipity. These findings highlight the importance of screening multiple candidates.

The development of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells against CD70 for renal cell carcinoma treatment

In this study, we investigated CD70 as a promising target for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) therapy and developed a potent chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells for potential clinical testing. CD70, found to be highly expressed in RCC tumors, was associated with decreased survival. We generated CAR-T cells expressing VHH sequence of various novel nanobodies from immunized alpaca and a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) derived from human antibody (41D12). In our in vitro experiments, anti-CD70 CAR-T cells effectively eliminated CD70-positive tumor cells while sparing CD70-negative cells. The nanobody-based CAR-T cells demonstrated significantly higher production of cytokines such as IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-ɑ during co-culture, indicating their potential for enhanced functionality. In xenograft mouse model, these CAR-T cells exhibited remarkable anti-tumor activity, leading to the eradication of RCC tumor cells. Importantly, human T cell expansion after infusion was significantly higher in the VHH groups compared to the scFv CAR-T group. Upon re-challenging mice with RCC tumor cells, the VHH CAR-T treated group remained tumor-free, suggesting a robust and long-lasting anti-tumor response. These findings provide strong support for the potential of nanobody-based CD70 CAR-T cells as a promising therapeutic option for RCC. This warrants further development and consideration for future clinical trials and applications.

Targeting solid tumor antigens with chimeric receptors: cancer biology meets synthetic immunology

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a medical breakthrough in the treatment of B cell malignancies. There is intensive focus on developing solid tumor-targeted CAR-T cell therapies. Although clinically approved CAR-T cell therapies target B cell lineage antigens, solid tumor targets include neoantigens and tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) with diverse roles in tumor biology. Multiple early-stage clinical trials now report encouraging signs of efficacy for CAR-T cell therapies that target solid tumors. We review the landscape of solid tumor target antigens from the perspective of cancer biology and gene regulation, together with emerging clinical data for CAR-T cells targeting these antigens. We then discuss emerging synthetic biology strategies and their application in the clinical development of novel cellular immunotherapies.

Manufacture of CD22 CAR T cells following positive versus negative selection results in distinct cytokine secretion profiles and γδ T cell output

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) have demonstrated curative potential for hematological malignancies, but the optimal manufacturing has not yet been determined and may differ across products. The first step, T cell selection, removes contaminating cell types that can potentially suppress T cell expansion and transduction. While positive selection of CD4/CD8 T cells after leukapheresis is often used in clinical trials, it may modulate signaling cascades downstream of these co-receptors; indeed, the addition of a CD4/CD8-positive selection step altered CD22 CART potency and toxicity in patients. While negative selection may avoid this drawback, it is virtually absent from good manufacturing practices. Here, we performed both CD4/CD8-positive and -negative clinical scale selections of mononuclear cell apheresis products and generated CD22 CARTs per our ongoing clinical trial (NCT02315612NCT02315612). While the selection process did not yield differences in CART expansion or transduction, positively selected CART exhibited a significantly higher in vitro interferon-γ and IL-2 secretion but a lower in vitro tumor killing rate. Notably, though, CD22 CART generated from both selection protocols efficiently eradicated leukemia in NSG mice, with negatively selected cells exhibiting a significant enrichment in γδ CD22 CART. Thus, our study demonstrates the importance of the initial T cell selection process in clinical CART manufacturing.

Toxicities, intensive care management, and outcome of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in adults: an update

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells are a promising new immunotherapy for haematological malignancies. Six CAR-T cells products are currently available for adult patients with refractory or relapsed high-grade B cell malignancies, but they are associated with severe life-threatening toxicities and side effects that may require admission to ICU.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this short pragmatic review is to synthesize for intensivists the knowledge on CAR-T cell therapy with emphasis on CAR-T cell-induced toxicities and ICU management of complications according to international recommendations, outcomes and future issues.

CAR-engineered lymphocyte persistence is governed by a FAS ligand/FAS auto-regulatory circuit

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T and NK cells can cause durable remission of B-cell malignancies; however, limited persistence restrains the full potential of these therapies in many patients. The FAS ligand (FAS-L)/FAS pathway governs naturally-occurring lymphocyte homeostasis, yet knowledge of which cells express FAS-L in patients and whether these sources compromise CAR persistence remains incomplete. Here, we constructed a single-cell atlas of diverse cancer types to identify cellular subsets expressing FASLG, the gene encoding FAS-L. We discovered that FASLG is limited primarily to endogenous T cells, NK cells, and CAR-T cells while tumor and stromal cells express minimal FASLG. To establish whether CAR-T/NK cell survival is regulated through FAS-L, we performed competitive fitness assays using lymphocytes modified with or without a FAS dominant negative receptor (ΔFAS). Following adoptive transfer, ΔFAS-expressing CAR-T and CAR-NK cells became enriched across multiple tissues, a phenomenon that mechanistically was reverted through FASLG knockout. By contrast, FASLG was dispensable for CAR-mediated tumor killing. In multiple models, ΔFAS co-expression by CAR-T and CAR-NK enhanced antitumor efficacy compared with CAR cells alone. Together, these findings reveal that CAR-engineered lymphocyte persistence is governed by a FAS-L/FAS auto-regulatory circuit.

Anticancer therapy-induced adverse drug reactions in children and preventive and control measures

In recent years, considerable achievements have been made in pediatric oncology with the innovation and development of antitumor drugs. However, compared to adults, children as a special group have not yet matured fully in terms of liver and kidney function. Moreover, pediatric patients are prone to more adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from the accumulation of antineoplastic drugs due to their smaller body size and larger body surface area. Chemotherapy-related ADRs have become a non-negligible factor that affects cancer remission. To date, studies on ADRs in pediatric cancer patients have emerged internationally, but few systematic summaries are available. Here, we reviewed the various systemic ADRs associated with antitumor drugs in children and adolescent patients, as well as the advances in strategies to cope with ADRs, which consisted of neurotoxicity, hematological toxicity, cardiotoxicity, ADRs of the respiratory system and gastrointestinal system and urinary system, ADRs of the skin and its adnexa, allergic reactions, and other ADRs. For clinicians and researchers, understanding the causes, symptoms, and coping strategies for ADRs caused by anticancer treatments will undoubtedly benefit more children.

Efficacy of MUC1-targeted CAR-NK cells against human tongue squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

The clinical efficacy of CAR-NK cells against CD19-expressing blood cancers has been demonstrated, and they have shown potential for treating solid tumors as well. However, the efficacy of CAR-NK cells for treating human oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) has not been examined.

Methods

We assessed MUC1 expression in human OTSCC tissue and a cell line using immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. We constructed NK cells that express CAR targeted to MUC1 from pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-derived MUC1-targeted CAR-NK cells) and evaluated their effectiveness against OTSCC in vitro using the xCELLigence Real-Time Cell Analysis system and CCK8 assay, and in vivo by measuring xenograft growth daily in BNDG mice treated with MUC1-targeted CAR-NK cells. As controls, we used iPSC-derived NK cells and NK-free media, which were CAR-free and blank, respectively.

Results

MUC1 expression was detected in 79.5% (66/83) of all OTSCC patients and 72.7% (24/33) of stage III and IV. In stage III and IV MUC1 positive OTSCC, 63.6% (21/33) and 48.5% (16/33) patients had a MUC1-positive cancer cell rate of more than 50% and 80%, respectively. The iPSC-derived MUC1-targeted CAR-NK cells exhibited significant cytotoxicity against MUC1-expressing OTSCC cells in vitro, in a time- and dose-dependent manner, and showed a significant inhibitory effect on xenograft growth compared to both the iPSC-derived NK cells and the blank controls. We observed no weight loss, severe hematological toxicity or NK cell-mediated death in the BNDG mice.

Conclusion

The MUC1-targeted CAR-NK cells had significant efficacy against human OTSCC, and their promising therapeutic response warrants further clinical trials.

INSPIRED Symposium Part 4B: Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Correlative Studies-Established Findings and Future Priorities

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of B cell malignancies, with multiple CAR T cell products approved for numerous indications by regulatory agencies worldwide. However, significant work remains to be done to enhance these treatments. In March 2023, a group of experts in CAR T cell therapy assembled at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland at the Insights in Pediatric CAR T Cell Immunotherapy: Recent Advances and Future Directions (INSPIRED) Symposium to identify key areas for research for the coming years. In session 4B, correlative studies to be incorporated into future clinical trials and real-world settings were discussed. Active areas of research identified included (1) optimizing CAR T cell product manufacturing; (2) ensuring adequate lymphodepletion prior to CAR T cell administration; (3) overcoming immunoregulatory cells and tumor stroma present in the tumor microenvironment, particularly in solid tumors; (4) understanding tumor intrinsic properties that lead to CAR T cell immunotherapy resistance; and (5) uncovering biomarkers predictive of treatment resistance, treatment durability, or immune-related adverse events. Here we review the results of previously published clinical trials and real-world studies to summarize what is currently known about each of these topics. We then outline priorities for future research that we believe will be important for improving our understanding of CAR T cell therapy and ultimately leading to better outcomes for patients.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapies for cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome due to CAR T cell therapy

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have revolutionized the treatment of multiple hematologic malignancies. Engineered cellular therapies now offer similar hope to transform the management of solid tumors and autoimmune diseases. However, toxicities can be serious and often require hospitalization.

AREAS COVERED

We review the two chief toxicities of CAR T therapy, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and the rarer immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome. We discuss treatment paradigms and promising future pharmacologic strategies. Literature and therapies reviewed were identified by PubMed search, cited references therein, and review of registered trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Management of CRS and ICANS has improved, aided by consensus definitions and guidelines that facilitate recognition and timely intervention. Further data will define optimal timing of tocilizumab and corticosteroids, current foundations of management. Pathophysiologic understanding has inspired off-label use of IL-1 receptor antagonism, IFNγ and IL-6 neutralizing antibodies, and janus kinase inhibitors, with data emerging from ongoing clinical trials. Further strategies to reduce toxicities include novel pharmacologic targets and safety features engineered into CAR T cells themselves. As these potentially curative therapies are used earlier in oncologic therapy and even in non-oncologic indications, effective accessible strategies to manage toxicities are critical.

Current advances in experimental and computational approaches to enhance CAR T cell manufacturing protocols and improve clinical efficacy

Since the FDA's approval of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in 2017, significant improvements have been made in the design of chimeric antigen receptor constructs and in the manufacturing of CAR T cell therapies resulting in increased in vivo CAR T cell persistence and improved clinical outcome in certain hematological malignancies. Despite the remarkable clinical response seen in some patients, challenges remain in achieving durable long-term tumor-free survival, reducing therapy associated malignancies and toxicities, and expanding on the types of cancers that can be treated with this therapeutic modality. Careful analysis of the biological factors demarcating efficacious from suboptimal CAR T cell responses will be of paramount importance to address these shortcomings. With the ever-expanding toolbox of experimental approaches, single-cell technologies, and computational resources, there is renowned interest in discovering new ways to streamline the development and validation of new CAR T cell products. Better and more accurate prognostic and predictive models can be developed to help guide and inform clinical decision making by incorporating these approaches into translational and clinical workflows. In this review, we provide a brief overview of recent advancements in CAR T cell manufacturing and describe the strategies used to selectively expand specific phenotypic subsets. Additionally, we review experimental approaches to assess CAR T cell functionality and summarize current in silico methods which have the potential to improve CAR T cell manufacturing and predict clinical outcomes.

Recent advances and current challenges in CAR-T cell therapy

Rapid advancements in the field of immunotherapy have significantly improved cancer treatments. Specifically, an individualized cell-based modality which involves the removal of some of the patient's own white blood cells, including T cells, has revolutionized research in this field. This study focuses on the recent advances and current challenges of Chimeric Antigen Receptor- T (CAR-T) cell therapy and its regulations in the United States (US) and European Union (EU). Understanding the regulatory regimes of CAR-T cell therapy is critical for researchers and manufacturers as they navigate the hurdles of bringing CAR-T cell therapy to the global market. Benefits of CAR-T cell therapy include high response rates and the potential of long-term remissions in some haematological malignancies. However, the drawbacks are still evident including high costs, adverse reactions, and limited efficacy to solid tumours. CAR-T cell therapy is rapidly advancing, with 1231 clinical trials launched globally according to www.clinicalTrial.gov . The future of CAR-T cell therapy holds enormous promise but improving its safety, effectiveness, and availability are still barriers to its successful implementation.

Early predictive factors of failure in autologous CAR T-cell manufacturing and/or efficacy in hematologic malignancies

ABSTRACT

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have shown significant benefits in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, such as B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and B-cell lymphoma. Despite the therapeutic advances offered by these innovative treatments, failures are still observed in 15% to 40% of patients with B-ALL and >50% of patients with B-cell lymphoma. Several hypotheses have emerged including CD19-negative or -positive relapses, low CAR T-cell activation and/or expansion in vivo, or T-cell exhaustion. To date, in the European Union, CAR T cells granted with marketing authorization are autologous and thus associated with a strong heterogeneity between products. Indeed, the manufacturing of a single batch requires cellular starting material collection by apheresis for each patient, with variable cellular composition, and then challenging pharmaceutical companies to standardize as much as possible the production process. In addition, these cost and time-consuming therapies are associated with a risk of manufacturing failure reaching 25%. Thus, there is a growing need to identify early risk factors of unsuccessful production and/or therapeutic escape. Quality of the apheresis product, pathology progression, as well as previous treatments have been reported as predictive factors of the variability in clinical response. The aim of this review is to report and discuss predictive factors that could help to anticipate the manufacturing success and clinical response.

Treatment strategies for relapse after CAR T-cell therapy in B cell lymphoma

Clinical trials of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CART19) cell therapy have shown high overall response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. CART19 cell therapy has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients who relapsed less than 12 months after initial therapy or who are refractory to first-line therapy. However, durable remission of CART19 cell therapy is still lacking, and 30%-60% of patients will eventually relapse after CART19 infusion. In general, the prognosis of patients who relapse after CART19 cell therapy is poor, and various strategies to treat this patient population have been investigated extensively. CART19 failures can be broadly categorized by the emergence of either CD19-positive or CD19-negative lymphoma cells. If CD19 expression is preserved on the lymphoma cells, a second infusion of CART19 cells or reactivation of previously infused CART19 cells with immune checkpoint inhibitors can be considered. When patients develop CD19-negative relapse, targeting different antigens (e.g., CD20 or CD22) with CAR T cells, investigational chemotherapies, or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are potential treatment options. However, salvage therapies for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma after CART19 cell therapy have not been fully explored and are conducted based on clinicians' case-by-case decisions. In this review, we will focus on salvage therapies reported to date and discuss the management of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas after CART19 cell therapy.

CD19/CD22 targeting with cotransduced CAR T cells to prevent antigen-negative relapse after CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell ALL

ABSTRACT

CD19-negative relapse is a leading cause of treatment failure after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We investigated a CAR T-cell product targeting CD19 and CD22 generated by lentiviral cotransduction with vectors encoding our previously described fast-off rate CD19 CAR (AUTO1) combined with a novel CD22 CAR capable of effective signaling at low antigen density. Twelve patients with advanced B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia were treated (CARPALL [Immunotherapy with CD19/22 CAR Redirected T Cells for High Risk/Relapsed Paediatric CD19+ and/or CD22+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia] study, NCT02443831), a third of whom had failed prior licensed CAR therapy. Toxicity was similar to that of AUTO1 alone, with no cases of severe cytokine release syndrome. Of 12 patients, 10 (83%) achieved a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission at 2 months after infusion. Of 10 responding patients, 5 had emergence of MRD (n = 2) or relapse (n = 3) with CD19- and CD22-expressing disease associated with loss of CAR T-cell persistence. With a median follow-up of 8.7 months, there were no cases of relapse due to antigen-negative escape. Overall survival was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-91%) at 6 and 12 months. The 6- and 12-month event-free survival rates were 75% (95% CI, 41%-91%) and 60% (95% CI, 23%-84%), respectively. These data suggest dual targeting with cotransduction may prevent antigen-negative relapse after CAR T-cell therapy.

Emerging Biomarkers for Monitoring Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized treatment of hematologic malignancies and holds promise for solid tumors. While responses to CAR T-cell therapy have surpassed other available options for patients with refractory malignancies, not all patients respond the same way. The reason for this variability is not currently understood. Therefore, there is a strong need to identify characteristics of patients as well as cellular products that lead to an effective response to CAR T-cell therapy.

CONTENT

In this review, we discuss potential biomarkers that may predict clinical outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy. Based on correlative findings from clinical trials of both commercially available and early-phase products, we classify biomarkers into categories of pre- and post-infusion as well as patient and product-related markers. Among the biomarkers that have been explored, measures of disease burden both pre- and post-infusion, as well as CAR T-cell persistence post-infusion, are repeatedly identified as predictors of disease response. Higher proportions of early memory T cells at infusion appear to be favorable, and tracking T-cell subsets throughout treatment will likely be critical.

SUMMARY

There are a growing number of promising biomarkers of CAR T-cell efficacy described in the research setting, however, none of these have been validated for clinical use. Some potentially important predictors of response may be difficult to obtain routinely under the current CAR T-cell therapy workflow. A collaborative approach is needed to select biomarkers that can be validated in large cohorts and incorporated into clinical practice.

Novel chimeric antigen receptor targets and constructs for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Moving beyond CD19

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the second most common acute leukemia in adults with a poor prognosis with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell lineage ALL (B-ALL). Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown excellent response rates in RR B-ALL, but most patients relapse due to poor persistence of CAR T-cell therapy or other tumor-associated escape mechanisms. In addition, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy causes several serious side effects such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. In this review, we will discuss novel CAR targets, CAR constructs, and various strategies to boost CARs for the treatment of RR B-ALL. In addition, we discuss a few novel strategies developed to reduce the side effects of CAR.

CAR-T Cell Therapy in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Treatment of refractory and relapsed (R/R) B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is an unmet medical need in both children and adults. Studies carried out in the last two decades have shown that autologous T cells engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) represent an effective technique for treating these patients. Antigens expressed on B-cells, such as CD19, CD20, and CD22, represent targets suitable for treating patients with R/R B-ALL. CD19 CAR-T cells induce a high rate (80-90%) of complete remissions in both pediatric and adult R/R B-ALL patients. However, despite this impressive rate of responses, about half of responding patients relapse within 1-2 years after CAR-T cell therapy. Allo-HSCT after CAR-T cell therapy might consolidate the therapeutic efficacy of CAR-T and increase long-term outcomes; however, not all the studies that have adopted allo-HSCT as a consolidative treatment strategy have shown a benefit deriving from transplantation. For B-ALL patients who relapse early after allo-HSCT or those with insufficient T-cell numbers for an autologous approach, using T cells from the original stem cell donor offers the opportunity for the successful generation of CAR-T cells and for an effective therapeutic approach. Finally, recent studies have introduced allogeneic CAR-T cells generated from healthy donors or unmatched, which are opportunely manipulated with gene editing to reduce the risk of immunological incompatibility, with promising therapeutic effects.

Intrathecal hydrocortisone for treatment of children and young adults with CAR T-cell immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome

Immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a significant toxicity occurring with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, with first-line treatment options including supportive care and systemic corticosteroids. Sparse data exist on how to approach progressive/refractory cases of ICANS. We present five pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who had progressively worsening ICANS despite systemic steroids, and received intrathecal hydrocortisone with rapid reversal of ICANS. Therapeutic lumbar punctures are routinely used in upfront ALL therapy in pediatrics, with a demonstrable safety profile, thus use of intrathecal hydrocortisone merits further prospective studies in patients with severe ICANS.

INSPIRED Symposium Part 3: Prevention and Management of Pediatric Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell-Associated Emergent Toxicities

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a revolutionary cancer treatment modality, particularly in children and young adults with B cell malignancies. Through clinical trials and real-world experience, much has been learned about the unique toxicity profile of CAR-T therapy. The past decade brought advances in identifying risk factors for severe inflammatory toxicities, investigating preventive measures to mitigate these toxicities, and exploring novel strategies to manage refractory and newly described toxicities, infectious risks, and delayed effects, such as cytopenias. Although much progress has been made, areas needing further improvements remain. Limited guidance exists regarding initial administration of tocilizumab with or without steroids and the management of inflammatory toxicities refractory to these treatments. There has not been widespread adoption of preventive strategies to mitigate inflammation in patients at high risk of severe toxicities, particularly children. Additionally, the majority of research related to CAR-T toxicity prevention and management has focused on adult populations, with only a few pediatric-specific studies published to date. Given that children and young adults undergoing CAR-T therapy represent a unique population with different underlying disease processes, physiology, and tolerance of toxicities than adults, it is important that studies be conducted to evaluate acute, delayed, and long-term toxicities following CAR-T therapy in this younger age group. In this pediatric-focused review, we summarize key findings on CAR-T therapy-related toxicities over the past decade, highlight emergent CAR-T toxicities, and identify areas of greatest need for ongoing research.

Practice Preferences for Consolidative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Following Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Treatment with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) achieves excellent complete remission rates in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but approximately 50% maintain long-term remission. Consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (cHSCT) is a potential strategy to reduce relapse risk, but it carries substantial short- and long-term toxicities. Additionally, several strategies for management of B cell recovery (BCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) positivity post-tisa-cel exist, without an accepted standard. We hypothesized that practice preferences surrounding cHSCT, as well as management of BCR and NGS positivity, varies across tisa-cel-prescribing physicians and sought to characterize current practice preferences. A survey focusing on preferences regarding the use of cHSCT, management of BCR, and NGS positivity was distributed to physicians who prescribe tisa-cel for children and young adults with B-ALL. Responses were collected from August 2022 to April 2023. Fifty-nine unique responses were collected across 43 institutions. All respondents prescribed tisa-cel for children and young adults. The clinical focus of respondents was HSCT in 71%, followed by leukemia/lymphoma in 24%. For HSCT-naive patients receiving tisa-cel, 57% of respondents indicated they made individualized decisions for cHSCT based on patient factors, whereas 22% indicated they would avoid cHSCT and 21% indicated they would pursue cHSCT when feasible. Certain factors influenced >50% of respondents towards recommending cHSCT (either an increased likelihood of recommending or always recommending), including preinfusion disease burden >25%, primary refractory B-ALL, M3 bone marrow following reinduction for relapse, KMT2A-rearranged B-ALL, history of blinatumomab nonresponse, and HSCT-naive status. Most respondents indicated they would pursue HSCT for HSCT-naive, total body irradiation (TBI) recipients with BCR before 6 months post-tisa-cel or with NGS positivity at 1 or 3 months post-tisa-cel, although there was variability in responses regarding whether to proceed to HSCT directly or provide intervening therapy prior to HSCT. Fewer respondents recommended HSCT for BCR or NGS positivity in patients with a history of HSCT, in noncandidates for TBI, and in patients with trisomy 21. The results of this survey indicate there exists significant practice variability regarding the use of cHSCT, as well as interventions for post-tisa-cel BCR or NGS positivity. These results highlight areas in which ongoing clinical trials could inform more standardized practice.

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in the Context of Hematological Malignancies and Solid Tumors

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) has been described for decades in association with malignancies (M-HLH). While its mechanism is unknown, M-HLH has a poor prognosis, ranging from 10% to 30% overall survival. Mature T-cell lymphomas, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma, with or without viral co-triggers such as Epstein-Barr virus, are among the most frequent underlying entities. Most M-HLH cases occur at the presentation of malignancy, but they may also occur during therapy as a result of immune compromise from chemotherapy (HLH in the context of immune compromise, IC-HLH) and (typically) disordered response to infection or after immune-activating therapies (Rx-HLH, also known as cytokine release syndrome, CRS). IC-HLH typically occurs months after diagnosis in the context of fungal, bacterial, or viral infection, though it may occur without an apparent trigger. Rx-HLH can be associated with checkpoint blockade, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or bispecific T-cell engaging therapy. Until recently, M-HLH diagnosis and treatment strategies were extrapolated from familial HLH (F-HLH), though optimized diagnostic and therapeutic treatment strategies are emerging.

15-color highly sensitive flow cytometry assay for post anti-CD19 targeted therapy (anti-CD19-CAR-T and blinatumomab) measurable residual disease assessment in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: Real-world applicability and challenges

OBJECTIVES

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is the most relevant predictor of disease-free survival in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We aimed to establish a highly sensitive flow cytometry (MFC)-based B-ALL-MRD (BMRD) assay for patients receiving anti-CD19 immunotherapy with an alternate gating approach and to document the prevalence and immunophenotype of recurrently occurring low-level mimics and confounding populations.

METHODS

We standardized a 15-color highly-sensitive BMRD assay with an alternate CD19-free gating approach. The study included 137 MRD samples from 43 relapsed/refractory B-ALL patients considered for anti-CD19 immunotherapy.

RESULTS

The 15-color BMRD assay with CD22/CD24/CD81/CD33-based gating approach was routinely applicable in 137 BM samples and could achieve a sensitivity of 0.0005%. MRD was detected in 29.9% (41/137) samples with 31.7% (13/41) of them showing <.01% MRD. Recurrently occurring low-level cells that showed immunophenotypic overlap with leukemic B-blasts included: (a) CD19+CD10+CD34+CD22+CD24+CD81+CD123+CD304+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells, (b) CD73bright/CD304bright/CD81bright mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (CD10+) and endothelial cells (CD34+CD24+), (c) CD22dim/CD34+/CD38dim/CD81dim/CD19-/CD10-/CD24- early lymphoid progenitor/precursor type-1 cells (ELP-1) and (d) CD22+/CD34+/CD10heterogeneous/CD38moderate/CD81moderate/CD19-/CD24- stage-0 B-cell precursors or ELP-2 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

We standardized a highly sensitive 15-color BMRD assay with a non-CD19-based gating strategy for patients receiving anti-CD19 immunotherapy. We also described the immunophenotypes of recurrently occurring low-level populations that can be misinterpreted as MRD in real-world practice.

Enhanced efficacy of CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR-T cells with EAAAK linker on B-cell malignancies

OBJECTIVES

Despite the great success of CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, its clinical efficacy has been greatly hampered by the high relapse rate. In this study, we designed and compared four structures of CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR-T cells with different linkers and different orders of the antibody sequences.

METHODS

We detected the cytotoxicity, cytokine secretion levels, sustainable killing ability, differentiation, exhaustion of these four CAR-T cells in vitro. The optimal Bis-C CAR-T cells were evaluated the efficacy using NSG mice.

RESULTS

The two structures of CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR-T cells using (EAAAK)3 as linker had more significant cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion levels. In the process of continuous killing, Bis-C CAR-T cells showed better sustained killing ability, memory phenotype differentiation, and exhaustion. In the in vivo experiment mimicking CD19-negative relapse, Bis-C CAR-T was more able to control the tumor progression of mice in the CD19 low expression or no expression groups than CD19 CAR-T.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has generated a novel bispecific CAR-T cell that can simultaneously target CD19 or CD22 positive tumor cells, providing a new strategy to address the limitations of single-targeted CAR-T therapy in B-cell tumors (limited response or relapse).

ALKemy to enhance chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy for neuroblastoma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy in solid cancer is severely limited by the absence of ideal targets. In this issue of Cancer Cell, Bergaggio et al. find that anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors can enhance the function of ALK-specific CAR T cells against neuroblastoma by increasing target density in cancer cells.

Preventing relapse after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for pediatric ALL: the role of transplant and enhanced CAR T cells

CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become an integral part of our treatment armamentarium for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, despite initial remission rates of greater than 80%, durable remission occurs in only 40% to 50% of patients. In this review we summarize our current knowledge of the role of consolidative hematopoietic cell transplantation in the management of pediatric patients who achieved a minimal residual disease-negative complete response post CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. In addition, we review approaches to enhance effector function CD19 CAR T cells, focusing on how to improve persistence and prevent the emergence of CD19- B-ALL blasts.

The Current State of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for B Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Over the past decade, CAR T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-ALL in children and adults. CD19-directed CAR T cells can induce complete remissions in a large majority of patients with B-ALL, and up to half of these patients will go on to maintain durable remissions. However, significant challenges remain for patients who relapse or do not respond. This review will discuss the history of CAR T cell therapy for B-ALL, the treatment considerations for CAR T cell recipients, and current clinical trials and future directions for CAR T cell therapy in B-ALL.

Mechanisms of resistance to chimeric antigen receptor-T cells in haematological malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells have recently emerged as a powerful therapeutic approach for the treatment of patients with chemotherapy-refractory or relapsed blood cancers, including acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Nevertheless, resistance to CAR-T cell therapies occurs in most patients. In this Review, we summarize the resistance mechanisms to CAR-T cell immunotherapy by analysing CAR-T cell dysfunction, intrinsic tumour resistance and the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. We discuss current research strategies to overcome multiple resistance mechanisms, including optimization of the CAR design, improvement of in vivo T cell function and persistence, modulation of the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment and synergistic combination strategies.