Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy

Targeted and intelligent nano-drug delivery systems for colorectal cancer treatment

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a highly heterogeneous malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite advancements in surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy, treatment efficacy is often hampered by drug resistance and systemic toxicity. In recent years, nano-drug delivery systems (NDDS) have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance therapeutic precision, reduce adverse effects, and overcome resistance in CRC treatment. This review discusses the recent advancements in NDDS for CRC treatment, focusing on the optimization of oral drug delivery systems, the development of tumor-specific targeting strategies, and the design of intelligent delivery systems responsive to the tumor microenvironment (TME). Furthermore, we summarize current challenges in NDDS translation and explore future research directions for enhancing their clinical feasibility and therapeutic impact.

Economic Burden of Intravenous Decitabine Administration in Patients Affected by Acute Myeloid Leukemia Ineligible for Induction Chemotherapy and Impact of Oral Formulation Introduction: A Micro-Costing Study in Italy

Purpose

Intravenous (IV) decitabine is a therapeutic option for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for induction chemotherapy. Recently, the oral formulation of decitabine-cedazuridine demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to IV decitabine, and pharmacokinetic equivalence. This study estimates the direct non-drug healthcare costs of IV decitabine administration in Italy, including central venous catheter (CVC) and infection management, and assesses the economic impact of oral decitabine introduction.

Methods

A micro-costing analysis from the Italian National Health Service (NHS) perspective was developed in four steps: 1) identification of the phases of IV and oral decitabine administration process, including CVC and infection management; 2) estimation of resource consumption, frequencies and proportion of patients for each phase; 3) collection of unit costs; 4) development of a cost analysis model. Inputs were retrieved from literature, public sources, IQVIA proprietary databases and a panel composed of clinicians, nurses and hospital pharmacists working in oncology departments. Two scenarios were explored: the first applying the economic impact to the population of interest over three years, the second including the cost of blood transfusions.

Results

The analysis estimated a total non-drug administration cost per patient of € 3574.6 and € 781.4 for a treatment course with IV and oral decitabine, respectively, leading to a cost impact of oral drug introduction of - € 2793.2 (-78.1%). The first scenario estimated a total saving for the Italian NHS of € 1.09 million over three years, the second scenario estimated a potential additional impact of - € 3418.6/patient due to transfusions.

Conclusion

The administration of oral versus IV decitabine is expected to generate cost savings for the Italian NHS in terms of drug administration, CVC and infection management, in patients with AML ineligible for induction chemotherapy.

Oral docetaxel plus encequidar - a phase 1 clinical trial

PURPOSE

To determine the bioavailability, safety, and tolerability of a single dose of oral docetaxel plus encequidar (oDox + E) and compare its pharmacokinetic exposure with current standard of care IV docetaxel.

INTRODUCTION

Docetaxel is a taxane widely used as an anti-neoplastic agent. Due to low oral bioavailability secondary to gut P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux, its current use is limited to intravenous administration. Oral docetaxel may provide a less resource intensive, more convenient, and tolerable alternative. Encequidar is a first in class, minimally absorbed, oral gut-specific P-gp inhibitor. We tested whether oDox + E can achieve comparable pharmacokinetic exposure to IV docetaxel.

METHODS

A multicentre, phase I open-label, pharmacokinetic trial was undertaken to determine the bioavailability, safety, and tolerability of a single dose of oDox + E (at 75 mg/m2 + 15 mg, 150 mg/m2 + 15 mg, and 300 mg/m2 + 15 mg) in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) patients compared to standard of care IV docetaxel as prescribed by their oncologists. The 15 mg of Encequidar at each dose level was given one hour prior to oral docetaxel.

RESULTS

11 patients were enrolled; 9 patients completed the study. Oral docetaxel exposure increased with dose, achieving the highest at 300 mg/m2 oDox + E (with AUC0 - infinity of 1343.3 ± 443.0 ng.h/mL compared to the IV docetaxel AUC0 - infinity of 2000 ± 325 ng.h/mL) and became non-linear at 300 mg/m2. The mean absolute bioavailability of oDox + E across all 3 dose levels was 16.14% (range: 8.19-25.09%). No patient deaths, dose limiting toxicity, treatment-related serious adverse event or grade 4 toxicity were observed. Maximal tolerated dose was not reached.

CONCLUSION

oDox + E has a safe and tolerable adverse event profile in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The increase in oral bioavailability of oDox + E suggests a multi-dose oDox + E regimen could theoretically achieve exposures comparable with standard of care IV docetaxel. Further development to examine the optimal multiple dose regimen of oDox + E is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

U1111-1173-5473.

Drinkable in situ-forming tough hydrogels for gastrointestinal therapeutics

Pills are a cornerstone of medicine but can be challenging to swallow. While liquid formulations are easier to ingest, they lack the capacity to localize therapeutics with excipients nor act as controlled release devices. Here we describe drug formulations based on liquid in situ-forming tough (LIFT) hydrogels that bridge the advantages of solid and liquid dosage forms. LIFT hydrogels form directly in the stomach through sequential ingestion of a crosslinker solution of calcium and dithiol crosslinkers, followed by a drug-containing polymer solution of alginate and four-arm poly(ethylene glycol)-maleimide. We show that LIFT hydrogels robustly form in the stomachs of live rats and pigs, and are mechanically tough, biocompatible and safely cleared after 24 h. LIFT hydrogels deliver a total drug dose comparable to unencapsulated drug in a controlled manner, and protect encapsulated therapeutic enzymes and bacteria from gastric acid-mediated deactivation. Overall, LIFT hydrogels may expand access to advanced therapeutics for patients with difficulty swallowing.

Polycaprolactone-Vitamin E TPGS Micellar Formulation for Oral Delivery of Paclitaxel

This study aimed to investigate the potential of polycaprolactone-vitamin E TPGS (PCL-TPGS) micelles as a delivery system for oral administration of paclitaxel (PTX). The PCL-TPGS copolymer was synthesized using ring opening polymerization, and PTX-loaded PCL-TPGS micelles (PTX micelles) were prepared via a co-solvent evaporation method. Characterization of these micelles included measurements of size, polydispersity, and encapsulation efficiency. The cellular uptake of PTX micelles was evaluated in Caco-2 cells using rhodamine 123 (Rh123) as a fluorescent probe. Moreover, an everted rat sac study was conducted to evaluate the ex vivo permeability of PTX micelles. Additionally, a comparative pharmacokinetic study of PTX micelles versus the marketed formulation, Ebetaxel® (a Taxol generic), was performed after a single oral administration to rats. The results demonstrated that the micellar formulation significantly improved PTX solubility (nearly 1 mg/mL). The in vitro stability and release of PTX micelles in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) demonstrated that PTX micelles remained stable for up to 24 h and significantly slowed the release of PTX in both media compared to Ebetaxel®. The in vitro cellular uptake, ex vivo intestinal permeability, and in vivo pharmacokinetic profile demonstrated that PTX micelles enhanced the permeability and facilitated a rapid absorption of the drug. Conclusively, the PCL7000-TPGS3500 micelles exhibit potential as an effective oral delivery system for PTX.

Oral docetaxel plus encequidar - A pharmacokinetic model and evaluation against IV docetaxel

The development of optimized dosing regimens plays a crucial role in oncology drug development. This study focused on the population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation of docetaxel, comparing the pharmacokinetic exposure of oral docetaxel plus encequidar (oDox + E) with the standard of care intravenous (IV) docetaxel regimen. The aim was to evaluate the feasibility of oDox + E as a potential alternative to IV docetaxel. The article demonstrates an approach which aligns with the FDA's Project Optimus which aims to improve oncology drug development through model informed drug development (MIDD). The key question answered by this study was whether a feasible regimen of oDox + E existed. The purpose of this question was to provide an early GO / NO-GO decision point to guide drug development and improve development efficiency.

METHODS

 A stepwise approach was employed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for total and unbound docetaxel plasma concentrations after IV docetaxel and oDox + E administration. Simulations were performed from the final model to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) for different oDox + E dose regimens (including multiple dose regimens) in relation to IV docetaxel using AUC over effective concentration (AUCOEC) metric across a range of effective concentrations (EC). A Go / No-Go framework was defined-the first part of the framework assessed whether a feasible oDox + E regimen existed (i.e., a PTA ≥ 80%), and the second part defined the conditions to proceed with a Go decision.

RESULTS

 The overall population pharmacokinetic model consisted of a 3-compartment model with linear elimination, constant bioavailability, constant binding mechanics, and a combined error model. Simulations revealed that single dose oDox + E regimens did not achieve a PTA greater than 80%. However, two- and three-dose regimens at 600 mg achieved PTAs exceeding 80% for certain EC levels.

CONCLUSION

 The study demonstrates the benefits of MIDD using oDox + E as a motivating example. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed for the total and unbound concentration in plasma of docetaxel after administration of IV docetaxel and oDox + E. The model was used to simulate oDox + E dose regimens which were compared to the current standard of care IV docetaxel regimen. A GO / NO-GO framework was applied to determine whether oDox + E should progress to the next phase of drug development and whether any conditions should apply. A two or three-dose regimen of oDox + E at 600 mg was able to achieve non-inferior pharmacokinetic exposure to current standard of care IV docetaxel in simulations. A Conditional GO decision was made based on this result and further quantification of the "effective concentration" would improve the ability to optimise the dose regimen.

Patients' perspectives on oral decitabine/cedazuridine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms

Background

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are guideline-recommended treatment for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS). However, a prior survey of patients with MDS reported challenges with intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) HMA therapies, including pain related to treatment administration and interference with daily activities; most patients also indicated a preference to switch to an oral therapy if one were available.

Objectives

This study evaluated the perspectives of US patients with MDS receiving oral decitabine/cedazuridine (DEC-C), an alternative to IV/SC HMAs.

Methods

An online survey was conducted among adult patients with MDS in the United States (10 November 2022 to 5 December 2022) who had filled a prescription for oral DEC-C between 2021 and 2022.

Results

A total of 150 patients completed the survey; 61% were aged ⩾60 years and 63% were male. Of these, 123 (82%) were still receiving oral DEC-C, and 27 (18%) had stopped oral DEC-C treatment. Half (50%) of patients had received oral DEC-C for ⩾6 months. The majority reported that treatment was convenient (83%) and that they were satisfied with treatment (86%). Most patients also reported very little/no interference with regular daily activities (82%), social activities (78%), and productivity (78%). When queried about negative impacts on quality of life (QOL), treatment side effects were the most commonly reported (30% of respondents). Among patients who had previously received IV/SC HMAs (n = 91), most agreed that oral DEC-C interfered less with daily life (91%) and had experienced improvement in QOL (85%) compared with previous treatment; 91% reported that oral DEC-C reduced the number of times they needed to travel to a healthcare facility.

Conclusion

Survey results suggest very little/no impact on regular daily activities and improved QOL with oral DEC-C relative to IV/SC HMAs, highlighting the potential for oral DEC-C to reduce the treatment burden associated with parenteral HMA therapy.

What are the needs in oral antitumor therapy? An analysis of patients' and practitioners' preferences

Background

Since the European approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors in 2016, the treatment of patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer has changed significantly. Compared with chemotherapy, endocrine-based therapy has different treatment regimens and is associated with new side effects. Oral therapy aims for optimal drug efficacy and long treatment times while maintaining maximum independence and quality of life resulting in the conservation of medical staff resources.

Methods

A monocentric analysis of therapy preferences of practitioners (25 nurses and physicians) and patients (11 on endocrine monotherapy, 17 on endocrine-based therapy, and 14 on intravenous chemotherapy) was performed using specific questionnaires. Preferences were assessed using a four-point Likert scale or bidirectional response options.

Results

All patients were highly supportive of oral therapy (mean agreement score on the Likert scale 1.3, p < 0.001 vs. all other options) and a consultation interval of 4 weeks (2.0, p = 0.015 vs. 3 weeks). Practitioners also preferred oral therapy (1.4) and visits every 4 weeks (1.6). In general, patients on oral therapies reported higher compatibility of their therapy with daily life than patients on chemotherapy (1.6 and 1.7 vs. 2.6, p = 0.006). Outpatient oncology is the main source of information for all patients, mainly in case of side effects (2.0) and open questions (1.8). Regarding oral antitumor therapy regimens, patients do not show a significant preference for a specific regimen, while practitioners prefer a continuous regimen (1.6) over a 21/7 regimen (21 days on and 7 days off therapy, 2.5). Patients are likely to accept mild side effects (e.g., neutropenia, diarrhea, polyneuropathy, fatigue) and would still adhere to their initial choice of regimen (continuous or 21/7). Only when side effects occur with a severity of CTCAE grade 3 do patients prefer the regimen in which the side effects occur for a shorter period of time.

Conclusion

Patients and practitioners prefer oral antitumor therapy-both continuous and 21/7 regimens-over other application forms. Patient education and proper therapy management, supported by additional tools, contribute to the specific management of side effects and high adherence. This allows quality of life to be maintained during long-term therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Maximum tolerated dose and toxicity evaluation of orally administered docetaxel granule in mice

Oral delivery of chemotherapy drugs is the most favorable and preferred route of drug administration. However, because of poor solubility and/or permeability, most chemotherapy drugs are given by intravenous administration. Docetaxel (DTX) is a potent chemotherapy drug that inhibits microtubular depolymerization and is widely used to treat numerous cancers. DTX is highly lipophilic and insoluble in water; thus, 50% polysorbate 80, which may cause hypersensitivity reactions and reduce drug uptake by tumor tissue, is used in the commercial DTX injection to dissolve DTX. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity are important to determine parameters in preclinical studies and to predict human dose in clinical trials. However, MTD and toxicity of oral DTX formulations have not been studied although various oral DTX formulations have been reported. We have previously developed oral DTX granule and demonstrated its ability to inhibit tumor growth. In this study, we aimed to systemically measure MTD and tissue distribution and evaluate the toxicity of oral DTX granule in mice. Oral DTX granule showed sex differences in toxicity and absorption. The MTD of DTX granule was determined at 50 mg/kg for female mice and 25 mg/kg for male mice. However, female mice had higher tissue absorption than male mice. At a very high dose (400 mg/kg), oral DTX granule induced kidney damage but did not influence the liver and the lungs. The study provides the fundamental data for future preclinical studies and clinical application of oral DTX formulations for cancers.

A Sensitive Assay for Unbound Docetaxel Using Ultrafiltration plus HPLC-MS and Its Application to a Clinical Study

INTRODUCTION

Docetaxel, a taxane used in the treatment of solid tumours, exerts pharmacological activity when in its unbound form. We report a sensitive assay to quantify unbound docetaxel after oral administration of docetaxel plus encequidar (oDox+E). Unbound drug quantification is important due to its direct correlation with drug-related toxicity and therapeutic efficacy. We improve on the sensitivity of current assay methods and demonstrate the utility of the assay on a novel formulation of oral docetaxel.

METHODS

Ultrafiltration followed by high-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) was utilized. Long-term stability, precision, accuracy, and recovery experiments were conducted to validate the assay. Additionally, patient samples from a Phase I dose-escalation pharmacokinetic study were analyzed using the developed assay.

RESULTS

The assay method exhibited long-term stability with an observed change between 0.8 and 6.9% after 131 days of storage at -60 °C. Precision and accuracy quality controls met the FDA acceptance criteria. An average recovery of 88% was obtained. Patient sample analysis demonstrated successful implementation of the assay.

CONCLUSION

A validated sensitive assay was developed with an LLOQ of 0.084 ng/mL using 485 µL of human plasma. The sensitivity of the assay allowed quantification of unbound docetaxel concentrations in an early-phase oDox+E clinical study to compare it against IV docetaxel using pharmacokinetic modelling. Successful development of oDox+E represents an opportunity to replace the current IV docetaxel regimen with an oral regimen with lower cost, decreased side effects, and improve patient quality of life and experience.

Co-release of paclitaxel and encequidar from amorphous solid dispersions increase oral paclitaxel bioavailability in rats

The oral bioavailability of paclitaxel is limited due to low solubility and high affinity for the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux transporter. Here we hypothesized that maximizing the intestinal paclitaxel levels through apparent solubility enhancement and controlling thesimultaneous release of both paclitaxel and the P-gp inhibitor encequidar from amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) would increase the oral bioavailability of paclitaxel. ASDs of paclitaxel and encequidar in polyvinylpyrrolidone K30 (PVP-K30), hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 5 (HPMC-5), and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 4 K (HPMC-4K) were hence prepared by freeze-drying. In vitro dissolution studies showed that both compounds were released fastest from PVP-K30, then from HPMC-5, and slowest from HPMC-4K ASDs. The dissolution of paclitaxel from all polymers resulted in stable concentration levels above the apparent solubility. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel after oral administration to male Sprague-Dawley rats was investigated with or without 1 mg/kg encequidar, as amorphous solids or polymer-based ASDs. The bioavailability of paclitaxel increased 3- to 4-fold when administered as polymer-based ASDs relative to solid amorphous paclitaxel. However, when amorphous paclitaxel was co-administered with encequidar, either as an amorphous powder or as a polymer-based ASD, the bioavailability increased 2- to 4-fold, respectively. Interestingly, a noticeable increase in paclitaxel bioavailability of 24-fold was observed when paclitaxel and encequidar were co-administered as HPMC-5-based ASDs. We, therefore, suggest that controlling the dissolution rate of paclitaxel and encequidar in order to obtain simultaneous and timed release from polymer-based ASDs is a strategy to increase oral paclitaxel bioavailability.

Cost-effectiveness of the ONCORAL multidisciplinary programme for the management of outpatients taking oral anticancer agents at risk of drug-related event: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled study

INTRODUCTION

The development of oral anticancer agents (OAA) has profoundly changed cancer care, leading patients to manage their chemotherapy treatment on an outpatient basis. The prevention of iatrogenic effects of OAA remains a major concern, especially since their side effects are not less serious than those of intravenous chemotherapy. The ONCORAL programme was set up to secure the management of OAA in cancer patients followed at the Lyon University Hospital. This multidisciplinary programme involves hospital pharmacists, nurses, oncologists, and haematologists, as well as community health professionals. Given the economic stakes that this programme entails for the health system, a medico-economic study was designed.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective controlled study, with individual open-label randomisation. A total of 216 outpatients treated with OAA and at risk of developing a drug-related iatrogenic event, will be randomised (2:1) to undergo follow-up in the ONCORAL programme or usual care. The primary outcome will be the estimation of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (difference in total costs per quality adjusted life years gained) at 12 months between the two groups. The secondary outcomes will be evaluation of OAA management consequences (relative-dose intensity, adherence, adverse drug events, drug-drug interactions, and proven medication errors), evaluation of overall survival and cancer-related quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes in relation to the treatment. A budget impact analysis will be implemented. Patient and health professional satisfaction regarding the ONCORAL programme will be measured.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval to conduct this study was obtained from an Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile-de-France VI) in October 2019, and from the French data protection agency (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés), according to the French Law. Trial results will be disseminated at clinical conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03660670.

The Efficacy, Adverse Effects and Economic Implications of Oral Versus Intravenous Methylprednisolone for the Treatment of Optic Neuritis: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Optic neuritis may occur in a variety of conditions, including as a manifestation of multiple sclerosis. Despite significant research into the efficacy of corticosteroids as a first-line treatment, the optimal route of administration has not been well defined. This review aims to explore the efficacy, adverse effects and economic implications of using oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone to treat acute optic neuritis.

METHODS

A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL was performed to July 2022, prior to data collection and risk of bias analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Six articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The results showed that in the treatment of acute optic neuritis, oral methylprednisolone has a non-inferior efficacy and adverse effect profile in comparison to intravenous methylprednisolone. In a cost analysis, oral methylprednisolone to be more cost-effective than intravenous methylprednisolone.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral methylprednisolone has comparable efficacy and adverse effect profiles to intravenous methylprednisolone for the treatment of optic neuritis. The analysis suggests oral administration is more cost-effective than intravenous administration; however, further analyses of the formal cost-benefit ratio are required.

A Retrospective Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil with Fruquintinib in Patients with Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) and fruquintinib are novel antitumor agents for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We conducted a retrospective study to explore the clinical efficacy and drug toxicities of combination therapy with TAS-102 and fruquintinib in real-life clinical practice.

METHODS

Between March 2021 and February 2023, patients at two different centers with mCRC who failed two or more lines of prior therapy and received TAS-102 in combination with fruquintinib were recruited.

RESULTS

In total, 32 mCRC patients were included in the analysis. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 9.4% and 75%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.3 (95% CI: 5.3-7.3) and 13.5 (95% CI: 9.5-17.5) months, respectively. Patients without liver metastasis or peritoneal metastasis obtained better median PFS (7.1 m vs. 5.6 m, p = 0.03 and 6.3 m vs. 3.4 m, p = 0.04), and OS (15.2 m vs. 10.4 m, p = 0.01 and 13.6 m vs. 7.1 m, p = 0.03), respectively. Other clinicopathological features, including age, tumor site, KRAS status, dosage of fruquintinib, and treatment line, did not affect the clinical efficacy of TAS-102 combined with fruquintinib. The most common grade three-four toxicities were neutropenia (46.9%), anemia (21.9%), diarrhea (15.6%), nausea (12.5%), and hand-foot syndrome rash (12.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that TAS-102 combined with fruquintinib has promising clinical efficacy and manageable safety for refractory mCRC patients in a real-world clinical setting. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm our results.

Efficacy and safety of Huachansu combined with adjuvant chemotherapy in resected colorectal cancer patients: a prospective, open-label, randomized phase II study

Although some studies in China have suggested Huachansu (HCS) combined with chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of various cancers, there are few studies on colorectal cancer (CRC), especially in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that HCS combined with adjuvant chemotherapy would improve survival probability in resected CRC patients. This was a prospective, open-label, randomized phase II study. Patients with stage III or high-risk stage II resected CRC were randomly assigned to the chemotherapy and HCS + chemotherapy groups. The Chemotherapy group was treated with the FOLFOX regimen for ≥ 6 cycles or the CAPEOX regimen for ≥ 4 cycles. The HCS + chemotherapy group was treated with HCS on the basis of the chemotherapy group. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS) and toxicity. A total of 250 patients were included in this study (126 chemotherapy, 124 HCS + chemotherapy). There were significant differences in 3-year DFS between the two groups (median 28.7 vs. 31.6 months, respectively; P = 0.027), but no significant differences in 3-year OS between the two groups (median 32.7 vs. 34 months, respectively; P = 0.146). No patients experienced grade four adverse events, and the rates of leukopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhea in the HCS + chemotherapy group were lower than that those in the chemotherapy group. HCS combined with adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection for patients with stage III or high-risk stage II CRC was demonstrated to be an effective and feasible treatment.

A potential Chinese medicine monomer against influenza A virus and influenza B virus: isoquercitrin

BACKGROUND

Influenza viruses, especially Influenza A virus and Influenza B virus, are respiratory pathogens and can cause seasonal epidemics and pandemics. Severe influenza viruses infection induces strong host-defense response and excessive inflammatory response, resulting in acute lung damage, multiple organ failure and high mortality. Isoquercitrin is a Chinese medicine monomer, which was reported to have multiple biological activities, including antiviral activity against HSV, IAV, SARS-CoV-2 and so on. Aims of this study were to assess the in vitro anti-IAV and anti-IBV activity, evaluate the in vivo protective efficacy against lethal infection of the influenza virus and searched for the more optimal method of drug administration of isoquercitrin.

METHODS

In vitro infection model (MDCK and A549 cells) and mouse lethal infection model of Influenza A virus and Influenza B virus were used to evaluate the antiviral activity of isoquercitrin.

RESULTS

Isoquercitrin could significantly suppress the replication in vitro and in vivo and reduced the mortality of mouse lethal infection models. Compared with virus infection group, isoquercitrin mitigated lung and multiple organ damage. Moreover, isoquercitrin blocked hyperproduction of cytokines induced by virus infection via inactivating NF-κB signaling. Among these routes of isoquercitrin administration, intramuscular injection is a better drug delivery method.

CONCLUSION

Isoquercitrin is a potential Chinese medicine monomer Against Influenza A Virus and Influenza B Virus infection.

Selection of Chemotherapy in Advanced Poorly Differentiated Extra-Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Extra-pulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma is rare, and evidence for treatment has been limited. In this article, the evidence behind the cytotoxic chemotherapy choices used for metastatic or unresectable EP-PD-NEC is reviewed. In the first-line setting, etoposide and platinum chemotherapy or irinotecan and platinum have been demonstrated to be equivalent in a large phase III trial. Questions remain regarding the optimal number of cycles, mode of delivery, and the precise definition of platinum resistance in this setting. In the second-line setting, FOLFIRI has emerged as an option, with randomized phase 2 trials demonstrating modest, but significant, response rates. Beyond this, data are extremely limited, and several regimens have been used. Heterogeneity in biological behaviour is a major barrier to optimal EP-PD-NEC management. Available data support the potential role of the Ki-67 index as a predictive biomarker for chemotherapy response. A more personalised approach to management in future studies will be essential, and comprehensive multi-omic approaches are required to understand tumour somatic genetic changes in relation to their effects on the surrounding microenvironment.

Predictors of community pharmacists' readiness to manage the effective and safe use of oral anticancer medicines in a developing setting

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of studies about the readiness of community pharmacists to manage the safe and effective use of oral anticancer medicines (OAMs) in developing settings.

OBJECTIVES

Using the readiness component (knowledge and willingness) of the situational theory of leadership, the study assessed community pharmacists' readiness to manage the safe and effective use of OAMs in Qatar, and also identified its significant predictors.

METHODS

A cross-sectional assessment of 252 community pharmacists was conducted with a pre-tested 48-item questionnaire. Readiness was assessed with a 5-point Likert-type scale and the maximum obtainable score was 70. The mean was used as the cut-off point to categorize willingness and knowledge as either high (≥ mean) or low (< mean). Independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance and multiple linear regression was used for data analyses.

RESULTS

The mean SD score for the readiness of community pharmacists was 39.3 ± 11.2 (min = 11, max = 70). Only a minority of the respondents expressed an excellent understanding of the chemotherapy cycles (19.6%; 45/230), and familiarity with targeted anticancer therapy (14.3%; 33/230), side effects (22.2%; 51/230), and dosing of OAMs (14.4%; 33/230). Employment status, number of OAMs prescriptions dispensed per month and adequacy of the contents related to OAMs in undergraduate training were the significant predictors of readiness (R2 = 0.558, (F (11, 209) = 3.559, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Community pharmacists' readiness appear inadequate especially regarding its dosing, side effects, handling, and disposal of OAMs. These inadequacies probably underline community pharmacists' low familiarity and comfortability with dispensing and educating patients on the effective and safe use of OAMs.

Capecitabine/Mitomycin versus 5-Fluorouracil/Mitomycin in Combination with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer

Since EXTRA, a non-randomized phase II trial with 31 patients, explored the use of capecitabine, mitomycin and radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of localized squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC), this treatment has been considered as an acceptable alternative to infusional 5-FU. However, the differences in efficacy between capecitabine and 5-FU in chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) for local SCCAC are not well documented. Patients included in this prospective monocentric cohort study were treated with SIB-RapidArc (a unique RT method treatment for all patients: identical technique, volume and constraints for at-risk organs), mitomycin C and 5-FU each day of RT for 7 weeks (group 1) or capecitabine each day of RT (group 2). Patients treated between July 2009 and August 2017 (group 1) and between November 2012 and April 2018 (group 2) for local SCCAC T2-4 classified as N, M0 or T, N1-3, M0 were included. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and acute toxicities. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were included, 91 in group 1 and 56 in group 2. The two groups were statistically comparable in terms of sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) and TNM. With a median duration of follow-up of 53.5 months, the PFS rate at 3 years was 80% for group 1 and 75% for group 2 (p = 0.32). The 3-year colostomy-free survival rate was 92% for group 1 and 85% for group 2 (p = 0.11). The rate of patients with at least one grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was 35.5% in group 1 and 21.4% in group 2 (p = 0.10), with a trend of fewer acute toxicities with capecitabine. Conclusion: Capecitabine/mitomycin in combination with SIB RapidArc radiation therapy for anal cancer seems as effective as 5-FU-based chemotherapy and is well tolerated with minimal toxicity.

Efficacy and safety of SOXIRI versus mFOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer

Background

Modified fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) regimen (mFOLFIRINOX), comprised of fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, is the first-line standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The S-1/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (SOXIRI) regimen has also been studied recently under similar conditions. This study compared its efficacy and safety.

Methods

All cases of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with the SOXIRI or mFOLFIRINOX regimen in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre from July 2012 to June 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The data of patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were compared between two cohorts, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, disease control rate and safety.

Results

A total of 198 patients were enrolled in the study, including 102 patients treated with SOXIRI and 96 patients treated with mFOLFIRINOX. There was no significant difference in OS [12.1 months versus 11.2 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.04, p = 0.81] or PFS (6.5 months versus 6.8 months, HR = 0.99, p = 0.96) between patients treated with SOXIRI and mFOLFIRINOX. In the subgroup analysis, patients with slightly elevated baseline total bilirubin (TBIL) or underweight patients before chemotherapy were more likely to have a longer OS or PFS from SOXIRI than from mFOLFIRINOX. In addition, the carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 decline was a good predictor for the efficacy and prognosis of both chemotherapy regimens. All grade adverse events were parallel in all kinds of toxicities except that anaemia was more common in the SOXIRI group than in the mFOLFIRINOX group (41.4% versus 24%, p = 0.03). The occurrence of any grade 3 to 4 toxicity was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

For locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, the SOXIRI regimen had similar efficacy and controllable safety compared with the mFOLFIRINOX regimen.

Capecitabine efficacy after cycline-dependent-kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The combination of endocrine treatment with cycline-dependent-kinase 4/6 inhibitor is the new standard of treatment in hormone receptor-positive HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. The optimal subsequent treatment after CDK4/6 inhibitor remain unclear. As recommended by standard guidelines, capecitabine, an oral chemotherapy is a therapeutic option in endocrine resistant metastatic breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate capecitabine efficacy after disease progression under combination of ET and CDK4/6 inhibitor in a hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients progressing under CDK 4/6 inhibitor plus ET and treated with capecitabine, between January 2016 and December 2020, were retrospectively included. Primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF) on capecitabine. Logistic regression were used to identify predictive factors: exclusive bone versus visceral metastases, first-line versus ≥ 2 lines of combination therapy, aromatase inhibitor (AI) versus fulvestrant.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with a 62-year median age (IC95% 42-81) were analyzed. The CDK 4/6 inhibitor and ET combination was prescribed in first-line setting in 26 patients (46%). Twenty-five patients (44%) had exclusive bone metastasis. Median TTF was 6.1 months. Six patients discontinued capecitabine due to toxicity. Outcomes were not significantly different regardless of metastases localization, ET, and treatment line of the combination of CDK 4/6 inhibitor and ET. Median PFS was 7.1 months. Median OS was 41.3 months.

CONCLUSION

Compared to other data of capecitabine prescribed in patients with hormonal resistant MBC, this retrospective study suggests that capecitabine remains effective after CDK 4/6 inhibitor plus ET progression, regardless of therapeutic-line setting and metastases localization.

MICRO ABSTRACT

Cycline dependant kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy have become the standard of care in metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Few data reported the optimal subsequent therapy after progression under the combination. Capecitabine is a therapeutic option in endocrine resistant HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Data evaluating efficacy of capecitabine after disease progression on endocrine therapy plus cycline-dependant kinase 4/6 inhibitor are poor. This study showed a 6.1-month median time to treatment failure on capecitabine. Capecitabine remained effective regardless of therapeutic-line setting and metastases localization.

Preclinical Bioavailability Assessment of a Poorly Water-Soluble Drug, HGR4113, Using a Stable Isotope Tracer

Drug solubility limits intravenous dosing for poorly water-soluble medicines, which misrepresents their bioavailability estimation. The current study explored a method using a stable isotope tracer to assess the bioavailability of drugs that are poorly water-soluble. HGR4113 and its deuterated analog, HGR4113-d7, were tested as model drugs. To determine the level of HGR4113 and HGR4113-d7 in rat plasma, a bioanalytical method using LC-MS/MS was developed. The HGR4113-d7 was intravenously administered to rats that were orally pre-administered HGR4113 at different doses; subsequently, the plasma samples were collected. HGR4113 and HGR4113-d7 were simultaneously determined in the plasma samples, and bioavailability was calculated using plasma drug concentration values. The bioavailability of HGR4113 was 53.3% ± 19.5%, 56.9% ± 14.0%, and 67.8% ± 16.7% after oral dosages of 40, 80, and 160 mg/kg, respectively. By eliminating the differences in clearance between intravenous and oral dosages at different levels, acquired data showed that the current method reduced measurement errors in bioavailability when compared to the conventional approach. The present study suggests a prominent method for evaluating the bioavailability of drugs with poor aqueous solubility in preclinical studies.

Overcoming barriers to patient adherence: the case for developing innovative drug delivery systems

Poor medication adherence is a pervasive issue with considerable health and socioeconomic consequences. Although the underlying reasons are generally understood, traditional intervention strategies rooted in patient-centric education and empowerment have proved to be prohibitively complex and/or ineffective. Formulating a pharmaceutical in a drug delivery system (DDS) is a promising alternative that can directly mitigate many common impediments to adherence, including frequent dosing, adverse effects and a delayed onset of action. Existing DDSs have already positively influenced patient acceptability and improved rates of adherence across various disease and intervention types. The next generation of systems have the potential to instate an even more radical paradigm shift by, for example, permitting oral delivery of biomacromolecules, allowing for autonomous dose regulation and enabling several doses to be mimicked with a single administration. Their success, however, is contingent on their ability to address the problems that have made DDSs unsuccessful in the past.

Outcomes of patient education in adult oncologic patients receiving oral anticancer agents: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

A large variety of oral anticancer agents have become available and while at first glance these therapies appear to provide only benefits, patients have expressed their need for educational interventions and raised safety issues. Although both patients and providers have recognized patient education's importance, and an interplay with safety has been acknowledged, no systematic reviews of the literature that summarize all of the current evidence related to patient education's outcomes for patients who receive oral anticancer agents have been performed to date. Accordingly, this systematic review will attempt to fill the gap in the literature as well as to map (1) contents, (2) methodologies, (3) settings, (4) timing/duration, and (5) healthcare professionals involved.

METHODS

This protocol is being reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic review will be performed. Studies that targeted eligible adult patients (≥ 18 years old) in hospital, outpatient, and home settings, and reported patient education's outcomes for those taking oral anticancer agents will be included. Searches will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus, and gray literature will be also sought. Two researchers will screen the search results independently and blindly in two phases: (1) title/abstract screening and (2) full-text screening using the Rayyan AI platform. An electronic data extraction form will be implemented and piloted, and then, two trained data extractors will extract the data cooperatively. Thereafter, a quality appraisal will be conducted using the Critical Appraisal Tools from The Joanna Briggs Institute. The results will be analyzed, grouped, clustered into categories, and discussed until a consensus is reached. Emerging evidence will be synthesized narratively and reported in accordance with the synthesis without meta-analysis guidelines.

DISCUSSION

The systematic review's results will be relevant to (1) policymakers and management at an institutional level, and (2) for clinical practice, in an evidence-based paradigm, potentially leading to a quality improvement with respect to safety and patient satisfaction.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022341797.

Adherence to oral hormonal therapy in advanced prostate cancer: a scoping review

Background

Orally administrated agents play a key role in the management of prostate cancer, providing a convenient and cost-effective treatment option for patients. However, they are also associated with adherence issues which can compromise therapeutic outcomes. This scoping review identifies and summarizes data on adherence to oral hormonal therapy in advanced prostate cancer and discusses associated factors and strategies for improving adherence.

Methods

PubMed (inception to 27 January 2022) and conference databases (2020-2021) were searched to identify English language reports of real-world and clinical trial data on adherence to oral hormonal therapy in prostate cancer using the key search terms 'prostate cancer' AND 'adherence' AND 'oral therapy' OR respective aliases.

Results

Most adherence outcome data were based on the use of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Self-reported and observer-reported adherence data were used. The most common observer-reported measure, medication possession ratio, showed that the vast majority of patients were in possession of their medication, although proportion of days covered and persistence rates were considerably lower, raising the question whether patients were consistently receiving their treatment. Study follow-up for adherence was generally around 6 months up to 1 year. Studies also indicate that persistence may drop further with longer follow-up, especially in the non-mCRPC setting, which may be a concern when years of therapy are required.

Conclusions

Oral hormonal therapy plays an important role in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Data on adherence to oral hormonal therapies in prostate cancer were generally of low quality, with high heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting across studies. Short study follow-up for adherence and focus on medication possession rates may further limit relevance of available data, especially in settings that require long-term treatment. Additional research is required to comprehensively assess adherence.

Risk thresholds for patients to switch between daily tablets and biweekly infusions in second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a patient preference study

BACKGROUND

Historically, high hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-related mortality has been, in part, due to lack of effective therapies; however, several systemic therapies have been recently approved for HCC treatment, including regorafenib and ramucirumab. These two treatments utilize different routes of administration (four daily tablets and biweekly intravenous infusions, respectively) and have different risks of adverse events (AEs). However, we lack data on patient preferences in balancing the route of administration and risk of AEs in patients with HCC. We aimed to determine patient preferences and trade-offs for second-line treatment in patients with HCC.  METHODS: Patients with advanced or metastatic HCC were recruited through their physicians for this study. Patient preferences were assessed by using a modified threshold technique (TT) design in which respondents were asked two direct-elicitation questions before (assuming same safety and efficacy and only varying mode of administration) and after (incorporating the safety profiles of ramucirumab and regorafenib) the TT series on seven risks of clinically relevant AEs.

RESULTS

In total, of the 157 patients recruited by their physicians, 150 were eligible and consented to participate. In the first elicitation question (assuming risk and efficacy were equivalent), 61.3% of patients preferred daily tablets. However, 76.7% of patients preferred the biweekly infusion when the safety profiles of the two available second-line therapies were included. The TT analysis confirmed that preferences for oral administration were not strong enough to balance out the risk of AEs that differentiate the two therapies.

DISCUSSION

We found that when patients were asked to choose between a daily, oral medication and a biweekly IV medication for HCC, they were more likely to choose a daily, oral medication if efficacy and safety profiles were the same. However, when risks of AEs representing the safety profiles of two currently available second-line treatments were introduced in a second direct-elicitation question, respondents often selected an IV administration with a safety profile similar to ramucirumab, rather than oral tablets with a safety profile similar to regorafenib. Our findings indicate that the risk profile of a second-line treatment for HCC may be more important than the mode of administration to patients.

Effect of Different Durations of Adjuvant Capecitabine Monotherapy on the Outcome of High-Risk Stage II and Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study Based on a CRC Database

(1) Background: The duration of adjuvant chemotherapy recommended by the NCCN guidelines is 6 months. However, patients are not compliant with intravenous chemotherapy for many reasons; therefore, one approach is to obtain a survival benefit by prolonging the duration of capecitabine monotherapy. (2) Methods: A total of 355 qualified colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from January 2010 to December 2020 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were selected to receive capecitabine monotherapy for 6−9 months and >12 months. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). (3) Results: Among stage III patients, in the >12 months (12M) and 6−9 months (6M) groups, the 5-year DFS rates were 80.7%% and 66.8%, respectively, and the 5-year OS rates were 94.7%% and 88.8%, respectively. Among high-risk stage II patients, in the >12 months (12M) and 6−9 months (6M) groups, the 5-year DFS rates were 81.5% and 78.6%, respectively, and the 5-year OS rates were 93.1% and 84.2%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Twelve months of chemotherapy demonstrated superior OS and DFS to that of six months in the stage III group but showed no difference in the high-risk stage II group. The better OS and DFS observed in the 12-month treatment period could be of value in selected cases.

Recent advances of polymer based nanosystems in cancer management

Cancer is still one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Nanotechnology, particularly nanoparticle-based platforms, is at the leading edge of current cancer management research. Polymer-based nanosystems have piqued the interest of researchers owing to their many benefits over other conventional drug delivery systems. Polymers derived from both natural and synthetic sources have various biomedical applications due to unique qualities like porosity, mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Polymers such as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), polycaprolactone (PCL), and polyethylene glycol (PEG) have been approved by the USFDA and are being researched for drug delivery applications. They have been reported to be potential carriers for drug loading and are used in theranostic applications. In this review, we have primarily focused on the aforementioned polymers and their conjugates. In addition, the therapeutic and diagnostic implications of polymer-based nanosystems have been briefly reviewed. Furthermore, the safety of the developed polymeric formulations is crucial, and we have discussed their biocompatibility in detail. This article also discusses recent developments in block co-polymer-based nanosystems for cancer treatment. The review ends with the challenges of clinical translation of polymer-based nanosystems in drug delivery for cancer therapy.

Novel Strategies for the Bioavailability Augmentation and Efficacy Improvement of Natural Products in Oral Cancer

Oral cancer is emerging as a major cause of mortality globally. Oral cancer occupies a significant proportion of the head and neck, including the cheeks, tongue, and oral cavity. Conventional methods in the treatment of cancer involve surgery, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, and these have not proven to completely eradicate cancerous cells, may lead to the reoccurrence of oral cancer, and possess numerous adverse side effects. Advancements in novel drug delivery approaches have gained popularity in cancer management with an increase in the number of cases associated with oral cancer. Natural products are potent sources for drug discovery, especially for anticancer drugs. Natural product delivery has major challenges due to its low solubility, poor absorption, inappropriate size, instability, poor permeation, and first-pass metabolism. Therefore, it is of prime importance to investigate novel treatment approaches for the delivery of bioactive natural products. Nanotechnology is an advanced method of delivering cancer therapy with minimal damage to normal cells while targeting cancer cells. Therefore, the present review elaborates on the advancements in novel strategies for natural product delivery that lead to the significant enhancement of bioavailability, in vivo activity, and fewer adverse events for the prevention and treatment of oral cancer. Various approaches to accomplish the desired results involve size reduction, surface property modification, and polymer attachment, which collectively result in the higher stability of the formulation.

Smartphone-based application and nurses' interventions for symptoms monitoring in patients treated with oral anticancer agents: A 1-year follow-up in a tertiary cancer center

AIM

The increasing use of oral anticancer agents over the past years has necessitated changes in monitoring toxicities to ensure patients' adherence and tolerance at home. The aim of this study was to describe nurses' interventions and medical changes after alerts triggered by a web-based platform designed to support the management of oral anticancer agents-related toxicities.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients undergoing oral anticancer agents in a cancer center from September 2018 to September 2019 (excluding hormonal therapy). In this cancer center, the standard of care included symptoms' collections for 1 month thanks to a web platform based on patient-reported outcomes. Patients had to fill a weekly questionnaire (Q1 to Q4). The web-based platform triggered orange alerts when patients reported moderate symptoms and red alerts when severe toxicities were declared. The rate of orange and red alerts, the rate of patients with medical changes consecutively to an orange or a red alert, and the different types of nurses' interventions and medical changes were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 524 patients were extracted but the final number of 436 patients were included in this study and 1488 questionnaires were filled in. More than 90% of patients declared that they took their medication as prescribed. Up to 60% of patients recorded all grade symptoms, including 8% of patients who recorded Grades 3-4 symptoms during the month, mostly anorexia, fatigue, and diarrhea. The web platform system triggered 700 orange and 212 red alerts: 305/700 (44%) of orange alerts resulted in nurses' interventions, most frequently phone counseling (78%), and 65/212 (31%) of red alerts resulted in medical changes, most frequent treatment interruptions (48%).

CONCLUSION

Implementing an e-health (electronic-health) system can be helpful for monitoring symptoms in patients under oral anticancer agents, enhancing that this organization should be a standard of care in every cancer centers.

Medication adherence and persistence among patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors and estimation of the economic burden associated with the unused medicines

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer deaths. Its treatment includes specific oral tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs).

OBJECTIVES

To estimate adherence and persistence among patients receiving TKIs and to assess the economic burden of the unused medicines in Alsace (France).

METHOD

This retrospective study was carried out using the Insurance Healthcare database.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adherence was calculated using medication possession ratio (MPR), persistence using estimated level of persistence with therapy (ELPT) and economic impact using prescription refill data.

RESULTS

242 patients were receiving TKIs. The most common TKIs prescribed were erlotinib (75.6%, n = 183) and crizotinib (12.8%, n = 31). Total of 149 patients were included in the adherence analysis. Overall MPR was 0.98. 180 patients were included in the persistence analysis. Almost half of patients had stopped treatment at 60 days and only 38.3% (n = 69) were still persistent with the therapy at 120 days. The expenses related to unused TKIs amounted to €356,392 and were related majorly to treatment discontinuation followed by overlapping refills, patient deaths and dose- or drug-switching, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicated overall adherence medicines above the acceptable limit of 0.80 but also pointed out a significant decline in persistence over time. The resulting economic losses justify the need for physicians and pharmacists to closely monitor their patients to ensure continuity of treatment. To limit the cost associated with unused medicines, interventions such as app-based monitoring, dispensing TKIs per unit over shorter periods and not only on monthly intervals could be implemented.

Adherence to oral hormonal anticancer agents in breast cancer

There is an increasing trend towards using oral antitumoral agents in oncological patients. Compared to parenteral therapy, oral treatment offers convenience for both the patient and the healthcare system, with similar efficacy. However, the benefit deriving from oral drugs will be obtained only if patients adhere strictly to the treatment. Medical oncologists must therefore seek to optimize patient adherence. Breast cancer patients, particularly, are often treated with oral hormonal anticancer agents. In this review, we summarized evidence about adherence of breast cancer patients to oral hormonal anticancer agents and the consequences of poor compliance, the barriers to oral treatment and strategies to overcome them.

Comparison of Approaches for Measuring Adherence and Persistence to Oral Oncologic Therapies in Patients Diagnosed with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Adherence and persistence studies face several methodologic difficulties, including short-term mortality. We compared approaches to quantify adherence and persistence to first line (1L) oral targeted therapy (TT) in patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

Patients with mRCC ages 66 years or more who initiated TTs within 4 months of diagnosis were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database (2007-2015). Adherence [proportion of days covered (PDC) >80%] was calculated using (i) PDC with a fixed 6-month denominator including then excluding patients who died within the 6 months and (ii) PDC with a denominator measuring time on treatment. Risk of nonpersistence was obtained by censoring death or treating death as a competing risk using cumulative incidence functions.

RESULTS

Among 485 patients with mRCC initiating a 1L oral TT (sunitinib, 64%; pazopanib, 25%; other, 11%), 40% died within 6 months. Adherence was higher after restricting to patients who survived (60%) compared with including those patients and assigning zero days covered after death (47%). Risk of nonpersistence was higher when censoring patients at death, 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88-0.94], compared with treating death as a competing risk, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Different approaches to handling death resulted in different adherence and persistence estimates in the metastatic setting. Future studies should explicitly report the proportion of patient deaths over time and explore appropriate methods to account for death as competing risk.

IMPACT

Use of several approaches can provide a more comprehensive picture of medication-taking behavior in the metastatic setting where death is a major competing risk.

Oral Tegafur-Uracil Combination plus Leucovorin versus Other Fluoropyrimidine Agents in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shikha VermaBackground  Systemic fluoropyrimidines, both oral and intravenous, are an integral part of colorectal cancer (CRC) management. They can be administered either with curative or palliative intent. Objectives  This article examines the literature to analyze the efficacy and safety of the oral fixed-dose combination of uracil and tegafur (UFT)/leucovorin (LV) compared with other fluoropyrimidine agents, with an intention to implement the findings into the current treatment algorithms for CRC. Methods  An exhaustive systematic literature search was performed for prospective studies using PUBMED, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE database. Studies which met eligibility criteria were shortlisted and grouped into chemotherapy given for curative or palliative intent. Results  Eight trials were shortlisted involving 4,486 patients for the analysis. There was no difference between UFT/LV and other fluoropyrimidines in the primary endpoints-disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-.15; p  = 0.81) and progression-free survival (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.66-.66; p  = 0.35) for curative and palliative intent CRC patients, respectively. In secondary analyses, there was no significant difference observed between UFT and other fluoropyrimidines in overall survival in CRC patients with curative intent (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.88-1.23; p  = 0.63) and palliative intent (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.97-1.06; p  = 0.42) . In the safety analysis, we found significantly lesser patients on UFT/LV had stomatitis/mucositis (odds ratio [OR] 0.20; 95% CI 0.05-0.85; p  = 0.03), fever (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.29-0.71; p  < 0.001), infection (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.24-0.74; p  < 0.01), leukopenia (OR 0.04; 95% CI 0.00-0.95; p  = 0.05), febrile neutropenia (OR 0.03; 95% CI 0.00-0.24; p  = 0.001), and thrombocytopenia (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.02-0.79; p  = 0.03) compared with other fluoropyrimidines. Conclusion  Oral UFT/LV is equally efficacious to other fluoropyrimidines, especially intravenous 5-fluorouracil, in the management of early as well as advanced CRC patients. Importantly, UFT/LV has a superior safety profile compared with other fluoropyrimidines in terms of both hematological and nonhematological adverse events.

Boosting the oral bioavailability of anticancer drugs through intentional drug-drug interactions

Oral anticancer drugs suffer from significant variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics partially due to limited bioavailability. The limited bioavailability of anticancer drugs is due to both pharmaceutical limitations and physiological barriers. Pharmacokinetic boosting is a strategy to enhance the oral bioavailability of a therapeutic drug by inhibiting physiological barriers through an intentional drug-drug interaction (DDI). This type of strategy has proven effective across several therapeutic indications including anticancer treatment. Pharmacokinetic boosting could improve anticancer drugs lacking or with otherwise unacceptable oral formulations through logistic, economic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic benefits. Despite these benefits, pharmacokinetic boosting strategies could result in unintended DDIs and are only likely to benefit a limited number of targets. Highlighting this concern, pharmacokinetic boosting has mixed results depending on the boosted drug. While pharmacokinetic boosting did not significantly improve certain drugs, it has resulted in the commercial approval of boosted oral formulations for other drugs. Pharmacokinetic boosting to improve oral anticancer therapy is an expanding area of research that is likely to improve treatment options for cancer patients.

Deprived social status is associated with decreased use of oral chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study on administrative databases in a French University Hospital

Factors associated with the choice of oral versus intravenous CT are not clearly established. Our purpose was to evaluate the influence of social status and home distance to hospital on the use of oral CT in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This retrospective single-center study included mCRC patients between 2011 and 2017. Patient social status was assessed by European Deprivation Index (EDI) and home distance to the hospital was calculated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. One hundred and seventy-five mCRC patients were included, with 71 receiving oral CT. Most deprived patients received less oral CT (OR 0.5 [0.26, 0.96], p = .039). No association was found for road distance. Previous use of adjuvant oral CT was associated with oral CT in mCRC (OR 2.65 [1.06, 6.66], p = .038). Our results suggest that deprived social status is a factor associated with decreased use of oral CT in patients with mCRC. Clinical trial registration: no registration.

Modelling the impact of fexinidazole use on human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) transmission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis is a deadly disease that has been declining in incidence since the start of the Century, primarily due to increased screening, diagnosis and treatment of infected people. The main treatment regimen currently in use requires a lumbar puncture as part of the diagnostic process to determine disease stage and hospital admission for drug administration. Fexinidazole is a new oral treatment for stage 1 and non-severe stage 2 human African trypanosomiasis. The World Health Organization has recently incorporated fexinidazole into its treatment guidelines for human African trypanosomiasis. The treatment does not require hospital admission or a lumbar puncture for all patients, which is likely to ease access for patients; however, it does require concomitant food intake, which is likely to reduce adherence. Here, we use a mathematical model calibrated to case and screening data from Mushie territory, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, to explore the potential negative impact of poor compliance to an oral treatment, and potential gains to be made from increases in the rate at which patients seek treatment. We find that reductions in compliance in treatment of stage 1 cases are projected to result in the largest increase in further transmission of the disease, with failing to cure stage 2 cases also posing a smaller concern. Reductions in compliance may be offset by increases in the rate at which cases are passively detected. Efforts should therefore be made to ensure good adherence for stage 1 patients to treatment with fexinidazole and to improve access to care.

Sleeping sickness is a parasitic disease present in parts of Central and West Africa that is fatal if left untreated. Current case management requires unpleasant procedures such as a lumbar puncture and intravenous drug administration, but has high compliance rates as the treatment is given by hospital staff to patients. In this study, we explore the impact of a new oral treatment on compliance rates for treatment using a mathematical model fitted to data on sleeping sickness cases and screening activities. We also look at the possibility of patients being more likely to seek and access treatment since the new treatment can be used without a lumbar puncture if the patient does not display clinically severe symptoms. We find that reduced compliance, especially from patients suffering from the first less severe stage of the disease, will lead to more sleeping sickness cases and delay elimination, but increases in the number of patients seeking treatment will likely counter effects of reduced compliance.

Nanomedicine for increasing the oral bioavailability of cancer treatments

Abstract

Oral administration is an appealing route of delivering cancer treatments. However, the gastrointestinal tract is characterized by specific and efficient physical, chemical, and biological barriers that decrease the bioavailability of medications, including chemotherapeutics. In recent decades, the fields of material science and nanomedicine have generated several delivery platforms with high potential for overcoming multiple barriers associated to oral administration. This review describes the properties of several nanodelivery systems that improve the bioavailability of orally administered therapeutics, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages in generating successful anticancer oral nanomedicines.

Graphical Abstract

Polyvinyl caprolactam-polyvinyl acetate-polyethylene glycol graft co-polymer based controlled release tablets of aceclofenac to simultaneously enhance the solubility and bioavailability

The aim of this study was to enhance the solubility of Aceclofenac with a new polyvinyl caprolactam-polyvinyl acetate-polyethylene glycol graft co-polymer (Soloplus®) and formulate it in controlled release (CR) tablet dosage form by direct compression method with HPMC K-15. Solid dispersions were prepared in different ratio of Aceclofenac and Soloplus® as F1, F2 and F3 with different polymer ratios i.e. 30%, 50%, and 70% respectively. All the quality control tests were performed for the prepared controlled release tablets. Drug polymer interaction studies of Aceclofenac and Soloplus® were carried using FTIR and XRD. Dissolution study was carried out against Alkaris® as a standard reference. The formulation F3 showed optimum results and followed zero order kinetics. The Soloplus® improved the solubility of the drug and the CR formulation enhanced the delivery in a sustained manner. Hence, the CR formulation enhanced the delivery of aceclofenac in a sustained manner, thereby an efficient drug delivery may lead to an effective anti-inflammatory activity.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have historically had few options and faced extremely poor prognoses if their disease progressed after standard-of-care tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Recently, the standard of care for HCC has been transformed as a combination of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) atezolizumab plus the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab was shown to offer improved overall survival in the first-line setting. Immunotherapy has demonstrated safety and efficacy in later lines of therapy as well, and ongoing trials are investigating novel combinations of ICIs and TKIs, in addition to interventions earlier in the course of disease or in combination with liver-directed therapies. Because HCC usually develops against a background of cirrhosis, immunotherapy for liver tumors is complex and oncologists need to account for both immunological and hepatological considerations when developing a treatment plan for their patients. To provide guidance to the oncology community on important concerns for the immunotherapeutic care of HCC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The expert panel drew on the published literature as well as their clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on these important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for HCC, including diagnosis and staging, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers treating patients with HCC.

Preclinical Pharmacokinetics, Tissue Distribution, and Primary Safety Evaluation of Indo5, a Novel Selective Inhibitor of c-Met and Trks

The compound [3-(1H-benzimidazol-2-methylene)-5-(2-methylphenylaminosulfo)-2-indolone], known as Indo5, is a novel selective inhibitor of c-Met and Trks, and it is a promising anticancer candidate against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Assessing the pharmacokinetic properties, tissue distribution, and toxicity of Indo5 is critical for its medicinal evaluation. A series of sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods were developed and validated to determine the concentration of Indo5 in rat plasma and tissue homogenates. These methods were then applied to investigate the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of Indo5 in rats. After intravenous injection of Indo5, the maximum concentration (C_max) and the time at which C_max was reached (T_max) were 1,565.3 ± 286.2 ng/ml and 1 min, respectively. After oral administration, C_max and T_max were 54.7 ± 10.4 ng/ml and 2.0 ± 0.48 h, respectively. We calculated the absolute oral bioavailability of Indo5 in rats to be 1.59%. Following intravenous injection, the concentrations of Indo5 in various tissues showed the following order: liver > kidney ≈ heart > lung ≈ large intestine ≈ small intestine ≈ stomach > spleen > brain ≈ testes; hence, Indo5 distributed highest in the liver and could not cross the blood–brain or blood–testes barriers. Continuous injection of Indo5 for 21 days did not lead to liver injury, considering unchanged ALT and AST levels, normal histological architecture of the liver, and normal number and frequencies of immune cells in the liver, indicating a very low toxicity of Indo5 in vivo. Collectively, our findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the biological actions of Indo5 in vivo and further support its development as an antitumor treatment for HCC patients.

Real-world outcomes for neoadjuvant capecitabine versus infusional 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is standard-of-care treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). A pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiation therapy is an early indicator of treatment benefit and associated with excellent survival outcomes, with capecitabine largely replacing infusional 5-fluorouracil as the choice in routine care of LARC.

AIMS

To analyse the uptake of capecitabine usage over time, and on the back of clinical trial data demonstrating equivalence between fluoropyrimidines, confirm that efficacy is maintained in the real-world setting.

METHODS

We analysed data from a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database at three Australian hospitals including patients diagnosed from January 2009 to December 2018. Pathological response was determined as either complete or incomplete and compared for patients receiving 5-FU or capecitabine.

RESULTS

A total of 657 patients was analysed, 498 receiving infusional 5-FU and 159 capecitabine. Capecitabine use has markedly increased from approval in 2014 in Australia, now being used in more than 80% of patients. Patient characteristics were similar by treatment, including age, tumour location and pre-treatment stage. pCR was reported in 22/159 (13.8%) of capecitabine-treated patients and 118/380 (23.7%) that received 5-FU (P ≤ 0.01). More capecitabine-treated patients received post-operative oxaliplatin (44.2% vs 6.3%, P < 0.01). Two-year progression-free survival was similar (84.9% vs 88.0%, P = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Capecitabine is now the dominantly used neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LARC. Capecitabine use was associated with a lower rate of pCR versus infusional 5-FU, a difference not explained by examined patient or tumour characteristics. Poor treatment compliance with oral therapy in the real-world setting is one possible explanation.

Comparison between oxaliplatin therapy and capecitabine monotherapy for high-risk stage II-III elderly colon cancer patients

PURPOSE

45% of colon cancer patients are elderly, yet they are often deviated from standard cancer management. The MOSAIC trial favored FOLFOX over FL with superior oncologic outcomes; however, which regimen is most beneficial in elderly population remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of oxaliplatin-added chemotherapy and capecitabine monotherapy in high-risk stage II/stage III elderly colon cancer patients.

METHODS

Colon cancer patients ≥70 years of age who received adjuvant chemotherapy at Inje University Busan Paik Hospital between February 2009 to April 2016 were included. Patients were separated into the oxaliplatin-added group and capecitabine monotherapy group. The primary outcomes were CSS and OS.

RESULTS

Of 74 patients, 45 received oxaliplatin-added chemotherapy and 29 received capecitabine monotherapy. There was no difference between the two groups in CSS or OS (p = 0.9670 and p = 0.6801, respectively). The N stage was significantly associated with CSS in both uni/multivariate analysis (p = 0.0565 and p = 0.0347, respectively). The oxaliplatin-added group had more stage III patients, so we performed a subgroup analysis of CSS and OS based on stage, which also showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Capecitabine monotherapy is an oncologically safe regimen compared to oxaliplatin-added regimens in elderly patients with high-risk stage II/stage III colon cancer.

Treosulfan in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

Treosulfan is offered as last-line treatment in patients with end-stage ovarian cancer. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the response rates, overall survival, and adverse events of treosulfan in this patient population.

METHODS

The study included patients with end-stage platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated with treosulfan from October 2015 to October 2020 at the Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark. Patients were included for treatment if their cancer had progressed and if other treatment options were limited. Patients receiving treosulfan as first-line treatment were excluded from the study. Response rates were evaluated according to the combined criteria of CA125 and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to illustrate progression-free and overall survival. Adverse events were graded 1-5 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients with a median age of 72 years (range 33-92) were identified. Sixty-three (94%) patients were diagnosed with serous adenocarcinoma. Fifty-seven (85%) patients were Federation of International Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV at the time of diagnosis. The median number of treatments prior to treosulfan treatment was 3 (range 1-8). One patient had a complete response (2%), eight patients had a partial response (13%), and 22 patients (35%) had stable disease as the best response. The median duration of response (complete or partial) was 239 days (range 43-572). Median progression-free survival was 63 days (95% CI 41 to 77). The most common adverse events were anemia (83%), fatigue (83%), anorexia (62%), nausea (57%), and constipation (41%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treosulfan is an alternative for the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer when other treatment options are limited, with response rates of approximately 15%. In general, the treatment was well tolerated. Taking the mild adverse events and the response rates into account, palliative treosulfan mainly seems beneficial for patients with performance status 0-1.

Medication Errors During Treatment with New Oral Anticancer Agents: Consequences for Clinical Practice Based on the AMBORA Study

Patients treated with oral anticancer agents (e.g., kinase inhibitors) are a high-risk population for medication errors due to, for example, polymedication, age, and limited adherence. Systematic evaluations regarding frequencies and causes of medication errors and resulting harm are lacking. Our previously published multicenter randomized AMBORA trial revealed that an intensified support by clinical pharmacologists/pharmacists for patients and the treatment team considerably reduced drug-related problems and improved patient-reported outcomes. Using this database, we performed a comprehensive, additional analysis focusing on medication errors related to the patients' complete medication with consideration of the antitumor agents, concomitantly administered drugs, and herb/food intake. Two hundred two patients starting a new oral anticancer drug regardless of the tumor entity were included. Clinical pharmacologists/pharmacists performed advanced medication reviews for 12 weeks. Medication errors were characterized regarding type, cause, patient harm, and the involved medicines. We detected 1.7 medication errors per patient (335/202). Of the medication errors (216/335), 64.5% occurred within the concomitant medication. Patients caused 28.4% of the medication errors. There were 67.8% detected immediately after the start of the new oral regimen, and 14.9% resulted in temporary harm. Drug-drug or drug-food interactions accounted for 24.8% of the medication errors. Patients and physicians need to be addressed in strategies for systematic reduction of medication errors during treatment with new oral antitumor drugs. Clinical decision support systems focusing on drug-drug interactions capture only a minority of the medication errors. Specialists with expertise in clinical pharmacology/pharmacy should support both the treating physicians as well as the patients for improved patient safety.

Oral lipid nanomedicines: Current status and future perspectives in cancer treatment

Oral anticancer drugs have earned a seat at the table, as the need for homecare treatment in oncology has increased. Interest in this field is growing as a result of their proven efficacy, lower costs and positive patient uptake. However, the gastrointestinal barrier is still the main obstacle to surmount in chemotherapeutic oral delivery. Anticancer nanomedicines have been proposed to solve this quandary. Among these, lipid nanoparticles are described to be efficiently absorbed while protecting drugs from early degradation in hostile environments. Their intestinal lymphatic tropism or mucoadhesive/penetrative properties give them unique characteristics for oral administration. Considering that chronic cancer cases are increasing over time, it is important to be able to provide treatments with low toxicity and low prices. The challenges, opportunities and therapeutic perspectives of lipid nanoparticles in this area will be discussed in this review, taking into consideration the pre-clinical and clinical progress made in the last decade.

The preferences of women with ovarian cancer for oral versus intravenous recurrence regimens

OBJECTIVE

To assess preferences of women with ovarian cancer regarding features of available anti-cancer regimens for platinum-resistant, biomarker-positive disease, with an emphasis on oral PARP inhibitor and standard intravenous (IV) chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

A discrete-choice-experiment preferences survey was designed, tested, and administered to women with ovarian cancer, with 11 pairs of treatment profiles defined using seven attributes (levels/ranges): regimen (oral daily, IV weekly, IV monthly); probability of progression-free (PFS) at 6 months (40%-60%); probability of PFS at 2 years (10%-20%); nausea (none, moderate); peripheral neuropathy (none, mild, moderate); memory problems (none, mild); and total out-of-pocket cost ($0 to $10,000).

RESULTS

Of 123 participants, 38% had experienced recurrence, 25% were currently receiving chemotherapy, and 18% were currently taking a PARP inhibitor. Given attributes and levels, the relative importance weights (sum 100) were: 2-year PFS, 28; cost, 27; 6-month PFS, 19; neuropathy,14; memory problems, nausea, and regimen, all ≤5. To accept moderate neuropathy, participants required a 49% (versus 40%) chance of PFS at 6 months or 14% (versus 10%) chance at 2 years. Given a 3-way choice where PFS and cost were equal, 49% preferred a monthly IV regimen causing mild memory problems, 47% preferred an oral regimen causing moderate nausea, and 4% preferred a weekly IV regimen causing mild memory and mild neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings challenge the assumption that oral anti-cancer therapies are universally preferred by patients and demonstrate that there is no "one size fits all" regimen that is preferable to women with ovarian cancer when considering recurrence treatment regimens.

Suboptimal Completion Rates, Adverse Events, Costs, Resource Utilization, and Cost Impact of Noncompletion in Oral Adjuvant Capecitabine-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal completion of chemotherapy, which may involve reduced patient adherence, remains a serious issue and leads to reduced treatment efficacy. This study assessed the completion rates, risk factors for noncompletion, and cost impact for noncompletion in patients on capecitabine monotherapy (Cape) or capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for the adjuvant treatment of early-stage colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of early-stage colon cancer between April 2013 and March 2017 were retrospectively identified. Treatment completion was evaluated. Multivariate logistic regressions analyses were used to assess the baseline factors associated with noncompletion. Adverse events, costs, healthcare resource utilization, and cost impact for noncompletion were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 673 patients met the eligibility criteria, of which 382 (57%) were treated with Cape and 291 (43%) with CAPOX. The overall completion rate for adjuvant therapy was 40% (Cape 46%; CAPOX 33%). Noncompletion was associated with CAPOX treatment and higher healthcare costs within 6 months prior to chemotherapy. The 6-month unadjusted total healthcare costs were $44,444 for Cape and $71,247 for CAPOX. The nonchemotherapy costs were 41% higher for noncompleters than completers in both treatment groups (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The real-world completion rates for adjuvant capecitabine-based chemotherapy in early-stage colon cancer patients are low. Noncompletion of therapy is associated with higher baseline healthcare costs. The nonchemotherapy costs are significantly higher in noncompleters than completers, highlighting the financial burden of managing adverse events and preexisting comorbidities, which may lead to early discontinuation of therapy. Effective strategies to optimize completion of oral chemotherapy may consider adherence monitoring.