1
|
Okamoto K, Nozawa H, Emoto S, Murono K, Sasaki K, Ishihara S. Adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a single-centre observational study in Japan. J Chemother 2024; 36:319-328. [PMID: 37881011 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2023.2273096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) following radical resection. The aim of the present study is to review appropriate chemotherapeutic regimens for elderly patients. We examined 1138 Japanese patients who were operated for high-risk stage II or stage III CRC between July 2010 and June 2021 at our hospital. Patients were divided according to an age of 70 years. The efficacy of adjuvant therapy was analyzed in association with age and adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens. A total of 507 patients (45%) were ≥70 years old. They were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001) or palliative chemotherapy after recurrence (p < 0.001) than patients aged <70 years. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) in stage III CRC patients was longer in the <70 years group than in the ≥70 years group (p = 0.006); however, CSS by regimens did not significantly differ between these groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with the longer relapse-free survival of stage III CRC patients in the <70 years group (p = 0.005). Although adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a favourable CSS regardless of age, the implementation rate of adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly CRC patients was low, which may explain shorter CSS in stage III CRC patients the ≥70 years group than in the <70 years group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuaki Okamoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigenobu Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chapin WJ, Hwang WT, Mamtani R, O’Hara MH. Low- vs High-Dose 5-FU in Triplet Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab for Patients With Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2424855. [PMID: 39083278 PMCID: PMC11292450 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024] Open
Abstract
This cohort study examines the association of low-dose vs high-dose 5-fluorouracil with overall survival when used in triplet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients from the metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J. Chapin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Wei-Ting Hwang
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ronac Mamtani
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Mark H. O’Hara
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Santhosh A, Sharma A, Bakhshi S, Kumar A, Sharma V, Malik PS, Pramanik R, Gogia A, Prasad CP, Sehgal T, Gund S, Dev A, Cheung WY, Pandey RM, Kumar S, Gupta I, Batra A. Topical Diclofenac for Prevention of Capecitabine-Associated Hand-Foot Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1821-1829. [PMID: 38412399 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting side effect of capecitabine. Celecoxib prevents HFS by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) that is upregulated because of the underlying associated inflammation. However, systemic side effects of celecoxib have limited routine prescription. Topical diclofenac inhibits COX-2 locally with minimal risk of systemic adverse events. Therefore, we conducted this study to assess the efficacy of topical diclofenac in the prevention of capecitabine-induced HFS. METHODS In this single-site phase III randomized double-blind trial, we enrolled patients with breast or GI cancer who were planned to receive capecitabine-based treatment. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive topical diclofenac or placebo gel for 12 weeks or until the development of HFS, whichever occurred earlier. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 2 or 3 HFS (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5), which was compared between the two groups using simple logistic regression. RESULTS In total, 264 patients were randomly assigned to receive topical diclofenac gel (n = 131) or placebo (n = 133). Grade 2 or 3 HFS was observed in 3.8% of participants in the diclofenac group compared with 15.0% in the placebo group (absolute difference, 11.2%; 95% CI, 4.3 to 18.1; P = .003). Grade 1-3 HFS was lower in the diclofenac group than in the placebo group (6.1% v 18.1%; absolute risk difference, 11.9%; 95% CI, 4.1 to 19.6). Capecitabine dose reductions because of HFS were less frequent in the diclofenac group (3.8%) than in the placebo group (13.5%; absolute risk difference, 9.7%; 95% CI, 3.0 to 16.4). CONCLUSION Topical diclofenac prevented HFS in patients receiving capecitabine. This trial supports the use of topical diclofenac to prevent capecitabine-associated HFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akhil Santhosh
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Atul Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Sameer Bakhshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Akash Kumar
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute Jhajjar, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Vinod Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute Jhajjar, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Raja Pramanik
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Gogia
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | | | - Tushar Sehgal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Sneha Gund
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Arundhathi Dev
- Department of Medical Oncology (LAB), BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - R M Pandey
- Department of Biostatistics, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Saran Kumar
- Kusuma School of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| | - Ishaan Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| | - Atul Batra
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith KL, Zhao F, Mayer IA, Tevaarwerk AJ, Garcia SF, Arteaga CL, Symmans WF, Park BH, Burnette BL, Makower DF, Block M, Morley KA, Jani CR, Mescher C, Dewani SJ, Brown-Glaberman U, Flaum LE, Mayer EL, Sikov WM, Rodler ET, DeMichele AM, Sparano JA, Wolff AC, Miller KD, Wagner LI. Adjuvant platinum versus capecitabine for residual, invasive, triple-negative breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in ECOG-ACRIN EA1131. Cancer 2024; 130:1747-1757. [PMID: 38236702 PMCID: PMC11078225 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a better tool for evaluating the experiences of patients who have symptomatic, treatment-associated adverse events (AEs) compared with clinician-rated AEs. The authors present PROs assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment-related neurotoxicity for adjuvant capecitabine versus platinum on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) EA1131 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02445391). METHODS Participants completed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale (platinum arm only) at baseline, cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), 6 months, and 15 months. Because of early termination, power was insufficient to test the hypothesis that HRQoL, as assessed by the NFBSI-16 treatment side-effect (TSE) subscale, would be better at 6 and 15 months in the capecitabine arm; all analyses were exploratory. Means were compared by using t-tests or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and proportions were compared by using the χ2 test. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-six of 330 eligible patients provided PROs. The mean NFBSI-16 TSE subscale score was lower for the platinum arm at baseline (p = .02; absolute difference, 0.6 points) and for the capecitabine arm at C3D1 (p = .04; absolute difference, 0.5 points), but it did not differ at other times. The mean change in TSE subscale scores differed between the arms from baseline to C3D1 (platinum arm, 0.15; capecitabine arm, -0.72; p = .03), but not from baseline to later time points. The mean decline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale scores exceeded the minimal meaningful change (1.38 points) from baseline to each subsequent time point (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS Despite the similar frequency of clinician-rated AEs, PROs identified greater on-treatment symptom burden with capecitabine and complemented clinician-rated AEs by characterizing patients' experiences during chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen L Smith
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ingrid A Mayer
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Sofia F Garcia
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- University of Texas Southwestern Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - William F Symmans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ben H Park
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian L Burnette
- Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan (CROWN) NCORP, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Margaret Block
- Alegent Health Bergan Mercy Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | | | - Chirag R Jani
- Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Albany, Georgia, USA
| | - Craig Mescher
- Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St Louis Park, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shabana J Dewani
- Columbus Oncology and Hematology Associates Inc., Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ursa Brown-Glaberman
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Lisa E Flaum
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Erica L Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William M Sikov
- Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Eve T Rodler
- University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Angela M DeMichele
- University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joseph A Sparano
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathy D Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gao X, Overtoom HCG, Eyck BM, Huang SH, Nieboer D, van der Sluis PC, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL, Chao YK, van Lanschot JJB. Pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Eastern versus Western countries: meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae083. [PMID: 38721902 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma can be treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy followed by oesophagectomy. Discrepancies in pathological response rates have been reported between studies from Eastern versus Western countries. The aim of this study was to compare the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Eastern versus Western countries. METHODS Databases were searched until November 2022 for studies reporting pCR rates after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Multi-level meta-analyses were performed to pool pCR rates separately for cohorts from studies performed in centres in the Sinosphere (East) or in Europe and the Anglosphere (West). RESULTS For neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 51 Eastern cohorts (5636 patients) and 20 Western cohorts (3039 patients) were included. Studies from Eastern countries included more men, younger patients, more proximal tumours, and more cT4 and cN+ disease. Patients in the West were more often treated with high-dose radiotherapy, whereas patients in the East were more often treated with a platinum + fluoropyrimidine regimen. The pooled pCR rate after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 31.7% (95% c.i. 29.5% to 34.1%) in Eastern cohorts versus 40.4% (95% c.i. 35.0% to 45.9%) in Western cohorts (fixed-effect P = 0.003). For cohorts with similar cTNM stages, pooled pCR rates for the East and the West were 32.5% and 41.9% respectively (fixed-effect P = 0.003). CONCLUSION The pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is less favourable in patients treated in Eastern countries compared with Western countries. Despite efforts to investigate accounting factors, the discrepancy in pCR rate cannot be entirely explained by differences in patient, tumour, or treatment characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing Gao
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hidde C G Overtoom
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben M Eyck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shi-Han Huang
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Daan Nieboer
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yin-Kai Chao
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sztukowski KE, Yaufman Z, Cook MR, Aarnes TK, Husbands BD. Vincristine-induced adverse events related to body weight in dogs treated for lymphoma. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38:1686-1692. [PMID: 38563346 PMCID: PMC11099714 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional dosing of chemotherapy drugs based on body surface area may overdose small dogs, leading to an increased frequency of adverse events (AEs). HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES Evaluate the frequency of hematologic and gastrointestinal AEs in dogs with newly diagnosed lymphoma treated with vincristine weighing ≤15 kg in comparison to dogs weighing >15 kg. We hypothesized that dogs weighing ≤15 kg would experience a higher frequency of AEs. ANIMALS One hundred and thirty-eight dogs with newly diagnosed lymphoma were treated with vincristine. METHODS A multicenter retrospective study reviewing hematologic data and medical record information. Complete blood counts were performed no more than 24 hours before vincristine administration and then between 4 and 8 days post-administration. Data were evaluated using logistic regression or ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS Thirty-eight dogs weighing ≤15 kg and 100 dogs weighing >15 kg were included. The median vincristine dose for both groups was 0.6 mg/m2. Seventeen (12.3%) instances of neutropenia occurred with no significant difference in overall frequency or grade between groups. Thirty initially asymptomatic substage A dogs (29.4%) experienced gastrointestinal AEs. Because of the widespread use of gastrointestinal supportive care medications, statistical comparison between groups could not be performed. Seven instances of hospitalization occurred (5.0%) and the risk of hospitalization did not differ significantly between groups (P = .37). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE Vincristine dosed at ≤0.6 mg/m2 does not increase the risk of hematologic AEs in dogs weighing ≤15 kg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keira E. Sztukowski
- Department of Clinical SciencesThe Ohio State University College of Veterinary MedicineColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Zachary Yaufman
- Department of Clinical SciencesThe Ohio State University College of Veterinary MedicineColumbusOhioUSA
- Present address:
Department of Small Animal Clinical SciencesVirginia‐Maryland College of Veterinary MedicineRoanokeVirginiaUSA
| | - Matthew R. Cook
- Nashville Veterinary SpecialistsNashvilleTennesseeUSA
- Present address:
Metropolitan Veterinary HospitalHighland HeightsOhioUSA
| | - Turi K. Aarnes
- Department of Clinical SciencesThe Ohio State University College of Veterinary MedicineColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Brian D. Husbands
- Department of Clinical SciencesThe Ohio State University College of Veterinary MedicineColumbusOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Balbach ML, Sherry AD, Rexer BN, Abramson VG, Niermann KJ, Johnson CR, Park BH, Mayer IA, Chakravarthy AB. Feasibility and Tolerability of Adjuvant Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation in Patients With Breast Cancer and Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1262-1270. [PMID: 37433376 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Addition of adjuvant capecitabine improves overall survival for patients with breast cancer lacking pathologic complete response to standard-of-care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Combining radiosensitizing capecitabine concurrent with radiation may further improve disease control, although the feasibility and tolerability of chemoradiation in this setting is unknown. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of this combination. Secondary objectives included the effect of chemoradiation on physician-reported toxicity, patient-reported skin dermatitis, and patient-reported quality of life compared with patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty patients with residual disease following standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in a prospective single-arm trial and treated with adjuvant capecitabine-based chemoradiation. Feasibility was defined as ≥75% of patients completing chemoradiation as planned. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and the patient-reported radiation-induced skin reaction scale. Quality of life was measured using the RAND Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey. RESULTS Eighteen patients (90%) completed chemoradiation without interruption or dose reduction. The incidence of grade ≥3 radiation dermatitis was 5% (1 of 20 patients). Patient-reported radiation dermatitis did not show a clinically meaningful difference following chemoradiation (mean increase, 55 points) compared with published reports of patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiation alone (mean increase, 47 points). On the other hand, patient-reported quality of life demonstrated a clinically meaningful decline at the end of chemoradiation (mean, 46; SD, 7) compared with the reference population of patients treated with adjuvant radiation alone (mean, 50; SD, 6). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant chemoradiation with capecitabine is feasible and tolerable in patients with breast cancer. Although current studies using adjuvant capecitabine for residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have specified sequential treatment of capecitabine and radiation, these results support the conduct of randomized trials in this setting to investigate the efficacy of concurrent radiation with capecitabine and provide patient-reported toxicity estimates for trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meridith L Balbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alexander D Sherry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brent N Rexer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Vandana G Abramson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kenneth J Niermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Corbin R Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ben Ho Park
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ingrid A Mayer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - A Bapsi Chakravarthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guo X, Lou W, Xu Y, Zhuang R, Yao L, Wu J, Fu D, Zhang J, Liu J, Rong Y, Jin D, Wu W, Xu X, Ji Y, Wu L, Lv M, Yao X, Liu X, Wang D, Kuang T, Liu L, Wang W, Liu T, Zhou Y. Efficacy of nab‑paclitaxel vs. Gemcitabine in combination with S‑1 for advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter phase II randomized trial. Oncol Lett 2024; 27:161. [PMID: 38449794 PMCID: PMC10915801 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) need a cost-effective treatment regimen. The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) regimens in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced PC. In this open-label, multicenter, randomized study named AvGmPC, eligible patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced PC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel, days 1 and 8; 80-120 mg S-1, days 1-14) or GS (1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine, days 1 and 8; 80-120 mg S-1, days 1-14). The treatment was administered every 3 weeks until intolerable toxicity or disease progression occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Between December 2018 and March 2022, 101 of 106 randomized patients were treated and evaluated for analysis (AS, n=49; GS, n=52). As of the data cutoff, the median follow-up time was 11.37 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.31-13.24]. The median PFS was 7.16 months (95% CI, 5.19-12.32) for patients treated with AS and 6.41 months (95% CI, 3.72-8.84) for patients treated with GS (HR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.51-1.21; P=0.264). The AS regimen showed a slightly improved overall survival (OS; 13.27 vs. 10.64 months) and a significantly improved ORR (44.90 vs. 15.38%; P=0.001) compared with the GS regimen. In the subgroup analyses, PFS and OS benefits were observed in patients treated with the AS regimen who had KRAS gene mutations and high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (≥5 mg/l). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, anemia and alopecia in the two groups. Thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently in the GS group than in the AS group. While the study did not meet the primary endpoint, the response benefit observed for AS may be suggestive of meaningful clinical activity in this population. In particular, promising survival benefits were observed in the subsets of patients with KRAS gene mutations and high CRP levels, which is encouraging and warrants further investigation. This trial was retrospectively registered as ChiCTR1900024588 on July 18, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
- Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Wenhui Lou
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Yaolin Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Rongyuan Zhuang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
- Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Lie Yao
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, P.R. China
| | - Junwei Wu
- Oncology Department, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, P.R. China
| | - Deliang Fu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, P.R. China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Oncology Department, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, P.R. China
| | - Jing Liu
- Oncology Department, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, P.R. China
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, P.R. China
| | - Yefei Rong
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Dayong Jin
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Wenchuan Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Xuefeng Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Yuan Ji
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Lili Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Minzhi Lv
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Research Unit, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Xiuzhong Yao
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Xiaowei Liu
- Department of Anti-tumor Business, Shi Yao Group European Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050035, P.R. China
| | - Dansong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Tiantao Kuang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Liang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Wenquan Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Tianshu Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
- Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Yuhong Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nikanjam M, Kurzrock R. Critical insights into the evolving drug-approval process in China. Cancer 2024; 130:665-667. [PMID: 38165313 PMCID: PMC10922387 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Efforts have been put forward to improve the therapeutic development process in China and more novel therapies have been approved in recent years. It is important to develop and test novel therapies in China given differences in metabolism and tolerance compared to other populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nikanjam
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
- WIN Consortium, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Verheij FS, Omer DM, Lin ST, Yuval JB, Thompson HM, Kim JK, Valdivieso SC, Qin LX, Wu AJ, Saltz LB, Garcia-Aguilar J. Compliance and Toxicity of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the OPRA Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:115-123. [PMID: 37544412 PMCID: PMC11027192 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) may achieve organ preservation without a compromise to oncologic outcomes. However, reports on patient compliance with TNT and with treatment-related toxicities are limited. METHODS AND MATERIALS The OPRA trial assessed organ preservation rates and oncologic outcomes in patients with clinical stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma randomized to induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (INCT-CRT) or chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CRT-CNCT). Systemic chemotherapy consisted of 8 cycles (16 weeks) of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or 5 cycles (15 weeks) of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPEOX). Patients received >4500 cGy of radiation with sensitizing capecitabine or fluorouracil. In this report, we compare compliance and treatment-related toxicity in patients receiving INCT-CRT versus CRT-CNCT. Additionally, we evaluate the association of compliance to chemotherapy, compliance to chemoradiation, and toxicity with organ preservation and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Of the 324 patients randomized, fewer patients started chemoradiation in the INCT-CRT group compared with the CRT-CNCT group (93% vs 98%, P = .03), and fewer patients started systemic chemotherapy in the CRT-CNCT group compared with the INCT-CRT group (94% vs 99%, P = .04). Order of TNT did not affect the ability to complete all intended cycles of FOLFOX (86% INCT-CRT vs 83% CRT-CNCT, P = .60) or CAPEOX (74% INCT-CRT vs 77% CRT-CNCT, P = .80). A total of 97% of INCT and 98% of CRT-CNCT patients received >4500 cGy radiation (P = .93). Sixty-four patients (41%) treated with INCT-CRT and 57 CRT-CNCT patients (34%) experienced a grade 3+ adverse event (P = .30). Compliance and toxicity were not associated with organ preservation or DFS. CONCLUSIONS We identified only minor differences in treatment compliance between patients treated with INCT-CRT and CRT-CNCT. No difference in adverse events was observed between groups. Treatment compliance and toxicity did not correlate with organ preservation rates or DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris S Verheij
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dana M Omer
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sabrina T Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan B Yuval
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hannah M Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jin K Kim
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sebastian C Valdivieso
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons at Harlem Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham J Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Leonard B Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nakamura I, Hatano E, Baba H, Kamei K, Wada H, Shimizu J, Kanai M, Yoshimura K, Nagano H, Ioka T. Impact of conversion surgery after chemotherapy in patients with initially unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:1009-1020. [PMID: 37927929 PMCID: PMC10623972 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy was superior to gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for progression-free survival and overall survival for unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer in a randomized phase III trial (KHBO1401). This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of conversion surgery after chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer patients (ancillary study, KHBO1401-3C). Methods A total of 246 patients were enrolled in KHBO1401. We compared progression-free and overall survivals between the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups. Results Eight patients (3.3%) underwent conversion surgery with chemotherapy, seven of whom were diagnosed with unresectable disease and one with recurrence. Six and two patients received gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy as well as gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy, respectively. Three patients in the conversion surgery group who received gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy showed no disease progression and survived without postoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level was a prognostic factor for conversion surgery. After correcting for immortal time bias, 1-year progression-free survival rates in the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups were 50.0% and 19.0%, respectively (hazard ratio 0.343, 95% confidence interval 0.286-0.843, p = 0.0092). One-year overall survival rates in the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups were 87.5% and 56.0%, respectively (hazard ratio 0.222, 95% confidence interval 0.226-0.877, p = 0.0197). Conclusions Conversion surgery might be an option for the treatment of unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer in patients with normal preoperative CA19-9 level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikuo Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryHyogo Medical UniversityHyogoJapan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan
| | - Keiko Kamei
- Department of SurgeryKindai University Faculty of MedicineOsakasayamaJapan
| | - Hiroshi Wada
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Junzo Shimizu
- Department of SurgeryToyonaka Municipal HospitalToyonakaJapan
| | - Masashi Kanai
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Pharmacogenomics, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Kenichi Yoshimura
- Center for Integrated Medical ResearchHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineYamaguchi UniversityYamaguchiJapan
| | - Tatsuya Ioka
- Oncology CenterYamaguchi University HospitalUbeJapan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lim JSJ, Ow SGW, Wong ALA, Lee MXW, Chan GHJ, Low JL, Sundar R, Choo JRE, Chong WQ, Ang YLE, Tai BC, Lee SC. Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic breast cancers with or without prior exposure to fluoropyrimidines. Eur J Cancer 2023; 193:113311. [PMID: 37717281 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluoropyrimidines are commonly used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) has shown activity in patients with colorectal and gastric cancers despite prior exposure to fluoropyrimidines. We investigate the role of FTD/TPI in patients with MBC with or without prior fluoropyridines in a single-arm phase II study. METHODS Patients with MBC were enroled first into a run-in dose confirmation phase, followed by two parallel cohorts including patients with (Cohort A) and without (Cohort B) prior exposure to fluoropyrimidines, where they were treated with FTD/TPI. Primary objectives for each cohort included determination of progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary objectives included determination of objective response rates (ORR), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS Seventy-four patients (42 Cohort A, 32 Cohort B) were enroled, all of whom were evaluable for toxicity and survival, with 72 evaluable for response. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval 3.8-8.3) and 9.4 months (95% CI 5.5-14.0) respectively in Cohorts A and B. Responses were observed regardless of prior exposure to fluoropyrimidines, with ORR of 19.5% (95% CI 8.8-34.9) and 16.1% (95% CI 5.5-33.7) in Cohorts A and B, and 6-month clinical benefit rates of 56.1% (95% CI 39.7-71.5) and 61.3% (95% CI 42.2-78.2) respectively. The safety profile was consistent with known toxicities of FTD/TPI, including neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, and anorexia, mitigated with dose modifications. CONCLUSION FTD/TPI showed promising antitumour activity with manageable toxicity and is a clinically valid option in patients with MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joline S J Lim
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Experimental Therapeutics Programme, Cancer Science Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Samuel G W Ow
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrea L A Wong
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Experimental Therapeutics Programme, Cancer Science Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Matilda X W Lee
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gloria H J Chan
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jia Li Low
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Raghav Sundar
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joan R E Choo
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wan Qin Chong
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yvonne L E Ang
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bee Choo Tai
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Soo Chin Lee
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Experimental Therapeutics Programme, Cancer Science Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hertz DL, Smith DM, Scott SA, Patel JN, Hicks JK. Response to the FDA Decision Regarding DPYD Testing Prior to Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 114:768-779. [PMID: 37350752 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Fluoropyrimidine (FP) chemotherapy is associated with severe, life-threatening toxicities, particularly among patients who carry deleterious germline variants in the DPYD gene. Pretreatment DPYD testing is standard of care throughout most of Europe; however, it has not been recommended in clinical practice guidelines in the United States. Due to increased risk of severe toxicity, a Citizen's Petition asked the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to update language in FP drug labels to recommend DPYD testing as part of a boxed warning and recommend FP dose reduction in patients carrying deleterious germline variants. In response, the FDA updated the capecitabine package insert to inform patients about the toxicity risk and test availability and consider DPYD testing. However, the FDA did not include a testing recommendation or requirement, or a boxed warning. Additionally, the FDA did not recommend FP dose adjustment in DPYD variant carriers. This review provides a critical assessment of the DPYD-FP pharmacogenetic association using the FDA's previously published Pharmacogenetic Pyramid, demonstrating that the evidence is compelling for recommending DPYD testing prior to FP treatment. Additionally, the FDA's stated concerns about recommending DPYD testing and DPYD-guided FP dose adjustment are addressed and discussed in the context of the FDA's other genetic testing and dose adjustment recommendations. We call on the FDA to follow our European counterparts in recommending DPYD testing and genotype-based dose adjustment to ensure patients with cancer receive safe and effective FP chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L Hertz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - D Max Smith
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland, USA
| | - Stuart A Scott
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Clinical Genomics Laboratory, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jai N Patel
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - J Kevin Hicks
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Manji GA. Reply to C. Springfeld et al. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4183-4184. [PMID: 37369091 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gulam A Manji
- Gulam A. Manji, MD, PhD, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Herbert Irving Pavilion, New York, NY, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Di Lisa FS, Krasniqi E, Pizzuti L, Barba M, Cannita K, De Giorgi U, Borella F, Foglietta J, Cariello A, Ferro A, Picardo E, Mitidieri M, Sini V, Stani S, Tonini G, Santini D, La Verde N, Gambaro AR, Grassadonia A, Tinari N, Garrone O, Sarobba G, Livi L, Meattini I, D’Auria G, Vergati M, Gamucci T, Pistelli M, Berardi R, Risi E, Giotta F, Lorusso V, Rinaldi L, Artale S, Cazzaniga ME, Zustovich F, Cappuzzo F, Landi L, Torrisi R, Scagnoli S, Botticelli A, Michelotti A, Fratini B, Saltarelli R, Paris I, Muratore M, Cassano A, Gianni L, Gaspari V, Veltri EM, Zoratto F, Fiorio E, Fabbri MA, Mazzotta M, Ruggeri EM, Pedersini R, Valerio MR, Filomeno L, Minelli M, Scavina P, Raffaele M, Astone A, De Vita R, Pozzi M, Riccardi F, Greco F, Moscetti L, Giordano M, Maugeri-Saccà M, Zennaro A, Botti C, Pelle F, Cappelli S, Cavicchi F, Vizza E, Sanguineti G, Tomao F, Cortesi E, Marchetti P, Tomao S, Speranza I, Sperduti I, Ciliberto G, Vici P. Adjuvant capecitabine in triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment: real-world evidence from CaRe, a multicentric, observational study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1152123. [PMID: 37260975 PMCID: PMC10227592 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1152123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In triple negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual disease at surgery is the most relevant unfavorable prognostic factor. Current guidelines consider the use of adjuvant capecitabine, based on the results of the randomized CREATE-X study, carried out in Asian patients and including a small subset of triple negative tumors. Thus far, evidence on Caucasian patients is limited, and no real-world data are available. Methods We carried out a multicenter, observational study, involving 44 oncologic centres. Triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease, treated with adjuvant capecitabine from January 2017 through June 2021, were recruited. We primarily focused on treatment tolerability, with toxicity being reported as potential cause of treatment discontinuation. Secondarily, we assessed effectiveness in the overall study population and in a subset having a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Results Overall, 270 patients were retrospectively identified. The 50.4% of the patients had residual node positive disease, 7.8% and 81.9% had large or G3 residual tumor, respectively, and 80.4% a Ki-67 >20%. Toxicity-related treatment discontinuation was observed only in 10.4% of the patients. In the whole population, at a median follow-up of 15 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 62%, 2 and 3-year overall survival 84.0% and 76.2%, respectively. In 129 patients with a median follow-up of 25 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 43.4%, 2 and 3-year overall survival 78.0% and 70.8%, respectively. Six or more cycles of capecitabine were associated with more favourable outcomes compared with less than six cycles. Conclusion The CaRe study shows an unexpectedly good tolerance of adjuvant capecitabine in a real-world setting, although effectiveness appears to be lower than that observed in the CREATE-X study. Methodological differences between the two studies impose significant limits to comparability concerning effectiveness, and strongly invite further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eriseld Krasniqi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Katia Cannita
- Oncology Division, Mazzini Hospital, ASL Teramo, Teramo, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Fulvio Borella
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Elisa Picardo
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 4, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Mitidieri
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 4, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicla La Verde
- Department of Oncology, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Gambaro
- Department of Oncology, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Grassadonia
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry and Centre for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Nicola Tinari
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Ornella Garrone
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Vergati
- UOC of Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- UOC of Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mirco Pistelli
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Emanuela Risi
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - Francesco Giotta
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Vito Lorusso
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Lucia Rinaldi
- “Don Tonino Bello” Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Artale
- Oncology Department, Ospedale di Gallarate, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Marina Elena Cazzaniga
- Phase 1 Research Centre and Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
- Oncology Unit, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Fable Zustovich
- Oncology Division, AULSS 1 Dolomiti, San Martino Medical Hospital, Belluno, Italy
| | - Federico Cappuzzo
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenza Landi
- Phase I Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosalba Torrisi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scagnoli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Michelotti
- UO Medical Oncology I, S. Chiara Hospital, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Beatrice Fratini
- UO Medical Oncology I, S. Chiara Hospital, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rosa Saltarelli
- Oncology Division, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, ASL RM5, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Muratore
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cassano
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gianni
- Oncology Unit Rimini, Azienda USL Romagna, Rimini, Italy
| | | | | | - Federica Zoratto
- Medical Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Elena Fiorio
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Marco Mazzotta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | | | - Maria Rosaria Valerio
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lorena Filomeno
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Minelli
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Scavina
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mimma Raffaele
- Presidio Oncologico Cassia – S. Andrea, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Astone
- Oncology Division, San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Roy De Vita
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Pozzi
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Greco
- Medical Oncology Unit, AULSS 9 Regione Veneto, Scaligera - Ospedale Generale Mater Salutis, Legnago, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology-Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zennaro
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Botti
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pelle
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Sonia Cappelli
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Cavicchi
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Medical Oncology B, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS IDI, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Iolanda Speranza
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hua Y, Zou Y, Guan M, Yuan HY, Zhou Y, Liu F. Predictive model of chemotherapy-related toxicity in elderly Chinese cancer patients. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1158421. [PMID: 37180715 PMCID: PMC10169599 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1158421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Older cancer patients are more likely to develop and die from chemotherapy-related toxicity. However, evidence on drug safety and optimal effective doses is relatively limited in this group. The aim of this study was to develop a tool to identify elderly patients vulnerable to chemotherapy toxicity. Patients and methods: Elderly cancer patients ≥60 years old who visited the oncology department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2008 and 2012 were included. Each round of chemotherapy was regarded as a separate case. Clinical factors included age, gender, physical status, chemotherapy regimen and laboratory tests results were recorded. Severe (grade ≥3) chemotherapy-related toxicity of each case was captured according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Univariate analysis was performed by chi-square statistics to determine which factors were significantly associated with severe chemotherapy toxicity. Logistic regression was used to build the predictive model. The prediction model was validated by calculating the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Results: A total of 253 patients and 1,770 cases were included. The average age of the patients was 68.9 years. The incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events was 24.17%. Cancer type (non-GI cancers), BMI<20 kg/m2, KPS<90%, severe comorbidity, polychemotherapy, standard dose chemotherapy, low white blood cells count, anemia, low platelet cells count, low creatine level and hypoalbuminemia were associated with severe chemotherapy-related toxicity. We used these factors to construct a chemotherapy toxicity prediction model and the area under the ROC curve was 0.723 (95% CI, 0.687-0.759). Risk of toxicity increased with higher risk score (11.98% low, 31.51% medium, 70.83% high risk; p < 0.001). Conclusion: We constructed a predictive model of chemotherapy toxicity in elderly cancer patients based on a Chinese population. The model can be used to guide clinicians to identify vulnerable population and adjust treatment regimens accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuwei Hua
- Department of Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuling Zou
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mei Guan
- Department of Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hsiang-Yu Yuan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yanping Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fengshuo Liu
- Department of Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ockeloen CW, Raaijmakers A, Hijmans-van der Vegt M, Bierau J, de Vos-Geelen J, Willemsen AE, van den Bosch BJ, Coenen MJ. Potential added value of combined DPYD/DPD genotyping and phenotyping to prevent severe toxicity in patients with a DPYD variant and decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2023; 29:5-13. [PMID: 34797200 DOI: 10.1177/10781552211049144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate if dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase phenotyping has added value when combined with DPYD genotyping in predicting fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. METHODS Retrospective cohort study in which treatment and toxicity data were collected of 228 patients genotyped for four DPYD variants and phenotyped using an ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cell assay. RESULTS Severe toxicity occurred in 25% of patients with a variant and normal dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity, in 21% of patients without a variant and with decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity, and in 29% of patients without a variant and with normal dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity (controls). The majority of patients with a variant or a decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity received an initial dose reduction (68% and 53% vs 19% in controls) and had a lower mean dose intensity (75% and 81% vs 91% in controls). Fifty percent of patients with a variant and decreased enzyme activity experienced severe toxicity, despite the lowest initial dose and whole treatment dose intensity. They also experienced more grade 4/5 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that a combined genotype-phenotype approach could be useful to identify patients at increased risk for fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity (e.g. patients with a variant and decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity). Because the group sizes are too small to demonstrate statistically significant differences, this warrants further research in a prospective study in a larger cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte W Ockeloen
- Department of Human Genetics, 6034Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jörgen Bierau
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, 199236Maastricht University Medical Center+, The Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, 199236Maastricht University Medical Center+, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marieke Jh Coenen
- Department of Human Genetics, 6034Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ioka T, Kanai M, Kobayashi S, Sakai D, Eguchi H, Baba H, Seo S, Taketomi A, Takayama T, Yamaue H, Takahashi M, Sho M, Kamei K, Fujimoto J, Toyoda M, Shimizu J, Goto T, Shindo Y, Yoshimura K, Hatano E, Nagano H. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine, cisplatin plus S-1 versus gemcitabine, cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer (KHBO1401- MITSUBA). JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2023; 30:102-110. [PMID: 35900311 PMCID: PMC10086809 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) combination therapy has been the standard palliative chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). No randomized clinical trials have been able to demonstrate the survival benefit over GC during the past decade. In our previous phase II trial, adding S-1 to GC (GCS) showed promising efficacy and we aimed to determine whether GCS could improve overall survival compared with GC for patients with advanced BTC. METHODS We performed a mulitcenter, randomized phase III trial across 39 centers. Enrolled patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either the GCS or GC arm. The GCS regimen comprised gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 ) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 ) infusion on day 1 and 80 mg/m2 of S-1 on days 1-7 every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and adverse events (AEs). This study is registered with Clinical trial identification: NCT02182778. RESULTS Between July 2014 and February 2016, 246 patients were enrolled. The median OS and 1-year OS rate were 13.5 months and 59.4% in the GCS arm and 12.6 months and 53.7% in the GC arm, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.628-0.996; P = .046 [stratified log-rank test]). Median PFS was 7.4 months in the GCS arm and 5.5 months in the GC arm (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.577-0.970; P = .015). RR was 41.5% in the GCS arm and 15.0% in the GC arm. Grade 3 or worse AEs did not show significant differences between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS GCS is the first regimen which demonstrated survival benefits as well as higher RR over GC in a randomized phase III trial and could be the new first-line standard chemotherapy for advanced BTC. To exploit the advantage of its high RR, GCS is now tested in the neoadjuvant setting in a randomized phase III trial for potentially resectable BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Ioka
- Department of Oncology Center, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.,Department of Cancer Survey and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masashi Kanai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Sakai
- Department of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tadatoshi Takayama
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Takahashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Keiko Kamei
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jiro Fujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masanori Toyoda
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Kobe University Hospital and Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Junzo Shimizu
- Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuma Goto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yoshitaro Shindo
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Kenichi Yoshimura
- Medical Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pang A, Jiali L, Ng A, Cheng J, Wang M, Ng YS, Yao Y, Chun M, Ho F, Tey J. Use of the Cancer and Aging Research Group Predictive Model for Chemotherapy-Related Toxic Effects in a Multiethnic, Older Adult Asian Population. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2237196. [PMID: 36255721 PMCID: PMC9579905 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) prediction model for chemotherapy-related toxic effects has been developed but not yet validated in older Asian adults. In view of differences in drug metabolism and toxic effect reporting in the Asian population, the ability of this tool to guide the cancer treatment decision-making process in older Asian adults needs to be assessed. OBJECTIVE To examine the validity of the CARG predictive model in a multiethnic Asian cohort of older adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this prognostic study, patients of various Asian ethnicities 70 years or older with a solid tumor diagnosis receiving chemotherapy at the National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, were accrued from June 1, 2017, to January 1, 2019. Their risks of chemotherapy-related toxic effects were calculated using the CARG tool. A geriatric assessment was performed, and the treating oncologist (blinded to the CARG scores) was asked to give an estimated likelihood of toxic effects (low, medium, or high). Chemotherapy-related toxic effects were recorded during each clinic visit. Validation of the prediction model was performed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables in other domains in the geriatric assessment predicting for severe toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Grade 3 to 5 toxic effects and hospitalization. RESULTS The study included 200 patients (median age, 74 years [range, 70-89 years]; 110 [55.0%] male; 177 [88.5%] Chinese, 17 [8.5%] Malay, 4 [2.0%] Indian, and 2 [1.0%] other ethnicities [according to Singapore's national system of race classification]). A total of 137 patients (68.5%) experienced grade 3 to 5 toxic effects, and 131 (65.5%) required hospitalization. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the CARG chemotoxicity prediction model was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.82), retaining good discrimination in the study population. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This prognostic study conducted in a multiethnic Asian cohort of older adults supports the validity of the CARG predictive model in this population, predicting which older adults are at risk of chemotherapy-related toxic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Pang
- Department of Haematology Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Low Jiali
- Department of Haematology Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Alex Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore
| | - Joseph Cheng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore
| | - Meng Wang
- Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yean Shin Ng
- Department of Haematology Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Yao Yao
- Department of Pharmacy, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Meiling Chun
- Department of Surgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Francis Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Jeremy Tey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Spanogiannopoulos P, Kyaw TS, Guthrie BGH, Bradley PH, Lee JV, Melamed J, Malig YNA, Lam KN, Gempis D, Sandy M, Kidder W, Van Blarigan EL, Atreya CE, Venook A, Gerona RR, Goga A, Pollard KS, Turnbaugh PJ. Host and gut bacteria share metabolic pathways for anti-cancer drug metabolism. Nat Microbiol 2022; 7:1605-1620. [PMID: 36138165 PMCID: PMC9530025 DOI: 10.1038/s41564-022-01226-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Pharmaceuticals have extensive reciprocal interactions with the microbiome, but whether bacterial drug sensitivity and metabolism is driven by pathways conserved in host cells remains unclear. Here we show that anti-cancer fluoropyrimidine drugs inhibit the growth of gut bacterial strains from 6 phyla. In both Escherichia coli and mammalian cells, fluoropyrimidines disrupt pyrimidine metabolism. Proteobacteria and Firmicutes metabolized 5-fluorouracil to its inactive metabolite dihydrofluorouracil, mimicking the major host mechanism for drug clearance. The preTA operon was necessary and sufficient for 5-fluorouracil inactivation by E. coli, exhibited high catalytic efficiency for the reductive reaction, decreased the bioavailability and efficacy of oral fluoropyrimidine treatment in mice and was prevalent in the gut microbiomes of colorectal cancer patients. The conservation of both the targets and enzymes for metabolism of therapeutics across domains highlights the need to distinguish the relative contributions of human and microbial cells to drug efficacy and side-effect profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Spanogiannopoulos
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Than S Kyaw
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ben G H Guthrie
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Patrick H Bradley
- Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joyce V Lee
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Melamed
- Clinical Toxicology and Environmental Biomonitoring Laboratory, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ysabella Noelle Amora Malig
- Clinical Toxicology and Environmental Biomonitoring Laboratory, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kathy N Lam
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daryll Gempis
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Moriah Sandy
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Wesley Kidder
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Erin L Van Blarigan
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Chloe E Atreya
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alan Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Roy R Gerona
- Clinical Toxicology and Environmental Biomonitoring Laboratory, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrei Goga
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine S Pollard
- Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter J Turnbaugh
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Koyilot MC, Natarajan P, Hunt CR, Sivarajkumar S, Roy R, Joglekar S, Pandita S, Tong CW, Marakkar S, Subramanian L, Yadav SS, Cherian AV, Pandita TK, Shameer K, Yadav KK. Breakthroughs and Applications of Organ-on-a-Chip Technology. Cells 2022; 11:cells11111828. [PMID: 35681523 PMCID: PMC9180073 DOI: 10.3390/cells11111828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Organ-on-a-chip (OOAC) is an emerging technology based on microfluid platforms and in vitro cell culture that has a promising future in the healthcare industry. The numerous advantages of OOAC over conventional systems make it highly popular. The chip is an innovative combination of novel technologies, including lab-on-a-chip, microfluidics, biomaterials, and tissue engineering. This paper begins by analyzing the need for the development of OOAC followed by a brief introduction to the technology. Later sections discuss and review the various types of OOACs and the fabrication materials used. The implementation of artificial intelligence in the system makes it more advanced, thereby helping to provide a more accurate diagnosis as well as convenient data management. We introduce selected OOAC projects, including applications to organ/disease modelling, pharmacology, personalized medicine, and dentistry. Finally, we point out certain challenges that need to be surmounted in order to further develop and upgrade the current systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mufeeda C. Koyilot
- Molecular Robotics, Cochin 682033, India; (M.C.K.); (P.N.); (S.S.); (R.R.); (S.J.); (S.M.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Priyadarshini Natarajan
- Molecular Robotics, Cochin 682033, India; (M.C.K.); (P.N.); (S.S.); (R.R.); (S.J.); (S.M.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Clayton R. Hunt
- Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Sonish Sivarajkumar
- Molecular Robotics, Cochin 682033, India; (M.C.K.); (P.N.); (S.S.); (R.R.); (S.J.); (S.M.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Romy Roy
- Molecular Robotics, Cochin 682033, India; (M.C.K.); (P.N.); (S.S.); (R.R.); (S.J.); (S.M.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Shreeram Joglekar
- Molecular Robotics, Cochin 682033, India; (M.C.K.); (P.N.); (S.S.); (R.R.); (S.J.); (S.M.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Shruti Pandita
- Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA;
| | - Carl W. Tong
- School of Engineering Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Shamsudheen Marakkar
- Molecular Robotics, Cochin 682033, India; (M.C.K.); (P.N.); (S.S.); (R.R.); (S.J.); (S.M.); (A.V.C.)
| | | | - Shalini S. Yadav
- Department of Immunology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Anoop V. Cherian
- Molecular Robotics, Cochin 682033, India; (M.C.K.); (P.N.); (S.S.); (R.R.); (S.J.); (S.M.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Tej K. Pandita
- Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Center for Genomic and Precision Medicine, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Correspondence: (T.K.P.); (K.S.); (K.K.Y.)
| | - Khader Shameer
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
- Correspondence: (T.K.P.); (K.S.); (K.K.Y.)
| | - Kamlesh K. Yadav
- School of Engineering Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Center for Genomic and Precision Medicine, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Correspondence: (T.K.P.); (K.S.); (K.K.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Piawah S, Walker EJ, Van Blarigan EL, Atreya CE. The Gut Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:491-506. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
23
|
Capecitabine Monotherapy as Palliative Treatment for Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:6860413. [PMID: 35422860 PMCID: PMC9005308 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6860413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background. Numerous chemotherapeutic agents have antitumor activity in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Evidence of capecitabine’s effectiveness as monotherapy is limited. Capecitabine tolerability in solid malignancies has ethnic and geographical variability. We investigated capecitabine’s tolerability and identified potential prognostic factors for clinical outcomes in R/M NPC. Methods. A consecutive retrospective cohort of patients who received capecitabine as the first recurrence, second- or third-line monotherapy for metastatic NPC (2011–2019) was reviewed concerning patient characteristics, pathological features, treatment outcomes, and toxicity. Results. Fifty-one patients were eligible (median age at diagnosis: 42 [35.5–52.5] years). Most patients (78.4%) tolerated a standard oral dose of 1,250 mg/m2 capecitabine (2 weeks on/1 week off) in a 3-week cycle. The objective response rate was 49%, and the disease control rate was 66.7%, with a median response duration of 6.2 months. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) was associated with a higher objective response rate (odds ratio, 5.1 [95% confidence interval: 1.18–21.98];
). The median follow-up duration was 17.8 (interquartile range: 7.8–30.4) months. The median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.6 (4.3–8.8) and 32.7 (25.9–39.5) months, respectively. HFS (
), better performance status (
), and absence of brain metastasis (
) were associated with prolonged progression-free survival. Conclusion. Capecitabine monotherapy is effective and well-tolerated as a palliative treatment for R/M NPC. Despite the lower incidence of HFS in our patients, it remained a favorable prognostic factor for objective response and progression-free survival.
Collapse
|
24
|
Matsuyama R, Mori R, Ota Y, Homma Y, Yabusita Y, Hiratani S, Murakami T, Sawada Y, Miyake K, Shimizu Y, Kumamoto T, Endo I. Impact of Gemcitabine Plus S1 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Borderline Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2393-2405. [PMID: 34994885 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11206-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is the only curative strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), but recurrence rates are high even after purported curative resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. METHODS In an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with GS, repeated every 21 days, was administered for three cycles to patients with histologic or cytologically confirmed borderline resectable (BR) PHC who were eligible for inclusion in the study. In this study, BR PHC was defined as positive for lymph node metastasis and for cancerous vascular invasion or Bismuth type 4 on preoperative imaging. The primary end point consisted of the 3- and 5-year survival rates. The secondary end points were feasibility, resection rate, and pathologic effect. RESULTS The study enrolled 60 patients between January 2011 and December 2016. With respect to toxicity, the major adverse effect was neutropenia, which reached grade 3 or 4 in 53.3% of cases. The overall disease control rate was 91.3%. The median survival time for the entire cohort was 30.3 months. For all the patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 44.1%, and the 5-year survival rate was 30.0%. Resection with curative intent was performed for 43 (71%) of the 60 patients. For 81% of the resected patients, R0 resection was performed, and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications or a higher morbidity rate was seen in 41% of the patients. The median survival time was 50.1 months for the resected and 14.8 months for the unresected patients. For the resected patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 55.8%, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 36.4%. CONCLUSIONS Gemcitabine/S-1 combination NAC has promising efficacy and good tolerability for patients with BR PHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryusei Matsuyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
| | - Ryutaro Mori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yohei Ota
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yuki Homma
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Yabusita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Seigo Hiratani
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takashi Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yu Sawada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Kentaro Miyake
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Kumamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chu X, Xue P, Zhu S. Management of chemotherapy dose intensity for metastatic colorectal cancer (Review). Oncol Lett 2022; 23:141. [PMID: 35340557 PMCID: PMC8931773 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy dose intensity is a momentous parameter of antitumor clinical medication. In certain clinical trials, the actual application dose of the chemotherapeutic drugs is frequently different from the prescribed dose. The chemotherapy dose intensity completed in different trials is also variable, which has an impact on the treatment efficacy, disease prognosis and patient safety. When these agents are tested in the population, chemotherapy reduction and delay or failure to complete the planned cycle constantly occur due to age, performance status, adverse reactions and other reasons, resulting in the modification of the chemotherapy dose intensity. The present review analyzed the correlation between the chemotherapy dose intensity and the incidence of adverse reactions, the treatment efficacy and disease prognosis in clinical trials of metastatic colorectal cancer. Moreover, the clinical applications of chemotherapy dose intensity were discussed. Based on individual differences, the present review analyzed the clinical trials that examined the efficacy of the chemotherapy dose intensity in different patient populations. The conclusions suggested that different populations require a specific dose intensity to reduce treatment toxicity without affecting the curative effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuelei Chu
- Department of Oncology, Wangjing Hospital Affiliated to China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, P.R. China
| | - Peng Xue
- Department of Oncology, Wangjing Hospital Affiliated to China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, P.R. China
| | - Shijie Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Wangjing Hospital Affiliated to China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Capecitabine and its Metabolites in Colorectal cancer patients. Saudi Pharm J 2022; 30:527-531. [PMID: 35693432 PMCID: PMC9177445 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
27
|
The clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an exploratory analysis of JCOG1113. Sci Rep 2022; 12:987. [PMID: 35046457 PMCID: PMC8770671 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04550-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In the FUGA-BT trial (JCOG1113), gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) showed non-inferiority to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) in overall survival (OS) with good tolerance for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We performed a subgroup analysis focused on the elderly cohort of this trial. All 354 enrolled patients in JCOG1113 were classify into two groups; < 75 (non-elderly) and ≥ 75 years (elderly) group. We investigated the influence of age on the safety analysis, including the incidence of chemotherapeutic adverse events and the efficacy analysis, including OS. There were no remarkable differences in OS between the elderly (n = 60) and the non-elderly groups (n = 294). In the elderly group, median OS was 12.7 and 17.7 months for those who received GC (n = 20) and GS (n = 40), respectively. The prevalence of all-grade adverse events was similar between the elderly and the non-elderly groups. However, among the elderly group, Grade ≥ 3 hematological adverse events were more frequently observed in the GC arm than in the GS arm. The clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced BTC were comparable to non-elderly patients. GS may be the more favorable treatment for elderly patients with advanced BTC.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kang J, Kim AH, Jeon I, Oh J, Jang IJ, Lee S, Cho JY. Endogenous metabolic markers for predicting the activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. Clin Transl Sci 2021; 15:1104-1111. [PMID: 34863048 PMCID: PMC9099117 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Five‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) is a chemotherapeutic agent that is mainly metabolized by the rate‐limiting enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The DPD enzyme activity deficiency involves a wide range of severities. Previous studies have demonstrated the effect of a DPYD single nucleotide polymorphism on 5‐FU efficacy and highlighted the importance of studying such genes for cancer treatment. Common polymorphisms of DPYD in European ancestry populations are less frequently present in Koreans. DPD is also responsible for the conversion of endogenous uracil (U) into dihydrouracil (DHU). We quantified U and DHU in plasma samples of healthy male Korean subjects, and samples were classified into two groups based on DHU/U ratio. The calculated DHU/U ratios ranged from 0.52 to 7.12, and the two groups were classified into the 10th percentile and 90th percentile for untargeted metabolomics analysis using liquid chromatography‐quantitative time‐of‐flight‐mass spectrometry. A total of 4440 compounds were detected and filtered out based on a coefficient of variation below 30%. Our results revealed that six metabolites differed significantly between the high activity group and low activity group (false discovery rate q‐value < 0.05). Uridine was significantly higher in the low DPD activity group and is a precursor of U involved in pyrimidine metabolism; therefore, we speculated that DPD deficiency can influence uridine levels in plasma. Furthermore, the cutoff values for detecting DPD deficient patients from previous studies were unsuitable for Koreans. Our metabolomics approach is the first study that reported the DHU/U ratio distribution in healthy Korean subjects and identified a new biomarker of DPD deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihyun Kang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Andrew HyoungJin Kim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Inseung Jeon
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaeseong Oh
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - In-Jin Jang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - SeungHwan Lee
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo-Youn Cho
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lu YS, Yeo W, Yap YS, Park YH, Tamura K, Li H, Cheng R. An Overview of the Treatment Efficacy and Side Effect Profile of Pharmacological Therapies in Asian Patients with Breast Cancer. Target Oncol 2021; 16:701-741. [PMID: 34582007 PMCID: PMC8613101 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-021-00838-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) among Asians accounts for ~ 40% of the global BC burden. Differences in BC risk, presentation, tumor biology, and response to treatment exist between Asian and non-Asian patients; however, Asian patients are often under-represented in clinical trials. This narrative review summarizes the efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies for BC in Asian populations, with a focus on outcomes in Asian versus non-Asian patients treated with chemotherapy, hormone therapy, anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 targeted therapies, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, bone-targeted therapies, poly-ADP ribose polymerase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, and checkpoint inhibitors. While most therapies have demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety in Asian and non-Asian patients with BC, differences that are largely attributed to pharmacogenetic variations between populations exist. Pharmacogenetic differences may contribute to a reduced clinical benefit of tamoxifen, whereas improved clinical outcomes have been reported with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and CDK4/6 inhibitors in Asian versus non-Asian patients with BC. In particular, Asian patients have an increased incidence of hematological toxicities, including neutropenia, although adverse events can be effectively managed using dose adjustments. Recent trials with CDK4/6 inhibitors have increased efforts to include Asians within study subsets. Future clinical trials enrolling higher numbers of Asian patients, and an increased understanding of differences in patient and tumor genetics between Asians and non-Asians, have the potential to incrementally improve the management of BC in Asian patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Shen Lu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
| | - Winnie Yeo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Yoon-Sim Yap
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yeon Hee Park
- Sungkyunkwan University, SKKU-Samsung Medical Centre, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kenji Tamura
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Huiping Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tan BKJ, Teo CB, Tadeo X, Peng S, Soh HPL, Du SDX, Luo VWY, Bandla A, Sundar R, Ho D, Kee TW, Blasiak A. Personalised, Rational, Efficacy-Driven Cancer Drug Dosing via an Artificial Intelligence SystEm (PRECISE): A Protocol for the PRECISE CURATE.AI Pilot Clinical Trial. Front Digit Health 2021; 3:635524. [PMID: 34713106 PMCID: PMC8521832 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.635524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Oncologists have traditionally administered the maximum tolerated doses of drugs in chemotherapy. However, these toxicity-guided doses may lead to suboptimal efficacy. CURATE.AI is an indication-agnostic, mechanism-independent and efficacy-driven personalised dosing platform that may offer a more optimal solution. While CURATE.AI has already been applied in a variety of clinical settings, there are no prior randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on CURATE.AI-guided chemotherapy dosing for solid tumours. Therefore, we aim to assess the technical and logistical feasibility of a future RCT for CURATE.AI-guided solid tumour chemotherapy dosing. We will also collect exploratory data on efficacy and toxicity, which will inform RCT power calculations. Methods and analysis: This is an open-label, single-arm, two-centre, prospective pilot clinical trial, recruiting adults with metastatic solid tumours and raised baseline tumour marker levels who are planned for palliative-intent, capecitabine-based chemotherapy. As CURATE.AI is a small data platform, it will guide drug dosing for each participant based only on their own tumour marker levels and drug doses as input data. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants in whom CURATE.AI is successfully applied to provide efficacy-driven personalised dosing, as judged based on predefined considerations. Secondary outcomes include the timeliness of dose recommendations, participant and physician adherence to CURATE.AI-recommended doses, and the proportion of clinically significant dose changes. We aim to initially enrol 10 participants from two hospitals in Singapore, perform an interim analysis, and consider either cohort expansion or an RCT. Recruitment began in August 2020. This pilot clinical trial will provide key data for a future RCT of CURATE.AI-guided personalised dosing for precision oncology. Ethics and dissemination: The National Healthcare Group (NHG) Domain Specific Review Board has granted ethical approval for this study (DSRB 2020/00334). We will distribute our findings at scientific conferences and publish them in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number: NCT04522284
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chong Boon Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xavier Tadeo
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, NUS Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siyu Peng
- Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hazel Pei Lin Soh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sherry De Xuan Du
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vilianty Wen Ya Luo
- Haematology-Oncology Research Group, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Aishwarya Bandla
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Raghav Sundar
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Haematology-Oncology Research Group, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dean Ho
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, NUS Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Smart Systems Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Theodore Wonpeum Kee
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, NUS Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Agata Blasiak
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, NUS Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
de Jesus VHF, Riechelmann RP. Comparative efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine plus capecitabine and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as adjuvant treatment for resected pancreatic cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1276. [PMID: 34567261 PMCID: PMC8426008 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are no head-to-head comparisons evaluating the efficacy of the main polychemotherapy regimens used for patients with pancreatic cancer in the adjuvant setting. We aimed to describe the relative efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) in this setting using a Bayesian network approach. Methods We collected data from the ESPAC-4, PRODIGE 24 and APACT trials. Disease-free survival (DFS), according to the investigators, and overall survival (OS) for the three polychemotherapy regimens were compared using gemcitabine as the reference arm. We ran Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations with a fixed-effect model to generate the posterior distribution of the hazard ratios (HRs) using non-informative priors. Relative efficacy was measured by HRs, surface under cumulative ranking and rankograms. Results mFOLFIRINOX was the chemotherapy regimen most likely to be the most effective in the adjuvant setting (98.9% and 89.6% probability for DFS and OS, respectively). GEM-NAB marginally improved DFS (HR = 0.97, 95% credible interval (95% CrI) = 0.77–1.21) and OS (HR = 0.98, 95% CrI = 0.76–1.25) when compared to GEM-CAP. However, GEM-NAB had the highest chances of being the second most active chemotherapy regimen (61.4% and 52.5% probability for DFS and OS, respectively), whereas GEM-CAP was less likely to represent the second most active regimen (37.7% and 40.1% probability for DFS and OS, respectively). Conclusion For patients eligible and fit enough to undergo adjuvant treatment with mFOLFIRINOX, this constitutes the treatment of choice. For those with contraindications to mFOLFIRINOX, while both GEM-NAB and GEM-CAP can be considered appropriate alternatives, GEM-NAB is likely the most effective regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Hugo Fonseca de Jesus
- Medical Oncology Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Rua Prof. Antônio Prudente 211, São Paulo SP 01509-010, Brazil
| | - Rachel P Riechelmann
- Medical Oncology Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Rua Prof. Antônio Prudente 211, São Paulo SP 01509-010, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nguyen PBH, Ohnmacht AJ, Sharifli S, Garnett MJ, Menden MP. Inferred Ancestral Origin of Cancer Cell Lines Associates with Differential Drug Response. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms221810135. [PMID: 34576298 PMCID: PMC8467551 DOI: 10.3390/ijms221810135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Disparities between risk, treatment outcomes and survival rates in cancer patients across the world may be attributed to socioeconomic factors. In addition, the role of ancestry is frequently discussed. In preclinical studies, high-throughput drug screens in cancer cell lines have empowered the identification of clinically relevant molecular biomarkers of drug sensitivity; however, the genetic ancestry from tissue donors has been largely neglected in this setting. In order to address this, here, we show that the inferred ancestry of cancer cell lines is conserved and may impact drug response in patients as a predictive covariate in high-throughput drug screens. We found that there are differential drug responses between European and East Asian ancestries, especially when treated with PI3K/mTOR inhibitors. Our finding emphasizes a new angle in precision medicine, as cancer intervention strategies should consider the germline landscape, thereby reducing the failure rate of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phong B. H. Nguyen
- Helmholtz Center Munich, Institute of Computational Biology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (P.B.H.N.); (A.J.O.); (S.S.)
- Department of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
| | - Alexander J. Ohnmacht
- Helmholtz Center Munich, Institute of Computational Biology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (P.B.H.N.); (A.J.O.); (S.S.)
- Department of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
| | - Samir Sharifli
- Helmholtz Center Munich, Institute of Computational Biology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (P.B.H.N.); (A.J.O.); (S.S.)
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Mathew J. Garnett
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK;
| | - Michael P. Menden
- Helmholtz Center Munich, Institute of Computational Biology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (P.B.H.N.); (A.J.O.); (S.S.)
- Department of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Franzoi MA, Eiger D, Ameye L, Ponde N, Caparica R, De Angelis C, Brandão M, Desmedt C, Di Cosimo S, Kotecki N, Lambertini M, Awada A, Piccart M, Azambuja ED. Clinical Implications of Body Mass Index in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Abemaciclib and Endocrine Therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:462-470. [PMID: 32750143 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data regarding the impact of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes in advanced breast cancer, especially in patients treated with endocrine therapy (ET) + cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. METHODS A pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from MONARCH 2 and 3 trials was performed. Patients were classified according to baseline BMI into underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2) and divided into 2 treatment groups: abemaciclib + ET vs placebo + ET. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to BMI in each treatment group. Secondary endpoints were response rate, adverse events according to BMI, and loss of weight (≥5% from baseline) during treatment. RESULTS This analysis included 1138 patients (757 received abemaciclib + ET and 381 placebo + ET). There was no difference in PFS between BMI categories in either group, although normal-weight patients presented a numerically higher benefit with abemaciclib + ET (Pinteraction = .07). Normal and/or underweight patients presented higher overall response rate in the abemaciclib + ET group compared with overweight and/or obese patients (49.4% vs 41.6%, odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval = 0.54 to 0.99) as well as higher neutropenia frequency (51.0% vs 40.4%, P = .004). Weight loss was more frequent in the abemaciclib + ET group (odds ratio = 3.23, 95% confidence interval = 2.09 to 5.01). CONCLUSIONS Adding abemaciclib to ET prolongs PFS regardless of BMI, showing that overweight or obese patients also benefit from this regimen. Our results elicit the possibility of a better effect of abemaciclib in normal and/or underweight patients compared with overweight and/or obese patients. More studies analyzing body composition parameters in patients under treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors may further clarify this hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Alice Franzoi
- Clinical Trials Support Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Eiger
- Clinical Trials Support Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lieveke Ameye
- Clinical Trials Support Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Noam Ponde
- Oncology Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rafael Caparica
- Clinical Trials Support Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Claudia De Angelis
- Clinical Trials Support Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mariana Brandão
- Clinical Trials Support Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Serena Di Cosimo
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Nuria Kotecki
- Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- University of Genova and IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Ahmad Awada
- Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine Piccart
- Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Clinical Trials Support Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium.,Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Loft M, Wong HL, Gibbs P. Author reply. Intern Med J 2021; 51:1367. [PMID: 34423551 DOI: 10.1111/imj.15329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Loft
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hui-Li Wong
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mayer IA, Zhao F, Arteaga CL, Symmans WF, Park BH, Burnette BL, Tevaarwerk AJ, Garcia SF, Smith KL, Makower DF, Block M, Morley KA, Jani CR, Mescher C, Dewani SJ, Tawfik B, Flaum LE, Mayer EL, Sikov WM, Rodler ET, Wagner LI, DeMichele AM, Sparano JA, Wolff AC, Miller KD. Randomized Phase III Postoperative Trial of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: ECOG-ACRIN EA1131. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2539-2551. [PMID: 34092112 PMCID: PMC8577688 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have a high-risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine. Preclinical models support the use of platinum agents in the TNBC basal subtype. The EA1131 trial hypothesized that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in patients with basal subtype TNBC treated with adjuvant platinum compared with capecitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clinical stage II or III TNBC with ≥ 1 cm RD in the breast post-NAC were randomly assigned to receive platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles or capecitabine 14 out of 21 days every 3 weeks for six cycles. TNBC subtype (basal v nonbasal) was determined by PAM50 in the residual disease. A noninferiority design with superiority alternative was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% with capecitabine. RESULTS Four hundred ten of planned 775 participants were randomly assigned to platinum or capecitabine between 2015 and 2021. After median follow-up of 20 months and 120 iDFS events (61% of full information) in the 308 (78%) patients with basal subtype TNBC, the 3-year iDFS for platinum was 42% (95% CI, 30 to 53) versus 49% (95% CI, 39 to 59) for capecitabine. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more common with platinum agents. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial as it was unlikely that further follow-up would show noninferiority or superiority of platinum. CONCLUSION Platinum agents do not improve outcomes in patients with basal subtype TNBC RD post-NAC and are associated with more severe toxicity when compared with capecitabine. Participants had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment, highlighting the need for better therapies in this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid A. Mayer
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Ben H. Park
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Brian L. Burnette
- Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan (CROWN) NCORP, Green Bay, WI
| | | | | | - Karen L. Smith
- Johns Hopkins University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | - Craig Mescher
- Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St Louis Park, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Antonio C. Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kathy D. Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Comparative study of low dose of capecitabine versus standard dose in metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety. FORUM OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.2478/fco-2019-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
A lower dose of capecitabine revealed better toxicity profiles and comparable efficacy in treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of lower dose of capecitabine in comparison with the standard dose.
Patients and methods
Patients were enrolled in two groups. Group 1 included 21 patients who received the standard dose of capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily [BID] for 14 days), while the patients in group 2 (19 patients) received lower dose of capecitabine (850 mg/m2 BID for 14 days) every 3 weeks.
Results
In group 1, dose reduction was reported in 12 (57.1%) patients versus 1 patient in group 2 (5.3%; P = 0.0005). Patients in group 1 reported higher toxicity rates without any significant difference between the groups. The median duration of response was 17 weeks in group 1, while it was 19 weeks in group 2. Disease progression was recorded in 10 (47.6%) patients in group 1 versus 8 (42.1%) patients in group 2 (P = 0.81). The mean time to progression was 8.16 ± 0.63 months and the median was 10.1 months in group 1, while the mean was 8.98 ± 0.75 months and the median was 10 months in group 2 (P = 0.66). The overall survival had a mean of 11.94 ± 0.754 and 11.24 ± 0.665 months, while the median was 13.1 and 13 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.9).
Conclusion
A lower dose of capecitabine provides MBC patients with an active therapy that can be continued for prolonged periods to achieve long-term disease control without compromising its antitumor activity.
Collapse
|
37
|
Kichenadasse G, Miners JO, Mangoni AA, Karapetis CS, Hopkins AM, Sorich MJ. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Receiving Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:1037-1044. [PMID: 33951613 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may negatively affect the efficacy of anticancer drugs such as fluoropyrimidines in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The primary objective of this study was to assess whether there is an association between concomitant PPI use and survival outcomes in patients with CRC treated with a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A secondary analysis of 6 randomized controlled clinical trials in patients with advanced CRC was conducted using individual patient data through data-sharing platforms. The outcome measures were progression-free survival and overall survival in PPI users and nonusers. Subgroup analysis included the type of chemotherapy, capecitabine versus 5-FU, line of therapy, and addition of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor. Overall pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS A total of 5,594 patients with advanced CRC across 6 trials and 11 trial arms were included; 902 patients were receiving a PPI at trial entry and initiation of chemotherapy. PPI use was significantly associated with worse overall survival (pooled HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03-1.40; P=.02; I2 for heterogeneity = 69%) and progression-free survival (overall pooled HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.37; P=.009; I2 = 65%) after adjusting for clinical covariates. Furthermore, the association between concomitant PPI use and survival outcomes was similar across most treatment subgroups. CONCLUSIONS We speculate that alterations in the gut microbiome, altered immune milieu within the tumor, and interactions through transporters are potential mechanisms behind this association between PPI use and chemotherapy in patients with CRC, which warrant further study. Concomitant use of PPIs is associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with CRC treated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Clinicians should cautiously consider the concomitant use of PPIs in such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganessan Kichenadasse
- 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, and.,2Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre/Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - John O Miners
- 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, and
| | - Arduino A Mangoni
- 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, and
| | - Christos S Karapetis
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre/Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ashley M Hopkins
- 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, and
| | - Michael J Sorich
- 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, and
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Safety and Efficacy of 7 Days on/7 Days off Versus 14 Days on/7 Days off Schedules of Capecitabine in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Review. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:153-160. [PMID: 33741260 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The administration schedule of capecitabine for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in clinical trials has been 14 days of drug with 7 days off in a 21 day cycle (14/7). In an effort to improve tolerability, an alternative every other week treatment (7/7) is often administered. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of administering 7/7 compared with 14/7 capecitabine dosing. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, mCRC patients received capecitabine on a 7/7 or 14/7 schedule. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability of the respective dosing schedules, defined according to frequency of dose reductions and treatment delays. Secondary objectives included comparisons of objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety of dosing strategies. RESULTS Of 175 included patients, 73 (41.7%) received the capecitabine 7/7 schedule and 102 (58.3%) received the 14/7 schedule. There was a statistically significant difference between the 7/7 and 14/7 groups with regard to dose reductions (4% vs. 29%; P < .001) and treatment delays (22% vs. 43%; P = .004). The incidence of any adverse effects (45% vs. 72%; P < .001) and specifically, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (18% vs. 45%; P < .001), were significantly higher in the 14/7 group. No significant difference was seen with regard to ORR, PFS, or OS. CONCLUSION Patients with mCRC who received the 7/7 schedule had significantly fewer dose reductions and treatment delays compared with patients who received the 14/7 schedule. Although no difference in efficacy outcomes were observed, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
|
39
|
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Arain MA, Chen YJ, Ciombor KK, Cohen S, Cooper HS, Deming D, Farkas L, Garrido-Laguna I, Grem JL, Gunn A, Hecht JR, Hoffe S, Hubbard J, Hunt S, Johung KL, Kirilcuk N, Krishnamurthi S, Messersmith WA, Meyerhardt J, Miller ED, Mulcahy MF, Nurkin S, Overman MJ, Parikh A, Patel H, Pedersen K, Saltz L, Schneider C, Shibata D, Skibber JM, Sofocleous CT, Stoffel EM, Stotsky-Himelfarb E, Willett CG, Gregory KM, Gurski LA. Colon Cancer, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:329-359. [PMID: 33724754 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 730] [Impact Index Per Article: 243.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Colon Cancer focuses on systemic therapy options for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), because important updates have recently been made to this section. These updates include recommendations for first-line use of checkpoint inhibitors for mCRC, that is deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high, recommendations related to the use of biosimilars, and expanded recommendations for biomarker testing. The systemic therapy recommendations now include targeted therapy options for patients with mCRC that is HER2-amplified, or BRAF V600E mutation-positive. Treatment and management of nonmetastatic or resectable/ablatable metastatic disease are discussed in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer available at NCCN.org. Additional topics covered in the complete version include risk assessment, staging, pathology, posttreatment surveillance, and survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Al B Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Alan P Venook
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Stacey Cohen
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | - Linda Farkas
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Steven Hunt
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Smitha Krishnamurthi
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Eric D Miller
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Mary F Mulcahy
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | | | - Katrina Pedersen
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wigle TJ, Povitz BL, Medwid S, Teft WA, Legan RM, Lenehan J, Nevison S, Panuganty V, Keller D, Mailloux J, Siebring V, Sarma S, Choi YH, Welch S, Winquist E, Schwarz UI, Kim RB. Impact of pretreatment dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotype-guided fluoropyrimidine dosing on chemotherapy associated adverse events. Clin Transl Sci 2021; 14:1338-1348. [PMID: 33620159 PMCID: PMC8301551 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Consensus guidelines exist for genotype‐guided fluoropyrimidine dosing based on variation in the gene dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD). However, these guidelines have not been widely implemented in North America and most studies of pretreatment DPYD screening have been conducted in Europe. Given regional differences in treatment practices and rates of adverse events (AEs), we investigated the impact of pretreatment DPYD genotyping on AEs in a Canadian context. Patients referred for DPYD genotyping prior to fluoropyrimidine treatment were enrolled from December 2013 through November 2019 and followed until completion of fluoropyrimidine treatment. Patients were genotyped for DPYD c.1905+1G>A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, and c.1236G>A. Genotype‐guided dosing recommendations were informed by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who experienced a severe fluoropyrimidine‐related AE (grade ≥3, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0). Secondary outcomes included early severe AEs, severe AEs by toxicity category, discontinuation of fluoropyrimidine treatment due to AEs, and fluoropyrimidine‐related death. Among 1394 patients, mean (SD) age was 64 (12) years, 764 (54.8%) were men, and 47 (3.4%) were DPYD variant carriers treated with dose reduction. Eleven variant carriers (23%) and 418 (31.0%) noncarriers experienced a severe fluoropyrimidine‐related AE (p = 0.265). Six carriers (15%) and 284 noncarriers (21.1%) experienced early severe fluoropyrimidine‐related AEs (p = 0.167). DPYD variant carriers treated with genotype‐guided dosing did not experience an increased risk for severe AEs. Our data support a role for DPYD genotyping in the use of fluoropyrimidines in North America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore J Wigle
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | | | - Samantha Medwid
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Wendy A Teft
- Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Robin M Legan
- Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - John Lenehan
- Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | | | - Veera Panuganty
- Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | | | - Jaymie Mailloux
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | | | - Sisira Sarma
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Yun-Hee Choi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Stephen Welch
- Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Eric Winquist
- Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Ute I Schwarz
- Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Richard B Kim
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wang X, Wang SS, Huang H, Cai L, Zhao L, Peng RJ, Lin Y, Tang J, Zeng J, Zhang LH, Ke YL, Wang XM, Liu XM, Chen QJ, Zhang AQ, Xu F, Bi XW, Huang JJ, Li JB, Pang DM, Xue C, Shi YX, He ZY, Lin HX, An X, Xia W, Cao Y, Guo Y, Su YH, Hua X, Wang XY, Hong RX, Jiang KK, Song CG, Huang ZZ, Shi W, Zhong YY, Yuan ZY. Effect of Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy Using Lower Dosage and Higher Frequency vs Observation on Disease-Free Survival Among Patients With Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Had Received Standard Treatment: The SYSUCC-001 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021; 325:50-58. [PMID: 33300950 PMCID: PMC7729589 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.23370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Among all subtypes of breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer has a relatively high relapse rate and poor outcome after standard treatment. Effective strategies to reduce the risk of relapse and death are needed. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of low-dose capecitabine maintenance after standard adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized clinical trial conducted at 13 academic centers and clinical sites in China from April 2010 to December 2016 and final date of follow-up was April 30, 2020. Patients (n = 443) had early-stage triple-negative breast cancer and had completed standard adjuvant chemotherapy. INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive capecitabine (n = 222) at a dose of 650 mg/m2 twice a day by mouth for 1 year without interruption or to observation (n = 221) after completion of standard adjuvant chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included distant disease-free survival, overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and adverse events. RESULTS Among 443 women who were randomized, 434 were included in the full analysis set (mean [SD] age, 46 [9.9] years; T1/T2 stage, 93.1%; node-negative, 61.8%) (98.0% completed the trial). After a median follow-up of 61 months (interquartile range, 44-82), 94 events were observed, including 38 events (37 recurrences and 32 deaths) in the capecitabine group and 56 events (56 recurrences and 40 deaths) in the observation group. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival was 82.8% in the capecitabine group and 73.0% in the observation group (hazard ratio [HR] for risk of recurrence or death, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.95]; P = .03). In the capecitabine group vs the observation group, the estimated 5-year distant disease-free survival was 85.8% vs 75.8% (HR for risk of distant metastasis or death, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.38-0.92]; P = .02), the estimated 5-year overall survival was 85.5% vs 81.3% (HR for risk of death, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.47-1.19]; P = .22), and the estimated 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival was 85.0% vs 80.8% (HR for risk of locoregional recurrence or death, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.46-1.13]; P = .15). The most common capecitabine-related adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (45.2%), with 7.7% of patients experiencing a grade 3 event. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among women with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer who received standard adjuvant treatment, low-dose capecitabine maintenance therapy for 1 year, compared with observation, resulted in significantly improved 5-year disease-free survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01112826.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Wang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shu-Sen Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Heng Huang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Lianjiang People’s Hospital, Lianjiang, China
| | - Li Cai
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Li Zhao
- Department of Breast Oncology, Guangzhou First People Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Rou-Jun Peng
- Department of Integrated Therapy in Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ying Lin
- Department of Breast Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jun Tang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jian Zeng
- Department of Breast Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Le-Hong Zhang
- Department of Breast Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yong-Li Ke
- Department of Breast Oncology, General Hospital of PLA Guangzhou Military Area, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xian-Ming Wang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Xin-Mei Liu
- Department of Breast Oncology, Haikou People’s Hospital, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Qian-Jun Chen
- Department of Breast Oncology, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - An-Qin Zhang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Fei Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xi-Wen Bi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jia-Jia Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Department of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Dan-Mei Pang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Foshan First People’s Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Cong Xue
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yan-Xia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhen-Yu He
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huan-Xin Lin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xin An
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wen Xia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ye Cao
- Department of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ying Guo
- Department of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | | | - Xin Hua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xin-Yue Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ruo-Xi Hong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kui-Kui Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chen-Ge Song
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhang-Zan Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wei Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China
| | - Yong-Yi Zhong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhong-Yu Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Fukuda N, Yunokawa M, Fujiwara Y, Wang X, Ohmoto A, Hayashi N, Urasaki T, Sato Y, Nakano K, Ono M, Tomomatsu J, Mitani H, Takahashi S. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen for treating recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in older and younger adult patients. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2020; 4:e1322. [PMID: 33295110 PMCID: PMC8451378 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a geriatric cancer. However, older adult patients are frequently underrepresented in large clinical trials. Aims The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen (platinum + fluorouracil + cetuximab) in older and younger adult patients with HNSCC. Methods and results Patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC treated with the EXTREME regimen were retrospectively analyzed. We compare the efficacy and safety in older (aged ≥70 years) younger (aged <70 years) adult patients. Of the 86 patients examined in this study, 21 (24.4%) were older adults. There was no difference in overall response rate (46.9% vs 38.5%, P = .76), median progression‐free survival [5.7 months vs 5.8 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.52‐1.51, P = .66] and overall survival (OS) (14.6 months vs 15.2 months, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43‐1.43, P = .44) in younger vs older patients. There was also no difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between groups. The exploratory analysis for geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) showed the association with lower GNRI (≤98) and poor OS in older adult patients (37.7 months vs 7.0 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31‐0.89, P = .002). Conclusions The EXTREME regimen with optimal dose modification is safe and effective for both older and younger adult patients with HNSCC. The GNRI can be an indicator to select the older adult patients who can get benefit from the EXTREME regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Fukuda
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Fujiwara
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Xiaofei Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ohmoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naomi Hayashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Urasaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuyoshi Sato
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Nakano
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makiko Ono
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Tomomatsu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Mitani
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunji Takahashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Beyerlin K, Jimenez R, Zangardi M, Fell GG, Edmonds C, Johnson A, Bossuyt V, Specht M, Mulvey TM, Moy B, Ellisen LW, Isakoff SJ, Bardia A, Spring LM. The adjuvant use of capecitabine for residual disease following pre-operative chemotherapy for breast cancer: Challenges applying CREATE-X to a US population. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 27:1883-1890. [PMID: 33153384 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220971751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The CREATE-X study, conducted in Japan and South Korea, established capecitabine as an adjuvant treatment option for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have residual disease (RD) following neoadjuvant anthracycline or taxane-based chemotherapy. However, there are no reports on the tolerability and outcomes of adjuvant capecitabine in the US setting following publication of the CREATE-X data. METHODS We retrospectively collected treatment and tolerability data from the medical records of the first 23 TNBC patients who received adjuvant capecitabine for RD post neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our institution. Disease-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The median starting dosage of capecitabine was 1871 mg/m2/day, most commonly divided into two daily doses on days 1-14 of each 21 day cycle. 34.8% of patients completed the treatment as prescribed. Side effects associated with treatment were common with 69.6% of patients experiencing hand-foot syndrome, 39.1% of patients experiencing diarrhea, and 13.0% of patients requiring hospitalization for side effects. Of 23 patients treated with adjuvant capecitabine, 34.8% completed the planned dose, 30.4% completed with dose reduction, and 34.8% discontinued early. At a median follow-up time of 14 months, the median disease-free survival was 22 months, with 30.4% of patients experiencing recurrence. CONCLUSION Tolerability was poor overall compared to the CREATE-X cohort. Administering adjuvant capecitabine for TNBC patients with residual disease in the United States is challenging given differences in tolerability. More research is needed to understand how poor tolerability will affect the efficacy of this approach in the US population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel Jimenez
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Christine Edmonds
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Veerle Bossuyt
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michelle Specht
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Therese M Mulvey
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leif W Ellisen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven J Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chan WL, Ma T, Cheung KL, Choi H, Wong J, Lam KO, Yuen KK, Luk MY, Kwong D. The predictive value of G8 and the Cancer and aging research group chemotherapy toxicity tool in treatment-related toxicity in older Chinese patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 12:557-562. [PMID: 33127385 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older patients experience a higher risk of treatment-related toxicity (TRT). The G8 screening tool was developed to separate cancer older patients fit to receive standard treatment from those who are frail and experiencing functional decline due to reduced organ function and multiple comorbidities. The Cancer and Aging Research Group chemotherapy toxicity tool (CARG-tt) questionnaire was developed to predict chemotherapy toxicity in geriatric patients. This prospective observational study evaluated the performance of G8 and CARG-tt in predicting severe TRT in older Chinese cancer patients. METHODS Chinese patients aged ≥65 with a diagnosis of solid malignancy and scheduled to receive anti-cancer treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) were enrolled from March 2016 to July 2017 at the Department of Clinical Oncology at Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong. All patients completed the G8 and CARG-tt screening and pre-treatment assessments before starting treatment. Patients were monitored for any severe TRT, which was defined by grades 3-5 using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03, treatment discontinuation, or unexpected hospitalization from starting to 30 days after treatment. RESULTS A total of 259 patients (male: 154, 59.5%; median age: 73.4, age range: 65-93) were enrolled in the study. Two hundred and ten (81.1%) patients received chemotherapy while the rest (n = 49, 18.9%) received targeted therapy. Overall, 146 patients (56.8%) experienced severe TRT. The mean G8 score was 12.4 (SD: 2.8). The G8 score had a significant association with unexpected admission (cutoff: 14, 41.3% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.03) but not significant in other types of TRTs. The mean CARG-tt score was 7.67 (SD: 3.7); it was not associated with severe TRTs. CONCLUSIONS The G8 and CARG-tt demonstrated a weak prediction of severe TRT in older Chinese cancer patients. Future studies need to develop predictive tools for TRT in patients receiving novel antineoplastic therapies, with a focus on subgroup analysis for different populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wing-Lok Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| | - Tiffany Ma
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Horace Choi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Josiah Wong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ka-On Lam
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Kwok-Keung Yuen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Mai-Yee Luk
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Dora Kwong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Small intestinal mucosal injury and its risk factors in patients with gastrointestinal cancer who developed complicated fluoropyrimidine-induced diarrhea. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:355. [PMID: 33109089 PMCID: PMC7590606 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01507-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Diarrhea is a common adverse event of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, limited data are available on the frequency and risk factors of complicated chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID) and small intestinal mucosal damage. In this current study, we aimed to determine the incidence of complicated CID and mucosal injury among patients with complicated CID receiving fluoropyrimidine via small bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) and determined baseline risk factors associated with complicated CID. Methods In total, 536 patients with advanced or recurrent gastrointestinal cancer who received fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Diarrhea was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. Complicated CID was defined according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. To evaluate small intestinal mucosal injury in patients with complicated CID, CE was performed. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for complicated CID. Results Total number of 32 (6%) patients developed complicated CID. Complicating symptoms were noted in 25 (78%) patients, with cramping, vomiting, and sepsis being observed in 15 (60%), 8 (32%), and 3 (12%) patients, respectively. Among the 13 patients who underwent CE, 11 (85%) showed abnormal findings. Multivariate analysis revealed that oral fluoropyrimidine administration was a risk factor for complicated CID (odds ratio 2.95; 95% confidence interval 1.06–8.19). Conclusions Despite the relatively low incidence of complicated CID, mucosal injury of small intestine was common in patients with complicated fluoropyrimidine-induced diarrhea and oral fluoropyrimidine was an independent risk factor.
Collapse
|
46
|
Chakrabarti S, Peterson CY, Sriram D, Mahipal A. Early stage colon cancer: Current treatment standards, evolving paradigms, and future directions. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12:808-832. [PMID: 32879661 PMCID: PMC7443846 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colon cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity throughout the world despite the availability of reliable screening tools and effective therapies. The majority of patients with colon cancer are diagnosed at an early stage (stages I to III), which provides an opportunity for cure. The current treatment paradigm of early stage colon cancer consists of surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in a select group of patients, which is directed at the eradication of minimal residual disease to achieve a cure. Surgery alone is curative for the vast majority of colon cancer patients. Currently, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy can achieve long term survival in about two-thirds of colon cancer patients with nodal involvement. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for all patients with stage III colon cancer, while the benefit in stage II patients is not unequivocally established despite several large clinical trials. Contemporary research in early stage colon cancer is focused on minimally invasive surgical techniques, strategies to limit treatment-related toxicities, precise patient selection for adjuvant therapy, utilization of molecular and clinicopathologic information to personalize therapy and exploration of new therapies exploiting the evolving knowledge of tumor biology. In this review, we will discuss the current standard treatment, evolving treatment paradigms, and the emerging biomarkers, that will likely help improve patient selection and personalization of therapy leading to superior outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakti Chakrabarti
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States
| | - Carrie Y Peterson
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States
| | - Deepika Sriram
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ruiz-Pinto S, Pita G, Martín M, Nuñez-Torres R, Cuadrado A, Shahbazi MN, Caronia D, Kojic A, Moreno LT, de la Torre-Montero JC, Lozano M, López-Fernández LA, Ribelles N, García-Saenz JA, Alba E, Milne RL, Losada A, Pérez-Moreno M, Benítez J, González-Neira A. Regulatory CDH4 Genetic Variants Associate With Risk to Develop Capecitabine-Induced Hand-Foot Syndrome. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 109:462-470. [PMID: 32757270 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome (CiHFS) is a common dermatological adverse reaction affecting around 30% of patients with capecitabine-treated cancer, and the main cause of dose reductions and chemotherapy delays. To identify novel genetic factors associated with CiHFS in patients with cancer, we carried out an extreme-phenotype genomewide association study in 166 patients with breast and colorectal capecitabine-treated cancer with replication in a second cohort of 85 patients. We discovered and replicated a cluster of four highly correlated single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with susceptibility to CiHFS at 20q13.33 locus (top hit = rs6129058, hazard ratio = 2.40, 95% confidence interval = 1.78-3.20; P = 1.2 × 10-8 ). Using circular chromosome conformation capture sequencing, we identified a chromatin contact between the locus containing the risk alleles and the promoter of CDH4, located 90 kilobases away. The risk haplotype was associated with decreased levels of CDH4 mRNA and the protein it encodes, R-cadherin (RCAD), which mainly localizes in the granular layer of the epidermis. In human keratinocytes, CDH4 downregulation resulted in reduced expression of involucrin, a protein of the cornified envelope, an essential structure for skin barrier function. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that skin from patients with severe CiHFS exhibited low levels of RCAD and involucrin before capecitabine treatment. Our results uncover a novel mechanism underlying individual genetic susceptibility to CiHFS with implications for clinically relevant risk prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ruiz-Pinto
- Human Genotyping Unit-Centro Nacional de Genotipado (CEGEN), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Guillermo Pita
- Human Genotyping Unit-Centro Nacional de Genotipado (CEGEN), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Martín
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocío Nuñez-Torres
- Human Genotyping Unit-Centro Nacional de Genotipado (CEGEN), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Cuadrado
- Chromosome Dynamics Group. Molecular Oncology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta N Shahbazi
- Epithelial Cell Biology Group, Cancer Cell Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniela Caronia
- Human Genotyping Unit-Centro Nacional de Genotipado (CEGEN), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alexander Kojic
- Chromosome Dynamics Group. Molecular Oncology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Leticia T Moreno
- Human Genotyping Unit-Centro Nacional de Genotipado (CEGEN), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio C de la Torre-Montero
- San Juan de Dios School of Nursing and Physical Therapy, Comillas Pontifical University, Madrid, Spain.,Medical Oncology Service, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Lozano
- Laboratory and Research Divison, Taper, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis A López-Fernández
- Pharmacy Department, Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria Ribelles
- UGC Oncología Intercentros, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Jose A García-Saenz
- Medical Oncology Service, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Alba
- UGC Oncología Intercentros, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ana Losada
- Chromosome Dynamics Group. Molecular Oncology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mirna Pérez-Moreno
- Epithelial Cell Biology Group, Cancer Cell Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Benítez
- Human Genetics Group, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna González-Neira
- Human Genotyping Unit-Centro Nacional de Genotipado (CEGEN), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Seita K, Ebata T, Mizuno T, Maeda A, Yamaguchi R, Kurumiya Y, Sakamoto E, Hiramatsu K, Ando M, Nagino M. Phase 2 Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S - 1 for Node-Positive Biliary Tract Cancer (N-SOG 09). Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:2348-2356. [PMID: 32180066 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08355-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nodal metastasis is a leading attributable factor of poor survival in biliary tract cancer (BTC), and adjuvant chemotherapy targeting this high-risk feature has not been attempted to date. This study aimed to test the efficacy of adjuvant S - 1 for patients with node-positive BTC. METHODS This single-arm multicenter phase 2 trial enrolled patients who underwent resection for histologically proven node-positive BTC. In this trial, S - 1 was administered at a dose of 80-120 mg/day on 14 days of a tri-weekly cycle for 6 months. The primary end point of the trial was 3-year overall survival (OS), in which the result would be promising if the 90% confidence interval (CI) surpassed a threshold of 30% (alpha error, 0.1; beta error, 0.2). The secondary end points were relapse-free survival (RFS), feasibility, and toxicity. RESULTS The trial included 50 patients with perihilar (n = 23) or distal (n = 20) cholangiocarcinoma, or gallbladder cancer (n = 7). The median numbers of positive lymph nodes and examined lymph nodes were respectively 2 and 15. The 3-year OS and RFS were respectively 50% (90% CI, 40.9-59.1%) and 32.0% (95% CI, 19.1-44.9%), with median survival times of 34.6 months (95% CI, 19.3-49.8 months) and 18.4 months (95% CI, 11.9-24.9 months). Although hematologic toxicity often occurred, grades 3 and 4 toxicity were rare. The completion rate of the test therapy was 64%, and the median relative dose intensity was 87.5% (interquartile range, 50-100%). CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemotherapy with S - 1 may be promising for patients with node-positive BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuaki Seita
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Atsuyuki Maeda
- Department of Surgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan
| | - Ryuzo Yamaguchi
- Department of Surgery, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, Kasugai, Japan
| | | | - Eiji Sakamoto
- Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Masahiko Ando
- Center for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masato Nagino
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Botticelli A, Scagnoli S, Roberto M, Lionetto L, Cerbelli B, Simmaco M, Marchetti P. 5-Fluorouracil degradation rate as a predictive biomarker of toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with capecitabine. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 26:1836-1842. [DOI: 10.1177/1078155220904999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Capecitabine is an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil with a relevant role in the treatment of breast cancer. Severe and unexpected toxicities related to capecitabine are not rare, and the identification of biomarkers is challenging. We evaluate the relationship between dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidylate synthase enhancer region and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms, 5-fluorouracil degradation rate and the onset of G3–4 toxicities in breast cancer patients. Genetic polymorphisms and the 5-fluorouracil degradation rate of breast cancer patients treated with capecitabine were retrospectively studied. Genetic markers and the 5-fluorouracil degradation rate were correlated with the reported toxicities. Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 58 years old treated with capecitabine for stages II–IV breast cancer were included in this study. Overall, 34 (91.9%) patients suffered from at least an episode of any grade toxicity while nine patients had G3–4 toxicity. Homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677TT was found to be significantly related to haematological toxicity (OR = 6.5 [95% IC 1.1–37.5], P = 0.04). Three patients had a degradation rate less than 0.86 ng/mL/106 cells/min and three patients greater than 2.1 ng/mL/106 cells/min. At a univariate logistic regression analysis, an altered value of 5-fluorouracil degradation rate (values < 0.86 or >2.10 ng/mL/106 cells/min) increased the risk of G3–4 adverse events (OR = 10.40 [95% IC: 1.48–7.99], P = 0.02). A multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, comorbidity and CAPE-regimen, confirmed the role of 5-fluorouracil degradation rate as a predictor of G3–4 toxicity occurrence (OR = 10.9 [95% IC 1.2–96.2], P = 0.03). The pre-treatment evaluation of 5-fluorouracil degradation rate allows to identify breast cancer patients at high risk for severe 5-FU toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Maurizio Simmaco
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lam KO, Fu MC, Lau KS, Lam KM, Choi CW, Chiu WH, Yuen CM, Kwok LH, Tam FK, Chan WL, Chan SY, Ho PY, Leung TW, Lee HF. Revisiting oral fluoropyrimidine with cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: Real-world data in Chinese population. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11:1031-1042. [PMID: 31798783 PMCID: PMC6883182 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Revised: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cetuximab in combination with oral fluoropyrimidine (FP) remains controversial in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In view of the regional variation in the tolerability of FP, we conducted a retrospective analysis to compare oral FP with infusional FP in combination with cetuximab in Chinese population.
AIM To compare the efficacy and safety profile of cetuximab in combination with oral FP and infusional FP in Chinese population in the real-world setting.
METHODS A retrospective cohort study was done to analyse consecutive patients with Kras wild-type mCRC who received first-line treatment with cetuximab and FP-based chemotherapy in our unit from January 2010 to December 2015. Ninety-five eligible patients were included. The median follow-up of our cohort was 65.0 mo.
RESULTS The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) of the entire cohort were 9.66 mo (95%CI: 7.72–12.5) and 25.8 mo (95%CI: 18.7–35.6), respectively. Between oral FP and infusional FP, there was no statistical significant difference in the mPFS [9.79 mo (95%CI: 7.49–12.7) vs 9.63 mo (95%CI: 6.34–13.4); P = 0.72] and mOS [25.8 mo (95%CI: 15.2–35.6) vs 26.3 mo (95%CI: 18.7–41.2); P = 0.63]. Grade 3 or above adverse events were reported in 28.4% of patients, being similar with oral and infusional FP, and included 10.5% of neutropenia and 2.1% of diarrhoea events.
CONCLUSION The current analysis demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety profiles of cetuximab in combination with oral and infusional FP in Chinese population. The results expand treatment options for Chinese patients and invite revision of existing treatment guidelines to incorporate oral FP-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka-On Lam
- Department of Clinical Oncology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong- Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Man-Chi Fu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kin-Sang Lau
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kam-Mo Lam
- Department of Pharmacy, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Cheuk-Wai Choi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wan-Hang Chiu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Cheng-Man Yuen
- Department of Pharmacy, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Lai-Han Kwok
- Department of Pharmacy, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Fong-Kit Tam
- Department of Pharmacy, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wing-Lok Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Sum-Yin Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Pui-Ying Ho
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - To-Wai Leung
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ho-Fun Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
- Clinical Oncology Centre, The University of Hong Kong- Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|