1
|
Balint N, Woopen H, Richter R, Pirmorady-Sehouli A, Pietzner K, Sehouli J. Sexuality as a Prognostic Factor-Results of an Individual Patient Data NOGGO (North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology)-Meta-Analysis of 644 Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients Prior to Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:811. [PMID: 38398202 PMCID: PMC10886503 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the associations between sexuality, quality of life, treatment discontinuation, and survival in recurrent ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS Raw data from various phase II/III studies, including the questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OV28, were included. Data from the meta-analysis were calculated using logistic and Cox regression. RESULTS Data on sexuality were available for 644 patients. A total of 162 patients had an interest in sex and were sexually active (Group A). A total of 45 patients had an interest in sex and were sexually not active (Group I) and 437 patients had no interest in sex and were not sexually active (Group N). Group A was younger in median age (age at randomization), at 57 years, than Group I, at 60 years, and Group N, at 65 years (p < 0.001). Group A had a better ECOG performance status and fewer recurrences (all p < 0.001). FIGO stage, grading, and BMI were not associated with interest in sex and sexual activity. Group A showed higher scores in role, body, and social function (all p < 0.001), emotional functionality (p < 0.002), and body image (p = 0.012). In addition, Group A reported less pain, less peripheral neuropathy, and less fatigue (all p < 0.001). There was no association with the premature discontinuation of chemotherapy. Group A showed better survival rates compared to group N (22.3 months vs. 17.4 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Physicians should routinely address the topic of sexuality with ovarian cancer patients. Sexuality appears to be a marker for quality of life as well as overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Balint
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany (R.R.); (K.P.); (J.S.)
| | - Hannah Woopen
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany (R.R.); (K.P.); (J.S.)
| | - Rolf Richter
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany (R.R.); (K.P.); (J.S.)
| | - Adak Pirmorady-Sehouli
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Klaus Pietzner
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany (R.R.); (K.P.); (J.S.)
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany (R.R.); (K.P.); (J.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
St Laurent J, Liu JF. Treatment Approaches for Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:127-133. [PMID: 37910841 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica St Laurent
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Joyce F Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garg V, Kumar L. Metronomic chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett 2023; 579:216469. [PMID: 37923056 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Translational research and the development of targeted therapies have transformed the therapeutic landscape in epithelial ovarian cancer over the last decade. However, recurrent ovarian cancer continues to pose formidable challenges to therapeutic interventions, necessitating innovative strategies to optimize treatment outcomes. Current research focuses on the development of pharmaceuticals that target potential resistance pathways to DNA repair pathways. However, the cost and toxicity of some of these therapies are prohibitive and majority of patients lack access to clinical trials. Metronomic chemotherapy, characterized by the continuous administration of low doses of chemotherapeutic agents without long treatment breaks, has emerged as a promising approach with potential implications beyond recurrent setting. It acts primarily by inhibition of angiogenesis and activation of host immune system. We here review the mechanism of action of metronomic chemotherapy, as well as its current role, limitations, and avenues for further research in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Garg
- Clinical Research Fellow, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Station 7W386, M5G 1Z5, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Lalit Kumar
- Oncology and BMT, Department of Medical Oncology, Artemis Hospital, Gurugram, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chekerov R, Arndt T, Pietzner K, Canzler U, Wimberger P, Strauß HG, Mahner S, Woelber L, de Gregorio N, Stocker G, von Abel E, Neunhoeffer T, Belau AK, Mustea A, Yalinkaya I, Braicu EI, Richter R, Sehouli J. Pazopanib with Topotecan weekly for patients with platinum-resistant or intermediate-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: results of a multicentre, open label phase I/II study (TOPAZ). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:7637-7649. [PMID: 37000264 PMCID: PMC10374680 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04647-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pazopanib has promising antiangiogenetic activity in solid cancers. The investigator-initiated phase I/II trial evaluated the combination of Topotecan with Pazopanib in platinum-resistant or intermediate-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). METHODS Patients (≥ 18 years) with first or second recurrence were enrolled in this multicentre open-label trial. Phase I analysed Topotecan 4 mg/m2 (day 1, 8, 15, ever 28 days) for six cycles to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Pazopanib added in a dose-escalating scheme with 400 mg starting dose. The phase II analysed safety and efficacy aspects. For all patients with clinical remission a maintenance with Pazopanib until progression was allowed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01600573. RESULTS Between June 2012 and February 2017, 11 patients were enrolled in the phase I, and 50 patients in the phase II study. The MTD of Pazopanib was determined by 400 mg/daily. Haematological and liver toxicities determined the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and the most common grade 3-4 adverse events: leucopenia (25%), neutropenia (22%), thrombocytopenia (19%), accumulation of cholestatic (20%) and hepatocellular damage (15%), which often caused dose modifications, but no new life-threatening events. Overall response was 16% and clinical benefit rate 68%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI 2.0-5.0). Due to early progression only 20% of the patients were able to start with maintenance treatment. CONCLUSION The combination of pazopanib and weekly topotecan is feasible, resulting in a manageable haematological and liver toxicity, but despite its encouraging response rate, was not associated with a significant survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radoslav Chekerov
- Department of Gynaecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Tjadina Arndt
- Department of Gynaecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Pietzner
- Department of Gynaecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Canzler
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics TU Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics TU Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Hans-Georg Strauß
- Department of Gynaecology Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik, Martin-Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Linn Woelber
- Department of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nikolaus de Gregorio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SLK Klinikum Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Gertraud Stocker
- Medical Department, University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ekkehard von Abel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stauferklinikum Schwäbisch Gmünd, Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany
| | - Tanja Neunhoeffer
- Department of Gynaecology, Helios Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Mustea
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Isil Yalinkaya
- Department of Gynaecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynaecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rolf Richter
- Department of Gynaecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynaecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gaitskell K, Rogozińska E, Platt S, Chen Y, Abd El Aziz M, Tattersall A, Morrison J. Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 4:CD007930. [PMID: 37185961 PMCID: PMC10111509 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007930.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many women, and other females, with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) develop resistance to conventional chemotherapy drugs. Drugs that inhibit angiogenesis (development of new blood vessels), essential for tumour growth, control cancer growth by denying blood supply to tumour nodules. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness and toxicities of angiogenesis inhibitors for treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). SEARCH METHODS We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase (from 1990 to 30 September 2022). We searched clinical trials registers and contacted investigators of completed and ongoing trials for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with standard chemotherapy, other types of anti-cancer treatment, other angiogenesis inhibitors with or without other treatments, or placebo/no treatment in a maintenance setting, in women with EOC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QoL), adverse events (grade 3 and above) and hypertension (grade 2 and above). MAIN RESULTS We identified 50 studies (14,836 participants) for inclusion (including five studies from the previous version of this review): 13 solely in females with newly-diagnosed EOC and 37 in females with recurrent EOC (nine studies in platinum-sensitive EOC; 19 in platinum-resistant EOC; nine with studies with mixed or unclear platinum sensitivity). The main results are presented below. Newly-diagnosed EOC Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS compared to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.07; 2 studies, 2776 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence is very uncertain for PFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.05; 2 studies, 2746 participants; very low-certainty evidence), although the combination results in a slight reduction in global QoL (mean difference (MD) -6.4, 95% CI -8.86 to -3.94; 1 study, 890 participants; high-certainty evidence). The combination likely increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.26; 1 study, 1485 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 4.27, 95% CI 3.25 to 5.60; 2 studies, 2707 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to block VEGF receptors (VEGF-R), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.17; 2 studies, 1451 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and likely increase PFS slightly (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.00; 2 studies, 2466 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination likely reduces QoL slightly (MD -1.86, 95% CI -3.46 to -0.26; 1 study, 1340 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but it increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.55; 1 study, 188 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 3) (RR 6.49, 95% CI 2.02 to 20.87; 1 study, 1352 participants; low-certainty evidence). Recurrent EOC (platinum-sensitive) Moderate-certainty evidence from three studies (with 1564 participants) indicates that bevacizumab with chemotherapy, and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02), but likely improves PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.63) compared to chemotherapy alone. The combination may result in little to no difference in QoL (MD 0.8, 95% CI -2.11 to 3.71; 1 study, 486 participants; low-certainty evidence), but it increases the rate of any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.11, 1.07 to 1.16; 3 studies, 1538 participants; high-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common in arms with bevacizumab (RR 5.82, 95% CI 3.84 to 8.83; 3 studies, 1538 participants). TKIs with chemotherapy may result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.11; 1 study, 282 participants; low-certainty evidence), likely increase PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.72; 1 study, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may have little to no effect on QoL (MD 6.1, 95% CI -0.96 to 13.16; 1 study, 146 participants; low-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common with TKIs (RR 3.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 9.10). Recurrent EOC (platinum-resistant) Bevacizumab with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance increases OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88; 5 studies, 778 participants; high-certainty evidence) and likely results in a large increase in PFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.58; 5 studies, 778 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 3.11, 95% CI 1.83 to 5.27; 2 studies, 436 participants; low-certainty evidence). The rate of bowel fistula/perforation (grade ≥ 2) may be slightly higher with bevacizumab (RR 6.89, 95% CI 0.86 to 55.09; 2 studies, 436 participants). Evidence from eight studies suggest TKIs with chemotherapy likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; 940 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with low-certainty evidence that it may increase PFS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89; 940 participants), and may result in little to no meaningful difference in QoL (MD ranged from -0.19 at 6 weeks to -3.40 at 4 months). The combination increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.49; 3 studies, 402 participants; high-certainty evidence). The effect on bowel fistula/perforation rates is uncertain (RR 2.74, 95% CI 0.77 to 9.75; 5 studies, 557 participants; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Bevacizumab likely improves both OS and PFS in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC. In platinum-sensitive relapsed disease, bevacizumab and TKIs probably improve PFS, but may or may not improve OS. The results for TKIs in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC are similar. The effects on OS or PFS in newly-diagnosed EOC are less certain, with a decrease in QoL and increase in adverse events. Overall adverse events and QoL data were more variably reported than were PFS data. There appears to be a role for anti-angiogenesis treatment, but given the additional treatment burden and economic costs of maintenance treatments, benefits and risks of anti-angiogenesis treatments should be carefully considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kezia Gaitskell
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Sarah Platt
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Yifan Chen
- Oxford Medical School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Jo Morrison
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Insights into ovarian cancer: chemo-diversity, dose depended toxicities and survival responses. Med Oncol 2023; 40:111. [PMID: 36871128 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-023-01976-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer has been one of the serious concerns for female health and medicinal practitioner all over the world. The wellness of over cancer patient is associated with survival responses which depends on many factors including chemotherapeutic diversity; treatment protocol; dose-dependent toxicity such as hematological toxicity and non-hematological toxicity. We found that the studied treatment regimens (TRs) (1-9) showed varying degree of hematological toxicities like moderate neutropenia (< 20%) critical neutropenia (> 20%), negligible leucopenia, critical leucopenia (> 20%), moderate thrombocytopenia (< 20%), critical thrombocytopenia (> 20%), moderate anemia (< 20%) and critical anemia (> 20%). The studied TRs showed varying degree of non-hematological toxicities like moderate nausea-vomiting (< 20%), critical nausea-vomiting (> 20%), moderate alopecia (< 20%), critical alopecia (> 20%), moderate fatigue (< 20%), critical fatigue (> 20%), moderate neurotoxicity (< 20%), critical neurotoxicity (> 20%), moderate diarrheas (< 20%). The studied TRs showed varying degree of survival responses like critical partial response (> 35%), remarkable overall responses (> 60%), critical overall responses (< 60%), remarkable stable disease (> 20%), critical stable disease (< 20%) and moderate progressive disease (< 20%). Out of the studied TRs 1-9, in case of TR 6, moderate non-hematological toxicity (NHT) and effective survival response (SR) is being diluted by critical hematological toxicity (HT). On the other hand, TR 8, 9 is showing critical HT, NHT and SR. Our analysis revealed that the toxicity of the existing therapeutic agents can be controlled through judicious decision of drug administration cycles and combination therapies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Matulonis UA, Lorusso D, Oaknin A, Pignata S, Dean A, Denys H, Colombo N, Van Gorp T, Konner JA, Marin MR, Harter P, Murphy CG, Wang J, Noble E, Esteves B, Method M, Coleman RL. Efficacy and Safety of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer With High Folate Receptor Alpha Expression: Results From the SORAYA Study. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2436-2445. [PMID: 36716407 PMCID: PMC10150846 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 84.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Single-agent chemotherapies have limited activity and considerable toxicity in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (PROC). Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting folate receptor α (FRα). SORAYA is a single-arm, phase II study evaluating efficacy and safety of MIRV in patients with PROC. METHODS SORAYA enrolled FRα-high patients with PROC who had received one to three prior therapies, including required bevacizumab. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by investigator; duration of response was the key secondary end point. RESULTS One hundred six patients were enrolled; 105 were evaluable for efficacy. All patients had received prior bevacizumab, 51% had three prior lines of therapy, and 48% received a prior poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor. Median follow-up was 13.4 months. ORR was 32.4% (95% CI, 23.6 to 42.2), including five complete and 29 partial responses. The median duration of response was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.7). In patients with one to two priors, the ORR by investigator was 35.3% (95% CI, 22.4 to 49.9) and in patients with three priors was 30.2% (95% CI, 18.3 to 44.3). The ORR by investigator was 38.0% (95% CI, 24.7 to 52.8) in patients with prior poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor exposure and 27.5% (95% CI, 15.9 to 41.7) in those without. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grade and grade 3-4) were blurred vision (41% and 6%), keratopathy (29% and 9%), and nausea (29% and 0%). Treatment-related adverse events led to dose delays, reductions, and discontinuations in 33%, 20%, and 9% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION MIRV demonstrated consistent clinically meaningful antitumor activity and favorable tolerability and safety in patients with FRα-high PROC who had received up to three prior therapies, including bevacizumab, representing an important advance for this biomarker-selected population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS and Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Ana Oaknin
- Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli Fondazione G Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrew Dean
- WA Medical Oncology St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia
| | | | - Nicoletta Colombo
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- University Hospital of Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Margarita Romeo Marin
- Institut Català d'Oncologia/Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Singh N, Jayraj AS, Sarkar A, Mohan T, Shukla A, Ghatage P. Pharmacotherapeutic treatment options for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:49-64. [PMID: 35968667 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2112030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Almost 80% of epithelial ovarian cancer present in advanced stage at diagnosis and despite excellent response to surgery and chemotherapy, more than 70% cancers recur. Subsequent therapies become decreasingly effective in controlling the disease, with each successful therapy being effective for a shorter duration. As a result, there is a need for novel therapeutic strategies to effectively treat recurrence. AREAS COVERED In this extensive literature review of high-quality articles, we have focused on surveillance strategy to detect recurrence early, classification of recurrence based on timeline, role of surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted agents such as anti-angiogenetic drugs, PARP inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant disease, respectively. EXPERT OPINION Recurrent ovarian cancers (ROC) are represented by a heterogenous group of patient population in terms of platinum-free interval (PFI), histology, molecular characteristics and immune recognition. In today's era of precision medicine, chemotherapy should be combined with appropriate targeted agent in a multipronged approach to prolong survival and provide better quality of life outcomes by minimizing side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilanchali Singh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Avir Sarkar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Trishala Mohan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Amlin Shukla
- Division of Reproductive Biology, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Therapeutic strategies to overcome cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. Eur J Med Chem 2022; 232:114205. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
10
|
Gaillard S, Oaknin A, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I, Scambia G, Colombo N, Fernandez C, Alfaro V, Kahatt C, Nieto A, Zeaiter A, Aracil M, Vidal L, Pardo-Burdalo B, Papai Z, Kristeleit R, O'Malley DM, Benjamin I, Pautier P, Lorusso D. Lurbinectedin versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label phase 3 study (CORAIL). Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:237-245. [PMID: 34521554 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The randomized phase 3 CORAIL trial evaluated whether lurbinectedin improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or topotecan in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m2 1-h i.v. infusion q3wk (experimental arm), versus PLD 50 mg/m2 1-h i.v. infusion q4wk or topotecan 1.50 mg/m2 30-min i.v. infusion Days 1-5 q3wk (control arm). Stratification factors were PS (0 vs. ≥1), prior PFI (1-3 months vs. >3 months), and prior chemotherapy lines (1-2 vs. 3). The primary endpoint was PFS by Independent Review Committee in all randomized patients. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02421588. RESULTS 442 patients were randomized: 221 in lurbinectedin arm and 221 in control arm (127 PLD and 94 topotecan). With a median follow-up of 25.6 months, median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.1-3.7) in the lurbinectedin arm and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.7-3.8) in the control arm (stratified log-rank p = 0.6294; HR = 1.057). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were most frequent in the control arm: 64.8% vs. 47.9% (p = 0.0005), mainly due to hematological toxicities. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were: fatigue (7.3% of patients) and nausea (5.9%) with lurbinectedin; mucosal inflammation (8.5%) and fatigue (8.0%) in the control arm. CONCLUSIONS The primary endpoint of improvement in PFS was not met. Lurbinectedin showed similar antitumor efficacy and was better tolerated than current standard of care in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Oaknin
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- University of Milan-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Vicente Alfaro
- Pharma Mar S.A., Clinical R&D, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Kahatt
- Pharma Mar S.A., Clinical R&D, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Nieto
- Pharma Mar S.A., Clinical R&D, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ali Zeaiter
- Pharma Mar S.A., Clinical R&D, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Aracil
- Pharma Mar S.A., Clinical R&D, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - David M O'Malley
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center - Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | | | | | - Domenica Lorusso
- Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, and Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Baert T, Ferrero A, Sehouli J, O'Donnell DM, González-Martín A, Joly F, van der Velden J, Blecharz P, Tan DSP, Querleu D, Colombo N, du Bois A, Ledermann JA. The systemic treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer revisited. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:710-725. [PMID: 33675937 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment approaches for relapsed ovarian cancer have evolved over the past decade from a calendar-based decision tree to a patient-oriented biologically driven algorithm. Nowadays, platinum-based chemotherapy should be offered to all patients with a reasonable chance of responding to this therapy. The treatment-free interval for platinum is only one of many factors affecting patients' eligibility for platinum re-treatment. Bevacizumab increases the response to chemotherapy irrespective of the cytotoxic regimen and can be valuable in patients with an urgent need for symptom relief (e.g. pleural effusion, ascites). For patients with recurrent high-grade ovarian cancer, which responds to platinum-based treatment, maintenance therapy with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor can be offered, regardless of the BRCA mutation status. Here we review contemporary decision-making processes in the systemic treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Baert
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - A Ferrero
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - J Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-University hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - D M O'Donnell
- Department of Oncology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A González-Martín
- Medical Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Joly
- Department of Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - J van der Velden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Blecharz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Oncology, M. Sklodowska-Curie Institute, Krakow, Poland
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute of Singapore, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - D Querleu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - N Colombo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - A du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - J A Ledermann
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wallace K, Adamski K, Pai A, Rose D, Chawla A. The Budget Impact of Including Rucaparib on a US Payer Formulary for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Ovarian Cancer. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:231-241. [PMID: 33145712 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00970-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A budget impact model was constructed to assess the incremental budget impact that rucaparib availability would have on a US health plan. METHODS An incremental budget impact was estimated over a 3-year horizon as the difference in total annual cost of treatment, with and without rucaparib available, for second-line maintenance, third-line treatment, and the combined maintenance and treatment settings. The hypothetical health plan includes one million covered lives, and commercial and Medicare lines of business. Alternative products included in the model were based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. The eligible patient population was estimated using an incidence-based approach. Modeled costs include drug acquisition, intravenous drug administration, required laboratory testing, and medical management of adverse events. RESULTS In the maintenance setting, average total expenditures over 3 years were estimated to be US$1,465,043 with rucaparib versus US$1,461,350 without it as a treatment option; the average incremental budget impact was US$3693 (US$0.0003 per member per month [PMPM]). In the treatment setting, average total expenditures were estimated to be US$1,320,718 with rucaparib versus US$1,313,736 without it; the average incremental budget impact was US$6982 (US$0.0006 PMPM). Budget impact is smaller in commercial plans than Medicare because of the higher incidence of ovarian cancer in the over-65 population. CONCLUSION The budget impact of adding rucaparib to the formulary for a health plan adds negligible PMPM costs of < US$0.001 in all tested settings and scenarios due to the small population eligible for therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrine Wallace
- Clovis Oncology, Inc., Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 5500 Flatiron Pkwy, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
| | - Kelly Adamski
- Analysis Group, Inc., Health Care Group, 1010 El Camino Real, Suite 310, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA
| | - Ashwini Pai
- Clovis Oncology, Inc., Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 5500 Flatiron Pkwy, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA
| | - Darya Rose
- Analysis Group, Inc., Health Care Group, 1010 El Camino Real, Suite 310, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA
| | - Anita Chawla
- Analysis Group, Inc., Health Care Group, 1010 El Camino Real, Suite 310, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schweer D, McCorkle JR, Rohr J, Tsodikov OV, Ueland F, Kolesar J. Mithramycin and Analogs for Overcoming Cisplatin Resistance in Ovarian Cancer. Biomedicines 2021; 9:70. [PMID: 33445667 PMCID: PMC7828137 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9010070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a highly deadly malignancy in which recurrence is considered incurable. Resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy bodes a particularly abysmal prognosis, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic agents and strategies. The use of mithramycin, an antineoplastic antibiotic, has been previously limited by its narrow therapeutic window. Recent advances in semisynthetic methods have led to mithramycin analogs with improved pharmacological profiles. Mithramycin inhibits the activity of the transcription factor Sp1, which is closely linked with ovarian tumorigenesis and platinum-resistance. This article summarizes recent clinical developments related to mithramycin and postulates a role for the use of mithramycin, or its analog, in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Schweer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology Lexington, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (D.S.); (F.U.)
| | - J. Robert McCorkle
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.R.M.); (J.R.); (O.V.T.)
| | - Jurgen Rohr
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.R.M.); (J.R.); (O.V.T.)
| | - Oleg V. Tsodikov
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.R.M.); (J.R.); (O.V.T.)
| | - Frederick Ueland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology Lexington, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (D.S.); (F.U.)
| | - Jill Kolesar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology Lexington, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (D.S.); (F.U.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Trillsch F, Mahner S, Czogalla B, Rottmann M, Chekerov R, Braicu EI, Oskay-Öczelik G, Wimberger P, Richter R, Sehouli J. Primary platinum resistance and its prognostic impact in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: an analysis of three prospective trials from the NOGGO study group. J Gynecol Oncol 2021; 32:e37. [PMID: 33825355 PMCID: PMC8039167 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) have a high need for reliable prognostic markers. Since significance of primary platinum resistance (PPR) versus secondary platinum resistance (SPR) was identified for patients receiving anti-angiogenic therapy, it has not been confirmed for chemotherapy only. Methods PROC patients from 3 prospective trials of the NOGGO study group (TOWER, NOGGO-Treosulfan, and TRIAS) were included in this meta-analysis. Exploratory Cox and logistic regression analyses were performed to correlate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the timing when platinum resistance developed. Results Of 477 patients, 264 (55.3%) were classified as PPR, compared to 213 (44.7%) with SPR. For patients receiving chemotherapy only, SPR was associated with a significantly longer median PFS of 3.9 compared to 3.1 months for PPR (hazard ratio [HR]=0.78; p=0.015). SPR versus PPR was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor for better PFS in multivariate analysis (HR=0.74; p=0.029). Benefit from adding sorafenib to chemotherapy was mainly seen in PPR (HR=0.40; p<0.001) compared to SPR patients (HR=0.83; p=0.465). Conclusions Prognostic significance of SPR versus PPR could be elucidated for patients receiving chemotherapy only. In contrast to bevacizumab, the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib exhibits profound therapeutic efficacy in PPR patients indicating potential to overcome this negative prognostic impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Trillsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bastian Czogalla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Miriam Rottmann
- Munich Cancer Registry, Bavarian Cancer Registry - Regional Centre Munich (LGL) at the University Hospital of Munich, Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Radoslav Chekerov
- Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Rolf Richter
- Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim HS, Park SY, Park CY, Kim YT, Kim BJ, Song YJ, Kim BG, Kim YB, Cho CH, Kim JH, Song YS. A multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group Phase 2b study of belotecan versus topotecan for recurrent ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 2021; 124:375-382. [PMID: 32994466 PMCID: PMC7853132 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01098-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This Phase 2b study compared the efficacy and toxicity of belotecan and topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent or platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRROC) were randomised 1:1 to receive belotecan 0.5 mg/m2 or topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 for five consecutive days every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS A total of 140 (belotecan, n = 71; topotecan, n = 69) and 130 patients (belotecan, n = 66; topotecan, n = 64) were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. ORR did not differ significantly between the belotecan and topotecan groups (ITT, 29.6% versus 26.1%; PP, 30.3% versus 25%). Although PFS did not differ between the groups, belotecan was associated with improved OS compared with topotecan in the PP population (39.7 versus 26.6 months; P = 0.034). In particular, belotecan showed longer OS in PRROC and non-high-grade serous carcinoma (non-HGSC; PP, adjusted hazard ratios, 0.499 and 0.187; 95% confidence intervals 0.255-0.977 and 0.039-0.895). Furthermore, there were no differences in toxicities between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Belotecan was not inferior to topotecan in terms of overall response for recurrent ovarian cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01630018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Seung Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Yoon Park
- Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan-Yong Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, 21565, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Tae Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Beob-Jong Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, 01812, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Jung Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, 50612, Republic of Korea
| | - Byoung-Gie Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Beom Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Chi-Heum Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, Daegu, 42601, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Hyeok Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Sang Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A phase Ib/II and pharmacokinetic study of EP0057 (formerly CRLX101) in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 160:688-695. [PMID: 33390325 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND EP0057 (formerly CRLX101) is an investigational nanoparticle-drug conjugate (NDC) of a cyclodextrin-based polymer backbone plus camptothecin, a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor. Prior studies showed efficacy in recurrent or persistent, epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer (EOC). METHODS This phase Ib/2 trial assessed safety and efficacy of EP0057 Q2W plus weekly paclitaxel in patients with EOC. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was identified using a 3+3 design. The single-arm phase 2 assessed overall response (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 in patients previously treated with bevacizumab. Secondary objectives included progression free survival (PFS) and duration of response. RESULTS The RP2D was established as 15 mg/m2 EP0057 Q2W plus 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel administered 3 weeks on/1 week off. Nine patients enrolled on phase 1b, with no DLTs; 21 additional patients enrolled on phase 2. All completed >1 cycle. Median age was 62 (44-76) years, 57% ≥3 prior therapies. For the primary analysis, 6/19 patients with prior bevacizumab had confirmed responses (ORR=31.6% (95% CI: 15.4% to 54.0%)) including one complete response (CR). Median PFS was 5.4 months. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events attributed to treatment were decreased neutrophil count (13, 43%) and anemia (3, 10%). CONCLUSIONS Although the observed ORR was not statistically better than the historical control rate, EP0057 remains an interesting option for treatment of recurrent EOC. EP0057 exhibits high plasma drug retention, slow clearance, and controlled slow release of CPT from the polymer when administered alone and with paclitaxel. (NCT02389985) 242 words.
Collapse
|
17
|
Garzon S, Laganà AS, Casarin J, Raffaelli R, Cromi A, Franchi M, Barra F, Alkatout I, Ferrero S, Ghezzi F. Secondary and tertiary ovarian cancer recurrence: what is the best management? Gland Surg 2020; 9:1118-1129. [PMID: 32953627 PMCID: PMC7475365 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer with complete clinical response recurs with a high rate. Recurrence is observed in almost 25% of cases with early-stage diseases and in more than 80% with more advance stages. Based on a platinum-free interval cut-off of 6 months, the first recurrence is usually classified in platinum-sensitive versus platinum-resistant, reflecting the biological characteristics underlying the clinical behavior. After this first recurrence, the patients are rarely cured, but second-line therapy can provide significant clinical responses, particularly in first platinum-sensitive recurrence. The approach to secondary and tertiary recurrence follows the same general principles applied in the first recurrence. Platinum-sensitivity based on the treatment-free interval defines the available chemotherapeutic regimens, whit less therapeutic options and a generally worse prognosis in platinum-resistant recurrent disease. Nevertheless, in this scenario, the introduction of new targeted therapies changed the prognosis of patients with both platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrence. The first introduced antiangiogenic therapy resulted able to improve prognosis in recurrent disease both as a single-agent and combined therapy, although the growing adoption in the first line therapy requires further investigation to prove their efficacy after repeated use. More recently, the approach to secondary, tertiary, and later recurrence has been changed by the introduction of PARP inhibitors, which resulted effective as maintenance monotherapy in both platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrence when the genetic background of the tumor allows their application with a significant improvement of oncological outcomes. Overall, although the growing body of promising therapeutic options to approach recurrent ovarian cancer, all the available evidence suggests that the best unique management of secondary and tertiary recurrence does not exist but should be personalized based on the disease characteristics, previous treatments, patient characteristics, and patient preference. On that basis, in this review, we report a general and complete overview of the approach at the secondary and tertiary ovarian cancer recurrence with the aim to provide a wide vision on the multiple available therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Garzon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Ricciarda Raffaelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonella Cromi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Massimo Franchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Barra
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ibrahim Alkatout
- Kiel School of Gynecological Endoscopy, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ovarian cancer typically presents at an advanced stage and while initial chemotherapy response rates are favorable, a majority of patients experience recurrence with the subsequent development of chemoresistance. Recurrent, platinum-resistant disease is associated with a very poor prognosis as treatment in this setting is often limited by systemic toxicity. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel therapeutic agents designed to target antigens specific to ovarian tumor cells with direct delivery of cytotoxic agents to combat recurrent, platinum-resistant disease while limiting systemic toxicity. AREAS COVERED The basic structure and function of ADCs will be reviewed as well as the current data on ADCs under investigation in ovarian cancer. EXPERT OPINION ADCs represent a promising class of targeted therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer with excellent response rates particularly when utilized as combination therapy. While mirvetuximab soravtansine is the only ADC that has been evaluated in a phase 3 trial, many other ADCs and trials are on the horizon. As the field of targeted therapy continues to evolve, continued development of target antigens and ADCs are likely to represent a key development in treatment of recurrent, platinum-resistant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinne A Calo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David M O'Malley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jung M, Gao J, Cheung L, Bongers A, Somers K, Clifton M, Ramsay EE, Russell AJ, Valli E, Gifford AJ, George J, Kennedy CJ, Wakefield MJ, Topp M, Ho GY, Scott CL, Bowtell DD, deFazio A, Norris MD, Haber M, Henderson MJ. ABCC4/MRP4 contributes to the aggressiveness of Myc-associated epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:2225-2238. [PMID: 32277480 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a complex disease comprising discrete histological and molecular subtypes, for which survival rates remain unacceptably low. Tailored approaches for this deadly heterogeneous disease are urgently needed. Efflux pumps belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family of transporters are known for roles in both drug resistance and cancer biology and are also highly targetable. Here we have investigated the association of ABCC4/MRP4 expression to clinical outcome and its biological function in endometrioid and serous tumors, common histological subtypes of EOC. We found high expression of ABCC4/MRP4, previously shown to be directly regulated by c-Myc/N-Myc, was associated with poor prognosis in endometrioid EOC (P = .001) as well as in a subset of serous EOC with a "high-MYCN" profile (C5/proliferative; P = .019). Transient siRNA-mediated suppression of MRP4 in EOC cells led to reduced growth, migration and invasion, with the effects being most pronounced in endometrioid and C5-like serous cells compared to non-C5 serous EOC cells. Sustained knockdown of MRP4 also sensitized endometrioid cells to MRP4 substrate drugs. Furthermore, suppression of MRP4 decreased the growth of patient-derived EOC cells in vivo. Together, our findings provide the first evidence that MRP4 plays an important role in the biology of Myc-associated ovarian tumors and highlight this transporter as a potential therapeutic target for EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moonsun Jung
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jixuan Gao
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leanna Cheung
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angelika Bongers
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Klaartje Somers
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Molly Clifton
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emma E Ramsay
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda J Russell
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emanuele Valli
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J Gifford
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Anatomical Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joshy George
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital and Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Millennium Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthew J Wakefield
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Monique Topp
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gwo-Yaw Ho
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | -
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare L Scott
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - David D Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna deFazio
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital and Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Millennium Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Murray D Norris
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,University of New South Wales Centre for Childhood Cancer Research, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Haber
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle J Henderson
- Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Australia, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Oza AM, Matulonis UA, Alvarez Secord A, Nemunaitis J, Roman LD, Blagden SP, Banerjee S, McGuire WP, Ghamande S, Birrer MJ, Fleming GF, Markham MJ, Hirte HW, Provencher DM, Basu B, Kristeleit R, Armstrong DK, Schwartz B, Braly P, Hall GD, Nephew KP, Jueliger S, Oganesian A, Naim S, Hao Y, Keer H, Azab M, Matei D. A Randomized Phase II Trial of Epigenetic Priming with Guadecitabine and Carboplatin in Platinum-resistant, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 26:1009-1016. [PMID: 31831561 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Platinum resistance in ovarian cancer is associated with epigenetic modifications. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) have been studied as carboplatin resensitizing agents in ovarian cancer. This randomized phase II trial compared guadecitabine, a second-generation HMA, and carboplatin (G+C) against second-line chemotherapy in women with measurable or detectable platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received either G+C (guadecitabine 30 mg/m2 s.c. once-daily for 5 days and carboplatin) or treatment of choice (TC; topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine) in 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were RECIST v1.1 and CA-125 response rate, 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 100 patients treated, 51 received G+C and 49 received TC, of which 27 crossed over to G+C. The study did not meet its primary endpoint as the median PFS was not statistically different between arms (16.3 weeks vs. 9.1 weeks in the G+C and TC groups, respectively; P = 0.07). However, the 6-month PFS rate was significantly higher in the G+C group (37% vs. 11% in TC group; P = 0.003). The incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicity was similar in G+C and TC groups (51% and 49%, respectively), with neutropenia and leukopenia being more frequent in the G+C group. CONCLUSIONS Although this trial did not show superiority for PFS of G+C versus TC, the 6-month PFS increased in G+C treated patients. Further refinement of this strategy should focus on identification of predictive markers for patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit M Oza
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada
| | | | | | - John Nemunaitis
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Lynda D Roman
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | - Sharad Ghamande
- Augusta University (Georgia Regents University), Augusta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | - Diane M Provencher
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Bristi Basu
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Geoff D Hall
- St James University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Kenneth P Nephew
- Indiana University School of Medicine, IU Simon Cancer Center, Bloomington, Indiana
| | | | | | - Sue Naim
- Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc., Pleasanton, California
| | - Yong Hao
- Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc., Pleasanton, California
| | - Harold Keer
- Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc., Pleasanton, California
| | | | - Daniela Matei
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bergamini A, Bocciolone L, Fodor A, Candiani M, Mangili G. Management of recurrent ovarian cancer: when platinum-based regimens are not a therapeutic option. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:1431-1436. [PMID: 31537620 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer relapses have been traditionally classified according to the platinum-free interval, leading to an arbitrary categorization of possible scenarios and treatment options. Its relevance in assessing treatment strategies has been revised in the last several years, as the panorama is constantly changing in the era of personalized medicine and targeted therapies. Factors to be considered while defining the best management of recurrent disease, and, consequently, the available treatment alternatives are increasing. Platinum remains one of the milestones of ovarian cancer treatment, but for some patients it might not be an ideal choice for several reasons other than limited platinum sensitivity. This review aims to analyze the scenarios in which platinum is not considered suitable in the management of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, and the currently available alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Bergamini
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy .,Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Luca Bocciolone
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrei Fodor
- Radiotherapy, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Giorgia Mangili
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Canaz E, Grabowski J, Richter R, Braicu E, Chekerov R, Sehouli J. Survival and prognostic factors in patients with recurrent low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer: An analysis of five prospective phase II/III trials of NOGGO metadata base. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 154:539-546. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
23
|
Pujade-Lauraine E, Banerjee S, Pignata S. Management of Platinum-Resistant, Relapsed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and New Drug Perspectives. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:2437-2448. [PMID: 31403868 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Pujade-Lauraine
- ARCAGY-GINECO (Association de Recherche contre les Cancers dont Gynécologiques-Groupe des Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers de l'Ovaire, gynécologiques et du sein), Paris, France
| | - Susana Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G Pascale, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bardhi E, Marchetti C, Scopelliti A, Musacchio L, Tomao F, Schiavi M, Carraro C, Palaia I, Monti M, Muzii L, Benedetti Panici P. Etirinotecan pegol in women with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2019; 28:667-673. [PMID: 31353973 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2019.1648430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: A PEGylated form of irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is now available in commerce; its safety and efficacy have been tested in platinum resistant/refractory ovarian cancer (PROC) patients. This novel agent is known as Etirinotecan Pegol (EP). EP, like irinotecan, exerts its action through its principal metabolite SN-38. Areas covered: This drug evaluation article focuses on the most recent investigations and clinical progress regarding EP, a long-acting polymer conjugate of irinotecan for the treatment of PROC. Expert opinion: EP provides prolonged and continuous exposure of SN-38 in tumors, when compared to its parent drug irinotecan. Results from phase II studies are comparable in terms of efficacy to other agents of proven use in PROC. A limitation of the use of EP is the schedule-dependent toxicities (mainly diarrhea and dehydration). In the future, EP could be investigated in association with other agents, even in attempts to restore sensitivity to other treatments. PROC remains a very difficult setting and EP might be a valid agent for patients with good performance status that have exhausted therapeutic options. In such a setting, participation in clinical trials is strongly encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erlisa Bardhi
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy
| | - Claudia Marchetti
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy.,b Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Annalisa Scopelliti
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy
| | - Lucia Musacchio
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy
| | - Michele Schiavi
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy
| | - Carlo Carraro
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy
| | - Marco Monti
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy
| | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- a Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome , Policlinico Umberto I, Rome , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Woopen H, Richter R, Chekerov R, Inci G, Alavi S, Grabowski JP, Sehouli J. Prognostic role of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in recurrent ovarian cancer patients: results of an individual participant data meta-analysis in 1213. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:73-78. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04778-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
26
|
Somashekhar SP, Ashwin KR, Rauthan A, Rohit KC. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy vs. intravenous chemotherapy for unresectable peritoneal metastases secondary to platinum resistant ovarian cancer - study protocol for a randomized control trial. Pleura Peritoneum 2019; 4:20180111. [PMID: 31198851 PMCID: PMC6545874 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2018-0111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite optimal surgery and appropriate first-line chemotherapy, ∼70–80 % of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer will develop disease relapse. The prognosis is poor especially for women with Platinum resistant ovarian cancer. The standard treatment for these groups of patients is non-platinum-containing chemotherapy like taxanes, anthracyclines, gemcitabine, topotecan, and trabectedin. These drugs in various combinations and sequences provide modest survival or symptomatic benefit but with significant side effects. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a minimally-invasive drug-delivery technique specifically addressing limited tissue penetration and poor drug distribution with promising results. PIPAC is a novel method of delivering normothermic chemotherapy into the abdominal cavity as an aerosol under pressure. This concept seems to enhance the effectiveness of intra peritoneal chemotherapy by taking advantage of the physical properties of gas and pressure by generating an artificial pressure gradient and enhancing tissue uptake and distributing drugs homogeneously within the closed and expanded peritoneal cavity. Thus, due to the high local bioavailability during PIPAC, the chemotherapy dosage can be reduced which in turn largely prevents systemic side effects and organ toxicity. Methods The study aims to investigate the therapeutic efficacy measured as objective tumour response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria, of PIPAC in comparison with conventional Intravenous chemotherapy for women with recurrent platinum resistant ovarian cancer with peritoneal metastasis (PM). Consecutive patients diagnosed with PM secondary to platinum-resistant ovarian cancer will be randomized to PIPAC group or IV chemotherapy group. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy after three cycles of PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin in comparison with six cycles of systemic chemotherapy. The secondary outcome measures include morbidity and mortality, overall survival and disease specific survival. Analysis is by intention to treat. Aim Assess the objective tumour response of PIPAC in comparison with systemic intravenous chemotherapy for women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Study type Prospective randomized control intervention trial. Intervention model IV Chemotherapy group (Control group) PIPAC group (Experimental group) Masking Open label. Primary purpose Treatment. Sample size Calculated sample size is 97 and rounded to 100. For each treatment group sample size of 50 will be considered. Primary outcome criteria Objective tumour response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria version 1.1. Discussion PIPAC in women with platinum resistant ovarian PM has good response owing to superior tissue penetration and better drug distribution. The procedure is safe and well tolerated owing it to its minimal invasiveness. Typical side-effects of systemic chemotherapy, such as alopecia, peripheral neurotoxicity, nausea and myelosuppression are absent. We expect reduction of ascites with symptomatic relief and CA 125 levels. PIPAC is a novel technique for selected patients with platinum resistant ovarian PM and further investigation in comparative clinical trials with conventional chemotherapy will establish its role as a good palliative treatment option. Ethics committee approval Obtained. Status Recruiting. Trial registration number REF/2018/08/021223 Registered on Clinical Trials Registry – India (CTRI); www.ctri.nic.in
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S P Somashekhar
- Consultant Surgical & Gynec. Onco & Robotic Surgeon, HIPEC Super Specialist, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Isoflavones isolated from members of the Fabaceae (primarily Leguminosae) family have been characterized for their phytoestrogenic properties, but certain derivatives have also shown potential as possible cancer therapeutic agents. ME-344, related to phenoxodiol (Fig. 1), is a second generation isoflavone with a recent history of both preclinical and early clinical testing. The drug has unusual cytotoxicity profiles, where cancer cell lines can be categorized as either intrinsically sensitive or resistant to the drug. Evolving studies show that the cytotoxic properties of the drug are enacted through targeting mitochondrial bioenergetics. While the drug has undergone early Phase I/II trials in solid tumors with confined dose limiting effects and some evidence of disease response, there is a continuing need to define specific cellular targets that determine sensitivity, with the long-term goal of applying such information to individualized therapy. This review article details some of the existing and ongoing studies that are assisting in the continued drug development processes that may lead to new drug application (NDA) status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leilei Zhang
- Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Zhiwei Ye
- Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Danyelle M Townsend
- Drug Discovery and Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Kenneth D Tew
- Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Syrios J, Kouroussis C, Kotsakis A, Kentepozidis N, Kontopodis E, Kalbakis K, Vardakis N, Hatzidaki D, Polyzos A, Georgoulias V. Combination of weekly topotecan and gemcitabine as a salvage treatment in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: a phase I study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 71:182-190. [PMID: 30727721 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4784.19.04249-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluation of safety of the weekly intravenous gemcitabine/topotecan combination as salvage treatment in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS Twenty-four women with histologically-proven relapsed ovarian cancer (ROC) were enrolled in the study. Topotecan (1.75 mg/m2 IV) along with escalated doses of gemcitabine (starting dose 700 mg/m2 with increments of 100 mg/m2) were administered on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity of the combination were evaluated at the first cycle. RESULTS Twenty-four ROC patients were enrolled in six dose-levels. Most patients had high-grade serous metastatic ovarian cancer (41.7%) and performance status score of 0-1 (95.8%). For 12 patients (50%) treatment was 2nd line and for 12 >2nd line. Eighty-eight cycles were administered with a median of three cycles per patient. The MTD was not reached and grade 3-4 (3.4% and 2.3% of cycles, respectively) neutropenia and grade 4 (3.4% of cycles) thrombocytopenia were the main adverse events. There was no case of febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild with grade 2 fatigue being the most frequent complain. The recommended MTD doses of the combination were topotecan 1.75 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Two complete (8.3%) and three (12.5%) partial responses were achieved (ORR: 20.8%). CONCLUSIONS The weekly administration of gemcitabine/topotecan regimen in patients with pretreated metastatic ovarian cancer is an active chemotherapy combination, even in heavily pretreated patients, with a manageable toxicity profile which merits further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Syrios
- Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Aris Polyzos
- Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vergote I, von Moos R, Manso L, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Concin N, Sessa C. Tumor Treating Fields in combination with paclitaxel in recurrent ovarian carcinoma: Results of the INNOVATE pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 150:471-477. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
30
|
Chekerov R, Hilpert F, Mahner S, El-Balat A, Harter P, De Gregorio N, Fridrich C, Markmann S, Potenberg J, Lorenz R, Oskay-Oezcelik G, Schmidt M, Krabisch P, Lueck HJ, Richter R, Braicu EI, du Bois A, Sehouli J. Sorafenib plus topotecan versus placebo plus topotecan for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (TRIAS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:1247-1258. [PMID: 30100379 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30372-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antiangiogenic therapy has known activity in ovarian cancer. The investigator-initiated randomised phase 2 TRIAS trial assessed the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib combined with topotecan and continued as maintenance therapy for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS We did a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial at 20 sites in Germany. Patients (≥18 years) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer previously treated with two or fewer chemotherapy lines for recurrent disease were stratified (first vs later relapse) in block sizes of four and randomly assigned (1:1) using a web-generated response system to topotecan (1·25 mg/m2 on days 1-5) plus either oral sorafenib 400 mg or placebo twice daily on days 6-15, repeated every 21 days for six cycles, followed by daily maintenance sorafenib or placebo for up to 1 year in patients without progression. Investigators and patients were masked to allocation of sorafenib or placebo; topotecan treatment was open label. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01047891. FINDINGS Between Jan 18, 2010, and Sept 19, 2013, 185 patients were enrolled, 174 of whom were randomly assigned: 85 to sorafenib and 89 to placebo. Two patients in the sorafenib group had serious adverse events before treatment and were excluded from analyses. 83 patients in the sorafenib group and 89 in the placebo group started treatment. Progression-free survival was significantly improved with sorafenib versus placebo (hazard ratio 0·60, 95% CI 0·43-0·83; p=0·0018). Median progression-free survival was 6·7 months (95% CI 5·8-7·6) with sorafenib versus 4·4 months (3·7-5·0) with placebo. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leucopenia (57 [69%] of 83 patients in the sorafenib group vs 47 [53%] of 89 in the placebo group), neutropenia (46 [55%] vs 48 [54%]), and thrombocytopenia (23 [28%] vs 20 [22%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 49 (59%) of 83 sorafenib-treated patients and 45 (51%) of 89 placebo-treated patients. Of these, events were fatal in four patients (5%) in the sorafenib group (dyspnoea and poor general condition, septic shock, ascites and dyspnoea, and sigma perforation) and seven (8%) in the placebo group (pulmonary embolism in two patients, disease progression in two patients, and one case each of sepsis with fever, pleural effusion, and tumour cachexia). Sorafenib was associated with increased incidences of grade 3 hand-foot skin reaction (three [13%] vs 0 patients) and grade 2 alopecia (24 [29%] vs 12 [13%]). INTERPRETATION Sorafenib, when given orally in combination with topotecan and continued as maintenance therapy, showed a statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival in women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. These encouraging results support the crucial role of antiangiogenesis as the treatment backbone in combination with chemotherapy, making this approach attractive for further assessment with other targeted strategies. FUNDING Bayer, Amgen, and GlaxoSmithKline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radoslav Chekerov
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Gynecologic Oncology Center at Jerusalem Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ahmed El-Balat
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, HSK Dr Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Claudius Fridrich
- Department of Gynecology and Cancer Center, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Susanne Markmann
- Frauenarztpraxis, Rostock, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Jochem Potenberg
- Department of Hematology, Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralf Lorenz
- Gynecologic Oncology, Gemeinschaftspraxis, Braunschweig, Germany
| | | | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Petra Krabisch
- Gynecologic Oncology, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | | | - Rolf Richter
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lorusso D, Pignata S. PARPi related toxicities: do we need more appropriate instruments to evaluate it? Ann Oncol 2018; 29:1613-1616. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
32
|
Moore KN, Vergote I, Oaknin A, Colombo N, Banerjee S, Oza A, Pautier P, Malek K, Birrer MJ. FORWARD I: a Phase III study of mirvetuximab soravtansine versus chemotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Future Oncol 2018; 14:1669-1678. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Mirvetuximab soravtansine, an antibody–drug conjugate that binds with high affinity to folate receptor-α to provide tumor-directed delivery of the potent microtubule-disrupting agent DM4, has emerged as a promising investigational agent for the treatment of ovarian cancer, particularly in the setting of platinum-resistant disease. Here we describe the rationale and design of FORWARD I (NCT02631876), the first randomized, multicenter Phase III study to compare the safety and efficacy of mirvetuximab soravtansine versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy in women with folate receptor-α-positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio. The primary end point is progression-free survival, and key secondary objectives include comparison of overall response rates, overall survival and duration of response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen N Moore
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stephenson Oklahoma Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Ana Oaknin
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona 08035, Spain
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology, The European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Susana Banerjee
- Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Amit Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Patricia Pautier
- Department of Adult Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif 94800, France
| | - Karim Malek
- Clinical Development, ImmunoGen, Inc., Waltham, MA 02451, USA
| | - Michael J Birrer
- Division of Hematology–Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wang M, Fan W, Ye M, Tian C, Zhao L, Wang J, Han W, Yang W, Gu C, Li M, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zhang H, Meng Y. Molecular profiles and tumor mutational burden analysis in Chinese patients with gynecologic cancers. Sci Rep 2018; 8:8990. [PMID: 29895933 PMCID: PMC5997642 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25583-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 04/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The goal of this work was to investigate the tumor mutational burden (TMB) in Chinese patients with gynecologic cancer. In total, 117 patients with gynecologic cancers were included in this study. Both tumor DNA and paired blood cell genomic DNA were isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens and blood samples, and next-generation sequencing was performed to identify somatic mutations. TP53, PTEN, ARID1A, and PIK3CA alterations were significantly different in various types of gynecologic cancers (p = 0.001, 1.15E-07, 0.004, and 0.009, respectively). The median TMB of all 117 gynecologic tumor specimens was 0.37 mutations/Mb, with a range of 0-41.45 mutations/Mb. Despite the lack of significant difference, endometrial cancer cases had a higher median TMB than cervical and ovarian cancer cases. Younger gynecologic cancer patients (age <40 years) had a significantly lower TMB than older patients (age ≥40 years) (p = 0.04). In addition, TMB was significantly increased with increasing clinical stage of disease (p = 0.001). PTEN alterations were commonly observed in patients with a moderate to high TMB (n = 8, 38.10%, p = 9.95E-04). Although limited by sample size, all of the patients with TSC2 (n = 3, p = 3.83E-11) or POLE (n = 2, p = 0.005) mutations had a moderate to high TMB. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 306th Hospital of PLA, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Wensheng Fan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Mingxia Ye
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Chen Tian
- Beijing Genecast Biotechnology Co., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Lili Zhao
- Beijing Genecast Biotechnology Co., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Jianfei Wang
- Beijing Genecast Biotechnology Co., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Wenbo Han
- Beijing Genecast Biotechnology Co., Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Wen Yang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Chenglei Gu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Mingxia Li
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yongjun Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Henghui Zhang
- Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China.
- Beijing Genecast Biotechnology Co., Beijing, P.R. China.
| | - Yuanguang Meng
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cheng Y, Zhang J, Geng H, Qin S, Hua H. Multiline treatment combining apatinib with toptecan for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer patients: a report of three cases. Onco Targets Ther 2018; 11:1989-1995. [PMID: 29670374 PMCID: PMC5898585 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s158141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to observe the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with toptecan therapy in the multiline treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer patients. The clinical records of three patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer treated with apatinib combined with toptecan therapy were analyzed and followed up for 3 months, and the related literatures were reviewed. The three patients achieved partial response and the tumor marker CA125 levels decreased significantly as an outcome of the treatment. Major adverse reactions were hypertension, hand–foot skin reaction, and anemia, which were manageable with medication. Apatinib combined with toptecan multiline therapy in the treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer patients is effective, and the adverse effects are tolerated. Large-scale studies should be conducted to further determine the efficacy and safety of this treatment protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Cheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, People's Liberation Army Cancer Center, Bayi Hospital Affiliated Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Juan Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, People's Liberation Army Cancer Center, Bayi Hospital Affiliated Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Haiyun Geng
- Department of Medical Oncology, People's Liberation Army Cancer Center, Bayi Hospital Affiliated Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, People's Liberation Army Cancer Center, Bayi Hospital Affiliated Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Haiqing Hua
- Department of Medical Oncology, People's Liberation Army Cancer Center, Bayi Hospital Affiliated Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Poveda A, Del Campo JM, Ray-Coquard I, Alexandre J, Provansal M, Guerra Alía EM, Casado A, Gonzalez-Martin A, Fernández C, Rodriguez I, Soto A, Kahatt C, Fernández Teruel C, Galmarini CM, Pérez de la Haza A, Bohan P, Berton-Rigaud D. Phase II randomized study of PM01183 versus topotecan in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory advanced ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1280-1287. [PMID: 28368437 PMCID: PMC5452066 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PM01183 is a new compound that blocks active transcription, produces DNA breaks and apoptosis, and affects the inflammatory microenvironment. PM01183 showed strong antitumor activity in preclinical models of cisplatin-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients and methods Patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer were included in a two-stage, controlled, randomized (in a second stage), multicenter, phase II study. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST and/or GCIG criteria. The exploratory first stage (n = 22) confirmed the activity of PM01183 as a single agent at 7.0 mg flat dose every 3 weeks (q3wk). The second stage (n = 59) was randomized and controlled with topotecan on days 1-5 q3wk or weekly (every 4 weeks, q4wk). Results ORR was 23% (95% CI, 13%-37%) for 52 PM01183-treated patients. Median duration of response was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5-6.9 months), and 23% (95% CI, 0%-51%) of responses lasted 6 months or more. Ten of the 12 confirmed responses were reported for 33 patients with platinum-resistant disease [ORR = 30% (95% CI, 16%-49%)]; for the 29 patients treated with topotecan in the second stage, no responses were found. Median PFS for all PM01183-treated patients was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.7-5.6 months), and 5.0 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.9 months) for patients with platinum-resistant disease. Grade 3/4 neutropenia in 85% of patients; febrile neutropenia in 21% and fatigue (grade 3 in 35%) were the principal safety findings for PM01183. Conclusion PM01183 is an active drug in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer and warrants further development. The highest activity was observed in platinum-resistant disease. Its safety profile indicates the dose should be adjusted to body surface area (mg/m2). Trial code EudraCT 2011-002172-16.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Poveda
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia
| | - J M Del Campo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard, GINECO Group, Lyon
| | - J Alexandre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paris Descartes University, GH Cochin Hôtel Dieu, Paris
| | - M Provansal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes Marseille, France
| | - E M Guerra Alía
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid
| | - A Casado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid
| | | | - C Fernández
- Clinical R&D, Pharma Mar, S.A, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Rodriguez
- Clinical R&D, Pharma Mar, S.A, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Soto
- Clinical R&D, Pharma Mar, S.A, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Kahatt
- Clinical R&D, Pharma Mar, S.A, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - C M Galmarini
- Clinical R&D, Pharma Mar, S.A, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - P Bohan
- Clinical R&D, Pharma Mar, S.A, Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain
| | - D Berton-Rigaud
- Department of Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes-Saint Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Measuring what matters MOST: validation of the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment, a patient-reported outcome measure of symptom burden and impact of chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. Qual Life Res 2017; 27:59-74. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1729-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
37
|
Hilal Z, Rezniczek GA, Klenke R, Dogan A, Tempfer CB. Nutritional status, cachexia, and anorexia in women with peritoneal metastasis and intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a longitudinal analysis. J Gynecol Oncol 2017; 28:e80. [PMID: 29027398 PMCID: PMC5641530 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Revised: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 08/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the nutritional status of women with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or peritoneal cancer and to assess longitudinal variations of the cachexia-anorexia syndrome (CAS) during palliative pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). METHODS Nutritional assessment included body mass index (BMI), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and blood chemistry. CAS presence/absence was recorded before and during repeated cycles (1-11) of PIPAC. RESULTS Eighty-four patients with peritoneal cancer (n=5) or PM from recurrent ovarian (n=77) or fallopian tube (n=2) cancer were included. At baseline, resting metabolism (RM) (1,432±172 kcal/day), visceral fat level (7.5±3.2), skeletal muscle mass (27.2%±4.6%), upper arm circumference (27.9±4.6 cm), lower leg circumference (35.1±3.9 cm), serum parameters (albumin [3.5±0.7 g/dL], total protein [6.3±0.9 g/dL], and transferrin [202±60 mg/dL]) were below normal limits. C-reactive protein (CRP) (4.3±6.8 mg/dL), caliper body fat (35.7%±6.3%), and total body fat mass (35.6%±8.5%) were above normal limits. Nineteen/84 (23%) patients had CAS at baseline. Deterioration or stabilization/improvement of CAS was observed in 9/55 (16.4%) and 46/55 (83.6%) patients with follow-up data, respectively. Baseline body fat mass, visceral fat level, skeletal muscle mass, caliper body fat, BMI, ascites, Karnofsky index, RM, and CRP, as well as tumor response were not predictive of CAS deterioration. CONCLUSION Nutritional decline and onset or deterioration of CAS are difficult to predict. Careful measuring and monitoring of nutritional parameters and CAS in all patients seems to be necessary in order to identify those patients in need of enteral/parenteral nutrition support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Hilal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany.
| | - Günther A Rezniczek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Robert Klenke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Askin Dogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Clemens B Tempfer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Diamond JR, Goff B, Forster MD, Bendell JC, Britten CD, Gordon MS, Gabra H, Waterhouse DM, Poole M, Ross Camidge D, Hamilton E, Moore KM. Phase Ib study of the mitochondrial inhibitor ME-344 plus topotecan in patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic small cell lung, ovarian and cervical cancers. Invest New Drugs 2017; 35:627-633. [PMID: 28283779 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-017-0444-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Background This multicenter, open-label, phase Ib study was designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of ME-344, a mitochondrial inhibitor, administered in combination with the topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, in patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic small cell lung (SCLC), ovarian and cervical cancers. Patients and methods In Part 1, patients received ME-344 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 in combination with topotecan 4 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Cycles were repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in cycle 1 and ME-344 pharmacokinetic samples were obtained. In Part 2, patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCLC and ovarian cancer were enrolled in expansion cohorts treated at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) determined in Part 1. Results Fourteen patients were enrolled in Part 1 and no DLTs were observed. The RP2D of ME-344 in combination with topotecan was established as 10 mg/kg. In Part 2, 32 patients were enrolled. The most common treatment-emergent all-grade and grade 3/4 toxicities included fatigue (65.2%, 6.5%), neutropenia (56.5%, 43.5%) and thrombocytopenia (50%, 23.9%). One patient with recurrent ovarian cancer experienced a partial response by RECIST 1.1 and 21 patients achieved stable disease as best response. Conclusions The combination of ME-344 10 mg/kg weekly and topotecan 4 mg/m2 was tolerable, however, the degree of anti-cancer activity does not support further investigation of the combination in unselected patients with SCLC, ovarian and cervical cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Diamond
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, 12801 E. 17th Avenue, Mailstop 8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Barbara Goff
- University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Johanna C Bendell
- Sara Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - D Ross Camidge
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, 12801 E. 17th Avenue, Mailstop 8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Erika Hamilton
- Sara Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kathleen M Moore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Heong V, Ngoi N, Tan DSP. Update on immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecological cancers. J Gynecol Oncol 2017; 28:e20. [PMID: 28028993 PMCID: PMC5323287 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2016] [Revised: 11/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, progress in our understanding of immune-modulatory signaling pathways in immune cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) has led to rejuvenated interest in cancer immunotherapy. In particular, immunotherapy targeting the immune checkpoint receptors such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell-death 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have demonstrated clinical activity in a wide variety of tumors, including gynecological cancers. This review will focus on the emerging clinical data on the therapeutic role of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and potential strategies to enhance the efficacy of this class of compounds, in the context of gynecological cancers. It is anticipated that future biomarker-directed clinical trials will provide further insights into the mechanisms underlying response and resistance to immunotherapy, and help guide our approach to designing therapeutic combinations that have the potential to enhance the benefit of immunotherapy in patients with gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Heong
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Natalie Ngoi
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - David Shao Peng Tan
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
A Review of mTOR Pathway Inhibitors in Gynecologic Cancer. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2017; 2017:4809751. [PMID: 28286604 PMCID: PMC5327776 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4809751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of advanced gynecologic cancers remains palliative in most of cases. Although systemic treatment has entered into the era of targeted drugs the antitumor efficacies of current therapies are still limited. In this context there is a great need for more active treatment and rationally designed targeted therapies. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR is a signaling pathway in mammal cells that coordinates important cell activities. It has a critical function in the survival, growth, and proliferation of malignant cells and was object of important research in the last two decades. The mTOR pathway emerges as an attractive therapeutic target in cancer because it serves as a convergence point for many growth stimuli and, through its downstream substrates, controls cellular processes that contribute to the initiation and maintenance of cancer. Aberrant PI3K-dependent signaling occurs frequently in a wide range of tumor types, including endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers. The present study reviewed the available evidence regarding the potential impact of some mTOR pathway inhibitors in the treatment of gynecological cancer. Few advances in medical management have occurred in recent years in the treatment of advanced or recurrent gynecological malignancies, and a poor prognosis remains. Rationally designed molecularly targeted therapy is an emerging and important option in this setting; then more investigation in PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway-targeted therapies is warranted.
Collapse
|
42
|
Musella A, Vertechy L, Romito A, Marchetti C, Giannini A, Sciuga V, Bracchi C, Tomao F, Di Donato V, De Felice F, Monti M, Muzii L, Benedetti Panici P. Bevacizumab in Ovarian Cancer: State of the Art and Unanswered Questions. Chemotherapy 2016; 62:111-120. [DOI: 10.1159/000448942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2016] [Accepted: 08/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a most lethal gynecologic tumor. The mainstay treatment is cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. However, a high percentage of patients recur, thus needing multiple treatments with a frequently poor prognosis. In the last two decades, research has focused on the potential of target therapies to improve the survival of patients affected by ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab is one of the most studied target therapies, and it is approved for first- and second-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal tumors. Despite its widespread use with favorable results, controversy regarding patient selection and the best schedule, dosage, and timing of bevacizumab still exists. This review summarizes the state of the art on the use of bevacizumab for ovarian cancer in front-line, recurrence, and neoadjuvant settings. This study focuses on the results of pivotal trials, emerging data, ongoing research, and still unanswered questions about the most adequate dosage of bevacizumab and its potential activity after disease progression or rechallenge in previously treated patients.
Collapse
|
43
|
Sehouli J, Grabowski JP. Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: Options and limits. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 41:88-95. [PMID: 27865654 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2016] [Revised: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery is the backbone of the multimodal therapy in primary ovarian cancer patients. Despite the effect of various tumor biological factors such as grading and histological subtype, the surgical outcome is the most important prognostic factor for both progression free- and overall survival. In contrast, the management of recurrent situation has long remained a subject of an emotional international discussion. To date, only few prospective studies have focused on the effect of surgery in relapsed ovarian cancer. The available retrospective data associate complete cytoreduction with prognosis improvement. However, the selection of patients eligible for surgery in recurrent situation is the essential issue. The establishment of predictive factors for complete tumor resection and defining the patient group with recurrent disease who might profit from this approach are crucial. The available predictors of complete resection depend on the results of primary surgery and the current patient's situation. Women who underwent primary complete cytoreduction are in good performance status, and those who have only minimal ascites volume (less than 500 ml) in the recurrent situation have 76% likelihood of undergoing complete resection and survival prolongation. Moreover, the complete cytoreduction in the tertiary cytoreductive approach has been evaluated and showed a potential positive influence on patients' survival. This review concentrates on the recent data and highlights the need of further randomized trials to develop and incorporate operative standards in recurrent ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité-University Medicine of Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - J P Grabowski
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité-University Medicine of Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A New Opportunity in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer? Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:ijms17071169. [PMID: 27447625 PMCID: PMC4964540 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Revised: 07/08/2016] [Accepted: 07/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of death for gynecological cancer. The standard treatment for advanced stage is the combination of optimal debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, recurrence is frequent (around 70%) and prognosis is globally poor. New therapeutic agents are needed to improve survival. Since EOC is strongly immunogenic, immune checkpoint inhibitors are under evaluation for their capacity to contrast the “turn off” signals expressed by the tumor to escape the immune system and usually responsible for self-tolerance maintenance. This article reviews the literature on anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, and anti-PD-L2 antibodies in EOC and highlights their possible lines of development. Further studies are needed to better define the prognostic role of the immune checkpoint inhibitors, to identify predictors of response and the optimal clinical setting in EOC.
Collapse
|
45
|
Elderly ovarian cancer patients: An individual participant data meta-analysis of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO). Eur J Cancer 2016; 60:101-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2015] [Revised: 02/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
46
|
Mittica G, Capellero S, Genta S, Cagnazzo C, Aglietta M, Sangiolo D, Valabrega G. Adoptive immunotherapy against ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res 2016; 9:30. [PMID: 27188274 PMCID: PMC4869278 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-016-0236-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The standard front-line therapy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is combination of debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the majority of patients experience disease recurrence. Although extensive efforts to find new therapeutic options, cancer cells invariably develop drug resistance and disease progression. New therapeutic strategies are needed to improve prognosis of patients with advanced EOC. Recently, several preclinical and clinical studies investigated feasibility and activity of adoptive immunotherapy in EOC. Our aim is to highlight prospective of adoptive immunotherapy in EOC, focusing on HLA-restricted Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs), and MHC-independent immune effectors such as natural killer (NK), and cytokine-induced killer (CIK). Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has shown activity in several pre-clinical models. Available preclinical and clinical data suggest that adoptive cell therapy may provide the best benefit in settings of low tumor burden, minimal residual disease, or maintenance therapy. Further studies are needed to better define the optimal clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Mittica
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Sofia Genta
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Aglietta
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Dario Sangiolo
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Valabrega
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy. .,Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy. .,Division of Medical Oncology-1, Candiolo Cancer Institute- FPO- IRCCS, Strada Provinciale 142 km 3.95, Candiolo, 10060, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bruchim I, Ben-Harim Z, Piura E, Haran G, Fishman A. Analysis of two topotecan treatment schedules in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. J Chemother 2016; 28:129-34. [PMID: 27093640 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2015.1115195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Two topotecan treatment schedules in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer were evaluated. Protocol A (21 days) was 1.5 mg/m(2)/day topotecan on days 1 through 5 of a 21-day cycle; Protocol B (weekly) 4 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Efficacy was determined by clinical exam, CT scan, and CA125 levels. Forty-three patients on Protocol A and 21 on Protocol B were evaluated. As second-line treatment, Protocol A response was 9/20 (45%). Response to Protocol B was 4/17 (23.5%; NS). As third line or more, the response on Protocols A and B together was only 3/27 (11%). High-grade haematological toxicity was reported in 12/43 (27.9%) on Protocol A and 1/21 (4.8%) on Protocol B (p = 0.04). There was no difference in progression-free-intervals between schedules in second-line treatment. The weekly protocol had lower severe haematological toxicity. Clinical response in third line or more was very low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilan Bruchim
- a Division of Gynecologic Oncology , Meir Medical Center , Kfar Saba , Israel.,b Sackler School of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - Zipi Ben-Harim
- a Division of Gynecologic Oncology , Meir Medical Center , Kfar Saba , Israel.,b Sackler School of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - Ettie Piura
- a Division of Gynecologic Oncology , Meir Medical Center , Kfar Saba , Israel.,b Sackler School of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - Gabi Haran
- a Division of Gynecologic Oncology , Meir Medical Center , Kfar Saba , Israel.,b Sackler School of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - Ami Fishman
- a Division of Gynecologic Oncology , Meir Medical Center , Kfar Saba , Israel.,b Sackler School of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Woopen H, Richter R, Ismaeel F, Chekerov R, Roots I, Siepmann T, Sehouli J. The influence of polypharmacy on grade III/IV toxicity, prior discontinuation of chemotherapy and overall survival in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 140:554-8. [PMID: 26790772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2015] [Revised: 01/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is mostly diagnosed in the elderly woman who is likely to have comorbid disease and to take several comedications on a regular basis. Aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of polypharmacy on grade III/IV toxicity, prior discontinuation of chemotherapy and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this individual participant data meta-analysis the original data of three phase II/III studies of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO) were analyzed using multivariate logistic and Cox regression. RESULTS Overall, 1213 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were included in these analyses. An increasing amount of medication was associated with overall grade III/IV toxicity (p<0.001; OR 1.120), and hematological (p<0.001; OR 1.056) and non-hematological (p<0.001; OR 1.134) toxicities. Prior discontinuation of chemotherapy was not influenced by an increasing amount of medication (p=0.196). There was no association of polypharmacy with overall survival (p=0.068). CONCLUSION As polypharmacy does not influence survival ovarian cancer patients taking several comedications may be included in clinical trials and should not be deprived of adequate cancer treatment. However, a thorough monitoring is mandatory due to the increased risk of toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Woopen
- European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer (EKZE), Department of Gynecology, Charité - University Medicine of Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany; Dresden International University, Division of Health Care Sciences, Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Freiberger Str. 37, 01067 Dresden, Germany.
| | - R Richter
- European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer (EKZE), Department of Gynecology, Charité - University Medicine of Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - F Ismaeel
- European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer (EKZE), Department of Gynecology, Charité - University Medicine of Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - R Chekerov
- European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer (EKZE), Department of Gynecology, Charité - University Medicine of Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - I Roots
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - T Siepmann
- Dresden International University, Division of Health Care Sciences, Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Freiberger Str. 37, 01067 Dresden, Germany
| | - J Sehouli
- European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer (EKZE), Department of Gynecology, Charité - University Medicine of Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Emons G, Kurzeder C, Schmalfeldt B, Neuser P, de Gregorio N, Pfisterer J, Park-Simon TW, Mahner S, Schröder W, Lück HJ, Heubner ML, Hanker L, Thiel F, Hilpert F. Temsirolimus in women with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian cancer or advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma. A phase II study of the AGO-study group (AGO-GYN8). Gynecol Oncol 2015; 140:450-6. [PMID: 26731724 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2015] [Revised: 12/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate activity and toxicity of mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in patients with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian cancer (OC) or advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC). METHODS Women with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer were eligible, when they had progression during treatment with a platinum based regimen or within 6 months after receiving a platinum based regimen and a previous taxane treatment. Women with advanced/recurrent EC, no longer amenable to curative surgery and/or radiotherapy were eligible when they had no previous or only adjuvant chemotherapy. Preceding endocrine therapy for metastatic/recurrent disease was allowed. Patients received weekly IV infusions of 25mg temsirolimus. Primary endpoint was progression free survival rate after 4 months (OC) or 6 months (EC). A two stage design was applied. RESULTS Forty-four patients (OC: n=22; EC: n=22) were enrolled and received temsirolimus treatment. Median age was 56 years (OC) or 63 years (EC). After eight weeks of treatment, 10 of 21 evaluable patients in the OC cohort and 8 of 20 evaluable patients in the EC cohort had progressive disease. Thus efficacy did not meet the predefined levels during the first stage of recruitment and the trial was stopped. Some patients in both cohorts had long lasting PFS (>7 months). Toxicity of temsirolimus was mild. CONCLUSIONS Temsirolimus treatment was well tolerated in our patients, but did not meet the predefined efficacy criteria. In our study as in other trials on rapalogs in OC or EC, a few patients had long lasting disease stabilisations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Günter Emons
- Klinikum Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Christian Kurzeder
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Evang. Huyssens Stiftung/Knappschaft GmbH, Gynäkologische Onkologie, Henricistraße 92, 45136 Essen, Germany.
| | - Barbara Schmalfeldt
- Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität, Frauen- und Poliklinik, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 München, Germany.
| | - Petra Neuser
- Koordinierungszentrum für Klinische Studien (KKS), Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
| | - Nikolaus de Gregorio
- Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Universitätsfrauenklinik, Prittwitzstr. 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
| | - Jacobus Pfisterer
- Städtisches Klinikum Solingen, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Gotenstraße 1, 42653 Solingen, Germany.
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Frauenklinik, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
| | - Sven Mahner
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Willibald Schröder
- GYNAEKOLOGIKUM Bremen, Praxisklinik für Gynäkologische Onkologie und Operative Gynäkologie, Schwachhauser Heerstr. 367, 28211, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Hans-Joachim Lück
- Gynäkologisch-onkologische Praxis, Pelikanplatz 23, 30177 Hannover, Germany.
| | - Martin Leonhard Heubner
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
| | - Lars Hanker
- Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität, Zentrum für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Falk Thiel
- Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsstr. 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 24, 24105 Kiel, Germany,.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
The use of weekly topotecan in the treatment of heavily pretreated recurrent epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: the Kaohsiung Chang Gung experience. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 54:43-7. [PMID: 25675918 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We attempted to investigate the safety and efficacy of alternative weekly topotecan dosing in a heavily pretreated Taiwanese population with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with recurrent EOC and PPC who had been treated with weekly topotecan between November 2008 and May 2012. Topotecan was given at a dose of 2.75-4 mg/m(2) via a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were identified and 24 (75%) of them had received at least two previous regimens of chemotherapy; the median number of treatment courses was seven. The main toxicities (Grades 3 and 4) were anemia in seven (21.9%), neutropenia in six (18.8%), and thrombocytopenia in two patients (6.2%). No deaths were attributable to the therapy. Overall, seven patients (21.9%) showed a partial response (PR), while seven patients (21.9%) with stable disease (SD) were observed. Furthermore, we found a favorable response and toxicity profile in patients who received the lowest dose intensity (2.75 mg/m(2)). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-3.2] and 20 months (95% CI 11.1-28.9), respectively. CONCLUSION Topotecan administered as a weekly dosage (2.75-4 mg/m(2)) seems to be a tolerable regimen with modest activity in a Taiwanese population. Although the lower dose schedule showed a higher response with a better toxicity profile, further studies with more cases are needed to confirm this finding.
Collapse
|