Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity at chromosomal location 18q: prospective evaluation of biomarkers for stages II and III colon cancer--a study of CALGB 9581 and 89803

Evaluating the utility of ZNF331 promoter methylation as a prognostic and predictive marker in stage III colon cancer: results from CALGB 89803 (Alliance)

While epigenomic alterations are common in colorectal cancers (CRC), few epigenomic biomarkers that risk-stratify patients have been identified. We thus sought to determine the potential of ZNF331 promoter hypermethylation (mZNF331) as a prognostic and predictive marker in colon cancer. We examined the association of mZNF331 with clinicopathologic features, relapse, survival, and treatment efficacy in patients with stage III colon cancer treated within a randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial (CALGB/Alliance89803). Residual tumour tissue was available for genomic DNA extraction and methylation analysis for 385 patients. ZNF331 promoter methylation status was determined by bisulphite conversion and fluorescence-based real-time polymerase chain reaction. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the prognostic and predictive role of mZNF331 in this well-annotated dataset, adjusting for clinicopathologic features and standard molecular markers. mZNF331 was observed in 267/385 (69.4%) evaluable cases. Histopathologic features were largely similar between patients with mZNF331 compared to unmethylated ZNF331 (unmZNFF31). There was no significant difference in disease-free or overall survival between patients with mZNF331 versus unmZNF331 colon cancers, even when adjusting for clinicopathologic features and molecular marker status. Similarly, there was no difference in disease-free or overall survival across treatment arms when stratified by ZNF331 methylation status. While ZNF331 promoter hypermethylation is frequently observed in CRC, our current study of a small subset of patients with stage III colon cancer suggests limited applicability as a prognostic marker. Larger studies may provide more insight and clarity into the applicability of mZNF331 as a prognostic and predictive marker.

Stratification of Stage II Colon Cancer Using Recurrence Prediction Value: A Multi-institutional International Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To create a recurrence prediction value (RPV) of high-risk factor and identify the patients with high risk of cancer recurrence.

BACKGROUND

There are several high-risk factors known to lead to poor outcomes. Weighting each high-risk factor based on their association with increased risk of cancer recurrence can provide a more precise understanding of risk of recurrence.

METHODS

We performed a multi-institutional international retrospective analysis of patients with stage II colon cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2010 to 2020. Patient data from a multi-institutional database were used as the Training data, and data from a completely separate international database from 2 countries were used as the Validation data. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 739 patients were included from Training data. To validate the feasibility of RPV, 467 patients were included from Validation data. Training data patients were divided into RPV low (n=564) and RPV high (n=175). Multivariate analysis revealed that risk of recurrence was significantly higher in the RPV high than the RPV low [hazard ratio (HR) 2.628; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.887-3.660; P <0.001). Validation data patients were divided into 2 groups (RPV low, n=420) and RPV high (n=47). Multivariate analysis revealed that risk of recurrence was significantly higher in the RPV high than the RPV low (HR 3.053; 95% CI 1.962-4.750; P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RPV can identify stage II colon cancer patients with high risk of cancer recurrence worldwide.

State of the art: Targeting microsatellite instability in gastrointestinal cancers

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and the associated microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype has become a subject of enormous interest in recent years due to the demonstrated efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in advanced tumours. Assessing MSI in patients with gastrointestinal tract (GI) cancers is useful to exclude Lynch syndrome, but also to predict benefit for ICI. Following review of the relevant literature, this review article aims to outline the clinicopathologic spectrum of MSI and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in the GI tract, hepatobiliary system and pancreas and discuss the therapeutic consideration in this disease.

Unraveling the Interplay of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and Micro-Satellite Instability in Non-Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review

Microsatellite Instability (MSI-H) occurs in approximately 15% of non-metastatic colon cancers, influencing patient outcomes positively compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers. This systematic review focuses on the prognostic significance of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations within MSI-H colon cancer. Through comprehensive searches in databases like MEDLINE, EMBASE, and others until 1 January 2024, we selected 8 pertinent studies from an initial pool of 1918. These studies, encompassing nine trials and five observational studies involving 13,273 patients, provided insights into disease-free survival (DFS), survival after recurrence, and overall survival. The pooled data suggest that while KRAS and BRAF mutations typically predict poorer outcomes in MSS colorectal cancer, their impact is less pronounced in MSI contexts, with implications varying across different stages of cancer and treatment responses. In particular, adverse effects of these mutations manifest significantly upon recurrence rather than affecting immediate DFS. Our findings confirm the complex interplay between genetic mutations and MSI status, emphasizing the nuanced role of MSI in modifying the prognostic implications of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colon cancer. This review underscores the importance of considering MSI alongside mutational status in the clinical decision-making process, aiming to tailor therapeutic strategies more effectively for colon cancer patients.

Non-metastatic colon cancer: French Intergroup Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatments, and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFP, AFEF, and SFR)

INTRODUCTION

This article is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of non-metastatic colon cancer (CC), revised in November 2022.

METHODS

These guidelines represent collaborative work of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of CC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B, and C) according to the level of evidence found in the literature published up to November 2022.

RESULTS

Initial evaluation of CC is based on clinical examination, colonoscopy, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CT) scan, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. CC is usually managed by surgery and adjuvant treatment depending on the pathological findings. The use of adjuvant therapy remains a challenging question in stage II disease. For high-risk stage II CC, adjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy proposed according to the type and number of poor prognostic features. Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPOX) is the current standard for adjuvant therapy of patients with stage III CC. However, these regimens are associated with significant oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The results of the recent IDEA study provide evidence that 3 months of treatment with CAPOX is as effective as 6 months of oxaliplatin-based therapy in patients with low-risk stage III CC (T1-3 and N1). A 6-month oxaliplatin-based therapy remains the standard of care for high-risk stage III CC (T4 and/or N2). For patients unfit for oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is recommended.

CONCLUSION

French guidelines for non-metastatic CC management help to offer the best personalized therapeutic strategy in daily clinical practice. Each individual case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board and then the treatment option decided with the patient.

Efficacy and safety of natural killer cells injection combined with XELOX chemotherapy in postoperative patients with stage III colorectal cancer in China: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial study protocol

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death in China. However, resistance to multiple chemotherapeutics after surgery leads to failure of the main therapy to CRC. Natural killer (NK) cells are innate cytotoxic lymphocytes that exhibit strong cytotoxic activity against tumour cells. NK cell-based therapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, has achieved favourable results and holds promise for addressing recurrence and metastasis in CRC patients after surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of interleukin 2 activated NK cells injection combined with XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin)-based chemotherapy for postoperative CRC patients. Participants will be randomly divided into treatment group and control group, and every group includes 40 patients. The treatment group will also receive NK cells (5×109) with+XELOX-based chemotherapy, while the control group will receive only XELOX-based chemotherapy. This treatment will be repeated for eight cycles (6 months). The follow-up period lasts about 3 years, during which CEA, CA19-9, CA125, enhancement CT and colonoscopy will be conducted. The primary endpoints of this study are progression-free survival and overall survival, while the secondary endpoint is safety (number and severity of adverse events). Additionally, we aim to identify cancer stem cells in peripheral blood and predictive biomarkers (cytokines secreted by NK cells and activated markers of NK cells) that indicate patients who achieve an effective response.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of our hospital (approval number 2023LLSC006) and the Chinese Clinical Trials. It will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300075861).

The development and implementation of pathological parameters and molecular testing impact prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma

Objective

This study aims to analyze how changes in pathological diagnosis practice and molecular detection technology have affected clinical outcomes for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 21,141 pathologically confirmed CRC cases diagnosed at FUSCC from 2008 to 2020. Patients were divided into five groups for different analytical purposes: (1) the before vs. since 2014 groups to analyze the influence of the changes in the classification criteria of pT3 and pT4 staging on the survival of patients; (2) the partial vs. total mesorectal excision (TME) groups to analyze whether evaluation of completeness of the mesorectum have impact on the survival of patients; (3) the tumor deposit (TD)(+)N0 vs. TD(+)N1c groups to analyze the influence of the changes in the pN staging on the survival of patients with positive TD and negative regional lymph node metastasis (LNM); (4) the before vs. since 2013 groups to analyze the influence of the changes in the testing process of deficient mismatch repair on the survival of patients; and (5) the groups with vs. without RAS/BRAF gene mutation testing to analyze the influence of these testing on the survival of patients. Patients' clinicopathological parameters, including age at diagnosis, sex, tumor size, location, differentiation, mucinous subtype, TD, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor depth, LNM and distant metastasis, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank method was performed for patients' overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses.

Results

In pathological reports, there were three parameter changes that impacted patient outcomes. Firstly, changes in the pT staging criteria led to a shift of the ratio of patients with stage pT3 to stage pT4 from 1: 110.9 to 1: 0.26. In comparison to patients admitted before 2014 (n = 4,754), a significant difference in prognosis between pT3 and pT4 stages was observed since 2014 (n = 9,965). Secondly, we began to evaluate the completeness of the mesorectum since 2016. As a result, 91.0% of patients with low rectal cancer underwent TME (n = 4,111) surgery, and patients with TME had significantly better OS compared with partial mesorectal excision (PME, n = 409). Thirdly, we began to stage TD (+) LNM (-) as N1c since 2017. The results showed that N1c (n = 127) but not N0 (n = 39) can improve the prognosis of patients without LNM and distal metastasis. In molecular testing, there have been three and five iterations of updates regarding mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status and RAS/BRAF gene mutation detection, respectively. The standardization of MMR status testing has sharply decreased the proportion of deficient MMR (dMMR) patients (from 32.5% to 7.4%) since 2013. The prognosis of patients underwent MMR status testing since 2013 (n = 867) were significantly better than patients before 2013 (n = 1,313). In addition, detection of RAS/BRAF gene mutation status (n = 5,041) resulted in better DFS but not OS, for patients with stage I-III disease (n = 16,557).

Conclusion

Over the past few decades, updates in elements in pathological reports, as well as the development of standardized tests for MMR/MSI status and RAS/BRAF gene mutations have significantly improved patient outcomes.

Resveratrol: biology, metabolism, and detrimental role on the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer

A substantial increase in colorectal cancer (CRC)-associated fatalities can be attributed to tumor recurrence and multidrug resistance. Traditional treatment options, including radio- and chemotherapy, also exhibit adverse side effects. Ancient treatment strategies that include phytochemicals like resveratrol are now widely encouraged as an alternative therapeutic option. Resveratrol is the natural polyphenolic stilbene in vegetables and fruits like grapes and apples. It inhibits CRC progression via targeting dysregulated cancer-promoting pathways, including PI3K/Akt/Kras, targeting transcription factors like NF-κB and STAT3, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In addition, combination therapies for cancer include resveratrol as an adjuvant to decrease multidrug resistance that develops in CRC cells. The current review discusses the biology of resveratrol and explores different mechanisms of action of resveratrol in inhibiting CRC progression. Further, the detrimental role of resveratrol on the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of CRC has been discussed. This review illustrates clinical trials on resveratrol in different cancers, including resveratrol analogs, and their efficiency in promoting CRC inhibition.

Radiologic T staging of colon cancer: renewed interest for clinical practice

Radiologic imaging, especially MRI, has long been the mainstay for rectal cancer staging and patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection. In contrast, colonoscopy and CT have been the standard for colon cancer diagnosis and metastasis staging with T and N staging often performed at the time of surgical resection. With recent clinical trials exploring the expansion of the use of neoadjuvant therapy beyond the anorectum to the remainder of the colon, the current and future state of colon cancer treatment is evolving with a renewed interest in evaluating the role radiology may play in the primary T staging of colon cancer. The performance of CT, CT colonography, MRI, and FDG PET-CT for colon cancer staging will be reviewed. N staging will also be briefly discussed. It is expected that accurate radiologic T staging will significantly impact future clinical decisions regarding the neoadjuvant versus surgical management of colon cancer.

Current Strategy to Treat Immunogenic Gastrointestinal Cancers: Perspectives for a New Era

Since pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody, showed a dramatic response to immunogenic cancers with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and/or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in the pilot clinical trial KEYNOTE-016, subsequent studies have confirmed durable responses of anti-PD-1 inhibitors for MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors. As immunotherapy is described as a "game changer," the therapeutic landscape for MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors including gastrointestinal cancers has changed considerably in the last decade. An MSI/MMR status has been established as the predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint blockades, playing an indispensable role in the clinical practice of patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors. Immunotherapy is also now investigated for locally advanced MSI-H/dMMR gastrointestinal cancers. Despite this great success, a few populations with MSI-H/dMMR gastrointestinal cancers do not respond to immunotherapy, possibly due to the existence of intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms. Clarifying the underlying mechanisms of resistance remains a future task, whereas attempts to overcome resistance and improve the efficacy of immunotherapy are currently ongoing. Herein, we review recent clinical trials with special attention to MSI-H/dMMR gastrointestinal cancers together with basic/translational findings, which provide their rationale, and discuss perspectives for the further therapeutic development of treatment in this field.

Evaluation of methylated DCR1 as a biomarker for response to adjuvant irinotecan-based therapy in stage III colon cancer: cancer and leukaemia Group B 89803 (Alliance)

Aberrantly methylated genes contribute to the landscape of epigenetic alterations in colorectal adenocarcinoma. The global CpG Island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and individually methylated genes are potential prognostic/predictive biomarkers. Research suggests an association between methylated DCR1 (mDCR1) and lack of benefit with irinotecan (IFL) treatment. We assessed the association between DCR1 methylation status and survival in patients receiving adjuvant fluorouracil/ leucovorin (5-FU/LV) or IFL. We analysed data from patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma randomly assigned to adjuvant 5-FU/LV or IFL in CALGB 89803 (Alliance). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Using tumour sample DNA, we evaluated the association between survival, DCR1 methylation status, and molecular subgroups (BRAF, KRAS, mismatch repair status, CIMP status) using Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazard model. mDCR1 was observed in 221/400 (55%) colon cancers. Histopathologic features were similar between mDCR1 and unmethylated DCR1 (unDCR1) colon cancers. There was no difference in OS (p = 0.83) or DFS (p = 0.85) based on DCR1 methylation status. There was no association between methylation status and response to IFL . In patients with unDCR1 and KRAS-wildtype tumours, those who received IFL had a nearly two-fold worse DFS compared to patients who received 5-FU/LV (HR = 1.85, 95% CI (0.97-3.53, p = 0.06). This relationship was not notable among other subgroups. In stage III colon cancer patients, mDCR1 status did not associate with response to irinotecan. Larger studies may suggest an association between the iridocene response and molecular subgroups.

Identification pyroptosis-related gene signature to predict prognosis and associated regulation axis in colon cancer

Background: Pyroptosis is an important component of the tumor microenvironment and associated with the occurrence and progression of cancer. As the expression of pyroptosis-related genes and its impact on the prognosis of colon cancer (CC) remains unclear, we constructed and validated a pyroptosis-related genes signature to predict the prognosis of patients with CC.

Methods: Microarray datasets and the follow-up clinical information of CC patients were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases. Candidate genes were screened out for further analysis. Various methods were combined to construct a robust pyroptosis-related genes signature for predicting the prognosis of patients with CC. Based on the gene signature and clinical features, a decision tree and nomogram were developed to improve risk stratification and quantify risk assessment for individual patients.

Results: The pyroptosis-related genes signature successfully discriminated CC patients with high-risk in the training cohorts. The prognostic value of this signature was further confirmed in independent validation cohort. Multivariable Cox regression and stratified survival analysis revealed this signature was an independent prognostic factor for CC patients. The decision tree identified risk subgroups powerfully, and the nomogram incorporating the gene signature and clinical risk factors performed well in the calibration plots.

Conclusion: Pyroptosis-related genes signature was an independent prognostic factor, and can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with CC.

Discordant prognosis of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal and endometrial cancer reflects variation in antitumour immune response and immune escape

Defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) causes elevated tumour mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in multiple cancer types. dMMR/MSI colorectal cancers (CRCs) have enhanced T-cell infiltrate and favourable outcome; however, this association has not been reliably detected in other tumour types, including endometrial cancer (EC). We sought to confirm this and explore the underpinning mechanisms. We first meta-analysed CRC and EC trials that have examined the prognostic value of dMMR/MSI and confirmed that dMMR/MSI predicts better prognosis in CRC, but not EC, with statistically significant variation between cancers (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54-0.73 versus HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.72-1.58; PINT  = 0.02). Next, we studied intratumoural immune infiltrate in CRCs and ECs of defined MMR status and found that while dMMR was associated with increased density of tumour-infiltrating CD3+ and CD8+ T-cells in both cancer types, the increases were substantially greater in CRC and significant only in this group (PINT  = 4.3e-04 and 7.3e-03, respectively). Analysis of CRC and EC from the independent Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) series revealed similar variation and significant interactions in proportions of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD8+ , CD4+ , NK cells and immune checkpoint expression, confirming a more vigorous immune response to dMMR/MSI in CRC than EC. Agnostic analysis identified the IFNγ pathway activity as strongly upregulated by dMMR/MSI in CRC, but downregulated in EC by frequent JAK1 mutations, the impact of which on IFNγ response was confirmed by functional analyses. Collectively, our results confirm the discordant prognosis of dMMR/MSI in CRC and EC and suggest that this relates to differences in intratumoural immune infiltrate and tumour genome. Our study underscores the need for tissue-specific analysis of cancer biomarkers and may help inform immunotherapy use. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Acromegaly and Colorectal Neoplasm: An Update

Acromegaly is a systemic disease caused by excessive inappropriate secretion of GH and IGF-I levels, resulting in many systemic complications, including cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic diseases, and a possible increased risk of some neoplasias. Although many studies on acromegaly and cancer remain uncertain, most data indicate that colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is increased in this population. The exact mechanism involved in the role of GH-IGF-I axis in CRC has not been fully explained, yet it is associated with local and circulating effects of GH and IGF-I on the colon, promoting angiogenesis, cell proliferation, risk of mutation, inhibition of tumor-suppressor genes and apoptosis, thus facilitating a tumor microenvironment. Nevertheless, population-based studies present controversial findings on CRC incidence and mortality. All worldwide guidelines and expert consensuses agree with the need for colonoscopic screening and surveillance in acromegaly, although there is no consensus regarding the best period to do this. This review aims to analyze the existing data on CRC and acromegaly, exploring its pathophysiology, epidemiological studies and their limitations, colonic polyp characteristics, overall cancer and CRC incidences and mortality, risk factors for colon cancer pathophysiology, and recommendation guideline aspects.

Clinical implication of adjuvant chemotherapy according to mismatch repair status in patients with intermediate-risk stage II colon cancer

Background

The present study evaluated the clinical implications of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the mismatch repair (MMR) status and clinicopathologic features of patients with intermediate- and high-risk stage II colon cancer (CC).

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed 5,774 patients who were diagnosed with CC and underwent curative surgical resection at Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital. The patients were enrolled according to the following criteria: (1) pathologically diagnosed with primary CC; (2) stage II CC classified based on the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system; (3) intermediate- and high-risk features; and (4) available test results for MMR status. A total of 286 patients met these criteria and were included in the study.

Results

Among the 286 patients, 54 (18.9%) were identified as microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or deficient MMR (dMMR). Although all the patients identified as MSI-H/dMMR showed better survival outcomes, T4 tumors and adjuvant chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors for survival. For the intermediate-risk patients identified as MSI-low (MSI-L)/microsatellite stable (MSS) or proficient MMR (pMMR), adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) but had no impact on overall survival (OS). Oxaliplatin-containing regimens showed no association with DFS or OS. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with DFS in intermediate-risk patients identified as MSI-H/dMMR.

Conclusion

The current study found that the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was correlated with better DFS in MSI-L/MSS or pMMR intermediate-risk stage II CC patients.

Adjuvant treatment of colon cancer with microsatellite instability - the state of the art

Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus oxaliplatin in stage III resected colorecatal cancer (RCRC) resulted in a 30% relative reduction of disease recurrence risk and mortality. The presence of altered mismatch repair genes identify tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) that have a better prognosis than stable tumors, but data about adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in this subgroup are compelling. We investigate the role of adjuvant therapy in resected MSI RCRC. The standard treatment is the association of FP plus oxaliplatin, while it can avoided in low risk stage II, thanks to its good prognosis. We propose a practice strategy to approach MSI RCRC in line with the current knowledge. In consideration of the dramatic results in chemorefractory MSI metastatic CRC, there are assumptions that immunotherapy can become a potential alternative to classical systemic therapies also in the adjuvant setting. We await the results of ongoing studies to draw further conclusions."

[Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy of resectable colon cancer - Current standards and developments]

The present review focusses on perioperative diagnosis and treatment of resectable colon cancer. In UICC stages associated with a higher risk of recurrence, adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of the primary tumor is an established standard. While initial data also indicate the benefit of Neoadjuvant, pre-operative chemotherapy, a final evaluation is still pending. The main focus of molecular testing in the perioperative setting is the analysis of microsatellite instability, which should routinely be performed in defined subgroups. In UICC stage II without risk factors, adjuvant therapy has a limited benefit and therefore is not a preferred option. In UICC stage II with risk factors, adjuvant therapy can be performed. The approach here is based on the recommendations applicable to stage III. In UICC stage III with low risk, adjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX for 3 months is preferentially recommended. In UICC stage III with high risk, adjuvant chemotherapy over 6 months is recommended, preferentially with FOLFOX. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is clearly associated with favorable prognosis in non-metastatic colon cancer. However, it cannot be considered a predictive factor for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy. Specifically, recent data of the IDEA study have opened the arena for shared decision making between physicians and patients allowing to define individual treatment approaches based on common assessment of risks and benefits. After completion of perioperative treatment, structured follow-up is of great importance and should be carried out according to the recommendations of the S3 guideline.

Rate of dissemination and prognosis in early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability status: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

For the past two decades, microsatellite instability (MSI) has been reported as a robust clinical biomarker associated with survival advantage attributed to its immunogenicity. However, MSI is also associated with high-risk adverse pathological features (poorly differentiated, mucinous, signet cell, higher grade) and exhibits a double-edged sword phenomenon. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the rate of dissemination and the prognosis of early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on MSI status.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of original studies was performed on Ovid searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, American College of Physicians ACP Journal Club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects DARE, Clinical Trials databases from inception of database to June 2019. Colorectal cancer, microsatellite instability, genomic instability and DNA mismatch repair were used as key words or MeSH terms. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed. Data were pooled using a random-effects model with odds ratio (OR) as the effect size. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan ver 5.3 Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

From 5288 studies, 136 met the inclusion criteria (n = 92,035; MSI-H 11,746 (13%)). Overall, MSI-H was associated with improved OS (OR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.90), DFS (OR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.66-0.81) and DSS (OR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.90). Importantly, MSI-H had a protective effect against dissemination with a significantly lower rate of lymph node and distant metastases. By stage, the protective effect of MSI-H in terms of OS and DFS was observed clearly in stage II and stage III. Survival in stage I CRC was excellent irrespective of MSI status. In stage IV CRC, without immunotherapy, MSI-H was not associated with any survival benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI-H CRC was associated with an overall survival benefit with a lower rate of dissemination. Survival benefit was clearly evident in both stage II and III CRC, but MSI-H was neither a robust prognostic marker in stage I nor stage IV CRC without immunotherapy.

Development and external validation of a novel nomogram for screening Chinese Lynch syndrome: based on a multicenter, population study

Background

This multicenter study aimed to reveal the genetic spectrum of colorectal cancer (CRC) with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and build a screening model for Lynch syndrome (LS).

Methods

Through the immunohistochemical (IHC) screening of mismatch repair protein results in postoperative CRC patients, 311 dMMR cases, whose germline and somatic variants were detected using the ColonCore panel, were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the clinical characteristics of these dMMR individuals, and a clinical nomogram, incorporating statistically significant factors identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis, was constructed to predict the probability of LS. The model was validated externally by an independent cohort.

Results

In total, 311 CRC patients with IHC dMMR included 95 identified MMR germline variant (LS) cases and 216 cases without pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in MMR genes (non-Lynch-associated dMMR). Of the 95 individuals, approximately 51.6%, 28.4%, 14.7%, and 5.3% cases carried germline MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, respectively. A novel nomogram was then built to predict the probability of LS for CRC patients with dMMR intuitively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve informed that this nomogram-based screening model could identify LS with a higher specificity and sensitivity with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.87 than current screening criteria based on family history. In the external validation cohort, the AUC of the ROC curve reached 0.804, inferring the screening model's universal applicability. We recommend that dMMR-CRC patients with a probability of LS greater than 0.435 should receive a further germline sequencing.

Conclusion

This novel screening model based on the clinical characteristic differences between LS and non-Lynch-associated dMMR may assist clinicians to preliminarily screen LS and refer susceptible patients to experienced specialists.

A SMAD4-modulated gene profile predicts disease-free survival in stage II and III colorectal cancer

Background

Colorectal cancer is the second‐leading cause of cancer‐related mortality in the United States and a leading cause of cancer‐related mortality worldwide. Loss of SMAD4, a critical tumor suppressor and the central node of the transforming growth factor‐beta superfamily, is associated with worse outcomes for colorectal cancer patients; however, it is unknown whether an RNA‐based profile associated with SMAD4 expression could be used to better identify high‐risk colorectal cancer patients.

Aim

Identify a gene expression‐based SMAD4‐modulated profile and test its association with patient outcome.

Methods and results

Using a discovery dataset of 250 colorectal cancer patients, we analyzed expression of BMP/Wnt target genes for association with SMAD4 expression. Promoters of the BMP/Wnt genes were interrogated for SMAD‐binding elements. Fifteen genes were implicated and three tested for modulation by SMAD4 in patient‐derived colorectal cancer tumoroids. Expression of the 15 genes was used for unsupervised hierarchical clustering of a training dataset and two resulting clusters modeled in a centroid model. This model was applied to an independent validation dataset of stage II and III patients. Disease‐free survival was analyzed by the Kaplan‐Meier method. In vitro analysis of three genes identified in the SMAD4‐modulated profile (JAG1, TCF7, and MYC) revealed modulation by SMAD4 consistent with the trend observed in the profile. In the training dataset (n = 553), the profile was not associated with outcome. However, among stage II and III patients (n = 461), distinct clusters were identified by unsupervised hierarchical clustering that were associated with disease‐free survival (p = .02, log‐rank test). The main model was applied to a validation dataset of stage II/III CRC patients (n = 257) which confirmed the association of clustering with disease‐free survival (p = .013, log‐rank test).

Conclusions

A SMAD4‐modulated gene expression profile identified high‐risk stage II and III colorectal cancer patients, can predict disease‐free survival, and has prognostic potential for stage II and III colorectal cancer patients.

A Serum Metabolomics Classifier Derived from Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Predicts Relapse in the Adjuvant Setting

Simple Summary

Around 30–40% of patients with early stage colorectal cancer (eCRC) experience relapse after surgery. Current recommendations for adjuvant therapy are based on suboptimal risk-stratification tools. In elderly patients, risk of relapse assessment is particularly important to ultimately avoid unnecessary chemotherapy-related toxicity in this frailer population. Serum metabolomics via NMR spectroscopy may improve risk stratification by identifying patients with residual micrometastases after surgery and thus at higher risk of relapse. We evaluated the serum metabolomic fingerprints of 94 elderly patients with eCRC (65 relapse free and 29 relapsed), and of 75 elderly patients with metastatic disease. Metabolomics efficiently discriminated patients with relapse-free eCRC from those with metastatic disease, correctly predicting relapse in 69% of relapsed eCRC patients. The metabolomic score was strongly and independently associated with prognosis. Our data suggest metabolomics as a valid addition to standard tools to refine risk stratification for eCRC and warrant further investigation.

Abstract

Adjuvant treatment for patients with early stage colorectal cancer (eCRC) is currently based on suboptimal risk stratification, especially for elderly patients. Metabolomics may improve the identification of patients with residual micrometastases after surgery. In this retrospective study, we hypothesized that metabolomic fingerprinting could improve risk stratification in patients with eCRC. Serum samples obtained after surgery from 94 elderly patients with eCRC (65 relapse free and 29 relapsed, after 5-years median follow up), and from 75 elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) obtained before a new line of chemotherapy, were retrospectively analyzed via proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The prognostic role of metabolomics in patients with eCRC was assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves. PCA-CA-kNN could discriminate the metabolomic fingerprint of patients with relapse-free eCRC and mCRC (70.0% accuracy using NOESY spectra). This model was used to classify the samples of patients with relapsed eCRC: 69% of eCRC patients with relapse were predicted as metastatic. The metabolomic classification was strongly associated with prognosis (p-value 0.0005, HR 3.64), independently of tumor stage. In conclusion, metabolomics could be an innovative tool to refine risk stratification in elderly patients with eCRC. Based on these results, a prospective trial aimed at improving risk stratification by metabolomic fingerprinting (LIBIMET) is ongoing.

Prognostic Value of Autophagy, Microsatellite Instability, and KRAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer

Introduction: Autophagy plays pivotal role in various tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Microsatellite instability (MSI) and KRAS mutations are also involved in response to the adjuvant therapy of CRC. We aimed to investigate the relationships among autophagy, KRAS mutations, MSI, clinicopathological parameters, and prognosis in CRC patients. Methods and Results: We tested 200 CRC tumors for autophagy-related protein expression (Beclin 1 and LC3), MSI status, and KRAS mutations. Results: Expression of Beclin 1 and LC3 was higher in CRC, with Beclin 1 significantly correlating with the depth of invasion, whereas LC3 was not associated with clinicopathological parameters. Patients expressing the LC3 proteins experienced a shorter overall survival (OS) after surgery with adjuvant therapy, especially in the MSS/L-CRC subgroup and the mutated KRAS subgroup. MSS/L-CRC patients with KRAS mutations positively expressed the LC3 protein and suffered a shorter OS than LC3 non-expressing patients. In CRC patients who received either capecitabine or capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin post-surgery, the positive expression of LC3 correlated with worse OS compared to patients who did not express LC3. Sequencing showed BRCA1/2 as the most variant genes in all patients. Nevertheless, deleterious variations were more frequent in patients with MSI-H CRC. Conclusions: High LC3 protein expression shows a certain prognostic value in CRC patients. LC3, the MSI status, and KRAS mutations must be considered when selecting an adjuvant therapy for CRC. The detection of these indexes is of great significance to identify high-risk patients who would benefit from autophagy-related anticancer drugs or help to explore more effective treatment options for patients who are resistant to conventional chemotherapy or relapse.

Identification of Novel Pathogenic Sequence Variants of the Mismatch Repair Genes During Screening for Lynch Syndrome in a Single Centre of Eastern Hungary

Introduction

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder, most frequent leading to colon cancer. Identification of patients with Lynch syndrome and screening of their family members are available prevention approach that can significantly decrease mortality. Unfortunately, routine screening still does not belong to standard of care in Hungary. In this study, we performed a comprehensive screening in order to identify patients with mismatch repair (MMR) mutation between the years of 2011 and 2014. Identified mutations were compared with those already published in the international databases.

Patients and Methods

Patients who underwent treatment for colorectal cancer at the Surgical Institute of the University of Debrecen were screened using the modified Amsterdam and Bethesda Criteria. Immunohistochemistry and microsatellite analyses were performed in order to identify possible mutation carrier cases. Suspicious cases underwent DNA sequencing to detect mutations in the mismatch repair genes (hMLH1, hMSH2).

Results

All together 760 colorectal cancer patients were screened. A total of 28 patients were identified as possible MMR mutation carrier and underwent further genetic evaluation. Pathogenic sequence variants of the MMR gene were found in 5 patients. Hypermethylation of the promoter region of the hMLH1 gene was identified in 2 patients. Two out of the 5 pathogenic sequence variants of the MMR gene were first identified by our group while other 2 mutations were previously published as possible founder mutations.

Conclusion

Identification of families with Lynch syndrome, while challenging because of variable phenotypes at diagnosis, is feasible with available molecular biological technologies and crucial to reduce mortality caused by this syndrome.

Management of Non-Colorectal Digestive Cancers with Microsatellite Instability

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of genetic predisposition to DNA damage. It arises from either germline or somatic events leading to impaired function of the mismatch repair system. It can be detected via genetic sequencing or immunohistochemistry with relatively high concordance rates. The presence of MSI in a tumor reflects a high neoantigen load and predicts favorable treatment response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In gastrointestinal cancers, MSI is a predictive biomarker for ICIs with potential prognostic impact but its clinical utility varies widely depending on tumor type. This may be explained by the complexity of tumor microenvironment as highlighted by recent translational studies. In this review, we will discuss the predictive and prognostic value of MSI status in non-colorectal cancers of the digestive system, important clinical trials involving ICIs and potential strategies to overcome resistance to immunotherapy.

Prognostic Value of MicroRNAs in Stage II Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and underline multiple microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers of disease prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The required articles were collected from online bibliographic databases from January 2011 to November 2019 with multiple permutation keywords. Quantitative data synthesis was based on a meta-analysis with pooled data to observe and analyse the outcome measures and effect estimates by using the random effect model. The subgroup analysis was performed from demographic characteristics and the available data.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles were included in this study, 16 of which were incorporated for meta-analysis to examine the stage II CRC prognosis with up- and downregulated miRNA expressions. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for death in stage II CRC patients was 1.90 (95% confidence interval 1.63-2.211), with a significant p value. A subgroup analysis based on up- or downregulated miRNA expression individually and any deregulated miRNA was also associated with a worse prognosis. The subgroup analysis included parameters such as age, gender, stage II and III combined patients' survival and the repetitive miRNAs (miR21, miR215, miR143-5p, miR106a and miR145) individually.

CONCLUSION

MicroRNAs play a significant role in determining prognosis in stage II CRC patients, with upregulation of miR21, miR215, miR143-5p and miR106a, in particular, portending a worse prognosis. These miRNAs could be considered for further evaluation as biomarkers of prognosis and to guide the decision to administer adjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognostic and Predictive Values of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Universal MMR/MSI testing is standard of care for all patients with newly diagnosed CRC based on multi-society guidelines in the United States. Such testing is intended to identify patients with Lynch Syndrome due to a germline mutation in an MMR gene, but also detects those with sporadic dMMR/MSI-high CRCs. The prognostic utility of MMR/MSI status in non-metastatic colorectal cancer has been studied extensively, yet more limited data are available for its predictive utility. Results have not been entirely consistent due to potential stage-related differences and limited numbers of dMMR/MSI-H patients included in the studies. In this review, we summarize the current evidence for the prognostic and predictive value of dMMR/MSI-H in non-metastatic CRC, and discuss the use of this biomarker for patient management and treatment decisions in clinical practice.

Better survival of right-sided than left-sided stage II colon cancer: a propensity scores matching analysis based on SEER database

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Most studies have found that right-sided colon cancer (RCC) has worse prognosis than left-sided colon cancer (LCC), especially in stage III, but the reported prognosis of stage II colon cancer is variable. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of tumor location on survival outcomes in stage II colon cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage II colon cancer were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2009. The effect of tumor location on overall survival and cancer-specific survival was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression models and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of 16,519 patients, 69.6% had RCC and30.4% had LCC. In unadjusted analyses, RCC had a 13% increased overall mortality risk (hazards ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.19; p<0.001) but an18% reduction in cancer-specific mortality risk compared with LCC (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.89; p<0.001). After propensity scores matching analyses, RCC had a 21% reduced overall mortality risk (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.87; p<0.001) and a 49% reduction in cancer-specific mortality risk compared with LCC (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.44-0.60; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

When adjusted for multiple clinicopathological features, stage II RCC showed better prognosis than stage II LCC.

Duration of FOLFOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer With Deficient Mismatch Repair

Background

We evaluated the impact of 3 months of mFOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone in comparison with 6 months of mFOLFOX6 on disease-free survival (DFS) in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colon cancer (CC) patients.

Methods

This retrospective study identified a cohort of patients with high-risk stage II and III dMMR CC who underwent curative surgery between May 2011 and July 2019. DFS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Propensity-score matching was performed to reduce imbalance in baseline characteristics.

Results

A total of 242 dMMR CC patients were identified; 66 patients received 6 months of mFOLFOX6, 87 patients received 3 months of mFOLFOX6, and 89 patients were treated with surgery alone. The 3-year DFS rate was 72.8% in 3-month therapy group and 86.1% in 6-month therapy group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.78 (95CI%, 1.18 to 6.47; P= 0.019). The difference in DFS between surgery alone group and 6-month therapy group was also observed but was nonsignificant (HR= 2.30, 95%CI, 0.99 to 5.38; P=0.054). The benefit of 6-month therapy in DFS compared with 3-month therapy group was pronounced for patients with stage III (HR=2.81, 95%CI, 1.03 to 7.67; P=0.044) but not for high-risk stage II patients. Propensity score matched analysis confirmed a DFS benefit in the 6-month therapy group.

Conclusion

This study suggested that a 6-month duration of mFOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy in dMMR CC patients may be associated with improved DFS compared with 3-month therapy, particularly in patients with stage III. The observational nature of the study implies caution should be taken in the interpretation of these results.

Characterization and Clinical Outcomes of DNA Mismatch Repair-deficient Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The prevalence and clinical characteristics of small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBA) in the setting of Lynch syndrome have not been well studied. We characterized SBA according to DNA mismatch repair and/or microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) and germline mutation status and compared clinical outcomes.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A single-institution review identified 100 SBAs. Tumors were evaluated for MSI via MSIsensor and/or corresponding MMR protein expression via IHC staining. Germline DNA was analyzed for mutations in known cancer predisposition genes, including MMR (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM). Clinical variables were correlated with MMR/MSI status.

RESULTS

Twenty-six percent (26/100; 95% confidence interval, 18.4-35.4) of SBAs exhibited MMR deficiency (MMR-D). Lynch syndrome prevalence was 10% overall and 38.5% among MMR-D SBAs. Median age at SBA diagnosis was similar in non-Lynch syndrome MMR-D versus MMR-proficient (MMR-P) SBAs (65 vs. 61; P = 0.75), but significantly younger in Lynch syndrome (47.5 vs. 61; P = 0.03). The prevalence of synchronous/metachronous cancers was 9% (6/67) in MMR-P versus 34.6% (9/26) in MMR-D SBA, with 66.7% (6/9) of these in Lynch syndrome (P = 0.0002). In the MMR-P group, 52.2% (35/67) of patients presented with metastatic disease, compared with 23.1% (6/26) in the MMR-D group (P = 0.008). In MMR-P stage I/II patients, 88.2% (15/17) recurred, compared with 18.2% (2/11) in the MMR-D group (P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with MMR-P SBA, MMR-D SBA was associated with earlier stage disease and lower recurrence rates, similar to observations in colorectal cancer. With a 38.5% prevalence in MMR-D SBA, germline Lynch syndrome testing in MMR-D SBA is warranted.

Clinical Decision Support for High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer: A Real-World Study of Treatment Concordance and Survival

BACKGROUND

Prognostic and pathologic risk factors typically guide clinicians and patients in their choice of surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy when managing high-risk stage II colon cancer. However, variations in treatment and outcomes in patients with stage II colon cancer remain.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the survival benefits of treatments concordant with suggested therapeutic options from Watson for Oncology, a clinical decision support system.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective observational study of concordance between actual treatment and Watson for Oncology therapeutic options.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a top-tier cancer center in China.

PATIENTS

Postoperative treatment data were retrieved from the electronic health records of 306 patients with high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were the treatment patterns plus 3- and 5-year overall and disease-free survival for concordant and nonconcordant cases.

RESULTS

Overall concordance was 90%. Most nonconcordant care resulted from adjuvant chemotherapy use (rather than surveillance) in patients with high-level microsatellite instability and ≥70 years old. No difference in overall survival (p = 0.56) or disease-free survival (p = 0.19) was observed between concordance groups. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly higher 5-year overall survival than those undergoing surveillance (94% vs 84%, p = 0.01).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the use of retrospective cases drawn from patients presenting for surgery, the lack of complete follow-up data for 58% of patients who could not be included in the analysis, and a survival analysis that assumes no unmeasured correlation between survival and censoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Watson for Oncology produced therapeutic options highly concordant with human decisions at a top-tier cancer center in China. Treatment patterns suggest that Watson for Oncology may be able to guide clinicians to minimize overtreatment of patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer with chemotherapy. Survival analyses suggest the need for further investigation to specifically assess the association between surveillance, single-agent and multiagent chemotherapy, and survival outcomes in this population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B291. APOYO A LA DECISIÓN CLÍNICA DEL CÁNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO II DE ALTO RIESGO: UN ESTUDIO DEL MUNDO REAL SOBRE LA CONCORDANCIA DEL TRATAMIENTO Y LA SUPERVIVENCIA: Los factores de riesgo pronósticos y patológicos generalmente guían a los médicos y pacientes en su elección de vigilancia o quimioterapia adyuvante cuando se trata el cáncer de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo. Sin embargo, las variaciones en el tratamiento y los resultados en pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio II permanecen.Evaluar los beneficios de supervivencia de los tratamientos concordantes con las opciones terapéuticas sugeridas por "Watson for Oncology" (Watson para la oncología), un sistema de apoyo a la decisión clínica.Estudio observacional retrospectivo de concordancia entre el tratamiento real y las opciones terapéuticas de Watson para oncología.Un centro oncológico de primer nivel en China.Datos de tratamiento postoperatorio de registros de salud electrónicos de 306 pacientes con adenocarcinoma de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo.Patrones de tratamiento más supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad a 3 y 5 años para casos concordantes y no concordantes.La concordancia general fue del 90%. La mayoría de la atención no concordante resultó del uso de quimioterapia adyuvante (en lugar de vigilancia) en pacientes de alto nivel con inestabilidad de microsatélites y pacientes ≥70 años. No se observaron diferencias en la supervivencia global (p = 0,56) o la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (p = 0,19) entre los grupos de concordancia. Los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante tuvieron una supervivencia global a los 5 años significativamente más alta que los que fueron sometidos a vigilancia (94% frente a 84%, p = 0,01).Uso de casos retrospectivos extraídos de pacientes que se presentan para cirugía, falta de datos de seguimiento completos para el 58% de los pacientes que no pudieron ser incluidos en el análisis, y análisis de supervivencia que asume que no exite una correlación no medida entre supervivencia y censura.Watson para Oncología produjo opciones terapéuticas altamente concordantes con las decisiones humanas en un centro oncológico de primer nivel en China. Los patrones de tratamiento sugieren que Watson para Oncología puede guiar a los médicos para minimizar el sobretratamiento de pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo con quimioterapia. Los análisis de supervivencia sugieren la necesidad de realizar mas investigaciónes para evaluar específicamente la asociación entre la vigilancia, la quimioterapia con uno solo o múltiples agentes y los resultados de supervivencia en esta población. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B291. (Traducción-Dr. Gonzalo Hagerman).

Survival outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy in deficient mismatch repair stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status remains controversial in patients with stage III colon cancer who are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival outcome of AC in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instable (MSI) stage III CC.

METHODS

Patients with pathological stage III CC between 2010 and 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Database using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (3rd Edition) morphology and topography codes 8140, 8480, and C18.0-18.8. Patients with pathologic stage T3N2, T4N1, or T4N were considered high risk; patients with stage T3N1 were considered low risk. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, and Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the association between AC and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 9226 patients with pathological stage III CC were identified, of which 2384 (25.8%) were MSI-high (MSI-H) and met the inclusion criteria of the final analysis. MSI-low (MSI-L) patients (n = 6842) were excluded. There was a preponderance of women (55.0% [n = 1311]), and 76.6% (n = 1825) of patients were non-Hispanic white. The median age was 65 years (range, 19-90 years). The primary sites were the cecum (29.7% [n = 707]), ascending colon (26.0% [n = 620]), sigmoid colon (17.2% [n = 410]), and transverse colon (10.8% [n = 257]). The most common tumor grade was moderately differentiated (n = 50.4% [1202]), followed by poorly differentiated (34.1% [n = 813]) and well differentiated (5.1% [n = 121]). High-risk pathologic stage III CC (T4N1, TxN2) constituted 51.0% (n = 1215) of the study population. High-risk stage III was associated with worse OS compared with low-risk stage III on univariate (P < .001) analysis and displayed a similar trend on multivariable analysis, without a statistically significant difference. Multiagent AC was associated with improved OS compared with no treatment on univariate (P < .001) and multivariable (P < .001) analysis. When stratified by risk status, multiagent AC was associated with improved OS compared with no treatment for high-risk (P < .001) and low-risk (P < .001) stage III disease.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better OS in stage III dMMR/MSI-H CC. An enhanced benefit was shown for high-risk stage III disease.

Myxoid stroma is associated with postoperative relapse in patients with stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Fibrosis surrounding cancer cells has been shown to affect cancer cell metastatic behavior. The present study aimed to explore the utility of myxoid stroma as a predictive factor for postoperative relapse in patients with stage II colon cancer.

METHODS

The present study retrospectively investigated 169 patients who underwent curative surgical resection of stage II colon cancer. The fibrotic stroma was classified according to Ueno's criteria, and the patients were divided into the myxoid (MY) group and the non-MY (NMY) group. We also recorded tumor budding (TB) and investigated the combination of MY and TB for postoperative relapse. Postoperative survival was also explored.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (18.9%) patients had MY. MY was significantly associated with tumor budding (TB) and postoperative relapse (p <  0.001 and p <  0.001, respectively). The 5-year RFS rates in MY group and NMY group were 52.1 and 94.6% (p < 0.0001), and the 5-year OS rates in MY group and NMY group were 74.6 and 93.3% (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that both MY and TB were significant risk factors for postoperative relapse (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively), and that only TB was a significant risk factor for OS (p = 0.043). Furthermore, compared with patients with either one of MY or TB, patients with both MY and TB had postoperative relapse more frequently (11.4% vs. 53.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that MY is a predictive marker for postoperative relapse in patients with stage II colon cancer.

Early stage colon cancer: Current treatment standards, evolving paradigms, and future directions

Colon cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity throughout the world despite the availability of reliable screening tools and effective therapies. The majority of patients with colon cancer are diagnosed at an early stage (stages I to III), which provides an opportunity for cure. The current treatment paradigm of early stage colon cancer consists of surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in a select group of patients, which is directed at the eradication of minimal residual disease to achieve a cure. Surgery alone is curative for the vast majority of colon cancer patients. Currently, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy can achieve long term survival in about two-thirds of colon cancer patients with nodal involvement. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for all patients with stage III colon cancer, while the benefit in stage II patients is not unequivocally established despite several large clinical trials. Contemporary research in early stage colon cancer is focused on minimally invasive surgical techniques, strategies to limit treatment-related toxicities, precise patient selection for adjuvant therapy, utilization of molecular and clinicopathologic information to personalize therapy and exploration of new therapies exploiting the evolving knowledge of tumor biology. In this review, we will discuss the current standard treatment, evolving treatment paradigms, and the emerging biomarkers, that will likely help improve patient selection and personalization of therapy leading to superior outcomes.

Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer (CC) are recommended to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). However, whether such patients can benefit from ACT remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic parameters that are important for selecting patients for ACT in high-risk stage II CC.

METHODS

We systematically retrieved articles from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase that were published up to September 13, 2018. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 23 cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial were included in our study. Overall analyses showed that ACT improved OS (HR=0.64, 95% CI=0.51-0.80, P<0.001) and DFS (HR=0.46, 95% CI=0.28-0.76, P=0.002) in patients with high-risk stage II CC. Subgroup analyses showed that ACT improved OS in patients with localized intestinal perforation and obstruction and pT4 lesions and improved OS and DFS in patients with <12 sampled lymph nodes. However, ACT had no significant effect on OS in patients with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, or poorly differentiated histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that not all high-risk factors (lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, poorly differentiated histology) show a benefit from ACT. Randomized controlled trials selectively targeting high-risk patients will need to be conducted in the future.

Genomic Alterations and Their Implications on Survival in Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer: Status Quo and Future Perspectives

The selection of treatment according to genomic alterations is a standard approach in metastatic colorectal cancer but is only starting to have an impact in the earlier stages of the disease. The status if genes like KRAS, BRAF, and MMR has substantial survival implications, and concerted research efforts have revolutionized treatment towards precision oncology. In contrast, a genomic-based approach has not changed the adjuvant setting after curative tumor-resection in the daily routine so far. This review focuses on the current knowledge regarding prognostic and predictive genomic biomarkers in patients with locally advanced nonmetastasized colorectal cancer. Furthermore, we provide an outlook on future challenges for a personalized adjuvant treatment approach in patients with colorectal cancer.

Clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of pT4 stage II colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair status: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIB/C CRC and defective mismatch repair (dMMr) status, and to evaluate what is the determinant risk factor for adjuvant chemotherapy in those patients.

METHOD

A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library databases will be performed. All RCTs published in electronic databases from inception to March 19, 2020, with language restricted in English will be included in this review study. Two reviewers will independently perform the Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and assessment of risk bias and will be supervised by third party. Outcomes consisted of overall survival, progression-free survival and sufficient information to extract hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals and it will be calculated to present the prognostic role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIB/C CRC and dMMR status using Review Manager version 5.3 when there is sufficient available data.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

CONCLUSION

This study will summarize up-to-date evidence to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIB/C CRC and dMMR status and provide a scientific and practical suggestions for treatment decision-making.

REGISTRATION

This protocol has been registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) with a registration number of INPLASY202050019.

Microsatellite Instability and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Randomized control trials and population-based studies do not demonstrate a definitive benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in stage II colon cancer (CC). Tumor sidedness and microsatellite instability (MSI) status may predict response to ACT, but previous studies have limited microsatellite data. We assessed the efficacy of ACT and possible interaction with MSI status and tumor sidedness in patients with resected stage II CC diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 using the National Cancer Database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall survival was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate and propensity score matched Cox proportional hazards models. The interaction between receipt of ACT, MSI status, and tumor sidedness was evaluated. The efficacy of ACT was assessed in patient subgroups by MSI status and tumor sidedness.

RESULTS

Among 6964 stage II CC patients with known MSI status, 1497 (21.5%) received ACT, 843 had MSI tumors, and 6121 had microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. In multivariate and propensity score matched analyses, ACT was associated with improved survival after adjusting for factors including high-risk features, MSI status, and tumor sidedness (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.52; P<0.001). There was no interaction between receipt of ACT and MSI status (P=0.25). Patients with MSS tumors benefitted from ACT (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.47; P<0.001), even without other high-risk features. Patients with MSI tumors did not (P=0.671). ACT was associated with improved survival regardless of tumor sidedness.

CONCLUSIONS

MSS alone may warrant ACT in stage II CC while patients with MSI tumors may not derive significant benefit from ACT.

Mismatch Repair-Deficient Rectal Cancer and Resistance to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Evaluate response of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

dMMR rectal tumors at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) were retrospectively reviewed for characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Fifty patients with dMMR rectal cancer were identified by IHC and/or microsatellite instability analysis, with initial treatment response compared with a matched MMR-proficient (pMMR) rectal cancer cohort. Germline and somatic mutation analyses were evaluated. Patient-derived dMMR rectal tumoroids were assessed for chemotherapy sensitivity.

RESULTS

Of 21 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (fluorouracil/oxaliplatin), six (29%) had progression of disease. In comparison, no progression was noted in 63 pMMR rectal tumors (P = 0.0001). Rectal cancer dMMR tumoroids reflected this resistance to chemotherapy. No genomic predictors of chemotherapy response were identified. Of 16 patients receiving chemoradiation, 13 (93%) experienced tumor downstaging; one patient had stable disease, comparable with 48 pMMR rectal cancers. Of 13 patients undergoing surgery, 12 (92%) had early-stage disease. Forty-two (84%) of the 50 patients tested positive for Lynch syndrome with enrichment of germline MSH2 and MSH6 mutations when compared with 193 patients with Lynch syndrome-associated colon cancer (MSH2, 57% vs 36%; MSH6, 17% vs 9%; P < 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Over one-fourth of dMMR rectal tumors treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy exhibited disease progression. Conversely, dMMR rectal tumors were sensitive to chemoradiation. MMR status should be performed upfront in all locally advanced rectal tumors with careful monitoring for response on neoadjuvant chemotherapy and genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in patients with dMMR rectal cancer.

Variation in Blood and Colorectal Epithelia's Key Trace Elements Along with Expression of Mismatch Repair Proteins from Localized and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an increasingly common medical issue affecting millions worldwide, and contribution of the body's trace elements to CRC is arguable. The concentrations and buffered status of selenium, iron, copper, zinc, and phosphorus in blood and large intestinal tissues of CRC patients are, respectively, variable and vital for cell physiology. The aim of this study was to assess selenium, iron, copper, zinc, and phosphorus variations in blood and colorectal epithelia along with examining the expression of mismatch repair proteins in CRC patients with/without metastasis for potential diagnosis/therapy. Concentrations of selenium, iron, copper, zinc, and phosphorus in blood of healthy versus CRC patients and colorectal epithelia (adenocarcinomatous versus non-adenocarcinomatous/control) were measured in 40 CRC patients (55.87 ± 11.9 years old) with/without metastasis before surgery using ICP-OES. Mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression was analyzed through histopathological/immunohistochemistry assays, which was sparse in 5 CRC patient's colorectal tissues (12%). Compared with healthy individuals, blood and colorectal tissue's levels of phosphorus, copper, and iron were significantly higher in the CRC patients, and more pronounced in metastatic CRC patients; conversely, blood and colorectal tissue's selenium levels were significantly lower in metastatic patients. Unlike blood zinc, cancerous colorectal tissue's zinc concentration was significantly lower in CRC patients compared to healthy control cohorts. There was no significant difference on the measured elements in samples from CRC patients with MMR^- compared to CRC patients with MMR⁺. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a correlation of blood iron, zinc, copper, and phosphorus to CRC, and inappropriately low levels of blood and colorectal selenium correlated with exacerbated metastasis. Altered levels of selenium, iron, copper, zinc, and phosphorus in vivo may impact the pathogenesis and detection of CRC, and their diagnostic/therapeutic potential in CRC would be revealing.

Mismatch repair status predicts survival after adjuvant treatment in stage II colon cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Stage II colon cancer is primarily a surgical disease. Only a still not well-defined subset of patients may benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The relationship between adjuvant chemotherapy and survival after relapse is furthermore still not definitely explored in this group of patients. A number of reports suggest some association between defective mismatch repair (dMMR) and colorectal cancer stage II prognosis, but due to contradictory results from existing studies, the exact predictive role is still not fully understood.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study including 451 stage II colon cancer patients. The proficiency or deficiency of mismatch repair was tested using immunohistochemistry and analyzed in relationship to two survival outcomes: overall survival (OS) and postrelapse survival.

RESULTS

Patients with dMMR (20.4%) derived no OS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-2.38; P = .897). Patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had the significantly better OS in comparison to those not receiving chemotherapy (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.82; P = .004). This relationship remained significant in multivariable analysis (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.78; P = .007). Patients with pMMR relapsing after adjuvant treatment lived significantly longer than those relapsing without previous adjuvant treatment (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.96; P = .033) and this result remained significant in the multivariable model (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.93; P = .030).

CONCLUSION

In stage II CC patients, adjuvant chemotherapy improves therapeutic outcomes only in patients with pMMR tumors. Survival after relapse in patients having received adjuvant chemotherapy is significantly longer for patients with pMMR. No survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was seen among patients with dMMR tumors.

Microsatellite instability and survival after adjuvant chemotherapy among stage II and III colon cancer patients: results from a population-based study

Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the benefit of administering 5‐FU‐based chemotherapy to colon cancer (CC) patients with microsatellite‐instable (MSI‐high) tumors, and results from stage‐specific analyses are scarce. Patients with stage II or III CC were recruited as part of a population‐based study between 2003 and 2015. The Cox regression models including propensity score weighting were used to calculate hazard ratios and confidence intervals for the association between chemotherapy and cancer‐specific (CSS), relapse‐free (RFS), and overall survival (OS) by stage of disease and MSI status of the tumor. Median follow‐up was 6.2 years. A total of 1010 CC patients were included in the analysis (54% stage II, 46% stage III, 20% MSI‐high). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 48 (8.7%) stage II and 366 (79%) stage III patients. Overall, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had better CSS [HR = 0.65 (0.49–0.86)] than those who received surgery alone. Among stage II patients, only 64 (12%) cancer‐related deaths occurred, none of which in MSI‐high patients who received chemotherapy. Patients with MSI‐high tumors who received adjuvant treatment showed better CSS and a tendency toward better RFS compared to MSI‐high patients who did not receive chemotherapy [HR_CSS = 0.36 (0.15–0.82), HR_RFS = 0.49 (0.22–1.06)]. Patients with microsatellite‐stable (MSS) tumors receiving adjuvant chemotherapy also had significantly better survival [HR_CSS = 0.65 (0.48–0.87) and HR_RFS = 0.68 (0.52–0.88)]. In this population‐based study including stage II and III CC patients, we observed a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for both MSS and MSI‐high tumors. Adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to be beneficial among high‐risk stage II patients with MSI‐high tumors.

Making sense of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for locoregional colon cancer. The goal of adjuvant chemotherapy is to eradicate micro-metastatic disease and improve survival. This has been most clearly demonstrated in stage III (node-positive) disease, whereas benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II disease remains controversial. In stage III colon cancer, 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy have been accepted as the standard for the last 15 years. The recent IDEA collaboration has challenged this in 2018; while overall was a negative non-inferiority study, pre-planned subset analyses do support that for patients with low-risk stage III disease, 3 months of XELOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination) is non-inferior to 6 months. In stage II colon cancer, where the potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is small, the emergence of biomarkers has helped in decision-making. Tumors with deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) do not benefit from 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. For patients with high clinicopathological risk stage II disease with proficient mismatch repair proteins and good performance status, six months of adjuvant chemotherapy is still recommended. In the management of rectal cancers, where the risk of local recurrence is higher, chemoradiation (CRT) is often included as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy in the management of stage II and III rectal cancer. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer has been extrapolated from adjuvant colon cancer studies with updated results from adjuvant rectal cancer studies demonstrating similar benefits. This review summarizes the current landscape of adjuvant therapy for patients with resected stage II and III colorectal cancer.

GEFT protein expression in digestive tract malignant tumors and its clinical significance

Guanine nucleotide exchange factor T (GEFT), a member of the Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor family, is expressed in a variety of tumors. In the present study, the expression and clinical significance of GEFT in malignant digestive tract tumors was assessed. Tumor and adjacent control samples from 180 patients were tested. Positive GEFT expression rates were 80, 83.33 and 86.67% in esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC), gastric carcinoma (GC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. GEFT expression was associated with diffuse type carcinoma according to the Lauren classification (χ²=12.525, P=0.002) and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages III/IV (χ²=4.033, P=0.045) in GC, and with vessel carcinoma embolus (χ²=7.890, P=0.005) and lymph node metastasis (χ²=5.455, P=0.020) in CRC, but was not associated with other clinicopathological parameters. Patients with high levels of GEFT protein expression had a less favorable outcome compared with patients with low levels of GEFT expression in patients with CRC (χ²=3.876, P=0.049). However, a significant association was not found between GEFT expression and overall survival in patients with ESCC (χ²=0.040, P=0.842) or GC (χ²=0.501, P=0.479). The rate of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 upregulation in patients with GC was 13.33% and it was associated with nerve invasion (χ²=4.005, P=0.045) and TNM stages III/IV (χ²=5.600, P=0.018). Mismatch repair protein (MMRP) defect was observed in six cases, and the KRAS mutation rate was 26.67% in patients with CRC. GEFT expression was significantly correlated with MMRP (r=-0.285, P=0.027) and KRAS mutation in patients with CRC (r=0.697, P<0.001). These findings revealed frequent GEFT upregulation in malignant digestive tract tumors, which may have promoted tumor development. GEFT expression in CRC may be associated with microsatellite instability and KRAS mutation status, suggesting that GEFT may be a potential therapeutic target for patients with CRC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in resected colon cancer: When, how and how long?

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has been clearly established in the adjuvant setting for node-positive colon cancer. A number of trials in the adjuvant setting have analyzed the efficacy of multiple-agent combinations, including irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab and cetuximab. Only oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil/capecitabine has been shown to be superior beyond a fluropyrimidine alone in the adjuvant setting. As such, standard treatment options include fluorouracil (FU) or capecitabine with or without oxaliplatin. However, oxaliplatin is associated with cumulative dose-dependent neurotoxicity, characterized by distal or perioral paresthesias or dysesthesias; for this reason, in this review we discuss the results of the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) trial. The IDEA trail is the largest prospective clinical trial ever conducted in colorectal cancer, wherein patients were treated with either 3 months or 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. In the era of cancer gene expression-based subtyping, the Colorectal Cancer Subtyping Consortium has proposed a four-subgroup molecular classification system for colorectal cancer, consisting of CMS1 (immune), CMS2 (canonical), CMS3 (metabolic) and CMS4 (mesenchymal). In this review, we present and analyze the available data on efficacy and toxicity of the combination regimen approved for treatment of resected colon cancer, and discuss the questions of when, how and how long we need to treat such patients.

Pseudoprogression during treatment with pembrolizumab followed by rechallenge with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: A case report

Disease progression during immunotherapy in colorectal cancer does not always indicate treatment failure. A case argues that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) may serve as an early marker to distinguish between pseudoprogression and real progression. Presentation of results from reintroduction of chemotherapy after progression on immunotherapy that suggest increased efficiency.

Is the Mirror Image Method Really Useful in Tumor Tissue Bank Quality Control?

Oncology research projects are highly dependent on the quality of tumor samples stored in the biobank. Microscopic control is important to ensure the quality of the frozen sample (Does the sample correspond to tumor tissue? Does the sample contain a sufficient number of tumor cells for molecular analysis?). The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the mirror image method in quality control of colonic adenocarcinoma samples stored in a tumor bank. Microscopic concordance for the differentiation grade, malignant and normal cell percentages, necrosis, mucinous component, and ulceration was assessed on 82 colon adenocarcinoma banked samples and their paired, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded mirror controls. Molecular concordance for KRAS status was evaluated in 76 of these 82 cases. Morphological correspondence between frozen and mirror samples was good for the mucinous component (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.81), moderate for differentiation (Cohen's kappa coefficient [k] = 0.67), fair for malignant cells (ICC = 0.44), and poor for ulceration (k = 0.08), normal tissue (ICC = 0.36), and necrosis (ICC = 0.13) percentages. Molecular correspondence for KRAS status was almost perfect (95% correspondence, k = 0.88) between frozen and mirror samples. In conclusion, the mirror sample method is not a good alternative for microscopic and molecular control of frozen colonic adenocarcinoma samples.

Challenges and solutions in patient treatment strategies for stage II colon cancer

Colorectal cancer remains one of the most common cancers worldwide and, despite improvements in treatment options for late-stage metastatic cancer, there are still questions surrounding how best to treat early-stage disease patients. Some recent advances have been made in the staging of cancer and improving the risk assessment of strategies for patient treatment. A number of high-risk features have been proposed that may help to stratify stage II cancer patients into groups that will truly benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Diagnostic tests are becoming available to measure these biomarkers, utilizing both currently available and novel technologies. This review will describe the challenges in treatment decisions for early-stage colon cancer and how personalized medicine can assist clinicians in making the best treatment choices for patients with stage II colon cancer in particular.