Overall survival benefit with lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: final results from the EGF104900 Study

HER2-CD3-Fc Bispecific Antibody-Encoding mRNA Delivered by Lipid Nanoparticles Suppresses HER2-Positive Tumor Growth

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor and tumor-associated antigen abnormally expressed in various types of cancer, including breast, ovarian, and gastric cancer. HER2 overexpression is highly correlated with increased tumor aggressiveness, poorer prognosis, and shorter overall survival. Consequently, multiple HER2-targeted therapies have been developed and approved; however, only a subset of patients benefit from these treatments, and relapses are common. More potent and durable HER2-targeted therapies are desperately needed for patients with HER2-positive cancers. In this study, we developed a lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-based therapy formulated with mRNA encoding a novel HER2-CD3-Fc bispecific antibody (bsAb) for HER2-positive cancers. The LNPs efficiently transfected various types of cells, such as HEK293S, SKOV-3, and A1847, leading to robust and sustained secretion of the HER2-CD3-Fc bsAb with high binding affinity to both HER2 and CD3. The bsAb induced potent T-cell-directed cytotoxicity, along with secretion of IFN-λ, TNF-α, and granzyme B, against various types of HER2-positive tumor cells in vitro, including A549, NCI-H460, SKOV-3, A1847, SKBR3, and MDA-MB-231. The bsAb-mediated antitumor effect is highly specific and strictly dependent on its binding to HER2, as evidenced by the gained resistance of A549 and A1847 her2 knockout cells and the acquired sensitivity of mouse 4T1 cells overexpressing the human HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) or epitope-containing subdomain IV to the bsAb-induced T cell cytotoxicity. The bsAb also relies on its binding to CD3 for T-cell recruitment, as ablation of CD3 binding abolished the bsAb's ability to elicit antitumor activity. Importantly, intratumoral injection of the HER2-CD3-Fc mRNA-LNPs triggers a strong antitumor response and completely blocks HER2-positive tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model of human ovarian cancer. These results indicate that the novel HER2-CD3-Fc mRNA-LNP-based therapy has the potential to effectively treat HER2-positive cancer.

Advances in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeted Therapy in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers

The Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer (ToGA) trial marked a pivotal moment in the adoption of trastuzumab for treating advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive esophagogastric (EG) cancer. The KEYNOTE-811 trial brought to light the synergistic effect of immune modulation and HER2 targeting. Additionally, the emergence of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) highlighted the potential of new pharmaceutical technologies to extend response, particularly for patients who have advanced beyond initial HER2-targeted therapies. This review aims to navigate through both the successes and challenges encountered historically, as well as promising current trials on innovative and transformative therapeutic strategies, including promising first-in-class and novel first-in-human agents.

HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer and Antibody Treatment: State of the Art and Future Developments

Despite a decreasing incidence in Western countries, gastric cancer is among the most common cancer subtypes globally and is associated with one of the highest tumor-related mortality rates. Biomarkers play an increasing role in the treatment against gastric cancer. HER2 was one of the first biomarkers that found its way into clinical practice. Since the ToGA trial, trastuzumab has been part of first-line palliative chemotherapy in metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer. HER2-targeting agents, such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib, the antibody drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab-emtansine or dual HER2 inhibition (pertuzumab and trastuzumab), have been investigated in the second-line setting but led to negative study results. More recently, the ADC trastuzumab-deruxtecan was authorized after the failure of trastuzumab-based treatment. However, further improvements in HER2-directed therapy are required as resistance mechanisms and HER2 heterogeneity limit the existing treatment options. This review aims to give an overview of the current standard-of-care HER2-directed therapy in gastric cancer, as well as its challenges and future developments.

Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Management of Breast cancer

ABSTRACT

The incidence of breast cancer is increasing rapidly in urban India due to the changing lifestyle and exposure to risk factors. Diagnosis at an advanced stage and in younger women are the most concerning issues of breast cancer in India. Lack of awareness and social taboos related to cancer diagnosis make women feel hesitant to seek timely medical advice. As almost half of women develop breast cancer at an age younger than 50 years, breast cancer diagnosis poses a huge financial burden on the household and impacts the entire family. Moreover, inaccessibility, unaffordability, and high out-of-pocket expenditure make this situation grimmer. Women find it difficult to get quality cancer care closer to their homes and end up traveling long distances for seeking treatment. Significant differences in the cancer epidemiology compared to the west make the adoption of western breast cancer management guidelines challenging for Indian women. In this article, we intend to provide a comprehensive review of the management of breast cancer from diagnosis to treatment for both early and advanced stages from the perspective of low-middle-income countries. Starting with a brief introduction to epidemiology and guidelines for diagnostic modalities (imaging and pathology), treatment has been discussed for early breast cancer (EBC), locally advanced, and MBC. In-depth information on loco-regional and systemic therapy has been provided focusing on standard treatment protocols as well as scenarios where treatment can be de-escalated or escalated.

The Efficacy and Safety of Inetetamab and Pyrotinib in Combination with Vinorelbine for Second-line Therapy and Beyond in HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Single-institution Clinical Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to observe the efficacy and safety of inetetamab and pyrotinib in combination with vinorelbine in second-line therapy and beyond in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS

Patients with HER2-positive MBC admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to December 2021 were selected. For patients who could not receive antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) during second-line (2nd-line) or third-line and beyond (≥ 3rd-line) anti-HER2 therapy, inetetamab + pyrotinib + vinorelbine was used for treatment until unacceptable adverse events occurred or the disease progressed, as evaluated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 every 2 cycles. The progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse reactions were recorded. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to explore the prognostic factors influencing the curative effect.

RESULTS

Overall, 52 patients were included; 13 patients received 2nd-line treatment, and 39 patients received ≥ 3rd-line treatment. The median PFS (mPFS) for all patients treated with inetetamab + pyrotinib + vinorelbine was 7 months. The mPFS of the 2nd-line subgroup was significantly better than that of the ≥ 3rd-line subgroup (17 vs. 5 months, P = 0.001). The mPFS of the subgroups that received trastuzumab (H) or trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP) only was significantly better than that of the H or HP and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) subgroups (8 vs. 5 months, P = 0.030). The mPFS of the HER2 resistance subgroup was better than that of the HER2 refractoriness subgroup (14 vs. 7 months, P = 0.025). Cox regression analysis showed that the treatment line (2nd-line more so than ≥ 3rd-line) was an independent prognostic factor for PFS. In addition, the ORR and CBR of 2nd-line patients were significantly higher than those of ≥ 3rd-line patients (69.2% vs. 30.8% and 92.3% vs. 64.1%, respectively). The most common hematological toxicities were leukopenia and neutropenia, and the most common nonhematological toxicity was diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

Inetetamab and pyrotinib in combination with vinorelbine have good efficacy in ≥ 2nd-line treatment of HER2-positive MBC with controllable toxicity, and the combination is a new treatment option, especially for patients who cannot use ADCs in 2nd-line treatment.

Multifunctional nanoparticle-mediated combining therapy for human diseases

Combining existing drug therapy is essential in developing new therapeutic agents in disease prevention and treatment. In preclinical investigations, combined effect of certain known drugs has been well established in treating extensive human diseases. Attributed to synergistic effects by targeting various disease pathways and advantages, such as reduced administration dose, decreased toxicity, and alleviated drug resistance, combinatorial treatment is now being pursued by delivering therapeutic agents to combat major clinical illnesses, such as cancer, atherosclerosis, pulmonary hypertension, myocarditis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, metabolic disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. Combinatorial therapy involves combining or co-delivering two or more drugs for treating a specific disease. Nanoparticle (NP)-mediated drug delivery systems, i.e., liposomal NPs, polymeric NPs and nanocrystals, are of great interest in combinatorial therapy for a wide range of disorders due to targeted drug delivery, extended drug release, and higher drug stability to avoid rapid clearance at infected areas. This review summarizes various targets of diseases, preclinical or clinically approved drug combinations and the development of multifunctional NPs for combining therapy and emphasizes combinatorial therapeutic strategies based on drug delivery for treating severe clinical diseases. Ultimately, we discuss the challenging of developing NP-codelivery and translation and provide potential approaches to address the limitations. This review offers a comprehensive overview for recent cutting-edge and challenging in developing NP-mediated combination therapy for human diseases.

Real-world data of triplet combination of pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, retrospective study

Background

Pyrotinib, an irreversible pan-human epidermal growth (HER) inhibitor, has proven its antitumor efficacy as a second-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC) when combined with capecitabine. However, real-world data concerning the pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy (PyroHC) combination remains scarce.

Objectives

Our study is to report the treatment patterns, efficacy, and safety of the PyroHC combination in a real-world setting.

Design

This study enrolled patients with HER2+ MBC from five institutions in China, treated with PyroHC between June 2017 and January 2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05839288).

Methods

We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), toxicity profile, and utilized treatment regimens.

Results

Of the 135 patients in our cohort, 91.9% had prior trastuzumab exposure and 52.2% underwent at least two systematic therapy lines before receiving PyroHC. The most prevalent chemotherapies paired with PyroH were capecitabine (36.3%). Patients receiving PyroHC achieved a median PFS of 8.67 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.84-10.51] and an ORR of 51.3% (95% CI: 42.1-61.5%). The first-line treatment with PyroHC led to a median PFS of 14.46 months (95% CI: 6.35-22.56). Patients with brain metastases showed a median PFS of 9.03 months (95% CI: 6.56-11.50), achieving an ORR of 52.17% (95% CI: 51.74-83.39). Longer previous trastuzumab (⩾6.37 months) or lapatinib (⩾10.05 months) therapies could indicate improved PFS, while prior pyrotinib exposure negatively influenced PFS. Notably, the most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhea (37.8%), which were generally manageable.

Conclusion

PyroHC shows promising efficacy and a satisfactory safety profile for treating HER2+ MBC, both as a first-line option and for heavily treated patients, including those with brain metastasis. Our findings suggest the duration and history of anti-HER2 therapy as potential predictors for PyroHC efficacy in advanced settings.

Systemic Therapies for HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

Despite recent advances, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) remains a largely incurable disease, with resistance to conventional anti-HER2 drugs ultimately unavoidable for all but a small minority of patients who achieve an enduring remission and possibly cure. Over the past two decades, significant advances in our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of HER2-driven oncogenesis have translated into pharmaceutical advances, with the developing of increasingly sophisticated therapies directed against HER2. These include novel, more potent selective HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); new anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates; and dual epitope targeting antibodies, with more advanced pharmacological properties and higher affinity. With the introduction of adjuvant T-DM1 for incomplete responders to neoadjuvant therapy, fewer patients are relapsing, but for those who do relapse, disease that may be resistant to standard first- and second-line therapies requires new approaches. Furthermore, the risk of CNS relapse has not been abrogated by current (neo)adjuvant strategies; therefore, current research efforts are being directed towards this challenging site of metastatic disease. In this article, we review the currently available clinical data informing the effective management of HER2-positive breast cancer beyond standard first-line therapy with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and taxanes, and the management of relapse in patients who have already been exposed to both these agents and T-DM1 for early breast cancer (EBC). We additionally discuss novel anti-HER2 targeted agents and combinations in clinical trials, which may be integrated into standard treatment paradigms in the future.

Can We De-escalate Therapy for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer?

A recent phase Ib/II trial evaluated the combination of tucatinib, letrozole, and palbociclib in patients with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, demonstrating a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy data. An all-oral, chemotherapy-free regimen is an appealing strategy, and could be a possible maintenance or primary therapy option in select patients. See related article by Shagisultanova et al., p. 5021.

Pyrotinib versus placebo in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel as first line treatment in patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (PHILA): randomised, double blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib (an irreversible pan-HER (human epidermal growth factor receptor) inhibitor), trastuzumab, and docetaxel compared with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for untreated HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer.

DESIGN

Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

SETTING

40 centres in China between 6 May 2019 and 17 January 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

590 female patients (median age 52 (interquartile range 46-58) years) with untreated HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer.

INTERVENTIONS

Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either oral pyrotinib (400 mg once daily) or placebo, both combined with intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg in cycle 1 and 6 mg/kg in subsequent cycles) and docetaxel (75 mg/m2) on day 1 of each 21 day cycle. Randomisation was stratified by treatment history of trastuzumab in the (neo)adjuvant setting and hormone receptor status. Patients, investigators, and the sponsor's study team were masked to treatment assignment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by the investigator.

RESULTS

Of the 590 randomised patients, 297 received pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel treatment (pyrotinib group), and 293 received placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel treatment (placebo group). At data cut-off on 25 May 2022, the median follow-up was 15.5 months. The median progression-free survival according to the investigator was significantly longer in the pyrotinib group than in the placebo group (24.3 (95% confidence interval 19.1 to 33.0) months versus 10.4 (9.3 to 12.3) months; hazard ratio 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.53); one sided P<0.001). Treatment related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 267 (90%) of the 297 patients in the pyrotinib group and 224 (76%) of the 293 patients in the placebo group. No treatment related deaths occurred in the pyrotinib group, and one (<1%; diabetic hyperosmolar coma) treatment related death occurred in the placebo group. Survival and toxicities are still under assessment with longer follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel showed superiority by significantly improving progression-free survival compared with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in patients with untreated HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer. The toxicity was manageable. The findings support this dual anti-HER2 regimen as an alternative first line treatment option in this patient population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03863223.

HER2-Selective and Reversible Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Tucatinib Potentiates the Activity of T-DM1 in Preclinical Models of HER2-positive Breast Cancer

The oncogenic receptor HER2 is overexpressed in many cancers, including up to 20% of breast cancers. Despite the availability of HER2-targeted treatments, patients’ disease often progresses during therapy, underscoring the need for novel treatment strategies. The addition of tucatinib, a reversible, highly selective HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), to treatment with trastuzumab and capecitabine significantly improved survival outcomes of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with active brain metastases. We rationalized that combining tucatinib with other HER2-targeting agents with complementary mechanisms of action would further increase efficacy against tumors. We characterized the activity of tucatinib with the antibody–drug conjugate T-DM1 in preclinical models of breast cancer, including HER2-positive breast cancer cells and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Mechanistic details on tucatinib activity were obtained in internalization and catabolism studies. In combination, tucatinib and T-DM1 showed an enhanced, often synergistic, cytotoxic response and demonstrated improved antitumor activity in vivo, including in PDX models refractory to T-DM1 single-agent activity. Mechanistically, tucatinib mediated an increase in inactive HER2 molecules at the cell surface through inhibition of HER2 ubiquitination, resulting in increased internalization and catabolism of T-DM1. The combination was correlated with enhanced HER2 pathway inhibition, decreased proliferation, and increased apoptosis. In a xenograft model of brain metastasis, tucatinib penetrated intracranial tumor tissues, inhibiting tumor growth and improving survival. These results suggest that tucatinib may be the optimal TKI partner for HER2-targeted therapies and support clinical studies of its combination with T-DM1, including in patients with brain metastases.

SIGNIFICANCE

The preclinical findings in breast cancer models presented here demonstrate that combining tucatinib with T-DM1 enhances the antitumor activity of either agent alone, supporting clinical studies of the combination in HER2-positive breast cancer, including in patients with brain metastases, which remains an important unmet medical need.

Clinical Impact of New Treatment Strategies for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Resistance to Classical Anti-HER Therapies

HER2-positive breast cancer accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancer cases. This subtype is characterized by an aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Anti-HER2 therapies have considerably improved the natural course of the disease. Despite this, relapse still occurs in around 20% of patients due to primary or acquired treatment resistance, and metastasis remains an incurable disease. This article reviews the main mechanisms underlying resistance to anti-HER2 treatments, focusing on newer HER2-targeted therapies. The progress in anti-HER2 drugs includes the development of novel antibody-drug conjugates with improvements in the conjugation process and novel linkers and payloads. Moreover, trastuzumab deruxtecan has enhanced the efficacy of trastuzumab emtansine, and the new drug trastuzumab duocarmazine is currently undergoing clinical trials to assess its effect. The combination of anti-HER2 agents with other drugs is also being evaluated. The addition of immunotherapy checkpoint inhibitors shows some benefit in a subset of patients, indicating the need for useful biomarkers to properly stratify patients. Besides, CDK4/6 and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also included in the design of new treatment strategies. Lapitinib, neratinib and tucatinib have been approved for HER2-positive metastasis patients, however clinical trials are currently ongoing to optimize combined strategies, to reduce toxicity, and to better define the useful setting. Clinical research should be strengthened along with the discovery and validation of new biomarkers, as well as a deeper understanding of drug resistance and action mechanisms.

Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Is There an Optimal Sequence of Therapy?

OPINION STATEMENT

Approximately 20% of breast cancers overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+), conferring a particularly aggressive subtype of the disease with an increased risk for the development of systemic and brain metastases. However, the advent of trastuzumab and more recently several other HER2-targeting novel therapies has led to significant improvements in the prognosis, making the diagnosis a "double-edged sword." The current standard first-line therapy for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a taxane combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Trastuzumab deruxtecan should be used preferentially in the second line, with the only caveat being patients with CNS involvement where the tucatinib, capecitabine, and trastuzumab regimen could be considered. In the third line setting, given the survival benefits demonstrated with the tucatinib regimen in patients with and without CNS metastases, this is the preferred strategy. In the fourth line and beyond, there is no clear standard. Options include margetuximab in combination with chemotherapy, neratinib + capecitabine, or trastuzumab + chemotherapy. There are several novel therapies under investigation reporting promising results in the late-line setting. The treatment landscape of HER2-positive advanced disease is evolving constantly, with several active therapies being moved to the early-stage setting. Accordingly, it will be critical to identify biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance to optimize therapy selection and maximize patient outcomes and quality of life. Here, we provide an overview of the current and future management of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer and address the specific scenarios which may impact treatment selection including triple-positive breast cancer and the presence of brain metastases. Finally, we highlight promising novel treatments and ongoing trials that may impact future treatment sequencing.

Small-molecule inhibitors of kinases in breast cancer therapy: recent advances, opportunities, and challenges

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide and despite significant advancements in detection, treatment, and management of cancer, it is still the leading cause of malignancy related deaths in women. Understanding the fundamental biology of breast cancer and creating fresh diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have gained renewed focus in recent studies. In the onset and spread of breast cancer, a group of enzymes known as kinases are extremely important. Small-molecule kinase inhibitors have become a promising class of medications for the treatment of breast cancer owing to their capacity to specifically target kinases involved in the growth and progression of cancer. The creation of targeted treatments that block these kinases and the signalling pathways that they activate has completely changed how breast cancer is treated. Many of these targeted treatments have been approved for the treatment of breast cancer as clinical trials have demonstrated their great efficacy. CDK4/6 inhibitors, like palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib, EGFR inhibitors such as gefitinib and erlotinib and HER2-targeting small-molecule kinases like neratinib and tucatinib are some examples that have shown potential in treating breast cancer. Yet, there are still difficulties in the development of targeted medicines for breast cancer, such as figuring out which patient subgroups may benefit from these therapies and dealing with drug resistance problems. Notwithstanding these difficulties, kinase-targeted treatments for breast cancer still have a lot of potential. The development of tailored medicines will continue to be fuelled by the identification of novel targets and biomarkers for breast cancer as a result of advancements in genomic and proteomic technology.

Prognostic Value of Erythroblastic Leukemia Viral Oncogene Homolog 2 and Neuregulin 4 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Although the roles of erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ERBB2), neuregulin 4 (NRG4), and mitogen-inducible gene 6 (MIG6) in epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other malignancies have been previously investigated, the prognostic value of their serum levels in HCC remains undetermined. In the present study, correlations between serum levels and tumor characteristics, overall survival, and tumor recurrence were analyzed. Furthermore, the prognostic potential of the serum levels of these biomarkers was evaluated relative to that of alpha-fetoprotein. Both ERBB2 and NRG4 correlated with the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, ERBB2 correlated with the tumor-maximal diameter, and NRG4 correlated with a tumor number. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that ERBB2 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.719; p = 0.007) was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. Furthermore, ERBB2 (HR, 2.338; p = 0.002) and NRG4 (HR, 431.763; p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for tumor recurrence. The products of ERBB2 and NRG4 had a better area under the curve than alpha-fetoprotein for predicting 6-month, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality. Therefore, these factors could be used to evaluate prognosis and monitor treatment response in patients with HCC.

Outcomes for the first four lines of therapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: results from the SONABRE registry

PURPOSE

We assessed the systemic treatment choices and outcomes in patients diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive (HER2 +) advanced breast cancer (ABC), for the first four lines of systemic therapy and by hormone receptor (HR) status.

METHODS

We identified 330 patients diagnosed with HER2 + ABC in 2013-2018 in the Southeast of The Netherlands, of whom 64% with HR + /HER2 + and 36% with HR-/HER2 + disease. Overall survival (OS) from start of therapy was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In real world, 95% of patients with HR + /HER2 + and 74% of patients with HR-/HER2 + disease received systemic therapy. In HR + /HER2 + disease, use of endocrine, chemo- and HER2-targeted therapy was , respectively, 64%, 46% and 60% in first line, and 39%, 64% and 75% in fourth line. In HR-/HER2 + disease, 91-96% of patients received chemotherapy and 77-91% HER2-targeted therapy, irrespective of line of therapy. In patients with HR + /HER2 + disease, median OS was 34.9 months (95%CI:25.8-44.0) for the first line and 12.8 months (95%CI:10.7-14.9) for the fourth line. In HR-/HER2 + disease, median OS was 39.9 months (95%CI:23.9-55.8) for the first line and 15.2 months (95%CI:10.9-19.5) for the fourth line. For patients treated with first-line pertuzumab, trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, median OS was not reached at 56.0 months in HR + /HER2 + disease and 48.4 months (95%CI:32.6-64.3) in HR-/HER2 + disease.

CONCLUSION

Survival times for later lines of therapy are surprisingly long and justify the use of multiple lines of systemic therapy in well-selected patients with HER2 + ABC. Our real-world evidence adds valuable observations to the accumulating evidence that within HER2 + ABC, the HR status defines two distinct disease subtypes.

HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Available Treatments and Current Developments

For several years, the overexpression of the HER2 receptor in breast cancer has been correlated with a poor prognosis and an increased risk of developing brain metastases. Currently, the combination of anti-HER2 double blockade and taxane and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) are considered the standard treatments for metastatic breast cancer overexpressing these receptors in the first and second line. Very recently, the development of a new antidrug conjugate, trastuzumab–deruxtecan, has improved the overall survival of patients, even in second-line treatment. However, trastuzumab–deruxtecan has become a new standard. Despite the benefits of these antidrug conjugates, this benefit in patients with brain metastases remains unclear. Tucatinib is a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has given hope for the treatment of these patients. The objective of this article was to review data on the established drugs and novel agents for HER2-positive MBC and to discuss how to incorporate anti-HER2 therapies in first and later-line settings.

HER2DX ERBB2 mRNA expression in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer treated with T-DM1

In advanced HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, the new antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan is more effective compared with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). However, trastuzumab deruxtecan can have considerable toxicities, and the right treatment sequence is unknown. Biomarkers to guide the use of anti-HER2 therapies beyond HER2 status are needed. Here, we evaluated if preestablished levels of ERBB2 mRNA expression according to the HER2DX standardized assay are associated with response and survival following T-DM1. In ERBB2 low, medium, and high groups, the overall response rate was 0%, 29%, and 56%, respectively (P < .001). ERBB2 mRNA was statistically significantly associated with better progression-free survival (P = .002) and overall survival (OS; P = .02). These findings were independent of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) levels, hormone receptor, age, brain metastasis, and line of therapy. The HER2DX risk score (P = .04) and immunoglobulin signature (P = .04) were statistically significantly associated with overall survival since diagnosis. HER2DX provides prognostic and predictive information following T-DM1 in advanced HER2+ breast cancer.

Review of the status of neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer

Purpose

The development of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapies has revolutionized the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. The aim of this article is to review the continually evolving treatment strategies in the neoadjuvant setting of HER2-positive breast cancer, as well as the current challenges and future perspectives.

Methods

Searches were undertaken on PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov for relevant publications and trials.

Findings

The current standard of care in high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer is to combine chemotherapy with dual anti-HER2 therapy, for a synergistic anti-tumor effect. We discuss the pivotal trials which led to the adoption of this approach, as well as the benefit of these neoadjuvant strategies for guiding appropriate adjuvant therapy. De-escalation strategies are currently being investigated to avoid over treatment, and aim to safely reduce chemotherapy, while optimizing HER2-targeted therapies. The development and validation of a reliable biomarker is essential to enable these de-escalation strategies and personalization of treatment. In addition, promising novel therapies are currently being explored to further improve outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Addition of endocrine therapy to dual anti-HER2 targeted therapy in initial treatment of HER2 + /HR + metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Dual anti-HER2 targeted therapy and chemotherapy is the current first-line standard of care for HER2 + metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with endocrine therapy (ET) the backbone of treatment in hormone receptor positive (HR +) disease. The potential ET benefit in HER2 + /HR + patients is unknown as pivotal dual anti-HER2 clinical trials precluded ET use.

METHODS

Real-world data from a multi-site registry of consecutive HER2 + MBC patients treated at clinician discretion were examined. Patients that were HR + (ER + and/or PR +) and had received first-line chemotherapy alongside trastuzumab and pertuzumab were explored. Of 362 patients in the registry, 215 were excluded due to being HR- (n = 210) or not receiving chemotherapy (n = 5).

RESULTS

Of the 147 patients included, 91 (62%) received concurrent ET and 56 (38%) had not. Comparing the groups, there were no significant differences in age, performance status, metastatic sites, use of previous therapy and de novo metastatic disease. More patients with ER + PR + disease versus those with ER + PR- or ER-PR + received ET (73 vs 45%). The addition of ET was associated with significantly improved 5-year PFS (HR 0.58, CI 0.37-0.89, p = 0.014) and OS (HR 0.52, CI 0.31-0.90, p = 0.018), with no increase in adverse events noted.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ET to first-line dual anti-HER2 therapy post chemotherapy in patients with HER2 + /HR + MBC was associated with major gains in PFS and OS with no safety concerns evident. Further studies of this combination are justified, along with studies of how best to integrate other agents that are active in this patient subset, including CDK4/6 inhibitors.

An anti-EGFR antibody-drug conjugate overcomes resistance to HER2-targeted drugs

Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that was approved in 2013 to treat HER2+ breast cancer. Despite its efficacy in the clinic, some patients exhibit intrinsic or acquired resistance to such ADC. To characterize mechanisms of resistance to T-DM1, we isolated several HER2+ resistant clones derived from the HCC1954 HER2+ cell line. The isolated clones were different as per their transcriptomic profiles. However, all the T-DM1-resistant clones showed decreased HER2 levels. Yet, the clones were still oncogenically dependent on HER2, as indicated by knock down experiments. The decrease in HER2 expression caused acquired resistance to T-DM1 and to other anti-HER2 therapies. Antibody array analyses showed that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was expressed in these T-DM1-resistant HCC1954 clones. Indeed, therapies targeting EGFR, particularly cetuximab-DM1, demonstrated a strong anti-proliferative action on cells with acquired resistance to T-DM1 and HER2 loss. The expression of EGFR in cells resistant to T-DM1 offers the possibility of using therapies directed to this receptor to combat resistance to anti-HER2 drugs and loss of HER2 overexpression.

Targeted Therapy and Personalized Medicine

Targeted therapy and personalized medicine are novel emerging disciplines of cancer research intended for treatment and prevention. One of the most significant advancements in modern oncology is the shift from an organ-centric strategy to a personalized strategy guided by deep molecular analysis. This shift in view, which focuses on the tumour's precise molecular changes, has paved the way for individualized treatment. Researchers and clinicians are using targeted therapies to select the best treatment available based on the molecular characterization of malignant cancer. In the treatment of a cancer, personalized medicine entails the use of genetic, immunological, and proteomic profiling to provide therapeutic alternatives as well as prognostic information about cancer. In this book, targeted therapies and personalized medicine have been covered for specific malignancies, including latest FDA-approved targeted therapies and it also sheds light on effective anti-cancer regimens and drug resistance. This will help to enhance our ability to conduct individualized health planning, make early diagnoses, and choose optimal medications for each cancer patient with predictable side effects and outcomes in a quickly evolving era. Various applications and tools' capacity have been improved for early diagnosis of cancer and the growing number of clinical trials that choose specific molecular targets reflects this predicament. Nevertheless, there are several limitations that must need to be addressed. Hence, in this chapter, we will discuss recent advancements, challenges, and opportunities in personalized medicine for various cancers, with a specific emphasis on target therapies in diagnostics and therapeutics.

Systemic Therapy for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Current and Future Trends

Approximately 20% of breast cancers (BC) overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). This subtype of BC is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease that was associated with an increased risk for the development of systemic and brain metastases and poor overall survival before anti-HER2 therapies were developed. The standard of care was dual blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab as first-line followed by TDM-1 as second-line. However, with the advent of new HER2-targeted monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibody- drug conjugates, the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-positive BC have changed dramatically in recent years, leading to a paradigm shift in the treatment of the disease. Notably, the development of new-generation ADCs has led to unprecedented results compared with T-DM1, currently establishing trastuzumab deruxtecan as a new standard of care in second-line. Despite the widespread availability of HER2-targeted therapies, patients with HER2-positive BC continue to face the challenges of disease progression, treatment resistance, and brain metastases. Response rate and overall life expectancy decrease with each additional line of treatment, and tumor heterogeneity remains an issue. In this review, we update the new-targeted therapeutic options for HER2-positive BC and highlight the future perspectives of treatment in this setting.

Therapeutic landscape of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer in 2022

HER2-positive breast cancer is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with five-year survival rates of 30% for the advanced stage. The development of anti-HER2 treatments has led to a paradigm shift in the management and clinical outcomes of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients. The standard first-line treatment consists of taxane-based chemotherapy plus dual anti-HER2 therapies with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has been a second-line therapeutic standard, but the second-line treatment approach is rapidly evolving. Given a substantial advantage of another ADC, Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), compared to T-DM1 in a recent randomized trial in the second-line setting, T-DXd is currently the preferred second-line option. Optimal third-line treatment strategies are still not established, and multiple approaches have been used including combinations based on capecitabine, trastuzumab, or both with oral anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Tucatinib plus capecitabine and trastuzumab, lapatinib plus trastuzumab, neratinib or lapatinib plus capecitabine are some of the FDA approved combinations. Another newer agent approved for third- or later-line therapy in the metastatic setting is margetuximab, an Fc-engineered anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, in combination with chemotherapy. Other novel agents currently under clinical trials are the drugs that indirectly target HER2, including immune cell cycle inhibitors, PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, and immunotherapy agents.

Targeted therapy for breast cancer: An overview of drug classes and outcomes

The last 25 years have seen significant growth in new therapeutic options for breast cancer, termed targeted therapies based on their ability to block specific pathways known to drive breast tumor growth and survival. Introduction of these drugs has been made possible through advances in the understanding of breast cancer biology. While the promise of targeted therapy for breast cancer has been clear for some time, the experience of the clinical use of multiple drugs and drug classes allows us to now present a summary and perspective as to the success and impact of this endeavor. Here we will review breast cancer targeted therapeutics in clinical use. We will provide the rationale for their indications and summarize clinical data in patients with different breast cancer subtypes, their impact on breast cancer progression and survival and their major adverse effects. The focus of this review will be on the development that has occurred within classes of targeted therapies and subsequent impact on breast cancer patient outcomes. We will conclude with a perspective on the role of targeted therapy in breast cancer treatment and highlight future areas of development.

Challenges and opportunities in metastatic breast cancer treatments: Nano-drug combinations delivered preferentially to metastatic cells may enhance therapeutic response

Despite advances in breast cancer treatments and related 5-year survival outcomes, metastatic breast cancer cures remain elusive. The current standard of care includes a combination of surgery, radiation therapy and drug therapy. However, even the most advanced procedures and treatments do not prevent breast cancer recurrence and metastasis. Once metastasis occurs, patient prognosis is poor. Recent elucidation of the spatiotemporal transit of metastatic cancer cells from primary tumor sites to distant sites provide an opportunity to integrate knowledge of drug disposition in our effort to enhance drug localization and exposure in cancer laden tissues . Novel technologies have been developed, but could be further refined to facilitate the distribution of drugs to target cancer cells and tissues. The purpose of this review is to highlight the challenges in metastatic breast cancer treatment and focus on novel drug combination and nanotechnology approaches to overcome the challenges. With improved definition of metastatic tissue target, directed localization and retention of multiple, pharmacologically active drugs to tissues and cells of interest may overcome the limitations in breast cancer treatment that may lead to a cure for breast cancer.

Current challenges and unmet needs in treating patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 oncogene (HER2-positive) overexpression/amplification occurs in less than 20% of breast cancers and has traditionally been associated with poor prognosis. Development of therapies that target HER2 has significantly improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). Currently available HER2-targeted agents include the monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and margetuximab, the small-molecule inhibitors lapatinib, tucatinib, neratinib, and pyrotinib, as well as the antibody-drug conjugates trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan. Optimal sequencing of these agents in the continuum of the disease is critical to maximize treatment outcomes. The large body of clinical evidence generated over the past 2 decades aids clinicians in treatment decision-making. However, patients with HER2-positive ABC and specific disease characteristics and/or comorbidities, such as leptomeningeal disease, brain metastases, or cardiac dysfunction, are generally excluded from large randomized clinical trials, and elderly or frail patients are often underrepresented. In addition, there is great inequality in the accessibility of approved drugs across countries. This article addresses various challenging clinical situations when treating patients with HER2-positive ABC. The objective is to provide guidance to clinicians on how and when HER2-targeted therapies and additional treatments can be best implemented in routine clinical practice, on the basis of existing clinical evidence and expert opinion where needed.

Systemic Treatment of Breast Cancer. 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer

This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified based on the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The professional guideline primarily reflects the resolutions and recommendations of the current ESMO, NCCN and ABC5, as well as that of the St. Gallen Consensus Conference statements. The recommendations cover classical prognostic factors and certain multigene tests, which play an important role in therapeutic decision-making. From a didactic point of view, the text first addresses early and then locally advanced breast cancer, followed by locoregionally recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Within these, we discuss each group according to the available therapeutic options. At the end of the recommendations, we summarize the criteria for treatment in certain rare clinical situations.

Targeted Therapeutic Options and Future Perspectives for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

The development of several antiHuman Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) treatments over the last few years has improved the landscape of HER2-positive breast cancer. Despite this, relapse is still the main issue in HER2-positive breast cancer. The reasons for therapeutic failure lie in the heterogeneity of the disease itself, as well as in the drug resistance mechanisms. In this review, we intended to understand the milestones that have had an impact on this disease up to their implementation in clinical practice. In addition, understanding the underlying molecular biology of HER2-positive disease is essential for the optimization and personalization of the different treatment options. For this reason, we focused on two relevant aspects, which are triple-positive disease and the role that modulation of the immune response might play in treatment and prognosis.

Abstract

Despite the improvement achieved by the introduction of HER2-targeted therapy, up to 25% of early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) patients will relapse. Beyond trastuzumab, other agents approved for early HER2+ BC include the monoclonal antibody pertuzumab, the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and the reversible HER2 inhibitor lapatinib. New agents, such as trastuzumab-deruxtecan or tucatinib in combination with capecitabine and trastuzumab, have also shown a significant improvement in the metastatic setting. Other therapeutic strategies to overcome treatment resistance have been explored in HER2+ BC, mainly in HER2+ that also overexpress estrogen receptors (ER+). In ER+ HER2+ patients, target therapies such as phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibition or cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 blocking may be effective in controlling downstream of HER2 and many of the cellular pathways associated with resistance to HER2-targeted therapies. Multiple trials have explored these strategies with some promising results, and probably, in the next years conclusive results will succeed. In addition, HER2+ BC is known to be more immunogenic than other BC subgroups, with high variability between tumors. Different immunotherapeutic agents such as HER-2 therapy plus checkpoint inhibitors, or new vaccines approaches have been investigated in this setting, with promising but controversial results obtained to date.

Modern developments in germline pharmacogenomics for oncology prescribing

The integration of genomic data into personalized treatment planning has revolutionized oncology care. Despite this, patients with cancer remain vulnerable to high rates of adverse drug events and medication inefficacy, affecting prognosis and quality of life. Pharmacogenomics is a field seeking to identify germline genetic variants that contribute to an individual's unique drug response. Although there is widespread integration of genomic information in oncology, somatic platforms, rather than germline biomarkers, have dominated the attention of cancer providers. Patients with cancer potentially stand to benefit from improved integration of both somatic and germline genomic information, especially because the latter may complement treatment planning by informing toxicity risk for drugs with treatment-limiting tolerabilities and narrow therapeutic indices. Although certain germline pharmacogenes, such as TPMT, UGT1A1, and DPYD, have been recognized for decades, recent attention has illuminated modern potential dosing implications for a whole new set of anticancer agents, including targeted therapies and antibody-drug conjugates, as well as the discovery of additional genetic variants and newly relevant pharmacogenes. Some of this information has risen to the level of directing clinical action, with US Food and Drug Administration label guidance and recommendations by international societies and governing bodies. This review is focused on key new pharmacogenomic evidence and oncology-specific dosing recommendations. Personalized oncology care through integrated pharmacogenomics represents a unique multidisciplinary collaboration between oncologists, laboratory science, bioinformatics, pharmacists, clinical pharmacologists, and genetic counselors, among others. The authors posit that expanded consideration of germline genetic information can further transform the safe and effective practice of oncology in 2022 and beyond.

Central nervous system disease in phase III studies for advanced HER2 positive breast cancer: A review

Importance

The introduction of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) directed therapy has transformed the outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer (BC). However, HER2 positive breast cancer has a predilection for the central nervous system (CNS) which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Understanding the intracranial activity of novel HER2 directed agents is key to developing treatments as well as possible preventative strategies for HER2-positive CNS disease.

Observations

Using protocols and data from published phase III clinical trials for locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer since the licensing of single agent trastuzumab for advanced BC we review the central nervous system related aspects. This includes CNS related entry criteria, use of baseline and on study cross-sectional imaging of the CNS and protocol and non-protocol defined CNS end points and reported data.

Conclusions

and Relevance: This review found heterogeneity between studies with regard to the entry criteria, use of CNS imaging and reported end points within the pivotal phase III studies. Based on these data, a standardisation of both entry criteria and end points with regard to the CNS should be developed and applied to future studies of HER2-positive advanced BC. Such an approach would enable the generation of comparable data and allow a meaningful analysis of different treatment approaches with regard to the CNS. This in turn would allow the development of the most optimal treatment approaches for HER2 positive CNS disease and ultimately the development of preventative strategies.

•

Heterogeneity exists with respect to the CNS in studies of advanced HER2 positive breast cancer.

•

A standardised approach to the CNS is required in future clinical trials.

•

This would enable the generation of comparable CNS data for meaningful analysis.

•

This would aid the development of treatments for HER2 positive CNS disease.

Fucoxanthin Is a Potential Therapeutic Agent for the Treatment of Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers diagnosed and the leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Although there are first-line treatments for BC, drug resistances and adverse events have been reported. Given the incidence of BC keeps increasing, seeking novel therapeutics is urgently needed. Fucoxanthin (Fx) is a dietary carotenoid commonly found in seaweeds and diatoms. Both in vitro and in vivo studies show that Fx and its deacetylated metabolite fucoxanthinol (Fxol) inhibit and prevent BC growth. The NF-κB signaling pathway is considered the major pathway contributing to the anti-proliferation, anti-angiogenesis and pro-apoptotic effects of Fx and Fxol. Other signaling molecules such as MAPK, MMP2/9, CYP and ROS are also involved in the anti-cancer effects by regulating the tumor microenvironment, cancer metastasis, carcinogen metabolism and oxidation. Besides, Fx also possesses anti-obesity effects by regulating UCP1 levels and lipid metabolism, which may help to reduce BC risk. More importantly, mounting evidence demonstrates that Fx overcomes drug resistance. This review aims to give an updated summary of the anti-cancer effects of Fx and summarize the underlying mechanisms of action, which will provide novel strategies for the development of Fx as an anti-cancer therapeutic agent.

Validity of data extraction in evidence synthesis practice of adverse events: reproducibility study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the validity of data extraction in systematic reviews of adverse events, the effect of data extraction errors on the results, and to develop a classification framework for data extraction errors to support further methodological research.

DESIGN

Reproducibility study.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched for eligible systematic reviews published between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2020. Metadata from the randomised controlled trials were extracted from the systematic reviews by four authors. The original data sources (eg, full text and ClinicalTrials.gov) were then referred to by the same authors to reproduce the data used in these meta-analyses.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Systematic reviews were included when based on randomised controlled trials for healthcare interventions that reported safety as the exclusive outcome, with at least one pair meta-analysis that included five or more randomised controlled trials and with a 2×2 table of data for event counts and sample sizes in intervention and control arms available for each trial in the meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was data extraction errors summarised at three levels: study level, meta-analysis level, and systematic review level. The potential effect of such errors on the results was further investigated.

RESULTS

201 systematic reviews and 829 pairwise meta-analyses involving 10 386 randomised controlled trials were included. Data extraction could not be reproduced in 1762 (17.0%) of 10 386 trials. In 554 (66.8%) of 829 meta-analyses, at least one randomised controlled trial had data extraction errors; 171 (85.1%) of 201 systematic reviews had at least one meta-analysis with data extraction errors. The most common types of data extraction errors were numerical errors (49.2%, 867/1762) and ambiguous errors (29.9%, 526/1762), mainly caused by ambiguous definitions of the outcomes. These categories were followed by three others: zero assumption errors, misidentification, and mismatching errors. The impact of these errors were analysed on 288 meta-analyses. Data extraction errors led to 10 (3.5%) of 288 meta-analyses changing the direction of the effect and 19 (6.6%) of 288 meta-analyses changing the significance of the P value. Meta-analyses that had two or more different types of errors were more susceptible to these changes than those with only one type of error (for moderate changes, 11 (28.2%) of 39 v 26 (10.4%) 249, P=0.002; for large changes, 5 (12.8%) of 39 v 8 (3.2%) of 249, P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Systematic reviews of adverse events potentially have serious issues in terms of the reproducibility of the data extraction, and these errors can mislead the conclusions. Implementation guidelines are urgently required to help authors of future systematic reviews improve the validity of data extraction.

Evolving management of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease

Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer are at a particularly high risk of breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Improvements in systemic therapy have translated to improved survival for patients with HER2-positive BCBM and LMD. However, the optimal management of these cases is rapidly evolving and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Herein, a team of radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, neuro-oncologists, and breast surgeon created a review of the evolving management of HER2-positive BCBM and LMD. We assess the epidemiology, diagnosis, and evolving treatment options for patients with HER2-positive BCBM and LMD, as well as the ongoing prospective clinical trials enrolling these patients. The management of HER2-positive BCBM and LMD represents an increasingly common challenge that involves the coordination of local and systemic therapy. Advances in systemic therapy have resulted in an improved prognosis, and promising targeted therapies currently under prospective investigation have the potential to further benefit these patients.

Targeted Nanoparticle for Co-delivery of HER2 siRNA and a Taxane to Mirror the Standard Treatment of HER2+ Breast Cancer: Efficacy in Breast Tumor and Brain Metastasis

The first-line treatment of advanced and metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2+) breast cancer requires two HER2-targeting antibodies (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) and a taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel). The three-drug regimen costs over $320,000 per treatment course, requires a 4 h infusion time, and has many adverse side effects, while achieving only 18 months of progression-free survival. To replace this regimen, reduce infusion time, and enhance efficacy, a single therapeutic is developed based on trastuzumab-conjugated nanoparticles for co-delivering docetaxel and siRNA against HER2 (siHER2). The optimal nanoconstruct has a hydrodynamic size of 100 nm and specifically treats HER2+ breast cancer cells over organ-derived normal cells. In a drug-resistant orthotopic HER2+ HCC1954 tumor mouse model, the nanoconstruct inhibits tumor growth more effectively than the docetaxel and trastuzumab combination. When coupled with microbubble-assisted focused ultrasound that transiently disrupts the blood brain barrier, the nanoconstruct inhibits the growth of trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ BT474 tumors residing in the brains of mice. The nanoconstruct has a favorable safety profile in cells and in mice. Combination therapies have become the cornerstone of cancer treatment and this versatile nanoparticle platform can co-deliver multiple therapeutic types to ensure that they reach the target cells at the same time to realize their synergy.

Targeted Therapy, Chemotherapy, Immunotherapy and Novel Treatment Options for Different Subtypes of Salivary Gland Cancer

Surgical resection remains the first line treatment for salivary gland cancer (SGC). In the case of locally advanced disease, surgery is followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Surgical resection should be favored in resectable locoregional recurrent disease as well, and even the complete resection of all distant oligometastases has clinical benefit for the patients. For inoperable and disseminated metastatic disease, a multitude of systemic therapies including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy are available. In this review, the current therapeutic options for inoperable recurrent or metastatic SGCs are summarized. Systemic treatment can achieve prolonged progression-free and overall survival, while the overall prognosis remains poor. Current clinical trials include only a limited number of patients and mostly combine different histologic subtypes. Additionally, no randomized controlled trial comparing different therapeutic options has been performed. In the future, further studies with a larger patient cohort and ideally only one histologic subtype are needed in order to improve the outcome for SGC patients. However, this may be difficult to accomplish due to the rarity and diversity of the disease. Additionally, molecular analyses need to be performed routinely in order to individualize treatment and to go one step further towards precision medicine.

Genomic Alterations in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Level of Evidence According to ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT)

Development of high-throughput technologies helped to decipher tumor genomic landscapes revealing actionable molecular alterations. We aimed to rank the level of evidence of recurrent actionable molecular alterations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) on the basis of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) to help the clinicians prioritize treatment. We identified actionable alterations in 33 genes. HRAS-activating mutations were ranked in tier IB because of the efficacy of tipifarnib (farnesyltransferase inhibitor) in HRAS-mutated patients with HNSCC (nonrandomized clinical trial). Microsatellite instability (MSI), high tumor mutational burden (TMB), and NTRK fusions were ranked in tier IC because of PD-1 and TRK tyrosine kinase inhibitors tissue-agnostic approvals. CDKN2A-inactivating alterations and EGFR amplification were ranked in tier IIA because of the efficacy of palbociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) and afatinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in these respective molecular subgroups in retrospective analyses of clinical trials. Molecular alterations in several genes, including PIK3CA gene, were ranked in tier IIIA because of clinical benefit in other tumor types, whereas molecular alterations in IGF1R and TP53 genes were ranked in tier IVA and tier V, respectively. The most compelling actionable molecular alterations in HNSCC according to ESCAT include HRAS-activating mutations, MSI, high TMB, NTRK fusions, CDKN2A-inactivating alterations, and EGFR amplification.

Prioritising systemic cancer therapies applying ESMO’s tools and other resources to assist in improving cancer care globally: the Kazakh experience

Background

In Kazakhstan, cancer is the second leading cause of death with a major public health and economic burden. In the last decade, cancer care and cancer medicine costs have significantly increased. To improve the efficiency and efficacy of cancer care expenditure and planning, the Kazakhstan Ministry of Health requested assistance from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) to review its systemic cancer treatment protocols and essential medicines list and identify high-impact, effective regimens.

Materials and methods

ESMO developed a four-phase approach to review Kazakhstan cancer treatment protocols: (i) perform a systematic analysis of the country’s cancer medicines and treatment protocols; (ii) cross-reference the country’s cancer protocols with the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale and the European Medicines Agency’s medicine availability and indications database; (iii) extract treatment recommendations from the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines; (iv) expert review for all cancer medicines not on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines and the country treatment protocols.

Results

This ESMO four-phase approach led to the update of the Kazakhstan national essential cancer medicines list and the list of cancer treatment protocols. This review has led to the withdrawal of several low-value or non-evidence-based medicines and a budget increase for cancer care to include all essential and highly effective medicines and treatment options.

Conclusion

When applied effectively, this four-phase approach can improve access to medicines, efficiency of expenditure and sustainability of cancer systems. The WHO–ESMO collaboration illustrated how, by sharing best practices, tools and resources, we can address access to cancer medicines and positively impact patient care.

•

In Kazakhstan, from 2009 to 2019, there was a significant increase in costs of cancer care and cancer medicines.

•

ESMO, under the guidance of WHO, reviewed the Kazakh cancer treatment protocols and national essential medicines list.

•

The ESMO four-phase approach helped Kazakhstan in prioritising the most effective and high-impact cancer medicines.

•

This approach can be applied in the evaluation of any national formulary as it uses open-access, evidence-based references.

•

This collaboration is an example of how we can improve access to cancer medicines and positively impact patient care.

Can Systems Biology Advance Clinical Precision Oncology?

Precision oncology is perceived as a way forward to treat individual cancer patients. However, knowing particular cancer mutations is not enough for optimal therapeutic treatment, because cancer genotype-phenotype relationships are nonlinear and dynamic. Systems biology studies the biological processes at the systems' level, using an array of techniques, ranging from statistical methods to network reconstruction and analysis, to mathematical modeling. Its goal is to reconstruct the complex and often counterintuitive dynamic behavior of biological systems and quantitatively predict their responses to environmental perturbations. In this paper, we review the impact of systems biology on precision oncology. We show examples of how the analysis of signal transduction networks allows to dissect resistance to targeted therapies and inform the choice of combinations of targeted drugs based on tumor molecular alterations. Patient-specific biomarkers based on dynamical models of signaling networks can have a greater prognostic value than conventional biomarkers. These examples support systems biology models as valuable tools to advance clinical and translational oncological research.

Research Progress on the Role of Regulatory T Cell in Tumor Microenvironment in the Treatment of Breast Cancer

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex ecosystem comprised of cancer cells, stromal cells, and immune cells. Analysis of the composition of TME is essential to assess the prognosis of patients with breast cancer (BC) and the efficacy of different regimes. Treg plays a crucial role in the microenvironment of breast cancer subtypes, and its function contributes to the development and progression of BC by suppressing anti-tumor immunity directly or indirectly through multiple mechanisms. In addition, conventional treatments, such as anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neo-therapies, such as immune-checkpoint blockades, have a significant impact on the absence of Tregs in BC TME, thus gaining additional anti-tumor effect to some extent. Strikingly, Treg in BC TME revealed the predicted efficacy of some therapeutic strategies. All these results suggest that we can manipulate the abundance of Treg to achieve the ultimate effect of both conventional and novel treatments. In this review, we discuss new insights into the characteristics of Treg in BC TME, the impact of different regiments on Treg, and the possibilities of Treg as a predictive marker of efficacy for certain treatments.

The efficacy of lapatinib in patients with metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer who received prior therapy with monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugate: a single institutional experience

The choice of the anti-HER2 agent depends on country-specific availability, the specific, previously administered anti-HER2 therapy and the relapse-free interval, although there is not much published data on the use of lapatinib after progression on pertuzumab and/or T-DM1. The aim of this research is to determine efficacy of lapatinib in this setting. This research included 111 patients with metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer who received lapatinib with capecitabine at The Oncology Institute of Vojvodina. Lapatinib was given to 83 patients after trastuzumab without prior exposure to pertuzumab or T-DM1 while 28 patients received lapatinib after prior exposure to trastuzumab, pertuzumab and/or T-DM1. In order to determine efficacy of lapatinib in both groups, we measured progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as by subsets: hormonal status (ER-positive and/or PR-positive tumours versus ER-negative and PR-negative tumours), the number of positive axillary lymph nodes (four or more positive axillary lymph nodes versus less than four positive axillary lymph nodes), marker of proliferation (Ki-67 ≥ 30 versus Ki-67 < 30), disease free interval (metastatic recurrence ≤ 1 year after initial diagnosis versus metastatic recurrence > 1 year after initial diagnosis or de novo metastatic disease. Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI 4.6-6.6) in the group of patients who received lapatinib after prior exposure to trastuzumab, pertuzumab and/or T-DM 1 and 7.4 months (95% CI 6.1-10.2) in the group of patients who received lapatinib after trastuzumab (HR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.61-0.98; P = 0.09). The patients with negative prognostic factors such as hormone receptor negativity, more than four positive axillary lymph nodes, marker of proliferation Ki 67 ≥ 30 and metastatic recurrence ≤ 1 year after initial diagnosis, had a similar PFS, regardless of receiving lapatinib after prior exposure to trastuzumab, pertuzumab and/or T-DM1 or without prior exposure. Median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI 8.6-NR) in the group that received lapatinib after exposure to trastuzumab, pertuzumab and/or T-DM1 and 16.3 months (95% CI 14.4-20.2) in the group of patients who received lapatinib after trastuzumab (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.94; P = 0.04). Patients with negative prognostic factors such as hormone receptor negativity, more than four positive axillary lymph nodes and marker of proliferation Ki 67 ≥ 30, had no distinctly worse OS, regardless of receiving lapatinib after prior exposure to trastuzumab, pertuzumab and/or T-DM1 or without prior exposure. Lapatinib with capecitabine is an effective therapeutic option, especially in patients with negative prognostic factors, who have received prior chemotherapy, trastuzumab, pertuzumab, T-DM1 and remains an acceptable option for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer until the novel drugs are approved in developing countries.

Management of Diarrhea in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neratinib: A Case Series and Summary of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Neratinib and neratinib-based combinations have demonstrated efficacy for treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) early-stage and metastatic breast cancers. However, diarrhea has been reported as a common adverse event leading to neratinib discontinuation. Results from the CONTROL trial suggest that proactive diarrhea management with antidiarrheal prophylaxis or dose escalation of neratinib from a lower starting dose to the full FDA-approved dose of 240 mg/day can reduce the incidence, duration, and severity of neratinib-associated diarrhea in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Dose escalation has been included in the FDA-approved label for both early-stage and metastatic HER2+ breast cancer since June 2021.

CASE SERIES

This series of five cases details real-world clinical implementation of strategies for management of neratinib-induced diarrhea in patients with early-stage and metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, including a patient with a pre-existing gastrointestinal disorder.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

In four of five cases, diarrhea was managed with neratinib dose escalation, and antidiarrheal prophylaxis with loperamide plus colestipol was used in the remaining case. Management of diarrhea allowed all patients to remain on therapy.

DISCUSSION

This case series shows that neratinib-associated diarrhea can be managed effectively with neratinib dose escalation from a lower initial starting dose and/or prophylactic antidiarrheal medications in a real-world clinical setting. The findings highlight the importance of patient-provider communication in proactive management of adverse events. Widespread implementation of the strategies described here may improve adherence and thereby clinical outcomes for patients with HER2+ breast cancer treated with neratinib.

Case Report: Effective Treatment With Pyrotinib and Capecitabine in a Heavily Pretreated Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Harboring Both HER2 Overexpression and Mutant

The prognosis for female patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) has improved with the emergence of novel drugs, especially for those who have HER2 overexpression or ERBB-2 amplification. Trastuzumab-based regimen has been the paradigm in guidelines as first-line therapy, whereas many patients got progressive disease after several cycles of treatment or rapidly progress because of primary resistance. Point mutations of ERBB2 gene occur in both HER2-amplication and non-amplification patients, with a 2% ratio in HER2 non-amplification cohort and 1.48% in HER2 amplication population. The acquired mutation ratio of ERBB2 substantially raised to 16.7%–17.7% in patients prior to trastuzumab treatment. ERBB2 mutation may be a critical reason of resistance and disease progression among the patients treated with anti-HER2 monoclonal trastuzumab or dual anti-HER2 antibodies with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, or tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. ERBB-2 mutation with L755S and V842I indicates resistance to trastuzumab, while that with L755S and K753I indicates resistance to lapatinib; these mutations maybe sensitive to pan-HER tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. A 48-year woman diagnosed with HER2-positive LABC developed trastuzumab resistance after three lines of trastuzumab cross-line treatment with partial response (PR) as the best response. The tissue was performed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the results discovered L755S in ERBB2 gene. Then, she received effective treatment with pyrotinib plus capecitabine and underwent mastectomy after six cycles of combined treatment with PR. Subsequently, breast mastectomy was performed, and she took pyrotinib plus capecitabine for 1 year and pyrotinib monotherapy for another 1 year as adjuvant therapy and achieved a long-term clinical benefit. In conclusion, pyrotinib is a potential neoadjuvant agent for patients who are heavily pretreated and harbor both ERBB2 amplification and ERBB2 mutant in locally advanced breast cancer.

Cardiac Toxicity Associated with Cancer Immunotherapy and Biological Drugs

Cancer immunotherapy significantly contributed to an improvement in the prognosis of cancer patients. Immunotherapy, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T), share the characteristic to exploit the capabilities of the immune system to kill cancerous cells. Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against HER2 that prevents HER2-mediated signaling; it is administered mainly in HER2-positive cancers, such as breast, colorectal, biliary tract, and non-small-cell lung cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) inhibit the binding of CTLA-4 or PD-1 to PDL-1, allowing T cells to kill cancerous cells. ICI can be used in melanomas, non-small-cell lung cancer, urothelial, and head and neck cancer. There are two main types of T-cell transfer therapy: tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (or TIL) therapy and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T) cell therapy, mainly applied for B-cell lymphoma and leukemia and mantle-cell lymphoma. HER2-targeted therapies, mainly trastuzumab, are associated with left ventricular dysfunction, usually reversible and rarely life-threatening. PD/PDL-1 inhibitors can cause myocarditis, rare but potentially fulminant and associated with a high fatality rate. CAR-T therapy is associated with several cardiac toxic effects, mainly in the context of a systemic adverse effect, the cytokines release syndrome.

Adverse Drug Reactions with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment: An Analysis from the Italian Pharmacovigilance Database

Background

Anti-HER2 therapy has evolved in the last years and an important role in this transformation was that of monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Considering their extended use in clinical practice, some toxicity problems have been highlighted around these drugs.

Objective

To analyze the onset of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to the use of HER2-positive breast cancer treatments through a spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database.

Methods

All ADR reports having as suspected drug trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib, or trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1), recorded into the Report Reazioni Avverse dei Medicinali (RAM) system database for national data and into the Italian SRS database for Sicilian data and collected from 2006 to 2020 have been evaluated. A descriptive analysis of basal demographic and drug-related characteristics was performed. A case-by-case methodology was conducted paying particular attention to the serious ADR reports collected in Sicily, focusing on type of seriousness, age, sex, concomitant drugs, comorbidities, time to onset (TTO), and time to resolution (TTR).

Results

Of the 3609 Italian reports, 65.6% were related to trastuzumab (n = 2367), followed by pertuzumab, TDM-1, and lapatinib. Almost all reports occurred in female patients (94.3%) and were most frequent in the age group 18–65 years (69.6%). A higher number of cases were related to general disorders and administration site conditions (n = 1079; 29.9%), gastrointestinal disorders (n = 1037; 28.7%), skin disorders (n = 821; 22.7%), and blood disorders (n = 599; 16.6%). Cases involving trastuzumab and pertuzumab mainly reported general disorders (n = 788; 33.3% and n = 194; 32.1%, respectively) while more than half of the reports associated with lapatinib were related to gastrointestinal (n = 184; 59.7%) and skin diseases (n = 146; 47.4%). Regarding TDM-1, 40% of reports had at least one ADR belonging to blood and lymphatic system disorders. The case-by-case assessment of Sicilian ADR reports showed that 40 cases were serious (33.3%), with a median TTO of 37 (6–97) days. Serious ADR reports mainly involved the onset of thrombocytopenia (n = 8; 20.0%), diarrhea (n = 6; 15.0%), asthenia and cardiac failure (both with n = 5; 12.5%), vomiting, hypersensitivity, and ejection fraction decreased (all with n = 4; 10.0%) and stomatitis (n = 3: 7.5%).

Conclusion

This study is fundamentally consistent with results from the literature. Given the serious clinical condition of breast cancer and taking into account the importance of preventing some clinically relevant ADRs related to the use of anti-HER2 therapy, further analyses are essential to better describe the safety profile of these target therapies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-021-00278-z.

New strategies for targeting kinase networks in cancer

Targeted strategies against specific driver molecules of cancer have brought about many advances in cancer treatment since the early success of the first small-molecule inhibitor Gleevec. Today, there are a multitude of targeted therapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cancer. However, the initial efficacy of virtually every targeted treatment is often reversed by tumor resistance to the inhibitor through acquisition of new mutations in the target molecule, or reprogramming of the epigenome, transcriptome, or kinome of the tumor cells. At the core of this clinical problem lies the assumption that targeted treatments will only be efficacious if the inhibitors are used at their maximum tolerated doses. Such aggressive regimens create strong selective pressure on the evolutionary progression of the tumor, resulting in resistant cells. High-dose single agent treatments activate alternative mechanisms that bypass the inhibitor, while high-dose combinatorial treatments suffer from increased toxicity resulting in treatment cessation. Although there is an arsenal of targeted agents being tested clinically and preclinically, identifying the most effective combination treatment plan remains a challenge. In this review, we discuss novel targeted strategies with an emphasis on the recent cross-disciplinary studies demonstrating that it is possible to achieve antitumor efficacy without increasing toxicity by adopting low-dose multitarget approaches to treatment of cancer and metastasis.

Clinicopathologic features and treatment advances in cancers with HER2 alterations

HER2 is one of the most important proteins of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family, whose alterations include amplification, overexpression and gene mutation. Growing attention has been given to HER2 as a biomarker for prognosis, an indicator for treatment response and a target for new drugs. Tumors with HER2 alterations have been well studied in multiple locations as distinct entities for treatment, especially breast cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer and colorectal cancer. These four cancers are the leading causes of cancer incidence and cancer-related death worldwide. The present study details the landscape of HER2 amplification/overexpression and mutations and gives an up-to-date analysis of current clinical trials in the four cancers mentioned above. Different HER2-altered cancers not only respond differently to HER2-targeting therapies but also display diverse survival outcomes. Even in the same type of cancer, HER2 amplification/overexpression differs from HER2 mutation in terms of clinicopathologic features and treatment strategies. As an emerging strategy in cancer treatment, immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrate distinct outcomes in HER2-altered breast cancer, gastric cancer and lung cancer.