Pathologic complete response as a potential surrogate for the clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-regression of 29 randomized prospective studies

Final analysis of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has shown promising results for resectable, locoregionally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (L/A HNSCC). We published the first phase II trial of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in resectable, L/A HNSCC, demonstrating it was safe and feasible with favorable pathological complete response (pCR). Here, we report the final analysis results for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in L/A HNSCC (minimum 2.0 years of follow-up).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three cycles of chemoimmunotherapy were administered before surgery to patients with L/A HNSCC. Two-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QOL) were reported.

RESULTS

The overall two-year DFS and OS rates were 90 % and 100 %, respectively. With a median follow-up of 33.7 months, 9 of 10 (90 %) patients with pCR were alive and disease free. Patients with TNM stage (II/III) or < 20 % of residual viable tumor trended toward improved DFS; hazard ratio (HR), 0.44 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.04-5.28] and HR, 0.26 (95 % CI, 0.03-2.36), respectively. All QLQ-C30 functioning and symptom scales other than nausea and vomiting were resolved at 2 years after the completion of radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab in combination with chemotherapy provided encouraging clinical outcomes for patients with L/A HNSCC. Further studies with longer follow-up and larger samples are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900025303. Registered Aug 22, 2019. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=41380.

GAIN2 trial overall survival with intense versus tailored dose dense chemotherapy in early breast cancer

GAIN-2 trial evaluated the optimal intense dose-dense (idd) strategy for high-risk early breast cancer. This study reports the secondary endpoints pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS). Patients (n = 2887) were randomized 1:1 between idd epirubicin, nab-paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEnPC) versus leukocyte nadir-based tailored regimen of dose-dense EC and docetaxel (dtEC-dtD) as adjuvant therapy, with neoadjuvant therapy allowed after amendment. At median follow-up of 6.5 years (overall cohort) and 5.7 years (neoadjuvant cohort, N = 593), both regimens showed comparable 5-year OS rates (iddEnPC 90.8%, dtEC-dtD 90.0%, p = 0.320). In the neoadjuvant setting, iddEnPC yielded a higher pCR rate than dtEC-dtD (51.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.045). Patients achieving pCR had significantly improved 5-year iDFS (88.7% vs. 70.1%, HR 0.33, p < 0.001) and OS rates (93.9% vs. 83.1%, HR 0.32, p < 0.001), but OS outcomes were comparable regardless of pCR status. Thus, iddEnPC demonstrates superior pCR rates compared to dtEC-dtD, yet with comparable survival outcomes.

Tailoring neo/adjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: "The advent of a personalized approach"-The Breast-Gynecological and Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) consensus and recommendations

BACKGROUND

The management of early breast cancer (BC) has witnessed an uprise in the use of neoadjuvant therapy and a remarkable reshaping of the systemic therapy postneoadjuvant treatment in the last few years, with the evolution of many controversial clinical situations that require consensus.

METHODS

During the 14th Breast-Gynecological and Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference held in Egypt in 2022, a panel of 44 BC experts from 13 countries voted on statements concerning debatable challenges in the neo/adjuvant treatment setting. The recommendations were subsequently updated based on the most recent data emerging. A modified Delphi approach was used to develop this consensus. A consensus was achieved when ≥75% of voters selected an answer.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The consensus recommendations addressed different escalation and de-escalation strategies in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy for early BC. The recommendations recapitulate the available clinical evidence and expert opinion to individualize patient management and optimize therapy outcomes. Consensus was reached in 63% of the statements (52/83), and the rationale behind each statement was clarified.

Breast Cancer Patient's Outcomes after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery at 5 and 10 Years for Stage II-III Disease

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer offers the possibility to facilitate breast and axillary surgery; it is a test of chemosensibility in vivo with significant prognostic value and may be used to tailor adjuvant treatment according to the response. Material and Methods: A retrospective single-institution cohort of 482 stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on anthracycline and taxans, plus antiHEr2 in Her2-positive cases, was studied. Survival was calculated at 5 and 10 years. Kaplan-Meier curves with a log-rank test were calculated for differences according to age, BRCA status, menopausal status, TNM, pathological and molecular surrogate subtype, 20% TIL cut-off, surgical procedure, response to chemotherapy and the presence of vascular invasion. Results: The pCR rate was 25.3% and was greater in HER2 (51.3%) and TNBC (31.7%) and in BRCA carriers (41.9%). The factors independently related to patient survival were pathology and molecular surrogate subtype, type of surgery, response to NACT and vascular invasion. BRCA status was a protective prognostic factor without reaching statistical significance, with an HR 0.5 (95%CI 0.1-1.4). Mastectomy presented a double risk of distant recurrence compared to breast-conservative surgery (BCS), supporting BCS as a safe option after NACT. After a mean follow-up of 126 (SD 43) months, luminal tumors presented a substantial difference in survival rates calculated at 5 or 10 years (81.2% compared to 74.7%), whereas that for TNBC was 75.3 and 73.5, respectively. The greatest difference was seen according to the response in patients with pCR, who exhibited a 10 years DDFS of 95.5% vs. 72.4% for those patients without pCR, p < 0001. This difference was especially meaningful in TNBC: the 10 years DDFS according to an RCB of 0 to 3 was 100%, 80.6%, 69% and 49.2%, respectively, p < 0001. Patients with a particularly poor prognosis were those with lobular carcinomas, with a 10 years DDFS of 42.9% vs. 79.7% for ductal carcinomas, p = 0.001, and patients with vascular invasion at the surgical specimen, with a 10 years DDFS of 59.2% vs. 83.6% for those patients without vascular invasion, p < 0.001. Remarkably, BRCA carriers presented a longer survival, with an estimated 10 years DDFS of 89.6% vs. 77.2% for non-carriers, p = 0.054. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can help patients and clinicians make well-informed decisions.

Pathological and clinical outcomes following neoadjuvant dual HER2 therapy for early-stage breast cancer: An Australian institutional real-world experience

AIM

There has been significant progress made in developing novel targeted therapies in the neoadjuvant setting for non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, which may be used in combination with conventional chemotherapy to optimise pathological responses at surgery. However, these therapies, particularly the chemotherapeutic components, may portend significant and long-lasting toxicity. Hence, de-escalation of treatment intensity has been an area of interest and was evaluated in the phase II NeoSphere study. Herein, we report the real-world pathological and survival outcomes from neoadjuvant taxane and dual HER2 blockade recorded at our centre.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving neoadjuvant pertuzumab, trastuzumab and taxane chemotherapy for non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer at a single centre in Sydney, Australia. We collected data pertaining to baseline demographic characteristics, pathological response rates, post-surgical prescribing patterns and also undertook survival analyses for invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) as well as exploratory analyses for correlations between pre-specified clinicopathologic factors and pathological response at surgery.

RESULTS

Our population was largely similar at baseline to the NeoSphere study. 71 patients were included in the final analysis. 61% achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). Three patients received conventional chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. 92% of included patients were alive and disease-free at 3 years of follow-up. Only 3 events of recurrence or death were recorded at a median follow-up of 32 months. No significant difference in iDFS was noted between patients achieving pCR and those with residual disease at surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that de-escalated adjuvant treatment for HER2-positive early breast cancer achieved favourable pathological and long-term outcomes comparable to large trials, some utilising more intensive chemotherapeutic components.

Association of pathological response with long-term survival outcomes after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complete pathological response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) have been proven to have a close association with improved event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients accepting chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, further study focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy is limited. Here we provided an updated and comprehensive evaluation of the association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level and trial level for neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

METHODS

We systematically searched and assessed studies in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and relevant conference abstracts from inception to June 1, 2023. Studies reported EFS/OS results by pCR/MPR status were eligible.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies comprising a total of 4100 patients were eligible for the analysis, which included 39 studies for the patient-level analysis and 5 randomized controlled trials for the trial-level analysis. Our results highlighted that pCR was associated with improved EFS (HR, 0.48 [95 % CI, 0.39-0.60]) and OS (HR, 0.55 [95 % CI, 0.41-0.74]). The magnitude of HRs by MPR status were similar to the results by pCR status (EFS HR, 0.31 [95 % CI, 0.18-0.53]) and OS HR, 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.19-0.96]). However, no association between pCR and EFS at trial level was found (P = 0.8, R2 = 0).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrates a strong association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level across studies applying neoadjuvant immunotherapy in most solid tumors but we fail to validate the relationship at trial level. Therefore, an accepted surrogate endpoint applied to both patient and trial levels are waited for further search.

Long-term outcomes of a randomized, open-label, phase II study comparing cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE)

BACKGROUND

The GENEVIEVE study, comparing neoadjuvant cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and luminal B/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC), previously reported significant differences in pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Effects on long-term outcome are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

GENEVIEVE randomized patients with cT2-3, any cN or cT1, cN+/pNSLN+, centrally confirmed TNBC or luminal B/HER2-negative BC (latter defined as estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive and >14% Ki-67-stained cells) to receive either cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 q3w for four cycles or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks. Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was allowed in case of histologically proven invasive residuals as neoadjuvant treatment or after surgery as adjuvant treatment. Here we report the secondary endpoints invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 333 patients randomized, 74.7% and 83.2% completed treatment in the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms, respectively. After a median follow-up of 89.3 months (interquartile range 68.8-97.3 months), 80 iDFS events (43 after cabazitaxel and 37 after paclitaxel) and 47 deaths (23 after cabazitaxel and 24 after paclitaxel) were reported. IDFS rates were not significantly different between the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms after a 3-year (83.6% versus 85.0%) and 5-year follow-up (76.2% versus 78.3%) [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.82-1.96, P = 0.294], respectively. DDFS rates at 3 years (88.6% versus 87.8%) and 5 years (82.1% versus 82.8%) for cabazitaxel and paclitaxel were comparable (HR = 1.15, P = 0.573). Similarly, OS rates at 3 years (91.6% versus 91.8%) and 5 years (89.2% versus 86.8%) showed no significant differences (HR = 1.05, P = 0.872). Subgroup analysis for TNBC and luminal B/HER2-negative BCs indicated no significant variations in 3- or 5-year iDFS, DDFS, or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant differences in pCR rates observed in both treatment arms did not significantly impact long-term outcomes for patients treated with cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel in the GENEVIEVE trial.

Ki-67 Change in Anthracyline-containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Anthracycline-containing regimens are irreplaceable in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer (BC) at present. However, 30% of early breast cancer (EBC) patients are resistant to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, leading to poor prognosis and higher mortality. Ki-67 is associated with the prognosis and response to therapy, and it changes after NAC.

METHODS

A total of 105 BC patients who received anthracycline-containing NAC were enrolled. Then, the optimal model of Ki-67 was selected, and its predictive efficacy was analyzed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to determine the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status and Ki-67 level. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to verify the HER-2 when the IHC score was 2+.

RESULTS

The post-NAC Ki67 level after treatment with anthracycline drugs was lower than pre-NAC Ki-67 (19.6%±23.3% vs. 45.6%±23.1%, P<0.001). Furthermore, patients with the Ki-67 decrease had a border line higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate (17.2% vs. 0.0%, P=0.068), and a higher overall response rate (ORR) (73.6% vs. 27.8%, P<0.001), when compared to patients without the Ki-67 decrease. The ΔKi-67 and ΔKi-67% were valuable markers for the prediction of both the pCR rate and ORR. The area under the curve (AUC) for ΔKi-67 on pCR and ORR was 0.809 (0.698-0.921) and 0.755 (0.655-0.855), respectively, while the AUC for ΔKi-67% on pCR and ORR was 0.857 (0.742-0.972) and 0.720 (0.618-0.822), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression model 1 revealed that ΔKi-67 was an independent predictor for both pCR [odds ratio (OR)=61.030, 95% confidence interval (CI)=4.709-790.965; P=0.002] and ORR (OR=10.001, 95% CI: 3.044-32.858; P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression model 2 revealed that ΔKi-67% was also an independent predictor for both pCR (OR=408.922, 95% CI=8.908-18771.224; P=0.002) and ORR (OR=5.419, 95% CI=1.842-15.943; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study results suggest that ΔKi67 and ΔKi67% are candidate predictors for anthracycline-containing NAC response, and that they may provide various information for further systematic therapy after surgery in clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant therapy in hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative breast cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy is commonly used in patients with locally advanced or inoperable breast cancer (BC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) represents an established treatment modality able to downstage tumours, facilitate breast-conserving surgery, yet also achieve considerable pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2-positive and triple-negative BC. For patients with HR+/HER2- BC, the choice between NACT and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is still based on clinical and pathological features and not guided by biomarkers of defined clinical utility, differently from the adjuvant setting where gene-expression signatures have been widely adopted to drive decision-making. In this review, we summarize the evidence supporting the choice of NACT vs NET in HR+/HER2- BC, discussing the issues surrounding clinical trial design and proper selection of patients for every treatment. It is time to question the binary paradigm of responder vs non-responders as well as the "one size fits all" approach in luminal BC, supporting the utilization of continuous endpoints and the adoption of tissue and plasma-based biomarkers at multiple timepoints. This will eventually unleash the full potential of neoadjuvant therapy which is to modulate patient treatment based on treatment sensitivity and surgical outcomes. We also reviewed the current landscape of neoadjuvant studies for HR+/HER2- BC, focusing on antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotherapy combinations. Finally, we proposed a roadmap for future neoadjuvant approaches in HR+/HER2- BC, which should be based on a staggered biomarker-driven treatment selection aiming at impacting long-term relevant endpoints.

Long-Term Outcomes and Predictors of Response in Breast Cancer Patients with Advanced Nodal Involvement

BACKGROUND

Advanced nodal disease is associated with poor prognosis. However, modern neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) regimens have resulted in higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, which are associated with improved survival. We sought to assess contemporary outcomes in patients with advanced nodal involvement and response to NST.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a single-institution, retrospective study of 521 patients with cN2-3 primary nonmetastatic breast cancer treated with NST followed by surgery and radiation from 2012 to 2018. Descriptive statistics, multivariate Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 50.5 years, and median follow-up was 61 (4.7 to 197) months. The majority of patients had hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative tumors (HER2-; n = 242, 47.8%). Most were cT2 (n = 243; 46.6%) or cT3 (n = 139; 26.7%) and 73.3% (n = 382) had cN3 disease. Rate of axillary pCR was 34.2%, and breast and axillary pCR was 19.4% (n = 101). Event-free survival (EFS) at 5 years was 75.1% (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.79). Rate of locoregional recurrence was 6.7%; distant metastatic rate was 29.4%. Axillary pCR with or without breast pCR was significantly associated with longer EFS (p = 0.001). Achieving breast/axillary pCR was an independent predictor of improved EFS (hazard ratio 0.22, p < 0.0001). Having triple-negative disease was associated with worse EFS (hazard ratio 1.74, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In a high-risk cohort of patients with cN2-3 disease, trimodality therapy was effective in achieving durable EFS. Approximately one-third of patients achieved axillary pCR, which was associated with improved survival. Further studies are needed to accurately determine axillary response in cN2-3 breast cancer after NST in order to develop de-escalation strategies to reduce morbidity associated with axillary surgery.

Efficacy comparisons of solvent-based paclitaxel, liposomal paclitaxel, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, and docetaxel after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer

PURPOSE

There are four kinds of taxanes: solvent-based paclitaxel (Sb-P), liposomal paclitaxel (Lps-P), nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Nab-P), and docetaxel. This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of different taxanes on neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) in breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer and had received integral NST from August 2013 to April 2022 were enrolled. The efficacy was divided into total pathological complete response (total-pCR), breast pathological complete response (breast-pCR), and axillary pathological complete response (axillary-pCR) for in-depth analysis and discussion.

RESULTS

The choice of taxane was an independent risk factor for total-pCR and breast-pCR rates. The highest total-pCR and breast-pCR rates were found in the Nab-P group. The difference was not significant among all the taxanes in the axillary-pCR rate.

CONCLUSION

Nab-P significantly improved the total-pCR and breast-pCR rates. It should be the first choice among taxanes in NST for breast cancer.

Surrogate endpoints for HTA decisions of breast cancer drugs: utility and pitfalls

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Health technology assessment (HTA) of cancer drugs is important to identify whether drugs should be publicly funded. With increasing use of surrogate end points in clinical trials including breast cancer, a review of literature was done to synthesize evidence for validation of these surrogate end points and their potential role in HTA decisions pertaining to breast cancer.

FINDINGS

Disease free survival (DFS) in human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2) positive early breast cancer remains the only validated surrogate end point. Other surrogate end points like pathological complete response (pCR) and event free survival (EFS) in early breast cancer (EBC) and objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) in advanced disease have not been validated for overall survival (OS). Moreover, surrogate end points for quality of life (QOL) have not been established and drugs that improve PFS can have detrimental effect on QOL. End points like pCR have excellent prognostic utility in individual patients but have weak correlation with survival at trial level.

SUMMARY

Most surrogate end points used in breast cancer do not predict OS or QOL which makes it challenging to use them for decisions regarding public funding of cancer drugs. These findings are relevant to HTA agencies prior to making drug reimbursement decisions.

Comprehensive Clinical Characterization of Decade-Long Survivors of Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Elucidating the clinical features of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with an exceptionally favorable prognosis may offer insights to improve the survival of more typical patients.

METHODS

We collected comprehensive real-world data on clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of 110 consecutive MBC patients who survived for over ten years from the clinical data warehouse of Samsung Medical Center.

RESULTS

The cohort included 54 hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-), 21 HR+/HER2+, 16 HR-/HER2+, and 14 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. The median age at MBC diagnosis was 48.5 years. Approximately 70% of patients initially had a single-organ metastasis. The most common site of metastasis was the lung (46.4%), followed by distant lymph nodes (37.3%). During a median follow-up of 14.6 years, the median duration of systemic therapy was 11, 8.4, 7.3, and 0.8 years in the HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, and TNBC subgroups, respectively. Seven HER2+ and ten TNBC patients received systemic treatment for less than two years and remained treatment-free for most of the follow-up period, suggesting a potential chance of cure. The TNBC subtype (p < 0.001) and local treatment with curative intent within 1 year of MBC diagnosis (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with long-term treatment-free survival. The survival of HER2+ MBC and TNBC patients, but not that of HR+/HER2- patients, plateaued approximately 13 years after MBC diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A small subset of patients with HER2+ MBC and metastatic TNBC may be curable with multimodality therapy. Prospective studies integrating clinical and genomic data may identify unique clinicogenomic features of MBC patients who can achieve durable disease control without prolonged chemotherapy.

The immune microenvironment characterisation and dynamics in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy

BACKGROUND

Oestrogen receptor positive (ER+)/HER-2 negative breast cancer (BC) is considered to be an immunologically cold tumour compared to triple negative breast cancer. Therefore, the tumour microenvironment (TME) of ER+/HER-2 negative BC is understudied. The aim of this project is to investigate the TME and the immune response during neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) and to correlate this with the treatment response in a real life setting.

METHODS

Expression of immune checkpoint receptors and immune cells was examined immunohistochemically, pre- and post-NET in a cohort of 56 ER+/HER-2 negative BC patients. They were treated with tamoxifen (n = 16), an aromatase inhibitor (n = 40) or a combination of an aromatase inhibitor with a PI3K inhibitor (n = 11) for a median duration of 6 months (range 1-32 months). Immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal antibodies for PDL-1, PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3, CTLA-4, CD4, CD68 and FOXP3 were performed. All staining procedures were done according to validated protocols, and scoring was done by a pathologist specialized in breast cancer. Positivity was defined as staining >1% on TILs. Response to NET was evaluated according to tumour size change on imaging and Ki-67 change.

RESULTS

The median age was 61.02 (37-90) years. Diameter of tumour size decreased with a mean of 8.1 mm (-16 mm to 45 mm) (p < 0.001) during NET and the value of Ki-67 value decreased with a median of 9 after NET (p < 0.001). An increase in PD-L1 expression after NET showed a trend towards significant (p = 0.088) and CD-4+ T cells significantly increased after NET (p = 0.03). A good response to NET defined as a decrease in tumour size and/or decrease of Ki-67 was found to be associated with a longer duration of NET, a change of CD4+ T-cells and a higher number of CD68+ tumour-associated macrophages before the start of NET.

CONCLUSION

The immune microenvironment plays an important role in ER+/HER-2 negative BC. NET influences the composition and functional state of the infiltrating immune cells. Furthermore, changes in the immune microenvironment are also associated with treatment response.

Hope and Hype around Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) holds a poor prognosis compared to other breast cancer subtypes, and the development of new effective treatment strategies is an unmet medical need. TNBC has traditionally been considered not amenable to treatment with targeted agents due to a lack of actionable targets. Therefore, chemotherapy has remained the mainstay of systemic treatment for many decades. The advent of immunotherapy raised very hopeful expectations in TNBC, possibly due to higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden compared to other breast cancer subtypes, that predict an effective anti-tumor immune-engagement. The results of clinical trials testing immunotherapy in TNBC led to the approval of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy in both early and advanced settings. However, some open questions about the use of immunotherapy in TNBC still exist. These include a deeper understanding of the heterogeneity of the disease, identification of reliable predictive biomarkers of response, determination of the most appropriate chemotherapy backbone and appropriate management of potential long-term immune-related adverse events. In this review we aim to examine the available evidence on the use of immunotherapy strategies in both early and advanced TNBC, to critically discuss some of the limitations encountered in clinical research and to summarize data on novel promising immunotherapeutic strategies beyond PD-(L)1 blockade that have been investigated in the most recent trials.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count Changes During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy are Associated With Prognosis of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

NTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Some reports have shown that absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is associated with prognosis in breast cancer; however, the impact of ALC changes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ALC changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients and disease prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study January 2010 to September 2020) included patients diagnosed with HER2-positive breast cancer and treated with trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The ALC ratio was defined as the ALC value after administration of the anti-HER2 drug divided by the ALC value before administration. The optimal ALC ratio cut-off value was identified using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and Youden's index. The relationship between the ALC ratio and disease-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Data from a total of 100 HER2-positive breast cancer patients were analyzed. The cut-off value of the ALC ratio was set as 1.142. The median follow-up period was 52.0 (range: 5.1-123.7) months. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 88.4% and 60.9% in the high-and low-ALC ratio groups, respectively, and were significantly higher in the high-ALC ratio group (p = .0031). The ALC ratio was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (p = .0032).

CONCLUSION

HER2-positive breast cancer patients with a higher ALC ratio during trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy may have a better prognosis than their counterparts.

Artificial intelligence reveals features associated with breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy responses from multi-stain histopathologic images

Advances in computational algorithms and tools have made the prediction of cancer patient outcomes using computational pathology feasible. However, predicting clinical outcomes from pre-treatment histopathologic images remains a challenging task, limited by the poor understanding of tumor immune micro-environments. In this study, an automatic, accurate, comprehensive, interpretable, and reproducible whole slide image (WSI) feature extraction pipeline known as, IMage-based Pathological REgistration and Segmentation Statistics (IMPRESS), is described. We used both H&E and multiplex IHC (PD-L1, CD8+, and CD163+) images, investigated whether artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms using automatic feature extraction methods can predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) outcomes in HER2-positive (HER2+) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Features are derived from tumor immune micro-environment and clinical data and used to train machine learning models to accurately predict the response to NAC in breast cancer patients (HER2+ AUC = 0.8975; TNBC AUC = 0.7674). The results demonstrate that this method outperforms the results trained from features that were manually generated by pathologists. The developed image features and algorithms were further externally validated by independent cohorts, yielding encouraging results, especially for the HER2+ subtype.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition in the management of glioblastoma: Exploring a new frontier

Brain tumors are one of the leading causes of cancer related death in both the adult and pediatric patient population. Gliomas represent a cohort of brain tumors derived from glial cell lineages which include astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and glioblastomas (GBMs). These tumors are known to grow aggressively and have a high lethality with GBM being the most aggressive tumor in this group. Currently, few treatment options exist for GBM outside of surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. While these measures have been shown to marginally improve patient survival, patients, especially those diagnosed with GBM, often experience a recurrence of their disease. Following disease recurrence, treatment options become more limited as additional surgical resections can pose life threatening risk to the patient, patients may be ineligible for additional radiation, and the recurrent tumor may be resistant to chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy as many patients with cancers residing outside the central nervous system (CNS) have experienced a survival benefit from this treatment modality. It has often been observed that this survival benefit is increased following neoadjuvant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors as tumor antigen is still present in the patient which enables a more robust anti-tumor immune response. Interestingly, results for ICI-based studies for patients with GBM have been largely disappointing which is a stark contrast from the success this treatment modality has had in non-central nervous system cancers. In this review, we will discuss the various benefits of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition such as how this approach reduces tumor burden and allows for a greater induction of an anti-tumor immune response. Additionally, we will discuss several non-CNS cancers where neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition has been successful and discuss why we believe this approach may provide a survival benefit for GBM patients. We hope this manuscript will foster future studies aimed at exploring whether this approach may be beneficial for patients diagnosed with GBM.

Predicting the Response of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer With Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis by Multigene Assay

PURPOSE

The GenesWell™ breast cancer test (BCT) is a recently developed multigene assay that predicts the risk of distant recurrence in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (BC). The ability of this assay to predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has not been established to date.

METHODS

Biopsy specimens from HR+/HER2- BC patients with axillary lymph node (LN) metastasis who underwent NACT were analyzed using the BCT score. The modified BCT score was developed and patients classified into high-and low-response groups. A total of 88 patients were available for the BCT score among the 108 eligible patients. The median follow-up duration was 35.9 (7.8-128.5) months.

RESULTS

Among them, 61 (65.1%) had cN1 and 53 (60.2%) had cT1 or cT2 disease. The BCT score was low in 25 (28.4%) patients and high in 63 (71.6%). Among the 50 patients with pathologic complete response or partial response, 41 (82.0%) were in the high BCT score group and 9 (18.0%) were in the low BCT score group. Among the 38 patients with stable or progressive disease, 22 (57.9%) were in the high BCT score group and 16 (42.1%) were in the low BCT score group (p = 0.025). Ki-67 before NACT was a significant factor for predicting tumor response (p = 0.006; 3.81 [1.50-10.16]). The BCT score showed a significant response to NACT (p = 0.016; 4.18 [1.34-14.28]). Distant metastasis-free survival was significantly different between the high- and low-response groups (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that the BCT score predicts NACT responsiveness in HR+/HER2- BC with LN metastasis and might help determine whether NACT should be performed. Further studies are required to validate these results.

Clinical N3 is an independent risk factor of recurrence for breast cancer patients achieving pathological complete response and near-pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

Although achieving pathological complete response (pCR) and near-pathological complete response (near-pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer predicts a better outcome, some patients still experience recurrence. The aim of our study was to investigate the predictive factors of recurrence in the pCR and near-pCR population.

Methods

We reviewed 1,209 breast cancer patients treated with NAC between January 2010 and April 2021 in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CHCAMS). A total of 292 patients achieving pCR and near-pCR were included in our analysis. pCR was defined as ypT0N0/ypTisN0. Near-pCR was defined as ypT1mi/1a/1bN0 or ypT0/isN1mi. Clinical features and follow-up information were collected. Survival and predictive factors of recurrence were analyzed.

Results

Of the 292 patients, 173 were pCR and 119 were near-pCR. The median age was 46 years (range, 23–75 years). The predominant tumor subtypes were human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (49.0%) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (30.8%). The median duration of follow-up was 53 months (range, 9–138 months). A total of 25 (8.6%) patients developed recurrence, with 9 (5.2%) in the pCR group and 16 (13.4%) in the near-pCR group. The vast majority of recurrence occurred within 36 months from onset of NAC. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate of patients achieving pCR was significantly higher than that of patients achieving near-pCR (94.6% vs. 85.6%, p = 0.008). However, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate between the two cohorts had no statistical difference (94.3% vs. 89.6%, p = 0.304). Clinical N3 (cN3) before NAC was an independent risk factor of recurrence in patients who achieved pCR (p = 0.003) and near-pCR (p = 0.036). Tumor size before NAC, subtypes of breast cancer, and chemotherapy regimens showed no significant association with RFS both for patients who achieved pCR and for those who achieved near-pCR (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

cN3 before NAC was an independent risk factor of recurrence in patients who achieved pCR and near-pCR. It is worthwhile to closely monitor patients with cN3, especially in the first 3 years.

New endpoints in adrenocortical carcinoma studies: a mini review

PURPOSE

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a very rare and aggressive malignant disease. Therefore, overall survival (OS) has long been considered as the best endpoint. Yet, a unique endpoint is not optimal to take into account the heterogeneity in tumor profile and the diversification of therapeutic option. The purpose of this mini review was to describe endpoints used in the past, present and future in the field of ACC.

METHODS

Pubmed and Clinicaltrial.gov were used to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Before year 2000 only three endpoints were regularly used: OS, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and response rate. These endpoints were used because ACC was seen as a homogeneous diseases with a high recurrence rate and low rate of long-term survival. Since 2000; along with the apparition of new class of drug, progression-free survival (PFS) has been more and more used. Other endpoints as "time to chemotherapy" or "Progression-free survival 2" were used to evaluate multimodal therapies or treatment with a delayed action. Finally, there is a hope that in the near future, quality of life along with other patient-reported outcomes may be used more frequently.

CONCLUSION

While OS and PFS are currently the most used endpoints in ACC, new endpoints are needed to better take into account the challenges offered by different situations and treatment strategies.

ENDOCRINE TUMOURS: Our experience with the management of patients with non-metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) accounts for a minority of all malignant tumors in adults. Surgery remains the most important therapeutic option for non-metastatic ACC. Whether a subset of patients with small ACC may benefit from minimally invasive surgery remains a debated issue, but we believe that surgeon's expertise is more important than surgical technique to determine outcome. However, even a state-of-the-art surgery cannot prevent disease recurrence that is determined mainly by specific tumor characteristics. We consider that the concomitant presence of the following features characterizes a cohort of patients at low risk of recurrence, (i) R0 resection (microscopically free margin), (ii) localized disease (stage I-II ACC), and (iii) low-grade tumor (ki-67 <10%). After the ADIUVO study, we do not recommend adjuvant mitotane as a routine measure for such patients, who can be managed with active surveillance thus sparing a toxic treatment. Patients at average risk of recurrence should be treated with adjuvant mitotane. For patients at very high risk of recurrence, defined as the presence of at least one of the following: Ki67 >30%, large venous tumor thrombus, R1 resection or stage IV ACC, we increasingly recommend to combine mitotane with four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. However, patients at moderate-to-high risk of recurrence should be ideally enrolled in the ongoing ADIUVO2 trial. We do not use adjuvant radiotherapy of the tumor bed frequently at our institutions, and we select patients with incomplete resection, either microscopically or macroscopically, for this treatment. In the long-term, prospective multicenter trials are required to improve patient care.

Predictive Factors of Long-Term Survival after Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in High-Risk Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

This retrospective analysis reports on the treatment outcomes of women diagnosed with high-risk breast cancer treated with chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy before the surgical removal of the tumor. It is well established that the lack of visible tumor cells in the pathological tumors analysis by the time of surgery (known as pathological complete response, pCR) is a factor that improves survival without the tumor reappearing in the body. However, it is unknown whether that is only true when giving systemic therapy or when pCR is achieved with the help of radiotherapy. We collected patient information and survival times to analyze the outcome in our patient group. We found that women with a pCR treated with chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy can expect favorable long-term survival. This was true across different types of breast cancer and chemotherapy substances.

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (naRT) in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (naCT) has been used for locally advanced, inoperable breast cancer or to allow breast conserving surgery (BCS). Retrospective analyses suggest that naRT + naCT might result in an improvement in pathological complete response (pCR rate and disease-free survival). pCR is a surrogate parameter for improved event-free and overall survival (OS) and allows for the adaption of the post-neoadjuvant therapy regimens. However, it is not clear whether pCR achieved with the addition of naRT has the same prognostic value. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective re-analysis of 356 patients (cT1-cT4/cN0-N+) treated with naRT and naCT with a long-term follow-up. Patients underwent naRT on the breast and regional lymph nodes combined with a boost to the primary tumor. Chemotherapy with different agents was given either sequentially or concomitantly to naRT. We used the Cox proportional hazard regression model to estimate the effect of pCR in our cohort in different subgroups as well as chemotherapy protocols. Clinical response markers correlating with OS were also analyzed. Results: For patients with median follow-ups of 20 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, and 25 years, OS rates were 69.7%, 60.6%, 53.1%, and 45.1%, respectively. pCR was achieved in 31.1% of patients and associated with a significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.58; CI-95%: 0.41–0.80; p = 0.001). The prognostic impact of pCR was evident across breast cancer subtypes and chemotherapy regimens. Multivariate analysis showed that age, clinical tumor and nodal stage, chemotherapy, and pCR were prognostic for OS. Conclusion: NaCT and naRT prior to surgical resection achieve good long-term survival in high-risk breast cancer. pCR after naRT maintains its prognostic value in breast cancer subtypes and across different subgroups. pCR driven by naRT and naCT independently influences long-term survival.

Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm Phase 2 Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the antitumor activity and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial, patients with resectable stage III-IVB HNSCC received chemotherapy [albumin-bound paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 (or docetaxel 75 mg/m2) plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2] and camrelizumab 200 mg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for three cycles, followed by surgery, and adjuvant radiotherapy. Co-primary end points were pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled and completed the neoadjuvant therapy, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 96.7% (29/30). Twenty-seven patients underwent surgery without delay, with an R0 resection rate of 92.6% (25/27). The clinical to pathological downstaging rate was 100% (27/27). The pCR rate was 37.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.4%-57.6%], and the major pathological response (MPR) rate was 74.1% (95% CI, 53.7%-88.9%). The median follow-up duration was 16.1 months (range, 8.3-28.5), and the disease-free survival rate at 12 months was 95.8% (95% CI, 73.9%-99.4%). Grade 3 neoadjuvant therapy-related adverse events included rash (1; 3.3%), pruritis (1; 3.3%), and thrombocytopenia (1; 3.3%), and no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related events occurred. The most common surgical complication was delayed wound healing (5; 18.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus camrelizumab for locally advanced HNSCC showed high ORR, pCR, and MPR rates, with an acceptable safety profile. These data support further evaluation of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced HNSCC.

Neoadjuvant afatinib with paclitaxel for triple-negative breast cancer and the molecular characteristics in responders and non-responders

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is worse and a major proportion of TNBC expresses epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Afatinib can inhibit EGFR signal pathway; however, its treatment effect for TNBC is unknown. Thus, we aimed to assess the efficacy and biomarkers of afatinib in combination with paclitaxel in a neoadjuvant setting.

METHODS

Patients with stage II to III TNBC were enrolled. They received 40 mg of afatinib daily for 14 days, followed by daily afatinib and weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m²) every 21 days for four to six cycles. To explore the mechanisms of responsiveness and non-responsiveness, 409 cancer-associated genes were sequenced.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled and one patient achieved a complete clinical response; however, a 2 mm residual tumor was noted in the surgical specimen. Overall, 33.0% patients were responders. Fifteen patients received molecular testing. No activated mutation of EGFR or Her2 were found. Activated PI3K or JAK2 pathway were trended to associate with non-responder (p = 0.057). Mutation of homologous recombination (HR) genes were correlated with non-responsiveness (p = 0.005). Seven patients did not have altered PI3K, JAK2 or HR pathway; six (85.7%) of them were responder. Patients with the amplified DAXX gene was associated with a favorable trend of response (p = 0.109).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding afatinib to neoadjuvant paclitaxel generated a modest effect in TNBC. Exploratory molecular analysis suggested that activated PI3K, JAK2 pathways and mutation of HR genes were associated with therapeutic non-responsiveness, and amplification of DAXX genes was associated with responsiveness to afatinib in combination with paclitaxel.

miRNAs as therapeutic predictors and prognostic biomarkers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Accumulating evidence has shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) are promising biomarkers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response in breast cancer (BC). However, their predictive roles remain controversial. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to describe the role of miRNA expression in NAC response and prognosis in BC to increase statistical power and improve translation.

METHODS

A systematic review of electronic databases for relevant studies was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted, collated, and combined by odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the strength of the associations.

RESULTS

Of the 560 articles screened, 59 studies were included in our systematic review, and 5 studies were included in the subsequent meta-analysis. Sixty of 123 miRNAs were found to be related with NAC response and an elevated baseline miR-7 level in tissues was associated with a higher pathological complete response rate (OR 5.63; 95% CI 2.15-14.79; P = 0.0004). The prognostic value of 39 miRNAs was also studied. Of them, 26 miRNAs were found to be associated with survival. Pooled HRs indicated that patients with increased levels of serum miR-21 from baseline to the end of the second NAC cycle and from baseline to the end of NAC had a worse disease-free survival than those with decreased levels.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight that a large number of miRNAs have possible associations with NAC response and prognosis in BC patients. Further well-designed studies are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying these associations.

The Evolving Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer

The role of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for localized breast cancer has evolved tremendously over the past several years. Currently, NAT is the preferred option for high-risk early triple-negative (TN) and HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers and is indicated for some estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers. In addition to traditional absolute indications for NAT, relative indications such as the assessment of outcomes at the time of surgery and guidance of treatment escalation and de-escalation have greatly evolved in recent years. Pathologic complete response (pCR) and the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) index are highly prognostic for disease recurrence and survival, mainly in patients with TN or HER2+ disease. Furthermore, post-NAT escalation strategies have been shown to improve long-term outcomes of patients who do not achieve pCR. Additionally, by allowing the direct assessment of drug effect on the tumor, the neoadjuvant setting has become an attractive setting for the exploration of novel agents and the identification of predictive biomarkers. Neoadjuvant trial design has also evolved, using adaptive treatment approaches that enable treatment de-escalation or escalation based on response. However, despite multiple practice-changing neoadjuvant trials and the addition of various new agents to the neoadjuvant setting for early breast cancer, many key questions remain. For example, patient selection for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in TN breast cancer, de-escalation methods in HER2+ breast cancer, and the use of gene expression profiles to guide NAT recommendations in ER+ breast cancer. This article reviews the current approach for NAT in localized breast cancer as well as evolving NAT strategies, the key remaining challenges, and the ongoing work in the field.

Progress and pitfalls in the use of immunotherapy for patients with triple negative breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an area of high unmet medical need in terms of new effective treatment strategies. Although breast cancer is traditionally considered a 'cold' tumor type, TNBC is the most appropriate subtype for immunotherapeutic strategies; this is due to the high level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden relative to other breast cancer subtypes.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the use of immunotherapeutic strategies in early and advanced TNBC. The paper summarizes data on novel promising immunomodulatory approaches that have been explored in early phase trials and discusses the pitfalls and limitations often encountered in clinical research.

EXPERT OPINION

PD-1-blockade is approved for stage II/III TNBC and for first-line treatment of PD-L1-positive TNBC patients with metastatic disease and should be considered standard of care. However, question marks and difficulties remain; these include the identification of predictive biomarkers to select patients who benefit from the addition of PD1-blockade and the balance between efficacy and long-term toxicity for an individual patient. Numerous treatment combinations and new immunotherapeutic strategies beyond PD1 blockade are being evaluated, thus reflecting a promising evolution of a more personalized approach, and extended clinical benefit in TNBC.

Clinical Significance of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes and Ki67 Expression as a Predictive Value for Pathological Complete Response following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon

Introduction

Breast cancer is considered nowadays the most prevalent cancer worldwide. The molecular era has successfully divided breast cancer into subtypes based on the various hormonal receptors. These molecular subtypes play a major role in determining the neoadjuvant chemotherapy to be administered. It was noted that the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with higher achievement of pathological complete response. The aim of the study was to determine the predictive role of breast cancer subtypes in the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

Methods

Combining dose dense anthracycline-based, regular dose anthracycline-based, and nonanthracycline-based chemotherapy, we observed data from 87 patients with breast cancer who received surgery after administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our institution between January 2015 and July 2018. The patients were classified into luminal A, luminal B, HER2 overexpression, and triple negative breast cancer as well as low Ki67 (≤14%) and high Ki67 (>14%) expression groups using immunohistochemistry. Pathologic complete response was the only neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcome parameter. To evaluate variables associated with pathologic complete response, we used univariate analyses followed by multivariate logistic regression.

Results

87 patients with breast cancer were classified into different subtypes according to the 12^th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference. The response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly different (p = 0.046) between the subgroups. There were significant correlations between pathological complete response (pCR) and ER status (p < 0.0001), HER2 (p = 0.013), molecular subtypes (p = 0.018), T stage (p = 0.024), N stage before chemotherapy (p = 0.04), and type of chemotherapy (p = 0.029). Luminal B type patients had the lowest pCR, followed by luminal A type patients.

Conclusion

Evaluating molecular subtype's significance in breast cancer prognosis warrants additional studies in our region with extensive data about patient-specific neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Our study was able to reproduce results complementary to those present in the literature in other outcomes.

Circulating tumor cells may serve as a supplement to RECIST in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of patients with locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been shown to be associated with the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and the prognosis of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients. Our study aimed to investigate whether the change of CTC status during NCT could serve as a supplement to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in the treatment and evaluation of LABC patients.

METHODS

6 ml of blood samples were collected before NCT, after the first cycle of NCT and after the completion of NCT, respectively. According to the change of CTC number during NCT, the patients were divided into "CTC low-response (low-R)" group and "CTC high-response (high-R)" group. Survival data of each group of patients were obtained through long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients diagnosed with LABC were enrolled. The median follow-up for distant metastasis was 27 months (range 7-36 months). There was no significant difference in distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) between PR/CR group and PD/SD group (P = 0.0914), while CTC low-R group had a worse DMFS than CTC high-R group (P = 0.0199). In PR/CR subgroup, patients with CTC low-R showed a lower DMFS compared with those with CTC high-R (P = 0.0159). However, in PD/SD subgroup, there was no significant difference in DMFS between CTC low-R and CTC high-R group (P = 0.7521). In terms of assessing response to NCT, CTC change or RECIST classification alone had an AUC of 0.533 (95% CI 0.277-0.790) and 0.700 (95% CI 0.611-0.789), respectively. When combining the two, the AUC slightly increased to 0.713 (95% CI 0.532-0.895).

CONCLUSION

The change of CTC number during NCT has a potential to serve as a supplement to RECIST in the assessment of NCT efficacy and the prognosis of LABC patients.

Spatial Profiling Identifies Prognostic Features of Response to Adjuvant Therapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that has few effective treatment options due to its lack of targetable hormone receptors. Whilst the degree of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been shown to associate with therapy response and prognosis, deeper characterization of the molecular diversity that may mediate chemotherapeutic response is lacking. Here we applied targeted proteomic analysis of both chemotherapy sensitive and resistant TNBC tissue samples by the Nanostring GeoMx Digital Spatial Platform (DSP). By quantifying 68 targets in the tumour and tumour microenvironment (TME) compartments and performing differential expression analysis between responsive and non-responsive tumours, we show that increased ER-alpha expression and decreased 4-1BB and MART1 within the stromal compartments is associated with adjuvant chemotherapy response. Similarly, higher expression of GZMA, STING and fibronectin and lower levels of CD80 were associated with response within tumour compartments. Univariate overall-survival (OS) analysis of stromal proteins supported these findings, with ER-alpha expression (HR=0.19, p=0.0012) associated with better OS while MART1 expression (HR=2.3, p=0.035) was indicative of poorer OS. Proteins within tumour compartments consistent with longer OS included PD-L1 (HR=0.53, p=0.023), FOXP3 (HR=0.5, p=0.026), GITR (HR=0.51, p=0.036), SMA (HR=0.59, p=0.043), while EPCAM (HR=1.7, p=0.045), and CD95 (HR=4.9, p=0.046) expression were associated with shorter OS. Our data provides early insights into the levels of these markers in the TNBC tumour microenvironment, and their association with chemotherapeutic response and patient survival.

Markers Associated With Tumor Recurrence in Patients With Breast Cancer Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients who achieve a tumor pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have better outcomes than patients with residual tumor. However, tumors still recur in the pCR patients. Therefore, we aim to explore factors associated with tumor recurrence in this patient population.

METHODS

A total of 1,913 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 1995 and 2020 and received NAC were included in this analysis. Clinicopathological data of the patients were retrospectively collected. We used Cox regression analysis to assess the associations of clinicopathological factors with patients' outcome. Proteomic study of tumors was applied to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between tumors from the pCR patients with tumor recurrence and tumors from those without tumor recurrence. PPI network analysis of the corresponding genes of DEPs was used to identify the hub genes. The prognostic value of the corresponding genes of DEPs was evaluated using two online databases, Kaplan-Meier Plotter and bc-GenExMiner. The genes that were significantly associated with patients' survival in both databases, as well as being identified as hub genes, were considered as potential prognostic markers for pCR patients. Publicly available data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) was used to verify the prognostic value of the identified marker.

RESULTS

Among the 1,913 included patients, 420 had tumor pCR. The median follow-up for the pCR patients was 32.6 months (IQR, 16.3-55.5). Overall estimated 5-year risk of tumor recurrence for the pCR patients was 11%. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher pre-NAC clinical T stage and N stage were independent predictors for increased risk of tumor recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-6.51, P=0.047 for clinical T stage and HR 3.48, 95%CI 1.37-8.83, P=0.009 for clinical N stage). NAC regimens, the type of breast and axillary surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with tumor recurrence. Finally, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) 3A2 was identified by the proteomic study and was verified as a potential predictor for tumor recurrence in the pCR patients (with a median follow up of 3.78 years for dataset GSE32603 and 2.74 years for dataset GSE25066 from GEO, tumor recurrence rate: low versus high expression, 20.7% versus 4.5% [data from GSE32603]; 10.9% versus 0% [data from GSE25066]).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical T stage, clinical N stage and tumor expression of ALDH3A2 were potential markers for predicting tumor recurrence in the pCR patients after NAC.

Nine-Year Median Follow-up of Cardiotoxicity and Efficacy of Trastuzumab Concurrently With Anthracycline-Based and Anthracycline-Free Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The combination of trastuzumab with anthracycline chemotherapy drugs is associated with synergistic cardiotoxicity. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and late-onset cardiac toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens, trastuzumab plus paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (PH-FECH) versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel and carboplatin (TCH), for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2⁺) breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

Patients with HER2⁺ BC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PH-FECH or TCH between 2002 and 2009 at MD Anderson Cancer Center were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival, cardiac events, breast cancer-specific survival, noncardiac toxicities, and chemotherapy interruption.

RESULTS

We identified 249 consecutive patients (184 who received PH-FECH and 65 who received TCH). The 10-year PFS was higher in the PH-FECH group than in the TCH group (83.6% vs. 72.2%; P = .044). The pCR rate was significantly higher in the PH-FECH group (58.2% vs. 41.5%; P = .021). The rate of cardiac events was higher in the PH-FECH group, but the difference was not significant (13.0% vs. 7.7%; P = .352). More patients developed late-onset cardiotoxicity in the PH-FECH group (3.8%) than in the TCH group (1.5%). Hypertension (odds ratio, 4.402 [95% confidence interval, 1.020-18.998]; P = .047) was an independent predictor of late-onset cardiotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Both neoadjuvant regimens are effective and tolerable in patients with HER2⁺ BC. The PH-FECH regimen offers a higher pCR rate and higher PFS but no difference in overall survival or breast cancer-specific survival. Higher frequency of cardiac toxicity with PH-FECH was noted.

Evaluation of pathological complete response as surrogate endpoint in neoadjuvant randomised clinical trials of early stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for disease-free survival and overall survival in regulatory neoadjuvant trials of early stage breast cancer.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, and Scopus to 1 December 2020.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION

Randomised clinical trials that tested neoadjuvant chemotherapy given alone or combined with other treatments, including anti-human epidermal growth factor 2 (anti-HER2) drugs, targeted treatments, antivascular agents, bisphosphonates, and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Trial level associations between the surrogate endpoint pathological complete response and disease-free survival and overall survival.

METHODS

A weighted regression analysis was performed on log transformed treatment effect estimates (hazard ratio for disease-free survival and overall survival and relative risk for pathological complete response), and the coefficient of determination (R2) was used to quantify the association. The secondary objective was to explore heterogeneity of results in preplanned subgroups analysis, stratifying trials according treatment type in the experimental arm, definition used for pathological complete response (breast and lymph nodes v breast only), and biological features of the disease (HER2 positive or triple negative breast cancer). The surrogate threshold effect was also evaluated, indicating the minimum value of the relative risk for pathological complete response necessary to confidently predict a non-null effect on hazard ratio for disease-free survival or overall survival.

RESULTS

54 randomised clinical trials comprising a total of 32 611 patients were included in the analysis. A weak association was observed between the log(relative risk) for pathological complete response and log(hazard ratio) for both disease-free survival (R2=0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.29) and overall survival (R2 =0.08, 0.00 to 0.22). Similar results were found across all subgroups evaluated, independently of the definition used for pathological complete response, treatment type in the experimental arm, and biological features of the disease. The surrogate threshold effect was 5.19 for disease-free survival but was not estimable for overall survival. Consistent results were confirmed in three sensitivity analyses: excluding small trials (<200 patients enrolled), excluding trials with short median follow-up (<24 months), and replacing the relative risk for pathological complete response with the absolute difference of pathological complete response rates between treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

A lack of surrogacy of pathological complete response was identified at trial level for both disease-free survival and overall survival. The findings suggest that pathological complete response should not be used as primary endpoint in regulatory neoadjuvant trials of early stage breast cancer.

TMB and TCR Are Correlated Indicators Predictive of the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Immune characteristics were reported correlated to benefit neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer, yet integration of comprehensive genomic alterations and T-cell receptors (TCR) to predict efficacy of NAC needs further investigation. This study simultaneously analyzed TMB (Tumor Mutation Burden), TCRs, and TILs (tumor infiltrating lymphocyte) in breast cancers receiving NAC was conducted in a prospective cohort (n = 22). The next-generation sequencing technology-based analysis of genomic alterations and TCR repertoire in paired breast cancer samples before and after NAC was conducted in a prospective cohort (n = 22). Fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry was used to stain CD4, CD8, PD1, TIM3, and cytokeratins simultaneously in those paired samples. TMB in pretreatment tumor tissues and TCR diversity index are higher in non-pCR patients than in pCR patients (10.6 vs. 2.3; p = 0.043) (2.066 vs. 0.467; p = 0.010). TMB and TCR diversity index had linear correlation (y = 5.587x − 0.881; r = 0.522, p = 0.012). Moreover, infiltrating T cells are significantly at higher presence in pCR versus non-pCR patients. Dynamically, the TMB reduced significantly after therapy in non-pCR patients (p = 0.010) but without TCR index change. The CDR3 peptide AWRSAGNYNEQF is the most highly expressed in pre-NAC samples of pCR patients and in post-NAC samples of non-pCR patients. In addition to pCR, high clonality of TCR and high level of CD8+ expression are associated with disease-free survival (DFS). TCR index and TMB have significant interaction and may guide neo-adjuvant treatment in operable breast cancers. Response to NAC in tumors with high TCR clonality may be attributable to high infiltration and expansion of tumor-specific CD8 positive effector cells.

Surrogate endpoints for early-stage breast cancer: a review of the state of the art, controversies, and future prospects

Drug approval for early-stage breast cancer (EBC) has been historically granted in the context of registration trials based on adequate outcomes such as disease-free survival and overall survival. Improvements in long-term outcomes have made it more difficult to demonstrate the clinical benefit of a new cancer drug in large, randomized, comparative clinical trials. Therefore, the use of surrogate endpoints rather than traditional measures allows for cancer drug trials to proceed with smaller sample sizes and shorter follow-up periods, which reduces drug development time. Among surrogate endpoints for breast cancer, the increase in pathological complete response (pCR) rates was considered appropriate for accelerated drug approval. The association between pCR and long-term outcomes was strongest in patients with aggressive tumor subtypes, such as triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive/hormone receptor-negative breast cancers. Whereas in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative EBC, the most accepted surrogate markers for endocrine therapy-based trials include changes in Ki67 and the preoperative endocrine prognostic index. Beyond the classic endpoints, further prognostic tools are required to provide EBC patients with individualized and effective therapies, and the neoadjuvant setting provides an excellent platform for drug development and biomarker discovery. Nowadays, the availability of multigene signatures is offering a standardized quantitative and reproducible tool to potentiate the efficacy of standard treatment for high-risk patients and develop de-escalated treatments for patients at lower risk of relapse. In this article, we first evaluate the surrogacies used for long-term outcomes and the underlying evidence supporting the use of each surrogate endpoint for the accelerated or regular drug approval process in EBC. Next, we provide an overview of the most recent studies and innovative strategies in a (neo)adjuvant setting as a platform to accelerate new drug approval. Finally, we highlight some clinical trials aimed at tailoring systemic treatment of EBC using prognosis-related factors or early biomarkers of drug sensitivity or resistance.

Circulating microRNAs as indicators in the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in luminal B breast cancer

PURPOSE

Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been indicated as predictive biomarker for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the prognosis of breast cancer (BC); however, to date the conclusions have been controversial. The biological characteristics of BC were affected by molecular subtypes. Hence, we aimed to investigate the predictive effect of miRNAs on NAC response in luminal B BC patients.

METHODS

Thirty-seven luminal B BC patient under NAC were prospectively enrolled in this study. Based on their clinical, pathological, and comprehensive response, the patients were defined as responder or non-responders, respectively. Circulating miRNAs were isolated from blood samples before and at the middle of NAC, and candidate miRNAs (miR-34a-5p, miR-125b-5p, miR-210, miR-222, miR-375, miR-718, miR-4516, and let-7g) were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In addition, the association between miRNAs and disease-free survival (DFS) was examined.

RESULTS

miR-718, miR-4516, miR-210, and miR-125b-5p were found to be specific miRNAs associated with chemo-sensitivity of luminal B HER2 negative patients (n = 24). In the luminal B HER2 positive cohort (n = 13), dynamics of miR-222 and let-7g correlated with pathological response. Treatment-induced increase in miR-34a-5p in the responders except who reached pathologic complete response (pCR) was consistently identified across all luminal B patients and its two subgroups. Finally, after adjustments for Neo-Bioscore, patients with increased levels of miR-125b-5p during NAC had a worse DFS than those with decreased levels (HR = 5.86, 95% CI = 1.39-24.62, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Specific circulating miRNAs were identified as predictive markers for NAC response and prognosis in luminal B BC. The underlying mechanism needs further studies.

Surgical perspective in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer

Background

There are many studies on neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Expert consensus recommends neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with resectable stage IB–IIIA NSCLC. However, there are few clinical studies or cases to verify this.

Methods

Data were collected from all NSCLC patients who underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and Xuzhou Central Hospital between September 2020 and April 2021. Data collected included patient information, relevant examination results, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, pathological changes, and 90‐day mortality.

Results

In total, 25 patients achieved R0 resection. Eleven (44%) patients completed surgery by thoracotomy, and three (12%) procedures were changed from minimally invasive procedures due to dense adhesions of hilar lymph nodes, which rendered it difficult to dissect the blood vessels. Thirteen (52%) patients achieved a major pathological response (MPR) with eight (32%) of these patients having a pathological complete response (pCR). Twenty‐two (88%) patients showed radiological regression, and three (12%) patients had stable disease. The median drainage time was 8.50 (3–27) days. Thirteen (52%) postoperative complications were observed, but none were above grade 3.

Conclusions

In this study, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was found to reduce tumor volume, cause pathological downstaging, and raise the surgical resection rate of patients with locally advanced NSCLC, and achieve a 100% R0 resection rate. There was an acceptable rate of postoperative complications. Thus, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is safe and practical.

Physicians’ Perception of the Evidence in Relation to Primary Endpoints of Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To investigate physicians’ perception of the evidence of clinical trials on breast cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A survey was conducted by the Chinese Society of Breast Surgeons. We investigated the physicians’ perception of meaningful endpoints, appropriate follow-up duration, and clinically acceptable benefit through online questionnaires. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among 278 validated questionnaires, the majority of the questions had no consistent answer. For local treatment, 30.6, 28.8, and 28.4% of participants regarded locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) as the most meaningful endpoint, respectively, 47.5% believed that 5-year follow-up can alter clinical practice, and 34.5% thought it should be &#x3e;10 years. In the adjuvant setting, 45.7, 38.5, and 12.9% regarded DFS, OS, and LRR as the most meaningful endpoint, respectively, 52.5% thought that 10-year follow-up was solid, while 37.4% thought that 5-year follow-up was enough. In the advanced setting, 49.6, 24.1, and 23.7% considered progression-free survival, quality of life, and OS the most meaningful endpoint, respectively, and 39.6 and 28.8% considered that a follow-up of 1 year and 3 years, respectively, was meaningful. Similarly, the clinically acceptable absolute difference was inconsistent. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Most Chinese oncologists advocated that surrogate endpoints could be used in certain circumstances, though OS was the most reliable one in breast cancer studies. Doctors’ perceptions of follow-up time and magnitude of benefit vary widely, reflecting the fact that there are many unanswered questions about supporting the use of new cancer treatments; a common understanding needs to be reached, such as a very consensual surrogate endpoint and a meaningful sufficiently large therapeutic benefit.

Discrepancy of Breast and Axillary Pathologic Complete Response and Outcomes in Different Subtypes of Node-positive Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Few studies have analyzed the discrepancy between breast pathologic complete response (B-pCR) and axillary node pCR (N-pCR) rates and their impact on survival outcomes in different intrinsic subtypes of early breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We retrospectively reviewed B-pCR, N-pCR, and total (breast and axillary node) pCR (T-pCR) after NAC to assess the discrepancy and outcomes between 2005 and 2017. A total of 968 patients diagnosed with cT1-4c, N1-2, and M0 breast cancer were enrolled in the study. The median age was 49 years and the median follow-up time was 45 months. Of these patients, 213 achieved T-pCR, 31 achieved B-pCR with axillary node pathologic non-complete response (N-non pCR), 245 achieved N-pCR with breast pathologic non-complete response (B-non pCR), and 479 achieved total (breast and axillary node) pathologic non-complete response (T-non pCR) after NAC. The highest B-pCR and N-pCR rates were found in the hormone receptor-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive HR(-)HER2(+) subtype, while the lowest B-pCR rate was found in the HR(+)HER2(-) subtype. The N-pCR rate was correlated to the B-pCR rate (P<0.001), but was higher than the B-pCR rate in all subtypes. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with T-pCR, B-pCR, and N-pCR were 91.2%, 91.7%, and 91.9%, respectively. For non-pCR, non-pCR, and non-pCR, the 5-year OS rates were 73.6%, 78.9%, and 74.7%, respectively (P<0.0001). B-non pCR patients had a lower risk of recurrence than T-non pCR or N-non-pCR patients, although there were no differences in OS among them. In conclusion, the N-pCR rate was higher than the B-pCR rate after NAC in all intrinsic subtypes, and N-non pCR or T-non pCR patients had the worst outcomes.

Pathologic Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis on Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

With advances in multimodal therapy, survival rates in gastric cancer have significantly improved over the last two decades. Neoadjuvant therapy increases the likelihood of achieving negative margins and may even lead to pathologic complete response (pCR). However, the impact of pCR on survival in gastric cancer has been poorly described. We analyzed the rate and predictors of pCR in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy as well as impact of pCR on survival.

METHODS

We conducted a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis (2004-2016) of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection.

RESULTS

The pCR rate was 2.2%. Following adjustment, only neoadjuvant chemoradiation, non-signet histology, and tumor grade remained as significant factors predicting pCR. pCR was a statistically significant predictor of survival.

CONCLUSION

In this NCDB study, pCR was a predictor of survival. Though chemoradiation rather than chemotherapy alone was a predictor of pCR, it was not a predictor of survival. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of radiation in the neoadjuvant setting and to discern the impact of pCR on survival.

Surrogate Endpoints in Oncology: Overview of Systematic Reviews and Their Use for Health Decision Making in Mexico

OBJECTIVES

The use of surrogate endpoints (SEs) for cancer drug approval in health systems is common. The objectives of this study were to identify systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated the correlation of SEs with overall survival (OS) in cancer drugs to analyze the applications of approved cancer drugs with SEs in Mexico and to apply the validation framework proposed by the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG).

METHODS

An overview of SRs was conducted according to Cochrane Collaboration methodology. Applications for approved cancer drugs with SEs in Mexico were analyzed. The IQWiG validation framework was applied to evaluate the SEs identified in the overview and in the applications in Mexico.

RESULTS

A total of 85 SRs that assessed 192 SEs for different types of cancer were selected. According to the IQWiG model, only 2.5% of the SEs analyzed in the overview and only one of the applications in Mexico could be used as surrogates for OS because the reliability (methodological quality) of the SRs and the strength of the correlation of SEs with OS was mostly low (92%) and low (correlation coefficient r ≤ 0.7; 50.5%), respectively. Of the total number of cancer drugs approved in Mexico, 19.4% used SEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Most SEs for different types of cancer could not be used as surrogates for OS according to the IQWiG model, and their use for the approval of cancer drugs in Mexico is generally not justified.

A pharmacophore-based classification better predicts the outcomes of HER2-negative breast cancer patients receiving the anthracycline- and/or taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy

AIMS

Prognosis of patients for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer post neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not well understood. The aim of this study was to develop a novel pharmacophore-based signature to better classify and predict the risk of HER2-negative patients after anthracycline-and/or taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

MAIN METHODS

Anthracycline and taxane pharmacophore-based genes were obtained from PharmMapper. Drug-targeted genes (DTG) related clinical and bioinformatic analyses were undertaken in four GEO datasets.

KEY FINDINGS

We used 12 genes from the pharmacophore to develop a DTG score (DTG-S). The DTG-S classification exhibited significant prognostic ability with respect to disease free survival (DFS) for HER2-negative patients who receive at least one type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy that included anthracycline and/or taxane. DTG-S associated with a high predictive ability for pathological complete response (pCR) as well as for prognosis of breast cancer. Using the DTG-S classification in other prediction models may improve the reclassification accuracy for DFS. Combining the DTG-S with other clinicopathological factors may further improve its predictive ability of patients' outcomes. Gene ontology and KEGG pathway analysis showed that the biological processes of DTG-S high group were associated with the cell cycle, cell migration, and cell signal transduction pathways. Targeted drug analysis shows that some CDK inhibitors and PI3K-AKT pathway inhibitors may be useful for high DTG-S patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

The DTG-S classification adds prognostic and predictive information to classical parameters for HER2-negative patients who receive anthracycline-and/or taxane-based NACT, which could improve the patients' risk stratification and may help guide adjuvant treatment.

Patterns of Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer, according to the Residual Cancer Burden Index and Reductions in Neoadjuvant Treatment Intensity

Simple Summary

The residual cancer burden (RCB) score provides prognostic information on the survival of breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant systemic therapy, with the greatest impact of higher scores on worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in triple-negative and HER2 positive patients. The impact of chemotherapy dose reduction on RCB is currently unknown, and should therefore be critically evaluated by clinicians. Our study confirms the prognostic relevance of the RCB score and suggests a potential association of the RCB with dose reduction having adverse impact on the RCB, thereby potentially impacting the prognosis of patients, as shown here in a large breast cancer cohort at the Medical University of Graz.

Abstract

Background: The prognostic performance of the residual cancer burden (RCB) score is a promising tool for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. We independently evaluated the prognostic value of RCB scores in an extended validation cohort. Additionally, we analyzed the association between chemotherapy dose reduction and RCB scores. Methods: In this extended validation study, 367 breast cancer patients with available RCB scores were followed up for recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). We also computed standardized cumulative doses of anthracyclines and taxanes (A/Ts) to investigate a potential interaction between neoadjuvant chemotherapy dose reduction and RCB scores. Results: Higher RCB scores were consistently associated with adverse clinical outcomes across different molecular subtypes (HR for RFS = 1.60, 95% CI 1.33–1.93, p < 0.0001; HR for DDFS = 1.70, 95% CI 1.39–2.05, p < 0.0001; HR for OS = 1.67, 95% CI 1.34–2.08, p < 0.0001). The adverse impact prevailed throughout 5 years of follow-up, with a peak for relapse risk between 1–2 years after surgery. Clinical outcomes of patients with RCB class 1 did not differ substantially at 5 years compared to RCB class 0. A total of 180 patients (49.1%) underwent dose reduction of neoadjuvant A/T chemotherapy. We observed a statistically significant interaction between dose reduction and higher RCB scores (interaction p-value = 0.042). Conclusion: Our results confirm RCB score as a prognostic marker for RFS, DDFS, and OS independent of the molecular subtype. Importantly, we show that lower doses of cumulative neoadjuvant A/T were associated with higher RCB scores in patients who required a dose reduction.

A Novel Three-Gene Score as a Predictive Biomarker for Pathologically Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is now a standard of care not only to decrease tumor size for breast conserving operation but also to assess drug response of an in situ cancer. Although the triple-negative subtype typically responds better compared to the other subtypes, a pathological complete response, which is a surrogate of survival, is achieved in less than half of the cases. For the most efficient patient selection, and avoiding unnecessary side effects and financial toxicity, an accurate predictive biomarker is urgently needed. We developed a novel three-gene score that associated with immune cell infiltration and pathological complete response not only in the training cohort but also in the validation triple-negative cohort. High-score TNBC was significantly associated with better survival in patients who received chemotherapy but not in patients who did not receive chemotherapy. Our score is a predictive and prognostic biomarker of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Abstract

Although triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) typically responds better to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) compared to the other subtypes, a pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved in less than half of the cases. We established a novel three-gene score using genes based on the E2F target gene set that identified pCR after NAC, which showed robust performance in both training and validation cohorts (total of n = 3862 breast cancer patients). We found that the three-gene score was elevated in TNBC compared to the other subtypes. A high score was associated with Nottingham histological grade 3 in TNBC. Across multiple cohorts, high-score TNBC enriched not only E2F targets but also G2M checkpoint and mitotic spindle, which are all cell proliferation-related gene sets. High-score TNBC was associated with homologous recombination deficiency, high mutation load, and high infiltration of Th1, Th2, and gamma-delta T cells. However, the score did not correlate with drug sensitivity for paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin in TNBC human cell lines. High-score TNBC was significantly associated with a high rate of pCR not only in the training cohort but also in the validation cohorts. High-score TNBC was significantly associated with better survival in patients who received chemotherapy but not in patients who did not receive chemotherapy. The three-gene score is associated with a high mutation rate, immune cell infiltration, and predicts response to NAC in TNBC.

Impact of Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Node Dissection (ISLND) for Breast Cancer Patients and a Nomogram for Predicting Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Pathological Complete Response (ispCR)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node dissection (ISLND) on the outcomes of breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (ISLNM), and to evaluate the prognostic value of ipsilateral supraclavicular pathological complete response (ispCR). Meanwhile, a nomogram was constructed to predict ispCR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical documents of 353 patients with ISLNM but no distant metastasis at presentation. Based on whether ISLND was performed, patients were divided into radiotherapy (RT) and ISLND + RT groups. The impact of ISLND was evaluated after propensity score matching, and the prognostic value of ispCR was also analyzed. A nomogram to predict the probability of ispCR was constructed based on clinicopathologic variables.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, we found that the use of ISLND was associated with a higher rate of ipsilateral supraclavicular relapse-free survival (ISRFS; p < 0.0001). Among 307 patients who underwent ISLND, ispCR was associated with a higher rate of ISRFS and disease-free survival (p = 0.018 and p = 0.00033, respectively). Furthermore, the nomogram constructed with number of axillary lymph node metastases, breast pCR, size of the ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), number of NAC cycles, and Ki67 level showed a good fit for predicting ispCR.

CONCLUSION

For breast cancer patients with ISLNM but no distant metastasis, ISLND may be beneficial in some certain subtypes, and ispCR indicated a better prognosis. Our nomogram is well-fitted to predict the probability of achieving ispCR.