1
|
Powers C, Kaya E, Bertinetti A, Hung A. The current state of proton radiotherapy. Curr Probl Cancer 2024; 53:101153. [PMID: 39413574 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 10/04/2024] [Indexed: 10/18/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is indicated for nearly all cancers and at all stages in one form or another. More than half of all cancer patients are treated with radiation at some point in their cancer treatment. Conventional X-ray (photon) based radiotherapy does have a number of physical limitations which were theorized to be overcome by instead employing proton based radiotherapy. The late 1990s and early 2000s saw a rapid adoption in proton therapy as many speculated a greatly improved therapeutic window compared with photon therapy. Only a few randomized clinical trials have been reported, but to-date proton therapy has not shown to improve cancer control metrics. There is improved treatment related toxicity which may be clinically meaningful in some scenarios, but further expansion and wide spread utilization of the technology may be drastically limited by the substantially higher start up and operational costs of a proton center. Nonetheless, proton therapy may be beneficial in select scenarios which warrant individualized consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colton Powers
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Erin Kaya
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Andrew Bertinetti
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Arthur Hung
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Upadhyay R, Paulino AC. Risk-Stratified Radiotherapy in Pediatric Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3530. [PMID: 39456624 PMCID: PMC11506666 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16203530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2024] [Revised: 10/15/2024] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
While the cure rate of cancer in children has markedly improved in the last few decades, late effects continue to be a problem in survivors. Radiotherapy, which is a major component of treatment in many cancers, is one of the major agents responsible for late toxicity. In the past decade, radiotherapy has been omitted in patients achieving excellent response to chemotherapy, such as in Hodgkin lymphoma and some Wilms tumors with lung metastases. Likewise, response to chemotherapy has been used to determine whether lower doses of radiation can be delivered in intracranial germinoma and pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Molecular subtyping in medulloblastoma is currently being employed, and in WNT-pathway M0 tumors, the reduction in radiotherapy dose to the craniospinal axis and tumor bed is currently being investigated. Finally, dose escalation was recently evaluated in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma > 5 cm who do not achieve a complete response to initial 9 weeks of chemotherapy as well as for unresectable Ewing sarcoma patients to improve local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43212, USA;
| | - Arnold C. Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lægdsmand P, Matysiak W, Muren LP, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Maduro JH, Vestergaard A, Righetto R, Pettersson E, Kristensen I, Dutheil P, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Charlwood F, Whitfield G, Feijoo MM, Vela A, Missohou F, Vennarini S, Mirandola A, Orlandi E, Rombi B, Goedgebeur A, Van Beek K, Bannink-Gawryszuk A, Campoo FC, Engellau J, Toussaint L. Variations in linear energy transfer distributions within a European proton therapy planning comparison of paediatric posterior fossa tumours. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 32:100675. [PMID: 39803348 PMCID: PMC11718416 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 10/10/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Radiotherapy for paediatric posterior fossa tumours may cause complications in the brainstem and upper spinal cord due to high doses. With proton therapy (PT) this risk may increase due to higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) from elevated linear energy transfer (LET). This study assesses variations in LET in the brainstem and spinal cord in proton treatment plans from European centres. Materials and Methods Ten European PT centres using spot-scanning PT planned two paediatric posterior fossa cases: One overlapping partly with the brainstem and upper spinal cord, prescribed 54 Gy(RBE), and the second wrapping around these organs, prescribed 59.4 Gy(RBE). Dose-averaged LET distributions were assessed in volumes of the brainstem and spinal cord irradiated to over 50 Gy(RBE = 1.1). The maximum hinge angle effect on near-maximum RBE-weighted doses using the Unkelbach RBE model was also investigated. Results In the first case, the mean LET in brainstem volumes receiving more than 50 Gy(RBE = 1.1) ranged from 2.8 keV/µm to 3.6 keV/µm across centres (median: 3.3 keV/µm). In the second case, treatment plans showed a narrower range of mean LET in the brainstem, from 2.5 keV/µm to 2.8 keV/µm (median: 2.7 keV/µm). There was no statistically significant impact of the maximum hinge angle. Conclusions LET distributions vary across centres due to different techniques but are also influenced significantly by factors like shape and position of the target volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Lægdsmand
- Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Witold Matysiak
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Ludvig P. Muren
- Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | | | - John H. Maduro
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Anne Vestergaard
- Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | | | - Erik Pettersson
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Kristensen
- Skåne University Hospital, Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Pauline Dutheil
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France
- Angers University Hospital, Department of Paediatric Oncology, Angers, France
| | - Frances Charlwood
- The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Whitfield
- The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- University of Manchester, Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, The Children’s Brain Tumour Research Network, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anthony Vela
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France
| | - Fernand Missohou
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France
| | - Sabina Vennarini
- Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale Tumori, Paediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Milano, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Clinical Department, Pavia, Italy
- University of Pavia, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Rombi
- Proton Therapy Centre, Hospital S. Chiara, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Karen Van Beek
- Particle UZLeuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Agata Bannink-Gawryszuk
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Jacob Engellau
- Skåne University Hospital, Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Laura Toussaint
- Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toussaint L, Matysiak W, Alapetite C, Aristu J, Bannink-Gawryszuk A, Bolle S, Bolsi A, Calvo F, Cerron Campoo F, Charlwood F, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Doyen J, Drosik-Rutowicz K, Dutheil P, Embring A, Engellau J, Goedgebeur A, Goudjil F, Harrabi S, Kopec R, Kristensen I, Lægsdmand P, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Meijers A, Mirandola A, Missohou F, Montero Feijoo M, Muren LP, Ondrova B, Orlandi E, Pettersson E, Pica A, Plaude S, Righetto R, Rombi B, Timmermann B, Van Beek K, Vela A, Vennarini S, Vestergaard A, Vidal M, Vondracek V, Weber DC, Whitfield G, Zimmerman J, Maduro JH, Lassen-Ramshad Y. Clinical practice in European centres treating paediatric posterior fossa tumours with pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 198:110414. [PMID: 38942120 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE As no guidelines for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy (PT) of paediatric posterior fossa (PF) tumours exist to date, this study investigated planning techniques across European PT centres, with special considerations for brainstem and spinal cord sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS A survey and a treatment planning comparison were initiated across nineteen European PBS-PT centres treating paediatric patients. The survey assessed all aspects of the treatment chain, including but not limited to delineations, dose constraints and treatment planning. Each centre planned two PF tumour cases for focal irradiation, according to their own clinical practice but based on common delineations. The prescription dose was 54 Gy(RBE) for Case 1 and 59.4 Gy(RBE) for Case 2. For both cases, planning strategies and relevant dose metrics were compared. RESULTS Seventeen (89 %) centres answered the survey, and sixteen (80 %) participated in the treatment planning comparison. In the survey, thirteen (68 %) centres reported using the European Particle Therapy Network definition for brainstem delineation. In the treatment planning study, while most centres used three beam directions, their configurations varied widely across centres. Large variations were also seen in brainstem doses, with a brainstem near maximum dose (D2%) ranging from 52.7 Gy(RBE) to 55.7 Gy(RBE) (Case 1), and from 56.8 Gy(RBE) to 60.9 Gy(RBE) (Case 2). CONCLUSION This study assessed the European PBS-PT planning of paediatric PF tumours. Agreement was achieved in e.g. delineation-practice, while wider variations were observed in planning approach and consequently dose to organs at risk. Collaboration between centres is still ongoing, striving towards common guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Toussaint
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Witold Matysiak
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Claire Alapetite
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton Centre, Paris, France
| | - Javier Aristu
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Proton Therapy Unit, Madrid, Spain
| | - Agata Bannink-Gawryszuk
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Bolle
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton Centre, Paris, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France; Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Centre for Proton Therapy, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Felipe Calvo
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Proton Therapy Unit, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Frances Charlwood
- University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France; Angers University Hospital, Department of Paediatric Oncology, Angers, France
| | - Jérôme Doyen
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nice, France
| | - Katarzyna Drosik-Rutowicz
- National Research Institute of Oncology Kraków/Gliwice branch, Department of Radiation Oncology, Kraków, Poland
| | - Pauline Dutheil
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France
| | - Anna Embring
- Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jacob Engellau
- Skåne University Hospital, Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anneleen Goedgebeur
- PARTICLE Proton Therapy Centre University Hospital Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton Centre, Paris, France
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Centre, University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Renata Kopec
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
| | - Ingrid Kristensen
- Skåne University Hospital, Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Peter Lægsdmand
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | | | - Arturs Meijers
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Centre for Proton Therapy, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Centre for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Fernand Missohou
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France
| | | | - Ludvig P Muren
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Barbora Ondrova
- Proton Therapy Centre Czech, Department of Radiation Oncology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Centre for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy; University of Pavia, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, Pavia, Italy
| | - Erik Pettersson
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Alessia Pica
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Centre for Proton Therapy, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Sandija Plaude
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Barbara Rombi
- Trento Proton Therapy Centre,epartment of Radiation Oncology, APSS Trento, Italy
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| | - Karen Van Beek
- PARTICLE Proton Therapy Centre University Hospital Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anthony Vela
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France
| | - Sabina Vennarini
- Paediatric Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Foundation Institute of Cancer, Milano, Italy
| | - Anne Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Marie Vidal
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nice, France
| | - Vladimir Vondracek
- Proton Therapy Centre Czech, Department of Radiation Oncology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Damien C Weber
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Centre for Proton Therapy, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Gillian Whitfield
- University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; University of Manchester, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, The Children's Brain Tumour Research Network, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Zimmerman
- Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - John H Maduro
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Siegel BI, Gust J. How Cancer Harms the Developing Brain: Long-Term Outcomes in Pediatric Cancer Survivors. Pediatr Neurol 2024; 156:91-98. [PMID: 38735088 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Survival rates for pediatric cancer are improving, resulting in a rising need to understand and address long-term sequelae. In this narrative review, we summarize the effects of cancer and its treatment on the developing brain, with a focus on neurocognitive function in leukemia and pediatric brain tumor survivors. We then discuss possible mechanisms of brain injury and management considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin I Siegel
- Brain Tumor Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia; Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Juliane Gust
- Department of Neurology, University of Washinton, Seattle, Washington; Seattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle, Washington.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giovannini D, Antonelli F, Casciati A, De Angelis C, Denise Astorino M, Bazzano G, Fratini E, Ampollini A, Vadrucci M, Cisbani E, Nenzi P, Picardi L, Saran A, Marino C, Mancuso M, Ronsivalle C, Pazzaglia S. Comparing the effects of irradiation with protons or photons on neonatal mouse brain: Apoptosis, oncogenesis and hippocampal alterations. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110267. [PMID: 38614282 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Medulloblastoma (MB) is a common primary brain cancer in children. Proton therapy in pediatric MB is intensively studied and widely adopted. Compared to photon, proton radiations offer potential for reduced toxicity due to the characteristic Bragg Peak at the end of their path in tissue. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of irradiation with the same dose of protons or photons in Patched1 heterozygous knockout mice, a murine model predisposed to cancer and non-cancer radiogenic pathologies, including MB and lens opacity. MATERIALS AND METHODS TOP-IMPLART is a pulsed linear proton accelerator for proton therapy applications. We compared the long-term health effects of 3 Gy of protons or photons in neonatal mice exposed at postnatal day 2, during a peculiarly susceptible developmental phase of the cerebellum, lens, and hippocampus, to genotoxic stress. RESULTS Experimental testing of the 5 mm Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) proton beam, through evaluation of apoptotic response, confirmed that both cerebellum and hippocampus were within the SOBP irradiation field. While no differences in MB induction were observed after irradiation with protons or photons, lens opacity examination confirmed sparing of the lens after proton exposure. Marked differences in expression of neurogenesis-related genes and in neuroinflammation, but not in hippocampal neurogenesis, were observed after irradiation of wild-type mice with both radiation types. CONCLUSION In-vivo experiments with radiosensitive mouse models improve our mechanistic understanding of the dependence of brain damage on radiation quality, thus having important implications in translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Giovannini
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Francesca Antonelli
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Arianna Casciati
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | | | - Maria Denise Astorino
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Giulia Bazzano
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Emiliano Fratini
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ampollini
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Monia Vadrucci
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy; Italian Space Agency, Science and Research Directorate, Via del Politecnico 00133, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Nenzi
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Luigi Picardi
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Anna Saran
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Carmela Marino
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Mariateresa Mancuso
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Concetta Ronsivalle
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Simonetta Pazzaglia
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mahajan A, Stavinoha PL, Rongthong W, Brodin NP, McGovern SL, El Naqa I, Palmer JD, Vennarini S, Indelicato DJ, Aridgides P, Bowers DC, Kremer L, Ronckers C, Constine L, Avanzo M. Neurocognitive Effects and Necrosis in Childhood Cancer Survivors Treated With Radiation Therapy: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:401-416. [PMID: 33810950 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A PENTEC review of childhood cancer survivors who received brain radiation therapy (RT) was performed to develop models that aid in developing dose constraints for RT-associated central nervous system (CNS) morbidities. METHODS AND MATERIALS A comprehensive literature search, through the PENTEC initiative, was performed to identify published data pertaining to 6 specific CNS toxicities in children treated with brain RT. Treatment and outcome data on survivors were extracted and used to generate normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. RESULTS The search identified investigations pertaining to 2 of the 6 predefined CNS outcomes: neurocognition and brain necrosis. For neurocognition, models for 2 post-RT outcomes were developed to (1) calculate the risk for a below-average intelligence quotient (IQ) (IQ <85) and (2) estimate the expected IQ value. The models suggest that there is a 5% risk of a subsequent IQ <85 when 10%, 20%, 50%, or 100% of the brain is irradiated to 35.7, 29.1, 22.2, or 18.1 Gy, respectively (all at 2 Gy/fraction and without methotrexate). Methotrexate (MTX) increased the risk for an IQ <85 similar to a generalized uniform brain dose of 5.9 Gy. The model for predicting expected IQ also includes the effect of dose, age, and MTX. Each of these factors has an independent, but probably cumulative effect on IQ. The necrosis model estimates a 5% risk of necrosis for children after 59.8 Gy or 63.6 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to any part of the brain if delivered as primary RT or reirradiation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This PENTEC comprehensive review establishes objective relationships between patient age, RT dose, RT volume, and MTX to subsequent risks of neurocognitive injury and necrosis. A lack of consistent RT data and outcome reporting in the published literature hindered investigation of the other predefined CNS morbidity endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Peter L Stavinoha
- Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Warissara Rongthong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - N Patrik Brodin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital at Ohio State University, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sabina Vennarini
- Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Paul Aridgides
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | - Daniel C Bowers
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | - Leontien Kremer
- Department of Pediatrics, UMC Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cecile Ronckers
- Department of Pediatrics, UMC Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Medical University Brandenburg-Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Louis Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Michele Avanzo
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Papini C, Mirzaei S. S, Xing M, Tonning Olsson I, de Blank PMK, Lange KR, Salloum R, Srivastava D, Leisenring WM, Howell RM, Oeffinger KC, Robison LL, Armstrong GT, Krull KR, Brinkman TM. Evolving therapies, neurocognitive outcomes, and functional independence in adult survivors of childhood glioma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:288-298. [PMID: 37688569 PMCID: PMC10852618 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of childhood glioma has evolved to reduce radiotherapy exposure with the goal of limiting late toxicity. However, the associations between treatment changes and neurocognition, and the contribution of neurocognition and chronic health conditions to attainment of adult independence, remain unknown. METHODS Adult survivors of childhood glioma diagnosed in 1970-1999 in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (n = 1284; median [minimum-maximum] 30 [18-51] years of age at assessment; 22 [15-34] years from diagnosis) self-reported neurocognitive impairment and chronic health conditions. Multivariable models evaluated associations between changes in treatment exposures (surgery only, chemotherapy [with or without surgery], cranial radiation [with or without chemotherapy and/or surgery]), and neurocognitive impairment. Latent class analysis with 5 indicators (employment, independent living, assistance with routine and/or personal care needs, driver's license, marital or partner status) identified classes of functional independence. Path analysis tested associations among treatment exposures, neurocognitive impairment, chronic health conditions, and functional independence. Statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Cranial radiation exposure decreased over time (51%, 1970s; 46%, 1980s; 27%, 1990s]. However, compared with siblings, survivors with any treatment exposure were at elevated risk for neurocognitive impairment, including surgery only (eg, memory: relative risk = 2.22; task efficiency: relative risk = 1.88; both P < .001). Three classes of functional independence were identified: independent (58%), moderately independent (20%), and nonindependent (22%). Cranial radiation was associated with nonindependence through impaired task efficiency (β = 0.06), sensorimotor (β = 0.06), and endocrine (β = 0.10) chronic health conditions and through the associations between these conditions and task efficiency (each β = 0.04). Sensorimotor and endocrine chronic health conditions were associated with nonindependence through memory. CONCLUSION Most long-term glioma survivors achieve adult independence. However, functional nonindependence is associated with treatment-related neurocognitive impairment and chronic health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Papini
- Department of Psychology and Biobehavioral Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Sedigheh Mirzaei S.
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Mengqi Xing
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Ingrid Tonning Olsson
- Department of Pediatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Peter M K de Blank
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, The Cure Starts Now Brain Tumor Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Katharine R Lange
- Divison of Pediatric Oncology, Hackensack Meridian Children’s Health, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Ralph Salloum
- Pediatric Brain Tumor Program, Division of Hematology, Oncology & Bone Marrow Transplant, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Deokumar Srivastava
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Wendy M Leisenring
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas at MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Leslie L Robison
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Gregory T Armstrong
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Kevin R Krull
- Department of Psychology and Biobehavioral Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Tara M Brinkman
- Department of Psychology and Biobehavioral Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Peterson RK, King TZ. A systematic review of pediatric neuropsychological outcomes with proton versus photon radiation therapy: A call for equity in access to treatment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2023; 29:798-811. [PMID: 36323679 DOI: 10.1017/s1355617722000819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is increasing interest in the utilization of proton beam radiation therapy (PRT) to treat pediatric brain tumors based upon presumed advantages over traditional photon radiation therapy (XRT). PRT provides more conformal radiation to the tumor with reduced dose to healthy brain parenchyma. Less radiation exposure to brain tissue beyond the tumor is thought to reduce neuropsychological sequelae. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of published studies comparing neuropsychological outcomes between PRT and XRT. METHOD PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane were systematically searched for peer-reviewed published studies that compared neuropsychological outcomes between PRT and XRT in pediatric brain tumor patients. RESULTS Eight studies were included. Six of the studies utilized retrospective neuropsychological data; the majority were longitudinal studies (n = 5). XRT was found to result in lower neuropsychological functioning across time. PRT was associated with generally stable neuropsychological functioning across time, with the exception of working memory and processing speed, which showed variable outcomes across studies. However, studies inconsistently included or considered medical and sociodemographic differences between treatment groups, which may have impacted neuropsychological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Despite methodological limitations, including limited baseline neuropsychological evaluations, temporal variability between radiation treatment and first evaluation or initial and follow-up evaluations, and heterogenous samples, there is emerging evidence of sociodemographic inequities in access to PRT. With more institutions dedicating funding towards PRT, there may be the opportunity to objectively evaluate the neuropsychological benefits of patients matched on medical and sociodemographic variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel K Peterson
- Department of Neuropsychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tricia Z King
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA
- Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Unnikrishnan S, Yip AT, Qian AS, Salans MA, Yu JD, Huynh-Le MP, Reyes A, Stasenko A, McDonald C, Kaner R, Crawford JR, Hattangadi-Gluth JA. Neurocognitive Outcomes in Multiethnic Pediatric Brain Tumor Patients Treated With Proton Versus Photon Radiation. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2023; 45:e837-e846. [PMID: 37539987 PMCID: PMC10538429 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000002724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We analyzed post-radiation (RT) neurocognitive outcomes in an ethnically diverse pediatric brain tumor population undergoing photon radiotherapy (XRT) and proton radiotherapy (PRT). PROCEDURE Post-RT neurocognitive outcomes from 49 pediatric patients (37% Hispanic/Latino) with primary brain tumors were analyzed. Tests included cognitive outcomes, behavioral outcomes, and overall intelligence. For each outcome, proportion of patients with cognitive impairment (scores <1.5 SD) was calculated. The Fisher exact tests compared proportion of patients with impairment and t tests compared T-scores between XRT (n=32) and PRT (n=17) groups. Linear regression assessed associations between radiation modality and outcomes. RESULTS Median follow-up was 3.2 and 1.8 years in the XRT and PRT groups, respectively. The median RT dose was 54.0 Gy. We found impairment in 16% to 42% of patients across most neurocognitive domains except executive function. There was no difference in scores between XRT and PRT groups. Regression analyses revealed no association of neurocognitive outcomes with radiation modality. Non-Hispanic patients had better Verbal Comprehension Index and General Ability Index scores than Hispanic patients ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS Among pediatric patients with brain tumors receiving RT, all cognitive domains were affected except executive function. Radiation modality was not associated with neurocognitive outcomes. Hispanic patients may be more vulnerable to posttreatment cognitive effects that warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumya Unnikrishnan
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine
- Departments of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Anthony T Yip
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine
- Departments of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Alexander S Qian
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine
- Departments of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Mia A Salans
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine
- Departments of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Justin D Yu
- Departments of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | | | | | | | - Carrie McDonald
- Departments of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
- Psychiatry
| | | | - John R Crawford
- Neurosciences and Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brown AL, Sok P, Raghubar KP, Lupo PJ, Richard MA, Morrison AC, Yang JJ, Stewart CF, Okcu MF, Chintagumpala MM, Gajjar A, Kahalley LS, Conklin H, Scheurer ME. Genetic susceptibility to cognitive decline following craniospinal irradiation for pediatric central nervous system tumors. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:1698-1708. [PMID: 37038335 PMCID: PMC10479777 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors treated with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) exhibit long-term cognitive difficulties. Goals of this study were to evaluate longitudinal effects of candidate and novel genetic variants on cognitive decline following CSI. METHODS Intelligence quotient (IQ), working memory (WM), and processing speed (PS) were longitudinally collected from patients treated with CSI (n = 241). Genotype-by-time interactions were evaluated using mixed-effects linear regression to identify common variants (minor allele frequency > 1%) associated with cognitive performance change. Novel variants associated with cognitive decline (P < 5 × 10-5) in individuals of European ancestry (n = 163) were considered replicated if they demonstrated consistent genotype-by-time interactions (P < .05) in individuals of non-European ancestries (n = 78) and achieved genome-wide statistical significance (P < 5 × 10-8) in a meta-analysis across ancestry groups. RESULTS Participants were mostly males (65%) diagnosed with embryonal tumors (98%) at a median age of 8.3 years. Overall, 1150 neurocognitive evaluations were obtained (median = 5, range: 2-10 per participant). One of the five loci previously associated with cognitive outcomes in pediatric CNS tumors survivors demonstrated significant time-dependent IQ declines (PPARA rs6008197, P = .004). Two variants associated with IQ in the general population were associated with declines in IQ after Bonferroni correction (rs9348721, P = 1.7 × 10-5; rs31771, P = 7.8 × 10-4). In genome-wide analyses, we identified novel loci associated with accelerated declines in IQ (rs116595313, meta-P = 9.4 × 10-9), WM (rs17774009, meta-P = 4.2 × 10-9), and PS (rs77467524, meta-P = 1.5 × 10-8; rs17630683, meta-P = 2.0 × 10-8; rs73249323, meta-P = 3.1 × 10-8). CONCLUSIONS Inherited genetic variants involved in baseline cognitive functioning and novel susceptibility loci jointly influence the degree of treatment-associated cognitive decline in pediatric CNS tumor survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin L Brown
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Pagna Sok
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Philip J Lupo
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Melissa A Richard
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Alanna C Morrison
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Jun J Yang
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Clinton F Stewart
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Mehmet Fatih Okcu
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Amar Gajjar
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Lisa S Kahalley
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Heather Conklin
- Psychology Department, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ahmed SK, Keole SR. Proton Therapy in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4269. [PMID: 37686545 PMCID: PMC10487250 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescent and young adult cancer patients are at high risk of developing radiation-associated side effects after treatment. Proton beam radiation therapy might reduce the risk of these side effects for this population without compromising treatment efficacy. METHODS We review the current literature describing the utility of proton beam radiation therapy in the treatment of central nervous system tumors, sarcomas, breast cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma for the adolescent and young adult cancer population. RESULTS Proton beam radiation therapy has utility for the treatment of certain cancers in the young adult population. Preliminary data suggest reduced radiation dose to normal tissues, which might reduce radiation-associated toxicities. Research is ongoing to further establish the role of proton therapy in this population. CONCLUSION This report highlights the potential utility of proton beam radiation for certain adolescent young adult cancers, especially with reducing radiation doses to organs at risk and thereby potentially lowering risks of certain treatment-associated toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safia K. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lassaletta Á, Morales JS, Valenzuela PL, Esteso B, Kahalley LS, Mabbott DJ, Unnikrishnan S, Panizo E, Calvo F. Neurocognitive outcomes in pediatric brain tumors after treatment with proton versus photon radiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Pediatr 2023; 19:727-740. [PMID: 37154861 PMCID: PMC10348930 DOI: 10.1007/s12519-023-00726-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in cancer treatments, particularly the development of radiation therapy, have led to improvements in survival outcomes in children with brain tumors. However, radiation therapy is associated with significant long-term neurocognitive morbidity. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the neurocognitive outcomes of children and adolescents with brain tumors treated with photon radiation (XRT) or proton therapy (PBRT). METHODS A systematic search was conducted (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science from inception until 02/01/2022) for studies comparing the neurocognitive outcomes of children and adolescents with brain tumors treated with XRT vs. PBRT. The pooled mean differences (expressed as Z scores) were calculated using a random effects method for those endpoints analyzed by a minimum of three studies. RESULTS Totally 10 studies (n = 630 patients, average age range: 1-20 years) met the inclusion criteria. Patients who had received PBRT achieved significantly higher scores (difference in Z scores ranging from 0.29-0.75, all P < 0.05 and significant in sensitivity analyses) after treatment than those who had received XRT for most analyzed neurocognitive outcomes (i.e., intelligence quotient, verbal comprehension and perceptual reasoning indices, visual motor integration, and verbal memory). No robust significant differences (P > 0.05 in main analyses or sensitivity analyses) were found for nonverbal memory, verbal working memory and working memory index, processing speed index, or focused attention. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric brain tumor patients who receive PBRT achieve significantly higher scores on most neurocognitive outcomes than those who receive XRT. Larger studies with long-term follow-ups are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Lassaletta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Calle Marquesado de Santa Marta 1, 28027, Madrid, Spain.
- Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Javier S Morales
- MOVE-IT Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain
- Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cádiz (INiBICA) Research Unit, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Pedro L Valenzuela
- Physical Activity and Health Research Group (PaHerg), Research Institute of the Hospital 12 de Octubre ('imas12'), Madrid, Spain
- Systems Biology Department, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - Borja Esteso
- Clinical Neuropsychology Unit, Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lisa S Kahalley
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Donald J Mabbott
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Elena Panizo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Calle Marquesado de Santa Marta 1, 28027, Madrid, Spain
| | - Felipe Calvo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Calle Marquesado de Santa Marta 1, 28027, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Phuong C, Qiu B, Mueller S, Braunstein SE. Precision based approach to tailoring radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary management of pediatric central nervous system tumors. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2023; 3:141-149. [PMID: 39035723 PMCID: PMC11256719 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern day survivorship from childhood malignancies is estimated to be over 80%. However, central nervous system tumors remain the leading cause of cancer mortality in children and is the most common solid tumor in this population. Improved survivorship is, in part, a result of improved multidisciplinary care, often with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy. With improved survival, long term effects of treatment and quality of life impacts have been recognized and pose a challenge to maximize the therapeutic ratio of treatment. It has been increasingly more apparent that precise risk stratification, such as with the inclusion of molecular classification, is instrumental in efforts to tailor radiotherapy for appropriate treatment, generally towards de-intensification for this vulnerable patient population. In addition, advances in radiotherapy techniques have allowed greater conformality and accuracy of treatment for those who do require radiotherapy for tumor control. Ongoing efforts to tailor radiotherapy, including de-escalation, omission, or intensification of radiotherapy, continue to improve as increasing insight into tumor heterogeneity is recognized, coupled with advances in precision medicine employing novel molecularly-targeted therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Phuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Bo Qiu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Sabine Mueller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Steve E. Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Merchant TE, Hoehn ME, Khan RB, Sabin ND, Klimo P, Boop FA, Wu S, Li Y, Burghen EA, Jurbergs N, Sandler ES, Aldana PR, Indelicato DJ, Conklin HM. Proton therapy and limited surgery for paediatric and adolescent patients with craniopharyngioma (RT2CR): a single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:523-534. [PMID: 37084748 PMCID: PMC10408380 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00146-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared with photon therapy, proton therapy reduces exposure of normal brain tissue in patients with craniopharyngioma, which might reduce cognitive deficits associated with radiotherapy. Because there are known physical differences between the two methods of radiotherapy, we aimed to estimate progression-free survival and overall survival distributions for paediatric and adolescent patients with craniopharyngioma treated with limited surgery and proton therapy, while monitoring for excessive CNS toxicity. METHODS In this single-arm, phase 2 study, patients with craniopharyngioma at St Jude Children's Research Hospital (Memphis TN, USA) and University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute (Jacksonville, FL, USA) were recruited. Patients were eligible if they were aged 0-21 years at the time of enrolment and had not been treated with previous radiotherapeutic or intracystic therapies. Eligible patients were treated using passively scattered proton beams, 54 Gy (relative biological effect), and a 0·5 cm clinical target volume margin. Surgical treatment was individualised before proton therapy and included no surgery, single procedures with catheter and Ommaya reservoir placement through a burr hole or craniotomy, endoscopic resection, trans-sphenoidal resection, craniotomy, or multiple procedure types. After completing treatment, patients were evaluated clinically and by neuroimaging for tumour progression and evidence of necrosis, vasculopathy, permanent neurological deficits, vision loss, and endocrinopathy. Neurocognitive tests were administered at baseline and once a year for 5 years. Outcomes were compared with a historical cohort treated with surgery and photon therapy. The coprimary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival. Progression was defined as an increase in tumour dimensions on successive imaging evaluations more than 2 years after treatment. Survival and safety were also assessed in all patients who received photon therapy and limited surgery. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01419067. FINDINGS Between Aug 22, 2011, and Jan 19, 2016, 94 patients were enrolled and treated with surgery and proton therapy, of whom 49 (52%) were female, 45 (48%) were male, 62 (66%) were White, 16 (17%) were Black, two (2%) were Asian, and 14 (15%) were other races, and median age was 9·39 years (IQR 6·39-13·38) at the time of radiotherapy. As of data cutoff (Feb 2, 2022), median follow-up was 7·52 years (IQR 6·28-8·53) for patients who did not have progression and 7·62 years (IQR 6·48-8·54) for the full cohort of 94 patients. 3-year progression-free survival was 96·8% (95% CI 90·4-99·0; p=0·89), with progression occurring in three of 94 patients. No deaths occurred at 3 years, such that overall survival was 100%. At 5 years, necrosis had occurred in two (2%) of 94 patients, severe vasculopathy in four (4%), and permanent neurological conditions in three (3%); decline in vision from normal to abnormal occurred in four (7%) of 54 patients with normal vision at baseline. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were headache (six [6%] of 94 patients), seizure (five [5%]), and vascular disorders (six [6%]). No deaths occurred as of data cutoff. INTERPRETATION Proton therapy did not improve survival outcomes in paediatric and adolescent patients with craniopharyngioma compared with a historical cohort, and severe complication rates were similar. However, cognitive outcomes with proton therapy were improved over photon therapy. Children and adolescents treated for craniopharyngioma using limited surgery and post-operative proton therapy have a high rate of tumour control and low rate of severe complications. The outcomes achieved with this treatment represent a new benchmark to which other regimens can be compared. FUNDING American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, American Cancer Society, the US National Cancer Institute, and Research to Prevent Blindness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
| | - Mary Ellen Hoehn
- Department of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Raja B Khan
- Department of Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Noah D Sabin
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Paul Klimo
- Department of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Frederick A Boop
- Department of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Shengjie Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Yimei Li
- Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Burghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Niki Jurbergs
- Department of Psychology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Philipp R Aldana
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Heather M Conklin
- Department of Psychology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chen Z, Dominello MM, Joiner MC, Burmeister JW. Proton versus photon radiation therapy: A clinical review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1133909. [PMID: 37064131 PMCID: PMC10091462 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1133909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
While proton radiation therapy offers substantially better dose distribution characteristics than photon radiation therapy in certain clinical applications, data demonstrating a quantifiable clinical advantage is still needed for many treatment sites. Unfortunately, the number of patients treated with proton radiation therapy is still comparatively small, in some part due to the lack of evidence of clear benefits over lower-cost photon-based treatments. This review is designed to present the comparative clinical outcomes between proton and photon therapies, and to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of proton radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Chen
- School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- *Correspondence: Zhe Chen,
| | - Michael M. Dominello
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Michael C. Joiner
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Jay W. Burmeister
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mash LE, Kahalley LS, Raghubar KP, Goodrich-Hunsaker NJ, Abildskov TJ, De Leon LA, MacLeod M, Stancel H, Parsons K, Biekman B, Desai NK, Grosshans DR, Paulino AC, Chu ZD, Whitehead WE, Okcu MF, Chintagumpala M, Wilde EA. Cognitive Sparing in Proton versus Photon Radiotherapy for Pediatric Brain Tumor Is Associated with White Matter Integrity: An Exploratory Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061844. [PMID: 36980730 PMCID: PMC10047305 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy for pediatric brain tumors is associated with reduced white matter structural integrity and neurocognitive decline. Superior cognitive outcomes have been reported following proton radiotherapy (PRT) compared to photon radiotherapy (XRT), presumably due to improved sparing of normal brain tissue. This exploratory study examined the relationship between white matter change and late cognitive effects in pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with XRT versus PRT. Pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with XRT (n = 10) or PRT (n = 12) underwent neuropsychological testing and diffusion weighted imaging >7 years post-radiotherapy. A healthy comparison group (n = 23) was also recruited. Participants completed age-appropriate measures of intellectual functioning, visual-motor integration, and motor coordination. Tractography was conducted using automated fiber quantification (AFQ). Fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) were extracted from 12 tracts of interest. Overall, both white matter integrity (FA) and neuropsychological performance were lower in XRT patients while PRT patients were similar to healthy control participants with respect to both FA and cognitive functioning. These findings support improved long-term outcomes in PRT versus XRT. This exploratory study is the first to directly support for white matter integrity as a mechanism of cognitive sparing in PRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa E Mash
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Psychology Service, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lisa S Kahalley
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kimberly P Raghubar
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Psychology Service, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Tracy J Abildskov
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Luz A De Leon
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Psychology Service, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Marianne MacLeod
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Psychology Service, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Heather Stancel
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Psychology Service, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kelley Parsons
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Psychology Service, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Brian Biekman
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Nilesh K Desai
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David R Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zili D Chu
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - William E Whitehead
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mehmet Fatih Okcu
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Murali Chintagumpala
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Elisabeth A Wilde
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Huang V, Rejimon A, Reddy K, Trivedi AG, Ramesh KK, Giuffrida AS, Muiruri R, Shim H, Eaton BR. Spectroscopic MRI-Guided Proton Therapy in Non-Enhancing Pediatric High-Grade Glioma. Tomography 2023; 9:633-646. [PMID: 36961010 PMCID: PMC10037577 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9020051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a critical part of definitive therapy for pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG). RT is designed to treat residual tumor defined on conventional MRI (cMRI), though pHGG lesions may be ill-characterized on standard imaging. Spectroscopic MRI (sMRI) measures endogenous metabolite concentrations in the brain, and Choline (Cho)/N-acetylaspartate (NAA) ratio is a highly sensitive biomarker for metabolically active tumor. We provide a preliminary report of our study introducing a novel treatment approach of whole brain sMRI-guided proton therapy for pHGG. An observational cohort (c1 = 10 patients) receives standard of care RT; a therapeutic cohort (c2 = 15 patients) receives sMRI-guided proton RT. All patients undergo cMRI and sMRI, a high-resolution 3D whole-brain echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (EPSI) sequence (interpolated resolution of 12 µL) prior to RT and at several follow-up timepoints integrated into diagnostic scans. Treatment volumes are defined by cMRI for c1 and by cMRI and Cho/NAA ≥ 2x for c2. A longitudinal imaging database is used to quantify changes in lesion and metabolite volumes. Four subjects have been enrolled (c1 = 1/c2 = 3) with sMRI imaging follow-up of 4-18 months. Preliminary data suggest sMRI improves identification of pHGG infiltration based on abnormal metabolic activity, and using proton therapy to target sMRI-defined high-risk regions is safe and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
| | - Abinand Rejimon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
| | - Kartik Reddy
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Radiology, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA
| | - Anuradha G. Trivedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
| | - Karthik K. Ramesh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
| | - Alexander S. Giuffrida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
| | - Robert Muiruri
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Hyunsuk Shim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Bree R. Eaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Radiology, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gram D, Brodin NP, Björk-Eriksson T, Nysom K, Munck Af Rosenschöld P. The risk of radiation-induced neurocognitive impairment and the impact of sparing the hippocampus during pediatric proton cranial irradiation. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:134-140. [PMID: 36847433 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2176253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Hippocampus is a central component for neurocognitive function and memory. We investigated the predicted risk of neurocognitive impairment of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and the deliverability and effects of hippocampal sparing. The risk estimates were derived from published NTCP models. Specifically, we leveraged the estimated benefit of reduced neurocognitive impairment with the risk of reduced tumor control. MATERIAL AND METHODS For this dose planning study, a total of 504 hippocampal sparing intensity modulated proton therapy (HS-IMPT) plans were generated for 24 pediatric patients whom had previously received CSI. Plans were evaluated with respect to target coverage and homogeneity index to target volumes, maximum and mean dose to OARs. Paired t-tests were used to compare hippocampal mean doses and normal tissue complication probability estimates. RESULTS The median mean dose to the hippocampus could be reduced from 31.3 GyRBE to 7.3 GyRBE (p < .001), though 20% of these plans were not considered clinically acceptable as they failed one or more acceptance criterion. Reducing the median mean hippocampus dose to 10.6 GyRBE was possible with all plans considered as clinically acceptable treatment plans. By sparing the hippocampus to the lowest dose level, the risk estimation of neurocognitive impairment could be reduced from 89.6%, 62.1% and 51.1% to 41.0% (p < .001), 20.1% (p < .001) and 29.9% (p < .001) for task efficiency, organization and memory, respectively. Estimated tumor control probability was not adversely affected by HS-IMPT, ranging from 78.5 to 80.5% for all plans. CONCLUSIONS We present estimates of potential clinical benefit in terms of neurocognitive impairment and demonstrate the possibility of considerably reducing neurocognitive adverse effects, minimally compromising target coverage locally using HS-IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gram
- Department of Oncology - Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Radiotherapy, Zealand University Hospital, Næstved, Denmark
| | - N Patrik Brodin
- Institute for Onco-Physics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Björk-Eriksson
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden.,Regional Cancer Centre West, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Karsten Nysom
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The Juliane Marie Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Radiation Physics - Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Contenti J, Bost F, Mazure NM. [Medulloblastoma: The latest major advances]. Bull Cancer 2023; 110:412-423. [PMID: 36822958 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant brain tumor that mainly affects children. It is rarely found in adults. Among the four groups of MB defined today according to molecular characteristics, group 3 is the least favorable with an overall survival rate of 50 %. Current treatments, based on surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, are not sufficiently adapted to the different characteristics of the four MB groups. However, the use of new cellular and animal models has opened new doors to interesting therapeutic avenues. In this review, we detail recent advances in MB research, with a focus on the genes and pathways that drive tumorigenesis, with particular emphasis on the animal models that have been developed to study tumor biology, as well as advances in new targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Contenti
- Université Côte d'Azur, C3M, Inserm U1065, 151, route de Saint-Antoine-de-Ginestière, BP2 3194, 06204 Nice cedex 03, France; CHU de Nice, 30, voie Romaine, 06000 Nice, France.
| | - Frédéric Bost
- Université Côte d'Azur, C3M, Inserm U1065, 151, route de Saint-Antoine-de-Ginestière, BP2 3194, 06204 Nice cedex 03, France
| | - Nathalie M Mazure
- Université Côte d'Azur, C3M, Inserm U1065, 151, route de Saint-Antoine-de-Ginestière, BP2 3194, 06204 Nice cedex 03, France.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mash LE, Kahalley LS, Okcu MF, Grosshans DR, Paulino AC, Stancel H, Leon LD, Wilde E, Desai N, Chu ZD, Whitehead WE, Chintagumpala M, Raghubar KP. Superior verbal learning and memory in pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy. Neuropsychology 2023; 37:204-217. [PMID: 36480379 PMCID: PMC10544942 DOI: 10.1037/neu0000882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radiotherapy for pediatric brain tumor has been associated with late cognitive effects. Compared to conventional photon radiotherapy (XRT), proton radiotherapy (PRT) delivers lower doses of radiation to healthy brain tissue. PRT has been associated with improved long-term cognitive outcomes compared to XRT. However, there is limited research comparing the effects of XRT and PRT on verbal memory. METHOD Survivors of pediatric brain tumor treated with either XRT (n = 29) or PRT (n = 51) completed neuropsychological testing > 1 year following radiotherapy. Performance on neuropsychological measures was compared between treatment groups using analysis of covariance. Chi-squared tests of independence were used to compare the frequency of encoding, retrieval, and intact memory profiles between treatment groups. Associations between memory performance and other neurobehavioral measures were examined using Pearson correlation. RESULTS Overall, patients receiving PRT demonstrated superior verbal learning and recall compared to those treated with XRT. Encoding and retrieval deficits were more common in the XRT group than the PRT group, with encoding problems being most prevalent. The PRT group was more likely to engage in semantic clustering strategies, which predicted better encoding and retrieval. Encoding ability was associated with higher intellectual and adaptive functioning, and fewer parent-reported concerns about day-to-day attention and cognitive regulation. CONCLUSION Results suggest that PRT is associated with verbal memory sparing, driven by effective encoding and use of learning strategies. Future work may help to clarify underlying neural mechanisms associated with verbal memory decline, which will better inform treatment approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa E. Mash
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine
- Psychology Service, Texas Children’s Hospital
| | - Lisa S. Kahalley
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine
- Psychology Service, Texas Children’s Hospital
- Texas Children’s Cancer and Hematology Centers, Texas Children’s Hospital
| | - M. Fatih Okcu
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - David R. Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Arnold C. Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Heather Stancel
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine
- Psychology Service, Texas Children’s Hospital
| | - Luz De Leon
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine
- Psychology Service, Texas Children’s Hospital
| | - Elisabeth Wilde
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine
| | - Nilesh Desai
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neuroradiology, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Zili D. Chu
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neuroradiology, Baylor College of Medicine
| | | | - Murali Chintagumpala
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Kimberly P. Raghubar
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine
- Psychology Service, Texas Children’s Hospital
- Texas Children’s Cancer and Hematology Centers, Texas Children’s Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
The intrinsic apoptosis pathway is controlled by the BCL-2 family of proteins. Although the pro-survival members of this family can help cancer cells evade apoptosis, they may also produce apoptotic vulnerabilities that can potentially be exploited therapeutically. Apoptotic vulnerabilities can be driven by endogenous factors including altered genetics, signaling, metabolism, structure and lineage or differentiation state as well as imposed factors, the most prominent being exposure to anti-cancer agents. The recent development of BH3 mimetics that inhibit pro-survival BCL-2 family proteins has allowed these apoptotic vulnerabilities to be targeted with demonstrable clinical success. Here, we review the key concepts that are vital for understanding, uncovering, and exploiting apoptotic vulnerabilities in cancer for the potential improvement of patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristopher A. Sarosiek
- Molecular and Integrative Physiological Sciences Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kris C. Wood
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Qiu W, Zhang W, Ma X, Kong Y, Shi P, Fu M, Wang D, Hu M, Zhou X, Dong Q, Zhou Q, Zhu J. Auto-segmentation of important centers of growth in the pediatric skeleton to consider during radiation therapy based on deep learning. Med Phys 2023; 50:284-296. [PMID: 36047281 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routinely delineating of important skeletal growth centers is imperative to mitigate radiation-induced growth abnormalities for pediatric cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. However, it is hindered by several practical problems, including difficult identification, time consumption, and inter-practitioner variability. PURPOSE The goal of this study was to construct and evaluate a novel Triplet-Attention U-Net (TAU-Net)-based auto-segmentation model for important skeletal growth centers in childhood cancer radiotherapy, concentrating on the accuracy and time efficiency. METHODS A total of 107 childhood cancer patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria were enrolled in the training cohort (N = 80) and test cohort (N = 27). The craniofacial growth plates, shoulder growth centers, and pelvic ossification centers, with a total of 19 structures in the three groups, were manually delineated by two experienced radiation oncologists on axial, coronal, and sagittal computed tomography images. Modified from U-Net, the proposed TAU-Net has one main branch and two bypass branches, receiving semantic information of three adjacent slices to predict the target structure. With supervised deep learning, the skeletal growth centers contouring of each group was generated by three different auto-segmentation models: U-Net, V-Net, and the proposed TAU-Net. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance 95% (HD95) were used to evaluate the accuracy of three auto-segmentation models. The time spent on performing manual tasks and manually correcting auto-contouring generated by TAU-Net was recorded. The paired t-test was used to compare the statistical differences in delineation quality and time efficiency. RESULTS Among the three groups, including craniofacial growth plates, shoulder growth centers, and pelvic ossification centers groups, TAU-Net had demonstrated highly acceptable performance (the average DSC = 0.77, 0.87, and 0.83 for each group; the average HD95 = 2.28, 2.07, and 2.86 mm for each group). In the overall evaluation of 19 regions of interest (ROIs) in the test cohort, TAU-Net had an overwhelming advantage over U-Net (63.2% ROIs in DSC and 31.6% ROIs in HD95, p = 0.001-0.042) and V-Net (94.7% ROIs in DSC and 36.8% ROIs in HD95, p = 0.001-0.040). With an average time of 52.2 min for manual delineation, the average time saved to adjust TAU-Net-generated contours was 37.6 min (p < 0.001), a 72% reduction. CONCLUSIONS Deep learning-based models have presented enormous potential for the auto-segmentation of important growth centers in pediatric skeleton, where the proposed TAU-Net outperformed the U-Net and V-Net in geometrical precision for the majority status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenlong Qiu
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Manteia Technologies Co., Ltd, Xiamen, P. R. China
| | - Xingmin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Youyong Kong
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, P. R. China
| | - Pengyue Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Min Fu
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Dandan Wang
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Man Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Xianjun Zhou
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, P. R. China
| | - Qian Dong
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, P. R. China
| | - Qichao Zhou
- Manteia Technologies Co., Ltd, Xiamen, P. R. China
| | - Jian Zhu
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Thibodaux LK, Bledsoe J, Breiger D. Sex Differences, Academic Outcomes, and the Impact of Cranial Radiation in Pediatric Medulloblastoma. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40817-022-00131-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
|
25
|
Morrison MA, Walter S, Mueller S, Felton E, Jakary A, Stoller S, Molinaro AM, Braunstein SE, Hess CP, Lupo JM. Functional network alterations in young brain tumor patients with radiotherapy-induced memory impairments and vascular injury. Front Neurol 2022; 13:921984. [PMID: 36172034 PMCID: PMC9511024 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.921984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cognitive impairment and cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are long-term side-effects of cranial radiation therapy (RT). Previously we showed that memory function is disrupted in young patients and that the rate of cognitive decline correlates with CMB development. However, vascular injury alone cannot explain RT-induced cognitive decline. Here we use resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) to further investigate the complex mechanisms underlying memory impairment after RT. Methods Nineteen young patients previously treated with or without focal or whole-brain RT for a brain tumor underwent cognitive testing followed by 7T rsfMRI and susceptibility-weighted imaging for CMB detection. Global brain modularity and efficiency, and rsfMRI signal variability within the dorsal attention, salience, and frontoparietal networks were computed. We evaluated whether MR metrics could distinguish age- and sex-matched controls (N = 19) from patients and differentiate patients based on RT exposure and aggressiveness. We also related MR metrics with memory performance, CMB burden, and risk factors for cognitive decline after RT. Results Compared to controls, patients exhibited widespread hyperconnectivity, similar modularity, and significantly increased efficiency (p < 0.001) and network variability (p < 0.001). The most abnormal values were detected in patients treated with high dose whole-brain RT, having supratentorial tumors, and who did not undergo RT but had hydrocephalus. MR metrics and memory performance were correlated (R = 0.34–0.53), though MR metrics were more strongly related to risk factors for cognitive worsening and CMB burden with evidence of functional recovery. Conclusions MR metrics describing brain connectivity and variability represent promising candidate imaging biomarkers for monitoring of long-term cognitive side-effects after RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A. Morrison
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Melanie A. Morrison
| | - Sadie Walter
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, WA, United States
| | - Sabine Mueller
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Erin Felton
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Angela Jakary
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Schuyler Stoller
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Annette M. Molinaro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Steve E. Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Christopher P. Hess
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Janine M. Lupo
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
McCurdy MD, Raghubar KP, Christopher K, Okcu MF, Wilde E, Desai N, Chu ZD, Gragert M, Stancel H, Warren EH, Whitehead WE, Grosshans D, Paulino AC, Chintagumpala M, Kahalley LS. Predicting neurocognitive function in pediatric brain tumor early survivorship: The neurological predictor scale and the incremental validity of tumor size. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29803. [PMID: 35709014 PMCID: PMC10265925 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS) quantifies cumulative exposure to conventional treatment-related neurological risks but does not capture potential risks posed by tumors themselves. This study evaluated the predictive validity of the NPS, and the incremental value of tumor location and size, for neurocognitive outcomes in early survivorship following contemporary therapies for pediatric brain tumors. PROCEDURE Survivors (N = 69) diagnosed from 2010 to 2016 were administered age-appropriate versions of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales. Hierarchical multiple regressions examined the predictive and incremental validity of NPS score, tumor location, and tumor size. RESULTS Participants (51% female) aged 6-20 years (M = 13.22, SD = 4.09) completed neurocognitive evaluations 5.16 years (SD = 1.29) postdiagnosis. The NPS significantly predicted Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ; ΔR2 = .079), Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI; ΔR2 = 0.051), Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI; ΔR2 = 0.065), and Processing Speed Index (PSI; ΔR2 = 0.049) performance after controlling for sex, age at diagnosis, and maternal education. Tumor size alone accounted for a significant amount of unique variance in FSIQ (ΔR2 = 0.065), PRI (ΔR2 = 0.076), and PSI (ΔR2 = 0.080), beyond that captured by the NPS and relevant covariates. Within the full model, the NPS remained a significant independent predictor of FSIQ (β = -0.249, P = 0.016), VCI (β = -0.223, P = 0.048), and PRI (β = -0.229, P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS Tumor size emerged as an independent predictor of neurocognitive functioning and added incrementally to the predictive utility of the NPS. Pretreatment disease burden may provide one of the earliest markers of neurocognitive risk following contemporary treatments. With perpetual treatment advances, measures quantifying treatment-related risk may need to be updated and revalidated to maintain their clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D. McCurdy
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US
- Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, US
| | - Kimberly P. Raghubar
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US
- Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, US
| | | | - M. Fatih Okcu
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US
- Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, US
| | - Elisabeth Wilde
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, US
| | - Nilesh Desai
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US
- Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, US
| | - Zili D. Chu
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US
- Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, US
| | - Marsha Gragert
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX US
| | | | - Emily H. Warren
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US
- Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, US
| | - William E. Whitehead
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US
- Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, US
| | - David Grosshans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX US
| | | | - Murali Chintagumpala
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US
- Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, US
| | - Lisa S. Kahalley
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US
- Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, US
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Söderström H, Brocki K, Kleberg JL, Martinsson U, Ljungman G. Neurocognitive Functions Before and After Radiotherapy in Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors. Pediatr Neurol 2022; 133:21-29. [PMID: 35751959 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The numbers of pediatric brain tumor survivors are increasing due to improved treatment protocols and multimodal treatments. Many survivors have neurocognitive sequelae, especially after radiotherapy. Neuropsychologic assessment is therefore essential to interpret clinical outcome, evaluate treatments protocol, and implement rehabilitation interventions. The overall aim of this study was to describe neurocognitive functions before and after radiotherapy. We also aimed to explore potential confounding risk factors that could affect the interpretation of radiotherapy-induced neurocognitive decline. METHODS Fifty pediatric brain tumor survivors who had received radiotherapy (five years or more ago) were included. Clinical characteristics, potential confounding risk factors, radiotherapy plans, and neurocognitive functions on intelligence quotient (IQ) and neuropsychologic measurements were analyzed before and after radiotherapy. RESULTS Neurocognitive functions were affected before radiotherapy and were progressively aggravated thereafter. The last neuropsychologic assessment after radiotherapy varied between two and 139 months. Nineteen patients were tested five years after radiotherapy, and 90% of them performed ≥1 S.D. below the normative mean on IQ measurements. Several potential confounding risk factors including those induced by radiotherapy were associated with lower performance on perceptual function, working memory, and processing speed. Longer time after radiotherapy was particularly associated with lower performance on working memory and processing speed. Importantly, the neuropsychologic assessments revealed more comprehensive problems than could be inferred from IQ measurements alone. CONCLUSIONS Our study underpins the importance of systematic and structured neuropsychologic assessment before and after radiotherapy. The timing of the assessment is important, and potential confounding risk factors need to be identified to better evaluate radiotherapy-induced neurocognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Söderström
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Pediatric Oncology, Uppsala University and Uppsala University Children's Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Karin Brocki
- Division of Emotion Psychology, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Johan Lundin Kleberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulla Martinsson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Section of Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gustaf Ljungman
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Pediatric Oncology, Uppsala University and Uppsala University Children's Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
The Current State of Radiotherapy for Pediatric Brain Tumors: An Overview of Post-Radiotherapy Neurocognitive Decline and Outcomes. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071050. [PMID: 35887547 PMCID: PMC9315742 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumors of the central nervous system are the most common solid malignancies diagnosed in children. While common, they are also found to have some of the lowest survival rates of all malignancies. Treatment of childhood brain tumors often consists of operative gross total resection with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The current body of literature is largely inconclusive regarding the overall benefit of adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy. However, it is known that both are associated with conditions that lower the quality of life in children who undergo those treatments. Chemotherapy is often associated with nausea, emesis, significant fatigue, immunosuppression, and alopecia. While radiotherapy can be effective for achieving local control, it is associated with late effects such as endocrine dysfunction, secondary malignancy, and neurocognitive decline. Advancements in radiotherapy grant both an increase in lifetime survival and an increased lifetime for survivors to contend with these late effects. In this review, the authors examined all the published literature, analyzing the results of clinical trials, case series, and technical notes on patients undergoing radiotherapy for the treatment of tumors of the central nervous system with a focus on neurocognitive decline and survival outcomes.
Collapse
|
29
|
Ruggi A, Melchionda F, Sardi I, Pavone R, Meneghello L, Kitanovski L, Zaletel LZ, Farace P, Zucchelli M, Scagnet M, Toni F, Righetto R, Cianchetti M, Prete A, Greto D, Cammelli S, Morganti AG, Rombi B. Toxicity and Clinical Results after Proton Therapy for Pediatric Medulloblastoma: A Multi-Centric Retrospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2747. [PMID: 35681727 PMCID: PMC9179586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. Even if current treatment dramatically improves the prognosis, survivors often develop long-term treatment-related sequelae. The current radiotherapy standard for medulloblastoma is craniospinal irradiation with a boost to the primary tumor site and to any metastatic sites. Proton therapy (PT) has similar efficacy compared to traditional photon-based radiotherapy but might achieve lower toxicity rates. We report on our multi-centric experience with 43 children with medulloblastoma (median age at diagnosis 8.7 years, IQR 6.6, M/F 23/20; 26 high-risk, 14 standard-risk, 3 ex-infant), who received active scanning PT between 2015 and 2021, with a focus on PT-related acute-subacute toxicity, as well as some preliminary data on late toxicity. Most acute toxicities were mild and manageable with supportive therapy. Hematological toxicity was limited, even among HR patients who underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation before PT. Preliminary data on late sequelae were also encouraging, although a longer follow-up is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Ruggi
- Specialty School of Paediatrics-Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Fraia Melchionda
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, IRCCS Sant’Orsola SSD, University Hospital of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.M.); (A.P.)
| | - Iacopo Sardi
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; (I.S.); (R.P.)
| | - Rossana Pavone
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; (I.S.); (R.P.)
| | - Linda Meneghello
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology Service, Pediatric Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, 38123 Trento, Italy;
| | - Lidija Kitanovski
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | | | - Paolo Farace
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Mino Zucchelli
- Pediatric Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurological Science, IRCCS Bellaria Hospital, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Mirko Scagnet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy;
| | - Francesco Toni
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Roberto Righetto
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Marco Cianchetti
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Arcangelo Prete
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, IRCCS Sant’Orsola SSD, University Hospital of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.M.); (A.P.)
| | - Daniela Greto
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (A.G.M.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (A.G.M.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Barbara Rombi
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Warren EA, Raghubar KP, Cirino PT, Child AE, Lupo PJ, Grosshans DR, Paulino AC, Okcu MF, Minard CG, Ris MD, Mahajan A, Viana A, Chintagumpala M, Kahalley LS. Cognitive predictors of social adjustment in pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with photon versus proton radiation therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29645. [PMID: 35285129 PMCID: PMC9208675 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric brain tumor survivors are at risk for poor social outcomes. It remains unknown whether cognitive sparing with proton radiotherapy (PRT) supports better social outcomes relative to photon radiotherapy (XRT). We hypothesized that survivors treated with PRT would outperform those treated with XRT on measures of cognitive and social outcomes. Further, we hypothesized that cognitive performance would predict survivor social outcomes. PROCEDURE Survivors who underwent PRT (n = 38) or XRT (n = 20) participated in a neurocognitive evaluation >1 year post radiotherapy. Group differences in cognitive and social functioning were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Regression analyses examined predictors of peer relations and social skills. RESULTS Age at evaluation, radiation dose, tumor diameter, and sex did not differ between groups (all p > .05). XRT participants were younger at diagnosis (XRT M = 5.0 years, PRT M = 7.6 years) and further out from radiotherapy (XRT M = 8.7 years, PRT M = 4.6 years). The XRT group performed worse than the PRT group on measures of processing speed (p = .01) and verbal memory (p < .01); however, social outcomes did not differ by radiation type. The proportion of survivors with impairment in peer relations and social skills exceeded expectation; χ2 (1) = 38.67, p < .001; χ2 (1) = 5.63, p < .05. Household poverty predicted peer relation difficulties (t = 2.18, p < .05), and verbal memory approached significance (t = -1.99, p = .05). Tumor diameter predicted social skills (t = -2.07, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS Regardless of radiation modality, survivors are at risk for social challenges. Deficits in verbal memory may place survivors at particular risk. Results support monitoring of cognitive and social functioning throughout survivorship, as well as consideration of sociodemographic risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A.H. Warren
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Kimberly P. Raghubar
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Paul T. Cirino
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston TX
| | - Amanda E. Child
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child and Adolescent Neurology, UT Health, Houston TX
| | - Philip J. Lupo
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - David R. Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Arnold C. Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - M. Fatih Okcu
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Charles G. Minard
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - M. Douglas Ris
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN
| | - Andres Viana
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston TX
| | - Murali Chintagumpala
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Lisa S. Kahalley
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX,Correspondence To: Lisa S. Kahalley, Ph.D., Texas Children’s Hospital, 1102 Bates Ave., Suite 940, Houston, TX 77030-2399, US; Telephone: 832-822-4759; Fax: 832-825-1222; .
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Upadhyay R, Liao K, Grosshans DR, McGovern SL, Frances McAleer M, Zaky W, Chintagumpala MM, Mahajan A, Nana Yeboa D, Paulino AC. Quantifying the risk and dosimetric variables of symptomatic brainstem injury after proton beam radiation in pediatric brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1571-1581. [PMID: 35157767 PMCID: PMC9435496 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brainstem toxicity after radiation therapy (RT) is a devastating complication and a particular concern with proton radiation (PBT). We investigated the incidence and clinical correlates of brainstem injury in pediatric brain tumors treated with PBT. METHODS All patients <21 years with brain tumors treated with PBT at our institution from 2007-2019, with a brainstem Dmean >30 Gy and/or Dmax >50.4 Gy were included. Symptomatic brainstem injury (SBI) was defined as any new or progressive cranial neuropathy, ataxia, and/or motor weakness with corresponding radiographic abnormality within brainstem. RESULTS A total of 595 patients were reviewed and 468 (medulloblastoma = 200, gliomas = 114, ependymoma = 87, ATRT = 43) met our inclusion criteria. Median age at RT was 6.3 years and median prescribed RT dose was 54Gy [RBE]. Fifteen patients (3.2%) developed SBI, at a median of 4 months after RT. Grades 2, 3, 4, and 5 brainstem injuries were seen in 7, 5, 1, and 2 patients respectively. Asymptomatic radiographic changes were seen in 51 patients (10.9%). SBI was significantly higher in patients with age ≤3 years, female gender, ATRT histology, patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue, and those not receiving craniospinal irradiation. Patients with SBI had a significantly higher V50-52. In 2014, our institution started using strict brainstem dose constraints (Dmax ≤57 Gy, Dmean ≤52.4 Gy, and V54≤10%). There was a trend towards decrease in SBI from 4.4% (2007-2013) to 1.5% (2014-2019) (P = .089) without affecting survival. CONCLUSION Our results suggest a low risk of SBI after PBT for pediatric brain tumors, comparable to photon therapy. A lower risk was seen after adopting strict brainstem dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Centre Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kaiping Liao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wafik Zaky
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Debra Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Corresponding Author: Arnold C. Paulino, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX 77030, USA ()
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Levitch CF, Holland AA, Bledsoe J, Kim SY, Barnett M, Ramjan S, Sands SA. Comparison of neuropsychological functioning in pediatric posterior fossa tumor survivors: Medulloblastoma, low-grade astrocytoma, and healthy controls. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29491. [PMID: 34842359 PMCID: PMC10409501 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuropsychological comparison of medulloblastoma (MB) and cerebellar low-grade astrocytoma (LGA) survivors to controls can clarify treatment-related neurocognitive late effects. While both brain tumor groups undergo surgery to the posterior fossa, children with MB additionally receive craniospinal irradiation with boost and chemotherapy. This study provides an updated comparison of neuropsychological functioning in these two groups and examines effects of demographic risk factors upon outcomes. PROCEDURE Forty-two children (16 MB, nine LGA, and 17 controls) completed measures of intellectual functioning, verbal learning/memory, visual-motor integration, and fine-motor functioning. The effects of age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, gender, fatigue, and social status on neuropsychological functioning were examined. RESULTS MB survivors demonstrated the worst neurocognitive late effects, but they were less severe and extensive than in prior studies. LGA survivors' mean scores were below normative expectations in working memory, processing speed, and fine-motor functioning. In this overall sample, processing speed difficulties were independent of fine-motor functioning and fatigue. Higher parental education was associated with better intellectual functioning, working memory, delayed recall, and visual-motor integration. Neuropsychological function was not associated with gender, age at diagnosis, or time since diagnosis. CONCLUSION The results support that contemporary treatment approaches with craniospinal irradiation plus boost and chemotherapy confer the greatest risk for late effects, while surgical resection is associated with subtle but important neurocognitive difficulties. Ultimately, this study furthers our understanding of factors impacting neuropsychological function in pediatric MB and LGA survivors and contributes to empirical support for close monitoring and targeted interventions into survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara F. Levitch
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alice Ann Holland
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Dallas, Texas
- Children’s Medical Center Dallas, Department of Psychiatry, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jesse Bledsoe
- Seattle Children’s Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Soo Young Kim
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marie Barnett
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sameera Ramjan
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Stephen A. Sands
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Breen WG, Paulino AC, Hartsell WF, Mangona VS, Perkins SM, Indelicato DJ, Harmsen WS, Tranby BN, Bajaj BVM, Gallotto SL, Yock TI, Laack NN. Factors Associated with Acute Toxicity in Pediatric Patients Treated with Proton Radiotherapy: A Report from the Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:155-162. [PMID: 34929404 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES Limited prospective information regarding acute toxicity in pediatric patients receiving proton therapy (PT) exists. In this study, Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry (PPCR) data was analyzed for factors associated with development of acute toxicity in children receiving passively scattered or pencil beam scanning PT. MATERIALS/METHODS Pediatric patients treated with PT and enrolled on the PPCR from 2016-2017 at seven institutions were included. Data was entered on presence versus absence of acute general, cardiac, endocrine, eye, gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary, hematologic, mouth, musculoskeletal, neurologic, psychologic, respiratory, and skin toxicities prior to (baseline) and at the end of PT (acute). Associations between patient and treatment variables with development of acute toxicity were assessed with multivariable modelling. RESULTS Of 422 patients included, PT technique was passively scattered in 241 (57%), pencil beam scanning in 180 (43%), and missing in 1 (<1%) patient. Median age was 9.9 years. Daily anesthesia for treatment was used in 169 (40%). Treatments were categorized as craniospinal irradiation (CSI) (n=100, 24%), focal CNS PT (n=157, 38%), or body PT (n=158, 38%). Passively scattered PT was associated with increased risk of hematologic toxicity compared to pencil beam scanning PT (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.38-6.70, p=0.006). There were no other differences toxicities between PT techniques. Uninsured patients had increased risk of GI (OR: 2.71, 1.12-6.58, p=0.027) and hematologic toxicity (OR: 10.67, 2.68-42.46, p<0.001). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were more likely to experience skin (OR: 2.45, 1.23-4.88, p=0.011), hematologic (OR: 2.87, 1.31-6.25, p=0.008), GI (OR: 2.37, 1.33-4.21, p=0.003), and mouth toxicities (OR: 2.03, 1.10-3.73, p=0.024). Patients receiving 49-55 Gy were more likely to experience skin (OR: 2.18, 1.06-4.44, p=0.033) toxicity than those receiving <49 Gy. CONCLUSION The PPCR registry highlights broad differences in acute toxicity rates in children receiving PT, and identifies opportunities for improvements in prevention, monitoring, and treatment of toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Stephanie M Perkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - W Scott Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | | | | | | | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cognitive Functions of Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors Treated With Proton Beam Therapy: A Case Series. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2021; 43:e1205-e1209. [PMID: 33235149 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000002011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric brain tumor survivors who received proton beam therapy at the University of Tsukuba Hospital from 2004 to 2011 were retrospectively evaluated for cognitive function. Five patients were included. The median age of diagnosis was 5.4 years (range: 1.5 to 12.5 y) and the median follow-up time was 5.8 years (range: 3.1 to 8.1 y). IQ scores at follow-up were decreased in 2 of 5 patients; 1 underwent whole-brain irradiation and the other was examined just after surgical removal of recurrent tumors. Local proton beam therapy may preserve cognitive function in survivors of pediatric brain tumors.
Collapse
|
35
|
Slykerman RF, Jenner E, Tsui K, Laughton S. Neuropsychological assessment of paediatric brain tumour survivors: Factors associated with assessment. J Paediatr Child Health 2021; 57:1612-1616. [PMID: 34014589 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.15568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM Paediatric brain tumour survivors are at increased risk of neurocognitive deficits that affect their education. The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of brain tumour survivors who historically received a neuropsychological assessment and examine the demographic and treatment-related variables associated with neuropsychological assessment. A further aim was to determine the number and treatment profile of brain tumour survivors who would benefit from neuropsychological assessment. METHODS Data from the New Zealand Children's Cancer Registry including treatments received, was used to identify children treated for a brain tumour at Starship Children's Hospital between January 2009 and December 2015. Clinical records were examined for evidence of a neuropsychological assessment in the form of a written report. Logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with receipt of an assessment. RESULTS Of the 132 brain tumour survivors, 37 (28.0%) had evidence of a neuropsychological assessment in their clinical records. In adjusted analysis, children who were treated with all three of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy (n = 38) were more likely to have had an assessment (odds ratio: 12.90; 95% confidence interval: 4.76-34.93) than children who had either no treatment, chemotherapy alone, surgery alone or chemotherapy and surgery (n = 73). Treatment with radiotherapy alone or with either chemotherapy or surgery (n = 21) was not significantly associated with receipt of assessment (odds ratio = 2.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.69-8.37). CONCLUSIONS It is important to identify the number of children who might benefit from neuropsychological assessment to inform prioritisation within existing resource and plan for additional resource if required. With a focus on reducing late effects, it is imperative that neuropsychological assessment is an integral component of a paediatric brain tumour programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca F Slykerman
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Emily Jenner
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Karen Tsui
- Starship Children's Health, Starship Blood and Cancer Centre, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Stephen Laughton
- Starship Children's Health, Starship Blood and Cancer Centre, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:554-564. [PMID: 34509550 PMCID: PMC8748279 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Compared with photon cranial radiation therapy (X-CRT), proton cranial radiation therapy (P-CRT) offers potential advantages in limiting radiation-induced sequalae in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. This study aims to identify cognitive, functional magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography imaging markers and molecular differences between the radiation modalities. Methods and Materials: Juvenile rats received a single faction of 10 Gy (relative biological effectiveness−weighted dose) delivered with 6 MV X-CRT or at the midspread out Bragg peak of a 100 MeV P-CRT beam. At 3, 6, and 12 months post-CRT, executive function was measured using 5-choice serial reaction time task. At ~12 months post-CRT, animals were imaged with 18F-Flurodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography imaging followed by functional ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging and stained for markers of neuroinflammation. Results: Irradiated animals had cognitive impairment with a higher number of omissions and lower incorrect and premature responses compared with sham (P ≤ .05). The accuracy of the animals’ X-CRT was less than that of sham (P ≤ .001). No significant difference in rates of cognitive change were found between the radiation modalities. At 12 months post-CRT, glucose metabolism was significantly higher than sham in X-CRT (P = .04) but not P-CRT. Using diffusion tensor imaging, P-CRT brains were found to have higher white matter volume and fiber lengths compared with sham (P < .03). Only X-CRT animals had higher apparent diffusion coefficient values compared with sham (P = .04). P-CRT animals had more connectomic changes compared with X-CRT. Correlative analysis identified several imaging features with cognitive performance. Further-more, microgliosis (P < .05), astrogliosis (P < .01), and myelin thinning (P <.05) were observed in both radiation modalities, with X-CRT showing slightly more inflammation. Conclusions: Both P-CRT and X-CRT lead to neurocognitive changes compared with sham. Although no significant difference was observed in neuroinflammation between the irradiated groups, differences were found in late-term glucose metabolism and brain connectome. Our results indicate that despite relative biological effectiveness weighting of the proton dose there are still differential effects which warrants further investigation.
Collapse
|
37
|
Child AE, Warren EA, Grosshans DR, Paulino AC, Okcu MF, Ris MD, Mahajan A, Orobio J, Cirino PT, Minard CG, Viana AG, Bick J, Woods SP, Chintagumpala M, Kahalley LS. Long-term cognitive and academic outcomes among pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e29125. [PMID: 34114294 PMCID: PMC8316321 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PRT) may be associated with less neurocognitive risk than photon RT (XRT) for pediatric brain tumor survivors. We compared neurocognitive and academic outcomes in long-term survivors treated with XRT versus PRT. METHODS Survivors underwent neurocognitive evaluation >1 year after craniospinal (CSI) or focal PRT or XRT. Groups were compared using separate one-way analyses of covariance for the CSI and focal groups. RESULTS PRT (n = 58) and XRT (n = 30) subgroups were similar on gender (66% male), age at RT (median = 6.5 years), age at follow-up (median = 14.6 years), and government assistance status (32%). PRT and XRT focal groups differed on follow-up interval, shunt history, and total RT dose (all p < .05), whereas PRT and XRT CSI groups differed on follow-up interval, baseline neurocognitive performance score, boost volume, and CSI dose (all p < .05). The PRT focal group outperformed the XRT focal group on inhibition/switching (p = .04). The PRT CSI group outperformed the XRT CSI group on inattention/impulsivity (both p < .05). Several clinical variables (i.e., RT dose, boost field, baseline performance) predicted neurocognitive outcomes (all p < .05). The PRT focal group performed comparably to population means on most neurocognitive measures, while both CSI groups performed below expectation on multiple measures. The XRT CSI group was most impaired. All groups fell below expectation on processing speed, fine motor, and academic fluency (most p < .01). CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest generally favorable neurocognitive and academic long-term outcomes following focal PRT. Impairment was greatest following CSI regardless of modality. Dosimetry and baseline characteristics are important determinants of outcome alone or in combination with modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E. Child
- Department of Neuropsychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD
| | - Emily A. Warren
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - David R. Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Arnold C. Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - M. Fatih Okcu
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - M. Douglas Ris
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN
| | - Jessica Orobio
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX
| | | | - Charles G. Minard
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | | | | | | | - Murali Chintagumpala
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Lisa S. Kahalley
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bär E, Collins-Fekete CA, Rompokos V, Zhang Y, Gaze MN, Warry A, Poynter A, Royle G. Assessment of the impact of CT calibration procedures for proton therapy planning on pediatric treatments. Med Phys 2021; 48:5202-5218. [PMID: 34174092 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Relative stopping powers (RSPs) for proton therapy are estimated using single-energy computed tomography (SECT), calibrated with standardized tissues of the adult male. It is assumed that those tissues are representative of tissues of all age and sex. Female, male, and pediatric tissues differ from one another in density and composition. In this study, we use tabulated pediatric tissues and computational phantoms to investigate the impact of this assumption on pediatric proton therapy. The potential of dual-energy CT (DECT) to improve the accuracy of these calculations is explored. METHODS We study 51 human body tissues, categorized into male/female for the age groups newborn, 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year-old children, and adult, with given compositions and densities. CT numbers are simulated and RSPs are estimated using SECT and DECT methods. Estimated tissue RSPs from each method are compared to theoretical RSPs. The dose and range errors of each approach are evaluated on three computational phantoms (Ewing's sarcoma, salivary sarcoma, and glioma) derived from pediatric proton therapy patients. RESULTS With SECT, soft tissues have mean estimation errors and standard deviation up to (1.96 ± 4.18)% observed in newborns, compared to (0.20 ± 1.15)% in adult males. Mean estimation errors for bones are up to (-3.35 ± 4.76)% in pediatrics as opposed to (0.10 ± 0.66)% in adult males. With DECT, mean errors reduce to (0.17 ± 0.13)% and (0.23 ± 0.22)% in newborns (soft tissues/bones). With SECT, dose errors in a Ewing's sarcoma phantom are exceeding 5 Gy (10% of prescribed dose) at the distal end of the treatment field, with volumes of dose errors >5 Gy ofV diff > 5 = 4630.7 mm3 . Similar observations are made in the head and neck phantoms, with overdoses to healthy tissue exceeding 2 Gy (4%). A systematic Bragg peak shift resulting in either over- or underdosage of healthy tissues and target volumes depending on the crossed tissues RSP prediction errors is observed. Water equivalent range errors of single beams are between -1.53 and 5.50 mm (min, max) (Ewing's sarcoma phantom), -0.78 and 3.62 mm (salivary sarcoma phantom), and -0.43 and 1.41 mm (glioma phantom). DECT can reduce dose errors to <1 Gy and range errors to <1 mm. CONCLUSION Single-energy computed tomography estimates RSPs for pediatric tissues with systematic shifts. DECT improves the accuracy of RSPs and dose distributions in pediatric tissues compared to the SECT calibration curve based on adult male tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Vasilis Rompokos
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark N Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison Warry
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Poynter
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gary Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Postsurgical geometrical variations of tumor bed and brainstem during photon and proton therapy for pediatric tumors of the posterior fossa: dosimetric impact and predictive factors. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1113-1123. [PMID: 34351450 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01828-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brainstem radionecrosis is an important issue during the irradiation of tumors of the posterior fossa. The aim of the present study is to analyze postsurgical geometrical variations of tumor bed (TB) and brainstem (BS) and their impact on dosimetry. METHODS Retrospective collection of data from pediatric patients treated at a single institution. Availability of presurgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was verified; availability of at least two postsurgical MRIs was considered a further inclusion criterion. The following metrics were analyzed: total volume, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Haudsdorff distances (HD). RESULTS Fourteen patients were available for the quantification of major postsurgical geometrical variations of TB. DSC, HD max, and HD average values were 0.47 (range: 0.08;0.76), 11.3 mm (7.7;24.5), and 2.6 mm (0.7;6.7) between the first and the second postoperative MRI, respectively. Postsurgical geometrical variations of the BS were also observed. Coverage to the TB was reduced in one patient (D95: -2.9 Gy), while D2 to the BS was increased for the majority of patients. Overall, predictive factors for significant geometrical changes were presurgical gross tumor volume (GTV) > 33 mL, hydrocephaly at diagnosis, Luschka foramen involvement, and younger age (≤ 8 years). CONCLUSION Major volume changes were observed in this cohort, with some dosimetric impact. The use of a recent co-registration MRI is advised. The 2-3 mm HD average observed should be considered in the planning target volume/planning organ at risk volume (PTV/PRV) margin and/or robust optimization planning. Results from wider efforts are needed to verify our findings.
Collapse
|
40
|
Tsang DS, Schulte F. Beyond the brain: socioeconomic status and race in pediatric brain tumor survivorship. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1050-1051. [PMID: 33822189 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona Schulte
- Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Plant-Fox AS, O'Halloran K, Goldman S. Pediatric brain tumors: the era of molecular diagnostics, targeted and immune-based therapeutics, and a focus on long term neurologic sequelae. Curr Probl Cancer 2021; 45:100777. [PMID: 34303558 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric brain tumors are the second most common malignancy of childhood after acute leukemia and the number one cause of cancer-related mortality1. Over the past decade, advanced molecular diagnostics have led to the discovery of new molecularly-defined tumor types with prognostic and therapeutic implications. Methylation profiles, whole genome sequencing, and transcriptomics have defined subgroups and revealed heterogeneity within commonly defined tumor entities2,3. These findings have also revealed important differences between adult and pediatric brain tumors of similar histology. The majority of pediatric low grade gliomas (pLGG) are defined by alterations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway including BRAFV600E point mutation, K1AA1549-BRAF fusion, and FGFR1 alterations as opposed to IDH1/2 mutations and 1p/19q co-deletion seen more frequently in adult low grade gliomas4. These findings have led to targeted therapies, namely BRAF and MEK inhibitors, which are currently being evaluated in phase III clinical trials and may soon supplant chemotherapy as standard of care for pLGG's. While targeted therapy trials for pediatric brain tumors have had significant success, immunotherapy remains a challenge in a group of tumors with generally lower mutational burden compared to adult tumors and relatively "cold" immune microenvironment. Despite this, a wide array of immunotherapy trials including vaccine therapies, immune checkpoint blockade, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, and viral therapies are on-going. Unique to pediatrics, multiple clinical trials have sought to answer the question of whether the most malignant pediatric brain tumors in the youngest patients can be successfully treated with high dose chemotherapy in lieu of radiation to avoid devastating long-term neurocognitive deficits. Due to the collaborative work of multiple pediatric neuro-oncology consortiums, the recent history of pediatric brain tumor research is one of efficient translation from bench to bedside in a rare group of tumors resulting in significant progress in the field. Here, advances in the areas of molecular characterization, targeted and immune-based therapies, and reduction in long term co-morbidities will be reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley S Plant-Fox
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Division of Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplantation/Neuro-Oncology. Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Katrina O'Halloran
- Children's Hospital of Los Angeles. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stewart Goldman
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Division of Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplantation/Neuro-Oncology. Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Weusthof K, Lüttich P, Regnery S, König L, Bernhardt D, Witt O, Herfarth K, Unterberg A, Jungk C, Farnia B, Combs SE, Debus J, Rieken S, Harrabi S, Adeberg S. Neurocognitive Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Following Brain Irradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143538. [PMID: 34298751 PMCID: PMC8307409 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Advanced radiation techniques can reduce the severity of neurocognitive sequelae in young brain tumor patients. In the present analysis, we sought to compare neurocognitive outcomes after proton irradiation with patients who underwent photon radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. Neurocognitive outcomes were evaluated in 103 pediatric brain tumor patients (proton RT n = 26, photon RT n = 30, surgery n = 47) before and after treatment. Comparison of neurocognitive outcomes following different treatment modalities were analyzed over four years after treatment completion. Longitudinal analyses included 42 months of follow-up after proton RT and 55 months after photon RT and surgery. Neurocognitive assessment included standardized tests examining seven domains. A comparison of neurocognitive outcomes after RT (proton and photon with >90% additional surgery) and surgery showed no significant differences in any neurocognitive domain. Neurocognitive functioning tests after proton RT failed to identify alterations compared to baseline testing. Long-term follow up over four years after photon RT showed a decrease in non-verbal intelligence (-9.6%; p = 0.01) and visuospatial construction (-14.9%; p = 0.02). After surgery, there was a decline in non-verbal intelligence (-10.7%; p = 0.01) and processing speed (14.9%; p = 0.002). Differences in neurocognitive outcomes between RT and surgical cohorts in direct intermodal comparison at long-term follow-up were not identified in our study, suggesting that modern radiation therapy does not affect cognition as much as in the past. There were no alterations in long-term neurocognitive abilities after proton RT, whereas decline of processing speed, non-verbal intelligence, and visuospatial abilities were observed after both photon RT and surgery. Domains dependent on intact white matter structures appear particularly vulnerable to brain tumor treatment irrespective of treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Weusthof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.); (S.R.); (L.K.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peggy Lüttich
- Section of Pediatric Brain Tumors, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, University Medical Center for Children and Adolescents, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.L.); (O.W.)
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.); (S.R.); (L.K.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.); (S.R.); (L.K.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, 81675 München, Germany; (D.B.); (S.E.C.)
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Olaf Witt
- Section of Pediatric Brain Tumors, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, University Medical Center for Children and Adolescents, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.L.); (O.W.)
- Translational Program, Hopp Children’s Cancer Center at NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.); (S.R.); (L.K.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Unterberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.U.); (C.J.)
| | - Christine Jungk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.U.); (C.J.)
| | - Benjamin Farnia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA;
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, 81675 München, Germany; (D.B.); (S.E.C.)
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.); (S.R.); (L.K.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany;
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.); (S.R.); (L.K.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.); (S.R.); (L.K.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-6221-56-8201
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Eaton BR, Fong GW, Ingerski LM, Pulsifer MB, Goyal S, Zhang C, Weyman EA, Esiashvili N, Klosky JL, MacDonald TJ, Ebb DH, MacDonald SM, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI. Intellectual functioning among case-matched cohorts of children treated with proton or photon radiation for standard-risk medulloblastoma. Cancer 2021; 127:3840-3846. [PMID: 34255345 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton therapy may reduce cognitive deficits after radiotherapy among brain tumor survivors, although current data are limited to retrospective comparisons between historical cohorts. The authors compared intelligence quotient scores within a case-matched cohort of children with medulloblastoma treated with proton radiation (PRT) or photon radiation (XRT) over the same time period. METHODS Among 88 consecutive patients with standard-risk medulloblastoma treated with PRT or XRT at 2 institutions from 2000 to 2009, 50 were matched 1:1 (25 with PRT and 25 with XRT) according to age, gender, date of diagnosis, histology, radiation boost, and craniospinal irradiation dose. One-way analyses of variance were performed to compare the Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) and associated index scores between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS Neurocognitive data were available for 37 survivors (17 with PRT and 20 with XRT) from the matched cohort. The mean age was 8.5 years (SD, 4.14 years). The median follow-up was 5.3 years (range, 1.0-11.4 years) and 4.6 years (range, 1.1-11.2 years) for the PRT and XRT cohorts, respectively (P = .193). Patients treated with PRT had significantly higher mean FSIQ (99.6 vs 86.2; P = .021), verbal (105.2 vs 88.6; P = .010), and nonverbal scores (103.1 vs 88.9; P = .011) than the XRT-treated cohort. Differences in processing speed (82.9 vs 77.2; P = .331) and working memory (97.0 vs 92.7; P = .388) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy-associated cognitive effects appear to be more attenuated after proton therapy. Comprehensive prospective studies are needed to appropriately evaluate the neurocognitive advantages of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bree R Eaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Grace W Fong
- Department of Psychology, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lisa M Ingerski
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.,Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Margaret B Pulsifer
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Subir Goyal
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Elizabeth A Weyman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natia Esiashvili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - James L Klosky
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.,Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tobey J MacDonald
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.,Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David H Ebb
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ali JS, Ashford JM, Swain MA, Harder LL, Carlson-Green BL, Miller JM, Wallace J, Kaner RJ, Billups CA, Onar-Thomas A, Merchant TE, Gajjar A, Conklin HM. Predictors of Cognitive Performance Among Infants Treated for Brain Tumors: Findings From a Multisite, Prospective, Longitudinal Trial. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2350-2358. [PMID: 33945291 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Infants treated for CNS malignancies experience a significantly poorer response to treatment and are particularly at risk for neuropsychological deficits. The literature is limited and inconsistent regarding cognitive outcomes among this group. We investigated predictors of cognitive outcomes in children treated for brain tumors during infancy as part of a large, prospective, multisite, longitudinal trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred thirty-nine infants with a newly diagnosed CNS tumor were treated with chemotherapy, with or without focal proton or photon radiation therapy (RT). Cognitive assessments were conducted at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and then annually for 5 years. The median length of follow-up was 816 days (26.8 months). Neurocognitive testing included assessment of intellectual functioning (intellectual quotient [IQ]), parent ratings of executive functioning and emotional and behavioral functioning, and socioeconomic status. RESULTS At baseline, IQ, parent-reported working memory, and parent-reported adaptive functioning were worse than normative expectations. Baseline cognitive difficulties were associated with younger age at diagnosis and lower socioeconomic status. Linear mixed models did not demonstrate a decline in IQ over time. There were increased parent-reported attention and executive problems over time. Increased concerns were related to supratentorial tumor location and CSF diversion. There were no differences in cognitive outcomes based on treatment exposure (chemotherapy-only v chemotherapy with RT and proton v photon focal RT). CONCLUSION Even before adjuvant therapy, young children with brain tumors experience cognitive difficulties that can affect quality of life. Changes in cognitive functioning over time were dependent on tumor location and surgical factors rather than adjuvant therapy. These findings may serve to guide treatment planning and indicate targets for cognitive monitoring and intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanelle S Ali
- Department of Psychology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Jason M Ashford
- Department of Psychology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Michelle A Swain
- Children's Health Queensland Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Joanna Wallace
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Ryan J Kaner
- Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, Encinitas, CA
| | - Catherine A Billups
- Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Arzu Onar-Thomas
- Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Amar Gajjar
- Department of Pediatric Medicine, Neuro-Oncology Division, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Heather M Conklin
- Department of Psychology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Aridgides P, Janssens GO, Braunstein S, Campbell S, Poppe M, Murphy E, MacDonald S, Ladra M, Alapetite C, Haas-Kogan D. Gliomas, germ cell tumors, and craniopharyngioma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28401. [PMID: 32960496 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2000] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
This report summarizes the current multimodality treatment approaches for children with low- and high-grade gliomas, germinoma, and nongerminomatous germ cell tumors, and craniopharyngiomas used in the Children's Oncology Group (COG) and the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP). Treatment recommendations are provided in the context of historical approaches regarding the roles of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Future research strategies for these tumors in both COG and SIOP are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Aridgides
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13210
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, GA, 3508, The Netherlands
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Ron Conway Family Gateway Medical Building, 1825 Fourth St. 1st floor M1215, San Francisco, CA, 94115
| | - Shauna Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue / CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195
| | - Matthew Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, 1950 Circle of Hope, Radiation Oncology, 1570, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112
| | - Erin Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Mail Code CA5, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Francis H Burr Proton Therapy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114
| | - Matthew Ladra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, 401 N. Broadway, Weinberg Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21231
| | | | - Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, D1622, 450 Brookline Ave, Brookline, MA, 02215
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Palmer JD, Tsang DS, Tinkle CL, Olch AJ, Kremer LCM, Ronckers CM, Gibbs IC, Constine LS. Late effects of radiation therapy in pediatric patients and survivorship. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28349. [PMID: 33818893 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Advances in multimodality therapy have led to childhood cancer cure rates over 80%. However, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy may lead to debilitating or even fatal long-term effects among childhood survivors beyond those inflicted by the primary disease process. It is critical to understand, mitigate, and prevent these late effects of cancer therapy to improve the quality of life of childhood cancer survivors. This review summarizes the various late effects of radiotherapy and acknowledges the Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC), an international collaboration that is systematically analyzing the association between radiation treatment dose/volume and consequential organ toxicities, in developing children as a basis to formulate recommendations for clinical practice of pediatric radiation oncology. We also summarize initiatives for survivorship and surveillance of late normal tissue effects related to radiation therapy among long-term survivors of childhood cancer treated in the past.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio, Columbus
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christopher L Tinkle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC and Children's' Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cecile M Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Brandenburg Medical School, Institute for Biostatistics and Registry Research, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Iris C Gibbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
in 't Ven L, Roelofs E, Cubillos Mesías M, Compter I, Klaver YL, Smeenk RJ, Janssens GO, Kaanders JH, Fajardo RD, Oldenburger F, de Ruysscher D, Troost EG, Eekers DB. The ROCOCO performance scoring system translates dosimetric differences into clinically relevant endpoints: Comparing IMPT to VMAT in an example pilocytic astrocytoma dataset. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 28:32-38. [PMID: 33748441 PMCID: PMC7966832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Proton therapy is expected to outperform photon-based treatment regarding organs at risk (OAR) sparing but to date there is no method to practically measure clinical benefit. Here, we introduce the novel ROCOCO Performance Scoring System (RPSS) translating dose differences into clinically relevant endpoints and apply this to a treatment plan comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in 20 pilocytic astrocytoma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The RPSS was developed on the basis of expert-based weighting factors and toxicity scores per OAR. The imaging datasets of 20 pilocytic astrocytoma patients having undergone radiotherapy were included in this in silico dosimetric comparison trial as proof of principle. For each of these patients, treatment plans to a total dose of 54 Gy (RBE) were generated for VMAT and IMPT and these were compared regarding radiation dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) and OARs. The RPSS was calculated for each treatment plan comparing VMAT and IMPT. RESULTS In 40 analysed treatment plans, the average and low dose volumes to various OARs were significantly reduced when using IMPT compared to VMAT (p < 0.05). Using the RPSS, a significant difference between both treatment modalities was found, with 85% of the patients having a lower RPSS in favour of the IMPT plan. CONCLUSION There are dosimetric differences between IMPT and VMAT in pilocytic astrocytoma patients. In absence of clinically validated NTCP models we introduce the RPSS model in order to objectively compare treatment modalities by translating dosimetric differences in potential clinical differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke in 't Ven
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Roelofs
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Inge Compter
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Geert O. Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Raquel Davila Fajardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Foppe Oldenburger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- KU Leuven, Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology/KU Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Esther G.C. Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniëlle B.P. Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bhat K, Medina P, He L, Zhang L, Saki M, Ioannidis A, Nguyen NT, Sodhi SS, Sung D, Magyar CE, Liau LM, Kornblum HI, Pajonk F. 1-[(4-Nitrophenyl)sulfonyl]-4-phenylpiperazine treatment after brain irradiation preserves cognitive function in mice. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:1484-1494. [PMID: 32291451 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Normal tissue toxicity is an inevitable consequence of primary or secondary brain tumor radiotherapy. Cranial irradiation commonly leads to neurocognitive deficits that manifest months or years after treatment. Mechanistically, radiation-induced loss of neural stem/progenitor cells, neuroinflammation, and demyelination are contributing factors that lead to progressive cognitive decline. METHODS The effects of 1-[(4-nitrophenyl)sulfonyl]-4-phenylpiperazine (NSPP) on irradiated murine neurospheres, microglia cells, and patient-derived gliomaspheres were assessed by sphere-formation assays, flow cytometry, and interleukin (IL)-6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Activation of the hedgehog pathway was studied by quantitative reverse transcription PCR. The in vivo effects of NSPP were analyzed using flow cytometry, sphere-formation assays, immunohistochemistry, behavioral testing, and an intracranial mouse model of glioblastoma. RESULTS We report that NSPP mitigates radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity in the brains of mice. NSPP treatment significantly increased the number of neural stem/progenitor cells after brain irradiation in female animals, and inhibited radiation-induced microglia activation and expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6. Behavioral testing revealed that treatment with NSPP after radiotherapy was able to successfully mitigate radiation-induced decline in memory function of the brain. In mouse models of glioblastoma, NSPP showed no toxicity and did not interfere with the growth-delaying effects of radiation. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that NSPP has the potential to mitigate cognitive decline in patients undergoing partial or whole brain irradiation without promoting tumor growth and that the use of this compound as a radiation mitigator of radiation late effects on the central nervous system warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kruttika Bhat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Paul Medina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ling He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Le Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mohammad Saki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Angeliki Ioannidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nhan T Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sirajbir S Sodhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - David Sung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Clara E Magyar
- Translational Pathology Core Laboratory, Image Analysis/Virtual Microscopy, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Linda M Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Harley I Kornblum
- NPI-Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Frank Pajonk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Oyefiade A, Paltin I, De Luca CR, Hardy KK, Grosshans DR, Chintagumpala M, Mabbott DJ, Kahalley LS. Cognitive Risk in Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumors. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:1718-1726. [PMID: 33886348 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ade Oyefiade
- Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychology, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Iris Paltin
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Cinzia R De Luca
- Children's Cancer Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kristina K Hardy
- Neuropsychology Division, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.,Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Pediatrics, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - David R Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Murali Chintagumpala
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.,Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Donald J Mabbott
- Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychology, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa S Kahalley
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.,Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX.,Psychology Service, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|