1
|
Lazarou I, Krooupa AM, Nikolopoulos S, Apostolidis L, Sarris N, Papadopoulos S, Kompatsiaris I. Cancer Patients' Perspectives and Requirements of Digital Health Technologies: A Scoping Literature Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2293. [PMID: 39001356 PMCID: PMC11240750 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Digital health technologies have the potential to alleviate the increasing cancer burden. Incorporating patients' perspectives on digital health tools has been identified as a critical determinant for their successful uptake in cancer care. The main objective of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the existing evidence on cancer patients' perspectives and requirements for patient-facing digital health technologies. Three databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Science Direct) were searched and 128 studies were identified as eligible for inclusion. Web-based software/platforms, mobile or smartphone devices/applications, and remote sensing/wearable technologies employed for the delivery of interventions and patient monitoring were the most frequently employed technologies in cancer care. The abilities of digital tools to enable care management, user-friendliness, and facilitate patient-clinician interactions were the technological requirements predominantly considered as important by cancer patients. The findings from this review provide evidence that could inform future research on technology-associated parameters influencing cancer patients' decisions regarding the uptake and adoption of patient-facing digital health technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioulietta Lazarou
- Information Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, P.O. Box 6036, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Anna-Maria Krooupa
- Information Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, P.O. Box 6036, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Spiros Nikolopoulos
- Information Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, P.O. Box 6036, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Lazaros Apostolidis
- Information Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, P.O. Box 6036, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikos Sarris
- Information Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, P.O. Box 6036, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Symeon Papadopoulos
- Information Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, P.O. Box 6036, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ioannis Kompatsiaris
- Information Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, P.O. Box 6036, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stover J, Avadhanula L, Sood S. A review of strategies and levels of community engagement in strengths-based and needs-based health communication interventions. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1231827. [PMID: 38655513 PMCID: PMC11035763 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1231827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Community engagement is key in health communication interventions that seek to incorporate community voices in their planning and implementation. Understanding what approaches and strategies are currently being used can help tailor programs in different social and cultural contexts. This review explores needs-based and strengths-based approaches and consensus and conflict strategies in community-based global health communications programs. Our objective is to examine the current state of the field, outline lessons learned, and identify gaps in existing programming to help guide future interventions. Methods PubMed and Web of Science were searched for articles published between 2010 and 2023. Studies were included if they described a community-based health communication intervention and an ongoing or completed implementation. Interventions were coded then categorized according to their level of community engagement and as single, hybrid, or complex, depending upon the number of approaches and strategies used. Results The search yielded 678 results and 42 were included in the final review and analysis. A vast majority 34 (81.0%) interventions utilized a needs-based approach and 24 (57.1%) utilized a strengths-based approach. Consensus as a strategy was utilized in 38 (90.5%) of the manuscripts and 9 (21.4%) implemented a conflict strategy. Interventions that combined approaches and strategies were more likely to leverage a higher level of community engagement. Conclusion These results showcase the complicated nature of global health communication program planning and implementation. There is a lack of interventions that use conflict as a strategy to empower communities to act on their own behalf, even when at odds with existing power structures. Complex interventions that include all approaches and strategies demonstrate the potential for global health communication interventions to be at the cutting edge of public health practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Stover
- Department of Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Laxmisupriya Avadhanula
- Department of Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Suruchi Sood
- Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Department of Health Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hudek N, Carroll K, Semchishen S, Vanderhout S, Presseau J, Grimshaw J, Fergusson DA, Gillies K, Graham ID, Taljaard M, Brehaut JC. Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR reporting checklist: a systematic methodology review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2024; 24:85. [PMID: 38589803 PMCID: PMC11000410 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02195-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruiting participants to clinical trials is an ongoing challenge, and relatively little is known about what recruitment strategies lead to better recruitment. Recruitment interventions can be considered complex interventions, often involving multiple components, targeting a variety of groups, and tailoring to different groups. We used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) reporting checklist (which comprises 12 items recommended for reporting complex interventions) to guide the assessment of how recruitment interventions are described. We aimed to (1) examine to what extent we could identify information about each TIDieR item within recruitment intervention studies, and (2) observe additional detail for each item to describe useful variation among these studies. METHODS We identified randomized, nested recruitment intervention studies providing recruitment or willingness to participate rates from two sources: a Cochrane review of trials evaluating strategies to improve recruitment to randomized trials, and the Online Resource for Research in Clinical triAls database. First, we assessed to what extent authors reported information about each TIDieR item. Second, we developed descriptive categorical variables for 7 TIDieR items and extracting relevant quotes for the other 5 items. RESULTS We assessed 122 recruitment intervention studies. We were able to extract information relevant to most TIDieR items (e.g., brief rationale, materials, procedure) with the exception of a few items that were only rarely reported (e.g., tailoring, modifications, planned/actual fidelity). The descriptive variables provided a useful overview of study characteristics, with most studies using various forms of informational interventions (55%) delivered at a single time point (90%), often by a member of the research team (59%) in a clinical care setting (41%). CONCLUSIONS Our TIDieR-based variables provide a useful description of the core elements of complex trial recruitment interventions. Recruitment intervention studies report core elements of complex interventions variably; some process elements (e.g., mode of delivery, location) are almost always described, while others (e.g., duration, fidelity) are reported infrequently, with little indication of a reason for their absence. Future research should explore whether these TIDieR-based variables can form the basis of an approach to better reporting of elements of successful recruitment interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Hudek
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Kelly Carroll
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Seana Semchishen
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Shelley Vanderhout
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Justin Presseau
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Ian D Graham
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Jamie C Brehaut
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morrissey E, Murphy A, Murphy P, O'Grady L, Byrne M, Casey M, Dolan E, Duane S, Durand H, Gillespie P, Hayes P, Hobbins A, Hynes L, McEvoy JW, Newell J, Molloy G. Supporting GPs and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure: Protocol for a pilot cluster RCT of the MIAMI intervention. HRB Open Res 2023; 6:6. [PMID: 38779427 PMCID: PMC11109531 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13661.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is one of the most important risk factors for stroke and heart disease. Recent international guidelines have stated that 'poor adherence to treatment - in addition to physician inertia - is the most important cause of poor blood pressure control'. The MaxImising Adherence, Minimising Inertia (MIAMI) intervention, which has been developed using a systematic, theoretical, user-centred approach, aims to support general practitioners (GPs) and people with hypertension to maximise medication use, through the facilitation of adequate information exchange within consultations about long-term antihypertensive medication use and adherence skill development. The aim of the MIAMI pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to gather and analyse feasibility data to allow us to (1) refine the intervention, and (2) determine the feasibility of a definitive RCT. Methods: GP practices (n = 6) will be recruited and randomised to the intervention arm (n = 3) or usual care control arm (n = 3). Each practice will recruit 10 patient participants. For a patient to be eligible they must have a diagnosis of hypertension, be on two or more anti-hypertensive medications, must not be achieving recommended blood pressure levels, and be over the age of 65 years. Participants in the intervention arm will meet their GP and receive the MIAMI intervention twice over three months. Quantitative data collection will take place at baseline and three month follow up. A pilot health economic analysis and a qualitative sub-study will also be incorporated into the study. Discussion: This pilot cluster RCT of the MIAMI intervention will allow us to gather valuable acceptability and feasibility data to further refine the intervention so it optimally designed for both GP and patient use. In particular, the qualitative component will provide an insight into GP and patient experiences of using the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Murphy
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Patrick Murphy
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Louise O'Grady
- School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Molly Byrne
- School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Monica Casey
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Eamon Dolan
- Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sinead Duane
- J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- HRB Trials Methodology Research Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Hannah Durand
- Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Paddy Gillespie
- Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, Institute for Lifecourse and Society, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CURAM, SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices (13/RC/2073_P2), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Peter Hayes
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Anna Hobbins
- Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, Institute for Lifecourse and Society, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CURAM, SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices (13/RC/2073_P2), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Lisa Hynes
- Croí, The West of Ireland Cardiac and Stroke Foundation, Galway, Ireland
| | - John William McEvoy
- National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - John Newell
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - MIAMI PPI group
- School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland
- J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- HRB Trials Methodology Research Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
- Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, Institute for Lifecourse and Society, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CURAM, SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices (13/RC/2073_P2), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Croí, The West of Ireland Cardiac and Stroke Foundation, Galway, Ireland
- National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Gerard Molloy
- School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parker AE, Scull TM, Kennedy KL. Efficacy of DigiKnowItNews: Teen, a multimedia educational website for adolescents about pediatric clinical trials: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:436. [PMID: 37391773 PMCID: PMC10311873 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07464-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric research is crucial for the development of new scientific advancements, treatments, and therapies for adolescents. Yet relatively few pediatric clinical trials are conducted due to barriers to successful recruitment and retention, including knowledge and attitudes about clinical trials. Adolescents tend to experience greater autonomy to make decisions and have expressed interest in being part of the decision to participate in clinical trials. Increasing knowledge, positive attitudes, and self-efficacy related to clinical trials could positively impact the decision to participate in a pediatric clinical trial. However, there are currently few interactive, developmentally appropriate, web-based resources available to educate adolescents about clinical trials. DigiKnowItNews: Teen was created as a multimedia educational website to address the relatively low levels of enrollment in pediatric clinical trials and need for information to empower adolescents to make decisions about participating in clinical trials. METHODS This is a parallel group randomized controlled superiority trial to test the effectiveness of DigiKnowItNews: Teen, for improving factors related to clinical trial participation among adolescent and parents. Eligible parent-adolescent (ages 12 to 17 years) pairs will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions: intervention or wait-list control. All participants will complete pre- and post-test questionnaires and participants assigned to the intervention will receive access to review the DigiKnowItNews: Teen content for 1 week. Wait-list control participants will have the option to review DigiKnowItNews: Teen after study completion. The primary outcomes are knowledge about clinical research, attitudes, and beliefs toward pediatric clinical trials, self-efficacy for making decisions related to clinical trial participation, willingness to participate in a future clinical trial, procedural fears, and parent-adolescent communication quality. Overall feedback and satisfaction related to DigiKnowItNews: Teen will also be collected. DISCUSSION The trial will evaluate the effectiveness of DigiKnowIt News: Teen, an educational website about pediatric clinical trials for adolescents. If found effective in promoting factors related to future pediatric clinical trial participation, DigiKnowIt News: Teen could be used by adolescents, along with their parents, as they make the decision to participate in a clinical trial. Clinical trial researchers can also use DigiKnowIt News: Teen to aid their participant recruitment efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05714943. Registered on 02/03/2023.
Collapse
|
6
|
Pothuri B, Blank SV, Myers TK, Hines JF, Randall LM, O'Cearbhaill RE, Slomovitz BM, Eskander RN, Alvarez Secord A, Coleman RL, Walker JL, Monk BJ, Moore KN, O'Malley DM, Copeland LJ, Herzog TJ. Inclusion, diversity, equity, and access (IDEA) in gynecologic cancer clinical trials: A joint statement from GOG foundation and Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO). Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:278-287. [PMID: 37315373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- B Pothuri
- NYU Langone Health and Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - S V Blank
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, New York, MY, USA
| | - T K Myers
- University of Massachusetts-Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - J F Hines
- University of Connecticut Health System, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - L M Randall
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - R E O'Cearbhaill
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - R N Eskander
- University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - A Alvarez Secord
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - R L Coleman
- Texas Oncology, US Oncology Network, The Woodlands, TX, USA
| | - J L Walker
- Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - B J Monk
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - K N Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - D M O'Malley
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbus, OH, USA
| | - L J Copeland
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbus, OH, USA
| | - T J Herzog
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Crown A, Fazeli S, Kurian AW, Ochoa DA, Joseph KA. Disparity in Breast Cancer Care: Current State of Access to Screening, Genetic Testing, Oncofertility, and Reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 236:1233-1239. [PMID: 36971366 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women, accounting for an estimated 30% of all new cancer diagnoses in women in 2022. Advances in breast cancer treatment have reduced the mortality rate over the past 25 years by up to 34% but not all groups have benefitted equally from these improvements. These disparities span the continuum of care from screening to the receipt of guideline-concordant therapy and survivorship. At the 2022 American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress, a panel session was dedicated to educating and discussing methods of addressing these disparities in a coordinated manner. While there are multilevel solutions to address these disparities, this article focuses on screening, genetic testing, reconstruction, and oncofertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelena Crown
- From the True Family Women's Cancer Center, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA (Crown)
| | | | - Allison W Kurian
- Division of Oncology, Population Sciences Program, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA (Kurian)
- Women's Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Kurian)
| | - Daniela A Ochoa
- Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock, AR (Ochoa)
| | - Kathie-Ann Joseph
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (Joseph)
- NYU Langone Health Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, New York, NY (Joseph)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morrissey E, Murphy A, Murphy P, O'Grady L, Byrne M, Casey M, Dolan E, Duane S, Durand H, Gillespie P, Hayes P, Hobbins A, Hynes L, McEvoy JW, Newell J, Molloy G. Supporting GPs and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure: Protocol for a pilot cluster RCT of the MIAMI intervention. HRB Open Res 2023. [DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13661.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is one of the most important risk factors for stroke and heart disease. Recent international guidelines have stated that 'poor adherence to treatment – in addition to physician inertia - is the most important cause of poor blood pressure control'. The MaxImising Adherence, Minimising Inertia (MIAMI) intervention, which has been developed using a systematic, theoretical, user-centred approach, aims to support general practitioners (GPs) and people with hypertension to maximise medication use, through the facilitation of adequate information exchange within consultations about long-term antihypertensive medication use and adherence skill development. The aim of the MIAMI pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to gather and analyse feasibility data to allow us to (1) refine the intervention, and (2) determine the feasibility of a definitive RCT. Methods: GP practices (n = 6) will be recruited and randomised to the intervention arm (n = 3) or usual care control arm (n = 3). Each practice will recruit 10 patient participants. For a patient to be eligible they must have a diagnosis of hypertension, be on two or more anti-hypertensive medications, must not be achieving recommended blood pressure levels, and be over the age of 65 years. Participants in the intervention arm will meet their GP and receive the MIAMI intervention twice over three months. Quantitative data collection will take place at baseline and three month follow up. A pilot health economic analysis and a qualitative sub-study will also be incorporated into the study. Discussion: This pilot cluster RCT of the MIAMI intervention will allow us to gather valuable acceptability and feasibility data to further refine the intervention so it optimally designed for both GP and patient use. In particular, the qualitative component will provide an insight into GP and patient experiences of using the intervention.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kukafka R, Kim S, Kim SH, Yoo SH, Sung JH, Oh EG, Kim N, Lee J. Digital Health Interventions for Adult Patients With Cancer Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e38333. [PMID: 36607712 PMCID: PMC9862347 DOI: 10.2196/38333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital care has become an essential component of health care. Interventions for patients with cancer need to be effective and safe, and digital health interventions must adhere to the same requirements. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify currently available digital health interventions developed and evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) targeting adult patients with cancer. METHODS A scoping review using the JBI methodology was conducted. The participants were adult patients with cancer, and the concept was digital health interventions. The context was open, and sources were limited to RCT effectiveness studies. The PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, Research Information Sharing Service, and KoreaMed databases were searched. Data were extracted and analyzed to achieve summarized results about the participants, types, functions, and outcomes of digital health interventions. RESULTS A total of 231 studies were reviewed. Digital health interventions were used mostly at home (187/231, 81%), and the web-based intervention was the most frequently used intervention modality (116/231, 50.2%). Interventions consisting of multiple functional components were most frequently identified (69/231, 29.9%), followed by those with the self-manage function (67/231, 29%). Web-based interventions targeting symptoms with the self-manage and multiple functions and web-based interventions to treat cognitive function and fear of cancer recurrence consistently achieved positive outcomes. More studies supported the positive effects of web-based interventions to inform decision-making and knowledge. The effectiveness of digital health interventions targeting anxiety, depression, distress, fatigue, health-related quality of life or quality of life, pain, physical activity, and sleep was subject to their type and function. A relatively small number of digital health interventions specifically targeted older adults (6/231, 2.6%) or patients with advanced or metastatic cancer (22/231, 9.5%). CONCLUSIONS This scoping review summarized digital health interventions developed and evaluated in RCTs involving adult patients with cancer. Systematic reviews of the identified digital interventions are strongly recommended to integrate digital health interventions into clinical practice. The identified gaps in digital health interventions for cancer care need to be reflected in future digital health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanghee Kim
- College of Nursing and Mo-im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei Evidence Based Nursing Center of Korea: Affiliation of the Joanna Briggs Institution, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo Hyun Kim
- Department of Nursing, Inha University, Inchon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Hee Yoo
- College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Sung
- College of Nursing, Kosin University, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Eui Geum Oh
- College of Nursing and Mo-im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei Evidence Based Nursing Center of Korea: Affiliation of the Joanna Briggs Institution, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nawon Kim
- Yonsei Medical Library, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jiyeon Lee
- College of Nursing and Mo-im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei Evidence Based Nursing Center of Korea: Affiliation of the Joanna Briggs Institution, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhao J, Abdallah M, Sanapala C, Watson E, LoCastro M, Castillo DA, Richardson D, LeBlanc TW, Loh KP. A Systematic Review of Decision Aids in Hematologic Malignancies: What Are Currently Available and What Are We Missing? Oncologist 2022; 28:105-115. [PMID: 36342114 PMCID: PMC9907042 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient decision aids (PDAs) are tools designed to facilitate decision-making. In this systematic review, we summarized existing studies on the development and evaluation of PDAs for patients with hematologic malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for articles in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included studies, abstracts, and clinical trial protocols available in English involving PDAs for patients age ≥18 diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy and/or their caregivers. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of the 5281 titles/abstracts screened, 15 were included: 1 protocol, 7 abstracts, and 7 full-texts. Six were PDA developmental studies, 6 were pilot studies, and 3 were randomized trials. PDA formats included electronic with web content, videos, and/or audio, questionnaires, bedside instruments, and a combination of various formats. Average participant age ranged from 36.0 to 62.4 years. Patients and caregivers identified efficacy, adverse effects, cost, and quality of life as important decision-making factors. PDAs were associated with increased knowledge and patient satisfaction as well as decreased decisional conflict and attitudinal barriers. Research on PDAs for adult patients with hematologic malignancies and their caregivers is limited. Among the studies, PDAs appear to support patients in shared decision-making. CONCLUSION While current literature examining the use of PDAs for adults with hematologic malignancies is limited, the positive impact of PDAs on shared decision-making and patient outcomes warrants additional research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice Zhao
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Maya Abdallah
- Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chandrika Sanapala
- Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erin Watson
- Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marissa LoCastro
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Daniel A Castillo
- Edward G. Miner Library, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Richardson
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Department of Medicine, Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine Durham, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- Corresponding author: Kah Poh Loh, MBBCh BAO, MS, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Tel: +1 585 276 4353;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yadav S, Todd A, Patel K, Tabriz AA, Nguyen O, Turner K, Hong YR. Public knowledge and information sources for clinical trials among adults in the USA: evidence from a Health Information National Trends Survey in 2020. Clin Med (Lond) 2022; 22:416-422. [PMID: 38589062 PMCID: PMC9595001 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lack of clinical trial awareness has been identified as a barrier to clinical trial recruitment. Identifying factors associated with clinical trial knowledge could inform ongoing efforts to improve diversity in clinical trials. METHODS Using data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2020, we examined the knowledge of clinical trials, associated characteristics, sources of clinical trial information and motives to participate in clinical trials among the general population in the USA. RESULTS Of 3,772 US adults, 41.3% reported not knowing about clinical trials. Prevalence of having no knowledge of clinical trials was higher among Hispanic adults (51.8%) and non-Hispanic Black adults (41.8%) compared with non-Hispanic White adults (37.4%; p=0.013). Other significant predictors of knowledge about clinical trials included higher education, online health information-seeking behaviour and patient portal access. Most respondents (73.2%) reported that healthcare providers were the most trusted source of information. Helping other people (71.6%) was the primary motivation for clinical trial participation, followed by financial compensation (12.5%) and receiving better treatment (5.1%). CONCLUSION There is a gap in knowledge about clinical trials among the US population. Development of multimodal approaches, including online and offline information broadcasting, is needed to improve knowledge and clinical trial recruitment in diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandhya Yadav
- University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, USA
| | - Alissa Todd
- University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, USA
| | | | - Amir A Tabriz
- Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa, USA and University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | | | - Kea Turner
- Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa, USA and University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Young-Rock Hong
- University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ramirez AG, Chalela P. Equitable Representation of Latinos in Clinical Research Is Needed to Achieve Health Equity in Cancer Care. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e797-e804. [PMID: 35544655 PMCID: PMC10476724 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Identify key barriers that keep Latinos from participating in clinical trials (CTs) and interventions proven effective in increasing their representation in clinical research. METHODS Utilize our own extensive research experience and review the literature to: identify key barriers, summarize strategies that have been proven effective in increasing Latino representation in CTs, issue a call to action for programs/practices and practitioners to implement what is proven effective, and make recommendations for further research to address current gaps. RESULTS Participation barriers are complex, multifactorial, and exist at different levels, including study design (eg, protocol complexity, patient exclusion criteria, trial duration and frequency), healthcare system barriers (eg, lack of minority staff), patient-related factors (eg, lack of awareness, low health literacy, language, social determinants of health [SDoH]), and medical team issues (eg, lack of cultural competence, lack of referrals, implicit bias, provider/patient communication). Research has shown that the most effective strategies to increase participation of underrepresented minorities in CTs include culturally sensitive educational tools aimed at community members, patients, and physicians, and strategies to address the multiple SDoH and other barriers to participation facing cancer patients and the factors that influence patient decision-making. CONCLUSION Raising awareness or offering clinical trials to everyone will not alone increase Latino participation. Other key barriers at different levels must also be addressed, especially SDoH and patients' contextual factors. To achieve equitable participation of Latinos and other underrepresented groups in clinical research, comprehensive approaches that address interrelated multilevel and multifactorial barriers to participation can produce a substantial, sustained impact-ensuring everyone equitably benefits from scientific advances in cancer treatment, improved cancer outcomes and quality of life, and reduced health care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelie G. Ramirez
- UT Health San Antonio, Institute for Health Promotion Research, San Antonio, TX
| | - Patricia Chalela
- UT Health San Antonio, Institute for Health Promotion Research, San Antonio, TX
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ousseine YM, Bouhnik AD, Mancini J. Health Literacy and Clinical Trial Participation in French Cancer Patients: A National Survey. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:3118-3129. [PMID: 35621643 PMCID: PMC9140004 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29050253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Few studies have explored the relationship between health literacy (HL) and trial participation. In this context, we aimed to study this relationship in French cancer patients. We used data from the French national VIe après le CANcer (VICAN) survey. Two questionnaire items focused on previous invitations to participate in clinical trials and subsequent enrollment. The Single Item Literacy Screener was used to measure functional HL. In total, 1954 cancer patients responded to both VICAN surveys (two and five years after diagnosis). Mean age was 54.1 ± 12.7 years at diagnosis, and 37.6% were classified as having limited HL. One in ten (10.3%) respondents reported having been previously invited to participate in a clinical trial. Of these, 75.5% had enrolled. Limited HL was associated with fewer trial invitations but not with enrollment once invited. Multivariate analysis confirmed the negative effect of limited HL on clinical trial invitation (adjOR = 0.55 (0.39 to 0.77), p < 0.001) after adjustment for multiple characteristics. Patients with limited HL received fewer invitations to participate in trials but were likely to enroll when asked. Addressing HL is necessary to create a more inclusive health system and to reduce inequalities not only in access to innovative cancer care, but to health inequalities in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssoufa M. Ousseine
- INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l’Information Médicale, Equipe CANBIOS Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Aix Marseille University, 13009 Marseille, France; (Y.M.O.); (A.-D.B.)
- Santé Publique France, French National Public Health Agency, CEDEX, 94415 Saint-Maurice, France
| | - Anne-Déborah Bouhnik
- INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l’Information Médicale, Equipe CANBIOS Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Aix Marseille University, 13009 Marseille, France; (Y.M.O.); (A.-D.B.)
| | - Julien Mancini
- APHM, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l’Information Médicale, Equipe CANBIOS Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Hop Timone, BioSTIC, Biostatistique et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication, Aix Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-4-91-22-35-02
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abbas A, Diaz A, Obeng-Gyasi S, Cloyd JM, Ejaz A, Stewart JH, Pawlik TM. Disparity in Clinical Trial Participation Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:589-598. [PMID: 35290279 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trial participation among cancer patients remains low. We sought to examine the impact of patient- and system-level factors on clinical trial participation among gastrointestinal (GI) surgical patients. STUDY DESIGN Adult patients with a GI cancer who underwent oncologic surgery who were enrolled in National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded clinical trials from 2000 through 2019 were compared with trial-eligible adult patients in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2017. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with clinical trial participation. RESULTS Participants from 36 NCI-funded clinical trials (n = 10,518) were compared with 2,255,730 trial-eligible nonparticipants from the NCDB. Patients aged 65 years or younger (odds ratio [OR] = 0.5, 95% CI 0.47-0.53), Medicare (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.43-0.49) or Medicaid (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.46-0.58) insurance, as well as lower levels of education (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.89) were associated with a lower likelihood of clinical trial enrollment. Black (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.67-0.78) and Asian/Pacific Islander (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-1.08) patients were less likely to participate in trials vs White patients. There were interactions between race/ethnicity and income; high-income (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.81) and low-income Black (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.87) patients were less likely, respectively, to participate than high- or low-income White individuals (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Clinical trial participation is low among adult GI cancer patients who undergo surgery in the US. Programs aimed at improving trial participation among vulnerable populations are needed to improve trial participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alizeh Abbas
- From the Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH (Abbas, Diaz, Obeng-Gyasi, Cloyd, Ejaz, Pawlik)
| | - Adrian Diaz
- From the Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH (Abbas, Diaz, Obeng-Gyasi, Cloyd, Ejaz, Pawlik)
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (Diaz)
| | - Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
- From the Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH (Abbas, Diaz, Obeng-Gyasi, Cloyd, Ejaz, Pawlik)
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- From the Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH (Abbas, Diaz, Obeng-Gyasi, Cloyd, Ejaz, Pawlik)
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- From the Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH (Abbas, Diaz, Obeng-Gyasi, Cloyd, Ejaz, Pawlik)
| | - John H Stewart
- Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA (Stewart)
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- From the Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH (Abbas, Diaz, Obeng-Gyasi, Cloyd, Ejaz, Pawlik)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Crown A, Ramiah K, Siegel B, Joseph KA. The Role of Safety-Net Hospitals in Reducing Disparities in Breast Cancer Care. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:10.1245/s10434-022-11576-3. [PMID: 35357616 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11576-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Advances in breast cancer screening and systemic therapies have been credited with profound improvements in breast cancer outcomes; indeed, 5-year relative survival rate approaches 91% in the USA (U.S. National Institutes of Health NCI. SEER Training Modules, Breast). While breast cancer mortality has been declining, oncologic outcomes have not improved equally among all races and ethnicities. Many factors have been implicated in breast cancer disparities; chief among them is limited access to care which contributes to lower rates of timely screening mammography and, once diagnosed with breast cancer, lower rates of receipt of guideline concordant care (Wu, Lund, Kimmick GG et al. in J Clin Oncol 30(2):142-150, 2012). Hospitals with a safety-net mission, such as the essential hospitals, historically have been dedicated to providing high-quality care to all populations and have eagerly embraced the role of caring for the most vulnerable and working to eliminate health disparities. In this article, we review landmark articles that have evaluated the role safety-net hospitals have played in providing equitable breast cancer care including to those patients who face significant social and economic challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelena Crown
- Breast Surgery, True Family Women's Cancer Center, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Bruce Siegel
- America's Essential Hospitals, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kathie-Ann Joseph
- Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, NYC Health and Hospitals, Bellevue, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Post AR, Burningham Z, Halwani AS. Electronic Health Record Data in Cancer Learning Health Systems: Challenges and Opportunities. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2022; 6:e2100158. [PMID: 35353547 PMCID: PMC9005105 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R. Post
- Research Informatics Shared Resource, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Zachary Burningham
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ahmad S. Halwani
- Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Parker AE, Scull TM, Morrison AM. DigiKnowIt News: Educating youth about pediatric clinical trials using an interactive, multimedia educational website. J Child Health Care 2022; 26:139-153. [PMID: 33836627 DOI: 10.1177/13674935211003774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric clinical trials allow for the testing of appropriate and effective treatments for children. However, some challenges exist with recruitment. This study examined the effectiveness of DigiKnowIt News, an interactive, multimedia website (which includes activities, videos, and comic books) designed to educate children about clinical trials. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2018 with 91 participants (M age = 10.92 years; SD = 2.06). Participants were randomly assigned to intervention or wait-list control groups and completed questionnaires at pretest and posttest (1 week later) about their knowledge, attitudes, beliefs about clinical trials, and self-efficacy for participating in clinical trials. Participants in the intervention group received access to DigiKnowIt News between pretest and posttest and completed a satisfaction questionnaire at posttest. At the end of the study, participants in the wait-list control group were offered the option to use the website and complete a satisfaction questionnaire. At posttest, participants in the intervention group, compared to participants in the wait-list control group, had more knowledge about clinical trials and more reported confidence for participating in clinical trials. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with DigiKnowIt News. The findings suggest that an educational website can improve factors related to increasing rates of participation in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
18
|
Asher N, Raphael A, Wolf I, Pelles S, Geva R. Oncologic patients' misconceptions may impede enrollment into clinical trials: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:5. [PMID: 34996362 PMCID: PMC8742439 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01478-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical trials are an essential source for advances in oncologic care, yet the enrollment rate is only 2-4%. Patients' reluctance to participate is an important barrier. This study evaluates patients' level of understanding and attitudes towards clinical trials. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in the oncology department and day care unit at the oncology division Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel. From January 2015 to September 2016. Two-hundred patients’ currently receiving active anti-cancer therapy at a large tertiary hospital completed an anonymous questionnaire comprised of demographic information, past experience in clinical research and basic knowledge on clinical trials. Results The majority of respondents did not meet the minimum knowledge level criteria. In those who replied they would decline to participate in a clinical trial, concern were related to potential assignment to the placebo arm, provision of informed consent and trust issues with their oncologist. Those with sufficient knowledge were significantly more interested in participating. Patients with past experience in clinical trials had a higher level of academic education, were less religious, had a better understanding of medical research and were inclined to participate in future research. Conclusions Misperceptions of clinical trials may contribute substantially to the unwillingness to participate in them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nethanel Asher
- The Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ari Raphael
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel.,The Oncology Division Clinical Trials Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ido Wolf
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel.,The Oncology Division Clinical Trials Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Sharon Pelles
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel.,The Oncology Division Clinical Trials Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ravit Geva
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel. .,The Oncology Division Clinical Trials Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eggly S, Manning M, Senft N, Moore TF, Albrecht TL, Penner LA, Heath E, Carducci MA, Lansey DG, Hamel LM. Development and pilot test of a physician-focused cancer clinical trials communication training intervention. PEC INNOVATION 2021; 1:100012. [PMCID: PMC10194245 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2021.100012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Objective We describe the development and pilot test of a physician-focused, web-based training module designed to improve physician communication related to clinical trials in a diverse cancer patient population. Methods Researchers and stakeholders developed the training module, which included a video explaining patient-centered communication strategies for discussing trials, and re-enactments of actual clinical interactions. For the pilot test, the module was provided to physician participants in the Partnering Around Cancer Clinical Trials (PACCT) trial at two major urban cancer centers. Questionnaires assessed change in beliefs, behavioral attitudes, knowledge and comfort; and perceptions of the module. Results Nineteen physicians participated in the pilot test. Most were experienced in discussing trials. Assessments of change were mixed regarding beliefs; they showed marginal improvement in attitudes, and significant improvement in knowledge, but no change in comfort. Feedback on the module was favorable. Conclusions This stakeholder-developed physician communication training module was acceptable and effective, albeit in this small and highly-experienced physician sample. Future research should determine its effectiveness on communication in clinical settings. Innovation This is the first physician training module to focus on communicating about clinical trials in a diverse patient population. It offers a web-based format and re-enactments of naturally-occurring clinical interactions. Trial Registration Number: NCT02906241
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Eggly
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Mark Manning
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Nicole Senft
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Tanina Foster Moore
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Terrance L. Albrecht
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Louis A. Penner
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Elisabeth Heath
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Michael A. Carducci
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Dina G. Lansey
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Lauren M. Hamel
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McKinney M, Bell R, Samborski C, Attwood K, Dean G, Eakle K, Yu W, Edge S. Clinical Trial Participation: A Pilot Study of Patient-Identified Barriers. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2021; 25:647-654. [PMID: 34800100 PMCID: PMC10150445 DOI: 10.1188/21.cjon.647-654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trial enrollment in the United States is lacking, particularly among older adult and ethnic and racial minority populations. OBJECTIVES The aim of the current study was to identify patient-related barriers to clinical trial participation using a mixed-methods patient survey and to offer insights to develop evidence-based implementation strategies to address these barriers. METHODS A retrospective survey was conducted of patients who were not interested in participating in a clinical trial to quantify the reasons these patients chose not to participate. Directed qualitative content analysis was used to identify themes that emerged from the write-in responses. FINDINGS The greatest patient-reported barriers were misperceptions about placebos, a desire to not feel like a human guinea pig, uncertainty surrounding clinical trial treatment effectiveness compared to standard care, and concerns about additional appointments or tests. Oncology nurses can address patient enrollment barriers by providing targeted education and participating in the informed consent process.
Collapse
|
21
|
Hamel LM, Dougherty DW, Hastert TA, Seymour EK, Kim S, Assad H, Phalore J, Soulliere R, Eggly S. The DISCO App: A pilot test of a multi-level intervention to reduce the financial burden of cancer through improved cost communication ☆. PEC INNOVATION 2021; 1:100002. [PMCID: PMC10194252 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2021.100002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Objective Financial toxicity affects 30–50% of people with cancer in the US. Although experts recommend patients and physicians discuss treatment cost, cost discussions occur infrequently. We pilot-tested the feasibility, acceptability and influence on outcomes of the DIScussions of COst (DISCO) App, a multi-level communication intervention designed to improve cost discussions and related outcomes. Methods While waiting to see their physician, patients (n = 32) used the DISCO App on a tablet. Physicians were given a cost discussion tip sheet. Clinic visits were video recorded and patients completed pre- and post-intervention measures of self-efficacy for managing costs, self-efficacy for interacting with physicians, cost-related distress, and perceptions of the DISCO App. Coders observed the recordings to determine the presence of cost discussions, initiators, and topics. Results Most patients reported needing ≤15 min to use the DISCO App, and that it made it easier to ask cost-related questions. Findings showed increased self-efficacy for managing treatment costs (p = .02) and for interacting with physicians (p = .001). All visits included a cost discussion. Conclusions Prompting patients to discuss costs may improve cost treatment discussions and related outcomes. Innovation An app-based and tailorable treatment-cost communication intervention is feasible, acceptable, and demonstrates promise in prompting cost discussions and improving outcomes. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov registration number: NCT03676920 (September 19, 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M. Hamel
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - David W. Dougherty
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave DA 941, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Theresa A. Hastert
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | | | - Seongho Kim
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Hadeel Assad
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Jasminder Phalore
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | | | - Susan Eggly
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bylund CL, Michaels M, Weiss ES, Patel S, D'Agostino TA, Binz-Scharf MC, McKee D. The Impact of an Online Training Program About Cancer Clinical Trials on Primary Care Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs, and Behavior. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:1039-1044. [PMID: 32157570 PMCID: PMC7483356 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01731-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Participation in cancer clinical trials (CCTs) is critical to improving cancer treatments and quality of care. However, rates of patient participation remain low. Research has shown that a trusted physician recommendation is an important influence on patients' decisions to enroll in a CCT. Improving primary care providers' (PCPs') knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about CCTs is a promising potential path for improving CCT participation. The aim of this pilot study was to test the effect of an online educational course for PCPs about clinical trials on primary care providers' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, and behavior. Forty-one PCPs in the New York City area participated in a 1-h online training session on cancer clinical trials. These PCPs had self-selected to complete the training in a previous survey. The objectives of the training module were to (1) educate the PCPs about clinical trials, with a focus on overcoming misconceptions; and (2) discuss roles of PCPs in partnering with oncologists to help patients gain access to clinical trials. The training module included didactics, audio excerpts, and case descriptions. Participants completed a pre-test immediately before taking the course, a post-test immediately after taking the course, and a 3-month post-course survey. All three assessments included a general T/F knowledge test, a 7-item attitude/belief scale, and a knowledge test focused specifically on local resources and access for clinical trials. Forty-one PCPs completed the module and the pre-post course surveys. Eighty percent (33/41) also completed the 3-month post-course survey. General knowledge and local knowledge increased significantly (p < .05) from pre- to post-course. At 3 months post-training, both general and local knowledge scores remained significantly increased from baseline. For those who completed the 3-month post-course survey, attitudes and beliefs increased significantly from pre- to post-course, but this change was not sustained at 3 months post-training. At 3 months post-training, 52% of the PCPs who had an interaction with a recently diagnosed cancer patient reported speaking with patients about CCTs as a result of the training. A brief online course showed significant and sustained improvement in PCPs' general and local knowledge about cancer clinical trials, which translated into self-reported behavior change. Future dissemination of the course and further research into its impact are important next steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carma L Bylund
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
- University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
| | - Margo Michaels
- Education Network to Advance Cancer Clinical Trials, Bethesda, USA
- Health Access and Action Consulting Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elisa S Weiss
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY, USA
| | - Shilpa Patel
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
- The Center for Health Care Strategies, Hamilton, USA
| | - Thomas A D'Agostino
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
- Albany Stratton VA Medical Center, Albany, USA
| | | | - Diane McKee
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nolan TS, Bell AM, Chan YN, Leak Bryant A, Bissram JS, Hirschey R. Use of Video Education Interventions to Increase Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2021; 18:302-309. [PMID: 34561957 PMCID: PMC8483572 DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Less than 5% of eligible adult cancer survivors participate in cancer clinical trials. Survivors identifying as Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) are less likely to participate in clinical trials compared to those identifying as non-Hispanic White. Common barriers to BIPOC participation are lack of knowledge, lack of access, and mistrust. These barriers are all factors in the disparities observed in BIPOC cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials need adequate BIPOC representation to garner generalizable findings that can reduce or eliminate cancer disparities associated with the social construct of race. AIM This systematic review examined the use of video education interventions to impact BIPOC survivor participation in clinical trials. METHODS Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases were queried for articles that described or tested video interventions aimed at increasing adult, BIPOC survivor clinical trial participation. Two authors independently screened articles for inclusion, appraised quality, and abstracted relevant data. All authors synthesized the data into themes through discussion and consensus. RESULTS The search yielded 2,512 articles. Seven selected articles described six distinct interventions. Although the six interventions reduced barriers to participation in clinical trials, their findings varied on Black and Hispanic survivors' readiness to enroll and participate in trials. Four themes emerged: (a) cultural sensitivity is needed in video development and delivery; (b) video content should be aimed to educate and change attitudes about clinical trials; (c) video interventions are feasible and acceptable; and (d) video interventions affect outcomes on intention or actual enrollment. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION Video interventions are well-received by BIPOC survivors and may improve representation in clinical trials. Yet, video interventions are underutilized. More studies are needed to establish best practices for video interventions aimed at diversifying clinical trial participation as widening cancer disparities and rapidly changing cancer care continue to emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timiya S Nolan
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center - The James, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ana' M Bell
- College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ya-Ning Chan
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley Leak Bryant
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer S Bissram
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rachel Hirschey
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hamel LM, Dougherty DW, Kim S, Heath EI, Mabunda L, Tadesse E, Hill R, Eggly S. DISCO App: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a patient intervention to reduce the financial burden of cancer in a diverse patient population. Trials 2021; 22:636. [PMID: 34535162 PMCID: PMC8447769 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05593-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Financial toxicity, the material and psychological burden of the cost of treatment, affects 30–50% of people with cancer, even those with health insurance. The burden of treatment cost can affect treatment adherence and, ultimately, mortality. Financial toxicity is a health equity issue, disproportionately affecting patients who are racial/ethnic minorities, have lower incomes, and are < 65 years old. Patient education about treatment cost and patient-oncologist cost discussions are recommended as ways to address financial toxicity; however, research shows cost discussions occur infrequently (Altice et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 109:djw205, 2017; Schnipper et al. J Clin Oncol 34:2925-34, 2016; Zafar et al. Oncologist 18:381-90, 2013; American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network 2010). Our overall goal is to address the burden of financial toxicity and work toward health equity through a tailorable education and communication intervention, the DISCO App. The aim of this longitudinal randomized controlled trial is to test the effectiveness of the DISCO App on the outcomes in a population of economically and racially/ethnically diverse cancer patients from all age groups. Methods Patients diagnosed with breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer at a NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center in Detroit, MI, will be randomized to one of three study arms: one usual care arm (arm 1) and two intervention arms (arms 2 and 3). All intervention patients (arms 2 and 3) will receive the DISCO App before the second interaction with their oncologist, and patients in arm 3 will receive an intervention booster. The DISCO App, presented on an iPad, includes an educational video about treatment costs, ways to manage them, and the importance of discussing them with oncologists. Patients enter socio-demographic information (e.g., employment, insurance status) and indicate their financial concerns. They then receive a tailored list of questions to consider asking their oncologist. All patients will have up to two interactions with their oncologist video recorded and complete measures at baseline, after the recorded interactions and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the second interaction. Outcome measures will assess discussions of cost, communication quality, knowledge of treatment costs, self-efficacy for treatment cost management, referrals for support, short- and longer-term financial toxicity, and treatment adherence. Discussion If effective, this intervention will improve awareness of and discussions of treatment cost and alleviate the burden of financial toxicity. It may be especially helpful to groups disproportionately affected by financial toxicity, helping to achieve health equity. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04766190. Registered on February 23, 2021
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M Hamel
- Wayne State University School of Medicine/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
| | | | - Seongho Kim
- Wayne State University School of Medicine/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Elisabeth I Heath
- Wayne State University School of Medicine/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Lorna Mabunda
- Wayne State University School of Medicine/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Eyouab Tadesse
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - RaeAnn Hill
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Susan Eggly
- Wayne State University School of Medicine/Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Williams CP, Senft Everson N, Shelburne N, Norton WE. Demographic and Health Behavior Factors Associated With Clinical Trial Invitation and Participation in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2127792. [PMID: 34586365 PMCID: PMC8482053 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Representative enrollment in clinical trials is critical to ensure equitable and effective translation of research to practice, yet disparities in clinical trial enrollment persist. OBJECTIVE To examine person-level factors associated with invitation to and participation in clinical trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study analyzed responses from 3689 US adults who participated in the nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey, collected February through June 2020 via mailed questionnaires. EXPOSURES Demographic, clinical, and health behavior-related characteristics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES History of invitation to and participation in a clinical trial, primary information sources, trust in information sources, and motives for participation in clinical trials were described. Respondent characteristics are presented as absolute numbers and weighted percentages. Associations between respondent demographic, clinical, and health behavior-related characteristics and clinical trial invitation and participation were estimated using survey-weighted logistic regression models. RESULTS The median (IQR) age of the 3689 respondents was 48 (33-61) years, and most were non-Hispanic White individuals (2063 [59%]; non-Hispanic Black, 452 [10%]; Hispanic, 521 [14%]), had more than a high school degree (2656 [68%]), were employed (1809 [58%]), and had at least 1 medical condition (2535 [61%]). Overall, 439 respondents (9%) had been invited to participate in any clinical trial. Respondents with increased odds of invitation were non-Hispanic Black compared with non-Hispanic White (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.13-3.02), had greater than a high school education compared with less than high school education (eg, ≥college degree: aOR, 4.84; 95% CI, 1.89-12.39), were single compared with married or living as married (aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.04-2.73), and had at least 1 medical condition compared to none (eg, 1 medical condition: aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.32-3.82). Respondents residing in rural vs urban areas had 77% decreased odds of invitation to a clinical trial (aOR 0.33; 95% CI 0.17-0.65). Of invited respondents, 199 (47%) participated. Compared with non-Hispanic White respondents, non-Hispanic Black respondents had 72% decreased odds of clinical trial participation (aOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.87). Respondents most frequently reported "health care providers" as the first and most trusted source of clinical trial information (first source: 2297 [59%]; most trusted source: 2597 [70%]). The most frequently reported motives for clinical trials participation were "wanting to get better" (2294 [66%]) and the standard of care not being covered by insurance (1448 [41%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that invitation to and participation in clinical trials may differ by person-level demographic and clinical characteristics. Strategies toward increasing trial invitation and participation rates across diverse patient populations warrant further research to ensure equitable translation of clinical benefits from research to practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney P. Williams
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Nicole Senft Everson
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Nonniekaye Shelburne
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Wynne E. Norton
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Awidi M, Al Hadidi S. Participation of Black Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials: Current Challenges and Proposed Solutions. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:265-271. [PMID: 33974816 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Low participation of Black Americans in cancer clinical trials is a well-established predicament. Many factors resulted in this current dilemma with racism being the fundamental unit. Here, we discuss some current challenges and proposed solutions to help in increasing the enrollment of Black Americans in cancer clinical trials. We suggest implementing the least acceptable race-specific percentage as a new bar that registrational clinical trials need to pass before cancer drugs approval. Clinical trials will continue to draw the future of cancer therapeutics in which we believe that a prompt improvement of Black Americans participation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Awidi
- Department of Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA
| | - Samer Al Hadidi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Margevicius S, Daly B, Schluchter M, Flocke S, Manne S, Surdam J, Fulton S, Meropol NJ. Randomized trial of a web-based nurse education intervention to increase discussion of clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2021; 22:100789. [PMID: 34169174 PMCID: PMC8209078 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical trials are a critical source of evidence for oncology care, yet very few patients participate. Among healthcare providers, nurses spend the most time with cancer patients and are the most highly trusted professionals. We developed and evaluated an educational program for oncology nurses targeting knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and perceived norms to facilitate discussion about clinical trials and support patient decision making. Methods A nationwide sample of oncology nurses were randomly assigned to receive general clinical trials education delivered as text (attention control) vs. tailored video vignettes (intervention) in a web-based continuing education program. Participants completed a baseline assessment and follow up assessments immediately after the educational program and three months later. The primary outcome was intention to discuss clinical trials with patients. Secondary outcomes were knowledge and attitudes about clinical trials, self-efficacy, and perceived norms. Results 1393 nurses enrolled and completed the educational program and post-intervention assessment (720 control, 673 video). Both text education and tailored video education increased intention to discuss clinical trials with patients, with a greater effect in the video group (p < .0001). Likewise, knowledge, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and perceived norms were all improved with education in both groups, and the magnitude of benefit was greater (p < .001) for the video group in all outcomes except knowledge. Conclusion A one-time online educational program for oncology nurses improves knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and intention to engage patients in discussions about clinical trials. A tailored video format was associated with a greater effect than standard text only material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seunghee Margevicius
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Barbara Daly
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mark Schluchter
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Susan Flocke
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Jessica Surdam
- University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sarah Fulton
- Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Neal J Meropol
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Flatiron Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kirshner J, Cohn K, Dunder S, Donahue K, Richey M, Larson P, Sutton L, Siu E, Donegan J, Chen Z, Nightingale C, Estévez M, Hamrick HJ. Automated Electronic Health Record-Based Tool for Identification of Patients With Metastatic Disease to Facilitate Clinical Trial Patient Ascertainment. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 5:719-727. [PMID: 34197178 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To facilitate identification of clinical trial participation candidates, we developed a machine learning tool that automates the determination of a patient's metastatic status, on the basis of unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data. METHODS This tool scans EHR documents, extracting text snippet features surrounding key words (such as metastatic, progression, and local). A regularized logistic regression model was trained and used to classify patients across five metastatic categories: highly likely and likely positive, highly likely and likely negative, and unknown. Using a real-world oncology database of patients with solid tumors with manually abstracted information as reference, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). We validated the performance in a real-world data set, evaluating accuracy gains upon additional user review of tool's outputs after integration into clinic workflows. RESULTS In the training data set (N = 66,532), the model sensitivity and specificity (% [95% CI]) were 82.4 [81.9 to 83.0] and 95.5 [95.3 to 96.7], respectively; the PPV was 89.3 [88.8 to 90.0], and the NPV was 94.0 [93.8 to 94.2]. In the validation sample (n = 200 from five distinct care sites), after user review of model outputs, values increased to 97.1 [85.1 to 99.9] for sensitivity, 98.2 [94.8 to 99.6] for specificity, 91.9 [78.1 to 98.3] for PPV, and 99.4 [96.6 to 100.0] for NPV. The model assigned 163 of 200 patients to the highly likely categories. The error prevalence was 4% before and 2% after user review. CONCLUSION This tool infers metastatic status from unstructured EHR data with high accuracy and high confidence in more than 75% of cases, without requiring additional manual review. By enabling efficient characterization of metastatic status, this tool could mitigate a key barrier for patient ascertainment and clinical trial participation in community clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Kirshner
- Hematology Oncology Associates of Central New York, East Syracuse, NY
| | - Kelly Cohn
- Hematology Oncology Associates of Central New York, East Syracuse, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Castillo G, Lalu MM, Asad S, Foster M, Kekre N, Fergusson DA, Hawrysh T, Atkins H, Thavorn K, Montroy J, Schwartz S, Holt RA, Broady R, Presseau J. Navigating choice in the face of uncertainty: using a theory informed qualitative approach to identifying potential patient barriers and enablers to participating in an early phase chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e043929. [PMID: 33741670 PMCID: PMC7986876 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Bench to bedside translation of groundbreaking treatments like chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy depends on patient participation in early phase trials. Unfortunately, many novel therapies fail to be adequately evaluated due to low recruitment rates, which slows patient access to emerging treatments. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), we sought to identify potential patient barriers and enablers to participating in an early phase CAR-T cell therapy trial. DESIGN We used qualitative semistructured interviews to identify potential barriers and enablers to patients' hypothetical participation in an early phase CAR-T cell therapy trial. We used the TDF and directed content analysis to identify relevant domains based on frequency, relevance and the presence of conflicting beliefs. PARTICIPANTS Canadian adult patients diagnosed with haematological malignancies. RESULTS In total, we interviewed 13 participants (8 women, 5 men). Participants ranged in age from 18 to 73 (median=56) and had been living with haematological cancer from a few months to several years. We found participants were unfamiliar with CAR-T cell therapy but wished to know more about treatment safety, efficacy and trial logistics (domains: knowledge, beliefs about consequences). They were motivated by altruistic considerations, though many prioritised personal health benefits despite recognising the goals (ie, establishing safety) of early phase clinical trials (domains: goals, intentions). Every participant valued receiving medical advice from their haematologists and oncologists, though some preferred impartial medical experts to inform their decision making (domain: social influences). Finally, participants indicated that improving access to financial and social supports would improve their trial participation experience (domain: environmental context and resources). CONCLUSION Using the TDF allowed us to identify factors that might undermine participation to a CAR-T cell therapy trial and to optimise recruitment processes by considering patient perspectives to taking part in early phase trials.Trial regestration: NCT03765177; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gisell Castillo
- Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manoj M Lalu
- Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Asad
- Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Madison Foster
- Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha Kekre
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Ottawa Hospital General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Harold Atkins
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Ottawa Hospital General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kednapa Thavorn
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- ICES University of Ottawa, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joshua Montroy
- Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Robert A Holt
- Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Raewyn Broady
- Leukemia/BMT Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Justin Presseau
- Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
McFarlane SJ, Morgan SE, Occa A, Peng W. An Evaluation of Clinical Trial Multimedia to Support Hispanic Cancer Patients' Informational and Decision-Making Needs. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:110-117. [PMID: 31444640 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01606-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The inclusion of diverse populations in clinical trial research is a social justice imperative. Creating the communicative tools that can support cancer patients across varied cultural backgrounds in processing complex clinical trial information, to achieve informed consent, has been a challenge. This study sought to evaluate specific clinical trial multimedia-a website, four animations, and a decision aid-to meet the decision-making and informational needs of Hispanic patients. The multimedia content was positively evaluated by Hispanic cancer patients. However, the discussions also yielded important steps for culturally adapting these tools to account for particular informational needs and cultural values that would be important to incorporate into these, and future, clinical trial multimedia interventions that target Hispanic populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan E Morgan
- School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Aurora Occa
- Department of Communication, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Wei Peng
- School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mattock HC, Ryan R, O'Farrelly C, Babalis D, Ramchandani PG. Does a video clip enhance recruitment into a parenting trial? Learnings from a study within a trial. Trials 2020; 21:856. [PMID: 33059763 PMCID: PMC7558733 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04779-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Reaching recruitment targets in randomised controlled trials is a challenge. Media tools are increasingly used to engage participants, yet there is a paucity of research into the use of video to optimise recruitment. We therefore tested whether adding a participant information video clip to a standard participant information sheet improved recruitment into a parenting trial. Methods One hundred seven participants were randomised to receive either a participant information sheet (n = 51) or an informational video clip (n = 56) as part of an email contact following a screening phase. All participants went on to receive the information sheet as part of the existing consent procedure. Results The video condition did not increase the odds of recruitment into the trial, such that those in the video condition were significantly less likely to participate in the main trial (OR = 0.253, CI = 0.104–0.618, p = 0.003). Conclusion The introduction of a video clip into the recruitment stages of a parenting trial did not lead to an improvement in recruitment; however, the small sample size precludes definitive inferences. We offer reflections on challenges encountered in implementing the SWAT and suggestions for other researchers seeking to embed recruitment SWATs into similar trials. Trial registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN 58327365. Registered on 19 March 2015. SWAT registration SWAT 106; Effects of a video clip on recruitment into a randomised trial. Registered on 20 December 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachael Ryan
- Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christine O'Farrelly
- Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.,PEDAL Research Centre, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, UK
| | - Daphne Babalis
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul G Ramchandani
- Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK. .,PEDAL Research Centre, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, UK. .,Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Smith AB, Niu AY, Descallar J, Delaney GP, Wu VS, Agar MR, Girgis A. Clinical trials knowledge and attitudes of Vietnamese- and Anglo-Australian cancer patients: A cross-sectional study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2020; 16:e242-e251. [PMID: 32779349 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM Low participation in cancer clinical trials by culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) patients limits access to cutting-edge treatments and generalizability of results. This is the first study exploring trials knowledge/attitudes and their association with trial participation in Vietnamese- and Anglo-Australian cancer patients. METHODS Eligible patients diagnosed with cancer in the past 10 years were invited to complete a self-report questionnaire comprising validated measures of: trials knowledge and attitudes, preferred information amount, preferred decision-making involvement, health literacy, and past and future (i.e. hypothetical) trial participation. Multivariable linear regression evaluated correlates of trials knowledge/attitudes. Multinomial logistic regression estimated the relationship between trials knowledge/attitudes and possible future trial participation. RESULTS Vietnamese-Australian participants (n = 50) had more negative attitudes regarding trials than Anglo-Australians (n = 100; B = -9.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17.60 to -0.97; P = 0.029), but similar knowledge (B = -0.91; 95% CI, -2.27 to 0.44; P = 0.18). Future trial participation was associated with positive attitudes (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12; P < 0.001) and greater knowledge (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.04-1.62; P = 0.02), but not Vietnamese background (OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.27-3.32; P = 0.93). CONCLUSION Despite poorer attitudes regarding trials in Vietnamese-Australians, Vietnamese background was not associated with less likely future trial participation, suggesting low trial participation by CALD patients may be more due to opportunity barriers. Improving knowledge and attitudes may increase trial participation generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan B Smith
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Anita Y Niu
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Joseph Descallar
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Geoff P Delaney
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.,Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Verena S Wu
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Meera R Agar
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.,Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.,Clinical Trials Unit, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhao M, Liang Y, Shen C, Wang Y, Ma L, Ma X. Patient Education Programs in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2020; 10:449-464. [PMID: 32200513 PMCID: PMC7211777 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-020-00365-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient education is crucial for improving disease outcomes in atopic dermatitis (AD). This review aims to summarize evidence about the effectiveness of educational programs for parents of pediatric AD patients. METHODS PubMed and Embase (inception to Feb 2020) were searched and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tools and quality of evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the disease severity instrument (Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis, SCORAD) and quality of life (QoL) instruments using the random-effects model. RESULTS A total of 13 RCTs were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis of SCORAD contained seven studies with a total of 1853 patients. The reduction in disease severity (SCORAD) was larger in the treatment group (SMD = - 8.22, 95% CI = - 11.29, - 5.15; P < 0.001; I2 = 78.6%). Subgroup analyses revealed that the association was modified by the frequency of sessions (P for Cochran Q < 0.01) and the duration of follow-up (P for Cochran Q < 0.01). No significant effect-modification was observed for disease severity and borderline significance was observed for session delivery (individual vs group session). The pooled effect sizes for QoL measures including Dermatitis Family Index (SMD = - 0.65, 95% CI = - 1.49, 0.18), Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (SMD = - 1.61, 95% CI = - 3.76, 0.55; I2= 89.0%) and Infants' Dermatology Quality of Life Index (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI = - 1.04, 1.63; I2= 63.1%) were not significant. CONCLUSIONS Structured patient education is beneficial and should be implemented for the management of AD patients. However, an optimal delivery mode needs to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mutong Zhao
- Department of Dermatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Yuan Liang
- Department of Dermatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Chunping Shen
- Department of Dermatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Daxing District People's Hospital, Daxing Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 102600, China
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Dermatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China.
| | - Xiuhua Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Daxing District People's Hospital, Daxing Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 102600, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wong AR, Sun V, George K, Liu J, Padam S, Chen BA, George T, Amini A, Li D, Sedrak MS. Barriers to Participation in Therapeutic Clinical Trials as Perceived by Community Oncologists. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e849-e858. [PMID: 32240068 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite considerable research on the barriers to enrollment in cancer therapeutic trials, few studies have elicited barriers from the perspective of community physicians, who provide the majority of cancer care. The purpose of this study was to characterize barriers to and facilitators of cancer therapeutic trials as perceived by oncologists in community practices. METHODS Twenty semistructured interviews were conducted with oncologists at six community sites affiliated with City of Hope National Medical Center from March to June 2018. Responses were recorded digitally and transcribed. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Of the 20 participants, 4 (20%) were women, 13 (65%) had > 10 years of practice experience, and 16 (80%) reported that < 5% of their patients were enrolled in a therapeutic trial. Participants identified four system-level barriers: lack of appropriate trials for community-based settings, insufficient infrastructure support, restrictive eligibility criteria, and financial limitations; three physician-level barriers: lack of awareness of available trials, lack of knowledge of trial details, and lack of time; and two patient-level barriers: patient burden and negative beliefs/attitudes toward research. Efforts aimed to increase trial availability, clinical trial support personnel, and physician knowledge were identified as major facilitators. CONCLUSION Community oncologists face numerous complex, multifaceted barriers to cancer therapeutic trial enrollment. Although expanding clinical research beyond the academic setting allows access to a larger and more diverse patient population, increasing generalizability and relevance of trial findings, there remains a substantial need for new strategies to improve cancer research delivery in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Virginia Sun
- Department of Population Science, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Kevin George
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Jennifer Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Simran Padam
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Brandon A Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Thomas George
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Daneng Li
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Mina S Sedrak
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hillyer GC, Beauchemin M, Hershman DL, Kelsen M, Brogan FL, Sandoval R, Schmitt KM, Reyes A, Terry MB, Lassman AB, Schwartz GK. Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients. Clin Trials 2020; 17:184-194. [PMID: 32009456 DOI: 10.1177/1740774520901514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Essential to bringing innovative cancer treatments to patients is voluntary participation in clinical trials but approximately 8% of American cancer patients are enrolled onto a trial. We used a domain-oriented framework to assess barriers to cancer clinical trial enrollment. METHODS Physicians (MD, DO, fellows, residents) and research staff (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, staff and research nurses, clinical assistants, and program coordinators) involved in clinical research at a comprehensive cancer center completed an online survey in 2017; adult cancer patients not currently enrolled in a trial were interviewed in 2018. To inform the construct of our physician/staff and patient surveys and to assess barriers to clinical trial enrollment, we first conducted in-depth interviews among 14 key informants representing medical, hematologic, gynecologic, neurologic, radiation oncology, as well as members of the clinical research team (one clinical research coordinator, one research nurse practitioner). Perceived structural, provider- and patient-level barriers to clinical trial enrollment were assessed. Differences in perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs toward clinical trial enrollment between (1) physicians and staff, (2) patients by ethnicity, and (3) physicians/staff and patients were examined. RESULTS In total, 120 physicians/staff involved in clinical research (39.2% physicians, 60.8% staff; 48.0% overall response rate) and 150 cancer patients completed surveys. Nearly three-quarters of physician/staff respondents reported difficulty in keeping track of the eligibility criteria for open studies but was more often cited by physicians than staff (84.4% vs 64.3%, p = 0.02). Physicians more often reported lack of time to present clinical trial information than did staff(p < 0.001); 44.0% of staff versus 18.2% of physicians reported patient family interaction as a clinical trial enrollment barrier (p = 0.007). Hispanic patients more often stated they would join a trial, even if standard therapy was an option compared to non-Hispanic patients (47.7% vs 20.8%, p = 0.002). Comparing the beliefs and perceptions of physicians/staff to those of patients, patients more often reported negative beliefs about clinical trial enrollment (e.g. being in a trial does not help patients personally, 32.9% vs 1.8%, p < 0.001) but less often felt they had no other options when agreeing to join (38.1% vs 85.6%, p < 0.001), and less often refused clinical trial enrollment due to lack of understanding (9.1% vs 63.3%, p = 0.001) than reported by physicians/staff. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate a wide gap between physician/staff and patient attitudes and beliefs about clinical trial enrollment and highlight the importance of focusing future initiatives to raise awareness of this incongruency. Reconciling these differences will require tailored education to reduce implicit biases and dispel misperceptions. Strategies to improve the quality of patient-provider communication and address infrastructure and resource issues are also needed to improve patient enrollment onto cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace C Hillyer
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa Beauchemin
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.,Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Moshe Kelsen
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frances L Brogan
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rossy Sandoval
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen M Schmitt
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andria Reyes
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gary K Schwartz
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sedrak MS, Sun V, Liu J, George K, Wong AR, Dale W, Dizon DS. Physician Perceptions of the Use of Social Media for Recruitment of Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1911528. [PMID: 31532517 PMCID: PMC6751756 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Social media campaigns have been successfully implemented in nontherapeutic trials. However, evidence to support their utility in cancer therapeutic trials is limited. OBJECTIVE To examine physician attitudes toward and perceptions of social media use for therapeutic trial recruitment of patients with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative study engaged 44 physicians (24 academic based and 20 community based) at the main academic and 6 affiliated community sites of City of Hope in Duarte, California. Semistructured interviews were conducted in person or by telephone from March to June 2018. An interview guide was developed to explore perceptions of social media use for accrual of cancer therapeutic trials. Responses were recorded digitally and transcribed. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Physicians' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of using social media for clinical trial recruitment, strategies to improve uptake of social media in clinical trials, and the barriers and facilitators to social media use for professional purposes in general. RESULTS Of the 44 participants, 16 (36%) were women, 30 (68%) had more than 10 years of practice experience, 24 (55%) practiced in academia, and 20 (45%) practiced in the community. Physicians most commonly cited increased trial awareness and visibility as an advantage of using social media for trial recruitment. Cited disadvantages were increased administrative burden and risk of misinformation. Physicians also reported a need for institutional-level interventions (eg, restructuring of clinical trial offices to include personnel with social media expertise), increased evidence-based approaches to social media use, and more physician training on the use of social media. Perceived facilitators to professional social media use were networking and education; barriers included lack of time and lack of evidence of benefit. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this qualitative study, physicians recognized the benefits of using social media for clinical trial recruitment but noted that barriers, including increased administrative burden, increased time, and the risk of misinformation, remain. Future interventions to address these concerns are a required first step in increasing digital engagement for clinical trial accrual purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina S. Sedrak
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Virginia Sun
- Department of Population Science, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Jennifer Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Kevin George
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Andrew R. Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - William Dale
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nickell A, Stewart SL, Burke NJ, Guerra C, Cohen E, Lawlor C, Colen S, Cheng J, Joseph G. Engaging limited English proficient and ethnically diverse low-income women in health research: A randomized trial of a patient navigator intervention. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1313-1323. [PMID: 30772115 PMCID: PMC8846431 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate a community-based navigator intervention to increase breast cancer patients' and survivors' access to information about health research participation opportunities. METHODS In the context of a Community Based Participatory Research collaboration, we conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of the Health Research Engagement Intervention with pre- and post-intervention surveys (n = 133). The primary outcome was health research information-seeking behavior. Secondary outcomes were health research knowledge, willingness to participate in health research, and health empowerment. Qualitative interviews (n = 11) elucidated participant perspectives on the intervention. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference between intervention and control groups' information-seeking behavior. Knowledge that not all health research studies are about drugs or treatments increased significantly from pre- to post-test among intervention group participants (32% to 48%, p = 0.012), but not in the control group (43% to 30%, p = 0.059); the difference between arms was statistically significant (p = 0.0012). Although survey responses indicated willingness to participate, qualitative interviews identified competing priorities that limited participants' motivation to seek enrollment information. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Community-based navigators are a trusted, and therefore promising link between health research and low-income underserved communities. However, systemic barriers in health research infrastructures need to be addressed to include low income, LEP and immigrant populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan L Stewart
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Davis, USA
| | - Nancy J Burke
- Public Health University of California, Merced, USA; Department of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco USA
| | - Claudia Guerra
- Department of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco USA
| | - Elly Cohen
- BreastCancerTrials.org, San Francisco, USA
| | | | | | - Janice Cheng
- Department of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
McKay R, Mills H, Werner L, Choudhury A, Choueiri T, Jacobus S, Pace A, Polacek L, Pomerantz M, Prisby J, Sweeney C, Walsh M, Taplin ME. Evaluating a Video-Based, Personalized Webpage in Genitourinary Oncology Clinical Trials: A Phase 2 Randomized Trial. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e12044. [PMID: 31045501 PMCID: PMC6538310 DOI: 10.2196/12044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 12/08/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The pace of drug discovery and approvals has led to expanding treatments for cancer patients. Although extensive research exists regarding barriers to enrollment in oncology clinical trials, there are limited studies evaluating processes to optimize patient education, oral anticancer therapy administration, and adherence for patients enrolled in clinical trials. In this study, we assess the feasibility of a video-based, personalized webpage for patients enrolled in genitourinary oncology clinical trials involving 1 or more oral anticancer therapy. Objective The primary objective of this trial was to assess the differences in the number of patient-initiated violations in the intervention arm compared with a control arm over 4 treatment cycles. Secondary objectives included patient satisfaction, frequently asked questions by patients on the intervention arm, patient-initiated calls to study team members, and patient-reported stress levels. Methods Eligible patients enrolling on a therapeutic clinical trial for a genitourinary malignancy were randomized 2:1 to the intervention arm or control arm. Patients randomized to the intervention arm received access to a video-based, personalized webpage, which included videos of patients’ own clinic encounters with their providers, instructional videos on medication administration and side effects, and electronic versions of educational documents. Results A total of 99 patients were enrolled (89 were evaluable; 66 completed 4 cycles). In total, 71% (40/56) of patients in the intervention arm had 1 or more patient-initiated violation compared with 70% (23/33) in the control arm. There was no difference in the total number of violations across 4 cycles between the 2 arms (estimate=−0.0939, 95% CI−0.6295 to 0.4418, P value=.73). Median baseline satisfaction scores for the intervention and control arms were 72 and 73, respectively, indicating high levels of patient satisfaction in both arms. Median baseline patient-reported stress levels were 10 and 13 for the intervention and control arms, respectively, indicating low stress levels in both arms at baseline. Conclusions This study is among the first to evaluate a video-based, personalized webpage that provides patients with educational videos and video recordings of clinical trial appointments. Despite not meeting the primary endpoint of reduced patient-initiated violations, this study demonstrates the feasibility of a video-based, personalized webpage in clinical trials. Future research assessing this tool might be better suited for realms outside of clinical trials and might consider the use of an endpoint that assesses patient-reported outcomes directly. A major limitation of this study was the lack of prior data for estimating the null hypothesis in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rana McKay
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Hannah Mills
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Lillian Werner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Atish Choudhury
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Toni Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Susanna Jacobus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Amanda Pace
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Laura Polacek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mark Pomerantz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Judith Prisby
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Meghara Walsh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Polite BN, Cipriano-Steffens TM, Liao C, Miller EL, Arndt NL, Hahn EA. Investigation of a multimedia, computer-based approach to improve knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and receptivity to cancer clinical trials among newly diagnosed patients with diverse health literacy skills. Cancer 2019; 125:2066-2075. [PMID: 30811591 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enrollment in therapeutic cancer trials remains low, and is especially challenging for patients with low health literacy. The authors tested an interactive technology designed for patients with diverse health literacy skills with the aim of improving patient receptiveness, willingness, knowledge, self-efficacy, and positive attitudes regarding clinical trials. METHODS Patients presenting for their first oncology appointment were eligible. Patients viewed an interactive teaching video concerning clinical trials that was adapted from the National Institutes of Health. Validated surveys assessing receptiveness, willingness, knowledge, self-efficacy, and positive attitudes regarding clinical trials were administered before and after the test. RESULTS A total of 120 patients with cancer were enrolled. Approximately 80% were non-Hispanic white, 33% were female, 69% had >high school education, and 8% reported an income <$20,000. Approximately 33% scored within the low health literacy range. Changes between pretest and posttest demonstrated increases in knowledge (P < .001), self-efficacy (P < .001), and positive beliefs (P = .004); a slight decrease in willingness (P = .009); and no difference in patient receptivity (P = .31). Higher health literacy was associated with improved willingness (P = .049) and non-Hispanic white race was associated with improved receptivity (P = .034). CONCLUSIONS Interactive technology that was designed for patients with diverse health literacy skills demonstrated the ability to improve knowledge, self-efficacy, and positive beliefs regarding cancer clinical trials. Contrary to the hypothesis of the current study, patients with lower health literacy did not appear to derive a greater advantage from this technology. There was no improvement noted with regard to patient willingness or receptivity, and clinical trial enrollment remained at historical institutional levels. Talking touchscreen technology has a potential role as an important element in informed decision making for patients, but likely needs to be coupled with more robust and multitargeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blase N Polite
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Chuanhong Liao
- Department of Public Health Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward L Miller
- Private Consultant, CancerHelp Institute, Wilmette, Illinois
| | - Nicole L Arndt
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Elizabeth A Hahn
- Medical Social Sciences and Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Financial barriers to clinical trial enrollment are an area of active investigation. Financial toxicity as a concept describes how high costs and financial burden can lead to compromised care and outcomes. Despite the potential to yield large survival benefits and improved access to cutting-edge therapies, less than 5% of adult patients with cancer are enrolled in a clinical trial. Disparities in trial enrollment exist along age, ethnic, and sociodemographic lines, with younger, poorer, nonwhite patients with private insurance-the exact population who may be at highest risk for financial toxicity-less likely to participate. Cost and insurance concerns remain an obstacle for clinical trial enrollment for certain patient populations. Changing the clinical trial paradigm with a focus on addressing structural and clinical barriers to clinical trial enrollment is paramount. This includes expanding access to clinical trials within community populations, advocating for health policy changes to guarantee insurance coverage of clinical trial standard-of-care health care, and considering noncoercive financial assistance (particularly for indirect costs like travel and lodging) for participants to defray their additional costs of participation. Additional steps toward education, cost transparency, and expansion of foundation assistance may also improve equitable access to clinical trials for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumiko Chino
- 1 Duke University Radiation Oncology, Durham, NC
| | - S Yousuf Zafar
- 2 Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Woodford J, Wikman A, Einhorn K, Cernvall M, Grönqvist H, Romppala A, von Essen L. Attitudes and Preferences Toward a Hypothetical Trial of an Internet-Administered Psychological Intervention for Parents of Children Treated for Cancer: Web-Based Survey. JMIR Ment Health 2018; 5:e10085. [PMID: 30563814 PMCID: PMC6318150 DOI: 10.2196/10085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials are often challenged with issues of recruitment and retention. Little is known concerning general attitudes and preferences toward trial design and willingness to participate among parents of children treated for cancer. Furthermore, willingness to participate in internet-administered psychological interventions remains unexplored. In this study, we examined attitudes and preferences of the population regarding study procedures for a hypothetical trial of an internet-administered psychological intervention. In addition, differences in the response rate between modes of study invitation and willingness to engage in internet-administered interventions were examined. OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study was to examine attitudes and preferences toward participating in an internet-administrated psychological intervention. The secondary objective was to examine the response rates and help-seeking behavior among parents of children treated for cancer. METHODS A cross-sectional, Web-based survey was conducted with parents of children who had completed cancer treatment. This Web-based survey examined self-reported emotional distress, prior help-seeking and receipt of psychological support, past research participation, attitudes toward research, preferences concerning recruitment procedures, and attitudes toward different types of trial design. RESULTS Of all the parents invited, 32.0% (112/350) completed the survey, with no difference in response rate between modes of study invitation (χ21=0.6, P=.45). The majority (80/112, 71.4%) of parents responded that they had experienced past emotional distress. Responses indicated high (56/112, 50.0%) or somewhat high trust in research (51/112, 45.5%), and the majority of parents would accept, or maybe accept, internet-administered psychological support if offered (83/112, 74.1%). In addition, responses showed a preference for postal study invitation letters (86/112, 76.8%), sent by a researcher (84/112, 75.0%) with additional study information provided on the Web via text (81/112, 72.3%) and video (66/112, 58.9%). Overall, parents responded that trials utilizing a waiting list control, active alternative treatment control, or a patient-preference design were acceptable. CONCLUSIONS Parents of children treated for cancer appear willing to participate in trials examining internet-administered psychological support. Findings of this study will inform the design of a feasibility trial examining internet-administered psychological support for the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Woodford
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Wikman
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kim Einhorn
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Martin Cernvall
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helena Grönqvist
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Amanda Romppala
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Louise von Essen
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chalela P, Muñoz E, Gallion KJ, Kaklamani V, Ramirez AG. Empowering Latina breast cancer patients to make informed decisions about clinical trials: a pilot study. Transl Behav Med 2018; 8:439-449. [PMID: 29800408 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Minority representation in clinical trials is vital for researchers to assess differential effects in outcomes of therapies on biological and genetic characteristics among groups. This study assessed the effect of Choices, a bilingual multi-component intervention, on perceived understanding of clinical trials, agreement with stages of decision readiness and consideration of clinical trials as a treatment option, among Latina breast cancer patients. This randomized controlled pilot study compared Choices with a control condition providing general clinical trial information to eligible patients. Seventy-seven Latina breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to either Choices (n = 38) or the control (n = 39). Choices included three components: an educational interactive video, a low-literacy booklet, and care coordination by patient navigation (i.e., educational and psychosocial support, coordinating appointments, translating, interacting with the medical team). Choices was more effective than the control in improving perceived understanding of clinical trials (p = .033) and increasing consideration of clinical trials as a treatment option (p = .008). Additionally, intervention participants showed significant changes between baseline and post-intervention on agreement with stages of decision readiness statements (p < .002) than control participants (p > .05); the percentage of intervention women in agreement with preparation to action statements increased from 52.8% at baseline to 86.1% at post-intervention, and those in agreement with ready to action stages rose from 50.0% to 88.9%. Computer-based videos and care coordination provided by patient navigation-specifically tailored to Latinos-are effective strategies to successfully address awareness, and improved decision-making skills to make informed decisions about clinical trial participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Chalela
- Institute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - Edgar Muñoz
- Institute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - Kipling J Gallion
- Institute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - Virginia Kaklamani
- Cancer Therapy and Research Center, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - Amelie G Ramirez
- Institute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rubinstein SM, Warner JL. CancerLinQ: Origins, Implementation, and Future Directions. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2018; 2:1-7. [DOI: 10.1200/cci.17.00060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Rapid-learning health systems have been proposed as a potential solution to the problem of quality in medicine, by leveraging data generated from electronic health systems in near-real time to improve quality and reduce cost. Given the complex, dynamic nature of cancer care, a rapid-learning health system offers large potential benefits to oncology practice. In this article, we review the rationale for developing a rapid-learning health system for oncology and describe the sequence of events that led to the development of ASCO’s CancerLinQ (Cancer Learning Intelligence Network for Quality) initiative, as well as the current state of CancerLinQ, including its importance to efforts such as the Beau Biden Cancer Moonshot. We then review the considerable challenges facing optimal implementation of a rapid-learning health system such as CancerLinQ, including integration of rapidly expanding multiomic data, capturing big data from a variety of sources, an evolving competitive landscape, and implementing a rapid-learning health system in a way that satisfies many stakeholders, including patients, providers, researchers, and administrators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel M. Rubinstein
- Samuel M. Rubinstein, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; and Jeremy L. Warner, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| | - Jeremy L. Warner
- Samuel M. Rubinstein, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; and Jeremy L. Warner, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Daly BJ, Nock N, Margevicious S, Meropol NJ. Importance of incorporating measures of attitude in planning and evaluating nursing education. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2018; 9:10.5430/jnep.v9n4p1. [PMID: 32864029 PMCID: PMC7453751 DOI: 10.5430/jnep.v9n4p1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Learners' attitudes towards a topic or behavior has long been recognized as an important component in the evaluation of formal education as well as in achieving desired behavior change. However, attitudes are frequently neglected and evaluation of outcomes from continuing nursing education often includes only changes in knowledge and learner satisfaction. We describe measurement of attitudes of oncology nurses towards holding discussions with patients about the option of participating in a clinical trial, in comparison to what can be learned from measuring knowledge alone. This article illustrates important insights that can be gained through inclusion of measures of attitude in both designing and evaluating continuing education using data from a larger on-going study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nora Nock
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ryan C, Dadabhoy H, Baranowski T. Participant Outcomes from Methods of Recruitment for Videogame Research. Games Health J 2018; 7:16-23. [PMID: 29394108 DOI: 10.1089/g4h.2017.0049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The most productive methods of recruitment for a videogame for health (G4H) trial are not known. Success or failure of recruitment methods has been reported for a variety of clinical trials, but few specifically for G4H trials. This study's goal was to recruit 444 overweight or obese (body mass index percentile between the 84.5th-99.4th percentiles) children between the ages of 10-12 years. The article reports the results of different methods of participant recruitment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants had to agree to three fasting blood samples (baseline, immediately after, and 2 months later); be willing to wear an accelerometer for 7 days at each assessment; read and speak English fluently (because the games were in English); have no history of any condition that would affect what he/she could eat or how much physical activity he/she could get; and have an eligible home computer purchased in the last 5 years with high-speed internet. Hardware criteria reflected the types of computers upon which Diab-Nano could be effectively played. Recruitment was conducted over a 35-month period and included electronic media, print advertising, community recruitment, and an internal volunteer list. Respondents were guided to a web-based screening questionnaire that asked for source of hearing about the study. RESULTS Although diverse recruitment methods were used, slow recruitment resulted in obtaining only 45% of the recruitment goal (n = 199). Electronic media (e.g., radio, television, and internet), which reached millions of targeted parents, resulted in only 76 respondents, of whom 13 became participants; print media (e.g., magazine, newsletter/newspaper, and mail), which also reached large numbers of parents, resulted in 192 respondents, of whom 19 became participants; community recruitment (e.g., school, friend or family, doctors office, flyer, work, community program) resulted in 162 respondents, of whom 38 became participants; and the internal volunteer list resulted in 413 respondents, of whom 128 became participants. CONCLUSION Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria and restricted access by gatekeepers could be deterrents to successful recruitment. The documented payoff of alternative comprehensive methods of recruitment should benefit other investigations in optimally allocating their recruitment resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Ryan
- Department of Pediatrics, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center , Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Hafza Dadabhoy
- Department of Pediatrics, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center , Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Tom Baranowski
- Department of Pediatrics, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center , Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Winkfield KM, Phillips JK, Joffe S, Halpern MT, Wollins DS, Moy B. Addressing Financial Barriers to Patient Participation in Clinical Trials: ASCO Policy Statement. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:JCO1801132. [PMID: 30212297 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Research conducted through clinical trials is essential for evaluating new treatment modalities, establishing new standards of cancer care, and ultimately improving and prolonging the lives of patients with cancer. However, participation in trials has been low, and this is attributable to various factors including patient financial barriers. Such financial barriers include the rising cost of cancer care; a lack of transparency in coverage policy; and the perception of ethical, compliance, or institutional impediments to patient financial support. ASCO convened a roundtable discussion with a variety of stakeholders to define the scope of the problem, as well as to identify clinical practice and policy solutions applicable at the institutional and system-wide levels. This statement summarizes key discussions from the ASCO Roundtable, as well as findings from the literature, and provides ASCO's recommendations for overcoming financial barriers that may otherwise prevent participation in clinical trials. These recommendations broadly address the following key areas: (1) improving the policy environment for coverage of clinical trials; (2) facilitating transparency among providers, patients, and payers for trial-related out-of-pocket costs; (3) refuting the specter of inducement to enable targeted financial support for patients; and (4) improving the available data on costs of cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Winkfield
- Karen M. Winkfield, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Jonathan K. Phillips and Dana S. Wollins, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Steven Joffe, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Michael T. Halpern, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA; and Beverly Moy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan K Phillips
- Karen M. Winkfield, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Jonathan K. Phillips and Dana S. Wollins, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Steven Joffe, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Michael T. Halpern, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA; and Beverly Moy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Steven Joffe
- Karen M. Winkfield, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Jonathan K. Phillips and Dana S. Wollins, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Steven Joffe, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Michael T. Halpern, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA; and Beverly Moy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Michael T Halpern
- Karen M. Winkfield, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Jonathan K. Phillips and Dana S. Wollins, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Steven Joffe, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Michael T. Halpern, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA; and Beverly Moy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Dana S Wollins
- Karen M. Winkfield, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Jonathan K. Phillips and Dana S. Wollins, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Steven Joffe, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Michael T. Halpern, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA; and Beverly Moy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Karen M. Winkfield, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Jonathan K. Phillips and Dana S. Wollins, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Steven Joffe, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Michael T. Halpern, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA; and Beverly Moy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Flocke SA, Antognoli E, Daly BJ, Jackson B, Fulton SE, Liu TM, Surdam J, Manne S, Meropol NJ. The Role of Oncology Nurses in Discussing Clinical Trials. Oncol Nurs Forum 2018; 44:547-552. [PMID: 28820515 DOI: 10.1188/17.onf.547-552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To describe oncology nurses' experiences discussing clinical trials with their patients, and to assess barriers to these discussions.
. RESEARCH APPROACH A qualitative study designed to elicit narratives from oncology nurses.
. SETTING Community- and academic-based oncology clinics throughout the United States.
. PARTICIPANTS 33 oncology nurses involved in direct patient care in community-based and large hospital-based settings. The sample was drawn from members of the Oncology Nursing Society.
. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH In-depth interviews were conducted and analyzed using a
immersion/crystallization approach to identify themes and patterns. The analyses highlight specific issues, examples, and contexts that present challenges to clinical trial discussions with patients.
. FINDINGS Oncology nurses view their roles as patient educators and advocates to be inclusive of discussion of clinical trials. Barriers to such discussions include lack of knowledge and strategies for addressing patients' common misconceptions and uncertainty about the timing of discussions.
. INTERPRETATION These data indicate that enabling nurses to actively engage patients in discussions of clinical trials requires educational interventions to build self-efficacy and close knowledge gaps.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Oncology nurses can play a critical role in advancing cancer care by supporting patients in decision making about clinical trial participation. This will require training and education to build their knowledge, reduce barriers, and increase their self-efficacy to fulfill this responsibility in various clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan A Flocke
- Department of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics at CWRU, Behavioral Measurement Core Facility, Case Comprehensive Center
| | | | - Barbara J Daly
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Winston K, Grendarova P, Rabi D. Video-based patient decision aids: A scoping review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:558-578. [PMID: 29102063 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study reviews the published literature on the use of video-based decision aids (DA) for patients. The authors describe the areas of medicine in which video-based patient DA have been evaluated, the medical decisions targeted, their reported impact, in which countries studies are being conducted, and publication trends. METHOD The literature review was conducted systematically using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Pubmed databases from inception to 2016. References of identified studies were reviewed, and hand-searches of relevant journals were conducted. RESULTS 488 studies were included and organized based on predefined study characteristics. The most common decisions addressed were cancer screening, risk reduction, advance care planning, and adherence to provider recommendations. Most studies had sample sizes of fewer than 300, and most were performed in the United States. Outcomes were generally reported as positive. This field of study was relatively unknown before 1990s but the number of studies published annually continues to increase. CONCLUSION Videos are largely positive interventions but there are significant remaining knowledge gaps including generalizability across populations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians should consider incorporating video-based DA in their patient interactions. Future research should focus on less studied areas and the mechanisms underlying effective patient decision aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Winston
- Alberta Children's Hospital, 2800 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8, Canada.
| | - Petra Grendarova
- University of Calgary, Division of Radiation Oncology, Calgary, Canada
| | - Doreen Rabi
- University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ibraheem A, Polite B. Improving the accrual of racial and ethnic minority patients in clinical trials: Time to raise the stakes. Cancer 2017; 123:4752-4756. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2017] [Revised: 09/03/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
50
|
Gad KT, Lassen U, Mau-Søerensen M, Høybye MT, Johansen C. Patient information in phase 1 trials: A systematic review. Psychooncology 2017; 27:768-780. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Revised: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Katrine Toubro Gad
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Ulrik Lassen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Morten Mau-Søerensen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Mette Terp Høybye
- Interdisciplinary Research Unit; Elective Surgery Center; Silkeborg Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
- Unit of Survivorship; Danish Cancer Society Research Center; Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|