1
|
Vera P, Thureau S, Le Tinier F, Chaumet-Riffaud P, Hapdey S, Kolesnikov-Gauthier H, Martin E, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Pourel N, Broglia JM, Boissellier P, Guillemard S, Salem N, Brenot-Rossi I, Le Péchoux C, Berthold C, Giroux-Leprieur E, Moreau D, Guillerm S, Benali K, Tessonnier L, Audigier-Valette C, Lerouge D, Quak E, Massabeau C, Courbon F, Moisson P, Larrouy A, Modzelewski R, Gouel P, Ghazzar N, Langlais A, Amour E, Zalcman G, Giraud P. Adaptive radiotherapy (up to 74 Gy) or standard radiotherapy (66 Gy) for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, according to [ 18F]FDG-PET tumour residual uptake at 42 Gy (RTEP7-IFCT-1402): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:1176-1187. [PMID: 39134086 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00320-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thoracic radiation intensification is debated in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the activity and safety of a boost radiotherapy dose up to 74 Gy in a functional sub-volume given according to on-treatment [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG)-PET results. METHODS In this multicentre, randomised, controlled non-comparative phase 2 trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with inoperable stage III NSCLC without EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and who were affiliated with or a beneficiary of a social benefit system, with evaluable tumour or node lesions, preserved lung function, and who were amenable to curative-intent radiochemotherapy. Patients were randomly allocated using a central interactive web-response system in a non-masked method (1:1; minimisation method used [random factor of 0·8]; stratified by radiotherapy technique [intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy] and by centre at which patients were treated) either to the experimental adaptive radiotherapy group A, in which only patients with positive residual metabolism on [18F]FDG-PET at 42 Gy received a boost radiotherapy (up to 74 Gy in 33 fractions), with all other patients receiving standard radiotherapy dosing (66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6·5 weeks), or to the standard radiotherapy group B (66 Gy in 33 fractions) over 6·5 weeks. All patients received two cycles of induction platinum-based chemotherapy cycles (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks and carboplatin area under the curve [AUC]=6 once every 3 weeks, or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 60 mg/m2 orally [or 30 mg/m2 intravenously] on day 8 once every 3 weeks). Then they concomitantly received radiochemotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy (three cycles for 8 weeks, with once per week paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 intravenously and carboplatin AUC=2 or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 40 mg/m2 orally (or 20 mg/m2 intravenously) on day 8 in 21-day cycles). The primary endpoint was the 15-month local control rate in the eligible patients who received at least one dose of concomitant radiochemotherapy. This RTEP7-IFCT-1402 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02473133), and is ongoing. FINDINGS From Nov 12, 2015, to July 7, 2021, we randomly assigned 158 patients (47 [30%] women and 111 [70%] men) to either the boosted radiotherapy group A (81 [51%]) or to the standard radiotherapy group B (77 [49%)]. In group A, 80 (99%) patients received induction chemotherapy and 68 (84%) received radiochemotherapy, of whom 48 (71%) with residual uptake on [18F]FDG-PET after 42 Gy received a radiotherapy boost. In group B, all 77 patients received induction chemotherapy and 73 (95%) received radiochemotherapy. At the final analysis, the median follow-up for eligible patients who received radiochemotherapy (n=140) was 45·1 months (95% CI 39·3-48·3). The 15-month local control rate was 77·6% (95% CI 67·6-87·6%) in group A and 71·2% (95% CI 60·8-81·6%) in group B. Acute (within 90 days from radiochemotherapy initiation) grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 20 (29%) of 68 patients in group A and 33 (45%) of 73 patients in group B, including serious adverse events in five (7%) patients in group A and ten (14%) patients in group B. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (seven [10%] of 68 in group A vs 16 [22%] of 73 in group B), and anaemia (five [7%] vs nine [12%]). In the acute phase, two deaths (3%) occurred in group B (one due to a septic shock related to chemotherapy, and the other due to haemotypsia not related to study treatment), and no deaths occurred in group A. After 90 days, one additional treatment-unrelated death occurred in group A and two deaths events occurred in group B (one radiation pneumonitis and one pneumonia unrelated to treatment). INTERPRETATION A thoracic radiotherapy boost, based on interim [18F]FDG-PET, led to a meaningful local control rate with no difference in adverse events between the two groups in organs at risk, in contrast with previous attempts at thoracic radiation intensification, warranting a randomised phase 3 evaluation of such [18F]FDG-PET-guided radiotherapy dose adaptation in patients with stage III NSCLC. FUNDING Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Vera
- Nuclear Medicine Department and QuantIF LITIS (EA4108), Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
| | - Sébastien Thureau
- Radiotherapy Department and QuantIF LITIS (EA4108), Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | | | | | - Sébastien Hapdey
- Nuclear Medicine Department and QuantIF LITIS (EA4108), Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | | | - Etienne Martin
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Nicolas Pourel
- Unité Fonctionnelle Onco-Thoracique, Institut du Cancer, Avignon, France
| | - Jean Marc Broglia
- Nuclear Medicine Deparment, Institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - Pierre Boissellier
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Guillemard
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Naji Salem
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Céline Berthold
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Etienne Giroux-Leprieur
- University Paris-Saclay, Department of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Oncology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Damien Moreau
- Oncology Radiotherapy Department, Paris Cité University, European Hospital Georges-Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Guillerm
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Khadija Benali
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Nord, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Tessonnier
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Centre Intercommunal Sainte-Musse de Toulon-La Seyne-sur-mer, Toulon, France
| | | | | | - Elske Quak
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Carole Massabeau
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Frédéric Courbon
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Patricia Moisson
- Radiotherapy Department, Hopital René Huguenin - Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Anne Larrouy
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre de Cancerologie Paris Nord, Sarcelles, France
| | - Romain Modzelewski
- Nuclear Medicine Department and QuantIF LITIS (EA4108), Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Pierrick Gouel
- Nuclear Medicine Department and QuantIF LITIS (EA4108), Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Nadia Ghazzar
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Paris Cité University, European Hospital Georges-Pompidou - Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Langlais
- Clinical Research Unit, Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique, Paris, France
| | - Elodie Amour
- Clinical Research Unit, Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique, Paris, France
| | - Gérard Zalcman
- Université Paris Cité, Thoracic Oncology Department, Centre d'Investigation Clinique Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale 1425, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Institut du Cancer - Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Nord, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Giraud
- Oncology Radiotherapy Department, Paris Cité University, European Hospital Georges-Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schulte C, Gauler T, Pöttgen C, Friedel G, Kopp HG, Fischer B, Schmidberger H, Kimmich M, Budach W, Cordes S, Wienker J, Metzenmacher M, de Los Rios RH, Spengler W, De Ruysscher D, Belka C, Welter S, Luetke-Brintrup D, Guberina M, Oezkan F, Darwiche K, Schuler M, Jöckel KH, Aigner C, Stamatis G, Stuschke M, Eberhardt WEE. Survivorship program including long-term toxicities and quality-of-life development over 10 years in a randomized trial in operable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (ESPATUE). Int J Cancer 2024. [PMID: 39198970 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.35131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
Over 40% stage-III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) experience 5-year survival following multimodality treatment. Nevertheless, little is known about relevant late toxicities and quality-of-life (QoL) in the further long-term follow-up. Therefore, we invited pts from our randomized phase-III trial (Eberhardt et al., Journal of Clinical Oncology 2015) after 10 years from diagnosis to participate within a structured survivorship program (SSP) including follow-up imaging, laboratory parameters, cardio-pulmonary investigations, long-term toxicity evaluations and QoL questionnaires. Of 246 pts initially accrued, 161 were considered potentially resectable following the induction therapy and were randomized (80 to arm A: definitive chemoradiation; 81 to arm B: definitive surgery; 85 not randomized for different reasons; group C). 31 from 37 pts still alive after 10 years agreed to the SSP (13 in A; 12 in B; 6 in C). Clinically relevant long-term toxicities (grade 3 and 4) were rarely observed with no signal favoring any of the randomization arms. Furthermore, available data from the global QoL analysis did not show a signal favoring any definitive locoregional approach (Mean QoL in SSP A pts: 56.41/100, B pts: 64.39/100) and no late decline in comparison to baseline and early 1-year follow-up. This is the first comprehensive SSP of very late survival follow-up reported in stage-III NSCLC treated within a randomized multimodality trial and it may serve as important baseline information for physicians and pts deciding for a locoregional treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Schulte
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital and Ruhrlandklinik, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas Gauler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Godehard Friedel
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hans-Georg Kopp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Robert-Bosch Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Berthold Fischer
- Department of Pulmonology, University Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Martin Kimmich
- Robert Bosch Center for Tumor Diseases (RBCTD), Robert-Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Sebastian Cordes
- Department of Pulmonology, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Wienker
- Department of Pulmonology, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Metzenmacher
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital and Ruhrlandklinik, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Werner Spengler
- Department of Pulmonology, University Medicine Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW School, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Welter
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lungenklinik Hemer, Hemer, Germany
| | - Diana Luetke-Brintrup
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Maja Guberina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Germany
| | - Filiz Oezkan
- Department of Pulmonology, Interventional Bronchology, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Kaid Darwiche
- Department of Pulmonology, Interventional Bronchology, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital and Ruhrlandklinik, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Germany
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Karl-Heinz Jöckel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Clemens Aigner
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruhrlandklinik Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Georgios Stamatis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruhrlandklinik Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Germany
| | - Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital and Ruhrlandklinik, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Richlitzki C, Wiesweg M, Metzenmacher M, Guberina N, Pöttgen C, Hautzel H, Eberhardt WEE, Darwiche K, Theegarten D, Aigner C, Bölükbas S, Schuler M, Stuschke M, Guberina M. C-reactive protein as robust laboratory value associated with prognosis in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive radiochemotherapy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:13765. [PMID: 38877146 PMCID: PMC11178931 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64302-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the prognostic value of biomarkers from peripheral blood obtained as routine laboratory assessment for overall survival in a cohort of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive radiochemotherapy at a high-volume cancer center. Seven blood biomarkers from 160 patients treated with definitive radiochemotherapy for stage III NSCLC were analyzed throughout the course treatment. Parameters were preselected using univariable and multivariable proportional hazards analysis and were assessed for internal validity using leave-one-out cross validation. Cross validated classifiers including biomarkers in addition to important clinical parameters were compared with classifiers containing the clinical parameters alone. An increased C-reactive protein (CRP) value in the final week of radiotherapy was found as a prognostic factor for overall survival, both as a continuous (HR 1.099 (1.038-1.164), p < 0.0012) as well as categorical variable splitting data at the median value of 1.2 mg/dl (HR 2.214 (1.388-3.531), p < 0.0008). In the multivariable analysis, the CRP value-maintained significance with an HR of 1.105 (1.040-1.173) and p-value of 0.0012. The cross validated classifier using CRP at the end of radiotherapy in addition to clinical parameters separated equally sized high and low risk groups more distinctly than a classifier containing the clinical parameters alone (HR = 2.786 (95% CI 1.686-4.605) vs. HR = 2.287 (95% CI 1.407-3.718)). Thus, the CRP value at the end of radiation therapy has successfully passed the crucial cross-validation test. The presented data on CRP levels suggests that inflammatory markers may become increasingly important during definitive radiochemotherapy, particularly with the growing utilization of immunotherapy as a consolidation therapy for stage III NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cedric Richlitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Marcel Wiesweg
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, University Medicine Essen - Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Metzenmacher
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, University Medicine Essen - Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Nika Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Essen, Germany
| | - Hubertus Hautzel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wilfried E E Eberhardt
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Kaid Darwiche
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Section of Interventional Pneumology, West German Lung Transplantation Center, University Medicine Essen - Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Theegarten
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Clemens Aigner
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Servet Bölükbas
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Ruhrlandklinik, Tueschner Weg 40, 45239, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, University Medicine Essen - Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Maja Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Essen, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schuler M, Hense J, Darwiche K, Michels S, Hautzel H, Kobe C, Lueong S, Metzenmacher M, Herold T, Zaun G, Laue K, Drzezga A, Theegarten D, Nensa F, Wolf J, Herrmann K, Wiesweg M. Early Metabolic Response by PET Predicts Sensitivity to Next-Line Targeted Therapy in EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancer with Unknown Mechanism of Acquired Resistance. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:851-855. [PMID: 38575188 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Targeted therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has established the precision oncology paradigm in lung cancer. Most patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer respond but eventually acquire resistance. Methods: Patients exhibiting the EGFR p.T790M resistance biomarker benefit from sequenced targeted therapy with osimertinib. We hypothesized that metabolic response as detected by 18F-FDG PET after short-course osimertinib identifies additional patients susceptible to sequenced therapy. Results: Fourteen patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer and resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR TKI testing negatively for EGFR p.T790M were enrolled in a phase II study. Five patients (36%) achieved a metabolic 18F-FDG PET response and continued osimertinib. In those, the median duration of treatment was not reached (95% CI, 24 mo to not estimable), median progression-free survival was 18.7 mo (95% CI, 14.6 mo to not estimable), and median overall survival was 41.5 mo. Conclusion: Connecting theranostic osimertinib treatment with early metabolic response assessment by PET enables early identification of patients with unknown mechanisms of TKI resistance who derive dramatic clinical benefit from sequenced osimertinib. This defines a novel paradigm for personalization of targeted therapies in patients with lung cancer dependent on a tractable driver oncogene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Schuler
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
| | - Jörg Hense
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
| | - Kaid Darwiche
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen-Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Michels
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hubertus Hautzel
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Smiths Lueong
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Bridge Institute for Experimental Tumor Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Metzenmacher
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas Herold
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Gregor Zaun
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
| | - Katharina Laue
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Theegarten
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Felix Nensa
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Wolf
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Medicine I, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Wiesweg
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Milella M. Stage Classification and Prognosis Assessment in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: It Takes Two to Tango. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1331-1334. [PMID: 38315951 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Milella
- Section of Innovation Biomedicine-Oncology Area, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schütte W, Gütz S, Nehls W, Blum TG, Brückl W, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Büttner R, Christopoulos P, Delis S, Deppermann KM, Dickgreber N, Eberhardt W, Eggeling S, Fleckenstein J, Flentje M, Frost N, Griesinger F, Grohé C, Gröschel A, Guckenberger M, Hecker E, Hoffmann H, Huber RM, Junker K, Kauczor HU, Kollmeier J, Kraywinkel K, Krüger M, Kugler C, Möller M, Nestle U, Passlick B, Pfannschmidt J, Reck M, Reinmuth N, Rübe C, Scheubel R, Schumann C, Sebastian M, Serke M, Stoelben E, Stuschke M, Thomas M, Tufman A, Vordermark D, Waller C, Wolf J, Wolf M, Wormanns D. [Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]. Pneumologie 2023; 77:671-813. [PMID: 37884003 DOI: 10.1055/a-2029-0134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Schütte
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Krankenhaus Martha Maria Halle-Dölau, Halle (Saale)
| | - Sylvia Gütz
- St. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Leipzig, Abteilung für Innere Medizin I, Leipzig
| | - Wiebke Nehls
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin und Geriatrie, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring
| | - Torsten Gerriet Blum
- Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Berlin
| | - Wolfgang Brückl
- Klinik für Innere Medizin 3, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Klinikum Nürnberg Nord
| | | | - Reinhard Büttner
- Institut für Allgemeine Pathologie und Pathologische Anatomie, Uniklinik Köln, Berlin
| | | | - Sandra Delis
- Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Berlin
| | | | - Nikolas Dickgreber
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Thoraxonkologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Klinikum Rheine
| | | | - Stephan Eggeling
- Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit, Klinikum Neukölln, Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Berlin
| | - Jochen Fleckenstein
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg
| | - Michael Flentje
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Nikolaj Frost
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Infektiologie/Pneumologie, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - Frank Griesinger
- Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | | | - Andreas Gröschel
- Klinik für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Clemenshospital, Münster
| | | | | | - Hans Hoffmann
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TU München, Sektion für Thoraxchirurgie, München
| | - Rudolf M Huber
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Thorakale Onkologie, LMU Klinikum Munchen
| | - Klaus Junker
- Klinikum Oststadt Bremen, Institut für Pathologie, Bremen
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Klinikum der Universität Heidelberg, Abteilung Diagnostische Radiologie, Heidelberg
| | - Jens Kollmeier
- Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Berlin
| | | | - Marcus Krüger
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau, Halle-Dölau
| | | | - Miriam Möller
- Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Halle-Dölau
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Kliniken Maria Hilf, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Mönchengladbach
| | | | - Joachim Pfannschmidt
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin
| | - Martin Reck
- Lungeclinic Grosshansdorf, Pneumologisch-onkologische Abteilung, Grosshansdorf
| | - Niels Reinmuth
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Thorakale Onkologie, Asklepios Lungenklinik Gauting, Gauting
| | - Christian Rübe
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Homburg
| | | | | | - Martin Sebastian
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt
| | - Monika Serke
- Zentrum für Pneumologie und Thoraxchirurgie, Lungenklinik Hemer, Hemer
| | | | - Martin Stuschke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen
| | - Michael Thomas
- Thoraxklinik am Univ.-Klinikum Heidelberg, Thorakale Onkologie, Heidelberg
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Thorakale Onkologie, LMU Klinikum München
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle
| | - Cornelius Waller
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg
| | | | - Martin Wolf
- Klinikum Kassel, Klinik für Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kassel
| | - Dag Wormanns
- Evangelische Lungenklinik, Radiologisches Institut, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhuang F, Haoran E, Huang J, Wu J, Xu L, Zhang L, Li Q, Li C, Zhao Y, Yang M, Ma M, She Y, Chen H, Luo Q, Zhao D, Chen C. Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake values in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2023; 178:20-27. [PMID: 36764154 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reliable predictive markers are lacking for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The present study investigated the utility of SUVmax values acquired from PET/CT to predict the response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable NSCLC. MATERAL AND METHODS SUVmax, clinical and pathological outcomes, were collected from patients in 5 hospitals. Patients who received dynamic PET/CT surveillance were divided into cohorts A (chemoimmunotherapy) and B (chemotherapy), respectively, while cohort C (chemoimmunotherapy) comprised patients undergoing post-therapy PET/CT. Associations between SUVmax and major pathologic response (MPR) were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS A total of 129 cases with an MPR rate of 46.5 % was identified. In neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, ΔSUVmax% (AUC: 0.890, 95 % CI: 0.761-0.949) and post-therapy SUVmax (AUC: 0.933, 95 % CI: 0.802-0.959) could accurately predict MPR. On the contrary, the baseline SUVmax was not associated with MPR (p = 0.184). Furthermore, an independent cohort C proved that post-therapy SUVmax could serve as an independent predictor (AUC: 0.928, 95 % CI: 0.823-0.958). In addition, robust predictive performance could be observed when we use the optimal cut-off point of both ΔSUVmax% (54.4 %, AUC: 0.912, 95 % CI: 0.824-0.994) and post-therapy SUVmax (3.565, AUC: 0.912, 95 % CI: 0.824-0.994) in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The RNA data revealed that the expression of PFKFB4, a key enzyme in glycolysis, was positively correlated with SUVmax value and tumor cell proliferation after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. CONCLUSION These findings highlighted that the ΔSUVmax% and remained SUVmax were accurate and non-invasive tests for the prediction of MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fenghui Zhuang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - E Haoran
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia Huang
- Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Junqi Wu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Long Xu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Chongwu Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yue Zhao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Minglei Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Minjie Ma
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Gansu, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunlang She
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Hezhong Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingquan Luo
- Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Deping Zhao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | - Chang Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Gansu, People's Republic of China; Linhai First People's Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Multi-scale characterization of tumor-draining lymph nodes in resectable lung cancer treated with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. EBioMedicine 2022; 84:104265. [PMID: 36116212 PMCID: PMC9486045 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Regional lymph node (LN) acts as a pivotal organ for antitumor immunity. Paradoxically, tumor-draining LNs (TDLNs) are usually the first site of tumor metastasis in lung cancer. It is largely unknown about the association between the status of TDLNs and the response of primary tumor beds to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer patients. Also, studies characterizing the TDLNs in response to ICIs are scarce. Methods We characterized and compared the radiological, metabolic (18F-FDG) and pathologic responses between primary tumor beds and paired TDLNs (invaded/non-invaded) from 68 lung cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant ICIs plus surgery. Additionally, we performed the spatial profiling of immune and non-immune cells within TDLNs using multiplexed immunofluorescence. Therapy responses (e.g., pathologic complete (pCR) or major response (MPR)) of primary lung tumor beds and paired TDLNs were investigated separately. Findings We observed that responses of TDLNs to ICIs markedly differ from their paired primary lung tumors regarding the radiological, metabolic (18F-FDG uptake), and pathologic alterations. Neoadjuvant ICIs therapy specifically decreased 18F-FDG-reflected metabolic activity in the primary tumor beds with pCR/MPR but not their TDLNs counterparts. Furthermore, the presence of invaded TDLNs was associated with poor pathologic responses in the matched primary tumor beds and predictive of rapid post-treatment tumor relapse. Spatial profiling demonstrated exclusion of T cell infiltrates within the metastatic lesions of invaded TDLNs, and diminished multiple immune and non-immune compositions in non-involved regions surrounding the metastatic lesions. Interpretation These results provide the first clinically-relevant evidence demonstrating unique response patterns of TDLNs under ICIs treatment and revealing the underappreciated association of TDLNs status with the response of their paired primary tumors to ICIs in lung cancer. Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82072570 to F. Yao; 82002941 to B. Sun), the excellent talent program of Shanghai Chest Hospital (to F.Y), the Basic Foundation Program for Youth of Shanghai Chest Hospital (2021YNJCQ2 to H.Yang), and the Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai (SHSMU-ZLCX20212302 to F. Yao).
Collapse
|
9
|
Aigner C, Hautzel H, Ploenes T. SUVmax-Δ makes the difference. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2022; 35:6617358. [PMID: 35748731 PMCID: PMC9270858 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Aigner
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hubertus Hautzel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Till Ploenes
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Provencio M, Calvo V, Romero A, Spicer JD, Cruz-Bermúdez A. Treatment Sequencing in Resectable Lung Cancer: The Good and the Bad of Adjuvant Versus Neoadjuvant Therapy. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-18. [PMID: 35561296 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_358995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The treatment scenario for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer has changed dramatically with the incorporation of immunotherapy. The introduction of immunotherapy into treatment algorithms has yielded improved clinical outcomes in several phase II and III trials in both adjuvant (Impower010 and PEARLS) and neoadjuvant settings (JHU/MSK, LCMC3, NEOSTAR, Columbia/MGH, NADIM, and CheckMate-816), leading to new U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals in this sense. Different treatment options are now available for patients, making the optimal treatment scenario a matter of intense debate. In this review, we summarize the main results concerning treatment sequencing in resectable non-small cell lung cancer from the past 30 years in the preimmunotherapy era, focusing on recent advances after incorporation of immunotherapy. Finally, the utility of several parameters (PD-L1, tumor mutational burden, radiomics, circulating tumor DNA, T-cell receptor, and immune populations) as predictive biomarkers for therapy personalization is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariano Provencio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Virginia Calvo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Atocha Romero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jonathan D Spicer
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alberto Cruz-Bermúdez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tanahashi M, Suzuki E, Yoshii N, Watanabe T, Tsuchida H, Yobita S, Iguchi K, Uchiyama S, Nakamura M. OUP accepted manuscript. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2022; 35:6584012. [PMID: 35543472 PMCID: PMC9297519 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Tanahashi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
- Corresponding author. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, 3443 Mikatahara-cho, Kita-ku, Hamamatsu 433-8558, Japan. Tel: +81-53-4361251; e-mail: (M. Tanahashi)
| | - Eriko Suzuki
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Naoko Yoshii
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Takuya Watanabe
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tsuchida
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Shogo Yobita
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Kensuke Iguchi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Suiha Uchiyama
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Minori Nakamura
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ren S, Xu A, Lin Y, Camidge DR, Di Maio M, Califano R, Hida T, Rossi A, Guibert N, Zhu C, Shen J. A narrative review of primary research endpoints of neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer: past, present and future. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:3264-3275. [PMID: 34430363 PMCID: PMC8350086 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-21-259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective This review summarizes the current status of neoadjuvant therapy and discusses the choice of new clinical research endpoints for non-small cell lung cancer. Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a recognized practice in patients with resectable and locally advanced lung cancer. With the introduction of molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the overall survival (OS) of patients with lung cancer has been significantly improved, and the original traditional clinical research endpoints are no longer suitable for existing clinical research. In order to accelerate the process of clinical trials and the development and approval of drugs, it is necessary to find suitable alternative indicators as the main indicators of clinical research. Methods Therefore, this article focuses on clinical trials using disease-free survival (DFS), progression free survival, and pathological evaluation indicators, pathologic complete response and major pathologic response, as surrogate endpoints. We search related literature through PubMed database and clinical trials through clinicaltrials.gov. Conclusions Pathologic complete response and major pathologic response are recommended as surrogate endpoints in the era of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and secondary endpoints are listed for the prediction of pathological results. In addition, the definitions of major pathological response (MPR) and PCR should be standardized, and a new pathological evaluation standard should be developed, which is applicable to all current treatment methods. Keywords Neoadjuvant therapy; resectable lung cancer; clinical research endpoint; pathological response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sijia Ren
- Taizhou Hospital, Zhejiang University, Taizhou, China
| | - Anyi Xu
- Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Yilian Lin
- Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - D Ross Camidge
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin/Division of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Raffaele Califano
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Toyoaki Hida
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Antonio Rossi
- Oncology Center of Excellence, Therapeutic Science & Strategy Unit, IQVIA, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolas Guibert
- Thoracic Oncology Department, Larrey Hospital, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Chengchu Zhu
- Taizhou Hospital, Zhejiang University, Taizhou, China
| | - Jianfei Shen
- Taizhou Hospital, Zhejiang University, Taizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhu J, Zhang Y, Wang M, Zhang Z, Yue D, Liu S, Pan Y, Wang C. Outcomes in 36 Patients with Stage IIIA-N2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung Treated with Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Prospective Study from a Single Center. Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e930738. [PMID: 34376631 PMCID: PMC8366304 DOI: 10.12659/msm.930738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whether nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin as neoadjuvant therapy can benefit patients with resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the lung remains unclear. This prospective study aimed to investigate outcomes in patients with stage IIIA-N2 squamous cell carcinoma of the lung treated with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin as neoadjuvant therapy. Material/Methods Patients with stage IIIA-N2 squamous cell carcinoma of the lung were treated with nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15) and carboplatin (5 mg/(mL·min), day 1) for two 21-day cycles. The patients were followed every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months after that. The primary endpoint was the downstaging rate. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), margin-free (R0) resection, pathologic complete response (pCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Among the 36 enrolled patients, 33 completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 23 underwent surgery. The preoperative ORR was 50.0% (18/36). R0 resection was achieved in 22 (95.7%) of 23 patients. Major pathologic response and pCR were achieved in 8 (34.8%) and 2 (8.7%) patients, respectively. The overall downstaging rate was 47.8% (11/23). The median follow-up was 39.8 (32.5–41.0) months. For patients who underwent surgery, the median PFS and OS were 31.4 (95%CI: 10.4-not reached (NR)) and 45.0 (95%CI: 22.6-NR) months, respectively. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, anemia, and leukopenia. Conclusions This study preliminarily indicated a favorable effect of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin as neoadjuvant therapy without significant adverse events for stage IIIA-N2 squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to verify these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianquan Zhu
- Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China (mainland)
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China (mainland)
| | - Meng Wang
- Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China (mainland)
| | - Zhenfa Zhang
- Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China (mainland)
| | - Dongsheng Yue
- Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China (mainland)
| | - Shichang Liu
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China (mainland)
| | - Yi Pan
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China (mainland)
| | - Changli Wang
- Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China (mainland)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guberina M, Pöttgen C, Metzenmacher M, Wiesweg M, Schuler M, Aigner C, Ploenes T, Umutlu L, Gauler T, Darwiche K, Stamatis G, Theegarten D, Hautzel H, Jentzen W, Guberina N, Herrmann K, Eberhardt WE, Stuschke M. PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF POST-INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY VOLUMETRIC PET/CT PARAMETERS FOR STAGE IIIA/B NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING DEFINITIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:jnumed.120.260646. [PMID: 34016730 PMCID: PMC8612197 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.260646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s): The aim of this follow-up analysis of the ESPATUE phase-3 trial was to explore the prognostic value of post-induction chemotherapy PET metrics in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were assigned to receive definitive chemoradiotherapy. Materials/Methods: All eligible patients stage IIIA (cN2) and stage IIIB of the trial received induction chemotherapy consisting of 3 cycles of cisplatin/paclitaxel and chemoradiotherapy up to 45 Gy/1.5 Gy per fraction twice-a-day, followed by a radiation-boost with 2 Gy once per day with concurrent cisplatin/vinorelbine. The protocol definition prescribed a total dose of 65-71 Gy. 18F-FDG-PET/CT (PETpre) was performed at study entry and before concurrent chemoradiotherapy (interim-PET; PETpost). Interim PETpost metrics and known prognostic clinical parameters were correlated in uni- and multivariable survival analyses. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to show internal validity. Results: Ninety-two patients who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT after induction chemotherapy were enrolled. Median MTVpost value was 5.9 ml. Altogether 85 patients completed the whole chemoradiation with the planned total dose of 60-71 Gy. In univariable proportional hazard analysis, each of the parameters MTVpost, SUVmax(post) and TLGmax(post) was associated with overall survival (P < 0.05). Multivariable survival analysis, including clinical and post-induction PET parameters, found TLGmax(post) (hazard ratio: 1.032 (95%-CI: 1.013-1.052) per 100 ml increase) and total radiation dose (hazard ratio: 0.930 (0.902-0.959) per Gray increase) significantly related with overall survival in the whole group of patients, and also in patients receiving a total dose ≥ 60 Gy. The best leave-one-out cross-validated 2 parameter classifier contained TLGmax(post) and total radiation dose. TLGmax(post) was associated with time to distant metastases (P = 0.0018), and SUVmax(post) with time to loco-regional relapse (P = 0.039) in multivariable analysis of patients receiving a total dose ≥ 60 Gy. Conclusion: Post-induction chemotherapy PET parameters demonstrated prognostic significance. Therefore, an interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT is a promising diagnostic modality for guiding individualized treatment intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Guberina
- Department for Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department for Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Metzenmacher
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Wiesweg
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Clemens Aigner
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Endoscopy, West German Lung Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Till Ploenes
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Endoscopy, West German Lung Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas Gauler
- Department for Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Kaid Darwiche
- Section of Interventional Pneumology, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Georgios Stamatis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Endoscopy, West German Lung Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Theegarten
- Institute of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Hubertus Hautzel
- Department for Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Walter Jentzen
- Department for Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nika Guberina
- Department for Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen
- Department for Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wilfried E.E. Eberhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department for Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Huynh C, Walsh LA, Spicer JD. Surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:563-580. [PMID: 33569337 PMCID: PMC7867741 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Surgery is the standard of care for patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, as a single modality, surgery for early stage or locally advanced NSCLC remains associated with high rates of local and distant recurrence. The addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has modestly improved outcomes. While systemic therapy paired with surgery for other malignancies such as breast cancer have resulted in far better outcomes for equivalent stage designations, outcome improvements for operable NSCLC have lagged in part as a result of trials where adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to incur harm for stage IA patients and only modest survival benefit for stage IB-IIIA patients (AJCC 7th ed.). In recent years, immunotherapy for NSCLC has emerged as a systemic therapy with significant benefit over traditional chemotherapy regimens. These advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have opened the door to administering peri-operative immunotherapy for operable NSCLC. As a result, a great multitude of studies investigating the use of immunotherapy in combination with surgery for NSCLC as well as several other malignancies have emerged. In this review, we outline the rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of operable NSCLC and summarize the available evidence that include preoperative ICI as a single modality or in combination with systemic agents and/or radiotherapy. Further, we summarize how such treatment trajectories open multiple unique windows of opportunity for scientific discovery and potential therapeutic gains for these vulnerable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Huynh
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal QC, Canada
| | - Logan A. Walsh
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal QC, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jonathan D. Spicer
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal QC, Canada
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stuschke M, Pöttgen C. 18F-FDG PET/CT for Target Volume Contouring in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy. J Nucl Med 2020; 61:178S-179S. [PMID: 33293438 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tang W, Hou Q, Lin J, Li D, Lin J, Chen J, Qiu Z, Chu X, Yang X, Yan H, Wang S, Wu Y, Zhong W. A New Prognostic Index Combines the Metabolic Response and RECIST 1.1 to Evaluate the Therapeutic Response in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1503. [PMID: 33014793 PMCID: PMC7493745 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is occasionally insufficient for evaluation. We proposed a new prognostic index (NPI) that combines the standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and RECIST. Methods: In total, 116 patients with lung cancer who underwent consecutive positron emission tomography-computed tomography prior to and after the initial treatment were included. We formulated the NPI by estimating the hazard ratios of overall survival for ΔMTV, ΔSUVmax, and ΔD (tumor size based on RECIST). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between RECIST and the NPI. Results: ROC curve analysis identified two cutoff values based on the NPI (≤ -49.3% and ≥43.4%) to discriminate partial remission (NPR), stable disease (NSD) and progressive disease (NPD). Based on RECIST, survival analysis did not discriminate significantly on either PFS or OS between the PR, SD, and PD groups. However, according to the NPI, PFS and OS differed significantly between the NPR, NSD, and NPD groups (training set: PFS, p = 0.048; OS, p = 0.026; validation set: PFS, p = 0.004; OS, p = 0.023). Moreover, therapeutic response based on NPI was independent prognostic factor for both PFS [NPR as reference, NSD: hazard ratio (HR) 2.04; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.35-3.08; p = 0.001; NPD: HR 6.87; 95% CI 3.03-15.57; p < 0.001] and OS (NPR as reference, NSD: HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.05-2.57; p = 0.031; NPD: HR 3.56; 95% CI 1.59-7.95; p = 0.002). Conclusion: The NPI showed superiority for evaluation of the therapeutic response and survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, overcoming the limitations of RECIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenfang Tang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qingyi Hou
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Weilun PET Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Juntao Lin
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dongjiang Li
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Weilun PET Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jieshan Lin
- Department of Nephrology, Blood Purifiction Center, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Jinghua Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- Guangzhou Twelfth People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenbin Qiu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangpeng Chu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiongwen Yang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Honghong Yan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuxia Wang
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Weilun PET Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yilong Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenzhao Zhong
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Predictive value of interim 18F-FDG-PET in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236350. [PMID: 32687531 PMCID: PMC7371172 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated that early metabolic response determined by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) during radiotherapy (RT), predicts outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-eight patients evaluated using pretreatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT (PETpre) and interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT (PETinterim) after 11 fractions of RT were retrospectively reviewed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated for primary lesion. Predictive value of gross tumor volume (ΔGTV) and SUVmax (ΔSUVmax) changes was evaluated for locoregional control (LRC), distant failure (DF), and overall survival (OS). Metabolic responders were patients with ΔSUVmax >40%. RESULTS Metabolic responders showed better trends in 1-year LRC (90.9%) than non-responders (47.1%) (p = 0.086). Patients with large GTVpre (≥120 cc) demonstrated poor LRC (hazard ratio 4.14, p = 0.022), while metabolic non-responders with small GTVpre (<120 cc) and metabolic responders with large GTVpre both had 1-year LRC rates of 75.0%. Reduction of 25% in GTV was not associated with LRC; however, metabolic responders without a GTV response showed better 1-year LRC (83.3%) than metabolic non-responders with a reduction in GTV (42.9%). Metabolic responders showed lower 1-year DF (16.7%) than non-responders (50.0%) (p = 0.025). An ΔSUVmax threshold of 40% yielded accuracy of 64% for predicting LRC, 75% for DF, and 54% for OS. However, ΔGTV > 25% demonstrated inferior diagnostic values than metabolic response. CONCLUSIONS Changes in tumor metabolism diagnosed using PETinterim during RT better predicted treatment responses, recurrences, and prognosis than other factors historically used.
Collapse
|
21
|
Unterrainer M, Eze C, Ilhan H, Marschner S, Roengvoraphoj O, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Walter F, Kunz WG, Rosenschöld PMA, Jeraj R, Albert NL, Grosu AL, Niyazi M, Bartenstein P, Belka C. Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:88. [PMID: 32317029 PMCID: PMC7171749 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01519-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy and radiation oncology play a key role in the clinical management of patients suffering from oncological diseases. In clinical routine, anatomic imaging such as contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are widely available and are usually used to improve the target volume delineation for subsequent radiotherapy. Moreover, these modalities are also used for treatment monitoring after radiotherapy. However, some diagnostic questions cannot be sufficiently addressed by the mere use standard morphological imaging. Therefore, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging gains increasing clinical significance in the management of oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy, as PET allows the visualization and quantification of tumoral features on a molecular level beyond the mere morphological extent shown by conventional imaging, such as tumor metabolism or receptor expression. The tumor metabolism or receptor expression information derived from PET can be used as tool for visualization of tumor extent, for assessing response during and after therapy, for prediction of patterns of failure and for definition of the volume in need of dose-escalation. This review focuses on recent and current advances of PET imaging within the field of clinical radiotherapy / radiation oncology in several oncological entities (neuro-oncology, head & neck cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal tumors and prostate cancer) with particular emphasis on radiotherapy planning, response assessment after radiotherapy and prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - C Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - S Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - O Roengvoraphoj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N S Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - F Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - W G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - P Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - R Jeraj
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
| | - N L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Belka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Filice A, Casali M, Ciammella P, Galaverni M, Fioroni F, Iotti C, Versari A. Radiotherapy Planning and Molecular Imaging in Lung Cancer. Curr Radiopharm 2020; 13:204-217. [PMID: 32186275 PMCID: PMC8206193 DOI: 10.2174/1874471013666200318144154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In patients suitable for radical chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer, 18F-FDGPET/ CT is a proposed management to improve the accuracy of high dose radiotherapy. However, there is a high rate of locoregional failure in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), probably due to the fact that standard dosing may not be effective in all patients. The aim of the present review was to address some criticisms associated with the radiotherapy image-guided in NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted. Only published articles that met the following criteria were included: articles, only original papers, radiopharmaceutical ([18F]FDG and any tracer other than [18F]FDG), target, only specific for lung cancer radiotherapy planning, and experimental design (eventually "in vitro" studies were excluded). Peer-reviewed indexed journals, regardless of publication status (published, ahead of print, in press, etc.) were included. Reviews, case reports, abstracts, editorials, poster presentations, and publications in languages other than English were excluded. The decision to include or exclude an article was made by consensus and any disagreement was resolved through discussion. RESULTS Hundred eligible full-text articles were assessed. Diverse information is now available in the literature about the role of FDG and new alternative radiopharmaceuticals for the planning of radiotherapy in NSCLC. In particular, the role of alternative technologies for the segmentation of FDG uptake is essential, although indeterminate for RT planning. The pros and cons of the available techniques have been extensively reported. CONCLUSION PET/CT has a central place in the planning of radiotherapy for lung cancer and, in particular, for NSCLC assuming a substantial role in the delineation of tumor volume. The development of new radiopharmaceuticals can help overcome the problems related to the disadvantage of FDG to accumulate also in activated inflammatory cells, thus improving tumor characterization and providing new prognostic biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelina Filice
- Address correspondence to this author at the Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Reggio Emilia, Italy; E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brierley J, O'Sullivan B, Asamura H, Byrd D, Huang SH, Lee A, Piñeros M, Mason M, Moraes FY, Rösler W, Rous B, Torode J, van Krieken JH, Gospodarowicz M. Global Consultation on Cancer Staging: promoting consistent understanding and use. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019; 16:763-771. [PMID: 31388125 PMCID: PMC7136160 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-019-0253-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Disease burden is the most important determinant of survival in patients with cancer. This domain, reflected by the cancer stage and codified using the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, is a fundamental determinant of prognosis. Accurate and consistent tumour classification is required for the development and use of treatment guidelines and to enable clinical research (including clinical trials), cancer surveillance and control. Furthermore, knowledge of the extent and stage of disease is frequently important in the context of translational studies. Attempts to include additional prognostic factors in staging classifications, in order to facilitate a more accurate determination of prognosis, are often made with a lack of knowledge and understanding and are one of the main causes of the inconsistent use of terms and definitions. This effect has resulted in uncertainty and confusion, thus limiting the utility of the TNM classification. In this Position paper, we provide a consensus on the optimal use and terminology for cancer staging that emerged from a consultation process involving representatives of several major international organizations involved in cancer classification. The consultation involved several steps: a focused literature review; a stakeholder survey; and a consultation meeting. This aim of this Position paper is to provide a consensus that should guide the use of staging terminology and secure the classification of anatomical disease extent as a distinct aspect of cancer classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Brierley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - David Byrd
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anne Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Marion Piñeros
- Cancer Surveillance Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Fabio Y Moraes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Center, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Wiebke Rösler
- Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Brian Rous
- National Cancer Registration Service, London, UK
| | - Julie Torode
- Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Mary Gospodarowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Castello A, Toschi L, Rossi S, Finocchiaro G, Grizzi F, Mazziotti E, Qehajaj D, Rahal D, Lopci E. Predictive and Prognostic Role of Metabolic Response in Patients With Stage III NSCLC Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer 2019; 21:28-36. [PMID: 31409523 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive and prognostic role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in candidates with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-six patients with stage III NSCLC treated with induction chemotherapy from March 2013 to December 2017 were retrospectively identified. Response assessment were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters were analyzed as absolute values as well as percentage changes (Δ) between 2 consecutive scans, for primary tumor (T) and for regional lymph nodes (N). All clinical variables and metabolic parameters were compared with treatment response and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), based on a median follow-up of 9.4 months. RESULTS Post-induction therapy standardized uptake value (SUV)max_T, SUVmean_T, metabolic tumor volume (MTV_T), and total lesion glycolysis of the tumor (TLG_T) varied significantly between responders and non-responders (6.6 vs. 13.8; P = .001; 4.2 vs. 8.1; P < .001; 6 vs. 17.9; P = .002; and 24.1 vs. 136.3; P < .001, respectively). Likewise, percentage changes (Δ_T) were significantly different between the 2 groups (P < .001). Along with primary tumor, also post-SUVmax_N, post-SUVmean_N, and post-TLG_N (P = .024, P = .015, and P = .024, respectively), as well as all percentage changes (Δ_N) were different between responders and non-responders. RECIST 1.1 and EORTC response classifications were discordant in 27 patients (40.9%; κ = 0.265; P = .003). On multivariate analysis, post-TLG_N was an independent predictor for both PFS and OS, whereas RECIST 1.1 was a predictor only for OS. CONCLUSIONS Several metabolic parameters may differentiate responders from non-responders following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III NSCLC. As compared with RECIST 1.1, EORTC seems to be more appropriate for evaluation therapeutic response. Finally, post-TLG_N has significant prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Castello
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Luca Toschi
- Department of Oncology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Sabrina Rossi
- Department of Oncology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Giovanna Finocchiaro
- Department of Oncology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Fabio Grizzi
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Emanuela Mazziotti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Dorina Qehajaj
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Daoud Rahal
- Department of Pathology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Guberina M, Eberhardt W, Stuschke M, Gauler T, Aigner C, Schuler M, Stamatis G, Theegarten D, Jentzen W, Herrmann K, Pöttgen C. Pretreatment metabolic tumour volume in stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer uncovers differences in effectiveness of definitive radiochemotherapy schedules: analysis of the ESPATUE randomized phase 3 trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:1439-1447. [PMID: 30710323 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-4270-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE According to the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial, pretreatment metabolic tumour volume (MTV) as detected by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT is a prognostic factor in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after definitive radiochemotherapy (RCT). To validate the prognostic value of MTV in patients with stage III NSCLC after RCT, we analysed mature survival data from the German phase III trial ESPATUE. METHODS This analysis included patients who were staged by PET/CT and who were enrolled in the ESPATUE trial, a randomized study comparing definitive RCT (arm A) with surgery (arm B) after induction chemotherapy and RCT in patients with resectable stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC. Patients refusing surgery and those with nonresectable disease were scheduled to receive definitive RCT. MTV was measured using a fixed threshold-based approach and a model-based iterative volume thresholding approach. Data were analysed using proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival functions. RESULTS MTV as a continuous variable did not reveal differences in survival between the 117 patients scheduled to receive definitive RCT and all 169 enrolled patients who underwent pretreatment PET/CT (p > 0.5). Five-year survival rates were 33% (95% CI 17-49%) in patients scheduled for definitive RCT with a high MTV (>95.4 ml) and 32% (95% CI: 22-42%) in those with a low MTV. The hazard ratio for survival was 0.997 (95% CI 0.973-1.022) per 10-ml increase in MTV and the slope was significantly shallower than that in the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial (random effects model, p = 0.002). There were no differences in MTV size distributions between the ACRIN and ESPATUE trials (p = 0.97). CONCLUSION Patients with stage III NSCLC and a large MTV in whom definitive RCT had a particularly good survival in the ESPATUE trial. Treatment individualization according to MTV is not supported by this study. The ESPATUE and ACRIN trials differed by the use of cisplatin-containing induction chemotherapy and an intensified radiotherapy regimen that were particularly effective in patients with large MTV disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Guberina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Wilfried Eberhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, 45122, Essen, Germany.
| | - Thomas Gauler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Clemens Aigner
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, 45122, Essen, Germany.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruhrlandklinik, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, 45239, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, 45122, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Georgios Stamatis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruhrlandklinik, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, 45239, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Theegarten
- Department of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Walter Jentzen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, 45122, Essen, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Current Status and Future Perspectives on Neoadjuvant Therapy in Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2018; 13:1818-1831. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
27
|
How much primary tumor metabolic volume reduction is required to improve outcome in stage III NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy? A single-centre experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45:2103-2109. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4063-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
28
|
Schreiner W, Gavrychenkova S, Dudek W, Rieker RJ, Lettmaier S, Fietkau R, Sirbu H. Pathologic complete response after induction therapy-the role of surgery in stage IIIA/B locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:2795-2803. [PMID: 29997942 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Pathologic complete response (pCR) is dominant prognostic factor determining favorable outcome in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after induction therapy (IT). There is no non-operative diagnostics that adequately estimates the pCR. Aim of this retrospective study was to assess the correlation between clinical and pathological factors in patients with pCR. Methods Twenty-five patients with pCR after curative lung resection following IT were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression and descriptive analysis. The survival rate was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results The IT included chemoradiation with median doses of 50.4 Gy (range, 45-59.4 Gy) combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in 23 patients (92%) and induction platinum-based chemotherapy in 2 patients (8%). Clinical tumor stage before IT was IIIA in 21, IIIB in 4 patients. Mean interval between IT and surgery was 8.1±3.0 weeks. Perioperative morbidity and 30-day mortality was 32% and 4%, respectively. There was no significant correlation of pCR and different clinical and pathological factors. The estimated 5-year long-term survival (LTS) and progressive-free survival (PFS) was 57% and 54%, respectively. The median LTS and PFS was not reached. Conclusions pCR in patients with locally advanced NSCLC following IT is an independent prognostic factor, without correlation with pathological and clinical factors. Non-operative accurate assessment of pCR is currently impossible. Surgical resection enables secure identification of pCR and might improve the patient stratification for additive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waldemar Schreiner
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sofiya Gavrychenkova
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wojciech Dudek
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ralf Joachim Rieker
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Lettmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Horia Sirbu
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pöttgen C, Eberhardt W, Stamatis G, Stuschke M. Definitive radiochemotherapy versus surgery within multimodality treatment in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) - a cumulative meta-analysis of the randomized evidence. Oncotarget 2018; 8:41670-41678. [PMID: 28415831 PMCID: PMC5522187 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Randomized trials were analyzed comparing surgery with definitive radiotherapy as local curative treatment options within the framework of different multimodality treatments for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Endpoints for comparison of treatment results were overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicity. Hazard ratios (HR) were taken to measure treatment effects and pooled using a random effects model. Overall survival was not significantly different between surgical and definitive radiotherapy arms (HR=0.92 [95%CI 0.82-1.04], p=0.19, χ2-test). There was heterogeneity with respect to survival at 2 years (p<0.0001, Cochran Mantel Haenszel (CMH)-test). Latter trials using concurrent radiochemotherapy (ccRT/CT) showed better survival at 2 years (risk ratio of death=0.80 [95%CI 0.73-0.88], p<0.0001, CMH-test). In the ccRT/CT trials, survival in the surgical arms tended to have an excess early mortality before 6 months of follow-up and a lesser hazard rate in comparison to definitive ccRT/CT thereafter (HR=0.78 [95%CI 0.63-0.98]). Over all trials, treatment associated mortality was higher in the surgical arms (risk ratio=3.56 [95% CI: 1.65-7.72], p=0.0005, CMH test). With respect to progression-free survival, no significant differences were found (HR=0.91 [95%CI: 0.73 - 1.13]), although the largest conducted trial found an advantage for the surgical arm (HR=0.77 [95%CI: 0.62-0.96]). Induction therapy followed by resection or definitive radiochemotherapy represent valuable curative treatment options for patients with stage III NSCLC, the individual treatment choice deserves careful interdisciplinary evaluation and counseling. Based on the broad heterogeneity of patient groups in these stages further research on predictive factors supporting individual therapy selection is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wilfried Eberhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ruhrlandklinik, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Georgios Stamatis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruhrlandklinik, University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Roengvoraphoj O, Wijaya C, Eze C, Li M, Dantes M, Taugner J, Tufman A, Huber RM, Belka C, Manapov F. Analysis of primary tumor metabolic volume during chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2017; 194:107-115. [PMID: 29116336 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1229-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Positron emission tomography with 2‑deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-d-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) has an established role in the initial diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. However, a prognostic value of PET/CT during multimodality treatment has not yet been fully clarified. This study evaluated the role of primary tumor metabolic volume (PT-MV) changes on PET/CT before, during, and after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS A total of 65 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) UICC stage IIIA/B (TNM 7th Edition) were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (sequential or concurrent setting). PET/CT was acquired before the start, at the end of the third week, and 6 weeks following CRT. RESULTS Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12-20). In all, 60 (92.3%) patients were eligible for pre-treatment (pre-PT-MV), 28 (43%) for mid-treatment (mid-PT-MV), and 53 (81.5%) for post-treatment (post-PT-MV) volume analysis. Patients with pre-PT-MV >63 cm3 had worse OS (p < 0.0001). A reduction from mid-PT-MV to post-PT-MV of >15% improved OS (p = 0.001). In addition, patients with post-PT-MV > 25 cm3 had significantly worse outcome (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, performance status (p = 0.002, hazard ratio [HR] 0.007; 95% CI 0.00-0.158), pre-PT-MV1 < 63 cm3 (p = 0.027, HR 3.98; 95% CI 1.17-13.49), post-PT-MV < 25 cm3 (p = 0.013, HR 11.90; 95% CI 1.70-83.27), and a reduction from mid-PT-MV to post-PT-MV > 15% (p = 0.004, HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.02-0.31) correlated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrated that pre- and post-treatment PT-MV, as well as an at least 15% reduction in mid- to post-PT-MV, significantly correlates with OS in patients with inoperable locally advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olarn Roengvoraphoj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Cherylina Wijaya
- Department of Pulmonology, Asklepios Fachkliniken München-Gauting, Munich, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maurice Dantes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Taugner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Internal Medicine V, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich and Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, Ziemssenstraße 1, 80336, Munich, Germany
- members of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL CPC-M), -, Germany
| | - Rudolf Maria Huber
- Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Internal Medicine V, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich and Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, Ziemssenstraße 1, 80336, Munich, Germany
- members of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL CPC-M), -, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- members of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL CPC-M), -, Germany
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- members of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL CPC-M), -, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Arnett AL, Packard AT, Mara K, Mansfield AS, Wigle DA, Haddock MG, Park SS, Olivier KR, Garces YI, Merrell KW. FDG-PET parameters as predictors of pathologic response and nodal clearance in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:e531-e541. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
32
|
Kalman NS, Weiss E, Walker PR, Rosenman JG. Local Radiotherapy Intensification for Locally Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer - A Call to Arms. Clin Lung Cancer 2017; 19:17-26. [PMID: 28712978 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy, the standard of care for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), often fails to eradicate all known disease. Despite advances in chemotherapeutic regimens, locally advanced NSCLC remains a difficult disease to treat, and locoregional failure remains common. Improved radiographic detection can identify patients at significant risk of locoregional failure after definitive treatment, and newer methods of escalating locoregional treatment may allow for improvements in locoregional control with acceptable toxicity. This review addresses critical issues in escalating local therapy, focusing on using serial positron emission tomography-computed tomography to select high-risk patients and employing stereotactic radiotherapy to intensify treatment. We further propose a clinical trial concept that incorporates the review's findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah S Kalman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
| | - Elisabeth Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Paul R Walker
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Julian G Rosenman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Guberina M, Eberhardt W, Stuschke M, Gauler T, Heinzelmann F, Cheufou D, Kimmich M, Friedel G, Schmidberger H, Darwiche K, Jendrossek V, Schuler M, Stamatis G, Pöttgen C. Heart dose exposure as prognostic marker after radiotherapy for resectable stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer: secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:1084-1089. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
34
|
Neoadjuvant approach for nonsmall cell lung cancer: overview of the current issues. Curr Opin Oncol 2017; 29:123-128. [DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
35
|
Mattoli MV, Massaccesi M, Castelluccia A, Scolozzi V, Mantini G, Calcagni ML. The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET-CT for assessing the clinical outcomes in locally advanced NSCLC patients after a new induction treatment: low-dose fractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:4. [PMID: 28057034 PMCID: PMC5217210 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0737-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 12/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) have poor prognosis despite several multimodal approaches. Recently, low-dose fractionated radiotherapy concurrent to the induction chemotherapy (IC-LDRT) has been proposed to further improve the effects of chemotherapy and prognosis. Until now, the predictive value of metabolic response after IC-LDRT has not yet been investigated. Aim: to evaluate whether the early metabolic response, assessed by 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT), could predict the prognosis in LA-NSCLC patients treated with a multimodal approach, including IC-LDRT. Methods Forty-four consecutive patients (35males, mean age: 66 ± 7.8 years) with stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC were retrospectively evaluated. Forty-four patients underwent IC-LDRT (2 cycles of chemotherapy, 40 cGy twice daily), 26/44 neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT: 50.4Gy), and 20/44 surgery. 18F-FDG PET-CT was performed before (baseline), after IC-LDRT (early) and after CCRT (final), applying PET response criteria in solid tumours (PERCIST). Patients with complete/partial metabolic response were classified as responders; patients with stable/progressive disease as non-responders. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meyer analysis; the relationship between clinical factors and survivals were assessed using uni-multivariate regression analysis. Results Forty-four out of 44, 42/44 and 23/42 patients underwent baseline, early and final PET-CT, respectively. SULpeak of primary tumour and lymph-node significantly (p = 0.004, p = 0.0002, respectively) decreased after IC-LDRT with a further reduction after CCRT (p = 0.0006, p = 0.02, respectively). At early PET-CT, 20/42 (47.6%) patients were classified as responders, 22/42 (52.3%) as non-responders. At final PET-CT, 19/23 patients were classified as responders (12 responders and 7 non-responders at early PET-CT), and 4/23 as non-responders (all non-responders at early PET-CT). Early responders had better PFS and OS than early non-responders (p ≤ 0.01). Early metabolic response was predictive factor for loco-regional, distant and global PFS (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, p = 0.005, respectively); surgery for loco-regional and global PFS (p = 0.03, p = 0.009, respectively). Conclusions In LA-NSCLC patients, 18F-FDG metabolic response assessed after only two cycles of IC-LDRT predicts the prognosis. The early evaluation of metabolic changes could allow to personalize therapy. This multimodality approach, including both low-dose radiotherapy that increases the effects of induction chemotherapy, and surgery that removes the disease, improved clinical outcomes. Further prospective investigation of this new induction approach is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Vittoria Mattoli
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariangela Massaccesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Castelluccia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Valentina Scolozzi
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Mantini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Calcagni
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|