Epcoritamab, a Novel, Subcutaneous CD3xCD20 Bispecific T-Cell-Engaging Antibody, in Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Dose Expansion in a Phase I/II Trial

Cancer immunotherapy in elderly patients: The concept of immune senescence challenged by clinical experience

Cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, has led to major improvements in the treatment of a wide range of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. However, age-mediated immune system modifications, known as immunosenescence, may preclude its efficacy in elderly patients. In this review, we assessed the efficacy of these different cancer immunotherapies in elderly patients compared to young patients to revisit the concept of immunosenescence from a therapeutic perspective.

Tafasitamab for the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) require additional treatments, especially those not eligible or not responding to high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Over the last few years, several new treatments have been developed and approved for these patients, among them of particular relevance are those targeting CD19. Tafasitamab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD19, composed of a modified fragment crystallizable (Fc) region engineered with higher affinity for Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) receptors, leading to increased cytotoxicity through natural killer cells and macrophages (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis). In this product review, we will discuss its mechanism of action, safety profile and efficacy results from clinical trials that led to its approval in combination with lenalidomide for patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation.

Cardiovascular toxicities associated with novel cellular immune therapies

ABSTRACT

Over the past decade, T-cell-directed therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) and bispecific T-cell engager (BTE) therapies, have reshaped the treatment of an expanding number of hematologic malignancies, whereas tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, a recently approved cellular therapy, targets solid tumor malignancies. Emerging data suggest that these therapies may be associated with a high incidence of serious cardiovascular toxicities, including atrial fibrillation, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and other cardiovascular toxicities. The development of these events is a major limitation to long-term survival after these treatments. This review examines the current state of evidence, including reported incidence rates, risk factors, mechanisms, and management strategies of cardiovascular toxicities after treatment with these novel therapies. We specifically focus on CAR-T and BTE therapies and their relation to arrhythmia, heart failure, myocarditis, bleeding, and other major cardiovascular events. Beyond the relationship between cytokine release syndrome and cardiotoxicity, we describe other potential mechanisms and highlight key unanswered questions and future directions of research.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Epcoritamab Following Subcutaneous Administration in Relapsed or Refractory B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Epcoritamab is a CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of adults with different types of relapsed or refractory (R/R) B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy. Here we report the first results from a population pharmacokinetic model-based analysis using data from 2 phase 1/2 clinical trials (EPCORE® NHL-1, NCT03625037 and EPCORE NHL-3, NCT04542824) evaluating epcoritamab in patients with R/R B-NHL.

METHODS

Plasma concentration-time data included 6819 quantifiable pharmacokinetic samples from 327 patients with R/R B-NHL. A wide range of subcutaneous epcoritamab doses, 0.004-60 mg, was explored, with most patients (n = 298) following the approved dosing regimen: step-up dose (SUD) 1 of 0.16 mg on cycle 1 day 1 and SUD 2 of 0.8 mg on cycle 1 day 8, followed by a full dose of 48 mg administered weekly during cycles 1-3, biweekly in cycles 4-9, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Each cycle lasted 28 days. The data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling.

RESULTS

Quasisteady-state approximation of a two-compartment target-mediated drug disposition model with first-order absorption adequately characterized pharmacokinetics of epcoritamab following subcutaneous administration. After the first full dose and at the end of the weekly dosing regimen (end of cycle 3), the estimated median time to maximum concentration (tmax) was 4 and 2.3 days, respectively. Age and body weight were significant covariates on the pharmacokinetics of epcoritamab. The geometric mean (coefficient of variation [CV], %) of the apparent total volume of distribution was 25.6 L (82%) for patients with R/R large B cell lymphoma in EPCORE NHL-1. Epcoritamab elimination exhibited nonlinear characteristics, with exposure increasing more than proportionally over 1.5-48 mg doses. The geometric mean (CV%) values of apparent total clearance and terminal half-life were 0.53 L/day (40%) and 22 days (58%), respectively, at the end of cycle 3 for the 48 mg full dose. Clinical data analyses did not identify any association between assessed characteristics, including body weight or age, and clinical efficacy or safety. After accounting for body weight, no clinically significant differences in epcoritamab pharmacokinetics were observed for sex, race, renal or hepatic function, or other disease characteristics. Age was not found to significantly affect epcoritamab pharmacokinetic exposure. Antidrug antibodies developed in 4 (2.6%) of 156 evaluable patients treated with the approved 0.16/0.8/48 mg regimen. Antidrug antibody status did not affect epcoritamab pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Epcoritamab pharmacokinetics in R/R B-NHL were well characterized by the population pharmacokinetic model. No dosage adjustments are recommended in subpopulations based on body weight, age, sex, race, mild-to-moderate renal impairment, or mild hepatic impairment. The risk of immunogenicity was low. These are the first published results of population pharmacokinetic modeling for epcoritamab.

DLBCL: who is high risk and how should treatment be optimized?

ABSTRACT

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified, is the most common subtype of large B-cell lymphoma, with differences in prognosis reflecting heterogeneity in the pathological, molecular, and clinical features. Current treatment standard is based on multiagent chemotherapy, including anthracycline and monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, which leads to cure in 60% of patients. Recent years have brought new insights into lymphoma biology and have helped refine the risk groups. The results of these studies inspired the design of new clinical trials with targeted therapies and response-adapted strategies and allowed to identify groups of patients potentially benefiting from new agents. This review summarizes recent progress in identifying high-risk patients with DLBCL using clinical and biological prognostic factors assessed at diagnosis and during treatment in the front-line setting, as well as new treatment strategies with the application of targeted agents and immunotherapy, including response-adapted strategies.

The high-grade B-cell lymphomas: double hit and more

ABSTRACT

Both the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors, 5th Edition and the International Consensus Classification of lymphoma have refined the way we now approach high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements moving the previous generation of classification a step forward. The unifying biology of MYC/BCL2 tumors has become clearer and their inferior prognosis confirmed compared with those with morphologic similar phenotypes but lacking the classifcation defining cytogenetic abnormalities. Fluorescent in situ hybridization testing has now become largely population based, and we have learned much from this. We can readily define molecular categories and apply these widely to clinical practice. Uncertainty has, however, been shed on the place of MYC/BCL6 translocations in defining a common disease group of double hit lymphoma due to biological heterogeneity. We have enhanced our knowledge of outcomes and the role of therapy intensification to overcome chemotherapy resistance in HGBL. For those patients failed by initial induction chemotherapy, immunotherapy approaches, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, are improving outcomes. Novel inhibitors, targeting dysregulated oncogenic proteins, are being explored at pace. The rare, but difficult, diagnostic classification HGBL (not otherwise specified) remains a diagnosis of exclusion with limited data on an optimal clinical approach. The days of talking loosely of double- and triple-hit lymphoma are numbered as biology and outcomes may not be shared. This review synergizes the current data on biology, prognosis, and therapies in HGBL.

Safety and efficacy of amulirafusp alfa (IMM0306), a fusion protein of CD20 monoclonal antibody with the CD47 binding domain of SIRPα, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 1/2 study

BACKGROUND

Amulirafusp alfa (IMM0306) is a fusion protein of CD47 binding domain of signal-regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) with CD20 monoclonal antibody on both heavy chains. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of amulirafusp alfa in relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL).

METHODS

We enrolled patients with CD20 + r/r B-NHL who had previously received at least two lines of therapy to receive a single-dose of amulirafusp alfa in the first 2 weeks, followed by a multiple-dose period, in which the patients received the same intravenous dose every week in 4-week cycles. The primary endpoints were to evaluate the safety, determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of amulirafusp alfa.

RESULTS

Between May 22, 2020 and February 10, 2022, 48 patients with r/r B-NHL were enrolled and received amulirafusp alfa at the doses of 40-2000 μg/kg. As of the data cut-off date of April 18, 2024, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the MTD was not reached. The dose of 2000 μg/kg was identified as the RP2D. All grades and ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 48 (100%) and 33 (68.8%) patients, respectively. The most common ≥ grade 3 TRAEs were lymphocyte count decreased (28/48, 58.3%), white blood cell count decreased (10/48, 20.8%), absolute neutrophil count decreased (9/48, 18.8%) and anemia (5/48, 10.4%). At the doses of 800-2000 μg/kg, objective response rate in follicular lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma was 41.2% (7/17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 18.4-67.1) and 33.3% (2/6, 95% CI 3.7-71.0), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Amulirafusp alfa showed favorable safety profile and preliminary efficacy in patients with r/r B-NHL, meriting further investigation. Trial registration NCT05805943.

The Evolving Applications of Bispecific Antibodies: Reaping the Harvest of Early Sowing and Planting New Seeds

After decades of gradual progress from conceptualization to early clinical trials (1960-2000), the therapeutic potential of bispecific antibodies (bisp Abs) is now being fully realized. Insights gained from both successful and unsuccessful trials are helping to identify which mechanisms of action, antibody formats, and targets prove most effective, and which may benefit from further refinement. While T-cell engagers remain the most commonly used class of bisp Abs, current efforts aim to increase their effectiveness by co-engaging costimulatory molecules, reducing escape mechanisms, and countering immunosuppression. Strategies to minimize cytokine release syndrome (CRS) are also actively under development. In addition, novel antibody formats that are selectively activated within tumors are an exciting area of research, as is the precise targeting of specific T-cell subsets. Beyond T cells, the recruitment of macrophages and dendritic cells is attracting increasing interest, with researchers exploring various macrophage receptors to promote phagocytosis or to carry out specialized functions, such as the immunologically silent clearance of amyloid-beta plaques in the brain. While bisp Abs targeting B cells are relatively limited, they are primarily aimed at inhibiting B-cell activity in autoimmune diseases. Another evolving application involves the forced interaction between proteins. Beyond the successful development of Hemlibra for hemophilia, bispecific antibodies that mimic cytokine activity are being explored. Additionally, the recruitment of cell surface ubiquitin ligases and other enzymes represents a novel and promising therapeutic strategy. In regard to antibody formats, some applications such as the combination of T-cell engagers with costimulatory molecules are driving the development of trispecific antibodies, at least in preclinical settings. However, the increasing structural complexity of multispecific antibodies often leads to more challenging development paths, and the number of multispecific antibodies in clinical trials remains low. The clinical success of certain applications and well-established production methods position this therapeutic class to expand its benefits into other therapeutic areas.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation against aggressive lymphomas: graft-versus-lymphoma effects in peripheral T-cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after myeloablative conditioning

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) represents a curative option for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) aggressive lymphomas. We compared outcomes of alloSCT in r/r PTCL and r/r DLBCL pts (n = 150) who underwent identical myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy, GvHD prophylaxis, and relapse management. 5-year PFS and OS were significantly superior in PTCL compared to DLBCL (56% vs. 24%; 56% vs. 28%; p ≤ 0.005). A landmark analysis (day≥ +100 post-alloSCT) markedly favored outcomes in PTCL vs. DLBCL: 5-year PFS and OS of 76% vs. 30% and 76% and 35%, respectively (p ≤ 0.003). Non-relapse mortality was comparable (35% PTCL vs. 34% DLBCL, p = 0.894), whereas post-alloSCT relapse mortality was significantly higher in DLBCL (36% vs. 10%, p = 0.0007). The occurence of limited chronic GvHD did not improve outcomes in DLBCL, whereas extensive chronic GvHD was a negative risk factor for both (HR 2.09 and 2.80, p ≤ 0.006). In conclusion, we gained evidence for strong graft-versus-lymphoma activity against PTCL but not DLBCL.

Neuro-toxicities of chemo- and immune-therapies in haematologic malignancies: from mechanism to management

Chemo- and immune therapies administered to treat haematologic malignancies frequently cause neurologic injury. The adverse events range from mild cognitive impairment and headaches to severe conditions such as seizures, stroke and encephalitis. We performed a comprehensive literature review and report the types, mechanisms, management and prevention of neuro-toxicity resulting from these therapies in subjects who develop these toxic effects. Our paper will not discuss radiation therapy, as it has already been extensively reviewed by many authors. Our focus will be on recently developed anti-cancer drugs.

Bispecific antibody and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T-cell in the treatment of multiple myeloma: where do we stand today?

Although the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has been significantly improved by the introduction of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs and monoclonal antibodies, MM is still considered an incurable disease in the vast majority of the patients. In recent years, T-cell based immunotherapy represents a novel treatment strategy for relapsed/refractory (RR) MM. So far, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T-cells and bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies (bsAb) have shown promising anti-MM efficacy and manageable safety profile within clinical trials, and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is the most commonly used immune target for T-cell based immunotherapies in MM. To date, several CAR T-cell and bsAb products have already been approved for the treatment of RRMM, leading to a paradigm shift in the MM therapy and providing a potential curative option. In this review, we provide a summary of mechanisms of action, immune targets, selected clinical data, resistance mechanisms and therapy sequencing of CAR T-cell and bsAb in MM.

Sequencing bispecific antibodies and CAR T cells for FL

Treatment for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) has evolved over recent years with the introduction of multiple novel immunotherapies: anti-CD3  ×  CD20 bispecific antibody (BsAb) T-cell engagers and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T). Both drug classes are highly active, and their adverse event profiles overlap considerably, with cytokine release syndrome, cytopenias, and infections being most common. However, key differences include accessibility and logistical considerations as well as distinct neurologic toxicities, which make recommending a BsAb or CAR T a nuanced decision for each patient with R/R FL. Notably, patients could receive both classes of therapies in sequence; however, data guiding this decision are sparse. Considering the 3 most advanced agents in each class, we generally favor BsAbs before CAR T as the standard-of-care third-line treatment for the typical patient with R/R FL without concern for aggressive histologic transformation (HT). This is based on a 3-year follow-up of the mosunetuzumab phase 2 trial in R/R FL highlighting durable complete responses after a time-limited therapy with an acceptable safety profile for patients of all ages and reasonable performance status. We generally prioritize CAR T before BsAbs for patients with proven or suspected HT given the curative-potential of this approach based on trial data from R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; it is unknown whether BsAbs offer the same long-term benefit in transformed FL. Overall, with the ability to personalize the sequencing of BsAbs and CAR T, the recently expanding portfolio of highly effective immunotherapies for R/R FL is poised to offer considerable benefit to this patient population.

The Prevalence of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Varies Substantially by Methods Applied: Results From a Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVES

Accurate prevalence estimates of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are important for numerous purposes including orphan drug designation. A key criterion for orphan drug designation is a disease prevalence of less than 5/10,000 persons. The objective is to apply and compare different methods of prevalence assessment.

METHODS

In the present nationwide Danish cohort study, the prevalence of DLBCL was assessed using different methodologies, including register-based and formula-based approaches.

RESULTS

The prevalence calculations were based on 9,492 patients diagnosed with DLBCL since year 2000. Incidence increased and survival improved in the period, resulting in higher prevalence of DLBCL. In year 2023, the 2-,3-,5-,10-, and 20-year prevalences were 1.53, 2.19, 3.45, 6.08, and 8.80 per 10,000 adults using the register-based approach. The formula-based approach was generally accurate when using restricted mean survival. However, when using median survival, the total prevalence was estimated at 8.1 per 10,000 adults. Furthermore, when extrapolating the median survival from the 5-year survival under constant hazard assumption as done in some orphan drug designation reports, the prevalence was estimated at 6.6 per 10,000 adults.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the estimated DLBCL prevalences are sensitive to the applied method. DLBCL would disqualify from orphan drug designation in some of the mentioned scenarios.

The current socioeconomic and regulatory landscape of immune effector cell therapies

Immune cell effector therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, T-cell receptor (TCR) T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and macrophage-based therapies, represent a transformative approach to cancer treatment, harnessing the immune system to target and eradicate malignant cells. CAR-T cell therapy, the most established among these, involves engineering T cells to express CARs specific to cancer cell antigens, showing remarkable efficacy in hematologic malignancies like leukemias, B-cell lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. Similarly, TCR-modified therapies, which reprogram T cells to recognize intracellular tumor antigens presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, offer promise for a range of solid tumors. NK-cell therapies leverage NK cells' innate cytotoxicity, providing an allogeneic approach that avoids some of the immune-related complications associated with T-cell-based therapies. Macrophage-based therapies, still in early stages of the development, focus on reprogramming macrophages to stimulate an immune response against cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment. Despite their promise, socioeconomic and regulatory challenges hinder the accessibility and scalability of immune cell effector therapies. These treatments are costly, with CAR-T therapies currently exceeding $400,000 per patient, creating significant disparities in access based on socioeconomic status and geographic location. The high manufacturing costs stem from the personalized, labor-intensive processes of harvesting, modifying, and expanding patients' cells. Moreover, complex logistics for manufacturing and delivering these therapies limit their reach, particularly in low-resource settings. Regulatory pathways further complicate the landscape. In the United States., the Food and Drug Administrations' (FDA) accelerated approval processes for cell-based therapies facilitate innovation but do not address cost-related barriers. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) offers adaptive pathways, yet decentralized reimbursement systems create uneven access across member states. Additionally, differing regulatory standards for manufacturing and quality control worldwide pose hurdles for global harmonization and access. To expand the reach of immune effector cell therapies, a multipronged approach is needed-streamlined regulatory frameworks, policies to reduce treatment costs, and international collaborations to standardize manufacturing. Addressing these socioeconomic and regulatory obstacles is essential to make these life-saving therapies accessible to a broader patient population worldwide. We present a literature review on the current landscape of immune effector cell therapies and barriers of access to currently approved standard of care therapy at various levels.

Impact of immunological aging on T cell-mediated therapies in older adults with multiple myeloma and lymphoma

The treatment landscape for lymphoma and multiple myeloma, which disproportionally affect older adults, has been transformed by the advent of T cell-mediated immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibition, T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, during the last decade. These treatment modalities re-enable the patient's own immune system to combat malignant cells and offer the potential for sustained remissions and cure for various diseases.Age profoundly affects the physiological function of the immune system. The process of biological aging is largely driven by inflammatory signaling, which is reciprocally fueled by aging-related alterations of physiology and metabolism. In the T cell compartment, aging contributes to T cell senescence and exhaustion, increased abundance of terminally differentiated cells, a corresponding attrition in naïve T cell numbers, and a decrease in the breadth of the receptor repertoire. Furthermore, inflammatory signaling drives aging-related pathologies and contributes to frailty in older individuals. Thus, there is growing evidence of biological aging modulating the efficacy and toxicity of T cell-mediated immunotherapies.Here, we review the available evidence from biological and clinical studies focusing on the relationship between T cell-mediated treatment of hematologic malignancies and age. We discuss biological features potentially impacting clinical outcomes in various scenarios, and potential strategies to improve the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T cell therapy in older patients.

CD19 CAR-T treatment shows limited efficacy in r/r DLBCL with double expression and TP53 alterations

OBJECT

Autologous CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) significantly modifies the natural course of chemorefractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, 25% to 50% of patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL still do not achieve remission. Therefore, investigating new molecular prognostic indicators that affect the effectiveness of CAR-T for DLBCL and developing novel combination therapies are crucial.

METHODS

Data from 73 DLBCL patients who received CD19 CAR-T (Axi-cel or Relma-cel) were retrospectively collected from Shanghai Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University. Prior to CD19 CAR-T-cell transfusions, the patients received fludarabine and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy regimen.

RESULTS

Our study revealed that relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) patients with both Double-expression (MYC > 40% and BCL2 > 50%) and TP53 alterations tend to have a poorer clinical prognosis after CAR-T therapy, even when CAR-T therapy is used in combination with other therapies. However, CAR-T therapy was found to be effective in patients with only TP53 alterations or DE status, suggesting that their prognosis is in line with that of patients without TP53 alterations or DE status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that r/r DLBCL patients with both DE status and TP53 alterations treated with CAR-T therapy are more likely to have a poorer clinical prognosis. However, CAR-T therapy has the potential to improve the prognosis of patients with only TP53 alterations or DE status to be similar to that of patients without these abnormalities.

Sequencing of therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the era of novel drugs

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma, accounting for ~40% of all cases in adults. Whilst approximately two-thirds of DLBCL patients can be cured by first-line therapy, one-third of patients are primary refractory or relapse after an initial response (r/r DLBCL). Recent advances in the treatment of DLBCL have been achieved by a plethora of novel drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), bi-specific T-cell engagers (BITEs), and CD-19 directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies. The increasing number of therapeutic options significantly improved the outcome of patients; however, the therapeutic algorithm has become increasingly complex. In this review, we provide an overview of novel therapies for DLBCL patients and potential treatment sequencing from first to second, third, and later lines.

Epcoritamab in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: 2-year follow-up from the pivotal EPCORE NHL-1 trial

Primary results (median follow-up, 10.7 months) from the pivotal EPCORE® NHL-1 study in relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) demonstrated deep, durable responses with epcoritamab, a CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody, when used as monotherapy. We report long-term efficacy and safety results in patients with LBCL (N = 157; 25.1-month median follow-up). As of April 21, 2023, overall response rate was 63.1% and complete response (CR) rate was 40.1%. Estimated 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 27.8% and 44.6%, respectively. An estimated 64.2% of complete responders remained in CR at 24 months. Estimated 24-month PFS and OS rates among complete responders were 65.1% and 78.2%, respectively. Of 119 minimal residual disease (MRD)-evaluable patients, 45.4% had MRD negativity, which correlated with longer PFS and OS. CR rates were generally consistent across predefined subgroups: 36% prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, 32% primary refractory disease, and 37% International Prognostic Index ≥3. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (51.0%), pyrexia (24.8%), fatigue (24.2%), and neutropenia (23.6%). These results underscore the long-term benefit of epcoritamab for treating R/R LBCL with deep responses across subgroups, including patients with hard-to-treat disease and expected poor prognosis (ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03625037).

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Current Evidence and Future Directions for Bispecific Antibodies in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

The CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies (bsAb) are "off-the-shelf" T-cell re-directing therapies that demonstrate remarkable single-agent clinical activity in B-cell lymphomas. Two agents, epcoritamab (epcor) and glofitamab (glofit) have recent global approvals for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL (RR DLBCL) following 2 prior treatment lines. Both agents demonstrate activity in patients with prior exposure to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatment. As multiyear follow-up data become available, it is clear that the majority of patients achieving complete remissions do not relapse and that outcomes are similar between epcor and glofit. CD20xCD3 bsAb have a safety profile that reflect their mechanism of action, with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) the key management issue. Neurotoxicity is far less common than observed with CD19-directed CAR-T. BsAbs are attractive, rapidly available, treatment options for patients with RR DLBCL, without the practical and financial challenges seen with autologous CAR-T therapies. Recent data also demonstrate the feasibility and potential efficacy of bsAb in combination with chemoimmunotherapy with large randomized trials evaluating bsAb-chemotherapy combinations underway. There are open questions about the future role of bsAB for LBCL, the optimal duration of therapy, optimal CRS risk mitigation strategies, and potential resistance mechanisms. In this review we seek to describe the current evidence for bsAb in LBCL, and offer opinion regarding these open questions.

Retrospective Study of CD20 Expression Loss in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Background

CD20-targeted therapies are widely used in the management of B-cell lymphomas. Re-treatment with CD20-directed agents is common; however, previous research has demonstrated loss of CD20 expression at relapse in a subset of patients.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective cohort of 243 patients, CD20 analysis was performed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or flow cytometry at diagnosis and at relapse if a biopsy was performed.

Results

Of 109 patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma, 59 patients with CD20-positive lymphoma at diagnosis underwent a biopsy at relapse for a total of 76 biopsies across all relapses. The rate of partial or complete CD20 expression loss was 11.9% (four patients with partial loss, three patients with complete loss). There were four cases of CD20 loss at first relapse (three IHC, one flow cytometry), two at second relapse (one IHC, one IHC and flow cytometry), and one at fifth relapse (IHC and flow cytometry). CD20 antigen escape was observed in marginal zone lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). All patients with CD20 expression loss previously received rituximab. Among patients with CD20 antigen escape, 85.7% had stage IV disease, and median overall survival after CD20 loss was 4 months. In the group of five patients with indolent lymphoma and CD20 expression loss, three patients (60%) had concurrent transformation to high-grade lymphoma.

Conclusions

This study, which reinforces the importance of repeating a biopsy at relapse before implementing CD20-directed therapy, is particularly relevant given the widespread use of rituximab along with the emerging significance of CD20-targeted bispecific antibodies in the management of B-cell lymphomas.

C-CAR066, a novel fully human anti-CD20 CAR-T therapy for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after failure of anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy: A phase I clinical study

Managing large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) that is refractory to or relapsed after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy remains a significant challenge. Here we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of C-CAR066, an autologous fully human anti-CD20 specific CAR-T, for relapsed/refractory LBCL after failure of anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy. This first-in-human, single-arm, phase 1 study was conducted at two sites in China. Eligible patients had to be histologically confirmed with CD20-positive LBCL and must have received prior anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy. Patients received a single intravenous infusion of C-CAR066 at a target dose of 2.0 × 106 or 3.0 × 106 CAR-T cells/kg. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs). As of October 10, 2023, 14 patients had received C-CAR066. The most common AEs of Grade 3 or higher were hematological toxicities. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 12 (85.7%) patients, with only one was Grade 4 event. No patient experienced immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome events. The overall response rate was 92.9% with a complete response rate of 57.1%. With a median follow-up of 27.7 months (range, 3.3-40.9), the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.4 months (95% CI, 2.0 to NA) and 34.8 months (95% CI, 7.5 to NA), respectively. C-CAR066 demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising efficacy in patients in whom prior anti-CD19 CAR-T therapies had failed, providing a promising treatment option for those patients. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04316624 and NCT04036019.

Outcomes with loncastuximab tesirine following CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The efficacy of loncastuximab tesirine (lonca) following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) progression/failure is unknown. Hence, we sought to examine real-world use and outcomes of lonca following CAR-T in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the USA. In this retrospective study, we included adults (age ≥ 18 years) with R/R DLBCL who received lonca monotherapy as third- (3 L) or fourth line (4 L) treatment after progressing on second line (2 L) or 3 L CAR-T, respectively. Post-CAR-T lonca outcomes included response rates (overall response rate [ORR] and complete response [CR] rate), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 118 patients were included in the analysis with 95 receiving lonca following 2 L CAR-T (median age:66 years; 61% male) and 23 following 3 L CAR-T (median age:57 years; 43% male). Patients with 2 L CAR-T/3 L lonca had an ORR of 73% (CR rate of 34%). With a median follow-up of 8.5 months following lonca initiation, median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. The DOR, PFS, and OS at 12 months were 68%, 77%, and 84%, respectively. Patients with 3 L CAR-T/4 L lonca had an ORR of 78% (CR rate of 17%). With a median follow-up of 13 months following lonca initiation, the median DOR and PFS were 7.6 and 12.0 months, while median OS was not reached. OS at 12 months was 95%. In this study, we found that lonca monotherapy was an effective treatment option in R/R DLBCL in 3 L and 4 L settings including those who were resistant to or progressed after CAR-T.

Bispecific antibodies in clinical practice: Understanding recent advances and current place in cancer treatment landscape

Immunotherapy has changed the treatment landscape of cancer in the past decade. Amongst various forms of immunotherapy, manipulating the T cell has shown promise in past few years. T cell manipulation can be done by CAR-T cell therapy or bispecific antibodies. These 2 therapeutic modalities have been studied and shown efficacy in hematologic malignancies in relapsed refractory setting. They have not been compared to each other in randomized control trials; hence, the adequate sequencing is not known. Although cross-trial comparison is not ideal, available evidence indicates toward similar efficacy and better tolerability of BiTEs compared to CAR-T cell therapy. Bispecific antibodies, though, have an advantage of being able to be used in an "off the shelf" manner considering these are not MHC specific and can be administered to all patients regardless of HLA type. There has been an explosive growth in the indications for bispecific antibodies in the recent past. In this article, we have reviewed recent approvals, indication and literature regarding efficacy and adverse effects of bispecific antibodies in all available indications. This will be a useful read for clinical practitioners to understand the mechanism of action and place of all available bispecific antibodies in the current oncology landscape.

Progress on angiogenic and antiangiogenic agents in the tumor microenvironment

The development of tumors and their metastasis relies heavily on the process of angiogenesis. When the volume of a tumor expands, the resulting internal hypoxic conditions trigger the body to enhance the production of various angiogenic factors. These include vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), all of which work together to stimulate the activation of endothelial cells and catalyze angiogenesis. Antiangiogenic therapy (AAT) aims to normalize tumor blood vessels by inhibiting these angiogenic signals. In this review, we will explore the molecular mechanisms of angiogenesis within the tumor microenvironment, discuss traditional antiangiogenic drugs along with their limitations, examine new antiangiogenic drugs and the advantages of combination therapy, and consider future research directions in the field of antiangiogenic drugs. This comprehensive overview aims to provide insights that may aid in the development of more effective anti-tumor treatments.

A tetraspecific engager armed with a non-alpha IL-2 variant harnesses natural killer cells against B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

NK cells offer a promising alternative to T cell therapies in cancer. We evaluated IPH6501, a clinical-stage, tetraspecific NK cell engager (NKCE) armed with a non-alpha IL-2 variant (IL-2v), which targets CD20 and was developed for treating B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). CD20-NKCE-IL2v boosts NK cell proliferation and cytotoxicity, showing activity against a range of B-NHL cell lines, including those with low CD20 density. Whereas it presented reduced toxicities compared with those commonly associated with T cell therapies, CD20-NKCE-IL2v showed greater killing efficacy over a T cell engager targeting CD20 in in vitro preclinical models. CD20-NKCE-IL2v also increased the cell surface expression of NK cell-activating receptors, leading to activity against CD20-negative tumor cells. In vivo studies in nonhuman primates and tumor mouse models further validated its efficacy and revealed that CD20-NKCE-IL2v induces peripheral NK cell homing at the tumor site. CD20-NKCE-IL2v emerges as a potential alternative in the treatment landscape of B-NHL.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma: EBMT Lymphoma Working Party study

ABSTRACT

Although broadly used, consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) has never been specifically investigated. Here, we have analyzed outcomes of auto-HCT for THRLBCL compared with diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (DLBCL). Eligible for this retrospective registry study were adult patients with R/R THRLBCL and DLBCL, respectively, who underwent a first auto-HCT in a salvage-sensitive disease status as assessed by positron emission tomography-computed tomography between 2016 and 2021 and were registered with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) 2 years after transplantation. A total of 201 patients with THRLBCL and 5543 with DLBCL were included. There were no significant differences in terms of disease status at HCT, pretreatment lines, and interval from diagnosis to transplant between the cohorts, but patients with THRLBCL were significantly younger, contained a higher proportion of men, and had a better performance status. Compared with DLBCL, THRLBCL was associated with significantly better 2-year PFS (78% vs 59%; P < .001) and overall survival (OS, 81% vs 74%; P = .02) because of a significantly lower 2-year relapse incidence (16% vs 35%; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, favorable relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.7) and PFS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82) of patients with THRLBCL remained significant, whereas OS benefits (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.54-1.12) did not. These results were validated in a propensity score-matched analysis. These data prove auto-HCT as an effective treatment option for salvage-sensitive R/R THRLBCL.

Strategies following failure of CAR-T-cell therapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Several CD19 CAR-T-cell drugs are approved for safety and efficacy in advanced B-cell cancers with encouraging results. However, primary refractory and relapse are common. We critically analyze long-term data on efficacy of CD19 CAR-T-cell therapies in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas from clinical trials with those of so-called real world data. We identify co-variates associated with efficacy, discuss mechanisms of relapse, summarize the data on the results of post-failure therapy including allotransplants, monoclonal and bi-specific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, immune checkpoint-inhibitors and repeat infusions of CAR-T-cells. We conclude, save for allotransplants, there are few data strongly supporting any of these interventions. Most trial are with few heterogeneously-treated subjects with diverse interventions and brief follow-up. Interventions need to be tailored to the cause(s) of CAR-T-cell failure. Prestly, there is not a convincingly safe and effective therapy of people failing initial CAR-T-cell therapy of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The mechanisms of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapsing following chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy; the plausible future strategies

Research has demonstrated the high mortality and morbidity associated with B-Acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-ALL). Researchers have developed several therapeutic approaches to combat the disorder. Recently, researchers developed chimeric antigen receptors (CARs)-T cells, which recognize antigens independently of major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) and activate at a higher level with additional persistence. However, relapsing B-ALL has been reported in several cases. This review article was aimed to collecting recent information regarding the mechanisms used by B-ALL-related lymphocytes to escape from CAR-T cells and the plausible resolution projects.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Review

Older adults (OA) with DLBCL are a heterogenous population with suboptimal outcomes. In this review, we identify and address the unique challenges encountered in the care of OA with DLBCL. We elaborate on the role and limitations of current geriatric assessment (GA) tools and ways to incorporate fitness in therapeutic decision making. We suggest best practices to implement GA in routine practice and clinical trials. The most widely used tool is simplified GA (sGA) which categorizes patients into fit, unfit and frail groups. Patients who are fit benefit from full dose/curative approach, whereas consideration should be made to reduce the intensity of chemotherapy for unfit patients. Frail patients with DLBCL are a major unmet need without any satisfactory treatment options. Ongoing investigations combining novel therapies into chemotherapy-free regimens are underway with promising early results. In the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting, anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy (CART) is now the standard of care for primary refractory disease or relapse within 12 months of completing therapy. Autologous stem cell transplant is still a consideration for fit OA with relapse >12 months after completing therapy. The recent approval of bispecific antibodies is a welcome advance that will greatly benefit OA not eligible for CART. Other regimens available for patients ineligible for CART or for those who experience progression post-CART include polatuzumab-rituximab±bendamustine, tafasitamab-lenalidomide, loncastuximab or chemotherapy-based approaches such as rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin. We discuss the changing paradigm in R/R DLBCL and spotlight emerging data from recent congresses that can improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Emerging strategies to overcome ovarian cancer: advances in immunotherapy

Ovarian cancer is the second most common malignant neoplasm of gynecological origin and the leading cause of death from cancer in the female reproductive system worldwide. This scenario is largely due to late diagnoses, often in advanced stages, and the development of chemoresistance by cancer cells. These challenges highlight the need for alternative treatments, with immunotherapy being a promising option. Cancer immunotherapy involves triggering an anti-tumor immune response and developing immunological memory to eliminate malignant cells, prevent recurrence, and inhibit metastasis. Some ongoing research investigate potentially immunological advancements in the field of cancer vaccines, immune checkpoint blockade, CAR-T cell, and other strategies.

Racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in adolescent and young adults: a SEER database analysis

Data regarding racial disparities in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is limited in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population. We utilized the surveillance, epidemiology, and end-result (SEER) registry research plus database to evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in 8605 AYA patients with DLBCL. Race/ethnicity was categorized into three main subsets: non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB), and 'other races' that included Hispanics (H), American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN), Asian or Pacific Islander (A/PI). NHB were more likely to present with advanced stage disease (p < 0.001) and B symptoms (p < 0.001) and were less likely to receive chemotherapy (p < 0.001) compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients and other races respectively. NHB patients had inferior 5-year disease specific survival (DSS) (70% vs 85% vs 80%, p < 0.001) and 5-year overall survival (OS) (66% vs 82% vs 77%, p < 0.001) compared to NHW and other races respectively. Black race was independently associated with both inferior DSS (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.17-2.05, p = 0.002) and OS (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.10-1.83, p = 0.007) after adjusting for age, gender, stage, presence of B symptoms, receipt of chemotherapy and radiation. NHB-DLBCL patients also had a lower 1-year relative survival rate (RSR) compared to NHW and other races. The low RSR in NHB patients persisted up to 5 years from diagnosis unlike NHW and other races. Our study shows that despite significant therapeutic advances in DLBCL over the last two decades, NHB AYA patients with DLBCL continue to have inferior survival outcomes compared to other ethnic and racial groups with disparities arising as early as the first year of diagnosis.

Event-free survival at 36 months is a suitable endpoint for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with immunochemotherapy: real-world evidence from the North Japan Hematology Study Group

Information regarding follow-up duration after treatment for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is important. However, a clear endpoint has yet to be established. We enrolled a total of 2,182 patients newly diagnosed with DLBCL between 2008 and 2018. The median age of the patients was 71 years. All patients were treated with rituximab- and anthracycline-based chemotherapies. Each overall survival (OS) was compared with the age- and sex-matched Japanese general population (GP) data. At a median follow-up of 3.4 years, 985 patients experienced an event and 657 patients died. Patients who achieved an event-free survival (EFS) at 36 months (EFS36) had an OS equivalent to that of the matched GP (standard mortality ratio [SMR], 1.17; P=0.1324), whereas those who achieved an EFS24 did not have an OS comparable to that of the matched GP (SMR, 1.26; P=0.0095). Subgroup analysis revealed that relatively old patients (>60 years), male patients, those with limited-stage disease, those with a good performance status, and those with low levels of soluble interleukin 2 receptor already had a comparable life expectancy to the matched GP at an EFS24. In contrast, relatively young patients had a shorter life expectancy than matched GP, even with an EFS36. In conclusion, an EFS36 was shown to be a more suitable endpoint for newly diagnosed DLBCL patients than an EFS24. Of note, younger patients require a longer EFS period than older patients in order to obtain an equivalent life expectancy to the matched GP.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Large B-cell lymphoma, the prototype of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas, is both the most common lymphoma and accounts for the highest global burden of lymphoma-related deaths. For nearly 4 decades, the goal of treatment has been "cure", first based on CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone), and subsequently with rituximab plus CHOP. However, there is significant clinical, pathologic, and biologic heterogeneity, and not all patients are cured. Understanding and incorporating this biologic heterogeneity into treatment decisions unfortunately is not yet standard of care. Despite this gap, we now have significant advances in frontline, relapsed, and refractory settings. The POLARIX trial shows, for the first time, improved progression-free survival in a prospective randomized phase 3 setting. In the relapsed and refractory settings, there are now many approved agents/regimens, and several bispecific antibodies poised to join the arsenal of options. While chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is discussed in detail elsewhere, it has quickly become an excellent option in the second-line setting and beyond. Unfortunately, special populations such as older adults continue to have poor outcomes and be underrepresented in trials, although a new generation of trials aim to address this disparity. This brief review will highlight the key issues and advances that offer improved outcomes to an increasing portion of patients.

Mechanism of Action and Pharmacokinetics of Approved Bispecific Antibodies

Bispecific antibodies represent a significant advancement in therapeutic antibody engineering, offering the ability to simultaneously target two distinct antigens. This dual-targeting capability enhances therapeutic efficacy, especially in complex diseases, such as cancer and autoimmune disorders, where drug resistance and incomplete target coverage are prevalent challenges. Bispecific antibodies facilitate immune cell engagement and disrupt multiple signaling pathways, providing a more comprehensive treatment approach than traditional monoclonal antibodies. However, the intricate structure of bispecific antibodies introduces unique pharmacokinetic challenges, including issues related to their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, which can significantly affect their efficacy and safety. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the structural design, mechanisms of action, and pharmacokinetics of the currently approved bispecific antibodies. It also highlights the engineering innovations that have been implemented to overcome these challenges, such as Fc modifications and advanced dimerization techniques, which enhance the stability and half-life of bispecific antibodies. Significant progress has been made in bispecific antibody technology; however, further research is necessary to broaden their clinical applications, enhance their safety profiles, and optimize their incorporation into combination therapies. Continuous advancements in this field are expected to enable bispecific antibodies to provide more precise and effective therapeutic strategies for a range of complex diseases, ultimately improving patient outcomes and advancing precision medicine.

Ibrutinib With Bendamustine and Rituximab for Treatment of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma

Therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aB-NHL) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or in elderly patients can be challenging. In this single-center, single-arm, phase II clinical study, we investigated the efficacy of ibrutinib (560 mg once daily) in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (IBR) given for six 28-day cycles in their standard dose, to patients with R/R aB-NHL who were either transplant ineligible in first or second relapse or post-ASCT for second relapse. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Fifty-six patients (54% male, median age 69.7 years) were included. ORR was 49.1% among 55 patients treated with ≥ 1 cycle of IBR and 69.4% among 36 patients treated with ≥ 3 cycles. Patients with relapsed disease had significantly higher ORR compared to those with refractory disease (72.3% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.024). Median overall survival (OS) was 11.6 months (95% CI, 7.1-22.3) and median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95% CI, 2.5-7.4). Patients with complete and partial responses had significantly longer median OS compared to those with stable and progressive disease (28.1 vs. 5.2 months, p < 0.0001). Adverse events included thrombocytopenia (19.6%), anemia (16.1%), neutropenia (7.1%), fatigue (35.7%), diarrhea (28.6%) and nausea (28.6%). At the first efficacy evaluation 8 patients were referred to transplantation, and 3 more were referred during follow-up. These data indicate that the IBR regimen is a safe and effective treatment option that can also be used for bridging to transplantation in patients with R/R aB-NHL.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02747732.

Novel Bispecific T-Cell Engagers for the Treatment of Relapsed B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Current Knowledge and Treatment Considerations

This article provides an overview of the novel treatments focusing on the class of bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL), the two most prevalent subtypes of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL). After a brief outline of these diseases, the difficulties in the management of relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease are highlighted. There are currently 4 main BiTEs showing promise in treating R/R B-NHL-glofitamab, epcoritamab, mosunetuzumab, and odronextamab. Although the rational of their mechanism of action is similar, there are significant differences in their respective clinical trial design, reported outcomes, and the final FDA approvals. Considerations for selecting a specific BiTE therapy, including treatment duration, cost, administration route, adverse effects, and impact on quality of life, are also discussed. Patient preferences and shared decision making should be acknowledged by healthcare providers. Finally, the importance of personalized treatment strategies and ongoing research to optimize outcomes in the evolving landscape of R/R B-NHL therapy cannot be overstated.

Outcome of patients with large B-cell lymphoma treated with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide either before or after CAR T-cell therapy

ABSTRACT

Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide (TAFA-LEN) treatment relevance pre- or post-anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is debated. We analyzed patients with large B-cell lymphoma in the DESCAR-T registry treated with axi[1]cel or tisa-cel in ≥3rd line and TAFA-LEN before (n = 15, "TL-pre-CAR-T" set) or directly after (n = 52, "TL-post-CAR-T" set) CAR T-cell therapy. We compared TAFA-LEN v. other treatments using inverse probability weighting in the TL-post-CAR[1]T set. In the TL-post-CAR-T set, the median progression-free survival (mPFS), overall survival (mOS), and duration of response (mDOR) since the first treatment for progression (mPFS2/mOS2/mDOR2) were 3, 4.7, and 8.1 months, respectively. The best overall response rate (bORR) and best complete response rate (bCRR) after TAFA-LEN were 13.5% and 7.7%, respectively. Outcomes were better for patients who relapsed >6 months after CAR T-cell therapy (mPFS2: 5.6 vs 2 months, P = .0138; mOS2: not reached vs 3.8 months, P = .0034). The bORR and bCRR between TAFA-LEN and other treatments were 20.6% vs 24.9% and 11.6% vs 15.6%, respectively. Outcomes were similar between TAFA-LEN and other treatments (mPFS2: 2.9 vs 2.4 months, P = .91; mOS2: 3.3 vs 5.5 months, P = .06). In an exploratory analysis of the TL-pre-CAR-T set, the median TAFA-LEN treatment duration before CAR-T was 3.7 months with no patient becoming CD19 negative. The bORR, bCRR, 6- month PFS, and OS rates after CAR T-cell infusion were 45.5%, 36.4%, 20.1%, and 58.2%, respectively. Neither TAFA-LEN nor comparative salvage treatment improved outcomes for patients relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy.

Cellular therapy in older adults with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) was historically the curative-intent treatment for patients who demonstrated chemosensitivity to salvage therapy. However, a significant portion of patients do not make it autoHCT due to disease progression or overall fitness and eligibility. This is of particular concern in the older adult population. In recent years, significant advances in cellular therapies including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells and bispecific antibodies, in addition to improvement in autoHCT tolerability, have allowed for additional treatment options for patients with R/R DLBCL. These novel therapies offer the potential for durable remissions and cure, and should be considered in older patients. We present a review focused on the safety and efficacy of cellular therapies in the older adult population with R/R DLBCL.

Antibody-Based Therapies for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

While antibody-based immunotherapeutic strategies have revolutionized the treatment of B-cell lymphomas, progress in T-cell lymphomas has suffered from suboptimal targets, disease heterogeneity, and limited effective treatment options. Nonetheless, recent advances in our understanding of T-cell biology, the identification of novel targets, and the emergence of new therapies provide hope for the future. In this review, we explore four areas of current and evolving antibody-based strategies for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL): monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), bispecific antibodies (BsAs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). As part of this discussion, we will also include limitations, lessons learned, and potential future directions.

Combining mathematical modeling, in vitro data and clinical target expression to support bispecific antibody binding affinity selection: a case example with FAP-4-1BBL

The majority of bispecific costimulatory antibodies in cancer immunotherapy are capable of exerting tumor-specific T-cell activation by simultaneously engaging both tumor-associated targets and costimulatory receptors expressed by T cells. The amount of trimeric complex formed when the bispecific antibody is bound simultaneously to the T cell receptor and the tumor-associated target follows a bell-shaped curve with increasing bispecific antibody exposure/dose. The shape of the curve is determined by the binding affinities of the bispecific antibody to its two targets and target expression. Here, using the case example of FAP-4-1BBL, a fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP)-directed 4-1BB (CD137) costimulator, the impact of FAP-binding affinity on trimeric complex formation and pharmacology was explored using mathematical modeling and simulation. We quantified (1) the minimum number of target receptors per cell required to achieve pharmacological effect, (2) the expected coverage of the patient population for 19 different solid tumor indications, and (3) the range of pharmacologically active exposures as a function of FAP-binding affinity. A 10-fold increase in FAP-binding affinity (from a dissociation constant [KD] of 0.7 nM-0.07 nM) was predicted to reduce the number of FAP receptors needed to achieve 90% of the maximum pharmacological effect from 13,400 to 4,000. Also, the number of patients with colon cancer that would achieve 90% of the maximum effect would increase from 6% to 39%. In this work, a workflow to select binding affinities for bispecific antibodies that integrates preclinical in vitro data, mathematical modeling and simulation, and knowledge on target expression in the patient population, is provided. The early implementation of this approach can increase the probability of success with cancer immunotherapy in clinical development.

Double hit lymphoma: contemporary understanding and practices

Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) is a high-risk subtype of large B-cell lymphoma, defined by concurrent rearrangements MYC and BCL2. The diagnosis is confirmed through histologic and immunophenotypic examination and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to demonstrate the rearrangements. DHL morphology ranges from DLBCL to high-grade B-cell lymphoma which can resemble Burkitt lymphoma and is almost always germinal center B-cell like (GCB). Prognosis is influenced by elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), advanced stage, and extranodal involvement, among other factors. Treatment outcomes vary, but intensive chemotherapy regimens such as dose-adjusted EPOCH-R have shown the most promising results, though low-risk cases do occur and may do well with less intensive treatments. Recent therapeutic advances such as CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies offer promise for patients with relapsed/refractory disease. This review synthesizes data from recent literature to provide a comprehensive analysis of the molecular underpinnings, diagnostic criteria, prognostic factors, and therapeutic strategies for DHL.

A Case of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy Caused by Epcoritamab

A female patient aged in her 50s had presented with the onset of follicular lymphoma (FL) with left mandibular swelling, with a pathological grade of 1 and clinical stage of Ⅳ (Ann Arbor staging). Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone, and rituximab (R-CHOP) resulted in complete molecular remission (CMR). The patient experienced two recurrences, and treatments were successful; however, the side effect of continuous lymphocytopenia existed eight years after the onset. For the third recurrence of FL, weekly epcoritamab therapy was administered with a white blood cell count of 2,010 /μL with neutrophils of 1,240/μL, lymphocytes of 430/μL, red blood cells of 390 × 104/μL, and platelets of 17.8 × 104/μL. 18Fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) confirmed CMR after six cycles of epcoritamab. After the 11th epcoritamab, the patient was diagnosed with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), presenting significant left hemispatial neglect and visuospatial problems. Brain magnetic resonance imaging of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and diffusion-weighted imaging showed high intensity in the right parietotemporal subcortex and frontal subcortical lesion with high or iso intensity on the apparent diffusion coefficient. FDG-PET did not show lymphoma recurrence. The patient had white blood cells of 2,310 /μL with lymphocytes of 480/μL, CD4-positive lymphocytes of 124/μL, and CD8-positive lymphocytes of 153/μL. The JC virus (JCV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) level in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) increased to 1.466 × 108 copies/mL. The patient became unconscious and died three months after diagnosis of PML. We report the first case of PML as a complication of epcoritamab, a bispecific antibody targeting CD3 and CD20 that redirects and activates T cells, which is expected to be used for treating FL. PML is a fatal infection of the central nervous system without effective treatment caused by the reactivation of the JCV in immunodeficient hosts. The antibody test for JCV is recommended for patients with multiple sclerosis for an earlier diagnosis, which is not common in other diseases. We should be aware of PML through innovative therapy.

Pathological landscape of tumor flare reaction to epcoritamab treatment

Tumor flare reaction (TFR) is characterized by an increase in lesion size during immune-based therapy, often resembling disease progression. It signifies inflammation at the tumor site and is frequently seen in immunotherapy, where it is termed "tumor pseudoprogression." The exact mechanisms behind TFR remain unclear. We report the case of a 62-year-old Japanese man with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with epcoritamab. On day 10 of the first epcoritamab cycle, after two subcutaneous injections of epcoritamab, the cutaneous lymphoma lesions became swollen. This was identified as TFR, and was managed with a three-day course of intravenous dexamethasone at 12 mg/day. The third injection, scheduled for day 15, was delayed by 1 week. Four doses of epcoritamab were completed over the initial 35-day period. A skin biopsy was performed on day 30. Histopathological examination showed CD20+ large atypical lymphocytes forming residual nodules, encircled by CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, with a predominance of CD8+ T cells over CD4+ T cells. Although infrequent, TFR may be a significant indicator of tumor response to epcoritamab therapy. The diagnosis of TFR could be underestimated, and proper identification and understanding of its clinicopathological features are crucial for its effective management.

Sequencing of cellular therapy and bispecific antibodies for the management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Historically, the management of relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) following first-line chemoimmunotherapy has been second-line chemotherapy, followed by high-dose chemotherapy and consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), resulting in durable remissions in approximately 40% of patients. In 2017, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy changed the landscape of treatment for patients with R/R DLBCL, with complete response rates ranging from 40-58% and long-term disease-free survival of >40% in the highest risk subgroups, including patients who relapsed after autologous HSCT. Since that time further studies have demonstrated improved overall response rates and survival outcomes in patients with primary refractory or early-relapsed (relapse within 1 year) DLBCL treated with CAR T-cell therapy compared with autologous HSCT, advancing CAR T-cell therapy into the second-line setting. However, >50% of patients will relapse in the post-CAR T-cell setting. In the past 2 years, two CD20 x CD3 bispecific antibodies were approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of R/R DLBCL after two or more lines of systemic therapy. These bispecific antibodies have demonstrated overall response rates exceeding 50% and durable remissions at >2 years of follow-up. Additionally, a notable treatment advantage of bispecific antibodies is their ability to be administered in the community setting, making treatment more accessible for patients. The development and advancement of these novel therapies raise questions regarding the ongoing role of HSCT in the management of R/R DLBCL and the best sequence of cellular and bispecific therapies to optimize patients' outcomes.

Bispecific antibodies: advancing precision oncology

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are engineered molecules designed to target two different epitopes or antigens. The mechanism of action is determined by the bsAb molecular targets and structure (or format), which can be manipulated to create variable and novel functionalities, including linking immune cells with tumor cells, or dual signaling pathway blockade. Several bsAbs have already changed the treatment landscape of hematological malignancies and select solid cancers. However, the mechanisms of resistance to these agents are understudied and the management of toxicities remains challenging. Herein, we review the principles in bsAb engineering, current understanding of mechanisms of action and resistance, data for clinical application, and provide a perspective on ongoing challenges and future developments in this field.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Fit Patients With Late Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma That Responded to Salvage Chemotherapy

The standard of care (SOC) for fit patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ≥12 months after completing frontline therapy is salvage chemotherapy (ST) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). However, this strategy may not be optimal for patients with certain clinical characteristics. We retrospectively studied 151 patients with DLBCL that relapsed ≥12 months after R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like frontline therapy who underwent ST and ASCT at Mayo Clinic between July 2000 and December 2017 or the University of Iowa between April 2003 and April 2020. Clinical characteristics, treatment information, and outcome data were abstracted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of ASCT were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median time from frontline therapy completion to 1st relapse was 26.9 months. The median line of ST was 1 (range 1-3), and 17 (11%) patients required >1 line of ST. Best response before ASCT was partial response (PR) in 60 (40%) and complete response (CR) in 91 (60%) patients. The median age at ASCT was 64 yr (range 19-78), and 36 (24%) patients were of ≥70 yr. The median follow-up after ASCT was 87.3 months. The median PFS and OS were 54.5 and 88.9 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS based on the age at ASCT (including patients aged ≥70-78 yr), sex, transplant era, time to relapse, LDH, extranodal site involvement, and central nervous system/nerve involvement at relapse. However, patients with advanced-stage relapse had inferior PFS than those with early-stage relapse (median 45.3 versus 124.7 months, P = .045). Patients who required > 1 line of ST, compared to those requiring 1 line, had significantly inferior PFS (median 6.1 versus 61.4 months, P < .0001) and OS (17.8 versus 111.7 months, P = .0004). There was no statistically significant difference in survival in patients who achieved PR versus CR, though numerically inferior in the former, with median PFS of 38.9 versus 59.3 months (P = .23) and median OS of 78.3 versus 111.7 months (P = .62). Patients achieving CR after 1 line of ST had excellent post-ASCT outcomes, with median PFS of 63.7 months. In conclusion, survival after ASCT was unfavorable in patients with late relapsed DLBCL (≥12 months) who required more than 1 line of ST to achieve PR or CR, and such patients should be treated with alternative therapies. Conversely, survival was favorable in patients who required only 1 line of ST, supporting the current clinical practice of ASCT consolidation in these patients. Moreover, outcomes were favorable in patients aged ≥70 to 78 yr at ASCT, similar to younger patients, highlighting the safety and feasibility of this approach in such patients.

The rules of T-cell engagement: current state of CAR T cells and bispecific antibodies in B-cell lymphomas

ABSTRACT

T-cell engaging-therapies have transformed the treatment landscape of relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas by offering highly effective treatments for patients with historically limited therapeutic options. This review focuses on the advances in chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells and bispecific antibodies, first providing an overview of each product type, followed by exploring the primary data for currently available products in large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma. This review also highlights key logistical and sequencing considerations across diseases and product types that can affect clinical decision-making.

Safety and Efficacy of Bispecific Antibodies in Adults with Large B-Cell Lymphomas: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trial Data

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are an emerging therapy in the treatment of large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs). There is a gap in the research on the safety and efficacy of bsAbs in adults with LBCL, with current research focusing on the wider non-Hodgkin's lymphoma population. To address this research gap, we conducted a systematic review aiming to evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes of bsAbs in adults with LBCL. A systematized search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 10 April 2024. Interventional clinical trials were eligible for inclusion. Observational studies, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. According to the Revised Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies, the included studies were largely of a high quality for safety outcome reporting, but of mixed quality for efficacy outcome reporting. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, the results were discussed as a narrative synthesis. Nineteen early phase studies were evaluated in the final analysis, with a pooled sample size of 1332 patients. Nine bsAbs were investigated across the studies as monotherapy (nine studies) or in combination regimes (10 studies). The rates of cytokine release syndrome were variable, with any grade events ranging from 0 to 72.2%. Infection rates were consistently high across the reporting studies (38-60%). Cytopenias were found to be common, in particular, anemia (4.4-62%), thrombocytopenia (3.3-69%), and neutropenia (4.4-70%). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and grade ≥3 adverse events were not commonly reported. Promising efficacy outcomes were reported, with median overall response rates of 95-100% in the front-line and 36-91% in terms of relapsed/refractory disease. The results of this systematic review demonstrate that bsAbs are generally well-tolerated and effective in adults with LBCL. BsAbs appear to have superior tolerability, but inferior efficacy to CAR T-cell therapies in adults with LBCL. Future research on safety and efficacy should focus on evaluating adverse event timing and management, the impact on the patient's quality of life, the burden on the healthcare system, and overall survival outcomes.