Cotreatment with pegvisomant and a somatostatin analog (SA) in SA-responsive acromegalic patients

Growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant and its role in the medical therapy of growth hormone excess

Pegvisomant is a growth-hormone (GH) receptor antagonist that prevents the formation of the active heterotrimer of the dimerised GH receptor and the GH molecule necessary for downstream signal transduction. Over the past 20 years, it has become a key therapeutic option for physicians treating syndromes of GH/IGF-1 excess. Sufficient longitudinal follow-up data suggest that it can be deemed both safe and effective. It is the drug with the greatest potential for achieving an amelioration of the biochemical effects of GH excess with a corresponding normalisation of IGF-1 levels; however, insufficient dose titration has lessened real-world therapeutic outcomes. Theoretical concerns about stimulating tumour growth have been resolved as this has not been observed, while derangement of liver enzymes and local skin-related adverse reactions may occur in a minority of the patients. It may be a particularly impactful medication for the treatment of children, young people, and those with inherited disorders of GH excess, where other treatment modalities often fail. Combination therapy of pegvisomant with first- and second-generation somatostatin receptor ligands or with dopamine agonists remains an ongoing area of interest and research. High cost remains a barrier to the use of pegvisomant in many settings.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of acromegaly: new agents to transform therapy

INTRODUCTION

Disease control is essential to decrease morbidity burden and mortality in acromegaly patients. In the last decades, the availability of new drugs increased the rate of disease control. However, up to 55% of patients remain uncontrolled despite available treatment strategies in real-world data. The reasons for this finding may include poor adherence, inadequate tolerability, therapeutic inertia, and high costs. Since acromegaly is a chronic disease and medical therapy is usually life-long, patient's adherence to treatment is fundamental in both achieving and maintaining disease control. Less invasive routes of administration could improve adherence and concur to increase disease control rate.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of current review is to provide a detailed update about investigational drugs for acromegaly treatment currently under investigation as paltusotine, ONO-5788, AP102, GT-02037, ISIS 766720, CAM2024, Lanreotide PRF, DP1038, MTD201, solid dose injection of octreotide.

EXPERT OPINION

Medical therapy of acromegaly is an evolving field. Current studies are addressing patient's need for both new molecules and less invasive routes of administration for already existing drugs. It cannot be ruled out that drugs currently used for other diseases such as cancer could be considered in the future for the treatment of acromegaly.

Surgical and non-surgical interventions for primary and salvage treatment of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in adults

BACKGROUND

Growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma is a severe endocrine disease. Surgery is the currently recommended primary therapy for patients with GH-secreting tumours. However, non-surgical therapy (pharmacological therapy and radiation therapy) may be performed as primary therapy or may improve surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of surgical and non-surgical interventions for primary and salvage treatment of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search of all databases was 1 August 2022. We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of more than 12 weeks' duration, reporting on surgical, pharmacological, radiation, and combination interventions for GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in any healthcare setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance, screened for inclusion, completed data extraction, and performed a risk of bias assessment. We assessed studies for overall certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We estimated treatment effects using random-effects meta-analysis. We expressed results as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, or in descriptive format when meta-analysis was not possible.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs that evaluated 445 adults with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Four studies reported that they included participants with macroadenomas, one study included a small number of participants with microadenomas. The remaining studies did not specify tumour subtypes. Studies evaluated surgical therapy alone, pharmacological therapy alone, or combination surgical and pharmacological therapy. Methodological quality varied, with many studies providing insufficient information to compare treatment strategies or accurately judge the risk of bias. We identified two main comparisons, surgery alone versus pharmacological therapy alone, and surgery alone versus pharmacological therapy and surgery combined. Surgical therapy alone versus pharmacological therapy alone Three studies with a total of 164 randomised participants investigated this comparison. Only one study narratively described hyperglycaemia as a disease-related complication. All three studies reported adverse events, yet only one study reported numbers separately for the intervention arms; none of the 11 participants were observed to develop gallbladder stones or sludge on ultrasonography following surgery, while five of 11 participants experienced any biliary problems following pharmacological therapy (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.47; 1 study, 22 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Health-related quality of life was reported to improve similarly in both intervention arms during follow-up. Surgery alone compared to pharmacological therapy alone may slightly increase the biochemical remission rate from 12 weeks to one year after intervention, but the evidence is very uncertain; 36/78 participants in the surgery-alone group versus 15/66 in the pharmacological therapy group showed biochemical remission. The need for additional surgery or non-surgical therapy for recurrent or persistent disease was described for single study arms only. Surgical therapy alone versus preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery Five studies with a total of 281 randomised participants provided data for this comparison. Preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery may have little to no effect on the disease-related complication of a difficult intubation (requiring postponement of surgery) compared to surgery alone, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.19 to 21.34; 1 study, 98 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Surgery alone may have little to no effect on (transient and persistent) adverse events when compared to preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery, but again, the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.03; 5 studies, 267 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Concerning biochemical remission, surgery alone compared to preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery may not increase remission rates up until 16 weeks after surgery; 23 of 134 participants in the surgery-alone group versus 51 of 133 in the preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery group showed biochemical remission. Furthermore, the very low-certainty evidence did not suggest benefit or detriment of preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery compared to surgery alone for the outcomes 'requiring additional surgery' (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.06; 1 study, 61 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or 'non-surgical therapy for recurrent or persistent disease' (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.28; 2 studies, 100 participants; very low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies measured health-related quality of life. None of the eight included studies measured disease recurrence or socioeconomic effects. While three of the eight studies reported no deaths to have occurred, one study mentioned that overall, two participants had died within five years of the start of the study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Within the context of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, patient-relevant outcomes, such as disease-related complications, adverse events and disease recurrence were not, or only sparsely, reported. When reported, we found that surgery may have little or no effect on the outcomes compared to the comparator treatment. The current evidence is limited by the small number of included studies, as well as the unclear risk of bias in most studies. The high uncertainty of evidence significantly limits the applicability of our findings to clinical practice. Detailed reporting on the burden of recurrent disease is an important knowledge gap to be evaluated in future research studies. It is also crucial that future studies in this area are designed to report on outcomes by tumour subtype (that is, macroadenomas versus microadenomas) so that future subgroup analyses can be conducted. More rigorous and larger studies, powered to address these research questions, are required to assess the merits of neoadjuvant pharmacological therapy or first-line pharmacotherapy.

A systematic literature review to evaluate extended dosing intervals in the pharmacological management of acromegaly

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review investigated whether extended dosing intervals (EDIs) of pharmacological acromegaly treatments reduce patient burden and costs compared with standard dosing, while maintaining effectiveness.

METHODS

MEDLINE/Embase/the Cochrane Library (2001-June 2021) and key congresses (2018-2021) were searched and identified systematic literature review bibliographies reviewed. Included publications reported on efficacy/effectiveness, safety and tolerability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient-reported and economic outcomes in longitudinal/cross-sectional studies in adults with acromegaly. Interventions included EDIs of pegvisomant, cabergoline, and somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs): lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN), octreotide long-acting release (OCT), pasireotide long-acting release (PAS), and oral octreotide; no comparator was required.

RESULTS

In total, 35 publications reported on 27 studies: 3 pegvisomant monotherapy, 11 pegvisomant combination therapy with SRLs, 9 LAN, and 4 OCT; no studies reported on cabergoline, PAS, or oral octreotide at EDIs. Maintenance of normal insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was observed in ≥ 70% of patients with LAN (1 study), OCT (1 study), and pegvisomant monotherapy (1 study). Achievement of normal IGF-I was observed in ≥ 70% of patients with LAN (3 studies) and pegvisomant in combination with SRLs (4 studies). Safety profiles were similar across EDI and standard regimens. Patients preferred and were satisfied with EDIs. HRQoL was maintained and cost savings were provided with EDIs versus standard regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and HRQoL outcomes in adults with acromegaly were similar and costs lower with EDIs versus standard regimens. Physicians may consider acromegaly treatment at EDIs, especially for patients with good disease control.

Surgically treated acromegaly patients have a similar quality of life whether controlled by surgery or requiring additional medical therapy (QuaLAT Study)

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on quality of life (QOL) in patients with acromegaly requiring medical treatment after surgery compared with those achieving remission by surgery alone.

METHODS

QuaLAT is a cross-sectional study comparing QOL in surgery-only treated acromegaly patients versus those requiring medical treatment post-surgery. Patients attending clinics were identified and divided into-Group 1: patients who had surgery only and were in biochemical remission, Group 2: all patients on medical treatment post-surgery, Group 3: patients from Group 2 with biochemical control. Participants were asked to fill three questionnaires; Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACROQOL), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF36), and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS).

RESULTS

There were 32 patients in Group 1 and 25 in Group 2. There was no difference in QOL scores between groups 1 and 2, as measured by ACROQOL (mean difference [MD] = - 2.5, 95% CI - 16.6 to 11.6; p = 0.72), SF36v2 [Physical component score (PCS) MD = - 4.9, 95% CI - 10.9 to 1.2; p = 0.12; mental component score MD = - 3.0, 95% CI - 10.5 to 4.4; p = 0.44], or FSS (MD = - 0.004, 95% CI - 1.14 to 1.33; p = 0.1). Comparison between groups 1 and 3 however showed that PCS (and 3 subdomains) was significantly better in group 3 (MD = - 8.3, 95% CI - 14.8 to -1.8; p = 0.01). All three QOL scores were lower when compared with healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical treatment not only achieves a QOL comparable to surgery, it may also be associated with better QOL in physical subdomains. When compared with healthy controls, QOL remains worse in treated acromegaly patients compared to controls.

In patients with controlled acromegaly, indices of glucose homeostasis correlate with IGF-1 levels rather than with type of treatment

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is accompanied by abnormalities in glucose and lipid metabolism which improve upon treatment. Few studies have investigated whether these improvements differ between treatment modalities. This study aimed to compare glucose homeostasis, lipid profiles and postprandial gut hormone response in patients with controlled acromegaly according to actual treatment.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study at a tertiary care centre.

PATIENTS

Twenty-one patients with acromegaly under stable control (ie insulin growth factor 1 [IGF1] levels below sex- and age-specific thresholds and a random growth hormone level <1.0 µg/L) after surgery (n = 5), during treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogues (n = 10) or long-acting somatostatin analogues + pegvisomant (n = 6) were included.

MEASUREMENTS

Glucose, insulin, total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were measured in fasting serum samples. Glucose, insulin, triglycerides, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide 1 were measured during a mixed meal test. Insulin sensitivity was evaluated by a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity or postprandial gut hormone responses between the three groups. Positive correlations between IGF1 levels and HbA1c, fasting glucose and insulin levels and postprandial area under the curve (AUC) of glucose and insulin and also an inverse association between IGF1 and glucose disposal rate were found in the whole cohort (all p < .05, lowest p = .001 for postprandial AUC glucose with r_s  = 0.660).

CONCLUSION

In this cross-sectional study in patients with controlled acromegaly, there were no differences in glucose homeostasis or postprandial substrate metabolism according to treatment modality. However, a lower IGF1 level seems associated with a better metabolic profile.

Improvement in Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life in Acromegaly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Whereas biochemical response is often used as a primary study outcome, improvement in symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is the relevant goal for patients to consider treatment successful. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of treatment on symptoms and HRQoL in acromegaly.

METHODS

Seven electronic databases were searched for longitudinal studies assessing patient-reported symptoms or HRQoL in acromegaly. Meta-analyses were performed to assess differences during treatment for the Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL) and Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ), and standardized mean difference (SMD) for individual symptoms (interpretation: 0.2 small, 0.5 moderate, and 0.8 large effect). Treatment-naive and previously treated patients were assessed separately.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies with 3301 patients were included; 24 contributed to quantitative analyses. Thirty-six studies used medication as main treatment, 1 transsphenoidal adenomectomy, and 9 various treatments. Symptoms and HRQoL both improved: AcroQoL increased 2.9 points (95% CI, 0.5 to 5.3 points), PASQ decreased -2.3 points (95% CI, -1.3 to -3.3 points), and individual symptom scores decreased for paresthesia -0.9 (95% CI, -0.6 to -1.2), hyperhidrosis -0.4 (95% CI, -0.1 to -0.6), fatigue -0.3 (95% CI, -0.1 to -0.6), arthralgia -0.3 (95% CI, -0.1 to -0.5), headache -0.3 (95% CI, 0.0 to -0.6), and soft-tissue swelling -0.2 (95% CI, 0.0 to -0.4).

CONCLUSION

Symptoms and HRQoL improved during acromegaly treatment. Consensus is needed on which symptoms should be included in a potential core outcome set, taking into account symptom frequency, severity, and sensitivity to change, which can be used in clinical practice and as outcome in trials.

Pegvisomant in combination or pegvisomant alone after failure of somatostatin analogs in acromegaly patients: an observational French ACROSTUDY cohort study

OBJECTIVE

After surgery, when somatostatin analogs (SAs) do not normalise IGF-I, pegvisomant (PEG) is indicated. Our aim was to define the medical reasons for the treatment of patients with PEG as monotherapy (M) or combined with SA, either as primary bitherapy, PB (PEG is secondarily introduced after SA) or as secondary bitherapy, SB (SAs secondarily introduced after PEG).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed French data from ACROSTUDY.

RESULTS

167, 88 and 57 patients were treated with M, PB or SB, respectively, during a median time of 80, 42 and 70 months. The median PEG dose was respectively 15, 10 and 20 mg. Before PEG, the mean IGF-I level did not differ between M and PB but the proportion of patients with suprasellar tumour extension was higher in PB group (67.5% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.022). SB regimen was used preferentially in patients with tumour increase and IGF-I level difficult to normalise under PEG. In both secondary regimens, the decrease of the frequency of PEG's injections, compared to monotherapy was confirmed. However, the mean weekly dose of PEG between M and PB remained the same.

CONCLUSIONS

The medical rationale for continuing SAs rather than switching to PEG alone in patients who do not normalise IGF-I under SAs was a tumour concern with suprasellar extension and tumour shrinkage under SA. A potential explanation for introducing SA in association with PEG appears to be a tumour enlargement and difficulties to normalise IGF-I levels under PEG given alone. In both regimens, the prospect of lowering PEG injection frequency favoured the choice.

Driver versus navigator causation in biology: the case of insulin and fasting glucose

BACKGROUND

In biomedicine, inferring causal relation from experimental intervention or perturbation is believed to be a more reliable approach than inferring causation from cross-sectional correlation. However, we point out here that even in interventional inference there are logical traps. In homeostatic systems, causality in a steady state can be qualitatively different from that in a perturbed state. On a broader scale there is a need to differentiate driver causality from navigator causality. A driver is essential for reaching a destination but may not have any role in deciding the destination. A navigator on the other hand has a role in deciding the destination and the path but may not be able to drive the system to the destination. The failure to differentiate between types of causalities is likely to have resulted into many misinterpretations in physiology and biomedicine.

METHODS

We illustrate this by critically re-examining a specific case of the causal role of insulin in glucose homeostasis using five different approaches (1) Systematic review of tissue specific insulin receptor knock-outs, (2) Systematic review of insulin suppression and insulin enhancement experiments, (3) Differentiating steady state and post-meal state glucose levels in streptozotocin treated rats in primary experiments, (4) Mathematical and theoretical considerations and (5) Glucose-insulin relationship in human epidemiological data.

RESULTS

All the approaches converge on the inference that although insulin action hastens the return to a steady state after a glucose load, there is no evidence that insulin action determines the steady state level of glucose. Insulin, unlike the popular belief in medicine, appears to be a driver but not a navigator for steady state glucose level. It is quite likely therefore that the current line of clinical action in the field of type 2 diabetes has limited success largely because it is based on a misinterpretation of glucose-insulin relationship. The insulin-glucose example suggests that we may have to carefully re-examine causal inferences from perturbation experiments and set up revised norms for experimental design for causal inference.

Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of a Novel Combination Regimen in Acromegaly: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

CONTEXT

Combination therapy with somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) plus pegvisomant for patients with acromegaly is recommended after a maximizing dose on monotherapy. Lower-dose combination regimens are not well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To compare cost-effectiveness and efficacy of 3 lower-dose combination regimens in controlled and uncontrolled acromegaly.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel arm study at a tertiary referral pituitary center.

PATIENTS

Adults with acromegaly regardless of response to prior SRL and biochemical control status at baseline, stratified by an SRL dose required for insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I normalization during any 3-month period within 12 months preceding enrollment.

INTERVENTION

Combination therapy for 24 to 32 weeks on arm A, high-dose SRL (lanreotide 120 mg/octreotide long-acting release [LAR] 30 mg) plus weekly pegvisomant (40-160 mg/week); arm B, low-dose SRL (lanreotide 60 mg/octreotide LAR 10 mg) plus weekly pegvisomant; or arm C, low-dose SRL plus daily pegvisomant (15-60 mg/day).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Monthly treatment cost in each arm in participants completing ≥ 24 weeks of therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled and 52 were evaluable. Fifty of 52 (96%) demonstrated IGF-I control regardless of prior SRL responsiveness (arm A, 14/15 [93.3%]; arm B, 22/23 [95.7%]; arm C, 14/14 [100%]). Arm B was least costly (mean, $9837 ± 1375 per month), arm C was most expensive (mean, $22543 ± 11158 per month), and arm A had an intermediate cost (mean, $14261 ± 1645 per month). Approximately 30% of patients required pegvisomant dose uptitration. Rates of adverse events were all < 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose SRL plus weekly pegvisomant represents a novel dosing option for achieving cost-effective, optimal biochemical control in patients with uncontrolled acromegaly requiring combination therapy.

Combined therapy of somatostatin analogues with pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is a rare, chronic and severe disease. Drug therapy including somatostatin analogues (SAs), dopamine receptor agonists and growth hormone receptor antagonists (pegvisomant, PEG) are commonly used to treat patients who do not respond to surgery. The use of combination therapy with PEG and SAs has become more common over the last decade. We performed this study to accurately evaluate the effect of combination therapy of SAs with PEG on acromegalic patients.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Trip database were searched for relevant studies. Prospective clinical trials treating acromegaly with the co-administration of SAs and PEG were included. We performed a meta-analysis by using Stata 12.1. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall rate of serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) normalization was 66% (95% CI: 52-78%; I² = 62.59%). The combination therapy did not significantly change patients' fasting plasma glucose (ES: 0.011 mmol*L^- 1; 95% CI: - 0.374 to 0.397 mmol*L^- 1; P = 0.954) or glycosylated haemoglobin (ES: - 0.074%; 95% CI: - 0.166 to 0.315%; P = 0.544) while decreasing the fasting plasma insulin (ES: - 21.487 pmol*L^-1; 95% CI: - 35.713 to - 7.260 pmol*L^-1; P = 0.003). Elevation of liver enzyme levels was found in 14% (95% CI: 8 to 21%) of the patients. There was no significant difference for serious adverse events and treatment discontinuation due to adverse event between SAs monotherapy group and combination therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined therapy of SAs and PEG effectively normalized IGF-1 levels in most of the patients whose IGF-1 level was greater than the upper limit of normal after high dose SAs monotherapy. The therapy also decreased significantly FPI levels with a neutral effect on glucose parameters in acromegaly patients. Moreover, elevated liver enzyme levels were observed in a small number of patients, which suggests a need for liver function monitoring.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

We have our protocol registered in PROSPERO. (Registration number: CRD42019115549 ).

Updates in rare and not-so-rare complications of acromegaly: focus on respiratory function and quality of life in acromegaly

Acromegaly is a complex disease with excessive growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) causing multisystem effects, particularly cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic. Psychological concerns and poor quality of life (QoL) are also major disease consequences. This review is intended for clinicians and focuses on the latest developments related to respiratory and QoL effects of long-term growth hormone excess. Along with biochemical disease control, patient treatment satisfaction and outcomes have become major treatment objectives; current knowledge and tools to evaluate and manage this aspect of the disease are described. Sleep apnea syndrome and other derangements of lung function and apparatus, from pathophysiology to treatment, and evaluation tools and determinants of QoL in patients with acromegaly are discussed.

Drug treatment strategies for secondary diabetes in patients with acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a rare disease due to oversecretion of growth hormone (GH). Even though the disease is often portrayed by its most apparent clinical features, given the abundance of GH receptors throughout the body, it truly is a systemic disease leading to numerous complications and comorbidities. A distinct medical issue in the context of acromegaly is diabetes: It can be a complication as a consequence of GH excess and its mediators, but it can also result from treatment of acromegaly.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the effects of acromegaly pathophysiology on glucose homeostasis. Furthermore, it devotes an extensive section on the influence that acromegaly treatment has on glucose metabolism, including approved as well as currently investigated drugs. It also summarizes observations from the use of anti-diabetic medication in patients with acromegaly.

EXPERT OPINION

Glucose imbalance is an important aspect of acromegaly comorbidity and deserves more attention. Even though numerous studies have investigated glucose homeostasis in acromegaly, there is still a clear need for more basic, translational, and also clinical research to advance the understanding of the underlying mechanisms and how to best address them.

Octreotide-Resistant Acromegaly: Challenges and Solutions

Acromegaly is a rare and severe disease caused by an increased and autonomous secretion of growth hormone (GH), thus resulting in high circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Comorbidities and mortality rate are closely related to the disease duration. However, in most cases achieving biochemical control means reducing or even normalizing mortality and restoring normal life expectancy. Current treatment for acromegaly includes neurosurgery, radiotherapy and medical therapy. Transsphenoidal surgery often represents the recommended first-line treatment. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are the drug of choice in patients with persistent disease after surgery and are suggested as first-line treatment for those ineligible for surgery. However, only about half of patients treated with octreotide (or lanreotide) achieve biochemical control. Other available drugs approved for clinical use are the second-generation SRL pasireotide, the dopamine agonist cabergoline, and the GH-receptor antagonist pegvisomant. In the present paper, we revised the current literature about the management of acromegaly, aiming to highlight the most relevant and recent therapeutic strategies proposed for patients resistant to first-line medical therapy. Furthermore, we discussed the potential molecular mechanisms involved in the variable response to first-generation SRLs. Due to the availability of different medical therapies, the choice for the most appropriate drug can be currently based also on the peculiar clinical characteristics of each patient.

Current perspectives on the impact of clinical disease and biochemical control on comorbidities and quality of life in acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare chronic, systemic disorder caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion from a somatotroph pituitary adenoma. GH hypersecretion leads to overproduction of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which contributes to the somatic overgrowth, physical disfigurement, onset of multiple systemic comorbidities, reduced quality of life (QoL) and premature mortality of uncontrolled patients. Somatostatin receptor ligands, dopamine agonists and a GH receptor antagonist are currently available for medical therapy of acromegaly. The main aim of treatment is biochemical normalisation, defined as age-normalised serum IGF-1 values and random GH levels <1.0 μg/L. However, there is an increasing evidence suggesting that achieving biochemical control does not always decrease the burden of disease-related comorbidities and/or improve patients' QoL. This lack of correlation between biochemical and clinical control can be due to both disease duration (late diagnosis) or to the peculiarity of a given comorbidity. Herein we conducted ad hoc literature searches in order to find the most recent and relevant reports on biochemical and clinical disease control during medical treatment of acromegaly. Particularly, we analyse and describe the relationship between biochemical, as well as clinical disease control in patients with acromegaly receiving medical therapy, with a focus on comorbidities and QoL. In conclusion, we found that current literature data seem to indicate that clinical disease control (besides biochemical control), encompassing clinical signs and symptoms, comorbidities and QoL, emerge as a primary focus of acromegaly patient management.

Endocrine Outcomes After Pituitary Surgery

Although removal of pituitary tumors yields excellent surgical outcomes, perturbations in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis are not uncommon. Careful assessment of postoperative hormone status with supplementation or further medical therapy is critical to successful outcomes. Although many centers routinely use perioperative steroids, they can be associated with worse outcomes in the absence of intact preoperative adrenal function or damage to the pituitary gland or stalk during surgery. Postoperative assessment of prolactin, cortisol, and growth hormone can be prognostic of surgical cure. Hormonal axes should be reevaluated routinely several weeks after surgery, because longitudinal monitoring is important for surgical and medical outcomes.

Pegvisomant Improves Glucose Metabolism in Acromegaly: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Interventional Studies

INTRODUCTION

Pegvisomant (PEG) in monotherapy or combined with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is used to control acromegaly, improving metabolism. However, the metabolic changes induced by PEG have not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To address the following questions: does PEG or the combination of PEG and SSAs affect fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycosylated Hb (HbA1c), glucose load (2-hour oral glucose tolerance test), insulin levels [fasting plasma insulin (FPI)], homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-I), homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function, lipid profile, or body mass index? Are the effects disease-related or drug-related?

DATA SOURCES

Indexed databases up to January 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Prospective interventional trials reporting glycometabolic outcomes under PEG or PEG plus SSAs for a minimum of 6 months.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three reviewers screened eligible publications (7248), three others extracted the outcomes, and all assessed the risk of biases.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirteen studies were included in the PEG and 5 in the PEG plus SSAs analysis (overall 550 subjects). PEG significantly decreased FPG [effect size (ES) -0.80 mmol/L (95% CI, -1.06 to -0.55); P = 0.000], HbA1c [ES -0.43% (95% CI, -0.56 to -0.31); P = 0.000], FPI [ES -5.31 mU/L (95% CI, -10.23 to -0.39); P = 0.034], and HOMA-I [ES -0.61 (95% CI, -1.17 to -0.04); P = 0.034]. Effects on FPG and FPI were not correlated to IGF-1 changes. The addition of PEG to SSAs mitigated the effects of SSAs on metabolism, producing an overall neutral effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Independently of disease control, PEG in monotherapy or combined with SSAs seems to improve glucose metabolism, reducing FPG, HbA1c, FPI, and HOMA-I.

Systemic Complications of Acromegaly and the Impact of the Current Treatment Landscape: An Update

Acromegaly is a chronic systemic disease with many complications and is associated with increased mortality when not adequately treated. Substantial advances in acromegaly treatment, as well as in the treatment of many of its complications, mainly diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and arterial hypertension, were achieved in the last decades. These developments allowed change in both prevalence and severity of some acromegaly complications and furthermore resulted in a reduction of mortality. Currently, mortality seems to be similar to the general population in adequately treated patients with acromegaly. In this review, we update the knowledge in complications of acromegaly and detail the effects of different acromegaly treatment options on these complications. Incidence of mortality, its correlation with GH (cumulative exposure vs last value), and IGF-I levels and the shift in the main cause of mortality in patients with acromegaly are also addressed.

PREDICTIVE MARKERS FOR POSTSURGICAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF ACROMEGALY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND CONSENSUS TREATMENT GUIDELINE

Objective: To clarify the selection of medical therapy following transsphenoidal surgery in patients with acromegaly, based on growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) response and glucometabolic control. Methods: We carried out a systematic literature review on three of the best studied and most practical predictive markers of the response to somatostatin analogues (SSAs): somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression, tumor morphologic classification, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity. Additional analyses focused on glucose metabolism in treated patients. Results: The literature survey confirmed significant associations of all three factors with SSA responsiveness. SSTR expression appears necessary for the SSA response; however, it is not sufficient, as approximately half of SSTR2-positive tumors failed to respond clinically to first-generation SSAs. MRI findings (T2-hypo-intensity) and a densely granulated phenotype also correlate with SSA efficacy, and are advantageous as predictive markers relative to SSTR expression alone. Glucometabolic control declines with SSA monotherapy, whereas GH receptor antagonist (GHRA) monotherapy may restore normoglycemia. Conclusion: We propose a decision tree to guide selection among SSAs, dopamine agonists (DAs), and GHRA for medical treatment of acromegaly in the postsurgical setting. This decision tree employs three validated predictive markers and other clinical considerations, to determine whether SSAs are appropriate first-line medical therapy in the postsurgical setting. DA treatment is favored in patients with modest IGF-1 elevation. GHRA treatment should be considered for patients with T2-hyperintense tumors with a sparsely granulated phenotype and/or low SSTR2 staining, and may also be favored for individuals with diabetes. Prospective analyses are required to test the utility of this therapeutic paradigm. Abbreviations: DA = dopamine agonist; DG = densely granulated; GH = growth hormone; GHRA = growth hormone receptor antagonist; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; SG = sparsely granulated; SSA = somatostatin analogue; SSTR = somatostatin receptor.

Increasing frequency of combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant

Pegvisomant monotherapy is effective and safe in treatment of acromegaly. However, some clinicians combine pegvisomant with somatostatin analogues (SSA) or dopamine agonist (DA). In this analysis of ACROSTUDY, a long-term non-interventional study, the use of combination regimens was evaluated. Based on their baseline treatment, 2043 patients were retrospectively categorized as: long-acting SSA combined with pegvisomant, 'Combo SSA' 768 patients (38%); DA combined with pegvisomant, 'Combo DA' 123 (6%); pegvisomant monotherapy, 'Peg mono' 1128 (55%). Treatment patterns changed over the 10-year period, with recent patients more likely to receive any combination (20% in 2003 vs 54% in 2012). Combo SSA use varied widely among countries from 22% to 78%. Exposure periods of the three treatment modalities were defined from pegvisomant start until the last visit in ACROSTUDY; patients could switch treatment categories. At year 4, IGF-I was normal in 62% of Combo SSA, 63% of Combo DA and 65% of Peg mono groups. Pegvisomant was initiated as daily injections in 94% of patients in the Peg mono group, 66% of Combo SSA and 91% of Combo DA patients. During 6169 years of treatment exposure, 3424 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 946 (51%) patients, of which 617 (18%) were serious and 401 (12%) were considered treatment related. The reported incidence of serious AEs and treatment-related non-serious AEs were similar among the three treatment modalities. This analysis describes real-world clinical care and shows favorable efficacy and safety for Peg mono and combinations. Novel findings include an increased use of combination therapy over time and variability in treatment modalities between countries.

Somatostatin Analogs and Glucose Metabolism in Acromegaly: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Interventional Studies

INTRODUCTION

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) effectivelycontrol growth hormone secretion in first and second line treatmentof acromegaly. Their effect onglucose metabolism is still debated.

AIM

to address the following questions: 1) Do SSAs affect fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), glucose load (2h-OGTT), HOMA-I, HOMA-β, triglycerides (TGD), weight (W) or body mass index (BMI)? 2) Do lanreotide (LAN) and octreotide LAR (OCT) affect metabolism differently? 3)Does their effect depend on disease control?

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of prospective interventional trialstreating acromegaly with SSAs. Inclusion criteria: all studies reporting glyco-metabolic outcomes before and after SSAs with a minimum 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 47 studies treating 1297 subjects (631 F). SSA treatment effectively lowered FPI (effect size [ES] -6.67 mU/L, 95%CI: -8.38 to -4.95mU/L; p<0.001), HOMA-I (ES -1.57, CI: -2.42 to -0.72; p<0.001), HOMA-β (ES -47.45, CI: -73.15 to -21.76; p<0.001) and TGD (ES -0.37 mmol/L, CI: -0.47 to -0.27 mmol/L; p<0.001). SSAs worsened 2h-OGTT (ES 0.59 mmol/L, CI: 0.05 to 1.13 mmol/L; p=0.032), but not FPG. A mild but significant increase in HbA1c (ES 0.12%, CI: 0.00to 0.25%; p=0.044) was found in OCT treated subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

SSA treatment in acromegaly patients-while improving disease control- reduces insulin levels, increases after load glucose and, ultimately, increases HbA1c levels without affecting FPG. The findings suggest that clinicians treating acromegaly with SSAs should consider targeting post-prandial glucose.

Pegvisomant in acromegaly: an update

BACKGROUND

In 2007, we published an opinion document to review the role of pegvisomant (PEG) in the treatment of acromegaly. Since then, new evidence emerged on the biochemical and clinical effects of PEG and on its long-term efficacy and safety.

AIM

We here reviewed the emerging aspects of the use of PEG in clinical practice in the light of the most recent literature.

RESULTS

The clinical use of PEG is still suboptimal, considering that it remains the most powerful tool to control IGF-I in acromegaly allowing to obtain, with a pharmacological treatment, the most important clinical effects in terms of signs and symptoms, quality of life and comorbidities. The number of patients with acromegaly exposed to PEG worldwide has become quite elevated and the prolonged follow-up allows now to deal quite satisfactorily with many clinical issues including major safety issues, such as the concerns about possible tumour (re)growth under PEG. The positive or neutral impact of PEG on glucose metabolism has been highlighted, and the clinical experience, although limited, with sleep apnoea and pregnancy has been reviewed. Finally, the current concept of somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) resistance has been addressed, in order to better define the acromegaly patients to whom the PEG option may be offered.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG increasingly appears to be an effective and safe medical option for many patients not controlled by SRL but its use still needs to be optimized.

Effects of long-term combined treatment with somatostatin analogues and pegvisomant on cardiac structure and performance in acromegaly

To date, no data are available on the effects of long-term combined treatment with somatostatin analogues (SA) and pegvisomant (PEG) on cardiovascular complications in acromegaly. The current study aimed at investigating the effects of long-term SA + PEG on cardiac structure and performance. Thirty-six patients (14 M, 22 F, aged 52.3 ± 10.2 years) entered this study. Weight, BMI, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, IGF-I, fasting glucose (FG), fasting insulin (FI), HOMA-IR, HbA_1c, and lipids were evaluated at baseline (T0), after long-term (median 36 months) SA (T1), after 12 (T12) and 60 (T60) months of SA + PEG, and at last follow-up (LFU, median 78 months). At each time point, all patients underwent echocardiography. At T1, induced a slight but not significant decrease in IGF-I (p = 0.077), whereas FI (p = 0.004), HOMA-IR (p = 0.013), ejection fraction (EF, p = 0.013), early (E) to late (A) ventricular filling velocities (E/A, p = 0.001), and isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT, p = 0.000) significantly improved. At T12, IGF-I (p = 0.000) significantly reduced compared to T0, and FI (p = 0.001), HOMA-IR (p = 0.000), LVMI (p = 0.000), and E/A (p = 0.006) further improved compared to T1. At T60, FI (p = 0.027), HOMA-IR (p = 0.049), and E/A (p = 0.005) significantly improved as compared to T1. At LFU IGF-I normalized in 83.3 %, FI (p = 0.000), HOMA-IR (p = 0.000), LVMi (p = 0.000), and E/A (p = 0.005) further improved as compared to T1. PEG dose significantly correlated with LVMi at T12 (r = 0.575, p = 0.000) and T60 (r = 0.403, p = 0.037). Long-term PEG addition to SA improves cardiac structure and performance, particularly diastolic dysfunction, in acromegalic patients resistant to SA.

The role of combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly

PURPOSE

Uncontrolled acromegaly results in approximately 2-fold excess mortality. Pituitary surgery is first-line therapy, and medical treatment is indicated for persistent disease. While cabergoline and pegvisomant are used in select patients, somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) remain the cornerstone of medical treatment. Management of patients poorly responsive to SRLs is therefore, challenging. The purpose of this review is to highlight the options for combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly, with an emphasis on efficacy and safety.

METHODS

All original articles/abstracts detailing combination medical therapy in acromegaly were identified from a PubMed search.

RESULTS

Studies reviewed included retrospective and open-label prospective studies. While the combination of SRL and cabergoline was generally well tolerated, a lower baseline insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level was the best predictor of efficacy; this combination may be most effective in patients with mildly elevated IGF-1. SRL-pegvisomant combination normalized IGF-1 in the majority of patients; continued efficacy despite individual drug dosing reduction was also reported. The risk of significant liver enzyme elevation was, however, higher than that reported with SRL monotherapy; close monitoring is recommended. Data on pegvisomant-cabergoline combination is limited, but this may be an option in the setting of SRL intolerance. Reports on temozolomide used in combination with other medical therapies in patients with aggressive GH-secreting tumors are also summarized.

CONCLUSION

While more prospective, randomized controlled trials on long-term efficacy and safety are needed, combination medical therapy remains a treatment strategy that should be considered for acromegaly patients poorly responsive to SRLs.

Predictors of Quality of Life in Acromegaly: No Consensus on Biochemical Parameters

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QoL) in patients with acromegaly is reduced irrespective of disease state. The contributions of multifactorial determinants of QoL in several disease stages are presently not well known.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review predictors of QoL in acromegalic patients.

METHODS

Main databases were systematically searched using predefined search terms for potentially relevant articles up to January 2017. Inclusion criteria included separate acromegaly cohort, non-hereditary acromegaly, QoL as study parameter with clearly described method of measurement and quantitative results, N ≥ 10 patients, article in English and adult patients only. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers; studies were included using the PRISMA flow diagram.

RESULTS

We identified 1,162 studies; 51 studies met the inclusion criteria: 31 cross-sectional observational studies [mean AcroQoL score 62.7 (range 46.6-87.0, n = 1,597)], 9 had a longitudinal component [mean baseline AcroQoL score 61.4 (range 54.3-69.0, n = 386)], and 15 were intervention studies [mean baseline AcroQoL score 58.6 (range 52.2-75.3, n = 521)]. Disease-activity reflected by biochemical control measures yielded mixed, and therefore inconclusive results with respect to their effect on QoL. Addition of pegvisomant to somatostatin analogs and start of lanreotide autogel resulted in improvement in QoL. Data from intervention studies on other treatment modalities were too limited to draw conclusions on the effects of these modalities on QoL. Interestingly, higher BMI and greater degree of depression showed consistently negative associations with QoL. Hypopituitarism was not significantly correlated with QoL in acromegaly.

CONCLUSION

At present, there is insufficient published data to support that biochemical control, or treatment of acromegaly in general, is associated with improved QoL. Studies with somatostatin receptor ligand treatment, i.e., particularly lanreotide autogel and pegvisomant have shown improved QoL, but consensus on the correlation with biochemical control is missing. Longitudinal studies investigating predictors in treatment-naive patients and their follow-up after therapeutic interventions are lacking but are urgently needed. Other factors, i.e., depression and obesity were identified from cross-sectional cohort studies as consistent factors associated with poor QoL. Perhaps treatment strategies of acromegaly patients should not only focus on normalizing biochemical markers but emphasize improvement of QoL by alternative interventions such as psychosocial or weight lowering interventions.

Combined treatment of somatostatin analogues with pegvisomant in acromegaly

Treatment of acromegaly with monotherapy long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSA) as primary treatment or after neurosurgery can only achieve complete normalization of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in roughly 40 % of patients. Recently, one of the acromegaly consensus groups has recommended switching to combined treatment of LA-SSA and pegvisomant (PEGV) in patients with partial response to LA-SSAs. This combination of LA-SSA and PEGV, a growth hormone receptor antagonist, can normalize IGF-I levels in virtually all patients, requiring that the adequate dose of PEGV is used. The required PEGV dose varies significantly between individual acromegaly patients. One of the advantages of the combination therapy is that tumor size control or even tumor shrinkage can be observed in a vast majority of patients. The main side effects of the combination treatment are gastrointestinal symptoms, lipohypertrophy and transient elevated liver transaminases. In this review we provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment of LA-SSAs with PEGV.

Italian Society for the Study of Diabetes (SID)/Italian Endocrinological Society (SIE) guidelines on the treatment of hyperglycemia in Cushing's syndrome and acromegaly

Hyperglycemia is a common feature associated with states of increased growth hormone secretion and glucocorticoid levels. The purpose of these guidelines is to assist clinicians and other health care providers to take evidence-based therapeutic decisions for the treatment of hyperglycemia in patients with growth hormone and corticosteroid excess. Both the SID and SIE appointed members to represent each society and to collaborate in Guidelines writing. Members were chosen for their specific knowledge in the field. Each member agreed to produce-and regularly update-conflicts of interest. The authors of these guidelines prepared their contributions following the recommendations for the development of Guidelines, using the standard classes of recommendation shown below. All members of the writing committee provided editing and systematic review of each part of the manuscript, and discussed the grading of evidence. Consensus was guided by a systematic review of all available trials and by interactive discussions.

Italian Society for the Study of Diabetes (SID)/Italian Endocrinological Society (SIE) guidelines on the treatment of hyperglycemia in Cushing's syndrome and acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycemia is a common feature associated with states of increased growth hormone secretion and glucocorticoid levels.

AIMS

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist clinicians and other health care providers to take evidence-based therapeutic decisions for the treatment of hyperglycemia in patients with growth hormone and corticosteroid excess.

METHODOLOGY

Both the SID and SIE appointed members to represent each society and to collaborate in Guidelines writing. Members were chosen for their specific knowledge in the field. Each member agreed to produce--and regularly update--conflicts of interest. The Authors of these guidelines prepared their contributions following the recommendations for the development of Guidelines, using the standard classes of recommendation shown below. All members of the writing committee provided editing and systematic review of each part of the manuscript, and discussed the grading of evidence. Consensus was guided by a systematic review of all available trials and by interactive discussions.

Pegvisomant Treatment in Acromegaly

Historically, medical treatment of acromegaly has mainly been used as an adjuvant therapy after surgery. In the last decades, an increased range of medical therapy options has been available. Somatostatin analogues have become the cornerstones of medical treatment in acromegaly and are even seen as a primary treatment in a selected group of acromegaly patients. The most recent medical treatment available for acromegaly patients is pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist. To date, it is the most effective medical treatment, but it is costly. Pegvisomant is used as monotherapy and combined with somatostatin analogues. In this article, we review clinical studies and cohorts that have documented the efficacy of pegvisomant monotherapy and combined therapy and give a concise overview of associated side effects.

Quality of life (QoL) impairments in patients with a pituitary adenoma: a systematic review of QoL studies

PURPOSE

Pituitary adenomas give rise to physical and psychological symptoms, which may persist after biochemical cure. Growing attention has been paid to quality of life (QoL) in these patients. We aimed to systematically analyze QoL assessment methods and QoL outcome in these patients.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search up to January 2014 in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, PsycInfo and EMBASE.

RESULTS

102 papers assessing QoL in patients with a pituitary adenoma were included. In clinical (original) studies in which QoL was the primary outcome parameter (n = 54), 19 studies combined a generic questionnaire with a disease-specific questionnaire. QoL was found to be impaired in patients with active disease relative to controls, and generally improved during biochemical cure. However, no normalization occurred, with patients with remitted Cushing's disease demonstrating the smallest improvement. Somatic factors (e.g., hypopituitarism, sleep characteristics), psychological factors (illness perceptions) and health care environment (rural vs. urban) were identified as influencing factors. Intervention studies (predominantly evaluating medical interventions) have been found to improve QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

The growing number of studies assessing QoL generally described the negative impact of pituitary adenomas. QoL research in this patient group could be further elaborated by the development of disease-specific questionnaires for prolactinoma and non-functioning adenoma, consequent use of generic and disease-specific questionnaires and using a long-term (longitudinal) follow-up. Surgical and pharmacological interventions improve but not normalize QoL. We postulate that there might be margin for further improvement of QoL, for instance by using psychosocial interventions, in addition to optimal medical treatment.

60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: The hypothalamo-GH axis: the past 60 years

At the time of the publication of Geoffrey Harris's monograph on 'Neural control of the pituitary gland' 60 years ago, the pituitary was recognised to produce a growth factor, and extracts administered to children with hypopituitarism could accelerate growth. Since then our understanding of the neuroendocrinology of the GH axis has included identification of the key central components of the GH axis: GH-releasing hormone and somatostatin (SST) in the 1970s and 1980s and ghrelin in the 1990s. Characterisation of the physiological control of the axis was significantly advanced by frequent blood sampling studies in the 1980s and 1990s; the pulsatile pattern of GH secretion and the factors that influenced the frequency and amplitude of the pulses have been defined. Over the same time, spontaneously occurring and targeted mutations in the GH axis in rodents combined with the recognition of genetic causes of familial hypopituitarism demonstrated the key factors controlling pituitary development. As the understanding of the control of GH secretion advanced, developments of treatments for GH axis disorders have evolved. Administration of pituitary-derived human GH was followed by the introduction of recombinant human GH in the 1980s, and, more recently, by long-acting GH preparations. For GH excess disorders, dopamine agonists were used first followed by SST analogues, and in 2005 the GH receptor blocker pegvisomant was introduced. This review will cover the evolution of these discoveries and build a picture of our current understanding of the hypothalamo-GH axis.

Clinical applications of somatostatin analogs for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas

Excessive growth hormone (GH) is usually secreted by GH-secreting pituitary adenomas and causes gigantism in juveniles or acromegaly in adults. The clinical complications involving cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic systems lead to elevated morbidity in acromegaly. Control of serum GH and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 hypersecretion by surgery or pharmacotherapy can decrease morbidity. Current pharmacotherapy includes somatostatin analogs (SAs) and GH receptor antagonist; the former consists of lanreotide Autogel (ATG) and octreotide long-acting release (LAR), and the latter refers to pegvisomant. As primary medical therapy, lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR can be supplied in a long-lasting formulation to achieve biochemical control of GH and IGF-1 by subcutaneous injection every 4-6 weeks. Lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR provide an effective medical treatment, whether as a primary or secondary therapy, for the treatment of GH-secreting pituitary adenoma; however, to maximize benefits with the least cost, several points should be emphasized before the application of SAs. A comprehensive assessment, especially of the observation of clinical predictors and preselection of SA treatment, should be completed in advance. A treatment process lasting at least 3 months should be implemented to achieve a long-term stable blood concentration. More satisfactory surgical outcomes for noninvasive macroadenomas treated with presurgical SA may be achieved, although controversy of such adjuvant therapy exists. Combination of SA and pegvisomant or cabergoline shows advantages in some specific cases. Thus, an individual treatment program should be established for each patient under a full evaluation of the risks and benefits.

The role of combination medical therapy in acromegaly: hope for the nonresponsive patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on combination drug treatment for acromegaly patients, including novel concepts and experimental therapies, with an emphasis on the author's personal experience.

RECENT FINDINGS

A review of published clinical studies demonstrates that combination therapy; somatostatin receptor ligands and dopamine agonists, somatostatin receptor ligands and pegvisomant, or cabergoline and pegvisomant could provide significant additive biochemical control of acromegaly in patients inadequately controlled with conventional somatostatin receptor ligand therapy.

SUMMARY

Advances in combination medical therapy have opened up new perspectives for acromegaly patients who are poorly, or nonresponsive to, presently available single drug therapies.

Effects of medical therapies for acromegaly on glucose metabolism

OBJECTIVE

Abnormalities of glucose metabolism are common findings of acromegaly. However, robust evidence on whether therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) or pegvisomant (PEG) differently affects glucose metabolism is lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of therapy with SSAs, PEG, or their combination on glucose metabolism in a large series of acromegalic patients.

DESIGN

This was a historical-prospective study. Among 50 consecutive acromegalic patients under SSA therapy, acromegaly in 19 patients was controlled. PEG used in combination with SSA therapy allowed the control of acromegaly in the remaining 31 patients and was then continued as monotherapy in 18 patients.

METHODS

The following parameters were evaluated at the diagnosis of acromegaly and during DIFFERENT TREATMENTS: fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and insulin concentrations, insulin sensitivity (QUICK-I), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR), and plasma glucose and insulin concentrations during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Comparison was made using analysis for paired data.

RESULTS

Insulin resistance improved when acromegaly was controlled with therapy with SSAs, PEG, or SSA+PEG. However, FPG concentrations were higher during SSA therapy (alone or combined with PEG) than at the diagnosis of acromegaly, even when corrected for disease activity, whereas they were reduced during PEG therapy. Mean glucose concentrations during the OGTT were higher in patients receiving SSA therapy than in those receiving PEG therapy. In addition, the prevalence of diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance was higher during SSA therapy than at diagnosis or during PEG therapy and was not influenced by disease control.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical therapies for acromegaly reduce insulin resistance and increase insulin sensitivity; on the contrary, glucose indexes may be differently affected by SSA or PEG therapy.

Recent advancements in the drug treatment of endocrine diseases

Recent years have seen several advances in the management of endocrine diseases. These include novel drugs developed as a consequence of better understanding of the pathophysiology of endocrine conditions, as well as improved delivery methods for existing drugs. In this article, we summarise recent studies evaluating several drugs used in the treatment of endocrine disorders.

Extra-hepatic Acromegaly

After the introduction of somatostatin analogs (LA-SMSA) and the growth hormone (GH) receptor antagonist, pegvisomant (Peg-v) normal serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations in virtually every patients with acromegaly is possible. The impact of these products on the GH-IGF1 axis is completely different. We advocate that LA-SMSA may normalize serum IGF1 levels in the presence of elevated GH actions in extra-hepatic tissues. This results in persistent peripheral disease activity that we call 'extra-hepatic acromegaly'. Peg-v competitively blocks systemic GH action and results in a GH serum level increase. Therefore high doses of Peg-v are necessary to control IGF-1. Since the mode of action differs between these products, it is questionable if identical IGF-1 levels, during Peg-v or LA-SMSA are really identical representations of the biochemical situation. With the traditional biomarkers medical treatment is therefore difficult to monitor with the traditional biomarkers. Additionally, Peg-v and LA-SMSA could be ideal combination since they have different mode of actions. We believe that the time has come to challenge the existing concepts of treatment and monitoring of patients with acromegaly.

Octreotide long-acting repeatable for acromegaly

Acromegaly remains a therapeutic challenge for the endocrinologist. Among the available therapeutic options, octreotide long-acting repeatable (Sandostatin(®) LAR(®), Novartis) plays a chief role, both as a primary therapy and as an adjuvant treatment after unsuccessful surgery. A plethora of papers and a meta-analysis have demonstrated its efficacy in: control of clinical picture; achievement of safe growth hormone and normal age-matched IGF-I levels (both factors associated with restoration of normal life expectancy) in 60-70% of patients; control of tumor volume (with real shrinkage in over half of cases); and halt or reversal of most acromegaly-associated comorbidities. Treatment is well tolerated in most patients and can be safely prolonged for many years if required.

Fat content in liver and skeletal muscle changes in a reciprocal manner in patients with acromegaly during combination therapy with a somatostatin analog and a GH receptor antagonist: a randomized clinical trial

CONTEXT

Pegvisomant is a GH antagonist, which is used for the treatment of acromegalic patients. It effectively blocks the hepatic and peripheral effects of GH, but transient elevations in circulating liver enzymes of unknown pathogenesis may occur, which seems to be more prevalent when the treatment is combined with a somatostatin analog (SA). Accumulation of intrahepatic lipid is a known cause of elevated liver enzymes, and there is evidence to suggest that GH impacts lipid content in liver and skeletal muscle.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to measure lipid content in liver and skeletal muscle in acromegalic patients before and after cotreatment with pegvisomant and SA as compared with SA monotherapy.

DESIGN

Eighteen acromegalic patients well controlled on SA monotherapy were randomized in a parallel study over 24 wk to 1) unchanged SA monotherapy, or 2) cotreatment with pegvisomant (15-30 mg twice a week) and SA (half the usual dosage).

SETTING

This was an investigator-initiated study in a single tertiary referral center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intrahepatic lipid (IHL) and intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) was assessed by ¹H magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

RESULTS

IHL increased in the cotreatment group compared with SA only (P = 0.002). The increase was positively correlated to weekly pegvisomant dose (r² = 0.52; P = 0.01). By contrast, IMCL decreased in the cotreatment group compared with SA only (P = 0.01). These changes related neither to insulin sensitivity nor inflammatory markers.

CONCLUSION

Cotreatment with pegvisomant and a reduced SA dose increase IHL and decrease IMCL compared with SA monotherapy. The clinical implications remain unclear, but increased IHL may be causally linked to the transient elevations in liver enzymes observed during pegvisomant treatment.