Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists versus Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Inhibitors for Treatment of T2DM

Comparative safety and cardiovascular effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in nursing homes

AIM

Studies examining the safety and effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among community-dwelling adults may not generalize to nursing home (NH) residents, who are typically older and more multimorbid. We compared the safety and cardiovascular effectiveness of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs among US NH residents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible individuals were aged ≥66 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus and initiated an SGLT2i or GLP-1RA in an NH between 2013 and 2018. Safety outcomes included fall-related injuries, hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), urinary tract infection or genital infection, and acute kidney injury in the year following treatment initiation. Cardiovascular effectiveness outcomes included death, major adverse cardiovascular events and hospitalization for heart failure. Per-protocol adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using stabilized inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighted cause-specific hazard regression models accounting for 127 covariates.

RESULTS

The study population included 7710 residents (31.08% SGLT2i, 68.92% GLP-1RA). Compared with GLP-1RA initiators, SGLT2i initiators had higher rates of DKA (HR 1.95, 95% confidence limits 1.27, 2.99) and death (HR 1.18, 95% confidence limits 1.02, 1.36). Rates of urinary tract infection or genital infection, acute kidney injury, major adverse cardiovascular events, and heart failure were also elevated, while rates of fall-related injuries and hypoglycaemia were reduced, but all estimates were imprecise and highly compatible with no difference.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2is do not have superior, and may have inferior, effectiveness compared with GLP-1RAs for cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in NH residents. Residents initiating SGLT2is should be monitored closely for DKA.

Comparison of A1c Reduction, Weight Loss, and Changes in Insulin Requirements With Addition of GLP-1 Agonists vs SGLT-2 Inhibitors in Patients Using Multiple Daily Insulin Injections

Objective: To determine whether Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists or Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors result in greater A1c reduction, weight loss, and reduction of insulin requirements in veterans using multiple daily doses of insulin. Methods: This retrospective, single-site, cohort study included patients of VA Eastern Kansas Health Care System with a diagnosis of Type II Diabetes utilizing multiple daily dose insulin and an SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1 agonist. SAS Enterprise Guide was utilized to complete a multivariate analysis of variance to evaluate all outcomes. Key Findings: 150 patients met selection criteria. The GLP-1 group averaged a .65% reduction in A1c compared to a 1.05% reduction in the SGLT-2 group (P = .1397). The Basal insulin dose was reduced by 5.5 units in the GLP-1 group vs 2.45 units in the SGLT-2 group (P = .3132), and 7.12 units vs 8.14 units respectively for short-acting insulin (P = .8170). The resulting weight reduction was 4.1 Kg in the GLP-1 group compared to 3.6 Kg in the SGLT-2 group (P = .6993). Conclusion: The results suggest there is not a statistically significant difference in changes to A1c, insulin requirements, or weight after 1 year of treatment with an SGLT-2 vs GLP-1 in patients using multiple daily insulin injections.

Possible Advantage of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists for Kidney Transplant Recipients With Type 2 Diabetes

CONTEXT

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) have the potential to improve native kidney function.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to elucidate the possible protective effects of GLP-1 RAs on kidney graft function after successful kidney transplantation (KTX).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all KTX recipients (KTRs) at our facility with type 2 diabetes who were followed up from 1 month post-transplantation for 24 months or longer as of December 31, 2020. We investigated associations between the use of GLP-1 RAs and other antidiabetic medications (non-GLP-1 RAs) and the risk of sustained estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reduction (40% reduction compared with baseline for 4 months) for KTRs with type 2 diabetes. We calculated the propensity score of initiating GLP-1 RAs compared with that of initiating non-GLP-1 RAs as a function of baseline covariates using logistic regression. The inverse probability of the treatment-weighted odds ratio was estimated to control for baseline confounding variables. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor use was a competing event. The primary outcome was sustained eGFR reduction of at least 40% from baseline for 4 months post-transplantation.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were GLP-1 RA users and 73 were non-GLP-1 RA users. Six patients and 1 patient in the non-GLP-1 RA and GLP-1 RA groups had sustained eGFR reduction. GLP-1 RA use after KTX was associated with a lower risk of sustained eGFR reduction.

CONCLUSION

GLP-1 RAs resulted in lower eGFR reduction compared with non-GLP-1 RAs and may contribute to better kidney graft survival after KTX.

Glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists and A1c: Good for the heart but less so for the eyes?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glucagon-like peptide1-receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) decrease major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Caution is recommended for semaglutide and dulaglutide with risk of exacerbating diabetic retinopathy (DR). Analyses were performed to determine if worsening of DR was dependent on drug class or fall in A1c.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Meta-analyses and meta-regressions (MR) were performed on the 7 major cardiovascular outcome trial (CVOTs) (n = 56004 patients) of GLP1-RA. A second analysis of 11 studies (n = 11894 subjects) with semaglutide documenting DR followed.

RESULTS

Six of the CVOTs evaluated DR. For the GLP1-RA class, there was no increase in the relative rate (rr) for retinopathy (rr = 1.09,95%CI; 0.925,1.289, p = 0.30), with only an increase with parenteral semaglutide (rr = 1.73; 1.10:2.71, p = 0.02). MR showed that decreases in A1c correlated with decreases in MACE (log rr = 0.364∗(Δ A1c), p = 0.014), but increases in DR (log rr= (-0.67∗(ΔA1c), p = 0.076). The change in DR was predominantly found for subcutaneous semaglutide given for >1 year (rr = 1.559,1.068,2.276, p = 0.022) and with decreases in A1c > 1.0% (rr = 1.59; 1.092,2.316, p = 0.016). For the class of GLP1-RA, the rate difference (rd) for worsening retinopathy was = 0.001 (and number needed to harm [NNH] = 1000) compared with rd for MACE = -0.013 (number needed to treat [NNT] = 77). The computation for semaglutide was NNH = 77 and NNT = 43.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis may assist in decisions balancing the relative risk (of existing retinopathy) versus benefits (to existing CVD). There should be close collaboration with ophthalmology to grade the baseline degree of retinopathy when initiating and following patients.

Changes of Guidelines in the Management of Obese Patients With Diabetes in the Metabolic Surgery Perspective

Recently, metabolic surgery was recommended for patients with a BMI of 30 or higher and 27.5 or higher for Asians, as evidence level A. Until 2008, bariatric surgery was not introduced for the treatment of diabetes. Bariatric surgery was first recommended for adults with body mass index ≥35 kg/m² and type 2 diabetes in the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines as evidence level B in 2009. In 2017, the terminology was changed from bariatric surgery to metabolic surgery. How such large changes could have occurred in the ADA guidelines? Because many patients have reached diabetes remission through metabolic surgery, and the long-term benefit and cost-effectiveness have been strongly proven by historical randomized controlled trials and high-quality studies. This review demonstrates how the recommendations for the treatment of obesity in patients with diabetes have changed in diabetes treatment guidelines and summarizes the evidence behind this change.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Non-ST-Segment and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Populations

Using a new-generation drug-eluting stent, we compared the 2-year clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-DM concomitant with a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 11,798 patients with acute myocardial infarction were classified into two groups: DM (NSTEMI, n = 2399; STEMI, n = 2693) and non-DM (NSTEMI, n = 2694; STEMI, n = 4012). The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or any coronary repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of definite or probable stent thrombosis. In all the patients, both multivariable and propensity score-adjusted analyses revealed that the incidence rates of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.214; p = 0.006 and aHR, 1.298; p = 0.002, respectively), all-cause death, cardiac death (CD), and non-CD rate were significantly higher in the NSTEMI group than in the STEMI group. Additionally, among patients with NSTEMI, there was a higher non-CD rate (aHR, 2.200; p = 0.007 and aHR, 2.484; p = 0.004, respectively) in the DM group and a higher CD rate (aHR, 2.688; p < 0.001 and 2.882; p < 0.001, respectively) in the non-DM group. In this retrospective study, patients with NSTEMI had a significantly higher 2-year mortality rate than those with STEMI did. Furthermore, strategies to reduce the non-CD rate in patients with DM and the CD rate in patients without DM could be beneficial for those with NSTEMI.

Current gaps in management and timely referral of cardiorenal complications among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Middle East and African countries: Expert recommendations

The upsurge of type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major public health concern in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and Africa (AFR) region, with cardiorenal complications (CRCs) being the predominant cause of premature morbidity and mortality. High prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors, lack of awareness among patients and physicians, deficient infrastructure, and economic constraints lead to a cascade of CRCs at a significantly earlier age in MENA and AFR. In this review, we present consensus recommendations by experts in MENA and AFR, highlighting region-specific challenges and potential solutions for management of CRCs. Health professionals who understand sociocultural barriers can significantly increase patient awareness and encourage health-seeking behavior through simple educational tools. Increasing physician knowledge on early identification of CRCs and personalized treatment based on risk stratification, alongside optimum glycemic control, can mitigate therapeutic inertia. Early diagnosis of high-risk people with regular and systematic monitoring of cardiorenal parameters, development of region-specific care pathways for timely referral to specialists, followed by guideline-recommended care with novel antidiabetics are imperative. Adherence to guideline-recommended care can catalyze utilization of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists with demonstrated cardiorenal benefits-thus paving the way for overcoming care gaps in a cost-effective manner. Leveraging digital technology like electronic medical records can help generate real-world data and provide insights on voids in adoption of newer antidiabetic medications. A patient-centric approach, collaborative care among physicians from different specialties, alongside involvement of policy makers are key for improving patient outcomes and quality of care in MENA and AFR.

Maintenance of glycaemic control with liraglutide versus oral antidiabetic drugs as add-on therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin alone: A randomized clinical trial in primary care (LIRA-PRIME)

AIM

To compare (in the LIRA-PRIME [NCT02730377], a randomized open-label trial), the efficacy of liraglutide in controlling glycaemia versus an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D), despite metformin use in a primary care setting (n = 219 sites, n = 9 countries).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults (n = 1991) with T2D (HbA1c 7.5%-9.0%) receiving metformin were randomized 1:1 to liraglutide (≤1.8 mg/d) or one OAD, selected by the investigator, added to metformin, for up to 104 weeks. Primary endpoint: time to inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c > 7.0%) at two scheduled consecutive visits after week 26. Outcomes were assessed for liraglutide versus a pooled OAD group, and (post hoc) liraglutide versus sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and sulphonylureas individually.

RESULTS

Among randomized patients (liraglutide, n = 996; OAD, n = 995), 47.6% were female, mean age was 57.4 years and mean HbA1c was 8.2%. Median time to inadequate glycaemic control was 44 weeks longer with liraglutide versus OAD (109 weeks [25% percentile, 38; 75% percentile, not available] vs. 65 weeks [25% percentile, 35; 75% percentile, 107], P < .0001). Changes in HbA1c and body weight at week 104 or at premature treatment discontinuation significantly favoured liraglutide over OAD. Hypoglycaemia rates were comparable between groups and few patients discontinued because of adverse events (liraglutide, 7.9% [n = 79]; OAD, 4.1% [n = 41]). Similar results were observed in the post hoc analysis for liraglutide versus individual OAD classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Glycaemic control was better maintained with liraglutide versus OAD, supporting liraglutide use when intensifying therapy in primary care patients with T2D.

The association between GLP-1 receptor agonist and diabetic ketoacidosis in the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In 2019, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) of the United Kingdom (UK) and food and drug administration (FDA) of the United States of America (US) suggested that the relationship between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) deserved attention. This study is aiming to assess the association between GLP-1RA and DKA/ketosis in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using FAERS database, we firstly extract the number of DKA reports from the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2019 and calculate proportional reporting ratios (PRRs). We then mined each FAERS file from 2004 Q1 to 2020 Q4 and obtained detailed information on DKA reports. From the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2019, there are 1382 DKA cases (1491 ketosis cases) associated with GLP-1RA in the FAERS database. There was a slight disproportionate reporting of DKA associated with overall GLP-1RA (PRR 1.49, 95%CI 1.24-1.79, p < 0.001) after excluding the impact of SGLT2i, T1D and insulin. Any disproportionality disappeared after selecting the GLP-1RA combined with insulin for comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

When GLP-1RA not combined with insulin, the disproportionality of DKA reports associated with GLP-1RA was observed. Our analysis mined the FAERS database to provide evidence and highlight the potential association between DKA adverse events and GLP-1RA therapy that clinicians tend to overlook.

The Enhanced Cardiac Outcome of Conjugated SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1RA Therapy in Diabetic Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiovascular disease secondary to diabetes continues to threaten the survivability of many people all over the world. We assess the most recent findings of synergistic effects of combined glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in lowering cardiac complications in the diabetic population. We describe drug therapies' mechanism of action, postulated cardioprotective process, the additive value of conjugated therapy, and analyze recently reported study and its limitation.

RECENT FINDINGS

SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs have gained popularity due to their ability to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in diabetic patients. There is emerging evidence of the additional cardiovascular benefit from the combined application of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs therapy demonstrated by a recent real-world cohort study. Reducing cardiac mortality in patients with diabetes by administering dual antihyperglycemic therapies (GLP-1Rs and SGLT2 inhibitors) might play a key role in the future treatment of the diabetic population.

Patients' Preferences for Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

PURPOSE

To determine patients' preferences for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional, web-based discrete choice experiment was conducted among US adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in May 2021. Six attributes-the route and frequency of administration, the chance of reaching target HbA1c in six months, the percentage reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), the chance of gastrointestinal side effects, the chance of genital infection, and out-of-pocket cost per month-were identified from literature review and consultation with patients and clinicians. A Bayesian efficient design was used to generate choice sets. Each choice set contained two hypothetical SGLT-2i and GLP-1 RA alternatives described by the attributes and an opt-out alternative. A total of 176 patients were asked to select the most preferred option from each choice set. Mixed logit (ML) and latent class (LC) models were developed. The conditional relative importance of each attribute was determined.

RESULTS

The ML model showed the out-of-pocket cost had the highest conditional relative importance, followed by the chance of reaching the target HbA1c. The best LC model revealed two patient classes. All attributes were significantly important to the patients in both classes, except the chance of genital infection in class 2. Compared to the patients in class 2, the patients in class 1 were older (approximately 65 vs 56 years) and had a higher number of comorbidities (approximately three vs two).

CONCLUSION

T2DM patients placed different preference weights or importance across SGLT-2i and GLP-1 RA attributes. Preference heterogeneity was found among patients with different ages and numbers of comorbidities.

Role of newer antidiabetic drugs on cardiovascular prevention and heart failure

Beyond glucemic control there are other important goals when it comes to providing integral care to patients with diabetes mellitus. A bibliographic review was made in order to identify the role played by new antidiabetic drugs in cardiovascular prevention and heart failure. The use of SLGT2i and GLP1a leads to a significant decrease in cardiovascular events, with no difference between the two, except when it comes to hospitalizations for heart failure, where the superiority of the last ones (especially dapaglifozin and empaglifozin) is evident. The current evidence regarding the effect of dpp-4i is diverse, although an increased risk of hospitalizations for heart failure is observed with the use of some drugs of this class (saxagliptin).

Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors on cardiac structure and function: a narrative review of clinical evidence

The impressive results of recent clinical trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) and sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in terms of cardiovascular protection prompted a huge interest in these agents for heart failure (HF) prevention and treatment. While both classes show positive effects on composite cardiovascular endpoints (i.e. 3P MACE), their actions on the cardiac function and structure, as well as on volume regulation, and their impact on HF-related events have not been systematically evaluated and compared. In this narrative review, we summarize and critically interpret the available evidence emerging from clinical studies. While chronic exposure to GLP-1Ra appears to be essentially neutral on both systolic and diastolic function, irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a beneficial impact of SGLT-2i is consistently detectable for both systolic and diastolic function parameters in subjects with diabetes with and without HF, with a gradient proportional to the severity of baseline dysfunction. SGLT-2i have a clinically significant impact in terms of HF hospitalization prevention in subjects at high and very high cardiovascular risk both with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D) or HF, while GLP-1Ra have been proven to be safe (and marginally beneficial) in subjects with T2D without HF. We suggest that the role of the kidney is crucial for the effect of SGLT-2i on the clinical outcomes not only because these drugs slow-down the time-dependent decline of kidney function and enhance the response to diuretics, but also because they attenuate the meal-related anti-natriuretic pressure (lowering postprandial hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia and preventing proximal sodium reabsorption), which would reduce the individual sensitivity to day-to-day variations in dietary sodium intake.

An Overview of Similarities and Differences in Metabolic Actions and Effects of Central Nervous System Between Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs) and Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT-2is)

GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are novel antidiabetic medications associated with considerable cardiovascular benefits therapying treatment of diabetic patients. GLP-1 exhibits atherosclerosis resistance, whereas SGLT-2i acts to ameliorate the neuroendocrine state in the patients with chronic heart failure. Despite their distinct modes of action, both factors share pathways by regulating the central nervous system (CNS). While numerous preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that GLP-1 can access various nuclei associated with energy homeostasis and hedonic eating in the CNS via blood-brain barrier (BBB), research on the activity of SGLT-2is remains limited. In our previous studies, we demonstrated that both GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) liraglutide and exenatide, as well as an SGLT-2i, dapagliflozin, could activate various nuclei and pathways in the CNS of Sprague Dawley (SD) rats and C57BL/6 mice, respectively. Moreover, our results revealed similarities and differences in neural pathways, which possibly regulated different metabolic effects of GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i via sympathetic and parasympathetic systems in the CNS, such as feeding, blood glucose regulation and cardiovascular activities (arterial blood pressure and heart rate control). In the present article, we extensively discuss recent preclinical studies on the effects of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is on the CNS actions, with the aim of providing a theoretical explanation on their mechanism of action in improvement of the macro-cardiovascular risk and reducing incidence of diabetic complications. Overall, these findings are expected to guide future drug design approaches.