Corticosteroids, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen for IFN -1a flu symptoms in MS: A randomized trial

Flu-like syndrome due to interferon-beta injections does not increase anxiety, depression, and lost working days in multiple sclerosis patients during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Aim of this study was to evaluated anxiety, depression, and possible negative implications on work activities during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, in a group of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients at risk of flu-like syndrome (FLS) compared with FLS- free treatments.

METHODS

The present study included patients treated with interferon-ß (IFNß), glatiramer, and natalizumab for at least one year. Collected data included the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), together with questions about FLS, change in work habits, use of antipyretics, anxiety, and depression.

RESULTS

100 patients were included in the study. Six patients in IFNß and 5 in the natalizumab group had a confirmed COVID-19 infection. 68% in the IFNß patients reported FLS and only one reported an increase in flu-like frequency during the pandemic; 14% reported lower compliance with treatment, and 40% reported uptake of antipyretics several times. Only one IFNß patient reported having lost more working days than the previous year. The average BAI (p = 0.039) was higher in natalizumab group. Correcting these data by age, sex and EDSS to a multivariate analysis we did not find any statistically significant difference in terms of BAI and BDI-II between the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

FLS were not perceived as COVID19-like symptoms but as expected by traditional pharmacological treatments indeed. These data suggest that IFNß can be used safely.

Therapy of women with multiple sclerosis: an analysis of the use of drugs that may have adverse effects on the unborn child in the event of (unplanned) pregnancy

Background:

Although effective contraception is strongly recommended during the therapy of women with multiple sclerosis (MS) with some immunomodulatory drugs, unplanned pregnancies still occur. Adequate medication management is essential to avoid foetal harm in the event of an unplanned pregnancy.

Objective:

The aim was to screen for medications used in women of childbearing age with MS that may pose a risk of side effects on foetal development.

Methods:

Sociodemographic, clinical and medication data were collected from 212 women with MS by structured interviews, clinical examinations and medical records. Using the databases from Embryotox, Reprotox, the Therapeutic Goods Administration and on the German summaries of product characteristics, we assessed whether the taken drugs were potentially harmful regarding the foetal development.

Results:

The majority of patients (93.4%) were taking one or more drugs for which a possible harmful effect on the foetus is indicated in at least one of the four databases used. This proportion was even higher in patients who used hormonal contraceptives (birth control pills or vaginal rings) (PwCo, n = 101), but it was also quite high in patients who did not use such contraceptives (Pw/oCo, n = 111) (98.0% and 89.2%, respectively). PwCo were significantly more likely to take five or more medications with potential foetal risk according to at least one database than Pw/oCo (31.7% versus 6.3%). PwCo were also more severely disabled (average Expanded Disability Status Scale score: 2.8 versus 2.3) and more frequently had comorbidities (68.3% versus 54.1%) than Pw/oCo.

Conclusion:

Data on the most commonly used drugs in MS therapy were gathered to study the risk of possible drug effects on foetal development in female MS patients of childbearing age. We found that the majority of drugs used by patients with MS are rated as having a potential risk of interfering with normal foetal development. More effective contraception and special pregnancy information programmes regarding the therapy management during pregnancy should be implemented to reduce potential risks to mother and child.

Plain Language Summary

Use of drugs not recommended during pregnancy by women with multiple sclerosis Introduction: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) often have to take different drugs simultaneously. During the therapy with some immunomodulatory drugs, effective contraception is strongly recommended. Nevertheless, unplanned pregnancies occur regularly in women with MS. Methods: Here, we investigated whether the 212 patients included in this study were taking drugs with known possibility of harm to the development of an unborn child. This was done using four different drug databases. Results: A subset of 111 patients was not taking hormonal contraceptives (birth control pills or vaginal rings). Of those, 99 patients were taking at least one drug that is not recommended during pregnancy according to at least one of the four databases. Most of the medications taken have the potential to affect normal foetal development. Conclusion: To ensure safe use of medications, the patients should be reminded of the importance of effective contraception.

Drug tolerability: How much ambiguity can be tolerated? A systematic review of the assessment of tolerability in clinical studies

AIMS

Drug tolerability refers to the degree to which drugs' overt adverse effects can be tolerated by patients. The tolerability profile is of comparative importance to its efficacy and safety, as it largely determines adherence to treatment and ultimately treatment success or failure. However, the term is frequently used imprecisely, and it is unclear if tolerability is limited to subjective patient-reported symptoms or also covers certain objective signs and findings. The aim of this systematic review was to assess how clinical studies define, evaluate and present drug tolerability.

METHODS

The study consisted of a systematic review of clinical studies in PubMed® reporting the term "tolerability".

RESULTS

Eighty clinical studies were screened and 56 studies reporting drug tolerability were retained. None of the retained studies defined events encompassed by the term tolerability by making a distinction between safety and tolerability. Twenty-five studies claimed to evaluate tolerability, but none of them described how to evaluate tolerability from the patient perspective. Most studies (54 out of 56) concluded that the treatment was well tolerated, apparently implying favourable safety. However, none of them actually presented tolerability in terms of a contrast between safety and tolerability.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolerability is used frequently, albeit incorrectly, to refer to a drug's favourable safety profile. Focused evaluation of drug tolerability (i.e., the patient perspective of adverse drug reactions) should become routine. Presentation in regulatory documents, such as risk management plan summaries, product information and patient leaflets should be a continuation of the process of patient-centred healthcare.

Pegylated interferon beta-1a (Plegridy) Italian real-world experience: a Delphi analysis of injection-site reaction and flu-like symptom management

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Peginterferon beta-1a (Plegridy) offers the advantage of a prolonged half-life with less-frequent administration and a higher patient adherence. However, the use of an interferon may lead to flu-like symptoms (FLS) and injection-site reactions (ISR) that results in drug discontinuation. The objective of this Delphi analysis was to obtain consensus on the characteristics and management of FLS/ISR of peginterferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing-remitting MS based on real-world clinical experiences.4 METHODS: A steering committee of MS neurologists and nurses identified issues regarding the features and management of adverse events and generated a questionnaire used to conduct three rounds of the Delphi web survey with an Italian expert panel (54 neurologists and nurses).

RESULTS

Fifty-three (100%), fifty-one (96.22%), and forty-two (79.24%) responders completed questionnaires 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Responders reported that, during the first 6 months of treatment, FLS generally occurred 6-12 h after injection; the fever tended to resolve after 12-24 h; otherwise, FLS lasted up to 48 h. FLS improved or disappeared after 6 months of treatment in most cases. Paracetamol was recommended as the first choice for managing FLS. Erythema was the most common ISR and usually resolved within 1 week after injection. Responders reported that the adherence to treatment increases after adequate patient education on the drug's tolerability profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient education and counseling play a key role in promoting adherence to treatment especially in the first months also in patients switching from nonpegylated IFNs to peginterferon beta-1a.

No Loose Ends: A Review of the Pharmacotherapy of Hairy Cell and Hairy Cell Leukemia Variant

Objective: To review the literature for the treatment of classical and variant hairy cell leukemia (HCL, HCLv), evaluating efficacy, safety, and supportive care involved in the use of purine analogues (PAs), interferon, BRAF inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and new immunotoxin, moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk (MPT). An electronic literature search of PubMed (January 1958 to January 2019) was conducted in PubMed using the MESH terms hairy cell leukemia, hairy cell leukemia variant, cladribine, pentostatin, rituximab, interferon, vemurafenib, moxetumomab pasudotox. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Studies written in the English language were considered for this article. The significance of each article was determined by authors independently. Data Synthesis: HCL and HCLv are rare B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, each with distinct biologies. Symptoms are characterized by pancytopenia and splenomegaly. Initial treatments for HCL were suboptimal, leading to minimal and transient remissions. PAs significantly improved outcomes, inducing remission in most patients. However, those with purine-resistant disease were left with a dearth of options, leading to implementation of vemurafenib for BRAF V600 mutated disease and chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab. Despite these advances, some HCL and a majority of HCLv patients experience relapse. Newer targeted agents offer promise for relapsed and refractory patients, including the recently approved MPT. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review provides a comprehensive update on the pharmacological management of HCL and HCLv for clinicians who encounter patients with this rare disease. Conclusion: HCL and HCLv are uncommon lymphoid neoplasms that lead to a characteristic constellation of symptoms. The emergence of PAs and novel targeted agents have improved the likelihood and durability of responses for these patients.

Drug-use patterns and severe adverse events with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cohort study based on German claims data

Purpose: To describe drug-use patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and to estimate the incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs) of treatment. Methods: We conducted a cohort study within the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2013. MS patients on DMDs were described in terms of clinical characteristics and drug-use patterns. Next, we assessed the incidence of AEs in new users of fingolimod, natalizumab, glatiramer acetate, and IFNβ_1a. Results: Among approximately 11 million insured members of German Statutory Health Insurance, the DMD-user cohort comprised 15,377 patients with MS, with a mean age of 39.6 years and 68% females. Nearly half of all DMD users had a diagnosis of depression, with prevalence ranging from 40.1% for IFNβ_1a to 62.3% for immunoglobulins. The overall rate of MS relapses per patient and year was 0.34 (95% CI 0.33-0.34). During an average follow-up of 1,650 days, the majority (42.4%) of MS patients were adherent to DMD treatment ("continuous single users"), followed by patients interrupting treatment (39.5%, "interrupters"). Switch of DMD treatment (11.9%) was less frequent, and only 5.6% discontinued treatment. Treatment discontinuation was most common in users of natalizumab (7.5%) and IFNβ_1b (7.0%). The most frequent SAE was hospitalization for depression, followed by any infectious disease and any malignancy. The incidence rate of all adverse events did not significantly differ across different DMDs. Conclusion: Treatment discontinuation with DMDs and treatment switch were rare. Causes of rather frequent DMD-treatment interruption have to be evaluated in further studies based on primary data collection. Active safety monitoring of new DMDs based on claims data requires large data sets to detect rare AEs and availability of up-to-date data.

Anemoside A3 ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by modulating T helper 17 cell response

Anemoside A₃ (AA3) is a natural triterpenoid glycoside isolated from the root of Pulsatilla chinensis (Bunge) Regel. We previously showed that AA3 exhibits cognitive-enhancing and neuroprotective properties. In the present study, we demonstrated that AA3 modulates inflammatory responses by regulating prostaglandin E receptor 4 signaling. Because prostaglandin E receptor 4 is involved in the pathophysiology of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of human multiple sclerosis (MS), we assessed the beneficial effect of AA3 in EAE mice. AA3 treatment significantly reduced clinical severity and inflammatory infiltrates in the spinal cord of EAE mice. In vitro studies revealed that AA3 inhibited the T cell response toward the encephalitogenic epitope of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). AA3 significantly downregulated the expressions of certain Th1 and Th17 cytokines in activated T cells re-stimulated by MOG. Moreover, AA3 inhibited the activation of STAT4 and STAT3, which are the transcription factors pivotal for Th1 and Th17 lineage differentiation, respectively, in activated T cells. Pharmacological analysis further suggested that AA3 reduced Th17 cell differentiation and expansion. In conclusion, AA3 exerts an immunomodulatory effect in EAE, demonstrating its potential as a therapeutic agent for MS in humans.

Effect of catalpol on remyelination through experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis acting to promote Olig1 and Olig2 expressions in mice

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) as an autoimmune disorder is a common disease occurring in central nervous system (CNS) and the remyelination plays a pivotal role in the alleviating neurological impairment in the MS. Catalpol, an effective component extracted from the Chinese herb Radix Rehmanniae, which has been proved protective in cerebral diseases.

METHODS

To determine the protective effects and mechanisms of Catalpol on MS, the mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) were induced by myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) 35-55, as a model for human MS. Th17 cells were counted by flow cytometric (FCM). The expressions of nerve-glial antigen (NG) 2 and myelin basic protein (MBP) were measured by immunohistochemical staining. Olig1+ and Olig2+/BrdU+ cells were counted by immunofluorescence. Olig1 and Olig2 gene expressions were detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative reverse transcription (qRT) -PCR.

RESULTS

The results showed that Catalpol improved neurological function, reduced inflammatory cell infiltration and demyelination. It could decrease Th17 cells in the peripheral blood. It increased the protein expressions of NG2 and MBP in mice brains, up-regulated markedly protein and gene expressions of Olig1 and Olig2 in terms of timing, site and targets.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrated that Catalpol had a strong neuroprotective effect on EAE mice. Catalpol also plays a role in remyelination by promoting the expressions of Olig1 and Olig2 transcription factors.

Risk Factors for Poor Adherence to Betaferon® Treatment in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis or Clinically Isolated Syndrome

Introduction

Adherence to treatment, including early treatment discontinuation, in patients with multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome can be affected by: treatment tolerability, route of drug administration, patient age, disease duration, comorbidities, medical care, and support from their caregivers.

Aim

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for poor adherence to Betaferon^® treatment, including early discontinuation and omitting doses.

Materials and Methods

852 adult patients treated with Betaferon participated in this 24-month study. All patients were interviewed using the Risk of Drop-out Questionnaire, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale.

Results

Patients who stopped therapy were younger (p = 0.003) had a higher mean EDSS score (p = 0.022), higher mean number of relapses (p = 0.017), and reported more often fear of injection (p = 0.027) and adverse events (p = 0.007) than those who did not stop treatment. Comparing patients who stopped therapy in the first and the second year, patients who stopped therapy in the first year of treatment more frequently reported flu-like symptoms and fever, and those who stopped therapy in the second year reported—ineffectiveness of treatment and disease progression. Multivariable logistic regression models confirmed that young age, short disease duration, advanced and progressing disease, and poor Betaferon tolerability were related to premature treatment discontinuation. The risk of omitting a dose during therapy was increased in patients who were working or studying, who had more advanced disease or more adverse events, and in patients who received less support from their caregivers.

Conclusions

Several reasons may lead to problems with adherence to Betaferon treatment. Patients at higher risk of discontinuing treatment need to be identified early to make caregivers’ support available to them.

Less Frequent and Less Severe Flu-Like Syndrome in Interferon Beta-1a Treated Multiple Sclerosis Patients with at Least One Allele Bearing the G>C Polymorphism at Position -174 of the IL-6 Promoter Gene

One of the most common adverse event of interferon beta (IFNβ) therapy for multiple sclerosis is flu-like syndrome (FLS), which has been reportedly related to increased levels of cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Average cytokine levels can be affected by single nucleotide polymorphism in the gene promoter regions. To investigate whether IL-6 -174 G>C and TNF-α -376 G>A polymorphisms could be correlated to the incidence of FLS, and whether an anti-inflammatory/antipyretic therapy may influence FLS development, a prospective observational study was performed in 190 treatment naïve, multiple sclerosis patients who started IM IFNβ-1a 30mcg once weekly. The identification of IL-6 -174 G>C and TNF-α -376 G>A polymorphisms was achieved by performing an amplification-refractory mutation system. Serum IL-6 levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in blood samples taken before therapy and then after the first and last IFNβ-1a injection of the follow-up. FLS-related symptoms were recorded by patients once per week during the first 12 weeks of therapy into a self-reported diary. We found that patients carrying at least one copy of the C allele at position -174 in the promoter of IL-6 gene produced lower levels of IL-6 and were less prone to develop FLS, which was also less severe. On the contrary, the polymorphism of TNF-α had no effect on FLS. Patients taking the first dose of anti-inflammatory/antipyretic therapy in the peri-injection period (within 1 hour) experienced a reduced FLS severity. In conclusion, the study of IL-6 -174 G>C polymorphism would allow the identification of patients lacking the C nucleotide on both alleles who are at risk of a more severe FLS, and may be addressed to a timely and stronger anti-inflammatory/antipyretic therapy for a more effective FLS prevention.

Nurses' perspective on approaches to limit flu-like symptoms during interferon therapy for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Several interferon beta (IFNβ) formulations are approved for first-line use as disease-modifying therapies to treat patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Systemic post-injection reactions, often termed flu-like symptoms (FLS), occur in approximately half of all patients treated with IFNβs and can affect adherence to therapy. These symptoms, which include pyrexia, chills, malaise, myalgia, and headaches, usually resolve within 24 hours or persist intermittently following each injection. Because FLS, which usually occur early in the treatment course and diminish over time, are a primary cause of nonadherence to IFNβ therapy, it is important to employ strategies that can attenuate these side effects.

METHODS

To identify interventions effective in limiting FLS, a panel of United States-based nurses with expertise in MS patient care was convened and a literature review completed.

RESULTS

Panel consensus was reached on specific interventions that can attenuate FLS. These prevention and mitigation strategies include dose titration, analgesia, and optimal injection timing, as well as other techniques that panel members have found useful in their clinical practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS

These measures, in addition to effective patient education, will help to reduce the incidence of FLS secondary to IFNβ therapy, improve patient medication adherence, and positively affect long-term clinical outcomes.

Alterations of brain eicosanoid synthetic pathway in multiple sclerosis and in animal models of demyelination: role of cyclooxygenase-2

Inflammation is a physiological response to exogenous and endogenous stimuli and, together with demyelination and immune system activation, is one of the key features of multiple sclerosis (MS). Arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism by cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LO) enzymes leads to the production of proinflammatory eicosanoids, and stimulates cytokine production and activation of microglia and astrocytes, thereby contributing to MS pathology. Current therapies target the immune system but do not specifically target AA-related inflammatory pathway. Corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently associated with immunomodulatory therapies to treat flu-like adverse effects. Few clinical and mounting preclinical data in MS show that AA metabolism contributes to immune system activation, demyelination and motor disabilities, and administration of NSAIDs reduces these symptoms. The beneficial effect of NSAIDs seems to be a prerogative of COX-2 selective inhibitors and suggests that NSAIDs selective for COX-2 may be more effective than mixed COX-1/2 inhibitors.

A mechanism-based classification of pain in multiple sclerosis

Pharmacological treatment of pain in multiple sclerosis (MS) is challenging due to the many underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Few controlled trials show adequate pain control in this population. Emerging evidence suggests that pain might be more effectively classified and treated according to symptoms and underlying mechanisms. The new mechanism-based classification we propose here distinguishes nine types of MS-related pain: trigeminal neuralgia and Lhermitte's phenomenon (paroxysmal neuropathic pain due to ectopic impulse generation along primary afferents), ongoing extremity pain (deafferentation pain secondary to lesion in the spino-thalamo-cortical pathways), painful tonic spasms and spasticity pain (mixed pains secondary to lesions in the central motor pathways but mediated by muscle nociceptors), pain associated with optic neuritis (nerve trunk pain originating from nervi nervorum), musculoskeletal pains (nociceptive pain arising from postural abnormalities secondary to motor disorders), migraine (nociceptive pain favored by predisposing factors or secondary to midbrain lesions), and treatment-induced pains. Identification of various types of MS-related pain will allow appropriate targeted pharmacological treatment and improve clinical practice.

Frequency and severity of headache is worsened by Interferon-β therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The relationship between multiple sclerosis (MS) and headache (HA) is not well known. It was reported that interferon-beta (IFNβ) could induce or worsen HA.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of IFNβ treatment on HA and the relationship between HA and the various commercial preparations of IFNβ in mildly disabled patients with MS.

METHODS

A specific questionnaire was administered to 357 relapsing-remitting MS patients. Characteristics of HAs were considered, including the temporal relationships with IFNβ administration.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen patients were treated with weekly intramuscular injections of interferon IFNβ-1a (Avonex(®)), 84 with subcutaneous injections of IFNβ-1b (Betaferon(®)) every other day, 48 and 108 with three times weekly subcutaneous injections of IFNβ-1a (Rebif(®)) 22 mcg or IFNβ-1a (Rebif(®)) 44 mcg, respectively. Three hundred and fourteen patients were affected by HA, and among them, 219 patients suffered of pre-existing HA. In this latter group, 121 subjects (55%) noted a worsening of their HA after starting IFNβ therapy; this was more frequently reported by patients treated with Avonex(®) and Rebif(®) 44. Ninety-five patients experienced new HA.

CONCLUSION

IFNβ treatment could worsen HA in patients with pre-existing HA or cause the appearance of new HA. Among different IFNβ preparations, Rebif(®) 44 and Avonex(®) seemed to be more cephalalgic than the other drugs.

Systematic review of disease-modifying therapies to assess unmet needs in multiple sclerosis: tolerability and adherence

Reviews of therapeutic drugs usually focus on the highly selected and closely monitored patient populations from randomized controlled trials. The objective of this study was to review systematically the tolerability and adherence of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies, using data from both randomized controlled trials and observational settings. Relevant literature was identified using predefined search terms, and adverse event and study discontinuation data were extracted and categorized according to study type (randomized controlled trial or observational) and study duration. A total of 151 papers were selected for analysis; 33% were classified as randomized controlled trials and 62% as observational studies. Most of the papers concerned interferon preparations and glatiramer acetate; the limited available information on mitoxantrone and natalizumab precluded extensive examination of these. The most common adverse events were flu-like symptoms (interferon therapies only) and injection-site reactions. Mean discontinuation rates ranged from 16% to 27%. There were no marked differences in tolerability or adherence data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies, but the incidence of adverse events remained high in lengthy studies and discontinuations accumulated with time. The present systematic review of randomized clinical trial and observational data highlights the tolerability and adherence issues associated with commonly used first-line multiple sclerosis treatments.

[Proposals to improve adherence to immunomodulatory therapies in patients with multiple sclerosis]

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this work was to assess the factors identified in the Global Adherence Project (GAP) in disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and to propose measures directed at improving adherence. It was proposed to prepare questionnaires to detect patients at risk of non-adherence before and during the follow-up.

METHODS

Two meetings were held by Spanish researchers involved in the GAP project. Factors associated with non-adherence were grouped in therapy-, patient-, disease- and health care professional-related factors. Four working groups were created. Each group studied one individual,factor, taking into account the stages of diagnosis, management and administering treatment, follow-up and discontinuation or change of treatment. A draft of proposals and tools (questionnaires) was agreed.

RESULTS

Patients should be provided with summaries of treatments, in a positive and simple way, and have time to discuss any doubts. Questionnaires should be given to patients at the start of treatment and during follow-up, so that individual characteristics can be assessed in order to monitor their adherence and act accordingly. Patients should be instructed in the management of the most common adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic education to improve adherence to treatments and identification of non-adherent patients is recommended. We propose 2 questionnaires, initial and follow up, to stratify patients depending on their adherence.

Patient satisfaction following transition from the original to the new formulation of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a randomized, two-arm, open-label, Phase IIIb study

OBJECTIVE

To assess satisfaction with the serum-free formulation of subcutaneous (sc) interferon (IFN) beta-1a among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Patients with relapsing MS who had been receiving sc IFN beta-1a for at least 6 months, were transitioned to the new formulation, 44 mug three times weekly. Patients were randomized to preventative ibuprofen (400 mg 30-60 minutes prior to injection) or ibuprofen as needed (PRN) for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the 'flu-like' symptom (FLS) domain score of the validated Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Concern Questionnaire (MSTCQ).

RESULTS

Of the 117 patients enrolled, 109 (93.2%) completed the study. Neither group's MSTCQ FLS score showed a clinically meaningful change from baseline to week 4: mean +/- SD changes were -1.1 +/- 4.4 in the preventative ibuprofen group and 0.8 +/- 3.6 in the ibuprofen PRN group. MSTCQ injection system satisfaction and global side-effect scores were unchanged; total and injection-site reaction scores improved moderately in both groups between baseline and week 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed continued or increased levels of satisfaction with the new formulation of sc IFN beta-1a. FLS occurring with the new formulation were generally mild and seldom sufficiently bothersome to require ibuprofen treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen in Children and Adults: A Meta-Analysis and Qualitative Review

Objective:

To evaluate the analgesic and antipyretic efficacy and safety of ibuprofen compared to acetaminophen in children and adults.

Data Sources:

Literature searches were performed using PubMed/MEDLINE (through August 2009) and EMBASE (through January 2008) and were restricted to the English language. In PubMed/MEDLINE, search terms used were ibuprofen, acetaminophen, paracetamol, clinical trials, and randomized controlled trials. EMBASE search terms included ibuprofen and acetaminophen, restricted to human and clinical trials.

Study Selection And Data Extraction:

All English-language articles identified from the data sources were reviewed. Multiple review articles were studied for any pertinent references and this yielded additional articles. Only articles that directly compared ibuprofen and acetaminophen were eligible for this review.

Data Synthesis:

Eighty-five studies that directly compared ibuprofen to acetaminophen were identified; 54 contained analgesic efficacy data, 35 contained antipyretic/temperature reduction data, and 66 contained safety data (some articles contained more than 1 type of data). Qualitative review of the literature revealed that, for the most part, ibuprofen was more efficacious than acetaminophen for the treatment of pain and fever in both pediatric and adult populations, and that these 2 drugs were equally safe. Meta-analyses on the subset of randomized clinical trial articles that reported sufficient quantitative information to calculate either an odds ratio (adverse event [AE]) or standardized mean difference (pain and fever) confirmed the qualitative results for adult (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.69; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.81) and pediatric (SMD 0.28; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.46) pain at 2 hours postdose and pediatric fever (SMD 0.26; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.41) at 4 hours postdose. Conclusions regarding adult fever/temperature reduction could not be made due to a lack of evaluable data. The combined odds ratio for the proportion of adult subjects experiencing at least 1 AE slightly favored ibuprofen; however, the difference was not statistically significant (1.12; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.25). No significant difference between drugs in AE incidence was found for pediatric patients (0.82; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.12).

Conclusions:

Ibuprofen is as or more efficacious than acetaminophen for the treatment of pain and fever in adult and pediatric populations and is equally safe.

Optimizing the benefit of multiple sclerosis therapy: the importance of treatment adherence

Poor treatment adherence is problematic in many therapy areas, including multiple sclerosis (MS). Several immunomodulatory drugs are available for the treatment of MS, all of which require frequent parenteral administration. Current first-line therapies are two formulations of interferon (IFN) beta-1a, one of IFN beta-1b, and one of glatiramer acetate. Discontinuation of treatment is common, particularly in the first few months after initiation. Although the true effect of poor adherence to MS therapy is not known, it is likely to lead to a fall in treatment efficacy. Many factors influence a patient's adherence to treatment, including the patient's MS subtype and disability level, cognitive impairment resulting from MS, perceived lack of efficacy of the prescribed medication, and adverse events associated with MS therapy. This article summarizes the barriers to adherence to MS therapies, and discusses patient management strategies that can be employed to encourage adherence. Future advances in the field of MS treatment will be explored, including the development of orally administered drugs, which may enhance adherence.

A review of disease-modifying therapies for MS: maximizing adherence and minimizing adverse events

BACKGROUND

In a chronic disabling disorder such as multiple sclerosis (MS), adherence to treatment is of critical importance in maximizing benefits of therapy over the long term. Adverse events (AEs) are often cited by patients who discontinue therapy.

METHODS

Databases including Medline, CINAHL, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched for literature pertaining to adherence and AEs in MS published between January 1970 and August 2008. Clinical studies and case reports of AEs were included, as were papers that outlined factors that influence adherence. An advisory board with extensive experience in managing patients with MS developed guidelines to assist healthcare providers in maximizing adherence to disease-modifying therapy.

DISCUSSION

Internally based factors such as self-image, and externally based factors such as AEs, may influence patients' willingness and ability to adhere to therapy. Management of AEs associated with disease-modifying therapies and other therapies is reviewed, including intramuscular and subcutaneous interferon beta (IFNbeta)-1a, IFNbeta-1b, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, methylprednisolone, mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, azathioprine, and intravenous immunoglobulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective management of MS is an ongoing, dynamic process that can enhance patients' adherence to therapy. Healthcare practitioners may address factors influencing adherence among patients with MS by managing treatment expectations, maintaining good communication with the patient, and managing AEs of treatment. Although the guidelines proposed herein originate from a single advisory board, it seems clear that by addressing patient concerns, healthcare practitioners can work with patients to enhance their ability to continue to adhere to their therapies and thereby gain the benefits of their treatment over the long term.

Current management of pain associated with multiple sclerosis

While pain is a common problem in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), it is not frequently mentioned by patients and a more direct approach is required in order to obtain information about pain from patients. Many patients with MS experience more than one pain syndrome; combinations of dysaesthesia, headaches and/or back or muscle and joint pain are frequent. For each pain syndrome a clear diagnosis and therapeutic concept needs to be established. Pain in MS can be classified into four diagnostically and therapeutically relevant categories: (i) neuropathic pain due to MS (pain directly related to MS); (ii) pain indirectly related to MS; (iii) MS treatment-related pain; and (iv) pain unrelated to MS. Painful paroxysmal symptoms such as trigeminal neuralgia (TN), or painful tonic spasms are treated with antiepileptics as first choice, e.g. carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, gabapentin, pregabalin, etc. Painful 'burning' dysaesthesias, the most frequent chronic pain syndrome, are treated with TCAs such as amitriptyline, or antiepileptics such as gabapentin, pregabalin, lamotrigine, etc. Combinations of drugs with different modes of action can be particularly useful for reducing adverse effects. While escalation therapy may require opioids, there are encouraging results from studies regarding cannabinoids, but their future role in the treatment of MS-related pain has still to be determined. Pain related to spasticity often improves with adequate physiotherapy. Drug treatment includes antispastic agents such as baclofen or tizanidine and in patients with phasic spasticity, gabapentin or levetiracetam are administered. In patients with severe spasticity, botulinum toxin injections or intrathecal baclofen merit consideration. While physiotherapy may ameliorate malposition-induced joint and muscle pain, additional drug treatment with paracetamol (acetaminophen) or NSAIDs may be useful. Moreover, painful pressure lesions should be avoided by using optimally adjusted aids. Treatment-related pain associated with MS can occur with subcutaneous injections of interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate, and may be reduced by optimizing the injection technique and by local cooling. Systemic (particularly 'flu-like') adverse effects of interferons, e.g. myalgias, can be reduced by administering paracetamol, ibuprofen or naproxen. A potential increase in the frequency of pre-existing headaches after starting treatment with interferons may require optimization of headache attack therapy or even prophylactic treatment. Pain unrelated to MS, such as back pain or headache, is common in patients with MS and may deteriorate as a result of the disease. In summary, a careful analysis of each pain syndrome will allow the design of the appropriate treatment plan using various medical and nonmedical options (multimodal therapy), and will thus help to improve the quality of life (QOL) of the patients.

Emerging oral therapies for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Current disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) have positively affected the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS); however, the requirement for long-term injections imposes a burden on patients and may lead to reduced adherence in some cases. Furthermore, not all patients respond adequately to current DMDs, suggesting that certain patients require different therapeutic approaches. Therefore, alternative MS treatments with less invasive routes of administration and new modes of action are needed to expand the current treatment repertoire, increase patient satisfaction and adherence, and thereby improve efficacy.

DISCUSSION

This review discusses the current unmet need for an orally administered treatment for RRMS, including potential benefits of this route of administration, and implications for improved treatment outcomes. Oral drugs that are currently in Phase II/III clinical development are discussed.

Pain associated with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and proposed classification

Pain is common in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), but estimates of its prevalence have varied widely. The literature describing pain in MS patients spans four decades and has employed a range of different methodologies. We undertook a systematic review in order to summarize current understanding of the association between MS and pain and provide a basis for the design and interpretation of future studies. The point prevalence of pain in patients with MS is nearly 50%, and approximately 75% of patients report having had pain within one month of assessment. Pain adversely affects most aspects of health-related quality of life, including functional domains such as the ability to work. The presence of pain in patients with MS is associated with increased age, duration of illness, depression, degree of functional impairment, and fatigue. Several different types of pain are found in patients with MS, including extremity pain, trigeminal neuralgia, Lhermitte's sign, painful tonic spasms, back pain, and headache. Putative mechanisms of pain in patients with MS are discussed, and a classification of pain in MS is proposed. Few randomized clinical trials of treatments for MS pain have been conducted, and the limitations of current knowledge regarding approaches for treating MS pain are discussed. Suggestions for future studies that would increase understanding of the natural history, mechanisms, and treatment of pain in patients with MS are presented.

Immunogenicity and tolerability of an investigational formulation of interferon-beta1a: 24- and 48-week interim analyses of a 2-year, single-arm, historically controlled, phase IIIb study in adults with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

RNF (Rebif New Formulation, Merck Serono International S.A., Geneva, Switzerland), a formulation of interferon-beta1a (IFN-beta1a) without human- or animal-derived components, is currently under investigation. It was developed with the aim of maximizing the treatment benefit for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) by improving injection tolerability and reducing the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).

OBJECTIVE

This paper reports the results of planned 24- and 48-week interim analyses comparing immunogenicity and tolerability data from an ongoing study of RNF with historical-control data for the currently approved formulation of IFN-beta1a from the EVIDENCE (EVidence of Interferon Dose-response: European North American Comparative Efficacy) study.

METHODS

Patients in the 96-week, multicenter, singlearm, Phase IIIb RNF study received 44 microg/0.5 mL SC tiw; patients in the EVIDENCE study received an identical regimen of the currently approved formulation of IFN-beta1a. Criteria for inclusion in the RNF study were age between 18 and 60 years, an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score <6.0, and a diagnosis of relapsing MS (McDonald criteria). Criteria for inclusion in the EVIDENCE study were age between 18 and 55 years, an EDSS score of 0 to 5.5, and a diagnosis of clinically definite relapsing-remitting MS (Poser criteria). Patients in both studies were treatment naive. Both studies used the same cytopathic-effect assay for NAbs to assess immunogenicity; patients who had NAb titers >or=20 neutralizing units (NU)/mL were considered NAb+. The primary end point was to compare the proportions of NAb+ patients in the RNF study and the historical data. Comparisons were descriptive and used exact 95% CIs. Safety analyses included 8 prespecified adverse events (AEs) of interest.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic characteristics were well balanced between the RNF (N = 260) and EVIDENCE (N = 339) studies, except that patients in the RNF study were slightly younger (median age, 34.0 vs 39.0 years, respectively), and a few had secondary progressive MS (n = 6) or progressive relapsing MS (n = 1). At week 48, 87.3% of patients in the RNF study remained on treatment. The incidence of the prespecified AEs of interest in the RNF and EVIDENCE studies was as follows: flu-like symptoms (70.8% and 48.1%, respectively), injection-site reactions (29.6% and 83.8%), hepatic disorders (13.1% and 16.8%), cytopenia (9.6% and 11.8%), depression and suicidal ideation (5.8% and 19.8%), skin rashes (5.4% and 12.1%), hypersensitivity reactions (5.4% and 3.2%), and thyroid disorders (2.3% and 5.0%). Overall, the majority (96.9%) of AEs in the RNF study were mild (69.5%) or moderate (27.5%) in severity. The proportions of patients in the RNF and EVIDENCE studies with NAbs at both 24 and 48 weeks were 2.5% (95% CI, 0.9-5.5) and 14.3% (95% CI, 10.7-18.6), respectively; the proportions with NAbs at week 48 only were 13.9% (95% CI, 9.9-18.7) and 24.4% (95% CI, 19.9-29.4). The proportions of NAb+ patients with high NAb titers (>1000 NU/mL) at week 48 were 11.1% in the RNF study and 19.5% in the EVIDENCE study.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of these interim analyses suggest that RNF had an improved overall tolerability and safety profile and a lower immunogenic potential compared with the approved IFN-beta1a formulation assessed in the EVIDENCE study. Two-year results from the RNF study are anticipated before the end of 2007.

Migraine in Multiple Sclerosis

Headache and migraine are common features in multiple sclerosis (MS) and can influence the diagnosis, radiological evaluation, treatment, and quality of life of these patients. Similarities in symptoms between patients with migraine and MS presenting with headache can lead to misdiagnosis. Likewise, MRI lesions which may be found in migraine patients without other neurological symptoms or signs may cause diagnostic confusion and patient anxiety. Studies addressing the pathophysiology of these comorbid conditions have not found a clear link, but brainstem lesions and inflammatory processes have been proposed. Management of de novo or treatment-induced headache in the MS patient is fairly straightforward if the physician is aware of the problem.

Symptomatic treatment of multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group (MSTCG) of the German Multiple Sclerosis Society

Besides immunomodulation and immunosuppression, the specific treatment of symptoms is an essential component of the overall management of multiple sclerosis (MS). Symptomatic treatment is aimed at the elimination or reduction of symptoms impairing the functional abilities and quality of life of the affected patients. Moreover, with symptomatic treatment the development of a secondary physical impairment due to an existing one may be avoided. Many therapeutic techniques as well as different drugs are used for the treatment of MS symptoms, but only a few of them have been investigated, especially in MS patients, and are approved by the national health authorities. Despite an overwhelming number of publications, only a few evidence-based studies exist and consensus reports are very rare, too. Therefore, it seemed necessary to develop a consensus statement on symptomatic treatment of MS comprising existing evidence-based literature as well as therapeutic experience of neurologists who have dealt with these problems over a long time. This consensus paper contains proposals for the treatment of the most common MS symptoms: disorders of motor function and coordination, of cranial nerve function, of autonomic, cognitive, and psychological functions as well as MS-related pain syndromes and epileptic seizures.

Current trials in multiple sclerosis: established evidence and future hopes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of the present report is to briefly review multiple sclerosis therapeutic trials published or presented in 2004 to provide an up-to-date overview of the established evidence and new insights.

RECENT FINDINGS

New data have come available that help us understand how currently approved disease modifying drugs can best be used. Nonetheless, their limited effectiveness - especially in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis - as well as the inconvenience and toxicity associated with their use, emphasize the need for new treatment strategies. A substantial number of reports on new emerging treatment modalities were published in 2004, and one of these modalities was newly approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.

SUMMARY

Further advances have been made in the treatment of multiple sclerosis patients. On the one hand, we know better how and in whom to use existing medications. On the other hand, it is exciting to witness how increased insight in the pathophysiology of the disease and its symptoms has led to a series of new, innovative treatment modalities.

Interferons in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: are there benefits from long-term use?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases in young adults in western countries. An important aspect of treatment of this disease is the use of interferons (IFNs). These are molecules with antiviral, immunomodulatory, antiproliferative and hormonal activities. IFNbeta, a class I IFN, has been used extensively in the therapy of MS, particularly in its relapsing-remitting (RRMS) phase, the most frequent clinical form of the disease. Although the available evidence from published clinical trials is difficult to evaluate because of methodological differences, an unbiased review of the data reveals sufficient evidence to conclude that treatment with IFNbeta in RRMS is both efficacious and safe, at least over the periods so far investigated (up to 4-6 years). While there is no reason to suspect that IFNbeta should not continue to be efficacious and safe over the longer term, studies investigating these questions over longer periods and including greater numbers of patients are needed.