1
|
Nanda U, Zhang G, Underhill D, Pangarkar S. Management of Pain and Headache After Traumatic Brain Injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2024; 35:573-591. [PMID: 38945652 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
This article will identify common causes of pain following traumatic brain injury (TBI), discuss current treatment strategies for these complaints, and help tailor treatments for both acute and chronic settings. We will also briefly discuss primary and secondary headache disorders, followed by common secondary pain disorders that may be related to trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udai Nanda
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pain Management, Headache Center of Excellence, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Grace Zhang
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David Underhill
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sanjog Pangarkar
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pain Management, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao C, Li C, Yu X, Dai X, Zou W. Effectiveness and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis for chronic migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Neurol 2024:10.1007/s00415-024-12512-z. [PMID: 38910144 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12512-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine (CM) significantly impacts both the physical and mental health of patients. Current studies on the safety and effectiveness of different pharmacological prophylaxis interventions for CM are limited. To address this gap, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of various drugs in preventing CM. METHODS Two independent researchers systematically searched four databases from their inception to August 1, 2023, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Subsequently, they performed data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. A NMA was then performed. Continuous outcomes and binary outcomes were displayed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratio (RR), respectively, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank each intervention separately. RESULTS 24 RCTs involving 8789 patients were included. Compared to placebo, Botulinum toxin A demonstrated the most significant effect in reducing the monthly migraine days for CM patients (MD = 3.88, 95% CI 0.48, 7.28); in terms of improving the response rate by a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days, Topiramate (RR = 50.06, 95% CI 3.18, 787.30) was the most effective; there was no statistically significant difference between all preventive drugs and placebo in improving the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score; in terms of the incidence of adverse events, Eptinezumab (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.8, 1.54) exhibited the highest safety profile. CONCLUSION Among all the drugs for the preventive drugs for CM, Botulinum toxin A has the best efficacy and safety profile, closely followed by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengqi Zhao
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, 150040, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Changxin Li
- The Second Department of Rehabilitation, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xueping Yu
- The Third Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150040, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xiaohong Dai
- The Third Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150040, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Wei Zou
- The Third Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150040, Heilongjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Özge A, Baykan B, Bıçakçı Ş, Ertaş M, Atalar AÇ, Gümrü S, Karlı N. Revolutionizing migraine management: advances and challenges in CGRP-targeted therapies and their clinical implications. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1402569. [PMID: 38938785 PMCID: PMC11210524 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1402569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Migraine, a prevalent neurological disorder, affects approximately 14.1% of the global population and disproportionately impacts females. This debilitating condition significantly compromises quality of life, productivity, and incurs high healthcare costs, presenting a challenge not only to individuals but to societal structures as a whole. Despite advances in our understanding of migraine pathophysiology, treatment options remain limited, necessitating ongoing research into effective therapies. This review delves into the complexity of migraine management, examining the roles of genetic predisposition, environmental influences, personalized treatment approaches, comorbidities, efficacy and safety of existing acute and preventive treatments. It further explores the continuum between migraine and tension-type headaches and discusses the intricacies of treating various migraine subtypes, including those with and without aura. We emphasize the recent paradigm shift toward trigeminovascular activation and the release of vasoactive substances, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which offer novel therapeutic targets. We assess groundbreaking clinical trials, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives, safety, tolerability, and the real-world application of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants. In the face of persisting treatment barriers such as misdiagnosis, medication overuse headaches, and limited access to specialist care, we discuss innovative CGRP-targeted strategies, the high cost and scarcity of long-term efficacy data, and suggest comprehensive solutions tailored to Turkiye and developing countries. The review offers strategic recommendations including the formulation of primary care guidelines, establishment of specialized outpatient clinics, updating physicians on novel treatments, enhancing global accessibility to advanced therapies, and fostering patient education. Emphasizing the importance of lifestyle modifications and holistic approaches, the review underscores the potential of mass media and patient groups in disseminating critical health information and shaping the future of migraine management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Özge
- Department of Neurology, Algology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Türkiye
| | - B. Baykan
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ş. Bıçakçı
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Türkiye
| | - M. Ertaş
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - A. Ç. Atalar
- Department of Neurology, University Health Sciences, Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - S. Gümrü
- Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - N. Karlı
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang YF, Yang FC, Chen LA, Chang TY, Su HC, Yang CP, Tu YH, Tzeng YS, Chen SP, Fuh JL, Lai KL, Ling YH, Chen WT, Wang SJ. Comparative effectiveness and tolerability of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: A multicenter, real-world study in Taiwan. Eur J Neurol 2024:e16372. [PMID: 38837528 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine (CM) patients. METHODS This multicenter study involved retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of CM patients treated with CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA, including difficult-to-treat (DTT) patients (i.e., ≥3 preventive failures). Treatment outcomes were determined at 6 months based on prospective headache diaries and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). RESULTS The study included 316 (55 M/261F, mean age 44.4 ± 13.5 years) and 333 (61 M/272F, mean age 47.9 ± 13.4 years) CM patients treated with CGRP mAbs or onabotulinbumtoxinA, respectively. At 6 months, CGRP mAb treatment was associated with a greater decrease in monthly migraine days (MMDs) (-13.0 vs. -8.7 days/month, p < 0.001) and a higher ≥50% responder rate (RR) (74.7% vs. 50.7%, p < 0.001) compared with onabotulinumtoxinA injections. The findings were consistent in DTT patients (-13.0 vs. -9.1 MMDs, p < 0.001; ≥50% RR: 73.9% vs. 50.3%, p < 0.001) or those with medication-overuse headache (MOH) (-13.3 vs. -9.0 MMDs, p < 0.001; ≥50% RR: 79.0% vs. 51.6%, p < 0.001). Besides, patients receiving CGRP mAbs had greater improvement (-42.2 vs. -11.8, p < 0.001) and a higher ≥50% RR (62.0% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.001) in MIDAS scores and a lower rate of adverse events (AEs) (6.0% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001). However, none of the patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter, real-world study, CGRP mAbs were more effective than onabotulinumtoxinA in CM patients, even in DTT or MOH patients. All of these injectables were well tolerated. Further prospective studies are needed to verify these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Feng Wang
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Chi Yang
- Department of Neurology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Lu-An Chen
- Department of Neurology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Yu Chang
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Chen Su
- Department of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Pai Yang
- Department of Neurology, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Ph.D. Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsien Tu
- Department of Neurology, An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Shiang Tzeng
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Pin Chen
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Translational Research, Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jong-Ling Fuh
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuan-Lin Lai
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsiang Ling
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ta Chen
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, Keelung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Taipei Municipal Gan-Dau Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ihara K, Schwedt TJ. Posttraumatic headache is a distinct headache type from migraine. Curr Opin Neurol 2024; 37:264-270. [PMID: 38294020 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Posttraumatic headache (PTH), a headache that develops within 7 days of a causative injury, is one of the most common secondary headaches, mostly attributed to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Because presence of preinjury headache is a risk factor for developing PTH and PTH symptoms often resemble migraine or tension-type headache, the association between PTH and primary headaches has attracted attention from clinicians and scientists. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies on epidemiological aspects, headache features, risk factors, imaging characteristics, and response to treatment, suggest overlapping features and distinct objective findings in PTH compared to migraine. SUMMARY We argue that PTH is distinct from migraine. Therefore, PTH epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis should continue to be investigated separately from migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Ihara
- Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Ashikaga
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd J Schwedt
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Takeshima T, Doi H, Ooba S, Tanji Y, Ozeki A, Komori M. Clinical Evaluation After Discontinuation of Galcanezumab in Japanese Patients with Episodic and Chronic Migraine: Analysis of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial and Open-label Extension Study. Neurol Ther 2024; 13:697-714. [PMID: 38581615 PMCID: PMC11136910 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00602-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This analysis of two Japanese clinical trials evaluated efficacy and safety after galcanezumab (GMB) discontinuation in patients with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). METHODS Data were from a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo [PBO]-controlled primary trial (patients with EM) and a 12-month open-label extension trial (patients with EM/CM). Patients received 6 months' (primary) or 12/18 months' (extension) treatment with GMB 120 mg (GMB120) plus 240-mg loading dose or 240 mg (GMB240) with 4 months' post-treatment follow-up. Efficacy was assessed as number of monthly migraine headache days during post-treatment. Safety was assessed via post-treatment-emergent adverse events (PTEAEs). RESULTS The analysis population included 186 patients from the primary trial (PBO N = 93; GMB120 N = 45; GMB240 N = 48), 220 patients with EM from the extension trial (PBO/GMB120 N = 57; PBO/GMB240 N = 55; GMB120/GMB120 N = 55; GMB240/GMB240 N = 53), and 55 patients with CM (GMB120 N = 28; GMB240 N = 27). In patients with EM receiving 6 months' GMB120, mean standard deviation (SD) monthly migraine headache days increased from 5.69 (4.64) at treatment end to 6.24 (4.37) at end of follow-up but did not return to pre-treatment levels (8.80 [2.96]). In the extension trial, mean monthly migraine headache days in patients with EM receiving GMB120 were 4.13 (3.85) after 12 months and 4.45 (3.78) at end of follow-up, and 3.59 (3.48) after 18 months and 3.91 (3.57) at end of follow-up. Monthly migraine headache days in patients with CM (12 months' GMB120) were 10.71 (4.61) at treatment end and 11.17 (5.64) at end of follow-up (pre-treatment 20.15 [4.65]). Similar results were seen for patients receiving GMB240. The most observed PTEAE after GMB discontinuation was nasopharyngitis. CONCLUSION Galcanezumab exhibited post-treatment efficacy for up to 4 months in Japanese patients with EM and with CM. No unexpected safety signals were observed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02959177 and NCT02959190.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takao Takeshima
- Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hikaru Doi
- Doi Clinic Internal Medicine/Neurology, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Satomi Ooba
- Department of Neurosurgery and Headache, Ooba Clinic, Oita, Japan
| | - Yuka Tanji
- Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan
| | - Akichika Ozeki
- Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan
| | - Mika Komori
- Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Salim A, Hennessy E, Sonneborn C, Hogue O, Biswas S, Mays M, Suneja A, Ahmed Z, Mata IF. Synergism of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and OnabotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine: A Real-World Retrospective Chart Review. CNS Drugs 2024; 38:481-491. [PMID: 38583127 PMCID: PMC11098928 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-024-01086-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with chronic migraine do not achieve clinically meaningful improvement in their headache frequency with monotherapy. The burden associated with chronic migraine calls for a multifaceted treatment approach targeting multiple aspects of migraine pathophysiology. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of concurrent anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onabot) treatment on median monthly migraine days (MMD) in patients with chronic migraine, through a retrospective study. METHODS The electronic medical records of Cleveland Clinic patients either concurrently (dual therapy) or consecutively (monotherapy) treated with anti-CGRP mAbs and onabot between June 2018 and November 2021 were extracted. Only adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) were included in this study. MMDs for 194 concurrently treated (86.6% female and a median [interquartile range] age of 51 [41-61] years) and 229 consecutively treated (88.2% female and median age of 47 [IQR 39-57] years) patients were examined at baseline, after first therapy of either anti-CGRP mAb or onabot, and following dual therapy for 3 consecutive months. The reduction of MMDs for each treatment group were compared. The same approach was utilized to compare consecutive monotherapy at separate times (n = 229) and dual-therapy groups. RESULTS The initial treatment of the dual-therapy group reduced the median (IQR) MMDs from 30 (30-30) to 15 (12-30) [p < 0.0001]. After initiation of dual therapy, the median MMDs was further decreased from 15 (12-30) to 8 (3-22) [p < 0.0001]. A majority [132/194 (68.0%)] of the dual-therapy patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MMD and 90/194 (46.4%) reported a ≥ 75% reduction. For the consecutive monotherapy group, median MMDs changed from a baseline of 30 (25-30) to 15 (8-25) from onabot monotherapy and decreased from 25 (15-30) to 12 (4-25) after anti-CGRP mAb monotherapy. Almost half (113/229 [49.3%] from onabot, and 104/229 [45.4%] from anti-CGRP mAb) of these patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs and a minority (38/229 [16.6%] from onabot, and 45/229 [19.7%] from anti-CGRP mAb) achieved a reduction of ≥ 75%. Additionally, dual therapy showed significant improvement in MMDs compared with monotherapy of either treatment (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Dual therapy of anti-CGRP mAbs and onabot may be more efficacious than monotherapy, possibly due to their synergistic mechanisms of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amira Salim
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Elise Hennessy
- Neuroscience Institute, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Claire Sonneborn
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Olivia Hogue
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sudipa Biswas
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - MaryAnn Mays
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aarushi Suneja
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Zubair Ahmed
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ignacio F Mata
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Díaz Insa S, Guerrero Á, Viguera J, Medrano Martínez V, Calle de Miguel C, Porta-Etessam J, Ciudad A, Diaz-Cerezo S, Roncero Martín A, Núñez M. Observational Retrospective Study in Patients Treated with Galcanezumab as Preventive Treatment for Migraine: The ORYGAM Study. Pain Ther 2024; 13:557-576. [PMID: 38546937 PMCID: PMC11111650 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00586-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The efficacy of galcanezumab has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials, but evidence about its use under clinical practice conditions is still limited. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of the patients treated with galcanezumab in routine clinical practice in Spain as well as treatment patterns, persistence, and effectiveness. METHODS A retrospective chart review study was carried out in six hospitals. Information of adults with migraine, who started treatment with galcanezumab between November 2019 and September 2021, was analyzed until end or loss of follow-up. Continuous variables were described as mean (standard deviation, SD) and median (interquartile range, IQR), and categorical variables as frequency and percentages. Persistence to treatment was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS A total of 314 patients were analyzed over median follow-up period of 17.5 months (13.8-20.7), with a mean age of 46.3 (12.6), 85% women, 80.6% chronic migraine, and reporting a mean of monthly migraine days of 16.7 (7.8). Overall, 72.9% had comorbid conditions, with anxiety and depression disorders being the most frequent. More than 60% had received ≥ 6 previous preventive drugs, the most common being antiepileptics, antidepressants, and botulinum toxin (95.2%, 89.8% and 84.1%, respectively). Overall, 60.3% of the patients with other preventive treatments maintained them after galcanezumab initiation. The median time on galcanezumab was 14.6 months (9.4-22.8); 95.7%, 82.0%, 76.2% and 59.8% of patients were persistent to treatment at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively. Of the patients who discontinued (151: 48.1%), 57.6% were due to lack of effectiveness and 31.1% were due to improvement in migraine. The average reduction of monthly migraine days at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months was 7.9 (7.2), 9.1 (7.5), 8.8 (6.6) and 9.0 (6.9) days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In real clinical practice, galcanezumab is an effective treatment and has a high persistence in patients with migraine, mostly chronic and with multiple use of previous preventive treatments.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kouga T, Miwa T, Sunami K, Itoh Y. Effectiveness of Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Medication in Vestibular Migraine: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Asian Population. CNS Drugs 2024:10.1007/s40263-024-01094-z. [PMID: 38809343 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-024-01094-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine and dizziness often coexist, with vestibular migraine (VM) presenting with vestibular symptoms and headaches. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) may be involved in motion-induced symptoms; however, studies on the use of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for the treatment of VM have yielded conflicting results. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs in VM treatment. METHODS This retrospective observational cohort study, conducted between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2023, assessed 12 Japanese patients with VM who were treated with anti-CGRP mAbs (CGRP group) for 6 months and 11 Japanese patients who received standard of care for VM and served as controls. Clinical questionnaires and equilibrium tests were administered, with primary outcomes including changes in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores compared with baseline values. Objective variables included the DHI score and explanatory variables included demographic data, balance test results, head-up tilt (HUT) test results, vestibular test results and questionnaire survey results. Analysis of variance was used to assess the treatment effects of anti-CGRP mAbs, and multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify mAb responders. RESULTS After 6 months, the CGRP group showed significant improvements in DHI scores [0 versus 6 months, odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 22.01 (0.13-43.88)] and number of vertigo/dizziness attacks per month [0 versus 6 months: 10.28 (2.80-17.76)]. No significant difference was observed in the control group [DHI scores, 0 versus 6 months: 0.65 (-26.84 to 28.14); number of vertigo/dizziness attacks per month, 0 versus 6 months: - 8.07 (- 23.77 to 7.62)]. Multivariate regression analysis showed that autonomic function at baseline was associated with mAb response in patients [β estimates (95% confidence interval): 3.63 (0.21-7.06)]. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs was more effective than conventional treatment in preventing migraine in patients with VM. While the identified factors associated with treatment responsiveness offer valuable insights into personalised treatment approaches, further prospective studies are warranted to validate the findings due to our study's retrospective design and limited sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teppei Kouga
- Department of Otolaryngology, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Toru Miwa
- Department of Otolaryngology, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate of School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Kishiko Sunami
- Department of Otolaryngology, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Itoh
- Department of Neurology, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mascarella D, Andrini G, Baraldi C, Altamura C, Favoni V, Lo Castro F, Pierangeli G, Vernieri F, Guerzoni S, Cevoli S. Blood pressure monitoring in elderly migraineurs starting an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody: a real-world prospective study. Neurol Sci 2024:10.1007/s10072-024-07567-9. [PMID: 38795273 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07567-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the CGRP pathway have revolutionized migraine management due to their improved tolerance and adherence, concerns remain about their potential impact on blood pressure (BP), especially in older patients, due to CGRP-mediated vasodilation blockade. Given the growing use of these therapies in older populations, assessing their cardiovascular (CV) safety is of paramount importance. METHODS This multicentric observational prospective study focused on migraine sufferers aged ≥ 60 who began erenumab, galcanezumab, or fremanezumab for prevention. Baseline, three-month, and twelve-month BP measurements were collected. Changes in antihypertensive medication and "Newly or Worsened Hypertensive" patients (NWHP) were assessed. RESULTS Among 155 patients receiving anti-CGRP mAbs (40 Erenumab, 47 Galcanezumab, 68 Fremanezumab), 42.5% had hypertension history and 39% were on antihypertensive treatment. No significant systolic or diastolic BP changes occurred at any time point compared to baseline (all p > 0.05), with no differences between the three groups. After one year, 20/155 (12.9%) patients were considered NWHP; 11/20 had prior hypertension, and 5/11 adjusted antihypertensive therapy. Among 9/20 newly hypertensive patients, 5/9 had a single measurement above the normal threshold with no requirement for new pharmacological therapy. A higher baseline BP value was associated with increased BP (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The study concludes that treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs over one year does not significantly affect BP in patients aged ≥ 60, nor does it increase the incidence of hypertension compared to general population trends. Nonetheless, continuous monitoring and further long-term studies are necessary to fullya scertain the cardiovascular safety of these medications in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Mascarella
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science DIBINEM, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgia Andrini
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science DIBINEM, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico Di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Claudia Altamura
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Favoni
- IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna ISNB, Bologna, Italy
| | - Flavia Lo Castro
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico Di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Giulia Pierangeli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science DIBINEM, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna ISNB, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico Di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna ISNB, Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moore L, Pakalnis A. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Inhibitors in the Treatment of Migraine in the Pediatric and Adolescent Populations: A Review. Pediatr Neurol 2024; 157:87-95. [PMID: 38905744 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
There are limited well-studied treatments for migraine in the pediatric population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors are an established safe and effective treatment in adults, and use may be appropriate for pediatric patients in certain clinical situations. We describe migraine pathophysiology as it relates to CGRP, provide an overview of available medications, and discuss clinical usage in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Moore
- Department of Neurology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Neurology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| | - Ann Pakalnis
- Department of Neurology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Neurology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stearns SA, Xun H, Haddad A, Rinkinen J, Bustos VP, Lee BT. Therapeutic Options for Migraines in the Microsurgical Patient: A Scoping Review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:988e-1001e. [PMID: 37337332 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There exists an increasing array of treatments proposed to prevent, alleviate, and abort symptoms of a migraine; however, for patients who undergo reconstructive microsurgery, caution must be taken to preserve vascular integrity. This study is the first-to-date scoping review of vascular and bleeding risk of current migraine therapies, with the purpose of identifying potential therapeutic agents for postoperative migraine management appropriate for microsurgical patients. METHODS Currently available migraine therapeutics were compiled from the UpToDate software system and the American Academy of Family Physicians. A PubMed literature review was performed for each therapeutic's effect on bleeding or vascular involvement. Data were compiled into tables of abortive, symptom-controlling and prophylactic, and nonpharmacologic treatments. Expert microsurgeons reviewed the data to provide recommendations for optimized patient care. RESULTS Triptans and other ergot derivatives demonstrated strong evidence of vasoconstriction and were greatly advised against for immediate postmicrosurgical use. Novel pharmaceutical therapies such as lasmiditan and calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists have no literature indicating potential for vasoconstriction or hematoma and remain an investigational option for abortive medical treatment. For symptom control, acetaminophen appears the safest option, with clinical judgment and further research needed for use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Alternative treatment techniques may include migraine prophylaxis with botulinum toxin injection or nutraceutical treatment by means of magnesium supplementation or coenzyme Q10 administration, minimizing the need for additional medication in the postoperative setting. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing reconstructive microsurgery have a unique medical profile limiting the therapeutic options available to treat migraines. This review provides preliminary evidence to be considered as a guide for prescribing therapeutics for migraine in the postoperative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Xun
- the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School
| | - Anthony Haddad
- the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School
| | - Jacob Rinkinen
- the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School
| | - Valeria P Bustos
- the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School
| | - Bernard T Lee
- the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Robblee J, Hakim SM, Reynolds JM, Monteith TS, Zhang N, Barad M. Nonspecific oral medications versus anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Headache 2024; 64:547-572. [PMID: 38634515 DOI: 10.1111/head.14693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) versus nonspecific oral migraine preventives (NOEPs). BACKGROUND Insurers mandate step therapy with NOEPs before approving CGRP mAbs. METHODS Databases were searched for class I or II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CGRP mAbs or NOEPs versus placebo for migraine prevention in adults. The primary outcome measure was monthly migraine days (MMD) or moderate to severe headache days. RESULTS Twelve RCTs for CGRP mAbs, 5 RCTs for topiramate, and 3 RCTs for divalproex were included in the meta-analysis. There was high certainty that CGRP mAbs are more effective than placebo, with weighted mean difference (WMD; 95% confidence interval) of -1.64 (-1.99 to -1.28) MMD, which is compatible with small effect size (Cohen's d -0.25 [-0.34 to -0.16]). Certainty of evidence that topiramate or divalproex is more effective than placebo was very low and low, respectively (WMD -1.45 [-1.52 to -1.38] and -1.65 [-2.30 to -1.00], respectively; Cohen's d -1.25 [-2.47 to -0.03] and -0.48 [-0.67 to -0.29], respectively). Trial sequential analysis showed that information size was adequate and that CGRP mAbs had clear benefit versus placebo. Network meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between CGRP mAbs and topiramate (WMD -0.19 [-0.56 to 0.17]) or divalproex (0.01 [-0.73 to 0.75]). No significant difference was seen between topiramate or divalproex (0.21 [-0.45 to 0.86]). CONCLUSIONS There is high certainty that CGRP mAbs are more effective than placebo, but the effect size is small. When feasible, CGRP mAbs may be prescribed as first-line preventives; topiramate or divalproex could be as effective but are less well tolerated. The findings of this study support the recently published 2024 position of the American Headache Society on the use of CGRP mAbs as the first-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Robblee
- Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Sameh M Hakim
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| | - John M Reynolds
- The Louis Calder Memorial Library, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Teshamae S Monteith
- Division of Headache, Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Niushen Zhang
- Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Meredith Barad
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Youn MS, Kim N, Lee MJ, Kim M. Treatment Outcome After Switching From Galcanezumab to Fremanezumab in Patients With Migraine. J Clin Neurol 2024; 20:300-305. [PMID: 38713076 PMCID: PMC11076194 DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2023.0311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP-R) have been widely administered to patients with migraine who show inadequate responses to preventive medications. Among patients in whom a particular anti-CGRP-R mAb is ineffective, switching between different anti-CGRP-R mAbs can be the next option. Few studies have investigated treatment outcomes for antibody switching, especially between mAbs with the same target of the CGRP ligand. We aimed to determine the treatment outcome after switching between two anti-CGRP mAbs (galcanezumab to fremanezumab). METHODS We identified migraine patients in a prospective headache clinic registry who received galcanezumab for ≥3 months and were switched to fremanezumab for a further ≥3 months at a single university hospital. We defined a treatment response as a ≥50% reduction in the number of days with a moderate or severe headache at the third month of treatment relative to baseline. The treatment response after switching to fremanezumab was compared with the initial treatment response to galcanezumab. RESULTS Among 21 patients identified in the registry, 7 (33.3%) were initial responders to galcanezumab. After switching to fremanezumab, 7 (33.3%) showed a treatment response. The treatment response rate was 28.6% in the initial responders and 71.4% in the nonresponders to galcanezumab (p>0.999). CONCLUSIONS Switching between anti-CGRP mAbs (galcanezumab to fremanezumab) yielded a treatment outcome comparable to that reported previously when switching from an anti-CGRP-R mAb (erenumab) to an anti-CGRP mAb (galcanezumab or fremanezumab). The treatment response to fremanezumab seems to be independent of the prior treatment response to galcanezumab. Our findings suggest that switching to another anti-CGRP mAb can be considered when a particular anti-CGRP mAb is ineffective or intolerable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Sojung Youn
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Namoh Kim
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Manho Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alabbad S, Figueredo N, Yuan H, Silberstein S. Developments in targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:477-485. [PMID: 38557226 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2332754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapy has revolutionized migraine treatment since its first approval in 2018. CGRP-targeted therapy includes monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and gepants, which modulate trigeminal nociceptive and inflammatory responses, alleviating pain sensitization involved in migraine pathogenesis. CGRP-targeted therapy is effective not only for migraine but also for other chronic headache disorders that share the CGRP pathway. AREAS COVERED The authors review the latest developments and evidence for CGRP-targeted therapy for episodic migraine and chronic migraine. In addition, the authors discuss the emerging evidence on response prediction, menstrual migraine, vestibular migraine, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, post-traumatic headache, and the relationship between selected migraine comorbidities and CGRP. EXPERT OPINION Since the launch of CGRP-targeted therapy, many practical issues have been raised. Generally, it's safe to combine CGRP-targeted mAbs and gepants; this is an excellent option for patients with partial response. When considering stopping CGRP-targeted therapy, although a disease-modifying effect is likely, the optimal time for discontinuation remains unknown. Finally, beyond migraine, CGRP-targeted therapy may be used for other chronic pain disorders and psychological comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sawsan Alabbad
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nathalia Figueredo
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hussein M, Hassan A, Nada MAF, Mohammed Z, Abdel Ghaffar NF, Kedah H, Fathy W, Magdy R. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Arabic version of HIT-6 questionnaire in patients with migraine indicated for preventive therapy: A multi-center study. Headache 2024; 64:500-508. [PMID: 38651363 DOI: 10.1111/head.14719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) is an important patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in migraine prevention trials. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to (i) assess the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of HIT-6 in Arabic-speaking patients experiencing migraine, and (ii) evaluate the responsiveness of HIT-6 following migraine preventive therapy. METHODS In this prospective study, patients with migraine (n = 145) were requested to fill out a headache diary, the Arabic version of HIT-6, and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) at two time points (baseline and 3 months after initiation of prophylactic treatment). Some respondents (n = 73) were requested to fill out HIT-6 again 1 week from the baseline for test-retest reliability. The intensity of migraine headache attacks was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). An anchor-based method was used to establish the minimal important change (MIC) value and responsiveness of HIT-6. RESULTS The total scores of HIT-6 were significantly correlated to a fair degree with MIDAS (r = 0.41), as well as VAS (r = 0.53), and monthly migraine days (r = 0.38) at the baseline while at the follow-up (after 3 months), the correlations were of moderate degree with MIDAS scores (r = 0.62) and monthly migraine days (r = 0.60; convergent validity). Reliability estimates of the Arabic HIT-6 were excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.91 at baseline and 0.89 at follow-up). The average measure interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value for the test-retest reliability was 0.96 (95% confidence interval = 0.94-0.98, p < 0.001). The HIT-6 total score is sensitive to change, being significantly reduced after prophylactic treatment compared to before (effect size = 1.5, standardized response mean = 1.3). A reduction from baseline of 4.5 on HIT-6 showed the highest responsiveness to predict improvement with an area under the curve equal to 0.66, sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 45%, and significance at 0.021. Changes in the HIT-6 total score were positively correlated with changes in monthly migraine days (r = 0.40) and VAS scores (r = 0.69) but not with changes in the score of MIDAS (r = 0.07). CONCLUSION The Arabic version of HIT-6 is valid, reliable, and sensitive to detect clinical changes following migraine prophylactic treatment with a MIC of 4.5 points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Hussein
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Amr Hassan
- Department of Neurology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mona A F Nada
- Department of Neurology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Zeinab Mohammed
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Nawal F Abdel Ghaffar
- Department of Neurology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Wael Fathy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Surgical ICU and Pain Management, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Rehab Magdy
- Department of Neurology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gago-Veiga AB, Lopez-Alcaide N, Quintas S, Fernández Lázaro I, Casas-Limón J, Calle C, Latorre G, González-García N, Porta-Etessam J, Rodriguez-Vico J, Jaimes A, Gómez García A, García-Azorín D, Guerrero-Peral ÁL, Sierra Á, Lozano Ros A, Sánchez-Soblechero A, Díaz-de-Teran J, Membrilla JA, Treviño C, Gonzalez-Martinez A. Evaluation of the concomitant use of prophylactic treatments in patients with migraine under anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide therapies: The PREVENAC study. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16215. [PMID: 38323742 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) therapies are recent preventive therapies approved for both episodic and chronic migraine. One of the measures of effectiveness is the withdrawal of other preventive treatments. The objective of this study is to quantify the impact of anti-CGRP drugs in concomitant preventive treatment in patients with migraine. METHODS This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter cohort study with patients from nine national headache units. Patients with migraine undergoing treatment for at least 6 months with anti-CGRP antibodies, who were initially associated with some preventive treatment (oral and/or onabotulinumtoxinA) were included. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, as well as variables related to headache. Differences according to withdrawal or nonwithdrawal were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 408 patients were included, 86.52% women, 48.79 (SD = 1.46) years old. Preventive treatment was withdrawn in 43.87% (179/408), 20.83% partially and 23.04% totally. In 27.45% (112/408), it was maintained exclusively due to comorbidity and in 28.6% (117/408) due to partial efficacy. The most frequent time of withdrawal was between 3 and 5 months after the start of treatment. The baseline characteristics associated with nonwithdrawal were comorbidities: insomnia, hypertension and obesity, chronic migraine, and medication overuse. In the multivariate analysis, the absence of high blood pressure, a greater number of preventive treatments at the start, and a lower number of migraine days/month after anti-CGRP treatment were independently associated with withdrawal of the treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Anti-CGRP antibodies allow the withdrawal of associated preventive treatment in a significant percentage of patients, which supports its effectiveness in real-life conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa & Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
| | - Noelia Lopez-Alcaide
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa & Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sonia Quintas
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa & Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
| | - Iris Fernández Lázaro
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa & Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Casas-Limón
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - Carlos Calle
- Headache Unit, Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Alex Jaimes
- Headache Unit, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - David García-Azorín
- Headache Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ángel Luis Guerrero-Peral
- Headache Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Álvaro Sierra
- Headache Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Cristina Treviño
- Headache Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario de la Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa & Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Dolezil D, Paemeleire K, Stepien A, Stude P, Snellman J, Arkuszewski M, Stites T, Ritter S, Lopez Lopez C, Maca J, Ferraris M, Gil-Gouveia R. Early Use of Erenumab vs Nonspecific Oral Migraine Preventives: The APPRAISE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2024; 81:461-470. [PMID: 38526461 PMCID: PMC10964163 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Importance Patients with migraine often cycle through multiple nonspecific preventive medications due to poor tolerability and/or inadequate efficacy leading to low adherence and increased disease burden. Objective To compare the efficacy, tolerability, patient adherence, and patient satisfaction between erenumab and nonspecific oral migraine preventive medications (OMPMs) in patients with episodic migraine (EM) who had previously failed 1 or 2 preventive treatments. Design, Setting, and Participants The 12-month prospective, interventional, global, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial comparing sustained benefit of 2 treatment paradigms (erenumab qm vs oral prophylactics) in adult episodic migraine patients (APPRAISE) trial was a 12-month open-label, multicenter, active-controlled, phase 4 randomized clinical trial conducted from May 15, 2019, to October 1, 2021. This pragmatic trial was conducted at 84 centers across 17 countries. Overall, participants 18 years or older with a 12-month or longer history of migraine, and 4 or more but fewer than 15 monthly migraine days (MMDs) were included. Interventions Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive erenumab or OMPMs. Dose adjustment was permitted (label dependent). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the proportion of patients completing 1 year of the initially assigned treatment and achieving a reduction of 50% or greater from baseline in MMDs at month 12. Secondary end points included the cumulative mean change from baseline in MMDs during the treatment period and the proportion of responders according to the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale at month 12 for patients taking the initially assigned treatment. Results A total of 866 patients were screened, of whom 245 failed the screening and 621 completed the screening and baseline period. Of the 621 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 41.3 [11.2] years; 545 female [87.8%]; 413 [66.5%] in the erenumab group; 208 [33.5%] in the OMPM group), 523 (84.2%) completed the treatment phase, and 98 (15.8%) discontinued the study. At month 12, significantly more patients assigned to erenumab vs OMPM achieved the primary end point (232 of 413 [56.2%] vs 35 of 208 [16.8%]; odds ratio [OR], 6.48; 95% CI, 4.28-9.82; P <.001). Compared with OMPMs, treatment with erenumab showed higher responder rate (314 of 413 [76.0%] vs 39 of 208 [18.8%]; OR, 13.75; 95% CI, 9.08-20.83; P <.001) on the PGIC scale (≥5 at month 12). Significant reduction in cumulative average MMDs was reported with erenumab treatment vs OMPM treatment (-4.32 vs -2.65; treatment difference [SE]: -1.67 [0.35] days; P < .001). Substantially fewer patients in the erenumab arm compared with the OMPM arm switched medication (9 of 413 [2.2%] vs 72 of 208 [34.6%]) and discontinued treatment due to adverse events (12 of 408 [2.9%] vs 48 of 206 [23.3%]). No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrated that earlier use of erenumab in patients with EM who failed 1 or 2 previous preventive treatments provided greater and sustained efficacy, safety, and adherence than continuous OMPM. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03927144.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Dolezil
- Headache Center, Dado Medical sro, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adam Stepien
- Department of Neurology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | - Tracy Stites
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | - Shannon Ritter
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | | | - Jeff Maca
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | | | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Naghdi S, Underwood M, Brown A, Matharu M, Duncan C, Davies N, Aksentyte A, Mistry H. Adverse and serious adverse events incidence of pharmacological interventions for managing chronic and episodic migraine in adults: a systematic review. BMJ Neurol Open 2024; 6:e000616. [PMID: 38646505 PMCID: PMC11029425 DOI: 10.1136/bmjno-2023-000616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine is the second most common prevalent disorder worldwide and is a top cause of disability with a substantial economic burden. Many preventive migraine medications have notable side effects that affect different body organs. Method We systematically searched for published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using terms for migraine/headache and preventive medications. Using eligibility criteria, two reviewers independently assessed the articles. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was applied to assess the quality of the studies. Data were classified by system organ class (SOC). Results Thirty-two RCTs with 21 780 participants met the eligibility criteria for the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Additionally, 33 RCTs with 22 615 participants were included to synthesise the incidence of serious AEs (SAEs). The percentage of attributed AEs and SAEs to each SOC for 10 preventive drugs with different dosing regimens was calculated. Amitriptyline and topiramate had a higher incidence of nervous system disorders; Topiramate was also associated with a higher incidence of psychiatric disorders. All drugs showed a certain incidence of infections and infestations, with Onabotulinumtoxin A (BTA) having the lowest rate. BTA had a higher incidence of musculoskeletal disorders than the other drugs. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) such as fremanezumab and galcanezumab were linked to more general disorders and administration site conditions than other drugs. Conclusion Notably, the observed harm to SOCs varies among these preventive drugs. We suggest conducting head-to-head RCTs to evaluate the safety profile of oral medications, BTA, and CGRP MAbs in episodic and/or chronic migraine populations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021265993.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyran Naghdi
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | - Martin Underwood
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, Coventry, UK
| | - Anna Brown
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Manjit Matharu
- Headache Group, UCL Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Callum Duncan
- Department of Neurology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Natasha Davies
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Aiva Aksentyte
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Hema Mistry
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Oliveira R, Gil-Gouveia R, Puledda F. CGRP-targeted medication in chronic migraine - systematic review. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:51. [PMID: 38575868 PMCID: PMC10996229 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01753-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine is a highly debilitating condition that is often difficult to manage, particularly in the presence of medication overuse headache. Drugs targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), or its receptor have shown promising results in treating this disorder. METHODS We searched Pubmed and Embase to identify randomized clinical trials and real-world studies reporting on the use of medication targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide in patients with chronic migraine. RESULTS A total of 270 records were identified. Nineteen studies qualified for the qualitative analysis. Most studies reported on monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs), that overall prove to be effective in decreasing monthly migraine days by half in about 27.6-61.4% of the patients. Conversion from chronic to episodic migraine was seen in 40.88% of the cases, and 29-88% of the patients stopped medication overuse. Obesity seems to be the main negative predictor of response to anti-CGRP mAbs. There is no evidence to suggest the superiority of one anti-CGRP mAb. Despite the lack of strong evidence, the combination of anti-CGRP medication with onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine is likely to bring benefits for resistant cases. Atogepant is the first gepant to demonstrate a significant decrease in monthly migraine days compared to placebo in a recent trial. Further, anti-CGRP mAb and gepants have a good safety profile. CONCLUSION There is strong evidence from randomized trials and real-world data to suggest that drugs targeting CGRP are a safe and effective treatment for chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Oliveira
- Headache Group, Wolfson SPaRRC, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
- Neurology Department, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Francesca Puledda
- Headache Group, Wolfson SPaRRC, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sirilertmekasakul C, Panto A, Lekhalawan P, Panyarachun P, Jindasakchai P, Rattanawong W. The transition of medication overuse status by acute medication categories in episodic or chronic migraine patients to non-overuse status after receiving anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized control trial. Neurol Sci 2024:10.1007/s10072-024-07496-7. [PMID: 38564060 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07496-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether patients with episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), who were treated with anti-CGRP antibodies, showed a reversal from medication overuse (MO) or medication overuse headache (MOH) status at their baseline to non-overuse status. Furthermore, this study aimed to establish which acute headache medication (AHM) categories responded more effectively to anti-CGRP antibodies. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database for relevant studies from January 2013 to September 2023. We included phase three randomized controlled trials to examine the role of anti-CGRP antibodies in patients with EM or CM and their MO status. A meta-analysis was conducted to find the association between anti-CGRP antibodies and the number of EM and CM patients with MO or MOH at baseline that reverted to non-MO status or below the MOH threshold. RESULTS The initial search yielded a total of 345 studies. After removing duplicates and screening with inclusion criteria, 5 studies fulfilled our conditions. Each study reviewed the response to changes in the MO status of patients after receiving anti-CGRP antibodies, including eptinezumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and erenumab, compared to placebo. Our study analyzed three AHM categories: triptans, simple analgesics, and multiple drugs. The overall relative risk (RR) was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.31 to 1.59; p < 0.001). The RRs for triptans, simple analgesics, and multi-drug groups were 1.71 (95% CI, 1.53 to 1.91; p < 0.001), 1.10 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.47; p = 0.5), and 1.29 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.46; p < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSION The meta-analysis has shown that anti-CGRP antibodies were statistically significant in transitioning from MO or MOH status to non-MO status or below the MOH threshold (RR = 1.44) for all included studies and all AHM categories except for simple analgesics. Patients from the triptan group had the highest RR of 1.71 with a p-value < 0.001, while the simple analgesics group had an RR of 1.10, however, with a p-value > 0.05. Interestingly, this analysis can be interpreted as that anti-CGRP antibodies might not be effective in reducing simple analgesics use in EM or CM patients. Further studies are needed to investigate these matters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Akkanat Panto
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand
| | - Pattanan Lekhalawan
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand
| | - Pariyada Panyarachun
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand
| | - Porpim Jindasakchai
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand
| | - Wanakorn Rattanawong
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Omaer A, Albilali A, Bamogaddam R, Almutairi F, Alsaif R, Almohammadi O, Alhifany AA. Improvement of comorbid anxiety and depression in patients with migraine treated with injectable preventive calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists: Review of clinical evidence. Saudi Pharm J 2024; 32:101989. [PMID: 38405041 PMCID: PMC10882171 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.101989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine is often associated with depression and anxiety, leading to a diminished quality of life. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists have shown promise in treating migraines, but their effects on concurrent depression and anxiety have not been clarified. Methods A literature review was conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Ovid Medline, and EMBASE focusing on phase 3 clinical trials, post-hoc analysis studies, and real-world evidence (RWE) published in the past 5 years. The review primarily utilized patient-reported outcome tools, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory-II, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)-7, and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), to assess anxiety and depression in relation to CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies. Results Out of 260 studies, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Eptinezumab lacked sufficient evidence regarding its impact on depression and anxiety. While sufficient evidence on its effect on comorbid anxiety was not available, fremanezumab was shown to significantly improve comorbid depression in one study while not achieving statistical significance in another. Erenumab and galcanezumab showed significant improvement in comorbid depression, implying possible benefits in patients with migraine. Galcanezumab showed faster relief from depressive symptoms than other injectable CGRP antagonists. Galcanezumab also exhibited improvements in GAD-7 scores for anxiety, although not statistically significant, whereas RWE showed promising HARS scores for both galcanezumab and erenumab. Conclusions Galcanezumab and erenumab appear to be more effective in improving concurrent depressive and anxiety symptoms in migraine patients than fremanezumab. Notably, these psychometric questionnaires were not the primary outcome measures of the trials and were not specifically designed to investigate the effects of these medications on depression or anxiety. Further research is needed to fully understand the impact of CGRP antagonists on mental health disorders associated with migraines. These findings have implications for enhancing the overall well-being and quality of life in individuals with migraines and comorbid psychiatric conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abubker Omaer
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrazaq Albilali
- Neurology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reem Bamogaddam
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fares Almutairi
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Raghad Alsaif
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Osama Almohammadi
- Pharmacy Department, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah A Alhifany
- Pharmacy Practices Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zovi A, Lasala R, Ferrara F, Langella R, Vitiello A, Sabbatucci M, Musazzi UM. Anti-CGRP mAbs for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: An Overview Review and a Cost Saving Analysis in the Global Scenario. Hosp Pharm 2024; 59:165-172. [PMID: 38450361 PMCID: PMC10913879 DOI: 10.1177/00185787231196763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
Objectives: Migraine is a neurological disease with a high frequency of incidence. The new monoclonal antibodies selective for the calcitonin gene-related peptide and its ligand (anti-CGRP mAbs) have been marketed both in the USA and EU based on the positive efficacy results in the prevention of migraine. This search has been carried out with the aim of collecting real-world evidence on the effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs, performing a cost-savings analysis, and comparing performances among anti-CGRP mAbs medicines marketed in the American and European market. Methods: The literature review has been performed in PubMed database on 31 December 2022; the cost of the unitary dose of anti-CGRP mAbs has been extracted consulting an American national database. Results: The results confirm efficacy and good tolerability of anti-CGRP mAbs, determining a difference in the purchase price. In fact, all extracted studies showed a protective risk factor exposure in monthly migraine days reduction for all the anti-CGRP mAbs, whereas the cost analysis showed that using eptinezumab, in a quarter there is a cost saving of at least $425 per patient, compared with the other anti-CGRP mAbs. Conclusions: With equal efficacy and equal safety, anti-CGRP mAbs should be prescribed also regard to the cost established at the negotiation, making sure to guarantee the best treatment to the patients, but at the same time impacting as little as possible to the healthcare services resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Roberto Langella
- Agency for Health Protection of the Metropolitan Area of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vernieri F, Iannone LF, Guerzoni S, Russo A, Barbanti P, Sances G, Cevoli S, Rao R, Lovati C, Ambrosini A, Buzzoni C, Battisti F, Vatteone L, King SML, Torelli F. Long-Term Effectiveness of Galcanezumab in the Prevention of Migraine: An Italian Retrospective Analysis (REALITY). Neurol Ther 2024; 13:415-435. [PMID: 38329615 PMCID: PMC10951161 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00582-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Galcanezumab is approved in the European Union (EU) as migraine prophylaxis in adults with at least four migraine days per month. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of galcanezumab on migraine-related burdens and its impact on the use of healthcare resources for migraine prophylaxis in an Italian setting. METHODS This retrospective study was conducted in patients with migraine who initiated treatment with galcanezumab for migraine prevention between September 2019 and December 2020. Patient data for monthly migraine days (MMDs) and MMDs with acute medication intake were obtained by medical chart reviews. Information on patient-reported outcomes (using the Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS] questionnaire and Headache Impact Test 6 [HIT-6] questionnaire) and on the use of healthcare resources were also collected. The time points of interest were 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months after the initiation of galcanezumab, and the most recent time point available during follow-up. RESULTS A total of 207 patients were enrolled in the study. Starting from month 3 after treatment initiation, more than half of the patients presented at least a 50% reduction in MMDs, and approximately one-third of non-responders at month 3 became responders at month 6. From month 3 to month 12, MMDs decreased on average by 10 days. Headache impact and disability, as well as migraine-associated health resource utilization decreased significantly during the treatment period. A positive significant association among the three dimensions of clinical burden (MMDs, MIDAS and days of acute medication intake) was also observed. CONCLUSION The results of this Italian real-world study confirmed that galcanezumab has a rapid onset of effect and provides a long-term response among patients over different migraine-related burdens. The use of healthcare resources was also remarkably reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico-Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, AOU Policlinico Di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Piero Barbanti
- IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
- University San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
| | - Grazia Sances
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renata Rao
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Carlo Lovati
- L. Sacco Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rikos D, Vikelis M, Dermitzakis EV, Soldatos P, Rallis D, Rudolf J, Andreou AP, Argyriou AA. Reporting Quality and Risk of Bias Analysis of Published RCTs Assessing Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1964. [PMID: 38610729 PMCID: PMC11012539 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are vulnerable to many types of bias beyond randomization. Insights into the reporting quality of RCTs involving migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system (anti-CGRP MAbs) are currently lacking. Our aim was to analyze the reporting quality of phase II/III RCTs involving migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. Methods: A systematic search was performed on the PubMed and EMBASE databases, according to PRISMA guidelines, for relevant RCTs in either episodic or chronic migraine prevention. Additionally, an adapted version of the 2010 CONSORT statement checklist was utilized. The ROBvis online tool was used to document the risk of bias. Results: From the initially identified 179 articles, we finally found 31 RCTs that were eligible for evaluation. The average CONSORT compliance was 88.7% (69.7-100%), while 93.5% (N = 29) of the articles had a compliance greater than 75%. Twenty-eight CONSORT items were reported in more than 75% of the articles. The average compliance of the analyzed RCTs was 93.9% for Galcanezumab, 91.3% for Fremanezumab, followed by 85.4% for Erenumab and Eptinezumab studies. Implementation of the ROB2 tool showed some concerning "missing information" arising from the inadequate reporting. Specifically, 50% of the studies (N = 16) were categorized as having inadequate information regarding the randomization process. Conclusions: Adequate reporting quality was disclosed in the evaluated RCTs with anti-CGRP MAbs in migraine prevention. However, some methodological issues need to be highlighted to be addressed in future studies assessing the efficacy of new molecules targeting CGRP or other candidate pathways implicated in migraine pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michail Vikelis
- Headache Clinic, Mediterraneo Hospital, 16675 Athens, Greece;
| | | | | | - Dimitrios Rallis
- Department of Neurology, Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, 18536 Athens, Greece;
| | - Jobst Rudolf
- Department of Neurology, Papageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 54645 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Anna P. Andreou
- Headache Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK;
- Headache Research-Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE1 1LU, UK
| | - Andreas A. Argyriou
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Department of Neurology, Agios Andreas General Hospital of Patras, 26335 Patras, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ciciarelli MC, Simioni CVDMG, Londero RG. Headaches in adults in supplementary health: management. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA (1992) 2024; 70:e023D701. [PMID: 38511747 PMCID: PMC10941913 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.023d701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Renata Gomes Londero
- Brazilian Academy of Neurology, Porto Alegre Clinical Hospital – Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Irimia P, Santos-Lasaosa S, Pozo-Rosich P, Leira R, Pascual J, Láinez JM. Eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine: a narrative review. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1355877. [PMID: 38523607 PMCID: PMC10959239 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1355877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Eptinezumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), was recently approved in Europe for the prophylactic treatment of migraine in adults who have at least four migraine days a month. Eptinezumab is administered by intravenous infusion every 12 weeks. During recent months, a considerable amount of evidence from eptinezumab trials has been published. The aim of this review is to describe the existing evidence on the tolerability, safety and efficacy of eptinezumab in patients with migraine. Data from randomized (PROMISE-1, PROMISE-2, RELIEF and DELIVER) and open-label (PREVAIL) phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated the favorable effect of eptinezumab in migraine symptoms from first day of treatment. These studies showed that eptinezumab results in an overall reduction in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs), increases in the ≥50% and ≥ 75% migraine responder rates (MRRs) and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures in both patients with episodic migraine (EM) and with chronic migraine (CM), including patients who failed previous preventive treatments. The RELIEF trial also showed that eptinezumab, within 2 h of administration, reduced headache pain, migraine-associated symptoms and acute medication use when administered during a migraine attack. Eptinezumab benefits manifested as early as day 1 after dosing and with the subsequent doses lasted up to at least 2 years. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported by ≥2% of patients included upper respiratory tract infection and fatigue. Current evidence demonstrates that eptinezumab has a potent, fast-acting, sustained migraine preventive effect in patients with EM and CM. Eptinezumab has also shown to be well tolerated, supporting its use in the treatment of patients with migraine and inclusion in the current migraine therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sonia Santos-Lasaosa
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragon), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, VHIR, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rogelio Leira
- Department of Neurology, Headache Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria and IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - José Miguel Láinez
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gonzalez-Martinez A, Sanz-García A, García-Azorín D, Rodríguez-Vico J, Jaimes A, Gómez García A, Casas-Limón J, Díaz de Terán J, Sastre-Real M, Membrilla J, Latorre G, Calle de Miguel C, Gil Luque S, Trevino-Peinado C, Quintas S, Heredia P, Echavarría-Íñiguez A, Guerrero-Peral Á, Sierra Á, González-García N, Porta-Etessam J, Gago-Veiga AB. Effectiveness, tolerability, and response predictors of preventive anti-CGRP mAbs for migraine in patients over 65 years old: a multicenter real-world case-control study. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2024; 25:194-202. [PMID: 37847661 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical characteristics, effectiveness, and tolerability of preventive anti- calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in the elderly. Anti-CGRP mAbs have demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with migraine although there is limited information regarding the elderly. DESIGN We performed a multicenter case-control study of cases (patients over 65 years old) and controls (sex-matched patients under 55 years old) with migraine receiving anti-CGRP mAbs. METHODS We included the demographic characteristics, effectiveness-reduction in the number of monthly headache days (MHD) and monthly migraine days (MMD), 30%, 50%, and 75% responder rates-and treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The primary endpoint was the 50% response rate regarding MHD at weeks 20-24; exploratory 50% response predictors in the elderly were evaluated. RESULTS In total, 228 patients were included: 114 cases , 114 controls-. Among cases 84.2% (96/114) were women, 79.8% (91/114) CM; mean age of cases 70.1 years old (range: 66-86); mean age of controls was 42.9 years old(range: 38-49). Cases had a higher percentage of vascular risk factors (P < .05),older age of onset (P < .001) and more reported prior preventive treatments (P < .001). Regarding effectiveness in cases, 50% response rate was achieved by 57.5% (42/73) at 20-24 weeks, with lower reduction in the MHD at 8-12 weeks (5 [7.2], 8 [9.1]; P = .001) and a higher reduction in MMD at 20-24 weeks (10.7 [9.1], 9.2 [7.7]; P = .04) compared to the control group. The percentage of TEAEs was similar in the 2 groups. Diagnosis of episodic migraine (EM) (P = .03) and lower number of MHD at baseline (P = .001) were associated with a 50% response in the elderly in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides real world evidence of effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP mAbs for migraine in patients without upper age-limit and possible predictors of anti-CGRP response in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain
| | - Ancor Sanz-García
- Data Analysis Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - David García-Azorín
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Jaime Rodríguez-Vico
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Alex Jaimes
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Andrea Gómez García
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Javier Casas-Limón
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid 28922, Spain
| | - Javier Díaz de Terán
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - María Sastre-Real
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - Javier Membrilla
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - Germán Latorre
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Madrid 28942, Spain
| | - Carlos Calle de Miguel
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Madrid 28942, Spain
| | - Sendoa Gil Luque
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Castilla y León 09006, Spain
| | - Cristina Trevino-Peinado
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Leganés, Madrid 28914, Spain
| | - Sonia Quintas
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - Patricia Heredia
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - Ana Echavarría-Íñiguez
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Ángel Guerrero-Peral
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Álvaro Sierra
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Nuria González-García
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Jesús Porta-Etessam
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Numthavaj P, Anothaisintawee T, Attia J, McKay G, Thakkinstian A. Efficacy of migraine prophylaxis treatments for treatment-naïve patients and those with prior treatment failure: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e077916. [PMID: 38431293 PMCID: PMC10910597 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine headache is a significant health problem affecting patients' psychological well-being and quality of life. Several network meta-analyses (NMAs) have compared the efficacy of migraine prophylaxis medications. However, some have focused exclusively on oral medications, while others were limited to injectable medications. Moreover, none of these NMAs conducted a stratified analysis between treatment-naïve patients and those with prior treatment failure. Therefore, this systematic review and NMA will compare the efficacy among all treatments for migraine prophylaxis, stratified by the treatment status of patients (ie, treatment-naïve and previous treatment failure). METHODS AND ANALYSIS Randomised-controlled trials that included patients with chronic or episodic migraine, assessed the efficacy of oral or injectable treatments for migraine prophylaxis and measured the outcomes as monthly migraine day, monthly headache day, migraine-related disability, health-related quality of life or adverse drug events will be eligible for inclusion in this review. Relevant studies will be searched from Medline, Scopus, the US National Institutes of Health Register, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP) databases since inception through 15 August 2023. Risk of bias assessment will be performed using a revised tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomised trials. Two-stage NMA will be applied to compare relative treatment effects among all treatments of migraine prophylaxis. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve will be applied to estimate and rank the probability to be the best treatment. Consistency assumption will be assessed using a design-by-treatment interaction model. Publication bias will be assessed by comparison-adjusted funnel plot. All analyses will be stratified according to patients' status (ie, treatment-naïve and prior treatment failure). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is a systematic review protocol collecting data from published literature and does not require approval from an institutional review board. Results from this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020171843.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawin Numthavaj
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thunyarat Anothaisintawee
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - John Attia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gareth McKay
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Ammarin Thakkinstian
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Haridas MP, Tripathy A, Maiti R, Srinivasan A. Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Prevention of Chronic Migraine: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN COLLEGE OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 2024; 22:23-32. [PMID: 38247409 PMCID: PMC10811399 DOI: 10.9758/cpn.23.1109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Due to the unmet needs in the management of migraine, a primary headache, and disabling disorder, the past decade has focused on developing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) as migraine prophylactic agents. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various anti-CGRP mAbs in the prevention of chronic migraine. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using the Bayesian framework to estimate the efficacy and safety of mAbs after performing a literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane database, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP). The outcomes calculated were in terms of mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with a 95% credible interval (95%CrI). Network graphs were constructed and node-split analysis was done to analyze the inconsistency. The NMA included a total of 10 clinical trials. Galacanezumab (120 mg) (MD: -2.7; 95%CrI: -4.8 to -0.83) was found to be better than other mAbs in terms of the difference in mean migraine days (MMD). Fremanezumab quarterly dose administration showed the best response (OR: 2.9; 95%CrI: 1.9 to 4.6) in terms of responder rate. Eptinezumab was found to be safer (OR: 0.88; 95%CrI: 0.61-1.3) as compared to other mAbs in terms of the rate of adverse events. Fremanezumab (quarterly) ranked better in terms of response rate, and eptinezumab was found to be the safest in the prophylactic management of migraine. Galacenequmab was better at reducing MMD. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy, and use of mAbs in migraine patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amruta Tripathy
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Rituparna Maiti
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Anand Srinivasan
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Grazzi L, Giossi R, Montisano DA, Canella M, Marcosano M, Altamura C, Vernieri F. Real-world effectiveness of Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies compared to OnabotulinumtoxinA (RAMO) in chronic migraine: a retrospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:14. [PMID: 38308209 PMCID: PMC10836018 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01721-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine (CM) is a disabling condition with high prevalence in the general population. Until the recent approval of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (Anti-CGRP mAbs), OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) was the only treatment specifically approved for CM prophylaxis. Direct comparisons between the two treatments are not available so far. METHODS We performed an observational, retrospective, multicenter study in Italy to compare the real-world effectiveness of Anti-CGRP mAbs and BoNT-A. Patients with CM who had received either treatment according to Italian prescribing regulations were extracted from available clinical databases. Efficacy outcomes included the change from baseline in monthly headache days (MHD), MIgraine Disability ASsessment test (MIDAS), and monthly acute medications (MAM) evaluated at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was MHD change from baseline at 12 months. Safety outcomes included serious adverse events (SAE) and treatment discontinuation. Unadjusted and adjusted models were used for the analyses. RESULTS Two hundred sixteen potentially eligible patients were screened; 183 (86 Anti-CGRP mAbs; 97 BoNT-A) were included. One hundred seventy-one (80 Anti-CGRP mAbs; 91 BoNT-A) and 154 (69 Anti-CGRP mAbs; 85 BoNT-A) patients were included in the efficacy analysis at 6 and 12 months of follow-up, respectively. Anti-CGRP mAbs and BoNT-A both resulted in a mean MHD reduction at 6 (-11.5 and -7.2 days, respectively; unadjusted mean difference -4.3; 95%CI -6.6 to -2.0; p = 0.0003) and 12 months (-11.9 and -7.6, respectively; unadjusted mean difference -4.4; 95%CI -6.8 to -2.0; p = 0.0002) of follow-up. Similar results were observed after adjusting for baseline confounders. Anti-CGRP mAbs showed a significant MIDAS (-31.7 and -19.2 points, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0296, respectively) and MAM reduction (-5.1 and -3.1 administrations, p = 0.0023 and p = 0.0574, respectively) compared to BoNT-A at 6 and 12 months. No SAEs were reported. One patient receiving fremanezumab discontinued treatment due to arthralgia. Treatment discontinuations, mainly for inefficacy, were comparable. CONCLUSION Both Anti-CGRP mAbs and BoNT-A were effective in CM patients with Anti-CGRP mAbs presenting higher effect magnitude, with comparable safety. Still, BoNT-A remains a valuable option for CM patients with contraindications to Anti-CGRP mAbs or for frail categories who are candidates to local therapy with limited risk of systemic administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Licia Grazzi
- Headache Center, Neuroalgology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria, 11, Milan, 20133, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giossi
- Poison Control Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, Milan, 20162, Italy.
- Department of Research and Clinical Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria, 11, Milan, 20133, Italy.
| | - Danilo Antonio Montisano
- Headache Center, Neuroalgology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria, 11, Milan, 20133, Italy
| | - Mattia Canella
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Vanvitelli, 32, Milan, 20129, Italy
- Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, 20133, Italy
| | - Marilena Marcosano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, Roma, 00128, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, Roma, 00128, Italy
| | - Claudia Altamura
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, Roma, 00128, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, Roma, 00128, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, Roma, 00128, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, Roma, 00128, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Moskatel LS, Graber-Naidich A, He Z, Zhang N. The introduction of the CGRP monoclonal antibodies and their effect on the prescription patterns of chronic migraine preventive medications in a tertiary headache center: A retrospective, observational analysis. Headache 2024; 64:188-194. [PMID: 37882379 DOI: 10.1111/head.14642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of the introduction of the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) in 2018 on the prescribing of older medications for the prevention of chronic migraine. BACKGROUND Prior to 2018, the preventive treatment of migraine borrowed from medications intended to treat other illnesses with the last medication, onabotulinumtoxinA, receiving Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the prevention of chronic migraine in 2010. The FDA approval of three CGRP mAbs in 2018 provided the ideal natural experiment to assess how the introduction of these medications, and a fourth in 2020, affected the generally stable migraine preventive medications market. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using the aggregated de-identified data of 6595 patients. The percentage of patients with chronic migraine who had been prescribed one of ten most prescribed oral preventive medications or onabotulinumtoxinA, or any of the four CGRP mAbs, were calculated relative to the total number of patients with chronic migraine who received a prescription for any medication from our clinic during the pre-CGRP mAb years of 2015-2017 and post-approval years of 2019-2021. RESULTS We observed a statistically significant decrease in the prescription of the top 10 most prescribed medications after the introduction of the CGRP mAbs overall (1456/3144, 46.3%, to 1995/4629, 43.1%, p = 0.001), as well as with most individual medications, including large decreases in verapamil (230/3144, 7.3%, to 125/4629, 2.7%; p < 0.001), the tricyclic antidepressants (494/3144, 15.7%, to 532/4629, 11.5%; p < 0.001), topiramate (566/3144, 18.0%, to 653/4629, 14.1%; p < 0.001), and onabotulinumtoxinA (861/3144, 27.4%, to 1134/4629, 24.5%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The introduction of the CGRP mAbs during 2018 resulted in a decrease in utilization of most oral medications and onabotulinumtoxinA for the prevention of migraine. Future work should continue to observe how the prescription patterns of these medications evolve with time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon S Moskatel
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Anna Graber-Naidich
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Zihuai He
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Niushen Zhang
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schwedt TJ, Myers Oakes TM, Martinez JM, Vargas BB, Pandey H, Pearlman EM, Richardson DR, Varnado OJ, Cobas Meyer M, Goadsby PJ. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Galcanezumab Versus Rimegepant for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: Results from a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Neurol Ther 2024; 13:85-105. [PMID: 37948006 PMCID: PMC10787669 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00562-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine. METHODS In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months. RESULTS Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinTrials.gov-NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility and Headache Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Wolfson SPRRC, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Friedrich N, Németh K, Tanner M, Rosta J, Dobos I, Oszlács O, Jancsó G, Messlinger K, Dux M. Anti-CGRP antibody galcanezumab modifies the function of the trigeminovascular nocisensor complex in the rat. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:9. [PMID: 38243174 PMCID: PMC10799508 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01717-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies directed against the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) are effective in the prevention of chronic and frequent episodic migraine. Since the antibodies do not cross the blood brain barrier, their antinociceptive effect is attributed to effects in meningeal tissues. We aimed to probe if such an antibody can be visualized within the dura mater and the trigeminal ganglia following its administration to rats and to examine if the activity of the trigeminovascular nocisensor complex is influenced by this treatment. METHODS Effects of the anti-CGRP antibody galcanezumab on the trigeminovascular nocisensor complex was examined by measuring release of sensory neuropeptides and histamine from the rat dura mater. Deposits of galcanezumab were visualized by fluorescence microscopy in the trigeminal ganglion and the dura mater. RESULTS Fluorophore-labelled galcanezumab was detected in the dura mater and the trigeminal ganglion up to 30 days after treatment affirming the long-lasting modulatory effect of this antibody. In female rats, seven days after systemic treatment with galcanezumab the capsaicin-induced release of CGRP was decreased, while that of substance P (SP) was increased in the dura mater. In control rats, release of the inhibitory neuropeptide somatostatin (SOM) was higher in females than in males. Stimulation with high concentration of KCl did not significantly change the release of SOM in control animals, while in rats treated with galcanezumab SOM release was slightly reduced. Galcanezumab treatment also reduced the amount of histamine released from dural mast cells upon stimulation with CGRP, while the effect of compound 48/80 on histamine release was not changed. CONCLUSIONS Galcanezumab treatment is followed by multiple changes in the release of neuropeptides and histamine in the trigeminal nocisensor complex, which may contribute to the migraine preventing effect of anti-CGRP antibodies. These changes affecting the communication between the components of the trigeminal nocisensor complex may reduce pain susceptibility in migraine patients treated with CGRP targeting monoclonal antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Friedrich
- Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, Dóm Tér 10, 6720, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Krisztina Németh
- Chemical Biology Research Group, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar Tudósok Krt. 2, 1117, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Martin Tanner
- Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, Dóm Tér 10, 6720, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Judit Rosta
- Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, Dóm Tér 10, 6720, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ildikó Dobos
- Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, Dóm Tér 10, 6720, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Orsolya Oszlács
- Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, Dóm Tér 10, 6720, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gábor Jancsó
- Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, Dóm Tér 10, 6720, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Karl Messlinger
- Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University, 91054, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Mária Dux
- Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, Dóm Tér 10, 6720, Szeged, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Shibata M, Fujita K, Hoshino E, Minami K, Koizumi K, Okada S, Sakai F. Real-world experience with calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted antibodies for migraine prevention: a retrospective observational cohort study at two Japanese headache centers. BMC Neurol 2024; 24:32. [PMID: 38238659 PMCID: PMC10795407 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03521-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are an efficacious and safe therapeutic modality for migraine prevention, their clinical benefits have not been well validated in Japanese patients in the real-world setting. The present study aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and erenumab in Japanese patients with migraine. METHODS This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted at two headache centers in Japan. Patients with migraine who had experienced treatment failure with at least one traditional oral migraine preventive agent were treated with a CGRP mAb de novo. The primary efficacy endpoints were the changes from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs) and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score after 3 dosing intervals (V3). We explored whether demographic and clinical characteristics predicted therapeutic outcomes at V3. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients who completed three doses of a CGRP mAb (85.3% female [58/68], mean age: 46.2 ± 13.1 years) were included in the analysis. There were 19 patients with chronic migraine. The baseline MMDs were 13.4 ± 6.0. After 3 doses, the MMDs significantly decreased to 7.4 ± 5.5 (p < 0.0001), and the 50% response rate was 50.0%. HIT-6 score was significantly reduced from 66.7 ± 5.4 to 56.2 ± 8.7 after 3 doses (P = 0.0001). There was a positive correlation between the changes in MMDs and HIT-6 score from baseline after 2 doses (p = 0.0189). Those who achieved a ≥ 50% therapeutic response after the first and second doses were significantly more likely to do so at V3 (crude odds ratio: 3.474 [95% CI: 1.037 to 10.4], p = 0.0467). The most frequent adverse event was constipation (7.4%). None of the adverse events were serious, and there was no need for treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS This real-world study demonstrated that CGRP mAbs conferred Japanese patients with efficacious and safe migraine prevention, and an initial positive therapeutic response was predictive of subsequent favorable outcomes. Concomitant measurement of MMDs and HIT-6 score was useful in evaluating the efficacy of CGRP mAbs in migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamoru Shibata
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, 5-11-13 Sugano, Ichikawa, Chiba, 272-8513, Japan.
| | - Kazuki Fujita
- Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama, Japan
| | - Eri Hoshino
- Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kazushi Minami
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, 5-11-13 Sugano, Ichikawa, Chiba, 272-8513, Japan
| | - Kenzo Koizumi
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, 5-11-13 Sugano, Ichikawa, Chiba, 272-8513, Japan
| | - Satoshi Okada
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, 5-11-13 Sugano, Ichikawa, Chiba, 272-8513, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zovi A, Langella R, Aloisi AC, De Giorgio C, Del Vecchio M, Dondi C, Handschin G, Lauria C, Marchetti C, Martinazzoli O, Nozza R, Scalzi V, Tratta E, Jemos C, Lasala R. Real-World Effectiveness of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide-Binding Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention: A Systematic Review. Can J Hosp Pharm 2024; 77:e3382. [PMID: 38204506 PMCID: PMC10754415 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Background Migraine is a neurological disease with a high incidence. The new anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing episodic and chronic migraine. Objective To collect evidence of the real-world effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs by assessing outcomes such as reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs), reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs), and percentage of patients having a 50% reduction in MMDs. Data Sources The PubMed database was searched for the period from inception to October 20, 2021. Study Selection and Data Extraction Of interest for this review were studies that evaluated the real-world effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs in terms of MMDs and reduction in MHDs. The search terms included "migraine", "monthly migraine days", and various drug names. The data are reported in terms of patients' baseline characteristics and treatment effectiveness. Data Synthesis A total of 46 studies were evaluated, of which 30 (enrolling a total of 4273 patients across 10 countries) were included in the systematic review. The greatest absolute reduction in MMD was from 20.4 at baseline to 10.7 after 3 months of treatment. After 6 months, the greatest absolute difference was 10, relative to baseline. The largest absolute reduction in MHD at 3 months was from 22 to 8, whereas at 6 months, the greatest absolute reduction in MHD was 13. The treatment could be considered clinically effective (≥ 50% reduction in MMDs) for 41% of patients at 3 months and about 44% of patients at 6 months. Conclusions Despite substantial variability in baseline values, this review confirmed the effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs, which yielded important clinical reductions in both MMDs and MHDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Zovi
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Langella
- , PharmD, is with the Lombardy Regional Section of SIFO (Società Italiana de Farmacia Ospedaliera e dei Servizi Farmaceutici delle Aziende Sanitarie), Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Chiara Aloisi
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Giorgio
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Del Vecchio
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Dondi
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Handschin
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Claudia Lauria
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlotta Marchetti
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Oscar Martinazzoli
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Renata Nozza
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Scalzi
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Tratta
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Milan, Italy
| | - Costantino Jemos
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruggero Lasala
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy of Corato, Local Health Unit of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yang C, Zhang Y. Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant for Migraine Patients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies. Clin Neuropharmacol 2024; 47:7-11. [PMID: 37909676 DOI: 10.1097/wnf.0000000000000576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rimegepant may have some potential in treating migraine, and this meta-analysis aims to study the efficacy and safety of rimegepant for migraine patients. METHODS We have searched several databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases and selected the randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of rimegepant versus placebo for migraine patients. This meta-analysis was conducted using the random- or fixed-effect model based on the heterogeneity. RESULTS Three randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo in migraine patients, rimegepant treatment was associated with substantially improved freedom from pain at 2 hours (odds ratio [OR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-2.59; P < 0.00001), pain relief at 2 hours (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.65 to 2.25; P < 0.00001), freedom from the most bothersome symptom at 2 hours (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.35-1.91; P < 0.00001), ability to function normally at 2 hours (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.42-2.01; P < 0.00001), sustained freedom from pain at 24 hours (OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.74-4.78; P < 0.0001), sustained pain relief at 24 hours (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.96-2.72; P < 0.00001), and no rescue medication (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.02-2.90; P < 0.00001) but showed no obvious impact on adverse events (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.60; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Rimegepant may be effective and safe for the treatment of migraine patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University, Jilin, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chase BA, Semenov I, Rubin S, Meyers S, Mark A, Makhlouf T, Chirayil TT, Maraganore D, Wei J, Zheng SL, Xu J, Epshteyn A, Pham A, Frigerio R, Markopoulou K. Characteristics associated with response to subcutaneously administered anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody medications in a real-world community cohort of persons living with migraine: A retrospective clinical and genetic study. Headache 2024; 64:68-92. [PMID: 38071464 DOI: 10.1111/head.14655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate response to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) migraine preventives in a real-world community cohort of persons living with migraine and to identify clinical and genetic characteristics associated with efficacious response. BACKGROUND Erenumab-aooeb, fremanezumab-vrfm, and galcanezumab-gnlm target CGRP or its receptor; however, many patients are non-responsive. METHODS In this retrospective clinical and genetic study, we identified 1077 adult patients who satisfied the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for migraine without aura, migraine with aura, or chronic migraine and who were prescribed an anti-CGRP migraine preventive between May 2018 and May 2021. Screening of 558 patients identified 289 with data at baseline and first follow-up visits; data were available for 161 patients at a second follow-up visit. The primary outcome was migraine days per month (MDM). In 198 genotyped patients, we evaluated associations between responders (i.e., patients with ≥50% reduction in MDM at follow-up) and genes involved in CGRP signaling or pharmacological response, and genetic and polygenic risk scores. RESULTS The median time to first follow-up was 4.4 (0.9-22) months after preventive start. At the second follow-up, 5.7 (0.9-13) months later, 145 patients had continued on the same preventive. Preventives had strong, persistent effects in reducing MDM in responders (follow-up 1: η2 = 0.26, follow-up 2: η2 = 0.22). At the first but not second follow-up: galcanezumab had a larger effect than erenumab, while no difference was seen at either follow-up between galcanezumab and fremanezumab or fremanezumab and erenumab. The decrease in MDM at follow-up was generally proportional to baseline MDM, larger in females, and increased with months on medication. At the first follow-up only, patients with prior hospitalization for migraine or who had not responded to more preventive regimens had a smaller decrease in MDM. Reasons for stopping or switching a preventive varied between medications and were often related to cost and insurance coverage. At both follow-ups, patient tolerance (1: 92.2% [262/284]; 2: 95.2% [141/145]) and continued use (1: 77.5% [224/289]; 2: 80.6% [116/145]) were high and similar across preventives. Response consistency (always non-responders: 31.7% [46/145]; always responders: 56.5% [82/145], and one-time only responders: 11.7% [17/145]) was also similar across preventives. Non-responder status had nominally significant associations with rs12615320-G in RAMP1 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 4.7 [1.5, 14.7]), and rs4680-A in COMT (0.6[0.4, 0.9]). Non-responders had a lower mean genetic risk score than responders (1.0 vs. 1.1; t(df) = -1.75(174.84), p = 0.041), and the fraction of responders increased with genetic and polygenic risk score percentile. CONCLUSIONS In this real-world setting, anti-CGRP preventives reduced MDM persistently and had similar and large effect sizes on MDM reduction; however, clinical and genetic factors influenced response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce A Chase
- Health Information Technology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Skokie, Illinois, USA
- Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Irene Semenov
- Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Susan Rubin
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Steven Meyers
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Angela Mark
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Thomas Makhlouf
- Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Tanya T Chirayil
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Jun Wei
- Center for Individualized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Siqun L Zheng
- Center for Individualized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Center for Individualized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Alexander Epshteyn
- Health Information Technology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Skokie, Illinois, USA
| | - Anna Pham
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Roberta Frigerio
- Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Katerina Markopoulou
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ihara K, Takizawa T, Watanabe N, Nakahara J, Martelletti P. Potential benefits and possible risks of CGRP-targeted multitherapy in migraine. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2024; 20:1-4. [PMID: 38323326 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2024.2316131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Ihara
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Tsubasa Takizawa
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Narumi Watanabe
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jin Nakahara
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- School of Health Sciences, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Naghdi S, Underwood M, Madan J, Brown A, Duncan C, Matharu M, Aksentyte A, Davies N, Rees S, Cooklin A, Grove A, Mistry H. Clinical effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for managing chronic migraine in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:164. [PMID: 38057728 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01696-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine can be a profoundly disabling disorder that may be treated with preventive medications. However, uncertainty remains as to which preventive medication is the most effective. We present a network meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness and rank of preventive drugs for chronic migraine in adults. METHODS We identified, reviewed, and extracted data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of preventive drugs for chronic migraine with at least 200 participants. Data were analysed using network meta-analysis. FINDINGS We included 12 RCTs of six medications (Eptinezumab, Erenumab, Fremanezumab, Galcanezumab, Onabotulinumtoxin A, and Topiramate) compared to placebo or each other. All drugs effectively reduced monthly headache and migraine days compared with placebo. The most effective drug for monthly headache days was Eptinezumab 300mg, with a mean difference of -2.46 days, 95% Credible Interval (CrI): -3.23 to -1.69. On the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Area (SUCRA) analysis, the probability that Eptinezumab 300mg was ranked highest was 0.82. For monthly migraine days, the most effective medication was Fremanezumab-monthly, with a mean difference: -2.77 days, 95% CrI: -3.36 to -2.17, and 0.98 probability of being ranked the highest. All included drugs, except Topiramate, improved headache-related quality of life. No eligible studies were identified for the other common preventive oral medications such as Amitriptyline, Candesartan, and Propranolol. The main reasons were that the studies did not define chronic migraine, were undertaken before the definition of chronic migraine, or were too small. INTERPRETATION All six medications were more effective than the placebo on monthly headache and migraine days. The absolute differences in the number of headache/migraine days are, at best, modest. No evidence was found to determine the relative effectiveness of the six included drugs with other oral preventive medications. REGISTRATION PROSPERO (number CRD42021265990).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyran Naghdi
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Martin Underwood
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Jason Madan
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Anna Brown
- Health Science Division, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Callum Duncan
- Department of Neurology, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, UK
| | - Manjit Matharu
- Headache and Facial Pain Group, University College London (UCL) Queen Square Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Aiva Aksentyte
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Natasha Davies
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Sophie Rees
- Bristol Clinical Trials Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK
| | - Andrew Cooklin
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Amy Grove
- Health Science Division, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Hema Mistry
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shibata M, Nihira A, Tanji Y, Ozeki A, Imagawa H, Komori M. Galcanezumab Efficacy Through the Dosing Interval in Japanese Patients with Episodic Migraine: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:2007-2019. [PMID: 37698836 PMCID: PMC10630272 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00534-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The efficacy and safety of galcanezumab as a preventive treatment in Japanese patients with episodic migraine was demonstrated in a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (conducted December 2016-January 2019). This post hoc analysis assessed the consistency of galcanezumab efficacy through the monthly dosing interval. METHODS Patients with 4-14 migraine headache days/month were randomized (2:1:1, stratified by baseline migraine frequency) to subcutaneous placebo (n = 230), 120-mg galcanezumab (with 240-mg loading dose; n = 115) or 240-mg galcanezumab (n = 114) once monthly for 6 months. Outcomes included change from baseline in weekly migraine headache days, proportion of patients with migraine headache on each day, and proportion of patients with worsening migraine headache days during each month ([average of weeks 3-4] - [average of weeks 1-2] > 0). RESULTS In the 120-mg (approved dose) galcanezumab group, mean change from baseline in weekly migraine headache days was consistent and significantly greater (p < 0.05) than placebo for weeks 1-4; efficacy was consistent when averaged across months 1-6 and in most individual months. Averaged across months 1-6, the proportion of patients with migraine headache was significantly lower with galcanezumab than placebo on every day in both dose groups and was not significantly different between days 2 and 28 with 120-mg galcanezumab (p = 0.161). Within each month, the proportion of patients with migraine headache was generally consistent from days 2-28. The proportion of patients with worsening during the dosing interval did not significantly exceed 50% in any group during any month. CONCLUSIONS This post hoc analysis supports the consistency of efficacy of galcanezumab across 6 months of treatment and suggests that wearing-off within the dosing interval does not occur on a population level in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02959177.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamoru Shibata
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Japan
| | - Atsuko Nihira
- Department of Neurology, Nakamura Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yuka Tanji
- Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan.
| | - Akichika Ozeki
- Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Imagawa
- Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan
| | - Mika Komori
- Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Alsaadi T, Kayed DM, Al-Madani A, Hassan AM, Terruzzi A, Krieger D, Riachi N, Sarathchandran P, Al-Rukn S. Consensus-Based Recommendations on the Use of CGRP-Based Therapies for Migraine Prevention in the UAE. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1845-1865. [PMID: 37792218 PMCID: PMC10630270 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00550-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is a common debilitating neurological disorder affecting a large proportion of the general population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37-amino acid neuropeptide, plays a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine, and the development of therapies targeting the anti-CGRP pathway has revolutionized the field of migraine treatment. METHODS An expert task force of neurologists in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) developed and critically assessed recommendations on the use of CGRP-based therapies in migraine treatment and management in the UAE, based on available published literature. A consensus was reached for each statement by means of an open-voting process, based on a predefined agreement level of at least 60%. RESULTS The consensus recommendations advocate the need for guidelines for the appropriate use of CGRP-based therapies by defining patient cohorts and appropriate monitoring of therapeutic response as well as standardizing the initiation, assessment, and cessation of treatment. The consensus recommendations were primarily formulated on the basis of international studies, because of the limited availability of regional and local data. As such, they may also act as guidelines for global healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS These are the first consensus recommendations for the UAE that address the use of CGRP-based therapies in the treatment and management of migraine, integrating both clinical evidence and medical expertise to enhance clinical judgment and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taoufik Alsaadi
- Department of Neurology, American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
| | - Deeb M Kayed
- Neurology Department, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | | | | | | | - Derk Krieger
- Neurology Department, Mediclinic Parkview Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - Naji Riachi
- Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Khalifa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Basedau H, Ornello R, Matteis ED, Davaasuren B, Kadyrova B, Vuralli D, Bozhenko M, Azizova I, Bitsadze N, Eralieva E, Ashina M, Mitsikostas D, Puledda F. Placebo and nocebo in the treatment of migraine: How much does real world effectiveness depend on contextual effects? Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231218392. [PMID: 38041833 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231218392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatments in medicine impact individuals beyond their intended effects, due to phenomena such as the placebo and nocebo effects. The placebo effect arises from the positive expectation of a treatment being beneficial, while the nocebo effect stems from the negative expectation of a treatment causing harm. Both in real-world practice and clinical trials, treatments can lead to outcomes unrelated to their intended mechanism of action, which we categorize as placebo and nocebo responses. These responses, combined with the inherent fluctuation in a condition's natural progression, regression to the mean, and random comorbidities, make up a significant part of the therapeutic experience. Particularly in pain management, placebo and nocebo effects play a substantial role. By addressing modifiable contextual factors such as patient expectations, lifestyle choices, and the therapeutic relationship, healthcare providers can enhance the effectiveness of migraine treatments, paving the way for a more comprehensive, individualized approach to patient care. We must also consider non-modifiable factors like personal experiences, beliefs, and information from social media and the internet. CONCLUSION This review offers a summary of our current understanding of the placebo and nocebo effects in migraine management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hauke Basedau
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Eleonora De Matteis
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Begimai Kadyrova
- Department of Special Clinical Disciplines, International School of Medicine of International University of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
| | - Doga Vuralli
- Department of Neurology and Algology, Neuropsychiatry Center, Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Center of Excellence (NÖROM), Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Myroslav Bozhenko
- Department of Neurology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Ilaha Azizova
- Neurological Clinic "New Medical Technologies", Baku, Azerbaijan
| | | | | | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dimos Mitsikostas
- Department of Neurology Α, Aegintion Hospital, National and Kapidistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Francesca Puledda
- Headache Group, Wolfson SPaRC, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kowacs PA, Sampaio Rocha-Filho PA, Peres MFP, Edvinsson L. The history and rationale of the development of new drugs for migraine treatment. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2023; 81:1084-1097. [PMID: 38157876 PMCID: PMC10756794 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is one of the most prevalent and disabling diseases in the world. Migraine attack treatments and prophylactic treatments of this disease are essential to lessen its individual, social, and economic impact. This is a narrative review of the main drugs used for treating migraine, as well as the experimental models and the theoretical frameworks that led to their development. Ergot derivatives, triptans, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, beta-blockers,: flunarizine,: valproic acid,: topiramate, onabotulinumtoxin A, ditans, monoclonal antibodies against CGRP and its receptor, and gepants are discussed. Possible therapeutic targets for the development of new drugs that are under development are also addressed. Many of the drugs currently in use for treating migraine were developed for the treatment of other diseases, but have proven effective for the treatment of migraine, expanding knowledge about the disease. With a better understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine, new drugs have been and continue to be developed specifically for the treatment of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro André Kowacs
- Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba, Serviço de Neurologia, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Unidade do Sistema Nervoso, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
| | - Pedro Augusto Sampaio Rocha-Filho
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências Médicas, Divisão de Neuropsiquiatria, Recife PE, Brazil.
- Universidade de Pernambuco, Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Clínica de Cefaleia, Recife PE, Brazil.
| | | | - Lars Edvinsson
- Lund University, Institute of Clinical Sciences, 22185 Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tana C, Cipollone F, Giamberardino MA, Martelletti P. New drugs targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide for the management of migraines. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2023; 28:233-240. [PMID: 37996401 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2023.2288334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Significant advances in migraine research have contributed to the development of new drugs for the treatment of migraine. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) or its receptor and CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) have been associated with a good safety profile and resulted in an overall efficacy in reducing the number of monthly migraine days both in episodic and chronic forms of migraine. AREAS COVERED The results from main investigation studies (phase 2 or 3) of CGRP-targeting drugs (both anti-CGRP mAbs and gepants) are reported in this expert-opinion review. EXPERT OPINION The introduction of new drugs targeting CGRP is a significant breakthrough in the migraine field, and represents a new generation of therapeutic agents that are available to manage migraine. The evaluation of efficacy and safety in the long-term follow-up and the development of trials comparing the available drugs could improve the current knowledge. The economic sustainability of these drugs remains to be clarified, and a cost-cutting campaign should be promoted based on the high burden of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Tana
- Headache Center, Geriatrics Clinic, SS Annunziata Hospital of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesco Cipollone
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, Medical Clinic, SS. Annunziata Hospital of Chieti, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Maria Adele Giamberardino
- Headache Center, Geriatrics Clinic, SS Annunziata Hospital of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging and CAST, G. D'Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- School of Health Sciences, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Takizawa T, Ihara K, Uno S, Ohtani S, Watanabe N, Imai N, Nakahara J, Hori S, Garcia-Azorin D, Martelletti P. Metabolic and toxicological considerations regarding CGRP mAbs and CGRP antagonists to treat migraine in COVID-19 patients: a narrative review. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2023; 19:951-967. [PMID: 37925645 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2023.2280221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine pharmacological therapies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), including monoclonal antibodies and gepants, have shown clinical effect and optimal tolerability. Interactions between treatments of COVID-19 and CGRP-related drugs have not been reviewed. AREAS COVERED An overview of CGRP, a description of the characteristics of each CGRP-related drug and its response predictors, COVID-19 and its treatment, the interactions between CGRP-related drugs and COVID-19 treatment, COVID-19 and vaccination-induced headache, and the neurological consequences of Covid-19. EXPERT OPINION Clinicians should be careful about using gepants for COVID-19 patients, due to the potential drug interactions with drugs metabolized via CYP3A4 cytochrome. In particular, COVID-19 treatment (especially nirmatrelvir packaged with ritonavir, as Paxlovid) should be considered cautiously. It is advisable to stop or adjust the dose (10 mg atogepant when used for episodic migraine) of gepants when using Paxlovid (except for zavegepant). CGRP moncolconal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) do not have drug - drug interactions, but a few days' interval between a COVID-19 vaccination and the use of CGRP mAbs is recommended to allow the accurate identification of the possible adverse effects, such as injection site reaction. Covid-19- and vaccination-related headache are known to occur. Whether CGRP-related drugs would be of benefit in these circumstances is not yet known.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsubasa Takizawa
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiko Ihara
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Uno
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seiya Ohtani
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Narumi Watanabe
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noboru Imai
- Department of Neurology, Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Jin Nakahara
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoko Hori
- Division of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan
| | - David Garcia-Azorin
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- School of Health Sciences, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Imai N, Isogai Y, Shibasaki Y, Nakai M, Ishida M, Ning X, Koga N. Effects of Fremanezumab on Medication Overuse in Japanese Chronic Migraine Patients: Post Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1981-1991. [PMID: 37695442 PMCID: PMC10630291 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00531-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic migraine (CM) patients commonly take acute headache medications, often resulting in medication overuse (MO). This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of fremanezumab in CM patients from Japan with and without MO, which is not yet established. METHODS A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 2b/3 trial randomized patients (1:1:1) to monthly fremanezumab via subcutaneous injection (initial dose: 675 mg, second/third doses: 225 mg), quarterly fremanezumab (initial dose: 675 mg, second/third doses: placebo), or placebo for 3 months. This post hoc analysis analyzed data from Japanese patients with and without MO (monthly use of acute headache medication ≥ 15 days, migraine-specific acute medication ≥ 10 days, or combination medication ≥ 10 days). Outcomes included the original primary endpoint of average headache days of moderate or greater severity per month (HDs), the proportion of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in HDs and the proportion of patients changing status from with to without MO. RESULTS Of 479 patients enrolled, 320 (66.8%) had baseline MO. Monthly average HDs were significantly reduced versus placebo with fremanezumab in both patients with MO (mean [standard error] difference vs. placebo: monthly - 2.0 [0.6], p = 0.0012; quarterly - 1.8 [0.6], p = 0.0042) and without MO (- 1.6 [0.8], p = 0.0437; - 1.5 [0.8], p = 0.0441). Significantly more fremanezumab-treated patients with MO (monthly 28/108 [25.9%], p = 0.0040 quarterly 25/99 [25.3%], p = 0.0070) or without MO (18/50 [36.0%], p = 0.0132; and 21/60 [35.0%], p = 0.0126) had ≥ 50% reduction in HDs versus placebo (12/111 [10.8%] and 7/49 [14.3%], respectively). A significantly greater proportion of fremanezumab-treated patients reverted to no MO (monthly 50/108 [46.3%], p = 0.0115; quarterly 44/99 [44.4%], p = 0.0272) vs. placebo (33/111 [29.7%]). CONCLUSION Fremanezumab appears effective as preventive migraine treatment in Japanese CM patients with or without MO while also being beneficial in reducing MO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noboru Imai
- Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yuki Isogai
- Medical Affairs, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, 16-4 Kounan 2-Chome, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-8242, Japan.
| | - Yoshiyuki Shibasaki
- Medical Affairs, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, 16-4 Kounan 2-Chome, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-8242, Japan
| | | | - Miki Ishida
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan
| | - Xiaoping Ning
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, West Chester, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rhatigan K, Hirons B, Kesavan H, Turner RD, Ebelthite C, Hull JH, Jolley CJ, Birring SS, Cho PSP. Patient Global Impression of Severity Scale in Chronic Cough: Validation and Formulation of Symptom Severity Categories. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:3706-3712.e1. [PMID: 37678666 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.08.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) scale is a self-reported, single-item categorical scale that is increasingly used when assessing chronic cough (CC). OBJECTIVE This study aimed to establish validity, repeatability, and responsiveness of the PGI-S scale in CC and use the scale to define discrete categories of severity when measured with other commonly used patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools. METHODS Consecutive patients with CC completed the PGI-S scale, cough severity and urge to cough visual analog scales (VAS), and cough-specific health status Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at a clinic visit. Validity, repeatability, and responsiveness were assessed, and threshold scores for PRO severity categories determined. RESULTS A total of 482 participants completed the assessments; the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 57 (46-67) years, 71% were female, and the median (IQR) duration of cough was 48 (24-120) months. They reported a median (IQR) PGI-S score of 3 (3-4; moderate severity), cough severity VAS of 57 (31-75) mm, urge to cough VAS of 62 (40-81) mm, and LCQ of 11.5 (8.7-14.4). There were strong associations between PGI-S scores and cough severity VAS (ρ = 0.81), urge to cough VAS (ρ = 0.73), and LCQ (ρ = -0.73) (all P < .001). Repeatability of the PGI-S scale was high (n = 77); the intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) was 0.85 (0.77-0.91) (P < .001). The PGI-S scale was responsive in participants with a treatment response (P < .001). The suggested PRO thresholds to define severe cough are ≥61 mm (cough severity VAS), ≥71 mm (urge to cough VAS), and ≤10 (LCQ). CONCLUSION The PGI-S scale is a simple and valid tool that characterizes cough severity and is repeatable and responsive in CC. The proposed categorical severity thresholds for VAS and LCQ can provide intuitive meaning for patients and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Rhatigan
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Barnaby Hirons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Harini Kesavan
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard D Turner
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia; School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Candice Ebelthite
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - James H Hull
- Airway Disease Section, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline J Jolley
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Surinder S Birring
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter S P Cho
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ceccardi G, Schiano di Cola F, Caratozzolo S, Di Pasquale M, Bolchini M, Padovani A, Rao R. Onabotulinumtoxin-A: Previous Prophylactic Treatment Might Improve Subsequent Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies Response in Patients with Chronic Migraine. Toxins (Basel) 2023; 15:677. [PMID: 38133181 PMCID: PMC10747467 DOI: 10.3390/toxins15120677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether previous preventive treatment with onabotulinumtoxin-A might influence subsequent clinical response following a switch to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The present retrospective study was conducted at the Headache Centre-Neurology Clinic at the Spedali Civili Hospital of Brescia between November 2018 and May 2023. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcome (monthly headache days (MHDs), monthly migraine days (MMDs), mean analgesics consumption, and clinical disability according to Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS)) following three months (T3) of preventive treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs comparing patients who did and those who did not previously receive treatment with Onabotulinumtoxin-A. Moreover, we aimed to evaluate whether the clinical response to anti-CGRP mAbs was affected by the number of previous Onabotulinumtoxin-A administrations. At T3, compared to Onabotulinumtoxin-A naïve patients, patients who previously received Onabotulinumtoxin-A documented fewer MMDs (3.3 ± 3.7 versus 5.2 ± 5.0; p = 0.017) and a lower MIDAS score (23.2 ± 20.9 versus 37.4 ± 39.6; p = 0.013). Patients who received at least 3 onabotulinumtoxin-A administrations documented, at T3, lower MMDs compared to those who received fewer cycles (respectively, 2.1 ± 2.7 vs. 6.5 ± 4.4; p = 0.024). In conclusion, according to our data, previous treatment with onabotulinumtoxin-A might improve subsequent response to anti-CGRP mAbs preventive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francesca Schiano di Cola
- Department of Care Continuity and Frialty, Neurology Unit, University of Brescia, 25128 Brescia, Italy; (G.C.); (A.P.); (R.R.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yalinay Dikmen P, Baykan B, Uludüz D, Özge A, Ilgaz Aydınlar E, Polat B, Karlı N, Tepe N, Çelebisoy N, Ergin Toktaş H, Niflioğlu B, Karacı R, Mayda Domaç F, Uludüz E, Erdogan Soyukibar T, Öksüz N, Ertaş M. Real-life experiences with galcanezumab and predictors for treatment response in Turkey. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:418. [PMID: 37996793 PMCID: PMC10666377 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03467-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complexity of clinical practice extends far beyond the controlled settings of trials, and there is a need for real-world studies aimed at identifying which patients will respond to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in different countries. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in treating migraine in a real-life setting in Turkey, as well as identify predictors of treatment response. METHODS A total of 476 patients who diagnosed with migraine according to ICHD-3 criteria and treated with galcanezumab by headache specialists were voluntarily participated in this cross-sectional study. Galcanezumab is indicated for the prevention of migraine in adults who have at least 4 monthly migraine days in Turkey. All patients filled out a survey on Google Form that comprised 54 questions, addressing various aspects such as demographics, migraine characteristics, previous use of acute symptomatic medication, failures with preventive drug classes, comorbidities, most bothersome symptoms, as well as the interictal burden of migraine. RESULTS Among the participants, 89.3% reported that galcanezumab treatment was beneficial for them. A decrease in the frequency (80.0%), severity (85.7%), and acute medication usage for migraine attacks (71.4%) was reported with galcanezumab treatment. An adverse effect related to galcanezumab was reported in 16.3% of cases, but no serious adverse reactions were observed. Remarkably, 14.3% of participants reported no longer experiencing any headaches, and 18.9% did not require any acute treatment while receiving galcanezumab treatment. A logistic regression model showed that male gender, lack of ictal nausea, and previous failure of more than 2 prophylactic agents may predict the non-responders. CONCLUSIONS The first large series from Turkey showed that galcanezumab treatment is safe and effective in most of the patients diagnosed with migraine by headache experts in the real-life setting. Patients reported a significant decrease in both ictal and interictal burden of migraine and expressed satisfaction with this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pınar Yalinay Dikmen
- School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Acibadem University, Büyükdere Caddesi. No: 40, Istanbul, 34390, Turkey.
| | | | - Derya Uludüz
- Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Aynur Özge
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Elif Ilgaz Aydınlar
- School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Acibadem University, Büyükdere Caddesi. No: 40, Istanbul, 34390, Turkey
| | - Burcu Polat
- School of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Necdet Karlı
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Nermin Tepe
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Balikesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey
| | - Neşe Çelebisoy
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | - Rahşan Karacı
- Neurology Department, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Füsun Mayda Domaç
- Neurology Department, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ezgi Uludüz
- Koc University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tuba Erdogan Soyukibar
- School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Acibadem University, Büyükdere Caddesi. No: 40, Istanbul, 34390, Turkey
| | - Nevra Öksüz
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Ertaş
- Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Neurology Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|