Risk of COVID-19 Infection and of Severe Complications Among People With Epilepsy: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Navigating the waves: A systematic review of telemedicine interventions and health service access challenges in epilepsy during COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically reshaped the landscape of healthcare delivery, prompting a surge in the adoption of telemedicine as a means to ensure continuity of care. During the pandemic, patients with epilepsy experienced difficulties accessing healthcare and obtaining necessary medications, with a substantial percentage facing obstacles in acquiring anti-seizure medication and reaching healthcare professionals. Disruptions in the supply and distribution of medication, due to COVID-19-related actions, further caused more problems for people with epilepsy and their caregivers like increasing seizure frequency. The pandemic has also accelerated the adoption of telemedicine, with evidence suggesting its potential benefits in various medical fields. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to investigate the challenges faced by patients with epilepsy during the COVID-19 pandemic, including healthcare access and medication acquisition, as well as evaluate changes in seizure frequency. Additionally, we will synthesize existing evidence on the use of telemedicine to address the healthcare needs of these patients, exploring its advantages and limitations.

METHODS

This systematic review was prepared using PRISMA reporting guidelines. The databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Risk of Bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Following rigorous application of eligibility criteria, relevant data, covering both telemedicine-related and health service access information, were methodically extracted and organized using Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. The analytical procedures were executed through the utilization of Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software.

RESULTS

A total of 70 articles included in this review. Regarding difficulties in accessing healthcare, 34% of PWE and 41% of caregivers experienced cancelled, changed or postponed appointments. Following issues with obtaining medicine, 13% of patients and 16% of caregivers had difficulties in medicine availability and 11% of patients and 10% of caregivers in medicine accessibility. A very high rate of 90% satisfaction with telemedicine was reported by PWE. 17.6% of PWE experienced an escalation, 9% a decrease and 67% no changes in seizure frequency.

CONCLUSION

This review and meta-analysis revealed that telemedicine and virtual communications have been helpful but not sufficient for meeting healthcare needs for PWE during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, there was a significant increase in seizure frequency among PWE who had difficulty obtaining medicine and access to healthcare.

Association of varicose veins with incidence risk of atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Varicose veins (VV) were once considered benign and common ailments; however, recent research suggests a potential link between VV and cardiovascular diseases or mortality. VV share common risk factors and pathophysiology with cardiovascular disease, potentially influencing the vascular system. Therefore, the authors aimed to investigate the association between VV and the incidence risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) using a population-based cohort.

METHODS

Our retrospective cohort study included 2 680 971 individuals who underwent examination through the Korean National Health Screening Service from 2010 to 2011. VV was defined by two or more claims with the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision diagnostic codes: I83.0, I83.1, I83.2 (VV of lower extremities with ulcer or inflammation, severe VV), and I83.9 (asymptomatic VV of lower extremities, mild VV). The 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to assess the risk of newly developed AF, identified via insurance claims coded as I48.

RESULTS

The mean age of all participants was 48.5±14.2 years, with 51.4% being male. Among the population, 24 557 (0.91%) had VV, including 3684 (0.14%) of severe VV and 20 873 (0.77%) of mild VV. During a median follow-up of 10.06 years, 24 557 (0.92%) cases of AF occurred. Participants with VV exhibited an increased incidence risk of AF compared to those without it before (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.21, P <0.001) and after PSM (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.27, P <0.001). This positive association was consistently observed in severe VV both before (HR: 1.19, 95% CI [1.09-1.28], P =0.002) and after PSM (HR: 1.20, 95% CI [1.10-1.30], P =0.003) and mild VV also before (HR: 1.10, 95% CI [1.04-1.16], P =0.003) and after PSM (HR: 1.13, 95% CI [1.03-1.-20], P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that VV may be associated with an increased risk of AF. Hence, the presence of VV should be considered as an association factor for AF occurrence.

Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome Associated with COVID-19: A Narrative Review

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a complex condition marked by an atypical autonomic response to standing, leading to orthostatic intolerance and significant tachycardia without accompanying hypotension. In recent studies, a considerable number of individuals recovering from COVID-19 have been reported to experience POTS within 6 to 8 months post-infection. Key symptoms of POTS include fatigue, difficulty with orthostatic tolerance, tachycardia, and cognitive challenges. The underlying causes of POTS following COVID-19 remain unknown, with various theories proposed such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) dysregulation, hyperadrenergic reaction, and direct viral infection. Healthcare professionals should be vigilant for POTS in patients who have recovered from COVID-19 and are experiencing signs of autonomic dysfunction and use diagnostic procedures such as the tilt-up table test for confirmation. COVID-19-related POTS should be approached with a holistic strategy. Although many patients show improvement with initial non-drug treatments, for subjects who do not respond and exhibit more severe symptoms, medication-based therapies may be necessary. The current understanding of COVID-19-related POTS is limited, underscoring the need for more research to increase knowledge and enhance treatment approaches.

COVID-19 response in a long-term care facility for people with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To assess asymptomatic rates and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in people with epilepsy and their healthcare workers in a long-term care facility which had implemented weekly surveillance testing between April 2020 and June 2022.

METHODS

Questionnaires focused on objective and subjective COVID-19 symptoms for people with epilepsy residing in and their healthcare workers at the Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy in June 2022. Demographic information, comorbidities, and seizure frequency were gathered from medical records. We also collected responses on objective and subjective COVID-19 symptoms from healthcare workers who participated in a prospective study assessing the reaction to COVID-19 vaccinations (SAFER).

RESULTS

Fifty-five out of 89 (62%) residents tested positive at least once on weekly PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 during the period of interest; 20 of those (37%) were asymptomatic. In comparison, of those 63 healthcare workers who tested positive at least once on weekly testing during the same period, only four (6%) were asymptomatic. Of the 159 healthcare workers who also participated in the SAFER study, 41 tested positive at least once, and seven (17%) were completely asymptomatic during infection with SARS-CoV-2.

SIGNIFICANCE

People with epilepsy living in a long-term care facility were more likely to present with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections than healthcare workers at the same facility. Despite possible bias in the reporting of subjective symptoms due to management-by-proxy, there is no evidence that vulnerable people living in an epilepsy long-term care facility showed reduced resilience towards infections.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

People with epilepsy living in care home facilities had a surprisingly high degree of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2. Very few residents had severe or fatal outcomes. This is in stark contrast to the widely reported bad outcomes for people without epilepsy in other care homes. People with epilepsy reported significantly less symptoms than their healthcare workers. No changes in seizure frequency during or after infection were observed.

Increasing incidence of Parkinson's disease in patients with epilepsy: A Nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although epilepsy is an uncommon comorbidity of Parkinson's disease (PD), the exact incidence of PD among the patients with epilepsy is not clarified yet.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to estimate the incidence of PD in patients with epilepsy and explore the association between epilepsy and PD.

METHODS

Epilepsy patients enrolled in the National Health Insurance Service Health Screening Cohort (NHIS-HealS) (2002-2013) between 2003 and 2007 were set up as the experimental group. The major outcome was the occurrence of PD. Non-epilepsy patients were obtained through Propensity Score Matching of 'greedy nearest neighbor' algorithm in 1:1 ratio. The Cox Proportional Hazards model was used to calculate PD incidence and hazard ratio (HR).

RESULTS

A total of 10,510 patients were finally included in the study, which contained 5255 patients in epilepsy and non-epilepsy groups, respectively. During the follow-up period, 85 patients with Parkinson's disease among 5255 patients with epilepsy and 57 patients with Parkinson's disease among 5255 patients without epilepsy occurred. The 10,000 Person-Year (PY), representing the number of PD patients per 10,000 per year, was 21.38 in the epilepsy group and 11.18 in the non-epilepsy group. When all variables were adjusted, it was found that the epilepsy group had a 2.19 times significantly higher risk of developing Parkinson's disease than the control group (The adjusted HR: 2.19 (95% CI, 1.55-3.12)).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates an increased risk of PD in patients with epilepsy. However, further research is needed to prove an exact causal relationship between these two brain disorders.

Pandemic Effect on Healthcare Use and Death in Adults with Epilepsy: A Population Study

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a population-based study using Ontario health administrative data to describe trends in healthcare utilization and mortality in adults with epilepsy during the first pandemic year (March 2020-March 2021) compared to historical data (2016-2019). We also investigated if changes in outpatient visits and diagnostic testing during the first pandemic year were associated with increased risk for hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, or death.

METHODS

Projected monthly visit rates (per 100,000 people) for outpatient visits, electroencephalography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, all-cause ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality were calculated based on historical data by fitting monthly time series autoregressive integrated moving-average models. Two-way interactions were calculated using Quasi-Poisson models.

RESULTS

In adults with epilepsy during the first quarter of the pandemic, we demonstrated a reduction in all-cause outpatient visits, diagnostic testing, ED visits and hospitalizations, and a temporary increase in mortality (observed rates of 355.8 vs projected 308.8, 95% CI: 276.3-345.1). By the end of the year, outpatient visits increased (85,535.4 vs 76,620.6, 95% CI: 71,546.9-82,059.4), and most of the diagnostic test rates returned to the projected. The increase in the rate of all-cause mortality during the pandemic, compared to pre-pandemic, was greater during months with the lower frequency of diagnostic tests than months with higher frequency (interaction p-values <.0001).

CONCLUSION

We described the impact of the pandemic on healthcare utilization and mortality in adults with epilepsy during the first year. We demonstrated that access to relevant diagnostic testing is likely important for this population while planning restrictions on non-urgent health services.

Further advances in epilepsy

In 2017, one of us reviewed advances in epilepsy (Manford in J Neurol 264:1811-1824, 2017). The current paper brings that review up to date and gives a slight change in emphasis. Once again, the story is of evolution rather than revolution. In recognition that most of our current medications act on neurotransmitters or ion channels, and not on the underlying changes in connectivity and pathways, they have been renamed as antiseizure (ASM) medications rather than antiepileptic drugs. Cenobamate is the one newly licensed medication for broader use in focal epilepsy but there have been a number of developments for specific disorders. We review new players and look forward to new developments in the light of evolving underlying science. We look at teratogenicity; old villains and new concerns in which clinicians play a vital role in explaining and balancing the risks. Medical treatment of status epilepticus, long without evidence, has benefitted from high-quality trials to inform practice; like buses, several arriving at once. Surgical treatment continues to be refined with improvements in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients, especially with new imaging techniques. Alternatives including stereotactic radiotherapy have received further focus and targets for palliative stimulation techniques have grown in number. Individuals' autonomy and quality of life continue to be the subject of research with refinement of what clinicians can do to help persons with epilepsy (PWE) achieve control. This includes seizure management but extends to broader considerations of human empowerment, needs and desires, which may be aided by emerging technologies such as seizure detection devices. The role of specialist nurses in improving that quality has been reinforced by specific endorsement from the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE).

The COVID-19 pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine and the frequency of seizures

OBJECTIVE

A nationwide vaccination operation against Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine commenced in Israel in December 2020. People older than 60 were prioritized, and most were vaccinated shortly after. Seizures are not infrequently attributed to the vaccine despite a lack of supporting evidence. People with epilepsy (PWE) are often reluctant to get the vaccine due to concerns of seizure aggravation. We aim to examine the effect of the vaccine effort on the frequency of both new-onset seizures and recurrent seizures in PWE.

METHODS

All adults who presented to the emergency department (ED) of Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center between January 1st and May 31st, 2017-2021, and were diagnosed with seizures were included. Demographic, clinical, and vaccination status parameters were collected using MDClone, a data acquisition tool. Vaccination rates in the general population were obtained from official governmental publications. Statistics included a sub-analysis of patients with the highest vaccination rate, people older than 60.

RESULTS

1675 cases were included. The numbers of ED visits and hospital admissions due to seizures in 2021 were comparable to preceding years after adjusting for the total number of ED visits at the same time. Out of 339 cases in 2021, 134 patients older than 60 years old presented to the ED (39.5%) compared to 124-151 in 2017-2019 (37-44%) and 103 in 2020 (33%). The vaccination rate among patients hospitalized due to seizures was similar to the general population of the same age group during the same period in Israel. There was no temporal relation between vaccination and hospitalization due to a seizure.

SIGNIFICANCE

Despite very high vaccination rates in the general population in Israel and especially among people older than 60 years, no increase was observed in ED presentations due to seizures. No temporal relation was observed between vaccination and hospitalization due to a seizure. We conclude that the mass vaccination with the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine is not associated with increased seizure propensity.

The association between epilepsy and COVID-19: analysis based on Mendelian randomization and FUMA

Objective

A multitude of observational studies have underscored a substantial comorbidity between COVID-19 and epilepsy. This study was aimed at establishing a conclusive causal link between these two conditions.

Methods

We employed Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate the causal link between COVID-19 and epilepsy, as well as its focal and generalized subtypes. The GWAS for epilepsy and its subtypes database were abstracted from both FinnGen consortium and ILAE. Additionally, we leveraged functional mapping and annotation (FUMA) to integrate information from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) results.

Results

The MR analyses revealed that genetic liability to COVID-19 infection conferred a causal effect on epilepsy [FinnGen: OR: 1.5306; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1676-2.0062, PFDR (false discovery rate) = 0.0076; ILAE: OR: 1.3440; 95% CI: 1.0235-1.7649, PFDR = 0.0429], and generalized epilepsy (FinnGen: OR: 2.1155; 95% CI: 1.1734-3.8139, PFDR = 0.0327; ILAE: OR: 1.1245; 95% CI: 1.0444-1.2108, PFDR = 0.0114). Genetic liability to COVID-19 hospitalization conferred a causal effect on epilepsy (FinnGen: OR: 1.0934; 95% CI: 1.0097-1.1841, PFDR = 0.0422; ILAE: OR: 1.7381; 95% CI: 1.0467-2.8862, PFDR = 0.0451), focal epilepsy (ILAE: OR: 1.7549; 95% CI: 1.1063-2.7838, PFDR = 0.0338), and generalized epilepsy (ILAE: OR: 1.1827; 95% CI: 1.0215-1.3693, PFDR = 0.0406). Genetic liability to COVID-19 severity conferred a causal effect on epilepsy (FinnGen consortium: OR: 1.2454; 95% CI: 1.0850-1.4295, PFDR = 0.0162; ILAE: OR: 1.2724; 95% CI: 1.0347-1.5647, PFDR = 0.0403), focal epilepsy (FinnGen: OR: 1.6818; 95% CI: 1.1478-2.4642, PFDR = 0.0231; ILAE: OR: 1.6598; 95% CI: 1.2572-2.1914, PFDR = 0.0054), and generalized epilepsy (FinnGen: OR: 1.1486; 95% CI: 1.0274-1.2842, PFDR = 0.0335; ILAE: OR: 1.0439; 95% CI: 1.0159-1.0728, PFDR = 0.0086). In contrast, no causal linkage of epilepsy on COVID-19 was observed. Further, FUMA analysis identified six overlapping genes, including SMEK2, PNPT1, EFEMP1, CCDC85A, VRK2, and BCL11A, shared between COVID-19 and epilepsy. Tissue-specific expression analyses revealed that the disease-gene associations of COVID-19 were significantly enriched in lung, ovary, and spleen tissue compartments, while being significantly enriched in brain tissue for epilepsy.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that COVID-19 can be a contributing factor to epilepsy, but we found no evidence that epilepsy contributes to COVID-19.

Epilepsy-related mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide study of routine Scottish data

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether epilepsy-related deaths increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and if the proportion with COVID-19 listed as the underlying cause is different between people experiencing epilepsy-related deaths and those experiencing deaths unrelated to epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a Scotland-wide, population-based, cross-sectional study of routinely-collected mortality data pertaining to March-August of 2020 (COVID-19 pandemic peak) compared to the corresponding periods in 2015-2019. ICD-10-coded causes of death of deceased people of any age were obtained from a national mortality registry of death certificates in order to identify those experiencing epilepsy-related deaths (coded G40-41), deaths with COVID-19 listed as a cause (coded U07.1-07.2), and deaths unrelated to epilepsy (death without G40-41 coded). The number of epilepsy-related deaths in 2020 were compared to the mean observed through 2015-2019 on an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model (overall, men, women). Proportionate mortality and odds ratios (OR) for deaths with COVID-19 listed as the underlying cause were determined for the epilepsy-related deaths compared to deaths unrelated to epilepsy, reporting 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A mean number of 164 epilepsy-related deaths occurred through March-August of 2015-2019 (of which a mean of 71 were in women and 93 in men). There were subsequently 189 epilepsy-related deaths during the pandemic March-August 2020 (89 women, 100 men). This was 25 more epilepsy-related deaths (18 women, 7 men) compared to the mean through 2015-2019. The increase in women was beyond the mean year-to-year variation seen in 2015-2019. Proportionate mortality with COVID-19 listed as the underlying cause was similar between people experiencing epilepsy-related deaths (21/189, 11.1%, CI 7.0-16.5%) and deaths unrelated to epilepsy (3,879/27,428, 14.1%, CI 13.7-14.6%), OR 0.76 (CI 0.48-1.20). Ten of 18 excess epilepsy-related deaths in women had COVID-19 listed as an additional cause.

CONCLUSIONS

There is little evidence to suggest there have been any major increases in epilepsy-related deaths in Scotland during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 is a common underlying cause of both epilepsy-related and unrelated deaths.

Interaction between COVID-19 and epilepsy during the omicron surge: A cross-sectional survey conducted in China tertiary hospital

Objective

It is unclear whether patients with epilepsy are more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, whether they experience more severe manifestations of COVID-19, and whether seizures worsen after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our study aims to explore these points and provide comprehensive and practical guidance for patients with epilepsy.

Methods

We designed a questionnaire to collect variables from epilepsy patients. We used the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or Mann-Whitney U test to analyze differences between the two groups. Multiple logistic regressions were employed to determine the risk factors for relevant outcome variables.

Results

We identified a total of 181 patients, with 74% (n = 134) reporting COVID-19. The patients' educational level was found to be a risk factor for COVID-19 (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.80, P = 0.013). When comparing seizure frequency changes between epilepsy patients with and without COVID-19, no statistically significant difference was observed (P > 0.05). However, an increase in seizure frequency was significantly associated with higher levels of anxiety (P < 0.001) and depression (P < 0.005).

Conclusion

The risk of COVID-19 infection may be increased in patients with epilepsy. COVID-19 infection does not seem to worsen seizures in epilepsy patients. Patients with epilepsy rarely develop more severe clinical manifestations of COVID-19 after SARS-CoV-2 infection. During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with epilepsy who also suffer from anxiety and depression may experience an increase in the frequency of their seizures.

Does SARS-CoV-2 Cause Seizures and Epilepsy in COVID-19 via Inflammation or by Direct Infection?

Incidence of Epilepsy and Seizures Over the First 6 Months After a COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Taquet M, Devinsky O, Cross JH, Harrison PJ, Sen A. Neurology. 2023;100:e790-e799. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000201595.

Background:

The relationship between COVID-19 and epilepsy is uncertain. We studied the potential association between COVID-19 and seizures or epilepsy in the 6 months after infection.

Methods:

We applied validated methods to an electronic health records network (TriNetX Analytics) of 81 million people. We closely matched people with COVID-19 infections to those with influenza. In each cohort, we measured the incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) of seizures and of epilepsy. We stratified data by age and by whether the person was hospitalized during the acute infection. We then explored time-varying HRs to assess temporal patterns of seizure or epilepsy diagnoses.

Results:

We analyzed 860,934 electronic health records. After matching, this yielded 2 cohorts each of 152,754 patients. COVID-19 was associated with an increased risk of seizures and epilepsy compared with influenza. The incidence of seizures within 6 months of COVID-19 was 0.81% (95% CI, 0.75-0.88; HR compared to influenza 1.55 (1.39-1.74)). The incidence of epilepsy was 0.30% (0.26-0.34; HR compared to influenza 1.87 (1.54-2.28)). The HR of epilepsy after COVID-19 compared with influenza was greater in people who had not been hospitalized and in individuals younger than 16 years. The time of peak HR after infection differed by age and hospitalization status.

Discussion:

The incidence of new seizures or epilepsy diagnoses in the 6 months after COVID-19 was low overall, but higher than in matched patients with influenza. This difference was more marked in people who were not hospitalized, highlighting the risk of epilepsy and seizures even in those with less severe infection. Children appear at particular risk of seizures and epilepsy after COVID-19 providing another motivation to prevent COVID-19 infection in pediatric populations. That the varying time of peak risk related to hospitalization and age may provide clues as to the underlying mechanisms of COVID-associated seizures and epilepsy.

Risk Factors of Severe COVID-19: A Review of Host, Viral and Environmental Factors

The clinical course and outcome of COVID-19 are highly variable, ranging from asymptomatic infections to severe disease and death. Understanding the risk factors of severe COVID-19 is relevant both in the clinical setting and at the epidemiological level. Here, we provide an overview of host, viral and environmental factors that have been shown or (in some cases) hypothesized to be associated with severe clinical outcomes. The factors considered in detail include the age and frailty, genetic polymorphisms, biological sex (and pregnancy), co- and superinfections, non-communicable comorbidities, immunological history, microbiota, and lifestyle of the patient; viral genetic variation and infecting dose; socioeconomic factors; and air pollution. For each category, we compile (sometimes conflicting) evidence for the association of the factor with COVID-19 outcomes (including the strength of the effect) and outline possible action mechanisms. We also discuss the complex interactions between the various risk factors.

COVID-19 vaccination-related exacerbation of seizures in persons with epilepsy

Although vaccines are generally safe in persons with epilepsy (PWE), seizures can be associated with vaccination, including COVID-19. This study assessed the occurrence of COVID-19 vaccination-related seizure exacerbations in PWE. Adult PWE who had received a COVID-19 vaccine were consecutively recruited at a tertiary epilepsy clinic between June 2021 and April 2022. Patient demographics, including epilepsy history, vaccination details, and reported adverse effects were recorded. Seizure exacerbation, defined as occurring within one week of vaccination, was assessed. Five hundred and thirty PWE received the COVID-19 vaccine. 75 % received the Comirnaty (Pfizer) vaccine as their initial dose. Most patients (72 %) were taking ≥ 2 antiseizure medications (ASM) and had focal epilepsy (73 %). One-third were 12 months seizure free at their first vaccination. 13 patients (2.5 %) reported a seizure exacerbation following their first vaccination, three of whom required admission. None were seizure-free at baseline. Six of these patients (46 %) had a further exacerbation of seizures with their second vaccine. An additional four patients reported increased seizures only with the second vaccine dose. Seizure exacerbations are infrequently associated with COVID-19 vaccination, mainly in patients with ongoing seizures. The likelihood of COVID-19 infection complications in PWE outweighs the risk of vaccination-related seizure exacerbations.

The effects of nutrition bio-shield superfood powder on immune system function: A clinical trial study among patients with COVID-19

The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of Nutrition Bio-shield Superfood (NBS) powder on the immune system function and clinical manifestations in patients with COVID-19. We compare the effects of NBS powder on the immune system function and clinical manifestations among two different groups: 1) intervention group receiving standard treatment scheduled according to treatment guidelines plus NBS powder, and 2) control group receiving only the same standard treatment. The serum levels of IL-2, IL-6, IL-17, IFNγ, and TNFα were determined after four weeks of treatment by specific ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, the level of immune system stimulation and inflammatory markers were compared at baseline and after intervention in both groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 22). A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was set as significant. A total of 47 patients with COVID-19 (24 patients in the intervention group and 23 patients in the control group) were included in this study. Results showed that the differences in the mean decrease of IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α in the intervention group in comparison to the control group were 0.93, 10.28, and 8.11 pg/ml, respectively (P<0.001). On the other hand, there was no difference in IL-17, IFNγ, monocytes, eosinophil, and other inflammatory indices between the intervention and control groups. Although NBS powder was able to significantly decrease the levels of some proinflammatory cytokines in patients with COVID-19, however, it is noteworthy that the course of the disease was to large part unaffected by NBS power and there was a reduction independent of treatment. The present study indicates that NBS powder could provide a beneficial anti-inflammatory effect in patients with COVID-19. Hence, NBS in treating patients with COVID-19 shows promise as an adjuvant to the current standard antiviral treatment of such patients.

Risk of hospitalization and death for COVID-19 in persons with epilepsy over a 20-month period: the EpiLink Bologna cohort, Italy

Objective

Data on COVID‐19 outcomes in persons with epilepsy (PWE) are scarce and inconclusive. We aimed to study the risk of hospitalization and death for COVID‐19 in a large cohort of PWE from March 1, 2020 to October 31, 2021.

Methods

The historical cohort design (EpiLink Bologna) compared adult PWE grouped into people with focal epilepsy (PFE), idiopathic generalized epilepsy (PIGE), and developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy (PDEE), and a population cohort matched (ratio 1:10) for age, sex, residence, and comorbidity (assessed with the multisource comorbidity score), living in the local health trust of Bologna (approximately 800 000 residents). Clinical data were linked to health administrative data.

Results

In both cohorts (EpiLink: n = 1575 subjects, 1128 PFE, 267 PIGE, 148 PDEE, 32 other; controls: n = 15 326 subjects), 52% were females, and the mean age was 50 years (SD = 18). Hospital admissions for COVID‐19 in the whole period were 49 (3.1%) in PWE and 225 (1.5%) in controls. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) in PWE was 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4–2.7). The subgroups at higher risk were PFE (aHR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.3–2.8) and PDEE (aHR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.7–8.7), whereas PIGE had a risk comparable to the controls (aHR = 1.1, 95% CI = .3–3.5). Stratified analyses of the two main epidemic waves (March–May 2020, October 2020–May 2021) disclosed a higher risk of COVID‐19‐related hospitalization during the first epidemic wave (March–May 2020; aHR = 3.8, 95% CI = 2.2–6.7). Polytherapy with antiseizure medications contributed to a higher risk of hospital admission. Thirty‐day risk of death after hospitalization was 14% in both PWE and controls.

Significance

During the first 20 months since the outbreak of COVID‐19 in Bologna, PWE had a doubled risk of COVID‐19 hospital admission compared to a matched control population. Conversely, epilepsy did not represent a risk factor for COVID‐19‐related death.

Associations of Guillain-Barré Syndrome with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination: Disproportionality Analysis Using the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Vaccinations against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 which causes COVID-19 have been administered worldwide. We aimed to investigate associations of COVID-19 vaccination with the occurrence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).

METHODS

We explored potential safety signals regarding the development of GBS using disproportionality analyses to compare COVID-19 vaccination with all adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports and influenza vaccines reported to VigiBase.

RESULTS

As of October 15, 2021, a total of 2,163 cases (0.13%) of GBS and its variants (including 46 cases of Miller-Fisher syndrome and 13 cases of Bickerstaff's encephalitis) were identified in entire ADR database after vaccination with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, England) or the two messenger RNA-based COVID-19 (BNT162b2 ; Pfizer and BioNTech) or mRNA-1273;Moderna) vaccines. The median time to onset of GBS after vaccination was around two weeks. The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and two messenger RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines demonstrated a higher risk for GBS against entire database (information component [IC]₀₂₅ =1.73 reporting odds ratio [ROR]₀₂₅ =3.51; IC₀₂₅ =1.07, ROR₀₂₅ =2.22, respectively). When compared with influenza vaccines, neither the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 nor mRNA-based vaccines were found to be associated with greater risks of GBS (IC₀₂₅ =-1.84, ROR₀₂₅ =0.11; IC₀₂₅ =-1.86, ROR₀₂₅ =0.06, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

Although potential safety signals associated with GBS COVID-19 vaccines have been identified, the risk of GBS from COVID-19 vaccines were low and did not surpass those of influenza vaccines; however, because of the heterogeneity of the sources of information in the WHO pharmacovigilance database, further epidemiological studies are warranted to confirm these observations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Association of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis with mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines: A Disproportionality Analysis of the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), a rare thrombotic event that can cause serious neurologic deficits, has been reported after some ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinations against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there are few reports of associations between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and CVT. We retrospectively analyzed CVT occurrence, time of onset after vaccination, outcomes (recovered/not recovered), and death after COVID-19 vaccination from adverse drug reactions (ADR) reports in VigiBase. A disproportionality analysis was performed regarding COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. We identified 756 (0.07%) CVT cases (620 (0.05%) after BNT162b2 and 136 (0.01%) after mRNA-1273) of 1,154,023 mRNA vaccine-related ADRs. Significant positive safety signals were noted for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (95% lower end of information component = 1.56; reporting odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.27). The median days to CVT onset differed significantly between the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines (12 (interquartile range, 3−22) and 11 (interquartile range, 7−16), respectively; p = 0.02). Fewer CVT patients died after receiving mRNA vaccines than after receiving the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22−0.45; p < 0.001). We noted a potential safety signal for CVT occurrence after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Therefore, awareness about the risk of CVT, even after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, is necessary.