Compliance and Dead Space Fraction Indicate an Optimal Level of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure After Recruitment in Anesthetized Patients

Mean airway pressure as a parameter of lung-protective and heart-protective ventilation

Mean airway pressure (MAP) is the mean pressure generated in the airway during a single breath (inspiration + expiration), and is displayed on most anaesthesia and intensive care ventilators. This parameter, however, is not usually monitored during mechanical ventilation because it is poorly understood and usually only used in research. One of the main determinants of MAP is PEEP. This is because in respiratory cycles with an I:E ratio of 1:2, expiration is twice as long as inspiration. Although MAP can be used as a surrogate for mean alveolar pressure, these parameters differ considerably in some situations. Recently, MAP has been shown to be a useful prognostic factor for respiratory morbidity and mortality in mechanically ventilated patients of various ages. Low MAP has been associated with a lower incidence of 90-day mortality, shorter ICU stay, and shorter mechanical ventilation time. MAP also affects haemodynamics: there is evidence of a causal relationship between high MAP and low perfusion index, both of which are associated with poor prognosis in mechanically ventilated patients. Elevated MAP values have also been associated with high central venous pressure and lactate, which are indicative of ventilator-associated right ventricular failure and tissue hypoperfusion, respectively. MAP, therefore, is an important parameter to measure in clinical practice. The aim of this review has been to identify the determinants of MAP, the pros and cons of using MAP instead of traditional protective ventilation parameters, and the evidence that supports the use of MAP in clinical practice.

Respiratory mechanics and mechanical power during low vs. high positive end-expiratory pressure in obese surgical patients - A sub-study of the PROBESE randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We aimed to characterize intra-operative mechanical ventilation with low or high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres (RM) regarding intra-tidal recruitment/derecruitment and overdistension using non-linear respiratory mechanics, and mechanical power in obese surgical patients enrolled in the PROBESE trial.

DESIGN

Prospective, two-centre substudy of the international, multicentre, two-arm, randomized-controlled PROBESE trial.

SETTING

Operating rooms of two European University Hospitals.

PATIENTS

Forty-eight adult obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Intra-operative protective ventilation with either PEEP of 12 cmH2O and repeated RM (HighPEEP+RM) or 4 cmH2O without RM (LowPEEP).

MEASUREMENTS

The index of intra-tidal recruitment/de-recruitment and overdistension (%E2) as well as airway pressure, tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), resistance, elastance, and mechanical power (MP) were calculated from respiratory signals recorded after anesthesia induction, 1 h thereafter, and end of surgery (EOS).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were analyzed in each group. PEEP was higher (mean ± SD, 11.7 ± 0.4 vs. 3.7 ± 0.6 cmH2O, P < 0.001) and driving pressure lower (12.8 ± 3.5 vs. 21.7 ± 6.8 cmH2O, P < 0.001) during HighPEEP+RM than LowPEEP, while VT and RR did not differ significantly (7.3 ± 0.6 vs. 7.4 ± 0.8 ml∙kg-1, P = 0.835; and 14.6 ± 2.5 vs. 15.7 ± 2.0 min-1, P = 0.150, respectively). %E2 was higher in HighPEEP+RM than in LowPEEP following induction (-3.1 ± 7.2 vs. -12.4 ± 10.2%; P < 0.001) and subsequent timepoints. Total resistance and elastance (13.3 ± 3.8 vs. 17.7 ± 6.8 cmH2O∙l∙s-2, P = 0.009; and 15.7 ± 5.5 vs. 28.5 ± 8.4 cmH2O∙l, P < 0.001, respectively) were lower during HighPEEP+RM than LowPEEP. Additionally, MP was lower in HighPEEP+RM than LowPEEP group (5.0 ± 2.2 vs. 10.4 ± 4.7 J∙min-1, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this sub-cohort of PROBESE, intra-operative ventilation with high PEEP and RM reduced intra-tidal recruitment/de-recruitment as well as driving pressure, elastance, resistance, and mechanical power, as compared with low PEEP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The PROBESE study was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov, identifier: NCT02148692 (submission for registration on May 23, 2014).

Comparison of the tidal volume by the recruitment maneuver combined with positive end-expiratory pressure for mechanically ventilated children

The recruitment maneuver (RM) combined with PEEP to prevent atelectasis have beneficial effects. However, the change in tidal volume (VT) due to RM combined with PEEP in pediatric patients during the induction of general anesthesia is unknown. Therefore, we assessed the effects of RM combined with PEEP on VT. Pediatric patients were divided into three groups: infants, preschool children, and school children. The RM was performed by maintaining pressure control continuous mandatory ventilation (PC-CMV) with a 15 cmH2O and PEEP increase of 5 cmH2O. VT, respiratory function and hemodynamics were monitored before and after RM combined with PEEP. VT (mL) /ideal body weight (kg) before vs. after RM combined with PEEP were 9 vs 12 mL/kg (p < 0.05) in the infants, 9 vs 11 mL/kg (p < 0.05) in the preschool children, 8 vs 10 mL/kg (p < 0.05) in the school children, respectively. HR and BP before and after RM combined with PEEP increased by 2-3% and decreased by 4-7% in all groups. RM combined with PEEP resulted in an increase in VT per ideal body weight (1.1-1.2%). Therefore, this RM combined with PEEP method might improve the lung function in pediatric patients.

Individualized PEEP without Recruitment Maneuvers Improves Intraoperative Oxygenation: A Randomized Controlled Study

Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) combined with recruitment maneuvers improves intraoperative oxygenation in individuals undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy. However, whether electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided individualized PEEP without recruitment maneuvers can also improve intraoperative oxygenation is unknown. To test this, fifty-six male patients undergoing elective robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy were randomly assigned to either individualized PEEP (Group PEEPIND, n = 28) or a control with a fixed PEEP of 5 cm H2O (Group PEEP5, n = 28). Individualized PEEP was guided by EIT after placing the patients in the Trendelenburg position and performing intraperitoneal insufflation. Patients in Group PEEPIND maintained individualized PEEP without intermittent recruitment maneuvers, and those in Group PEEP5 maintained a PEEP of 5 cm H2O intraoperatively. Both groups were extubated in a semi-sitting position once the extubation criteria were met. The primary outcome was arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) prior to extubation. Other outcomes included intraoperative driving pressure, plateau pressure and dynamic, respiratory system compliance, and the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia in the post-operative care unit (PACU). Our results showed that the intraoperative median for PEEPIND was 16 cm H2O (ranging from 12 to 18 cm H2O). EIT-guided PEEPIND was associated with higher PaO2/FiO2 before extubation compared to PEEP5 (71.6 ± 10.7 vs. 56.8 ± 14.1 kPa, p = 0.003). Improved oxygenation extended into the PACU with a lower incidence of postoperative hypoxemia (3.8% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.021). Additionally, PEEPIND was associated with lower driving pressures (12.0 ± 3.0 vs. 15.0 ± 4.4 cm H2O, p = 0.044) and better compliance (44.5 ± 12.8 vs. 33.6 ± 9.1 mL/cm H2O, p = 0.017). Our data indicated that individualized PEEP guided by EIT without intraoperative recruitment maneuvers also improved perioperative oxygenation in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, which could benefit patients with the risk of intraoperative hemodynamic instability caused by recruitment maneuvers. Trial registration: China Clinical Trial Registration Center Identifier: ChiCTR2100053839. This study was registered on 1 December 2021. The first patient was recruited on 15 December 2021.

Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia

Objective

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of different titrated methods used to determine individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for intraoperative mechanical ventilation in female patients undergoing general anesthesia in different operative positions, and provide reference ranges of optimal PEEP values based on the titration.

Methods

A total of 123 female patients who underwent elective open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. After endotracheal intubation, patients' body position was adjusted to the supine position, Trendelenburg positions at 10° and 20° respectively. PEEP was titrated from 20 cmH2O to 4 cmH2O, decreasing by 2 cmH2O every 1 min. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT), hemodynamic and respiratory mechanics parameters were continuously monitored and recorded. Optimal PEEP values and reference ranges were respectively calculated based on optimal EIT parameters, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and lung dynamic compliance (Cdyn).

Results

EIT-guided optimal PEEP was found to have higher values than those of the MAP-guided and Cdyn-guided methods for all three body positions (P < 0.001), and it was observed to more significantly inhibit hemodynamics (P < 0.05). The variable coefficients of EIT-guided optimal PEEP values were smaller than those of the other two methods, and this technique could provide better ventilation uniformity for dorsal/ventral lung fields and better balance for pulmonary atelectasis/collapse. The 95% reference ranges of EIT-guided optimal PEEP values were 4.6-13.8 cmH2O, 7.0-15.0 cmH2O and 8.6-17.0 cmH2O for the supine position, Trendelenburg 10°, and Trendelenburg 20° positions, respectively.

Conclusion

EIT-guided optimal PEEP titration was found to be a superior method for lung protective ventilation in different operative positions under general anesthesia. The calculated reference ranges of PEEP values based on the EIT-guided method can be used as a reference for intraoperative mechanical ventilation.

Whole lung lavage decreases physiological dead space in patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: two case reports

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is a rare disease characterized by progressive accumulation of the alveolar surfactant. Whole lung lavage (WLL) using a high volume of warmed saline remains the standard therapy. However, no established bedside monitoring tool can evaluate the physiological effect of WLL in the perioperative period. Indirect calorimetry, which is generally used to measure resting energy expenditure, can detect carbon dioxide (CO2) production and mixed-expired partial pressure of CO2 breath by breath. In this physiological study, we calculated CO2 elimination per breath (VTCO2,br) and Enghoff's dead space using indirect calorimetry and measured the extravascular lung water index to reveal the effect of WLL.

CASE PRESENTATION

We measured VTCO2,br, Enghoff's dead space, and the extravascular lung water and cardiac indices before and after WLL to assess the reduction in shunt by washing out the surfactant. A total of four WLLs were performed in two PAP patients. The first case involved an Asian 62-year-old man who presented with a 3-month history of dyspnea on exertion. The second case involved an Asian 48-year-old woman with no symptoms. VTCO2,br increased, and the Enghoff's dead space decreased at 12 h following WLL. An increase in the extravascular lung water was detected immediately following WLL, leading to a transient increase in Enghoff's dead space.

CONCLUSION

WLL can increase efficient alveolar ventilation by washing out the accumulated surfactant. However, the lavage fluid may be absorbed into the lung tissues immediately after WLL and result in an increase in the extravascular lung water.

Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation adjusting tidal volume to a plateau pressure restriction in elderly patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) strategies have been considered as best practice in the care of critically patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effects individualized perioperative LPV with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and low tidal volumes (VT) based on a target airway plateau pressure (Pplat) in patients during and after an operation compared with conventional ventilation in elderly patients during abdominal surgery.

METHODS

Sixty-one elderly patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I to III undergoing open abdominal surgery received either conventional ventilation (8 ml/kg-1VT; CV group) or LPV (VT was adjusted to a target Pplat [⩽ 20 cm H2O]) in the volume-controlled mode with PEEP (9 cm H2O; LPV group) ventilation.

RESULTS

Patients in the LPV group showed significantly lower pH values (7.30 ± 0.07 vs. 7.38 ± 0.05, P< 0.001) and respiratory indexes than that of CV group (0.806 ± 0.339 vs. 0.919 ± 0.300, P= 0.043) at the end of surgery. Compared with the CV group, the dynamic lung compliance (33.39 ± 3.163 vs. 30.15 ± 2.572, P< 0.001) was significantly higher, and the body temperature remained significantly more favorable in the LPV group (35.9 ± 0.3 vs. 35.1 ± 0.4, P< 0.001). Patients in the LPV group had significantly faster postoperative recovery than that of the CV group (P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that LPV could be beneficial for ventilation, core body temperature, and postoperative recovery in elderly patients with healthy lungs.

A structured narrative review of clinical and experimental studies of the use of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels during thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to present a review on the general effects of different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels during thoracic surgery by qualitatively categorizing the effects into detrimental, beneficial, and inconclusive.

DATA SOURCE

Literature search of Pubmed, CNKI, and Wanfang was made to find relative articles about PEEP levels during thoracic surgery. We used the following keywords as one-lung ventilation, PEEP, and thoracic surgery.

RESULTS

We divide the non-individualized PEEP value into five grades, that is, less than 5, 5, 5-10, 10, and more than 10 cmH₂ O, among which 5 cmH₂ O is the most commonly used in clinic at present to maintain alveolar dilatation and reduce the shunt fraction and the occurrence of atelectasis, whereas individualized PEEP, adjusted by test titration or imaging method to adapt to patients' personal characteristics, can effectively ameliorate intraoperative oxygenation and obtain optimal pulmonary compliance and better indexes relating to respiratory mechanics.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data suggest that PEEP might play an important role in one-lung ventilation, the understanding of which will help in exploring a simple and economical method to set the appropriate PEEP level.

Effects of volume-targeted pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation on functional residual capacity and dead space in obese patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Background

The effect of inverse inspiration:expiration (I:E) ratio on functional residual capacity (FRC) during pneumoperitoneum is unclear. We hypothesised that volume-targeted pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation (vtPC-IRV) would increase FRC by increasing the level of auto-PEEP in low respiratory compliance situations.

Methods

During robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, 20 obese patients were sequentially ventilated with four different settings for 30 min in each setting: (1) control, I:E ratio of 1:2 and baseline airway pressure (BAP) of 5 cm H2O; (2) IRV2, I:E ratio of 2:1 and BAP off; (3) IRV3, I:E ratio of 3:1 and BAP off; and (4) IRV4, I:E ratio of 4:1 and BAP off. The changes in FRC were identified and compared among these settings.

Results

The FRC significantly increased as the I:E ratio increased. The FRC values expressed as median (inter-quartile range) during control, IRV2, IRV3, and IRV4 were 1149 (898-1386), 1485 (1018-1717), 1602 (1209-1775), and 1757 (1337-1955) ml, respectively. Auto-PEEP increased significantly as the I:E ratio increased and correlated with FRC (rho=0.303; P=0.006). Shunt and physiological dead space were significantly lower in all IRV groups than in the control group; however, there were no significant differences among the IRV groups.

Conclusions

vtPC-IRV with shortened expiratory time and increased auto-PEEP effectively increases FRC during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients. FRC increases progressively as the I:E ratio increases from 1:2 to 4:1; however, an I:E ratio higher than 2:1 does not further improve the dead space.

Clinical trial registration

UMIN000038989.

Effects of two alveolar recruitment maneuvers in an “open-lung” approach during laparoscopy in dogs

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a sustained inflation alveolar recruiting maneuver (ARM) followed by 5 cmH₂O of PEEP and a stepwise ARM, in dogs undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

Materials and methods

Twenty adult dogs were enrolled in this prospective randomized clinical study. Dogs were premedicated with methadone intramuscularly (IM); anesthesia was induced with propofol intravenously (IV) and maintained with inhaled isoflurane in pure oxygen. The baseline ventilatory setting (BVS) was as follows: tidal volume of 15 mL/kg, inspiratory pause of 25%, inspiratory to expiratory ratio of 1:2, and the respiratory rate to maintain the end-tidal carbon dioxide between 45 and 55 mmHg. 10 min after pneumoperitoneum, randomly, 10 dogs underwent sustained inflation ARM followed by 5 cmH₂O of PEEP (ARMi), while 10 dogs underwent a stepwise recruitment maneuver followed by the setting of the “best PEEP” (ARMc). Gas exchange, respiratory system mechanics, and hemodynamic were evaluated before the pneumoperitoneum induction (BASE), 10 min after the pneumoperitoneum (PP), 10 min after the recruitment (ARM), and 10 min after the pneumoperitoneum resolution (PostPP). Statistical analysis was performed with the ANOVA test (p < 0.05).

Results

Static compliance decreased in both groups at PP (ARMc = 1.35 ± 0.21; ARMi = 1.16 ± 0.26 mL/cmH₂O/kg) compared to BASE (ARMc = 1.78 ± 0.60; ARMi = 1.66 ± 0.66 mL/cmH₂O/kg) and at ARM (ARMc = 1.71 ± 0.41; ARMi = 1.44 ± 0.84 mL/cmH₂O/kg) and PostPP (ARMc = 1.75 ± 0.45; ARMi = 1.89 ± 0.59 mL/cmH₂O/kg), and it was higher compared to PP and similar to BASE. The PaO₂/FiO₂, in both groups, was higher at ARM (ARMc = 455.11 ± 85.90; ARMi = 505.40 ± 31.70) and PostPP (ARMc = 521.30 ± 66.20; ARMi = 450.90 ± 70.60) compared to PP (ARMc = 369.53 ± 49.31; ARMi = 394.32 ± 37.72).

Conclusion and clinical relevance

The two ARMs improve lung function in dogs undergoing laparoscopic surgery similarly. Application of PEEP at the end of the ARMs prolonged the effects of the open-lung strategy.

Comparison of Global and Regional Compliance-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Regional Lung Ventilation in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Purpose

To investigate the difference in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selected with chest electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and with global dynamic respiratory system compliance (Crs) in moderate-to-severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (pARDS).

Methods

Patients with moderate-to-severe pARDS (PaO2/FiO2 &lt; 200 mmHg) were retrospectively included. On the day of pARDS diagnosis, two PEEP levels were determined during the decremental PEEP titration for each individual using the best compliance (PEEPC) and EIT-based regional compliance (PEEPEIT) methods. The differences of global and regional compliance (for both gravity-dependent and non-dependent regions) under the two PEEP conditions were compared. In addition, the EIT-based global inhomogeneity index (GI), the center of ventilation (CoV), and standard deviation of regional delayed ventilation (RVDSD) were also calculated and compared.

Results

A total of 12 children with pARDS (5 with severe and 7 with moderate pARDS) were included. PEEPC and PEEPEIT were identical in 6 patients. In others, the differences were only ± 2 cm H2O (one PEEP step). There were no statistical differences in global compliance at PEEPC and PEEPEIT [28.7 (2.84–33.15) vs. 29.74 (2.84–33.47) ml/cm H2O median (IQR), p = 0.028 (the significant level after adjusted for multiple comparison was 0.017)]. Furthermore, no differences were found in regional compliances and other EIT-based parameters measuring spatial and temporal ventilation distributions.

Conclusion

Although EIT provided information on ventilation distribution, PEEP selected with the best Crs might be non-inferior to EIT-guided regional ventilation in moderate-to-severe pARDS. Further study with a large sample size is required to confirm the finding.

Clinical guide to perioperative management for videothoracoscopy lung resection (Section of Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Anesthesia, SEDAR; Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery, SECT; Spanish Society of Physiotherapy)

The introduction of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) techniques has led to a new approach in thoracic surgery. VATS is performed by inserting a thoracoscope through a small incisions in the chest wall, thus maximizing the preservation of muscle and tissue. Because of its low rate of morbidity and mortality, VATS is currently the technique of choice in most thoracic procedures. Lung resection by VATS reduces prolonged air leaks, arrhythmia, pneumonia, postoperative pain and inflammatory markers. This reduction in postoperative complications shortens hospital length of stay, and is particularly beneficial in high-risk patients with low tolerance to thoracotomy. Compared with conventional thoracotomy, the oncological results of VATS surgery are similar or even superior to those of open surgery. This aim of this multidisciplinary position statement produced by the thoracic surgery working group of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT), and the Spanish Association of Physiotherapy (AEF) is to standardize and disseminate a series of perioperative anaesthesia management guidelines for patients undergoing VATS lung resection surgery. Each recommendation is based on an in-depth review of the available literature by the authors. In this document, the care of patients undergoing VATS surgery is organized in sections, starting with the surgical approach, and followed by the three pillars of anaesthesia management: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative anaesthesia.

Anesthetic considerations in lung transplantation: past, present and future

Lung transplantation is a very complex surgical procedure with many implications for the anesthetic care of these patients. Comprehensive preoperative evaluation is an important component of the transplant evaluation as it informs many of the decisions made perioperatively to manage these complex patients effectively and appropriately. These decisions may involve pre-emptive actions like pre-habilitation and nutrition optimization of these patients before they arrive for their transplant procedure. Appropriate airway and ventilation management of these patients needs to be performed in a manner that provides an optimal operating conditions and protection from ventilatory injury of these fragile post-transplant lungs. Pain management can be challenging and should be managed in a multi-modal fashion with or without the use of an epidural catheter while recognizing the risk of neuraxial technique in patients who will possibly be systemically anticoagulated. Complex monitoring is required for these patients involving both invasive and non-invasive including the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and continuous cardiac output monitoring. Management of the patient's hemodynamics can be challenging and involves managing the systemic and pulmonary vascular systems. Some patients may require extra-corporeal lung support as a planned part of the procedure or as a rescue technique and centers need to be proficient in instituting and managing this sophisticated method of hemodynamic support.

Effects of end-expiratory lung volume versus PaO2 guided PEEP determination on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in moderate to severe ARDS

There is no ideal method for determination of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. We compared the effects of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV)-guided versus PaO₂-guided PEEP determination on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation during the first 48 hours in moderate to severe ARDS.

Twenty-two patients with moderate to severe ARDS admitted to an academic medical ICU were assigned to PaO₂-guided (n = 11) or to EELV-guided PEEP determination (n = 11) group. First, an incremental PEEP trial was performed by increasing PEEP by 3 cmH₂O steps from 8 to 20 cmH₂O and in each step EELV and lung mechanics were measured in both groups. Then, oxygenation and respiratory mechanics were measured under the determined PEEP at 4, 12, 24, and 48th hours.

After the incremental PEEP trial, over the 48 hours of the study period, in the EELV-guided group PaO₂ and PaO₂/FiO₂ increased (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02; respectively), whereas they did not change in PaO₂-guided group (p = 0.09 and p = 0.27; respectively). In all patients, the median value of EELV change (ΔEELV) during incremental PEEP trial was 25%. In patients with ΔEELV > 25% (n = 11) PaO₂, PaO₂/FiO₂ and Cs increased over time in 48 hours (p = 0.03, p < 0.01, and p = 0.04; respectively), whereas they did not change in those with ΔEELV ≤ 25% (n = 11) (p = 0.73, p = 0.51, and p = 0.73; respectively).

Compared to PaO₂-guided PEEP determination, EELV-guided PEEP determination resulted in greater improvement in oxygenation over time. Patients who had > 25% improvement in EELV during a PEEP trial had greater improvement in oxygenation and compliance over 48 hours.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at.

Over-distension prediction via hysteresis loop analysis and patient-specific basis functions in a virtual patient model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Recruitment maneuvers (RMs) with subsequent positive-end-expiratory-pressure (PEEP) have proven effective in recruiting lung volume and preventing alveolar collapse. However, a suboptimal PEEP could induce undesired injury in lungs by insufficient or excessive breath support. Thus, a predictive model for patient response under PEEP changes could improve clinical care and lower risks.

METHODS

This research adds novel elements to a virtual patient model to identify and predict patient-specific lung distension to optimise and personalise care. Model validity and accuracy are validated using data from 18 volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) patients at 7 different baseline PEEP levels (0-12cmH₂O), yielding 623 prediction cases. Predictions were made up to ΔPEEP = 12cmH₂O ahead covering 6x2cmH₂O PEEP steps.

RESULTS

Using the proposed lung distension model, 90% of absolute peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) prediction errors compared to clinical measurement are within 3.95cmH₂O, compared with 4.76cmH₂O without this distension term. Comparing model-predicted and clinically measured distension had high correlation increasing to R² = 0.93-0.95 if maximum ΔPEEP ≤ 6cmH₂O. Predicted dynamic functional residual capacity (V_frc) changes as PEEP rises yield 0.013L median prediction error for both prediction groups and overall R² of 0.84.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall results demonstrate nonlinear distension mechanics are accurately captured in virtual lung mechanics patients for mechanical ventilation, for the first time. This result can minimise the risk of lung injury by predicting its potential occurrence of distension before changing ventilator settings. The overall outcomes significantly extend and more fully validate this virtual mechanical ventilation patient model.

Difference between arterial and end-tidal carbon dioxide and adverse events after non-cardiac surgery: a historical cohort study

Purpose

The difference between arterial and end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (ΔCO₂) is a measure of alveolar dead space, commonly evaluated intraoperatively. Given its relationship to ventilation and perfusion, ΔCO₂ may provide prognostic information and guide clinical decisions. We hypothesized that higher ΔCO₂ values are associated with occurrence of a composite outcome of re-intubation, postoperative mechanical ventilation, or 30-day mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Methods

We conducted a historical cohort study of adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with an arterial line at a single tertiary care medical centre. The composite outcome, identified from electronic health records, was re-intubation, postoperative mechanical ventilation, or 30-day mortality. Student’s t test and Chi-squared test were used for univariable analysis. Logistic regression was used for multivariable analysis of the relationship of ΔCO₂ with the composite outcome.

Results

A total of 19,425 patients were included in the final study population. Univariable analysis showed an association between higher mean (standard deviation [SD]) intraoperative ΔCO₂ values and the composite outcome (6.1 [5.3] vs 5.7 [4.5] mm Hg; P = 0.002). After adjusting for baseline subject characteristics, every 5-mm Hg increase in the ΔCO₂ was associated with a nearly 20% increased odds of the composite outcome (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 1.28; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this patient population, increased intraoperative ΔCO₂ was associated with an increased odds of the composite outcome of postoperative mechanical ventilation, re-intubation, or 30-day mortality that was independent of its relationship with pre-existing pulmonary disease. Future studies are needed to determine if ΔCO₂ can be used to guide patient management and improve patient outcomes.

Respiratory Mechanics

Today's management of the ventilated patient still relies on the measurement of old parameters such as airway pressures and flow. Graphical presentations reveal the intricacies of patient-ventilator interactions in times of supporting the patient on the ventilator instead of fully ventilating the heavily sedated patient. This opens a new pathway for several bedside technologies based on basic physiologic knowledge; however, it may increase the complexity of measurements. The spread of the COVID-19 infection has confronted the anesthesiologist and intensivist with one of the most severe pulmonary pathologies of the last decades. Optimizing the patient at the bedside is an old and newly required skill for all physicians in the intensive care unit, supported by mobile technologies such as lung ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography. This review summarizes old knowledge and presents a brief insight into extended monitoring options.

Clinical guide to perioperative management for videothoracoscopy lung resection (Section of Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Anesthesia, SEDAR; Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery, SECT; Spanish Society of Physiotherapy)

The introduction of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) techniques has led to a new approach in thoracic surgery. VATS is performed by inserting a thoracoscope through a small incisions in the chest wall, thus maximizing the preservation of muscle and tissue. Because of its low rate of morbidity and mortality, VATS is currently the technique of choice in most thoracic procedures. Lung resection by VATS reduces prolonged air leaks, arrhythmia, pneumonia, postoperative pain and inflammatory markers. This reduction in postoperative complications shortens hospital length of stay, and is particularly beneficial in high-risk patients with low tolerance to thoracotomy. Compared with conventional thoracotomy, the oncological results of VATS surgery are similar or even superior to those of open surgery. This aim of this multidisciplinary position statement produced by the thoracic surgery working group of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT), and the Spanish Association of Physiotherapy (AEF) is to standardize and disseminate a series of perioperative anaesthesia management guidelines for patients undergoing VATS lung resection surgery. Each recommendation is based on an in-depth review of the available literature by the authors. In this document, the care of patients undergoing VATS surgery is organized in sections, starting with the surgical approach, and followed by the three pillars of anaesthesia management: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative anaesthesia.

Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during one-lung ventilation for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is an important part of the lung protection strategies for one-lung ventilation (OLV). However, a fixed PEEP value is not suitable for all patients. Our objective was to determine the prevention of individualized PEEP on postoperative complications in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.

METHOD

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane and performed a meta-analysis to compare the effect of individual PEEP vs fixed PEEP during single lung ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications. Our primary outcome was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the partial pressure of arterial oxygen and oxygenation index during one-lung ventilation.

RESULT

Eight studies examining 849 patients were included in this review. The rate of postoperative pulmonary complications was reduced in the individualized PEEP group with a risk ratio of 0.52 (95% CI:0.37-0.73; P = .0001). The partial pressure of arterial oxygen during the OLV in the individualized PEEP group was higher with a mean difference 34.20 mm Hg (95% CI: 8.92-59.48; P = .0004). Similarly, the individualized PEEP group had a higher oxygenation index, MD: 49.07mmHg, (95% CI: 27.21-70.92; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized PEEP setting during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery was associated with fewer postoperative pulmonary complications and better perioperative oxygenation.

Driving Pressure-Guided Individualized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remains unclear. Recent evidence showed that driving pressure was closely related to PPCs. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that an individualized PEEP guided by minimum driving pressure during abdominal surgery would reduce the incidence of PPCs.

METHODS

This single-centered, randomized controlled trial included a total of 148 patients scheduled for open upper abdominal surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an individualized PEEP guided by minimum driving pressure or an empiric fixed PEEP of 6 cm H2O. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant PPCs within the first 7 days after surgery, using a χ2 test. Secondary outcomes were the severity of PPCs, the area of atelectasis, and pleural effusion. Other outcomes, such as the incidence of different types of PPCs (including hypoxemia, atelectasis, pleural effusion, dyspnea, pneumonia, pneumothorax, and acute respiratory distress syndrome), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality were also explored.

RESULTS

The median value of PEEP in the individualized group was 10 cm H2O. The incidence of clinically significant PPCs was significantly lower in the individualized PEEP group compared with that in the fixed PEEP group (26 of 67 [38.8%] vs 42 of 67 [62.7%], relative risk = 0.619, 95% confidence intervals, 0.435-0.881; P = .006). The overall severity of PPCs and the area of atelectasis were also significantly diminished in the individualized PEEP group. Higher respiratory compliance during surgery and improved intra- and postoperative oxygenation was observed in the individualized group. No significant differences were found in other outcomes between the 2 groups, such as ICU admission rate or 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of individualized PEEP based on minimum driving pressure may effectively decrease the severity of atelectasis, improve oxygenation, and reduce the incidence of clinically significant PPCs after open upper abdominal surgery.

Protective mechanical ventilation with optimal PEEP during RARP improves oxygenation and pulmonary indexes

BACKGROUND

This trial aimed to evaluate the effects of a protective ventilation strategy on oxygenation/pulmonary indexes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the steep Trendelenburg position.

METHODS

In phase 1, the most optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was determined in 25 patients at 11 cmH₂O. In phase 2, 64 patients were randomized to the traditional ventilation group with tidal volume (VT) of 9 ml/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) and the protective ventilation group with VT of 7 ml/kg of PBW with optimal PEEP and recruitment maneuvers (RMs). The primary endpoint was the intraoperative and postoperative PaO₂/FiO₂. The secondary endpoints were the PaCO₂, SpO₂, modified clinical pulmonary infection score (mCPIS), and the rate of complications in the postoperative period.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, PaO₂/FiO₂ in the protective group increased after the second RM (P=0.018), and the difference remained until postoperative day 3 (P=0.043). PaCO₂ showed transient accumulation in the protective group after the first RM (T2), but this phenomenon disappeared with time. SpO₂ in the protective group was significantly higher during the first three postoperative days. Lung compliance was significantly improved after the second RM in the protective group (P=0.025). The mCPIS was lower in the protective group on postoperative day 3 (0.59 (1.09) vs. 1.46 (1.27), P=0.010).

CONCLUSION

A protective ventilation strategy with lower VT combined with optimal PEEP and RMs could improve oxygenation and reduce mCPIS in patients undergoing RARP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR ChiCTR1800015626 . Registered on 12 April 2018.

Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Background and objectives

With the intensive study of lung protective ventilation strategies, people begin to advocate the individualized application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This study investigated the optimal PEEP in patients during one-lung ventilation (OLV) and its effects on pulmonary mechanics and oxygenation.

Methods

Fifty-eight patients who underwent elective thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomly divided into two groups. Both groups received an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) after OLV. Patients in Group A received optimal PEEP followed by PEEP decremental titration, while Group B received standard 5 cmH₂O PEEP until the end of OLV. Relevant indexes of respiratory mechanics, pulmonary oxygenation and hemodynamics were recorded after entering the operating room (T₀), 10 minutes after intubation (T₁), pre-ARM (T₂), 20 minutes after the application of optimal PEEP (T₃), at the end of OLV (T₄) and at the end of surgery (T₅). Postoperative outcomes were also assessed.

Results

The optimal PEEP obtained in Group A was 8.8 ± 2.4 cmH₂O, which positively correlated with BMI and forced vital capacity (FVC). Group A had a higher C_PAT than Group B at T₃, T₄, T₅ (p < 0.05) and a smaller ΔP than Group B at T₃, T₄ (p < 0.01). At T₄, PaO₂ was significantly higher in Group A (p < 0.01). At T₃, stroke volume variation was higher in Group A (p < 0.01). Postoperative outcomes did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the individualized PEEP can increase lung compliance, reduce driving pressure, and improve pulmonary oxygenation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy, with little effect on hemodynamics.

Evaluation of alveolar recruitment maneuver on respiratory resistance during general anesthesia: a prospective observational study

Background

Alveolar recruitment maneuvers enable easily reopening nonaerated lung regions via a transient elevation in transpulmonary pressure. To evaluate the effect of these maneuvers on respiratory resistance, we used an oscillatory technique during mechanical ventilation. This study was conducted to assess the effect of the alveolar recruitment maneuvers on respiratory resistance under routine anesthesia. We hypothesized that respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (R5) after the maneuver would be decreased after the lung aeration.

Methods

After receiving the ethics committee’s approval, we enrolled 33 patients who were classified with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 1, 2 or 3 and were undergoing general anesthesia for transurethral resection of a bladder tumor within a 12-month period from 2017 to 2018. The recruitment maneuver was performed 30 min after endotracheal intubation. The maneuver consisted of sustained manual inflation of the anesthesia reservoir bag to a peak inspiratory pressure of 40 cmH₂O for 15 s, including 5 s of gradually increasing the peak inspiratory pressure. Respiratory resistance was measured using the forced oscillation technique before and after the maneuver, and the mean R5 was calculated during the expiratory phase. The respiratory resistance and ventilator parameter results were analyzed using paired Student’s t-tests, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We analyzed 31 patients (25 men and 6 women). R5 was 7.3 ± 1.6 cmH₂O/L/sec before the recruitment maneuver during mechanical ventilation and was significantly decreased to 6.4 ± 1.7 cmH₂O/L/sec after the maneuver. Peak inspiratory pressure and plateau pressure were significantly decreased, and pulmonary compliance was increased, although the values were not clinically relevant.

Conclusion

The recruitment maneuver decreased respiratory resistance and increased lung compliance during mechanical ventilation.

Trial registration

Name of registry: Japan Medical Association Center for Clinical Trials.

Trial registration number: reference JMA-IIA00136.

Date of registration: 2 September 2013.

URL of trial registry record: https://dbcentre3.jmacct.med.or.jp/JMACTR/App/JMACTRE02_04/JMACTRE02_04.aspx?kbn=3&seqno=3582

Influence of overdistension/recruitment induced by high positive end-expiratory pressure on ventilation-perfusion matching assessed by electrical impedance tomography with saline bolus

BACKGROUND

High positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) may induce overdistension/recruitment and affect ventilation-perfusion matching (VQMatch) in mechanically ventilated patients. This study aimed to investigate the association between PEEP-induced lung overdistension/recruitment and VQMatch by electrical impedance tomography (EIT).

METHODS

The study was conducted prospectively on 30 adult mechanically ventilated patients: 18/30 with ARDS and 12/30 with high risk for ARDS. EIT measurements were performed at zero end-expiratory pressures (ZEEP) and subsequently at high (12-15 cmH2O) PEEP. The number of overdistended pixels over the number of recruited pixels (O/R ratio) was calculated, and the patients were divided into low O/R (O/R ratio < 15%) and high O/R groups (O/R ratio ≥ 15%). The global inhomogeneity (GI) index was calculated to evaluate the ventilation distribution. Lung perfusion image was calculated from the EIT impedance-time curves caused by 10 ml 10% NaCl injection during a respiratory pause (> 8 s). DeadSpace%, Shunt%, and VQMatch% were calculated based on lung EIT perfusion and ventilation images.

RESULTS

Increasing PEEP resulted in recruitment mainly in dorsal regions and overdistension mainly in ventral regions. ΔVQMatch% (VQMatch% at high PEEP minus that at ZEEP) was significantly correlated with recruited pixels (r = 0.468, P = 0.009), overdistended pixels (r = - 0.666, P < 0.001), O/R ratio (r = - 0.686, P < 0.001), and ΔSpO2 (r = 0.440, P = 0.015). Patients in the low O/R ratio group (14/30) had significantly higher Shunt% and lower VQMatch% than those in the high O/R ratio group (16/30) at ZEEP but not at high PEEP. Comparable DeadSpace% was found in both groups. A high PEEP caused a significant improvement of VQMatch%, DeadSpace%, Shunt%, and GI in the low O/R ratio group, but not in the high O/R ratio group. Using O/R ratio of 15% resulted in a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 100% for an increase of VQMatch% > 20% in response to high PEEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Change of ventilation-perfusion matching was associated with regional overdistention and recruitment induced by PEEP. A low O/R ratio induced by high PEEP might indicate a more homogeneous ventilation and improvement of VQMatch.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04081155 . Registered on 9 September 2019-retrospectively registered.

Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial

Applying lung protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) during general anaesthesia even in patients with non-injured lungs is recommended. However, the effects of an individual PEEP-optimisation on respiratory mechanics, oxygenation and their potential correlation with the inflammatory response and postoperative complications have not been evaluated have not been compared to standard LPV in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Thirty-nine patients undergoing open radical cystectomy were enrolled in this study. In the study group (SG) optimal PEEP was determined by a decremental titration procedure and defined as the PEEP value resulting the highest static pulmonary compliance. In the control group (CG) PEEP was set to 6 cmH2O. Primary endpoints were intraoperative respiratory mechanics and gas exchange parameters. Secondary outcomes were perioperative procalcitonin kinetics and postoperative pulmonary complications. Optimal PEEP levels (median = 10, range: 8–14 cmH2O), PaO2/FiO2 (451.24 ± 121.78 mmHg vs. 404.15 ± 115.87 mmHg, P = 0.005) and static pulmonary compliance (52.54 ± 13.59 ml cmH2O-1 vs. 45.22 ± 9.13 ml cmH2O-1, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher, while driving pressure (8.26 ± 1.74 cmH2O vs. 9.73 ± 4.02 cmH2O, P < 0.0001) was significantly lower in the SG as compared to the CG. No significant intergroup differences were found in procalcitonin kinetics (P = 0.076). Composite outcome results indicated a non-significant reduction of postoperative complications in the SG. Intraoperative PEEP-optimization resulted in significant improvement in gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics as compared to standard LPV. Whether these have any effect on short and long term outcomes require further investigations. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02931409.

The effects of a recruitment manoeuvre with positive end-expiratory pressure on lung compliance in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

The effects of a recruitment manoeuvre (RM) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on lung compliance (C_LUNG) are not well characterised in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients were allocated to group R (n = 10; with an RM) or C (n = 9; without an RM). An RM involved sustained inflation of 30 cmH₂O for 30 s. The lungs were ventilated with volume-controlled ventilation with tidal volume of 7 mL kg^-1 of predicted body weight and fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5. End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure was maintained at normocapnia. Patients were in the horizontal lithotomy position (pre-op). After pneumoperitoneum, patients underwent RARP in a steep Trendelenburg lithotomy position at a PEEP level of 0 cmH₂O (RARP0). An RM was used in the R group but not in the C group. Patients were then ventilated with 5 cmH₂O PEEP for 1 h after RARP0 (RARP5.1) and 2 h after RARP0 (RARP5.2). Oesophageal pressure and airway pressure were measured for calculating C_LUNG and chest wall compliance. C_LUNG significantly decreased from pre-op to RARP0 and did not significantly increase from RARP0 to RARP5.1 and RARP5.2 in either group. C_LUNG differed significantly between groups at RARP5.1 and RARP5.2 (103 ± 30 vs. 68 ± 11 mL cm^-1 H₂O and 106 ± 35 vs. 72 ± 9 mL cm^-1 H₂O; P < 0.05). In patients undergoing RARP, with the addition of RM, the C_LUNG was effectively increased from the horizontal lithotomy position to the steep Trendelenburg lithotomy position under pneumoperitoneum.

Does Lung Compliance Optimization Through PEEP Manipulations Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Hypoxemia in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery? A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

In obese patients (OP), the best intraoperative ventilation strategy remains to be defined. Dynamic lung compliance (C_dyn) and dead space fraction are indicators of efficient ventilation at an optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Herein, we investigated whether intraoperative dynamic lung compliance optimization through PEEP manipulations affects the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia (SpO₂ < 90%) in OP undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS).

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study conducted from July 2013 to December 2015. After obtaining institutional review board approval and informed consent, 100 OP undergoing LBS under volume-controlled ventilation (tidal volume 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight) were randomized according to the PEEP level maintained during the surgery. In the control group, a PEEP of 10 cm H₂O was maintained, while in the intervention group, the PEEP was adapted to achieve the best dynamic lung compliance. Anesthesia and analgesia were standardized. The patients received supplemental nasal oxygen on the first postoperative day and were monitored up to the second postoperative day with a portable pulse oximeter.

RESULTS

Demographics were similar between groups. There was no difference in the incidence of hypoxemia during the first 2 postoperative days (control: 1.3%; intervention: 2.1%; p = 0.264).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of postoperative hypoxemia was not reduced by an open-lung approach with protective ventilation strategy in obese patients undergoing LBS. A pragmatic application of a PEEP level of 10 cm H₂O was comparable to individual PEEP titration in these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT02579798; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02579798.

Physiologic Analysis and Clinical Performance of the Ventilatory Ratio in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

RATIONALE

Pulmonary dead space fraction (Vd/Vt) is an independent predictor of mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Yet, it is seldom used in practice. The ventilatory ratio is a simple bedside index that can be calculated using routinely measured respiratory variables and is a measure of impaired ventilation. Ventilatory ratio is defined as [minute ventilation (ml/min) × Pa_CO2 (mm Hg)]/(predicted body weight × 100 × 37.5).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relation of ventilatory ratio with Vd/Vt in ARDS.

METHODS

First, in a single-center, prospective observational study of ARDS, we tested the association of Vd/Vt with ventilatory ratio. With in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome and ventilator-free days as the secondary outcome, we tested the role of ventilatory ratio as an outcome predictor. The findings from this study were further verified in secondary analyses of two NHLBI ARDS Network randomized controlled trials.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ventilatory ratio positively correlated with Vd/Vt. Ordinal groups of ventilatory ratio had significantly higher Vd/Vt. Ventilatory ratio was independently associated with increased risk of mortality after adjusting for Pa_O2/Fi_O2, and positive end-expiratory pressure (odds ratio, 1.51; P = 0.024) and after adjusting for Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (odds ratio, 1.59; P = 0.04). These findings were further replicated in secondary analyses of two separate NHLBI randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilatory ratio correlates well with Vd/Vt in ARDS, and higher values at baseline are associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. These results are promising for the use of ventilatory ratio as a simple bedside index of impaired ventilation in ARDS.

Individual Positive End-expiratory Pressure Settings Optimize Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation and Reduce Postoperative Atelectasis

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC

WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation has been recommended to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. Although the protective role of a more physiologic tidal volume has been established, the added protection afforded by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) remains uncertain. The authors hypothesized that a low fixed PEEP might not fit all patients and that an individually titrated PEEP during anesthesia might improve lung function during and after surgery.

METHODS

Forty patients were studied in the operating room (20 laparoscopic and 20 open-abdominal). They underwent elective abdominal surgery and were randomized to institutional PEEP (4 cm H2O) or electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP (applied after recruitment maneuvers and targeted at minimizing lung collapse and hyperdistension, simultaneously). Patients were extubated without changing selected PEEP or fractional inspired oxygen tension while under anesthesia and submitted to chest computed tomography after extubation. Our primary goal was to individually identify the electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP value producing the best compromise of lung collapse and hyperdistention.

RESULTS

Electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP varied markedly across individuals (median, 12 cm H2O; range, 6 to 16 cm H2O; 95% CI, 10-14). Compared with PEEP of 4 cm H2O, patients randomized to the electrical impedance tomography-guided strategy had less postoperative atelectasis (6.2 ± 4.1 vs. 10.8 ± 7.1% of lung tissue mass; P = 0.017) and lower intraoperative driving pressures (mean values during surgery of 8.0 ± 1.7 vs. 11.6 ± 3.8 cm H2O; P < 0.001). The electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP arm had higher intraoperative oxygenation (435 ± 62 vs. 266 ± 76 mmHg for laparoscopic group; P < 0.001), while presenting equivalent hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure during surgery of 80 ± 14 vs. 78 ± 15 mmHg; P = 0.821).

CONCLUSIONS

PEEP requirements vary widely among patients receiving protective tidal volumes during anesthesia for abdominal surgery. Individualized PEEP settings could reduce postoperative atelectasis (measured by computed tomography) while improving intraoperative oxygenation and driving pressures, causing minimum side effects.

Effect of transpulmonary pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration on lung injury in pigs with acute respiratory distress syndrome

To investigate the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) guided by transpulmonary pressure or with maximum oxygenation-directed PEEP on lung injury in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The porcine model of ARDS was induced in 12 standard pigs by intratracheal infusion with normal saline. The pigs were then randomly divided into two groups who were ventilated with the lung-protective strategy of low tidal volume (VT) (6 ml/kg), using different methods to titrate PEEP level: transpulmonary pressure (TP group; n = 6) or maximum oxygenation (MO group; n = 6). Gas exchange, pulmonary mechanics, and hemodynamics were determined and pulmonary inflammatory response indices were measured after 4 h of ventilation. The titrated PEEP level in the TP group (6.12 ± 0.89 cmH₂O) was significantly lower than that in the MO group (11.33 ± 2.07 cmH2O) (P < 0.05). The PaO₂/FiO₂ (P/F) after PEEP titration both improved in the TP and MO groups as compared with that at T0 (when the criteria for ARDS were obtained). The P/F in the TP group did not differ significantly from that in the MO group during the 4 h of ventilation (P > 0.05). Respiratory system compliance and lung compliance were significantly improved in the TP group compared to the MO group (P < 0.05). The VD/VT in the TP group was significantly lower than that in the MO group after 4 h of ventilation (P < 0.05). Central venous pressure increased and the cardiac index decreased significantly in the MO group as compared with the TP group (P < 0.05), whereas oxygen delivery did not differ significantly between the groups (P > 0.05). The pulmonary vascular permeability index and the extravascular lung water index in the TP group were significantly lower than those in the MO group (P < 0.05). The TP group had a lower lung wet to dry weight ratio, lung injury score, and MPO, TNF-, and IL-8 concentrations than the MO group (P < 0.05). In summary, in a pig model of ARDS, ventilation with low VT and transpulmonary pressure-guided PEEP adjustment was associated with improved compliance, reduced dead space ventilation, increased cardiac output, and relieved lung injury, as compared to maximum oxygenation-guide PEEP adjustment.

Optimal PEEP during one-lung ventilation with capnothorax: An experimental study

BACKGROUND

One-lung ventilation (OLV) with induced capnothorax carries the risk of severely impaired ventilation and circulation. Optimal PEEP may mitigate the physiological perturbations during these conditions.

METHODS

Right-sided OLV with capnothorax (16 cm H₂ O) on the left side was initiated in eight anesthetized, muscle-relaxed piglets. A recruitment maneuver and a decremental PEEP titration from PEEP 20 cm H₂ O to zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) was performed. Regional ventilation and perfusion were studied with electrical impedance tomography and computer tomography of the chest was used. End-expiratory lung volume and hemodynamics were recorded and.

RESULTS

PaO₂ peaked at PEEP 12 cm H₂ O (49 ± 14 kPa) and decreased to 11 ± 5 kPa at ZEEP (P < 0.001). PaCO₂ was 9.5 ± 1.3 kPa at 20 cm H₂ O PEEP and did not change when PEEP step-wise was reduced to 12 cm H₂ O PaCO_2. At lower PEEP, PaCO₂ increased markedly. The ventilatory driving pressure was lowest at PEEP 14 cm H₂ O (19.6 ± 5.8 cm H₂ O) and increased to 38.3 ± 6.1 cm H₂ O at ZEEP (P < 0.001). When reducing PEEP below 12-14 cm H₂ O ventilation shifted from the dependent to the nondependent regions of the ventilated lung (P = 0.003), and perfusion shifted from the ventilated to the nonventilated lung (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Optimal PEEP was 12-18 cm H₂ O and probably relates to capnothorax insufflation pressure. With suboptimal PEEP, ventilation/perfusion mismatch in the ventilated lung and redistribution of blood flow to the nonventilated lung occurred.

Detection of optimal PEEP for equal distribution of tidal volume by volumetric capnography and electrical impedance tomography during decreasing levels of PEEP in post cardiac-surgery patients

Background

Homogeneous ventilation is important for prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has been used to identify optimal PEEP by detection of homogenous ventilation in non-dependent and dependent lung regions. We aimed to compare the ability of volumetric capnography and EIT in detecting homogenous ventilation between these lung regions.

Methods

Fifteen mechanically-ventilated patients after cardiac surgery were studied. Ventilator settings were adjusted to volume-controlled mode with a fixed tidal volume (Vt) of 6–8 ml kg⁻¹ predicted body weight. Different PEEP levels were applied (14 to 0 cm H₂O, in steps of 2 cm H₂O) and blood gases, Vcap and EIT were measured.

Results

Tidal impedance variation of the non-dependent region was highest at 6 cm H₂O PEEP, and decreased significantly at 14 cm H₂O PEEP indicating decrease in the fraction of Vt in this region. At 12 cm H₂O PEEP, homogenous ventilation was seen between both lung regions. Bohr and Enghoff dead space calculations decreased from a PEEP of 10 cm H₂O. Alveolar dead space divided by alveolar Vt decreased at PEEP levels ≤6 cm H₂O. The normalized slope of phase III significantly changed at PEEP levels ≤4 cm H₂O. Airway dead space was higher at higher PEEP levels and decreased at the lower PEEP levels.

Conclusions

In postoperative cardiac patients, calculated dead space agreed well with EIT to detect the optimal PEEP for an equal distribution of inspired volume, amongst non-dependent and dependent lung regions. Airway dead space reduces at decreasing PEEP levels.

Mechanical Ventilation in Adults with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Summary of the Experimental Evidence for the Clinical Practice Guideline

RATIONALE

The American Thoracic Society/European Society for Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines on mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) provide treatment recommendations derived from a thorough analysis of the clinical evidence on six clinical interventions. However, each of the recommendations contains areas of uncertainty and controversy, which may affect their appropriate clinical application.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a critical review of the experimental evidence surrounding the pathophysiology of ventilator-induced lung injury and to help clinicians apply the clinical recommendations to individual patients.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search and narrative review.

RESULTS

A large number of experimental studies have been performed with the aim of improving understanding of the pathophysiological effects of mechanical ventilation. These studies have formed the basis for the design of many clinical trials. Translational research has fundamentally advanced understanding of the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury, thus informing the design of interventions that improve survival in patients with ARDS.

CONCLUSIONS

Because daily management of patients with ARDS presents the challenge of competing considerations, clinicians should consider the mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury, as well as the rationale for interventions designed to mitigate it, when applying evidence-based recommendations at the bedside.

Individualized lung recruitment maneuver guided by pulse-oximetry in anesthetized patients undergoing laparoscopy: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

We conducted this study to test whether pulse-oximetry hemoglobin saturation (SpO₂ ) can personalize the implementation of an open-lung approach during laparoscopy. Thirty patients with SpO₂  ≥ 97% on room-air before anesthesia were studied. After anesthesia and capnoperitoneum the FIO₂ was reduced to 0.21. Those patients whose SpO₂ decreased below 97% - an indication of shunt related to atelectasis - completed the following phases: (1) First recruitment maneuver (RM), until reaching lung's opening pressure, defined as the inspiratory pressure level yielding a SpO₂ ≥ 97%; (2) decremental positive end-expiratory (PEEP) titration trial until reaching lung's closing pressure defined as the PEEP level yielding a SpO₂  < 97%; (3) second RM and, (4) ongoing ventilation with PEEP adjusted above the detected closing pressure.

RESULTS

When breathing air, in 24 of 30 patients SpO₂ was < 97%, PaO₂ /FIO₂  ˂ 53.3 kPa and negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (P_TP-EE ). The mean (SD) opening pressures were found at 40 (5) and 33 (4) cmH₂ O during the first and second RM, respectively (P < 0.001; 95% CI: 3.2-7.7). The closing pressure was found at 11 (5) cmH₂ O. This SpO₂ -guided approach increased P_TP-EE (from -6.4 to 1.2 cmH₂ O, P < 0.001) and PaO₂ /FIO₂ (from 30.3 to 58.1 kPa, P < 0.001) while decreased driving pressure (from 18 to 10 cmH₂ O, P < 0.001). SpO₂ discriminated the lung's opening and closing pressures with accuracy taking the reference parameter P_TP-EE (area under the receiver-operating-curve of 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99).

CONCLUSION

The non-invasive SpO₂ monitoring can help to individualize an open-lung approach, including all involved steps, from the identification of those patients who can benefit from recruitment, the identification of opening and closing pressures to the subsequent monitoring of an open-lung condition.

Lung volumes, respiratory mechanics and dynamic strain during general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Driving pressure (ΔP) represents tidal volume normalised to respiratory system compliance (C_RS) and is a novel parameter to target ventilator settings. We conducted a study to determine whether C_RS and ΔP reflect aerated lung volume and dynamic strain during general anaesthesia.

METHODS

Twenty non-obese patients undergoing open abdominal surgery received three PEEP levels (2, 7, or 12 cm H₂O) in random order with constant tidal volume ventilation. Respiratory mechanics, lung volumes, and alveolar recruitment were measured to assess end-expiratory aerated volume, which was compared with the patient's individual predicted functional residual capacity in supine position (FRCp).

RESULTS

C_RS was linearly related to aerated volume and ΔP to dynamic strain at PEEP of 2 cm H₂O (intraoperative FRC) (r=0.72 and r=0.73, both P<0.001). These relationships were maintained with higher PEEP only when aerated volume did not overcome FRCp (r=0.73, P<0.001; r=0.54, P=0.004), with 100 ml lung volume increases accompanied by 1.8 ml cm H₂O^-1 (95% confidence interval [1.1-2.5]) increases in C_RS. When aerated volume was greater or equal to FRCp (35% of patients at PEEP 2 cm H₂O, 55% at PEEP 7 cm H₂O, and 75% at PEEP 12 cm H₂O), C_RS and ΔP were independent from aerated volume and dynamic strain, with C_RS weakly but significantly inversely related to alveolar dead space fraction (r=-0.47, P=0.001). PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment yielded higher C_RS and reduced ΔP only at aerated volumes below FRCp (P=0.015 and 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

During general anaesthesia, respiratory system compliance and driving pressure reflect aerated lung volume and dynamic strain, respectively, only if aerated volume does not exceed functional residual capacity in supine position, which is a frequent event when PEEP is used in this setting.

Respiratory System Mechanics During Low Versus High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Open Abdominal Surgery: A Substudy of PROVHILO Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In the 2014 PROtective Ventilation using HIgh versus LOw positive end-expiratory pressure (PROVHILO) trial, intraoperative low tidal volume ventilation with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP = 12 cm H2O) and lung recruitment maneuvers did not decrease postoperative pulmonary complications when compared to low PEEP (0-2 cm H2O) approach without recruitment breaths. However, effects of intraoperative PEEP on lung compliance remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that higher PEEP leads to a dominance of intratidal overdistension, whereas lower PEEP results in intratidal recruitment/derecruitment (R/D). To test our hypothesis, we used the volume-dependent elastance index %E2, a respiratory parameter that allows for noninvasive and radiation-free assessment of dominant overdistension and intratidal R/D. We compared the incidence of intratidal R/D, linear expansion, and overdistension by means of %E2 in a subset of the PROVHILO cohort.

METHODS

In 36 patients from 2 participating centers of the PROVHILO trial, we calculated respiratory system elastance (E), resistance (R), and %E2, a surrogate parameter for intratidal overdistension (%E2 > 30%) and R/D (%E2 < 0%). To test the main hypothesis, we compared the incidence of intratidal overdistension (primary end point) and R/D in higher and lower PEEP groups, as measured by %E2.

RESULTS

E was increased in the lower compared to higher PEEP group (18.6 [16…22] vs 13.4 [11.0…17.0] cm H2O·L; P < .01). %E2 was reduced in the lower PEEP group compared to higher PEEP (-15.4 [-28.0…6.5] vs 6.2 [-0.8…14.0] %; P < .05). Intratidal R/D was increased in the lower PEEP group (61% vs 22%; P = .037). The incidence of intratidal overdistension did not differ significantly between groups (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

During mechanical ventilation with protective tidal volumes in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery, lung recruitment followed by PEEP of 12 cm H2O decreased the incidence of intratidal R/D and did not worsen overdistension, when compared to PEEP ≤2 cm H2O.

Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI)

It has been shown that mechanical ventilation in patients with, or at high-risk for, the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can be a double-edged sword. If the mechanical breath is improperly set, it can amplify the lung injury associated with ARDS, causing a secondary ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Conversely, the mechanical breath can be adjusted to minimize VILI, which can reduce ARDS mortality. The current standard of care ventilation strategy to minimize VILI attempts to reduce alveolar over-distension and recruitment-derecruitment (R/D) by lowering tidal volume (Vt) to 6 cc/kg combined with adjusting positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on a sliding scale directed by changes in oxygenation. Thus, Vt is often but not always set as a "one-size-fits-all" approach and although PEEP is often set arbitrarily at 5 cmH2O, it may be personalized according to changes in a physiologic parameter, most often to oxygenation. However, there is evidence that oxygenation as a method to optimize PEEP is not congruent with the PEEP levels necessary to maintain an open and stable lung. Thus, optimal PEEP might not be personalized to the lung pathology of an individual patient using oxygenation as the physiologic feedback system. Multiple methods of personalizing PEEP have been tested and include dead space, lung compliance, lung stress and strain, ventilation patterns using computed tomography (CT) or electrical impedance tomography (EIT), inflection points on the pressure/volume curve (P/V), and the slope of the expiratory flow curve using airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). Although many studies have shown that personalizing PEEP is possible, there is no consensus as to the optimal technique. This review will assess various methods used to personalize PEEP, directed by physiologic parameters, necessary to adaptively adjust ventilator settings with progressive changes in lung pathophysiology.

Effects of pneumoperitoneum and of an alveolar recruitment maneuver followed by positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiopulmonary function in sheep anesthetized with isoflurane-fentanyl

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of pneumoperitoneum alone or combined with an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) followed by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on cardiopulmonary function in sheep.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, crossover study.

ANIMALS

A total of nine adult sheep (36-52 kg).

METHODS

Sheep were administered three treatments (≥10-day intervals) during isoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia and volume-controlled ventilation (tidal volume: 12 mL kg^-1) with oxygen: CONTROL (no intervention); PNEUMO (120 minutes of CO₂ pneumoperitoneum); PNEUMO_ARM/PEEP (PNEUMO protocol with an ARM instituted after 60 minutes of pneumoperitoneum). The ARM (5 cmH₂O increases in PEEP of 1 minute duration until 20 cmH₂O of PEEP) was followed by 10 cmH₂O of PEEP until the end of anesthesia. Cardiopulmonary data were recorded until 30 minutes after abdominal deflation.

RESULTS

PaO₂ was decreased from 435-462 mmHg (58.0-61.6 kPa) (range of mean values in CONTROL) to 377-397 mmHg (50.3-52.9 kPa) in PNEUMO (p < 0.05). Quasistatic compliance (C_qst, mL cmH₂O^-1 kg^-1) was decreased from 0.85-0.92 in CONTROL to 0.52-0.58 in PNEUMO. PaO₂ increased from 383-385 mmHg (51.1-51.3 kPa) in PNEUMO to 429-444 mmHg (57.2-59.2 kPa) in PNEUMO_ARM/PEEP (p < 0.05) and C_qst increased from 0.52-0.53 in PNEUMO to 0.70-0.74 in PNEUMO_ARM/PEEP. Abdominal deflation in PNEUMO did not restore PaO₂ and C_qst to control values. Cardiac index (L minute^-1 m²) decreased from 4.80-4.70 in CONTROL to 3.45-3.74 in PNEUMO and 3.63-3.76 in PNEUMO_ARM/PEEP. Compared with controls, ARM/PEEP with pneumoperitoneum decreased mean arterial pressure from 81 to 68 mmHg and increased mean pulmonary artery pressure from 10 to 16 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Abdominal deflation did not reverse the pulmonary function impairment associated with pneumoperitoneum. The ARM/PEEP improved respiratory compliance and reversed the oxygenation impairment induced by pneumoperitoneum with acceptable hemodynamic changes in healthy sheep.

Rationale and study design for an individualised perioperative open-lung ventilatory strategy with a high versus conventional inspiratory oxygen fraction (iPROVE-O2) and its effects on surgical site infection: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a serious postoperative complication that increases morbidity and healthcare costs. SSIs tend to increase as the partial pressure of tissue oxygen decreases: previous trials have focused on trying to reduce them by comparing high versus conventional inspiratory oxygen fractions (FIO₂) in the perioperative period but did not use a protocolised ventilatory strategy. The open-lung ventilatory approach restores functional lung volume and improves gas exchange, and therefore it may increase the partial pressure of tissue oxygen for a given FIO₂. The trial presented here aims to compare the efficacy of high versus conventional FIO₂ in reducing the overall incidence of SSIs in patients by implementing a protocolised and individualised global approach to perioperative open-lung ventilation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a comparative, prospective, multicentre, randomised and controlled two-arm trial that will include 756 patients scheduled for abdominal surgery. The patients will be randomised into two groups: (1) a high FIO₂ group (80% oxygen; FIO₂ of 0.80) and (2) a conventional FIO₂ group (30% oxygen; FIO₂ of 0.30). Each group will be assessed intra- and postoperatively. The primary outcome is the appearance of postoperative SSI complications. Secondary outcomes are the appearance of systemic and pulmonary complications.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The iPROVE-O2 trial has been approved by the Ethics Review Board at the reference centre (the Hospital Clínico Universitario in Valencia). Informed consent will be obtained from all patients before their participation. If the approach using high FIO₂ during individualised open-lung ventilation decreases SSIs, use of this method will become standard practice for patients scheduled for future abdominal surgery. Publication of the results is anticipated in early 2019.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02776046; Pre-results.

Open lung approach versus standard protective strategies: Effects on driving pressure and ventilatory efficiency during anesthesia - A pilot, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Low tidal volume (VT) during anesthesia minimizes lung injury but may be associated to a decrease in functional lung volume impairing lung mechanics and efficiency. Lung recruitment (RM) can restore lung volume but this may critically depend on the post-RM selected PEEP. This study was a randomized, two parallel arm, open study whose primary outcome was to compare the effects on driving pressure of adding a RM to low-VT ventilation, with or without an individualized post-RM PEEP in patients without known previous lung disease during anesthesia.

METHODS

Consecutive patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were submitted to low-VT ventilation (6 ml·kg-1) and standard PEEP of 5 cmH2O (pre-RM, n = 36). After 30 min estabilization all patients received a RM and were randomly allocated to either continue with the same PEEP (RM-5 group, n = 18) or to an individualized open-lung PEEP (OL-PEEP) (Open Lung Approach, OLA group, n = 18) defined as the level resulting in maximal Cdyn during a decremental PEEP trial. We compared the effects on driving pressure and lung efficiency measured by volumetric capnography.

RESULTS

OL-PEEP was found at 8±2 cmH2O. 36 patients were included in the final analysis. When compared with pre-RM, OLA resulted in a 22% increase in compliance and a 28% decrease in driving pressure when compared to pre-RM. These parameters did not improve in the RM-5. The trend of the DP was significantly different between the OLA and RM-5 groups (p = 0.002). VDalv/VTalv was significantly lower in the OLA group after the RM (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung recruitment applied during low-VT ventilation improves driving pressure and lung efficiency only when applied as an open-lung strategy with an individualized PEEP in patients without lung diseases undergoing major abdominal surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02798133.

Application of dead space fraction to titrate optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in an ARDS swine model

This study aimed to apply the dead space fraction [ratio of dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT)] to titrate the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in a swine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Twelve swine models of ARDS were constructed. A lung recruitment maneuver was then conducted and the PEEP was set at 20 cm H₂O. The PEEP was reduced by 2 cm H₂O every 10 min until 0 cm H₂O was reached, and VD/VT was measured after each decrement step. VD/VT was measured using single-breath analysis of CO₂, and calculated from arterial CO₂ partial pressure (PaCO₂) and mixed expired CO₂ (PeCO₂) using the following formula: VD/VT = (PaCO₂ - PeCO₂)/PaCO₂. The optimal PEEP was identified by the lowest VD/VT method. Respiration and hemodynamic parameters were recorded during the periods of pre-injury and injury, and at 4 and 2 cm H₂O below and above the optimal PEEP (Po). The optimal PEEP in this study was found to be 13.25±1.36 cm H₂O. During the Po period, VD/VT decreased to a lower value (0.44±0.08) compared with that during the injury period (0.68±0.10) (P<0.05), while the intrapulmonary shunt fraction reached its lowest value. In addition, a significant change of dynamic tidal respiratory compliance and oxygenation index was induced by PEEP titration. These results indicate that minimal VD/VT can be used for PEEP titration in ARDS.

Single Minute of Positive End-expiratory Pressure at the Time of Induction: Effect on Arterial Blood Gases and Hemodynamics in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

Background:

The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been studied in detail after induction of general anesthesia especially in obese individuals. However, sparse information can be gathered from the literature regarding its effect when applied at the time of induction and the time of onset of its effect. Thus, this study was planned to assess the effect of PEEP when applied for a single minute in morbidly obese patients.

Materials and Methods:

This was a randomized prospective study comprising seven morbidly obese patients (body mass index ≥40 kg/m²). Control group included 30 patients who received no PEEP at the time of induction. The study group consisted of thirty patients who were given a PEEP of 10 cmH₂O. Serial arterial blood gas samples were taken preoperatively, at the time of intubation, 5 min after intubation and 10 min after intubation.

Results:

PaO₂ was significantly higher in test group (242.0 ± 116.0 mmHg) than in control group (183.0 ± 107.0 mmHg) just after intubation. PaCO₂ was comparable in control group (43.73 ± 6.32 mmHg) and test group (44.52 ± 6.33 mmHg) just after intubation but was significantly less in test group than in control group at 5 and 10 min thereafter. Hemodynamic parameters were comparable in both groups at all time intervals.

Conclusion:

Application of even a single minute of PEEP at the time of induction improves oxygenation without any adverse effects on hemodynamics, in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Bariatric surgery.